EP2774125A1 - Dokumentenprüfung - Google Patents
DokumentenprüfungInfo
- Publication number
- EP2774125A1 EP2774125A1 EP12784206.0A EP12784206A EP2774125A1 EP 2774125 A1 EP2774125 A1 EP 2774125A1 EP 12784206 A EP12784206 A EP 12784206A EP 2774125 A1 EP2774125 A1 EP 2774125A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- personal
- document
- plausibility
- person
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 89
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000976 ink Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010224 classification analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007621 cluster analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007418 data mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004049 embossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/22—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder
- G07C9/25—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder using biometric data, e.g. fingerprints, iris scans or voice recognition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/27—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass with central registration
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for verifying documents that are uniquely associated with a person, as well as a corresponding verification device and a verification system with such a verification device.
- the verification of a document based on a verification of given authenticity features may not be sufficient to reliably detect any types of counterfeits.
- the authenticity check is supplemented by a plausibility check of the personal document based on plausibility data, which are related to the personal document to be verified or the person to whom the personnel document is uniquely assigned, and which are also determined in the database network.
- the plausibility check checks whether there is a consistency in content between the plausibility data on the one hand and the personal document, personal data or factual data recorded thereon or the person himself, on the other hand.
- the personal data or property personal data relating to the person or pertinent data relate to an item which is assigned to the person by means of a property or ownership relationship, eg a vehicle or the like.
- the plausibility data in turn relate to personal / factual data of the person or an object associated with the person in other contexts, eg in the form of further personal documents stored in the database network or the like.
- the authenticity check is made safer and more reliable by the additional logical-qualitative plausibility check and thus significantly improved. Another advantage is that the plausibility check, unlike the authenticity check, can also take into account dynamic personnel / factual data, ie data that may change over time.
- the personal document may, in principle, be any document associated with a person, e.g. Also, an electronic document such as a smart card, in which personal or pertinent data is stored in a memory of an embedded integrated circuit, or a paper or plastic document on which personal / factual data is printed or imprinted.
- Such personal documents may be, in particular, official documents issued by a public authority or an organization that provide personal or factual data of the subject for machine or visual examination, such as personal data. Badge, Travel, Access or
- Authorization documents, certificates, invoices, application documents, tax documents, value or personal documents relating to goods such as vehicle registration documents, in particular electronic vehicle registration documents ("electronic vehicles"). Registration Card “; eVRC), or other documents documenting ownership or ownership.
- the verification method is implemented with a verification system according to the invention, which comprises at least one verification device and one database network with at least one, but preferably several databases.
- These databases may be operated by various agencies, organizations or companies that manage personal or factual records and documents that are potential sources of plausibility data.
- the authenticity check and plausibility check can be performed automatically or partially or entirely manually by an operator of the verification device.
- the database network preferably includes a verification server, which the verification device responds to with requests for reference data, plausibility data or other personal / factual data, for example via a data communication connection via the Internet.
- the verification server executes the request by determining the requested data in the available databases and making it available to the verification device.
- the verification device comprises suitable read-out devices in order to read out or read from the document the identification and / or the comparison data, for example a camera or scanning device or electronic readout means via contactless or contact-based data communication interfaces.
- the identifier may be a unique code applied to the personal document, eg the serial number coded as a bar code, or a unique code stored in an integrated circuit.
- the reference data are determined in the database network on the basis of the unique identification of the personal document, for example on a database of the manufacturer or publisher of the personal document, in which the reference data can be identified by the associated label. In contrast, the plausibility data can be determined on the basis of the identification or based on the already determined reference data in the database network.
- the comparison and reference data can be derivable from any authenticity features, for example from the optically variable elements known from the field of banknotes or securities, holograms, embossing structures, color imprints or printed patterns, watermarks or the like.
- the reference data form a digital image of the original, unfalsified personal document, while the comparison data is a current digital image of the circulating personal document, which was made by the verification device specifically for authenticity testing.
- the plausibility data can relate to any other personal / factual data not originating from the personnel document and ascertainable in the database network.
- the most recent available plausibility data is determined, e.g. the most recent digital image of the person or, as far as possible, current other documents relating to the person with further personal / factual data. In this way, the plausibility check is always carried out on the most up-to-date available personal / factual data.
- the verification device or the verification server it is determined whether logical-qualitative There are consistencies or substantive consistencies between the personal / factual data to be extracted from the personal document and the plausibility data determined. For example, it can be checked whether the plausibility data can be logically assigned to the personnel document or the person, for example by comparing a determined current image of the person with the current appearance of the person. Likewise, the examination of any other logical assignments is conceivable, eg the check as to whether an age resulting from the ascertained personal / factual data correlates with the current appearance of the person or whether the location of a vehicle registration agrees with the place of residence of the person. If such tests are negative, at least doubts are attached to any positive authenticity check.
- the plausibility check can also be used to check whether the plausibility data can be derived from the personal / factual data specified on the personal document or whether the personal / factual data specified on the document can be derived at least in part from the plausibility data , This would be the case, for example, if the personal / factual data given on the personal document can be used to derive a marital status or a comparable private characteristic, which also results from an official document from which plausibility data were taken.
- the plausibility check supplements the authenticity check with a second information channel and a different check.
- a purely mathematical or numerical-quantitative comparison operation is the basis of the assurance check.
- the plausibility check can also use statistical methods, for example a regression analysis, or derivation and information acquisition methods from the field of data mining and information repair, such as classification and cluster analysis or the like.
- the further personal / factual data obtained within the scope of the determination of the plausibility data can also be made available to an operator of the verification device or an official for further verification of the personal document and / or the person, eg for checking the rightful owner in the case of a purchase of a motor vehicle.
- FIG. 1 shows a preferred embodiment of a verification arrangement according to the invention for verifying a personal identity document
- FIG. 2 an electronic personnel document
- FIG. 3 shows a method sequence according to a preferred embodiment of the verification method according to the invention.
- a document to be verified with a verification system 20, 30, 32 according to FIG. 1 in accordance with a verification method according to FIG. 3 is a readable, paper or card-form personal document 10 which has a barcode 11 Identification for unambiguous identification of the personal document 10 carries, and which is provided with authenticity features from which comparison data 12 (CMP) can be derived for an authenticity check.
- CMP comparison data 12
- personal / factual data 13, 14 are indicated on the personal document, which either relate to the person to whom the personal document 10 is associated, or provide information and information on objects and things owned or owned by that person, and the personal document 10, for example to a motor vehicle of the person.
- a passport or portrait image 13 of the person and other personal or factual data 14 may be indicated on the personal document 10 concerning the name, address or date of birth of the person or type, technical specifications or registration of a motor vehicle or the like.
- the verification system 20, 30, 32 is set up and equipped according to a further embodiment to check electronic personal documents 10.
- Fig. 2 shows a chip card-shaped personal document 10, which also printed on a barcode 11 as a unique identifier is.
- personal / factual data are indicated on the card body of the personal document 10, namely a passport or portrait picture 13 as well as personal or factual information 14.
- the same personal / factual data 13, 14 are - in digital form - but also in one non-volatile memory of an integrated circuit 17 which is embedded in the electronic personnel document 10 and is accessible via contact surfaces 16 for the verification device 20.
- comparison data 12 for checking the authenticity and other personal / factual data 15 are stored, which are not visible on the personal document 10 deposited.
- the personal document 10 relates to an electronic vehicle registration card (eVRC) according to ISO 7816, which allows contact-based data communication with the verification device 20 via a contact field 16 and a plurality of personal / Factual data 13, 14, 15 to the vehicle owner and the vehicle includes.
- eVRC electronic vehicle registration card
- the comparison data 12, which are compared in the authenticity check with reference data 37 (REF) stored in a database 32, can relate to any authenticity features originating from the securities and value document area, for example microprint, complex graphic patterns and guilloches, optically variable imprints and elements, laser images , Holograms, laser or gravure engravings, temperature-dependent dyes, complex spectral distributions of printing inks or printing ink components or the like.
- the comparison and reference data 12, 37 relate to a digital image of the entire personal document 10 which is currently recorded and which, upon production of the personal document 10, has a sufficiently high resolution digital image.
- the verification device 20 checks the personal document 10 for authenticity and plausibility (compare steps S6 and S7 in FIG.
- the verification device 20 can be any computer-aided device which has been set up in accordance with the software and is equipped with hardware, for example also a portable verification computer, a modern smartphone with a verification application or the like.
- the verification device 20 preferably includes a read-out device 21 which can read graphic or textual information on the personal document 10 or read out electronic data from an integrated circuit 17 of the personal document 10 in order to make it available to a control device 22.
- the read-out device 21 is here in particular an optical sensor or scanning device, e.g. a digital camera, with the person / item data 13, 14, a unique identifier in the form of a barcode 11 or comparison data 12 (CMP) can be read from the personnel document 10.
- an electronic personnel document 10 can also be checked (see Fig. 2), for which the verification device 20 as a read-out device 21 comprises a suitable reading device for reading the relevant data 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 from the integrated circuit 17, for example contact-type or contactless access mechanisms according to the relevant communication protocols.
- the verification device 20 also includes a display device 23, e.g. an LCD display or the display of a portable computer or smartphone running e.g. Plausibility data 33, 34 or item / person data 35, 36 can be displayed.
- a display device 23 e.g. an LCD display or the display of a portable computer or smartphone running e.g. Plausibility data 33, 34 or item / person data 35, 36 can be displayed.
- the verification device 20 is connected via a suitable data communication infrastructure, for example the Internet 40, with a verification server.
- Ver 30 is connected, which is equipped with a control device 31 and in turn is connected to various generally independent databases 32.
- the databases 32 may be operated by various organizations, government agencies, or companies, and may also manage, for any purposes, the personal or factual data 33, 34, 35, 36 relating to the person or the personal document 10, which may include the personal / personal information provided on the personal document 10. Add or subtract data 12, 13, 14, 15.
- the databases 32 can be operated, for example, by various KfZ registration authorities, or by information service providers, such as information files for economic or personal data.
- personal / factual data 33, 34, 35, 36 to the person are stored in databases 32 in various databases 32.
- These personal / factual data 33, 34, 35, 36 can be selected as plausibility data 33, 34 for the plausibility check or can be available as additional personal / factual data 35, 36 which can be accessed via the personal / factual data 13 to be taken from the document 10. 14, 15 go out and complete this.
- the latter are not used for the plausibility check, but can provide an operator of the verification device 20, for example in the context of a vehicle inspection, further information, for example about a vehicle owner and the vehicle.
- the personal / factual data 33, 34, 35, 36 present in the database network 30, 32 may, for example, relate to digital images 33 of the person or of objects or places that are acquired for other purposes by authorities or organizations in connection with the person and a database 32 have been deposited.
- the personal / factual data 33, 34, 35, 36 Any other official or other documents, texts or information which are suitable for the plausibility check of the personal document 10 can also be used, for example also certifications or translations of personal documents into other languages.
- FIG. 3 outlines the sequence of a verification of the personal document 10 by the verification device 20 or the verification system 20, 30, 32 according to FIG. 1.
- the steps S1 to S10 can be executed in a different order, as far as possible and meaningful.
- a person submits a personal document 10 to be verified, for example an electronic vehicle registration or the like, first the uniquely identifying barcode 11 by means of a barcode reader 20 read (READ CODE) and forwards to the controller 22.
- the bar code reader may be a conventional or infrared camera 21 supplemented by a bar code evaluation software in the control device 22.
- step S2 which may also be integrated into step S1
- the verification device 20 reads out the comparison data 12 with the camera 21 (READ CMP).
- the comparison data 12 is, for example, a digital image of the personal document 10 or its surface.
- the actual comparison data 12 can also be extracted by the control device 22 from an image of the entire personal document 10, if the comparison data 12 concerns only a section of the personal document 10 or an authenticity feature located thereon.
- a step S3 the control device 22 sends a request for the reference data 37 to the verification server 30 and for this purpose transfers the bar code to the verification server 30.
- code 11 as search criterion (GET REF).
- the verification server 30 or its control device 31 then carries out, starting from the barcode 11, a search in the connected databases 32 and in this way determines the reference data 37 associated with the barcode 11 in a database 32, for example from the manufacturer of the personal document 10 is provided for their authenticity.
- the personal document 10 is classified as genuine, subject to the plausibility check.
- a request for plausibility data 33, 34 (PI, P2) is directed to the verification server 30 in step S4 (GET P-DATA).
- the verification device 20 again gives the server device 30 a suitable search criterion, for example the barcode 11 or the previously determined reference data 37.
- search criterion additional personal / factual data 13, 14, 15 which exist and / or have been suitably read on / in the personnel document 10 can be sent to the Verification server 30 are passed.
- step S5 it is checked in step S5 whether there is authorization at all to issue the plausibility data 33, 34 (PD ATA AUTHORIZED?).
- this authorization consists in that the verification device 20 proves its authorization to the verification server 30 by means of an authorization signal to be able to receive and use confidential plausibility data 33, 34.
- the verification device 20 may have such an authorization, for example, because it belongs to a specific security class due to structural or organizational circumstances or is used by an authority that already has access to the relevant data.
- the verification server 30 can forward the plausibility data 33, 34 to the verification device 20 only after explicit approval by the person.
- a corresponding release signal can be interrogated by the verification device 20 at the person, e.g. by displaying a release request on the display 23 and manual confirmation by the person. However, the release can also take place via a direct contact of the verification server 30 with the person, for example by telephone or by means of electronic data communication.
- the plausibility check takes place, partly by displaying the plausibility data 33 on the display 23 of the verification device 20 and partly by an automated logical derivation in the control device 22 (CHECK PLAUSIBILITY).
- the plausibility data 33 relates to a person's digital image (PI) as it exists in a database 32 which manages identity documents. If certain plausibility data 33 are present multiple times on one or more databases 32, such as a passport picture 33 of the person, the most recent plausibility data 33 is selected. As part of the plausibility check, the person's current digital image 33 is displayed on the display 23, where an operator of the verification device 20 can compare this with the actual appearance of the person.
- the plausibility check can be carried out completely or partially automatically by the control device 22.
- D4, D5) from the database network 32 can be made (P2 ⁇ -> - Dl-D5).
- Tsar can successfully complete the authentication in step S6; However, the plausibility check in step S7 can give rise to doubts about the personal document 10 or the person due to a detected consistency of the data or substantive contradictions. If authenticity and plausibility checks have been successful, the personnel document 10 will be verified.
- the further personal / factual data 35, 36 (D4, D5), which exceed the personal / factual data 13, 14, 15, 14 (D1, D2, D3) to be taken from the personal document 10, are transferred to the verification server 30 in step S8 requested (GET D-DATA) and in addition to the plausibility check by the operator of the verification device 20 in step S10 displayed on the display 23 (DISPLAY D-DATA).
- step S9 it is checked in step S9 before displaying the item / person data 35, 36 whether it is authorized (D-DATA AUTHORIZED?), For example by Examination of an authorization of the verification device 20 or a release by the person.
- the further personal / factual data 35, 36 may also be readily available to the operator (or the person himself) as additional information, e.g. to determine the ownership of the vehicle in question when buying a car or driving license.
- the person may be offered value added services based on the data 35, 36, for example, information about technical characteristics of a vehicle from a vehicle manufacturer or the like.
- the additional personal / factual data 35, 36 can be automatically inserted into an application form, which the person receives by presenting the personal document 10 or wants to submit it to an authority.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102011117467A DE102011117467A1 (de) | 2011-11-02 | 2011-11-02 | Dokumentenprüfung |
PCT/EP2012/004296 WO2013064210A1 (de) | 2011-11-02 | 2012-10-15 | Dokumentenprüfung |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2774125A1 true EP2774125A1 (de) | 2014-09-10 |
EP2774125B1 EP2774125B1 (de) | 2021-05-19 |
Family
ID=47172583
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12784206.0A Active EP2774125B1 (de) | 2011-11-02 | 2012-10-15 | Dokumentenprüfung |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2774125B1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE102011117467A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2013064210A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6549692B2 (ja) | 2014-07-29 | 2019-07-24 | ヒューレット−パッカード デベロップメント カンパニー エル.ピー.Hewlett‐Packard Development Company, L.P. | 認証マークの送信 |
DE102017001879A1 (de) | 2017-02-27 | 2018-08-30 | Giesecke+Devrient Mobile Security Gmbh | Verfahren zur Verifizierung der Identität eines Nutzers |
CN107358686A (zh) * | 2017-06-21 | 2017-11-17 | 西安科技大学 | 一种矿山运输安全管理系统 |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5321751A (en) * | 1993-02-18 | 1994-06-14 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and apparatus for credit card verification |
US6040783A (en) * | 1995-05-08 | 2000-03-21 | Image Data, Llc | System and method for remote, wireless positive identity verification |
US20050160271A9 (en) * | 1998-11-19 | 2005-07-21 | Brundage Trent J. | Identification document and related methods |
DE10063489A1 (de) * | 2000-12-20 | 2002-06-27 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Verfahren zur Überprüfung von Ausweisen |
CA2532296A1 (en) * | 2003-07-17 | 2005-02-03 | Digimarc Corporation | Uniquely linking security elements in identification documents |
DE102004056007A1 (de) * | 2004-11-19 | 2006-05-24 | Bundesdruckerei Gmbh | Mobile Verifikationseinrichtung zur Echtheitsüberprüfung von Reisedokumenten |
DE102005038092A1 (de) * | 2005-08-11 | 2007-02-15 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Prüfung eines elektronischen Passes |
RS51531B (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2011-06-30 | Vlatacom D.O.O. | MANUAL PORTABLE DEVICE FOR VERIFICATION OF PASSENGERS AND PERSONAL DOCUMENTS, READING BIOMETRIC DATA |
-
2011
- 2011-11-02 DE DE102011117467A patent/DE102011117467A1/de active Pending
-
2012
- 2012-10-15 WO PCT/EP2012/004296 patent/WO2013064210A1/de active Application Filing
- 2012-10-15 EP EP12784206.0A patent/EP2774125B1/de active Active
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
None * |
See also references of WO2013064210A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2774125B1 (de) | 2021-05-19 |
DE102011117467A1 (de) | 2013-05-02 |
WO2013064210A1 (de) | 2013-05-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE10204870B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Fälschungssicherung eines Wertträgers, Wertträger und Verfahren zur Überprüfung seiner Echtheit | |
DE102013103856B4 (de) | Gesichertes EPass-Heft basierend auf einer zweifach Chip-Technologie | |
DE10027365A1 (de) | Objektbezogene Steuerung von Informations- und Werbeträgern | |
DE102015108432B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Fälschungserkennung von Identifikationsdokumenten, die ein Gesichtsbild mit IR-absorbierenden Bestandteilen enthalten | |
EP2774125B1 (de) | Dokumentenprüfung | |
DE102014214548B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Dokuments | |
DE102008041990A1 (de) | Dokument, Verfahren zur Herstellung und zur Überprüfung eines Dokuments, Computerprogrammprodukt, Datenverarbeitungssystem und Prüfsystem | |
EP3024666B1 (de) | Verfahren zur überprüfung der echtheit eines dokumentes | |
AT515654A2 (de) | Sicherheitsmerkmal mit einem Markierungs- und einem Codeabschnitt | |
DE2452202A1 (de) | Urkunden mit echtheitspruefmoeglichkeit sowie vorrichtung zur echtheitspruefung | |
DE202007018857U1 (de) | Verwaltungsterminal | |
DE102015108429B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Fälschungserkennung von Identifikationsdokumenten, die Datenfelder mit IR-absorbierenden personalisierten Daten enthalten | |
WO2012055539A1 (de) | Merkmalsbeschreibung für echtheitsmerkmal | |
EP1947612A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Auslesen von Ausweisdokumenten | |
DE10348751A1 (de) | Verfahren und Gerät zur Alterslegitimation bei der Benutzung von Verkaufsautomaten | |
DE102009007588A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Verifizieren von Dokumenten unter Verwendung einer Wavelet-Transformation | |
DE102010019853A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Überprüfen von Smart- und/oder Zugangskarten bei deren Verwendung | |
EP3408789A1 (de) | Authentifikationsvorrichtung, authentifikationsdokument und verfahren zur authentifizierung einer person | |
CN113096301B (zh) | 票据的检验方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 | |
WO2018001869A1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur identifikation eines produkts | |
DE102008001148A1 (de) | Dokument mit einer integrierten Anzeige und Empfänger-Gerät | |
EP2003622A2 (de) | Verfahren, Einrichtung und System zur Prüfung der Echtheit von Wertzeichen | |
EP3772726A1 (de) | Verfahren zur verifikation der echtheit eines wert- oder sicherheitsdokumentes sowie wert- oder sicherheitsdokument | |
DE102012200299B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit bei der Unterzeichnung eines Dokuments | |
EP1519307A1 (de) | Kennzeichnungsvorrichtung für Ausweisdokumente und entsprechendes Kennzeichnungsverfahren |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140602 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT MOBILE SECURITY GMBH |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20190513 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G07C 9/27 20200101ALI20201030BHEP Ipc: G07C 9/00 20200101AFI20201030BHEP Ipc: G07C 9/25 20200101ALI20201030BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20201127 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012016763 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1394721 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210615 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210819 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210819 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210920 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210820 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210919 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502012016763 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20220222 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210919 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20211031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211015 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211015 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20121015 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210519 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230520 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502012016763 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT EPAYMENTS GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT MOBILE SECURITY GMBH, 81677 MUENCHEN, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20231023 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231025 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231023 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231031 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20231102 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20231019 Year of fee payment: 12 |