EP2584874B1 - Luminaire à LEDs avec supervision - Google Patents

Luminaire à LEDs avec supervision Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2584874B1
EP2584874B1 EP12187908.4A EP12187908A EP2584874B1 EP 2584874 B1 EP2584874 B1 EP 2584874B1 EP 12187908 A EP12187908 A EP 12187908A EP 2584874 B1 EP2584874 B1 EP 2584874B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
luminaire
sensors
light
deviation
led
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12187908.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2584874A1 (fr
Inventor
Jens Beecken
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zumtobel Lighting GmbH Austria
Original Assignee
Zumtobel Lighting GmbH Austria
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zumtobel Lighting GmbH Austria filed Critical Zumtobel Lighting GmbH Austria
Publication of EP2584874A1 publication Critical patent/EP2584874A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2584874B1 publication Critical patent/EP2584874B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B45/00—Circuit arrangements for operating light-emitting diodes [LED]
    • H05B45/10—Controlling the intensity of the light
    • H05B45/12—Controlling the intensity of the light using optical feedback

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a luminaire with a plurality of LED light sources, which is designed to monitor the operation of the LED light sources.
  • luminaires with LED light sources are widely used and are preferred for reasons of energy efficiency and easy controllability or regulation of the light output in the new development of luminaires.
  • one of the biggest benefits of customers of a lighting management system is that lights can be monitored remotely and malfunctions can thus be detected without great personnel or time expenditure. If, for example, an electronic ballast (ECG) or a fluorescent lamp fails, this can be directly and easily recognized by means of the light management system to the user or customer.
  • ECG electronic ballast
  • a fluorescent lamp fails
  • a light unit which comprises three LEDs and two sensors for measuring the actual light intensity.
  • the output signals of the sensors are fed to a computer and, based thereon, a regulation takes place on the desired luminous intensity-specific energization of the LEDs.
  • the invention is therefore based on the object to detect the deviation of an operating function of a lamp with multiple LED bulbs.
  • a luminaire is provided with a plurality of LED illuminants and a plurality of sensors for generating a sensor signal.
  • the sensor signal represents a luminance, an illuminance or a luminous flux of the LED bulbs again.
  • the luminaire has means for detecting a deviation an operating function based on a comparison of the sensor signals, in particular a failure of one or more LED light sources, wherein the comparison takes into account setpoints for each individual sensor signals and wherein based on the comparison of the deviation of the individual sensor signals from their respective setpoint a deviation of an operating function is detected ,
  • a permanent deviation such as the
  • the luminaire can be designed to categorize the deviation of the operating function, that is to say to distinguish different deviations from one another.
  • the luminaire has communication means which make the deviation of an operating function to the user of a luminaire recognizable, in particular a category of the deviation of the operating function corresponding to the categorization.
  • the communication means may include, for example, the connection to a bus system for controlling and regulating the operation of the luminaire.
  • the luminaire can therefore be connectable to an external control device for controlling the operation of the luminaire, wherein the luminaire sends information to the control device upon detection of a deviation of an operating function and preferably the DALI standard or the extended DALI standard (eDALI) for communication is provided with the control device.
  • an external control device for controlling the operation of the luminaire
  • the luminaire sends information to the control device upon detection of a deviation of an operating function and preferably the DALI standard or the extended DALI standard (eDALI) for communication is provided with the control device.
  • eDALI extended DALI standard
  • the inventively provided comparison of a plurality of sensor signals allows in particular the mentioned categorization or differentiation of several different deviations or different operating errors.
  • the comparison preferably takes into account setpoints for individual sensor signals, a deviation of an operating function being detected based on the comparison of the deviation of the individual sensor signals from their respective desired value.
  • the deviation of the sensor signals from their setpoint thus contributes to the categorization, so that, for example, the deviations from their setpoint can serve as input variables of a decision matrix.
  • the decision matrix With the aid of the decision matrix, it is then possible to differentiate between different errors depending on the input variables or can a categorization be carried out.
  • each deviation is assigned an operating function, a combination of input variables or a category that can be used for differentiation.
  • At least two of the sensors are identical and preferably the sensors in one of the lamp or A housing circumscribed space are arranged. For example, it is thus possible to determine the spatial deviation of sensor signals from a desired value, so that the spatial information contributes to the categorization or to the detection of the deviation from operating functions.
  • the sensors are arranged in an edge region of a light emission region of the luminaire and comprise photodiodes or photoresistors.
  • a particularly simple possibility is thus given to arrange sensors in or on the lamp, which take into account substantially the entire light output of the LED bulbs and additionally provide spatial information about the light output of the LED bulbs available.
  • the sensors have different detection ranges, such that in each case a part of the light emitted by the LED lamps can be assigned to a detection range of a sensor.
  • the detection regions preferably overlap or may be arranged adjacent overlapping.
  • At least one sensor can be assigned an optical element which changes the detection range.
  • one or more of the sensors in the light path is or are arranged immediately following the LED lighting means, i. while avoiding optical elements, the detection range can be defined.
  • a particularly advantageous arrangement of the sensors and their associated detection ranges in the luminaire results in that the luminaire has one or more planes of symmetry or points of symmetry, wherein the sensors are regularly symmetrically arranged with respect to each of the planes of symmetry or with respect to the point of symmetry.
  • At least three sensors are arranged symmetrically with respect to one another regularly, in particular with respect to a symmetry plane or a symmetry point.
  • the density of the arrangement of the sensors that is, the number of sensors per unit area, substantially is constant, wherein the number of sensors in this case preferably comprises more than three sensors.
  • a constant density of the arrangement can likewise for the Be provided detection ranges of the sensors.
  • the luminaire preferably has means for shading the sensors from extraneous light or stray light, wherein the means comprise, for example, a light entry surface in an interior of the luminaire circumscribed by the luminaire or a luminaire housing.
  • the sensor signals thus essentially only reflect the light output of the LED lamps.
  • a further aspect of the invention relates to a light management system having a luminaire having one or more of the features described above, and to a control device for controlling the operation of the luminaire, wherein the control device is designed to receive status messages via an operating function of the LED bulbs.
  • a method for detecting operational errors with a lamp as described above wherein the detection of operating errors is limited to time windows.
  • the restriction to a time window that affects a period at night or in the dark take place.
  • the time window comprises only a period of darkness.
  • a method for detecting an operating error of a luminaire with a luminaire as described above comprising the steps of: comparing the sensor signals with their respective desired value; Detecting an operating error of the lamp when one or more sensor signals differ from its setpoint by more than a tolerance range and at least one sensor signal is within a tolerance range around its setpoint.
  • a failure of one or more of the LED bulbs can be detected, and in particular a combination of deviations in a decision matrix, which are assigned to the failure of a specific or a plurality of specific LED bulbs.
  • An improvement of the method is conceivable in that with substantially uniform deviation of all sensor signals from their respective desired value or when exceeding all tolerance ranges of the respective target values, the illuminance of the LED lamps is adjusted and preferably adjusted according to the respective setpoint of the sensor signal.
  • an aging process of LED lighting means can be detected, so that thus a further combination of deviations can form a further category or operating function deviation in a decision matrix.
  • FIG. 5 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of a light management system 1000 according to the invention with a luminaire 100 according to the invention and a control device 300 for controlling and monitoring the operation of the luminaire 100.
  • a particular advantage of light management systems is the ability to remotely monitor operating functions of luminaires.
  • the luminaire includes several LED bulbs, the detection of a fault is particularly difficult for the LED bulbs.
  • the failure of individual LEDs may cause the total power consumption of the LED lamps to change only insignificantly, so that the detection of operational errors by changing the power consumption of the LED lamps extremely difficult and therefore unreliable.
  • Typical errors of LED bulbs 20 can also result in a short-circuit current, for example, which makes the failure of individual LED bulbs difficult to detect.
  • the invention provides a simple remedy for this problem and detects deviations from operating functions of a lamp with multiple LED bulbs.
  • FIG. 1 shows a lamp 100, with a trough-shaped housing having a light exit opening, which with a in FIG. 4 clearly visible Lichtabstrahlusion is completed.
  • a plurality of LED lighting means 10 are arranged in the space circumscribed by the housing and the light exit opening.
  • the exemplary embodiment shows a luminaire 100 for planar illumination, so that the LED illuminants 10 are advantageously arranged in a field or matrix manner. As will become clear later, a regular arrangement of the LED lamps 10 is associated with particular advantages for the invention.
  • the concept of the invention provides no restriction with respect to the arrangement of the LED light-emitting means 10 and moreover also with respect to the design of the housing, as will become clear in particular from the embodiments described below.
  • the luminaire 100 has a plurality of sensors 20 which generate a sensor signal which corresponds to a luminance, an illuminance or a luminous flux of at least part of the emitted light LED illuminant 20.
  • the correspondence of the sensor signal applies at least to the part of the emitted light 20 which can be assigned to a detection range of the sensor.
  • the sensors 20 are arranged in an edge region of the housing or a light exit opening and follow the LED lighting means 20 directly in the light path. This results in a particularly advantageous arrangement, which allows to detect the entire light output of the lamp 100 with a few sensors 20. In addition, the sensors are arranged regularly, resulting in the later even more precisely described advantages.
  • the spatial arrangement of the sensors 20 to each other or to the LED bulbs 10 is known;
  • the comparison of the sensor signals of several sensors 20 simultaneously includes spatial information about the light emission of the LED bulbs 10. This information is missing, for example, when the sensor signals are detected via a common light guide, which usually requires a light mixture, so that the spatial information about the light emission in this case is changed or lost.
  • the invention provides to detect a deviation from an operating function of the luminaire 100 on the basis of the comparison of the sensor signals.
  • the deviation of an operating function may be a permanent deviation, such as the failure of one or more of the LED lamps 10 or the aging of LED lamps or the like, without user intervention.
  • the luminaire 100 can in particular be designed to carry out a categorization of the deviation of an operating function, that is to say to distinguish different deviations from one another.
  • setpoints for individual sensor signals can be provided.
  • the comparison of the deviation of the respective sensor signals from their associated set values contributes to the differentiation of the deviation of the operating function of the luminaire, whereby in particular the spatial information of the deviation can play a special role.
  • the sensors 20 are essentially identically formed photoresistors (LDRs) which can provide a sensor signal in a particularly cost-effective manner, which corresponds to the luminous flux of the LED luminous means 20 in an assigned spatial area or detection area.
  • LDRs photoresistors
  • each of the sensors 20 is arranged in a plane of symmetry S of the luminaire 100.
  • the arrangement of the LED lighting means 10 can be provided in a field or grid-like manner. This makes it particularly easy to arrange the sensors in a plane of symmetry S of the lamp or it is particularly easy to define a corresponding plane of symmetry.
  • the described embodiments can also be transferred to the points of symmetry of the arrangement of the LED lighting means 10, i. the sensors 20 may be arranged symmetrically to the arrangement of the LED bulbs 10.
  • Each of the sensors 20 thus detects a light emission of the LED light source 10 or generates a sensor signal which can be assigned to the mutually similar (in the mathematical sense) or dimensionally substantially identical space sections or detection areas.
  • the sensors thus realize similar (mathematical) or essentially identical detection ranges I, II, III and IV to each other.
  • a deviation of an operating function can be determined from the comparison of the sensor signals.
  • each of the sensor signals is compared with its associated setpoint value;
  • an operating error or a deviation from an operating function of the luminaire 100 is detected when at least one sensor signal is within a tolerance range around its desired value and at least one sensor signal deviates from the assigned desired value by more than a tolerance range.
  • the tolerance range can be defined by at least two threshold values of a corresponding sensor signal and include, for example, the setpoint.
  • one of the sensors 20 detect light from a detection area II, and the luminous flux from the Detection area I to arrange a corresponding sensor signal.
  • the other of the sensors 20 could be correspondingly associated with a respective detection range I, III or IV, wherein the other sensors 20 also generate sensor signals associated with the luminous flux of the respective detection ranges I, III and IV.
  • the detection or differentiation of operating errors or deviations from operating functions can be improved by overlapping the detection ranges I, II, II and IV of the sensors 20, as in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1 the case is.
  • the LED luminous means 20 arranged in the detection area II and now failing will cause an insignificant, but measurable change in the luminous flux in the adjacent detection areas I, III and IV, so that the sensor signals associated with the detection areas I, III and IV are within the tolerance range of the deviation may be changed by a setpoint.
  • the failed LED illuminant 20 can be explicitly determined in the detection area II.
  • the position of the failed LED light-emitting means 20 can be triangulated with the help of the information about the spatial arrangement of the sensors 20 or the position of the detection areas I, II, III and IV and the comparison of the deviations of the sensor signals to each other.
  • the comparison of the deviation of the sensor signals can take place with the aid of a decision matrix;
  • the decision matrix can then be used to distinguish the deviation from operating functions or to differentiate between Operating errors are used.
  • one or more threshold values or setpoint values can be provided for each sensor signal, for example.
  • Each deviation from an operating function can be assigned a combination of deviations from the threshold values or nominal values, so that the comparison of the deviations of the sensor signals is carried out with the aid of a decision matrix and different operating errors can be distinguished with the aid of the decision matrix.
  • a single LED lighting means 10 need not necessarily be determined or located explicitly. In order to be able to determine an operating error or a deviation of an operating function, it is sufficient to characterize the normal operation of the luminaire 100 sufficiently with sensor signals. In the case of dimmable LED lighting means 10, for example, it is also conceivable to adapt the threshold values, tolerance ranges or setpoint values for comparison of the sensor signals to a predetermined or actual dimming value. It is also particularly advantageous if the sensor signal setpoint values or the deviation of the sensor signal setpoint values are or are calibrated for a plurality of operating functions. Thus, for example, an abnormal drift in the light output of one or more of the LED bulbs 10 can be detected.
  • a discernible deviation of an operating function may, for example, also relate to the aging of the LED lighting means 10.
  • the deviation of an operating function of the luminaire 100 can also be ascertained if the sensor signals deviate substantially uniformly from their nominal value or if all the sensor signals lie uniformly outside their respective tolerance ranges.
  • the uniform deviation from a set point may form another category in the decision matrix.
  • a correlation function of the sensor signals can be used.
  • the correlation function particularly preferably allows a normalized assessment of the deviation. For example, this may be the determination of the percentage deviation of the sensor signal with respect to the desired value or with respect to a comparison quantity.
  • temporal correlations are also conceivable, for example the determination of the deviation with respect to a previously determined sensor signal.
  • the illuminance of the LED light-emitting means 10 is adjusted and is preferably adjusted in accordance with the respective sensor setpoint.
  • the detection of a deviation of an operating function is explicitly started when the corresponding operating function of the luminaire is selected.
  • the selection of the operating function can be made, for example, by a user, preferably in the course of normal operation of the lamp.
  • the detection of operating errors of the luminaire 100 is limited to time windows.
  • the characterization of the plurality of sensor signals or a calibration is preferably carried out under reduced influence of light which does not originate from the LED lighting means 10.
  • a characterization or calibration during a certain time window preferably at night or in the dark, be provided.
  • the detection of an operating error of a luminaire 100 or the detection of the deviation of an operating function from a time window at night or in the dark could be limited.
  • the influence of stray light on the detection of the deviation of an operating function or an operating error can be excluded or reduced, and the time window can be selected preferably in accordance with a calibration time or calibration time window.
  • other environmental influences on the light output of the LED bulbs 10 can be considered.
  • the detection of an operating error of a lamp 100 preferably regularly, particularly preferably daily, weekly or monthly in a certain time window with respect to the time of day, for example, between 22 clock and 23 clock.
  • This procedure uses the fact that the LED bulbs 10 are relatively reliable, and in case of failure of each of the LED bulbs 10 a functionality of the lamp 100 is still likely to be sufficiently given.
  • the influence of scattered light is relatively reliably excluded and it can continue to minimize the disturbance of the inhabitants of the building by checking the LED light-emitting means 10.
  • one of the sensors 20 can also be designed to evaluate extraneous light to be considered or to measure the luminance, illuminance or luminous flux of extraneous light, so that the Measurement of the deviation of the sensor signals can be determined by extraneous light and is considered accordingly in the detection of the deviation of an operating function of the lamp 100.
  • a corresponding correction of the desired or threshold values of the sensor signals can be provided.
  • FIG. 2 shows a further embodiment of a lamp 100.
  • the in this case substantially disc-shaped, or circular in cross-section lamp 100 has a central point of symmetry at the intersection of the symmetry planes S shown in dashed lines.
  • the sensors are arranged according to the rule that they have an identical distance to the symmetry point are therefore arranged regularly.
  • the sensors are arranged following a circumferential line of the housing of the luminaire 100 or a peripheral line of a corresponding light exit opening of the housing for the light of the LED illuminant 10.
  • the light output of the LED light-emitting means 10 can again be characterized in a particularly favorable manner.
  • the number of sensors 20 particularly preferably exceeds three, since thus a triangulation of the position of individual LED lighting means 10 is made possible. Particularly preferably, even in this rather small number of sensors 20 a regular arrangement is provided.
  • the number of sensors can be chosen relatively small, since the illustrated lamp 100 has a high degree of symmetry.
  • the lamp 100 is six-fold rotationally symmetric, point-symmetrical and two-fold mirror-symmetrical.
  • the luminaire 100 is a luminaire of so-called "organic form", i. the luminaire or the arrangement of the LED illuminant 10 has only a few or no symmetry ranges, so a deviating procedure for arranging the sensors may be advantageous.
  • the support surface of the LED light source 10 may, for example, specify a corresponding area section.
  • the LED lighting means 10 are arranged in the form of a grid or field on the common carrier surface, however, for example, the arrangement may also be provided in the form of a plurality of LED clusters on the common carrier surface. In contrast to previously described embodiments, the arrangement of the LED light-emitting means 10 has only local symmetry, for example limited to LED cluster size or field size.
  • the sensors 20 are arranged uniformly in a grid or field-like arrangement. Furthermore, it may also be in this case to identical sensors 20, which can be formed for example by a particularly cost-effective variant.
  • a cost-effective variant can be formed by a photodiode or a photoresistor, so that the density of the arrangement grid can be increased and can preferably be arranged on average between 2 and 9 LEDs between adjacent sensors.
  • this measure relates to the direct connection line of adjacent diodes or sensors 20.
  • the effect of a constant density of the arrangement of the sensors can also be simulated with the aid of optical elements.
  • one or more of the sensors 20 may be assigned an optical element which changes the detection range of the respective sensor 20.
  • FIG. 4 shows in cross section a lamp 100 with a trough-shaped housing, as may for example also be provided in the above-described embodiments.
  • the housing has a light exit opening for the light output of the LED illuminant 10, which is closed with a light exit disc.
  • a plurality of sensors 20 are arranged, which detect the light of the LED lamps 10.
  • the sensors are each assigned different detection ranges I and II, which have a substantially similar surface area with respect to a support surface of the LED light source 10 and a similar (again in the mathematical sense) form.
  • the detection areas are arranged with respect to the support surface in a constant density. This can be realized in particular for three or more sensors 20.
  • the shape and the surface dimension with respect to a support surface of the LED light source 10 can be changed with the aid of optical elements 25, the individual sensors 20 are changed, so that, for example, the above-described constant density of the detection areas I, II can be realized.
  • the optical element 25 limits the detection range of the sensors 20 to a solid angle that has an identical surface dimension in cross-section in the plane of the carrier surface of the LED lighting device 10.
  • the optical elements 25 may preferably comprise one or more lenses, so that, for example, also spatially non-contiguous detection areas can be assigned to individual sensors 20. Furthermore, it is also possible, for example, to provide mirrors or reflectors, but it is particularly advantageous if the spatial information about the light distribution in the respective detection area remains reproducible.
  • the embodiment describes the FIG. 4 a luminaire 100 with means 50 for shading the sensors 20 with respect to extraneous light, so that the or the sensor signals substantially exclusively reproduce the light output of the LED illuminant.
  • the light exit window which simultaneously forms a light entry surface for extraneous light in the lamp 100, with prismatic elevations that limit the entrance angle of extraneous light into the lamp 100.
  • the light exit disc or the light entry surface thus defines a cut-off region for extraneous light entering the luminaire 100, in which one or more of the sensors 20 is or are arranged. The entrance angle is then limited so that no external light hits the sensors 20 directly.
  • FIG. 5 shows a detail of an embodiment of a light management system 1000 with a lamp 100 according to the invention.
  • the light management system 1000 is configured to control the operation of the lamp 100;
  • a bus system is provided, via which the components of the light management system 1000 are connected.
  • the luminaire 100 can communicate directly or indirectly over several areas of the bus system.
  • the DALI gateway 200 is preferably designed to receive and forward information relating to an operating state of a luminaire 100, so that this information can be forwarded to a control device 300 of the light management system 1000.
  • the control device 300 is accordingly configured to receive status messages for the operation of the LED lighting means 10. It is also particularly advantageous to provide an eDALI standard, so that the delivered message can, for example, be given a light-specific or light management-specific adaptation.
  • the light management system 1000 comprises a control device 400 which can be connected to the bus system and controls the operation of the luminaire 100 with the aid of the control device 300, and can display corresponding status information for operating the luminaire or make it identifiable to a user of the light management system.
  • this may be a control computer, or an operator panel of a plant operator, which has or the corresponding display elements.
  • the luminaire 100 has a connection device to the bus system or via communication means for communication with the bus system, which in particular can also enable wireless communication with the control device.
  • the control device 300 of the light management system 1000 can now preferably initiate the check of the LED light source 10 of the light 100 in accordance with a predetermined time window.
  • the check can also be carried out at the request of the plant operator, for example by means of the control device 400.
  • the control device 300 sends a corresponding command to the luminaire 100, which will transmit to the luminaire 100 using the DALI standard or particularly advantageously the eDALI standard.
  • the DALI / resp. eDALI Gateway 200 may be provided.
  • the luminaire 100 now evaluates according to the invention, the operating functions of the lamp 100 and sends a status message to the control system 300 regarding the deviations of operating functions of the lamp 100th These can now be detected by the plant operator with the aid of the control device 400, so that a corresponding maintenance of the lamp 100th can be made.
  • the luminaire 100 also independently carries out a check of deviations of an operating function. This can preferably take place in a correspondingly provided time window. If the luminaire 100 now detects a deviation of an operating function, it likewise sends a status message to the control system 300 about the deviation of an operating function of the luminaire 100, which can then be identified in the same way to the plant operator.
  • the invention defines a luminaire 100 with a plurality of LED illuminants 10, as well as a light management system 1000, which considerably improves the possibilities for detecting a deviation of an operating function of LED luminous means 10 or the luminaire 100.
  • the methods proposed in the context of the invention contribute directly to improving the detection of deviations of an operating function of the luminaire 100.

Landscapes

  • Circuit Arrangement For Electric Light Sources In General (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Appareil d'éclairage (100),
    comprenant plusieurs moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10),
    et plusieurs capteurs (20) servant à produire un signal de capteur, qui reproduit un niveau de luminance, une intensité d'éclairement ou un flux de lumière des moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10), ainsi que
    des moyens servant à détecter un éventuel écart d'un mode de fonctionnement sur la base d'une comparaison des signaux de capteur, en particulier une panne d'un ou de plusieurs moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10), sachant que la comparaison tient compte des valeurs théoriques pour chacun respectivement des signaux de capteur, sachant que l'écart du mode de fonctionnement est détecté sur la base de la comparaison de l'écart présenté par les divers signaux de capteur par rapport à leur valeur théorique respective,
    sachant que les capteurs (20) sont disposés dans la zone de bordure d'une zone d'émission de lumière de l'appareil d'éclairage,
    caractérisé en ce
    que les capteurs (20) comprennent des photodiodes ou des photorésistances (LDR),
    et en ce que les capteurs (20) présentent diverses zones de détection (I, II),
    de telle manière qu'une partie de la lumière émise par les moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10) peut être respectivement associée à une zone de détection (I, II) d'un capteur (20).
  2. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    qu'au moins deux des capteurs (20) sont réalisés de manière identique, et en ce que de préférence les capteurs (20) sont disposés dans un espace décrit par l'appareil d'éclairage (100) ou par un boîtier d'appareil d'éclairage.
  3. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    qu'un élément optique (25) est associé à au moins un capteur (20), lequel élément optique modifie la zone de détection.
  4. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    que plusieurs des capteurs (20) sont disposés dans le chemin de lumière directement en aval des moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10).
  5. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    que l'appareil d'éclairage (100) présente un ou plusieurs plans de symétrie (S) ou points de symétrie, sachant que les capteurs sont disposés, par rapport à chacun des plans de symétrie (S) ou par rapport à chaque point de symétrie, de manière régulière en particulier de manière symétrique.
  6. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    qu'au moins trois capteurs (20) sont disposés de manière régulière les uns par rapport aux autres, en particulier de manière symétrique par rapport à un plan de symétrie (S) ou un point de symétrie, et/ou en ce que la densité de l'agencement des capteurs, en d'autres termes le nombre des capteurs (20) par unité de surface, est essentiellement constante.
  7. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    que l'appareil d'éclairage (100) peut être raccordé à un dispositif de commande (300) externe servant à commander le fonctionnement de l'appareil d'éclairage (100),
    sachant que l'appareil d'éclairage (100) envoie, lors de la détection d'un écart d'un mode de fonctionnement, une information au dispositif de commande (300) et que
    de préférence la norme DALI ou la norme étendue DALI (e-DALI) est prévue aux fins de la communication.
  8. Appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    que l'appareil d'éclairage (100) présente des moyens servant protéger par des zones d'ombre les capteurs (20) de la lumière extérieure ou de la lumière parasite, sachant que les moyens comprennent de préférence une surface d'entrée de lumière de l'appareil d'éclairage (50).
  9. Système de gestion de la lumière (1000),
    comprenant un appareil d'éclairage (100) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, ainsi
    qu'un dispositif de commande (300) servant à commander le fonctionnement de l'appareil d'éclairage (100),
    sachant que le dispositif de commande (300) est réalisé pour recevoir des messages de statut servant à faire fonctionner les moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10).
  10. Procédé servant à détecter un dysfonctionnement d'un appareil d'éclairage,
    avec un appareil d'éclairage (100) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8,
    caractérisé en ce
    que la détection de dysfonctionnements se limite à des fenêtres temporelles, de préférence à une fenêtre temporelle la nuit ou dans l'obscurité.
  11. Procédé servant à détecter un dysfonctionnement d'un appareil d'éclairage,
    avec un appareil d'éclairage selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8,
    comprenant les étapes suivantes consistant à :
    (A) comparer les signaux de capteur à leur valeur théorique respective ;
    (B) détecter un dysfonctionnement de l'appareil d'éclairage en cas d'écart supérieur à une plage tolérée présenté par un signal de capteur ou plusieurs signaux de capteur par rapport à leur valeur théorique, et
    en présence d'un signal de capteur présentant, dans une plage tolérée, une valeur approchant sa valeur théorique.
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 11,
    caractérisé en ce que, en cas d'écart essentiellement constant présenté par tous les signaux de capteur par rapport à leur valeur théorique respective ou en cas de dépassement de toutes les plages tolérées des valeurs théoriques respectives, l'intensité d'éclairement des moyens d'éclairage à DEL (10) est adaptée ou de préférence est réglée de manière à correspondre à la valeur théorique de capteur respective.
EP12187908.4A 2011-10-17 2012-10-10 Luminaire à LEDs avec supervision Active EP2584874B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102011084590A DE102011084590A1 (de) 2011-10-17 2011-10-17 Leuchte

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2584874A1 EP2584874A1 (fr) 2013-04-24
EP2584874B1 true EP2584874B1 (fr) 2015-03-25

Family

ID=47263027

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12187908.4A Active EP2584874B1 (fr) 2011-10-17 2012-10-10 Luminaire à LEDs avec supervision

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2584874B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102011084590A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013107855B4 (de) 2013-07-23 2021-09-23 Pictiva Displays International Limited Optoelektronische Bauelementevorrichtung, Verfahren zum Herstellen einer optoelektronischen Bauelementevorrichtung und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer optoelektronischen Bauelementevorrichtung
DE102013022118A1 (de) 2013-12-27 2015-07-02 Ceag Notlichtsysteme Gmbh Leuchte und Verfahren zur Überwachung einer Leuchte
DE102014101367A1 (de) 2014-02-04 2015-08-06 "TDX GmbH - Technisches Licht-Design" Anordnung und Verfahren zur Überwachung von LED-Beleuchtungssystemen sowie LED-Leuchte

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6998594B2 (en) * 2002-06-25 2006-02-14 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method for maintaining light characteristics from a multi-chip LED package
US20070001177A1 (en) * 2003-05-08 2007-01-04 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Integrated light-emitting diode system
US7482567B2 (en) * 2004-09-24 2009-01-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Optical feedback system with improved accuracy
CN101238359A (zh) * 2005-03-23 2008-08-06 Tir技术有限公司 用于聚集和检测照明装置发出的光的装置和方法
US7696964B2 (en) * 2006-06-09 2010-04-13 Philips Lumileds Lighting Company, Llc LED backlight for LCD with color uniformity recalibration over lifetime
DE102008016095A1 (de) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-01 Osram Opto Semiconductors Gmbh Lumineszenzdiodenmodul
RU2010150342A (ru) * 2008-05-09 2012-06-20 Конинклейке Филипс Электроникс Н.В. (Nl) Устройство и способ управления цветовой точкой светодиодного источника света
WO2010015277A1 (fr) * 2008-08-04 2010-02-11 Osram Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Dispositif d'éclairage à del multiples
IT1396088B1 (it) * 2009-10-16 2012-11-09 Solari Di Udine S P A Dispositivo di segnalazione luminosa a led e relativo procedimento di controllo
DE102010005088A1 (de) * 2010-01-15 2011-07-21 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, 80333 Lichtsignal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102011084590A1 (de) 2013-04-18
EP2584874A1 (fr) 2013-04-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102007018224A1 (de) LED-Leuchte mit stabilisiertem Lichtstrom und stabilisierter Lichtfarbe
DE102007036978A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Steuerung der Lichtabgabe
EP2584874B1 (fr) Luminaire à LEDs avec supervision
EP2439451B1 (fr) Dispositif de détection de la présence d'une flamme
DE112013001922B4 (de) Beleuchtungssystem und Unterstützungsvorrichtung
EP2842389B1 (fr) Système et procédé d'évaluation de l'état d'un ensemble électronique utilisé à des fins d'éclairage
WO2014095176A1 (fr) Procédé et système de contrôle fonctionnel de dispositifs d'éclairage
EP3587170A1 (fr) Concept d'éclairage pour une station de recharge
EP2553674B1 (fr) Procédé d'éclairage d'un caisson lumineux
EP1842991B1 (fr) Terminal de bouton-poussoir d'urgence avec affichage combiné
DE102008034524B4 (de) Notlichteinheit
DE102010011408A1 (de) Vorrichtung mit einem Leuchtmittel und Verfahren zu dessen Steuerung
EP2138012B8 (fr) Appareil fonctionnel et procédé de fonctionnement combiné de lampes à décharge gazeuse et de sources de lumière à semiconducteur
EP3399078A1 (fr) Séparateur de corps étrangers
EP1654198B9 (fr) Dispositif de traitement uv de fluides en ecoulement
EP3185651B1 (fr) Procédé de réglage d'éclairage et système
DE102014101367A1 (de) Anordnung und Verfahren zur Überwachung von LED-Beleuchtungssystemen sowie LED-Leuchte
EP2028913B1 (fr) Agencement d'éclairage doté d'une source lumineuse et capteur destiné à la saisie de la lumière émise par la source lumineuse
DE102013106894A1 (de) Behälterinspektionsvorrichtung und Behälterinspektionsverfahren zur Inspektion von Behältern
EP2954757B1 (fr) Installation d'éclairage et procédé de détermination de l'état de fonctionnement d'une installation d'éclairage
DE10208462A1 (de) Beleuchtungsanordnung
DE19738978C2 (de) Leuchte mit in Umfangsrichtung gleichmäßig verteilten Lichtsensoren
DE102016120865A1 (de) Beleuchtungssteuerungsvorrichtung und Beleuchtungssystem
DE29701066U1 (de) Beleuchtungssystem für eine Verkehrsfläche
DE102007053793A1 (de) Leuchtmittel-Betriebsgerät mit Schnittstelle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131010

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20141030

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: FIAMMENGHI-FIAMMENGHI, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502012002628

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150507

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 718517

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150515

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150626

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150727

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150725

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502012002628

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151010

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20121010

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150625

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150325

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20181025

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 502012002628

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20191025

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 718517

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20221024

Year of fee payment: 11

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230530

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231024

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231027

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231031