EP2862939A1 - Procédé pour l'hydrolyse d'une biomasse - Google Patents

Procédé pour l'hydrolyse d'une biomasse Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2862939A1
EP2862939A1 EP20130004990 EP13004990A EP2862939A1 EP 2862939 A1 EP2862939 A1 EP 2862939A1 EP 20130004990 EP20130004990 EP 20130004990 EP 13004990 A EP13004990 A EP 13004990A EP 2862939 A1 EP2862939 A1 EP 2862939A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
biomass
preferred
permeate
enzyme
process according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP20130004990
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Michael Zavrel
Sandra Schütze
Marcus Verhuelsdonk
Marcus Jakob
Danielle DENNEWALD
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Clariant International Ltd
Original Assignee
Clariant International Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Clariant International Ltd filed Critical Clariant International Ltd
Priority to EP20130004990 priority Critical patent/EP2862939A1/fr
Priority to CN201480056792.2A priority patent/CN105637094B/zh
Priority to US14/917,943 priority patent/US9988658B2/en
Priority to CA2924387A priority patent/CA2924387C/fr
Priority to PCT/EP2014/072147 priority patent/WO2015055731A1/fr
Priority to EP14792414.6A priority patent/EP3058081A1/fr
Publication of EP2862939A1 publication Critical patent/EP2862939A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P19/00—Preparation of compounds containing saccharide radicals
    • C12P19/14—Preparation of compounds containing saccharide radicals produced by the action of a carbohydrase (EC 3.2.x), e.g. by alpha-amylase, e.g. by cellulase, hemicellulase
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P19/00—Preparation of compounds containing saccharide radicals
    • C12P19/02—Monosaccharides
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/02—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
    • C12P7/04—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
    • C12P7/06—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
    • C12P7/14—Multiple stages of fermentation; Multiple types of microorganisms or re-use of microorganisms
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C13—SUGAR INDUSTRY
    • C13B—PRODUCTION OF SUCROSE; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • C13B20/00—Purification of sugar juices
    • C13B20/16—Purification of sugar juices by physical means, e.g. osmosis or filtration
    • C13B20/165—Purification of sugar juices by physical means, e.g. osmosis or filtration using membranes, e.g. osmosis, ultrafiltration
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C13—SUGAR INDUSTRY
    • C13K—SACCHARIDES OBTAINED FROM NATURAL SOURCES OR BY HYDROLYSIS OF NATURALLY OCCURRING DISACCHARIDES, OLIGOSACCHARIDES OR POLYSACCHARIDES
    • C13K1/00—Glucose; Glucose-containing syrups
    • C13K1/02—Glucose; Glucose-containing syrups obtained by saccharification of cellulosic materials

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to a process for the hydrolysis of biomass as well as the saccharide-containing permeate-product and the protein-containing product produced by this process.
  • the present invention is directed to a process for producing organic compounds from the saccharide-containing permeate.
  • the present invention is directed to the use of the protein-containing product for the production of a fermentation medium.
  • Biomass originating from crops such as sugar beet, corn, straw and other saccharide- or polysaccharide- and protein- containing material are valuable sources not only for refined saccharides such as monomeric or dimeric sugars, but also for other components such as amino acids, proteins and minerals.
  • the raw juice is further purified and filtrated, and subsequently concentrated to yield thick juice (65 to 70% dry matter content), or, after crystallization, to yield refined sugar.
  • the elevated temperature and pH conditions during this process cause the destruction of a crucial amount of monosaccharides contained in the solution. Further, due to the decomposition of nitrogen compounds ammonia is produced.
  • the so called beet-pulp still contains not only the majority of proteins of the sugar beet but also the majority of polysaccharides such as cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin.
  • the invention thus provides a process for hydrolyzing biomass comprising the steps of
  • biomass refers to any type of biomass known to a person skilled in the art as suitable for the inventive process. Particularly preferred is biomass of plant-origin. Within a further preferred embodiment, the initial dry matter content of the biomass is selected from 5 to 40 wt.-%, more preferred from 15 to 30 wt.-%.
  • dry matter (d.m.) refers to the mass to biomass ratio determined after water and other volatile compounds have been removed from fresh tissue using an IR-balance.
  • biomass whereby its dry matter contains at least 25 wt.-% of saccharides such as monomeric sugars, dimeric sugars and oligosaccharides and/or polysaccharides, more preferred at least 40 wt.-%, particularly preferred at least 60 wt.-%, further preferred at least 80 wt.-% of saccharides such as monomeric sugars, dimeric sugars and oligosaccharides and/or polysaccharides. Further, any mixtures of suitable biomasses are to be included within the term "biomass”.
  • Particularly preferred biomass is selected from “sugar beet biomass” and/or “sugar cane biomass” and/or “lignocellulose biomass”.
  • the term “sugar beet biomass” refers to the complete and unprocessed root tissue of Beta vulgaris including the outer peel and the internal pulp. Dry tissue of Beta vulgaris contains 80% wt.-% soluble sucrose, while beet pulp contains approximately 7% pectin, 7% cellulose and 7% hemicellulose, 17% arabinose, 20% glucose and 3.5 % fructose and 10% proteins, all relative to the dry matter (d.m.) of the biomass.
  • the term “sugar beet biomass” further comprises sugar beet pulp (sugar beet chips).
  • saccharum cane biomass refers to the complete and unprocessed stalks of Saccharum sp. including the outer peel and the internal pulp. Dry tissue of Saccharum sp. contains 80% wt.-% soluble sucrose, while dry cane bagasse is made up of approximately 70% polymeric sugars, including 45% cellulose, 23% lignin and 25% hemicellulose primarily in the form of xylan all relative to the dry matter (d.m.) of the biomass.
  • sugar cane pressed cake bagasse
  • lignocellulose biomass refers to residue-, waste- and/or by- products from forestry and agriculture, the food-processing and paper industry and communal waste.
  • the term "lignocellulose biomass” as used within the present invention includes grain straw and/or spelt (such as wheat, rye, barley, oats), maize straw, stover and/or spindles, grasses such as Sericea lespedeza, switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), Napier grass (Miscanthus; China reed), Sudan grass (Sorghum sudananse, Sorghum drummondi), Arundo donax, barks, wood, wood residues, wood chips and/or wood chippings, fruit pulp and agave residues.
  • grain straw and/or spelt such as wheat, rye, barley, oats
  • maize straw stover and/or spindles
  • grasses such as Sericea lespedeza, switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), Na
  • biomass suitable for the process are manure from stables, herbaceous materials, coffee grinds and waste from oil mills such as rapeseed pressed cake and sewage from mills, papermaking stock and waste water from paper mills, waste paper, vegetable and fruit leftovers.
  • the biomass is selected from cellulose, hemicellulose and/or lignin- containing biomass.
  • the biomass is selected from sugar beet, sugar cane, straw, com, wood, oilseed and mixtures thereof.
  • the biomass is lignocellulosic biomass from agricultural residues, such as wheat straw, sugar cane bagasse, sugar cane leaves and stalks, and/or maize straw and stover.
  • hydrolysis as used within the present invention is to be understood as depolymerization of a polymer by a hydrolysis reaction.
  • Hydrolysis reaction is to be understood as the cleavage of chemical bonds by the addition of water.
  • One way to perform hydrolysis technically is to add hydrolase enzymes to the biomass.
  • saccharides are obtained from the biomass material, wherein it is particularly preferred that at least 50 wt.-% of the saccharides obtained are in the form of monomeric and dimeric sugars, preferably at least 65 wt.-%, more preferred at least 75 wt.-%, also preferred at least 85 wt.-% and most preferred 99 wt.-% all relative to the dry matter (d.m.) of the biomass. It is further possible to obtain of amino acids, oligopeptides, oligosaccharides and/or proteins from the biomass material when applying the process for the hydrolysis of biomass according to the present invention.
  • the biomass is preferably washed prior to subjecting it to the enzymatic treatment, and washing water is removed prior to further processing. Moreover, it is preferred to provide the biomass in particulate form e.g. by cutting, milling, grinding, shearing, shear-dispersing, chopping, dispersing and/or blending the biomass prior to step (a).
  • the size of the biomass particles is preferably such that at least 90 wt.-% of the particles have a maximum length of 200 mm, more preferred 100 mm, even more preferred 50 mm and most preferred 25. It is further preferred that the size of the biomass particles is preferably such that at least 95 wt.-% of the particles have a maximum length of 200 mm, more preferred of 100 mm, even more preferred of 50 mm and most preferred of 25 mm.
  • step a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass the biomass is contacted with an enzyme-composition containing at least one enzyme selected from the class of hydrolases.
  • contacting as used within the process for the hydrolysis of biomass comprises any kind of contacting of biomass with an enzyme composition known to a person skilled in the art as suitable for the inventive process.
  • the "contacting" of the biomass with the enzyme composition is carried out by adding the enzyme composition to the biomass. Further, it is particularly preferred that the addition of the enzyme composition is followed by or carried out concurrently with a mixing of the enzyme composition and the biomass.
  • enzyme composition refers to any composition comprising at least one enzyme selected from the class of hydrolases.
  • the at least one enzyme selected from the class of hydrolases amounts preferably to from 1 to 99.99 wt.-% (relative to the weight of the enzyme composition), further preferred to from 5 to 99 wt.-%, particularly preferred to from 10 to 95 wt.-% and most preferred to from 20 to 90 wt.-% and may further contain at least one enzyme selected from the class of lyases.
  • the enzyme-composition contains at least one enzyme selected from the class of lyases
  • the at least one enzyme selected from the class of hydrolases preferably amounts to from 0.01 to 50 wt.-% (relative to the weight of the enzyme composition), preferred to from 0.05 to 20 wt.-%, more preferred to from 0.08 to 5 wt.-% and most preferred to from 0.1 to 1 wt.-%.
  • the enzyme composition contains cellulases, hemicellulases and/or pectinases.
  • the enzyme composition further contains at least one enzyme selected from pectinmethylesterases, rhamnogalacturonases,1,3-/1,6- beta-D-glucanases and/or xylanases.
  • the enzyme composition contains cellulases, hemicellulases and pectinases and at least one enzyme selected from pectinmethylesterases, rhamnogalacturonases,1,3-/1,6- beta-D-glucanases and/or xylanases.
  • the enzyme composition contains cellobiohydrolases (CBH) (EC 3.2.1.-), endo-1,4- ⁇ -glucanases (EG) (EC 3.2.1.4).), endo-xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8), ⁇ -xylosidases (EC 3.2,1.37), polygalacturonases (EC 3.2.1.15, 67, 82; GH28) and pectin/pectate lyases (EC 4.2.2.2, 6, 9, 10).
  • CBH cellobiohydrolases
  • EG endo-1,4- ⁇ -glucanases
  • EC 3.2.1.4 endo-xylanases
  • ⁇ -xylosidases EC 3.2,1.37
  • polygalacturonases EC 3.2.1.15, 67, 82; GH28
  • pectin/pectate lyases EC 4.2.2.2, 6, 9, 10
  • this enzyme composition further contains one or more enzymes selected from ⁇ -glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.4), glycoside hydrolase 61 (GH61 and CBM33), ⁇ -glucanases (EC 3.2.1.-), acetylxylan esterase (EC 3.1.1.72), acetylgalactan esterase (3.1.1.6)), ⁇ -arabinopyranosidase (3.2.1.-), ⁇ -galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22), ⁇ -galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23), ⁇ -glucuronidases (EC 3.2.1.139), ⁇ -mannase (EC 3.2,1.78), pectin methyl esterase (EC 3.1.1.11), pectin acetyl esterase (EC 3.1.1.-), rhamnogalacturonase (EC 3.2.1.-; GH28), rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase (EC 3.1.1.
  • cellulases refer to any blend of enzymes which is involved in the hydrolytic degradation (depolymerization) of polymeric cellulose, hemicellulose and/or pectin to monomeric sugars.
  • cellulases refer to both naturally occurring and non-naturally occurring blends that include a plurality of enzymes as produced by an organism, for example a filamentous fungus.
  • Cellulases are preferably derived from fungi such as members of the subdivision Eumycota and Oomycota, including but are not limited to the following genera: Aspergillus, Acremonium, Aureobasidium, Beauveria, Cephalosporium, Ceriporiopsis, Chaetomium, Chrysosporium, Claviceps, Cochiobolus, Cryptococcus, Cyathus, Endothia, Endothia mucor, Fusarium, Gilocladium, Humicola, Magnaporthe, Myceliophthora, Myrothecium, Mucor, Neurospora, Phanerochaete, Podospora, Paecilomyces, Pyricularia, Rhizomucor, Rhizopus, Schizophylum, Stagonospora, Talaromyces, Trichoderma, Thermomyces, Thermoascus
  • the cellulases and/or pectinases are from a fungal source.
  • this fungal source is Trichoderma reesei.
  • blend of enzymes preferably refers to a blend of enzymes secreted from one single or more microbial sources.
  • enzymes for use in these blend(s) of enzymes can be prepared from one or more naturally occurring or engineered strains of filamentous fungi. Preferred strains are listed above.
  • the desired ratio of enzyme components within the final blend(s) can be achieved by altering the relative amount of enzyme in the final blend e.g, by supplementation of purified or partially purified enzyme(s).
  • cellulase refers to any enzyme capable of hydrolyzing cellulose polymers to shorter oligomers and/or glucose.
  • Cellulases preferred within the enzyme composition include cellobiohydrolases (CBH) (EC 3.2.1.-), endo-1,4- ⁇ -glucanases (EG) (EC 3.2.1.4).), ⁇ -glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.4), cellobiose hydrolase (EC 3.2.1.21), glycoside hydrolase 61 (GH61 and CBM33), Expansin, Swollenin, Loosinin and CIP Proteins (EC 3.1.1.-; CE15).
  • CBH cellobiohydrolases
  • EG endo-1,4- ⁇ -glucanases
  • ⁇ -glucosidase EC 3.2.1.4
  • cellobiose hydrolase EC 3.2.1.21
  • glycoside hydrolase 61 GH61 and CBM33
  • Expansin Swollenin
  • cellulases comprises at least one enzyme selected from the group of CBH1, CBH2, EG1, EG2, EG4, xylanases and xylosidases.
  • hemicellulase refers to any enzyme capable of degrading or supporting the degradation of hemicellulose.
  • Hemicellulases preferred within the enzyme composition include ⁇ -glucanases (EC 3.2.1.-), endo-xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8), ⁇ -xylosidases (EC 3.2.1.37), acetylxylan esterase (EC 3.1.1.72), acetylgalactan esterase (3.1.1.6), acetyl mannan esterase, feruloyl esterase (EC 3.1.1.73), glucuronoyl esterase (EC 3.1.1.-), ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.55), ⁇ -arabinopyranosidase (3.2.1.-), ⁇ -galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22), ⁇ -galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23), ⁇ -glucuronidases (EC 3.2.1.139), ⁇ -mannase (EC 3.2.1.78), ⁇ -mannosidases (EC 3.2.1,25), mannan 1,
  • pectinase refers to any enzyme capable of degrading or supporting the degradation of pectin.
  • Pectinases preferred within the enzyme composition include polygalacturonases (EC 3.2.1.15, 67, 82; GH28), pectin/pectate lyases (EC 4.2.2.2, 6, 9, 10), pectin methyl esterase (EC 3.1.1.11), pectin acetyl esterase (EC 3.1.1.-), rhamnogalacturonase (EC 3.2.1.-; GH28), rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase (EC 3.1.1.86), rhamnogalacturonan endolyase (EC 4.2.2.23), rhamnogalacturonan lyase (EC 4.2.2.-), rhamnogalacturonan galacturonohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.-), xylogalacturon
  • pectinases comprises at least one pectinase selected from the group of pectinesterases, polygalacturonases, pectat lyases, pectin lyases, xylogalacturonases, mannosidase, and rhamnogalacturonase.
  • pectinmethylesterase refers to an enzyme of the E.C. 3.1.1.11 class, which catalyses the hydrolysis of methyl substituents from modified polygalacturonan backbone.
  • rhamnogalacturonase refers to an enzyme of the E.C. 3.2.1 class, which catalyses the hydrolysis of rhamnose substituents of polygalacturonan backbone.
  • 1,3-/1,6-D-glucanase refers to an enzyme of the E.C. 3.2.1 class, which catalyses the hydrolysis of hexose substituents of 1,3-/1,6-modified sugar polymers.
  • xylanase refers to an enzyme of the E.C. class 3.2.1.8, which catalyses the random hydrolysis of polymeric xylan, polymeric pectin, or hemicellulose containing xylose residues resulting in the formation of xylose-containing sugar oligomers and/ or monomeric xylose residues.
  • lyase refers any enzyme that catalyzes the breaking of various chemical bonds by means other than hydrolysis and oxidation, often forming a new double bond or a new ring structure.
  • the enzymes referenced within the present invention of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass are classified according nomenclatures that are either based on the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology's Enzyme Nomenclature and Classification (http://www.chem.qmu1.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/) or on Carbohydrate-Active EnZYmes (http://www.cazy.org/) database.
  • activity of an enzyme as used within the present invention of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass refers to the catalytic activity of the enzyme under appropriate conditions under which the enzyme serves as a protein catalyst, which converts specific polymeric or artificial substrates to specific oligomeric or monomeric products.
  • appropriate conditions is well known to and applicable by a person skilled in the art.
  • the enzymes may be employed in varied relative proportions in a given mixture.
  • step (a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is carried out for a time sufficient to hydrolyze at least 20 wt.-%, preferably at least 30 wt.-%, more preferred at least 50 wt.-% and most preferred at least 60 wt.-% of the biomass.
  • step (a) is carried out for a time sufficient to hydrolyze from 10 to 100 wt.-%, preferably from 50 to 99.5 wt.-% of the hydrolysable compounds of the biomass.
  • hydrolyze is to be understood as the hydrolytic conversion of insoluble polymeric components of the biomass to soluble monomeric, dimeric and/or oligomeric compounds by chemical, physical, and/or enzymatic processes such as hydrolysis.
  • step (a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is carried out for 1 minute to 100 hours, more preferred for 10 minutes to 80 hours, particularly preferred for 30 minutes to 40 hours, even more preferred for 1 hour to 30 hours also particularly preferred from 2 hours to 20 hours.
  • step (a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is carried out until the content of remaining insoluble solids is less than 30 wt.-%, preferably less than 20 wt.-%, even more preferred less than 12.5 wt.-%.
  • step (a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is carried out until the content of remaining insoluble solids is from 5 to 30 wt.-%, preferably from 10 to 20 wt.-% and most preferred from 12.5 to 17.5 wt.-%.
  • step (a) is carried out until the biomass is liquefied to at least 50%, preferably at least 60% and most preferred at least 80%, wherein a liquefaction of from 60 to 100%, preferably from 70 to 99% is particularly preferred.
  • liquefaction is defined by the respective measurement method as given in the method section.
  • reaction temperature is preferably selected from 25 to 80 °C, more preferred selected from 45 to 75 °C and particularly preferred from 48 to 70 °C.
  • step (a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is carried out for 1 to 80 hours, preferably 2 to 40 hours, more preferred 3 to 20 hours, wherein the temperature is selected from 45 to 75 °C or from 48 to 70 °C.
  • the enzyme composition is preferably added to the biomass in an amount of from 0.025 to 8 wt.-% of the dry matter of the biomass, more preferred 0.05 to 4 wt.-% of the dry matter of the biomass, particularly preferred being 0.08 to 2 wt.-% of the dry matter of the biomass and most preferred from 0.1 to 0.2 wt.-% of the dry matter of the biomass.
  • Step (a) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is carried out within any kind of vessel known to a person skilled in the art as suitable for the inventive process, preferably within a reactor.
  • Suitable reactors are within the knowledge of a person skilled in the art.
  • Preferable vessels/reactors include but are not limited to vessels/reactors comprising a stirring measure and/or a measure for pumping over or recirculating the biomass content within the reactor.
  • Further preferred measures of preferred reactors include but are not limited to measures for temperature and/or pH-controlling and regulation of temperature and/or pH.
  • step (b) of the process the hydrolysis of biomass, a part of said biomass is eliminated from the vessel/reactor, within a preferred embodiment said part of biomass is continuously eliminated from the vessel/reactor.
  • the elimination can be carried out by pumping a part of said biomass through a pipeline.
  • the volume-exchange-rate is selected from 0.05-20 h -1 .
  • the volume-exchange-rate is selected from 0.1-15 h -1 , more preferred from 0.5 - 10 h -1 .
  • the term "volume-exchange-rate” is to be understood as the number of times the initial reaction volume is retrieved from the vessel per hour. Selecting the exchange-rate within these ranges ensures a continuous flow of biomass within the distinct circuits.
  • reaction volume thereby relates to total the total volume of biomass and enzyme composition present in the vessel.
  • steps (b) and (c) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass are carried out in distinct circuits, preferably at least two distinct circuits.
  • the first (or preferably the outer) circuit starts with transporting and eliminating the part of biomass according to step (b) using a first pump.
  • This biomass is then pumped into the second (or preferably the inner) circuit, which comprises a second pump and at least one filtration module.
  • the second pump is used for transporting the eliminated part firstly to and secondly through the at least one filtration module.
  • step (c) the permeate is removed from the at least one filtration module. At least a part of the filtrated biomass is withdrawn from the second (or preferably the inner) circuit after passing the at least one filtration module and fed back into the vessel according to step (d).
  • Both circuits/pipelines are equipped with individual hoisting-devices ⁇ such as a pump ⁇ in order to be able to select different hoisting speeds and pressures applied for both, the first and second (or preferably the outer and inner) circuit/pipeline.
  • both circuits/pipelines are equipped with a pump.
  • the hoisting device of the first circuit is placed between the vessel and the transition from the first circuit to the second circuit and the hoisting device of the second circuit is placed between the transition from the first circuit to the second circuit and the filtration module.
  • the hoisting device of the first circuit builds-up a pressure of from 0.25 to 8 bar, more preferred from 0.5 to 6 bar, most preferred from 1 to 4 bar.
  • the hoisting device of the second circuit should preferably produce a cross-flow velocity of from 0.1 to 10 m/s, more preferred of from 1 to 8 m/s, even more preferred of from 3 to 5 m/s. Further preferred is a combination of a pressure build-up of from 1 bar to 4 bar within the first circuit and a cross-flow velocity of from 3 to 5 m/s within the second circuit.
  • the preferred ratio of the biomass-volume within the vessel to the biomass-volume within the second circuit is from 1 to 1000, more preferred from 10 to 750 and even more preferred from 20 to 500 and most preferred from 25 to 400.
  • the membrane is back-flushed in order to avoid clogging of the membrane.
  • This back-flushing is achieved by increasing the pressure on the permeate side of the membrane equal or higher than the pressure on the feed side.
  • the pressure on the permeate side is 0 to 10 bar higher than the pressure on the feed side, more preferred 0.05 to 8 bar higher than the pressure on the feed side, even more preferred 0.1 to 6 bar higher than the pressure on the feed side, and most preferred 0.15 to 4 bar higher than the pressure on the feed side.
  • This back-flushing can be conducted once or several times.
  • the membrane is back-flushed 0.05 to 120 times per hour, more preferred 0.1 to 60 times per hour, and even more preferred 0.15 to 30 times per hour, and most preferred 0.2 to 15 times per hour.
  • the ratio of the sum of all back-flushing steps to the process time of step c) is 0 to 0.5, more preferred 0.001 to 0.4, even more preferred 0.002 to 0.3, and most preferred 0.004 to 0.2.
  • the back-flushing can be carried out by using a liquid.
  • this liquid is permeate, water or mixtures of permeate and water.
  • further chemicals can be added to the liquid such as cleaning agents, acids, bases or any mixtures thereof.
  • the cleaning effect of the back-flushing can be enhanced by injecting gas on the feed side of the permeate.
  • the injected gas is air.
  • the filtration according to step (c) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass is preferably carried out by use of one or more filtration module(s) containing at least one filtration membrane.
  • each filtration module is operated in a cross-flow mode.
  • the at least one filtration membrane is an ultrafiltration membrane.
  • the ultrafiltration membrane is a ceramic membrane, a stainless steel membrane, a synthetic membrane (preferably comprising polysulfone) or silicon or silicon-containing membrane or any combination thereof.
  • the cut-off of the membrane is selected from 0.5 kDa to 100 kDa, more preferred from 1 kDa to 50 kDa, even more preferred from 2 kDa to 25 kDa.
  • a permeate product which contains a particular high amount of soluble compounds such as e.g. monomeric and dimeric sugars but is essentially free of microorganism-contaminants and larger biopolymers such as proteins and polysaccharides.
  • the resulting permeate-product shows a long shelf-stability which could until then not be achieved without the addition of preservatives and/or by use of biological preservation.
  • the enzyme concentration even increases over time within the vessel. This constitutes a particular advantage of the inventive process for the hydrolysis of biomass as it significantly increases the reaction rate of the hydrolysis over the process time.
  • the at least one membrane of the at least one filtration module might also be a microfiltration membrane.
  • the microfiltration membrane is a ceramic membrane, a stainless steel membrane, a synthetic membrane (preferably comprising polysulfone) or silicon or silicon-containing membrane or any combination thereof.
  • the applied enzyme-composition consists predominantly of enzymes which are able to adsorb onto the solid particles of the biomass such as e.g. cellulases which possess a cellulose binding domain.
  • An advantage of the application of a microfiltration membrane within the at least one filtration module is a relatively high permeability per time which enables the implementation of a smaller membrane-surface compared to ultrafiltration membranes.
  • the membrane area is 0.05 to 100 m 2 per 1000 kg of added biomass, further preferred 0.1 to 70 m 2 per 1000 kg of added biomass, more preferred 0.2 to 50 m 2 per 1000 kg of added biomass and most preferred 0.4 to 25 m 2 per 1000 kg of added biomass.
  • the permeate-product obtained by the filtration is preferably continuously removed and may also be collected within a second vessel.
  • the remaining filtrated or preferably part of the remaining filtrated biomass is fed back to the vessel.
  • the rest of biomass is pumped within the second (or preferably the inner circuit).
  • the preferred ratio of the flow that is fed back into the hydrolysis vessel (step d) to the permeate flow (step c) is from 0.05 to 50, more preferred from 0.1 and 25, and even more preferred from 0.25 and 10 and most preferred from 0.5 and 5.
  • the ratio of biomass fed back to the vessel to the part of the biomass pumped within the second (or preferably the inner) circuit is determined by the flow rate of biomass from the vessel into the outer circuit and the permeate flow through the at least one filtration module.
  • liquid added corresponding to the amount of liquid within the permeate-product is to be understood in that the liquid added amounts to at least 10 vol.-%, preferably at least 25 vol.-%, more preferably at least 50 vol.-%, more preferred at least 70 vol.-% of the liquid within the permeate product and is further preferred selected from 50 to 150 vol.-%, preferably 70 to 130 vol.-% and most preferred from 80 to 120 vol.% of the liquid within the permeate product which is removed each time during step c) of the process. It is particularly preferred if the volume of liquid added equals the volume of the permeate product. In another preferred embodiment, the liquid is added continuously. Thus, the amount of liquid added to the biomass during optional step e) compensates at least partially for the volume removed according to step c).
  • the amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed by filtration is added directly into the vessel.
  • the amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed by filtration is added by back-flushing the membrane as described above.
  • the amount of liquid is added to the filtrated biomass, i.e. after carrying out step (c) of the process for the hydrolysis of biomass. More preferably, the amount of liquid is added to the filtrated biomass after the content of the vessel has been reduced to from 0.25 to 40 % of the initial non- filtrated volume, most preferably once it has been reduced to from 0.5 to 30 % of the initial non- filtrated volume, even more preferably once it has been reduced to from 1 to 20%.
  • an amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed during filtration is particularly advantageous as an increase in yield is achieved by flushing the small percentage of insoluble rests of biomass remaining in the system after the hydrolysis and carrying with it the rests of soluble sugar still present on the surface of the solids through the membrane.
  • the liquid added is water.
  • the filtrated biomass still contains the same concentration of saccharides as the permeate.
  • This embodiment of the inventive process might be advantageous for applications of the filtrated biomass (equals in this case the protein-containing product) as a fermentation substrate or supplement to a fermentation medium.
  • step (f) Addition of fresh biomass.
  • the percentage of the biomass present in the vessel at the start of the process compared to the sum of all biomass processed is at least 1 wt.-%, preferably at least 5 wt.-%, more preferred at least 10 wt.-% and most preferred at least 15 wt.-%. It is particularly preferred to select the percentage of the biomass present in the vessel at the start of the process compared to the sum of all biomass processed from the range of from 1 to 40 wt.-%, preferably from 5 to 35 wt.-% and particularly preferred of from 10 to 25 wt.-%.
  • This embodiment is preferred as the addition of parts of the total biomass at different times of the process is advantageous as there is no need to store major amounts of fresh biomass before subjecting it to the inventive process.
  • the addition of fresh biomass stops at least 1 hour before the process is stopped, preferably at least 2 hours before the process is stopped, more preferred at least 3 hours before the process is stopped and most preferred at least 4 hours before the process is stopped.
  • the addition of fresh biomass stops at least 1 hour before step (e) is started, preferably at least 2 hours before step (e) is started, more preferred at least 3 hours before step (e) is started and most preferred at least 4 hours before step (e) is started.
  • steps (b) to (e) or steps (b) to (f) are repeated at least once to ensure the at most possible yield of the desirable compounds of the biomass.
  • steps (b) to (e) or steps (b) to (f) are repeated from 2 to 10000 times, preferably from 10 to 7000 times, more preferred from 50 to 5000 times and most preferred from 100 to 1000 times.
  • steps (b) to (e) or steps (b) to (f) are repeated until the content of remaining soluble hexoses in the filtrated biomass is less than 4 wt.-% with respect to the initial total hexoses content in the biomass, preferably less than 2 wt.-%, even more preferred less than 1 wt.-% and most preferred less than 0.5 wt.-%.
  • steps (b) to (e) or steps (b) to (f) are carried out in a way to enable a continuous process.
  • steps (a) and (b) are carried out concurrently for at least 80% of the time period of step (a), preferably from 50 to 95 %, particularly preferred from 60 to 90% and most preferred from 70 to 85%.
  • steps (a) and (c) are carried out concurrently for at least 80% of the time period of step (a), preferably from 50 to 95 %, particularly preferred from 60 to 90% and most preferred from 70 to 85%.
  • steps (a) and (d) are carried out concurrently for at least 80% of the time period of step (a), preferably from 50 to 95 %, particularly preferred from 60 to 90% and most preferred from 70 to 85%.
  • steps (a) and (e) are carried out concurrently for at least 0.1% of the time period of step (a), preferably from 1 to 40 %, particularly preferred from 2 to 30% and most preferred from 3 to 20%.
  • the enzyme composition added to the biomass is in an amount of from 0.05 to 0.15 wt.-% of dry matter of the biomass and the process step b) is started after 3 to 7 hours. In another particularly preferred embodiment of the process the enzyme composition added to the biomass is in an amount of from 0.15 to 0.25 wt.-% of dry matter of the biomass and the process step b) is started after 2 to 6 hours.
  • the process of the present invention for the hydrolysis of biomass enables to obtain a permeate-product with a high content of saccharides in terms of monomeric and oligomeric sugars which shows a particularly long shelf stability as it is completely free of microbial contaminants. For this reason, the permeate-product obtainable by the process according to the present invention is also highly suitable for food and feed applications. Further, the permeate-product is highly suitable for pharmaceutical applications.
  • the present invention therefore comprises in another aspect a saccharide-containing permeate-product, produced by a process as defined within the present invention.
  • the permeate product comprises at least 80 g per liter saccharides, preferably 100 g per liter, more preferred 120 g per liter and most preferred 130 g per liter.
  • the permeate product comprises at least 50 g per liter fructose, preferably at least 60 g per liter fructose and also preferred is a fructose content of from 50 to 100 g per liter.
  • the permeate product comprises at least 50 g per liter glucose, preferably at least 60 g per liter glucose and also preferred is a glucose content of from 50 to 100 g per liter, wherein it is particularly preferred that the general amount of monomeric and dimeric sugars is from 80 g per liter to 200 g per liter.
  • the process of the present invention for the hydrolysis of biomass further enables to obtain a protein-containing product with a high content of proteins and low sugar content, preferably a sugar content below 4 wt.-% but a high content of nitrogen which is preferably in the range from 0.2 to 5 wt.-%, further preferred in the range from 0.3 to 4 wt.-%.
  • the protein-containing product obtainable by the process of the present invention is therefore highly suitable as a supplement to commercial fermentation media or as a fermentation medium basis or for food and feed applications.
  • the present invention therefore comprises in another aspect a protein-containing product, produced by a process as defined within the present invention.
  • the protein-containing product comprises at least 1 wt.-% protein, preferably at least 2.5 wt.-% protein, more preferred at least 5 wt.-% protein, even more preferred at least 7.5 wt.-% protein and most preferred at least 10 wt.-% protein.
  • the present invention is directed to the use of the protein-containing product for the production of a fermentation medium or for food and feed applications in which high protein contents are beneficial.
  • the protein-containing product further contains a considerable high amount of nitrogen, the protein-containing product is particularly suitable as a supplement to fermentation media for the production of enzymes.
  • the present invention relates to a process for the production of organic compounds from the saccharide-containing permeate-product as defined above, comprising the steps:
  • the temperature during contacting the saccharide-containing permeate-product with the at least one microorganism is selected from 10 to 65 °C, preferably from 15 to 55 °C, especially preferred from 20 to 50°C, most preferred from 25 to 45 °C.
  • mesophilic yeasts such as all apecies of genus Saccaromyces, especially Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces boulardii, Saccharomyces bulderi, Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces cariocus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces chevalieri, Saccharomyces dairenensis, Saccharomyces ellipsoideus, Saccharomyces eubayanus, Saccharomyces exiguus, Saccharomyces florentinus, Saccharomyces reteyveri, Saccharomyces martiniae, Saccharomyces monacensis, Saccharomyces norbensis, Saccharomyces paradoxus, Saccharomyces pastorianus, Saccharomyces spencerorum, Saccharomyces turicensis, Saccharomyces unisporus, Saccharomyces bay
  • thermophilic micro-organisms are used.
  • thermophilic yeasts suitable for the inventive process are Candida bovina, Candida picachoensis, Candida emberorum, Candida pintolapesii, Candida thermophila, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Kluyveromyces fragilis, Kazachstania telluris, Issatchenkia orientalis and Lachancea thermotolerans.
  • thermophylic bacteria include Clostridium thermocellum, Clostridium thermohydrosulphuricum, Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum, Thermoanaerobium brockii, Thermobacteroides acetoethylicus, Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus, Clostridium thermoaceticum, Clostridium thermoautotrophicum, Acetogenium kivui, Desulfotomaculum nigrificans and Desulvovibrio thermophilus, Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis, Bacillus stearothermophilus and Thermoanaerobacter mathranii.
  • follovving mesophilic yeasts is especially preferred: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia stipitis, Pachysolen tannophilus, Candida shehatae.
  • fungi suitable for the inventive process are Aspergillus sp., Trichoderma sp., Penicillium sp., Acremonium sp., Rhizopus sp. and Talaromyces sp.
  • bacteria suitable for the inventive process are Clostridium acetobutylicum, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus lactis, Lactococcus lactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Lactobacillus sp., Zymomonas mobilis, Escherichoia coli.
  • Fermentation is preferably conducted in a batch mode (discontinuous), in the fed-batch mode or in a continuous mode. Most preferably, fermentation is conducted in the batch mode.
  • minerals such as copper, zinc, magnesium, calcium, iron and nitrogen-containing compounds such as nitrate, amino acids, ammonia are added to the saccharide-containing permeate-product prior to step a) of the process for the production of organic compounds.
  • nitrogen-containing compounds such as nitrate, amino acids, ammonia
  • a part of the protein-containing product is added to the fermentation medium.
  • Valuable organic compounds resulting from bacterial fermentation of the saccharide-containing permeate-product comprise but are not limited to organic acids (such as acetic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid, itaconic acid, fumaric acid, propionic acid, and glucuronic acid), amino acids (such as glutamic acid, leucine, lysine, threonine, aspartic acid, phenylalanine, cysteine), caprolactams (such as alpha-amino-caprolactam), antibiotics (such as bleomycin, virginiamycin, lincomycin, monensin, blasticidin, tetracycline), vitamins (such as vitamin B2, B12 and C), enzymes, nucleotides/ nucleosides (such as NADH, ATP, cAMP, FAD, coenzyme A), biogas, biopolymers (such as polyhydroxybutyrate, polyamides/ fibroins), proteins, polysaccharides (such as x
  • Valuable organic compounds resulting from yeast fermentation of the saccharide-containing permeate-product comprise but are not limited to organic solvents (e.g. ethanol, propanol), nucleotides (e.g. RNA), biosurfactants (e.g. sophorose lipids), enzymes, and biopolymers (e.g. spidroins).
  • organic solvents e.g. ethanol, propanol
  • nucleotides e.g. RNA
  • biosurfactants e.g. sophorose lipids
  • enzymes e.g. spidroins
  • Valuable organic compounds resulting from fungal fermentation of the saccharide-containing permeate-product comprises organic acids (such as citric acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid), antibiotics (such as penicillin, cephalosporin), enzymes, and polysaccharides (such as chitin).
  • organic acids such as citric acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid
  • antibiotics such as penicillin, cephalosporin
  • enzymes such as chitin
  • the organic compound is selected from alcohols, organic acids, biopolymers, antibiotics, amino acids, caprolactams, polysaccharides, organic solvents, biofuels, aminoglucans, nucleotides/nucleosides, vitamins, biosurfactants, enzymes and mixtures thereof.
  • the protein-containing product obtained by the inventive process was an excellent fermentation substrate or supplement of commercial fermentation media for bacterial, yeast and fungal organisms producing value adding products such as enzymes, pharmaceuticals or chemical products.
  • the protein-containing product could thereby also serve as the basis for the production of a fermentation medium.
  • the present invention therefore pertains to the use of the protein-containing product as defined above for the production of a fermentation medium.
  • Preferred fermentation processes include the fermentation of the saccharides to ethanol using Saccharomyces cerevisiae or to lactic acid using a Lactobacillus strain or to itaconic acid using Aspergillus terreus. Especially preferred is that these fermentations are carried out without any supplements.
  • a saccharide-containing permeate-product produced by a process as defined within the present invention with a saccharide content of at least 100 g per liter saccharides wherein it is most preferred that at least 40 wt.-% of this saccharide content is glucose.
  • a protein-containing product produced by a process as defined within the present invention with a sugar content below 4 wt.-% but a high content of nitrogen, wherein a nitrogen content of from 0.3 to 4 wt.-%. is preferred.
  • reaction mixture (20mL) of the enzyme-composition and biomass with a d.m, content of 15 % is mixed with 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5). The mixture is incubated for 30 min to 5 hours at 50 °C. Afterwards, the reaction mixture is centrifuged for 30 min at 3200 g and the liquid supernatant is separated and weighed.
  • the liquefaction is determined according the formula: net weight of supernatant 20 ⁇ 100.
  • Fig. 1 Illustration of temporal courses for volume, enzyme concentration and saccharide yield during the process of the invention
  • step a The process is started by contacting the biomass with the enzyme-composition (step a). Within the period in which only step (a) is carried out, the volume and the enzyme concentration remain constant and a part of the biomass is hydrolyzed.
  • steps (b), (c) and (d) are started additionally to step (a). Due to the removal of permeate the volume decreases and saccharides are obtained within the permeate. Therefore, the saccharide yield increases. Since the enzymes are retained by the membrane, the enzyme concentration increases, which improves the hydrolysis.
  • step (e) is additionally started by continuously adding the same amount of water as permeate is removed. Therefore, the volume remains constant as well as the enzyme concentration. The saccharides are washed out and so the saccharide yield increases further.
  • FIG. 2 exemplary process setup implementing one filtration module and two circuits (inner and outer circuit)
  • step a) biomass is fed into the vessel (2) which is equipped with a stirrer (1).
  • step b) a part of biomass is eliminated according to step b) of the process and conveyed to the outer circuit (5) by use of a first pipeline (5a) and pumped by a first pump (4) to the inner circuit (8).
  • the eliminated part of biomass is conveyed to a second pump (6) by use of a second pipeline (8a).
  • the second pump (6) is operated separately from the first pump (4) thereby selecting a pump-rate in order to achieve the required cross-flow velocity.
  • the second pump (6) is pumping the eliminated part of biomass to the filtration module (7) in order to subject the biomass to a filtration according to step c) of the process.
  • the permeate is then removed from the filtration module (7) through a pipeline (10) wherein the output volume is controlled by a valve (9).
  • the filtrated biomass is then further transported within the inner circuit (8) by a third pipeline (8b) to the outer circuit (5) wherein the at least part of the volume of the filtrated biomass which is fed back to the vessel according to step d) of the process through a fourth pipeline (5b) is regulated by a valve (3).
  • a third pipeline (8b) to the outer circuit (5) wherein the at least part of the volume of the filtrated biomass which is fed back to the vessel according to step d) of the process through a fourth pipeline (5b) is regulated by a valve (3).
  • a fourth pipeline (5b) is regulated by a valve (3).
  • An amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed during filtration is added to the vessel (2) from a reservoir (11) through a pipeline (12).
  • FIG. 3 exemplary process setup implementing two circuits (inner and outer circuit) and two filtration modules in parallel within the inner circuit
  • the eliminated part of biomass is conveyed to a second pump (6) by use of a second pipeline (8.1a).
  • the second pump (6) is operated separately from the first pump (4) thereby selecting a pump-rate in order to achieve the required cross-flow velocity.
  • the second pump (6) is pumping the eliminated part of biomass to the first filtration module (7.1) by use of a pipeline (8.1c) in order to subject the biomass to a filtration according to step c) of the process but also, concurrently, by use of a pipeline (8.2a) to the second filtration module (7.2).
  • the first and second filtration module (7.1) and (7.2) can be operated parallel.
  • the permeate is then removed from the first filtration module (7.1) and the second filtration module (7.2) through a pipeline (10.1) and a pipeline (10.2) wherein the output volume is controlled independently by a valve (9.1) and a valve (9.2).
  • the filtrated biomass is then further transported within the inner circuit (8) by a pipeline (8.1b), (8.1d) and by a pipeline (8.2b) to the outer circuit (5) wherein the volume of the filtrated biomass which is fed back to the reactor according to step d) of the process through a pipeline (5b) is regulated by a valve (3).).
  • a pipeline (8.1e) An amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed during filtration is added to the vessel from a reservoir (11) through a pipeline (12).
  • FIG. 4 exemplary process setup implementing two circuits (inner and outer circuit) and two filtration modules in series within the inner circuit
  • the eliminated part of biomass is conveyed to a second pump (6.1) by use of a second pipeline (8a).
  • the second pump (6.1) is operated separately from the first pump (4) thereby selecting a pump-rate in order to achieve the required cross-flow velocity.
  • the second pump (6.1) is pumping the eliminated part of biomass to the first filtration module (7.1) in order to subject the biomass to a filtration according to step c) of the process.
  • the permeate is then removed from the first filtration module (7.1)) through a pipeline (10.1) wherein the output volume is controlled independently by a valve (9.1).
  • the filtrated biomass is then further transported within the inner circuit (8) by a pipeline (8c) and pumped by a third pump (6.2) to the second filtration module (7.2) thereby selecting a pump-rate in order to achieve the required cross-flow velocity.
  • the third pump (6.2) is also operated separately from the first pump (4) and the second pump (6.1).
  • the permeate is then removed from the second filtration module (7.2) through a pipeline (10.2) wherein the output volume is controlled independently by a valve (9.2).
  • the first and second filtration module (7.1) and (7.2) can be operated in series.
  • the filtrated biomass is then further transported within the inner circuit (8) by a pipeline (8b) to the outer circuit (5) wherein the volume of the filtrated biomass which is fed back to the reactor according to step d) of the process through a pipeline (5b) is regulated by a valve (3).
  • the rest of the filtrated biomass is circulated within the inner circuit (8) by use of a pipeline (8.1e).
  • An amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed during filtration is added to the vessel from a reservoir (11) through a pipeline (12).
  • FIG. 5 exemplary process setup implementing one outer and two inner circuits in parallel
  • the eliminated part of biomass is conveyed to a second pump (6.1) by use of a pipeline (8.1a).
  • the second pump (6.1) is operated separately from the first pump (4) thereby selecting a pump-rate in order to achieve the required cross-flow velocity.
  • the second pump (6.1) is pumping the eliminated part of biomass to the first filtration module (7.1) in order to subject the biomass to a filtration according to step c) of the process.
  • the eliminated part of biomass is conveyed to a third pump (6.2) by use of a pipeline (8.2a).
  • the third pump (6.2) is operated separately from the first pump (4) and the second pump (6.1) thereby selecting a pump-rate in order to achieve the required cross-flow velocity.
  • the third pump (6.2) is pumping the eliminated part of biomass to the second filtration module (7.2) in order to subject the biomass to a filtration according to step c) of the process,
  • the first and second inner circuit (8.1) and (8.2) can be operated parallel.
  • the permeate is then removed from the first filtration module (7.1) and the second filtration module (7.2) through a pipeline (10.1) and a pipeline (10.2) wherein the output volume is controlled independently by a valve (9.1) and a valve (9.2).
  • the filtrated biomass is then further transported within the first inner circuit (8.1) by a pipeline (8.1 b) and within the second inner circuit (8.2) by a pipeline (8.2b) to the outer circuit (5) wherein the volume of the filtrated biomass which is fed back to the reactor according to step d) of the process through a pipeline (5b) is regulated by a valve (3), In case only a part of the filtrated biomass is fed back to the vessel (2) the rest of the filtrated biomass is circulated within the inner circuit (8.1) and/or the inner circuit (8.2) by use of a pipeline (8.1e). An amount of liquid corresponding to the amount removed during filtration is added to the vessel from a reservoir (11) through a pipeline (12).
  • Whole sugar beet material was prepared from fresh sugar beet roots sampled in Bedburg, Germany. Beet roots were washed to remove remaining soil and cut. The material was then treated by a high shear mixer in order to allow pumping. The sugar beet material on average had a d.m. content of 22 %.
  • the following enzymes were used: 43.4 %(w/w) Celluclast ® , 6.3 %(w/w) Novo 188 ® and 50.3 % (w/w) Pectinex Ultra SP-L ® . These products were mixed in 50 mM NaAc buffer (pH 5).
  • This enzyme mixture was mixed with 200 kg fresh sugar beet material at 0.2 % wt.-% E/S.
  • the final reaction mixture contained 18 % d,m. of sugar beet material.
  • the mixture was incubated with slight stirring at 50 °C. After incubation for 4 hours, the ultrafiltration step was started using two circuits equipped each with a pump (one for increasing the transmembrane pressure and one for the transportation of the biomass through the membrane unit).
  • the membrane used was a ceramic membrane with 10 kDa cut-off (GEA Filtration, GEA Wiegand GmbH).
  • the transmembrane pressure applied was 0.5-3 bar and the cross-flow velocity was 3-4 m/s.
  • the resulting permeate flux was 15-20 L/h.
  • Table 1 shows the obtained sugar concentrations in permeate obtained during step b) to d), permeate obtained during step b) to e) and filtrated biomass (the error is estimated to +/-10%) Permeate obtained during step b) to d) Permeate obtained during step b) to e) Filtrated biomass (final composition) Glucose [g/l] 74 34 12 Fructose [g/l] 77 36 11 Arabinose [g/l] 7 4 1 Cellobiose [g/l] 6 4 1
  • Whole sugar beet material was prepared from fresh sugar beet roots sampled in Bedburg; Germany. Beet roots were washed to remove remaining soil and. The material was then treated by a high shear mixer in order to allow pumping. The sugar beet material on average had a d.m. content of 22 %.
  • the following enzymes were used: 43.4 % (w/w) Celluclast ® , 6.3 %(w/w) Novo 188 ® and 50.3 % (w/w) Pectinex Ultra SP-L ® . These products were mixed in 50 mM NaAc buffer (pH 5).
  • This enzyme mixture was mixed with 150 kg fresh sugar beet material at 0.1 % wt.-% E/S.
  • the final reaction mixture contained 18 % d.m, of sugar beet material.
  • the mixture was incubated with slight stirring.at 50 °C. After incubation for 5 hours, the ultrafiltration step was started using two circuits equipped each with a pump (one for increasing the transmembrane pressure and one for the transportation of the biomass through the membrane unit).
  • the membrane used was a ceramic membrane with 10 kDa cut-off (GEA Filtration, GEA Wiegand GmbH).
  • the transmembrane pressure applied was 0.5-3 bar and the cross-flow velocity was 3-4 m/s.
  • the resulting permeate flux was 10-20 L/ h.
  • Table 2 shows the obtained sugar concentrations in permeate obtained during step b) to d), permeate obtained during step b) to e) and filtrated biomass (the error is estimated to +/-10%) Permeate obtained during step b) to d ) Permeate obtained during step b) to e) Filtrated biomass (final composition) Glucose [g/l] 75 45 23 Fructose [g/l] 72 44 22 Arabinose [g/l] 7 5 2 Cellobiose [g/l] 7 6 3
  • the following enzymes were used: 43.4 %(w/w) Celluclast ® , 6.3 %(w/w)Novo 188 ® and 50.3 % (w/w) Pectinex Ultra SP-L ® . These products were mixed in 50 mM NaAc buffer (pH 5).
  • This enzyme mixture was mixed with 150 kg fresh sugar beet material at 0.1 wt.-% E/S.
  • the final reaction mixture contained 18 % d.m. of sugar beet material in 50mM sodium acetate buffer (pH5).
  • reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min to 5 hours at 50°C. After liquefaction and hydrolysis the reaction mixture was centrifuged for 30min at 3200 g and the liquid supernatant was separated and weighted. 1 ml of the supernatant was heat inactivated at 95°C for 10 min and the amount of sugar released was analyzed by HPLC (Agilent, Germany) with an Aminex HPX 87 (BioRad Labs, Hercules, USA) ion exchange column (Eluent: 100% water, T: 85 °C, Flow: 0.6 ml/min, RI detection).
  • Table 3 shows the obtained sugar concentrations in the supernatant.
  • Supernatant Glucose [g/l] 54 Fructose [g/l] 53 Arabinose [g/l] 9 Cellobiose [g/l] 5

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
EP20130004990 2013-10-18 2013-10-18 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse d'une biomasse Withdrawn EP2862939A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20130004990 EP2862939A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2013-10-18 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse d'une biomasse
CN201480056792.2A CN105637094B (zh) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 用于使生物质水解的方法
US14/917,943 US9988658B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 Process for the hydrolysis of biomass
CA2924387A CA2924387C (fr) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 Procede pour l'hydrolyse de biomasse
PCT/EP2014/072147 WO2015055731A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse de biomasse
EP14792414.6A EP3058081A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse de biomasse

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20130004990 EP2862939A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2013-10-18 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse d'une biomasse

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2862939A1 true EP2862939A1 (fr) 2015-04-22

Family

ID=49515146

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20130004990 Withdrawn EP2862939A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2013-10-18 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse d'une biomasse
EP14792414.6A Pending EP3058081A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse de biomasse

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14792414.6A Pending EP3058081A1 (fr) 2013-10-18 2014-10-15 Procédé pour l'hydrolyse de biomasse

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US9988658B2 (fr)
EP (2) EP2862939A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN105637094B (fr)
CA (1) CA2924387C (fr)
WO (1) WO2015055731A1 (fr)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0737753A2 (fr) 1995-04-14 1996-10-16 ERIDANIA S.p.A. Procédé de production de sucre à partir de jus bruit de betterave sucrière
EP2256208A1 (fr) 2009-05-25 2010-12-01 Süd-Chemie Ag Biomasse liquéfiée
WO2013105033A1 (fr) * 2012-01-09 2013-07-18 Beta Renewables S.P.A. Procédé de récupération de sucre amélioré à partir de biomasse ligno-cellulosique
EP2650384A1 (fr) * 2010-12-09 2013-10-16 Toray Industries, Inc. Procédé de fabrication d'une solution aqueuse concentrée de sucre

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5256297A (en) * 1992-12-17 1993-10-26 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Multi-stage ultrafiltration process (OP-3711)
DE102007019643A1 (de) * 2007-04-26 2008-10-30 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Verfahren zur Herstellung von zuckerhaltigen Hydrolysaten aus Lignocellulose

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0737753A2 (fr) 1995-04-14 1996-10-16 ERIDANIA S.p.A. Procédé de production de sucre à partir de jus bruit de betterave sucrière
EP2256208A1 (fr) 2009-05-25 2010-12-01 Süd-Chemie Ag Biomasse liquéfiée
EP2650384A1 (fr) * 2010-12-09 2013-10-16 Toray Industries, Inc. Procédé de fabrication d'une solution aqueuse concentrée de sucre
WO2013105033A1 (fr) * 2012-01-09 2013-07-18 Beta Renewables S.P.A. Procédé de récupération de sucre amélioré à partir de biomasse ligno-cellulosique

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BELDMAN ET AL., ENZYME MICROB. TECHNOL., vol. 6, November 1984 (1984-11-01), pages 503 - 507
BELDMAN G ET AL: "Application of cellulase and pectinase from fungal origin for the liquefaction and saccharification of biomass", ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, STONEHAM, MA, US, vol. 6, no. 11, 1 November 1984 (1984-11-01), pages 503 - 507, XP023678124, ISSN: 0141-0229, [retrieved on 19841101], DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(84)90004-8 *
JING ET AL., APPL BIOCHEM BIOTECHNOL., vol. 159, no. 3, 2009, pages 696 - 707
TANAKA M ET AL: "Removal of lignin and reuse of cellulases for continuous saccharification of lignocelluloses", BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, WILEY & SONS, HOBOKEN, NJ, US, vol. 32, 1 January 1988 (1988-01-01), pages 897 - 902, XP002096253, ISSN: 0006-3592, DOI: 10.1002/BIT.260320708 *
TJERNELD F ET AL: "ENZYME RECYCLING IN CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS BY COMBINED USE OF AQUEOUS TWO-PHASE SYSTEMS AND ULTRAFILTRATION", BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM, JOHN WILEY & SONS, US, vol. 17, no. 15, 1 January 1985 (1985-01-01), pages 419 - 429, XP009040364, ISSN: 0572-6565 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9988658B2 (en) 2018-06-05
CA2924387C (fr) 2021-09-14
CA2924387A1 (fr) 2015-04-23
CN105637094B (zh) 2020-11-10
US20160215313A1 (en) 2016-07-28
CN105637094A (zh) 2016-06-01
WO2015055731A1 (fr) 2015-04-23
EP3058081A1 (fr) 2016-08-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR20160145817A (ko) 리그노셀룰로스 물질을 효소적으로 가수분해하고 당을 발효시키는 방법
US10316341B2 (en) Process for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic material, wherein the hydrolysate is used for microbial hydrolase production
US10519477B2 (en) Self-sufficient process for the production of biomass hydrolysate with reduced salt content
US9988658B2 (en) Process for the hydrolysis of biomass
CN113544280A (zh) 用于产生发酵液的方法
US10876141B2 (en) Process for the hydrolysis of biomass
WO2022214460A1 (fr) Procédé de préparation d'un produit à base de sucre et d'un produit de fermentation
CN109312380A (zh) 用于大规模酶生产的种子训练
EA041359B1 (ru) Способ ферментативного гидролиза лигноцеллюлозного материала и ферментации сахаров

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131018

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20151023