EP3034754B1 - Installation de porte battante pliante - Google Patents

Installation de porte battante pliante Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3034754B1
EP3034754B1 EP14198570.5A EP14198570A EP3034754B1 EP 3034754 B1 EP3034754 B1 EP 3034754B1 EP 14198570 A EP14198570 A EP 14198570A EP 3034754 B1 EP3034754 B1 EP 3034754B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
folding
leaf door
folding leaf
door
sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14198570.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3034754A1 (fr
Inventor
Andreas Finke
Stefan Kampmeier
Peter Schilfka
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dormakaba Deutschland GmbH
Original Assignee
Dormakaba Deutschland GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dormakaba Deutschland GmbH filed Critical Dormakaba Deutschland GmbH
Priority to EP14198570.5A priority Critical patent/EP3034754B1/fr
Publication of EP3034754A1 publication Critical patent/EP3034754A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3034754B1 publication Critical patent/EP3034754B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05FDEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/60Power-operated mechanisms for wings using electrical actuators
    • E05F15/603Power-operated mechanisms for wings using electrical actuators using rotary electromotors
    • E05F15/605Power-operated mechanisms for wings using electrical actuators using rotary electromotors for folding wings
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05FDEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05DHINGES OR SUSPENSION DEVICES FOR DOORS, WINDOWS OR WINGS
    • E05D15/00Suspension arrangements for wings
    • E05D15/26Suspension arrangements for wings for folding wings
    • E05D15/264Suspension arrangements for wings for folding wings for bi-fold wings
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05FDEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • E05F2015/434Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05YINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2400/00Electronic control; Electrical power; Power supply; Power or signal transmission; User interfaces
    • E05Y2400/10Electronic control
    • E05Y2400/52Safety arrangements associated with the wing motor
    • E05Y2400/53Wing impact prevention or reduction
    • E05Y2400/54Obstruction or resistance detection
    • E05Y2400/57Disabling thereof

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a folding door system.
  • the invention also relates to a method for actuating a folding door system.
  • the main closing edge must be secured in accordance with legal regulations and for general safety reasons in such a way that a danger, in particular with regard to fingers being crushed, is largely avoided for walkers and users of the door in the area of the main closing edges.
  • folding door systems Due to the kinematics of the folding wing doors, folding door systems have the problem that if the main closing edge is protected directly by sensors on the folding side of the door wings, for example by means of light buttons, the folding door can fold into the sensor field when opening and closing Sensor swings in. This leads to self-detection, in which the corresponding sensor detects the opening or closing movement of the folding door within the sensor field and produces a corresponding control signal which, for example, in particular when the door closes, would trigger an unwanted repeated reversing.
  • the main closing edge on the folding side of the folding door system is therefore secured exclusively by means of motor current detection, an increase in the motor current being used when the door hits an obstacle, for example on the hand of a user, in order to correspondingly reverse or stop the door cause.
  • this detection is relatively slow and inaccurate, particularly in the last phase of the closing movement of a folding wing door, so that when a user intervenes in the area of the main closing edge or when a child stays in the area in the last phase of the closing movement, an obstacle is detected by means of the motor current detection cannot be guaranteed. In this way, due to the comparatively high closing forces that are kinematically caused in folding wing doors, there is still a considerable potential for injury.
  • the object is achieved by a folding door system according to claim 1 and a method according to claim 3 or 6.
  • the subclaims relate to advantageous developments of the invention.
  • the object is thus achieved by a folding door system comprising at least one folding door and at least one drive unit for moving the folding door.
  • the drive unit can be controlled by a control unit of the folding door system.
  • the drive unit is designed to move the folding door between the open position and the closed position.
  • the folding door system comprises at least one position sensor for determining the position of the folding door and at least one obstacle sensor for detecting obstacles in a travel area of the folding door.
  • the folding wing door has a monitoring unit, the monitoring unit being set up to receive signals from the position sensor and / or the obstacle sensor.
  • the position sensor is an incremental encoder, which is arranged in particular on a motor shaft of the drive unit.
  • the incremental encoder can be a linear incremental encoder or a rotary incremental encoder, with the rotary incremental encoder being preferred.
  • the rotary incremental encoder has the advantage that it can be designed to be self-calibrating, so that very precise measurement results are available.
  • the incremental encoder preferably has a resolution between 3000 and 35000, in particular between 5000 and 30000, particularly preferably between 7500 and 20,000 pulses per travel path of the folding door between the open and closed positions. This means that there is an optimal resolution to reliably and reliably identify a position of the folding door.
  • the control unit is preferably set up so that a deviation of the folding wing door from the closed position can be detected.
  • a deviation of the folding wing door from the closed position is caused in particular by the influence of wind or by a manual force that a user applies to the folding wing doors. In both cases, however, the folding wing door should remain in the closed position.
  • the fully closed position is thus a target position from which a deviation can be detected by the control unit. If such a deviation is detected, the control unit is set up to control the drive unit such that the drive unit applies an increasing force to the folding wing door in the direction of the closed position as the deviation increases. There is thus a regulation with which the described deviation of the folding door from the closed position is to be minimized.
  • the force to be applied by the drive unit to the folding wing door can be controlled by an electrical power that is output to the drive unit.
  • the aforementioned force is applied to the folding door.
  • a drive unit with a small maximum nominal power can be used, since an electrical energy necessary for locking the folding wing door is only applied when required. In particular, no permanent locking current is required.
  • the monitoring unit is set up to deactivate the obstacle sensor or to disregard the signal from the obstacle sensor if the position of the folding wing door lies outside a predefined activation range.
  • the activation area is in particular a measure of the risk of self-detection of the folding wing door.
  • the folding wing door recognizes itself when the folding wing door projects into a sensor area of the obstacle sensor, so that the obstacle sensor incorrectly considers the folding wing door to be an obstacle.
  • the obstacle sensor is not taken into account or deactivated if there is a risk of self-detection of the folding wing door, ie if the door is outside the activation area.
  • the activation area can be a single area or can comprise several partial areas. In particular, it is provided that the activation area covers a section of the travel path of the Folding wing door corresponds to that which the folding wing door moves to move between the closed position and the open position.
  • the invention also relates to a method for actuating a folding door system.
  • the folding door system corresponds in particular to the folding door system described above.
  • the method comprises the following steps: First, a deviation of a folding door of the folding door system from the closed position is detected. This is done in particular by the position sensor. Again, deviation is to be understood to mean that the folding wing door should remain in the closed position, but is moved out of the closed position by an external influence, such as in particular by wind or by a user. The closed position is therefore a target position from which the folding door deviates. Then, with increasing deviation, an increasing force is applied to the folding door in the direction of the closed position.
  • the invention further relates to a method for actuating a folding door system.
  • the folding door system is in particular a previously described folding door system.
  • the method according to the invention comprises the following steps: First, a position of a folding door of the folding door system is recorded. This is done by the position sensor. In addition, the position of the folding wing door is detected during a movement of the folding wing door, in particular during a closing of the folding wing door. The movement of the folding door is stopped and / or reversed if an obstacle is detected by an obstacle sensor of the folding door system within a sensor field of the obstacle sensor and the position of the folding door is simultaneously within a predefined activation range.
  • the position of the folding wing door preferably corresponds to the position of the main closing edge or the movable end of the folding wing door relative to the guide rail.
  • the main closing edge or the movable end of the folding door is that end of the folding door which is movable along the guide rail for moving the folding door between the closed position and the open position.
  • the sensor signal of the obstacle sensor is only observed when the door is within the activation area.
  • the activation area ensures that the folding wing door does not protrude into the sensor area of the obstacle sensor when the folding wing door lies within the activation area. A false detection of the folding door as an obstacle is therefore excluded.
  • the aforementioned method is advantageously carried out in such a way that the movement of the folding door is continued when an obstacle within the sensor field of the obstacle sensor is detected by the obstacle sensor of the folding door system and the position of the folding door lies outside the predefined activation range.
  • the obstacle sensor would thus output a false obstacle signal, since the obstacle sensor incorrectly recognizes the folding door as an obstacle.
  • the obstacle sensor is therefore ignored if the position of the folding wing door lies outside the predefined activation range.
  • the invention relates to a method for actuating a folding door system.
  • the folding door system corresponds in particular to the folding door system described above.
  • the method comprises the following steps: First, a position of a folding door of the folding door system is recorded. This is done by the position sensor. In addition, the position of the folding wing door is detected during a movement of the folding wing door, in particular during a closing of the folding wing door. An obstacle sensor of the folding door system is then activated if the position of the folding door lies within a predefined activation range. In addition, the movement of the folding wing door is stopped and / or reversed when the obstacle sensor detects an obstacle within the sensor field of the obstacle.
  • the obstacle sensor is only activated if the door is within the activation area. Only in this case can the obstacle sensor work reliably, i. H. only in this case are obstacles that have been detected by the obstacle sensor actually considered as obstacles. An incorrect detection of the folding door as an obstacle is then excluded. In contrast to the previously described method, energy savings are possible because the obstacle sensor can be deactivated when it is not needed. By activating the obstacle sensor as soon as the folding door reaches the predefined activation area, it is nevertheless ensured that the folding door system is monitored.
  • the aforementioned method is preferably carried out in such a way that the obstacle sensor is deactivated when the position of the folding wing door lies outside the predefined activation range.
  • the energy consumption of the obstacle sensor is thus reduced since the obstacle sensor is deactivated when it cannot provide reliable values.
  • this ensures safe and reliable monitoring of the folding door system, on the other hand, the energy consumption that is necessary for monitoring is minimized.
  • control unit increases a power to be output to the drive unit linearly with increasing deviation.
  • the power to be output is, in particular, electrical power, the electrical voltage being particularly advantageously constant.
  • the electrical power can thus be set via the current that is delivered to the drive unit.
  • the control unit reduces the power to the maximum power within a predefined period.
  • a brief overload of the motor is possible in order to generate a necessary locking force, which is why there is no need to provide an oversized motor for the pure drive of the folding wing door.
  • the drive unit which comprises the motor, can be designed to be very compact.
  • the predefined time period is particularly preferably between 5 seconds and 25 seconds, in particular between 5 seconds and 15 seconds, particularly preferably 10 seconds. This is an ideal balance between applying the necessary locking force and avoiding damage to the drive unit. Through the selected periods, it is ensured in particular that a possible overload of the drive unit only has a short-term effect, so that damage is avoided.
  • the control unit detects a deviation over a predefined limit value within a predefined time window. If this is the case, the control unit increases the power by a predetermined increase value. If the predefined limit value is exceeded within the predefined time window, this is due to a strong gust of wind. In order to avoid repeated opening by several gusts of wind, which usually follow the first strong gust of wind, the power is increased by the specified increase value.
  • the specified increase value is, in particular, an increase in the current supplied by 500 mA with a constant electrical voltage.
  • the predefined time window is in particular a maximum of a throughput time of the described method by the control unit, and thus a clock frequency of the control unit. In particular, the predefined time window is a maximum of 10 milliseconds.
  • the predefined limit value is at least 20, in particular 43, pulses from the incremental encoder.
  • the control unit particularly preferably repeatedly reduces the power to be output after a predefined time grid by a predefined reduction value. This takes place in particular until the previously set increase value is balanced. In this way, a middle path is available, so that on the one hand the required locking force for holding the folding door in the closed position is given even in the event of repeated gusts of wind, on the other hand overloading or permanent loading of the drive unit is avoided.
  • the predefined time grid is in particular three minutes, the predefined reduction value being 100 mA. Thus, the current to be delivered to the drive unit is reduced by 100 mA every three minutes within 15 minutes, so that after these 15 minutes the previously used increase value is completely balanced.
  • the reduction value is particularly advantageously smaller than the increase value, the control unit reducing the output to be emitted by the reduction value until the increase by the increase value is canceled.
  • the obstacle sensor is an optical sensor.
  • the optical sensor has, in particular, a transmission frequency between 500 Hz and 5000 Hz, preferably between 750 Hz and 3500 Hz, in particular between 1000 Hz and 2500 Hz.
  • the optical sensor can be an active sensor or a passive sensor, the optical sensor in particular not visible area works.
  • the obstacle sensor preferably generates a sensor field, the projection of which is elliptical or rectangular on a floor surrounding the folding door system. It is provided that a dimension in the direction of a main axis of the projection is between 2 cm and 250 cm, preferably between 5 cm and 100 cm, particularly preferably between 10 cm and 50 cm. A dimension in the direction of the minor axis is preferably between 10% and 95%, preferably between 25% and 75%, particularly preferably between 40% and 60% of the dimension in the direction of the main axis.
  • the main axis is in particular oriented parallel to the passage plane, the secondary axis advantageously being oriented perpendicular to the main axis. In both cases, angular deviations of up to 10% are possible in both directions. In this way, reliable detection of obstacles is achieved, as a result of which contact between the folding door system and the obstacle, in particular the walker, can be avoided.
  • the activation region advantageously extends from a position of a movable end of the folding wing door in the completely closed position to a position of the movable end of the folding wing door in a predefined, partially closed position.
  • the predefined, partially closed position corresponds to a position in which the folding door remains just outside the sensor field described above, in particular the projection described above. If the folding wing door was opened further, it would move into the sensor field, in particular into the projection.
  • One advantage of this definition is a. that the folding door system can determine the predefined, partially closed position itself by opening the folding door from the fully closed position until the obstacle sensor detects the folding door. The fully closed position of the folding door system is particularly present when the folding door is fully unfolded.
  • a further activation area can also be defined in that it extends from the fully open position of the folding wing door to a predefined, partially opened position of the folding wing door.
  • the predefined, partially open position corresponds to the position in which the folding wing door just remains outside the sensor field, in particular the projection. If the folding wing door were opened further from this position, the folding wing door would move into the sensor field, in particular into the projection of the obstacle sensor.
  • the folding wing door remains outside the sensor field of the obstacle sensor during a movement between the predefined, partially closed position and the completely closed position. This prevents erroneous detection of the folding door as an obstacle.
  • the invention relates to a computer program product with a program code stored on machine-readable storage medium for carrying out the method described above when the computer program product runs on a computer.
  • Computer here means in particular the monitoring device or control unit described above.
  • a computer is to be understood as any computing device, in particular also a microcontroller.
  • the folding wing door has in particular a closing force of at most 170 N, preferably at most 165 N, in particular at most 150 N. This closing force is generated in particular by the drive unit. The closing force selected in this way ensures that the folding door system closes safely and reliably.
  • the obstacle sensor advantageously has a response time between 1 millisecond and 200 milliseconds, preferably between 10 milliseconds and 150 milliseconds, particularly preferably between 30 milliseconds and 120 milliseconds. This provides an optimal response time for the obstacle sensor so that an obstacle can be recognized in good time before contact is made with a wing of the folding door system. The contact between the folding door system and the walker, which is usually perceived as very unpleasant by the walker, is thus effectively avoided.
  • the sensor field lies outside a passage plane of the folding wing door.
  • the folding wing door performs a folding-in process or a folding-out process during the opening or closing, the folding-wing door in particular being retracted into the sensor field during the folding-in process or the folding-out process.
  • the monitoring unit advantageously has a clock rate between 10 Hz and 10 kHz, preferably between 20 Hz and 1000 Hz, particularly preferably between 50 Hz and 200 Hz. This means that the aforementioned Method steps are repeated with a clock rate between 10 Hz and 10 kHz, preferably between 20 Hz and 1000 Hz, particularly preferably between 50 Hz and 200 Hz.
  • a clock frequency ensures that the obstacle detection and a possibly necessary reversal of the door movement or a stopping of the door movement can take place sufficiently quickly, so that contact between the folding door and the obstacle is avoided.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic view of the folding wing door system 1 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the folding door system 1 comprises a first folding door 2 and a second folding door 3.
  • the first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3 each comprise a first leaf 24 and a second leaf 25 which are connected via a hinge system (cf. 2 to 4 ) are connected.
  • the first wing 24 has a first frame 10
  • the second wing 25 has a second frame 11.
  • the individual wings 24, 25 are constructed identically, so that in particular the first frame 10 is also identical to the second frame 11.
  • a filling element 22 is held by both the first frame 10 and the second frame 11, the filling element 22 being in particular a glass pane.
  • the folding wing door system 1 If the wing door system 1 is to be opened or closed, at least one of the folding wing doors 2, 3, ie either the first folding wing door 2 or the second folding wing door 3 or the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 together, is moved along a guide rail 8. The first wings 24 and second wings 25 are thus folded in relative to one another. Therefore, the folding wing door system 1 has a folding side, into which the first wing 24 and the second wing 25 move for folding.
  • the Fig. 2 shows a section through the first folding wing door 2 in a plan view.
  • the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 each have two vertical profile elements 12 and two horizontal profile elements 13.
  • the horizontal profile element 13 and the vertical profile element 12 are butted onto one another and screwed.
  • a counter element 49 is introduced in the horizontal profile element 13.
  • the counter element 49 lies directly on the vertical profile element 12 and is screwed to the vertical profile element 12 by means of two fastening screws 66.
  • the fastening screws 66 are supported on a fastening element 48 which is in the vertical Profile element 12 is arranged.
  • the vertical profile element 13 comprises two thermal separations 31 and two clamping elements 50, which are each arranged essentially perpendicular to one another.
  • the clamping element 50 serve to receive the filling element 22, while the thermal separations 31 thermally isolate the two clamping elements 50 from one another.
  • a first outer surface 32 of the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 is thermally separated from a second outer surface 33 of the first frame 10 and the second frame 11, in particular opposite the first outer surface.
  • the wing door system 1 also forms a thermal separation between those areas that are to be separated with the folding door system 1.
  • a chamber 51 is formed within the vertical profile element 12.
  • the fastening element 48 is attached within this chamber 51.
  • the fastening element 48 is a perforated plate which is fastened in fastening grooves 47 (cf. Fig. 3 ) is inserted.
  • a first hinge element 20 is inserted into the first frame 10, while a second hinge element 21 is inserted into the second frame 11.
  • the first frame 10, in particular the vertical profile element 12, has a groove 43 in the vertical direction.
  • the first hinge element 20 is inserted into this groove 43.
  • the second frame 11 also has a groove 43 into which the second hinge element 21 is inserted.
  • first hinge element 20 and the second hinge element 21 have a fastening web 44.
  • fastening web 44 the first hinge element 20 is inserted into the groove 43 of the first frame 10 and the second hinge element 21 is inserted into the groove 43 of the second frame 11.
  • Both the fastening web 44 and the groove 43 have an undercut 55, so that the first hinge element 20 is arranged in all directions except for the vertical in the groove 43. The same applies to the second hinge element 21.
  • both the first hinge element 20 and the second hinge element 21 have a strip web 45.
  • the strip web 45 is attached, in particular opposite the undercut 55, to the first hinge element 20 and to the second hinge element 21.
  • In the strip web 45 there is a threaded bore 46 into which a grub screw can be screwed.
  • the strip web 45 can thus be pressed away from the first frame 10 by screwing the grub screw into the threaded bore 46, as a result of which the groove 43 is pressed against the fastening web 44 at the same time.
  • the first hinge element 20 can be pressed onto the first frame 10, in particular the vertical profile element 12, via the undercut 55.
  • the pressure creates a frictional connection, which also includes the vertical direction acts.
  • a frictional connection which also includes the vertical direction acts.
  • the first hinge element 20 and the second hinge element 21 have the advantage that they are only attached to an outer region of the first frame 10 and the second frame 11. It is thus avoided in particular that a cold bridge along the thermal separations 31 is introduced into the vertical profile elements 13 by fastening the hinge elements 20, 21. This ensures safe and reliable thermal separation. At the same time, a secure and rigid connection of the first hinge element 20 to the first frame 10 and the second hinge element 21 to the second frame 11 is made possible. This leads to a very stable folding wing door 2, 3, which is why a lowering of the wing 24, 25 is very small even with large opening widths.
  • first hinge element 20 In order to connect a first hinge element 20 to a second hinge element 21, the first hinge element 20 has a first sleeve-shaped area 52, while the second hinge element 21 has a second sleeve-shaped area 53.
  • the connection of the first sleeve-shaped area 52 to the second sleeve-shaped area 53 is in particular in FIG Fig. 4 shown.
  • a door pin 54 is mounted on the inner surface 56 of the first sleeve-shaped area 52 and the second sleeve-shaped area 53, in particular via one bearing each.
  • the inner surface 56 of the sleeve-shaped regions 52, 53 have the shape of a hollow splined shaft, as a result of which the bearing of the door bolt 54 is fixed in a rotationally fixed manner in the first sleeve-shaped region 52 and the second sleeve-shaped region 53.
  • low-friction yet stable storage takes place, as a result of which play in the connection between the first hinge element 20 and the second hinge element 21 is minimized.
  • the folding wing doors 2, 3 are lowered by a maximum of 4 mm between an open and a closed position during the process.
  • each first sleeve-shaped area 52 can be connected to two second sleeve-shaped areas 53, likewise every second sleeve-shaped area 53 can be connected to two first sleeve-shaped areas 52.
  • the folding wing door 2, 3 can thus be assembled very flexibly from the first wing 24 and the second wing 25. Due to the number of first hinge elements 20 and second hinge elements 21, a stiffness of the mounting of the first wing 24 and the second wing 25 against one another can thus be set.
  • the Fig. 5 shows a drive of the folding door system 1.
  • a drive unit 4 which is in particular a DC electric motor.
  • the drive unit 4 is connected to a transmission 5 which drives a conversion device 6.
  • the converting device 6 is in particular a disk or comprises two lever arms, a linkage 7 being attached to outer regions of the disk or the lever arms. In particular, a separate linkage 7 is provided for each folding wing door 2, 3.
  • the conversion device 6 converts a rotation of the gear 5 into a translation of the linkage 7.
  • the drive unit 4 is controlled accordingly, as a result of which it applies a torque to the transmission 5.
  • the torque is applied to the conversion device 6 via the transmission 5, in which the torque is converted into a tensile force within the linkage 7.
  • a control unit 19 is provided to control the drive unit 4.
  • the folding wing door system 1 has a monitoring device 23 with which a movement of the folding wing doors 2, 3 can be monitored. This is discussed below with reference to the 10 to 15 described.
  • each folding wing door 2, 3 has a carriage 9.
  • An exploded view of the carriage 9 is shown in FIG Fig. 6 shown.
  • the carriage 9 comprises a base body 26 which has a multiplicity of bores.
  • Four vertical rollers 15 can be introduced into four of these bores, the vertical rollers 15 having an axis 65 which is non-positively fastened within the bores of the base body 26.
  • a roller body 16 is mounted on the axis 65 via a bearing 30, in particular via a closed ball bearing.
  • the roller body 16 has a roller surface 17 which runs on a running surface 18 of the guide rail 8.
  • the vertical rollers 15 in particular have a diameter of 100 mm.
  • the base body 26 also has a through opening 29 through which a bolt 27 is guided.
  • a horizontal roller 14 is mounted on the bolt 27.
  • the horizontal roller 14 is in particular directly, that is, without an additional bearing, mounted on the bolt 27. It is also provided that the horizontal roller 14 has a larger diameter than the vertical rollers 15. Finally, it is provided that the horizontal roller 14 has a spherical tread. The horizontal roller 14 serves to guide the carriage 9 laterally within the guide rail 8.
  • a suspension 28 for the folding wing door 2, 3 is fastened to the bolt 27.
  • the suspension 28 is screwed onto a thread of the bolt 27.
  • the folding wing door system 1 can be adapted to a variety of environmental conditions.
  • a sealing element 34 is provided for this.
  • the sealing element 34 is shown schematically in FIG Fig. 8 shown.
  • the sealing effect of the sealing element 34 is in Fig. 9 shown.
  • the sealing element 34 comprises a plate-shaped base area 35 and a first tubular sealing area 36 and a second tubular sealing area 41.
  • a wall thickness of the tubular sealing area 41 is between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm, in particular 1.0 mm.
  • a wall thickness of the base region 35 is between 0.5 mm and 2.0 mm, in particular between 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm.
  • Both the first sealing area 36 and the second sealing area 41 are arranged on the same side of the base area 35 and are in particular aligned symmetrically to one another.
  • two undercut elements 42 are arranged with which the sealing element 34 can be attached to the vertical profile elements 13 of the first frame 10 and the second frame 11. It is also provided that both the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 are covered by the base region 35 of the sealing element 34.
  • the sealing element 34 thus fulfills a first sealing effect by sealing the vertical profile elements 13.
  • a second sealing effect is brought about by the fact that the first sealing area 36 and the second sealing area 41 of a sealing element 34 are in contact with the base area 35 of another sealing element 34.
  • the first sealing area 36 and the second sealing area 41 of a sealing element 34 which is located on a movable end 38 of the first folding wing door 2 is arranged, in a closed state of the folding wing door system 1 bears against the base region 35 of the sealing element 34, that is attached to the movable end 38 of the second folding wing door 3.
  • the first sealing area 36 and the second sealing area 41 are deformed by contacting the base area 35 of another sealing element 34, so that a contact pressure is exerted by the sealing element 34 itself. This ensures high tightness.
  • the first sealing area 36 and the second sealing area 41 each have a first leg 39 and a second leg 41.
  • the first leg 39 is attached to the base region 35, while the second leg 40 is attached to the first leg 39.
  • the first leg 39 is angled relative to the base region 35. The bend is designed such that the first leg 39 of the first sealing area 36 points in the direction of the second sealing area 41.
  • the first leg 39 of the second sealing area 41 points in the direction of the first sealing area 36.
  • the second leg 40 of the first sealing area 36 faces away from the second sealing area 41, and the second leg 40 of the second sealing area 41 also faces the first Sealing area 36 away.
  • a first angle between the first leg 39 and the second leg 40 is preferably between 120 ° and 150 °, particularly preferably 135 °.
  • a second angle el between the first leg 39 and the base region 35 is between 55 ° and 80 °, in particular 68 °.
  • the folding door system 1 is located in the Fig. 9 shown state in a closed position so that the sealing elements 34 attached to the movable ends 38 of the first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3 abut each other.
  • no deformation of the sealing elements 34 is shown, but it is shown schematically how far the first sealing regions 36 and the second sealing regions 41 would penetrate into the respectively opposite base regions 35 if these were not deformed. So it's over Fig. 9 It can be seen that in order to close the folding wing doors 2, 3, a considerable deformation of the sealing elements 34 is necessary, so that the first sealing areas 36 and the second sealing areas 41 generate a high restoring force. This ensures that the sealing elements 34 are pressed firmly against one another.
  • the sealing element 34 is used to adapt to the kinematics of the folding door system 1. It is necessary with folding door systems that the movable ends 37 of the folding wing doors 2, 3 are first moved towards one another during a closing operation, the movable ends 38 of the folding wing doors 2, 3 being separated from one another by a small amount in a last movement step. If this is done with conventional seals, the conventional seal has to be strongly compressed, which results in an increased driving force of the drive unit 4. In contrast to this, the first sealing areas 36 and the second sealing areas 41 have simple deformability, as a result of which low driving forces act within the drive unit 4. Thus, on the one hand the drive unit 4 is protected, on the other hand there is no risk of an erroneous error message due to excessive drive forces.
  • a folding wing door system 1 is shown schematically, the folding wing doors 2 being in different positions. So is in Fig. 10 the folding door system 1 fully opened, in Fig. 11 completely closed and in Fig. 12 partially open.
  • the folding door system 1 has an obstacle sensor 57 which generates a sensor field 59.
  • the obstacle sensor 57 can thus detect whether there is an obstacle, in particular a person, within the sensor field 59.
  • the obstacle sensor 57 is in particular an optical sensor.
  • a projection 58 of the sensor field 59 results as an ellipse.
  • first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3 are moved along the guide rail 8 in the direction of the fixed ends 37 of the first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3.
  • the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 are fastened to a wall and / or to a floor, wherein rotation is made possible.
  • the folding wing doors 2, 3 fold in in the direction of the first area 60. This means that the first wings 24 and the second wings 25 of the folding wing doors 2, 3 are always within the first area 60, but never within the second area 61.
  • Fig. 12 One problem with this movement is in Fig. 12 shown. It can be seen here that the folding wing doors 2, 3 bear directly on the sensor field 59, in particular on the projection 58 of the sensor field 59 of the obstacle sensor 57.
  • the projection 58 thus has a first entrance area 63, into which the first folding wing door 2 enters during an opening process or a closing process, while the second folding wing door 3 enters a second entry area 64 of the projection 58.
  • the monitoring device 23 is set up, which is shown in FIG Fig. 16 or 17 execute the schedules shown. In the Fig. 16 and 17 Flowcharts shown are below with reference to the 13 to 15 explained.
  • the 13 to 15 show a plan view of a schematic folding door system 1 according to the embodiment of the invention.
  • the folding door system 1 is partially closed, the first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3 remaining outside the sensor field 59, in particular outside the projection 58 of the sensor field 59.
  • Fig. 5 it can be seen that the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 remain in a completely closed position outside the projection 58.
  • Fig. 14 shows a state in which the first folding wing door 2 is in direct contact with the first entry area 63 and the second folding door 3 is in direct contact with the second entry area 64. If the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 perform a closing movement, then they have just left the sensor field 59. In this state, the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 are located within an activation area 62.
  • the activation area 62 corresponds to a predefined width of the guide rail 8 along the direction of travel of the folding wing doors 2, 3, this width being symmetrical about a center point between the first folding wing doors 2 and 3 second folding door 3 is arranged.
  • the position of the first folding wing door 2 and the second Folding wing door 3 is thus defined in particular by the position of the movable ends 38 on the guide rail 8. Should the movable ends 38 and thus the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 lie within the activation area 62, then the first folding wing door 2 is located outside the first entry area 63 and the second folding wing door 3 is located outside the second entry area 64.
  • the obstacle sensor 57 is active at all times.
  • the process begins with an initial step S00. It is then determined in a first step whether the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 perform a closing movement. This can be determined in particular using a position sensor, not shown.
  • the position sensor is in particular an incremental encoder, which is arranged on the axis of rotation of the drive unit 4.
  • the position sensor can be used to determine the position of the first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3, and on the other hand it can also be determined whether the first folding door 2 and the second folding door 3 are currently in a closing movement.
  • the second step S02 is carried out. Here it is queried whether an object within the sensor field 59, in particular the projection 58, has been detected with the obstacle sensor 57. If this is the case, the process continues with the third step S03. If this is not the case, however, the process comes to a final termination step S05.
  • a query is made as to whether the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 are located within the activation region 62. If this is the case, the closing movement of the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 is stopped or reversed in a fourth step S04. Since the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 are located within the activation region 62, a detection of the first wing 24 or the second wing 25 of the first folding wing door 2 or the second folding wing door 3 is within the projection 58 and thus an incorrect detection of a nonexistent one Obstacle excluded. A detected obstacle must therefore be an external obstacle, for example an inspector of the folding door system 1. Stopping and / or reversing is therefore necessary. The final termination step S05 is then carried out.
  • the obstacle sensor 57 is permanently activated, and signals from the obstacle sensor are not used at all times.
  • the signals from the obstacle sensor are only observed when the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 are located within the activation region 62. Therefore in Fig. 17 a more energy-saving variant of the process is shown.
  • an initial step S10 begins the process.
  • a first step S11 it is determined whether the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 perform a closing movement. If this is the case, it is determined in a second step S12 whether the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 are located within the activation region 62. If this is not the case, the obstacle sensor 57 is deactivated in a third step S13 and the process continues with the first step S11.
  • the folding door system 1 is in a position in which the signal from the obstacle sensor 57 is not reliable, since in this position it is possible for the first folding door 2 or the second folding door 3 to be incorrectly detected as an obstacle. Since the obstacle sensor 57 does not provide reliable data, it is sensible to deactivate the obstacle sensor 57 in order to be able to save energy.
  • the obstacle sensor 57 is activated in a fourth step S14. It is then checked in a fifth step S15 whether the obstacle sensor 57 has detected an obstacle. If this is not the case, the process continues with the second step S12 in a sixth step S16. If, on the other hand, an obstacle is detected, the closing movement of the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 is stopped and / or reversed in a seventh step S17. Again, in this case, it can be assumed that the detected obstacle is an external obstacle, for example an inspector of the folding door system 1, which is why a stop and / or reversing is necessary. The process is then ended with a final termination step S18.
  • the obstacle monitoring makes it possible to implement a closing movement of the folding door system 1 not only by monitoring the power consumption of the drive unit 4. In this case, an obstacle would have to come into contact with the closing folding door system 1, so that the obstacle can be detected. However, especially people find contact with the closing folding door system 1 very uncomfortable, which is why this should be avoided if possible.
  • the sensor field 59 in particular also the projection 58, must be arranged outside a passage plane of the folding wing door system 1, the problem that the obstacle sensor 57 incorrectly identifies the first wing 24 or the second wing 25 of the folding wing doors 2, 3 as always has to be expected Recognizes obstacle.
  • obstacle monitoring by means of obstacle sensor 57 would only be possible with a very precise adjustment of the projection 58 of the sensor field 59.
  • the sensor field 59 would have to be aligned in such a way that retracting the folding wing doors 2, 3 is safely and reliably avoided. This complex setting of the obstacle sensor is avoided by the above-mentioned processes.
  • the Fig. 18 shows a flow chart of a wind load control, which is executed in particular by the control unit 19 of the folding door system 1.
  • a wind load regulation has the sense that the folding wing doors 2, 3 remain in the closed position even in the presence of strong gusts of wind and are not pushed open by the wind.
  • the in Figure 18 shown flowchart in the control unit is run every ten milliseconds.
  • the folding door system 1 is in the closed position. If the position sensor now recognizes that the folding wing doors 2, 3 are not in the closed position, this must have been caused by a gust of wind. Alternatively, this can also be done by a manually applied force on the folding door system 1. In both cases, however, it is undesirable for the folding wing doors 2, 3 to open.
  • the wind load control is thus implemented in such a way that it tries to minimize a deviation of the door position of the folding wing doors 2, 3 from the target position, that is to say from the closed position.
  • the position sensor is used to determine the door position.
  • the position sensor is in particular an incremental encoder which is arranged on a motor shaft of the drive unit 4.
  • the incremental encoder has a resolution between 3,000 and 35,000, preferably between 5,000 and 30,000, particularly preferably between 7,500 and 2,000, pulses per travel path between the open position and the closed position of the folding door system 1. With Such a resolution ensures that the positions of the first folding wing door 2 and the second folding wing door 3 can be reliably detected.
  • the wind load regulation as in Figure 18 essentially comprises three control complexes, which are initialized by a first step S21, a fourth step S24 and a sixth step S26.
  • These rule complexes have different tasks, which are described in detail below:
  • the first step S21 asks whether the folding door system 1 has opened by more than a predefined limit value within a predefined period of time.
  • the predefined time period is in particular the throughput time, thus preferably ten milliseconds.
  • the predefined limit value is advantageously 20, particularly advantageously 43, pulses of the incremental encoder. If such an opening is recognized, the process continues with the second step S22.
  • the power is an electrical power, the electrical voltage preferably being constant.
  • the power is thus regulated via the current. It is therefore particularly preferably provided that the current delivered to the drive unit 4 is increased in the second step S22.
  • the increase is advantageously 500 mA.
  • the drive unit 4 With the increased current, the drive unit 4 generates an increased closing force, which acts on the first folding wing door 2 and on the second folding wing door 3.
  • This closing force on the one hand causes a locking force when the folding door system 1 is in the fully closed position, on the other hand the closing force causes the doors 24, 25 of the folding door system 1 opened by gusts of wind to close.
  • a time counter is finally started, which is in particular 15 minutes.
  • the first control complex which is initiated by the first step S21, ensures that the repeated folding gates 1 are not opened again in the event of repeated gusts. It is thus determined in the first step S21 whether there is a strong gust of wind, since only a strong gust of wind enables the large opening within the short time. If a strong gust of wind is detected, it can be assumed that this strong gust of wind is followed by further gusts of wind, which mostly have the same strength as the initially detected gust of wind. Thus, by increasing the current that is delivered to the drive unit 4, the folding wing door system 1 can remain in a closed position, even if subsequent gusts of wind act on the folding wing doors 2, 3. Starting the counter in the third step S23 enables the current increased in the second step S22 to be gradually reduced. This reduction is the subject of the second control complex, which is initiated with the fourth step S24.
  • the fourth step S24 asks whether the time counter has been started. If this is the case, the fifth step S25 is carried out at regular intervals. The regular intervals are in particular every three minutes. In the fifth step S25, the current increased in the second step S22 is finally reduced, in particular by 100 mA in each case. The process then continues with the sixth step S26. This is preferably repeated five times, so that after 15 minutes that the time counter is running, the increased current is reduced five times by 100 mA. After the 15 minutes have elapsed, the current increased in the second step S22 is completely reduced again. In this way, overloading of the drive unit 4 is avoided in particular.
  • the third control complex is initiated with the sixth step S26.
  • the sixth step S26 it is determined whether the folding wing doors 2, 3 have a deviation from the fully closed position. As already described, such a deviation is generated in particular by a wind load or by a manual force on the leaves 24, 25 of the folding door system 1. Since the folding door system 1 is to remain in the fully closed position, such a deviation is undesirable.
  • the process continues with the seventh step S27.
  • the current that is output to the drive unit 4 is increased.
  • the increase is particularly linear to the deflection of the folding doors 2, 3 from the fully closed position.
  • a p-controller is thus implemented.
  • the regulation in the seventh step S27 can cause a power output to the drive unit 4 to exceed a nominal power of the drive unit 4.
  • the current delivered then exceeds a predetermined maximum nominal current. This is checked in an eighth step S28. If the maximum rated current is exceeded, the process continues with the ninth step S29. If, on the other hand, there is no exceedance, the process is ended with the termination step S30.
  • the current applied to the drive unit in the seventh step S27 is reduced to the maximum rated current. This takes place in particular within a predetermined period of time, which is advantageously ten seconds.
  • the brief overloading of the drive unit ensures that the folding wing door system 1 remains in the closed position even when there are strong wind gusts.
  • a filigree folding door system 1 can be realized, which nevertheless has a sufficiently powerful wind load control so that the folding door system 1 remains in the closed position even when strong gusts of wind occur.
  • the Fig. 19 finally shows traversing curves of the folding wing door system 1 during opening and closing of the folding wing doors 2, 3.
  • the upper diagram shows a speed profile
  • the lower diagram shows a profile of the acceleration.
  • a position of the folding wing doors 2, 3 is shown on the abscissa axis, that is, a position of the movable end 38 on the running rail 8. This means that the folding wing door system 1 is completely closed at a left limit value, while the folding wing door system 1 is closed at one right limit on the axis of abscissa is fully open.
  • the coordinate axes of the diagrams show a speed in the upper diagram and an acceleration of the folding wing doors 2, 3 in the lower diagram.
  • the folding doors 2, 3 behave according to the upper curve of the diagrams. However, if the folding wing door system 1 is closed, the folding wing doors 2, 3 behave according to the lower curves of the diagrams.
  • the shown profiles of speed and acceleration allow the folding door to be opened quickly, while at the same time vibrations within the folding door system 1 can be avoided when opening and closing. Due to the reduction in vibrations, a lowering of the leaves 24, 25 of the folding door system 1 is minimized, which is why they can be at a short distance from a floor. Thermal insulation is thus increased. At the same time, the reduction of vibrations and the resulting minimal lowering of the folding wing doors 2, 3 allow a large opening width to be realized. In particular, this enables a maximum opening width of 2,400 millimeters. This means that when using four wings 24, 25 as shown in Figure 1 was shown, each wing has a width of 60 millimeters.
  • the leaves 24, 25 are braked within the last quarter or within the last third of the travel path of the folding wing doors 2, 3.
  • a negative acceleration is applied to the folding wing doors 2, 3, the maximum negative acceleration being in particular 50 percent higher than is the maximum positive acceleration of the folding wing doors 2, 3.
  • the rapid braking of the wings 24, 25 thus allows the end stop to be reached gently in the open position.
  • the maximum closing speed of the folding doors 2, 3 is a maximum of half the maximum opening speed of the folding doors 2, 3. This particularly enables monitoring of the closing process, since the reduced speed when closing the folding door system 1 monitors the closing movement allowed. Therefore, when an obstacle is detected within the travel path of the folding wing doors 2, 3, the folding wing door system 1 can stop and / or reverse the wings 24, 25, which enables the folding wing door system 1 to be operated very safely.
  • a vertical profile element 12 of the first frame 10 or the second frame 11 in the focus a first main moment of inertia between 30,000 mm 4 and 60,000 mm 4 , preferably from 48,470 mm 4 .
  • a second main moment of inertia is between 60,000 mm 4 and 80,000 mm 4 , preferably 73,570 mm 4 .
  • a polar moment of inertia is between 120,000 mm 4 and 130,000 mm 4 , preferably 122,041 mm 4 .
  • the vertical profile element 12 of the first frame 10 or the second frame 11 has a first main moment of inertia between 20,000 mm 4 and 40,000 mm 4 , preferably of 31,934 mm 4 , in the center of gravity on.
  • a second main moment of inertia is between 50,000 mm 4 and 80,000 mm 4 , preferably 65,389 mm 4 .
  • a polar moment of inertia is between 85,000 mm 4 and 110,000 mm 4 , preferably 97,324 mm 4 .
  • a horizontal profile element 13 of the first frame 10 or of the second frame 11 has a first main moment of inertia between 85,000 mm 4 and 120,000 mm 4 , preferably of 102,266 mm 4 , in the center of gravity.
  • a second main moment of inertia is between 85,000 mm 4 and 120,000 mm 4 , preferably 103,497 mm 4 .
  • a polar moment of inertia is between 150,000 mm 4 and 250,000 mm 4 , preferably 205,763 mm 4 .
  • the guide rail is made of a material with a modulus of elasticity at 20 ° C. between 60 MPa and 80 MPa, preferably 70 MPa.
  • the modulus of elasticity is determined in accordance with EN ISO 6892-1: 2009.
  • a shear modulus of the material of the guide rail 8, which can be determined in particular in accordance with DIN 53445, is between 20 MPa and 40 MPa, preferably 27 MPa, at 20 ° C.
  • a very rigid frame 10, 11 is present around the filling element 22, so that a lowering of the first leaf 24 or the second leaf 25 and thus in the first folding leaf door 2 or the second folding leaf door 3 is minimized.
  • a maximum opening width of 2,400 millimeters can be realized, with a maximum lowering of the folding wing doors 2, 3 over the entire travel path between the closed position and the open position being a maximum of four millimeters.
  • This allows a sufficiently high gap seal between a lower edge of the folding wing doors 2, 3 and a floor receiving the folding wing door system 1.
  • the folding door system 1 is still very quiet to operate. This is achieved in that the transmission and emission of structure-borne noise in the individual components of the folding door system 2 is minimized.
  • the roller body 16 of the rollers 14, 15 has a modulus of elasticity at 20 ° C. between 2,700 MPa and 3,100 MPa, preferably 2,900 MPa.
  • the roll body 16 at 20 ° C has a density between 1.10 g / cm 3 and 1.70 g / cm 3 , preferably 1.42 g / cm 3 .
  • the modulus of elasticity is determined in accordance with ISO 527.
  • the density is determined in accordance with ISO 1183.
  • the running surface 18 of the guide rail 8 has a modulus of elasticity at 20 ° C. between 60 MPa and 80 MPa, preferably of 70 MPa. Furthermore, the tread 18 at 20 ° C has a shear modulus between 10 MPa and 40 MPa, preferably of 27 MPa. A density in the tread 18 at 20 ° C. is finally between 3 g / cm 3 and 5 g / cm 3 , preferably 2 g / cm 3 .
  • the elastic modulus is determined here in accordance with EN ISO 6892-1: 2009. The shear modulus is determined according to DIN 53445, the density in turn according to ISO 1183.
  • the base body 26 of the carriage 9 has a modulus of elasticity at 20 ° C. between 2,500 MPa and 2,900 MPa, preferably of 2,700 MPa.
  • a shear modulus of the base body 26 at 20 ° C. is between 600 MPa and 900 MPa, preferably 750 MPa.
  • the density of the base body 26 at 20 ° C. is finally between 1.10 g / cm 3 and 1.70 g / cm 3 , preferably 1.39 g / cm 3 .
  • the modulus of elasticity is again determined in accordance with ISO 527, the shear modulus according to DIN ISO 1827: 2010-07.
  • the density is again determined in accordance with ISO 1183. This means that there is also poor structure-borne sound propagation within the base body 26 and thus within the entire carriage 9, as a result of which the noise emissions are also minimized here.
  • the roller surfaces 17 of the rollers 14, 15 have a surface roughness Rz between 5.0 ⁇ m and 7.0 ⁇ m, preferably of 3.0 ⁇ m.
  • the entire roller body 16 has such a surface roughness.
  • the surface hardness according to the Rockwell scale is M 92.
  • the tread 18 preferably has a groove, the groove being oriented parallel to a direction of displacement of the carriage 19. Grooving is to be understood as a regular, wavy pattern on the surface of the tread 18.
  • the scoring has a surface roughness Ra measured in the longitudinal direction of 0.05 to 1.0, preferably of 0.5. Thus, low noise emission due to low energy loss is also realized on the part of the tread 18.
  • a static surface pressure between a roller surface 17 of the rollers 14, 15 and the running surface 18 is between 8 N / mm 2 and 12 N / mm 2 , preferably 10 N / mm 2 .
  • the travel speed of the carriage 9 with respect to the guide rail 8 is between 10 cm / s and 100 cm / s, preferably between 10 cm / s and 75 cm / s, particularly preferably between 10 cm / s and 50 cm / s. Since the friction is fundamentally dependent on the speed, these values can be used to minimize friction and thus energy loss and thus noise emissions. This in turn ensures that the folding door system 1 operates very quietly.
  • the base body 26 of the carriage 9 is of very solid and compact construction, as a result of which noise is avoided.
  • the length of the base body 26 is between 40 mm and 80 mm, preferably 60 mm.
  • a width of the base body 26 is between 15 mm and 20 mm, preferably 18 mm.
  • the height of the base body 26 is between 10 mm and 15 mm, preferably 13 mm.
  • the vertical rollers 15 attached to the base body 26 have a radius between 75 mm and 125 mm, preferably of 100 mm.
  • the connection between the vertical roller 15 and the base body 26 takes place via an axis 65.
  • the axis 65 has a modulus of elasticity at 20 ° C. between 150 MPa and 250 MPa, preferably of 200 MPa.
  • a shear modulus at 20 ° C of axis 65 is between 70 MPa and 90 MPa, preferably 81 MPa.
  • the density of the axis 65 at 20 ° C. is between 5.0 g / cm 3 and 10.0 g / cm 3 , preferably 7.9 g / cm 3 .
  • the modulus of elasticity is determined according to EN ISO 689-1: 2009, the shear modulus according to DIN 53445 and the density according to ISO 1183.
  • the flattening of the rollers 14, 15 leads to the generation of noise due to long idle times.
  • the flattening of the rollers 14, 15, in particular the vertical rollers 15, after a period of eight hours on a flat surface and loading with a test load of 200 N is a maximum of 0.20 mm, preferably a maximum of 0.12 mm. This slight flattening ensures that the rollers 14, 15 do not run out of round when the folding wing door 1 has a long service life.
  • a water absorption of the roller body 16 after immersion in water of 23 degrees is between 0.1 and 0.5, preferably 0.3.
  • a water absorption of the roller body 16 after storage at 50 percent relative air humidity is between 1.2 and 1.6, preferably 1.4.
  • the water absorption is determined according to ISO 62. Method 1 (immersion in water at 23 degrees) and method 4 (storage at 50 percent relative air humidity) are used in particular. These values ensure that an increase in volume of the rollers 14, 15 does not lead to a non-circular running and thus to noise when water is absorbed.
  • the folding wing doors 2, 3 have a maximum heat transfer coefficient U D of 3.0 W / (m 2 K).
  • the maximum heat transfer coefficient U D is a maximum of 1.7 W / (m 2 K).
  • the frame 10, 11 of the folding wing doors 2, 3 is in particular made of a material that has a heat transfer coefficient U D between 2.0 W / (m 2 K) and 4.0 W / (m 2 K).
  • the filling element 22 of the folding wing doors 2, 3 comprises a material with a heat transfer coefficient U D between 0.5 W / (m 2 K) and 1.5 W / (m 2 K), preferably of 1.0 W / (m 2 K) ). With these values, the aforementioned low heat transfer through the folding wing door system 1 is made possible.
  • both the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 in the vertical profile elements 12 have thermal separations 31.
  • the thermal separations 31 are, in particular, insulation webs, the thermal separations 31 made of a material with a thermal conductivity coefficient between 0.1 W / (m 2 K) and 0.3 W / (m 2 K), preferably of 0.2 W / ( m 2 K).
  • a modulus of elasticity of the thermal separation 31 is between 400 MPa and 3,000 MPa at 20 ° C., the modulus of elasticity being measured in particular in accordance with DIN 53457.
  • the thermal separation 31 is a material with a coefficient of linear expansion between 0.10 mm / (m K) and 0.25 mm / (m K), preferably between 0.15 mm / (m K) and 0.20 mm / (m K). Sufficient thermal insulation is thus ensured by the thermal separation 31, as a result of which the heat transport through the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 is minimized.
  • the filling element 22 comprises a material with a thermal conductivity coefficient between 0.60 W / (m 2 K) and 0.90 W / (m 2 K), preferably of 0.76 W / (m 2 K).
  • a modulus of elasticity of the filling element 22 at 20 ° C. is between 50 GPa and 90 GPa, preferably 70 GPa.
  • the filling element 22 comprises a material with a coefficient of linear expansion of 0.01 mm / (m K). The heat transport through the filling element 22 is thus also minimized.
  • the filling element 22 is connected to the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 via an adhesive.
  • the adhesive has a tensile strength between 1.0 N / mm 2 and 2.5 N / mm 2 , preferably 1.8 N / mm 2 .
  • the tensile strength can be determined in particular according to ISO 527.
  • the folding wing door system 1 has seals in the form of brushes. These brushes seal the gap between folding door 2, 3 and floor or guide rail 8.
  • the seals in the form of brushes have a trim that has a bristle length between 12 mm and 20 mm, preferably 15.9 mm.
  • a base body of the brushes comprises a round base body, which in particular has a diameter between 2.0 mm and 4.0 mm, preferably of 2.9 mm. In this way, a safe and sufficient sealing of a gap between folding door 2, 3 and floor or guide rail 8 is made possible. Heat transport through this gap is therefore almost prevented.
  • a thermal bridge surcharge between the filling element 22 and the first frame 10 or the second frame 11 is between 0.050 W / (m 2 K) and 0.060 W / (m 2 K), preferably 0.056 W / (m 2 K).
  • a thermal bridge surcharge between the first frame 10 and the second frame 11 and a wall receiving the frame is between 0.050 W / (m 2 K) and 0.060 W / (m 2 K), preferably 0.056 W / (m 2 K).

Landscapes

  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)

Claims (13)

  1. Installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1), comportant
    - au moins une porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3), et
    - au moins une unité d'entraînement (4) pour déplacer la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) entre un emplacement fermé et un emplacement ouvert,
    - une unité de commande (23) pour asservir l'unité d'entraînement (4),
    - au moins un capteur de position pour déterminer la position de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3),
    - au moins un capteur d'obstacle (57) pour détecter des obstacles dans une région de déplacement de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3), et
    - une unité de surveillance (23), dans laquelle l'unité de surveillance (23) est adaptée à recevoir des signaux du capteur de position et/ou du capteur d'obstacle (57),
    - dans laquelle le capteur de position est un codeur incrémental, lequel tout particulièrement est agencé sur un arbre de moteur de l'unité d'entraînement (4), dans laquelle le codeur incrémental fonctionne à une résolution entre 3000 et 35000, de préférence entre 5000 et 30000, tout particulièrement préféré entre 7500 et 20000, impulsions par chemin de déplacement entre l'emplacement ouvert et l'emplacement fermé,
    - caractérisée en ce qu'une région d'activation (62) du capteur d'obstacle (57) s'étend d'une position d'une extrémité mobile (38) de la porte à vantaux (2, 3) en l'emplacement complètement fermé jusqu'à une position de l'extrémité mobile (38) de la porte à vantaux (2, 3) en l'emplacement partiellement fermé prédéfini,
    - dans laquelle, pendant un mouvement entre l'emplacement partiellement fermé prédéfini et l'emplacement complètement fermé, la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) reste en-dehors du champs de capteur (59) du capteur d'obstacle (57),
    - dans laquelle l'unité de surveillance (23) désactive le capteur d'obstacle (57) ou ne tient pas compte du signal du capteur d'obstacle (57) si la position de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) se situe en-dehors de la région d'activation (62) prédéfinie.
  2. Installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que l'unité de commande (23) est adaptée
    - à détecter une déviation, causée potentiellement par l'influence de vent, de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) de l'emplacement fermé, et
    - à asservir l'unité de commande (4) de telle façon que l'unité d'entraînement (4) avec une déviation croissante applique une force croissante sur la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) en direction de l'emplacement fermé.
  3. Méthode pour actionner une installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1), selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisée par les étapes :
    - détecter une position d'une porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) de l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) par un capteur de position pendant un mouvement, tout particulièrement pendant une fermeture de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3),
    - arrêter et/ou renverser le mouvement de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3), lorsque
    - un capteur d'obstacle (57) de l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) détecte un obstacle à l'intérieur du champs de capteur (59) du capteur d'obstacle (57), et
    - la position de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) se situe à l'intérieur d'une région d'activation (62) prédéfinie.
  4. Méthode pour actionner une installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) selon la revendication 3, caractérisée par les étapes supplémentaires :
    - détecter une déviation, causée potentiellement par l'influence de vent, d'une porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) de l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) d'un emplacement fermé, et
    - développer, lors d'une déviation croissante, une force croissante sur la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) en direction de l'emplacement fermé par une unité d'entraînement (4) pour déplacer la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) entre l'emplacement fermé et un emplacement ouvert.
  5. Méthode selon la revendication 4, caractérisée par l'étape :
    - continuer le mouvement de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3), lorsque
    - le capteur d'obstacle (57) de l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) détecte un obstacle à l'intérieur du champs de capteur (59) du capteur d'obstacle (57), et
    - la position de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) se situe à l'extérieur d'une région d'activation (62) prédéfinie.
  6. Méthode pour actionner une installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1), selon la revendication 1, caractérisée par les étapes :
    - détecter une position d'une porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) de l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) par l'intermédiaire du capteur de position pendant un mouvement, tout particulièrement pendant une fermeture, de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3),
    - activer un capteur d'obstacle (57) de l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) lorsque la position de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) se situe à l'intérieur d'une région d'activation (62) prédéfinie, et
    - arrêter et/ou renverser le mouvement de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3), lorsque le capteur d'obstacle (57) détecte un obstacle à l'intérieur d'un champs de capteur (58) du capteur d'obstacle (57).
  7. Méthode selon la revendication 6, caractérisée par l'étape :
    - désactiver le capteur d'obstacle (57), lorsque la position de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) se situe à l'extérieur d'une région d'activation (62) prédéfinie.
  8. Méthode selon l'une des revendications 4 ou 5, caractérisée en ce que l'unité de commande (23) linéairement augmente une puissance à délivrer à l'unité d'entraînement (4) avec déviation croissante de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3) d'un emplacement fermé.
  9. Méthode selon l'une des revendications 3 à 8, caractérisée en ce que, lors d'un dépassement d'une puissance maximum prévue comme maximum pour l'unité d'entraînement (4), l'unité de commande (23) baisse la puissance à la puissance maximale pendant une période de temps prédéfinie, dans laquelle tout particulièrement la période de temps prédéfinie est entre 5 secondes et 25 secondes, de préférence entre 5 secondes et 15 secondes, tout particulièrement préféré 10 secondes.
  10. Méthode selon l'une des revendications 3 à 9, caractérisée en ce que l'unité de commande (23) reconnaît une déviation au-delà d'une valeur limite pendant une lucarne temporelle prédéfinie, et augmente la puissance d'une valeur d'accroissement spécifiée, dans laquelle de préférence la valeur limite prédéfinie s'élève à 20, tout particulièrement à 43 impulsions du codeur incrémental et/ou la lucarne temporelle prédéfinie est entre 5 ms et 100 ms, tout particulièrement 10 ms.
  11. Méthode selon la revendication 10, caractérisée en ce que l'unité de commande (23) abaisse la puissance à délivrer de façon répétée d'une valeur d'abaissement prédéfinie après l'expiration d'une tranche de temps prédéfinie , dans laquelle tout particulièrement la valeur d'abaissement est inférieur à la valeur d'accroissement, et dans laquelle l'unité de commande (23) abaisse la puissance à délivrer tant de fois d'une valeur d'abaissement jusqu'à ce que l'accroissement par la valeur d'accroissement est neutralisée.
  12. Méthode selon l'une des revendications 3 à 11, caractérisée en ce que le capteur d'obstacle (57) génère un champs de capteur (59), dont la projection (58) sur un plancher entourant l'installation de porte à vantaux pliants (1) est en forme d'ellipse ou forme rectangulaire, dans laquelle une dimension en direction d'un axe principal est entre 2 centimètres et 250 centimètres, de préférence entre 5 centimètres et 100 centimètres, tout particulièrement préféré entre 10 centimètres et 50 centimètres, et/ou dans laquelle une dimension en direction d'un axe secondaire est entre 10 % et 95 %, de préférence entre 25 % et 75 %, tout particulièrement préféré entre 40 % et 60 % de la dimension en direction de l'axe principal, dans laquelle tout particulièrement le champs de capteur (59) se situe en dehors d'une plaine de passage de la porte à vantaux pliants (2, 3).
  13. Produit de programme informatique avec un code de programme mémorisé sur un support de mémorisation lisible par machine pour l'exécution d'une méthode selon l'une des revendications 3 à 12, lorsque le produit de programme informatique est exécuté sur un ordinateur.
EP14198570.5A 2014-12-17 2014-12-17 Installation de porte battante pliante Active EP3034754B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14198570.5A EP3034754B1 (fr) 2014-12-17 2014-12-17 Installation de porte battante pliante

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14198570.5A EP3034754B1 (fr) 2014-12-17 2014-12-17 Installation de porte battante pliante

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3034754A1 EP3034754A1 (fr) 2016-06-22
EP3034754B1 true EP3034754B1 (fr) 2020-02-12

Family

ID=52103077

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14198570.5A Active EP3034754B1 (fr) 2014-12-17 2014-12-17 Installation de porte battante pliante

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3034754B1 (fr)

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10027416B4 (de) * 2000-06-02 2008-09-18 Geze Gmbh Falttürantrieb
DE102013207453A1 (de) * 2013-04-24 2014-10-30 Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Coburg Schließvorrichtung eines Gebäudes mit einer elektromotorischen Antriebsvorrichtung

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3034754A1 (fr) 2016-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0910883B1 (fr) Procede de commande de la fermeture de dispositifs de fermeture pourvus d'au moins une partie deplacee par moteur electrique
WO2013160087A2 (fr) Dispositif d'entraînement de vantail
EP2685039A2 (fr) Dispositif de guidage, chariot et rail de guidage
EP3452680A1 (fr) Dispositif d'étanchéité
DE202016105495U1 (de) Beschlag für verschiebbare plattenförmige Elemente mit Dämpfungsfunktion
EP3489448A1 (fr) Système d'étanchéité pour porte coulissante
DE102011051336B3 (de) Antriebseinrichtung
DE102010000920B4 (de) Verfahren zur Steuerung eines verstellbaren Antriebselements einer Verstellvorrichtung und Verstellvorrichtung
EP3034754B1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP2620575B1 (fr) Dispositif d'assistance d'ouverture pour une fenêtre, une porte ou analogue ainsi que la fenêtre correspondante
EP3034756B1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3170957A1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3034748A1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3034771B1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3034732B1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3034755B1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3034733B1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP2400091B1 (fr) Penture de porte pour le montage sur des systèmes de chambres creuses
DE102011078832B4 (de) Gebäudetür
EP3034764A1 (fr) Installation de porte battante pliante
EP3943701A1 (fr) Installation de porte à battant pliant
EP3348776A1 (fr) Fixation d'un store protège-doigts destiné au recouvrement d'une fente
WO2001018935A1 (fr) Procede pour reguler un dispositif de deplacement commande par un moteur electrique, par exemple pour un leve-vitres, et dispositif pour mettre en oeuvre ledit procede
EP1573157B1 (fr) Dispositif pour porte coulissante et procédé pour fermer des portes coulissantes
DE202013005586U1 (de) Laufwerk für eine Schiebetür

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161214

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: DORMAKABA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20170601

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190828

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1232318

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014013590

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: FREI PATENTANWALTSBUERO AG, CH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200512

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200513

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200612

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200512

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200705

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502014013590

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20201113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201217

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201217

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231214

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231221

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240102

Year of fee payment: 10