EP2683589B1 - Railway control system - Google Patents

Railway control system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2683589B1
EP2683589B1 EP12709823.4A EP12709823A EP2683589B1 EP 2683589 B1 EP2683589 B1 EP 2683589B1 EP 12709823 A EP12709823 A EP 12709823A EP 2683589 B1 EP2683589 B1 EP 2683589B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sub
control
center
centers
graphics
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12709823.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2683589A1 (en
Inventor
Roland PASSERN
Michael Schaaf
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Mobility GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=45872919&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2683589(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP2683589A1 publication Critical patent/EP2683589A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2683589B1 publication Critical patent/EP2683589B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/06—Indicating or recording the setting of track apparatus, e.g. of points, of signals
    • B61L25/08—Diagrammatic displays
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/70—Details of trackside communication

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a railway control system with at least one control center which is connected to at least one sub-center, wherein the control center is designed to monitor operating state images created in an image-setting device of the sub-center.
  • the invention has for its object to simplify the production of compatibility between control centers and sub-centers in a railway control system of the generic type.
  • the object is achieved in that the image forming device of the sub-center for creating and sending the operating state images is designed in the form of graphics packages, being provided via security gateways, secured cloud computing connection between the control center and the sub-center and that the control center is a display device for Display of operating state images based on a standardized graphics protocol and a device for Jardinsummener ein has.
  • a graphics hardware is provided in the sub-center on COTS - Connection Oriented Transport Service - basis for creating the graphics packages.
  • the graphics packages are displayed by means of a standardized graphics protocol on the part of the control center. Standardized graphics protocols are known, for example, under the designation X11 or SVG - Scalable Vector Graphics.
  • a computer in the control center which may be far away from the sub-center, thus manages without configuration and element-specific display algorithms.
  • An operator station computer in the sub-center can continue to be equipped with company-specific software and configuration, for example for interlocking control.
  • the operator station computer in the subcenter controls the KF command release procedures, as usual. B. in conjunction with an electronic interlocking.
  • sub-center here any subsumed by a control center facilities, for example, ETCS - European Train Control System - facilities subsumed.
  • Cloud computing is the transmission of information over open networks, such as the Internet.
  • Architecture and function of cloud computing are for example in JASON H. CHRISTENSEN: Using RESTful web services and cloud computing to create next generation mobile applications ", PROCEEDING OF THE 24TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE COMPANION ON OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING SYSTEMS LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS, OOPSLA '09, January 1, 2009 (2009-01 -01), page 627, XP55029683, New York, NY, USA DOI: 10.1145 / 1639950.1639958 ISBN: 978-1-60-558768-4 described in more detail.
  • the monitoring of the image contents in the KF command release process as well as the procedural safeguards with regard to the operator station system in the sub-centers take place on the remote computer of the control center by merely installing a process for creating image checksum.
  • the determined checksum is sent in a secure telegram to the respective operator station computer in the respective subcenter.
  • the KF processes in conjunction with a signal box controlled.
  • fault and diagnostic data can be included in the monitoring functionality of the control center.
  • a time stamping method or a double time stamping method in the manner of the SAHARA - Safe Available and Redundant protocol can be installed.
  • a control center 1 Shown is the interaction of a control center 1 with a sub-center 2, wherein usually a control center 1 is connected to a plurality of sub-centers 2 for the purpose of monitoring.
  • the overall configuration forms a railway control system.
  • Several control centers 1 can also monitor several subcentrals 2 in crossover connections.
  • the sub-centers 2 are each with manufacturer-specific Control devices 3, in particular for interlocking control, equipped.
  • Operating state images in particular magnifying glass and area overviews, are transmitted to an image-setting device 5 via an operating channel management 4 in the sub-center 2.
  • the image-forming device 5 generates graphics packets from the operating state images, which are transmitted to the control center 1 via a secure cloud computing connection 6.
  • the graphics packages are visualized using a standardized graphics protocol in a display device 7.
  • a sub-central administration and operator allocation device 8 is used to monitor the received operating status images of the respective sub-center 2, for example by creating image checksums. As a result, mouse and keyboard operations are retransferred from the control center 1 to the subcenter 2. These operating instructions ultimately allow a fault-free execution of functions of the control devices 3 in the sub-center 2, in particular with regard to the very high security requirements of a KF - command release - operation.
  • the required compatibility between sub-centers 2 and control centers 1, also from different manufacturers, is easier to implement, so that, for example, the takeover a sub-center 2 from another control center 1 or a crossover operation is easily possible.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft ein Eisenbahnleitsystem mit mindestens einer Steuerzentrale, die mit mindestens einer Unterzentrale verbunden ist, wobei die Steuerzentrale zur Überwachung von in einer Bilderstellungseinrichtung der Unterzentrale erstellten Betriebszustandsbildern ausgebildet ist.The invention relates to a railway control system with at least one control center which is connected to at least one sub-center, wherein the control center is designed to monitor operating state images created in an image-setting device of the sub-center.

Problematisch bei derartigen Eisenbahnleitsystemen ist vor allem das Erfordernis der Kompatibilität zwischen der Steuerzentrale und den mit dieser verbundenen Unterzentralen. Die Projektierung in der Steuerzentrale und in den Unterzentralen muss aufeinander und auf die zwischen den Zentralen verwendete Schnittstelle abgestimmt sein. Ein Systemaufbau mit Steuerzentralen und Unterzentralen verschiedener Hersteller ist dadurch äußerst schwierig. Auch eine Erweiterung des Gesamtsystems oder kreuzweise Bedienung zwischen verschiedenen Steuerzentralen und Unterzentralen ist weitgehend ausgeschlossen oder erfordert ganz erheblichen Aufwand zur individuellen, systemspezifischen Anpassung verschiedener Datenformate und Schnittstellen. Aus LUEBBERS M ET AL: "INTEGRATION VON RELAISSTELLWERKEN IN DIE BEDIENUNG VON BETRIEBSZENTRALEN", SIGNAL + DRAHT, TELZLAFF VERLAG GMBH. DARMSTADT, DE, Bd. 99, 1. Juni 2007 (2007-06-01), Seiten 13 - 19, XP001541171, ISSN: 0037-4997 ist ein Eisenbahnleitsystem mit Steuerzentrale und Unterzentrale bekannt.The problem with such rail control systems is above all the requirement of compatibility between the control center and the associated sub-centers. The configuration in the control center and in the sub-centers must be coordinated with each other and with the interface used between the centers. A system structure with control centers and sub-centers of different manufacturers is extremely difficult. An extension of the overall system or cross-operation between different control centers and sub-centers is largely excluded or requires considerable effort for individual, system-specific adaptation of different data formats and interfaces. Out LUEBBERS M ET AL: "INTEGRATION OF RELAY SETTINGS IN THE OPERATION OF BUSINESS CENTERS", SIGNAL + DRAHT, TELZLAFF VERLAG GMBH. DARMSTADT, DE, Vol. 99, 1 June 2007 (2007-06-01), pages 13-19, XP001541171, ISSN: 0037-4997 is a railway control system with control center and sub-center known.

Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, die Herstellung der Kompatibilität zwischen Steuerzentralen und Unterzentralen bei einem Eisenbahnleitsystem der gattungsgemäßen Art zu vereinfachen.The invention has for its object to simplify the production of compatibility between control centers and sub-centers in a railway control system of the generic type.

Erfindungsgemäß wird die Aufgabe dadurch gelöst, dass die Bilderstellungseinrichtung der Unterzentrale zur Erstellung und Übersendung der Betriebszustandsbilder in Form von Graphikpaketen ausgebildet ist, wobei zwischen der Steuerzentrale und der Unterzentrale eine über Security Gateways, gesicherte Cloud Computing Verbindung vorgesehen ist und dass die Steuerzentrale eine Anzeigeeinrichtung zur Anzeige der Betriebszustandsbilder anhand eines standardisierten Graphikprotokolls sowie eine Vorrichtung zur Bildprüfsummenerstellung aufweist.According to the invention the object is achieved in that the image forming device of the sub-center for creating and sending the operating state images is designed in the form of graphics packages, being provided via security gateways, secured cloud computing connection between the control center and the sub-center and that the control center is a display device for Display of operating state images based on a standardized graphics protocol and a device for Bildumsummenerstellung has.

Auf diese Weise ergibt sich eine Standardbedienschnittstelle, die eine kreuzweise Bedienung in Unterzentralen und Steuerzentralen auch unterschiedlicher Herstellfirmen ermöglicht. Die Harmonisierung der Standardbedienschnittstelle drückt sich in der Harmonisierung der Projektierungsdaten aus. Durch das dynamische Aufrüsten der Projektierungsdaten zwischen den Unterzentralen und Steuerzentralen wird die Übernahme einer beliebigen Unterzentrale in ein Eisenbahnleitsystem mit einer beliebigen anderen Steuerzentrale möglich. Unterschiedliche Projektierungsversionen in Unterzentralen und Steuerzentralen werden vermieden. Eine zentrale Projektierungsdatenhaltung ist nur in den Unterzentralen erforderlich. Für das Leit- und Bediensystem ist eine Hochrüstung der Software im Wesentlichen nur in den Unterzentralen notwendig. In der Steuerzentrale genügt dagegen eine auf ein Minimum reduzierte Software für die Standardbedienschnittstelle. Eine Projektierung der Betriebszustandsbilder, beispielsweise Lupenbilder und Bereichsübersichten, ist nicht erforderlich. Stattdessen ist eine Graphikhardware in der Unterzentrale auf COTS - Connection Oriented Transport Service - Basis zur Erstellung der Graphikpakete vorgesehen. Die Graphikpakete werden mittels eines standardisierten Graphikprotokolls auf Seiten der Steuerzentrale zur Anzeige gebracht. Standardisierte Graphikprotokolle sind beispielsweise unter der Bezeichnung X11 oder SVG - Scalable Vector Graphics - bekannt. Ein Rechner in der unter Umständen von der Unterzentrale weit entfernten Steuerzentrale kommt somit ohne Projektierung und elementspezifische Anzeigealgorithmen aus. Ein Bedienplatzrechner in der Unterzentrale kann hingegen weiterhin mit firmenspezifischer Software und Projektierung, beispielsweise zur Stellwerkssteuerung, ausgestattet sein. Der Bedienplatzrechner in der Unterzentrale steuert wie gewohnt die KF - Kommandofreigabe - Abläufe, z. B. in Verbindung mit einem elektronischen Stellwerk.This results in a standard user interface that provides cross-operation in sub-centers and control centers also allows different manufacturing companies. The harmonization of the standard user interface is expressed in the harmonization of the configuration data. The dynamic upgrading of the configuration data between the sub-centers and the control centers makes it possible to transfer any sub-center to a railway control system with any other control center. Different configuration versions in sub-centers and control centers are avoided. A central configuration data management is required only in the sub-centers. For the control and operating system, upgrading the software is essentially only necessary in the sub-centers. On the other hand, in the control center, software for the standard user interface, which has been reduced to a minimum, is sufficient. It is not necessary to configure the operating status screens, for example magnifying glasses and area overviews. Instead, a graphics hardware is provided in the sub-center on COTS - Connection Oriented Transport Service - basis for creating the graphics packages. The graphics packages are displayed by means of a standardized graphics protocol on the part of the control center. Standardized graphics protocols are known, for example, under the designation X11 or SVG - Scalable Vector Graphics. A computer in the control center, which may be far away from the sub-center, thus manages without configuration and element-specific display algorithms. An operator station computer in the sub-center, on the other hand, can continue to be equipped with company-specific software and configuration, for example for interlocking control. The operator station computer in the subcenter controls the KF command release procedures, as usual. B. in conjunction with an electronic interlocking.

Mit dem Begriff "Unterzentrale" sind hier jegliche von einer Steuerzentrale überwachte Einrichtungen, zum Beispiel auch ETCS - European Train Control System - Einrichtungen, subsummiert.The term "sub-center" here any subsumed by a control center facilities, for example, ETCS - European Train Control System - facilities subsumed.

Zwischen der Steuerzentrale und der Unterzentrale ist eine mittels Security Gateways gesicherte Cloud Computing Verbindung vorgesehen. Unter Cloud Computing versteht man die Übertragung von Informationen über offene Netze, beispielsweise das Internet. Architektur und Funktion von Cloud Computing sind beispielsweise in JASON H. CHRISTENSEN: Using RESTful web-services and cloud computing to create next generation mobile applications", PROCEEDING OF THE 24TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE COMPANION ON OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING SYSTEMS LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS, OOPSLA '09, 1. Januar 2009 (2009-01-01), Seite 627, XP55029683, New York, New York, USA DOI: 10.1145/1639950.1639958 ISBN: 978-1-60-558768-4
näher beschrieben.Between the control center and the sub-center a secured by security gateways cloud computing connection is provided. Cloud computing is the transmission of information over open networks, such as the Internet. Architecture and function of cloud computing are for example in JASON H. CHRISTENSEN: Using RESTful web services and cloud computing to create next generation mobile applications ", PROCEEDING OF THE 24TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE COMPANION ON OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING SYSTEMS LANGUAGES AND APPLICATIONS, OOPSLA '09, January 1, 2009 (2009-01 -01), page 627, XP55029683, New York, NY, USA DOI: 10.1145 / 1639950.1639958 ISBN: 978-1-60-558768-4
described in more detail.

Der Aspekt der Sicherheit und der Datenintegrität spielt bei Eisenbahnleitsystemen naturgemäß eine herausragende Rolle. Die Graphikpakete mit den Lupenbildern und Bereichsübersichten werden deshalb mittels an sich bekannter Security Gateways gesichert.The aspect of security and data integrity naturally plays a prominent role in railway control systems. The graphics packages with the magnifying glass images and area overviews are therefore backed up using security gateways known per se.

Die Überwachung der Bildinhalte im KF - Kommandofreigabe - Ablauf sowie die Verfahrenssicherung bezüglich des Bedienplatzsystems in den Unterzentralen erfolgt auf dem entfernten Rechner der Steuerzentrale, indem lediglich ein Prozess zur Bildprüfsummenerstellung installiert wird. Die ermittelte Prüfsumme wiederum wird in einem gesicherten Telegramm zu dem jeweiligen Bedienplatzrechner in der jeweiligen Unterzentrale gesendet. Von diesem Bedienplatzrechner aus werden in üblicher Weise beispielsweise die KF-Abläufe in Verbindung mit einem Stellwerk gesteuert. Auch Störungs- und Diagnosedaten können in die Überwachungsfunktionalität der Steuerzentrale einbezogen werden. Dazu kann ein Zeitstempelverfahren oder auch ein doppeltes Zeitstempelverfahren nach Art des SAHARA - Safe Available and Redundant - Protokolls installiert werden.The monitoring of the image contents in the KF command release process as well as the procedural safeguards with regard to the operator station system in the sub-centers take place on the remote computer of the control center by merely installing a process for creating image checksum. The determined checksum, in turn, is sent in a secure telegram to the respective operator station computer in the respective subcenter. From this workstation from the usual way, for example, the KF processes in conjunction with a signal box controlled. Also fault and diagnostic data can be included in the monitoring functionality of the control center. For this purpose, a time stamping method or a double time stamping method in the manner of the SAHARA - Safe Available and Redundant protocol can be installed.

Die Erfindung wird nachfolgend anhand eines figürlich dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiels näher erläutert.The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to an embodiment shown figuratively.

Dargestellt ist das Zusammenwirken einer Steuerzentrale 1 mit einer Unterzentrale 2, wobei üblicherweise eine Steuerzentrale 1 mit mehreren Unterzentralen 2 zwecks deren Überwachung verbunden ist. Die Gesamtkonfiguration bildet ein Eisenbahnleitsystem. Dabei können auch mehrere Steuerzentralen 1 in Überkreuzverbindungen mehrere Unterzentralen 2 überwachen. Die Unterzentralen 2 sind jeweils mit herstellerspezifischen Steuereinrichtungen 3, insbesondere zur Stellwerkssteuerung, ausgestattet. Über eine Bedienkanalverwaltung 4 in der Unterzentrale 2 werden Betriebszustandsbilder, insbesondere Lupen- und Bereichsübersichten, an eine Bilderstellungseinrichtung 5 übertragen. Die Bilderstellungseinrichtung 5 erzeugt aus den Betriebszustandsbildern Graphikpakete, die über eine gesicherte Cloud Computing Verbindung 6 an die Steuerzentrale 1 übertragen werden. In der Steuerzentrale 1 werden die Graphikpakete anhand eines standardisierten Graphikprotokolls in einer Anzeigeeinrichtung 7 visualisiert. Eine Unterzentralenverwaltungs- und Bedienerzuordnungseinrichtung 8 dient der Überwachung der empfangenen Betriebszustandsbilder der jeweiligen Unterzentrale 2, indem zum Beispiel Bildprüfsummen erstellt werden. Im Ergebnis werden Maus- und Tastaturbedienungen von der Steuerzentrale 1 an die Unterzentrale 2 rückübertragen. Diese Bedienungsvorgaben ermöglichen letztlich eine fehlerfreie Ausführung von Funktionen der Steuereinrichtungen 3 in der Unterzentrale 2, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die sehr hohen Sicherheitsanforderungen einer KF - Kommandofreigabe - Bedienung.Shown is the interaction of a control center 1 with a sub-center 2, wherein usually a control center 1 is connected to a plurality of sub-centers 2 for the purpose of monitoring. The overall configuration forms a railway control system. Several control centers 1 can also monitor several subcentrals 2 in crossover connections. The sub-centers 2 are each with manufacturer-specific Control devices 3, in particular for interlocking control, equipped. Operating state images, in particular magnifying glass and area overviews, are transmitted to an image-setting device 5 via an operating channel management 4 in the sub-center 2. The image-forming device 5 generates graphics packets from the operating state images, which are transmitted to the control center 1 via a secure cloud computing connection 6. In the control center 1, the graphics packages are visualized using a standardized graphics protocol in a display device 7. A sub-central administration and operator allocation device 8 is used to monitor the received operating status images of the respective sub-center 2, for example by creating image checksums. As a result, mouse and keyboard operations are retransferred from the control center 1 to the subcenter 2. These operating instructions ultimately allow a fault-free execution of functions of the control devices 3 in the sub-center 2, in particular with regard to the very high security requirements of a KF - command release - operation.

Durch die Datenübertragung in Form der Graphikpakete über die gesicherte Cloud Computing Verbindung 6 und die Visualisierung über ein standardisiertes Graphikprotokoll, zum Beispiel X11, ist die erforderliche Kompatibilität zwischen Unterzentralen 2 und Steuerzentralen 1, auch verschiedener Hersteller, einfacher realisierbar, so dass zum Beispiel die Übernahme einer Unterzentrale 2 aus einer anderen Steuerzentrale 1 oder eine Überkreuzbedienung problemlos möglich wird.Due to the data transmission in the form of the graphics packages via the secure cloud computing connection 6 and the visualization via a standardized graphics protocol, for example X11, the required compatibility between sub-centers 2 and control centers 1, also from different manufacturers, is easier to implement, so that, for example, the takeover a sub-center 2 from another control center 1 or a crossover operation is easily possible.

Claims (1)

  1. Railway control system with at least one control centre (1) which is connected to at least one subcentre (2), wherein the control centre (1) is embodied to monitor operating state images generated in an image generation facility (5) of the subcentre (2),
    characterised in that
    the image generation facility (5) is embodied to generate and transmit the operating state images in the form of graphics packages, wherein there is provision for a cloud computing connection (6), secured via security gateways, between the control centre (1) and the subcentre (2) and the control centre (1) has a display facility (7) for displaying the operating state images using a standardised graphics protocol as well as an apparatus for image checksum generation.
EP12709823.4A 2011-03-07 2012-02-27 Railway control system Active EP2683589B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102011005188A DE102011005188A1 (en) 2011-03-07 2011-03-07 Railway Control System
PCT/EP2012/053270 WO2012119879A1 (en) 2011-03-07 2012-02-27 Railway control system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2683589A1 EP2683589A1 (en) 2014-01-15
EP2683589B1 true EP2683589B1 (en) 2017-06-28

Family

ID=45872919

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12709823.4A Active EP2683589B1 (en) 2011-03-07 2012-02-27 Railway control system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2683589B1 (en)
DE (1) DE102011005188A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012119879A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3549842A1 (en) 2018-04-06 2019-10-09 Thales Management & Services Deutschland GmbH Train traffic control system and method for safe displaying a state indication of a route and train control system

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103481917A (en) * 2013-09-22 2014-01-01 江苏美伦影像系统有限公司 Visual modeling system of high-speed railway
CN104077552B (en) * 2014-07-07 2017-08-25 北京泰乐德信息技术有限公司 A kind of track traffic signal based on cloud computing integrates O＆M method and system
DE102014214918A1 (en) * 2014-07-30 2016-02-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for operating a railway safety system
CN106585665A (en) * 2016-12-31 2017-04-26 江苏美伦影像系统有限公司 High speed railway visualization integrated system
CN110027596B (en) * 2019-03-29 2020-07-24 北京交通大学 Rail transit train operation control system based on cloud calculates
EP3943363B1 (en) 2020-07-22 2023-04-05 Siemens Mobility AG Railway control system with restriction
EP3960580A1 (en) 2020-08-25 2022-03-02 Siemens Mobility AG Railway control system with an interface adapter and method for configuration

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4005393A1 (en) 1990-02-21 1991-08-22 Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag DEVICE FOR SIGNAL-RELIABLE REPRESENTATION OF A REPORTING IMAGE

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4005393A1 (en) 1990-02-21 1991-08-22 Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag DEVICE FOR SIGNAL-RELIABLE REPRESENTATION OF A REPORTING IMAGE

Non-Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"ETCS Streckenausrüstung Ausschreibung 2. Stufe, Anlage 2 Generi- sches Lastenheft ETCS L2", ÖBB, 5 September 2011 (2011-09-05)
"Streckenausrüstung ETCS ERTMS Korridor E", BEKANNTMACHUNG VERGEBENER AUFTRÄGE, 10 December 2011 (2011-12-10), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://ausschreibungen-oesterreich.at/ 3260_Streckenausruestung_ETCS_ERTMS_Korridor_E_2011_Wien>
"Veröffentlichung des Supplements zum Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften", ERKENNUNGSNUMMER
"X Window System protocols and architecture", WIKIPEDIA-ARTIKEL, 6 September 2011 (2011-09-06), XP055481581, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= X_Window_System_protocols_and_architecture&oldid=448726044>
"xwd", WIKIPEDIA-ARTIKEL, 2 November 2011 (2011-11-02), XP055481578, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20111102021436/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xwd>
BARRENTO ET AL.: "Operations Control Centre Lisbon - automated route ma- nagement", SIGNAL DRAHT, vol. 101, October 2009 (2009-10-01), pages 40 - 44, XP001548188
C. MESSAUER: "Railway Operation Management in Austria", IRSE NEWS, no. 174, January 2012 (2012-01-01), pages 1 - 9, XP055479732
FORSTREUTER ET AL.: "Verfahrensgesicherte Meldebildanzeige für den Fdl- Arbeitsplatz bei der Deutsche Bahn AG", SIGNAL + DRAHT, vol. 86, no. 10, 1994, pages 320 - 324, XP000487976
HERRN GAIDER: "Streckenausrüstung ETCS ERTMS Korridor E", ÖBB AN DEN VERTRIEB DER EINSPRECHENDEN BETREF- FEND AUSSCHREIBUNGSUNTERLAGEN FÜR DIE AUSSCHREIBUNG, 5 September 2011 (2011-09-05)
HEUER ET AL.: "ARAMIS - Leitzentrale im internationalen Einsatz", SIGNAL DRAHT, vol. 97, November 2005 (2005-11-01), pages 20 - 24, XP001235008
LUEBBERS M ET AL.: "Integration von Relais-Stellwerken in die Bedienung von Betriebszentralen", SIGNAL DRAHT, vol. 99, June 2007 (2007-06-01), pages 13 - 19, XP055481597
SÖLCH ET AL.: "Das ESTW B950 (Bombardier) - Entwicklungsbegleitung bis zur Inbetriebna hme", SIGNAL + DRAHT, vol. 98, September 2006 (2006-09-01), pages 12 - 19, XP055481591

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3549842A1 (en) 2018-04-06 2019-10-09 Thales Management & Services Deutschland GmbH Train traffic control system and method for safe displaying a state indication of a route and train control system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102011005188A1 (en) 2012-09-13
EP2683589A1 (en) 2014-01-15
WO2012119879A1 (en) 2012-09-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2683589B1 (en) Railway control system
DE102007045729B4 (en) System and method of communication between two process controls within a process control system
EP3102475B1 (en) Spare ressource for the faulty channel of a rail vehicle
CH701344A1 (en) Stellwerk control.
WO2020074653A1 (en) Image switch-in on an operator station client
DE102017219661A1 (en) Method for operating a control device
DE10253174A1 (en) Device for developing and / or configuring an automation system
EP1197418B1 (en) Control method for a safety critical railway operation process and device for carrying out this method
EP2274874A1 (en) Examination of a communication connection between field devices
EP3167641B1 (en) Method and device for the secure communication between a first and a second participant
EP2978654B1 (en) Method for replacing a first signal box with a second signal box
DE4107639A1 (en) DEVICE FOR SIGNAL-SAFE REMOTE CONTROL OF A SUBSTATION IN A RAILWAY SYSTEM
DE102004035901A1 (en) Safety-critical process e.g. railway system process, controlling method, involves creating telegrams with security attachments, synchronizing telegrams, and sending resulting telegrams with attachments to multi-channel computer
DE102011086726B4 (en) Method for redundant communication between a user terminal and a control system server
EP1843929B1 (en) Control system for controlling and/or monitoring an object
EP1963162B1 (en) Method and arrangement for the reliable monitoring and evaluation of operating states of at least one traffic control system, and use of the same
DE102017220694A1 (en) Converter module and method for converting software protocol formats
DE102021127310B4 (en) System and method for data transmission
WO2016016003A2 (en) Method and device for operating a railway safety system
EP1944698B1 (en) Assemblies, methods and devices for transmitting data between a controller and an electric device
EP3871944A1 (en) Method for documentation of a voice-based communication
EP3945703A1 (en) Method, network, computer programm product and apparatus for remotely updating a target device in a network, in particular in a a rail automation system
EP3832624A1 (en) Aviation control system for flight safety and method for transmitting video and / or image data
DE102006042131A1 (en) Computer system and method for exchanging data telegrams between computers of a computer system
EP2173062A1 (en) Passive monitoring communication device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130813

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 502012010653

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: B61L0027000000

Ipc: B61L0025080000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B61L 25/08 20060101AFI20161220BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170120

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 904559

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502012010653

Country of ref document: DE

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCOW

Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: WERNER-VON-SIEMENS-STRASSE 1, 80333 MUENCHEN (DE)

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170928

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170628

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170928

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502012010653

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: THALES MANAGEMENT & SERVICES DEUTSCHLAND GMBH

Effective date: 20180326

PLAS Information related to reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBS3

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180227

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20181031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502012010653

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 80333 MUENCHEN, DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: PC

Ref document number: 904559

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH, DE

Effective date: 20190506

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 502012010653

Country of ref document: DE

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20190617

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170628

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220620

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230504

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240109

Year of fee payment: 13