EP2875888B1 - Tool, system and method for separating a head from a shaft - Google Patents
Tool, system and method for separating a head from a shaft Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2875888B1 EP2875888B1 EP14003786.2A EP14003786A EP2875888B1 EP 2875888 B1 EP2875888 B1 EP 2875888B1 EP 14003786 A EP14003786 A EP 14003786A EP 2875888 B1 EP2875888 B1 EP 2875888B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- jaws
- head
- tool
- shank
- blades
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 7
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 53
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 101100008048 Caenorhabditis elegans cut-4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003716 rejuvenation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B17/00—Hand cutting tools, i.e. with the cutting action actuated by muscle power with two jaws which come into abutting contact
- B26B17/006—Hand cutting tools, i.e. with the cutting action actuated by muscle power with two jaws which come into abutting contact having cutting edges parallel to a pivot axis
Definitions
- the invention relates to a tool for separating a head from a shaft having the features of the preamble of claim 1, a system comprising such a tool and a head and a shaft having the features of the preamble of claim 8 and a method for separating a head from one Shaft with the tool having the features of the preamble of claim 10.
- a tool, system and method is for example from the US 5 984 272 A out.
- the invention is particularly intended to separate the head from an anchor which is anchored in an anchorage, so that the head rests against a surface of the anchorage or a component disposed thereon.
- Anchored means that the anchor is anchored in the anchorage.
- the intended application of the invention is the removal of fire protection panels on tubbing in tunnels, for example for testing, inspection or maintenance purposes. If the fire protection plates with anchors are fastened to the tubbings on the inside, heads of shafts of the anchors must be separated in order to be able to remove the fire protection plates. Since the head of an anchor rests on the surface of the fire protection plate, when the anchor is anchored as intended, the shaft of the anchor is inaccessible.
- anchors used in tunnel construction must be made of stainless steels, for example grade A4 or even grade 1.4529, ie steels of high strength and toughness.
- the invention is not limited to severing heads of high strength and / or toughened steel anchors, but is generally applicable to severing heads of shafts of any material.
- the object of the invention is to provide an easily manageable tool for separating a head of a shaft when the shaft is anchored in an anchorage and the head rests against a surface of the anchor base or a component disposed thereon.
- the tool is also intended for heads and shanks made of steels higher Strength and toughness are suitable.
- the term "tool” is to be interpreted broadly and may include, for example, a device. It is another object of the invention to provide a system with such a tool and a head and a shaft and a method for separating a head from a shaft with such a tool.
- the tool according to the invention has at least two jaws with cutting edges, which can be moved towards one another and moved away from one another. Moving the jaws and cutting toward each other is also referred to as closing and moving the jaws and the cutting away from each other also as opening the tool or the jaws.
- the jaws have a projecting cutting edge and a recessed cutting edge, which are arranged, for example, side by side on the jaw.
- the cutting edges are arranged and the tool is designed so that when closing the jaws, the projecting cutting edges come so close to each other that they separate a shaft located between them.
- the projecting blades may be arranged to contact each other when the jaws are closed or, with the jaws closed, a gap exists between the projecting blades which is so small that the shank between the blades will break despite the gap between the projecting blades.
- the design is dependent on a diameter and a material of the shaft to be separated with the tool.
- the recessed cutting edges are spaced from each other when the jaws are closed, which is about as large or larger as the shaft is thick.
- the recessed cuts are first used: The tool according to the invention is attached to the head so that the recessed cutting edges on a surface of an anchorage or a component disposed thereon or with the smallest possible distance from the surface against a circumference of the head reach. Subsequently, the tool is closed, with the jaws and the blades move towards each other. The recessed cutting edges on the circumference of the head pass between the head and the surface, thereby lifting the head slightly, for example about 1 mm to 2 mm, from the surface and pulling the shaft out of the anchor base accordingly.
- expanding expansion anchors can always be pulled out so far from an anchorage in which they are anchored.
- Post-spreading anchor which is in an anchor hole in anchored to an anchorage, spread, ie spread on when the anchor hole widens, for example, as a result of cracking in a tensile zone of the anchorage.
- the post-expanding armature is a bolt anchor having a spreading cone widening in diameter opposite the direction of insertion of the armature into a borehole, on which an expansion sleeve displaceable in the longitudinal direction along the shaft of the expansion armature is arranged.
- the re-spreading takes place at a tensile stress of the expansion anchor, which pulls the expansion anchor a short distance from the Ankergrurid by the shank arranged on the expansion cone further pulled into the slidably disposed on the shaft expansion sleeve and the expansion sleeve is widened in the radial direction.
- other anchors, nails and the like. Can be pulled out a short distance from an anchorage by the recessed edges of the tool according to the invention as described attached to the circumference of the head and penetrate by closing the jaws between the head and the surface.
- the recessed cutting edges are not used for cutting, but rather like cutting wedges between the head and the surface, the recessed cutting edges are comparatively slightly stressed and therefore relatively sharp, without breaking off or breaking out during use. Sharp cutting enables or at least facilitates penetration between a head resting on a surface and the surface.
- the stress on the recessed cutting edges of the tool according to the invention is independent of the material of the shank from which the head is to be cut, because the recessed cutting edges do not separate the shank.
- the distance between the recessed cutters is preferably at least as great as the shank is thick, so that the recessed cutters do not rest or lie against the shaft without force. It is also conceivable a slightly smaller distance of the recessed cutting each other with closed jaws. In any case, their distance should be chosen so large that a contact force of the recessed cutting edges on the shank with closed jaws does not damage the recessed cutting edges, even if they are sharp-edged.
- a short distance of, for example, 1 mm to 2 mm from the anchor base with the recessed cutting edges tool according to the invention is opened so that the protruding cutting so far away from each other that between the head and the surface on the shaft can be recognized.
- the projecting blades may be rounded or blunt, which they preferably are, so that they withstand the stress of cutting the shaft.
- blunt is common that the projecting cutting, for example, have a narrow, flat surface instead of an edge.
- the protruding cutting edges can be rounded or blunted to such an extent that they can withstand the severing of a shank made of a steel of high strength and toughness.
- the invention enables a low-cost tool, with which the heads of shafts can be quickly separated by shutting the tool twice shafts, even if the shanks are made of a steel of high strength and toughness.
- a preferred embodiment of the invention proposes that the jaws have abutment surfaces which bear against the surface when the tool is attached to the head to be severed or the shank of the tool to be severed and support the tool on the surface there.
- the recessed cutting edges are in a plane with the abutment surfaces, wherein the abutment surfaces may also be rounded.
- the abutment surfaces end at the recessed cutting edges.
- the jaws are formed at least in the region of the recessed cutters in the manner of wedges, which act as wedges when penetrating between the head and the surface and lift the head by wedging force from the surface, wherein the jaws are supported on the surface.
- the jaws have two wedge surfaces whose transition form the preferably sharp-edged, recessed cutting.
- One of the wedge surfaces is, for example, the abutment surface of the jaws, with which the jaws are supported on the surface when the shaft is pulled out of the anchorage.
- the other wedge surfaces engage under the head and press it from the surface when the jaws are closed.
- the wedge surfaces can be flat or, for example, also rounded, the abutment surfaces, if they are rounded, preferably convex and the other wedge surfaces, when rounded, are preferably concavely rounded.
- a preferred embodiment of the invention provides for a lateral stop of the tool or the jaws at one end of the projecting cutting edges.
- the stop abuts the side of the head to be separated from the shaft when the projecting blades between the head and the surface are attached to the shaft.
- the stop simplifies positioning of the tool when attaching the projecting cutting edges on the shaft. For the recessed cutting the projecting cutting edges can form a lateral stop.
- the tool according to the invention is a hand tool, d. H. a hand-held tool, in particular, it is a pair of pliers.
- the tool according to the invention may for example be a side cutter, wherein the projecting and the recessed cutting edges are arranged one behind the other on one side of the jaws or the projecting edges on one side and the recessed edges on the other side of the jaws.
- An embodiment of the invention provides a front cutter as a pliers, in which the cutting edges are arranged at the front, a pliers joint distal ends of the jaws.
- the pliers can be a lever pliers with a force translating lever mechanism.
- the peripheral surface of the head to be separated from the shaft may be perpendicular to the surface when the head abuts the surface. Even then, in most cases, the recessed edges of the tool according to the invention will force between the head and the surface when the jaws are closed, especially when the recessed edges are sharp-edged. However, it facilitates the placement of the tool according to the invention, the penetration of the recessed cutters between the head and the surface, the lifting of the head from the surface and the withdrawal of the stem a short distance from the anchor base when the head has an undercut on the circumference.
- the undercut may be formed, for example, by a rounded peripheral edge of the head or a chamfer on the circumference of the head, which tapers to the surface, ie to the shank.
- a low undercut that is so high is enough the recessed cutters can reach them when the head abuts the surface.
- the undercut is formed such that an end of the undercut remote from the shaft has a greater distance from a bottom of the head than the recessed cutting edges from the abutment surface of the tool.
- a head with such a frusto-conical undercut is described in one embodiment.
- the peripheral surface of the head is frusto-conical and tapers in the direction of the shaft.
- the frusto-conical, the undercut forming peripheral surface of the head is axially higher than the distance of the recessed edges of the tool from the abutment surfaces, so that the recessed edges when attaching and closing the tool against the frusto-conical peripheral surface of the shaft to be separated from a shaft head, when the tool with its abutment surfaces on a surface or an attached object and the bottom of the head also rests on the surface.
- a despreading expansion anchor with a shaft and a head to be separated from the shaft is described.
- a nachsp Schwarzender expansion anchor is particularly suitable for separating his head with the tool according to the invention, because its shaft can be pulled out as already explained as in a Nachspreizen a short distance from the anchorage.
- inventive tool 1 is a Hebelvornschneider 2, so a pair of pliers with a lever mechanism 3 to a power transmission, the arranged transversely to the pliers cutting 4, 5 (see FIG. 2 ) has at front ends of two jaws 6 of the forceps.
- the tool 1 is thus a hand tool or a hand-operated tool 1.
- levers 19 By pivoting of levers 19, the jaws 6 together with the cutting edges 4, 5 via the lever mechanism 3 and moved apart, which also as closing and opening of the jaws 6 and des Tool 1 can be construed.
- FIG. 2 shows a front part of the tool 1 with closed jaws 6 from an opposite side as.
- FIG. 1 shows a front part of the tool 1 with closed jaws 6 from an opposite side as.
- the jaws 6 each have on one side a recessed edge 4 and a projecting edge 5 next to the recessed edge 4 on the other side of the jaws 6.
- the recessed cutting edges 4 are sharp-edged, whereas the projecting cutting edges 5 are rounded.
- Front faces of the jaws 6 form abutment surfaces 7, which end at the recessed cut 4.
- the jaws 6 have wedge surfaces 8, which likewise end at the recessed edges 4, so that 6 wedges 9 are formed on the jaws, which are bounded by the wedge surfaces 8 and the abutment surfaces 7 and pointed to the sharp-edged, recessed cutting edge. 4 leak.
- the wedge surfaces 8 are concave, but this is not mandatory for the invention.
- the projecting blades 5 are formed on wedges 10 projecting from the jaws 6 inwardly towards each other.
- the tool 1 On the side of the jaws 6, on which the projecting cutting edges 5 are arranged, the tool 1 has a lateral stop 11.
- the tool 1 is used for separating a head 12 from a shaft 13 of an in FIG. 3
- the expansion anchor 20 serves for fastening, for example, fire protection plates 14 to an anchorage 15, for example a tubbing in a tunnel (FIG. FIG. 4 ).
- the shaft 13 passes through the fire protection plate 14 and is anchored in the tubbing 15.
- the tubbing forms the anchoring base 15.
- the side of the fire protection plate 14 facing away from the anchoring base 15 forms a surface 1.8.
- the expansion anchor 20 can be nachspreizen, ie further spread, for example, if an anchor hole in which the expansion anchor is anchored, as a result of cracking in a tensile zone of the tubing or anchor base 15 expands.
- the shank 13 has an expansion cone 21 at its head far end, on which a slotted expansion sleeve 22 is arranged.
- a slotted expansion sleeve 22 is arranged.
- the head 12 has a chamfer 16 on its circumference, which tapers in the direction of the shaft 13.
- the chamfer 16 is a frusto-conical surface on the circumference of the head 12, which tapers in the direction of the shaft 13 and forms a peripheral surface of the head 12.
- the tool 1 As in Figure. 4 drawn with open jaws 6 set so that the abutment surfaces 7 abut a surface 18 of the fire protection plate 14, the head 12 of the expansion anchor 20 is located between the recessed cutting edge 4 and the blades 4 when closing against the circumference of the head 12 arrive.
- the recessed cutting edges 4 reach against the chamfer 16, which forms the undercut 17 of the head 12.
- the head 12 is pressed or lifted off the fire protection plate 14 and the shaft 13 accordingly pulled out of the tubbing or anchorage 15 ( FIG. 5 ).
- the head 12 is lifted by, for example, about 2 mm from the fire protection plate 14 and the shaft 13 is also pulled out by about 2 mm from the tubbing or anchorage 15 accordingly.
- the shaft 13 is now accessible between the head 12 and the fire protection plate 14.
- the jaws 6 are opened again and the tool 1 is offset laterally so that the shaft 13 is now located between the projecting blades 5.
- the jaws 6 are closed again, the projecting blades 5 penetrate into the shaft 13 and severing it, so that the head 12 is separated from the shaft 13, as in FIG. 6 shown.
- the fire protection plate 14 can be removed from the anchorage.
- the fire protection plate 14 can be fastened with new expansion anchors 20 again on the tubbing or anchorage 15.
- expansion anchors are made of corrosion-resistant steel of high strength and toughness, for example grade A4 or 1.4529.
- a correspondingly stable tool 1 is necessary. Because the recessed blades 4 are not used to sever the shaft 13, their stress is comparatively low and they may therefore be sharp-edged to allow them to be forced between the head 12 resting against the fire protection plate 14 and the fire protection plate 14.
- the projecting cutting edges 5 used for cutting the shaft 13 can be by their rounding or by a blunt formation (not shown) so stable that they are able to sever the shaft 13 without being damaged, even if the shaft 13 is made of a steel of high strength and toughness.
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Werkzeug zum Abtrennen eines Kopfs von einem Schaft mit den Merkmalen des Oberbegriffs des Anspruchs 1, ein System umfassend ein solches Werkzeug sowie einen Kopf und einen Schaft mit den Merkmalen des Oberbegriffs des Anspruchs 8 und ein Verfahren zum Abtrennen eines Kopfs von einem Schaft mit dem Werkzeug mit den Merkmalen des Oberbegriffs des Anspruchs 10. Ein derartiges Werkzeug, System und Verfahren geht beispielsweise aus der
Die Erfindung ist insbesondere dazu vorgesehen, den Kopf von einem Anker abzutrennen, der in einem Ankergrund verankert ist, so dass der Kopf an einer Oberfläche des Ankergrunds oder eines daran angeordneten Bauteils anliegt. Verankert bedeutet, dass der Anker im Ankergrund befestigt ist. Vorgesehener Anwendungsfall der Erfindung ist das Entfernen von Brandschutzplatten an Tübbings in Tunnels beispielsweise zu Prüf-, Revisions- oder Wartungszwecken. Sind die Brandschutzplatten mit Ankern innen an den Tübbings befestigt, müssen Köpfe von Schäften der Anker abgetrennt werden, um die Brandschutzplatten abnehmen zu können. Da der Kopf eines Ankers auf der Oberfläche der Brandschutzplatte aufliegt, wenn der Anker wie vorgesehen verankert ist, ist der Schaft des Ankers unzugänglich. Zu berücksichtigen ist, dass Anker im Tunnelbau aus nichtrostenden Stählen beispielsweise der Sorte A4 oder sogar der Sorte 1.4529 bestehen (müssen), also aus Stählen hoher Festigkeit und Zähigkeit. Allerdings ist die Erfindung nicht auf das Abtrennen von Köpfen von Ankern aus Stählen hoher Festigkeit und/oder Zähigkeit beschränkt, sondern allgemein zum Abtrennen von Köpfen von Schäften aus beliebigem Werkstoff verwendbar.The invention is particularly intended to separate the head from an anchor which is anchored in an anchorage, so that the head rests against a surface of the anchorage or a component disposed thereon. Anchored means that the anchor is anchored in the anchorage. The intended application of the invention is the removal of fire protection panels on tubbing in tunnels, for example for testing, inspection or maintenance purposes. If the fire protection plates with anchors are fastened to the tubbings on the inside, heads of shafts of the anchors must be separated in order to be able to remove the fire protection plates. Since the head of an anchor rests on the surface of the fire protection plate, when the anchor is anchored as intended, the shaft of the anchor is inaccessible. It should be borne in mind that anchors used in tunnel construction must be made of stainless steels, for example grade A4 or even grade 1.4529, ie steels of high strength and toughness. However, the invention is not limited to severing heads of high strength and / or toughened steel anchors, but is generally applicable to severing heads of shafts of any material.
aufgabe der Erfindung ist ein einfach handhabbares Werkzeug zum Abtrennen eines Kopfs von einem Schaft vorzuschlagen, wenn der Schaft in einem Ankergrund verankert ist und der Kopf an einer Oberfläche des Ankergrunds oder eines daran angeordneten Bauteils anliegt. Das Werkzeug soll sich auch für Köpfe und Schäfte aus Stählen hoher Festigkeit und Zähigkeit eignen. Dabei ist der Begriff "Werkzeug" weit auszulegen und kann beispielsweise auch ein Gerät umfassen. Weiter ist es Aufgabe der Erfindung, ein System mit einem solchen Werkzeug sowie einem Kopf und einem Schaft und ein Verfahren zum Abtrennen eines Kopfs von einem Schaft mit einem derartigen Werkzeug vorzuschlagen.The object of the invention is to provide an easily manageable tool for separating a head of a shaft when the shaft is anchored in an anchorage and the head rests against a surface of the anchor base or a component disposed thereon. The tool is also intended for heads and shanks made of steels higher Strength and toughness are suitable. The term "tool" is to be interpreted broadly and may include, for example, a device. It is another object of the invention to provide a system with such a tool and a head and a shaft and a method for separating a head from a shaft with such a tool.
Diese Aufgabe wird erfindungsgemäß durch die Merkmale der Ansprüche 1, 8 und 10 gelöst. Das erfindungsgemäße Werkzeug weist mindestens zwei Backen mit Schneiden auf, die aufeinander zubewegbar und voneinander wegbewegbar sind. Das Bewegen der Backen und Schneiden aufeinander zu wird auch als Schließen und das Bewegen der Backen und der Schneiden voneinander weg auch als Öffnen des Werkzeugs bzw. der Backen bezeichnet. Die Backen weisen eine vorspringende Schneide und eine zurückgesetzte Schneide auf, die beispielsweise nebeneinander an der Backe angeordnet sind. Die Schneiden sind so angeordnet und das Werkzeug ist so ausgebildet, dass beim Schließen der Backen die vorspringenden Schneiden so dicht zueinander gelangen, dass sie einen zwischen sich befindlichen Schaft abtrennen. Die vorspringenden Schneiden können so angeordnet sein, dass sie sich bei geschlossenen Backen berühren oder es verbleibt bei geschlossenen Backen ein Spalt zwischen den vorspringenden Schneiden, der so klein ist, dass der zwischen den Schneiden befindliche Schaft trotz des Spalts zwischen den vorspringenden Schneiden abreißt. Die Bemessung ist abhängig von einem Durchmesser und einem Werkstoff des Schafts, der mit dem Werkzeug abgetrennt werden soll.This object is achieved by the features of
Die zurückgesetzten Schneiden weisen bei geschlossenen Backen einen Abstand voneinander auf, der ungefähr so groß oder größer wie der Schaft dick ist. Zum Abtrennen des Kopfs vom Schaft kommen zuerst die zurückgesetzten schneiden zum Einsatz: Das erfindungsgemäße Werkzeug wird so am Kopf angesetzt, dass die zurückgesetzten Schneiden auf einer Oberfläche eines Ankergrunds oder eines daran angeordneten Bauteils oder mit möglichst kleinem Abstand von der Oberfläche gegen einen Umfang des Kopfs gelangen. Anschließend wird das Werkzeug geschlossen, wobei sich die Backen und die Schneiden aufeinander zubewegen. Die zurückgesetzten Schneiden am Umfang des Kopfs treten zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche, heben dabei den Kopf wenig, beispielsweise etwa 1 mm bis 2 mm, von der Oberfläche ab und ziehen den Schaft entsprechend weit aus dem Ankergrund heraus. Beispielsweise nachspreizende Spreizanker lassen sich immer so weit aus einem Ankergrund, in dem sie verankert sind, herausziehen. Nachspreizende Anker, die in einem Ankerloch in einem Ankergrund verankert sind, spreizen nach, d. h. spreizen weiter auf, wenn sich das Ankerloch beispielsweise in Folge einer Rissbildung in einer Zugzone des Ankergrunds aufweitet. Insbesondere handelt es sich bei dem, nachspreizenden Anker um einen Bolzenanker mit einem sich entgegen der Einbringrichtung des Ankers in ein Bohrloch im Durchmesser erweiternden Spreizkonus, an dem eine in Längsrichtung entlang des Schafts des Spreizanker verschiebbare Spreizhülse angeordnet ist. Das Nachspreizen erfolgt bei einer Zugbeanspruchung des Spreizankers, die den Spreizanker ein kurzes Stück aus dem Ankergrurid herauszieht, indem der am Schaft angeordnete Spreizkonus weiter in die verschiebbar am Schaft angeordnete Spreizhülse gezogen und die Spreizhülse in radialer Richtung aufgeweitet wird. Aber auch andere Anker, Nägel und dgl. lassen sich ein kurzes Stück aus einem Ankergrund herausziehen, indem die zurückgesetzten Schneiden des erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeugs wie beschrieben am Umfang des Kopf angesetzt und durch Schließen der Backen zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche eindringen. Weil die zurückgesetzten Schneiden nicht zum Trennen verwendet werden, sondern wie Schneiden von Keilen zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche eindringen, werden die zurückgesetzten Schneiden vergleichsweise gering beänsprucht und lassen sich deswegen verhältnismäßig scharf ausbilden, ohne bei ihrer Verwendung ab- oder auszubrechen. Scharfe Schneiden ermöglichen oder erleichtern zumindest das Eindringen zwischen einen auf einer Oberfläche aufliegenden Kopf und die Oberfläche. Insbesondere ist die Beanspruchung der zurückgesetzten Schneiden des erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeugs unabhängig vom Werkstoff des Schafts, von dem der Kopf abgetrennt werden soll, weil die zurückgesetzten Schneiden den Schaft nicht abtrennen. Bei geschlossenen Backen ist der Abstand der zurückgesetzten Schneiden vorzugsweise mindestens so groß wie der Schaft dick ist, so dass die zurückgesetzten Schneiden nicht oder kraftlos am Schaft anliegen. Denkbar ist auch ein etwas kleinerer Abstand der zurückgesetzten Schneiden voneinander bei geschlossenen Backen. Ihr Abstand sollte jedenfalls so groß gewählt werden, dass eine Anlagekraft der zurückgesetzten Schneiden am Schaft bei geschlossenen Backen die zurückgesetzten Schneiden nicht beschädigt, auch wenn sie scharfkantig ausgebildet sind.The recessed cutting edges are spaced from each other when the jaws are closed, which is about as large or larger as the shaft is thick. To remove the head from the shaft, the recessed cuts are first used: The tool according to the invention is attached to the head so that the recessed cutting edges on a surface of an anchorage or a component disposed thereon or with the smallest possible distance from the surface against a circumference of the head reach. Subsequently, the tool is closed, with the jaws and the blades move towards each other. The recessed cutting edges on the circumference of the head pass between the head and the surface, thereby lifting the head slightly, for example about 1 mm to 2 mm, from the surface and pulling the shaft out of the anchor base accordingly. For example, expanding expansion anchors can always be pulled out so far from an anchorage in which they are anchored. Post-spreading anchor, which is in an anchor hole in anchored to an anchorage, spread, ie spread on when the anchor hole widens, for example, as a result of cracking in a tensile zone of the anchorage. In particular, the post-expanding armature is a bolt anchor having a spreading cone widening in diameter opposite the direction of insertion of the armature into a borehole, on which an expansion sleeve displaceable in the longitudinal direction along the shaft of the expansion armature is arranged. The re-spreading takes place at a tensile stress of the expansion anchor, which pulls the expansion anchor a short distance from the Ankergrurid by the shank arranged on the expansion cone further pulled into the slidably disposed on the shaft expansion sleeve and the expansion sleeve is widened in the radial direction. But other anchors, nails and the like. Can be pulled out a short distance from an anchorage by the recessed edges of the tool according to the invention as described attached to the circumference of the head and penetrate by closing the jaws between the head and the surface. Because the recessed cutting edges are not used for cutting, but rather like cutting wedges between the head and the surface, the recessed cutting edges are comparatively slightly stressed and therefore relatively sharp, without breaking off or breaking out during use. Sharp cutting enables or at least facilitates penetration between a head resting on a surface and the surface. In particular, the stress on the recessed cutting edges of the tool according to the invention is independent of the material of the shank from which the head is to be cut, because the recessed cutting edges do not separate the shank. With closed jaws, the distance between the recessed cutters is preferably at least as great as the shank is thick, so that the recessed cutters do not rest or lie against the shaft without force. It is also conceivable a slightly smaller distance of the recessed cutting each other with closed jaws. In any case, their distance should be chosen so large that a contact force of the recessed cutting edges on the shank with closed jaws does not damage the recessed cutting edges, even if they are sharp-edged.
Nach dem Herausziehen des Schafts um ein kurzes Stück von beispielsweise 1 mm bis 2 mm aus dem Ankergrund mit den zurückgesetzten Schneiden wird das erfindungsgemäße Werkzeug geöffnet, so dass sich die vorspringenden Schneiden so weit voneinander entfernen, dass sie zwischen dem Kopf und der Oberfläche am Schaft angesetzt werden können. Durch erneutes Schließen der Backen wird der Schaft von den vorspringenden Schneiden durchtrennt und damit der Kopf vom Schaft abgetrennt. Die vorspringenden Schneiden können gerundet oder stumpf ausgebildet sein, was sie vorzugsweise auch sind, so dass sie der Beanspruchung beim Durchtrennen des Schafts standhalten. Mit "stumpf" ist gemein, dass die vorspringenden Schneiden beispielsweise eine schmale, ebene Fläche anstatt einer Kante aufweisen. Indem das werkzeug den Schaft erst so weit aus dem Ankergrund herauszieht, dass er den vorspringenden Schneiden zugänglich ist, können die vorspringenden Schneiden so stark gerundet oder stumpf ausgebildet werden, dass sie auch dem Durchtrennen eines Schafts aus einem Stahl hoher Festigkeit und Zähigkeit standhalten.After pulling the shaft a short distance of, for example, 1 mm to 2 mm from the anchor base with the recessed cutting edges tool according to the invention is opened so that the protruding cutting so far away from each other that between the head and the surface on the shaft can be recognized. By re-closing the jaws, the shaft of cut the protruding cutting and thus separated the head from the shaft. The projecting blades may be rounded or blunt, which they preferably are, so that they withstand the stress of cutting the shaft. By "blunt" is common that the projecting cutting, for example, have a narrow, flat surface instead of an edge. As the tool pulls the shank out of the anchoring base until it is accessible to the projecting cutting edge, the protruding cutting edges can be rounded or blunted to such an extent that they can withstand the severing of a shank made of a steel of high strength and toughness.
Die Erfindung ermöglicht ein preisgünstiges Werkzeug, mit dem Köpfe von Schäften schnell durch zweimaliges Schließen des Werkzeugs von Schäften abgetrennt werden können, auch wenn die Schäfte aus einem Stahl hoher Festigkeit und Zähigkeit bestehen.The invention enables a low-cost tool, with which the heads of shafts can be quickly separated by shutting the tool twice shafts, even if the shanks are made of a steel of high strength and toughness.
Eine bevorzugte Ausgestaltung der Erfindung schlägt vor, dass die Backen Widerlagerflächen aufweisen, die bei einem Ansetzen des Werkzeugs an dem abzutrennenden Kopf oder dem zu durchtrennenden Schaft des Werkzeugs an der Oberfläche anliegen und das Werkzeug dort an der Oberfläche abstützen. Die zurückgesetzten Schneiden befinden sich in einer Ebene mit den Widerlagerflächen, wobei die Widerlagerflächen auch gerundet sein können. Beispielsweise enden die Widerlagerflächen an den zurückgesetzten Schneiden. Diese Ausgestaltung der Erfindung ermöglicht ein Ansetzen des erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeugs an einem Kopf eines in dem Ankergrund verankerten Schafts so, dass die zurückgesetzten Schneiden an der Oberfläche anliegen, wenn sie gegen den Umfang des Kopfs gelangen. Das ermöglicht ein bestmögliches Eindringen der zurückgesetzten Schneiden zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche beim Schließen der Backen.A preferred embodiment of the invention proposes that the jaws have abutment surfaces which bear against the surface when the tool is attached to the head to be severed or the shank of the tool to be severed and support the tool on the surface there. The recessed cutting edges are in a plane with the abutment surfaces, wherein the abutment surfaces may also be rounded. For example, the abutment surfaces end at the recessed cutting edges. This embodiment of the invention makes it possible to attach the tool according to the invention to a head of a shaft anchored in the anchor base, such that the recessed cutters bear against the surface when they reach the circumference of the head. This allows for the best possible penetration of the recessed cutters between the head and the surface when closing the jaws.
Vorzugsweise sind die Backen zumindest im Bereich der zurückgesetzten Schneiden nach Art von Keilen ausgebildet, die beim Eindringen zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche wie Keile wirken und den Kopf durch Keilkraft von der Oberfläche abheben, wobei sich die Backen an der Oberfläche abstützen. Die Backen weisen zwei Keilflächen auf, deren Übergang die vorzugsweise scharfkantigen, zurückgesetzten Schneiden bilden. Eine der Keilflächen ist beispielsweise die Widerlagerfläche der Backen, mit denen sich die Backen beim Herausziehen des Schafts aus dem Ankergrund an der Oberfläche abstützen. Die anderen Keilflächen untergreifen den Kopf und drücken ihn von der Oberfläche ab, wenn die Backen geschlossen werden. Die Keilflächen können eben oder beispielsweise auch gerundet sein, wobei die Widerlagerflächen, wenn sie gerundet sind, vorzugsweise konvex und die anderen Keilflächen, wenn sie gerundet sind, vorzugsweise konkav gerundet sind.Preferably, the jaws are formed at least in the region of the recessed cutters in the manner of wedges, which act as wedges when penetrating between the head and the surface and lift the head by wedging force from the surface, wherein the jaws are supported on the surface. The jaws have two wedge surfaces whose transition form the preferably sharp-edged, recessed cutting. One of the wedge surfaces is, for example, the abutment surface of the jaws, with which the jaws are supported on the surface when the shaft is pulled out of the anchorage. The other wedge surfaces engage under the head and press it from the surface when the jaws are closed. The wedge surfaces can be flat or, for example, also rounded, the abutment surfaces, if they are rounded, preferably convex and the other wedge surfaces, when rounded, are preferably concavely rounded.
Eine bevorzugte Ausgestaltung der Erfindung sieht einen seitlichen Anschlag des Werkzeugs bzw. der Backen an einem Ende der vorspringenden Schneiden vor. Der Anschlag liegt seitlich an dem von dem Schaft abzutrennenden Kopf an, wenn die vorspringenden Schneiden zwischen dem Kopf und der Oberfläche am Schaft angesetzt werden. Der Anschlag vereinfacht ein Positionieren des Werkzeugs beim Ansetzen der vorspringenden Schneiden am Schaft. Für die zurückgesetzten Schneiden können die vorspringenden Schneiden einen seitlichen Anschlag bilden.A preferred embodiment of the invention provides for a lateral stop of the tool or the jaws at one end of the projecting cutting edges. The stop abuts the side of the head to be separated from the shaft when the projecting blades between the head and the surface are attached to the shaft. The stop simplifies positioning of the tool when attaching the projecting cutting edges on the shaft. For the recessed cutting the projecting cutting edges can form a lateral stop.
Vorzugsweise ist das erfindungsgemäße Werkzeug ein Handwerkzeug, d. h. ein handbestätigtes Werkzeug, insbesondere ist es eine Zange. Das hat den Vorteil, dass das Werkzeug keine Energieversorgung benötigt. Als Zange kann das erfindungsgemäße Werkzeug beispielsweise ein Seitenschneider sein, wobei die vorspringenden und die zurückgesetzten Schneiden hintereinander auf einer Seite der Backen oder die vorspringenden Schneiden auf einer Seite und die zurückgesetzten Schneiden auf der anderen Seite der Backen angeordnet sind. Eine Ausgestaltung der Erfindung sieht einen Vornschneider als Zange vor, bei der die Schneiden an vorderen, einem Zangengelenk fernen Enden der Backen angeordnet sind. Die Zange kann eine Hebelzange mit einer kraftübersetzenden Hebelmechanik sein.Preferably, the tool according to the invention is a hand tool, d. H. a hand-held tool, in particular, it is a pair of pliers. This has the advantage that the tool requires no power supply. As pliers, the tool according to the invention may for example be a side cutter, wherein the projecting and the recessed cutting edges are arranged one behind the other on one side of the jaws or the projecting edges on one side and the recessed edges on the other side of the jaws. An embodiment of the invention provides a front cutter as a pliers, in which the cutting edges are arranged at the front, a pliers joint distal ends of the jaws. The pliers can be a lever pliers with a force translating lever mechanism.
Die Umfangsfläche des Kopfs, der vom Schaft abgetrennt werden soll, kann senkrecht auf die Oberfläche stoßen, wenn der Kopf an der Oberfläche anliegt. Auch dann werden sich in den meisten Fällen die zurückgesetzten Schneiden des erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeugs zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche zwängen, wenn die Backen geschlossen werden, insbesondere wenn die zurückgesetzten Schneiden scharfkantig sind. Allerdings erleichtert es das Ansetzen des erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeugs, das Eindringen der zurückgesetzten Schneiden zwischen den Kopf und die Oberfläche, das Abheben des Kopf von der Oberfläche und das Herausziehen des Schafts um ein kurzes Stück aus dem Ankergrund, wenn der Kopf eine Hinterschneidung am Umfang aufweist. Die Hinterschneidung kann beispielsweise durch einen gerundeten Umfangsrand des Kopfs oder eine Fase am Umfang des Kopfs, die sich zur Oberfläche, d. h. zum Schaft verjüngt, gebildet sein. Es genügt eine niedrige Hinterschneidung, die so hoch ist, dass die zurückgesetzten Schneiden gegen sie gelangen können, wenn der Kopf an der Oberfläche anliegt. Die Hinterschneidung ist derart ausgebildet, dass ein dem Schaft abgewandtes Ende der Hinterschneidung einen größeren Abstand von einer Unterseite des Kopfs aufweist, als die zurückgesetzten Schneiden von der Widerlagerfläche des Werkzeugs. Ein Kopf mit einer solchen, nämlich kegelstumpfförmigen Hinterschneidung ist in einer Ausführungsform beschrieben. Insbesondere ist die Umfangsfläche des Kopfs kegelstumpfförmig und verjüngt sich in Richtung des Schafts. Die kegelstumpfförmige, die Hinterschneidung bildende Umfangsfläche des Kopfs ist axial höher als der Abstand der zurückgesetzten Schneiden des Werkzeugs von dessen Widerlagerflächen, so dass die zurückgesetzten Schneiden beim Ansetzen und Schließen des Werkzeugs gegen die kegelstumpfförmige Umfangsfläche des von einem Schaft abzutrennenden Kopfs gelangen, wenn das Werkzeug mit seinen Widerlagerflächen auf einer Oberfläche oder eines daran befestigten Gegenstands und die Unterseite des Kopfs ebenfalls auf der Oberfläche aufliegt.The peripheral surface of the head to be separated from the shaft may be perpendicular to the surface when the head abuts the surface. Even then, in most cases, the recessed edges of the tool according to the invention will force between the head and the surface when the jaws are closed, especially when the recessed edges are sharp-edged. However, it facilitates the placement of the tool according to the invention, the penetration of the recessed cutters between the head and the surface, the lifting of the head from the surface and the withdrawal of the stem a short distance from the anchor base when the head has an undercut on the circumference. The undercut may be formed, for example, by a rounded peripheral edge of the head or a chamfer on the circumference of the head, which tapers to the surface, ie to the shank. A low undercut that is so high is enough the recessed cutters can reach them when the head abuts the surface. The undercut is formed such that an end of the undercut remote from the shaft has a greater distance from a bottom of the head than the recessed cutting edges from the abutment surface of the tool. A head with such a frusto-conical undercut is described in one embodiment. In particular, the peripheral surface of the head is frusto-conical and tapers in the direction of the shaft. The frusto-conical, the undercut forming peripheral surface of the head is axially higher than the distance of the recessed edges of the tool from the abutment surfaces, so that the recessed edges when attaching and closing the tool against the frusto-conical peripheral surface of the shaft to be separated from a shaft head, when the tool with its abutment surfaces on a surface or an attached object and the bottom of the head also rests on the surface.
In einer Ausführungsform ist ein nachspreizender Spreizanker mit einem Schaft und einem vom Schaft abzutrennenden Kopf beschrieben. Ein nachspreizender Spreizanker ist besonders zum Abtrennen seines Kopfs mit dem erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeug geeignet, weil sich sein Schaft wie bereits erläutert wie bei einem Nachspreizen ein kurzes Stück aus dem Ankergrund herausziehen lässt.In one embodiment, a despreading expansion anchor with a shaft and a head to be separated from the shaft is described. A nachspreizender expansion anchor is particularly suitable for separating his head with the tool according to the invention, because its shaft can be pulled out as already explained as in a Nachspreizen a short distance from the anchorage.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren ist bereits anhand vorstehender Erläuterungen des erfindungsgemäßen Werkzeugs erläutert worden, worauf zur Vermeidung von Wiederholungen verwiesen wird.The inventive method has already been explained with reference to the above explanations of the tool according to the invention, which is referred to avoid repetition.
Die Erfindung wird nachfolgend anhand eines in der Zeichnung dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiels näher erläutert:The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to an embodiment shown in the drawing:
Es zeigen:
- Figur 1
- ein Werkzeug zum Abtrennen eines Kopfs von einem Schaft gemäß der Erfindung;
- Figur 2
- einen vorderen Teil des Werkzeugs aus
Figur 1 etwas schräg gestellt in größerer Darstellung und von einer gegenüberliegenden Seite; - Figur 3
- einen nachspreizenden Spreizanker mit einem Schaft mit einem Kopf;
Figur 4- ein Ansetzen des Werkzeugs aus
Figur 1 an einem Kopf eines Schafts; Figur 5- ein Herausziehen des Schafts aus einem Ankergrund mit dem Werkzeug aus
Figur 1 ; und Figur 6- ein Abtrennen des Kopfs vom Schaft mit dem Werkzeug aus
Figur 1 .
- FIG. 1
- a tool for severing a head from a shaft according to the invention;
- FIG. 2
- a front part of the tool
FIG. 1 slightly inclined in a larger view and from an opposite side; - FIG. 3
- a despreading expansion anchor with a shaft with a head;
- FIG. 4
- a preparation of the tool
FIG. 1 on a head of a shaft; - FIG. 5
- pulling the stem out of an anchorage with the tool
FIG. 1 ; and - FIG. 6
- a separation of the head from the shaft with the tool
FIG. 1 ,
Das in
Die vorspringenden Schneiden 5 sind an Keilen 10 ausgebildet, die von den Backen 6 nach innen aufeinander zu vorspringen. Auf der Seite der Backen 6, an der die vorspringenden Schneiden 5 angeordnet sind, weist das Werkzeug 1 einen seitlichen Anschlag 11 auf.The projecting
Das Werkzeug 1 dient zum Abtrennen eines Kopfs 12 von einem Schaft 13 eines in
Zum Abtrennen des Kopfs 12 vom Schaft 13 des Spreizankers 20 wird das erfindungsgemäße Werkzeug 1 wie in
Nach dem kurzen Herausziehen des Schafts 13 aus dem Tübbing bzw. Ankergrund 15 werden die Backen 6 wieder geöffnet und das Werkzeug 1 wird seitlich so versetzt, dass sich der Schaft 13 nunmehr zwischen den vorspringenden Schneiden 5 befindet. Zum seitlichen Positionieren dient der seitliche Anschlag 11 des Werkzeuges 1, der an den Umfang des Kopfs 12 anlegbar ist. Anschließend werden die Backen 6 wieder geschlossen, die vorspringenden Schneiden 5 dringen in den Schaft 13 ein und Durchtrennen ihn, so dass der Kopf 12 vom Schaft 13 abgetrennt ist, wie in
Nach dem Abtrennen der Köpfe 12 aller Spreizanker, mit denen die Brandschutzplatte 14 am Tübbing bzw. Ankergrund 15 befestigt ist, kann die Brandschutzplatte 14 vom Ankergrund abgenommen werden. Zu einer erneuten Befestigung werden die Schäfte 13 der Spreizanker 20, die bei abgenommener Brandschutzplatte 14 aus dem Tübbing bzw. Ankergrund 15 vorstehen, in den Tübbing bzw. Ankergrund 15 eingeschlagen. Danach kann die Brandschutzplatte 14 mit neuen Spreizankern 20 wieder am Tübbing bzw. Ankergrund 15 befestigt werden.After separation of the heads 12 of all expansion anchors, with which the
Im Tunnelbau bestehen Spreizanker aus korrosionsbeständigem Stahl hoher Festigkeit und Zähigkeit beispielsweise der Sorte A4 oder 1.4529. Zum Durchtrennen ist ein dementsprechend ausreichend stabiles Werkzeug 1 notwendig. Weil die zurückgesetzten Schneiden 4 nicht zum Durchtrennen des Schafts 13 verwendet werden, ist ihre Beanspruchung vergleichsweise niedrig und sie können deswegen scharfkantig ausgeführt sein, damit sie sich zwischen den an der Brandschutzplatte 14 anliegenden Kopf 12 und die Brandschutzplatte 14 zwängen lassen. Die zum Durchtrennen des Schafts 13 verwendeten vorspringenden Schneiden 5 lassen sich durch ihre Rundung oder durch eine stumpfe Ausbildung (nicht dargestellt) so stabil ausbilden, dass sie in der Lage sind, den Schaft 13 durchzutrennen, ohne beschädigt zu werden, auch wenn der Schaft 13 aus einem Stahl hoher Festigkeit und Zähigkeit besteht.In tunnel construction, expansion anchors are made of corrosion-resistant steel of high strength and toughness, for example grade A4 or 1.4529. For cutting a correspondingly stable tool 1 is necessary. Because the recessed
- 11
- WerkzeugTool
- 22
- HebelvornschneiderLever End Cutting
- 33
- Hebelmechanismuslever mechanism
- 44
- zurĂĽckgesetzte Schneiderecessed edge
- 55
- vorspringende Schneideprojecting cutting edge
- 66
- Backejaw
- 77
- Widerlagerfläche.Abutment surface.
- 88th
- Keilflächewedge surface
- 99
- Keilwedge
- 1010
- Keilwedge
- 1111
- seitlicher Anschlaglateral stop
- 1212
- Kopfhead
- 1313
- Schaftshaft
- 1414
- BrandschutzplatteFire protection panel
- 1515
- AnkergrundAnkergrund
- 1616
- Fasechamfer
- 1717
- Hinterschneidungundercut
- 1818
- Oberflächesurface
- 1919
- Hebellever
- 2020
- Spreizankerexpansion anchor
- 2121
- Spreizkonusexpansion cone
- 2222
- SpreizhĂĽlseexpansion sleeve
Claims (10)
- Tool for separating a head (12) from a shank (13), with at least two jaws (6) having blades (4, 5), which jaws are movable towards one another, the jaws (6) having set-back blades (4) which, when the jaws (6) are in the closed position, are spaced apart from one another by a distance which is at least approximately as large as the shank (13) is thick, characterised in that the jaws (6) have projecting blades (5) which, when the jaws (6) are closed, come so close together that they cut through a shank (13) located therebetween.
- Tool according to claim 1, characterised in that the projecting blades (5) are rounded or blunt.
- Tool according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the jaws (6) have counter-bearing faces (7) for supporting the tool (1) against a surface (18), and the set-back blades (4) are located in the same plane as the counter-bearing faces (7) of the jaws (6).
- Tool according to claim 3, characterised in that the jaws (6) have wedge faces (8) which adjoin the set-back blades (4) and form the wedges (9) with the counter-bearing faces (7).
- Tool according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that at an end of the projecting blades (5) remote from the set-back blades (4) the tool (1) has a stop (11) for the head (12) to be separated from the shank (13).
- Tool according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the tool (1) is a hand tool.
- Tool according to claim 6, characterised in that the tool (1) is a pair of pliers.
- System for separating a head (12) from a shank (13), having a tool according to any one of claims 3 - 7 which has at least two jaws (6), which are movable towards one another, with a projecting blade (5) and a set-back blade (4) and with a counter-bearing face (7) in the plane of which the set-back blades (4) are located, wherein when the jaws (6) are closed the projecting blades (5) come so close together that they cut off a shank (13) located therebetween and the set-back blades (4) are spaced apart from one another by a distance which is at least approximately as large as the shank (13) is thick, and with a shank (13) having a head (12), characterised in that the jaws (6) of the tool (1) have a counter-bearing face (7) for supporting the tool (1) against a surface (18); the head (12) of the shank (13) has an undercut (17); and an end of the undercut (17) remote from the shank is spaced a greater distance apart from an underside of the head (12) than the set-back blades (4) are spaced apart from the counter-bearing face (7).
- System according to claim 8, characterised in that the head (12) and the shank (13) are components of an expansible anchor capable of follow-up expansion.
- Method of separating a head (12) from a shank (13), wherein the shank (13) is fixed in an anchoring substrate (15) and the head (12) rests against a surface (18), having a tool (1) according to any one of claims 3 - 7 which has at least two jaws (6) with a projecting blade (5) and a set-back blade (4), wherein when the jaws (6) are closed the projecting blades (5) come so close together that they cut off a shank (13) located therebetween and the set-back blades (4) are spaced apart from one another by a distance which is at least approximately as large as the shank (13) is thick, and with counter-bearing faces (7) for supporting the tool (1) against the surface (18), characterised in that the jaws (6) are positioned against the head (12) so that the counter-bearing faces (7) rest against the surface (18); the jaws (6) are closed so that the set-back blades (4) pass between the head (12) and the surface (18) and the head (12) is lifted away from the surface (18) and the shank (13) is pulled slightly out of the anchoring substrate (15); the jaws (6) are subsequently opened again and the projecting blades (5) of the tool (1) are positioned against the shank (13) between the head (12) and the surface (18) and the jaws (6) are then closed so that the projecting blades (5) cut through the shank (13).
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102013112959.5A DE102013112959A1 (en) | 2013-11-25 | 2013-11-25 | Tool, system and method for severing a head from a shaft |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2875888A1 EP2875888A1 (en) | 2015-05-27 |
EP2875888B1 true EP2875888B1 (en) | 2016-11-02 |
Family
ID=51900074
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14003786.2A Active EP2875888B1 (en) | 2013-11-25 | 2014-11-11 | Tool, system and method for separating a head from a shaft |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2875888B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102013112959A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3372848A1 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-12 | HILTI Aktiengesellschaft | Use of expansion anchor with screwed anchor head |
EP3372847A1 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-12 | HILTI Aktiengesellschaft | Expansion anchor and process to remove an expansion anchor |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2202340A (en) * | 1938-10-18 | 1940-05-28 | Faist Jacob | Screw cutting nipper |
US4676000A (en) * | 1985-06-20 | 1987-06-30 | Brambles Industries, Ltd. | Powered pallet repair tool |
US5813297A (en) * | 1996-03-04 | 1998-09-29 | Zepkowski; John | Screw driving tool |
US5984272A (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 1999-11-16 | Crider; Donald E. | Tool for extracting headed nails |
US20120055031A1 (en) * | 2010-09-03 | 2012-03-08 | Irwin Industrial Tool Company | Cutting edge for a cutting tool |
-
2013
- 2013-11-25 DE DE102013112959.5A patent/DE102013112959A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2014
- 2014-11-11 EP EP14003786.2A patent/EP2875888B1/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102013112959A1 (en) | 2015-05-28 |
EP2875888A1 (en) | 2015-05-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3084233B1 (en) | Expansion anchor comprising anti-twist device | |
DE19601853C1 (en) | Method for inserting and removing valve spring retainers | |
DE102005001222B4 (en) | Cutting device and cutting method for cutting or rupturing a pipeline in the longitudinal direction | |
DE3111361A1 (en) | SPREADING SCREW DEVICE | |
EP0811775A1 (en) | Self-undercutting anchor | |
EP2163348A1 (en) | Extractor with partition device | |
AT13162U1 (en) | A method of drilling holes in soil and for securing an anchor in a well and apparatus therefor | |
DE1129778B (en) | Expanding rivet connection | |
EP2875888B1 (en) | Tool, system and method for separating a head from a shaft | |
EP1375932A1 (en) | Attachment member | |
CH622861A5 (en) | ||
EP2740851B1 (en) | Spreading element with a cover panel | |
DE10111406B4 (en) | Device for longitudinally cutting an old pipe | |
EP2865903A1 (en) | Expansion anchor with spring element | |
EP3090835B1 (en) | Press tool and its use for pressing a fitting | |
EP0188173A1 (en) | Expansion dovel with wedge shaped expanding element | |
EP2464908B1 (en) | Jacket pipe connection | |
EP3770448A1 (en) | Connection system for mechanical connection of two materials | |
DE19527138C1 (en) | Underground pipe replacement device | |
EP3316395B1 (en) | Fixing device and method for its manufacture | |
EP3719329B1 (en) | Device for at least temporarily attaching of components to each other | |
EP3508667A1 (en) | Method for connecting a spacing element with a connection strip spacing and stop holder, a wedge and a holder | |
WO2018192979A1 (en) | Fastening method and fastening system | |
DE10111404A1 (en) | Blind rivet to form joint has rivet mandrel with several load-bearing grooves between intended break groove and mandrel head | |
DE10212845B4 (en) | Device for dividing pipes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20141111 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B23D 29/00 20060101AFI20150807BHEP Ipc: B26B 17/00 20060101ALI20150807BHEP Ipc: B26B 17/02 20060101ALI20150807BHEP Ipc: B27B 7/02 20060101ALI20150807BHEP |
|
R17P | Request for examination filed (corrected) |
Effective date: 20151021 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160630 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
GRAL | Information related to payment of fee for publishing/printing deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR3 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160919 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 841312 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161115 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502014001808 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20161102 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170202 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161130 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170302 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170302 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502014001808 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170202 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161130 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170803 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161111 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20171109 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20161130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20141111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20181111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161102 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231124 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231013 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 10 |