EP3088906B1 - Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method - Google Patents

Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3088906B1
EP3088906B1 EP15275126.9A EP15275126A EP3088906B1 EP 3088906 B1 EP3088906 B1 EP 3088906B1 EP 15275126 A EP15275126 A EP 15275126A EP 3088906 B1 EP3088906 B1 EP 3088906B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
phase
fault
distance
power transmission
transmission medium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15275126.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3088906A1 (en
Inventor
Hengxu Ha
Sankara Subramanian Sri Gopala Krishna Murthi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
General Electric Technology GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Technology GmbH filed Critical General Electric Technology GmbH
Priority to EP15275126.9A priority Critical patent/EP3088906B1/en
Priority to CN201510334003.3A priority patent/CN106199328B/en
Priority to MX2017013823A priority patent/MX2017013823A/en
Priority to JP2017556131A priority patent/JP6711844B2/en
Priority to CA2983370A priority patent/CA2983370C/en
Priority to US15/570,612 priority patent/US10746779B2/en
Priority to BR112017023196-4A priority patent/BR112017023196A2/en
Priority to PCT/EP2016/059555 priority patent/WO2016174168A1/en
Publication of EP3088906A1 publication Critical patent/EP3088906A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3088906B1 publication Critical patent/EP3088906B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G01R31/088Aspects of digital computing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G01R31/081Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors
    • G01R31/085Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors in power transmission or distribution lines, e.g. overhead
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/40Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to ratio of voltage and current
    • H02H3/405Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to ratio of voltage and current using phase sequence analysing arrangements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H1/00Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements
    • H02H1/0007Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements concerning the detecting means
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H1/00Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements
    • H02H1/0092Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements concerning the data processing means, e.g. expert systems, neural networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/02Details
    • H02H3/04Details with warning or supervision in addition to disconnection, e.g. for indicating that protective apparatus has functioned
    • H02H3/042Details with warning or supervision in addition to disconnection, e.g. for indicating that protective apparatus has functioned combined with means for locating the fault
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/26Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
    • Y04S10/52Outage or fault management, e.g. fault detection or location

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an apparatus for fault detection and/or distance protection.
  • the invention also relates to an associated method and a power transmission network including said apparatus.
  • an apparatus for determining a fault location distance or a distance for distance protection in a multi-phase power transmission medium configured to;
  • the apparatus is advantageous as it may provide for accurate determination of a fault location distance and/or a distance protection distance using easy to measure line fault parameters and by use of a derivative of one of them.
  • the set of line fault parameters may comprise measurements of the voltage and currents of at least the faulty phase.
  • u p may comprise a measurement of the voltage of the faulty phase or a voltage difference between measurements of the voltage for two phases having a phase to phase fault.
  • i PR may comprise a resistive measurement of current of the faulty phase or a difference between current measurements of two phases having a phase to phase fault.
  • i PX may comprise an inductive measurement of current of the faulty phase or a difference between current measurements of two phases having a phase to phase fault.
  • i P0 may comprise a residual current measurement, comprising the summation of all (commonly three) phase currents.
  • the fault type may be provided to the apparatus by a fault type detector configured to detect and identify phases of the power transmission medium experiencing a fault.
  • the apparatus is configured to;
  • the apparatus is configured to determine a fault location distance for one or more of the following fault types;
  • the apparatus is configured to determine an approximation of the derivative, with respect to time, of the line fault parameter i PX .
  • the apparatus is configured to determine the Fourier transforms based on;
  • the apparatus is configured to provide the approximation of the derivative of i PX at sample time n and said remaining line fault parameters u p , i PR , and i P0 with a time delay relative to time n based on the order of the approximation M, the time delay comprising M/2 for determination of the set of phasors.
  • the apparatus is configured to determine a phase-to-ground fault and provide for definition of line fault parameters
  • the apparatus is configured to perform the Fourier transformation of the line fault parameters using the following equations;
  • N is number of samples per cycle of fundamental frequency.
  • the apparatus is configured to;
  • the apparatus is configured to determine a phase-to-phase fault (including phase-to-phase-to ground fault) and provide for definition of the line fault parameters;
  • the apparatus is configured to perform the Fourier transformation of the line fault parameters using the following equations;
  • N is number of samples per cycle of fundamental frequency.
  • the apparatus is configured to;
  • Accurate calculation of a fault location from measurements is helpful for finding a fault point along a power transmission medium.
  • Accurate determination of a fault location may reduce operating costs by avoiding expensive patrols as well as reducing revenue loss caused by long time outage.
  • Distance protection comprises use of a protective relaying device in the power transmission medium which can clear a fault by sending a tripping order to a breaker provided that the fault occurs in a protective zone relative to the protective relaying device.
  • Present techniques for fault location and distance protection can be inaccurate due to the fault-induced DC offset components in measured voltage and current. Relevant prior art can be found in EP0671011 and EP0577229 .
  • impedance based fault location determination may be inaccurate due to the presence of decaying DC components present in voltage and current measurements made by fault location apparatus during determination of the fault location.
  • the following examples provide for an apparatus and method which utilises a derivative of the measured current which can take account of the decaying DC component that may occur during a phase to ground, phase to phase, phase to phase to ground fault.
  • Figure 1 shows an example method of fault location, which may also be used for distance protection.
  • the method uses, at step 10, a plurality of instantaneous voltage and current measurements taken at a measurement point along a power transmission medium, such as a power line.
  • the measurement point may be the location of a fault detection apparatus or it may be a measurement point from which measurements can be taken.
  • the voltage and current measurements may be acquired for each phase.
  • the measurements may be sampled in real time, that is, the measurements are continuously measured and recorded for fault location or distance protection.
  • the sampling rate may be, for example, 24 samples per cycle (a cycle of fundamental frequency may be 50Hz or 60Hz), 16 samples per cycle or 12 samples per cycle. It will be appreciated that other sampling frequencies may be used.
  • the following description describes a three phase power transmission medium, but other numbers of phase could be used.
  • the notification of a fault condition is shown at step 11.
  • the identification of fault condition of the line may be performed by a different apparatus.
  • the present apparatus may receive a notification signal indicative of the fault condition.
  • Step 11 comprises determining a set of line fault parameters based on the plurality of instantaneous voltage and current measurements and the fault condition.
  • the fault condition may be indicative of which phase or phases are experiencing a fault condition.
  • the fault condition may identify at least one phase that is experiencing a phase-to-ground fault, identifying which phases are experiencing a phase-to-phase fault or a phase-to-phase-to-ground fault, and whether three or more phases are experiencing a fault (e.g. a three phase fault for a three phase system).
  • Determining a differential of one of the prepared current values with respect to time or, in particular, an approximation of a differential with respect to time of one of the line fault parameters is shown at step 12.
  • the taking of the differential has been found to provide for accurate determination of a fault location distance or a distance protection distance despite the presence of a decaying DC component with a line equation as described below.
  • Step 13 shows the determination of a Fourier transform of the differential obtained at step 12 and the remaining line fault parameters from step 11.
  • the remaining line fault parameters provided for Fourier transformation may be time delayed relative to the differential by a time delay value.
  • the time delay value may be based on a parameter of the approximation of the differential operator used in step 12.
  • the Fourier transform has been found to reduce the effect of high frequency noise in the subsequent fault location and distance protection calculations.
  • the output of step 13 comprises a set of vectors or phasors based on the approximated differential of one of the line fault parameters and based on the remaining line fault parameters.
  • the calculation of the location of the fault or a distance protection distance is performed at step 14 based on the output of the Fourier transform step 13.
  • Figure 2 shows an example current signature recorded by a relay.
  • the fault current 20 in current of phase C of a three phase system.
  • the fault resistance is nearly zero (0.01 ⁇ ) and the fault distance from the relay is 35km.
  • prior methods that do not take account of the decaying DC offset can result in the fault location, by known impedance-based methods, being calculated as 32.31km.
  • this comprises a relative error of up to 5.37%, which is in excess of what many power transmission medium operators expect.
  • the DC offset component has a significant impact on distance protection, especially for the simultaneous Zone I of distance protection.
  • Figure 3 shows an apparatus 30 configured for fault location determination and/or distance protection.
  • the apparatus 30 may form part of a fault detection module arranged in associated with a power transmission medium, such as a power line.
  • the apparatus may be remote from the power transmission medium and configured to receive voltage and current measurements from said power transmission medium.
  • the apparatus comprises a pre-processing block 31 configured to (optionally) identify a fault in a power transmission medium or a phase of a power transmission medium.
  • the pre-processing block uses measurements of instantaneous voltage and current from each of the phases (for a multi-phase power transmission medium) and using a comparison between the measurements of the different phases and with predetermined values, determines a faulty phase.
  • the pre-processing block 31 determines a set of line fault parameters u p , i PR , i PX and i P0 based on said voltage and current measurements and the fault condition.
  • the apparatus 30 further comprises a measurement processing block 32 for deriving vectors or phasors from the line fault parameters (u P , i PR , i PX , i P0 ) by applying a Fourier transform as described below.
  • the apparatus further comprises a fault location/distance protection determination block 33 configured to use said phasors to determine a fault location distance (D F ) and/or a distance protection distance (DDB-DIST).
  • D F fault location distance
  • DDB-DIST distance protection distance
  • the apparatus 30 is configured to, based on a measurement sample of voltage and current values at a measurement point, determine, a set of line fault parameters. Then, at block 32, determine an approximation of a differential with respect to time of one of the current based line fault parameters (and in particular an inductive current based line fault parameter) and determine the remaining line fault parameters at a time related to the approximation. Further, at block 32, determine a Fourier transformation, which results in phasors U ⁇ P , ⁇ PR , ⁇ PX , ⁇ P 0 , and use said Fourier transformed values, at block 33, to determine a fault location distance or distance projection along the power transmission medium.
  • the pre-processing block 31 is configured to receive an instantaneous voltage measurement, U m , and an instantaneous current measurement, i m , from each phase of the power transmission medium.
  • the block 31 is configured to receive the voltage and current measurements u mA and i mA for phase A, u mB and i mB for phase B and u mC and i mC for phase C.
  • the block 31 receives a faulty phase detection signal, FtPhsld, from a faulty phase detector.
  • the preprocessing block 31 may be configured to be informed of the faulty phase by way of signal FtPhsld, which is received from a faulty phase detector, and provide an appropriate set of line fault parameters derived from the measurements to the block 32.
  • the preprocessing block 31 is configured to determine four parameters, termed "line fault parameters", from the instantaneous phase voltage and current measurements; U ⁇ P , ⁇ PR , ⁇ PX , ⁇ P 0 .
  • U ⁇ P may be representative of voltage of the faulty phase.
  • ⁇ PR may be representative of a resistive part of the faulty phase current.
  • ⁇ PX may be representative of an inductive part of the faulty phase current.
  • ⁇ P 0 may be representative of zero-sequence current.
  • one phase voltage is related to not only the corresponding phase of current but to all the other two phase currents and the line fault parameters are selected to provide for determination of such a condition.
  • the preprocessing block receives the fault identification signal FtPhsld and is configured to assign the four parameters as follows:
  • R 1 is the first line coefficient, which is calculated by zero-sequence resistance per length (real part "Ro" of zero-sequence impedance per length Z 0 ohm/km) and positive sequence resistance per length (real part “R,” of positive-sequence impedance z 1 , ohm/km) of the power transmission medium or line.
  • the first line coefficient is a parameter of the power transmission medium that the apparatus 30 is configured to operate on and will therefore be provided to the apparatus 30 as a predetermined value.
  • K X X 0 ⁇ X 1 3
  • X 1 is the second line coefficient, which is calculated by zero-sequence reactance per length (imaginary part "X 0 " of zero-sequence impedance Z 0 , ohm/km) and positive sequence reactance per length (imaginary part "X 1 " of positive-sequence impedance z 1 , ohm/km) of the power transmission medium or line.
  • the second line coefficient is a parameter of the power transmission medium that the apparatus 30 is configured to operate on and will therefore be provided to the apparatus 30 as a predetermined value.
  • phase B and C are used for the three phase fault type, it will be appreciated that the line fault parameters u p , i PR and i PX may comprise the difference between phase B and phase C, phase C and phase A, or phase A and phase B.
  • the apparatus may receive the fault type from the fault detector and determine the line fault parameters to measure. Alternatively, it may measure and/or calculate a plurality of line fault parameters, voltages or currents and on determination of a fault type, select the appropriate line fault parameters.
  • Figure 4 shows a more detailed view of the measurement processing block 32.
  • the block 32 is configured to receive the four line fault parameters at each sample time instance, n.
  • the output of block 32 comprises four phasors (or phase vectors) that have been transformed by a Fourier transform.
  • the block 32 includes a derivative approximation block 40, a time shift block 41 and a Fourier transform block 42.
  • ⁇ h(k) ⁇ are coefficients of the approximation of derivative operator
  • M is the order of the approximation
  • Ts is sampling period of the block 31.
  • the coefficients of the approximation are predetermined based on the projection of the derivative operator on a scale function basis, for example, the Daubechies scale function, at a predetermined resolution.
  • the derivative operator can be efficiently and precisely approximated by convolution these coefficients with the signal that is derived.
  • the order, M is selected based on the accuracy required.
  • the order corresponds to the number of i PX samples used in the approximation of the derivative function.
  • i PXDer n i PX n ⁇ i PX n ⁇ 1 / T S
  • the time shift block 41 is configured to receive a subset of the line fault parameters, u P , i PR , and ipo.
  • the block 41 is configured to time delay the subset of parameters by M/2. This is because the approximation of the derivative has M/2 time shift and the time delay is selected to correspond to the time shift of the derivative operator.
  • the function of block 41 is to compensate such time shift.
  • the approximation of the differential of i PX at sample time n and the remaining line fault parameters at sample time n-M/2 is provided to the Fourier transform block 42.
  • u P n ⁇ 1 / 2 u p n + u p n ⁇ 1 / 2
  • PR n ⁇ 1 / 2 i pR n + i pR n ⁇ 1 / 2
  • P 0 n ⁇ 1 / 2 i p 0 n + i p 0 n ⁇ 1 / 2
  • the Fourier transform block 42 receives; u p n ⁇ M / 2 , i PR n ⁇ M / 2 , and i P 0 n ⁇ M / 2 from the block 41 as well as the i PXDer (n) from the derivative approximation block 40.
  • the Fourier transform block 42 by way of application of the Fourier transform, may be configured to filter high order harmonics.
  • the measurement processing block 32 is configured to pass the Fourier transformed terms or phasors U ⁇ P ( n ), ⁇ PR ( n ), ⁇ PX ( n ), and ⁇ P 0 ( n ) to the fault location/distance protection determination block 33.
  • the fault location/distance protection determination block 33 performs its calculation for fault location and/or distance protection based on one or more of the phasors received from the block 32 and the line equation shown below, in which the derivative of current has already been approximated by convolution with coefficients of a derivative operator:
  • U ⁇ P U ⁇ F + R 1 I ⁇ PR + X 1 ⁇ 0 I ⁇ PX D F
  • R 1 positive sequence resistance of line per length (ohm/km)
  • X 1 is a positive sequence reactance per length of line (ohm/km)
  • U F is the voltage of the fault point on the line;
  • w 0 2 ⁇ f where f is the line frequency and D F is fault distance in kilometers from the measurement point.
  • the block 33 is configured to determine the following equations depending on the type of fault, which may be determined from the indicator FtPhsld. Signaling may be provided from the preprocessing block 31 indicative of the type of fault or, alternatively, signaling may be provided from a separate faulty phase detector.
  • D F imag U ⁇ P I ⁇ P 0 imag R 1 I ⁇ PR + X 1 ⁇ 0 I ⁇ PX I ⁇ P 0 where I P 0 is the conjugate of ⁇ P 0 .
  • U op U ⁇ P ⁇ R 1 I ⁇ PR + X 1 ⁇ 0 I ⁇ PX D set where D set is setting distance.
  • a trip pickup parameter can be determined by the following criterion: ⁇ 2 ⁇ arg U ⁇ P U ⁇ op ⁇ 3 ⁇ 2
  • the trip signal will be picked up and subsequently trigger a breaker to open the circuit to clear the fault.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Locating Faults (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
  • Remote Monitoring And Control Of Power-Distribution Networks (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to an apparatus for fault detection and/or distance protection. The invention also relates to an associated method and a power transmission network including said apparatus.
  • According to a first aspect of the invention we provide an apparatus for determining a fault location distance or a distance for distance protection in a multi-phase power transmission medium, the apparatus configured to;
    • determine a set of line fault parameters up, iPR, iPX and iP0 based on a measurement sample of voltage and current values at a measurement point for phases of a multi-phase current of said power transmission medium and a fault type, the set of line fault parameters determined at a plurality of sample times, n;
    • determine a derivative with respect to time of one of the line fault parameters iPX representative of an inductive part of measured faulty phase current;
    • determine a set of phasors P (n), PR (n), PX (n), and P0(n) using a Fourier transformation of the derivative and of the remaining line fault parameters at the plurality of sample times and use said set of phasors to determine a fault location distance or distance projection distance along the power transmission medium;
    • wherein, the determination of the fault location distance or the distance protection distance is based on the line equation; U ˙ P = U ˙ F + R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D F
      Figure imgb0001
      where P, İPR , and PX comprise the Fourier transforms of the line fault parameters up, iPR and the derivative iPX, F is a Fourier transform of the voltage at the fault location, R1 is a positive sequence resistance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km), DF is the fault location distance, X1 is a positive sequence reactance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km) and ω0 is the fundamental angular frequency where ω0=2πf0 and f0 is the fundamental frequency of the current of the power transmission medium.
  • The apparatus is advantageous as it may provide for accurate determination of a fault location distance and/or a distance protection distance using easy to measure line fault parameters and by use of a derivative of one of them.
  • The set of line fault parameters may comprise measurements of the voltage and currents of at least the faulty phase. up may comprise a measurement of the voltage of the faulty phase or a voltage difference between measurements of the voltage for two phases having a phase to phase fault. iPR may comprise a resistive measurement of current of the faulty phase or a difference between current measurements of two phases having a phase to phase fault. iPX may comprise an inductive measurement of current of the faulty phase or a difference between current measurements of two phases having a phase to phase fault. iP0 may comprise a residual current measurement, comprising the summation of all (commonly three) phase currents.
  • The fault type may be provided to the apparatus by a fault type detector configured to detect and identify phases of the power transmission medium experiencing a fault.
  • Optionally the apparatus is configured to;
    • determine a fault location distance for one or more of the following fault conditions or for distance protection;
      1. i) a phase-to-phase fault in which: D F = imag U ˙ P imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX
        Figure imgb0002
        where the function imag[y] defines taking the imaginary part of the term y;
      2. ii) single-phase-to-ground fault in which; D F = imag U ˙ P I P 0 imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX I P 0
        Figure imgb0003
        where I P0 is the conjugate of P0; and
      3. iii) distance protection, in which; U ˙ op = U ˙ P R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D set
        Figure imgb0004
        where Dset is a setting distance for distance protection and op is a Fourier transform of an operating voltage. Further, if this operating voltage meets the following criterion, then the trip signal of distance protection will be picked up, that is, the fault is determined as an internal fault. 90 ° < arg U ˙ P U ˙ op < 270 °
        Figure imgb0005
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to determine a fault location distance for one or more of the following fault types;
    • a first phase of a multi-phase to ground fault;
    • a second phase of a multi-phase to ground fault;
    • a third phase of a multi-phase to ground fault;
    • a first phase to second phase fault;
    • a second phase to third phase fault;
    • a third phase to first phase fault;
    • a first phase to second phase to ground fault;
    • a second phase to third phase to ground fault;
    • a third phase to first phase to ground fault;
    • a three phase fault of a three phase power transmission medium.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to determine an approximation of the derivative, with respect to time, of the line fault parameter iPX.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to determine the Fourier transforms based on;
    • the approximation of the derivative of iPX with respect to time at a sample time n; and
    • the remaining line fault parameters up, iPR and iP0 at a sample time delayed relative to n, the delay based in the approximation.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to determine an approximation of said derivative with respect to time of one of the line parameters iPX wherein the approximation is made using a number M of sample sets n by; i PXDer n = 1 T S k = 0 M h k i PX n k
    Figure imgb0006
    where iPXDer comprises the approximation of the time derivative, {h(k)} are coefficients of the approximation of derivative operator and Ts is a sampling period of the measurement sample of voltage and current values.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to provide the approximation of the derivative of iPX at sample time n and said remaining line fault parameters up, iPR, and iP0 with a time delay relative to time n based on the order of the approximation M, the time delay comprising M/2 for determination of the set of phasors.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to determine a phase-to-ground fault and provide for definition of line fault parameters;
    • uP as a voltage measurement of the faulty phase;
    • iPR as a current measurement of the faulty phase plus KR(ΣiMP) where ΣiMP equals the sum of each of the instantaneous current measurement of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium and KR comprises a resistance based line coefficient; where KR = (R0-R1)/3R1, and R0 is zero-sequence resistance per length of the line, R1 is the positive-sequence resistance per length of the line.
    • iPX as a current measurement of the faulty phase plus KX(ΣiMP) where ΣiMP equals the sum of each of the instantaneous current measurement of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium and Kx comprises a reactance based line coefficient; where KX = (X0-X1)/3X1, and X0 is zero-sequence reactance per length of the line, X1 is positive sequence reactance per length of the line.
    • iP0 as the sum of the instantaneous current measurements of each of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to perform the Fourier transformation of the line fault parameters using the following equations; U ˙ P n = 2 N k = 1 N u p n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0007
    I ˙ PR n = 2 N k = 1 N i RP n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0008
    I ˙ PX n = 2 N k = 1 N i RXDer n N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0009
    I ˙ P 0 n = 2 N k = 1 N i P 0 n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0010
    where N is number of samples per cycle of fundamental frequency.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to;
    • determine the fault location distance for the single-phase-to-ground fault using the equation; D F = imag U ˙ P I P 0 imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX I P 0
      Figure imgb0011
      where DF is the fault location distance and I P0 is the conjugate of P0 .
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to determine a phase-to-phase fault (including phase-to-phase-to ground fault) and provide for definition of the line fault parameters;
    • uP as a difference between the voltage measurements of the two faulty phases;
    • iPR as a difference between current measurements of the two faulty phases;
    • iPX as a difference between current measurements of the two faulty phases;
    • iP0 as the sum of the instantaneous current measurements of each of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to perform the Fourier transformation of the line fault parameters using the following equations; U ˙ P n = 2 N k = 1 N u P n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0012
    I ˙ PR n = 2 N k = 1 N i PR n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0013
    I ˙ PX n = 2 N k = 1 N i PXDer n N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0014
    I ˙ P 0 n = 2 N k = 1 N i P 0 n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0015
    where N is number of samples per cycle of fundamental frequency.
  • Optionally, the apparatus is configured to;
    • determine the fault location distance DF for the phase-to-phase fault using the equation; D F = imag U ˙ P imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX
      Figure imgb0016
      where the function imag[y] defines taking the imaginary part of the term y.
  • Optionally, the operating voltage for distance protection is defined as; U ˙ op = U ˙ p R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D set
    Figure imgb0017
    where Dset is a setting distance for distance protection and op is a Fourier transform of an operating voltage.
  • If this operating voltage meets the following criterion, then the trip signal of distance protection will be picked up, that is, the fault is determined as an internal fault. 90 ° < arg U ˙ P U ˙ op < 270 °
    Figure imgb0018
  • According to a further aspect of the invention we provide a method for determining a fault location distance or distance protection in a multi-phase power transmission medium, the method comprising;
    • determine a set of line fault parameters up, iPR, iPX and iP0 based on a measurement sample of voltage and current values at a measurement point for phases of a multi-phase current of said power transmission medium and a fault type, the set of line fault parameters determined at a plurality of sample times, n;
    • determine a derivative with respect to time of one of the line fault parameters iPX;
    • determine a set of phasors U̇p(n), PR (n), PX (n), and P0(n) using a Fourier transformation of the derivative and of the remaining line fault parameters at the plurality of sample times and use said set of phasors to determine a fault location distance or distance projection distance along the power transmission medium;
    • wherein, the determination of the fault location distance or the distance protection distance is based on the line equation; U ˙ P = U ˙ F + R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D F
      Figure imgb0019
      where P , PR and PX comprise the Fourier transforms of the line fault parameters up, iPR and the derivative iPX, F is a Fourier transform of the voltage at the fault location, R1 is a positive sequence resistance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km), DF is the fault location distance, X1 is a positive sequence reactance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km) and ω0 is the fundamental angular frequency where ω0=2πf0 and f0 is the fundamental frequency of the current of the power transmission medium.
  • The methods performed by the apparatus of the first aspect, defined as optional features above, may be applied as optional features to this further aspect.
  • There now follows, by way of example only, a detailed description of embodiments of the invention with reference to the following figures, in which:
    • Figure 1 shows a method illustrating example steps for determining a fault location and/or distance protection for a power transmission medium;
    • Figure 2 shows an example three phase current as recorded by a distance relay along the power transmission medium during a fault condition which shows a decaying DC component;
    • Figure 3 shows an example apparatus for determination of fault location and/or distance protection; and
    • Figure 4 shows a more detailed view of a component of Figure 3 for determination of a Fourier transform.
  • Accurate calculation of a fault location from measurements is helpful for finding a fault point along a power transmission medium. Accurate determination of a fault location may reduce operating costs by avoiding expensive patrols as well as reducing revenue loss caused by long time outage. Distance protection comprises use of a protective relaying device in the power transmission medium which can clear a fault by sending a tripping order to a breaker provided that the fault occurs in a protective zone relative to the protective relaying device. Present techniques for fault location and distance protection can be inaccurate due to the fault-induced DC offset components in measured voltage and current. Relevant prior art can be found in EP0671011 and EP0577229 .
  • It has been found that impedance based fault location determination may be inaccurate due to the presence of decaying DC components present in voltage and current measurements made by fault location apparatus during determination of the fault location. The following examples provide for an apparatus and method which utilises a derivative of the measured current which can take account of the decaying DC component that may occur during a phase to ground, phase to phase, phase to phase to ground fault.
  • Figure 1 shows an example method of fault location, which may also be used for distance protection. The method uses, at step 10, a plurality of instantaneous voltage and current measurements taken at a measurement point along a power transmission medium, such as a power line. The measurement point may be the location of a fault detection apparatus or it may be a measurement point from which measurements can be taken. For a multi-phase power transmission medium, the voltage and current measurements may be acquired for each phase. The measurements may be sampled in real time, that is, the measurements are continuously measured and recorded for fault location or distance protection. The sampling rate may be, for example, 24 samples per cycle (a cycle of fundamental frequency may be 50Hz or 60Hz), 16 samples per cycle or 12 samples per cycle. It will be appreciated that other sampling frequencies may be used. The following description describes a three phase power transmission medium, but other numbers of phase could be used.
  • The notification of a fault condition is shown at step 11. The identification of fault condition of the line may be performed by a different apparatus. Thus the present apparatus may receive a notification signal indicative of the fault condition. Step 11 comprises determining a set of line fault parameters based on the plurality of instantaneous voltage and current measurements and the fault condition. The fault condition may be indicative of which phase or phases are experiencing a fault condition. The fault condition may identify at least one phase that is experiencing a phase-to-ground fault, identifying which phases are experiencing a phase-to-phase fault or a phase-to-phase-to-ground fault, and whether three or more phases are experiencing a fault (e.g. a three phase fault for a three phase system).
  • Determining a differential of one of the prepared current values with respect to time or, in particular, an approximation of a differential with respect to time of one of the line fault parameters is shown at step 12. The taking of the differential has been found to provide for accurate determination of a fault location distance or a distance protection distance despite the presence of a decaying DC component with a line equation as described below.
  • Step 13 shows the determination of a Fourier transform of the differential obtained at step 12 and the remaining line fault parameters from step 11. The remaining line fault parameters provided for Fourier transformation may be time delayed relative to the differential by a time delay value. The time delay value may be based on a parameter of the approximation of the differential operator used in step 12. The Fourier transform has been found to reduce the effect of high frequency noise in the subsequent fault location and distance protection calculations. The output of step 13 comprises a set of vectors or phasors based on the approximated differential of one of the line fault parameters and based on the remaining line fault parameters.
  • The calculation of the location of the fault or a distance protection distance is performed at step 14 based on the output of the Fourier transform step 13.
  • Figure 2 shows an example current signature recorded by a relay. There is a significant decaying DC offset component superposed on the fault current 20 (in current of phase C of a three phase system). In this example, the fault resistance is nearly zero (0.01Ω) and the fault distance from the relay is 35km. As an example, it has been found that prior methods that do not take account of the decaying DC offset can result in the fault location, by known impedance-based methods, being calculated as 32.31km. Thus, this comprises a relative error of up to 5.37%, which is in excess of what many power transmission medium operators expect. Additionally, the DC offset component has a significant impact on distance protection, especially for the simultaneous Zone I of distance protection.
  • Figure 3 shows an apparatus 30 configured for fault location determination and/or distance protection. The apparatus 30 may form part of a fault detection module arranged in associated with a power transmission medium, such as a power line. The apparatus may be remote from the power transmission medium and configured to receive voltage and current measurements from said power transmission medium. The apparatus comprises a pre-processing block 31 configured to (optionally) identify a fault in a power transmission medium or a phase of a power transmission medium. The pre-processing block uses measurements of instantaneous voltage and current from each of the phases (for a multi-phase power transmission medium) and using a comparison between the measurements of the different phases and with predetermined values, determines a faulty phase.
  • The pre-processing block 31 determines a set of line fault parameters up, iPR, iPX and iP0 based on said voltage and current measurements and the fault condition.
  • The apparatus 30 further comprises a measurement processing block 32 for deriving vectors or phasors from the line fault parameters (uP, iPR, iPX, iP0) by applying a Fourier transform as described below.
  • The apparatus further comprises a fault location/distance protection determination block 33 configured to use said phasors to determine a fault location distance (DF) and/or a distance protection distance (DDB-DIST).
  • Thus, the apparatus 30 is configured to, based on a measurement sample of voltage and current values at a measurement point, determine, a set of line fault parameters. Then, at block 32, determine an approximation of a differential with respect to time of one of the current based line fault parameters (and in particular an inductive current based line fault parameter) and determine the remaining line fault parameters at a time related to the approximation. Further, at block 32, determine a Fourier transformation, which results in phasors P, İPR, İPX , P0, and use said Fourier transformed values, at block 33, to determine a fault location distance or distance projection along the power transmission medium.
  • The pre-processing block 31 is configured to receive an instantaneous voltage measurement, Um, and an instantaneous current measurement, im, from each phase of the power transmission medium. Thus, for a three phase arrangement with phases A, B and C, the block 31 is configured to receive the voltage and current measurements umA and imA for phase A, umB and imB for phase B and umC and imC for phase C. The block 31 receives a faulty phase detection signal, FtPhsld, from a faulty phase detector. Thus, in one example, the preprocessing block 31 may be configured to be informed of the faulty phase by way of signal FtPhsld, which is received from a faulty phase detector, and provide an appropriate set of line fault parameters derived from the measurements to the block 32. The preprocessing block 31 is configured to determine four parameters, termed "line fault parameters", from the instantaneous phase voltage and current measurements; P , PR , PX , P0 . U̇P may be representative of voltage of the faulty phase. PR may be representative of a resistive part of the faulty phase current. PX may be representative of an inductive part of the faulty phase current. P0 may be representative of zero-sequence current. There are mutual resistances (earth resistance) and mutual inductances between the three phase conductors of the power transmission line. For an un-symmetrical fault, one phase voltage is related to not only the corresponding phase of current but to all the other two phase currents and the line fault parameters are selected to provide for determination of such a condition.
  • In this example, the preprocessing block receives the fault identification signal FtPhsld and is configured to assign the four parameters as follows:
    1. a) If it is phase A to ground fault (if FtPhsld ==1): u P = U mA
      Figure imgb0020
      i PR = i mA + K R i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0021
      i PX = i mA + K X i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0022
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0023
    2. b) If it is phase B to ground fault (if FtPhsld ==2): u P = u mB
      Figure imgb0024
      i PR = i mB + K R i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0025
      i PX = i mB + K X i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0026
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0027
    3. c) If it is phase C to ground fault (if FtPhsld ==3): u P = u mC
      Figure imgb0028
      i PR = i mC + K R i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0029
      i PX = i mC + K X i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0030
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0031
    4. d) If it is phase A to phase B fault, or phase A to phase B to ground fault (if FtPhsld ==4): u P = u mA u mB
      Figure imgb0032
      i PR = i mA i mB
      Figure imgb0033
      i PX = i mA i mB
      Figure imgb0034
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0035
    5. e) If it is phase B to phase C fault, or phase B to phase C to ground fault (if FtPhsld ==5) u P = u mB u mC
      Figure imgb0036
      i PR = i mB i mC
      Figure imgb0037
      i PX = i mB i mC
      Figure imgb0038
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0039
    6. f) If it is phase C to phase A fault, or phase C to phase A to ground fault (if FtPhsld ==6) u P = u mC u mA
      Figure imgb0040
      i PR = i mC i mA
      Figure imgb0041
      i PX = i mC i mA
      Figure imgb0042
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0043
    7. g) If it is three-phase fault (if FtPhsld ==7) u p = u mB u mC
      Figure imgb0044
      i PR = i mB i mC
      Figure imgb0045
      i PX = i mB i mC
      Figure imgb0046
      i P 0 = i mA + i mB + i mC
      Figure imgb0047
  • Where K R = R 0 R 1 3 R 1
    Figure imgb0048
    is the first line coefficient, which is calculated by zero-sequence resistance per length (real part "Ro" of zero-sequence impedance per length Z0 ohm/km) and positive sequence resistance per length (real part "R," of positive-sequence impedance z1, ohm/km) of the power transmission medium or line. It will be appreciated that the first line coefficient is a parameter of the power transmission medium that the apparatus 30 is configured to operate on and will therefore be provided to the apparatus 30 as a predetermined value. K X = X 0 X 1 3 X 1
    Figure imgb0049
    is the second line coefficient, which is calculated by zero-sequence reactance per length (imaginary part "X0" of zero-sequence impedance Z0, ohm/km) and positive sequence reactance per length (imaginary part "X1" of positive-sequence impedance z1, ohm/km) of the power transmission medium or line. It will be appreciated that the second line coefficient is a parameter of the power transmission medium that the apparatus 30 is configured to operate on and will therefore be provided to the apparatus 30 as a predetermined value.
  • While phases B and C are used for the three phase fault type, it will be appreciated that the line fault parameters up, iPR and iPX may comprise the difference between phase B and phase C, phase C and phase A, or phase A and phase B.
  • The apparatus may receive the fault type from the fault detector and determine the line fault parameters to measure. Alternatively, it may measure and/or calculate a plurality of line fault parameters, voltages or currents and on determination of a fault type, select the appropriate line fault parameters.
  • Figure 4 shows a more detailed view of the measurement processing block 32. The block 32 is configured to receive the four line fault parameters at each sample time instance, n. The output of block 32 comprises four phasors (or phase vectors) that have been transformed by a Fourier transform. The block 32 includes a derivative approximation block 40, a time shift block 41 and a Fourier transform block 42.
  • The differential approximation block 40 is configured to calculate an approximation of the derivative function of current iPX , which comprises one of the line fault parameters that is based in the current measurements of the phases (that is, di PX dt ,
    Figure imgb0050
    which is notated as iPXDer ) by the following equation: i PXDer n = 1 T S k = 0 M h k i PX n k
    Figure imgb0051
  • Where {h(k)} are coefficients of the approximation of derivative operator, M is the order of the approximation and Ts is sampling period of the block 31. The coefficients of the approximation are predetermined based on the projection of the derivative operator on a scale function basis, for example, the Daubechies scale function, at a predetermined resolution.
  • With these coefficients, the derivative operator can be efficiently and precisely approximated by convolution these coefficients with the signal that is derived.. The order, M, is selected based on the accuracy required. The order corresponds to the number of iPX samples used in the approximation of the derivative function.
  • For example, for M=1, h(k)={1,-1}, the approximation of the derivative operator to iPX is: i PXDer n = i PX n i PX n 1 / T S
    Figure imgb0052
  • In order to obtain a higher accuracy of approximation, for example a 4-order approximation, which is based on the Daubechies orthogonal basis, then, optionally, M=4, h(k)={-0.0833, 0.6667, 0, -0.6667, 0.0833}.
  • The time shift block 41 is configured to receive a subset of the line fault parameters, uP, iPR, and ipo. The block 41 is configured to time delay the subset of parameters by M/2. This is because the approximation of the derivative has M/2 time shift and the time delay is selected to correspond to the time shift of the derivative operator. The function of block 41 is to compensate such time shift. Thus, the approximation of the differential of iPX at sample time n and the remaining line fault parameters at sample time n-M/2 is provided to the Fourier transform block 42.
  • Thus, providing; u P n M / 2
    Figure imgb0053
    i PR n M / 2
    Figure imgb0054
    i P 0 n M / 2
    Figure imgb0055
    uPn-M/2=upn+upn-1/2iPRn-M/2=ipRn+ipRn-1/2iP0n-M/2=ip0n+ip0n-1/2If M/2 is not an integer, then a linear interpolation may be employed: u P n M / 2 = u p n + u p n M / 2
    Figure imgb0056
    i PR n M / 2 = i pR n + i pR n M / 2
    Figure imgb0057
    i P 0 n M / 2 = i p 0 n + i p 0 n M / 2
    Figure imgb0058
  • For example, if M=1: u P n 1 / 2 = u p n + u p n 1 / 2
    Figure imgb0059
    i PR n 1 / 2 = i pR n + i pR n 1 / 2
    Figure imgb0060
    i P 0 n 1 / 2 = i p 0 n + i p 0 n 1 / 2
    Figure imgb0061
  • The Fourier transform block 42 receives; u p n M / 2 ,
    Figure imgb0062
    i PR n M / 2 ,
    Figure imgb0063
    and i P 0 n M / 2
    Figure imgb0064
    from the block 41 as well as the iPXDer (n) from the derivative approximation block 40.
  • The Fourier transform is determined using the following equations: U ˙ P n = 2 N k = 1 N u P n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0065
    I ˙ PR n = 2 N k = 1 N u PR n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0066
    I ˙ PX n = 2 N k = 1 N i PXDer n N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0067
    I ˙ P 0 n = 2 N k = 1 N i P 0 n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0068
    where N is samples per cycle of fundamental frequency, for example, for a 50Hz system, N can be selected as 16 samples per 0.02s.
  • The Fourier transform block 42, by way of application of the Fourier transform, may be configured to filter high order harmonics.
  • The measurement processing block 32 is configured to pass the Fourier transformed terms or phasors P (n), PR (n), PX (n), and P0(n) to the fault location/distance protection determination block 33.
  • The fault location/distance protection determination block 33 performs its calculation for fault location and/or distance protection based on one or more of the phasors received from the block 32 and the line equation shown below, in which the derivative of current has already been approximated by convolution with coefficients of a derivative operator: U ˙ P = U ˙ F + R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D F
    Figure imgb0069
    where R1 is positive sequence resistance of line per length (ohm/km); X1 is a positive sequence reactance per length of line (ohm/km); UF is the voltage of the fault point on the line; w0 = 2πf where f is the line frequency and DF is fault distance in kilometers from the measurement point.
  • For fault location the block 33 is configured to determine the following equations depending on the type of fault, which may be determined from the indicator FtPhsld. Signaling may be provided from the preprocessing block 31 indicative of the type of fault or, alternatively, signaling may be provided from a separate faulty phase detector.
  • If the fault is a phase-to-phase fault (including phase-to-phase-to-ground fault) or three-phase fault, the fault distance is located by the following equation: D F = imag U ˙ P imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX
    Figure imgb0070
    where "imag" means taking the imaginary part. It will be appreciated that F is excluded from the imaginary part because the fault resistance is always resistive.
  • If the fault is a phase-to-ground fault, the fault distance is given by: D F = imag U ˙ P I P 0 imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX I P 0
    Figure imgb0071
    where I P0 is the conjugate of P0 .
  • For distance protection, the block 33 defines the operating voltage op op = U̇P-[R1PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX ] D set
    Figure imgb0072
    (Fourier transform of the operating voltage) by the following equation: U ˙ op = U ˙ P R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D set
    Figure imgb0073
    where Dset is setting distance. Thus this provide information for a distance protection relay device which may be configured to compare the operating voltage with the measured voltage. If they are in opposite direction, then it will be determined as an internal fault. Otherwise an external fault will be determined. Once the internal fault is detected, a trip signal may be generated and subsequently trigger a breaker to open the circuit.
    Thus, the output of the block 33 is a fault location distance providing a distance to the fault from the measurement point or a distance Dset for use in distance protection.
  • Additionally, a trip pickup parameter can be determined by the following criterion: π 2 < arg U ˙ P U ˙ op < 3 π 2
    Figure imgb0074
  • If the comparison of operating voltage with measured voltage meets the above criterion, the trip signal will be picked up and subsequently trigger a breaker to open the circuit to clear the fault.

Claims (14)

  1. An apparatus for determining a fault location distance or a distance for distance protection in a multi-phase power transmission medium, the apparatus configured to;
    determine a set of line fault parameters up, iPR, iPX and iP0 based on a measurement sample of voltage and current values at a measurement point for phases of a multi-phase current of said power transmission medium and a fault type, the set of line fault parameters determined at a plurality of sample times, n;
    determine a derivative with respect to time of one of the line fault parameters iPX representative of an inductive part of measured faulty phase current;
    determine a set of phasors P (n), PR (n), PX (n), and I P0(n) using a Fourier transformation of the derivative and of the remaining line fault parameters at the plurality of sample times and use said set of phasors to determine a fault location distance or distance projection distance along the power transmission medium; characterised in that the determination of the fault location distance or the distance protection distance is based on the line equation; U ˙ P = U ˙ F + R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D F
    Figure imgb0075
    where P, PR and PX comprise the Fourier transforms of the line fault parameters up, iPR and the derivative iPX, F is a Fourier transform of the voltage at the fault location, R1 is a positive sequence resistance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km), DF is the fault location distance, X1 is a positive sequence reactance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km) and ω0 is the fundamental angular frequency where ω0=2πf0 and f0 is the fundamental frequency of the current of the power transmission medium.
  2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is configured to;
    determine a fault location distance for one or more of the following fault conditions or for distance protection;
    i) a phase-to-phase fault and/or phase-to-phase-to-ground fault and/or three-phase fault in which; D F = imag U ˙ P imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX
    Figure imgb0076
    where the function imag[y] defines taking the imaginary part of the term y;
    ii) a single-phase-to-ground fault in which; D F = imag U ˙ P I P 0 imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX I P 0
    Figure imgb0077
    where I P0 is the conjugate of P0; and
    iii) distance protection, in which; U ˙ op = U ˙ P R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D set
    Figure imgb0078
    where Dset is a distance protection distance and op is a Fourier transform of an operating voltage wherein when the operating voltage meets the following criterion: π 2 < arg U ˙ P U ˙ op < 3 π 2
    Figure imgb0079
    an internal fault will be determined.
  3. An apparatus according to claim 1, in which the apparatus is configured to determine a fault location distance for one or more of the following fault types;
    a first phase of a multi-phase to ground fault;
    a second phase of a multi-phase to ground fault;
    a third phase of a multi-phase to ground fault;
    a first phase to second phase fault;
    a second phase to third phase fault;
    a third phase to first phase fault;
    a first phase to second phase to ground fault;
    a second phase to third phase to ground fault;
    a third phase to first phase to ground fault;
    a three phase fault of a three phase power transmission medium.
  4. An apparatus according to claim 1, in which the apparatus is configured to determine an approximation of a derivative with respect to time.
  5. An apparatus according to claim 4, in which the apparatus is configured to determine the Fourier transforms based on;
    the approximation of the derivative of iPx with respect to time at a sample time n; and
    the remaining line fault parameters up, iPR and iP0 at a sample time delayed relative to n, the delay based in the approximation.
  6. An apparatus according to claim 4, in which the apparatus is configured to determine an approximation of said derivative with respect to time of one of the line parameters iPX wherein the approximation is made using a number M of sample sets n by; i PXDer n = 1 T S k = 0 M h k i PX n k
    Figure imgb0080
    where iPXDer comprises the approximation of the time derivative, {h(k)} are coefficients of the approximation of derivative operator and Ts is a sampling period of the measurement sample of voltage and current values.
  7. An apparatus according to claim 6, in which the apparatus is configured to provide the approximation of the derivative of iPX at sample time n and said remaining line fault parameters up, iPR, and iP0 with a time delay relative to time n based on the order of the approximation M, the time delay comprising M/2 for determination of the set of phasors.
  8. An apparatus according to claim 1, in which the apparatus is configured to determine a phase-to-ground fault and provide for definition of line fault parameters;
    uP as a voltage measurement of the faulty phase;
    iPR as a current measurement of the faulty phase plus KR(ΣiMP) where ΣiMP equals the sum of each of the instantaneous current measurement of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium and KR comprises a resistance based line coefficient;
    iPX as a current measurement of the faulty phase plus KX(ΣiMP) where ΣiMP equals the sum of each of the instantaneous current measurement of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium and KX comprises a reactance based line coefficient;
    iP0 as the sum of the instantaneous current measurements of each of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium.
  9. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is configured to perform the Fourier transformation of the line fault parameters using the following equations; U ˙ P n = 2 N k = 1 N u P n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0081
    I ˙ PR n = 2 N k = 1 N i PR n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0082
    I ˙ PX n = 2 N k = 1 N i PXDer n N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0083
    I ˙ P 0 n = 2 N k = 1 N i P 0 n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0084
    where N is number of samples per cycle of fundamental frequency.
  10. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is configured to;
    determine the fault location distance for the single-phase-to-ground fault using the equation; D F = imag U ˙ P I P 0 imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX I P 0
    Figure imgb0085
    where DF is the fault location distance and I P0 is the conjugate of P0 .
  11. An apparatus according to claim 1, in which the apparatus is configured to determine a phase-to-phase fault and provide for definition of the line fault parameters;
    uP as a difference between the voltage measurements of the two faulty phases;
    iPR as a difference between current measurements of the two faulty phases;
    iPX as a difference between current measurements of the two faulty phases;
    iP0 as the sum of the instantaneous current measurements of each of the phases of the multi-phase power transmission medium.
  12. An apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the apparatus is configured to perform the Fourier transformation of the line fault parameters using the following equations; U ˙ P n = 2 N k = 1 N u P n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0086
    I ˙ PR n = 2 N k = 1 N i PR n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0087
    I ˙ PX n = 2 N k = 1 N i PXDer n N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0088
    I ˙ P 0 n = 2 N k = 1 N i P 0 n M 2 N + k exp 2 πk N
    Figure imgb0089
    where N is number of samples per cycle of fundamental frequency.
  13. An apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the apparatus is configured to; determine the fault location distance DF for the phase-to-phase fault using the equation; D F = imag U ˙ P imag R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX
    Figure imgb0090
    where the function imag[y] defines taking the imaginary part of the term y.
  14. A method for determining a fault location distance or distance protection in a multi-phase power transmission medium, the method comprising;
    determine a set of line fault parameters up, iPR, iPX and iP0 based on a measurement sample of voltage and current values at a measurement point for phases of a multi-phase current of said power transmission medium and a fault type, the set of line fault parameters determined at a plurality of sample times, n;
    determine a derivative with respect to time of one of the line fault parameters iPX;
    determine a set of phasors P (n), PR (n), PX (n), and P0(n) using a Fourier transformation of the derivative and of the remaining line fault parameters at the plurality of sample times and use said set of phasors to determine a fault location distance or distance projection distance along the power transmission medium; characterised in that the determination of the fault location distance or the distance protection distance is based on the line equation; U ˙ P = U ˙ F + R 1 I ˙ PR + X 1 ω 0 I ˙ PX D F
    Figure imgb0091
    where P, İPR and PX comprise the Fourier transforms of the line fault parameters up, iPR and the derivative iPX, F is a Fourier transform of the voltage at the fault location, R1 is a positive sequence resistance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km), DF is the fault location distance, X1 is a positive sequence reactance of the power transmission medium per length (ohm/km) and ω0 is the fundamental angular frequency where ω0=2πf0 and fo is the fundamental frequency of the current of the power transmission medium.
EP15275126.9A 2015-04-30 2015-04-30 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method Active EP3088906B1 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15275126.9A EP3088906B1 (en) 2015-04-30 2015-04-30 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method
CN201510334003.3A CN106199328B (en) 2015-04-30 2015-06-16 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and related methods
JP2017556131A JP6711844B2 (en) 2015-04-30 2016-04-28 Fault position detection and distance protection device and related method
CA2983370A CA2983370C (en) 2015-04-30 2016-04-28 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method
MX2017013823A MX2017013823A (en) 2015-04-30 2016-04-28 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method.
US15/570,612 US10746779B2 (en) 2015-04-30 2016-04-28 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method
BR112017023196-4A BR112017023196A2 (en) 2015-04-30 2016-04-28 apparatus and method for determining a location distance
PCT/EP2016/059555 WO2016174168A1 (en) 2015-04-30 2016-04-28 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15275126.9A EP3088906B1 (en) 2015-04-30 2015-04-30 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3088906A1 EP3088906A1 (en) 2016-11-02
EP3088906B1 true EP3088906B1 (en) 2017-08-30

Family

ID=53016571

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15275126.9A Active EP3088906B1 (en) 2015-04-30 2015-04-30 Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US10746779B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3088906B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6711844B2 (en)
CN (1) CN106199328B (en)
BR (1) BR112017023196A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2983370C (en)
MX (1) MX2017013823A (en)
WO (1) WO2016174168A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3639045B1 (en) * 2017-06-15 2023-08-16 Hitachi Energy Switzerland AG Method, system and apparatus for fault detection
KR102063097B1 (en) * 2017-07-19 2020-01-07 이현창 Electrical leak detecting apparatus and electrical leak detecting method for improving the electrical leak detecting accuracy
DE102017212730A1 (en) * 2017-07-25 2019-01-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for fault location along a power supply line in DC systems
US10823777B2 (en) * 2018-04-16 2020-11-03 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Detection and location of broken conductors for transmission lines
CN109088402B (en) * 2018-08-09 2020-11-17 国网辽宁省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 Time-domain full-waveform protection device for power transmission line and phase jump vector direction judgment method thereof
CN109283430B (en) * 2018-09-25 2020-07-07 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Power distribution network fault location method based on voltage distribution principle
CN109283431B (en) * 2018-09-25 2020-06-09 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Power distribution network fault section positioning method based on limited PMU
CN109283429B (en) * 2018-09-25 2020-06-09 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Power distribution network fault location method based on positive and negative sequence impedance equality principle
CN109856502B (en) * 2018-12-24 2019-12-10 西南交通大学 Fault location method for compound line direct supply traction network
WO2020209242A1 (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-15 株式会社和田電業社 Device and program
JP7021748B2 (en) * 2019-04-09 2022-02-17 株式会社和田電業社 Equipment and programs
CN110265979B (en) * 2019-05-06 2021-12-17 萨德克·阿齐兹 Method and device for realizing non-communication high-speed distance relay in signal-free transmission line
US11143715B2 (en) 2019-08-15 2021-10-12 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Broken conductor detection in a multiple-phase electric power delivery system
US11480601B2 (en) * 2019-09-26 2022-10-25 General Electric Technology Gmbh Systems and methods to improve distance protection in transmission lines
CN111308270B (en) * 2020-03-06 2021-08-17 西南交通大学 Power transmission line fault detection method based on node fault injection current
EP3913382B1 (en) * 2020-05-19 2024-05-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for determining the location of a three-pole assymetrical fault on a line of a three-phase electrical energy supply network
CN112162170B (en) * 2020-06-15 2022-05-10 国网湖北省电力有限公司黄冈供电公司 Single-phase earth fault rapid line selection method for small current grounding system
CN113066540B (en) * 2021-03-19 2023-04-11 新疆大学 Method for preprocessing non-equilibrium fault sample of oil-immersed transformer
CN113437734B (en) * 2021-08-30 2021-12-31 国网江西省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 Fault protection method and device suitable for wind power plant output line
CN113848428B (en) * 2021-09-29 2022-06-14 华南理工大学 Power transmission line double-end fault distance measurement method, system, device and medium
CN114696304B (en) * 2022-04-24 2023-04-07 天津大学 Single-end quantity protection method of alternating current transmission line based on UPFC boundary
CN116577594B (en) * 2023-07-10 2023-11-14 广东电网有限责任公司佛山供电局 Fault monitoring method and system of relay protection device

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0577229A1 (en) * 1988-11-14 1994-01-05 General Electric Company Apparatus for providing distance protection and distance measurement for a high voltage transmission line
SE470499B (en) * 1992-10-20 1994-06-06 Asea Brown Boveri Procedure and apparatus for error determination in the event of a fault on a power line
DE19514698C1 (en) * 1995-04-13 1996-12-12 Siemens Ag Procedure for taking a distance measurement
KR100393909B1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2003-08-06 유호전기공업주식회사 Methol of distance relay for protecting transmission line with removal reactance effect
CN100459355C (en) * 2006-01-26 2009-02-04 天津大学 Transmission line distance protecting method
LV13922B (en) * 2007-10-16 2009-08-20 Rīgas Tehniskā Universitāte Method for determination of distance to fault place by phase-to-earth fault in distribution networks
CN100576682C (en) * 2008-03-07 2009-12-30 西安交通大学 Band serial compensation capacitance transmission line distance protecting method based on Model Identification
CN102255292B (en) * 2011-07-25 2014-03-12 西安交通大学 High-voltage transmission line distance protection method based on parametric recognition
GB201120477D0 (en) * 2011-11-28 2012-01-11 Univ Nottingham Fault location in power distribution systems
CN103532113A (en) * 2013-10-23 2014-01-22 国家电网公司 Rapid distance protection method for power transmission line containing micro-grid system
CN104242267B (en) * 2014-09-11 2017-06-06 国家电网公司 A kind of wind-power electricity generation sends out transmission line distance protecting method
CN104466928B (en) * 2015-01-06 2017-11-28 华北电力大学 Distance protecting method and system
US10236675B2 (en) * 2016-07-26 2019-03-19 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Fault detection and protection during steady state using traveling waves

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN106199328A (en) 2016-12-07
WO2016174168A1 (en) 2016-11-03
BR112017023196A2 (en) 2018-08-07
JP2018515758A (en) 2018-06-14
CN106199328B (en) 2020-01-14
JP6711844B2 (en) 2020-06-17
US20180284180A1 (en) 2018-10-04
EP3088906A1 (en) 2016-11-02
MX2017013823A (en) 2018-02-21
CA2983370A1 (en) 2016-11-03
US10746779B2 (en) 2020-08-18
CA2983370C (en) 2023-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3088906B1 (en) Fault location detection and distance protection apparatus and associated method
CN103852691B (en) The oriented detection of failure in the network of compensation or the earthed system for the neutral point that insulate
CN106415286B (en) System and method for impulse ground fault detection and localization
EP1971869B1 (en) Method and device for fault location in a two-terminal transmission or distribution power line
EP2474076B1 (en) A method of fault phase selection and fault type determination
EP1870717B1 (en) System and method for determining phase-to-earth admittances of a three-phase electric line
RU2631025C2 (en) Detection of direction of weakly resistant short circuit to earth of average voltage with help of linear correlation
EP1724597A2 (en) System and method for determining location of phase-to-earth fault
EP3482472B1 (en) A method and system for locating a fault in a mixed power transmission line
EP3369150B1 (en) Method and system for protection in a mixed line
WO1998029752A1 (en) System for locating faults and estimating fault resistance in distribution networks with tapped loads
EP2786163A1 (en) Fault location in power distribution systems
EP2745367B1 (en) A method of distance protection of parallel transmission line
CN105467268B (en) Directional detection of ground faults in an electric power distribution network
EP2544014A1 (en) A method of selecting between faulted and healthy circuits in parallel lines using one-end measurements
WO2019166903A1 (en) Method and device for fault location in a two-terminal transmission system
JP5615566B2 (en) Distribution line ground fault location method and apparatus
EP3629437B1 (en) Method and device for controlling at least one circuit breaker of a power system
EP3327453A1 (en) Method of locating a fault in a power transmission scheme
Samantaray Fast S-transform based distance relaying in transmission line
CN108369254B (en) Method of locating a fault in a power transmission medium
EP4136725A1 (en) Fault detection in a power transmission system
CN116157693A (en) Fault location determination in power transmission systems
Anierobi et al. Review of Impedance-Based Fault Location Algorithm in Electric Power Transmission Line, using computerized fault recorders.
Choudry POWER STREAM From

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161013

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170420

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 924075

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER AND PEDRAZZINI AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602015004456

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 924075

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171130

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171230

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171201

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171130

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602015004456

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20180502

Year of fee payment: 4

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150430

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170830

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230327

Year of fee payment: 9

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230522

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 10