EP2699870B1 - Firing range - Google Patents

Firing range Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2699870B1
EP2699870B1 EP20120722868 EP12722868A EP2699870B1 EP 2699870 B1 EP2699870 B1 EP 2699870B1 EP 20120722868 EP20120722868 EP 20120722868 EP 12722868 A EP12722868 A EP 12722868A EP 2699870 B1 EP2699870 B1 EP 2699870B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sound
firing
firing range
suppression
area
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP20120722868
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2699870A1 (en
Inventor
Riccardo TRICHILO
Eugenio RIGHI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beretta SpA
Original Assignee
Fabbrica dArmi Pietro Beretta SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fabbrica dArmi Pietro Beretta SpA filed Critical Fabbrica dArmi Pietro Beretta SpA
Publication of EP2699870A1 publication Critical patent/EP2699870A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2699870B1 publication Critical patent/EP2699870B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J11/00Target ranges
    • F41J11/02Safety means therefor
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J11/00Target ranges
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/10Applications
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/321Physical
    • G10K2210/3216Cancellation means disposed in the vicinity of the source

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a firing range, for example for target practice by a user, in particular the firing range of the present invention is eco-sustainable.
  • Firing ranges of the most varied types are known of; for example firing ranges suitable for practising Olympic disciplines such as “Double Trap”, “Olympic Trap”, and “Skeet” are known of; other types of firing range suitable for practising disciplines not recognised at an Olympic level, such as “Electrocibles”, “Universal Trench”, “Hunting course”, and “Fast Sports Shooting” are also known of; “classic” firing ranges are also known of where the shooter aims at a fixed or mobile target positioned substantially in front of him.
  • firing ranges are structures which are generally located in open spaces inasmuch as involving a series of difficulties, related to pollution in particular.
  • the recovery and cleaning of the firing area is decidedly complex, polluted by waste materials such as for example the shots fired from rifles or the clay pigeons to be hit by the shooters.
  • the purpose of the present invention is to create an eco-sustainable firing range suitable for resolving at least one of these problems. This way the firing range in question may be situated where desired, without restriction. This is achieved by a firing range having the features of claim 1.
  • reference numeral 1 globally denotes the firing range according to the invention.
  • the firing range 1 comprises a firing area 2, suitable for accommodating a user or users, generally, depending on the discipline practised, the firing area comprises special stands 25 which the user positions himself in for shooting.
  • the firing range 1, further comprises an embankment 3, suitable for providing a barrier to the exploded bullets so as to stop them thanks to its presence.
  • Said embankment 3 is distanced in relation to the firing area 2 in the direction in which the user aims.
  • the embankment 3 is preferably positioned substantially in front of the firing area 2 in the firing direction of the user.
  • the firing range 1 comprises an intermediate area 5, positioned between the firing area 2 and the embankment 3.
  • targets fixed rather than mobile, are positioned some distance away from the firing area 2, preferably near the embankment 3, at the end of the intermediate area 5, which the shooter fires at.
  • the embankment 3 acts as a barrier to the progress of the bullets missing the target in their course.
  • the shooter must fire at moving targets, such as clay pigeons.
  • the firing range 1 therefore comprises a launching area 6 suitable for housing the launching machines 60 specifically for launching clay pigeons.
  • the launching area 6 is positioned substantially in a position in front of the firing area 2.
  • the launching area 6 is positioned substantially in a position to the side of the firing area 2.
  • the launching area 6 is at the same or a greater height than the firing area 2, consequently the launching machines are external; in other embodiment variations the launching area 6 is at a lower level than the firing area 2, consequently the launching machines 60 are buried or entrenched.
  • the intermediate area 5 is therefore suitable to receive any residual materials produced during the firing activity.
  • Said residual materials comprise for example the bullets, shot, cartridges, clays and portion of clays, etc.
  • the firing area 2 preferably comprises means of shelter to protect the shooters in the firing area 2, for example in the stands 25 from the sun and /or weather conditions.
  • the shelter means comprise, in a preferred embodiment, a roof 20; the roof 20 is positioned at a certain height so as to cover the shooters.
  • the roof 20 is held in such position by a load-bearing structure
  • said load-bearing structure comprises shafts or columns; or again the load-bearing structure comprises walls 22.
  • no wall is provided or holes or spaces are provided on the wall, if present, to permit firing at the target.
  • the roof 21 and the walls 22 are covered in a material suitable for deadening, preferably limiting, the propagation of sound, such as sound absorbent panels 27.
  • the firing range 1 comprises a dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, suitable for minimising and annulling the noise caused by the shots outside the firing area 2; in other words, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, is suitable for minimising if not annulling the noise caused by the shots in the area occupied by the firing range 1 and in the surrounding area.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 comprises a detector device of the sound caused by the shots and a suppression sound player device, operatively connected to the detector device.
  • the detector device of the sound of the shots is suitable for detecting the sound caused by a shot; while the sound player device is suitable for reproducing a sound substantially similar, but in push-pull, preferably changed by 180 degrees in phase, in relation to the noise of the explosion of the firearm.
  • the sound player device is suitable for reproducing a sound having similar spectral characteristics and breadth of signal, but in push-pull, that is generated by an "anti-sound" preferably changed by 180 degrees in phase, in relation to the noise of the explosion of the firearm.
  • the sound made by the sound player device is suitable to interfere at least partially in a destructive manner with the sound caused by the shots.
  • the sum of the sound waves is substantially null; consequently there is no substantial propagation of noise.
  • the sound detector device comprises at least one microphone 101 suitable for picking up or detecting a sound caused by a firearm.
  • the sound player device comprises at least one megaphone, (membrane) loudspeaker, or at least one booster 102 suitable to play a suppression sound.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 comprises analysis and processing means 103.
  • said analysis and processing means 103 are suitable for placing the sound detector device in communication with the sound player device.
  • the analysis and processing means are suitable for placing the microphone 101 in operative communication with the megaphone or loudspeaker 102.
  • the analysis and processing means 103 are suitable for picking up the firing signal by means of the sound detector device and of generating a signal transmitted to the suppression sound player device.
  • the analysis and processing means 103 comprise a processing unit 105 suitable to analyse the signal picked up by the sound detector device and, depending on the characteristics of the sound caused by the shots, to select and/or calculate the appropriate suppression sound to generate, for example calculating the appropriate spectral and energetic characteristics of the suppression sound.
  • the suppression sound emitted by the sound player device is the same sound emitted by the firearm but appropriately push-pulled, detected by the sound detector device.
  • the processing unit 105 preferably comprise a CPU.
  • the processing unit 105 is suitable for appropriately push-pulling the sound caused by the shots and ordering its playing, generation by the sound player device.
  • the analysis and processing means 103 also comprise memorisation means 106.
  • Said memorisation means 106 are suitable for storing data such as sounds, or audio tracks, or sound spectra.
  • the memorisation means 106 are a data bank of sounds of firearms being fired, or of the sound imprints of the sound of a shot.
  • the processing unit 105 analyses the sound caused by the firearm and picked up by the detector device; preferably it analyses the sound spectra of the sound of the exploded bullet. Depending on the results of the analysis the signal is sent to the suppression sound player device.
  • Such playing may take place in a number of ways.
  • a suppression sound is played specular to the sound caused by the firearm.
  • a number of parameters are identified so as to compare the sound used by the firearm with the data stored in the memorisation means 106; once the sound player device finds the desired data in the memory 106, that is to say the most similar stored sound wave, that is suitable for attenuating that detected, it plays said found wave.
  • the "data bank” can be updated instantly; the first exploded shot is analysed by the processing unit 105 and stored in the memorisation means 106. This way at the moment of the shots subsequent to the first, the exact noise emitted by the firearm suitably push-pulled, for example by 180°, is played as a suppression sound, by the player device.
  • the user before starting to shoot the user chooses what type of firearm and what type of ammunition to use. This way, upon detecting the sound of the first shot or shots fired, the sound of the rifle already stored in the memory 106 is played; subsequently, as described above, the recorded sound is stored and played.
  • the memory unit 105 has more time to analyse, record and update if necessary the correct signal to play.
  • the signal detector device comprises a certain number of microphones 101 positioned all along the firing range area in such a way as to pick up a certain number of sounds, sound spectra.
  • Such signal will in turn be analysed by one or more analysis and processing means 103 so as to optimise the suppression sound algorithm.
  • the suppression sound player device comprises a certain number of megaphones, or loudspeakers or in general sound sources, 102 suitable to play various sounds in such a way that these interfere with each other in a destructive manner in every part of the firing range and the surrounding area.
  • the aim is to completely and as efficiently as possible cancel out the sounds of the shots covering the entire area of the firing range and the surrounding area with the various sounds in push-pull.
  • the aim is to attenuate as much as possible in the most effective manner the noises of the shots to the benefit of the entire firing range and the surrounding area.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 is mobile and is able to move with the shooter along, for example, a predefined path.
  • the microphone 101 suitable for recording the sound of the shot, near the firearm is the microphone used by the shooter to give the signal to launch the clay pigeon, for example in clay pigeon shooting.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 comprises a multiplicity of signal detection devices, and similarly of sound player devices.
  • the sound caused by the shots varies depending on the characteristics of sound directivity of the firearm. This means that the phase of the generated signal may also vary in space. Similarly, the suppression sound played in push-pull by the player device is variable in space.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 comprises a multiplicity of signal detection devices, and a multiplicity of player devices.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 and specifically, the player devices are facing in such a way as to play the suppression sound in the direction in which the sound caused by the shots is propagated, preferably bearing in mind the directivity and orientation of the firearm.
  • multiplicity of detection devices and similarly of player devices, are positioned in such a way that they are appropriately positioned distanced from each other along the preferential directions of sound propagation.
  • the sound caused by the shots, propagating itself is detected by a first detector or measurement device near the firing area 2; a first player device emits a suppression sound at the detected sound.
  • a second microphone detects the residual sound caused by the shots after the interference and deals with adapting the system response to improve the suppression of the noise.
  • a second player device is therefore provided which emits a new suppression sound suitably out of phase with that detected to further reduce the sound emission.
  • the sound of the shots is therefore dynamically suppressed over an extensive area and not in a limited space, in such a way that the sound of the shots does not cause acoustic pollution outside the firing range.
  • analysis and processing means 103 are also envisaged, connected in series, such as those described above, each operatively connected to a relative detector device and to a suppression device; or, in one embodiment variation, the multiplicity of detection devices, and suppression devices, are controlled by the same analysis and processing means, operatively connected to all the devices.
  • the sound detection device is positioned on the firearm.
  • the sound player device is positioned on the firearm.
  • the analysis and processing means are positioned on the firearm.
  • both the sound detection device and the player device of the suppression sound are positioned on the firearm.
  • they can be physically fitted to the same; thereby realising a portable dynamic sound suppression kit suitable for being fitted to any firearm.
  • the firing range 1 to which the present invention relates may also comprise a recovery system of residual materials 500.
  • Said system for recovering residual materials 9 is suitable for transporting to a recovery area 7, also included in the firing range 1, the aforesaid residual materials, in such a way that it is always kept clean thereby preventing problems due to environmental pollution.
  • said system for recovering residual materials 500 comprises a main conveyor belt 501 suitable for performing the aforementioned task.
  • the system for recovering residual materials 500 is designed so as to substantially cover the entire intermediate area 5.
  • the movement of said main conveyor belt 501 means that all the waste consisting of shot, bullets, clay pigeons or the like, is transported and accumulated in the recovery area 7, for example near the embankment 3.
  • the system for recovering residual materials 500 comprises at least one secondary conveyor belt 502.
  • the secondary conveyor belt 502 is located substantially downstream of the embankment 3 and is substantially parallel to it.
  • Said secondary conveyor belt 502 moves the residues brought downstream of the embankment 3 by the main conveyor belt 501, to the side of the firing area 2, to the special recovery area7.
  • the secondary conveyor belt 502 is suitable for receiving and subsequently moving, for example laterally, the shot, bullets or more generally the residues coming to stop against the embankment 3 and which falling move downstream.
  • the installation of an energy recovery system is envisaged on the embankment 3.
  • the energy recovery system comprises solar panels 301.
  • the energy recovery system 300 is connected and supplies electricity to the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100.
  • the energy recovery system 300 is connected and supplies electricity to the recovery system of residual materials 500.
  • the energy recovery system 300 is connected and supplies electricity to both the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 and to the recovery system of residual materials 500.
  • the firing range which the present invention relates to overcomes the aforementioned problems of pollution typical of the firing ranges of the prior art.
  • the sound produced by the shots is suppressed with evident benefits both inside and outside the firing range.
  • it can be executed near the source of the shots. This way a comfortable environment is created inside the firing range both for those shooting and for those inside it, such as the public, but above all a certain degree of comfort is achieved outside the firing range in the vicinity.
  • the firing range which the present invention relates to does not need or may not need other specific systems for soundproofing or noise abatement, the presence of the dynamic sound suppression apparatus being sufficient to achieve such purpose.
  • the dynamic sound suppression apparatus comprises a multiplicity of detection devices and player devices opportunely located in the firing area and/or moving away from it. This way the sound caused by the shots is attenuated.
  • the same noise of the shot fired is played in push-pull.
  • the microphones used by the shooter to give the launching order of the clay pigeons are also used to detect the noise of the shot.
  • the analysis and processing means comprise memorisation means suitable for containing the data of different noises caused by different firearms or different ammunition.
  • the analysis and processing means envisage the live recording and use of noises; this way different environmental conditions are also advantageously considered.
  • kit version of the dynamic sound suppression apparatus is envisaged so that it can be fitted to any firearm.
  • the sound of the firearm used by the shooter may be selected so as to use, at least for the first shots, as similar a recording as possible to the noise effectively caused by the firearm.
  • the system makes it possible to easily recover the waste in such a way as to easily recover and /or recycle it, thereby entailing economic benefits.
  • said recovery operation need not be performed by a specialised operator but is completely automatic.
  • the recovery system of the residual materials envisages the recovery of both the materials which have “ fallen” into the intermediate area and those "falling” onto the embankment.
  • an area is used, that is to say the surface of the embankment, which is perfectly illuminated in that for obvious reasons it faces the sun, given that the shooters must substantially have the sun behind them so as not to be blinded.
  • the signal detection devices and similarly the sound player devices are movable around the area of the firing range following the shooter, this way the detection devices and/or player devices are movable in such a way as to position them where needed throughout the firing range, so as to create a uniformity of interference sound throughout said firing range, but also beyond it.
  • the detection devices and/or player devices can be opportunely positioned on the area of the firing range in such a way as not to have areas where there is constructive interference between the sound caused by the shots and the suppression sound.
  • loudspeakers are envisaged with a maximum power of over 500 Watts for example.
  • loudspeakers are envisaged with a sensitivity of over 93 dB.
  • the loudspeakers have a frequency response suitable for covering the entire sound emission spectrum of the firearm.
  • the recovery system of the residual materials comprises a separator device downstream of the conveyor belt or belts suitable for dividing the residual materials collected. This way the pieces of clay pigeon are separated from the shot or from the bullets.
  • the system for recovering residual materials comprises a robot suitable for gathering said materials.
  • said robot also divides the residual materials, or in one embodiment variation, empties the residual materials collected into the separator device as above.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a firing range, for example for target practice by a user, in particular the firing range of the present invention is eco-sustainable.
  • Firing ranges of the most varied types are known of; for example firing ranges suitable for practising Olympic disciplines such as "Double Trap", "Olympic Trap", and "Skeet" are known of; other types of firing range suitable for practising disciplines not recognised at an Olympic level, such as "Electrocibles", "Universal Trench", "Hunting course", and "Fast Sports Shooting" are also known of; "classic" firing ranges are also known of where the shooter aims at a fixed or mobile target positioned substantially in front of him.
  • In all these cases, as in others not mentioned, firing ranges are structures which are generally located in open spaces inasmuch as involving a series of difficulties, related to pollution in particular.
  • First of all the problem of noise pollution is deeply felt in the area surrounding the firing range due to the noise of the shots propagated in the firing range and from the firing range for a considerable radius.
  • Particularly, depending on the type of firearm, the fact that noise extends from the firing range over a wide radius and volume is extremely problematic.
  • Secondly, the recovery and cleaning of the firing area is decidedly complex, polluted by waste materials such as for example the shots fired from rifles or the clay pigeons to be hit by the shooters.
  • Moreover such structures have massive overheads.
  • Such problems, whether considered singly or combined with each other have encouraged the decision not to open firing ranges in certain areas as opposed to deciding to close existing firing ranges.
  • In the prior art such problems have not been resolved, and noise is propagated for several hundred metres from the firing range, as described in the publication "The test setup for active noise control at shooting range" published 1. June 2006 during Euronoise 2006 in Tampere, Finland by Mikko Kuisma et al. (XP008161501), which forms the starting point for the preamble of claim 1.
  • Current firing ranges are therefore situated as far away from residential urban areas as possible, where the aforementioned issues are not a problem; for example in quarries or the like.
  • The purpose of the present invention is to create an eco-sustainable firing range suitable for resolving at least one of these problems. This way the firing range in question may be situated where desired, without restriction. This is achieved by a firing range having the features of claim 1.
  • Further details of the characteristics and advantages of the invention will be more clearly comprehensible from the following description made by way of a non-limiting example with reference to the appended drawings showing possible embodiments of the firing range according to the invention:
    • figure 1 is a scheme of the firing range according to the invention;
    • figure 2 is a block diagram of the dynamic sound suppression apparatus of the firing range according to the present invention;
    • figure 3 is a further scheme of the firing range according to the invention, in one embodiment, wherein a solution of the dynamic sound suppression apparatus is represented.
  • According to the appended drawings reference numeral 1 globally denotes the firing range according to the invention.
  • The firing range 1 comprises a firing area 2, suitable for accommodating a user or users, generally, depending on the discipline practised, the firing area comprises special stands 25 which the user positions himself in for shooting.
  • The firing range 1, further comprises an embankment 3, suitable for providing a barrier to the exploded bullets so as to stop them thanks to its presence.
  • Said embankment 3 is distanced in relation to the firing area 2 in the direction in which the user aims. In other words, the embankment 3 is preferably positioned substantially in front of the firing area 2 in the firing direction of the user.
  • In addition the firing range 1 comprises an intermediate area 5, positioned between the firing area 2 and the embankment 3.
  • In a preferred embodiment, targets, fixed rather than mobile, are positioned some distance away from the firing area 2, preferably near the embankment 3, at the end of the intermediate area 5, which the shooter fires at.
  • The embankment 3 acts as a barrier to the progress of the bullets missing the target in their course.
  • In a further embodiment, the shooter must fire at moving targets, such as clay pigeons.
  • The firing range 1 therefore comprises a launching area 6 suitable for housing the launching machines 60 specifically for launching clay pigeons.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the launching area 6 is positioned substantially in a position in front of the firing area 2.
  • In a further embodiment variation, the launching area 6 is positioned substantially in a position to the side of the firing area 2.
  • In some embodiment variations the launching area 6 is at the same or a greater height than the firing area 2, consequently the launching machines are external; in other embodiment variations the launching area 6 is at a lower level than the firing area 2, consequently the launching machines 60 are buried or entrenched.
  • When the shooter fires at a clay pigeon such as in clay pigeon shooting sports, he/she usually uses a rifle; in particular bullets are usually fired containing a quantity of shot which opens when shot to form a shot pattern.
  • Generally speaking, only a part of the shot composing the pattern strikes the clay pigeon. The shot which does not come into contact with the clay pigeons will therefore fall on the embankment 3.
  • The clays which are missed, as also the parts of the clay broken by impact with some of the shot and said shots hitting the target, will come to fall in the intermediate area 5.
  • The intermediate area 5 is therefore suitable to receive any residual materials produced during the firing activity.
  • Said residual materials comprise for example the bullets, shot, cartridges, clays and portion of clays, etc.
  • The firing area 2 preferably comprises means of shelter to protect the shooters in the firing area 2, for example in the stands 25 from the sun and /or weather conditions.
  • The shelter means comprise, in a preferred embodiment, a roof 20; the roof 20 is positioned at a certain height so as to cover the shooters. The roof 20 is held in such position by a load-bearing structure
  • Preferably, said load-bearing structure comprises shafts or columns; or again the load-bearing structure comprises walls 22.
  • In one embodiment, on the side adjacent to the intermediate area 5, head on to the embankment 3, of the firing area 2 no wall is provided or holes or spaces are provided on the wall, if present, to permit firing at the target.
  • In one embodiment, the roof 21 and the walls 22 are covered in a material suitable for deadening, preferably limiting, the propagation of sound, such as sound absorbent panels 27.
  • The firing range 1 comprises a dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, suitable for minimising and annulling the noise caused by the shots outside the firing area 2; in other words, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, is suitable for minimising if not annulling the noise caused by the shots in the area occupied by the firing range 1 and in the surrounding area.
  • In particular the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, comprises a detector device of the sound caused by the shots and a suppression sound player device, operatively connected to the detector device.
  • Specifically, the detector device of the sound of the shots is suitable for detecting the sound caused by a shot; while the sound player device is suitable for reproducing a sound substantially similar, but in push-pull, preferably changed by 180 degrees in phase, in relation to the noise of the explosion of the firearm.
  • In other words, the sound player device is suitable for reproducing a sound having similar spectral characteristics and breadth of signal, but in push-pull, that is generated by an "anti-sound" preferably changed by 180 degrees in phase, in relation to the noise of the explosion of the firearm.
  • In particular the sound made by the sound player device is suitable to interfere at least partially in a destructive manner with the sound caused by the shots.
  • In other words, in the area of the firing range, preferably external to the firing area 2, and in the surrounding area, the sum of the sound waves is substantially null; consequently there is no substantial propagation of noise.
  • That is to say that the sum of the waves generated by the shot and reproduced by the dynamic suppression system, is substantially null; there is therefore a considerable reduction of the sound emitted at the firing station.
  • In particular the sound detector device comprises at least one microphone 101 suitable for picking up or detecting a sound caused by a firearm.
  • In particular the sound player device comprises at least one megaphone, (membrane) loudspeaker, or at least one booster 102 suitable to play a suppression sound.
  • Moreover, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, comprises analysis and processing means 103.
  • Preferably, said analysis and processing means 103 are suitable for placing the sound detector device in communication with the sound player device.
  • Specifically, in a preferred embodiment, the analysis and processing means are suitable for placing the microphone 101 in operative communication with the megaphone or loudspeaker 102.
  • The analysis and processing means 103 are suitable for picking up the firing signal by means of the sound detector device and of generating a signal transmitted to the suppression sound player device.
  • The analysis and processing means 103 comprise a processing unit 105 suitable to analyse the signal picked up by the sound detector device and, depending on the characteristics of the sound caused by the shots, to select and/or calculate the appropriate suppression sound to generate, for example calculating the appropriate spectral and energetic characteristics of the suppression sound.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the suppression sound emitted by the sound player device is the same sound emitted by the firearm but appropriately push-pulled, detected by the sound detector device.
  • The processing unit 105 preferably comprise a CPU.
  • The better the performance of the processing unit 105 the more the sound played is simultaneous to the sound of the shot fired; this way the sum of the two waves in push pull is substantially null, preferably in a point in space near the firearm and can therefore not be propagated in the surrounding space.
  • In one embodiment, the processing unit 105 is suitable for appropriately push-pulling the sound caused by the shots and ordering its playing, generation by the sound player device.
  • The analysis and processing means 103 also comprise memorisation means 106.
  • Said memorisation means 106 are suitable for storing data such as sounds, or audio tracks, or sound spectra.
  • Depending on their capacity, the memorisation means 106 are a data bank of sounds of firearms being fired, or of the sound imprints of the sound of a shot.
  • In one embodiment, the processing unit 105 analyses the sound caused by the firearm and picked up by the detector device; preferably it analyses the sound spectra of the sound of the exploded bullet. Depending on the results of the analysis the signal is sent to the suppression sound player device.
  • Such playing may take place in a number of ways.
  • In a preferred embodiment, in the analysis of the sound caused by the firearm a suppression sound is played specular to the sound caused by the firearm.
  • In a further embodiment, in the analysis of the sound caused by the firearm a number of parameters are identified so as to compare the sound used by the firearm with the data stored in the memorisation means 106; once the sound player device finds the desired data in the memory 106, that is to say the most similar stored sound wave, that is suitable for attenuating that detected, it plays said found wave.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the "data bank" can be updated instantly; the first exploded shot is analysed by the processing unit 105 and stored in the memorisation means 106. This way at the moment of the shots subsequent to the first, the exact noise emitted by the firearm suitably push-pulled, for example by 180°, is played as a suppression sound, by the player device.
  • Such expedient is very useful in that the sound recorded and played also takes into consideration the environmental conditions of the firing session.
  • In a further embodiment, before starting to shoot the user chooses what type of firearm and what type of ammunition to use. This way, upon detecting the sound of the first shot or shots fired, the sound of the rifle already stored in the memory 106 is played; subsequently, as described above, the recorded sound is stored and played. Advantageously this way the memory unit 105 has more time to analyse, record and update if necessary the correct signal to play.
  • In one embodiment variation, the signal detector device comprises a certain number of microphones 101 positioned all along the firing range area in such a way as to pick up a certain number of sounds, sound spectra. Such signal will in turn be analysed by one or more analysis and processing means 103 so as to optimise the suppression sound algorithm.
  • In a further embodiment variation, the suppression sound player device comprises a certain number of megaphones, or loudspeakers or in general sound sources, 102 suitable to play various sounds in such a way that these interfere with each other in a destructive manner in every part of the firing range and the surrounding area. The aim is to completely and as efficiently as possible cancel out the sounds of the shots covering the entire area of the firing range and the surrounding area with the various sounds in push-pull.
  • In other words, destructive interferences take place starting from the shooting position and consequently the noise is deadened throughout the surrounding area. The aim is to attenuate as much as possible in the most effective manner the noises of the shots to the benefit of the entire firing range and the surrounding area.
  • In one embodiment variation, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 is mobile and is able to move with the shooter along, for example, a predefined path.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the microphone 101 suitable for recording the sound of the shot, near the firearm, is the microphone used by the shooter to give the signal to launch the clay pigeon, for example in clay pigeon shooting.
  • In other words, since the noise all over the area occupied by the firing range and, consequently the surrounding area, must be attenuated as far as possible, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 comprises a multiplicity of signal detection devices, and similarly of sound player devices.
  • Specifically, in fact, around the firing area 2 the sound caused by the shots varies depending on the characteristics of sound directivity of the firearm. This means that the phase of the generated signal may also vary in space. Similarly, the suppression sound played in push-pull by the player device is variable in space.
  • It is therefore possible that in some areas the noise or sound is in any case propagated in that the sound caused by the shots and the suppression sound may not find themselves perfectly out of phase.
  • In a preferred embodiment, at the firing area 2 the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 comprises a multiplicity of signal detection devices, and a multiplicity of player devices.
  • Preferably, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100, and specifically, the player devices are facing in such a way as to play the suppression sound in the direction in which the sound caused by the shots is propagated, preferably bearing in mind the directivity and orientation of the firearm.
  • In particular said multiplicity of detection devices, and similarly of player devices, are positioned in such a way that they are appropriately positioned distanced from each other along the preferential directions of sound propagation.
  • In other words, the sound caused by the shots, propagating itself, is detected by a first detector or measurement device near the firing area 2; a first player device emits a suppression sound at the detected sound. A second microphone detects the residual sound caused by the shots after the interference and deals with adapting the system response to improve the suppression of the noise. Preferably a second player device is therefore provided which emits a new suppression sound suitably out of phase with that detected to further reduce the sound emission. The sound of the shots is therefore dynamically suppressed over an extensive area and not in a limited space, in such a way that the sound of the shots does not cause acoustic pollution outside the firing range.
  • In a preferred embodiment, analysis and processing means 103 are also envisaged, connected in series, such as those described above, each operatively connected to a relative detector device and to a suppression device; or, in one embodiment variation, the multiplicity of detection devices, and suppression devices, are controlled by the same analysis and processing means, operatively connected to all the devices.
  • In a further embodiment variation, the sound detection device is positioned on the firearm.
  • In a further embodiment variation, the sound player device is positioned on the firearm.
  • In yet a further embodiment variation, the analysis and processing means are positioned on the firearm.
  • In a preferred embodiment, both the sound detection device and the player device of the suppression sound are positioned on the firearm. In particular they can be physically fitted to the same; thereby realising a portable dynamic sound suppression kit suitable for being fitted to any firearm.
  • The firing range 1 to which the present invention relates may also comprise a recovery system of residual materials 500.
  • In particular residual materials are taken to mean both the clay pigeons, or parts of clay pigeons, and the shots/bullets which fall and remain on the ground, especially in the intermediate area 5, and which are extremely pollutant inasmuch as the former contain hydrocarbons and the latter lead.
  • Said system for recovering residual materials 9 is suitable for transporting to a recovery area 7, also included in the firing range 1, the aforesaid residual materials, in such a way that it is always kept clean thereby preventing problems due to environmental pollution.
  • In particular said system for recovering residual materials 500 comprises a main conveyor belt 501 suitable for performing the aforementioned task.
  • Specifically, the system for recovering residual materials 500 is designed so as to substantially cover the entire intermediate area 5. The movement of said main conveyor belt 501 means that all the waste consisting of shot, bullets, clay pigeons or the like, is transported and accumulated in the recovery area 7, for example near the embankment 3.
  • Preferably, the system for recovering residual materials 500 comprises at least one secondary conveyor belt 502.
  • The secondary conveyor belt 502 is located substantially downstream of the embankment 3 and is substantially parallel to it.
  • Said secondary conveyor belt 502 moves the residues brought downstream of the embankment 3 by the main conveyor belt 501, to the side of the firing area 2, to the special recovery area7.
  • The secondary conveyor belt 502 is suitable for receiving and subsequently moving, for example laterally, the shot, bullets or more generally the residues coming to stop against the embankment 3 and which falling move downstream.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the installation of an energy recovery system is envisaged on the embankment 3.
  • In particular the energy recovery system comprises solar panels 301.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the energy recovery system 300 is connected and supplies electricity to the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100.
  • In a further preferred embodiment, the energy recovery system 300 is connected and supplies electricity to the recovery system of residual materials 500.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the energy recovery system 300 is connected and supplies electricity to both the dynamic sound suppression apparatus 100 and to the recovery system of residual materials 500.
  • Innovatively, the firing range which the present invention relates to overcomes the aforementioned problems of pollution typical of the firing ranges of the prior art.
  • In particular a dynamic sound suppression system has been innovatively introduced to overcome the problem of acoustic pollution; thanks to this system both the area of the firing range and the surrounding area are substantially decontaminated.
  • Advantageously the sound produced by the shots is suppressed with evident benefits both inside and outside the firing range. Preferably, advantageously it can be executed near the source of the shots. This way a comfortable environment is created inside the firing range both for those shooting and for those inside it, such as the public, but above all a certain degree of comfort is achieved outside the firing range in the vicinity.
  • Advantageously natural or artificial barriers to overcome the problem of noise are not needed In other words, the firing range which the present invention relates to does not need or may not need other specific systems for soundproofing or noise abatement, the presence of the dynamic sound suppression apparatus being sufficient to achieve such purpose. Depending on the breadth of the firing range, for example of the number of stands present in the firing area, and depending on the type of practice or sports activities played, and therefore on the firearms used, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus comprises a multiplicity of detection devices and player devices opportunely located in the firing area and/or moving away from it. This way the sound caused by the shots is attenuated.
  • Advantageously the same noise of the shot fired is played in push-pull.
  • Advantageously in some embodiment variations the microphones used by the shooter to give the launching order of the clay pigeons are also used to detect the noise of the shot.
  • The analysis and processing means comprise memorisation means suitable for containing the data of different noises caused by different firearms or different ammunition.
  • Advantageously the analysis and processing means envisage the live recording and use of noises; this way different environmental conditions are also advantageously considered.
  • Advantageously a kit version of the dynamic sound suppression apparatus is envisaged so that it can be fitted to any firearm.
  • Advantageously before the firing session the sound of the firearm used by the shooter may be selected so as to use, at least for the first shots, as similar a recording as possible to the noise effectively caused by the firearm.
  • Moreover, innovatively a recovery system of the residual material is envisaged to overcome the problem of pollution of the ground and water.
  • Advantageously this way the pollutant materials which could otherwise pollute the soil and later the water can be recovered at predefined and /or predefinable intervals by the user.
  • Advantageously the system makes it possible to easily recover the waste in such a way as to easily recover and /or recycle it, thereby entailing economic benefits.
  • Advantageously said recovery operation need not be performed by a specialised operator but is completely automatic.
  • Advantageously the recovery system of the residual materials envisages the recovery of both the materials which have "fallen" into the intermediate area and those "falling" onto the embankment.
  • Innovatively furthermore the installation of an energy recovery system is envisaged to make the entire invention self - sufficient, if not advantageous.
  • Advantageously an area is used, that is to say the surface of the embankment, which is perfectly illuminated in that for obvious reasons it faces the sun, given that the shooters must substantially have the sun behind them so as not to be blinded.
  • Advantageously electricity is thereby produced which may be stored or used subsequently by the other systems as above; or again may in turn be sold, entailing self-sufficiency and economic income.
  • A person skilled in the art may make variations to the embodiments of the aforementioned firing range, replacing elements with others functionally equivalent, so as to satisfy specific requirements.
  • In a further embodiment, in fact, the signal detection devices and similarly the sound player devices are movable around the area of the firing range following the shooter, this way the detection devices and/or player devices are movable in such a way as to position them where needed throughout the firing range, so as to create a uniformity of interference sound throughout said firing range, but also beyond it.
  • In other words, the detection devices and/or player devices can be opportunely positioned on the area of the firing range in such a way as not to have areas where there is constructive interference between the sound caused by the shots and the suppression sound.
  • In a preferred embodiment, loudspeakers are envisaged with a maximum power of over 500 Watts for example.
  • In a preferred embodiment, loudspeakers are envisaged with a sensitivity of over 93 dB.
  • Moreover, in a preferred embodiment, the loudspeakers have a frequency response suitable for covering the entire sound emission spectrum of the firearm.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the recovery system of the residual materials comprises a separator device downstream of the conveyor belt or belts suitable for dividing the residual materials collected. This way the pieces of clay pigeon are separated from the shot or from the bullets.
  • In a further preferred embodiment, the system for recovering residual materials comprises a robot suitable for gathering said materials. Preferably, said robot also divides the residual materials, or in one embodiment variation, empties the residual materials collected into the separator device as above.
  • Such variations also fall within the sphere of protection as defined by the following claims.
  • Moreover, each variant described as belonging to a possible embodiment may be realised independently of the other variations.

Claims (11)

  1. Firing range (1) for example for the target practice of a user, comprising:
    - a firing area (2), suitable to accommodate the user;
    - a dynamic sound suppression apparatus (100) comprising:
    a) a sound detector device of the sound caused by the shots;
    b) a suppression sound player device, operatively connected to the detector device, suitable to generate a suppression sound so as to interfere with the sound caused by the shots to dampen such at least partially, and suitable to operate in interference in the area of the firing range (1) and in its surrounding area;
    c) analysis and processing means (103); the firing range (1) is characterized by the fact that the analysis and processing means (103) comprise memorization means (106) storing data such as sounds, or audio tracks, or sound spectra and comprising a data bank of sounds of the firearms being fired, or of the sound imprints of the sound of a shot; and the firing range comprises an embankment (3), distanced in relation to the firing area (2) in the direction in which the user aims, suitable to form an obstacle to the bullets exploded by the user.
  2. Firing range (1) according to claim 1, wherein the analysis and processing means (103) connect the sound detector device and the suppression sound player device, in such a way as to pick up the firing signal from the sound detector device and to generate a signal transmitted to the suppression sound player device.
  3. Firing range (1) according to claim 2, wherein analysis and processing means (103) comprise a processing unit (105) suitable to analyse the signal picked up by the sound detector device and, depending on the characteristics of the sound caused by the shots, to select and/or to calculate the appropriate suppression sound to generate.
  4. Firing range (1) according to any one of the previous claims, wherein the sound caused by the shots is analysed by the processing unit, stored by the memorisation means and, if necessary, generated as a suppression sound in the push-pull stage.
  5. Firing range (1) according to any one of the previous claims, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus (100) comprises a plurality of sound detector devices and a plurality of suppression sound player devices.
  6. Firing range (1) according to any one of the previous claims, the sound detector device comprises a plurality microphones (101) positioned all along the firing range area in such a way as to pick up a certain number of sounds, sound spectra.
  7. Firing range (1) according to any one of the previous claims, the suppression sound player device comprises a certain number of megaphones, or loudspeakers or in general sound sources, (102) suitable to play various sounds in such a way that these interfere with each other in a destructive manner in every part of the firing range and the surrounding area.
  8. Firing range (1) according to any one of the previous claims, the dynamic sound suppression apparatus (100) is mobile and , for example, is able to move with the shooter along a predefined path.
  9. Firing range (1) according to any one of the previous claims from 5 to 8, wherein said plurality of sound detector device and/or said plurality of suppression sound player device are positioned in such a way that they are appropriately positioned distanced from each other along the preferential directions of sound propagation.
  10. Firing range (1) according to any of the previous claims, comprising:
    - an intermediate area (5), positioned between the firing area (2) and the embankment (3), suitable to receive the residual cartridge cases produced during the firing activity;
    - a system for recovering the residual cartridge cases (500), comprising at least one conveyor belt for the transport of the residual cartridge cases contained in the intermediate area (5).
  11. Firing range (1) according to any of the previous claims, comprising an energy recovery system (300) such as solar panels (301) positioned on the embankment (3), for the supply of electricity to the components of the firing range.
EP20120722868 2011-04-22 2012-04-20 Firing range Not-in-force EP2699870B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT000058A ITBS20110058A1 (en) 2011-04-22 2011-04-22 SHOOTING RANGE
PCT/IB2012/052003 WO2012143905A1 (en) 2011-04-22 2012-04-20 Firing range

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2699870A1 EP2699870A1 (en) 2014-02-26
EP2699870B1 true EP2699870B1 (en) 2015-04-22

Family

ID=44554138

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20120722868 Not-in-force EP2699870B1 (en) 2011-04-22 2012-04-20 Firing range

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20140042701A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2699870B1 (en)
IT (1) ITBS20110058A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012143905A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120240754A1 (en) * 2011-03-22 2012-09-27 William James Expended Cartridge Case Receiver
US10612895B2 (en) 2014-01-02 2020-04-07 Bryan A Stear Tapered shooting range
NL2013641B1 (en) 2014-10-16 2016-10-04 Ingb En Technische Handelsonderneming Autron B V Modular shooting range.

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3329432A (en) * 1965-01-29 1967-07-04 Brunswick Corp Arrow return and quiver loading mechanism
US5031920A (en) * 1990-05-14 1991-07-16 Keith Poirier Shot pattern checker
DE9421802U1 (en) * 1994-12-13 1996-10-31 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Target sector indicator to limit shooting lanes
US20030221354A1 (en) * 2002-05-28 2003-12-04 Goza Michael Edward Bullet casing collector
DE10301384A1 (en) * 2003-01-16 2004-08-26 Glasa, Hans-Jürgen, Dipl.-Ing. Indoor clay-pigeon shooting installation has a roof and wall construction with nets of different predefined mesh sizes hung from frames or the roof for capture of projectiles
JP5017808B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2012-09-05 ヤマハ株式会社 Noise removal apparatus and program thereof
US20070223714A1 (en) * 2006-01-18 2007-09-27 Masao Nishikawa Open-air noise cancellation system for large open area coverage applications
US20110274283A1 (en) * 2009-07-22 2011-11-10 Lewis Athanas Open Air Noise Cancellation
US8737634B2 (en) * 2011-03-18 2014-05-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Wide area noise cancellation system and method
US20120240754A1 (en) * 2011-03-22 2012-09-27 William James Expended Cartridge Case Receiver

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2699870A1 (en) 2014-02-26
ITBS20110058A1 (en) 2012-10-23
WO2012143905A1 (en) 2012-10-26
US20140042701A1 (en) 2014-02-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10586109B1 (en) Indoor gunshot detection with video analytics
CA2635763C (en) Self-calibrating shooter estimation
EP2699870B1 (en) Firing range
US20100079280A1 (en) Advanced object detector
US9057582B2 (en) Simulation system
US11282353B1 (en) Gunshot detection within an indoor environment with video analytics
CA2361478C (en) Method and device for simulating detonating projectiles
JP2018525601A (en) A system to defend against threats
WO2017043147A1 (en) Shooting simulation system
US3948522A (en) Projectile simulation
WO2013025103A1 (en) Mortar simulator system
JP2012163271A (en) Shooting training system
KR102009457B1 (en) Mobile ammunition firing range to prevent enviromental pollution
KR20230131378A (en) Shooting training and drone target system having warhead trapping function
KR102116752B1 (en) Smart shooting target system
JP2010210148A (en) Target device
KR102031154B1 (en) Apparatus for collecting bullet
Pääkkönen Environmental noise reduction means of weapons
Donzier et al. Gunshot acoustic signature specific features and false alarms reduction
RU2279032C2 (en) Bullet-catching antiricochet facing
RU2710068C2 (en) Method of tracking cutting, loading, transportation of wood and movable mechanisms
Naz et al. Sound detection and localization of small arms, mortars, and artillery guns
KR101967291B1 (en) Warhead recovery device
Pääkkönen et al. Low-frequency noise emission of finnish large-calibre weapons
AU2022260409A1 (en) Device, method and vehicle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131017

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20141127

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: TRICHILO, RICCARDO

Inventor name: RIGHI, EUGENIO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 723483

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012006897

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20150422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150722

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150723

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150822

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012006897

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160125

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160420

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160420

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: UEP

Ref document number: 723483

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120420

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160430

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20200430

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200430

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20200407

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20200427

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20200420

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012006897

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 723483

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210420

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210420

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211103

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200420