EP2533104A1 - Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus therewith - Google Patents

Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus therewith Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2533104A1
EP2533104A1 EP20120171864 EP12171864A EP2533104A1 EP 2533104 A1 EP2533104 A1 EP 2533104A1 EP 20120171864 EP20120171864 EP 20120171864 EP 12171864 A EP12171864 A EP 12171864A EP 2533104 A1 EP2533104 A1 EP 2533104A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
optical system
imaging optical
mirror
image plane
mirrors
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP20120171864
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2533104B1 (en
Inventor
Hans-Jürgen Mann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
Original Assignee
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH filed Critical Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
Publication of EP2533104A1 publication Critical patent/EP2533104A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2533104B1 publication Critical patent/EP2533104B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70058Mask illumination systems
    • G03F7/702Reflective illumination, i.e. reflective optical elements other than folding mirrors, e.g. extreme ultraviolet [EUV] illumination systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/20Exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B17/00Systems with reflecting surfaces, with or without refracting elements
    • G02B17/02Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system
    • G02B17/06Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system using mirrors only, i.e. having only one curved mirror
    • G02B17/0647Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system using mirrors only, i.e. having only one curved mirror using more than three curved mirrors
    • G02B17/0652Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system using mirrors only, i.e. having only one curved mirror using more than three curved mirrors on-axis systems with at least one of the mirrors having a central aperture
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B17/00Systems with reflecting surfaces, with or without refracting elements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B17/00Systems with reflecting surfaces, with or without refracting elements
    • G02B17/02Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70058Mask illumination systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70216Mask projection systems
    • G03F7/70225Optical aspects of catadioptric systems, i.e. comprising reflective and refractive elements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70216Mask projection systems
    • G03F7/70233Optical aspects of catoptric systems, i.e. comprising only reflective elements, e.g. extreme ultraviolet [EUV] projection systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70216Mask projection systems
    • G03F7/70275Multiple projection paths, e.g. array of projection systems, microlens projection systems or tandem projection systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/027Making masks on semiconductor bodies for further photolithographic processing not provided for in group H01L21/18 or H01L21/34

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an imaging optical system according to the preamble of claim 1. Furthermore, the invention relates to a projection exposure installation comprising an imaging optical system of this type, a method for producing a microstructured component comprising a projection exposure installation of this type and a microstructured component produced with this method.
  • Imaging optical systems of the type mentioned at the outset are known from EP 1 434 093 A2 , US 2002/0056815 A1 , US 6,750,948 B2 , US 2006/0232867 A1 , EP 0 267 766 A2 , US 7,209,286 B2 and WO 2006/069 725 A1 .
  • the intermediate image plane in the direction of the image plane leads, by comparison with known constructions, to reduced requirements on the optical effect of the last two mirrors of the imaging optical system.
  • the intermediate image plane is often spatially arranged at approximately the height of the last mirror in the light path. It has been found according to the invention that this is not a compulsory requirement because the last mirror in the light path is mostly not decisive as regards the pupil obscuration, in such a way that a relatively large central opening, and thus an intermediate plane separated from the reflection surface of the penultimate mirror, can be tolerated there.
  • a convex fourth-last mirror according to claim 2 allows the imaging optical system to be constructed with relatively low pupil obscuration.
  • An arrangement of the fourth-last mirror according to claim 3 has equivalent advantages.
  • the arrangement of the fourth-last mirror according to claim 4 makes it possible to apply an aperture stop to this mirror.
  • a distance ratio according to claim 7 has proved to be particularly advantageous.
  • the distance from the image plane of the last mirror in the light path is then defined as the distance from the image plane of the piercing point of an optical axis of the imaging optical system through the reflection surface of this mirror.
  • the piercing point of the optical axis through a surface which carries on continuously in accordance with the optical design input is selected instead of the piercing point of the optical axis through the reflection surface. If the mirror is rotationally symmetric about the optical axis, this piercing point coincides with the centre of the reflection surface of the mirror.
  • the centre of the reflection surface may also lie in the obscuration through-opening, in which case it is assumed that the reflection surface carries on continuously within the obscuration through-opening in accordance with the optical design input.
  • the distance of the intermediate image plane from the image plane may for example, be 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 times the distance of the last mirror in the light path from the image plane.
  • the imaging optical system may have a numerical aperture of at least 0.4, preferably at least 0.5, even more preferably at least 0.6, even more preferably at least 0.9. Such numerical apertures are preferred for achieving a high local resolution of the imaging optical system.
  • the imaging catoptric optical system may comprise fewer than ten mirrors (M1 to M8), which image an object field in an object plane into an image field in an image plane and may have a numerical aperture of ⁇ 0.7.
  • Such an imaging optical system may comprise precisely eight mirrors and having a numerical aperture of 0.9. The object stated above is also solved by such an imaging optical system.
  • An imaging optical system according to the claims mentioned above is useful in particular for a plurality of the solution methods described above. Accordingly, imaging optical systems result in which combinations of advantages are realised.
  • the imaging optical system may have a maximum root mean square (rms) wavefront error of less than 10 nm, preferably less than 5 nm, even more preferably less than 2 nm, even more preferably less than 1 nm, even more preferably less than 0.5 nm.
  • the imaging optical system may have a maximum distortion of 10 nm, preferably less than 5 nm, even more preferably less than 2 nm, even more preferably less than 1 nm, even more preferably less than 0.5 nm.
  • Such imaging properties are advantageous for achieving a high local resolution over the whole field. These imaging properties are independent of the wavelength of the imaging light.
  • the wavelength of the imaging light can range from the EUV range to the visible spectrum.
  • Wavefront errors are preferred which lead to a diffraction limited resolution and which are therefore, in particular, less than one fourteenth of the imaging light wavelength.
  • a wavefront error which has a root mean square (rms) of less than 1 nm leads to a resolution which is, in practice, diffraction limited.
  • a low pupil obscuration i.e. the proportion of the pupil surface which cannot be used because of the central pupil obscuration, according to claim 8 leads to an advantageously high light throughput for the imaging optical system. Additionally, an imaging optical system with a low pupil obscuration can be more widely used, because the lower the pupil obscuration, the greater the bandwidth of the available illumination means. Imaging optical systems with low pupil obscurations therefore provide high-contrast imaging substantially independently of the type of object structure to be imaged.
  • the imaging optical system may have an image plane which is arranged parallel to the object plane.
  • Such field planes arranged parallel to one another facilitate the integration of the imaging optical system into structural surroundings. This advantage is particularly significant when the imaging optical system is used in a scanning projection exposure installation, since the scan directions can then be guided parallel to one another.
  • the image field of the imaging optical system may be larger than 1 mm 2 .
  • the image field of the imaging optical system may have a rectangular or arc-shape with side-lengths of 1 mm and 13 mm. Such image field sizes lead to a good throughput when the imaging optical system is used in a projection exposure installation.
  • Other dimensions of the long and short image field sides are also possible.
  • the short image field sides may also be less than 1 mm or greater than 1 mm.
  • the long image field sides may, for example, also be 5 mm, 10 mm or 15 mm.
  • An imaging scale according to claim 9 allows a low angle of incidence on a reflection mask when using the imaging optical system in a projection exposure installation.
  • the use of an imaging scale of this type does not lead to the requirement of unnecessarily large masks.
  • Constructions with an odd number of obscured mirrors according to claim 10 have also proved to be particularly suitable. For example, three mirrors could be obscured.
  • An arrangement according to claim 11 leads to the possibility, in a spatially restricted arrangement, of exerting influences both in a field plane and in a pupil plane of the imaging optical system. This can be particularly expedient for correction purposes.
  • One embodiment of the imaging optical system according to claim 12 leads to the possibility of supplying on the imaging optical system, directly and without the interposition of additional imaging elements, from a preceding illumination optical system via a pupil component which is the last element before the imaging optical system, it then being possible for this pupil component to be arranged in the pupil plane of the imaging optical system, which plane is disposed so as to precede said imaging optical system.
  • an imaging optical system according to claim 13 has two intermediate image planes, and this can be used on the one hand for compact beam guidance and also, on the other hand, for correction purposes.
  • the imaging optical system may comprise a plurality of mirrors, which image an object field in an object plane into an image field in an image plane, at least one of the mirrors comprising a through-opening for imaging light to pass through, wherein the imaging optical system comprises at least six mirrors, a fourth-last mirror before the image field, in the light path between the object field an the image field, comprising no through-opening and providing with an outer edge surrounding the optically effective surface of the fourth-last mirror, a central shadowing in a pupil plane of the imaging optical system.
  • the outer edge of the fourth-last mirror which surrounds the optically effective reflection surface thereof is either the outer edge of the optically effective reflection surface itself, or the outer edge of a substrate on which the reflection surface is provided, or the outer edge of a mechanical holding structure supporting the reflection surface or the substrate.
  • the advantages of a projection exposure installation according to claim 14 correspond to those previously discussed with regard to the imaging optical system according to the invention.
  • the light source for generating the illumination light may be formed with a wave length of between 10 and 30 nm.
  • the advantages of a projection exposure installation having such a light source correspond to those previously discussed with regard to the imaging optical system according to the invention.
  • the light source of the projection exposure installation may be in the form of a broadband light source and may have, for example, a bandwidth greater than 1 nm, greater than 10 nm or greater than 100 nm.
  • the projection exposure installation may be constructed in such a way that it can be operated with light sources of different wavelengths.
  • Light sources for other wavelengths can be used in conjunction with the imaging optical system according to the invention, for example light sources with wavelengths of 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, 126 nm and 109 nm, and in particular also with wavelengths which are less than 100 nm.
  • a method for producing a microstructured component may comprise the following steps:
  • a projection exposure installation 1 for microlithography has a light source 2 for illumination light.
  • the light source 2 is an EUV light source which produces light in a wavelength range in particular of between 10 nm and 30 nm. Other EUV wavelengths are also possible. In general, any desired wavelengths, for example visible wavelengths or any other wavelengths which are used, for example, in microlithography and are available for the appropriate laser light sources and/or LED light sources (for example 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, 129 nm or 109 nm), are possible for the illumination light guided in the projection exposure installation 1.
  • a light path of the illumination light 3 is shown extremely schematically in Fig. 1 .
  • An illumination optical system 6 guides the illumination light 3 from the light source 2 to an object field 4 (cf. Fig. 2 ) in an object plane 5.
  • the object field 4 is imaged into an image field 8 (cf. Fig. 2 ) in an image plane 9, at a pre-specified reduction scale, with a projection optical system 7.
  • One of the embodiments shown in Fig. 2 to 7 may be used for the projection optical system 7.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 has a reduction factor of 8.
  • Other reduction scales are also possible, for example 4x, 5x, or even reduction scales that are greater than 8x.
  • An imaging scale of 8x is particularly suitable for illumination light 3 with an EUV wavelength, since the object-side angle of incidence on a reflection mask 10 can thus remain small.
  • An imaging scale of 8x also does not require the use of unnecessarily large masks.
  • the image plane 9 is arranged parallel to the object plane 5.
  • a portion of the reflective mask 10, also known as a reticle, coinciding with the object field 4 is hereby imaged.
  • the image field 8 is bent in an arc shape, the distance between the two arcs which delimit the image field 8 being 1 mm. 1 mm is also the side length of the straight side edges which delimit the image field 8 between the two arcs and which extend parallel to one another. These two straight side edges of the image field 8 are at a distance of 13 mm from one another.
  • the surface of this curved image field corresponds to a rectangular image field with side lengths of 1 mm x 13 mm.
  • a square image field 8 of this type is also possible.
  • Imaging takes place on the surface of a substrate 11 in the form of a wafer which is supported by a substrate holder 12.
  • a light beam 13 of the illumination light 3 entering the projection optical system 7 is shown schematically between the reticle 10 and said projection optical system, and a light beam 14 of the illumination light 3 exiting from the projection optical system 7 is shown schematically between the projection optical system 7 and the substrate 11.
  • the image field-side numerical aperture of the projection optical system 7 in accordance with Fig. 2 is 0.9. This is not reproduced to scale in Fig. 1 for visual reasons.
  • an xyz Cartesian coordinate system is provided in the drawings and shows the respective locations of the components represented in the figures.
  • the x direction extends perpendicular to and into the drawing plane.
  • the y direction extends to the right and the z direction extends downwards.
  • the projection exposure installation 1 is a scanner-type device. Both the reticle 10 and the substrate 11 are scanned in the y direction during operation of the projection exposure installation 1.
  • Fig. 2 shows the optical construction of a first embodiment of the projection optical system 7.
  • the two individual rays 15, which belong to one of these two object field points, are each associated with two different illumination directions for the two image field points.
  • the individual rays 15, associated with the same illumination direction, of different field points extend divergently proceeding from the object plane 5. This is also referred to in the following as a negative input back focal length or a negative back focal length of the entrance pupil.
  • An entrance pupil of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 lies not inside the projection optical system 7, but before the object plane 5 in the light path. This makes it possible, for example, to arrange a pupil component of the illumination optical system 6 in the entrance pupil of the projection optical system 7, before the projection optical system 7 in the light path, without further imaging optical components having to be present between these pupil components and the object plane 5.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 has a total of eight mirrors, which are numbered in the sequence of the light path, proceeding from the object field 4, as M1 to M8.
  • Fig. 2 shows only the calculated reflection surfaces of the mirrors M 1 to M8.
  • the optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 are shown in the following by means of two tables.
  • the first table shows in each case the radius of curvature of the mirrors M1 to M8.
  • the third column (thickness) describes the distance, proceeding from the object plane 5, to the following surface in each case.
  • the reciprocal of "radius" is used for c.
  • Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode Object plane infinity 517.466 M1 -460.153 -217.028 REFL M2 -380.618 101.780 REFL M3 304.428 -158.351 REFL M4 248.577 786.055 REFL M5 320.928 -512.457 REFL M6 826.181 1504.412 REFL M7 -3221.704 -191.095 REFL stop infinity -375.302 M8 750.83 606.397 REFL Image plane infinity 0 Surface K A B C D M1 0.000000E+00.
  • the mirrors M1, M2 and M4 of a first mirror group 18, which comprises the mirrors M1 to M4, are shaped as ring segments and are used off-axis with respect to the optical axis 19 - completely in the case of the mirrors M1 and M2 and for the most part in the case of the mirror M4.
  • the employed optical reflection surface of the mirrors M, M2 and - for the most part - M4 thus lies at a distance from the optical axis 19.
  • the reflection surfaces of all the mirrors M1 to M8 are rotationally symmetric about the optical axis 19.
  • the employed reflection surface of the mirror M3 is approximately centred on the optical axis 19 (on-axis).
  • the mirrors M1, M4, M6, M7 and M8 are concave mirrors.
  • the mirrors M2, M3 and M5 are convex mirrors.
  • An intermediate image plane 20 of the projection optical system 7 lies between the mirrors M4 and M5. As their course continues, the individual rays 15 pass through a through-opening 21 in the mirror M6.
  • the mirror M6 is used around the through-opening 21.
  • the mirror M6 is thus an obscured mirror.
  • the mirrors M7 and M8 are also obscured and both likewise comprise a through-opening 21.
  • the mirror M5 i.e. the fourth-last mirror in the light path before the image field 8, is not obscured and thus has no through-opening for imaging light.
  • An outer edge 22 of the optically effective reflection surface of the mirror M5 provides a central shadowing of the projection optical system 7, i.e. of the imaging optical system, in the pupil plane 17. The mirror M5 therefore shadows the light path between the mirrors M6 and M7.
  • the mirror M5 is arranged on the optical axis 19 and lies approximately centrally on said optical axis 19.
  • the distance between the mirror M5 and the last mirror M8, which are arranged back-to-back in terms of the reflective effect thereof, is approximately 20.6 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9 and, in particular, approximately 20 % of the marginally greater distance between the object field 4 and the image field 8.
  • a substantially greater space is thus present in the optical system 7 between the mirrors M5 and M8.
  • a further intermediate plane 23 lies between the mirror M6 and the mirror M7 in the light path. This is the intermediate image plane which is closest to the image plane 9. This intermediate image plane 23 lies spatially between the last mirror M8 in the light path and the image plane 9. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.7 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 has a maximum root mean square (rms) wavefront error of 0.9 nm.
  • the distortion of the projection optical system 7 is at most 0.5 nm.
  • the pupil obscuration i.e. the ratio of a central shadowed surface portion in the pupil plane 17 to the whole surface within an illuminated edge contour in the pupil plane 17, is 11.6 %.
  • Fig. 3 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7.
  • Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 and 2 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2 .
  • the embodiment of Fig. 3 differs from that of Fig. 2 substantially by virtue of the arrangement of the first mirror group 18 comprising the mirrors M1 to M4. All four mirrors M1 to M4 of the first mirror group 18 of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 are supplied off-axis via a light source.
  • the mirror M 1 is convex and the mirrors M2 to M4 are concave.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 has a negative back focal length of the entrance pupil.
  • the first intermediate image plane 20 is arranged in the region of the mirror M4 in the embodiment of Fig. 3 . According to the precise configuration of the mirror construction, the associated intermediate image can be arranged before the mirror M4, on the mirror M4, or even after the mirror M4.
  • the mirror M3 lies not to the left of the mirror M6, as in the embodiment of Fig. 2 , but at the level of the optical axis 19 to the right of the mirror M6.
  • the rays 15 pass through the mirror M6 on the way from the mirror M2 to the mirror M3, exactly like the rays 15 on the way from the mirror M3 to the mirror M4 and on the way from the mirror M4 to the mirror M5.
  • the through-opening 21 in the mirror M6 is thus passed through thrice by the individual rays 15.
  • the distance between the mirrors M5 and M8 is approximately 12.8 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9.
  • the distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.8 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • the maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 is 2.2 nm.
  • the maximum distortion is 5 nm.
  • the pupil obscuration is 8.4%.
  • Fig. 4 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7.
  • Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 and 2 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2 .
  • Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode Object plane infinity 390.160 M1 5657.607 -290.160 REFL M2 547.829 364.027 REFL M3 150.329 -131.050 REFL M4 182.077 674.854 REFL M5 301.845 -517.671 REFL M6 809.621 1464.069 REFL M7 -3032.589 -177.803 REFL stop infinity -377.065 M8 753.606 600.638 REFL Image plane infinity 0.000 Surface K A B C D M1 0.000000E+00 -2.662522E-10 -5.535133E-15 9.951400E-20 -1.728701E-24 M2 0.000000E+00 -7.758511E-11 -4.927920E-16 -2.380995E-21 1.771881E-27
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4 also differs from those of Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 substantially by virtue of the arrangement of the first mirror group 18 comprising the mirrors M1 to M4.
  • the mirrors M1, M2 and M4 are supplied off-axis.
  • the mirror M3 is convex.
  • the mirrors M1, M2 and M4 are convex.
  • the mirror M1 has such a low curvature that said mirror may not only be concave, but with a slight adaptation of the construction may also be planar or convex.
  • the first intermediate image plane 20 lies in the light path between the mirrors and M4 and M5, approximately at the level of the mirror M3.
  • the mirror M3 is again arranged to the left of the mirror M6, in such a way that the through-opening 21 of the mirror M6 is only passed through once by the rays 15. With a slight adaptation of the construction, the mirror M3 may also be moved into the opening of the mirror M6.
  • the distance between the mirrors M5 and M8 is approximately 19.6 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9.
  • the distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.76 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • the maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4 is 1.4 nm.
  • the maximum distortion is 1.5 nm.
  • the pupil obscuration is 10.9 %.
  • Fig. 5 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7.
  • Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 and 2 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2 .
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 has a total of six mirrors, which are numbered in the sequence of the light path, proceeding from the object field 5, as M1 to M6.
  • a first mirror group 24 comprises only two mirrors, namely the mirrors M1 and M2.
  • the mirror M1 is supplied approximately on-axis and the mirror M2 is supplied off-axis.
  • the following mirrors M3 to M6 correspond in arrangement and function to the mirrors M5 to M8 of the embodiments of Fig. 2 to 4 .
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 has a numerical aperture of 0.4.
  • the projection optical system 7 has a positive back focal length for the entrance pupil, i.e. principal rays 16 extending initially convergently from the object field 4.
  • the mirror M1 lies in the region of an entrance pupil plane 25 of the projection optical system 7.
  • the first intermediate image plane 20 also lies between the mirrors M2 and M3, likewise approximately at the level of the mirror M1.
  • the mirror M1 is arranged in the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4.
  • the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4 is again passed through thrice, similarly to the mirror M6 in the embodiment of Fig. 3 .
  • An aperture stop of the projection optical system 7 according to Fig. 5 can therefore be applied to the mirror M3.
  • the distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 21.0 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9 in the embodiment of Fig. 5 .
  • the distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.74 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 has a maximum (rms) wavefront error of 0.4 nm.
  • the maximum distortion is 0.3 nm.
  • the pupil obscuration is 17.6%.
  • Fig. 6 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7.
  • Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 to 5 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2 .
  • Surface K A B C M1 7.396949E-03 -8.591818E-11 2.958631E-15 -1.515085E-19 M2 -4.696303E-0 -1.639186E-09 -1.894486E-14 -4.136066E-18 M3 -5.224549E-1 -2.010111E-09 -1.293006E-14 -2.918315E-20 M4
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 is a six-mirror system, like that of Fig. 5 .
  • the first mirror group 24 also comprises only the mirrors M1 and M2.
  • the two mirrors M1 and M2 are supplied off-axis.
  • the mirror M1 is arranged adjacent to the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4. This arrangement is such that the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4 is only passed through once for the ray between the mirrors M2 and M3.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 has only a single intermediate image plane 27, which is spatially arranged, like the intermediate image planes 23 in the embodiments of Fig. 2 to 5 , between the last mirror in the light path, i.e. the mirror M6, and the image plane 9.
  • the fourth-last mirror M3 is still the mirror which, with the outer edge 22 thereof, provides the pupil obscuration of the projection optical system 7.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 has a numerical aperture of 0.55.
  • the distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 22 % of the distance of the object plane 5 from the image plane 9 in the embodiment of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 .
  • the distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.8 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 has a maximum (rms) wavefront error of 1.4 nm.
  • the maximum distortion is 1.4 nm.
  • the pupil obscuration is 16.8 %.
  • Fig. 7 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7.
  • Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 to 5 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the optical data for the projection optical system 7 according to Fig. 7 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2 .
  • REFL stop infinity -281.138 M6 562.495 354.144
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 is also a six-mirror system.
  • the construction of the first mirror group 24 comprising the mirrors M1 and M2 corresponds to that of the embodiment of Fig. 6 .
  • the embodiment according to Fig. 7 also has only one intermediate image plane, namely the intermediate image plane 27, which is arranged correspondingly to that of Fig. 6 .
  • the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 has a numerical aperture of 0.60.
  • the distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 25 % of the distance of the object plane 5 from the image plane 9 in the embodiment of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 .
  • the distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.8 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • the maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 is 0.7 nm.
  • the maximum distortion is 0.3 nm.
  • the pupil obscuration is 16.0%.
  • the projection exposure installation 1 is used as follows: Initially, the reflection mask 10, or the reticle and the substrate, or the wafer 11 is prepared. Subsequently, a structure on the reticle 10 is projected onto a light-sensitive layer of the wafer 11 by means of the projection exposure installation 1. By developing the light-sensitive layer, a microstructure on the wafer 11, and thus the microstructured component, are then produced.

Abstract

An imaging optical system (7) comprises a plurality of mirrors (M1 to M8), which image an object field (4) in an object plane (5) into an image field (8) in an image plane (9). At least three of the mirrors (M6, M7, M8) are obscured, and thus have a through-opening (21) for imaging light (15) to pass through. At least one intermediate image plane (23) is present between the object plane (5) and the image plane (9). The intermediate image plane (23) which is closest to the image plane (9) in the light path between the object field (4) and the image field (8), is spatially arranged between the last mirror (M8) in the light path and the image plane (9). These measures lead to an imaging optical system with improved imaging properties and/or reduced production costs.

Description

  • The invention relates to an imaging optical system according to the preamble of claim 1. Furthermore, the invention relates to a projection exposure installation comprising an imaging optical system of this type, a method for producing a microstructured component comprising a projection exposure installation of this type and a microstructured component produced with this method.
  • In particular for use within a projection exposure installation for microlithography, in particular for the production of microstructured or nanostructured semiconductor components, there is a need for improved imaging properties, for example a greater numerical aperture or a better correction of imaging errors, in the imaging optical systems mentioned at the outset. Alternatively or additionally, there is a need for simpler manufacture of the mirror at pre-specified dimensions, or for a mirror arrangement which relaxes the requirements on the production of the mirror support in particular, at least for individual mirrors. In particular, the number of optical elements required for the imaging and for the correction of imaging errors should be kept as low as possible.
  • The object stated at the outset is solved by an imaging optical system according to claim 1.
  • Moving the intermediate image plane in the direction of the image plane leads, by comparison with known constructions, to reduced requirements on the optical effect of the last two mirrors of the imaging optical system. In known obscured systems, the intermediate image plane is often spatially arranged at approximately the height of the last mirror in the light path. It has been found according to the invention that this is not a compulsory requirement because the last mirror in the light path is mostly not decisive as regards the pupil obscuration, in such a way that a relatively large central opening, and thus an intermediate plane separated from the reflection surface of the penultimate mirror, can be tolerated there.
  • A convex fourth-last mirror according to claim 2 allows the imaging optical system to be constructed with relatively low pupil obscuration.
  • An arrangement of the fourth-last mirror according to claim 3 has equivalent advantages.
  • The arrangement of the fourth-last mirror according to claim 4 makes it possible to apply an aperture stop to this mirror.
  • In imaging optical systems according to claims 5 and 6, an advantageously large space is present between the fourth-last and last mirrors. In other constructions with obscured mirrors and a high numerical aperture, the region between the fourth-last and the last mirror was a problematic region because either only very thin mirrors or a mirror which was very expensive to produce, comprising reflective coatings on both sides, could be used there.
  • A distance ratio according to claim 7 has proved to be particularly advantageous. The distance from the image plane of the last mirror in the light path is then defined as the distance from the image plane of the piercing point of an optical axis of the imaging optical system through the reflection surface of this mirror. In the case where the optical axis does not pass through the reflection surface of the mirror, i.e. in the case, for example, of an off-axis mirror, the piercing point of the optical axis through a surface which carries on continuously in accordance with the optical design input is selected instead of the piercing point of the optical axis through the reflection surface. If the mirror is rotationally symmetric about the optical axis, this piercing point coincides with the centre of the reflection surface of the mirror. In the case where this last mirror is obscured, the centre of the reflection surface may also lie in the obscuration through-opening, in which case it is assumed that the reflection surface carries on continuously within the obscuration through-opening in accordance with the optical design input. The distance of the intermediate image plane from the image plane may for example, be 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 times the distance of the last mirror in the light path from the image plane.
  • The imaging optical system may have a numerical aperture of at least 0.4, preferably at least 0.5, even more preferably at least 0.6, even more preferably at least 0.9. Such numerical apertures are preferred for achieving a high local resolution of the imaging optical system.
  • The imaging catoptric optical system may comprise fewer than ten mirrors (M1 to M8), which image an object field in an object plane into an image field in an image plane and may have a numerical aperture of ≥ 0.7. Such an imaging optical system may comprise precisely eight mirrors and having a numerical aperture of 0.9. The object stated above is also solved by such an imaging optical system.
  • An imaging optical system according to the claims mentioned above is useful in particular for a plurality of the solution methods described above. Accordingly, imaging optical systems result in which combinations of advantages are realised.
  • The imaging optical system may have a maximum root mean square (rms) wavefront error of less than 10 nm, preferably less than 5 nm, even more preferably less than 2 nm, even more preferably less than 1 nm, even more preferably less than 0.5 nm. The imaging optical system may have a maximum distortion of 10 nm, preferably less than 5 nm, even more preferably less than 2 nm, even more preferably less than 1 nm, even more preferably less than 0.5 nm. Such imaging properties are advantageous for achieving a high local resolution over the whole field. These imaging properties are independent of the wavelength of the imaging light. The wavelength of the imaging light can range from the EUV range to the visible spectrum. Wavefront errors are preferred which lead to a diffraction limited resolution and which are therefore, in particular, less than one fourteenth of the imaging light wavelength. For EUV wavelengths, a wavefront error which has a root mean square (rms) of less than 1 nm leads to a resolution which is, in practice, diffraction limited.
  • A low pupil obscuration, i.e. the proportion of the pupil surface which cannot be used because of the central pupil obscuration, according to claim 8 leads to an advantageously high light throughput for the imaging optical system. Additionally, an imaging optical system with a low pupil obscuration can be more widely used, because the lower the pupil obscuration, the greater the bandwidth of the available illumination means. Imaging optical systems with low pupil obscurations therefore provide high-contrast imaging substantially independently of the type of object structure to be imaged.
  • The imaging optical system may have an image plane which is arranged parallel to the object plane. Such field planes arranged parallel to one another facilitate the integration of the imaging optical system into structural surroundings. This advantage is particularly significant when the imaging optical system is used in a scanning projection exposure installation, since the scan directions can then be guided parallel to one another.
  • The image field of the imaging optical system may be larger than 1 mm2. The image field of the imaging optical system may have a rectangular or arc-shape with side-lengths of 1 mm and 13 mm. Such image field sizes lead to a good throughput when the imaging optical system is used in a projection exposure installation. Other dimensions of the long and short image field sides are also possible. The short image field sides may also be less than 1 mm or greater than 1 mm. The long image field sides may, for example, also be 5 mm, 10 mm or 15 mm.
  • An imaging scale according to claim 9 allows a low angle of incidence on a reflection mask when using the imaging optical system in a projection exposure installation. In this type of application, the use of an imaging scale of this type does not lead to the requirement of unnecessarily large masks.
  • Constructions with an odd number of obscured mirrors according to claim 10 have also proved to be particularly suitable. For example, three mirrors could be obscured.
  • An arrangement according to claim 11 leads to the possibility, in a spatially restricted arrangement, of exerting influences both in a field plane and in a pupil plane of the imaging optical system. This can be particularly expedient for correction purposes.
  • One embodiment of the imaging optical system according to claim 12 leads to the possibility of supplying on the imaging optical system, directly and without the interposition of additional imaging elements, from a preceding illumination optical system via a pupil component which is the last element before the imaging optical system, it then being possible for this pupil component to be arranged in the pupil plane of the imaging optical system, which plane is disposed so as to precede said imaging optical system.
  • If there are a low number of mirrors, an imaging optical system according to claim 13 has two intermediate image planes, and this can be used on the one hand for compact beam guidance and also, on the other hand, for correction purposes.
  • The imaging optical system may comprise a plurality of mirrors, which image an object field in an object plane into an image field in an image plane, at least one of the mirrors comprising a through-opening for imaging light to pass through, wherein the imaging optical system comprises at least six mirrors, a fourth-last mirror before the image field, in the light path between the object field an the image field, comprising no through-opening and providing with an outer edge surrounding the optically effective surface of the fourth-last mirror, a central shadowing in a pupil plane of the imaging optical system. It has been found that such a construction of an imaging optical system with a mirror which determines, with the outer edge thereof and not with a through-opening, the pupil obscuration of an obscured optical system, opens up entirely new constructional possibilities in comparison with the known imaging optical systems. This allows high-aperture objectives with well-corrected imaging errors. The outer edge of the fourth-last mirror which surrounds the optically effective reflection surface thereof, is either the outer edge of the optically effective reflection surface itself, or the outer edge of a substrate on which the reflection surface is provided, or the outer edge of a mechanical holding structure supporting the reflection surface or the substrate.
  • The advantages of a projection exposure installation according to claim 14 correspond to those previously discussed with regard to the imaging optical system according to the invention. The light source for generating the illumination light may be formed with a wave length of between 10 and 30 nm. The advantages of a projection exposure installation having such a light source correspond to those previously discussed with regard to the imaging optical system according to the invention. The light source of the projection exposure installation may be in the form of a broadband light source and may have, for example, a bandwidth greater than 1 nm, greater than 10 nm or greater than 100 nm. In addition, the projection exposure installation may be constructed in such a way that it can be operated with light sources of different wavelengths. Light sources for other wavelengths, in particular wavelengths used for microlithography, can be used in conjunction with the imaging optical system according to the invention, for example light sources with wavelengths of 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, 126 nm and 109 nm, and in particular also with wavelengths which are less than 100 nm.
  • A method for producing a microstructured component may comprise the following steps:
    • providing a reticle and a wafer,
    • projecting a structure on the reticle onto a light-sensitive layer of the wafer by using the projection exposure installation according to the invention,
    • producing a microstructure on the wafer.
  • Corresponding advantages also apply to such a production method and a microstructured component produced thereby.
  • Embodiments of the invention will be described in the following in greater detail with reference to the drawings, in which:
  • Fig. 1
    is a schematic view of a projection exposure installation for EUV microlithography;
    Fig. 2 to 7
    are embodiments of an imaging optical system, each in meridional section.
  • A projection exposure installation 1 for microlithography has a light source 2 for illumination light. The light source 2 is an EUV light source which produces light in a wavelength range in particular of between 10 nm and 30 nm. Other EUV wavelengths are also possible. In general, any desired wavelengths, for example visible wavelengths or any other wavelengths which are used, for example, in microlithography and are available for the appropriate laser light sources and/or LED light sources (for example 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, 129 nm or 109 nm), are possible for the illumination light guided in the projection exposure installation 1. A light path of the illumination light 3 is shown extremely schematically in Fig. 1.
  • An illumination optical system 6 guides the illumination light 3 from the light source 2 to an object field 4 (cf. Fig. 2) in an object plane 5. The object field 4 is imaged into an image field 8 (cf. Fig. 2) in an image plane 9, at a pre-specified reduction scale, with a projection optical system 7. One of the embodiments shown in Fig. 2 to 7 may be used for the projection optical system 7. The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 has a reduction factor of 8. Other reduction scales are also possible, for example 4x, 5x, or even reduction scales that are greater than 8x. An imaging scale of 8x is particularly suitable for illumination light 3 with an EUV wavelength, since the object-side angle of incidence on a reflection mask 10 can thus remain small. An imaging scale of 8x also does not require the use of unnecessarily large masks. In the projection optical system 7 in the embodiments of Fig. 2 to 7, the image plane 9 is arranged parallel to the object plane 5. A portion of the reflective mask 10, also known as a reticle, coinciding with the object field 4 is hereby imaged.
  • The image field 8 is bent in an arc shape, the distance between the two arcs which delimit the image field 8 being 1 mm. 1 mm is also the side length of the straight side edges which delimit the image field 8 between the two arcs and which extend parallel to one another. These two straight side edges of the image field 8 are at a distance of 13 mm from one another. The surface of this curved image field corresponds to a rectangular image field with side lengths of 1 mm x 13 mm. A square image field 8 of this type is also possible.
  • Imaging takes place on the surface of a substrate 11 in the form of a wafer which is supported by a substrate holder 12. In Fig. 1, a light beam 13 of the illumination light 3 entering the projection optical system 7 is shown schematically between the reticle 10 and said projection optical system, and a light beam 14 of the illumination light 3 exiting from the projection optical system 7 is shown schematically between the projection optical system 7 and the substrate 11.
  • The image field-side numerical aperture of the projection optical system 7 in accordance with Fig. 2 is 0.9. This is not reproduced to scale in Fig. 1 for visual reasons.
  • In order to aid the description of the projection exposure installation 1 and the various embodiments of the projection optical system 7, an xyz Cartesian coordinate system is provided in the drawings and shows the respective locations of the components represented in the figures. In Fig. 1, the x direction extends perpendicular to and into the drawing plane. The y direction extends to the right and the z direction extends downwards.
  • The projection exposure installation 1 is a scanner-type device. Both the reticle 10 and the substrate 11 are scanned in the y direction during operation of the projection exposure installation 1.
  • Fig. 2 shows the optical construction of a first embodiment of the projection optical system 7. The light path of each of two individual rays 15, which proceed in each case from two object field points in Fig. 2 and are distanced from one another in the y direction, is shown. The two individual rays 15, which belong to one of these two object field points, are each associated with two different illumination directions for the two image field points. The individual rays 15, associated with the same illumination direction, of different field points extend divergently proceeding from the object plane 5. This is also referred to in the following as a negative input back focal length or a negative back focal length of the entrance pupil. An entrance pupil of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 lies not inside the projection optical system 7, but before the object plane 5 in the light path. This makes it possible, for example, to arrange a pupil component of the illumination optical system 6 in the entrance pupil of the projection optical system 7, before the projection optical system 7 in the light path, without further imaging optical components having to be present between these pupil components and the object plane 5.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 has a total of eight mirrors, which are numbered in the sequence of the light path, proceeding from the object field 4, as M1 to M8. Fig. 2 shows only the calculated reflection surfaces of the mirrors M 1 to M8.
  • The optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 are shown in the following by means of two tables. In the column "radius", the first table shows in each case the radius of curvature of the mirrors M1 to M8. The third column (thickness) describes the distance, proceeding from the object plane 5, to the following surface in each case.
  • The second table describes the precise surface form of the reflection surfaces of the mirrors M 1 to M8, where the constants K and A to J are to be put into the following equation for the sagittal height: z k = c h 2 1 + SQRT 1 - 1 + K c 2 h 2 + A h 4 + B h 6 + C h 8 + D h 10 + E h 14 + F h 12 + G h 14 + H h 18 + J h 20
    Figure imgb0001
  • In this case, h represents the distance from the optical axis 19. Therefore: h2 = x2 + y2. The reciprocal of "radius" is used for c.
    Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode
    Object plane infinity 517.466
    M1 -460.153 -217.028 REFL
    M2 -380.618 101.780 REFL
    M3 304.428 -158.351 REFL
    M4 248.577 786.055 REFL
    M5 320.928 -512.457 REFL
    M6 826.181 1504.412 REFL
    M7 -3221.704 -191.095 REFL
    stop infinity -375.302
    M8 750.83 606.397 REFL
    Image plane infinity 0
    Surface K A B C D
    M1 0.000000E+00. -1.631597E-10 9.657530E-16 -6.306626E-20 1.072197E-24
    M2 -7.342117E+00 -3.247790E-08 1.007295E-13 -2.908653E-18 -6.581368E-21
    M3 -8.421287E+00 1.604616E-09 1.164266E-11 -7.638324E-15 2.158838E-18
    M4 5.504873E-02 -2.854695E-10 1.302845E-15 7.411326E-19 -1.319473E-22
    My -2.441303E-02 -4.072151E-09 -5.877441E-14 2.214912E-18 -8.175465E-23
    M6 3.411049E-03 -7.680740E-12- -7.621133E-18 -6.837917E-24. -8.305886E-30
    M7 -2.544754E+00 5.119174E-10 -8.412525E-16 8.746864E-21 -4.053738E-26
    M8 1.012485E-01 -6.355004E-11- -1.261118E-16 -6.58695lE-24. -4.143278E-28
    Surface E F G H J
    M1 -1.289213E-29 8.646860E-35 -2.746050E-40 00.000000E+00 1.075412E-51
    M2 1.743214E-24 -2.256980E-28 1.288821E-32 0.000000E+00. -2.146208E-41
    M3 2.665732E-25 1.001342E-24 -1.896580E-27 1.213404E-30 -2.772775E-34
    M4 1.642304E-26- -1.185339E-30 4.697782E-35 -7.812489E-40 0.000000E+00
    M5 1.783031E-27 -3.302179E-32 6.356237E-37 -8.439168E-42 3.970026E-47
    M6 -1.193959E-35 3.014822E-41- -1.666695E-46 2.921935E-52 -2.589560E-58
    M7 1.405577E-31 1.660762E-37- -4.750000E-42 2.390150E-47 -4.132019E-53
    M8 3.396965E-35 3.588060E-40 -3.053788E-45 6.807302E-51 -1.109855E-56
  • The mirrors M1, M2 and M4 of a first mirror group 18, which comprises the mirrors M1 to M4, are shaped as ring segments and are used off-axis with respect to the optical axis 19 - completely in the case of the mirrors M1 and M2 and for the most part in the case of the mirror M4. The employed optical reflection surface of the mirrors M, M2 and - for the most part - M4 thus lies at a distance from the optical axis 19. The reflection surfaces of all the mirrors M1 to M8 are rotationally symmetric about the optical axis 19.
  • The employed reflection surface of the mirror M3 is approximately centred on the optical axis 19 (on-axis).
  • The mirrors M1, M4, M6, M7 and M8 are concave mirrors. The mirrors M2, M3 and M5 are convex mirrors.
  • An intermediate image plane 20 of the projection optical system 7 lies between the mirrors M4 and M5. As their course continues, the individual rays 15 pass through a through-opening 21 in the mirror M6. The mirror M6 is used around the through-opening 21. The mirror M6 is thus an obscured mirror. As well as the mirror M6, the mirrors M7 and M8 are also obscured and both likewise comprise a through-opening 21.
  • The mirror M5, i.e. the fourth-last mirror in the light path before the image field 8, is not obscured and thus has no through-opening for imaging light. An outer edge 22 of the optically effective reflection surface of the mirror M5 provides a central shadowing of the projection optical system 7, i.e. of the imaging optical system, in the pupil plane 17. The mirror M5 therefore shadows the light path between the mirrors M6 and M7.
  • The mirror M5 is arranged on the optical axis 19 and lies approximately centrally on said optical axis 19.
  • In the embodiment of Fig. 2, the distance between the mirror M5 and the last mirror M8, which are arranged back-to-back in terms of the reflective effect thereof, is approximately 20.6 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9 and, in particular, approximately 20 % of the marginally greater distance between the object field 4 and the image field 8. A substantially greater space is thus present in the optical system 7 between the mirrors M5 and M8.
  • A further intermediate plane 23 lies between the mirror M6 and the mirror M7 in the light path. This is the intermediate image plane which is closest to the image plane 9. This intermediate image plane 23 lies spatially between the last mirror M8 in the light path and the image plane 9. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.7 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 2 has a maximum root mean square (rms) wavefront error of 0.9 nm. The distortion of the projection optical system 7 is at most 0.5 nm. The pupil obscuration, i.e. the ratio of a central shadowed surface portion in the pupil plane 17 to the whole surface within an illuminated edge contour in the pupil plane 17, is 11.6 %.
  • Fig. 3 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7. Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 and 2 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • The optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2.
    Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode
    Object plane infinity 240.357
    M1 306.212 -140.357 REFL
    M2 472.863 1508.127 REFL
    M3 -1214.568 -651.640 REFL
    M4 371.570 1076.156 REFL
    M5 210.825 -524.516 REFL
    M6 793.298 1450.998 REFL
    M -3402.480 -176.337 REFL
    stop infinity -366.873
    M8 734.006 584.084 REFL
    Image plane infinity 0.000
    Surface K A B C D
    M1 0.000000E+00 5.528998E-09 -4.968534E-13 1.659177E-17 -3.863442E-22
    M2 -6.538633E-01 5.913642E-10 -2.068085E-15 1.843758E-20 -6.714355E-26
    M3 0.000000E+00 9.809893E-10 1.757665E-15 6.252623E-20 -7.383824E-25
    M4 2.740280E+00 -4.880461E-08 8.522603E-12 -1.221389E-15 1.142980E-19
    M5 -5.973645E-02 -1.313275E-08 -1.603339E-13 2.016611E-18 -4.373542E-22
    M6 4.517989E-02 -1.639817E-11 -1.843198E-17 -2.050197E-23 -3.219956E-29
    M7 -1.286534 E +01 4.603123E-10 -1.024577E-15 1.178213E-20 -7.426445E-26
    M8 9.856773E-02 -8.505963E-11 -1.255661E-16 -1.224739E-22 -3.390517E-28
    Surface E F G H J
    M1 5.540209E-27 -4.791768E-32 2.229758E-37 -4.553644E-43 0.000000E+00
    M2 1.572034E-31 -1.728552E-37 1.501360E-43 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M3 8.354870E-30 -3.768113E-35 0.000000E+00 4.020897E-45 0.000000E+00
    M4 -6.828562E-24 2.234887E-28 -2.050695E-33 -5.185597E-38 0.000000E+00
    M5 2.682717E-26 -1.836495E-30 8.559900E-35 -1.643140E-39 0.000000E+00
    M6 2.845752E-35 -2.880170E-40 5.575425E-46 -7.139928E-52 0.000000E+00
    M7 4.719915E-31 -2.246586E-36 6.923567E-42 -9.256971E-48 0.000000E+00
    M8 5.071111E-34 -2.813625E-39 6.372889E-45 -9.981207E-51 0.000000E+00
  • The embodiment of Fig. 3 differs from that of Fig. 2 substantially by virtue of the arrangement of the first mirror group 18 comprising the mirrors M1 to M4. All four mirrors M1 to M4 of the first mirror group 18 of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 are supplied off-axis via a light source. The mirror M 1 is convex and the mirrors M2 to M4 are concave.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 has a negative back focal length of the entrance pupil.
  • The first intermediate image plane 20 is arranged in the region of the mirror M4 in the embodiment of Fig. 3. According to the precise configuration of the mirror construction, the associated intermediate image can be arranged before the mirror M4, on the mirror M4, or even after the mirror M4.
  • In the embodiment of Fig. 3, the mirror M3 lies not to the left of the mirror M6, as in the embodiment of Fig. 2, but at the level of the optical axis 19 to the right of the mirror M6. The rays 15 pass through the mirror M6 on the way from the mirror M2 to the mirror M3, exactly like the rays 15 on the way from the mirror M3 to the mirror M4 and on the way from the mirror M4 to the mirror M5. The through-opening 21 in the mirror M6 is thus passed through thrice by the individual rays 15.
  • In the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3, the distance between the mirrors M5 and M8 is approximately 12.8 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.8 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • The maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 3 is 2.2 nm. The maximum distortion is 5 nm. The pupil obscuration is 8.4%.
  • Fig. 4 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7. Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 and 2 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • The optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2.
    Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode
    Object plane infinity 390.160
    M1 5657.607 -290.160 REFL
    M2 547.829 364.027 REFL
    M3 150.329 -131.050 REFL
    M4 182.077 674.854 REFL
    M5 301.845 -517.671 REFL
    M6 809.621 1464.069 REFL
    M7 -3032.589 -177.803 REFL
    stop infinity -377.065
    M8 753.606 600.638 REFL
    Image plane infinity 0.000
    Surface K A B C D
    M1 0.000000E+00 -2.662522E-10 -5.535133E-15 9.951400E-20 -1.728701E-24
    M2 0.000000E+00 -7.758511E-11 -4.927920E-16 -2.380995E-21 1.771881E-27
    M3 0.000000E+00 2.187978E-08 -4.324024E-12 -2.166837E-15 6.601874E-19
    M4 0.000000E+00 1.844448E-09 6.801387E-14 2.528119E-17- -6.128096E-21
    M5 1.156883E-04 -6.361997E-09 -4.599504E-14 1.885582E-18 -6.053781E-23
    M6 3.259720E-02 -1.077005E-11 -1.049275E-17 -1.178590E-23- -1.688268E-30
    M7 -8.103305E+00 3.958094E-10 -5.118462E-16 5.066772E-21 -1.825272E-26
    M8 1.035316E-01 -7.996215E-11 -1.253165E-16 -7.448536E-23 -2.060928E-28
    Surface E F G H J
    M1 1.574353E-29 -5.663846E-35 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M2 -1.673915E-31 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M3 -1.166941E-23 -9.288602E-26 5.378119E-29 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M4 1.073882E-24 -9.788111E-29 3.783735E-33 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M5 -4.369093E-28 5.123232E-32 -7.255963E-37 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M6 -6.033318E-35 1.025297E-40 -1.418317E-46 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
    M7 1.004654E-31 -5.423670E-37 2.038001E-42 -3.000000E-48 0.000000E+00
    M8 -4.980960E-34 5.995233E-40 6.787033E-46 -4.632967E-51 0.000000E+00
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4 also differs from those of Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 substantially by virtue of the arrangement of the first mirror group 18 comprising the mirrors M1 to M4. The mirrors M1, M2 and M4 are supplied off-axis. The mirror M3 is convex. The mirrors M1, M2 and M4 are convex. The mirror M1 has such a low curvature that said mirror may not only be concave, but with a slight adaptation of the construction may also be planar or convex.
  • In the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4, the first intermediate image plane 20 lies in the light path between the mirrors and M4 and M5, approximately at the level of the mirror M3.
  • In the embodiment of Fig. 4, the mirror M3 is again arranged to the left of the mirror M6, in such a way that the through-opening 21 of the mirror M6 is only passed through once by the rays 15. With a slight adaptation of the construction, the mirror M3 may also be moved into the opening of the mirror M6.
  • In the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4, the distance between the mirrors M5 and M8 is approximately 19.6 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.76 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • The maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 4 is 1.4 nm. The maximum distortion is 1.5 nm. The pupil obscuration is 10.9 %.
  • Fig. 5 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7. Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 and 2 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • The optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2.
    Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode
    Object plane infinity 591.532
    M1 -6782.876 -530.662 REFL
    M2 702.707 1026.755 REFL
    stop infinity 0.000
    M3 217.303 -507.993 REFL
    M4 776.996 1490.702 REFL
    M5 -2014.188 -533.319 REFL
    M6 791.740 603.252 REFL
    Image plane infinity 0.000
    Surface K A B C
    M1 0.000000E+00 8.899437E-09 -1.356259E-12 2.954130E-15
    M2 -3.639089E+00 1.110645E-09 -2.542191E-15 2.297600E-20
    M3 1.390154E-01. -1.972567E-08 3.444974E-13 -7.400803E-17
    M4 -2.088645E-02 -1.996767E-11 -3.060841E-17 -4.632700E-23
    M5 -1.390893E+01 1.114680E-09 1.108176E-15 5.215888E-20
    M6 1.112425E-01 6.540015E-11 8.340321E-17 2.310935E-22
    Surface D E F G
    M1 -2.165883E-18 0.000000E+00 6.325365E-25 -1.919429E-28
    M2 -1.439457E-24 9.400607E-29 -3.212860E-33 4.384528E-38
    M3 9.862318E-21 -2.518066E-24 3.734400E-28 -2.241749E-32
    M4 -5.236534E-29 -6.140963E-35. -6.134373E-40 8.521628E-46
    M5 -1.658708E-24 7.482784E-29 -1.911769E-33 1.936176E-38
    M6 -2.192695E-27 6.492849E-33 1.784557E-37 -1.082995E-42
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 has a total of six mirrors, which are numbered in the sequence of the light path, proceeding from the object field 5, as M1 to M6.
  • In the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5, a first mirror group 24 comprises only two mirrors, namely the mirrors M1 and M2. The mirror M1 is supplied approximately on-axis and the mirror M2 is supplied off-axis. The following mirrors M3 to M6 correspond in arrangement and function to the mirrors M5 to M8 of the embodiments of Fig. 2 to 4.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 has a numerical aperture of 0.4.
  • The projection optical system 7 according to Fig. 5 has a positive back focal length for the entrance pupil, i.e. principal rays 16 extending initially convergently from the object field 4. The mirror M1 lies in the region of an entrance pupil plane 25 of the projection optical system 7. The first intermediate image plane 20 also lies between the mirrors M2 and M3, likewise approximately at the level of the mirror M1.
  • The mirror M1 is arranged in the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4. The through-opening 21 of the mirror M4 is again passed through thrice, similarly to the mirror M6 in the embodiment of Fig. 3.
  • The fourth-last mirror M3, the outer edge 22 of which again provides the pupil obscuration of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5, lies in the region of a further pupil plane 26 of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5. An aperture stop of the projection optical system 7 according to Fig. 5 can therefore be applied to the mirror M3.
  • The distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 21.0 % of the distance between the object plane 5 and the image plane 9 in the embodiment of Fig. 5. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.74 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 5 has a maximum (rms) wavefront error of 0.4 nm. The maximum distortion is 0.3 nm. The pupil obscuration is 17.6%.
  • Fig. 6 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7. Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 to 5 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • The optical data for the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2.
    Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode
    Object plane infinity 683.665
    M1 -694.834 -271.324 REFL
    M2 -411.527 1372.036 REFL
    M3 346.281 -1100.613 REFL
    M4 1469.502 2005.780 REFL
    M5 -722.731 -41.563 REFL
    stop infinity -272.149
    M6 544.465 370.467 REFL
    Image plane infinity 0.000
    Surface K A B C
    M1 7.396949E-03 -8.591818E-11 2.958631E-15 -1.515085E-19
    M2 -4.696303E-0 -1.639186E-09 -1.894486E-14 -4.136066E-18
    M3 -5.224549E-1 -2.010111E-09 -1.293006E-14 -2.918315E-20
    M4 -3.021297E-02 9.250522E-14 5.057734E-20 4.887335E-28
    M5 -3.126684E+00 2.153833E-09 1.799694E-14 -1.892202E-20
    M6 6.984230E-01 -1.682769E-10 -1.422157E-15 1.234832E-20
    Surface D E F G
    M1 4.091038E-24. -5.790509E-29 3.296826E-34 8.178384E-41
    M2 1.255234E-21. -1.379809E-25 5.435466E-3 -4.566966E-36
    M3 1.475407E-23 -5.835055E-28 1.288505E-32 -3.671165E-37
    M4 4.320243E-35 4.670696E-39 4.109431E-45 2.963010E-51
    M5 -6.296522E-25 2.964336E-29 6.191151E-34 -1.998284E-38
    M6 -1.683381E-25 8.658821E-31 -3.676860E-36 -5.905802E-41
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 is a six-mirror system, like that of Fig. 5. In this case, the first mirror group 24 also comprises only the mirrors M1 and M2. The two mirrors M1 and M2 are supplied off-axis.
    The mirror M1 is arranged adjacent to the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4. This arrangement is such that the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4 is only passed through once for the ray between the mirrors M2 and M3.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 has only a single intermediate image plane 27, which is spatially arranged, like the intermediate image planes 23 in the embodiments of Fig. 2 to 5, between the last mirror in the light path, i.e. the mirror M6, and the image plane 9.
  • In the embodiment of Fig. 6, despite the fact that the through-opening 21 of the mirror M4 is passed though by a light beam which has no focus there and thus has a relatively large diameter, the fourth-last mirror M3 is still the mirror which, with the outer edge 22 thereof, provides the pupil obscuration of the projection optical system 7.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 has a numerical aperture of 0.55.
  • The distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 22 % of the distance of the object plane 5 from the image plane 9 in the embodiment of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.8 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 6 has a maximum (rms) wavefront error of 1.4 nm. The maximum distortion is 1.4 nm. The pupil obscuration is 16.8 %.
  • Fig. 7 shows a further embodiment of a projection optical system 7. Components and features which correspond to those which have previously been described with reference to Fig. 1 to 5 have the same reference numerals and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • The optical data for the projection optical system 7 according to Fig. 7 are shown in the following by means of two tables, which correspond in layout to the tables for Fig. 2.
    Surface Radius (1/c) Thickness Operating mode
    Object plane infinity 379.207
    M1 -509.962 -179.207 REFL
    M2 -318.440 1332.984 REFL
    M3 343.817 -1093.195 REFL
    M4 1475.059 2039.667 REFL
    M5 -609.119 -28.006 REFL
    stop infinity -281.138
    M6 562.495 354.144 REFL
    Image plane infinity 0.000
    Surface K A B C
    M1 1.484533E-01 -5.739623E-10 9.023124E-14 -7.365787E-18
    M2 5.827688E-01 3.542976E-09 1.241138E-13 -3.596600E-17
    M3 -1.284995E+00 -4.653305E-09 1.019610E-13 -3.037140E-18
    M4 -4.865988E-02 -1.091347E-13 -6.628260E-21 -4.841711E-28
    M5 -4.572713E+00 2.517019E-09 7.268687E-16 6.794125E-19
    M6 8.759896E-01 1.726609E-10 -2.501863E-15 1.688202E-20
    Surface D E F G
    M1 3.807256E-22 -1.215662E-26 2.193281E-31 -1.712891E-36
    M2 9.673512E-21 -1.599535E-24 1.493641E-28. -5.987766E-33
    M3 9.767861E-23 -2.436531E-27 3.766380E-32 -2.616614E-37
    M4 -3.662658E-33 -1.445033E-38 1.208908E-44 -4.273745E-51
    M5 -1.846769E-23 4.603723E-28 -6.890055E-33 4.664473E-38
    M6 1.453398E-25 -6.794812E-30 8.060319E-35 -3.545269E-40
  • Like the embodiments of Fig. 5 and 6, the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 is also a six-mirror system. The construction of the first mirror group 24 comprising the mirrors M1 and M2 corresponds to that of the embodiment of Fig. 6. The embodiment according to Fig. 7 also has only one intermediate image plane, namely the intermediate image plane 27, which is arranged correspondingly to that of Fig. 6.
  • The projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 has a numerical aperture of 0.60.
  • The distance between the fourth-last mirror M3 and the last mirror M6 is equal to approximately 25 % of the distance of the object plane 5 from the image plane 9 in the embodiment of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7. The distance of the intermediate image plane 23 from the image plane 9 is approximately 0.8 times the distance of the last mirror M6 in the light path from the image plane 9.
  • The maximum (rms) wavefront error of the projection optical system 7 of Fig. 7 is 0.7 nm. The maximum distortion is 0.3 nm. The pupil obscuration is 16.0%.
  • To produce a microstructured or nanostructured component, the projection exposure installation 1 is used as follows: Initially, the reflection mask 10, or the reticle and the substrate, or the wafer 11 is prepared. Subsequently, a structure on the reticle 10 is projected onto a light-sensitive layer of the wafer 11 by means of the projection exposure installation 1. By developing the light-sensitive layer, a microstructure on the wafer 11, and thus the microstructured component, are then produced.

Claims (14)

  1. Imaging optical system (7) comprising a plurality of mirrors (M 1 to M8; M1 to M6), which image an object field (4) in an object plane (5) into an image field (8) in an image plane (9), at least three of the mirrors (M6 to M8; M4 to M6) comprising a through-opening (21) for imaging light (15) to pass through, the mirrors (M6 to M8; M4 to M6) comprising the through-opening (21) being used around the through-opening (21),
    at least one intermediate image plane (20, 23; 27) being present between the object plane (5) and the image plane (9),
    characterised in that the intermediate image plane (23; 27) which is closest to the image plane (9), in the light path between the object field (4) and the image field (8), is spatially arranged between the last mirror (M8; M6) in the light path and the image plane (9).
  2. Imaging optical system according to claim 1, characterised in that the fourth-last mirror (M5; M3) is a convex mirror.
  3. Imaging optical system according to either claim 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the fourth-last mirror (M5; M3) lies on an optical axis (19) of the imaging optical system (7).
  4. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterised in that the fourth-last mirror (M3) is arranged in the region of a pupil plane (26) of the imaging optical system (7).
  5. Imaging optical system (7) according to any one of claims 1 to 4 characterised in that the imaging optical system (7) comprises at least six mirrors (M1 to M8; M1 to M6), the distance (M5 to M8, M3 to M6) between a fourth-last mirror (M5; M3), in the light path between the object field (4) and the image field (8), and a last mirror (M8; M6) in the light path being at least 10 % of the distance between the object field (4) and the image field (8).
  6. Imaging optical system (7) according to claim 5, comprising at least eight mirrors (M1 to M8), the distance (M5 to M8) between a fourth-last mirror (M5), in the light path between the object field (4) and the image field (8), and a last mirror (M8) in the light path being at least 10 % of the distance between the object field (4) and the image field (8).
  7. Imaging optical system (7) according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the distance of the intermediate image plane (23; 27) from the image plane (9) is at most 0.95 times the distance, from the image plane (9), of the last mirror (M8; M6) in the light path.
  8. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterised by a pupil obscuration of less than 20 %, preferably less than 15 %, even more preferably less than 10 %.
  9. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterised by a reduction imaging scale of 8.
  10. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterised by an odd number of mirrors (M6 to M8; M4 to M6) having a through-opening (21) for imaging light (15) to pass through.
  11. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 10, characterised in that at least one intermediate image plane (20) is folded in the vicinity of a pupil plane (25) of the imaging optical system (7), in particular coinciding therewith.
  12. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterised in that principal rays (16) extend divergently to neighbouring field points in the light path from the object field (4) to the first mirror (M1).
  13. Imaging optical system according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterised in that the imaging optical system comprises precisely six mirrors (M1 to M6) and precisely two intermediate image planes (20, 23).
  14. Projection exposure installation for microlithography
    - comprising an imaging optical system (7) according to any one of claims 1 to 13,
    - comprising a light source (2) for the illumination and imaging light (3),
    - comprising an illumination optical system (6) for guiding the illumination light (3) to the object field (4) of the imaging optical system (7).
EP12171864.7A 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus therewith Active EP2533104B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US98278507P 2007-10-26 2007-10-26
DE102007051670 2007-10-26
EP20080802769 EP2203787B1 (en) 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type

Related Parent Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20080802769 Division-Into EP2203787B1 (en) 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type
EP20080802769 Division EP2203787B1 (en) 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type
EP08802769.3 Division 2008-10-02

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2533104A1 true EP2533104A1 (en) 2012-12-12
EP2533104B1 EP2533104B1 (en) 2016-05-11

Family

ID=40490434

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20080802769 Active EP2203787B1 (en) 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type
EP12171864.7A Active EP2533104B1 (en) 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus therewith

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20080802769 Active EP2203787B1 (en) 2007-10-26 2008-10-02 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US8576376B2 (en)
EP (2) EP2203787B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5337159B2 (en)
KR (2) KR101592136B1 (en)
CN (2) CN101836164B (en)
DE (1) DE102008042917A1 (en)
TW (1) TWI391704B (en)
WO (1) WO2009052932A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007051671A1 (en) 2007-10-26 2009-05-07 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Imaging optics and projection exposure system for microlithography with such an imaging optics
JP5902884B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2016-04-13 カール・ツァイス・エスエムティー・ゲーエムベーハー Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus for microlithography including this kind of imaging optical system
CN101836164B (en) * 2007-10-26 2013-03-13 卡尔蔡司Smt有限责任公司 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type
DE102009046685A1 (en) 2009-11-13 2011-05-26 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics
WO2011073039A2 (en) 2009-12-14 2011-06-23 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics
DE102010001336B3 (en) * 2010-01-28 2011-07-28 Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH, 73447 Arrangement and method for characterizing the polarization properties of an optical system
WO2012013241A1 (en) 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for microlithography with an imaging optical system of this type
DE102010039745A1 (en) 2010-08-25 2012-03-01 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics
DE102010043498A1 (en) 2010-11-05 2012-05-10 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Projection objective of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus designed for EUV, and method for optical adjustment of a projection objective
DE102011076752A1 (en) 2011-05-31 2012-12-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics
DE102012208793A1 (en) * 2012-05-25 2013-11-28 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics and projection exposure equipment for projection lithography with such an imaging optics
US9448343B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-09-20 Kla-Tencor Corporation Segmented mirror apparatus for imaging and method of using the same
DE102014223811B4 (en) 2014-11-21 2016-09-29 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics for EUV projection lithography, projection exposure apparatus and method for producing a structured component
DE102015221983A1 (en) 2015-11-09 2017-05-11 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Imaging optics for imaging an object field in an image field and projection exposure apparatus with such an imaging optics
CN108152940B (en) * 2016-12-05 2021-04-27 佳能株式会社 Catadioptric optical system, illumination optical system, and exposure apparatus
DE102017215664A1 (en) 2017-09-06 2019-03-07 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Optical system for a projection exposure machine
US10533823B1 (en) * 2018-10-27 2020-01-14 Lewis Smith Tension gun for firing arrows

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0267766A2 (en) 1986-11-10 1988-05-18 Compact Spindle Bearing Corporation Catoptric reduction imaging systems
US20020056815A1 (en) 2000-02-14 2002-05-16 Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung Trading As Carl Zeiss 6-mirror microlithography projection objective
WO2003016977A2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-27 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Objective with pupil obscuration
US6750948B2 (en) 1999-10-15 2004-06-15 Nikon Corporation Projection optical system, projection exposure apparatus having the projection optical system, projection method thereof, exposure method thereof and fabricating method for fabricating a device using the projection exposure apparatus
EP1434093A2 (en) 2002-12-27 2004-06-30 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Catoptric projection system, exposure apparatus and device fabrication method
DE102005042005A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2006-07-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Objective lens esp. as micro-lithography projection objective, has objective divided into first part-objective with single mirror and second part-objective with primary and secondary mirror
WO2006069725A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-07-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag High aperture lens with an obscured pupil

Family Cites Families (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR890004881B1 (en) * 1983-10-19 1989-11-30 가부시기가이샤 히다찌세이사꾸쇼 Plasma treating method and device thereof
US4804258A (en) 1986-05-05 1989-02-14 Hughes Aircraft Company Four mirror afocal wide field of view optical system
IL113789A (en) 1994-05-23 1999-01-26 Hughes Aircraft Co Off-axis three-mirror anastigmat having corrector mirror
US5473263A (en) 1994-12-19 1995-12-05 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Negative feedback to reduce voltage oscillation in CMOS output buffers
JPH09213618A (en) * 1996-01-31 1997-08-15 Canon Inc Projection exposure system and manufacture of device using the same
US5737137A (en) * 1996-04-01 1998-04-07 The Regents Of The University Of California Critical illumination condenser for x-ray lithography
US7186983B2 (en) * 1998-05-05 2007-03-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Illumination system particularly for microlithography
DE59914179D1 (en) * 1999-02-15 2007-03-22 Zeiss Carl Smt Ag Microlithography reduction objective device and projection exposure system
US7151592B2 (en) * 1999-02-15 2006-12-19 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Projection system for EUV lithography
US6985210B2 (en) * 1999-02-15 2006-01-10 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Projection system for EUV lithography
US6600552B2 (en) * 1999-02-15 2003-07-29 Carl-Zeiss Smt Ag Microlithography reduction objective and projection exposure apparatus
US6033079A (en) * 1999-03-15 2000-03-07 Hudyma; Russell High numerical aperture ring field projection system for extreme ultraviolet lithography
JP4143236B2 (en) 1999-10-15 2008-09-03 キヤノン株式会社 Image forming apparatus
JP2001185480A (en) * 1999-10-15 2001-07-06 Nikon Corp Optical projection system and projection exposure device equipped with the system
KR100787525B1 (en) 2000-08-01 2007-12-21 칼 짜이스 에스엠티 아게 6 Mirror-microlithography-projection objective
DE10052289A1 (en) * 2000-10-20 2002-04-25 Zeiss Carl 8 mirror microlithography projection lens
US6785051B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2004-08-31 Corning Incorporated Intrinsic birefringence compensation for below 200 nanometer wavelength optical lithography components with cubic crystalline structures
JPWO2003025173A1 (en) * 2001-09-17 2004-12-24 武 今西 Novel antisense oligonucleotide derivative against hepatitis C virus
JP2004022945A (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-01-22 Canon Inc Aligner and aligning method
JP2004158786A (en) 2002-11-08 2004-06-03 Canon Inc Projection optical system and exposure device
JP2004252363A (en) * 2003-02-21 2004-09-09 Canon Inc Reflection type projection optical system
JP2004252358A (en) 2003-02-21 2004-09-09 Canon Inc Reflective projection optical system and exposing device
JP2005057154A (en) * 2003-08-07 2005-03-03 Canon Inc Aligner
TWI311691B (en) * 2003-10-30 2009-07-01 Asml Netherlands Bv Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method
JP5106858B2 (en) 2003-12-15 2012-12-26 カール・ツァイス・エスエムティー・ゲーエムベーハー Projection objective having a high numerical aperture and a planar end face
JP2005189247A (en) 2003-12-24 2005-07-14 Nikon Corp Projection optical system and exposure device provided with the projection optical system
WO2005098504A1 (en) 2004-04-08 2005-10-20 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Imaging system with mirror group
US8011793B2 (en) 2004-12-15 2011-09-06 European Space Agency Wide field four mirror telescope using off-axis aspherical mirrors
DE602006014368D1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2010-07-01 Zeiss Carl Smt Ag MICROLITHOGRAPHY PROJECTION SYSTEM WITH AN ACCESSIBLE MEMBRANE OR APERTURE PANEL
EP2169465A1 (en) 2005-05-13 2010-03-31 Carl Zeiss SMT AG A six-mirror EUV projection system
FR2899698A1 (en) * 2006-04-07 2007-10-12 Sagem Defense Securite DEVICE FOR COLLECTING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION FLUX IN EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET
DE102006017336B4 (en) 2006-04-11 2011-07-28 Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH, 73447 Lighting system with zoom lens
US20080118849A1 (en) * 2006-11-21 2008-05-22 Manish Chandhok Reflective optical system for a photolithography scanner field projector
EP1930771A1 (en) 2006-12-04 2008-06-11 Carl Zeiss SMT AG Projection objectives having mirror elements with reflective coatings
EP1950594A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-07-30 Carl Zeiss SMT AG Imaging optical system, projection illumination unit for microlithography with such an optical system, method for manufacturing a microstructured component with such a projection illumination unit, microstructured component produced by the manufacturing method and use of such an optical system
DE102007051671A1 (en) 2007-10-26 2009-05-07 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Imaging optics and projection exposure system for microlithography with such an imaging optics
JP5902884B2 (en) * 2007-10-26 2016-04-13 カール・ツァイス・エスエムティー・ゲーエムベーハー Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus for microlithography including this kind of imaging optical system
CN101836164B (en) * 2007-10-26 2013-03-13 卡尔蔡司Smt有限责任公司 Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for micro-lithography with an imaging optical system of this type

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0267766A2 (en) 1986-11-10 1988-05-18 Compact Spindle Bearing Corporation Catoptric reduction imaging systems
US6750948B2 (en) 1999-10-15 2004-06-15 Nikon Corporation Projection optical system, projection exposure apparatus having the projection optical system, projection method thereof, exposure method thereof and fabricating method for fabricating a device using the projection exposure apparatus
US20020056815A1 (en) 2000-02-14 2002-05-16 Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung Trading As Carl Zeiss 6-mirror microlithography projection objective
WO2003016977A2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-27 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Objective with pupil obscuration
US7209286B2 (en) 2001-08-16 2007-04-24 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Objective with pupil obscuration
EP1434093A2 (en) 2002-12-27 2004-06-30 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Catoptric projection system, exposure apparatus and device fabrication method
DE102005042005A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2006-07-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Objective lens esp. as micro-lithography projection objective, has objective divided into first part-objective with single mirror and second part-objective with primary and secondary mirror
WO2006069725A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-07-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag High aperture lens with an obscured pupil
US20060232867A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-10-19 Hans-Jurgen Mann Catoptric objectives and systems using catoptric objectives

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR101592136B1 (en) 2016-02-04
US8576376B2 (en) 2013-11-05
CN102819197A (en) 2012-12-12
EP2203787A1 (en) 2010-07-07
KR101515663B1 (en) 2015-04-27
US20140036246A1 (en) 2014-02-06
JP2011502347A (en) 2011-01-20
CN101836164B (en) 2013-03-13
DE102008042917A1 (en) 2009-04-30
EP2203787B1 (en) 2014-05-14
TWI391704B (en) 2013-04-01
CN101836164A (en) 2010-09-15
US20160004165A1 (en) 2016-01-07
KR20100102586A (en) 2010-09-24
WO2009052932A1 (en) 2009-04-30
EP2533104B1 (en) 2016-05-11
CN102819197B (en) 2016-06-22
US20100231885A1 (en) 2010-09-16
KR20150006019A (en) 2015-01-15
JP5337159B2 (en) 2013-11-06
US9152056B2 (en) 2015-10-06
TW200921145A (en) 2009-05-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2533104B1 (en) Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus therewith
EP2616865B1 (en) Imaging optical system
EP2396700B1 (en) Imaging optical system and projection exposure installation for microlithography with an imaging optical system of this type
US7209286B2 (en) Objective with pupil obscuration
TWI714524B (en) Illumination optical unit for projection lithography, pupil facet mirror, optical system, illumination system, projection exposure apparatus, method for producing a microstructured component, and microstructured component
EP2297612B1 (en) Imaging optics
EP2169465A1 (en) A six-mirror EUV projection system
US20100231886A1 (en) Imaging optical system and projection exposure apparatus for microlithography including an imaging optical system
US20080123807A1 (en) Illumination optics for projection microlithography
US8605255B2 (en) Imaging optical system and projection exposure system including the same
KR101388330B1 (en) Imaging optics and projection exposure installation for microlithography with an imaging optics of this type
KR20110137787A (en) Illumination optics unit and optical systems for microlithography
EP2192446B1 (en) Microlithography projection system with an accessible aperture stop
KR20020031057A (en) 8-Mirror-microlithography -projection objective
EP2541324A1 (en) Optical system
US20150055110A1 (en) Illumination optical unit for projection lithography
US8558991B2 (en) Imaging optical system and related installation and method
EP2761355B1 (en) Imaging catoptric euv projection optical unit
EP3791230A1 (en) Optical system for transferring original structure portions of a lithography mask, projection optical unit for imaging an object field in which at least one original structure portion of the lithography mask is arrangeable, and lithography mask
US20170285493A1 (en) Projection exposure method and projection exposure apparatus
US20120069314A1 (en) Imaging optics and projection exposure installation for microlithography with an imaging optics of this type

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120613

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 2203787

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20131106

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20151211

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: MANN, HANS-JUERGEN

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 2203787

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 799120

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008044255

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160811

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 799120

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160912

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160812

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008044255

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20161002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161031

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20081002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161031

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160511

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20231019

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231020

Year of fee payment: 16