EP2936715A1 - Verfahren zur anlockung eines systems zum abfangen und stören durch einfügen von dummy-synchronisationsmustern in das emittierte signal und emitter zur umsetzung des verfahrens - Google Patents

Verfahren zur anlockung eines systems zum abfangen und stören durch einfügen von dummy-synchronisationsmustern in das emittierte signal und emitter zur umsetzung des verfahrens

Info

Publication number
EP2936715A1
EP2936715A1 EP13805372.3A EP13805372A EP2936715A1 EP 2936715 A1 EP2936715 A1 EP 2936715A1 EP 13805372 A EP13805372 A EP 13805372A EP 2936715 A1 EP2936715 A1 EP 2936715A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sequence
bits
dummy
code
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP13805372.3A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2936715B1 (de
Inventor
Sébastien MALLIER
François SIRVEN
François Delaveau
Philippe Viravau
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales SA
ETAT FRANCAIS REPRESENTE PAR LE DELEGUE GENERAL
Original Assignee
Direction General pour lArmement DGA
Thales SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Direction General pour lArmement DGA, Thales SA filed Critical Direction General pour lArmement DGA
Publication of EP2936715A1 publication Critical patent/EP2936715A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2936715B1 publication Critical patent/EP2936715B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/20Countermeasures against jamming
    • H04K3/28Countermeasures against jamming with jamming and anti-jamming mechanisms both included in a same device or system, e.g. wherein anti-jamming includes prevention of undesired self-jamming resulting from jamming
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/60Jamming involving special techniques
    • H04K3/65Jamming involving special techniques using deceptive jamming or spoofing, e.g. transmission of false signals for premature triggering of RCIED, for forced connection or disconnection to/from a network or for generation of dummy target signal
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/80Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function
    • H04K3/82Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function related to preventing surveillance, interception or detection
    • H04K3/825Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function related to preventing surveillance, interception or detection by jamming
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/40Jamming having variable characteristics
    • H04K3/45Jamming having variable characteristics characterized by including monitoring of the target or target signal, e.g. in reactive jammers or follower jammers for example by means of an alternation of jamming phases and monitoring phases, called "look-through mode"

Definitions

  • the technical field of the invention is that of the fight against the jamming of telecommunications systems and the intrusion into such systems.
  • the invention aims to provide a solution for preventing the interception and / or jamming of a signal emitted by a transmitting equipment, such as a telephone or a portable terminal.
  • the invention relates to a method of decoying an interception and jamming system by inserting dummy synchronization patterns into the signal transmitted by the transmitting equipment.
  • the dummy patterns inserted are intended to disrupt the signal analysis of the transmitter by the interception and jamming system and to disperse both the computing power of its interception function and the power of the interference signal.
  • the dummy synchronization pattern (s) are introduced into the transmitted signal by generating a bit sequence adapted directly in the binary data sequence to be transmitted.
  • the invention does not require any modification of the transmitter equipment because it intervenes at the input of the transmission channel.
  • the communication systems use, during the generation of the signal to be transmitted, particular sequences, inserted in the signal, which are used to synchronize the transmitter and receiver equipment with each other. These synchronization sequences are fixed once and for all by the communication protocol or the system implementation standard and are inserted in the signal to be transmitted with the modulated information sequences.
  • An interception and jamming system has interception and analysis functions by which it can detect a synchronization sequence within a signal emitted by a transmitter, then scramble this sequence precisely in a coherent manner with respect to a receiver, so that the synchronization between the transmitter and a compatible receiver of the transmitter is no longer possible.
  • a problem to be solved relates to the development of a decoy solution implemented in a transmission transmitter to prevent or making more complex and / or less effective scrambling synchronization sequences within the transmitted signal.
  • An associated subproblem is to design a solution that is weakly complex, from the point of view of its implementation, and that requires little or no modification of the transmitting and / or receiving equipment of the communication system.
  • the solution must make it possible to maintain compatibility with the telecommunications standard implemented and to preserve the synchronization between transmitters and receivers despite the presence of jammers.
  • the aim of the invention is to solve the aforementioned problems and to eliminate the limitations of the solutions of the prior art by proposing a method of decoying interception and scrambling systems consisting in carrying out a specific coding of the useful data to be transmitted so as to generate indirectly in the signal emitted in fine, one or more dummy synchronization patterns in the form of stationary patterns.
  • the implementation of the method according to the invention at the level of the useful data to be transmitted and not at the output of the transmission chain makes it possible not to alter the properties of the transmitter with respect to the respect of the telecommunications standard used. .
  • the invention thus relates to a method of decoying against an interception and / or jamming system, consisting in generating, in a signal to be transmitted, at least one dummy sequence so as to decoy the said system while preserving the synchronization with a receiver of said transmitted signal, said method being characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
  • the implementation of the decoying method according to the invention applied to a communication system gives it resistance to a selective interception and jamming system which will then hang on. and selectively scrambling the dummy synchronization sequences instead of hooking and selectively scrambling the synchronization patterns actually used by a compatible receiver of said communication system.
  • the value and the position of the dummy bits are estimated by determining the inverse transfer function F "1 of said transfer function F and applying said inverse transfer function F "1 to said dummy sequence.
  • the inverse transfer function F "1 of said transmission chain is determined by carrying out the composition, in reverse order, of the inverse transfer functions of the different blocks composing said chain.
  • the transmission chain comprises at least one output correction code k / n for which the inversion of its transfer function is performed by solving the system of equations following m0, p l m 0, p 2 m 0, p, ⁇ m 0, p d
  • [i 0 , - - - i k -i] is the sequence to be produced at the input of said code
  • m iiP j are the coefficients of the matrix generating said code, pi, p 2 , ... pd being the set of positions of symbols whose value is fixed in the coded sequence, with d an integer at most equal to the number n of symbols of the coded sequence.
  • said correction code is a linear block code or a convolutional code or a turbo-code or a low density code LDPC
  • the transmission system further comprises a stirrer and / or an interleaver and / or a framing module and / or a signal binary coder and / or a modulator.
  • the value and the position of the dummy bits are estimated by searching the input sequence T 'of the transmission channel which minimizes a distance criterion between the sequence F (T ') (t) obtained at the output of the transmission chain when said sequence T' is actually produced at its input, and said dummy sequence.
  • said distance criterion is taken equal to the integral, over a given duration, of the standard squared of the difference between the sequence F (T ') (t) obtained at the output of the chain of transmission and said dummy sequence.
  • the search for the input sequence T 'of the transmission chain which minimizes said distance criterion is carried out on a subset of the set of possible bit sequences at the input of the channel of emission.
  • said data sequence is produced by an application, for example an audio, image or video coder.
  • the dummy bits are inserted in the sequence produced at the input of a sub-part of the transmission channel whose transfer function is surjective and whose output is common at the output of the transmission chain.
  • said transmission channel comprises an encryption device and said sub-part of the transmission channel excludes this device.
  • said dummy sequence is positioned in a non-vulnerable time and / or frequency zone of the signal to be transmitted.
  • said non-vulnerable zone is a part of the signal protected by a correction code or is a stuffing zone containing no useful information.
  • the dummy bits are removed from the data sequence.
  • the subject of the invention is also a device for transmitting a signal comprising a transmission channel for transforming a data sequence to be transmitted into a signal to be transmitted and means adapted to implement the method according to the invention.
  • the invention also relates to a computer program comprising instructions for executing the method according to the invention, when the program is executed by a processor.
  • the subject of the invention is also a recording medium readable by a processor on which is recorded a program comprising instructions for executing the method according to the invention, when the program is executed by a processor.
  • FIG. 1 a diagram illustrating the problem of scrambling synchronization sequences in a signal transmitted by a transmitter and sent to a receiver
  • FIG. 2 a diagram illustrating the solution proposed by the invention for solving the aforementioned problem
  • FIGS. 3a, 3b two diagrams illustrating the generation, according to the invention, of dummy synchronization patterns
  • FIG. 4 a block diagram of the various functions successively implemented by a transmitter of a communication system for transmitting a signal containing data to be transmitted
  • FIG. 5 a diagram of the shift registers of a convolutional code of output 1 ⁇ 2,
  • FIG. 6 a representation, for the example of convolutional code associated with FIG. 5, of the matrix generating such a code
  • FIG. 7 an illustration of the necessary and sufficient condition for imposing, at the output of the convolutional code defined in FIGS. 5 and 6, the values of a sequence of consecutive bits
  • FIG. 8 an illustration of the parity relations of a punch code.
  • the expression “useful data”, “useful bits”, “useful information” or “useful symbols” is used to designate the binary data to be transmitted between the application executed by a transmitter and the application. correspondingly executed by a receiver as opposed to the binary data present in the transmitted frames but which are not intended for the application executed by the receiver but are used for signaling, synchronization or any other function necessary for the proper functioning of the transmission system. communication.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates, in a diagram, the problem of the jamming of synchronization sequences in a signal sent by a transmitter and sent to a receiver.
  • a wireless communication system in the form of an emitter EM which communicates with a receiver REC by radio wave.
  • the transformation of the binary data to be transmitted into a radio signal S can be specified by a standard or a telecommunications standard.
  • This specification defines, in particular, the insertion, within the signal to be transmitted, of synchronization sequences SYNC.
  • Such sequences consist of symbols known from the system equipment and positioned periodically or in a time pattern also known from both the EM transmitter and the REC receiver that implement the same telecommunications standard.
  • the receiver REC can synchronize temporally with the transmitter by detecting for example the beginning or the end of a frame, indicated by the presence of said sequence, within of the transmitted signal.
  • INT interceptors In the field of passive listening, there are devices called INT interceptors which are able to intercept the signal emitted by an EM transmitter, to synchronize with synchronization SYNC sequences and to demodulate and / or analyze if necessary symbols intercepted to decode the information or reproduce the corresponding signal.
  • BR jammers coupled to INT interceptors, which aim to neutralize the EM communications system, REC by transmitting at the same radio frequency a high power signal, compatible, strongly correlated or similar with the signals expected by the target receiver, resulting in the loss of system synchronization.
  • the BRJNT interception and jamming systems thus have both interception functions by which they can detect, identify and regenerate synchronization sequences within a transmitted signal, and scrambling functions based on broadcast transmissions. Signals strongly correlated or identical with the signal expected by the target receiver.
  • the interference efficiency is enhanced because it concentrates its jamming power on the time portions of the transmitted signal which are the most vulnerable, namely the synchronization sequences, and thus penetrates deeply into the reception chain of the REC receiver.
  • synchronization sequences is not limiting and can be extended to any sequence of known symbols fixed a priori by the telecommunications standard or the radio access technology and which, when they are scrambled, cause a malfunction of the system.
  • sequences also include the equalization sequences and frame synchronization patterns within the signal. These sequences, as the case may be, precede or are multiplexed with the information to be transmitted. They most often have a limited combinatorial position and value which increases their vulnerability to interception and jamming.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates, in a diagram similar to that of FIG. 1, the principle underlying the invention making it possible to decoy an interception system INT and / or a scrambler BR in order to preserve synchronization within the control system.
  • one or more SYNCF dummy synchronization patterns are introduced within the signal emitted by the emitter EM.
  • These dummy sequences have stationary characteristics that are easily detectable by an interceptor. They are inserted periodically or in a predetermined temporal pattern within the signal to be transmitted. For example, they may be inserted with a period identical to that of the actual synchronization patterns SYNC present in the signal but with a time offset and / or a frequency offset so that the dummy synchronization sequences do not replace, in whole or in part , the actual synchronization sequences that must be preserved to ensure the proper functioning of the communication system.
  • the SYNC F dummy sequence (s) may advantageously be positioned on the least vulnerable or best protected parts of the signal, for example on parts protected by a robust correction code or on frequencies or blanking time intervals of useful data. and not exploited for taking synchronization or access to the network, or on frequencies or time intervals empty of useful data and dedicated for this purpose.
  • the symbol values and positions of the SYNCF dummy synchronization sequences are defined by values and / or positions different from those used by the legitimate receiver for the purposes specific to establishing the radiocommunication with the transmitter, in order to avoid any confusion with the sequences used by the legitimate receiver.
  • the expression legitimate receiver here designates a REC compatible receiver of the communication system and able to communicate with an EM transmitter of said system.
  • the values and periodicity characteristics of the SYNCF dummy synchronization sequences are preferably chosen from patterns similar to those used in the telecommunications field and easy to identify for an interceptor. It may for example be patterns close to those commonly intended for frequency synchronization consisting of series of identical symbols "0000 " or "1 1 1 1 ". It may also be patterns close to those commonly intended for time synchronization consisting of series of alternating symbols "010101 ". It may also be sequences of symbols similar to those used in certain known civil standards operating the same frequency ranges as the transmitter. In any case, the values and positions of the symbols of the dummy synchronization sequences must, however, be different from those used by the communication system to ensure synchronization between a transmitter and a receiver.
  • dummy synchronization sequences does not disturb the synchronization between the transmitter EM and receiver REC equipment because the dummy sequences chosen are sufficiently decorrelated from the actual synchronization sequences used within the communication system.
  • the values and positions, in the time-frequency domain, of the symbols of the dummy sequences are chosen such that they are different from the values and positions of the actual synchronization sequences.
  • the dummy sequences can be processed by a receiver of the communication system either as random data comparable to transmitted data, or as decoys whose values and positions are known a priori and which are therefore easily identifiable to be eliminated during the synchronization process.
  • the purpose of inserting dummy synchronization sequences into the signal is to decoy an interception and interference system INT, BR.
  • the ability of the scrambler to identify and analyze the signal is impaired by the existence of such dummy sequences that the scrambler tends to detect and identify as actual synchronization sequences.
  • the computational capacity of the interception function of the interferer is solicited on non-significant sequences of the signal, the scrambling signal will tend to be transmitted on the time zones of the signal corresponding to the dummy sequences while the actual synchronization sequences are preserved.
  • Oriented identification techniques that the interception function could implement are disrupted by the appearance of dummy signals, and even more so if they are produced in large quantities and are variable from one communication to another or managed with long-term fluctuation mechanisms.
  • the performance of an interception and jamming system is further diminished by the fact that a large number of Fake synchronization are present in the transmitted signal.
  • the scrambler analysis system is obliged to disperse its computational efforts, up to the possible saturation of its computing capabilities, on artificial patterns other than the actual synchronization pattern since it has no means to recognize it a priori.
  • the jammer analysis system works with a database of signals to be identified (according to an oriented analysis and identification approach)
  • the implementation of the invention will tend to charge artificially said database, to disperse the efforts of analysis and oriented research and to penalize the identification, especially if the artificial artificially created motives are made intentionally fluctuating according to the time.
  • the invention thus makes it possible to lure an intelligent jammer but also to prevent the synchronization of the signal emitted by any receiving or intercepting equipment which does not have the knowledge of the real synchronization pattern.
  • Inserting a dummy synchronization pattern into a modulated symbol frame at the output of the transmission chain leads to modifying the transmission channel itself and therefore the transmitter itself, which is not always technically possible on the one hand, or desirable from the point of view of the complexity of implementation.
  • the aim of the invention is to allow the introduction of false synchronization patterns by intervening at the input of the transmission chain, that is to say directly on the binary data to be transmitted, without modification of the transmission chain, and by through software means.
  • Figures 3a, 3b illustrate the method of generating dummy sequences according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3a schematically illustrates the transformation undergone by a binary data sequence useful to be transmitted in order to obtain a sequence of modulated S T symbols, ready to be transmitted in the form of a radio signal.
  • the transformation executed corresponds to the transfer function F of the transmission chain of the transmitter.
  • the sequence of modulated symbols S T consists on the one hand of useful symbols Su resulting from the transformation of the useful binary data Du and on the other hand of at least one synchronization sequence SYNC or an equivalent sequence composed of known symbols of all the equipment of the communication system.
  • FIG. 3b illustrates the implementation of the method according to the invention.
  • the location and constitution of the SYNCF dummy synchronization sequence are chosen in an empty frame T F , of the same size as a real frame of modulated symbols S T and on a given frequency channel f.
  • the selected time position and / or frequency channel are different from the time position and / or the frequency channel of a real synchronization sequence.
  • the size and exact nature of the dummy sequence can be variable.
  • a second step it is estimated the value and the position of the dummy bits B F to be inserted within the data sequence to be transmitted, at the input of the transmission chain, so as to obtain, at the output of the chain of emission, the value and the predefined temporal position of the symbols of said fake sequence SYNC F.
  • This operation can be performed by calculating the inverse transfer function F "1 of the transfer function F implemented by the transmission chain and then by applying the inverse transfer function F " 1 to the dummy frame T F to obtain a frame modulated D F comprising the dummy bits B F.
  • the dummy bits B F are then inserted into the actual data sequence to be transmitted from the input of the transmission chain by punching, shifting or multiplexing the useful bits corresponding to the actual data sequence.
  • the sequence of modulated symbols obtained at the output of the transmission chain comprises both the useful symbols Su, the real synchronization pattern SYNC and the dummy synchronization pattern SYNC F.
  • the dummy bits can thus be introduced directly into the data sequence to be transmitted without modifying or intruding into the transmission chain of the transmitting equipment. If the data to be transmitted comes from an application, for example an audio or video source coder, it is possible to intercept the application binary data before entering the transmission chain which is implemented at the level of the physical layer. a modem. This interception can be done at an intermediate layer, for example at the network layer.
  • the dummy bits are deleted from the demodulated and decoded data sequence.
  • FIG. 4 represents a block diagram of the various functions successively implemented by a transmitter of a communication system for transmitting a signal containing data to be transmitted.
  • the main functions traditionally implemented are represented, it being understood that the diagram of FIG. 4 is given for illustrative and nonlimiting purposes. In particular, some functions may be omitted and the order of some functions may be changed.
  • the transfer function F of the transmission chain is equal to the composition of the transfer functions of each functional block independent of the string, it being understood that the blocks are connected in series.
  • the inverse transfer function F "1 is, when it exists, equal to the composition, in reverse order, of the inverse transfer functions of each block, that is, if fi, f 2 , ...
  • the direct transfer function F of the transmission system can be known when the invention is implemented by the system designer communication system or when said system complies with a known standard. It can also be estimated by testing the sending equipment, for example by injecting test signals at its input and by analyzing the signals obtained at the output.
  • the transformations applied in the transmission channel on the bitstream are generally reversible, that is to say that it is possible from the bitstream output to find the input bitstream. This is the operation performed by the receiver.
  • some functions implemented by the transmission chain of a communications system may not always be surjective.
  • a TBC encoded bitstream which one would like to force the values
  • the channel coding or framing operations transform a useful bitstream of length Lu into a coded bit stream of length Le.
  • LoLu is still practiced. This means that among the 2 Lc sequences of the encoded bits, only 2 L "sequences may be obtained by encoding. Coding is therefore never surjective.
  • the practical implementation consists in successively analyzing the different transformations of the bit stream, starting with the transformation occurring last in the transmission chain. For each transformation, the inputs to be applied are determined to output the desired coded bitstream.
  • the transmission chain 400 shown in FIG. 4 comprises an application 401 capable of generating or transforming a sequence of binary data to be transmitted.
  • the data to be transmitted can be text, audio, video or any other information.
  • the application 401 may also include a source coding function, for example an audio, image or video coder able to suppress or reduce the redundancy of information or to reduce the noise affecting the sequence.
  • the application 401 outputs a useful bit sequence T to be transmitted.
  • the invention is advantageously implemented at the output of the application 401 by modifying the useful bit sequence T to insert dummy bits therein so as to obtain at the output of the transmission chain a sequence of modulated symbols F (T) (t). ) to be transmitted comprising at least one dummy synchronization pattern.
  • the transmission channel 400 may also include a correction coding module 402.
  • the objective of a corrective coding function is to transform the binary sequence of useful data received at the output of the application 401 into a protected bit sequence so that the impact of the errors due to the transmission channel is as small as possible. .
  • the corrector coding function adds redundancy to this bit sequence.
  • the determination of the inverse transfer function of a correction coding module is equivalent to finding the bit sequence to be produced at the input of the correction coder in order to obtain an encoded sequence in which the value and the position of a predetermined number of bits are imposed.
  • correcting codes There are different types of correcting codes including linear block codes, convolutional codes or turbo codes and LDPC low density codes.
  • a k / n efficiency linear block corrector code transforms a binary sequence comprising k symbols into a protected bit sequence comprising n symbols with n strictly greater than k. Such a code thus introduces nk redundancy symbols.
  • the symbols may be bits or consist of several concatenated bits.
  • the block coding consists in producing the product of an input information vector of k bits by a binary matrix, of full rank, of size k * n, called generator matrix, to obtain an encoded vector of n bits.
  • the code is said systematically on the left, respectively on the right, when the first k, respectively the last k, bits of the encoded vector of n bits correspond to the k bits of the input information vector.
  • the encoding operation can be illustrated by the following relation, where io, - - - i k -i are the bits of the input sequence, c 0 , ... c n -i are the bits of the coded sequence and are the coefficients of the generator matrix of the code.
  • the coded sequence is written [ 0 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ i k _ l c k ⁇ c n _ 1 ].
  • the inverse transform of the coding operation is to analyze the received word to determine if it is a possible code word. If it is not a possible code word, it must be replaced by the codeword at a minimum distance from the received code word. Then, as the code is systematic, the information is obtained by removing the last nk bits of the word. In other words, it is possible to impose, by the choice of the input sequence, the output value of the first k bits of the codeword. The values of the remaining nk bits are then deduced from the values chosen for the k bits that were forced. It is exactly the same for a systematic block code on the right.
  • Block coding cases from cyclic codes Bulk codes commonly used are cyclic block codes or are derived from cyclic block codes by punching or shortening.
  • This coding operation consists in calculating the division of i ( x ) - x " ⁇ k by g ( x ) The rest of the division is v (x) (of degree less than or equal to nk-1) and the quotient of the division is k ( x ).
  • v (x) is of degree less than or equal to n-k-1
  • the values of the coefficients of c (x) for degrees greater than or equal to n-k are the coefficients of i (x) shifted by n-k.
  • any circular permutation of a code word is also a code word, it means that it is also possible, always for the cyclic codes, to impose the value of any group of k consecutive bits of code. 'a code word.
  • the dependence between the values of the input bits of the encoder and the bits at the output of the encoder is linear.
  • the values of the bits that must be forced into the encoder input depend linearly on the values of the other bits at the input of the encoder and the values of the forced bits at the output of the encoder.
  • a sufficient condition to be able to impose the value of a group of d bits at the output of the encoder, with d less than or equal to k, is that set of positions pi, p 2 , ... pd, bits in the coded sequence must be such that the sub-matrix of the matrix generating the code:
  • the indices Pi, P2, - - -Pd denoting the positions of the bits or symbols in the sequence of n bits or symbols.
  • the encoding operation is represented by the following relation:
  • the rank of a matrix corresponds to the number of independent columns of the matrix or equivalently to the number of independent rows of the matrix.
  • the value of these bits depends not only on the value of the pattern generated at the output of the encoder but also on the values of the other bits at the input of the encoder (which are a priori random because they are related to the useful information).
  • Convolutional codes are the second major family of error-correcting codes. While linear block codes are used to split the message into blocks of k symbols, the convolutional codes apply a sliding window of symbols to the message and produce a continuous sequence of encoded symbols.
  • the symbols are binary (ie at value 0 or 1 in the Welsh GF body (2), "+” means the addition modulo 2 and ".” multiplication modulo 2).
  • n symbols at the output of the encoder linearly depend on the last / * (m + 1) symbols at the input of the encoder.
  • the convolutional coding is a periodic k-bit period coding on the input binary signal. For each new group of k bits, n coded bits are calculated. The n coded bits are bit combinations relating to the (m + 1) last groups of A: bits, m is the constraint length of the code.
  • the step of the method according to the invention which consists in inverting the transfer function of a convolutional code, that is to say, determining the sequence of bits to be produced at the input to obtain an output of a signal, is illustrated in a nonlimiting example. encoded sequence in which the value and the position of a predetermined number of bits are set.
  • the polynomials Gi and G 2 are applied to the input bits to respectively form the even index output bits and the odd index output bits then interleaved in pairs b 2n b 2n + i to form a bit stream of size equal to a multiple of 2. It is illustrated below the possibility of choosing the input bit stream so as to generate desired patterns after coding.
  • the two bits (b 2n , b 2n + i) at the output are to be chosen from either (0,0) or (1, 1), or (0,1) or (1, 0 ).
  • the last bit that enters the encoder is used for the calculation of each of the two outputs of the encoder: by changing this bit, the values of the two outputs are changed.
  • the two possible output bits are to be chosen from two complementary groups. It is therefore always possible to choose the input bit so as to force the value of one of the two output bits. It is therefore easy with this code to force every other bit at the output of the encoder.
  • the outgoing bit groups for a state of the encoder, are chosen so as to be at maximum distance from each other.
  • the last bit that enters the encoder is used for the calculation of each of the two outputs of the encoder. It is therefore possible, for all the usual 1/2 output codes, to force the value of one bit out of two at the output of the encoder.
  • the input bits of the encoder it is possible to choose the input bits of the encoder so as to force the value of n (m + 1) consecutive bits at the output of the encoder.
  • n (m + 1) consecutive bits at the output of the encoder.
  • the dependence between the encoder input bit values and the encoder output bits is linear.
  • the values of the bits that must be forced into the encoder input linearly depend on the values of the other encoder input bits and the forced bit values at the encoder output.
  • the invention also applies to turbo-type correcting codes. product codes.
  • Turbo-codes are correcting codes that combine at least two simple codes by interleaving the entries so that each of the simple codes sees a different set of information on the one hand, and the information specific to each bit, block or message is spread over these neighbors on the other hand. As a result, even if part of the bits, blocks or messages is corrupted during transmission, the corresponding information still exists more or less on bits, blocks or neighboring messages.
  • the decoding procedure is iterative and collaborative between each simple code. It involves a notion of trust on each bit, block or message decoded and differs the final decision on their values ("soft decision" or "soft decision” in English).
  • Each of the decoders transmits to the others the information resulting from its own decoding (called extrinsic information) which is multiplexed with the input information of the other coders.
  • extrinsic information the information resulting from its own decoding
  • the bit, block or message thus transmitted is decoded a second time by the other simple coders, and the corresponding information is re-transmitted to the other coders (hence the name "turbo" which is related to the decoding procedure and not to the code itself).
  • convolutional codes Recursive and systematic convolutional codes are in practice particularly suitable.
  • the codes can be placed in series or in parallel.
  • the clever management of the interleaving and the iterative detection / correction of data by each simple code makes it possible to increase the detector and corrector power of the overall process while limiting the number of iterations and the complexity.
  • turbo coding structure corresponds to product codes.
  • product codes In the simplest version corresponding to product codes to two k ⁇ k
  • the product yield code - - is built from nn 2 two elementary codes C l and C 2 of output - and -.
  • the elementary codes used are very simple block codes (typically parity codes, Hamming codes or extended Hamming codes).
  • the n x - n 2 successive bits appear as a sequence of n 2 codewords. Considering the binary train decimated by a factor / 3 ⁇ 4, we obtain words of the code C 2 .
  • turbo codes produced built from several block codes, are like block codes when it comes to determining whether it is possible to generate the desired pattern. Indeed, the encoding operation can be broken down into coding and interleaving operations.
  • Coding with the code C x of the bit stream the coding transforms k 2 groups of k ⁇ bits into k 2 groups of n bits.
  • a simple line / column interleaving the bits are written line by line in a matrix of size k 2 rows and n columns. The bits are then read column by column.
  • Coding with the C 2 code of the bitstream the coding transforms n x groups of k 2 bits into n x groups of n 2 bits.
  • bits are written line by line in a matrix of size n rows and n 2 columns. The bits are then read column by column.
  • the constraints of the code C 2 do not affect not this portion because there is no parity relationship related to the code C 2 that is contained entirely in this portion of bits. Consequently, if we consider a portion of consecutive bits smaller than n - k 2 , everything happens as if there were only the code C x when it comes to determining the reasons that it is possible to force. Like block codes, it is therefore possible, in particular, to generate consecutive bit patterns of size 2 - k.
  • LDPC codes are specific block codes that are constructed in such a way that the parity bits are computed using a low weight parity relationship. This is in practice systematic (but not cyclic) block codes and the analysis made on block codes applies by analogy to the description made previously.
  • LDPC codes are usually very large. As has been established for block codes, the LPDC codes thus make it possible, in particular, to generate selected patterns with consecutive series of bits of great length.
  • any correction code for which the coding operation can be performed by multiplying the information sequence by a generator matrix to obtain the coded sequence it is possible to set the value and the position of a set of bits. of the coded sequence by imposing a particular input binary sequence. This possibility exists, however, only if the sub-matrix, of the generating matrix, is defined m, m, m, m,
  • the bits or symbols whose value is fixed in the coded sequence are the unknowns of the system to be inputted to the encoder.
  • the transmission channel 400 may also include a scrambling module 403, also called brewing.
  • the brewing, or scrambling is used to make the binary sequence to emit as random as possible, in order to improve the symbol synchronization but also to contribute to the protection of the contents of the brewed messages. Its purpose is to remove long sequences of bits equal to 0 or 1 that prevent a correct recovery of the symbol rate.
  • brewers There are several types of brewers including synchronous brewers requiring a prior time reference or self-synchronizing brewers.
  • This transformation is invertible, the scrambling operation consists in transforming a group of L bits into another group of L bits and the operation of inverting the transformation of the bitstream is an operation performed by a receiver.
  • the reverse transfer function of a brewer or scrambler is easily deductible from its direct transfer function.
  • the dependence between the value i of a bit at the input of the scrambler and the value c of the bit at the output of the scrambler is affine.
  • a pseudo-random sequence is added modulo 2 to the binary signal to be scrambled.
  • the binary series ⁇ ..., e k , e k + i, ... ⁇ representing the scrambling sequence is periodic, with a long period L.
  • the states of the register are filled with a finite number of scrambled data.
  • the output of the register is added modulo 2 to the input data bit to form the new scrambled bit.
  • b' kP (+" always denotes modulo 2 addition in GF2). This makes it possible to perform descrambling on reception in a simple manner and without having to synchronize beforehand.
  • the difficulty in forcing the output bits arises from the fact that the expression of the register states as a function of the input data b k (non-scrambled data) involves an unlimited number of said input data. In other words, all the inputs b k since the startup of the scrambler are involved in the value of the states of the register.
  • the transmission chain comprises a self-synchronizing scrambler.
  • the transmission channel 400 may also include an interleaving module 404.
  • Interleaving is widely used on transmission channels where the occurrences of errors are grouped into packets. Its function is to distribute these errors as uniformly as possible. In reception, the errors are, after deinterleaving, placed in such a way that they impact different codewords. These errors can then be considered as decorrelated, and the correcting power of the decoders makes it possible to minimize their impact. Interleaving also appears as a means of introducing time diversity into the transmission chain and thereby helps to protect it from fading, interference and potential interference. Many interleavers are constituted by a table, the input bits are then arranged by rows in the table, and the output bits are produced by reading in a column of the table.
  • the transformation performed by an interleaver is also an invertible operation. Its inverse transfer function is deductible from its direct transfer function. Indeed, it is a transformation that transforms a block of L bits into another block of L bits, simply by swapping the order of the bits.
  • B ' b' k , ... b ' k + L -i
  • We then obtain a block of bits B b k , ... b k + L -i, which once interleaved, is strictly equal to bit stream B.
  • the transmission chain 400 may also include a framing module 405.
  • the framing 405 allows the receiver to synchronize on the bit stream transformations such as interleaving or decoding operations, and then retrieve data.
  • Several frames can also be grouped to form a multi-frame or a hyper-frame.
  • the synchronization patterns used for the framing are repeated in the transmitted sequence and can be detected and scrambled as previously explained.
  • the framing limits the ability to force the desired modulated signal since some bits take values imposed at regular intervals, and it is necessary to keep these bits for proper operation of the receiver in connection with the transmitter. This transformation is therefore not surjective for data blocks whose output size exceeds that of a block of useful data per frame.
  • the framing occupies only a very limited (and temporally well-defined) part of the total bit rate (example: start frame pattern using only a few symbols, etc.) and does not prevent generating the desired coded signal within a frame.
  • the transmission channel 400 may also include a binary signal coding module 406.
  • Binary signal coding is used to adapt the signal to the transmission channel. It transforms the digital message into a baseband electrical signal or a low frequency signal.
  • NRZ Non-Reset
  • alphabetic codes There are two major classes of signal binary codes, NRZ (Non-Reset) transcoding codes and alphabetic codes.
  • the transmission channel 400 includes a modulator 407 that transforms the binary sequence into a sequence of modulated symbols. Symbols are taken from a complex set called constellation. A symbol can group several bits. For example, digital phase or PSK (Phase Shift Keying) modulations or digital amplitude modulation or QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) modulations may be mentioned.
  • PSK Phase Shift Keying
  • QAM Quadrature Amplitude Modulation
  • the transformation operated by a modulator is an invertible operation. Its inverse transfer function is therefore deductible from its direct transfer function.
  • the transformations applied in the transmission channel on the bit stream are reversible, that is to say that it is possible from the output bit stream to recover the input bitstream.
  • redundancy is even added so as to be able to recover the original binary signal in the presence of errors on the coded bitstream.
  • a first variant consists in finding among the set F ( ⁇ TBU ⁇ ) modulated sequences that can be obtained at the output of the transmission chain from the set ⁇ TBU ⁇ of the possible input bit sequences of transmission chain, the bit sequence T 'which minimizes the distance between the modulated output transformation F (T') of the sequence T 'and the desired modulated sequence D which contains at least one factitious synchronization pattern SYNC F positioned at the desired location.
  • the distance considered may, for example, be a least squares distance calculated by integrating the difference between a possible sequence F (T), T belonging to the set ⁇ TBU ⁇ , and the desired sequence D over a fixed time interval.
  • a possible criterion can be calculated using the following relation:
  • this variant of the invention can be implemented by restricting the set ⁇ TBU ⁇ to a subset ⁇ TBU ' ⁇ which comprises only useful bit sequences T whose lengths and positions after passing through the transmission chain (and in particular after passing through the coding and interleaving modules) correspond to dummy SYNC'F patterns, where appropriate suboptimal with respect to the deception of an interception and jamming system, but compatible with the implementation standard of the telecommunication system in terms of positions, recurrence and frame periodicity, and therefore easy to generate and insert in the frames of useful data.
  • the time / frequency structure and / or the choice of the positions, lengths and recurrences of the fake signals SYNC ' F approaching in the sense of the criteria mentioned above the desired SYNCF dummy signals are set based on the frame periodicities of the transmission and moving as far as possible (in the time / frequency domain) the dummy patterns of the data truly useful for the synchronization and demodulation of the receiver.
  • the dummy patterns will be placed at positions different from those of the real patterns, in end of packet rather than at the beginning of the packet, on fictitious beacon frequencies rather than on those actually used.
  • orthogonal codes In a multiplexing transmission of several user flows by orthogonal codes, orthogonal codes will be used as factual patterns to all the codes actually used by the users.
  • the restricted set ⁇ TBLT ⁇ is then pre-determined by inverting, for the SYNC ' F units , analytically or by simulation, the modules of the transmission chain and in particular the interleaving modules and the coding modules.
  • the applied transformation consists in first determining a partitioning of the frame of the useful data by inverting the coding interleaving modules: this determines precise positions, on which, instead of transmitting useful data, the bits of useful information by forced useful bits for generating dummy sequences after interleaving and coding.
  • the values of these dummy useful bits can change depending on the value of the neighboring useful information bits (variables and random): the value of each of these forced bits depends on not only values of the desired coded dummy bits but also values of some neighboring useful bits (according to the scrambling and coding scheme). These dependencies are linear or affine, this means that the value of each forced useful bit is expressed as the sum of dummy bits at the coding output and neighboring useful information bits (ie linear dependence on the useful information bits plus possibly an inversion of the coded forced bits).
  • the key steps concern the inversion of the interlace and corrector coding operations.
  • the positions and dependency relationships of the dummy useful bits in the useful information stream are fixed. These positions and dependency relationships can be computed once and for all and then applied for computation and positioning of the forced bits on each successive frame.
  • the dummy bits that were used to generate the sequences dummies after coding are of prior known position of the receiver which removes them directly from the demodulated / decoded information bitstream.
  • a second embodiment of the invention consists in applying the invention to a subset located downstream of the transmission chain consisting of blocks in series whose transfer functions are all invertible.
  • the portion of maximum length of the transmission chain for which the inversion of the bit stream can be satisfactorily realized is identified. For this we go back from the modulator output signal to the sequence of useful data to be transmitted.
  • the bitstream intended to produce modulated signals D (t), containing a dummy synchronization sequence is injected only at the input of this subset, ie at the output of the first noninvertible function of the transmission chain in the inverse order of the transmission functions (from the modulator - end of the string - to the correction coder - start of the string).
  • This second variant of the invention is for example applied if the transmission chain comprises an encryption device or cryptography whose function has by nature a non-determinable inverse.
  • the method according to the invention can be declined with dummy sequences (SYNCF) having significant combinatorics and periodicities or slow variations, so as to maintain over time the combinatorial analysis and to penalize the capacity of identification and storage of the "interception" function of the lure interception and scrambling system.
  • SYNCF dummy sequences
  • the method according to the invention can be implemented from software elements.
  • Such software can be executed by the sending equipment so as to modify the useful binary sequence to be transmitted, which is for example produced by an application. It can also be executed by a computer connected to said transmitter for the purpose of setting it.
  • the method according to the invention may be available as a computer program product on a computer readable medium.
  • the support can be electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic or be an infrared type of diffusion medium.
  • Such supports are, for example, Random Access Memory RAMs (ROMs), magnetic or optical tapes, disks or disks (Compact Disk - Read Only Memory (CD-ROM), Compact Disk - Read / Write (CD-R / W) and DVD).
  • the invention finds application for any communication system that it is desired to make more robust to interception and jamming, in particular, the invention applies to the retrofit of old generation communication systems thus becoming vulnerable to interceptors and modern jammers.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
EP13805372.3A 2012-12-19 2013-12-13 Verfahren zur anlockung eines systems zum abfangen und stören durch einfügen von dummy-synchronisationsmustern in das emittierte signal und emitter zur umsetzung des verfahrens Active EP2936715B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1203478A FR2999842B1 (fr) 2012-12-19 2012-12-19 Procede de leurrage d'un systeme d'interception et de brouillage par insertion de motifs de synchronisation factices dans le signal emis et emetteur mettant en oeuvre le procede
PCT/EP2013/076586 WO2014095651A1 (fr) 2012-12-19 2013-12-13 Procede de leurrage d' un systeme d' interception et de brouillage par insertion de motifs de synchronisation factices dans le signal emis et emetteur mettant en oeuvre le procede

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2936715A1 true EP2936715A1 (de) 2015-10-28
EP2936715B1 EP2936715B1 (de) 2016-09-07

Family

ID=48237009

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13805372.3A Active EP2936715B1 (de) 2012-12-19 2013-12-13 Verfahren zur anlockung eines systems zum abfangen und stören durch einfügen von dummy-synchronisationsmustern in das emittierte signal und emitter zur umsetzung des verfahrens

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2936715B1 (de)
FR (1) FR2999842B1 (de)
SG (1) SG11201504915VA (de)
WO (1) WO2014095651A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108898212B (zh) * 2018-06-13 2024-03-29 孙艺笑 一种基于差分进化狼群算法的欺骗干扰识别方法及装置
GB2585886B (en) 2019-07-19 2023-10-18 Kirintec Ltd A signal generator
CN111077503B (zh) * 2020-01-16 2022-04-01 深圳大学 1比特混合干扰信号生成方法、装置、设备及介质
EP4033682A1 (de) * 2021-01-20 2022-07-27 Nokia Technologies Oy Schutz von übertragungen gegen störeinflüsse
CN115426003B (zh) * 2022-08-15 2023-09-26 北京理工大学 一种基于ldpc信道编码的码字分集跳频抗干扰方法

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8055184B1 (en) * 2008-01-30 2011-11-08 Sprint Communications Company L.P. System and method for active jamming of confidential information transmitted at a point-of-sale reader

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014095651A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2936715B1 (de) 2016-09-07
FR2999842A1 (fr) 2014-06-20
SG11201504915VA (en) 2015-07-30
WO2014095651A1 (fr) 2014-06-26
FR2999842B1 (fr) 2015-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2936715B1 (de) Verfahren zur anlockung eines systems zum abfangen und stören durch einfügen von dummy-synchronisationsmustern in das emittierte signal und emitter zur umsetzung des verfahrens
EP2815508B1 (de) Verfahren zur übertragung nicht binärer fehlerkorrekturcodewörter mit ccsk-modulation, entsprechendes signal und entsprechende vorrichtung
EP0578313B1 (de) Verkettete Kodierung für OFDM-Übertragung
EP2947799B1 (de) Verfahren zur im weiteren sinne linearen turboentzerrung in einem system mit mehreren nutzern und für einen mehrantennen-empfänger
EP2232765A2 (de) Verfahren und einheit zur probabilistischen symmetrischen datenverschlüsselung
US8473738B2 (en) Mode of information transmission and complex protection
FR2985150A1 (fr) Procede de transmission d'un signal numerique pour un systeme ms-marc non-orthogonal, produit programme et dispositif relais correspondants
EP3391605B1 (de) Vorkompensation von störungen, die durch eine ofdm/oqam-modulation induziert werden, die schneller als nyquist ist
EP3398290A1 (de) Verfahren für monovalente eins-zu-eins-extraktion von schlüsseln aus dem propagationskanal
EP3539253A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum senden von verschlüsselten daten, verfahren und vorrichtung zum extrahieren von daten
Smith Error-correcting codes for fibre-optic communication systems
WO2018069661A1 (fr) Procédé de génération d'un signal multiporteuse, dispositif et programme d'ordinateur correspondant
EP3476071A1 (de) Dynamische und selektive fd-dsdf-übertragung eines digitalen signals für ein marc/mamrc-system mit vollduplex-relais und einem begrenzten rückweg
EP2904754B1 (de) Verfahren zur übertragung eines mehrträgersignals sowie entsprechende übertragungsvorrichtung und computerprogramm
FR2805102A1 (fr) Procedes et dispositifs d'emission et de reception d'information, et systemes les mettant en oeuvre
EP2936714B1 (de) Verfahren zur verschlüsselung in einem kommunikationssystem durch einfügen von dummy-mustern in einem zu übertragenden datenstrom
WO2005114863A1 (fr) Detection multiutilisateur iterative pour systemes de communications cdma sur canal mimo
Nergui et al. Reliable and robust transmission and storage techniques for medical images with patient information
Kumar et al. Exploiting WiMAX for covert transmission of secret data over fading channel
FR2706704A1 (fr) Système de transmission numérique à étalement de spectre obtenu par codage pseudo-aléatoire basse fréquence de l'information utile et procédé d'étalement et de compression de spectre utilisé dans un tel système.
FR3029375A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de relayage souple et selectif ssdf
WO2012089632A1 (fr) Procede et systeme permettant de tester une integrite cryptographique d'une donnee tolerante aux erreurs
Pfeiffer et al. Combining scrambling and multilevel coding for physical-layer security
FR2977425A1 (fr) Procede de traitement d'un paquet de donnees avant son emission dans un reseau de communication par radio, procede de traitement d'un paquet de donnees recu, dispositifs et systemes associes
Kamel Security for wireless communications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150608

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: THALES

Owner name: ETAT FRANCAIS REPRESENTE PAR LE DELEGUE GENERAL PO

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160520

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 827677

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20161015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013011246

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161207

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 827677

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161208

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170109

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161231

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161207

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013011246

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602013011246

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161231

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161213

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161213

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170701

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20161231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20131213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20171213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171213

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230517

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231122

Year of fee payment: 11