EP2638528A1 - Method and system for transmitting and receiving data coming from an aircraft black box - Google Patents
Method and system for transmitting and receiving data coming from an aircraft black boxInfo
- Publication number
- EP2638528A1 EP2638528A1 EP11794529.5A EP11794529A EP2638528A1 EP 2638528 A1 EP2638528 A1 EP 2638528A1 EP 11794529 A EP11794529 A EP 11794529A EP 2638528 A1 EP2638528 A1 EP 2638528A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- data
- flight
- communication
- black box
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 60
- 230000006854 communication Effects 0.000 claims description 60
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 44
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000010295 mobile communication Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012432 intermediate storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007175 bidirectional communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013523 data management Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
- B64D45/00—Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0004—Transmission of traffic-related information to or from an aircraft
- G08G5/0008—Transmission of traffic-related information to or from an aircraft with other aircraft
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/185—Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
- H04B7/18502—Airborne stations
- H04B7/18506—Communications with or from aircraft, i.e. aeronautical mobile service
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
- H04W4/30—Services specially adapted for particular environments, situations or purposes
- H04W4/40—Services specially adapted for particular environments, situations or purposes for vehicles, e.g. vehicle-to-pedestrians [V2P]
- H04W4/42—Services specially adapted for particular environments, situations or purposes for vehicles, e.g. vehicle-to-pedestrians [V2P] for mass transport vehicles, e.g. buses, trains or aircraft
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/008—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles communicating information to a remotely located station
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for transmitting and receiving data from a black box on board an aircraft.
- a black box also called recorder is a device embedded on board aircraft and which stores during the flight various flight data, sound data and possibly visual data.
- the flight data come from different sensors on board the aircraft that collect different flight data, as well as computers that provide flight parameters.
- the data stored in a black box also include audio recordings and possibly video of the activity inside the cockpit (discussions between members of the crew, ).
- Such black boxes are generally orange and equipped with a radio transmitter so that it can be located more easily, for example, following an air disaster.
- the present invention aims to remedy this drawback by means of a communication of data stored on board one or more black boxes of an aircraft during the flight thereof, which communication is carried out from the aircraft to the aircraft. outside thereof and, more specifically to at least one other aircraft.
- the invention more particularly relates to a method for transmitting data in flight, characterized in that it comprises a data transmission step between a first aircraft and at least a second aircraft, the data transmitted being data stored in at least one black box on board the first aircraft.
- the data of a black box or recorder are transmitted during the flight out of the aircraft concerned, thus ensuring that these data will be accessible (because saved in another aircraft) in the event that an air disaster would occur on this aircraft and that the black box could not be found or would be illegible.
- the second aircraft receiving these data can, when it lands, make it possible to make a copy of these data on the ground.
- the transmission of such data between two aircraft can be carried out continuously depending on the possible communication connections or intermittently, regularly or not, automatically or following a manual trigger initiated in case of emergency by a member crew.
- the first aircraft may, depending on the circumstances, transmit black box data to several aircraft and not to one to increase the chances of reliably transmitting, and thus to back up these data. .
- the second aircraft to which the data are transmitted is not known in advance. It is selected after a decision to transmit the data has been made (eg decision taken aboard the first aircraft).
- Transmitting data to a second aircraft that is not a predetermined aircraft provides flexibility and reliability in data transmission and ensures that data can be transmitted at all times (by selecting a second aircraft when necessary) and regardless of the geographical area overflown.
- the invention makes it possible to save the data of black box (s) even if the overflown zone is not covered by satellite.
- other data may be transmitted with the black box data, for example, depending on the circumstances and applications envisaged.
- the data from said at least one black box requires for their transmission a bandwidth of at least 100 Kbits / s. Indeed, such a bandwidth is necessary to transmit the flight data and audio data recorded in the cockpit.
- the method comprises a preliminary step of storing the data to be transmitted in an intermediate storage space that is distinct from the said at least one black box.
- the method comprises a preliminary step of processing the data to be transmitted in order to reduce the bandwidth necessary to transmit these data.
- the method comprises a preliminary step of encrypting the data to be transmitted.
- This step is to ensure the confidentiality of the data that will be transmitted between the two aircraft.
- An aircraft receiving black box data from another aircraft is not generally considered to be an entity authorized to read this data and, in this regard, does not have any means of decryption. This received data is therefore illegible for the receiving aircraft.
- the method comprises a step of selecting a communication means from among a plurality of communication means.
- a communication means may be chosen preferentially for use first (example: choice of the radio link) and other means are envisaged if the preferential means is for example not available or, for example, if it does not meet a predetermined criterion with respect to the new flight conditions of the first and second aircraft.
- the data transmission is for example carried out by a radio means or by another means of wireless communication (example: mobile telephone network, WiMax ...) or by satellite means.
- the data transmission is performed in a communication network comprising mobile communication nodes which are aircraft in flight.
- the method comprises a preliminary step of searching the network of at least one mobile communication node in flight with which the first aircraft (transmitting mobile node) is capable of communicating.
- the method comprises, prior to the transmission step, a step of selecting in flight at least one non-predetermined mobile communication node, said at least one node being selected from a set of mobile nodes of network communication according to at least one predetermined selection criterion.
- this selection aims to determine, for example, the "best" node, that is to say the node that is most appropriate with respect to the selection criterion (s) applied at a given moment. given. This makes it possible to ensure that there will always be a receiving node (not predetermined) within the communication range of the transmitting node (first aircraft) in order to be able to transmit the data of black box (es) and this, whatever the time and regardless of the geographical area overflown.
- said at least one predetermined selection criterion is at least one of the following criteria: aircraft (s) from which a signal-to-noise ratio (signal quality) exceeds a predetermined threshold, aircraft (s) having similar or identical flight plans (to maximize the availability of the receiving aircraft), aircraft (s) belonging to the same airline or alliance of several airlines, aircraft (s) of the same manufacturer, aircraft ( s) within range of communication, aircraft farthest from the first aircraft (to reduce the relative movement between the transmitting aircraft and the receiving aircraft), aircraft (s) in the descent phase.
- aircraft (s) from which a signal-to-noise ratio (signal quality) exceeds a predetermined threshold aircraft (s) having similar or identical flight plans (to maximize the availability of the receiving aircraft), aircraft (s) belonging to the same airline or alliance of several airlines, aircraft (s) of the same manufacturer, aircraft ( s) within range of communication, aircraft farthest from the first aircraft (to reduce the relative movement between the transmitting aircraft and the receiving aircraft), aircraft (s) in the descent phase.
- the most appropriate node or nodes among the nodes of the network are for example identified from the signal-to-noise ratio originating from the nodes, for example by giving priority to the signal or the maximum signal-to-noise ratios.
- the method comprises a step of requesting a connection with the selected node, prior to the transmission of the data.
- steps of searching for nodes, selecting the most suitable node and requesting a connection are generally performed by the sending node.
- the invention relates to a method of receiving data which comprises a step of receiving in flight, from a first aircraft, data stored in at least one black box on board the first aircraft, the reception stage being carried out aboard a second aircraft.
- the method of receiving data comprises a preliminary step of verifying the availability of a storage space in order to store the data to be received.
- This verification is performed on the second aircraft, at the request of the first, after receiving the connection establishment request.
- the method comprises a step of storing the data received either in a storage space available on board the second aircraft receiving the data or, in the event of unavailability of this space, in a storage space reserved for this purpose.
- the invention also relates to a data transmission system, characterized in that it comprises means for transmitting data in flight between a first aircraft and at least a second aircraft, the transmitted data being data stored in at least one a black box on board the first aircraft.
- the transmission system comprises, in the form of corresponding means, one or more of the process characteristics set forth in above, or all these features and thus enjoys the same benefits.
- the invention furthermore relates to an on-board data reception system on board an aircraft, characterized in that it comprises means for receiving, in flight, from a first aircraft, data stored in at least one a black box on board the first aircraft, the system being embarked on board a second aircraft.
- the invention is directed to an aircraft comprising a transmission system and / or a reception system, as briefly described above.
- FIG. 1 is a general schematic view of a transmission system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing several aircraft constituting mobile nodes of a communication network
- Figure 3 is a general algorithm for establishing a connection between two aircraft
- FIG. 4 is a general diagram illustrating a reception system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is an algorithm of a data transmission method according to the invention.
- FIGS. 6a and 6b are two algorithms respectively of a connection method and a method of receiving data according to the invention.
- a system according to the invention on board an aircraft comprises two black boxes or recorders 12 and 14 storing, for one, a set of data from different computers on board the aircraft and which are for example flight data (data reflecting the behavior of the aircraft in flight), and for the other, audio data saved in the cockpit.
- flight data data reflecting the behavior of the aircraft in flight
- audio data saved in the cockpit can be distributed differently between the two black boxes and that other types of data can be stored in one and / or the other of these boxes such as video data recorded in the cockpit and in the environment of the aircraft.
- one or more other black boxes can be added to store the flight data and the audio data and / or other types of data such as the aforementioned video data differently.
- this may apply to a different number of black boxes and to any type of data.
- the system 10 further comprises a data transmission system 16.
- the system 16 comprises data encryption means 18 which are intended to be transmitted out of the aircraft and which come from one or both black boxes 12, 14.
- the data contained in one and / or the other of the black boxes may be identical from one black box to another or different.
- the data coming from one and / or the other of the black boxes may correspond to all the data stored in each of them or to a selection of these data.
- the encryption is for example achieved by means of a public key system and private key, the use of the public key owned by each of the entities concerned (sender and receiver authorized to know the data) is necessary for decryption.
- threshold schemes can also be implemented to ensure greater data confidentiality. The principle of the threshold scheme is that several entities authorized to decrypt the data share the decryption key: thus, the entities will have to agree all to proceed to the decryption.
- the system 16 optionally includes means for pre-processing data from one and / or the other of the black boxes 12 and 14.
- Data selection means may for example be part of the means 18.
- the optional processing means ensure, for example, an optimization of the volume of the data in order to reduce the bandwidth used for their transmission.
- the effective one-way (non-satellite) bandwidth between two aircraft is 5Mb / s.
- the system 16 also includes a physical storage medium 20 (e.g., a magnetic medium) which may be a buffer area or a storage space on a hard disk.
- a physical storage medium 20 e.g., a magnetic medium
- Data from one and / or the other of the black boxes, previously encrypted, are stored in the separate intermediate storage space 20.
- the system 16 also comprises data processing means 22 (example: microprocessor, dedicated electronic circuit, programmable FPGA type component ”) coming from the storage space 20.
- data processing means 22 example: microprocessor, dedicated electronic circuit, programmable FPGA type component .
- This treatment can fulfill several functions.
- this processing allows formatting of the data in the form of a data frame.
- This formatting consists, for example, in structuring the data in the form of a signal comprising one or more headers and a signal body containing the useful data.
- the processing may also include a second encryption which here makes it possible to guarantee the integrity of the data previously encrypted by the means 18 and which will be transmitted.
- This second encryption consists for example in calculating a signature from the data that have been previously encrypted. Such a signature can be obtained by calculation from a mathematical formula applied to the encrypted data. The encrypted data will then be transmitted with the signature thus calculated.
- the system 16 also includes means 24 for transmitting the data. These means use a communication procedure between a transmitting aircraft and a receiving aircraft which is linked to the communication protocol chosen for the communication means used. This procedure established between the two aircraft makes the transmitted signal more robust insofar as it allows the detection of errors: packet not arrived at destination, loss of integrity of the packet ... Thus, we can reissue the packet in detected error case.
- the system 16 further comprises means 26 for establishing one or more connections between the aircraft comprising the system 10 and one or more aircraft.
- In flight aircraft are mobile nodes of a communication network.
- Figure 2 schematically illustrates several mobile nodes 30, 32, 34, 36 of such a communication network 40.
- the aircraft represented by the mobile node 30 corresponds to the aircraft comprising the system 10 of Figure 1.
- the communication protocol used for data transmission supports a connected connection mode.
- the communication management means 26 first carry out a phase of discovery of the topology of the communication network to which the aircraft concerned belongs. During this discovery phase, the means 26 examine, by sending a signal and the eventual reception of a response signal, whether a mobile communication node is in radio range.
- the transmission is effected indeed for example by a bidirectional radio frequency communication link.
- the advantage of a radio-frequency type of communication lies in the bandwidth width and in its free use or in the fact that the cost is included in a package, without additional cost depending on consumption.
- the means 16 may optionally send the signal over a satellite link so as to be able to identify, by signal feedback, one or more mobile communication nodes that may constitute a communication pair in connected mode. following this communication link either in order to send it to a ground installation.
- the advantage of a satellite communication lies in the geographical coverage of the latter and in the fact that it does not depend on atmospheric conditions.
- the means 26 more particularly comprise several sub-means:
- sub-means for searching for at least one mobile communication node in the network for example, with reference to FIG. 2, the search is carried out among the nodes 32, 34 and 36 of the network 40;
- sub-means for selecting a mobile communication node among the searched nodes this node satisfying one or more predetermined criteria (the selection of a particular node among the nodes 32, 34 and 36 of FIG. for example, with respect to a predetermined criterion such as the best signal-to-noise ratio provided by these nodes, another criterion for selecting a node may be to choose the node of the network that remains the longest within communication range (for example : the node 30).
- the transmission system 16 transmits the data (which has been processed as indicated above) to the selected node.
- Node 30 has been informed of the existence of the selected node to receive its data only after the selection process just described.
- Figure 3 illustrates a mechanism for establishing a connection between the aircraft 30 and one of the aircraft 32, 34, 36 of Figure 2.
- the algorithm comprises a first step S1 of searching for one or more mobile communication nodes in the network 40.
- the type of communication network that will be used for the transmission is selected, namely a radio communication network, an optical communication network, or a wireless communication network of another type, or even a satellite communication network.
- the search for the best node takes place.
- the selection of the best physical layer is made, for example, in the software whose algorithm is shown in FIG. 3.
- An order of preference of the physical layer is for example defined. For example, as long as the radio frequency communication is available (i.e. nodes are in range and available for communication) we choose this medium, otherwise the 4G network is chosen, otherwise the satellite network.
- next selection step S2 provides for selecting one or more nodes that satisfy one or more predetermined criteria.
- One of the predetermined criteria is, for example, the maximization of the signal-to-noise ratio of the signal coming from a node.
- Another criterion may for example reside in the aircraft or aircraft that have flight plans similar to that of the aircraft 30 to maximize the duration of availability of the node or nodes.
- the search for aircraft belonging to the same airline as the aircraft 30 can also be used as a criterion.
- search and selection steps are performed either periodically or on demand, for example following a loss of connection with an aircraft.
- the algorithm of FIG. 3 comprises a connection request step S3 with the previously selected node or nodes.
- This request for establishing a connection is intended to inform the future receiving node of the desire of the sending node 30 to transmit sensitive information.
- the receiving node of this connection request accepts it according to its own conditions (the node is for example not already in active connection with this aircraft or with another aircraft, one or more storage spaces are available in the receiving node ...), the connection is established.
- the data transmission step of the aircraft 30, for example, to the aircraft 32 accepting the connection is then performed (step S4).
- step S5 which terminates the connection.
- the first option consists in replacing one of the worst connections still active with the aircraft 30 by a connection with the new node which has just been identified; - the second option is to keep this new node as a backup node and the connection with it will be made only after the loss of existing communication with a so-called current node.
- Figure 4 schematically illustrates a data receiving system 50 on board an aircraft.
- the aircraft concerned is for example the aircraft 32 mentioned above which is the best candidate for recovering data from the recorder (s) or the black box (s) of the aircraft 30, taking into account the criterion of selection put in place (example: geographical proximity).
- the system 50 comprises means 52 for receiving the data transmitted by the aircraft 30 which are, for example, radio reception means, optical, satellite ... according to the physical communication link used.
- the system 50 also includes a backup storage space 54 and a reserved storage space 56 in the event that the space 54 is unavailable. The received data is then stored in the appropriate space.
- the aircraft 32 has the same means as those of Figure 1, which makes it possible, if the type of communication allows (bidirectional communication), that the aircraft 32 transmits its data to the aircraft 30.
- the data of the aircraft 30 are then retrieved, stored for a limited time, possibly centralized by the airline or a region or an airport for possible exploitation after decryption.
- Figure 5 illustrates an algorithm of a data transmission method according to the invention.
- This algorithm is implemented on board the aircraft which will transmit data present in its black boxes or recorders.
- the algorithm is for example implemented by the system 16 of Figure 1 after recovery of data from the black boxes or recorders 12 and 14.
- This algorithm comprises several steps including a first, denoted S10, of initialization of the algorithm.
- the next step S12 of the algorithm is a test verifying whether the aircraft is in alert mode or not.
- the alert mode characterizes the fact that an aircraft is facing one or more critical problems. This is a mode that defines that outgoing communications from this aircraft take precedence over other transmissions that are not in this mode.
- This mode can be activated manually or automatically and is intended to transmit the data (or some selected data) contained in the black boxes to an aircraft or to all the aircraft in the vicinity (for example the aircraft 32, 34 and 36 on Figure 2) and force registration by one or more of these aircraft from this area.
- the transmission, for the purpose of safeguarding, of these data is carried out by means of a means of communication which is chosen with respect to a predetermined criterion such as its availability or because it constitutes a preferential means ( example: radio).
- another means of communication may be automatically selected as the second preferential means (example: satellite).
- the data transmission system of the aircraft concerned may be able to transmit data from the black boxes by via a satellite link, to a ground station, to inform the rescue team and the investigation team as soon as possible.
- step S14 of FIG. 5 in alert mode it may also be envisaged to suspend or abandon existing connections with aircraft, except for connections already established from one or more aircraft in alert mode, in order to release bandwidth. This makes it possible to provide the maximum bandwidth to the aircraft in difficulty and thus optimize the collection of data from this aircraft.
- the next step S 6 provides for fragmenting the data to be transmitted into data packets each consisting of a header and a payload containing the payload data.
- This fragmentation is performed according to the physical layer and the communication protocol used.
- step S18 is a test to determine if there are still fragments of data to transmit. If no fragments remain pending transmission, then the algorithm is terminated in step S20.
- step S18 is followed by a step S22 of creating and adding a header in the data signal to be transmitted (packet).
- the header (s) thus created are useful for data management.
- markers or markers indicating the presence of particular information such as information to identify aircraft (code) ....
- the algorithm comprises a next step S24 which provides for adding information to the signal to be transmitted in order to guarantee the integrity of the data to be transmitted.
- the processing applied to ensure the integrity of the data is that already described with reference to FIG. 1 and realized by the means 22.
- the next step S26 provides for notifying in the signal to be transmitted the indication that the data to be transmitted come from an aircraft, configured in alert mode. This indication is for example added to the header created in step S22.
- the next step S30 provides to transmit the data in packets on the physical link (either by radio link, or by satellite link, or by the optical link, or by the link 4G ”) as already described above after execution of the algorithm of Figure 3.
- the topology discovery mechanism described with reference to Figure 3 is adapted to a mobile node radio network as well as to a satellite network and must take into account the performance aspects in order to avoid excessive consumption of the band. and local resources.
- timer in English terminology
- connection is for example carried out at least in one of the protocol layers.
- connection is preferably established in a single layer because several connections at different protocol levels complicate the transmission system and make it less efficient.
- a very dense radio frequency network such as that of the global aircraft fleet in flight at a given moment (t) must be able to withstand a very large load without altering its operation.
- N denotes the number of outgoing connections
- M the number of total connections
- K the number of backup locations
- K M + 1, the number "1" designates a backup location which is always reserved for storing the data of an aircraft in alert mode.
- One of the communication means used to transmit the data uses a two-way radio communication network to transmit and receive data between mobile nodes.
- Such a network is not necessarily dedicated to the intended use for the implementation of the invention and can also be used to provide one or more other features of the aircraft.
- the system used is for example a Wi-Fi system or a WiMax system which provides the bandwidth, the range (maximum distance in which the communication is physically possible) as well as the properties necessary for the implementation of the invention (for example it technology must be able to provide the required level of safety, to manage the quality of services ).
- transmission step S30 is followed by the step S18 already described above in order to check whether there remain fragments of data to be transmitted.
- next step S31 provides for fragmentation of the data to be transmitted if necessary.
- This step is identical to step S16 already described above.
- Step S31 is followed by a test step S32 making it possible to determine whether there remain fragments of data to be transmitted.
- step S20 terminating the transmission algorithm.
- step S32 is followed by step S34 which provides for creating and adding one or more headers in the data signal to be transmitted.
- This step is identical to step S22 already described above.
- the next step S40 provides for transmitting the data configured in the previous steps on a physical link as already described in step S30.
- the data is thus transmitted to an aircraft that has been previously selected as the receiving node of the network that is most suitable for transmission.
- the data are transmitted in real time or near real-time, ie as the data are acquired by the black box (es).
- a second connection is for example made with another aircraft selected to transmit older data, for example those that date from several minutes (example: t - 15 min).
- the second connection is established with the second "best" peer found when searching for mobile nodes in the network.
- the transmission priority is attributed to the data obtained in real time.
- the transmission algorithm is executed in order to restore the transmission of data in real time.
- Step S40 is then followed by the test step S32 already described above.
- the hardware platform used in the transmission system 16 of Figure 1 is for example a PC type open platform whose level of confidence is improved by the use of a cryptographic hardware component which is for example a TPM module (known in English terminology as the "Trusted Platform Module") defined by an organization called TCG known as "Trusted Computing Group”).
- TPM module known in English terminology as the "Trusted Platform Module” defined by an organization called TCG known as "Trusted Computing Group”
- Figure 6a shows an algorithm of part of a data receiving method according to the invention.
- This algorithm is implemented in an aircraft of the mobile network such as that illustrated in FIG. 2 and for example in the aircraft 32 which has been selected by the aircraft 30 as being the best communication pair.
- This algorithm starts with an initialization step S50 of the algorithm.
- This algorithm comprises a step S52 for receiving a connection request from the aircraft 30 and is followed by a test step S54.
- step S56 refusal of the connection and the algorithm is then terminated by a step S58.
- step S54 is followed by a step S60.
- a test is performed to determine whether the aircraft 30 is in alert mode or not.
- step S62 accept the connection request and then a step S64 to terminate other ongoing communications (abandon or block other existing connections between the selected aircraft). 32 and other aircraft).
- alert mode is defined in the aircraft from which the connection request originates, for example from the detection of certain predetermined events which may be related to the detection of critical faults and / or which are linked to measurements. disturbing flight parameters (example: exceeding predetermined thresholds).
- the alert mode is thus chosen in order to prioritize the reception of black box data (s) issued by any mobile node located in a geographical area for receiving data.
- Step S64 is followed by step S58 terminating the algorithm.
- step S60 when the result of the practiced test indicates that the aircraft is not configured in alert mode, then a next S66 test step is performed. During this step, it is determined whether storage space is available on board the aircraft (storage location).
- the algorithm of Figure 6b details more particularly the process of saving the black box data collected on board the selected receiving aircraft.
- This algorithm starts with an initialization step S80, followed by a test step S82 verifying the presence of data fragments (packets) to be received.
- step S84 terminating the algorithm.
- step S86 verifying the integrity of the received data.
- the means put in place to control the integrity of the data are known to those skilled in the art (eg use of a signature for example in the MD5 or RSA algorithms). If the received data are not identical to those sent, a processing is then provided so that the emitting aircraft is alerted and so that the data can be reissued.
- Step S86 is followed by step S88 to verify the information in the header (s) of the received data signal.
- the identification of a marking or a tag is Saxon under the term "flag" indicating to the receiving node that the transmitting node is a distressed aircraft.
- the verification step makes it possible, for example, to identify other information: identifier of the sender, the receiver, the serial number of the packet, etc. This information is useful for organizing and then retrieving the data if necessary.
- Step S88 is followed by a test step S90.
- step S88 it is determined whether the aircraft from which the black box data (s) originate is in alert mode or not.
- step S92 that stores the received data in an available storage space (backup location).
- step S90 shows that it is data from an aircraft in alert mode
- step S94 test step
- this step it is checked whether a storage space is available on board the aircraft. In particular, it is checked whether the conventional storage space is available in priority to avoid "filling" the reserved area.
- step S94 is followed by a step S96 providing the storage of the black box data (s) received in this space (location of backup).
- step S94 is followed by a step S98 providing for saving the black box data in a reserved storage space (dedicated location ).
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Astronomy & Astrophysics (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1059336A FR2967542B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2010-11-12 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA FROM A BLACK AIRCRAFT BOX |
PCT/FR2011/000605 WO2012062982A1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2011-11-14 | Method and system for transmitting and receiving data coming from an aircraft black box |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2638528A1 true EP2638528A1 (en) | 2013-09-18 |
EP2638528B1 EP2638528B1 (en) | 2018-08-01 |
Family
ID=43827285
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11794529.5A Active EP2638528B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2011-11-14 | Method and system for transmission and reception of data from an aircraft black box |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9221551B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2638528B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5981929B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103314397B (en) |
CA (1) | CA2815448C (en) |
FR (1) | FR2967542B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012062982A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2967542B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2013-10-18 | Airbus | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA FROM A BLACK AIRCRAFT BOX |
FR3007532B1 (en) * | 2013-06-20 | 2016-10-28 | Thales Sa | SYSTEM FOR LOCALIZATION OF A DISAPPEARED AIRCRAFT |
US9718557B2 (en) * | 2014-01-17 | 2017-08-01 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Flight data tracker |
FR3019414B1 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2017-09-08 | Sagem Defense Securite | METHOD FOR THE FLIGHT TRANSMISSION OF BLACKBOX TYPE DATA |
WO2014128571A2 (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2014-08-28 | Emmanuel Theodore J | Airborne interactive reconnaissance (acronym air) |
US9761147B2 (en) | 2014-12-12 | 2017-09-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Commercial and general aircraft avoidance using light pattern detection |
US9685089B2 (en) * | 2014-12-12 | 2017-06-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Commercial and general aircraft avoidance using acoustic pattern recognition |
US9997079B2 (en) | 2014-12-12 | 2018-06-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Commercial and general aircraft avoidance using multi-spectral wave detection |
FR3030962B1 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2018-04-13 | Airbus Operations | AIRCRAFT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM |
WO2016141231A1 (en) * | 2015-03-05 | 2016-09-09 | Comac America Corporation | Emergency mechanical and communication systems and methods for aircraft |
US9730042B2 (en) * | 2015-12-21 | 2017-08-08 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | Aircraft data handoff |
FR3048805A1 (en) * | 2016-03-08 | 2017-09-15 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR AN AIRCRAFT FORMATION IN RELATION TO AN INTRUDED AIRCRAFT. |
GB2549262B (en) * | 2016-04-05 | 2020-11-25 | Taleris Global Llp | Systems and methods to determine maintenance-focused aircraft data recording frame configurations |
CN106504587B (en) * | 2016-10-17 | 2019-09-17 | 四川九洲电器集团有限责任公司 | A kind of unmanned plane air traffic control system and method |
US10222452B2 (en) | 2016-12-09 | 2019-03-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for prioritizing and transmitting data generated from an airplane during flight |
US9745071B1 (en) | 2017-01-27 | 2017-08-29 | Comac America Corporation | Ejectable flight data recorder systems, methods, and devices |
FR3065567B1 (en) * | 2017-04-24 | 2021-04-16 | Airbus Operations Sas | PROCESS FOR TRANSMISSION OF FLIGHT PARAMETERS FROM A LEADING AIRCRAFT TO AN INTRUDER AIRCRAFT |
US10713956B2 (en) * | 2017-08-02 | 2020-07-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Sharing critical flight information using mesh network |
US11100726B2 (en) * | 2018-06-01 | 2021-08-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for real-time streaming of flight data |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7131136B2 (en) * | 2002-07-10 | 2006-10-31 | E-Watch, Inc. | Comprehensive multi-media surveillance and response system for aircraft, operations centers, airports and other commercial transports, centers and terminals |
EP1017188A3 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2001-12-12 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for high speed data access from remote locations |
US6278913B1 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2001-08-21 | Mil-Com Technologies Pte Ltd. | Automated flight data management system |
US6167239A (en) * | 1999-06-25 | 2000-12-26 | Harris Corporation | Wireless spread spectrum ground link-based aircraft data communication system with airborne airline packet communications |
US7085562B1 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2006-08-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus and computer program product for implementing and organizing an AD-HOC aviation data communication network |
US6917863B2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2005-07-12 | Karl F. Milde, Jr. | System for assuming and maintaining secure remote control of an aircraft |
US20040027255A1 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2004-02-12 | Greenbaum Myron H. | Wideband avionics data retrieval system |
CN1459619A (en) * | 2002-05-25 | 2003-12-03 | 吴继华 | Flight information recording and treating method |
US20030225492A1 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2003-12-04 | Cope Gary G. | Flight data transmission via satellite link and ground storage of data |
US20040039497A1 (en) * | 2002-06-13 | 2004-02-26 | Accurate Automation Corporation | Aircraft operations information recording and processing system |
JP2006261956A (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2006-09-28 | Hochiki Corp | Notice broadcast system |
US7302323B2 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2007-11-27 | Polar Industries, Inc. | Transportation data recording system |
US20070072639A1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-03-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Flight recorder wireless interface |
US7808377B2 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2010-10-05 | The Boeing Company | Direct aircraft-to-aircraft data link communication |
CN101286243A (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2008-10-15 | 北京海兰信数据科技股份有限公司 | Sailing recorder and sailing recording method |
US20090318138A1 (en) * | 2008-06-20 | 2009-12-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for in-flight wireless communication |
EP2237614B1 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2014-06-04 | The Boeing Company | Mobile ad hoc network |
FR2967542B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2013-10-18 | Airbus | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA FROM A BLACK AIRCRAFT BOX |
-
2010
- 2010-11-12 FR FR1059336A patent/FR2967542B1/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-11-14 CN CN201180054502.7A patent/CN103314397B/en active Active
- 2011-11-14 WO PCT/FR2011/000605 patent/WO2012062982A1/en active Application Filing
- 2011-11-14 EP EP11794529.5A patent/EP2638528B1/en active Active
- 2011-11-14 CA CA2815448A patent/CA2815448C/en active Active
- 2011-11-14 JP JP2013538251A patent/JP5981929B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2013
- 2013-05-10 US US13/891,629 patent/US9221551B2/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2012062982A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2013546264A (en) | 2013-12-26 |
CN103314397B (en) | 2016-06-08 |
FR2967542A1 (en) | 2012-05-18 |
CA2815448A1 (en) | 2012-05-18 |
CA2815448C (en) | 2019-01-15 |
JP5981929B2 (en) | 2016-08-31 |
US9221551B2 (en) | 2015-12-29 |
FR2967542B1 (en) | 2013-10-18 |
EP2638528B1 (en) | 2018-08-01 |
CN103314397A (en) | 2013-09-18 |
WO2012062982A1 (en) | 2012-05-18 |
US20130317673A1 (en) | 2013-11-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2638528B1 (en) | Method and system for transmission and reception of data from an aircraft black box | |
FR2988244A1 (en) | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DATA TRANSMISSION IN AN AIRCRAFT NETWORK IN FLIGHT | |
EP2137836B1 (en) | Method and device for managing communication channels for data exchange from an aircraft | |
EP3127252B1 (en) | Method of transmitting flight data recorded by a black box in an aircraft by emitting a radio beam whose direction changes if a critical condition of the aircraft is detected. | |
WO2006035140A1 (en) | Method, device a program for detecting an unauthorised connection to access points | |
CA2889036C (en) | Pcmcia card for transferring flight data | |
WO2009106729A1 (en) | Method of producing a proof of presence or of operation of an entity in an identified zone for a duration greater than a given threshold, and monitoring system. | |
FR3058293A1 (en) | METHOD FOR SELECTING A GATEWAY FOR TRANSMITTING A FRAME | |
WO2015155440A1 (en) | Methods for encoding and decoding frames in a telecommunication network | |
WO2021048512A1 (en) | Mobile communication device, and communication method | |
EP3234854B1 (en) | Technique for controlling the reading of a digital object | |
WO2009071783A1 (en) | Determination of coordinates of a node in a node network | |
WO2022180339A1 (en) | Method for controlling a device for protecting a network element, control unit and protective device | |
EP3024181B1 (en) | Data communication method between a roaming wireless device and a network access gateway | |
EP3993309A1 (en) | Device and method for processing a message and for transmitting lpwan messages | |
FR3134492A1 (en) | Method of adding a communicating object to a wireless communication network. | |
EP1631107A1 (en) | Method for access control between a control module and an autonomous locating module | |
EP3747238A1 (en) | Method for aggregating a plurality of radio connections in a wireless network | |
FR2939271A1 (en) | Communication routing management method for home theatre type communication network, involves adapting routing of communication in wireless communication network based on estimated capacity level | |
FR3023667A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR FURTHER ESTABLISHING WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS | |
WO2006021570A1 (en) | Method for controlling access between a control module and an autonomous locating module | |
WO2016016576A1 (en) | Automatic method of remote updating of sofware contained in an autonomous radio transmitter device of the beacon type |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130429 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20170614 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602011050614 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G07C0005000000 Ipc: H04W0004420000 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G08G 5/00 20060101ALI20180309BHEP Ipc: H04W 4/42 20180101AFI20180309BHEP Ipc: G07C 5/00 20060101ALI20180309BHEP Ipc: B64D 45/00 20060101ALI20180309BHEP Ipc: H04B 7/185 20060101ALI20180309BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180403 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1025788 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011050614 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1025788 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181201 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181101 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181102 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011050614 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190503 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20111114 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180801 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180801 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231123 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 13 |