EP3113118A1 - Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage - Google Patents

Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3113118A1
EP3113118A1 EP15175359.7A EP15175359A EP3113118A1 EP 3113118 A1 EP3113118 A1 EP 3113118A1 EP 15175359 A EP15175359 A EP 15175359A EP 3113118 A1 EP3113118 A1 EP 3113118A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
toll
vehicle
control
violation
database
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP15175359.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3113118B1 (fr
Inventor
Matthias Heyd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toll Collect GmbH
Original Assignee
Toll Collect GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toll Collect GmbH filed Critical Toll Collect GmbH
Priority to EP15175359.7A priority Critical patent/EP3113118B1/fr
Publication of EP3113118A1 publication Critical patent/EP3113118A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3113118B1 publication Critical patent/EP3113118B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B15/00Arrangements or apparatus for collecting fares, tolls or entrance fees at one or more control points
    • G07B15/06Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/01Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
    • G08G1/017Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled identifying vehicles
    • G08G1/0175Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled identifying vehicles by photographing vehicles, e.g. when violating traffic rules
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/20Monitoring the location of vehicles belonging to a group, e.g. fleet of vehicles, countable or determined number of vehicles
    • G08G1/205Indicating the location of the monitored vehicles as destination, e.g. accidents, stolen, rental

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for tracking toll vehicles in a toll system and to a toll system for carrying out such a method.
  • toll roads Different methods for collecting user charges or tolls for tolled traffic areas, such as toll roads, are known.
  • the toll is paid for example by the purchase of a vignette or other use authorization and is then valid for a predetermined period and a predetermined range.
  • the toll is charged depending on use.
  • the actual distance covered by the toll vehicle on the toll road surface is used to calculate the toll due - usually according to vehicle types and / or vehicle specifics such as the mass of the vehicle, the number of axles of the vehicle, the length of the vehicle, the emission class of the vehicle and / or the presence of a trailer.
  • decentralized elevating systems in which a position-determining device is provided in the vehicle, for example in a vehicle device or a vehicle device, which is also referred to as "on-board unit" (OBU).
  • a GNSS receiver in the vehicle detects the position of the vehicle via a GNSS system and a DSRC receiver in the vehicle can receive positions from roadside facilities.
  • these position data are processed in the vehicle unit for recognizing the traffic area subject to tolls.
  • the toll can be charged decentrally in the vehicle unit, for example by debiting a pre-paid credit.
  • the toll may be charged after transmission of the calculated toll data to a toll center through the toll center, which makes the debit or billing.
  • the collection of the toll takes place after driving on the toll road section.
  • a position determining device is again provided in the vehicle or a vehicle device, which transmit the position data to a toll center and the toll recognition, the toll determination and the toll collection are carried out in the toll center.
  • a GNSS receiver in the vehicle detects the position of the vehicle via a GNSS system and a DSRC receiver in the vehicle can receive positions from roadside equipment.
  • the toll recognition can be carried out in the vehicle unit or in the toll center. If toll recognition is carried out outside the vehicle unit, only position data which carries out toll recognition is transmitted to the toll center. The collection of the toll takes place after driving on the toll road section.
  • toll collection systems which dispense with the use of GNSS receivers and perform position determination and toll recognition exclusively via roadside vehicle detection devices.
  • the toll vehicle sends to the roadside vehicle detection device a corresponding identification signal.
  • the identification signals received from the roadside vehicle detection devices become sent to a toll center, which determines and levies the toll on this basis.
  • the collection of the toll takes place after driving on the toll road section.
  • the Toll Collect GmbH system is used to levy tolls on the use of motorways, with roadside controls in the form of fixed, fixed surveillance bridges spanning the road, covering the marks of each passing vehicle.
  • roadside controls in the form of fixed, fixed surveillance bridges spanning the road, covering the marks of each passing vehicle.
  • a comparison can be made with vehicle-specific data present in a central database under license plates of vehicles, in order to be able to check the correct charging of the toll incurred and possibly determine whether the driver of the vehicle is currently making a toll violation, in particular if no vehicle-specific data, in particular toll data, are present under the identified license plate of a vehicle for the relevant route section on which the vehicle was detected.
  • information about a route preselected for the respective license plate can be stored or information about the payment modalities.
  • Vehicle-side vehicle devices which are also referred to as OBUs (on-board units), have proven useful for individual and largely automatic detection of the use of the toll roads, which have a position-determining device for position detection of the vehicle or are coupled to a position-determining device provided in the vehicle.
  • the vehicle devices can accordingly determine and / or detect the position of the respective vehicle subject to tolling and detect, on the basis of map material stored in the vehicle device, whether the vehicle is on a toll road. If this is the case, a toll fee for the use of the determined toll road surface is determined by the vehicle device and the corresponding toll data, which include the determined fee, transmitted to a toll center.
  • the toll due can then be collected in the toll center, either by calculating the toll from the transmitted route data or by using the transmitted charge data.
  • the due toll will then be charged to the respective user or deducted from an existing credit.
  • the user In order to enable a proper toll collection, the user must initialize the vehicle device before departure and enter, among other vehicle data, such as the total weight of the vehicle, its emission class and the current number of axles. Based on this, the vehicle unit, taking into account the position of the toll vehicle determined by the position determination device and the adjustment of the position of the toll vehicle with a database in which the toll roads are deposited, determines the toll incurred for the respective journey and transmits this toll data at the latest Fulfillment of a certain criterion, for example when leaving the toll route, to the toll center.
  • vehicle data such as the total weight of the vehicle, its emission class and the current number of axles.
  • the position data determined over the course of the journey by the position-determining device and recorded by the vehicle device are transmitted continuously or when a specific criterion, such as the achievement of a predetermined amount of data at position data, to the toll center is met.
  • the toll for the toll vehicle to be paid for this journey is then determined and collected centrally in the toll center on the basis of the vehicle data and the toll road traffic areas recognized as traffic from the position data.
  • This method of collecting the toll data in which the user of the toll vehicle only has to initialize the vehicle device and then the detection of the route, the transmission of the toll data to the toll center, as well as the collection of the toll after initialization are carried out without further user input is also referred to as automatic procedure (AV).
  • AV automatic procedure
  • the toll is determined in this process only after driving on the respective toll section and thereby charged that it is charged accordingly or deducted from a deposited or pre-paid credit.
  • the vehicle device carried by the vehicle subject to toll recognizes according to the comparison of position data, which were determined by means of the position determining device with stored in a database map data, whether, and if so, which toll road section is traveled.
  • a toll road section is then stored in a storage device of the vehicle device.
  • toll sections are stored section by section in the storage device in the vehicle unit and then transmitted as toll data upon the occurrence of a predetermined criterion, for example, after exceeding a predetermined number of stored sections, to the toll center.
  • the toll determination takes place on this basis either in the toll center or in the vehicle unit. In the latter case, the toll to be collected is then transferred to the toll center as toll data.
  • the right to use the traveled, toll section is then acquired step by step after driving through each toll section, the toll charged via the toll center after leaving the toll section and transmitting the relevant data to the toll center becomes.
  • the toll collection system operated by Toll Collect GmbH also allows logging in according to the so-called manual procedure (MV).
  • AV automatic procedure
  • MV manual procedure
  • the respective user can use one of the approximately 3600 toll-station terminals, which are typically set up on truck stops, rest areas or petrol stations.
  • the manual procedure (MV) can also use a web service on the Internet.
  • the user acquires in the manual procedure (MV) a right to use the respective toll section before driving on the toll section or a toll route, which consists of one or more toll sections.
  • the user already indicates the planned driveway and the planned departure from the toll road surface before driving on the route at the toll station or in the web service, which then defines the one or more toll road sections of the route.
  • the user can also enter via positions in his route, which are taken into account in the determination of the route to be traveled and which are based on the calculation of the toll fee due.
  • the user of the manual method (MV) determines accordingly before the actual driving on the toll road sections the route to be traveled and pays the appropriate toll.
  • the toll can either be paid directly at the toll station or on the Internet, or for registered users can be provided via the toll center in a monthly collective bill or deducted from an existing credit balance.
  • a booking of a route with the manual procedure results in a fixed route, which the user can not leave without possibly being considered a toll-bumper.
  • a change in the route may become necessary, for example, if a section of the route booked is blocked or if a traffic jam occurs that is to be avoided. It may also happen that a user wants to go to additional stations while traveling. If the user wants to change his route after starting the trip booked via the manual procedure, he must do so at a stationary toll terminal so that his actually traveled route remains traceable. The user then has to make a partial cancellation of the booked route and then book the new desired route.
  • the position determination device In the vehicle devices or vehicle devices, a highly accurate position determination is possible by means of the position determination device, which has a GNSS receiver which receives specific signals from satellites of a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), which are stationed in Earth orbit and which corresponding position signals send out.
  • the position determining device uses these signals in a known manner for calculating the own position.
  • GNSS systems include, for example, the US GPS system, the Russian GLONASS, the European Galileo and the Chinese Compass system, the latter of which are still under construction.
  • GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
  • Such GNSS systems include, for example, the US GPS system, the Russian GLONASS, the European Galileo and the Chinese Compass system, the latter of which are still under construction.
  • a position determination device either a position determination device already provided in the toll vehicle can be used, which transfers its data to an OBU, or the OBU itself can have a position determination device.
  • encoders tiltometer, odometer
  • direction sensors such as a gyroscope or an electronic compass of the toll vehicle or with the position determining device may be connected to allow an even more accurate position determination by a dead reckoning. This may be particularly important if no GNSS data is available by covering, for example in a tunnel, and yet a precise position determination is desired.
  • the transmission of the information to the toll center is carried out via a communication module present in the vehicle equipment, which uses a known mobile radio standard and communicates the data, for example via the GSM standard, to the toll center.
  • a two-way communication is generally not provided, but only the toll-relevant data determined by the vehicle device are transmitted to the toll center when the vehicle device has completed the collection of data.
  • tolling systems are dependent on the collection of the route of the respective toll vehicles at least in the area which is decisive for the use of the toll road.
  • vehicle positions in the toll collection system operated by the German toll carrier Toll Collect GmbH are regularly recorded in the area of the driveway to the respective toll area and in the area of the departure from this traffic area.
  • Toll data is here understood to mean data associated with a user of tollable traffic areas and / or tolls, which are determined by a toll recognition and / or toll determination.
  • Toll relevant data are all data that are included in the determination of the toll, such as the identifier and / or the length of the toll road surface and the vehicle data such as weight, number of axles and pollutant class.
  • At least one toll-relevant data record is usually coupled with a basic charge or charge rate, which, in conjunction with the other toll-relevant data, permits the determination of the total charge for toll collection.
  • toll recognition is technically understood the process of linking a used, on the basis of the detected vehicle position (s) recognized, toll road surface with the user. In other words, it is understood to associate the user for the first time with a used toll road surface.
  • toll determination is technically understood the process of determining a toll from the used or perspective to be used toll road surface, possibly taking into account toll-related vehicle data and times.
  • toll collection is technically understood the process that has certain tolls from the user whose vehicle has proven to use the toll road surface or in perspective, for example, by taking cash such as at a toll station, by central debiting of an account or by decentralized deduction of a pre-paid balance on a chip card arranged in a vehicle device.
  • a toll fee is due.
  • the determination of the amount of the toll for example, according to measured on the toll road surface, for example, in meters, according to the number of used toll sections or lump sum or time for the use of a specific toll route network, such as a city toll, take place.
  • a toll violation is understood herein to mean that a toll vehicle has used or used a toll road surface and that the toll actually due for the use can not be charged. This may have the background that the toll vehicle is not accessible for automatic detection, since the technical prerequisites for carrying out an automatic procedure are missing - for example, an on-board unit suitable for the respective toll system is not present, is not switched on or is defective. However, it may also be that the current section of the route has not been booked for the respective vehicle in the manual procedure.
  • a toll may also exist if the toll collection fails because the toll to be paid can not be collected - for example, because an account, a credit card or a credit account is not covered.
  • it may also happen that a toll fee from the foreign operator of the on-board unit is not paid to the domestic operator of the toll system and accordingly a toll violation manifests itself at a time after the actual driving on the toll section ,
  • a toll-infringement notice is understood to mean a data record by means of which a controller can control a vehicle suspected of being liable for a toll.
  • a toll-prohibiting notice designates a toll violation related to a toll vehicle.
  • the tamper indication thus includes the information needed by a controller to have a valid reason for the departure or the stopping of a vehicle.
  • a toll fraud alert is associated with or associated with a vehicle license plate and includes information about the toll violation of which the vehicle is suspect. This information can be, for example, the type and timing of the potential toll violation as well as further details of the potential toll violation detecting control device.
  • toll vehicles and to punish toll road traffic inspectors which check tolled vehicles where a potential toll violation has been detected, remove them from circulation and, accordingly, upon suspicion of a toll violation, submit the penalty ,
  • controllers are usually trained by the crews of control vehicles. Present in the control vehicles or carried by the respective crew are mobile display devices on which the markings of the toll vehicles for which a toll violation is suspected are displayed. For this purpose, a mobile display device in the control vehicle usually receives toll-infringement notices from the road-side control device assigned to it.
  • a control vehicle with its crew is usually located in the vicinity of a roadside control device, which may be in the form of a control bridge, stationed and equipped with a mobile display device such that upon detection of a potential toll violation of a toll vehicle, a corresponding toll offense notice on the mobile display device can be displayed.
  • a roadside control device which may be in the form of a control bridge, stationed and equipped with a mobile display device such that upon detection of a potential toll violation of a toll vehicle, a corresponding toll offense notice on the mobile display device can be displayed.
  • the toll-infringement notifications are determined either by a central data processing device or in the road-side control device, for example in the data processing device provided in the roadside control device, by corresponding analysis of the vehicle data determined by the roadside control device.
  • the methods used for determining whether a toll vehicle is one in which there is a suspicion of a toll violation are known in principle.
  • tolls that have taken place in the past have not been penalized. This may be the case, for example, because at a given time a large number of potential toll violations were detected and the respective controllers did not detect all the vehicles for which Toll-infringement notice was generated, led out, control and possibly could lead to the punishment.
  • a lack of control and punishment of a potential toll violation may also occur because the vehicle for which the information about a potential toll violation exists, has left the monitored traffic area and was then no longer accessible to surveillance. This is particularly the case with toll vehicles, which have left the catchment area of the toll system, for example, by a border crossing in a neighboring country or in an adjacent toll system.
  • EETS European Electronic Toll Service
  • a third party the so-called EETS provider, on-board units provides the toll in the field of another toll operator, which in turn to operate or operate the control equipment.
  • the respective on-board units are not necessarily provided by the actual operator of the toll system, but can be provided by another operator, which is located, for example, abroad.
  • a toll vehicle registered abroad to enter the area of the domestic toll collection system and this vehicle to be equipped with an on-board unit functioning for the domestic toll collection system.
  • the tolls are paid out on a regular basis by the operator of the on-board units located abroad to the operator of the domestic toll collection system. Only then can the domestic toll operator make a binding determination as to whether the toll vehicle originating from abroad has actually paid the tolls due. Accordingly, it is also possible to determine at this point in time whether the driving on the tolled traffic area in the past is based on a toll violation. Accordingly, the corresponding vehicle can only be identified as a toll-seller by the foreign operator of the on-board unit to the domestic toll operator at the time of transfer of the corresponding payments.
  • a complete control or punishment of such vehicles from abroad, which are equipped with a functional on-board unit, is accordingly for the Checkers even with a random inspection of the respective vehicles at the time of driving the toll road surface not or only unreliable possible.
  • From the DE 10 2011 085 814 B3 is a system with each other via a common server wirelessly networked mobile phone to allow for improved communication between multiple vehicles.
  • a method for tracking toll vehicles in a toll system which has at least one data processing device in communication with a crime database and at least one roadside control device, wherein in the crime database each associated with license plates of toll vehicles first toll infringement notices are stored.
  • the method comprises the steps of detecting at least one license plate of a toll vehicle by means of the roadside control device, forming a control data record comprising the identification of the toll vehicle being recorded and the time of its detection, the determination by the Data processing means, whether in the offense database for the detected number already a detected before the detection time first toll infringement notice exists, and in the presence of a first toll violation notice for the detected characteristic in the crime database, associating the first toll offense notice with the control record.
  • control record By associating the control record with the first toll fraud alert, it is possible for a controller having this data to sanction a toll violation committed in the past.
  • the data available to the controller is accordingly enriched by the association of the control data with the first toll violation alert, thus simplifying the prosecution of toll violations.
  • the control data record associated with the first toll fraud notification is preferably stored in a data memory, preferably in the crime database, in a data memory assigned to the central data processing device, in a data memory associated with the roadside control device, in a data memory associated with a transmission device or in a further data memory.
  • the data records thus provided are available for further processing.
  • the control record associated with the first toll fraud alert can then be retrieved, for example, for further evaluation.
  • the one associated with the first toll fraud alert Control record can also be retrieved from a display device to then stand ready for the search and punishment.
  • the toll infringement notifications stored in the offense database are determined by previously detecting at least one license plate of a tolled vehicle by means of a roadside control device and determining in advance whether or not there is a toll violation of the tolled vehicle.
  • the determination itself can be carried out in a data processing device of the roadside control device, in a central data processing device or in the interaction of different data processing devices and databases.
  • the analysis can be performed using known criteria based on the collected or collected and known data. For example, it can be determined whether a specific section of the route was previously booked in the manual procedure for the license plate of a tolled vehicle.
  • the setting made in an on-board unit for example, the number of axles or the pollutant class of the toll vehicle agrees with the data determined by the roadside control device and / or if the OBU is functional. It can be determined in a pre-paid survey, if the pre-paid credit is still sufficient to pay the current toll. The determination can also be made on the basis of further known criteria and methods.
  • the determination as to whether a toll violation exists can also be made after the actual driving on the toll road through the toll vehicle. For example, in this way also toll violations, which are determined for example by the time delay between the payment of the corresponding tolls by a foreign-based operator of on-board units, for example in the EETS system to the domestic toll operator only after driving on the toll road surface, also be punished.
  • the existence of such a toll violation is usually determined in a central data processing device of the toll operator, which communicates with a payment database.
  • control data record is then stored, at least temporarily, together with the first toll infringement reference associated therewith in a data memory of the toll system by a data processing device of the toll system.
  • control data record and at least the associated first toll-infringing notification are transmitted to a mobile display device and the control data record and the associated first toll-infringement notification are displayed on the mobile display device.
  • the inspector can keep at least the first known for the respective vehicle license plate and not yet checked or not yet punished toll violation in view. It is particularly preferred if several or all toll-infringing information associated with the license plate is transmitted to the mobile display device.
  • a prioritization of the decision on the removal of a toll vehicle especially when a larger number of submitted toll fraud warnings to the controller or its mobile display device are made, so that, for example, a priority vehicle is discharged, for which more than a toll or there is a past toll violation.
  • the determination as to whether the first toll violation detected prior to the detection time is already present at the registration number recorded at the time of acquisition is preferably carried out in a central data processing device of the toll system and / or in a data processing device of the roadside control device itself.
  • the offense database can either be present in a central data processing device or be addressed by it or else the offense database is located in the roadside control device before or can be addressed by this.
  • a further downstream controller can then check, divert and penalize this vehicle when that vehicle passes another roadside controller, correspondingly checking a control record with the tag detected at that roadside controller in the crime database and then determining it in that a toll violation has been recorded in the past, namely the toll violation which could not previously be punished.
  • the toll database includes a toll violation record comprising the first toll violation indication, the associated flag, the time of detection of the toll violation, and a position identifier of the toll breaching controller, wherein the toll infringement record is associated with the control record is transmitted to the mobile display device and the data is displayed on the mobile display device.
  • a highly detailed toll-infringement record may facilitate the clarification of the facts during the inspection and review.
  • the control data record transmitted to the mobile display device is preferably also provided with a position identifier of the toll-detecting control device such that the inspector, who is also informed of this information, can give the driver of the correspondingly discharged motor vehicle detailed information about the preceding toll infringement, here to facilitate the acceptance of the punishment as well as the punishment itself.
  • the first toll-infringing notification can preferably be detected by a control device at a point in time prior to the acquisition time and transmitted to the central data-processing device. There, the first toll infringement notice can be entered in a crime database of the data processing device.
  • the first tamper indication together with the associated tag, the time of detection of the toll violation and the position identifier of the toll-detecting control device in a toll violation record in the crime scene of the central data processing device are stored, in particular, if a settlement of the toll violation is not within a predetermined Time duration from the time of detection is signaled to the central data processing device. In this way, it can be ensured that the untaxed toll violation will be punished in the event of later inspection by a controller.
  • toll infringement data records stored in the offense database are transmitted to a plurality of fixed, roadside control devices or all control devices or the offense database provides the stored toll infringement data sets to a plurality of stationary, roadside control devices or to all control devices, so that a secure and rapid determination as to whether a license plate of the control record agrees with a license number of a toll infringement record, can be performed in a control device.
  • This is preferably done in that control device which has detected the indicator at the time of detection.
  • An inspector located in the vicinity of the control device can thus be informed particularly quickly about the toll-infringing alert or it can be transmitted to the mobile display device of the inspector, since the matching of the license plate can take place directly in the control device.
  • a prioritization indication may be generated and associated with the control record, which may be transmitted via the mobile display device and displayed thereon along with the control record and the toll violation indications. The inspector can thus be given in the presence of several toll violations in his control area an indication of which of the vehicles he should preferentially divert to check the toll and possibly sanction.
  • the toll-prohibiting indication includes an identification of the type of toll infringement.
  • a corresponding prioritization indication can then be generated on the basis of a weighting table present in a centralized or decentralized prioritization database, associated with the control data record and transmitted to the mobile display device.
  • the inspector can read the prioritization notice together with the control data record and the toll infringement notice on the mobile display device and accordingly select which toll vehicle is to be routed out preferentially.
  • a control vehicle for tracking detected toll vehicles includes the mobile display device, or is carried by this or provided by this, so that a checker located in the control vehicle can read, for example, while driving toll-infringement information.
  • the inspector can access the mobile display device via a mobile device, preferably a mobile computer, a tablet computer or a smartphone, and clearly inform the driver of the correspondingly discharged motor vehicle directly at the place where the motor vehicle is parked to make the previous toll violation, in order to facilitate the acceptance of the punishment and the punishment itself and to shorten their duration.
  • a mobile device preferably a mobile computer, a tablet computer or a smartphone
  • the mobile display device may comprise a flat screen or the like and the input unit in the form of a touch screen, scroll wheel, joystick, touch pads, a mouse, one or more input keys or a voice control.
  • control record and the associated toll-infringement indications may preferably be transmitted to a mobile display device by means of a tracking case request.
  • an input unit is further provided, with which the controller can answer the prosecution request.
  • a prosecution request is understood to mean that a controller or several controllers are sent to license plates and associated toll-infringement notices and the inspector or inspectors are requested to take over this prosecution case. Through a user input, the prosecution case can then be accepted. If the prosecution request is sent to several controllers, the prosecution request will be removed by acceptance of the tracking order by an inspector at the other inspectors or displayed as inactive or already taken over.
  • the toll violation records available in the crime database may be disabled or deleted if there is an event justifying the deactivation or deletion.
  • the toll violation records may be deleted after exceeding a period of time from the time of the detection of the first toll violation notice, since these may be barred after the expiration of the period of time.
  • signaling a settlement of the toll violation for example, on the basis of a corresponding input of the check on the mobile display device to the central data processing device to unnecessarily increase the required data capacity of the data processing device and release the occupied by the completed toll violations space.
  • the at least one license plate of a toll vehicle is detected by means of a stationary roadside control device or by means of a mobile roadside control device.
  • a stationary roadside control device may be formed, for example, by a control bridge.
  • a mobile roadside control device may be formed for example by a suitably trained control vehicle.
  • a toll system for tracking toll vehicles comprising a data processing device, a crime scene database communicating with the data processing device, and at least one roadside control device.
  • the data processing device is set up to determine, in response to a control data record generated by one of the control devices, which comprises a license-pending vehicle registration number and the corresponding acquisition time, whether a first first or second license number exists in the offense database for the detected license plate Toll-infringement notice exists and, in the event of a toll-infringement notice, associate the first toll-infringing notice with the control data record.
  • a computer program product which comprises software code sections that can be loaded into an internal memory of a data processing device that is communicatively coupled to at least one crime database and that, when executed by the data processing device, cause the data processing device to perform the method described above perform.
  • FIG. 1 schematically a toll system 200 for tracking toll vehicles 102 is shown, with a toll road surface 100 is provided, for example in the form of a highway, on which a toll vehicle 102 drives along.
  • the toll vehicle 102 has inter alia a license plate 104, wherein the license plate 104 may be, for example, the conventionally known license plate or license plate.
  • Other forms of identification may also be included here, for example another optical or electronic identification, by means of which a toll vehicle 102 is clearly identified and which can be detected automatically.
  • the toll collection system 200 includes toll-detecting vehicles 102, inter alia, a road-side control device 202, which is provided in the embodiment shown in the form of a control bridge, which spans the toll road surface 100.
  • a road-side control device 202 which is provided in the embodiment shown in the form of a control bridge, which spans the toll road surface 100.
  • Such control bridges are known in principle and allow detection of license plate 104 and other parameters and properties of toll vehicles 104 on all lanes of the toll road surface 100. A detection can take place essentially directly from the front.
  • the roadside control device 202 can also be designed in the form of a control device arranged on the edge of the toll road surface 100, which makes it possible to detect the license plates 104 and other parameters of the toll vehicles 104 from the lateral position.
  • each roadway of the toll road surface 100 is preferably assigned its own roadside control device 202.
  • the road-side control device 202 has detection devices 204, 204 ', which in the exemplary embodiment shown are in the form of optical detection devices, by means of which the license plates 104 toll motor vehicles 102 are read out can.
  • detection devices 204, 204 ' which in the exemplary embodiment shown are in the form of optical detection devices, by means of which the license plates 104 toll motor vehicles 102 are read out can.
  • cameras are installed in the control devices 202, which enable read-out of the license plates 104 of the toll-transmitting vehicles 102 passing through the control device 202. It is also possible to provide further sensors and receivers by means of which further parameters and characteristics of the toll-liable vehicles 102 passing the roadside control device 202 can be determined.
  • the identifiers 104 read out by the control device 202 or the optical detection device 204 are fed to a central data processing device 206, which can be arranged centrally, for example, at the location of the operator of the toll system.
  • the central data processing device 206 may also be distributed and correspondingly constructed of a plurality of interconnected computers or processors that are not locally in a single physical location.
  • the system can also be structured as a distributed system or as a cloud system.
  • the data acquired by at least two, preferably by a plurality or a plurality of roadside controllers 202 are fed to the central data processing device 206.
  • the central data processing device 206 is connected to a toll database 208 of the toll system 200.
  • the offense database 208 data records are stored which link the license plate 104 of a toll vehicle 102 with a first toll-infringing notification associated with this license plate. These records stored in the offense database 208 were acquired by the roadside controller 202 before the actual detection timing of the current detection of the toll vehicle 102.
  • the offense database 208 contains toll fraud notifications with correspondingly associated vehicle license plates which have not yet been checked or punished and which have been recorded in the past.
  • the data records present in the offense database 208 are correspondingly historical toll-infringement notices of toll vehicles 102 which have not yet been checked or punished.
  • the central data processing device 206 checks on receipt of a control data record from the roadside control device 202, which includes a license plate 104 of the toll-bound vehicle 102 detected by the roadside control device 202, in the Delikt Scheme 208, whether this record 104 in the crime database 208 is already stored a record with a toll refusal notice.
  • the data processing can also be carried out in a data processing device 205 of the control device 202.
  • the data processing device 205 may have a data memory 203 which is provided for the temporary storage or for the permanent storage of data. Accordingly, alternatively, the data processing device 205 of the control device 202 can perform the determination.
  • the data processing device 205 of the control device 202 in the embodiment shown is in communication with the offense database 208, which may be a copy or a locally stored version of the offense database 208 in order to improve the performance.
  • the toll-infringing notification is associated with the license plate and together with the control data record via a corresponding transmission device 210, for example mobile radio, to a mobile display device 212, which for example in a control vehicle 214.
  • a transmission from the control device 202 or from the data processing device 205 of the control device 202 via mobile radio can be transmitted directly to the mobile display device (214). Alternatively, this can also take place via a schematically represented transmission device 210, which is in communication with the central data processing device 206, via mobile radio to the mobile display device 214.
  • control record comprising the license plate 104 of the toll vehicle 102 being recorded and the time of its detection and the toll-related notice associated therewith, which has been taken from the offense database 208, are displayed.
  • the inspector can accordingly recognize on the display of the mobile display device 212 that the toll vehicle 102 which has passed the roadside control device 202 has already committed or suspected a toll violation prior to the current detection time.
  • the controller may decide to divert, check and possibly prosecute that vehicle.
  • the central data processing device 206 it is furthermore possible to determine from the control data record transmitted by the roadside control device 202 whether there is also a toll violation at the time of detection, ie the time of detection of the toll vehicle 102 by the roadside control device 202. If this is the case, then this second toll violation is also transmitted to the mobile display device 212. The determination of whether there is a potential toll violation is carried out in the data processing device 206 on the basis of the data determined by the roadside control device 202 for the respective toll vehicle 102 as well as from the data made available in a database using known analysis methods.
  • a determination as to whether a first toll infringement notice is present in the offense database 208 for the license plate can also be carried out in a data processing device arranged in the roadside control device 202 or in a data processing device directly associated therewith, wherein the roadside control device 202 directly associated data processing device then either has access to a central offense database 208, or has a locally stored copy of the offense database 208.
  • FIG. 2 schematically shows a flowchart of the method steps for the pursuit of toll vehicles in a toll system.
  • step S10 first, a license plate of a toll vehicle is detected by a roadside control device. This detection and the sensors and method steps used for this purpose are known in principle.
  • step S12 a control record is formed, which includes the flag and the detection time of the flag.
  • step S14 it is checked whether there is already a toll-infringing notice in a toll database of the toll system for the tag included in the check record. If this is not the case, the query ends from the crime database.
  • control data record and the then associated toll notification is transmitted to the mobile display device in step S16.
  • control record is then displayed on the mobile display device in step S18 along with the associated toll violation indication.
  • the toll-infringement notice is preferably transmitted to a mobile display device of the controller, which is connected to the respective road-side detection device or which of these is associated.
  • a controller is usually either stationed directly on a roadside detection device, or he is stationed in the direction of travel after such a roadside detection device. This stationing is preferably arranged between the roadside detection device and a subsequent departure from the toll road surface in order to potentially be able to control and discharge all vehicles detected by the roadside detection device.
  • control record and the associated tamper indication may also be communicated to a mobile display device of another controller which is in a different relationship with the roadside detection means.
  • FIG. 3 An exemplary central data processing device 206 of the toll system 200 for carrying out the method is shown as a block diagram in FIG FIG. 3 shown.
  • instructions are executed, for example in the form of software code sections, so that the data processing device 206 is set up to perform one or more of the method steps and functions described herein.
  • the central data processing device 206 may include only a single computer. It can also be a distributed system ( "distributed system "). In one embodiment, the central data processing device 206 is a single, preferably physically demarcated, computer. In another embodiment, this is a distributed system, that is, multiple independent computers that are interconnected and interact with each other to appear to a user as a single coherent system. In the latter case, each of the computers would have at least one processor with internal memory. The several computers of the computing device then work autonomously but functionally coordinated.
  • the exemplary central data processing device 206 comprises a central processor 220 (for example a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) or both) with an internal memory, a central main memory 222 and a central static memory 224 which are interconnected via a Bus 226 communicatively coupled.
  • the central data processing device 206 may also be communicatively coupled to a user interface.
  • This user interface may include a display unit 228 (eg, a flat panel display or the like) and a first input unit 230 (eg, a touch screen, input keys, a scroll wheel, a joystick, a touch pad, a mouse, or a voice recognition system) and a second input unit 232 (for example, a touch screen, input keys, a scroll wheel, a joystick, a touch pad, a mouse or a voice recognition system).
  • the user interface may include the display unit 228 and the input unit (s) in a single integrated device, such as a touch screen.
  • the central data processing device 206 also includes a central data memory 234, a signal generating device 236 and a central communication device 238, which are communicatively connected to one another via the bus 226.
  • the central data storage 234 includes a machine readable medium 240 having stored thereon software code portions and data (e.g., instructions 242) required for the methods and functions of the computing device described herein.
  • the instructions 242 may also be, at least partially, loaded into the main memory 222 and / or the internal memory of the processor 220, wherein the main memory 222 and the internal memory of the processor 220 are also machine-readable Media acts.
  • instructions 242 may also be communicated or received over a network 244 by the central communication device 238 using one of the numerous known transmission protocols (eg, TCP / IP, HTTP).
  • TCP / IP Transmission Control Protocol
  • HTTP HyperText Transfer Protocol
  • machine-readable medium 240 (which is preferably non-transitory) in an exemplary embodiment is a single medium
  • machine-readable medium includes both a single medium and multiple media (eg, a central or distributed database, and any buffers associated therewith ("Cache") and server), which store the instructions 242 in the form of software code sections.
  • the term “machine-readable medium” also includes any medium suitable to store, encode or carry instructions 242. This can be a solid state memory, an optical or a magnetic memory.
  • Exemplary embodiments of the central computing device 206 may be implemented in digital circuits or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or combinations thereof.
  • the toll database 208 is connected to the bus 226 of the central data processing device 206 in the exemplary embodiment shown.
  • this is also a data memory which can be designed in the manner described above.
  • the data store of the offense database 208 can also be formed in a known manner by a database server, which is technically connected to a mass storage device, for example a RAID network of hard disks. The data of the offense database 208 is then stored in the mass storage and the access is organized by the database server in a known manner.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
EP15175359.7A 2015-07-03 2015-07-03 Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage Active EP3113118B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15175359.7A EP3113118B1 (fr) 2015-07-03 2015-07-03 Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15175359.7A EP3113118B1 (fr) 2015-07-03 2015-07-03 Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3113118A1 true EP3113118A1 (fr) 2017-01-04
EP3113118B1 EP3113118B1 (fr) 2023-12-13

Family

ID=53514062

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15175359.7A Active EP3113118B1 (fr) 2015-07-03 2015-07-03 Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3113118B1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020084513A1 (fr) * 2018-10-25 2020-04-30 Samy Gharb Système de surveillance pour le suivi de véhicules
RU2785196C1 (ru) * 2018-10-25 2022-12-05 Зами ГАРБ Система отслеживания для отслеживания транспортных средств

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1783692A2 (fr) * 2005-10-06 2007-05-09 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Mise en application avec des temps de cycle réduits
US20080238719A1 (en) * 2007-02-15 2008-10-02 Paylock, Inc Vehicle Violation Enforcement System And Method
US20130033386A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2013-02-07 Milan Zlojutro Vehicle monitoring & identification system
DE102011085814B3 (de) 2011-11-07 2013-03-28 Robert Bosch Gmbh System mit untereinander über einen gemeinsamen zentralen Server drahtlos vernetzten Mobiltelefonen
US20140201064A1 (en) * 2010-11-03 2014-07-17 Scott A. Jackson System and method for violation enforcement utilizing vehicle immobilization
EP2624231B1 (fr) 2012-02-02 2014-09-24 Kapsch TrafficCom AG Dispositifs et procédé de contrôle d'un système de péage routier

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1783692A2 (fr) * 2005-10-06 2007-05-09 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Mise en application avec des temps de cycle réduits
US20130033386A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2013-02-07 Milan Zlojutro Vehicle monitoring & identification system
US20080238719A1 (en) * 2007-02-15 2008-10-02 Paylock, Inc Vehicle Violation Enforcement System And Method
US20140201064A1 (en) * 2010-11-03 2014-07-17 Scott A. Jackson System and method for violation enforcement utilizing vehicle immobilization
DE102011085814B3 (de) 2011-11-07 2013-03-28 Robert Bosch Gmbh System mit untereinander über einen gemeinsamen zentralen Server drahtlos vernetzten Mobiltelefonen
EP2624231B1 (fr) 2012-02-02 2014-09-24 Kapsch TrafficCom AG Dispositifs et procédé de contrôle d'un système de péage routier

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020084513A1 (fr) * 2018-10-25 2020-04-30 Samy Gharb Système de surveillance pour le suivi de véhicules
RU2785196C1 (ru) * 2018-10-25 2022-12-05 Зами ГАРБ Система отслеживания для отслеживания транспортных средств

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3113118B1 (fr) 2023-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2909815B1 (fr) Procédé et installations de soulèvement de péage conditionné par le trafic
EP1088286B2 (fr) Dispositif de controle cote route pour un appareil de peage installe dans un vehicule
EP0616301B1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination de péage routier
DE10104502B4 (de) Kontrollverfahren zur Straßengebührenerfassung
EP1101201B1 (fr) Procede et systeme pour controler si un appareil servant a debiter une somme d'argent fonctionne correctement
EP0752688A2 (fr) Dispositif pour identifier les distances routières
EP3002733B1 (fr) Centrale d'encaissement de péage, appareil mobile et procédé d'encaissement d'un péage
EP1449174B1 (fr) Systeme de detection en surface destine a la detection de vehicules au moyen de gps
EP3002734B1 (fr) Dispositifs de véhicule et système de péage
EP1630747A2 (fr) Système et méthode de perception des droits de péage
DE102022125933A1 (de) System und Verfahren zur Mauterhebung für ein Kraftfahrzeug
EP1192600A1 (fr) Dispositif de collecte de taxes flexible
EP0625767B1 (fr) Système de contrôle pour vérifier le paiement de taxes des utilisateurs de routes
CH695585A5 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur automatischen Mauterhebung.
EP3113118B1 (fr) Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage et systeme de peage
EP3210194A1 (fr) Procédé et unité embarquée (obu) pour la détermination de taxes de péage
WO2007045623A1 (fr) Appareil de detection de peage et procede de detection de peage
EP3113119B1 (fr) Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage
WO2009043691A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de détection de péage routier
DE4416125A1 (de) Einrichtung zur Erhebung der Autobahnmaut
DE102006024729A1 (de) Verfahren zur Überprüfung der Funktion einer mobilen Detektionseinheit
EP3783573A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de collecte conforme à la protection des données de péage routier
DE102006027191A1 (de) Verfahren und System zur automatischen Erkennung eines mautpflichtigen Verkehrsweges und zur automatischen Bezahlung der Mautgebühr
EP4163886A1 (fr) Système et procédé de perception de péage pour un véhicule automobile
EP1361554A1 (fr) Appareil d'identification de véhicules

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170704

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190314

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

APBK Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE

APBN Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E

APBR Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E

APAF Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE

APBT Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E

APAM Information on closure of appeal procedure modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCNOA9E

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230919

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502015016699

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240314

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20231213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240314

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240413