EP2721388B1 - Method of determining the optimal wavelength for inspecting ophthalmic lenses - Google Patents

Method of determining the optimal wavelength for inspecting ophthalmic lenses Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2721388B1
EP2721388B1 EP12729784.4A EP12729784A EP2721388B1 EP 2721388 B1 EP2721388 B1 EP 2721388B1 EP 12729784 A EP12729784 A EP 12729784A EP 2721388 B1 EP2721388 B1 EP 2721388B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
thickness
wavelength
transmittance
several different
percent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12729784.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2721388A1 (en
Inventor
Peter W. Sites
Russell J. Edwards
Kenneth L. CAGLE
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Johnson and Johnson Vision Care Inc
Original Assignee
Johnson and Johnson Vision Care Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Johnson and Johnson Vision Care Inc filed Critical Johnson and Johnson Vision Care Inc
Publication of EP2721388A1 publication Critical patent/EP2721388A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2721388B1 publication Critical patent/EP2721388B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M11/00Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
    • G01M11/02Testing optical properties
    • G01M11/0285Testing optical properties by measuring material or chromatic transmission properties
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M11/00Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
    • G01M11/02Testing optical properties
    • G01M11/0242Testing optical properties by measuring geometrical properties or aberrations

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the inspection of ophthalmic lenses, particularly hydrogel contact lenses for missing material defects.
  • Ophthalmic lenses such as hydrogel contact lenses are formed, inspected, and packaged on manufacturing lines with minimal human intervention. During these processes, certain defects to those lenses occur and one common defect is missing material in a formed lens. Whether such missing material is the entire thickness of a contact lens, or just a portion of its thickness, lenses with such defects should be removed from the product that ultimately reaches end users.
  • This invention provides a method of determining the wavelength of radiation which may be used to automatically inspect an ophthalmic lens of a maximum thickness for missing material of an amount between about zero and about a certain thickness, comprising steps as defined in Claim 1.
  • ophthalmic lens refers to soft contact lenses, such as hydrogels which are made from monomers, macromers or prepolymers.
  • ophthalmic lenses include but are not limited to lenses made from the following generic formulations acofilcon A, alofilcon A, alphafilcon A, amifilcon A, astifilcon A, atalafilcon A, balafilcon A, bisfilcon A, bufilcon A, comfilcon, crofilcon A, cyclofilcon A,balilcon A, deltafilcon A, deltafilcon B, dimefilcon A, drooxifilcon A, epsifilcon A, esterifilcon A, etafilcon A, focofilcon A, genfilcon A, govafilcon A, hefilcon A, hefilcon B, hefilcon D, hilafilcon A, hilafilcon B, hioxifilcon B, hioxifilcon C, hixoifilcon A
  • More particularly preferred ophthalmic lenses of the invention are genfilcon A, lenefilcon A, comfilcon, lotrafilcon A, lotraifilcon B, and balafilcon A.
  • the most preferred lenses include etafilcon A, nelfilcon A, hilafilcon, polymacon, comfilcon, galyfilcon , senofilcon , and narafilcon.
  • the term thickness refers to the measurement of the ophthalmic lens from its front surface to its opposing back surface.
  • a typical hydrogel contact lens has a thickness of about 60 ⁇ m to about 600 ⁇ m.
  • the thickness of the finished product is the "maximum thickness".
  • radiation is transmitted through hydrogel contact lenses having a thickness of from about 200 ⁇ m to about 600 ⁇ m, preferably about 85 ⁇ m to about 209 ⁇ m.
  • certain thickness refers to the depth of a missing material defect which does not go through the entire maximum thickness of the ophthalmic lens.
  • a certain thickness is any number from about 300 ⁇ m to about 50 ⁇ m.
  • certain thickness is selected from the group consisting of 30 ⁇ m, 40 ⁇ m, 50 ⁇ m, and 60 ⁇ m.
  • % transmittance means the amount of radiation which reaches a spectrometer after its transmission through either a cuvette, an ophthalmic lens and a solution, or a cuvette and solution.
  • solutions are deionized water and saline solution, preferably saline solution.
  • the transmitted radiation may have wavelengths in the visible, ultraviolet, or infrared radiation.
  • Visible radiation has wavelengths from about 390nm to about 700 nm
  • ultraviolet radiation has wavelengths from about 10 nm to about 390 nm
  • infrared radiation has wavelengths from about 700 nm to about 3000 nm. It is preferred that radiation in the range of about 340 nm to about 550 nm is transmitted through the ophthalmic lenses.
  • contrast value means the difference in transmission between the two different thickness of lens material.
  • the wavelengths found by this method may be used in a number of inspection techniques.
  • Non-limiting examples of such techniques are disclosed in the following patents US Patents 6,882,411 , 6,577,387 , 6,246,062 ; 6,154,274 ; 5,995,213 ; 5,943,436 ; 5,828,446 ; 5,812,254 ; 5,805,276 ; 5,748,300 ; 5,745,230 ; 5,687,541 ; 5,675,962 ; 5,649,410 ; 5,640,464 ; 5,578,331 ; 5,568,715 ; 5,443,152 ; 5,528,357 ; and 5,500,732 ; all of which are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
  • the % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution/lens having a thickness of 50 ⁇ m was subtracted from % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution to give a first contrast value.
  • the % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution/lens having a thickness of 350 ⁇ m was subtracted from % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution//lens having a thickness of 300 ⁇ m to give a second contrast value.
  • the first and the second contrast values were compared at each wavelength and the lower of the two values was plotted against wavelength in Fig. 3 . This figure shows that the highest peak occurs at around 375 nm, therefore, the best wavelength to determine a missing material defect of about 50 ⁇ m is 375 nm.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to the inspection of ophthalmic lenses, particularly hydrogel contact lenses for missing material defects.
  • Background of the Invention
  • Ophthalmic lenses, such as hydrogel contact lenses are formed, inspected, and packaged on manufacturing lines with minimal human intervention. During these processes, certain defects to those lenses occur and one common defect is missing material in a formed lens. Whether such missing material is the entire thickness of a contact lens, or just a portion of its thickness, lenses with such defects should be removed from the product that ultimately reaches end users.
  • There are inspection methods, which find holes in ophthalmic lenses. However, given the variety of different types of contact lens materials that are on the market, lens makers often must inspect such lenses using radiation of different wavelengths. This is particularly true if one is looking for a missing material defect which is not a complete hole, such as a depression in the lens material. Typically the process of finding radiation of an optimal wavelength is a trial and error process. This trial and error method wastes a great deal of time and materials, and does not guarantee an optimal wavelength selection.
  • The document US2002/0122172 A discloses such an inspection method
  • Therefore, it is desirable to determine the optimal wavelength of radiation for the inspection of such missing material defects without a trial and error process. This desire is met by the foregoing invention.
  • Description of the Figures
    • Fig. 1 Plot of % transmission over several thickness at several wavelengths.
    • Fig. 2 Plot of theoretical Beer's Law calculation over the experimental data of Fig 1.
    • Fig. 3 Plot of Contrast over several wavelengths.
    Detailed Description of the Invention
  • This invention provides a method of determining the wavelength of radiation which may be used to automatically inspect an ophthalmic lens of a maximum thickness for missing material of an amount between about zero and about a certain thickness, comprising steps as defined in Claim 1.
  • As used herein the term "ophthalmic lens" refers to soft contact lenses, such as hydrogels which are made from monomers, macromers or prepolymers. Examples of such ophthalmic lenses include but are not limited to lenses made from the following generic formulations acofilcon A, alofilcon A, alphafilcon A, amifilcon A, astifilcon A, atalafilcon A, balafilcon A, bisfilcon A, bufilcon A, comfilcon, crofilcon A, cyclofilcon A, darfilcon A, deltafilcon A, deltafilcon B, dimefilcon A, drooxifilcon A, epsifilcon A, esterifilcon A, etafilcon A, focofilcon A, genfilcon A, govafilcon A, hefilcon A, hefilcon B, hefilcon D, hilafilcon A, hilafilcon B, hioxifilcon B, hioxifilcon C, hixoifilcon A, hydrofilcon A, lenefilcon A, licryfilcon A, licryfilcon B, lidofilcon A, lidofilcon B, lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B, mafilcon A, mesifilcon A, methafilcon B, mipafilcon A, narafilcon, nelfilcon A, netrafilcon A, ocufilcon A, ocufilcon B, ocufilcon C, ocufilcon D, ocufilcon E, ofilcon A, omafilcon A, oxyfilcon A, pentafilcon A, perfilcon A, pevafilcon A, phemfilcon A, polymacon, silafilcon A, siloxyfilcon A, tefilcon A, tetrafilcon A, trifilcon A, and xylofilcon A. More particularly preferred ophthalmic lenses of the invention are genfilcon A, lenefilcon A, comfilcon, lotrafilcon A, lotraifilcon B, and balafilcon A. The most preferred lenses include etafilcon A, nelfilcon A, hilafilcon, polymacon, comfilcon, galyfilcon , senofilcon , and narafilcon.
  • The term thickness refers to the measurement of the ophthalmic lens from its front surface to its opposing back surface. A typical hydrogel contact lens has a thickness of about 60 µm to about 600 µm. For purposes of this invention, the thickness of the finished product is the "maximum thickness". In the methods of the invention radiation is transmitted through hydrogel contact lenses having a thickness of from about 200 µm to about 600 µm, preferably about 85µm to about 209 µm.
  • The term "certain thickness" refers to the depth of a missing material defect which does not go through the entire maximum thickness of the ophthalmic lens. For example for an ophthalmic lens having a maximum thickness of about 350 µm, a certain thickness is any number from about 300 µm to about 50 µm. Preferably certain thickness is selected from the group consisting of 30 µm, 40 µm, 50 µm, and 60 µm.
  • As used herein, the term "% transmittance" means the amount of radiation which reaches a spectrometer after its transmission through either a cuvette, an ophthalmic lens and a solution, or a cuvette and solution. In either case the non-limiting examples of solutions are deionized water and saline solution, preferably saline solution.
  • In the method, the transmitted radiation may have wavelengths in the visible, ultraviolet, or infrared radiation. Visible radiation has wavelengths from about 390nm to about 700 nm, ultraviolet radiation has wavelengths from about 10 nm to about 390 nm, and infrared radiation has wavelengths from about 700 nm to about 3000 nm. It is preferred that radiation in the range of about 340 nm to about 550 nm is transmitted through the ophthalmic lenses.
  • As used herein the term "contrast value" means the difference in transmission between the two different thickness of lens material.
  • As used herein the "k" value is the constant found in the theoretical relationship known as Beer's Law. Beer's Law relates the percent of transmission of radiation through a material ("%T") to the thickness of the material ("t") and a constant ("k") (%T= 10 (2-kt)). Each wavelength has a particular k which may be calculated by known methods, such as regression fitting.
  • The wavelengths found by this method may be used in a number of inspection techniques. Non-limiting examples of such techniques are disclosed in the following patents US Patents 6,882,411 , 6,577,387 , 6,246,062 ; 6,154,274 ; 5,995,213 ; 5,943,436 ; 5,828,446 ; 5,812,254 ; 5,805,276 ; 5,748,300 ; 5,745,230 ; 5,687,541 ; 5,675,962 ; 5,649,410 ; 5,640,464 ; 5,578,331 ; 5,568,715 ; 5,443,152 ; 5,528,357 ; and 5,500,732 ; all of which are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
  • Example
  • Ten etafilcon A hydrogel lenses having center thicknesses from 93 µm to 252 µm were prepared. Each sample was placed in a cuvette having internal dimensions of 18.5 mm wide x 5.1 mm wide x 21.2 high (without a cap) which holds approximately 1650 mL of liquid with a cap. Light of wavelengths from 340 nm to 420 nm was shown through the lens/cuvette/saline solution and the percent transmission was obtained using a Perkin Elmer UV/VIS Lambda 18 spectrometer. The percent transmission versus wavelength for every lens thickness is plotted in Fig. 1. Fig. 2 overlays the theoretical calculation over the experimental data of Fig. 1 and illustrates that this material behaves in accordance with Beer's Law.
  • For each wavelength the % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution/lens having a thickness of 50 µm was subtracted from % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution to give a first contrast value. For each wavelength the % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution/lens having a thickness of 350 µm was subtracted from % transmittance for a cuvette/saline solution//lens having a thickness of 300 µm to give a second contrast value. The first and the second contrast values were compared at each wavelength and the lower of the two values was plotted against wavelength in Fig. 3. This figure shows that the highest peak occurs at around 375 nm, therefore, the best wavelength to determine a missing material defect of about 50 µm is 375 nm.

Claims (8)

  1. A method of determining the wavelength of radiation which may be used to automatically inspect an ophthalmic lens of a maximum thickness for missing material of an amount between about zero and about a certain thickness, comprising:
    (a) measuring a percent of transmittance of radiation of several different wavelengths through ophthalmic lenses of several different known thicknesses;
    (b) calculating a k value for each wavelength of the several different wavelengths by regression fitting and confirming that transmission of light through the ophthalmic lenses follows Beer's Law, wherein Beer's Law is represented by: percent of transmittance = 10 1 - kt ,
    Figure imgb0001

    where t is the thickness of the ophthalmic lens;
    (c) subtracting the percent of transmittance at said certain thickness from the percent of transmittance in the absence of an ophthalmic lens at said several different wavelengths to give first contrast values;
    (d) subtracting the percent of transmittance at said maximum thickness from the percent of transmittance at said certain lens thickness at said several different wavelengths to give second contrast values;
    (e) comparing the first contrast values with the second contrast values at each wavelength and selecting the lowest contrast values at each wavelength and then plotting such lowest contrast values against wavelength; and
    (f) selecting the wavelength from the plot of step (e) at the highest peak for inspection of missing material defects.
  2. The method of claim 1 wherein the maximum thickness is about 60 µm to about 400 µm.
  3. The method of claim 1 wherein the maximum thickness is about 85 µm to about 209 µm.
  4. The method of claim 1 wherein said certain thickness is a number from about 20 µm to about 100 µm.
  5. The method of claim 1 wherein said certain thickness is a number selected from the group consisting of 30 µm, 40 µm, 50 µm, and 60 µm.
  6. The method of claim 1 wherein said radiation of several different wavelengths are from about 340 nm to about 430 nm.
  7. The method of claim 1 wherein said radiation of several different wavelengths are from about 340 nm to about 550 nm.
  8. The method of claim 1 wherein said ophthalmic lenses are selected from the group consisting of etafilcon A, nelfilcon A, hilafilcon, polymacon, comfilcon, galyfilcon , senofilcon , and narafilcon.
EP12729784.4A 2011-06-16 2012-06-13 Method of determining the optimal wavelength for inspecting ophthalmic lenses Active EP2721388B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161497825P 2011-06-16 2011-06-16
PCT/US2012/042277 WO2012174131A1 (en) 2011-06-16 2012-06-13 Method of determining the optimal wavelength for inspecting ophthalmic lenses

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2721388A1 EP2721388A1 (en) 2014-04-23
EP2721388B1 true EP2721388B1 (en) 2015-10-14

Family

ID=46354483

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12729784.4A Active EP2721388B1 (en) 2011-06-16 2012-06-13 Method of determining the optimal wavelength for inspecting ophthalmic lenses

Country Status (14)

Country Link
US (1) US8634068B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2721388B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6046130B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101932404B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103765185B (en)
AR (1) AR086954A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2012271705B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112013032353B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2840375A1 (en)
HK (1) HK1196872A1 (en)
MY (1) MY166086A (en)
RU (1) RU2597679C2 (en)
TW (1) TWI536004B (en)
WO (1) WO2012174131A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10607335B2 (en) * 2016-06-28 2020-03-31 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Systems and methods of using absorptive imaging metrology to measure the thickness of ophthalmic lenses
DE102017000698B4 (en) * 2017-01-26 2019-05-29 Rodenstock Gmbh Method and dyeing system for coloring an optical glass
KR20210112948A (en) 2020-03-06 2021-09-15 삼성전자주식회사 Correlated double samling circuit and image sensor including thereof
CN112033291B (en) * 2020-09-17 2021-09-17 上海海关机电产品检测技术中心 Ultraviolet transmission type plastic film thickness online measurement method

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0510727A (en) * 1991-07-05 1993-01-19 Fujitsu Ltd Thin film inspection apparatus and its inspection method
GR1002789B (en) 1992-12-21 1997-10-17 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products Inc. An apparatus for carrying ophthalmic lenses.
GR1002072B (en) 1992-12-21 1995-11-30 Johnson & Johnson Vision Prod Illumination system for opthalmic lens inspection.
NZ250042A (en) 1992-12-21 1997-01-29 Johnson & Johnson Vision Prod Robotic inspection of ophthalmic lenses
IL107602A0 (en) 1992-12-21 1994-02-27 Johnson & Johnson Vision Prod Method of inspecting ophthalmic lenses
IL107513A (en) 1992-12-21 1997-07-13 Johnson & Johnson Vision Prod Ophthalmic lens inspection system and method
IL107605A (en) 1992-12-21 1998-01-04 Johnson & Johnson Vision Prod Lens inspection system
IL107601A (en) 1992-12-21 1997-09-30 Johnson & Johnson Vision Prod Illumination and imaging subsystems for a lens inspection system
US5640464A (en) 1994-05-31 1997-06-17 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Method and system for inspecting packages
US5568715A (en) 1994-05-31 1996-10-29 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Automated inspection system with transport and ejector conveyor
US5649410A (en) 1994-06-10 1997-07-22 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Post-hydration method and apparatus for transporting, inspecting and packaging contact lenses
US5578331A (en) 1994-06-10 1996-11-26 Vision Products, Inc. Automated apparatus for preparing contact lenses for inspection and packaging
US5500732A (en) 1994-06-10 1996-03-19 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Lens inspection system and method
US5482901A (en) * 1994-07-15 1996-01-09 Corning Incorporated Amber photochromic glasses
US5995213A (en) 1995-01-17 1999-11-30 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Lens inspection system
JP4006039B2 (en) * 1995-09-13 2007-11-14 生化学工業株式会社 Photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid contact lens
JPH10221038A (en) * 1997-02-04 1998-08-21 Egawa:Kk Optically measuring apparatus and method
US6246062B1 (en) 1998-11-05 2001-06-12 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Missing lens detection system and method
JP2001289618A (en) * 2000-04-05 2001-10-19 Seiko Epson Corp Method and device for recognizing shape of peripheral edge of plastic lens
US6577387B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2003-06-10 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Inspection of ophthalmic lenses using absorption
BRPI0303222B1 (en) 2002-02-21 2017-03-28 Johnson & Johnson method and apparatus for inspecting optical devices
WO2003073060A2 (en) * 2002-02-21 2003-09-04 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Dual inspection of ophthalmic lenses
US20060017184A1 (en) * 2004-07-22 2006-01-26 Dermot Keena Predictive method of assigning power to an ophthalmic lens or lens lot
US7438411B2 (en) 2005-05-07 2008-10-21 Nanospectra Biosciences, Inc. Plasmon resonant based eye protection
JP2007064912A (en) 2005-09-02 2007-03-15 Sun Tec Kk Light source device and optical coherence tomography measuring apparatus
US20080102122A1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2008-05-01 Shivkumar Mahadevan Antimicrobial polymeric articles, processes to prepare them and methods of their use
CN100582718C (en) * 2007-05-24 2010-01-20 上海交通大学 Optical quality measuring device for glasses
US8318055B2 (en) * 2007-08-21 2012-11-27 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Methods for formation of an ophthalmic lens precursor and lens
CN101266194B (en) * 2007-08-27 2011-09-07 温州医学院眼视光研究院 High precision image quality detection system for optical eye lens
CN101377409A (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-04 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Method for detecting surface appearance of glasses lens
JP2009053134A (en) * 2007-08-29 2009-03-12 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Film thickness measuring method and device, and etching method and device using them
JP5056582B2 (en) * 2008-05-22 2012-10-24 東京エレクトロン株式会社 Coating, developing device, coating, developing method and storage medium
CN201438142U (en) * 2009-05-26 2010-04-14 郑克立 Spectacles lens optical resolution detection instrument

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8634068B2 (en) 2014-01-21
MY166086A (en) 2018-05-24
AR086954A1 (en) 2014-02-05
RU2014101159A (en) 2015-07-27
EP2721388A1 (en) 2014-04-23
AU2012271705A1 (en) 2013-12-19
HK1196872A1 (en) 2014-12-24
TW201315981A (en) 2013-04-16
US20120320366A1 (en) 2012-12-20
KR101932404B1 (en) 2018-12-27
CN103765185A (en) 2014-04-30
KR20140037216A (en) 2014-03-26
JP6046130B2 (en) 2016-12-14
CA2840375A1 (en) 2012-12-20
BR112013032353A2 (en) 2016-12-20
CN103765185B (en) 2016-10-12
BR112013032353B1 (en) 2020-10-27
JP2014518403A (en) 2014-07-28
AU2012271705B2 (en) 2016-02-04
RU2597679C2 (en) 2016-09-20
WO2012174131A1 (en) 2012-12-20
TWI536004B (en) 2016-06-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2721388B1 (en) Method of determining the optimal wavelength for inspecting ophthalmic lenses
KR101578248B1 (en) Multi-imaging automated inspection methods and systems for wet ophthalmic lenses
RU2012149860A (en) METHOD FOR IMPROVING LENS ROTATION
EP1224448B1 (en) Method and apparatus for transmission measurement of the geometric structure of an optical component
US20120048114A1 (en) Methods of degassing ophthalmic lens monomer mixtures
EP1828741B1 (en) Method and device for contactless measurement of the curvature of an ophthalmic object
Nichols et al. The assessment of automated measures of hydrogel contact lens refractive index
JP5550828B2 (en) Inspection method for ophthalmic lenses
EP1692565B1 (en) Method for automatic verification of at least one centering characteristic of an ophthalmic lens provided with index marks
WO2006121885A2 (en) Ophthalmic lens post demold processing aid
FR2913493A1 (en) Ophthalmic object e.g. finished lens, local curvature's contactless measuring method, involves emitting light beam on front face of ophthalmic object, and calculating surface of front face with help of analyzed data of wave front

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131224

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: DE

Ref document number: 1196872

Country of ref document: HK

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150227

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAR Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150904

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 755502

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151015

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012011560

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20151014

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 755502

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160214

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160115

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012011560

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: GR

Ref document number: 1196872

Country of ref document: HK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120613

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190620

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200613

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20230510

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230510

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230502

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230504

Year of fee payment: 12