EP2718775A1 - Système de simulation, procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation, système de guidage et produit-programme informatique - Google Patents

Système de simulation, procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation, système de guidage et produit-programme informatique

Info

Publication number
EP2718775A1
EP2718775A1 EP12726417.4A EP12726417A EP2718775A1 EP 2718775 A1 EP2718775 A1 EP 2718775A1 EP 12726417 A EP12726417 A EP 12726417A EP 2718775 A1 EP2718775 A1 EP 2718775A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
simulation
environment
control system
interfaces
simulation system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP12726417.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Andreas RATHGEB
Rainer Speh
Michael Unkelbach
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP2718775A1 publication Critical patent/EP2718775A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
    • G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • Simulation system method for carrying out a simulation, control system and computer program product
  • the invention relates to a simulation system, in particular for a control system, which controls a process running in a technical installation, wherein the control system comprises at least ei ⁇ ne designed as a container first plinUm constitution, which is designed to the system underlying the ⁇ simulate the automation process and corresponding Has interfaces to the control system.
  • the invention further relates to a method for carrying out a simulation by means of the simulation system according to the invention. Also indicated is a corresponding control system and computer program product.
  • simulators are also used for testing purposes in the engineering of a technical system, in order to give a project engineer the opportunity to find optimal solutions for the interconnection of functions within the technical system or to detect faults before the realization of the system and thus commissioning shorten.
  • a simulator is usually one
  • a power plant is simulated as software in the simulator, in principle.
  • the simulator behaves identically to the real power plant. If the power plant is operated with a specific control system, such as the Siemens SPPA-T3000 control system, all the details on the simulator screen correspond to those from the control console of the real plant.
  • simulation computers are used to simulate power plants, which are independent of the control system, i. represent their own separate computer system.
  • the effort required for this usually requires a gigantic computer performance of the simulation computer used.
  • the hardware for the simulation computer must be set up, installed and maintained at each site.
  • simulators in which the control and monitoring system of the original control system is used, and simulators, which include the control and Be ⁇ care system of the control system, ie the entire Simulate user interface with - but this is very complicated and the results are generally also unsatisfactory.
  • This solution is aimed mostly reasonable only in older control systems, such as when the operating and Beobachtungssys ⁇ system is not capable of simulation because eg no simulator time ⁇ support is available.
  • simulators which are separate computers for the hardware, which are the automation servers of the control system and the hardware connected to the control system, such as I / O modules, motors, valves, etc., and for the technical installation underlying have physical process, (see also description of Fig. 1A)
  • the software as well as the hardware of the simulators is decoupled from the control system.
  • Parts of the original software engineering data often are on the automa- tion of the control system used, ie the inputs for the simulation software get values from the Leitsys ⁇ tem, but are in a separate from the control system software ge ⁇ wrote.
  • the configuration of these simulators is very complex (sometimes not accessible to the user in the process simulators) and takes place with completely different configuration tools than the control system. A consistency check between simulators and the control system does not take place.
  • the configuration of simulators generally does not take into account the engineering data for the cabling or wiring of connected hardware (sensors, actuators).
  • the simulation system comprises in this Va ⁇ riante runtime environments for the simulation of the hardware of the periphery of the control system and for the simulation of processes occurring in the technical installation process.
  • All drainage environments have the same interfaces and are connected to the bus system via them.
  • the drain environments may also merge into a single drain environment.
  • each run environment itself can be a software component.
  • Within the drain environments and software Components have embedded software components as representatives of functions, assemblies, devices and computational models or other processing units of the process.
  • the simulation of the hardware of the periphery of the control system and the simulation of the process underlying the technical installation are integrated into the software of the control system.
  • this runtime environment can now be used in both the normal control system in real-time for automation, for example, a power plant ⁇ to, as in other instances, the hardware and the process to simulate.
  • the simulation of both the hardware of the periphery of the control system and the process simulation run here advantageously in one instance. For this purpose, only extensions in the block library are required for simulation blocks for the hardware of the periphery of the control system and, if necessary, process simulation blocks for the process.
  • control system and the simulator merge into one unit in terms of software and thus also in terms of computer technology, which entails numerous advantages:
  • the simulation system is configured using the same engineering or configuration tools as the control system configuration.
  • the simulation system is designed using graphical tools in block technology as well as the configuration of the real plant within the control system.
  • the invention provides a simplified simulation system for training and testing purposes. As a result, Reduced equipment downtime, shortening and improvement in commissioning, and improved simulation quality because consistency is present throughout the simulator solution and everything runs on one platform.
  • a program be is a software component ⁇ stands that consists of directly on an operating system aus Kunststoffba ⁇ rem software code, and is closed to the outside, so that communication other software components only via exactly defined interfaces to other software components.
  • An embedded (English, "embedded") Soft ⁇ ware component is a software component that is embedded in a ande ⁇ re software component. She is also closed to the outside and communicates only through well-defined interfaces to other software components, but it will not directly running on the operating system, but in the environment of the surrounding software component.
  • a program As a container in computer science, a program is called, which consists of directly executable software code and ⁇ at least one interface to an embedded (embedded) software component and at least one interface to Be ⁇ operating system has and is executable directly on the operating system.
  • a container which is for its part constructed as a software component and forms a univer ⁇ sell usable runtime environment for one or more inserted ⁇ embedded software components, referred to as "flow container" will be.
  • the process container provides therefore on the one hand a coupling element between any embedded software software component and the operating system and enables the flow of embedded software component on the computer.
  • Fig. 1A is a block diagram of a possible realization of a control system of a technical installation with i ⁇ NEN hardware components, SDT
  • 1B is a schematic representation of the control software of an exemplary control system, SdT,
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic illustration of a first embodiment variant of the simulation system according to the invention
  • Fig. 3 is a schematic representation of a second embodiment of the invention Simulationssys ⁇ tems.
  • Fig. 1A the block diagram of a possible implementation of a control system of a technical system is shown in simplified form. In this illustration, only the hardware is shown.
  • the underlying by the control system ⁇ de underlying physical process is illustrated by the box P. This can be, for example, a process for generating energy in a power plant, waste incineration or a chemical process.
  • the signals recorded by sensors are forwarded to input and output modules EA1, EA2 to EAN. These can be pure input / output modules or even intelligent field devices.
  • EA2 EAN control signals to the field devices in the process about the construction ⁇ groups EA1.
  • the bidirectional signal flow is illustrated by the arrows.
  • the modules EA1, EA2 to EAN are on the side facing away from the process with a external or internal bus system BS connected, which collects the signals and forwards, for example, at least one auto ⁇ automation server AUTS.
  • the modules EA1 to EAN can also be intelligent field devices in which sensor and / or actuator are integrated together with processing logic in a device which is connected directly to the automation server AUTS via the bus system BS.
  • the automation server AUTS in turn, can-as described in this example-be connected to at least one application server APPS via a communication bus KB. For availability reasons, in general all connections between the servers and buses are designed to be redundant, as indicated by the double connection lines.
  • An arbitrary user interface is also connected to the communication bus KB. This is an arbitrary graphical user interface
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • thin clients which means any operator control and monitoring systems, engineering clients or other display systems.
  • simulation ⁇ systems are mostly such out ⁇ leads according to the prior art SdT that either a very powerful computer is riding provided loading, which simulates the entire user interface GUI of the control system (as shown in the figure by box SIM1 indicated), or that from the user interface GUI of the control system instead of the automation server AUTS on ei ⁇ NEN separate simulation computer SIM2 is accessed.
  • the latter solution can also be realized by two computers, for example by a computer SIMHW, which simu ⁇ liert the hardware of the underlying automation process, and by a computer SIMP, which simulates the underlying process.
  • FIG. 1B shows a possible embodiment variant for the software architecture of an exemplary control system, as described in FIG. 1A with reference to the hardware.
  • the software of the control system is in this embodiment been reduced to a few components to ensure a better overview:
  • the basic functions are here to call 51 that allows depicting ⁇ development Kunststoffster operating screens presentation software. This could be, for example, a web browser running on a thin client.
  • the execution environment is be distinguished ⁇ with 50th
  • the automation function of the control system is shown in this embodiment by its own software. It is a flow container 10, ie a container, which in turn is latestbil ⁇ det as software component 1 and a universally applicable SeaUm consultancy for one or more embedded software components 101, 102, 111 and 112 forms.
  • the workflow container 10 manages and executes all existing automation functions, including the processing functions.
  • the flow container 10 has multiple interfaces. In the following, an interface is always meant to mean a data interface. It may, for example, a sectional ⁇ point 13 act for the engineering or near the interfaces 11 and 12, which are connected to the rest of the control system including other instances of a runtime environment. There may also be interfaces for diagnostics, for certain messages or for operation.
  • embedded software components 101 and 102 are shown in FIG. 1B. These in turn have internal, standardized interfaces, which are shown as dots.
  • the embedded Softwarekompo ⁇ components 101 and 102 contain the main functions such as all automation tasks, controls, regulations, calculations conditions, processing functions, alarm management and execution management.
  • proxy modules 111 and 112 are shown within the dormitorContainer.
  • the deputy ⁇ representative module representing substantially existing hardware components such as an input or Ausga ⁇ bebaueria. Their software is here by 81 and 82 verdeut ⁇ light.
  • the proxy modules 111 and 112 provide for the connection of the input raw data to / from the field devices and monitors them and is therefore responsible for the communication with the field devices.
  • the bus interface 18 is used. This interface of theticians 10 to an automation bus (bus interface to the bus system BS), via which the input and output modules and the intelligent field devices are connected to the automation server.
  • the Stellvertre ⁇ termodule 111 and 112 communicate (th and intelligent field devices) with the input and output modules that are indeed outside the automation server (and thus outside of the flow container 10) are located in the interior of the drain container 10th
  • the car ⁇ mat Deutschensbus may ever acting on the model, for example to a Profibus, Modbus one, another serial bus or an Ethernet-based bus (such as Profinet or a pure TCP / IP or UDP based communication).
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show variant embodiments of the simulation system according to the invention.
  • this is a software architecture which is directly compatible with the architecture shown in FIG. 1B and follows it.
  • the simulati ⁇ onssystem according to the invention in the embodiment shown in Fig. 2 200a from two drain environments.
  • the two drain environments are combined to form a single drain environment, and the simulation system 200b here includes only this one drain environment.
  • the simulation system 200a of FIG. 2 may be considered as a combination of a hardware simulator and process simulator.
  • the hardware simulator consists here of the expiration environment 20, which simulates the hardware of the periphery of the control system with all its interconnections in software.
  • proxy modules 211 and 212 are embedded, which the control system periphery repre ⁇ sentieren, for example, connects directly to the automation server AUTS of Fig. 1A.
  • This may for example be construction ⁇ groups, sensors other bus modules, intelligent Feldge ⁇ councils such as actuators (point drives, motor controllers) and sensor or communication modules to external systems.
  • the software component 201 simulates, for example, the behavior of an actuator with commands in the direction open or closed direction and corresponding feedback or the behavior of the insertion of the switchgear for a motor of a procedural component.
  • the software modules 201, 211, 212 be ⁇ sit to each internal interfaces (English, "internal interfaces") over which, for example, physical quantities or other data and parameters may be exchanged.
  • the connection lines between the individual modules and interfaces represent this signal exchange, which occurs in the real system, for example over existing cables / wires in the routing ⁇ system or data transmission in the field bus systems.
  • Kgs ⁇ NEN also clamp bodies for example as a hub or repeater are included in the field bus.
  • the proxy modules 211 and 212 are formed inversely to proxy modules 111 and 112. Inverse here means that inputs and outputs of the respective interfaces are interchanged.
  • a representative module of the type such as 111 and 112 provides to / from the control interface in the rule for the connection of the input raw data, simulating a Stellvertre ⁇ termodul of the type such as 211 and 212 already an assembly and thus for the conversion of the field data in the Raw input data for higher-level software modules.
  • the entire drain environment 20 can now be designed in accordance with the container definition described above or as software component 2. In both cases, external
  • Interfaces (English, "external interfaces") a certain number such as 21, 22 and 23, which permit communica ⁇ cation with the other parts of the program of the control system.
  • the interface 23 may be such as the interface 13 of the first charge of the automation execution environment 10 for the filling of the container must be responsible for engineering data and connected to the component bus 90.
  • the communication between the software components 1 and 2 or the drain environments 10 and 20 can take place via the interfaces 18 and 28.
  • the interface 28 is dependent on bus either identical to the interface 18 (ia for Ethernet-based bus systems), or is complementary depending on the bus system, the interface to the interface 18 for the addition Ver ⁇ (ia serial bus systems with master - slave tionality radio).
  • a further interface 24 available which allows connection to the process simulation e interface 24 process data can be transmitted from a process simulator, ie a responsible for the technical process simulation computer.
  • the process simulator here consists of theticianUm 21, which simulates the process underlying the technical system in software.
  • the process underlying the technical system may be a physical, chemical, biological or other technical
  • the process simulator is constructed, for example as a separate runtime environment 30 and / or as a separate soft ware ⁇ Component 3.
  • the software architecture of the process simulator would thus be consistent with the architecture Run processes 10 and 20 and software components 1 and 2 are available and facilitate integration into the control system.
  • Analog would contain the process simulator in this case, a plurality of embedded software components such as 71, 72 and 73, which represent for example a physi ⁇ ULTRASONIC model of the technical installation.
  • Software components 71, 72 and 73 could also include other computation modules.
  • a power plant of the basic process is the production of energy by combustion examples play of pulverized coal under supply of air at Ent ⁇ stehung of flue gas.
  • the interfaces 21, 22, 23 of the drainage environment 20 are almost identical to the interfaces 31, 32, 33 of the drainage environment 30 and almost identical to the interfaces 11, 12, 13 of the first drainage environment 10. This means that the communication of the Both containers 20 and 30 runs over the same interface, which leads to the control system.
  • the interfaces 21, 22 and 23 are in their
  • the drain environment 30 responsible for the process simulator can be connected directly via various interfaces to the drain environment 20 responsible for the simulation of the hardware periphery.
  • the process simulator 30 can have an extra for this purpose provided interface 33 with a likewise extra here ⁇ provided for interface 24 of the hardware simulator on ⁇ closed.
  • the process simulator 30 can be connected to interfaces 31 and 32 of the process simulator by converting the interfaces 21 and 22 of the hardware simulator.
  • a second embodiment 200b of the Invention ⁇ proper simulation system, which is shown in Fig. 3, the two execution environments 20 and 30 are combined into a single runtime environment 25th Hardware and Listesimu ⁇ lation run in an instance.
  • Embedded software components and proxy modules of the individual software components 2 and 3 now come in a NASAUm plausible 25 for execution.
  • the newly formed drain environment 25 itself may be a software component 25 '.
  • Previously contai ⁇ ner cross-connections or interconnections between the embedded components and modules from previously 20 and 30 are now to intra-container connections or circuits.
  • external interfaces now become internal (in the container included) interfaces or can be completely omitted.
  • the connecting lines drawn in dashed lines represent, for example between the individual components 71, 72 and 73, the exchange of process signals and, in contrast to the solid lines
  • the simulation system 200b now consists of only one runtime environment. At least the interfaces 21 and 22 are now available for communication with the control system. In addition, a further interface 23 before ⁇ hands, which allows the filling of the container with engineering data from the bus system 90 as well.
  • the simulation system 200b can be connected to the automation server, ie to the execution environment 10 for the automation, either via a connection between the interfaces 11 and 12 with the interfaces 21 and 22 or via a connection between the interfaces 18 and 28
  • the proxy modules 111 and 112 are in a simulati ⁇ onsmodus or not. It is also possible ⁇ ness that the entire automation container 10 or portions thereof are in a simulation mode.
  • the execution environment 10, or parts thereof are in the simulation mode, the commu ⁇ nication of signals over both the connection between the interfaces 11 and 12 with the interfaces 21 and 22 or via the Connection between the interfaces 18 and 28 run.
  • the drain environment 10 in
  • the first execution environment 10 is created by means of a configu ⁇ approximately tool of the control system.
  • the second and third reliability 20 and 30 with sämtli ⁇ embedded software components such as 201, the proxy modules 211, 212 and interconnections are also generated by means of the previously used for the first relieveumge ⁇ advertising project planning tool of the control system. Modules of type 211, 212 can even be generated automatically.
  • the drain environments 20 and 30 are either separately or together executed, with a simulation of the technical plant or parts of the technical plant is performed.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système de simulation destiné en particulier à un système de guidage qui commande un processus (P) se déroulant dans une installation technique. Le système de guidage comprend au moins un premier environnement d'exécution (10) réalisé sous la forme d'un conteneur et configuré pour reconstituer le processus d'automatisation sur lequel l'installation est fondée, et comportant des interfaces correspondantes (11, 12, 13) vers le système de guidage. Le système de simulation (200a) selon l'invention comprend un deuxième environnement d'exécution (20) réalisé sous la forme d'un conteneur pour la simulation du matériel périphérique du système de guidage et un troisième environnement d'exécution (30) réalisé sous la forme d'un conteneur pour la simulation du processus sur lequel l'installation technique est fondée. Dans un autre mode de réalisation (200b) du système de simulation, les deux environnements d'exécution peuvent également être réunis sous la forme d'un environnement d'exécution (25) unique. Dans les deux modes de réalisation, les interfaces (21, 22, 23) du deuxième environnement d'exécution (20) sont pratiquement identiques aux interfaces (31, 32, 33) du troisième environnement d'exécution (30) et aux interfaces (11, 12, 13) du premier environnement d'exécution (10). L'invention concerne en outre un procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation au moyen du système de simulation selon l'invention. L'invention concerne également un système de guidage et un produit-programme informatique associés.
EP12726417.4A 2011-06-09 2012-06-05 Système de simulation, procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation, système de guidage et produit-programme informatique Withdrawn EP2718775A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102011077317.7A DE102011077317B4 (de) 2011-06-09 2011-06-09 Simulationssystem, Verfahren zur Durchführung einer Simulation, Leitsystem und Computerprogrammprodukt
PCT/EP2012/060561 WO2012168217A1 (fr) 2011-06-09 2012-06-05 Système de simulation, procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation, système de guidage et produit-programme informatique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2718775A1 true EP2718775A1 (fr) 2014-04-16

Family

ID=46229480

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12726417.4A Withdrawn EP2718775A1 (fr) 2011-06-09 2012-06-05 Système de simulation, procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation, système de guidage et produit-programme informatique

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20140222408A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2718775A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN103597415A (fr)
DE (1) DE102011077317B4 (fr)
WO (1) WO2012168217A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2911024B1 (fr) * 2014-02-21 2017-05-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procédé de mise en service d'un réseau d'automatisation industriel
CN104880960A (zh) * 2015-04-28 2015-09-02 深圳职业技术学院 一种原油工艺处理的仿真方法及装置
US10733901B2 (en) * 2016-10-03 2020-08-04 General Electric Technology Gmbh Dynamic dispatcher training simulator
JP2022091301A (ja) * 2020-12-09 2022-06-21 オムロン株式会社 制御システムおよび制御方法

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3903403A (en) * 1973-02-23 1975-09-02 Westinghouse Electric Corp Nuclear power plant training simulator system and method
JP2004133650A (ja) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-30 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd 制御用ロジックのシミュレーション検証方法及びシミュレーション検証用パソコン
JP2007536634A (ja) * 2004-05-04 2007-12-13 フィッシャー−ローズマウント・システムズ・インコーポレーテッド プロセス制御システムのためのサービス指向型アーキテクチャ
EP1857896A1 (fr) * 2006-05-16 2007-11-21 Ansaldo Energia S.P.A. Emulateur d'un dispositif de commande d'une installation industrielle
US8527252B2 (en) * 2006-07-28 2013-09-03 Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc. Real-time synchronized control and simulation within a process plant
DE102006045503A1 (de) * 2006-09-27 2008-04-03 Abb Technology Ag System und Verfahren zur Integration von Prozessleitsystemen in eine Trainingssimulation
DE102006059430A1 (de) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh Automatisierte Erstellung und Adaption eines Maschinen- oder Anlagenmodells
US20090089031A1 (en) * 2007-09-28 2009-04-02 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Integrated simulation of controllers and devices
US20090132060A1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2009-05-21 Winston Jenks Foundation fieldbus simulation system
US8825462B2 (en) * 2008-09-17 2014-09-02 Accenture Global Services Limited Method and system for simulating a plurality of devices
CN101604146B (zh) * 2009-07-15 2011-05-04 中冶南方工程技术有限公司 高炉供料自动控制系统的控制方法
US8316313B2 (en) * 2009-10-14 2012-11-20 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Method for selecting shapes in a graphical display
DE102009055810A1 (de) * 2009-11-13 2011-05-19 Technische Universität Ilmenau Verfahren zur Simulation und Automatisierung eines komplexen Betriebsführungsprozesses
DE102011077318B4 (de) * 2011-06-09 2015-07-16 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Simulationssystem, Verfahren zur Durchführung einer Simulation, Leitsystem und Computerprogrammprodukt
DE102011077319B4 (de) * 2011-06-09 2015-08-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Simulationssystem, Verfahren zur Durchführung einer Simulation, Leitsystem und Computerprogrammprodukt

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2012168217A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103597415A (zh) 2014-02-19
WO2012168217A1 (fr) 2012-12-13
US20140222408A1 (en) 2014-08-07
DE102011077317A1 (de) 2012-12-13
DE102011077317B4 (de) 2015-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102011077319B4 (de) Simulationssystem, Verfahren zur Durchführung einer Simulation, Leitsystem und Computerprogrammprodukt
EP2801873B1 (fr) Dispositif de test d'un appareil de commande virtuel
EP1738236B1 (fr) Reseau d'automatisation a composantes reseau produisant des messages d'etat
EP2685382B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de création et de test d'un programme d'appareil de commande
DE102011077318B4 (de) Simulationssystem, Verfahren zur Durchführung einer Simulation, Leitsystem und Computerprogrammprodukt
WO2008090216A1 (fr) Système d'automatisation comprenant un environnement technique implémenté
WO1997012301A1 (fr) Procede de conception pour systemes industriels et systemes de construction, et systeme de planification assiste par ordinateur a utiliser dans le cadre dudit procede
WO2017182312A1 (fr) Système de gestion de cycle de vie pour composants d'installations
DE102006058282A1 (de) Engineering-Verfahren zur Entwicklung einer Service orientierten Software-Komponente sowie Software-Komponenten als Bestandteile einer Service orientierten Architektur
EP3055745A1 (fr) Système d'exploitation flexible d'une installation d'automatisation
EP1906377A1 (fr) Système et procédé d'intégration d'un système de contrôle de processus industriel dans un simulateur d'entraînement
EP2718775A1 (fr) Système de simulation, procédé permettant d'effectuer une simulation, système de guidage et produit-programme informatique
EP2985663A1 (fr) Procédé de simulation d'une installation industrielle automatisée
DE102014101321A1 (de) Testeinrichtung zum Test eines virtuellen Steuergeräts
EP2247989B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour planifier l'intégration d'appareils de terrain d'une installation technique
DE19725915A1 (de) Rechnergestützte Diagnoseeinrichtung und Diagnoseverfahren für elektronisch gesteuerte Systeme
EP2193409B1 (fr) Système et procédé de modélisation de flux de signaux dans des installations industrielles d'automatisation
EP2557464A1 (fr) Procédé destiné au fonctionnement d'un système d'automatisation
EP2048587A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à la planification d'une installation de production
WO2006106077A2 (fr) Dispositif de conception pour la mise au point d'une installation de commande et procede de verification des taches technologiques lors de la conception d'une installation de commande
DE10394242T5 (de) Verfahren und Instrument zur Zuweisung von Rechenressourcen in einem verteilten Steuersystem
LU500646B1 (de) Technik zur Bereitstellung einer Diagnosefunktionalität für eine auf einer speicherprogrammierbaren Steuerung basierenden Anwendung
DE102004051834B4 (de) Prüfgerät und Prüfverfahren für programmierbare Elektroinstallationen, sowie entsprechendes Computerprogramm und entsprechendes computerlesbares Speichermedium
EP2862075B1 (fr) Simulation d'un système complexe
DE102021123596A1 (de) Technik zur Bereitstellung einer Diagnosefunktionalität für eine auf einer speicherprogrammierbaren Steuerung basierenden Anwendung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131205

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20151111

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20160524