EP2783057B1 - Seismic dissipation module made up of compression-resistant spheres immersed in a variable low density material - Google Patents

Seismic dissipation module made up of compression-resistant spheres immersed in a variable low density material Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2783057B1
EP2783057B1 EP12790430.8A EP12790430A EP2783057B1 EP 2783057 B1 EP2783057 B1 EP 2783057B1 EP 12790430 A EP12790430 A EP 12790430A EP 2783057 B1 EP2783057 B1 EP 2783057B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
seismic
module
spheres
sintered alumina
prefabricated panel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12790430.8A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2783057A1 (en
Inventor
Giuseppe GENTILI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP2783057A1 publication Critical patent/EP2783057A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2783057B1 publication Critical patent/EP2783057B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04HBUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H9/00Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate
    • E04H9/02Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate withstanding earthquake or sinking of ground
    • E04H9/021Bearing, supporting or connecting constructions specially adapted for such buildings
    • E04H9/023Bearing, supporting or connecting constructions specially adapted for such buildings and comprising rolling elements, e.g. balls, pins
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04HBUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H9/00Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate
    • E04H9/02Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate withstanding earthquake or sinking of ground
    • E04H9/021Bearing, supporting or connecting constructions specially adapted for such buildings
    • E04H9/0215Bearing, supporting or connecting constructions specially adapted for such buildings involving active or passive dynamic mass damping systems

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns the industry for making seismic isolators, namely devices used for isolating the load-bearing structure of buildings from the effects of an earthquake and consists of a seismic dissipation and isolation panel or module made up of compression-resistant spheres, made of sintered alumina, bound by variable low density substances, polyurethane foams or polystyrene or other similar material, to be used in new buildings by placing it between a reinforced concrete bed to be made on the ground and the foundation structures of the building, so that, in the event of an earthquake, there can be movements of the building independent from those of the ground on which it is built, so absorbing and isolating the seismic wave and therefore reducing the effects on the structures until, in theory, they cancel them.
  • the base of the isolated building can move in all horizontal directions compared to the foundations; therefore, after a movement, it is necessary for the building to return to its original position, if the residual movements are not of small magnitude compared to the building.
  • the base of the building must be provided with suitable re-centring systems, also called auxiliary devices, whose function is to dissipate energy and/or re-centre the system and/or to provide lateral constraint of the structure.
  • suitable re-centring systems also called auxiliary devices, whose function is to dissipate energy and/or re-centre the system and/or to provide lateral constraint of the structure.
  • WO 99/07966 A1 discloses such a system.
  • Devices that can re-centre the structure and also dissipate energy may include hydraulic devices or devices based on the particular mechanical properties of Shape Memory Alloys (SMA). These materials, typically made up of nickel-titanium alloys, have the ability to "remember" their original shape, which is unusual for other types of materials.
  • SMA Shape Memory Alloys
  • Foundation structures must withstand the effects resulting from the response of the ground and the structures above, without permanent movements that are incompatible with the reference extreme state.
  • the foundation system must be provided with high extensional stiffness in the horizontal plane and with sufficient flexural stiffness.
  • the structural elements of the foundations which must be sized on the basis of the stresses transmitted to them from the structure above, must have non-dissipative behaviour, irrespective of the structural behaviour attributed to the structure bearing down on them.
  • the foundation-isolators-structure system can dissipate the seismic energy of the ground: the dissipation is almost exclusively concentrated in the isolation devices, which dissipate the seismic energy transmitted to them from the foundations at the expense of large plastic deformations, through wide hysteresis cycles.
  • This allows the superstructure to have a response practically in elastic field by remaining almost immobile compared to the motion of the ground. This considerably changes the seismic input, since, by reducing the accelerations transmitted to the building, the response capacity of the structure to the ultimate collapse strength and to the extreme state of damage is considerably raised.
  • these devices In addition to protecting the load-bearing structure, these devices also allow the non-structural parts and all it contains to be protected.
  • this technology allows the prevention of cracks or damage to infills, partition walls, installations/systems or to goods inside buildings, such as museums or libraries, data processing centres, etc. This allows the damage caused to the structures by an earthquake to be minimized or completely eliminated, so maintaining unchanged the activity carried on in it, even after the occurrence of a severe telluric event.
  • the isolated structure behaves almost like a rigid body that tends to remain still compared to the vibrations of the ground.
  • Isolators made of elastomeric material and steel are made up of layers of elastomeric material (natural rubber or suitable artificial materials) alternated with steel plates, having the predominant function of confining the elastomer, and are arranged in the structure so as to withstand the rated horizontal actions and deformations through actions parallel to the position of the layers and of the vertical loads through actions perpendicular to the layers.
  • They are usually of circular design, but can also be made with square or rectangular section. They are characterized by reduced horizontal stiffness, high vertical stiffness and appropriate dissipative capacity.
  • Elasto-plastic isolators are made up of elements that stay elastic when there are just vertical loads but plasticize when there are horizontal actions higher than a set threshold.
  • elasto-plastic isolators Thanks to their high dissipation capacity, elasto-plastic isolators have the task of limiting the transfer of stresses to the substructures, and so guarantee a better response of the entire construction to a seismic event.
  • Sliding or rolling isolators made up respectively of steel and Teflon supports and of supports on roller or spheres, are all characterized by low friction resistance values. Therefore, whereas for elasto-plastic isolators and for those made of elastomeric material and steel, the damping needed to contain the relative movements of the two separate structures is ensured by the strongly hysteretic behaviour of the material with which they are made, for sliding isolators and for rolling isolators, it is necessary to place suitable energy dissipators in parallel.
  • viscoelastic dissipators exploit the viscous behaviour of materials such as plastics, mineral oils and silicone.
  • elasto-plastic dissipators exploit the plasticization of metallic materials to dissipate energy in hysteresis cycles.
  • friction dissipators exploit the friction between suitably treated metal surfaces that slide against each other.
  • elasto-plastic isolators and those made of elastomeric material and steel are particularly vulnerable in the event of fire and must be suitably protected from such an eventuality or used together with devices that can replace them if they are destroyed.
  • the new aseismic marble base is particularly suitable for statues vertically developed that have a very small base and are therefore particularly vulnerable to horizontal seismic actions, which can compromise their balance and cause them to tip over.
  • the rolling mechanical isolators described in patent "MICALI" No. IT 1146596 B are made entirely of steel or other suitable rigid material and each made up of a pair of circular concave elements with a sphere interposed of diameter not less than the sum of the heights of the two concavities.
  • WO 99/07966 discloses a friction ball, made of either plastically deformable homogeneous material (lead, aluminium, brass, iron, steel, etc.) or elastomeric material, which is deformed when it supports a weight; said deformation generating a frictional force which resists rolling motion in the deformed ball.
  • a panel or module to be used in new buildings to be installed between a reinforced concrete bed to be made on the ground and the foundation structures of the building, such as for example a reinforced concrete beam or foundation bed, so that, in the event of an earthquake, there can be movements of the building independent from those of the ground on which it is built, so absorbing and isolating the seismic wave and therefore reducing the effects on the structures until, in theory, they cancel them.
  • the polyurethane or polystyrene or other similar material (3) of the prefabricated module (1) is used to support the concrete casting of the superstructure in the first 28 days of curing of the said concrete.
  • the sintered alumina with which the spheres (2) of the prefabricated module (1) are made is a ceramic material resulting from the sintering of alumina, a substance present in bauxite, consisting of a thermal and mechanical process through which the powdered materials are reduced to a compact mass of a given shape; it combines the advantages of aluminium alloys and of powder metallurgy.
  • the sintered alumina spheres are characterized by very high hardness and compressive strength and therefore high resistance to axial loads, such that laboratory tests show that a sintered alumina sphere, about 5 cm in diameter, subjected to a vertical axial load of 9,000 kg, does not show any plastic effect on its contact surface.
  • the thickness of the prefabricated panel or module (1) is equal to the diameter of the spheres (2), (example: 3-5-8 cm, etc.) with a variable surface area that is suitable for transport, (example: 3.00 x 1.50 m, etc.) or below standard sizes.
  • the sintered alumina spheres (2) should be covered with a suitable additive on the market, a silicone release agent, to ensure that the polyurethane or polystyrene or other similar material (3) does not come into contact with the spheres (2), since these must be allowed the possibility of rotating independently from the structure made of binding material (3) that surrounds them.
  • the binding material (3), of the sintered alumina spheres (2), at low and variable density allows their controlled rotation.
  • the prefabricated module (1) does not undergo deformations during the earthquake, since the sintered alumina spheres (2) have high compressive strength and are without plastic consequences; consequently, the response, with dissipative-isolating effect, will always be the same even during the next earthquake shock, without the panel (1) components ever having to be replaced.
  • the centre-to-centre distances between the sintered alumina spheres (2) may, in particular cases, be adapted to the requirements of the weights above so as to optimize the point load on the sphere (2).
  • the binding material (3) of the sintered alumina spheres (2) is shaped in such a way that each sphere (2) must move inside a localized circular area (9) that delimits its possibility of movement and, in the same way, allows its controlled rotation.

Description

    Field of invention
  • The present invention concerns the industry for making seismic isolators, namely devices used for isolating the load-bearing structure of buildings from the effects of an earthquake and consists of a seismic dissipation and isolation panel or module made up of compression-resistant spheres, made of sintered alumina, bound by variable low density substances, polyurethane foams or polystyrene or other similar material, to be used in new buildings by placing it between a reinforced concrete bed to be made on the ground and the foundation structures of the building, so that, in the event of an earthquake, there can be movements of the building independent from those of the ground on which it is built, so absorbing and isolating the seismic wave and therefore reducing the effects on the structures until, in theory, they cancel them.
  • Background
  • Seismic events are the cause of considerable damage to both concrete and masonry buildings, with well-known consequences on the life of many people. Buildings are anchored to the ground by various types of foundations; they are consequently totally affected by the seismic wave that propagates through the ground to the foundations and therefore to the building, so producing forces that cause considerable stresses to the structural masses, which it is attempted to remedy by laying considerable dimensions of structures and of metal reinforcements that can withstand these forces as much as possible.
  • To contain the uncertainties due to the uncertainty of the determination of the structural modelling parameters and guarantee good behaviour of the structures under seismic actions, specific measures must be adopted, which are listed below, aiming at ensuring ductility characteristics to the structural elements and to the building as a whole.
  • When an earthquake occurs, the base of the isolated building can move in all horizontal directions compared to the foundations; therefore, after a movement, it is necessary for the building to return to its original position, if the residual movements are not of small magnitude compared to the building. To that end, the base of the building must be provided with suitable re-centring systems, also called auxiliary devices, whose function is to dissipate energy and/or re-centre the system and/or to provide lateral constraint of the structure. WO 99/07966 A1 discloses such a system.
  • Devices that can re-centre the structure and also dissipate energy may include hydraulic devices or devices based on the particular mechanical properties of Shape Memory Alloys (SMA). These materials, typically made up of nickel-titanium alloys, have the ability to "remember" their original shape, which is unusual for other types of materials.
  • In general, movements experienced by the isolated structures as a consequence of seismic action must fall within tolerable values to contain the dimensions of the structural joints and not cause problems to the connections of the installations/systems. For isolated structures, flexible connections should in fact be envisaged for all the installations/systems that, from ground level, are connected to the superstructure.
  • Foundation structures must withstand the effects resulting from the response of the ground and the structures above, without permanent movements that are incompatible with the reference extreme state.
  • Buildings must be provided with structural systems that will guarantee stiffness and resistance to the two orthogonal-horizontal components of seismic actions.
  • The foundation system must be provided with high extensional stiffness in the horizontal plane and with sufficient flexural stiffness.
  • The structural elements of the foundations, which must be sized on the basis of the stresses transmitted to them from the structure above, must have non-dissipative behaviour, irrespective of the structural behaviour attributed to the structure bearing down on them.
  • By inserting isolators between the foundations and the elevation structures, the frequencies of the earthquake are uncoupled from the frequencies of the elevation structure and so the development of resonance phenomena is prevented.
  • In the event of seismic stress, the insertion of isolators allows the proper period of vibration of the structure to be increased so moving it away from the area of the response spectrum with greater accelerations.
  • This effectively causes a dynamic uncoupling of the building in relation to the ground ("filter" effect), so as to reduce transmission of the energy supplied by the seismic action to the superstructure. As a consequence of this last, the foundation-isolators-structure system can dissipate the seismic energy of the ground: the dissipation is almost exclusively concentrated in the isolation devices, which dissipate the seismic energy transmitted to them from the foundations at the expense of large plastic deformations, through wide hysteresis cycles. This allows the superstructure to have a response practically in elastic field by remaining almost immobile compared to the motion of the ground. This considerably changes the seismic input, since, by reducing the accelerations transmitted to the building, the response capacity of the structure to the ultimate collapse strength and to the extreme state of damage is considerably raised.
  • In addition to protecting the load-bearing structure, these devices also allow the non-structural parts and all it contains to be protected. In fact, as a consequence of the almost total absence of intermediate landing deformations (drift), this technology allows the prevention of cracks or damage to infills, partition walls, installations/systems or to goods inside buildings, such as museums or libraries, data processing centres, etc. This allows the damage caused to the structures by an earthquake to be minimized or completely eliminated, so maintaining unchanged the activity carried on in it, even after the occurrence of a severe telluric event.
  • During an earthquake, the isolated structure behaves almost like a rigid body that tends to remain still compared to the vibrations of the ground.
  • Using seismic isolators, a structure is designed that remains in elastic field even during the most violent earthquakes and keeps intact the energy dissipative capacity given by ductility.
  • Currently, in the field of seismic engineering, there are three categories of isolators and various types for each category.
  • Isolators made of elastomeric material and steel are made up of layers of elastomeric material (natural rubber or suitable artificial materials) alternated with steel plates, having the predominant function of confining the elastomer, and are arranged in the structure so as to withstand the rated horizontal actions and deformations through actions parallel to the position of the layers and of the vertical loads through actions perpendicular to the layers.
  • They are usually of circular design, but can also be made with square or rectangular section. They are characterized by reduced horizontal stiffness, high vertical stiffness and appropriate dissipative capacity.
  • Elasto-plastic isolators are made up of elements that stay elastic when there are just vertical loads but plasticize when there are horizontal actions higher than a set threshold.
  • Thanks to their high dissipation capacity, elasto-plastic isolators have the task of limiting the transfer of stresses to the substructures, and so guarantee a better response of the entire construction to a seismic event.
  • Sliding or rolling isolators, made up respectively of steel and Teflon supports and of supports on roller or spheres, are all characterized by low friction resistance values. Therefore, whereas for elasto-plastic isolators and for those made of elastomeric material and steel, the damping needed to contain the relative movements of the two separate structures is ensured by the strongly hysteretic behaviour of the material with which they are made, for sliding isolators and for rolling isolators, it is necessary to place suitable energy dissipators in parallel.
  • The dynamics of these types of isolators is complex, since the sliding process is inherently non-linear.
  • Some dissipators, called viscoelastic dissipators, exploit the viscous behaviour of materials such as plastics, mineral oils and silicone. Other dissipators, called elasto-plastic dissipators, exploit the plasticization of metallic materials to dissipate energy in hysteresis cycles. Finally, so-called friction dissipators exploit the friction between suitably treated metal surfaces that slide against each other.
  • In addition to the aging of elastomers (rubbers) and thermoplastic polymers (Teflon), the physical and chemical properties of the adhesives used to glue the steel sheets to the rubber, as well as those of the linear chain organosilicon polymers (silicone oils and greases) used in viscoelastic dissipators, possibly arranged in parallel to sliding or rolling isolators, are also important for the purposes of durability.
  • Moreover, elasto-plastic isolators and those made of elastomeric material and steel are particularly vulnerable in the event of fire and must be suitably protected from such an eventuality or used together with devices that can replace them if they are destroyed.
  • In the current art, there are also ENEA's aseismic marble bases for the Bronzi di Riace.
  • These belong to the family of seismic isolators developed by ENEA for the protection of delicate instruments. These are passive and/or semi-passive non-invasive seismic protection devices made up of two superimposed blocks of marble on the internal surfaces of which, in a specular way to the two blocks, four bowls have been hollowed out whose geometry is a rotation ellipsoid where four marble spheres are placed, which, with their rolling, give the requirements of large movements, low stiffness and low friction required to maximize seismic isolation.
  • When there is an earthquake, it will be the part beneath the base to be subjected to the seismic action and this will be able to move with the ground without transmitting the stresses to the upper part, since they are completely absorbed by the movement of the spheres inside the cavities hollowed out in the marble. The movement of the spheres makes the protection system not very rigid with very low friction, characteristics that minimize the stresses of the earthquake or render them almost null. The new aseismic marble base is particularly suitable for statues vertically developed that have a very small base and are therefore particularly vulnerable to horizontal seismic actions, which can compromise their balance and cause them to tip over.
  • This type of seismic isolation cannot be used for houses and flats since the materials used for making this device, if used for large areas, become very expensive in terms of both raw material and installation, and therefore the use of these aseismic bases with marble spheres is limited to works of art.
  • The different types of seismic dissipators or isolators on the market are very costly and made with a highly specialized technology, and even their installation cannot be carried out by an ordinary construction firm.
  • The rolling mechanical isolators described in patent "MICALI" No. IT 1146596 B are made entirely of steel or other suitable rigid material and each made up of a pair of circular concave elements with a sphere interposed of diameter not less than the sum of the heights of the two concavities. According to this patent, by setting the concave elements in two reinforced concrete beds or net-like structures with one resting directly on the ground and the other on the spheres, only the lower bed or net-like structure is forced to undergo any horizontal seismic movements of the ground whereas the upper one, thanks to the rolling of the spheres beneath, can follow the calm inertia of the building and stay nearly immobile because it is forced only to undergo brief upward traverses due to the momentary movement of the lower concave elements compared to the upper ones set in it.
  • The limit of these rolling mechanical isolators regards the compressive strength of the spheres because of the small contact with the relevant concave rolling seats and the consequent need for large numbers or large dimensions. WO 99/07966 discloses a friction ball, made of either plastically deformable homogeneous material (lead, aluminium, brass, iron, steel, etc.) or elastomeric material, which is deformed when it supports a weight; said deformation generating a frictional force which resists rolling motion in the deformed ball.
  • The limit of these friction balls regards both the expensive costs of the materials they are made of and the low durability over time in terms of resistance thereof.
  • Disclosure of invention
  • It is an object of the present invention to make a seismic isolator made up of raw materials that are easy to find on the market, that have very low costs but have technical characteristics, in terms of density and strength, that allow an identical response for each event to be had in case of repeated earthquakes, and also involve no maintenance costs, since the components do not need to be replaced. Moreover, the isolator will form an excellent insulation from rising damp given the quality of aggregate of the sintered alumina spheres.
  • It is another object of the present invention to make a seismic isolator that can withstand a multidirectional seismic input so that, in the event of an earthquake, there can be movements of the building independent from those of the ground on which it is built, so absorbing and isolating the seismic wave and therefore reducing the effects on the structures until, in theory, they cancel them.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to make a seismic isolator that can avoid transmitting the induced seismic forces on the building, so giving a reduction in structural dimensioning and, at the same time, maintenance of the functionality of the building.
  • These and other objects are obtained with the present invention that concerns a panel or module to be used in new buildings, to be installed between a reinforced concrete bed to be made on the ground and the foundation structures of the building, such as for example a reinforced concrete beam or foundation bed, so that, in the event of an earthquake, there can be movements of the building independent from those of the ground on which it is built, so absorbing and isolating the seismic wave and therefore reducing the effects on the structures until, in theory, they cancel them.
  • Further features and advantages of the invention will be more readily apparent from the description of a preferred, but not exclusive, embodiment of the product that is the subject of the present patent application, illustrated by way of non-limiting example in the drawing units in which:
    • Fig. 1 shows a plan view and a cross-sectional view of a prefabricated panel or module (1) made up of spheres (2), with a pre-set centre-to-centre distance between them that changes depending on the point load (load acting on a single point of the sphere) that it is wished make the sphere support, made of sintered alumina, bound by variable low density substances, polyurethane foams or polystyrene or other similar material (3);
    • Fig. 2 is a cross-section:
      • of the prefabricated panel or module (1) made up of spheres (2) made of sintered alumina and bound by variable low density substances, polyurethane foams or polystyrene or other similar material (3);
      • of the reinforced concrete bed (4) of the foundation resting the ground (5) and bounded on the upper part by the "isolation interface", by "isolation interface" meaning the separation surface on which the isolation system is active;
      • of the reinforced concrete beam or foundation bed (6);
      • of the building (7) with column (8).
    • Figures 3 and 4 show an alternative embodiment of the prefabricated panel or module (1) in which:
      • Fig. 3 shows a plan view and a cross-sectional view of a prefabricated panel or module (1) made up of spheres (2), whose movement capacity is localized inside a circular area (9) and having a pre-set centre-to-centre distance between them that changes depending on the point load (load acting on a single point of the sphere) that it is wished make the sphere support, made of sintered alumina, bound by variable low density substances, polyurethane foams or polystyrene or other similar material (3);
    • Fig. 4 is a cross-section:
      • of the prefabricated panel or module (1) made up of spheres (2) made of sintered alumina, with capacity to move inside a localized area (9) and bound by variable low density substances, polyurethane foams or polystyrene or other similar material (3);
      • of the reinforced concrete bed (4) of the foundation resting the ground (5) and bounded on the upper part by the "isolation interface", with "isolation interface" meaning the separation surface on which the isolation system is active;
      • of the reinforced concrete beam or foundation bed (6);
      • of the building (7) with column (8).
    Detailed description of invention
  • In the description below, the following terms will be used, of which the definition is given:
    • "substructure" or "first foundation", the part of the structure situated below the interface of the isolation system and that includes the foundations, generally having negligible horizontal deformability and directly subject to the movements imposed by the seismic movement of the ground;
    • "superstructure" or "second foundation", the part of the structure situated above the isolation interface, and therefore isolated.
  • The polyurethane or polystyrene or other similar material (3) of the prefabricated module (1) is used to support the concrete casting of the superstructure in the first 28 days of curing of the said concrete.
  • The sintered alumina with which the spheres (2) of the prefabricated module (1) are made is a ceramic material resulting from the sintering of alumina, a substance present in bauxite, consisting of a thermal and mechanical process through which the powdered materials are reduced to a compact mass of a given shape; it combines the advantages of aluminium alloys and of powder metallurgy.
  • The sintered alumina spheres are characterized by very high hardness and compressive strength and therefore high resistance to axial loads, such that laboratory tests show that a sintered alumina sphere, about 5 cm in diameter, subjected to a vertical axial load of 9,000 kg, does not show any plastic effect on its contact surface.
  • The advantages of aluminium alloys are:
    • low specific weight (about 2.7 g/cm3);
    • good corrosion resistance;
    • remarkable mechanical properties;
    • good wear resistance;
    • good fatigue resistance;
    the advantages of powder metallurgy are:
    • low production costs;
    • good control of tolerances without subsequent processing;
    • possibility of obtaining complex shapes at limited cost.
  • The thickness of the prefabricated panel or module (1) is equal to the diameter of the spheres (2), (example: 3-5-8 cm, etc.) with a variable surface area that is suitable for transport, (example: 3.00 x 1.50 m, etc.) or below standard sizes.
  • The installation of these prefabricated panels or modules (1) envisages that they be placed touching each other on the horizontal plane, between the first and second foundation.
  • The sintered alumina spheres (2) should be covered with a suitable additive on the market, a silicone release agent, to ensure that the polyurethane or polystyrene or other similar material (3) does not come into contact with the spheres (2), since these must be allowed the possibility of rotating independently from the structure made of binding material (3) that surrounds them.
  • The possibility of multidirectional rotation of the spheres (2) in the event of an earthquake absorbs and isolates the horizontal oscillating motion of the ground (5) without transmitting stresses to the superstructure of the building (7), which, by inertia, will tend to maintain the position, so reducing the well-known disastrous effects.
  • The binding material (3), of the sintered alumina spheres (2), at low and variable density allows their controlled rotation. The prefabricated module (1) does not undergo deformations during the earthquake, since the sintered alumina spheres (2) have high compressive strength and are without plastic consequences; consequently, the response, with dissipative-isolating effect, will always be the same even during the next earthquake shock, without the panel (1) components ever having to be replaced.
  • For the system of the foundations (6), both the intradosal ones of the isolator and the extradosal ones, normal strength concretes Rck 30 can be used, with usual loads without plastic effects on the concrete due to the sintered alumina sphere (2) of the isolator (tests carried out in a laboratory). For particular loads on the foundation (6), a foundation concrete with suitable strengths will be used.
  • The centre-to-centre distances between the sintered alumina spheres (2) may, in particular cases, be adapted to the requirements of the weights above so as to optimize the point load on the sphere (2).
  • According to a further embodiment of this prefabricated panel or module (1) for seismic dissipation and isolation, the binding material (3) of the sintered alumina spheres (2) is shaped in such a way that each sphere (2) must move inside a localized circular area (9) that delimits its possibility of movement and, in the same way, allows its controlled rotation.
  • The materials and the dimensions of the above-described invention, illustrated in the accompanying drawings and later claimed, may be varied according to requirements. Moreover, all the details may be replaced by other technically equivalent ones without for this reason straying from the protective scope of the present application as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (4)

  1. Seismic dissipation module to isolate the load-bearing structure of buildings from the effects of an earthquake that consists of a prefabricated panel or module (1) to be installed between a reinforced concrete bed (4) to be made on the ground (5) and the foundation structures (6) of a building (7), wherein said prefabricated panel or module (1) is made up of compression-resistant spheres (2) arranged inside the prefabricated panel or module (1) with a pre-set centre-to-centre distance between them, said prefabricated panel or module (1) being characterized in that said compression-resistant spheres (2) are made of sintered alumina and bound by low and variable density substances (3), such as polyurethane foams or polystyrene.
  2. Seismic dissipation module (1) according to claim 1, whose sintered alumina spheres (2) are characterized in that they are covered with a suitable additive on the market such as a silicone release agent.
  3. Seismic dissipation module (1) according to claim 1, characterized in that the thickness of the prefabricated panel or module (1) is equal to the diameter of the sintered alumina spheres (2), with a variable surface area that is suitable for transport.
  4. Seismic dissipation module according to claim 1, whose low and variable density substances (3), such as polyurethane foams or polystyrene binding the sintered alumina spheres (2) are characterized in that they are shaped in such a way that each sintered alumina sphere (2) must move inside a localized circular area (9).
EP12790430.8A 2011-11-21 2012-11-19 Seismic dissipation module made up of compression-resistant spheres immersed in a variable low density material Active EP2783057B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT000066A ITMC20110066A1 (en) 2011-11-21 2011-11-21 MODULE FOR SEISMIC DISSIPATION CONSISTING OF SPHERES RESISTANT TO COMPRESSION IMMERSED IN A VARIABLE LOW DENSITY MATERIAL.
PCT/EP2012/004798 WO2013075814A1 (en) 2011-11-21 2012-11-19 Seismic dissipation module made up of compression-resistant spheres immersed in a variable low density material

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2783057A1 EP2783057A1 (en) 2014-10-01
EP2783057B1 true EP2783057B1 (en) 2015-08-05

Family

ID=45955444

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12790430.8A Active EP2783057B1 (en) 2011-11-21 2012-11-19 Seismic dissipation module made up of compression-resistant spheres immersed in a variable low density material

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20140345210A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2783057B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2014533783A (en)
CN (1) CN103946468A (en)
CA (1) CA2856108A1 (en)
CL (1) CL2014001320A1 (en)
IT (1) ITMC20110066A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2014005823A (en)
WO (1) WO2013075814A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITME20130010A1 (en) * 2013-11-12 2015-05-13 Bruno Azzerboni DISSIPATORS OF SEISMIC WAVES BASED ON INTERNAL RESONATORS
CN106460354B (en) * 2014-03-24 2020-09-01 马西莫·基亚皮妮 Composite foundation for earthquake-proof protection of building structure
KR101613399B1 (en) * 2015-07-19 2016-04-20 장성철 Seismic reinforcement driving a friction coating on a rolling unit rolling surface
US20200196758A1 (en) * 2016-03-25 2020-06-25 Paul J. Segas Seismic base isolation system for barrel racks
US10113610B2 (en) * 2017-03-28 2018-10-30 SK Commercial Construction, Inc. Method for improved semiconductor processing equipment tool pedestal / pad vibration isolation and reduction
US10480611B2 (en) * 2017-03-28 2019-11-19 SK Commercial Construction, Inc. Method for improved semiconductor processing equipment tool pedestal / pad vibration isolation and reduction
US9995365B1 (en) * 2017-03-28 2018-06-12 SK Commercial Construction, Inc. Method and system for improved semiconductor processing equipment vibration isolation and reduction
US10060501B1 (en) * 2017-03-28 2018-08-28 SK Commercial Construction, Inc. Method for improved semiconductor processing equipment tool pedestal/pad vibration isolation and reduction
AU2019257276A1 (en) * 2018-04-16 2020-11-19 Damir AUJAGHIAN Seismic isolator and damping device
CN109811927B (en) * 2019-03-19 2023-11-14 中国矿业大学 Fireproof and shock-insulation support device under earthquake action and fireproof and shock-insulation method

Family Cites Families (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1761659A (en) * 1928-01-18 1930-06-03 Frank D Cummings Building construction
US2002934A (en) * 1933-04-10 1935-05-28 George R Collins Building construction
US2014643A (en) * 1933-08-31 1935-09-17 Jacob F J Bakker Balance block for buildings
US3705558A (en) * 1963-04-24 1972-12-12 Gen Motors Corp Armor
US3904352A (en) * 1974-01-17 1975-09-09 Coors Porcelain Co Assembly and method for supporting ceramics and the like during firing
MX149151A (en) * 1978-05-02 1983-09-07 Manuel Gonzalez Flores IMPROVED ASISMIC SLIDER AND PLACEMENT SYSTEM
NZ208129A (en) * 1984-05-11 1988-10-28 New Zealand Dev Finance Shear energy absorber: confined granular material within deformable block
JPS63223244A (en) * 1987-03-12 1988-09-16 鹿島建設株式会社 Vibrationproof earthquake damping apparatus
US5261200A (en) * 1990-01-20 1993-11-16 Sumitomo Gomu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Vibration-proofing device
JPH08510540A (en) * 1993-06-02 1996-11-05 インダストリアル リサーチ リミテッド Motion damper for large structures
JP2834980B2 (en) * 1993-08-04 1998-12-14 良三 米田 Seismic support structure for structures
JP3014034B2 (en) * 1995-09-21 2000-02-28 鹿島建設株式会社 Windproof seismic isolation building
JP3409611B2 (en) * 1996-10-04 2003-05-26 良三 米田 Seismic support device for objects
US5905804A (en) * 1997-03-19 1999-05-18 Lee; Tzu-Min Pad structure for a speaker cabinet
JP3939435B2 (en) * 1997-06-25 2007-07-04 株式会社奥村組 Seismic isolation device
AU8248498A (en) * 1997-07-11 1999-02-08 Penguin Engineering Limited Energy absorber
KR100384591B1 (en) * 1997-08-08 2003-05-22 로빈슨 사이즈믹 리미티드 Energy absorber
JPH11264262A (en) * 1998-03-16 1999-09-28 Tsutomu Mizuno Base isolation device for small-scale building
JP2000179616A (en) * 1998-12-11 2000-06-27 Daido Metal Co Ltd Sliding member
RU2187598C2 (en) * 2000-10-19 2002-08-20 Самарская государственная архитектурно-строительная академия Foundation of earthquake-proof building, structure
US20040221529A1 (en) * 2001-04-03 2004-11-11 Zornes David A. Modular building structure
US20050241245A1 (en) * 2004-04-29 2005-11-03 Chong-Shien Tsai Foundation shock eliminator
US7237364B2 (en) * 2004-07-02 2007-07-03 Chong-Shien Tsai Foundation shock eliminator
JP3709485B1 (en) * 2004-10-08 2005-10-26 株式会社昭和 Lining structure
DE102007006818B4 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-11-13 Sgl Carbon Ag component composite
JP5275230B2 (en) * 2007-06-25 2013-08-28 オイレス工業株式会社 Damper device
CN201232267Y (en) * 2008-06-11 2009-05-06 宁日清 Anti-shock building
CN101619599A (en) * 2008-07-02 2010-01-06 李德安 Oval face steel ball building earthquake-resistant structure
CN101871272A (en) * 2009-04-21 2010-10-27 朱乃盛 Building method of earthquake-resistant house and integral terrace house
CN201474357U (en) * 2009-09-03 2010-05-19 于迎军 Earthquake-proof building unit
CN101748686B (en) * 2010-01-20 2015-04-08 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司 Non-linear damping radiation vibration absorption and isolation support

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2856108A1 (en) 2013-05-30
CN103946468A (en) 2014-07-23
ITMC20110066A1 (en) 2012-02-20
WO2013075814A1 (en) 2013-05-30
JP2014533783A (en) 2014-12-15
MX2014005823A (en) 2014-10-24
EP2783057A1 (en) 2014-10-01
US20140345210A1 (en) 2014-11-27
CL2014001320A1 (en) 2014-11-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2783057B1 (en) Seismic dissipation module made up of compression-resistant spheres immersed in a variable low density material
Zhang et al. Investigation on low-cost friction-based isolation systems for masonry building structures: Experimental and numerical studies
Zhang et al. The advancement of seismic isolation and energy dissipation mechanisms based on friction
Harvey Jr et al. A review of rolling-type seismic isolation: Historical development and future directions
Tsai et al. Component and shaking table tests for full‐scale multiple friction pendulum system
Mazza et al. Nonlinear dynamic response of RC buildings with different base isolation systems subjected to horizontal and vertical components of near-fault ground motions
TWI554668B (en) Seismic isolation systems and method for isolating a payload from vibration
Tsai et al. Tri-directional shaking table tests of vibration sensitive equipment with static dynamics interchangeable-ball pendulum system
Chiaramonte et al. Seismic analyses of conventional and improved marginal wharves
Khan et al. Effect of near and far field earthquakes on performance of various base isolation systems
Wang et al. Multi-location seismic isolation approach and design for underground structures employing the negative-stiffness amplification system
Gurkalo et al. The nonlinear analysis of an innovative slit reinforced concrete water tower in seismic regions
Yuan et al. Hybrid geotechnical and structural seismic isolation: Shake table tests
CN207436616U (en) A kind of achievable skyscraper isolation structure
Fayyadh et al. Development of floating rubber-concrete isolation slab system for 3D vibrations
Fasil et al. The state of the art on seismic isolation of shear wall structure using elastomeric isolators
Li et al. Earthquake-resistant design of RC frame with “dual functions” metallic dampers
Tashkov et al. Evaluation of efficiency of ALSC floating-sliding base-isolation system based on shake table test and floor response spectra
Antonucci et al. Shaking table testing of an RC frame with dissipative bracings
JP2008121399A (en) Foundation vibration damping device
JP2017043988A (en) Vibration control building
Yuen et al. Seismic performance and lateral stability of RC frames with vertical irregular infill arrangements
Kerileng et al. Base Isolation Systems in Multi-Storey Structures
Hidayaty et al. Numerical analysis of viscous wall dampers on steel frame
Fuller et al. Rubber-based energy dissipators for earthquake protection of structures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140605

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150302

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 740816

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012009406

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 740816

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151106

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151207

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151205

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012009406

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012009406

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151119

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20160729

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151119

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20121119

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20161119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805