EP3209206A1 - Verfahren zum testen eines kleinkindes und dafür geeignete vorrichtung zur durchführung des testverfahrens - Google Patents

Verfahren zum testen eines kleinkindes und dafür geeignete vorrichtung zur durchführung des testverfahrens

Info

Publication number
EP3209206A1
EP3209206A1 EP15784638.7A EP15784638A EP3209206A1 EP 3209206 A1 EP3209206 A1 EP 3209206A1 EP 15784638 A EP15784638 A EP 15784638A EP 3209206 A1 EP3209206 A1 EP 3209206A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
target
screen
infant
contacts
contact
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP15784638.7A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Carolyn GRANIER-DEFERRE
Anthony James Decasper
Elodie HANRION-MONNIER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS
Universite Paris Cite
Original Assignee
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS
Universite Paris 5 Rene Descartes
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Universite Paris 5 Rene Descartes filed Critical Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS
Publication of EP3209206A1 publication Critical patent/EP3209206A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1124Determining motor skills
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
    • A61B5/162Testing reaction times
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
    • A61B5/168Evaluating attention deficit, hyperactivity
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/74Details of notification to user or communication with user or patient ; user input means
    • A61B5/742Details of notification to user or communication with user or patient ; user input means using visual displays
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/74Details of notification to user or communication with user or patient ; user input means
    • A61B5/7475User input or interface means, e.g. keyboard, pointing device, joystick
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/02Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient
    • A61B3/024Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for determining the visual field, e.g. perimeter types
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/40Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
    • A61B5/4076Diagnosing or monitoring particular conditions of the nervous system
    • A61B5/4082Diagnosing or monitoring movement diseases, e.g. Parkinson, Huntington or Tourette
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/68Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
    • A61B5/6887Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient mounted on external non-worn devices, e.g. non-medical devices
    • A61B5/6898Portable consumer electronic devices, e.g. music players, telephones, tablet computers
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/74Details of notification to user or communication with user or patient ; user input means
    • A61B5/742Details of notification to user or communication with user or patient ; user input means using visual displays
    • A61B5/744Displaying an avatar, e.g. an animated cartoon character

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of testing an infant and a device adapted to implement the test method.
  • Fagan's test is a rare example of such a test ("The Fagan Test of Intelligence: A Technical Summary," Joseph G. Fagan III, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Douglas K. Detterman, Volume 13, Issue 2, April -June 1992, Pages 173-193). It represents a great progress in cognitive assessment of the infant.
  • An object of the invention is to provide a solution for testing infants more accurately and more reliably than with conventional, observation-based tests.
  • an infant testing method comprising steps of: displaying a target on a screen,
  • the proposed method allows the detection of infant contacts on the screen, including those of very short duration ( ⁇ 10 milliseconds)
  • the data obtained are therefore more accurate and reliable than those obtained from conventional, observation-based tests, since the success parameter is an objective parameter, which does not depend on the judgment of an experimenter, and which can easily be to be compared to reference parameters.
  • the proposed method can be implemented by a large number of professionals, without requiring extensive prior specific training.
  • the calculated success parameter may include, for example, a distance between a point of contact of the infant with the screen and a position of the target displayed on the screen.
  • the calculated success parameter may also include a duration between two successive contacts of the infant with the screen inside and / or outside the target.
  • the calculated success parameter may include a success rate equal to the ratio between a number of contacts within the target and a number of contacts outside the target.
  • the calculated success parameter may include a success rate equal to the ratio between a number of contacts within the target and a total duration of the test.
  • an active target and an inactive target are displayed on the screen, and the method comprises a step of:
  • a first active target and a second active target are displayed on the screen, and the method comprises steps of:
  • the method comprises a step of:
  • Moving from one position to another can be associated with a sound sequence successively or simultaneously.
  • the predetermined sequence of positions may include a starting position, and the method comprises a step of: - if after a previous contact inside the target, no other contact is detected for a predetermined time, display the target in the starting position.
  • the display of the target may be omitted.
  • the method may also include a step of:
  • the target is hidden by the mask.
  • the mask can be displayed before or after the target is displayed in the position of the sequence in which the target is hidden by the mask.
  • the target preferably represents a face or other attractive visual form for the infant.
  • the target preferably has a width and / or a length of between 0.5 centimeters and 5 centimeters.
  • the method may also comprise a step of:
  • the invention also relates to an infant testing device comprising a touch screen and a processing module configured to perform the steps of the method as defined above.
  • test device may be in the form of a tablet incorporating in a single device the touch screen and the processing module.
  • the test device is preferably arranged on a table with an inclination with respect to the table of between 40 and 50 °, preferably 45 °. This inclination allows the child to easily reach the screen of the device, with the motor coordination capabilities related to his age.
  • the invention also relates to a computer program product comprising code instructions for executing a method as defined above.
  • the invention also relates to a storage medium readable by a computer equipment on which is recorded a computer program comprising code instructions for executing a method as defined above.
  • FIG. 1 schematically represents a device for testing an infant according to one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically showing the steps of a first phase of a test method according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 schematically represents a screen of the device during the first phase of the process
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram schematically showing the steps of a second phase of the test method
  • FIG. 5 schematically represents a screen of the device during the second phase of the process
  • FIG. 6 schematically represents a target that can be used during the different phases of the process
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram schematically showing the steps of a third phase of the test method.
  • FIG. 8 schematically represents a screen of the device during the third phase of the method
  • the test device 10 represented generally comprises a processing module 11, a data storage module 12 and a display module 13.
  • the processing module 11 is a processor configured to execute the steps of the test method.
  • the processing module 11 may be an electronic card, a dedicated integrated circuit or a programmable electronic component.
  • the storage module 12 is a memory in which is recorded a program comprising code instructions for the execution of the test method by the processing module 11.
  • the memory 12 is also able to contain the measurement data recorded during the execution of the program.
  • the memory can be a hard disk (“Hard Disk Drive”), an EEPROM (“Electrically erasable programmable read-only memory”) or a flash memory (for example of "Solid State Drive” type) being in fixed form or removable (for example in the form of a USB connector key).
  • the display module 13 comprises a touch screen 14.
  • the touch screen 14 is clean on the one hand to be controlled by the processing module January 1 to display test pages and on the other hand to detect coordinates of a point of contact between a user and the touch screen 14.
  • the test device 10 may also comprise a loudspeaker
  • the test device 10 may be in the form of a tablet incorporating in a single device the processing module 11, the storage module 12, the display module 13 and the loudspeaker 15.
  • the program may be present initially in the memory 12 of the device 10 or be downloaded by the user and then stored in the memory 12 of the device 10.
  • the test method implemented comprises three successive phases.
  • the first phase 100 of the test method (illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3) corresponds to a simple associative learning by contacts on fixed touch zones.
  • this first phase aims to evaluate either the understanding of the contingency between certain movements of the child and a specific sensory feedback of the environment, namely the understanding of contingency. (synchrony) between two different sensory stimulations, which can be simultaneous or successive.
  • This first phase can also be used to evaluate the ability to recognize novelty, the ability to discriminate certain elements between sound stimulation or between visual stimulation, and thus the perceptive finesse and memory of recognition of the child.
  • the second phase 200 of the test method (illustrated in FIGS. 4 to 6) consists in testing whether the infant can successively touch a target that moves along a predetermined trajectory.
  • This second phase allows a more extensive observation of the attention, the working memory and the representations capacities of the infant, those of a dynamic object and of a trajectory, thus a spatio-temporal representation more complex than that of the previous phase, during a task of a level of difficulty higher than the visual-manual coordination level.
  • the third phase 300 of the test method (illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8) is implemented in the continuity of the second phase.
  • This third phase makes it possible to evaluate the ability to anticipate in time and space the movements of the target and / or the ability to represent the presence of a hidden object (permanence of the object), and therefore the visual-spatial working memory capabilities of the child.
  • the test method proceeds as follows.
  • infant means in the context of this application, a child aged 0 to 6 months. In the case of a child born prematurely, it is the corrected age of the child that is taken into account.
  • the infant is placed in a ventral baby carrier, slightly rigid, carried by a relative or a close familiar to the child, with which it is allowed time to become familiar.
  • the observer controls the start of the program in the device 10.
  • the observer can start the program by selecting an appropriate icon corresponding to this program in a menu of the device.
  • the parent or loved one sits down well on an adjustable chair, at a sufficient distance so that the infant can manually reach all the areas of the screen 14 dedicated to the method used, the eyes of the infant preferably at a distance of about 15 to 30 centimeters from the screen 14.
  • the room in which the infant is tested should be empty, except for the items needed for the test, preferably be of a light and solid color, without any disturbing visual or sound element that may catch the child's attention.
  • the room is also placed in relative darkness in order to maximize the child's attention and focus his attention as much as possible on the screen 14.
  • Fig. 2 is a diagram schematically showing the steps of the first phase 100 of the test method.
  • a processing module 1 1 controls the display module 13 to display on the screen 14 a first test page.
  • the first test page 16 is illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • the first test page 16 contains a first target 17 (called “active target”) and a second target 18 (called “inactive target”).
  • each target 17, 18 is constituted by a colored zone of the page.
  • Each zone 17, 18 may have a rectangular shape. Areas 17 and 18 are located side by side at the bottom of screen 14.
  • the display module 13 detects the contact (s) of the infant with the screen 14. More specifically, the display module 13 detects the coordinates (abscissa and ordinate) of the contact points of the infant with the screen 14. The display module 13 transmits the detected coordinates to the processing module 1 1.
  • Each contact of the infant with the screen 14 triggers the following steps.
  • the processing module 11 determines whether the contact point is situated in the active target 17.
  • the processing module 11 controls the transmission by the device 10 of a stimulation comprising an audible and / or visual signal.
  • the sound signal may for example consist of a spoken or musical sequence of different languages or different tones, for example a message of encouragement, emitted by the loudspeaker 15, according to the activated target.
  • the visual signal may for example consist of the temporary display of an icon 19, a drawing or a video on the screen 14.
  • the processing module 1 1 does not control the emission of stimulation.
  • the processing module 11 controls the recording in the storage module 12 of the coordinates of the contact points and the contact moments (time elapsed since the beginning of the test, in milliseconds).
  • the coordinates of the contact points and the contact times are recorded in the chronological order of the contacts.
  • Each pair of contact coordinates is associated in the storage module 12 at a contact time, and at a number representative of the order of appearance of the contact. After a test duration determined by the behavior of the child and his attention to the task, the processing module terminates the test and performs a sixth step.
  • the processing module 11 calculates one or more success parameters according to all the data recorded in the storage module 12 during the step 105.
  • the calculated success parameters can be:
  • a success rate equal to the ratio between a number of contacts inside the active target 17 and a number of contacts outside the active target 17.
  • the processing module 1 1 can also calculate the following parameters:
  • the processing module saves the calculated parameters in the storage module.
  • the processing module 11 can control the display, on the screen 14, of the parameters calculated during the first phase 100 of the test method. The observer can thus view the results of this first phase.
  • the two targets 17 and 18 may be active targets.
  • the fourth step is modified so that:
  • the processing module 11 controls the emission of a first stimulation comprising a first visual and / or audible signal, and
  • the processing module 11 controls the emission of a second stimulation comprising a second visual and / or sound signal, different the first visual and / or sound signal.
  • This second phase may be implemented if the observer considers that the child's motor coordination abilities have been sufficient during the first phase.
  • Fig. 4 is a diagram schematically showing steps of the second phase 200 of the test method.
  • the processing module 11 controls the display module 13 to display on the screen 14 a second test page 20.
  • the second test page 20 is shown in FIG. 5.
  • the second test page 20 contains a target 21.
  • the target 21 schematically represents a face.
  • the target 21 is positioned at the bottom of the screen 14 at a starting position P1.
  • Figure 6 shows in more detail the shape of the target 21.
  • Target 21 is specifically designed to attract the attention of infants.
  • the target 21 has for example a circular shape and a bright color (such as yellow for example). It comprises two smaller circles 22 representing eyes and an arcuate line 23 representing a smiling mouth.
  • the dimensions of the target 21 are particularly adapted to dimensions of the hands of the infants.
  • the target 21 has a diameter D of between 3 and 5 centimeters, preferably of the order of 4 centimeters. In the case where the screen 14 comprises pixels whose size is 0.27 millimeters ⁇ 0.27 millimeters, the diameter of the target 21 is about 148 pixels and the area of the target is of the order of 17200 pixels.
  • the position of the target 21 on the screen 14 is defined by the horizontal coordinates (abscissa along the X axis) and vertical coordinates (ordinate along the Y axis) of the center O of the target.
  • the display module detects the contact (s) of the infant with the screen. More precisely, the display module 13 detects the coordinates (abscissa and ordinate) of the points of contact of the infant with the screen 14 and transmits the detected coordinates to the processing module 11.
  • Each contact of the infant with the screen 14 triggers the following steps.
  • the processing module 11 determines whether the point of contact is in the target 21.
  • the processing module 1 1 controls the displacement of the target 21 on the screen 14 from a position Pi to a position Pi + 1 following, in a predetermined sequence of positions .
  • the displacement can be accompanied by the emission of a sound stimulation, for example a message of encouragement.
  • the target 21 is moved from a position Pi to a next position Pi + 1 according to the predetermined sequence.
  • the sequence comprises a number N of predetermined successive positions, ranging from a starting position P1 to an arrival position PN along a predetermined trajectory.
  • the number N can be equal to 3 for example.
  • the processing module 11 controls the displacement of the target 21 on the screen 14 from the arrival position PN of the sequence to the starting position P1 of the sequence (reset of the sequence). If the point of contact is out of the target 21, the processing module 1 1 does not control the displacement of the target 21. The target 21 is maintained in its current position.
  • the processing module 1 1 controls the displacement of the target 21 in the starting position P1 (resetting the sequence ).
  • the movement sequence is reset to re-engage the infant's attention.
  • the maximum display time can be between 5 and 20 seconds. It is preferably of the order of 10 seconds.
  • the processing module 11 controls the recording in the storage module 12 of the coordinates of the contact points and the contact moments. Each pair of contact coordinates is associated in the storage module 12 at a contact time.
  • the processing module 1 1 After a test duration determined by the behavior and attention of the child on the task, the processing module 1 1 ends the test and performs a sixth step.
  • the processing module 11 calculates one or more success parameters according to all the data recorded in the storage module 12.
  • the calculated success parameters can be: - distance between each point of contact and the center O of the target
  • success rate equal to the ratio between a number of contacts inside the target 21 and a number of contacts outside the target 21.
  • the processing module 1 1 can also calculate the following parameters: - a total duration of the second test phase,
  • N being an integer greater than or equal to 3
  • the processing module 11 stores the calculated parameters in the storage module 12.
  • the processing module 11 can control the display, on the screen 14, of the parameters calculated during the second phase 200 of the test method. The observer can thus view the result of the second phase of the process.
  • the third phase is started only if the child has been able to make several successive sets of contacts on the moving target during the second phase.
  • the third phase of the test method represents a possible continuation of the second phase of the test method.
  • Fig. 7 is a diagram schematically showing steps of the third phase 300 of the test method.
  • the steps 301 to 308 of this third phase of the method are identical to the steps 201 to 208 of the second phase of the method.
  • the third phase 300 of the method however comprises a step
  • the processing module January 1 controls the display module 13 to display on the screen 14 a mask 24.
  • the mask 24 comprises a colored area of the screen 14.
  • the zone may have a rectangular shape.
  • the third displayed test page 25 is identical to the second test page 20, except that the third test page 25 contains the mask 24.
  • the mask 24 extends over one or more positions Pj to Pk of the sequence, so that it hides the target 21 when the target 21 is in each of the positions Pj to Pk.
  • the target 21 is moved from a position Pi to a next following position Pi + 1, according to the same predetermined sequence of positions as during the second phase of the process.
  • certain positions Pj to Pk of the target 21 are not visible to the infant because of the mask 24.
  • the display of the target 21 can be omitted in the positions Pj to Pk.
  • the processing module 11 calculates one or more success parameters as a function of all the data recorded in the storage module 12. The same parameters are calculated as in the step 206.
  • the calculated pass parameters further include the following parameters:
  • the processing module 11 stores the calculated parameters in the storage module 12.
  • the processing module can control the display, on the screen 14, of the parameters calculated during the third phase 300 of the test method.
  • the experimenter can thus visualize the result of the third phase of the process.
  • Figures 9 and 10 present the results obtained with each group of children.
  • Figure 9 is a diagram showing the average contact frequency (in number of contacts per minute) for each infant tested.
  • Figure 10 is a diagram showing the frequency of contact series (in number of contact series per minute) for each infant tested.
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B schematically illustrate results such that they can be displayed on the screen 14 at the end of the second phase of the process. These figures represent chronologically (clockwise) the distance (in number of pixels) between the point of contact and the center of the moving target during the second phase of the process, respectively for a full-term infant and for a premature infant.
  • the total number of contacts generated by the premature infant is substantially identical to the number of contacts generated by the term-born infant.
  • the premature infant does not generate any contact inside the target (in this case, the target does not move) while the term-born infant is able to make a series of 2 to 3 successive contacts with the target.
  • the proposed method makes it possible to discriminate effectively between different groups of infants.
  • the significant variability individual results within the group of term children, as well as within the group of premature infants indicates that the discriminative fineness of the process is very satisfactory, since it also allows them to be differentiated from each other. children of the same group, which is a prerequisite for any valid assessment.
  • the program includes several test modules corresponding to different possible test phases; these can vary according to the characteristics of the targets, and those of the visual and auditory sequences. The child can be retested another day by focusing on specific elementary abilities to better understand the origin of his disorders.
  • the proposed test method can be applied not only to the detection of developmental disorders in infants, but also to measure the course of their disorders after the application of child-appropriate management procedures.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
  • Psychology (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Psychiatry (AREA)
  • Social Psychology (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Neurology (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
EP15784638.7A 2014-10-21 2015-10-21 Verfahren zum testen eines kleinkindes und dafür geeignete vorrichtung zur durchführung des testverfahrens Withdrawn EP3209206A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1460108A FR3027206B1 (fr) 2014-10-21 2014-10-21 Procede de test d'un nourrisson et dispositif adapte pour mettre en oeuvre le procede de test
PCT/EP2015/074377 WO2016062773A1 (fr) 2014-10-21 2015-10-21 Procede de test d'un nourrisson et dispositif adapte pour mettre en oeuvre le procede de test

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3209206A1 true EP3209206A1 (de) 2017-08-30

Family

ID=52477829

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15784638.7A Withdrawn EP3209206A1 (de) 2014-10-21 2015-10-21 Verfahren zum testen eines kleinkindes und dafür geeignete vorrichtung zur durchführung des testverfahrens

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US11026601B2 (de)
EP (1) EP3209206A1 (de)
JP (1) JP2017536872A (de)
KR (1) KR20170087863A (de)
CN (1) CN106999103A (de)
CA (1) CA2964870A1 (de)
FR (1) FR3027206B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2016062773A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3027206B1 (fr) * 2014-10-21 2021-06-04 Univ Paris Descartes Procede de test d'un nourrisson et dispositif adapte pour mettre en oeuvre le procede de test
EP3946001A4 (de) * 2019-03-28 2022-12-14 University of Miami Sehfehlerbestimmung und -verbesserung
KR102228354B1 (ko) 2019-08-14 2021-03-15 박혜경 맞춤형 유아발달검사 및 유아발달지도를 위한 유아발달검사시스템

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06327659A (ja) * 1993-05-25 1994-11-29 Kyoto Densoku Kk 知能検査・知能回復訓練装置
AU780567B2 (en) * 1999-08-13 2005-04-07 James F. Cassily Method and apparatus of enhancing learning capacity
JP4167596B2 (ja) * 2001-08-10 2008-10-15 コッグステイト リミテッド 認知機能のテスト装置及びコンピュータ可読媒体
US7452336B2 (en) * 2003-09-06 2008-11-18 Interactive Neuro Technology, Inc. Interactive neural training device
US20050273017A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-12-08 Evian Gordon Collective brain measurement system and method
US20060247153A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-11-02 Mcmahon Robert J Method of improving learning and memory in mammals
WO2008030493A2 (en) * 2006-09-05 2008-03-13 Innerscope Research, Llc Method and system for determining audience response to a sensory stimulus
WO2008128192A1 (en) * 2007-04-13 2008-10-23 Nike, Inc. Vision cognition and coordination testing and training
CN101953677B (zh) * 2009-07-15 2014-10-08 徐黎明 神经行为测试评价方法
US9492344B2 (en) * 2009-08-03 2016-11-15 Nike, Inc. Unified vision testing and/or training
US9055904B2 (en) * 2009-08-03 2015-06-16 Nike, Inc. Multi-touch display and input for vision testing and training
JP5926210B2 (ja) * 2012-03-21 2016-05-25 国立大学法人浜松医科大学 自閉症診断支援システム及び自閉症診断支援装置
US9171131B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2015-10-27 Integrated Deficit Examinations, LLC Device and methods for mobile monitoring and assessment of clinical function through sensors and interactive patient responses
JP5983135B2 (ja) * 2012-07-23 2016-08-31 株式会社Jvcケンウッド 診断支援装置および診断支援方法
US20140066802A1 (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-06 Greatbatch Ltd. Cognition and Usability Aptitude Evaluations for Clinician Programmers
CA2883505A1 (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-06 National University Corporation Tokyo Medical And Dental University Brain function evaluation system and brain function evaluation method
US9717459B2 (en) * 2013-03-04 2017-08-01 Anne Bibiana Sereno Touch sensitive system and method for cognitive and behavioral testing and evaluation
US10383553B1 (en) * 2014-10-14 2019-08-20 The Cognitive Healthcare Company Data collection and analysis for self-administered cognitive tests characterizing fine motor functions
FR3027206B1 (fr) * 2014-10-21 2021-06-04 Univ Paris Descartes Procede de test d'un nourrisson et dispositif adapte pour mettre en oeuvre le procede de test

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2017536872A (ja) 2017-12-14
US11026601B2 (en) 2021-06-08
FR3027206A1 (fr) 2016-04-22
WO2016062773A1 (fr) 2016-04-28
CN106999103A (zh) 2017-08-01
CA2964870A1 (fr) 2016-04-28
KR20170087863A (ko) 2017-07-31
US20170340247A1 (en) 2017-11-30
FR3027206B1 (fr) 2021-06-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3445270B1 (de) System zur herstellung einer orthodontischen vorrichtung
EP3212116B1 (de) Verfahren zur überwachung der zähne
EP3212115B1 (de) Verfahren zur überwachung einer orthodontischen behandlung
EP3659545B1 (de) System zur überwachung der positionierung der zähne eines patienten
EP3209206A1 (de) Verfahren zum testen eines kleinkindes und dafür geeignete vorrichtung zur durchführung des testverfahrens
EP3361929B1 (de) Vorrichtung zur prüfung des visuellen verhaltens einer person und verfahren zur bestimmung von zumindest einem optischen designparameters eines brillenglases mit solch einer vorrichtung
EP2988249A1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung auf einem bild mindestens einer geeigneten zone zur darstellung mindestens eines fingers einer person
CA3001990A1 (fr) Methode de determination d'un parametre de comportement visuel d'un individu et dispositif de test associe
CA3049134C (fr) Dispositif et procede de determination des mouvements oculaires par interface tactile
WO2024146940A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour le suivi d'un individu atteint d'une maladie neurodegenerative
CAULLIER L’art d’entendre
SADRZADEH et al. THE FAMILY ROMANCE AND THE REBUILDING OF IDENTITY FOR ANNIE ERNAUX

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170517

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20210721

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE (CNRS)

Owner name: UNIVERSITE DE PARIS

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE (CNRS)

Owner name: UNIVERSITE PARIS CITE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20220201