EP2880712A1 - Procédé de découplage électromagnétique entre une antenne et son mât de support et mât de support correspondant - Google Patents
Procédé de découplage électromagnétique entre une antenne et son mât de support et mât de support correspondantInfo
- Publication number
- EP2880712A1 EP2880712A1 EP13756618.8A EP13756618A EP2880712A1 EP 2880712 A1 EP2880712 A1 EP 2880712A1 EP 13756618 A EP13756618 A EP 13756618A EP 2880712 A1 EP2880712 A1 EP 2880712A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- mast
- antenna
- decoupling
- waves
- electrically conductive
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/52—Means for reducing coupling between antennas; Means for reducing coupling between an antenna and another structure
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/52—Means for reducing coupling between antennas; Means for reducing coupling between an antenna and another structure
- H01Q1/528—Means for reducing coupling between antennas; Means for reducing coupling between an antenna and another structure reducing the re-radiation of a support structure
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q21/00—Antenna arrays or systems
- H01Q21/24—Combinations of antenna units polarised in different directions for transmitting or receiving circularly and elliptically polarised waves or waves linearly polarised in any direction
Definitions
- the invention relates to a decoupling method between an antenna and its support mast and a corresponding support mast.
- Wave transmission systems for broadcast generally include an antenna transmitting horizontal polarization waves.
- some systems such as broadcasting or private radio, for example for police or firefighters, include antennas transmitting vertical polarization waves.
- Such an antenna is generally mounted on a vertical support mast, made of an electrically conductive material, connected to the Earth and arranged to allow the passage of lightning to the Earth when it reaches the mast.
- the electromagnetic radiation waves emitted towards the mast induces currents on the mast, thus creating a coupling between the antenna and the mast.
- Such inductive coupling between the antenna and the mast may cause parasitic radiation capable of deforming the antenna radiation, especially towards the mast, and reducing the efficiency of the antenna in this direction and in the surroundings, which has a disadvantage.
- the object of the present invention is to remedy this drawback and to improve the efficiency of an antenna which is arranged to emit at least partially vertical polarization waves and which is carried by a vertical antenna support mast, made of an electrically conductive material.
- the invention is intended in particular to allow the electromagnetic decoupling between the antenna and its support mast.
- the invention relates to a method of electromagnetic decoupling between a substantially vertical support mast, made of an electrically conductive material, and an antenna emitting, in a frequency band centered on a central frequency, polarization waves at least partially vertical and wide by said support mast, characterized in that said antenna is mounted on said mast by a connecting arm and in that there is arranged on the support mast, between the antenna and the mast, at least two electromagnetic decoupling devices comprising at least one electrically conductive decoupling element of length between one fifth and one third of the wavelength of the waves emitted by the antenna at the central frequency, at least one first device being disposed on the mast above said connecting arm and at least a second device being disposed on the mast below said connecting arm, so as to neutralize the currents induced in the mast by the waves emitted by said antenna.
- neutralize it is meant that the majority of currents induced by the antenna in the support mast are blocked so as to obtain a quasi-constant omnidirectional radiation of the antenna.
- quasi-constant means that the radiation deviation is less than 2 dB in all directions.
- the method according to the invention allows substantially equal radiation in all directions , within plus or minus 1 dB.
- the antenna is mounted on the mast by a connecting arm, at least a first decoupling device being disposed on the mast above said linkage arm and at least one second decoupling device being placed on the mast below said linkage connecting arm.
- An antenna is generally configured to work on a frequency band [,], that is to say to emit waves at frequencies between a low frequency fi and a high frequency f 2 , for example itself comprised in the VHF or UHF bands.
- the frequency band can be reduced to a single frequency.
- at least one decoupling device is disposed coaxially with the mast.
- the decoupling element has a length of between one quarter and one third, preferably approximately three tenths, of the wavelength of the waves emitted by the antenna at the central frequency.
- the decoupling element is at least partially parallel to the mast.
- the arrangement of such a decoupling device makes it possible to prevent these from decreasing the current. level of radiation from the antenna towards the antenna support mast.
- the arrangement of such a device on the mast allows the omnidirectionality of an antenna working with waves whose component is vertical, preferably whose main component is vertical, avoiding that the coupling of the The antenna and the support mast do not reduce the antenna radiation in the mast direction in the direction of the antenna towards the mast.
- At least one decoupling device is arranged along the mast at least over the height of the antenna.
- the invention also relates to a substantially vertical support mast, made of an electrically conductive material and comprising at least one antenna transmitting, in a frequency band centered on a central frequency, at least partially vertical polarization waves, characterized in that that the antenna is mounted on the mast by a connecting arm and in that it comprises at least two electromagnetic decoupling devices arranged between the antenna and the support mast, at least one first device being placed on the mast above the mast; above said link arm and at least one second device being disposed on the mast below said link arm, and comprising at least one electrically conductive decoupling element of length between one fifth and one third of the wavelength of the waves transmitted by the antenna at the central frequency, so as to neutralize the currents induced in the mast by the waves emitted by the the antenna.
- a decoupling device according to the invention can in particular make it possible to decouple independent antenna systems fixed on the mast.
- At least one decoupling device is coaxial with the mast.
- At least one decoupling element is at least partially parallel to the mast.
- At least one decoupling element comprises a portion of length between one-fourth and one-eighth of the wavelength of the waves emitted by the antenna at the central frequency, preferably extending parallel to the mast, so that to allow efficient operation of the broadband antenna.
- the mast comprises a plurality of decoupling elements, advantageously at least eight, preferably at least twelve, in the form of equilateral metal rods bent L-shaped and each comprising a first portion arranged vertically, in parallel at the mast, and a second portion disposed horizontally, perpendicular to the mast and connecting it to the lower end of the first portion so as to form a short-circuit line.
- decoupling elements advantageously at least eight, preferably at least twelve, in the form of equilateral metal rods bent L-shaped and each comprising a first portion arranged vertically, in parallel at the mast, and a second portion disposed horizontally, perpendicular to the mast and connecting it to the lower end of the first portion so as to form a short-circuit line.
- the upper end of the first portion is then in open circuit so as to allow on the mast, at the right of said upper end, an electrical break of the mast.
- the antenna is working with waves in a frequency band [f 1 # f 2 ] centered around a central frequency f 0 , the term "relative frequency band” refers to the ratio (f 2 - fi) / fo, often expressed percentage.
- the mast comprises a plurality of cages
- the vertical misalignment of the cages with respect to the mast modifies little the performance of the decoupling device. Nevertheless, the same orientation is preferentially maintained on all the cages to allow a regular electric break of the mast.
- break electrical means here the neutralization of the currents induced by the antenna in the support mast.
- the mast comprises a plurality of decoupling devices
- the sum of the height of a device and the spacing between said device and a device disposed consecutively on the mast is less than a quarter of the wavelength at the high frequency of the frequency band in which the antenna operates. Therefore, when two decoupling devices are arranged so spaced along the mast, the portion of the mast at the right of said sum forms a section electrically insulating the portion of the mast above said section of the portion of the mast located below said section.
- Such an isolation section greatly attenuates the parasitic radiation created by the currents induced by the radiation of the antenna.
- a number of decoupling cages as defined above and placed at least over the height of the portion of the mast that is at right angles to the antenna makes it possible to limit the variations of radiation from the antenna to the antenna. or at least 1 dB at 360 °.
- the cage or cages are arranged over a height h greater than or equal to 1.5 ⁇ L, where L represents the largest dimension of the antenna in the vertical direction.
- the number of cages is greater than or equal to four, preferably on a mast length of between half the wavelength and the length of the antenna. wave at the high frequency f 2 of operation of the antenna.
- the antenna is omnidirectional.
- the omnidirectional antenna is a dipole, for example of the half-wave dipole type, configured to emit substantially vertical polarization waves.
- the omnidirectional antenna is a monopole, for example of the ground plane antenna type.
- a monopole comprises a ground plane, for example perpendicular to the monopole.
- the antenna may also be in the form of a double dipole, for example positioned on the upper part of the mast or a double V-dipole generating elliptical polarization waves.
- the mast comprises at least one metal tube, for example whose section is less than or equal to one-tenth of the wavelength corresponding to the central frequency emitted by the antenna. This allows the antenna to work effectively in FM band.
- the mast is in the form of a single metal tube.
- the decoupling device (s) are arranged along the mast in line with the antenna at least over the height thereof.
- the invention also relates to an electromagnetic decoupling device between a support mast, as defined above, substantially vertical, made of an electrically conductive material, and an antenna emitting, in a frequency band centered on a central frequency, at least partially vertical polarization waves carried by said support mast, characterized in that it is configured to be disposed between the antenna and the support mast and in that it comprises at least one electrically decoupling element conductor of length between one fifth and one third of the wavelength of the waves emitted by the antenna at the central frequency, so as to neutralize the currents induced in the mast by the waves emitted by said antenna.
- Such a device allows a significant reduction of the contact currents and risks of intermodulation on the carrier mast.
- the decoupling device comprises a plurality of decoupling elements, advantageously at least eight, preferably at least twelve, in the form of metal rods, preferably made of a metal rod.
- metal or a metal alloy of high conductivity for example greater than 1.10 6 S / m.
- the rods are equidistributed.
- the rods are bent L-shaped and each comprise a first portion, configured to be disposed vertically, parallel to the mast, and a second portion, configured to be disposed horizontally, perpendicular to the mast and connecting it to the lower end of the first portion so as to form a short-circuit line.
- the decoupling device comprises an electrically conductive ring connecting the upper ends of the first portion of each of the rods so as to form a substantially cylindrical structure or cage configured to be mounted coaxially. on the support mast.
- a structure is electrically conductive and may be, for example, metallic.
- the device may further comprise a second electrically conductive ring of substantially the same diameter as the first ring connecting the rods to each other at their bends.
- the diameter D of a cage can be variable and depends on the diameter d of the mast.
- Such a device may allow the antenna to work with waves over a wide frequency band, for example wide enough to cover the FM band.
- the height of a cage can also be a function of its diameter D.
- the total length of the rods is between ⁇ / 4.1 and ⁇ / 3, preferably approximately equal to 0.3 x ⁇ , at the central frequency f 0 of operation, for example for a half-wave dipole situated at a distance of ⁇ / 4 from the mast.
- Figure 1 illustrates a radiation pattern of an antenna mounted on a vertical mast of the prior art.
- Figure 2 is a schematic sectional representation of a mast portion comprising a first embodiment of the decoupling device according to the invention.
- Figure 3 is a schematic sectional representation of a mast portion comprising a second embodiment of the decoupling device according to the invention.
- Figure 4 is a perspective view of a mast portion comprising a half-wave doublet and a third embodiment of the decoupling device according to the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a mast portion comprising an antenna, comprising two V-shaped metal elements generating a predominantly vertical elliptical polarization, and the third embodiment of the decoupling device according to the invention of FIG. figure 4.
- Figure 6a is a partial perspective view of a particular embodiment of a mast according to the invention comprising a ground plane antenna.
- Figure 6b is a partial perspective view of a particular embodiment of a mast according to the invention comprising a ground plane antenna.
- Figure 6c is a partial perspective view of a particular embodiment of a mast according to the invention comprising a ground plane antenna.
- Figure 6d is a partial perspective view of a particular embodiment of a mast according to the invention comprising a ground plane antenna.
- Figure 6e is a partial perspective view of a particular embodiment of a mast according to the invention comprising a ground plane antenna.
- Figure 7 illustrates a particular form of decoupling device according to the invention of substantially frustoconical shape.
- Figure 8 illustrates a particular form of decoupling device according to the invention comprising decoupling elements of complex shape.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a particular form of decoupling device according to the invention comprising elements made of dielectric material.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a first radiation diagram of an antenna mounted on a vertical mast with and without the decoupling device according to the invention.
- FIG. 11 illustrates a second radiation diagram of an antenna mounted on a vertical mast with and without the decoupling device according to the invention.
- FIG. 1 represents a radiation diagram of an antenna mounted on a vertical mast which does not comprise a decoupling device according to the invention.
- the antenna used is a dipole, emitting vertical polarization waves, positioned on the radiation pattern at zero degrees and zero dB.
- the mast is a vertically disposed metal tube whose position corresponds to the center of the radiation pattern.
- the radiation of the antenna is attenuated by about 7 dB in the direction 180 °, that is to say in the direction of the mast , in the direction of the antenna towards the mast.
- Figures 2 to 9 show a support pole 1, made of an electrically conductive material, substantially vertical and on which are mounted respectively different embodiments of the decoupling device 3 according to the invention.
- the mast 1 is in the form of a cylindrical tube, of diameter d, made of an electrically conductive material, for example of metal or a metal alloy, preferably of high conductivity, for example greater than 1.10 6 S / m. .
- the mast 1 could also be in the form of a post, for example of rectangular section, and / or comprise a plurality of support elements, for example a plurality of metal tubes, without this being limited to the scope. of the present invention.
- the support mast 1 comprises an antenna 2, shown in FIGS. 4 to 9, mounted on the mast 1 by a connecting arm 4 to the right of the decoupling device 3.
- the antenna 2 is configured to transmit in a frequency band [f 1 , f 2 ], that is to say to emit waves at frequencies between a low frequency fi and a high frequency f 2 , for example itself included in the VHF or UHF bands.
- the diameter of the mast 1 is advantageously of small size, preferably less than one-tenth of the wavelength ⁇ 0 associated with the central frequency f 0 .
- the diameter of the mast 1 is preferably less than 340 mm, for example between 60 and 125 mm.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a first embodiment of a decoupling device 3 of a mast according to the invention in the form of a tubular portion 5 made of an electrically conductive material.
- the tubular portion 5 is open at its upper end and closed at its lower end by a contact ring 6 perpendicular to the mast 1 made of an electrically conductive material and extending over the surface between the mast 1 and the tubular portion 5 of to electrically connect the tubular portion 5 to the mast 1.
- the tubular portion 5 thus surrounds the tube 1 so as to form a coaxial guide.
- the sum of the length of the tubular portion 5 and the radial dimension of the ring, between the tubular portion 5 and the mast 1, is of length approximately equal to three tenths of the wavelength ⁇ 0 of the waves emitted by the antenna (not shown) at the center frequency f 0 .
- the impedance of the coaxial guide formed by the assembly of the mast 1 and the tubular portion 5 is theoretically infinite at point B since it is located at a quarter-wave of a short-circuit located at point A.
- the mast 1 is thus electrically cut at the plane orthogonal to the section of the tube and passing through the point B.
- Such a decoupling device operates more particularly on cylindrical metal tubes of small section, that is to say whose diameter is less than one tenth of the wavelength associated with the central frequency f 0 , and present, by its operating principle, a frequency selectivity.
- the frequency selectivity, and thus the efficiency of the blockage of currents induced by waves at frequencies within large bandwidths, is therefore related to the characteristic impedance of the decoupling device which must be as high as possible .
- FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of a decoupling device 3 of a mast according to the invention in the form of a decoupling element 7 made of an electrically conductive material of length approximately equal to a quarter of the wavelength ⁇ 0/4 of the waves emitted by the antenna (not shown) at the center frequency f 0 .
- the decoupling element 7 comprises a first portion 9 disposed parallel to the mast 1 and a second portion 11 connecting the first portion 9 to the mast 1 and disposed perpendicularly thereto.
- the sum of the lengths of the first and the second portion being approximately equal to a quarter of the wavelength ⁇ 0/4 of the waves emitted by the antenna (not shown) at the center frequency f 0 .
- the decoupling element 7 thus behaves as a short-circuited asymmetric two-wire line where the two conductors, that is to say the mast 1 and the decoupling element 7, are of different cross-sections.
- the two conductors that is to say the mast 1 and the decoupling element 7, are of different cross-sections.
- B 'an infinite impedance to f 0 if the path ⁇ is equal to one quarter of the wavelength ⁇ 0 associated with this frequency f
- This type of device less complex than the previous one illustrated in FIG. 2, thus has greater installation flexibility and is more easily adaptable to a mast 1 of larger section, for example of a diameter greater than 125 mm in diameter. FM band.
- a decoupling device has a greater frequency selectivity than that of the decoupling device illustrated in FIG. 2.
- the almost single frequency characteristic of the induced electrical blocking can be substantially improved by widening the width of the constituent metal strips of the device. decoupling.
- Figures 4 and 5 each illustrate a mast 1 comprising an antenna 2 and four decoupling devices 3 according to a third embodiment.
- the antenna 2, illustrated in FIG. 4, is in the form of a half-wave doublet dipole disposed vertically, parallel to the mast 1, and configured to emit polarized waves substantially vertically in an omnidirectional manner.
- the antenna 2, illustrated in FIG. 5, is in the form of two V-shaped metal elements 2b, generating elliptical polarization waves, each mounted on the link arm 4 and whose planes are substantially orthogonal to one another. .
- the antenna 2 is mounted on the mast 1 by a connecting arm 4 perpendicular to the mast 1.
- Each decoupling device 3 is in the form of a substantially cylindrical metal cage, of diameter D, comprising twelve decoupling elements in the form of metal rods 17, electrically conductive, bent L-shaped and evenly distributed around it of the mast 1.
- the cages 3 are mounted superimposed one above the other along the mast 1 and coaxially with it.
- the distance between the rings 20 of two cages 3 arranged consecutively is less than a quarter of the wavelength ⁇ 2 corresponding to the high frequency f 2 of the frequency band [f 1 , f 2 ] in which the antenna 2 is working.
- Each rod 17 comprises a first portion 17a disposed vertically, parallel to the mast 1, and a second portion 17b, disposed horizontally, perpendicular to the mast 1 and connecting the lower end of the first portion 17a to the mast 1.
- the first portion 17a and the second portion 17b are interconnected at a bend 18.
- the sum of the lengths of the first portion 17a and the second portion 17b is approximately equal to three tenths of the wavelength ⁇ 0 of the waves emitted by the antenna 2 at the center frequency f 0 .
- the rods 17 are connected together at their respective upper ends 19 by a metal ring 20 allowing an electrical connection between said rods 17 and reinforcing the structure of the decoupling device 3.
- a second metal ring (not shown) may be arranged to connect the rods 17 at their respective bends 18 so as to create a second electrical junction between the rods 17 and to further strengthen the structure of the decoupling device 3.
- the number of metal cages 3 is evaluated so as to restrict the metal support sections contributing to the radiation of the antenna, that is to say the mast portions 1 located between two decoupling devices 3, to length sections less than ⁇ 0/4 .
- the number of decoupling devices 3 is preferably greater than or equal to four over a metal support length of between ⁇ 0/2 and ⁇ 0 depending on the height h. retained metal cages, for example between ⁇ 0/4 and ⁇ 0/8 at the center frequency f 0 .
- the decoupling device 3 according to the invention can thus be configured to decouple antennas of the double dipole type, such as the half-wave doublet illustrated in FIG. 4, but also more generally any grouping of antennas or aerials of FIG. type dipoles or the like emitting polarization waves at least substantially vertical.
- the decoupling device 3 according to the invention can thus be configured to decouple V-dipole type antennas as shown in FIG. 5.
- a decoupling device 3 of a mast can also be configured to decouple antennas 2 of the "ground plane" type.
- an antenna 2 comprises a monopole 22 of the quarter-wave type placed on a discretized ground plane 24 consisting of a limited to very limited number of metal rods 26, for example four.
- the ground plane 24 constituted by these rods 26 is not flat but inclined downwards, as illustrated by FIGS. 6a to 6e, so as to reduce the main radiation to a site close to 0 ° (line horizon).
- the decoupling device does not allow to optimize the azimuthal diagram of the antenna but its diagram in site by blocking the currents induced on the mast and which make vary the angle of appearance of the lateral lobes of radiation.
- the following two configurations of the mast 1, the antenna 2 and the decoupling device 3 can be used:
- a decoupling device 3 (Figure 6a), preferably two decoupling devices 3 ( Figures 6b) are arranged under the antenna at the upper end of the support mast 1;
- FIGS. 6c to 6e in which the ground plane 24 constitutes the short-circuited part, that is to say the ring 20, of the cage metal 3 closest to the antenna 2 ( Figure 6c) or the direct support of the latter ( Figure 6d).
- the ground plane 24 constitutes the short-circuited part, that is to say the ring 20, of the cage metal 3 closest to the antenna 2 ( Figure 6c) or the direct support of the latter ( Figure 6d).
- a second decoupling device 3 positioned just below and slightly smaller diameter to that of the first device 3 can be realized to allow efficient operation over a wider relative frequency band, as shown in Figure 6d.
- a second metal cage 3 can be added to the mast 1 shown in Figure 6d to improve the efficiency of the device, as shown in Figure 6e.
- the decoupling devices 3 may be in the form of cages of substantially frustoconical shape.
- the cages 3 illustrated in FIG. 7 comprise a closed side wall surrounding the mast 1, the ends of the cage 3 being open.
- the side wall 30 could be perforated or discretized.
- the solution can of course be discretized in the same manner as described above, the number of metal elements being preferably greater than twelve to ensure optimum performance.
- the decoupling devices 3 may be in the form of cages formed of metal decoupling elements 32 of FIG.
- the cage 3 here comprises a second ring 33 connecting the elements of complex shapes at their lower ends so as to form an electrical junction between them.
- the cages 3 further comprise one (or more) element 34 made of a dielectric material completely filling the inside of the cage 3. The use of such a dielectric material reduces the dimensions of the decoupling device 3, in particular in the direction of the height h of the cage. The reduction is carried out on the dimension of each metal cage but not on the spacing between the cages 3.
- Figures 10 and 11 illustrate two radiation patterns of an antenna 2 supported by a mast 1 in a frequency band centered respectively at frequencies 88 and 108 MHz.
- the solid line curve illustrates the radiation of an antenna 2 supported by a mast 1 comprising a decoupling device 3 according to the invention and the curve in dotted lines illustrates the radiation of a supported antenna 2 by a mast 1 not including a decoupling device according to the invention.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1257441A FR2994341B1 (fr) | 2012-07-31 | 2012-07-31 | Procede et dispositif de decouplage electromagnetique entre une antenne et son mat de support |
PCT/FR2013/051824 WO2014020272A1 (fr) | 2012-07-31 | 2013-07-29 | Procédé de découplage électromagnétique entre une antenne et son mât de support et mât de support correspondant |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2880712A1 true EP2880712A1 (fr) | 2015-06-10 |
EP2880712B1 EP2880712B1 (fr) | 2016-09-07 |
Family
ID=47178076
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13756618.8A Not-in-force EP2880712B1 (fr) | 2012-07-31 | 2013-07-29 | Procédé de découplage électromagnétique entre une antenne et son mât de support et mât de support correspondant |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2880712B1 (fr) |
FR (1) | FR2994341B1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2014020272A1 (fr) |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2184940A (en) * | 1937-07-27 | 1939-12-26 | Emi Ltd | Aerial mounting |
US4700196A (en) * | 1986-08-01 | 1987-10-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Highly decoupled cosited antennas |
-
2012
- 2012-07-31 FR FR1257441A patent/FR2994341B1/fr active Active
-
2013
- 2013-07-29 WO PCT/FR2013/051824 patent/WO2014020272A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2013-07-29 EP EP13756618.8A patent/EP2880712B1/fr not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2014020272A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR2994341B1 (fr) | 2015-04-10 |
FR2994341A1 (fr) | 2014-02-07 |
EP2880712B1 (fr) | 2016-09-07 |
WO2014020272A1 (fr) | 2014-02-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
FR3068176B1 (fr) | Structure antennaire colineaire a acces independants | |
FR2960710A1 (fr) | Element rayonnant a double polarisation d'antenne multibande | |
EP2625741B1 (fr) | Antenne de grande dimension à ondes de surface et à large bande | |
FR2911725A1 (fr) | Antenne ou element d'antenne ultra-large bande. | |
FR2903234A1 (fr) | Element parasite pour antenne helicoidale. | |
FR2944917A1 (fr) | Antenne multiplie large bande a faible profil | |
EP2543111B1 (fr) | Structure antennaire à dipôles | |
EP1516393B1 (fr) | Dispositif rayonnant bi-bande a double polarisation | |
CA2489776C (fr) | Antenne a brins a polarisation circulaire | |
EP1181744B1 (fr) | Antenne a polarisation verticale | |
WO2015007746A1 (fr) | Antenne de type bouchon et structure antennaire et ensemble antennaire associés | |
EP2880712B1 (fr) | Procédé de découplage électromagnétique entre une antenne et son mât de support et mât de support correspondant | |
EP1432073A1 (fr) | Antenne colinéaire du type coaxial alterné | |
EP3227960A1 (fr) | Antenne reseau multicouche du type auto-complementaire | |
FR2987500A1 (fr) | Dispositif a bande interdite electromagnetique, utilisation dans un dispositif antennaire et procede de determination des parametres du dispositif antennaire | |
EP2449629B1 (fr) | Systeme antennaire compacte omnidirectionnel et large bande comportant deux acces emission et reception separes fortement decouples | |
EP2610965B1 (fr) | Antenne compacte à large bande à double polarisation linéaire | |
WO2012104433A1 (fr) | Système d'antenne à polarisation circulaire et lecteur d'étiquette radiofréquence comportant un tel système | |
FR2518321A1 (fr) | Ensemble rayonnant a deux antennes superposees travaillant dans une meme gamme de frequences | |
FR2996686A1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif de decouplage electromagnetique entre deux systemes d'antennes montes sur un mat de support | |
WO2016139403A1 (fr) | Structure antennaire omnidirectionnelle large bande | |
EP0850496B1 (fr) | Dispositif d'emission a antenne omnidirectionnelle | |
EP0792528B1 (fr) | Antenne de type dip le demi-onde | |
CH178703A (fr) | Installation de radiocommunication à ondes courtes. | |
EP0778632B1 (fr) | Radioaltimètre protégé contre diverses détections |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20150127 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160317 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 827583 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602013011182 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161207 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 827583 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161208 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161207 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170109 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170107 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602013011182 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602013011182 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20170729 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180330 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170729 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180201 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170729 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170729 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130729 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160907 |