EP2665635A1 - Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails - Google Patents

Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails

Info

Publication number
EP2665635A1
EP2665635A1 EP12701232.6A EP12701232A EP2665635A1 EP 2665635 A1 EP2665635 A1 EP 2665635A1 EP 12701232 A EP12701232 A EP 12701232A EP 2665635 A1 EP2665635 A1 EP 2665635A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
track
vehicle
bound vehicle
bound
speed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12701232.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2665635B1 (fr
Inventor
Jörg WOLBERG
Jens-Harro Oechsner
Bernd TIEFTRUNK
Minever KACAR
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP2665635A1 publication Critical patent/EP2665635A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2665635B1 publication Critical patent/EP2665635B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
    • B61L15/0058—On-board optimisation of vehicle or vehicle train operation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/10—Operations, e.g. scheduling or time tables
    • B61L27/16—Trackside optimisation of vehicle or train operation

Definitions

  • Track-bound vehicles which may be, for example, rail vehicles, maglev trains or track-guided vehicles with rubber tires, have significant advantages in terms of the environmental impact they cause as compared to other means of transport such as airplanes or cars. This shall be ⁇ attracted to the number of transported passengers or based on the amount of transported goods in particular for the energy consumption and pollutant emissions.
  • the environment is usually also affected by track-bound vehicles.
  • ⁇ hang in particular emitted by railbound vehicles noise should be mentioned that ⁇ granting, for example, particularly in metropolitan regions plays an essential role in terms of the Ak ⁇ tance of systems with track-bound or track-guided vehicles within the population.
  • comparatively high investment sums for passive noise abatement measures are generally spent on new and conversion measures of corresponding systems in urban areas.
  • the present invention has for its object to provide a limitation of the noise emissions of rail vehicles in a particularly efficient and unnecessary costs manner avoided allows forming method of operating a track-bound vehicle ⁇ indicated.
  • This object is achieved by a method for operating a track-bound vehicle, being transmitted from a trackside device, the noise emission of the tracked vehicle information signal relating to the track-bound vehicle, based on the übermit ⁇ te information signal for the track-bound driving ⁇ specific maximum speed is determined at which the noise emission of the tracked vehicle just maintains a limit value in this respect and, taking into account the determined maximum speed, a control signal directed to influencing the speed of the tracked vehicle is generated.
  • the inventive method is thus from trackside device, ie one at or along the travel path of the track-bound vehicle angeord ⁇ Neten device, a noise emission of the track-bound vehicle Affected information signal to the spurgebun ⁇ dene vehicle transmitted.
  • a noise emission of the track-bound vehicle Affected information signal to the spurgebun ⁇ dene vehicle transmitted.
  • the submitted Informa ⁇ tion signal it is possible response to this, to determine a specific speed at which the noise emission of the tracked vehicle just maintains a relevant, the noise emission of ⁇ tracked vehicle limit in question.
  • a control signal directed to influencing the speed of the tracked vehicle is then generated.
  • the control signal in particular be directed to a reduction or limitation of the Ge ⁇ speed of the track-bound vehicle.
  • the inventive method is advantageous because it attaches the Hin ⁇ a view to limiting the noise emission of rail vehicles or the Doomed by these vehicles ⁇ gentle noise exposure where the noise emissions are produced, ie the vehicle side. This results in a significant savings potential compared to structural noise control measures in relation to the required investment costs. It must also be borne in mind that structural noise abatement measures, depending on the particular circumstances, are not possible everywhere or may not be sufficient for a sufficient limitation of the noise emissions of track-bound vehicles.
  • the inventive method further provides the partially pre ⁇ that by the information signal takes place communication between the trackside device and the track-bound vehicle.
  • additional information can be transmitted to the track-bound vehicle which can subsequently be taken into account in the determination of the specific maximum speed. This results in a dynamic, adapted to the respective conditions limiting the noise emission of the track-bound vehicle is advantageous ⁇ legally possible way.
  • a predetermined algorithm for determining the specific speed for the track-bound vehicle at which the Noise emission of the tracked vehicle the relevant limit, ie a noise emission limit, just complies, a predetermined algorithm is used.
  • a predetermined algorithm for track-bound vehicles in the form of rail vehicles, an algorithm which can be used for this purpose, allowing for determination of the resulting noise emissions or noise immissions, taking account of input variables such as road type and type, length and speed of the respective vehicle, for example in the German Traffic Noise Ordinance ( Annex 2 of the Sixteenth Regulation implementing the Federal Pollution Control Act).
  • the method according to the invention is at least determined by the trackside A ⁇ direction, a measured value for the noise emission of the track-bound vehicle and at least transmitted with the information signal a for the at least one measured value determined specific characteristic of the track-bound vehicle.
  • a corresponding control loop may embodiment example ⁇ be realized in such a way that strongly noise be ⁇ poor locations, sensors, for example in the form of microphones for measuring the sound level to be installed for noise measurement and the results of the noise measurement by means of the infor ⁇ mations signal to the track-bound vehicle are transmitted.
  • the at least one characteristic variable that is specific for the at least one measured value can be the at least one determined measured value on the one hand.
  • At least one is übermit ⁇ telt means of the at least one measured value determined specific characteristic of an infor mation about the actual noise emission of the track-bound vehicle or the thereby trackside be ⁇ worked noise pollution to the track-bound vehicle.
  • At least one limit value Rende characterization parameter is transmitted to the track-bound vehicle having the in ⁇ formations signal.
  • this may be the limit value itself or a quantity from which the limit value can be derived on the vehicle side. So it may be, in the limit characterizing parameter, for example, the An ⁇ reproducing a Lärmemissions- or Lärmemissions- protection class.
  • the control signal may be generated Be ⁇ consideration of valid for a respective track section limit value without entspre ⁇ limit values must be kept on the vehicle side.
  • the inventive method can still proceed in such a way that an automatic ⁇ diagram influencing the speed of the track-bound vehicle is performed by means of the control signal.
  • a corresponding automatic influencing the speed of the track-bound vehicle which can be done for example by means of an ATO (Automatic Train Operation) -Fahrzeuguzes, offers the advantage that a timely and immediate influence on the Ge ⁇ speed of the track-bound vehicle is carried out.
  • appropriate vehicle devices are advantageously often already for other purposes, such as the optimization of energy consumption or the route throughput, available and usable by comparatively minor changes in their software for an automatic effect on the speed of each track-bound vehicle to limit its noise emission.
  • the inventive method may further be so pronounced that the specific for the track-bound vehicle speed is ⁇ Siert means of the control signal to the driver of the track-bound vehicle signaled.
  • the driving ⁇ imaging guide of the track-bound vehicle specific to the track-bound vehicle speed is signaled by managerial rerstandssignalmaschine and it will allow for the part of the driver, such a manual control of the speed of the track-bound vehicle, that the limit value for the noise emission of the tracked vehicle is maintained.
  • the signaling for the track-bound vehicle specific speed limit by means of the control signal to the driver merely informative character and independently of this, there is an automatic effect on the speed of the track-bound vehicle.
  • the transmission of the information signal from the ??nsei term device to the track-bound vehicle can grund ⁇ addition to any known per se manner he ⁇ follow.
  • the information signal is transmitted via the rails in the case of a track-bound vehicle in the form of a rail vehicle.
  • the information signal is transmitted without contact from the trackside device to the tracked vehicle.
  • a corresponding Berüh contactless transmission of the information signal can be done in ⁇ example by means of on the route, ie, for example, in or on the track, provided transponder.
  • Such transponders may be, for example, balises used in securing the tracked vehicle.
  • ECS European Train Control System
  • Eurobaiisen are used for point-to-point data transmission from the line to track-bound vehicles in the form of rail vehicles.
  • the inventive method may also be such further developed in that the determination of the specific for the spurge ⁇
  • Thematic vehicle speed and the generation of the control signal by a vehicle-side STEU ⁇ er worn of the track-bound vehicle are made.
  • the vehicle-side control device may be, for example, a control computer, for example in the form of an ATO vehicle device.
  • the in-vehicle ⁇ He mediation specific to the track-bound vehicle speed and the vehicle-side generation of the control signal offer the advantage that a relatively simple procedure achieved and unnecessary Kirunikationsauf ⁇ wall is avoided. This will in particular also achieved a particularly timely and immediate effect on the Ge ⁇ speed of the tracked vehicle.
  • the inventive method can be wei ⁇ terge strict preferably also such that the information signal is passed from the track ⁇ bound vehicle to a central control device for the track-bound vehicle specifi ⁇ specific speed by the central Steuereinrich ⁇ tion is determined and the control signal is transmitted from the central control device to the track-bound vehicle.
  • a central control device for the track-bound vehicle specifi ⁇ specific speed by the central Steuereinrich ⁇ tion is determined and the control signal is transmitted from the central control device to the track-bound vehicle.
  • a central controller such as in the form of a control center
  • other information is taken into account when Determined ⁇ lung specific for the track-bound vehicle maximum ⁇ rate available to the individual track-bound vehicle is not or not readily available. So it is conceivable that was ⁇ least the central control device information into account how many track-bound vehicles in ei ⁇ nem certain period of time before the relevant track-bound vehicle already have the relevant stretch pas ⁇ Classification or this section of road in a certain time period after the the relevant track-bound vehicle will pass and noise emissions at what level have been caused thereby or are expected to cause ⁇ Lich.
  • the inventive method can also be so pronounced that the position of the track-bound vehicle is determined and specific for track-bound driving ⁇ imaging speed is determined taking into account the position of the track-bound vehicle.
  • the determination of the position of the tracked vehicle on the one hand take place in that related with the in ⁇ formations signal on the position of the track-bound vehicle data to the track-bound vehicle are übermit ⁇ telt.
  • the track-bound vehicle it is also conceivable, for example, for the track-bound vehicle to autonomously determine its position. So have guided vehicles usually components that allow them, for example on the basis of at ⁇ number of wheel rotations to determine their position along a route.
  • a vehicle-side position determination of the track-bound vehicle alternatively or additionally, for example, satellite-based or by means of track-side balises known position. Based on the respectively determined position of the track-bound vehicle can advantageously ⁇ example, be checked whether limits have to be observed for the noise emission of the track-bound vehicle in a respective track section using an electronic Streckenatlasses. If this is the case, the specific for the track-bound vehicle speed can be so ⁇ determined with taking into account the position of the track-bound vehicle. According to another particularly preferred development of the inventive method is designed such that the specific for the track-bound vehicle alignmentschwindig ⁇ activities is determined taking into account at least one of the following further variables:
  • Weather or climate data in particular with regard to precipitation, temperature, wind, air pressure, humidity and / or season.
  • the other variables mentioned above are advantageously those which can usually influence or influence the noise emission of track-bound vehicles.
  • the track-bound vehicle such that a hand allowable noise levels are not exceeded and on the other hand, unnecessary restrictions on maximum ⁇ speed of the track-bound vehicle avoided who ⁇ the.
  • the type of tracked vehicle can be, for example, be a passenger or Gü ⁇ teryak while the type of tracked vehicle called the series or, for example, the kind of attached to a locomotive freight cars closer.
  • the noise emission of track-bound vehicles is influenced, in particular, by weather, for example, climate data.
  • weather for example, climate data.
  • a consideration of these data which can take place due to the known location of the track bound ⁇ nen vehicle with comparatively high accuracy, allows a particularly precise determination of the noise ⁇ emission of the track-bound vehicle as a function of its speed, so that in this context on "worst case" Considerations can advantageously be dispensed with.
  • Figure for explaining an embodiment of the method according to the invention is a schematic representation of a track-bound vehicle and a trackside device.
  • a track-bound vehicle 10 is shown in the form of a rail vehicle, which travels a track or a track 300.
  • the track-bound vehicle 10 has a vehicle-side receiving device 20, a vehicle-side control device 30, a vehicle-mounted Werner ⁇ tion device 40, a vehicle-mounted locating device 50, a vehicle-side transmission device 60 and a vehicle-mounted display device 70.
  • Trackside A ⁇ direction 200 with a track-side transmitting device 210 and a track-side sensor device 220 and a central control device are trackside indicated 230 with a central transmitting device 240 in the figure.
  • the track-bound vehicle 10 ge ⁇ Frankfurtss can be operated proceedings such Now an embodiment of the procedure according to the invention that the noise emission from the trackside equipment 200 of the track-bound vehicle 10 relevant information signal 100 is transmitted to the spurge ⁇ bound vehicle 10. It can be made 100 from the halnseiti- gen device 200 at the track-bound vehicle 10 at ⁇ play in such a manner that over ⁇ averaging of the information signal that the trackside transmission ⁇ device 210 is configured as RFID-transponder and the vehicle-side receiving device 20 as corresponding Le ⁇ seillion.
  • the trackside device 200 as a balise and the vehicle-side receiving device 20 as a vehicle antenna for reading out the balise be made.
  • the vehicle-mounted receiving apparatus 20 is performed based radio.
  • the web-specific mobile ⁇ system GSM-R (Global System for Mobile Communication - rail way) or a WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network), for example according to the IEEE 802.11 standard may be used .
  • a specific speed for the track-bound vehicle 10 can now be determined. This can be done on the vehicle side, ie, for example, by the vehicle-side control device 30, which may be, for example, an ATO (Automatic Train Operation) vehicle device.
  • the information signal 100 or the information contained in it is forwarded from the track-bound vehicle 10 to the central control device 230, for example by means of the vehicle-side transmission device 60 and the central transmission device 240, and the maximum speed specific to the track-bound vehicle 10 is determined by the central control device 230.
  • a control signal directed at influencing the speed of the track-bound vehicle 10 is generated, taking into account the determined maximum speed. If the determination of the track-bound vehicle 20 specific maximum speed is made by the central control device 240, the control signal for this purpose is transmitted from the central control device 230 to the track-bound vehicle 10.
  • the information signal 100 may include, for example, a characteristic quantity ⁇ SSE, the at least one determined by the halnseiti- ge device 200 the measured value for the noise emission of the track-bound vehicle 10 is specific or characteristic.
  • the trackside ⁇ A direction on the track side sensor device 220 are detected by the measurement values, for example in the form of sound pressure levels of rail vehicles for the noise emission NEN kön-.
  • the track-side sensor device 220 may be such a device, which are also used for other purposes. This is how it is for example, conceivable that the trackside Sensoreinrich ⁇ device 220 is also used for an acoustic hot box locating.
  • the trackside sensor device 220 which may include, for example, a microphone as a sensor, the arrangement is advantageously expanded to a rule ⁇ circle.
  • corresponding track-side sensor devices 220 can be provided in particular at locations which are particularly in need of noise protection, ie, for example, in the area of settlements, localities, nature reserves, forest areas or highways or highways.
  • At least one parameter characterizing the limit value can also be transmitted to the track-bound vehicle 10.
  • the parameter characterizing the limit value may be the limit itself and, for example, the indication of a noise emission class.
  • the corresponding parameter characterizing the limit value can be stored, for example, in a memory device (not shown in the figure) of the trackside device 200.
  • the on-board tax The speed of the tracked vehicle 10 can be controlled in such a way that the limit value of the noise emission of the tracked vehicle 10 valid for the respective route section is adhered to, taking into account specifications of the vehicle-side train protection device 40 and information from the vehicle-side locating device 50.
  • the control signal also to the driver of the track-bound vehicle 10 signals the stuff for the track-bound vehicle 10 specific speed ⁇ the.
  • the resulting maximum speed can be output to the driver on the vehicle-side display device 70, which can be designed as part of a so-called HMI (Human Machine Interface).
  • HMI Human Machine Interface
  • Means of a corresponding HMI it is the driver advantageously furthermore possible to determine the required for the track-bound vehicle 10 specific maximum base data, such as in the form of the type whiteningswei ⁇ se of the type of tracked vehicle, the length of the track-bound vehicle and the Weight or Bela ⁇ tion state of the track-bound vehicle 10, enter.
  • corresponding Wet ⁇ ter schemes taking into account the determined by the vehicle-mounted positioning means 50 position of the track-bound vehicle 10, for example from a local weather Station or be retrieved from a corresponding Internet portal fen fen ⁇ fen.
  • the process described in the context of the embodiment has the advantage that it enables a demand Begren ⁇ wetting or reduction of noise emissions of rail vehicles, which starts on the side of track-bound vehicles themselves.
  • advantageously costly structural noise protection measures can be replaced or supplemented if necessary.
  • the noise reduction is performed individually schezo ⁇ gen here, so track-bound vehicles with high noise levels a stronger influence on the speed as such are subject vehicles with relatively low Lärmemis ⁇ sions.
  • Railcar for passenger transport usually in terms of a higher specific speed controlled ⁇ than the comparatively loud freight trains.
  • the track-bound vehicles are thus regulated as a function of their noise emission causer, which advantageously ⁇ also a polluter-fair pricing, for example in the form of line prices, is possible.
  • ⁇ friendliness of a waiver of structural noise protection measures, such as in the form of noise barriers it is further avoided, a corresponding optical interference in the environment.
  • the method further depending on the particular circumstances flexibly and in different ways realizable ⁇ bar.
  • This relates in particular to the provision of the limit value of the noise emission which is valid for a route section or a route and which can be transmitted from the route-side device 200 to the track-bound vehicle 10 on the one hand.
  • corresponding limit values can also be deposited within the track-bound vehicle 10, ie, for example, in a digital route atlas , as a result of which these limit values of the vehicle control are immediately available.
  • the control of the speed of the respective track-bound vehicle 10 continue to take into account timetable data, so that depending on the respective with respect to the noise emission of the track-bound vehicle 10 permissible maximum speed delays may be retracted or with corresponding temporal reserves, a reduction of Speed of the tracked vehicle can be used to deliberately reduce noise emissions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails (10) permettant de limiter les émissions sonores de véhicules guidés sur rails de manière particulièrement efficace et évitant les frais inutiles. Selon l'invention, le procédé se déroule de la manière suivante: un signal d'information (100) relatif au niveau sonore du véhicule guidé sur rails (10) est transmis par un dispositif côté voie (200) au véhicule guidé sur rails (10), une vitesse maximale spécifique du véhicule guidé sur rails (10) est déterminée sur la base du signal d'information (100) transmis, vitesse maximale à laquelle le niveau sonore du véhicule guidé sur rails (10) adopte toujours une valeur limite ayant rapport à cette vitesse, et un signal de commande destiné à influencer la vitesse du véhicule sur rails (10) est produit, compte tenu de la vitesse maximale déterminée.
EP12701232.6A 2011-01-17 2012-01-06 Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails Not-in-force EP2665635B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102011002772A DE102011002772A1 (de) 2011-01-17 2011-01-17 Verfahren zum Betreiben eines spurgebundenen Fahrzeugs
PCT/EP2012/050176 WO2012098024A1 (fr) 2011-01-17 2012-01-06 Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2665635A1 true EP2665635A1 (fr) 2013-11-27
EP2665635B1 EP2665635B1 (fr) 2015-07-15

Family

ID=45531857

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12701232.6A Not-in-force EP2665635B1 (fr) 2011-01-17 2012-01-06 Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2665635B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102011002772A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2012098024A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL219427B1 (pl) 2012-09-03 2015-04-30 Ls Electric Spółka Cywilna Urządzenie do odbierania, przetwarzania i generowania sygnałów dla samoczynnego oddziaływania na pojazd szynowy
DE102013201494A1 (de) 2012-09-18 2014-03-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Diagnoseverfahren für Schienenfahrzeuge
DE102013002366A1 (de) * 2013-02-09 2014-08-14 Servus Intralogistics Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ortsbestimmung von Transportrobotern in einem weit verzweigten Schienennetz
DE102016116419A1 (de) 2016-09-02 2018-03-08 Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überwachen von Fahrzeugzuständen in Schienenfahrzeugen
DE102017209928A1 (de) * 2017-06-13 2018-12-13 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Betreiben eines spurgebundenen Verkehrssystems
RU2727325C2 (ru) * 2018-07-23 2020-07-21 Алексей Андреевич Калмыков Способ трехмерной путевой навигации в автоматизированной помощи управлением грузо-подъемно-транспортными механизмами
CN116714611B (zh) * 2023-08-07 2023-11-14 比亚迪股份有限公司 列车控车方法、车载控制器、列车及存储介质

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006021050A1 (fr) * 2004-08-26 2006-03-02 Queensland Rail Analyse du bruit roue-rail
US7426917B1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-09-23 General Electric Company System and method for controlling locomotive smoke emissions and noise during a transient operation
AU2009225776A1 (en) * 2008-03-21 2009-09-24 General Electric Company Method for controlling a powered system based on mission plan

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2012098024A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2012098024A1 (fr) 2012-07-26
EP2665635B1 (fr) 2015-07-15
DE102011002772A1 (de) 2012-07-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2665635B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé sur rails
EP0970870B1 (fr) Dispositif pour la surveillance de véhicules sur rails comprenant une unité motrice et au moins un wagon
DE102009026326A1 (de) System, Verfahren und computerlesbare Medien zum Betrieb eines Zugs mit verteilter Traktion
WO2009109475A1 (fr) Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules
EP2085286B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant
DE102005051077A1 (de) Verfahren zum Erfassen und Berücksichtigen von Seitenwindbelastungen bei einem in Fahrt befindlichen Schienenfahrzeug und dessen entsprechend ausgeführter Endwagen
EP3280631A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination d'une autorisation de circuler pour un véhicule guidé sur rails
WO2009024563A1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une formation de véhicules, dispositifs de communication, véhicule moteur, véhicule et formation de véhicules
EP3608201B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de simulation d'un trajet d'un véhicule moteur
DE102014210190A1 (de) Fahrerlaubnis für ein Schienenfahrzeug
EP2516238A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'intégralité d'un train se déplaçant sur une voie
EP3612430A1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner un système de circulation guidé
EP3448737A1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un passage à niveau, ainsi qu'équipement de commande fixe pour un système de contrôle de la marche des trains
EP3527459A1 (fr) Procédé et système de détection de déraillement d'au moins un essieu d'un véhicule ferroviaire
EP3787950B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détection de véhicules suivant un véhicule
EP3612428A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif de véhicule ainsi que dispositif de commande pour le fonctionnement d'un système de circulation guidé
WO2014033089A1 (fr) Fonctionnement d'un véhicule ferroviaire
DE102008046565A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Detektion eines Zuges
EP0849138B1 (fr) Méthode pour le fonctionnement d'un véhicule ferroviaire sur des voies avec des sections dangereuses ainsi que système de commande pour cela
EP3795451B1 (fr) Procédé de localisation d'un véhicule dans une station destinée à un arrêt du véhicule
DE102010041078A1 (de) Verfahren zur automatischen Steuerung einer Mehrzahl spurgebundener Fahrzeuge
EP1935749B1 (fr) Procédé et système de localisation d'un véhicule sur rail
DE102010033237A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines spurgebundenen Fahrzeugs, spurgebundenes Fahrzeug sowie Anordnung mit einem solchen
WO2013044947A1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule guidé, véhicule guidé correspondant, et dispositif présentant un tel véhicule
DE102016217913A1 (de) Überwachung eines Schienenfahrzeugs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130705

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150212

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 736619

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502012003794

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151016

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151015

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151116

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502012003794

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160131

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160106

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20160930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160106

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170320

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20170404

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCOW

Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: WERNER-VON-SIEMENS-STRASSE 1, 80333 MUENCHEN (DE)

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120106

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20171207

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502012003794

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180131

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 736619

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190106