EP2519813A1 - Seal integrity evaluation device and method of use thereof - Google Patents
Seal integrity evaluation device and method of use thereofInfo
- Publication number
- EP2519813A1 EP2519813A1 EP10795841A EP10795841A EP2519813A1 EP 2519813 A1 EP2519813 A1 EP 2519813A1 EP 10795841 A EP10795841 A EP 10795841A EP 10795841 A EP10795841 A EP 10795841A EP 2519813 A1 EP2519813 A1 EP 2519813A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- probe
- container
- seal
- electrolyte
- fluid supply
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/40—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using electric means, e.g. by observing electric discharges
Definitions
- the present disclosure generally provides apparatuses for evaluating the integrity of a container seal. More particularly, the present disclosure provides apparatuses for evaluating the seal integrity of liquid-filled containers of varying sizes, and methods for evaluating such seals.
- Containers with resealable closures are used throughout the food and beverage industry.
- the closures are designed to prevent product leakage and yet they must also provide the user with easy open access to the contents of the container.
- Resealable closures are appropriate when the container contents are beverages or food products because these closures enable consumers to dispense a desired portion of the beverage or food product and then reseal the remainder of the product for later consumption.
- One problem with this type of sealed container is leakage, which is more common, for example, with plastic containers.
- the leaks are primarily attributable to processing conditions such as heat exposure, finish abrasions, fill temperature, head space, pull-up range, and inversion.
- processing conditions such as heat exposure, finish abrasions, fill temperature, head space, pull-up range, and inversion.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,535,618 to Konieczka discloses a destructive method for testing for leaks in sealed containers.
- the method of that invention includes measuring for electrical conductivity between contents of a sealed container and an electrolyte solution in which the container is partially immersed.
- the method disclosed in the patent detects a container seal leak if there is electric current flowing from an electrode in a solution to a second electrode positioned within the container contents. Conversely, if no electric current flow is detected, then the container seal is not leaking.
- a device currently used in accordance with the teachings of the '618 patent for testing container seals requires the operator to perform two distinct, time
- the operator In a first jig, the operator must pierce a surface of the container with a dri ll bit mounted in a drill press. Next, the operator must transport the container to a testing device and properly secure the container before beginning the testing procedure. Since the liquid contents of the container can be spilled while transporting the pierced container, the device has an inherent level of imprecision which can affect the accuracy of test results and the veri fication of earl ier test results. In addition, the components comprising the testing devices are numerous and are not integrated into a single apparatus. As a result, the testing device is inefficiently packaged and consumes a disproportionate amount of workspace. Also, because the prior device is immobile, the operator is precluded from repositioning the testing device or temporarily moving the testing device closer to or away from the container production line.
- the prior conventional test apparatus of the '61 8 patent employs a manually moved member to secure and deform the container during the test process.
- developing the necessary force to deform or squeeze the container requires muscular exertion by a human operator.
- the manually moved member is subject to variation based upon the individuality of the operation and the operator, which further reduces the precision of the testing results.
- the operator can experience some fatigue when repeatedly applying the necessary muscular exertion to the manually moved member.
- the manually moved member i.e., a hand crank
- an external pressure source is used by the apparatus of the '618 patent, and because the rigidity of plastic containers can vary, the amount of pressure inside the container cannot be quantified at the point of seal rupture.
- the present disclosure provides an apparatus for an electroconductivity test.
- the apparatus and method involves inserting one probe (e.g., electrode) into a sealed container (filled with a conductive water/salt solution) and a second probe (e.g., electrode) placed in a conductive water/salt solution bath.
- the container is then internally pressurized with a fluid such as, for example, air or water until electroconductivity is observed between the two probes.
- the apparatus is used in the evaluation and qualification of new packages and package seal quality.
- apparatuses for evaluating the integrity of a container seal include a holder so constructed and arranged to receive a container having a seal and containing an electrolyte product, a probe actuating device having a first probe removably attached to a lower portion thereof, the first probe having a tip portion that is so constructed and arranged to puncture the container when the probe actuating device is actuated, a fluid supply fluidly connected to the first probe, an electrolyte bath having a second probe at least partially immersed therein, and a conductivity meter connected to the first probe and the second probe.
- the first probe is attached by attachment means selected from the group consisting of magnetic, adhesive, or combinations thereof.
- the first probe may further have a hollow cylindrical shape that is so constructed and arranged to deliver a fluid from the fluid supply to an interior of the container.
- the first probe and the second probe are electrodes.
- the container and the container seal are made of non-conductive materials selected from the group consisting of plastic, glass, foil, or combinations thereof.
- the seal may be a screw-on plastic cap.
- the electrolyte product is selected from the group consisting of fruit juice, flavored water, a pediatric electrolyte drink, carbonated beverages and teas, isotonic beverages, or combinations thereof.
- the electrolyte bath includes water and an electrolyte selected from the group consisting of aluminum chloride, citric acid, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, or combinations thereof.
- the probe actuating device is a press that is actuated by means selected from the group consisting of manually, mechanically, electrically, or combinations thereof.
- the apparatuses include a mobile platform.
- apparatuses for evaluating the integrity of a container seal include a holder for receiving a container having a seal and containing an electrolyte product, a probe actuating device having a first hollow probe attached to a lower portion thereof, the first hollow probe having a tip portion that is so constructed and arranged to puncture the container, a fluid supply fluidly connected to the first hollow probe, the fluid supply so constructed and arranged to deliver a pressurized fluid to an interior of the container through a fluid supply tube and the first hollow probe, an electrolyte bath having a second probe at least partially immersed therein, and a conductivity meter connected to each of the first hollow probe and the second probe.
- the first hollow probe is a removable probe attached to the probe actuating device by attachment means selected from the group consisting of magnetic, adhesive, or combinations thereof.
- the first hollow probe and the second probe are electrodes.
- the container and the container seal are made of non-conductive materials selected from the group consisting of plastic, glass, foil, or combinations thereof.
- the seal may be a screw-on plastic cap.
- the electrolyte product is selected from the group consisting of fruit juice, flavored water, a pediatric electrolyte drink, carbonated beverages and teas, isotonic beverages, or combinations thereof.
- the electrolyte bath includes water and an electrolyte selected from the group consisting of aluminum chloride, citric acid, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, or combinations thereof.
- the probe actuating device is a press that is actuated by means selected from the group consisting of manually, mechanically, electrically, or combinations thereof.
- the apparatuses further include a mobile platform.
- methods for evaluating the integrity of a container seal include actuating a probe actuating device having a first removable probe thereon in a direction that is toward a container having a seal and containing an electrolyte product, inserting the first removable probe into the container such that the first removable probe is at least partially immersed in the electrolyte product, separating removable probe from probe actuating device, placing the container having the first removable probe therein into an electrolyte bath such that at least the seal of the container is immersed in the electrolyte bath, the electrolyte bath having a second probe at least partially immersed therein, connecting each of the first and second probes to a conductivity meter, and measuring an electrical conductivity from one probe to another using the conductivity meter, wherein the seal is not leaking if there is no measured flow of electrons from one probe to the other, and the seal is leaking if there is a flow of electrons from one probe to the other.
- the methods further include puncturing the container with the removable probe.
- the removable probe may be hollow and may be attached to a fluid supply by a fluid supply tube.
- the methods further include supplying a pressurized fluid from the fluid supply to an interior of the container through the fluid supply tube and hollow removable probe.
- the methods further include measuring an internal pressure in the container using a pressure gauge at a time when the conductivity meter begins to measure an electrical conductivity from one probe to the other.
- methods for evaluating the integrity of a container seal include actuating a probe actuating device having a first probe thereon in a direction that is toward a container having a seal and containing an electrolyte product, the first probe having a hollow cylindrical shape and being fluidly connected to a fluid supply by a fluid supply tube, inserting the first probe into the container such that a portion of the first probe is at least partially immersed in the electrolyte product, placing the container having the first probe therein into an electrolyte bath such that at least the seal of the container is immersed in the electrolyte bath, the electrolyte bath having a second probe at least partially immersed therein, connecting the first and second probes to a conductivity meter, detecting an electrical conductivity from one probe to another using the conductivity meter, wherein the seal is not leaking if there is no measured flow of electrons from one probe to the other, and the seal is leaking if there is a flow of electrons from
- the methods further include puncturing the container with the first probe.
- the first probe may be a removable probe that is removably attached to the probe actuating device.
- the methods further include separating removable probe from probe actuating device prior to placing the container having the first probe therein into the electrolyte bath.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a side view of an apparatus in accordance with embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of an apparatus in accordance with embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Apparatus 10 includes, for example, a container preparation portion 12 and a seal integrity testing portion 14.
- a container 16 having a seal may be inverted and placed into a block holder 18 that is configured to hold container 16 while a probe 20, or first electrode, is inserted therein.
- block holder 18 includes a means for engaging containers of different sizes.
- the engaging means permits the apparatus to test different sized containers, i.e. large and small containers, thereby increasing the versatility and value of apparatus 10.
- the means comprises at least one insert 19, each with an engaging surface or a plurality of engaging surfaces.
- Insert 19 can be removably attached to block holder 18. Insert 19 enhances the ability of block holder 18 to engage containers of different shapes and sizes. The number, size, and configuration of inserts 19 can vary depending on the size and shape of the container. Insert 19 has an engaging surface which comes into direct contact with an outer surface of container 16 as block holder 18 engages container 12. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that insert 19 could be integrated into block holder 18 to form an integral structure, the integral structure having a distinct engaging surface that contacts an outer surface of container 16. Alternatively, insert 19 could be removably set into block holder 18 and configured to be changed in order to allow containers 16 of different sizes to be tested.
- insert 19 enable apparatus 10 to evaluate seals 22 on containers 16 of different sizes and shapes.
- apparatus 10 is capable of evaluating containers 16 with capacities ranging from 1 to 128 ounces. However, by increasing the size of the components of apparatus 10 can be used to evaluate containers larger than 128 ounces.
- apparatus 10 is capable of evaluating containers 16 with capacities of about 4 ounces.
- apparatus 10 is capable of evaluating containers other than circular, including containers that are ellipsoidal, square, triangular, or rectangular. However, it may be desired to modify certain features, such as the shape of insert 19 and holding block 1 8 to better accommodate a particular shape.
- At least one insert 19 could define a "V" shape to better accommodate a triangular-shaped container.
- apparatus 10 uses pressurized fluid to provide an accurate and relatively immediate feedback of the actual pressure in the sealed container 16, which provides a quantifiable burst pressure value at point of failure. This, in turn, provides a means of quantifying the quality or robustness of the seal in addition to pass/fai l result.
- Electrolyte solution 17 may be a beverage of some kind including, for example, fruit juice, flavored water, a pediatric electrolyte drink, carbonated beverages and teas, isotonic beverages, etc. Regardless, the beverage or liquid contained in container 16 includes at least one electrolyte such as, but not limited to, potassium chloride, sodium citrate, sodium chloride, or combinations thereof. Electrolyte solution 17 may also include a carbohydrate including, for example, sucrose, glucose, fructose, maltodextrins, or combinations thereof.
- the present apparatuses 10 could also be used to test the integrity of a seal on a container containing foods such as purees, yogurts, etc.
- apparatus 10 is not limited to use with the specific electrolyte solutions discussed above.
- seal 22 and sealed container 16 do not conduct electricity. Accordingly, container 16 and seal 22 may be made of a material or materials that do not conduct electricity, or container 16 and seal must be electrically insulated.
- seals 22 of the present disclosure may include, but are not limited to, plastic caps, plastic lids, foil induction seals, pull tab seals, crown caps for bottles, tear cap seals, laminated flexible seals, resealable seals, foil conduction seals, etc.
- seal 22 is a resealable seal that can be closed to provide a leak seal to prevent leakage of an electrolyte solution contained therein.
- resealable seals include, for example, snap-open and push-pull closures, screw-on metal and plastic lids and caps, and spray pump nozzles with screw-on metal and plastic lids and caps.
- the containers and seals tested using the present apparatuses need not be resealable containers and may include, for example, non-resealable containers and containers with non-screw-on tops.
- Containers 16 of the present disclosure may include any known container 16 that is non-conducting or insulated, as described above.
- Such containers 16 may include, for example, glass and plastic bottles, foil packages, flexible packaging, cans, or combinations thereof.
- a press 24 is used to drive probe 20 downward to puncture container 16 and deposit at least a portion of probe 20 therein.
- probe 20 is a removable probe.
- Press 24 may be any device capable of driving probe 20 downward such as, but not limited to, a mechanical press, a hydraulic press, an electric press, etc.
- press 24 includes a lever 26 that, when pulled by an operator, drives probe 20 downward.
- Probe 20 is configured for several functions with respect to the present apparatuses and methods.
- probe 20 has a tip portion 28 that is sufficiently sharp so as to allow tip portion 28 to puncture container 16 to insert at least tip portion 28 of probe 20 therein.
- Tip portion 28 extends far enough into container 16 so as to be at least partially immersed in electrolyte solution 1 7 contained in container 16.
- container 16 Upon insertion of a portion of probe 20 into container 16, container 16 remains sufficiently sealed off from ambient pressure since probe 20 and container 16 are in a pressure- sealed relationship.
- Probe 20 is fixed spatially in its partially immersed position by the construction of probe 20.
- probe 20 can be of any shape capable of being at least partially inserted into the container 16 being tested in the manner described herein.
- probe 20 is of a long, thin cylindrical shape. Such a shape requires a minimum opening in container 16 through which probe 20 is inserted during the puncture of container 16 by probe 20.
- the cylindrical shape also allows for a better fit and a leak-proof seal.
- probe 20 may have any shape or size known in the art that is capable of puncturing and being inserted into container 16.
- probe 20 may be removably associated with press 24 such thai when press 24 drives probe 20 downward into container 16, probe 20 will stay with container 16 as press 24 is driven upward into a starting position.
- probe 20 may have a magnet attached to an upper side thereof that interacts with a magnet on a lower side of press 24.
- probe 20 may have a releasable adhesive on an upper side thereof that releasable adheres to a lower side of press 24. Probe 20 may release from press 24 by manual separation of the two components after probe 20 is inserted into container 16.
- probe 20 may remain in container 16 if friction forces between probe 20 and container 16 (after probe 20 is inserted into container 16) are higher than the magnetic or adhesive forces between probe 20 and press 24.
- friction forces between probe 20 and container 16 after probe 20 is inserted into container 16
- magnetic or adhesive forces between probe 20 and press 24 The skilled artisan will appreciate, of course, that other methods for removably adhering probe 20 to press 24 may be used, as well as other means of removing probe 20 from press 24.
- probe 20 acts as a first electrode, which will be one of two electrodes that complete an electrical; circuit for purposes of testing the integrity of seal 22 of container 16.
- Probe 20, or first electrode may be made of any material capable of conducting an electrical current. Such materials may include, but are not limited to, aluminum, copper, gold, iron, steel, or combinations thereof.
- Probe 20 is connected to a first wire 46 capable of conducting electric current, which, in turn, is connected to either the positive or negative terminal of a multimeter 48 (e.g., conductivity meter).
- a multimeter 48 e.g., conductivity meter
- probe 20 also acts as a pressurizing means to pressurize the inside of container 16.
- a pressure regulator 34 is located to the left side of press 24 and block holder 18.
- Pressure regulator 34 includes a pressure gauge 36, a fluid supply connection 38, a fluid supply on/off switch 40, and a fluid supply hose 42 that connects pressure regulator 34 and probe 20.
- Pressure regulator 34 is so constructed and arranged to supply a fluid such as, for example, air or water, to probe 20 to be delivered to the inside of container 16 via a hollow channel portion of probe 20 (not shown).
- probe 20 is configured not only to have sharp tip portion 28 for puncturing container 16, but probe 20 also has a hollowed-out inside portion (not shown) that is so constructed and arranged to receive fluid from fluid supply 39 and fluid supply tube 42 and del iver the fluid to the inside of container 16 so as to internally pressurize container 16 to test the integrity of seal 22.
- Fluid supply tube 42 is so constructed and arranged to follow probe 20 from container preparation portion 12 of apparatus 10 to seal integrity testing portion 14 of apparatus 10 in order to pressurize the inside of container 16. This method will be described further herein below.
- Container preparation portion 12 also includes a storage tank 44 that may be used to store any of the elements used to complete apparatus 10.
- storage tank 44 may be used to store extra probes 20, containers 16, fluid supply hoses 42, or electrolyte solution.
- storage tank 44 need not be limited to these uses and may be used for any storage purpose known in the art.
- electrolyte solution 30 must contain at least one electrolyte such as, for example, aluminum chloride, citric acid, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, or combinations thereof.
- electrolyte solution 20 is an aqueous solution of water and any one of the above-mentioned electrolytes.
- the concentration of electrolyte solution 30 may comprise from about 0.01 % to about 10% by weight of an electrolyte and the balance water.
- electrolyte solution 30 comprises from about 0.1 % to
- I I about 5%, or from about 0.1 % to about 3%, or about 0.3% to about 1 % by weight electrolyte and the balance water.
- first wire 46 that connects to probe 20 is attached to either the positive or negative terminal of multimeter 48.
- a second probe 50 is inserted into electrolyte solution 30 and a second wire 52 connects from second probe 50 to an opposite terminal of multimeter 48.
- Second probe 50 acts as a second electrode and may be made of materials similar to probe 20, as discussed above.
- Second wire 52 is also capable of conducting electrical current similar to first wire 46, as is discussed above.
- probe 20 acts as a cathode.
- probe 20 acts as an anode.
- probe 20 does not contact electrolyte solution 30 and second probe 50 does not contact electrolyte solution 17. Accordingly, the skilled artisan will appreciate that, as long as seal 22 is not compromised, no electrical current will register with multimeter 48. However, should seal 22 become compromised such that seal 22 leaks, a flow of electrons will be detected between probe 20 and second probe 50.
- the flow of electrons between probe 20 and second probe 50 may be generated by multimeter 48, a source of direct current, or by making the electrodes out of two dissimilar metals, in which case the electrons will flow from one electrode to the other due to the electrochemical potential between the two dissimilar metals.
- any source of direct electric current known to those skilled in the art may be used.
- a non-limiting example of a source of direct electric current is a battery having a positive and negative terminal.
- the source of direct electric current may be a low voltage, low ampere current source for purposes of both cost savings and safety considerations.
- a source of direct electric current is rated at a voltage in the range of from about 1 volt to about 5 volts, or from about I volt to about 1 .2 volts, or about 1 .2 volts, and has a current rating in the range of from about 100 milliamps to about 200 milliamps, or about 100 mi lliamps.
- the method of leak detection that utilizes two dissimilar metals is essentially the same as the method using a source of direct electric current.
- the difference between the leak detection method using two dissimilar metals (e.g., a galvanic cell) versus the method using a source of direct electric current is that in the method using two dissimilar metals (e.g., a galvanic cell), probe 20 and second probe 50 must be made from dissimilar metals and a conductivity measurement device is used instead of a source of direct electric current.
- the conductivity measurement device is connected to probe 20 and the second probe 50 in the same manner as the source of direct electric current is connected to probe 20 and second probe 50.
- the conductivity measurement device not only measures the conductivity of the galvanic cell, but also completes the circuit of the galvanic cell, allowing the electrons to flow from one electrode to the other.
- the apparatus is capable of making an electrical circuit, and electricity will flow from one electrode to the other if the seal is leaking.
- the direction of the flow of electricity will depend upon which electrode is the cathode and which electrode is the anode.
- the electric current flow may be measured by any means and in any manner known to those skilled in the art for measuring electric current flow. Examples of useful means of measuring the electric current flow include, but are not limited to, ohm meters, conductivity meters, volt meters, and amp meters, or combinations thereof. If no electrical current flow is measured, then seal 22 is not leaking. If an electrical current flow is measured, then seal 22 is leaking. The size of the leak may be determined by the magnitude of current flow, with a greater level of current flow indicating a larger leak.
- seal 22 of container 16 is defective. This may signal to the test operator that this specific container 16 is defective. In the case where several containers 1 6 are tested and several containers 16 are found to have seal integrity issues, this may signal to a test operator that an overall manufacturing problem may exist and cause the manufacturing engineer to reevaluate to the manufacturing processor line to rectify the problem.
- pressure regulator 34 is turned on using fluid supply on off switch 40, and is used to slowly deliver an incrementally increasing and known amount of pressurized fluid via fluid supply line 42 to an inside of container 16.
- pressure regulator 34 may slowly deliver an increasing amount of pressurized fluid (e.g., air or water) to the inside of container 16, via fluid supply tube 42 to increase the pressure therein.
- pressurized fluid e.g., air or water
- apparatus 10 also includes a mobile platform 54 that allows the test operator to vary the location and precise position of the apparatus such that the apparatus can be moved closer to or away from the container production line or to other container testing areas.
- the position of mobile platform 54 can be varied to reduce operator fatigue.
- Tank 32 on mobile platform 54 is configured to store a liquid solution, preferably an electrolyte solution 30.
- Tank 32 can be secured to the mobile platform in a number of ways to prevent unwanted movement of tank 32.
- the manner of securing tank 32 should preferably permit tank 32 to be removed from mobile platform 54 for cleaning and maintenance.
- Multimeter 48 e.g., conductivity meter
- the methods may include, for example, inserting a first probe into the container having a seal and containing an electrolyte product such that the first removable probe is at least partially immersed in the electrolyte product, separating removable probe from probe actuating device, placing the container having the first removable probe therein into an electrolyte bath such that at least the seal of the container is immersed in the electrolyte bath, the electrolyte bath having a second probe at least partially immersed therein, connecting the first and second probes to a conductivity meter, and measuring an electrical conductivity from one probe to another using the conductivity meter, wherein the seal is not leaking if there is no measured flow of electrons from one probe to the other, and the seal is leaking if there is a flow of electrons from one probe to the other.
- the methods may further include puncturing the container with the removable probe, supplying a pressurized fluid from the fluid supply to an interior of the container through the fluid supply tube and hollow removable probe, and/or measuring an internal pressure in the container using a pressure gauge at a time when the conductivity meter begins to measure an electrical conductivity from one probe to the other.
- the removable probe may be hollow and may be attached to a fluid supply by a fluid supply tube.
- methods for evaluating the integrity of a container seal may include, for example, actuating a probe actuating device having a first probe thereon in a direction that is toward a container having a seal and containing an electrolyte product, the first probe having a hollow cylindrical shape and being fluidly connected to a fluid supply by a fluid supply tube, inserting the first probe into the container such that a portion of the first probe is at least partially immersed in the electrolyte product, placing the container having the first probe therein into an electrolyte bath such that at least the seal of the container is immersed in the electrolyte bath, the electrolyte bath having a second probe at least partially immersed therein, connecting the first and second probes to a conductivity
- the methods further include puncturing the container with the first probe.
- the first probe may be a removable probe that is removably attached to the probe actuating device, and/or separating removable probe from probe actuating device prior to placing the container having the first probe therein into the electrolyte bath.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US29077309P | 2009-12-29 | 2009-12-29 | |
PCT/US2010/059355 WO2011081801A1 (en) | 2009-12-29 | 2010-12-08 | Seal integrity evaluation device and method of use thereof |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2519813A1 true EP2519813A1 (en) | 2012-11-07 |
EP2519813B1 EP2519813B1 (en) | 2017-09-13 |
Family
ID=43530342
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10795841.5A Not-in-force EP2519813B1 (en) | 2009-12-29 | 2010-12-08 | Seal integrity evaluation device and method of use thereof |
Country Status (14)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8973425B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2519813B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5663034B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102686993B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2010337243B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112012016123A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2785740C (en) |
CL (1) | CL2012001801A1 (en) |
CR (1) | CR20120383A (en) |
MX (1) | MX2012007529A (en) |
MY (1) | MY163643A (en) |
RU (1) | RU2544263C2 (en) |
SG (1) | SG181804A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011081801A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101512298B1 (en) * | 2013-08-07 | 2015-04-15 | 강성일 | Air tight container of easy to leak inspection and inspection method of using it and inspection apparatus |
CN104634516B (en) * | 2015-03-09 | 2017-04-05 | 青岛双蝶集团股份有限公司 | The permeable verifying attachment of condom |
RU2603339C1 (en) * | 2015-09-25 | 2016-11-27 | Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии "Росатом" (Госкорпорация "Росатом") | Method of measuring temperature, moisture content and rate of change thereof in sealed container with gaseous medium and device therefor |
CN105973549A (en) * | 2016-06-04 | 2016-09-28 | 陈志刚 | Electrode leak detection device |
CN105928664A (en) * | 2016-07-13 | 2016-09-07 | 金湖县常盛动力机械配件有限公司 | Leakage test fixture and airtightness and ventilation detection method for nozzle body part |
IT201600079175A1 (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2018-01-28 | Fillshape Srl | Envelope verification device and procedure for filling lines. |
WO2018064743A1 (en) * | 2016-10-07 | 2018-04-12 | Mmc Packaging Equipment Ltd | Cap inspection and manufacture |
RU2700292C2 (en) * | 2018-03-07 | 2019-09-16 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью НПЦ "Динамика" - Научно-производственный центр "Диагностика, надежность машин и комплексная автоматизация" | System and method of diagnosing machines |
US11504103B2 (en) | 2018-04-11 | 2022-11-22 | Eximis Surgical Inc. | Tissue specimen removal device, system and method |
US12018997B2 (en) | 2018-04-11 | 2024-06-25 | Eximis Surgical, Inc. | Tissue specimen removal device, system and method |
EP3849430B1 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2024-06-26 | Eximis Surgical Inc. | Tissue specimen removal device, system and method |
US11067473B2 (en) * | 2019-06-07 | 2021-07-20 | Packaging Technologies & Inspection, LLC | System and method for high voltage leak detection |
EP4073382B1 (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2024-04-10 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Methods for evaluating vapor pump performance |
Family Cites Families (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL7109071A (en) * | 1971-07-01 | 1973-01-03 | ||
US3981701A (en) * | 1973-08-10 | 1976-09-21 | H.W. Andersen Products Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling a volatile substance |
US3958448A (en) * | 1974-10-10 | 1976-05-25 | Aluminum Company Of America | Test apparatus for pressurized container and method |
DE2715399A1 (en) * | 1976-07-15 | 1978-01-19 | Takeda Chemical Industries Ltd | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CHECKING CLOSED CONTAINERS FOR DEFECTS |
US4135384A (en) * | 1976-09-29 | 1979-01-23 | Gte Sylvania Incorporated | Method of determining electrolyte leakage in hermetically sealed electrochemical cell |
US4089208A (en) * | 1977-01-07 | 1978-05-16 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Pressure test fixture for pressurized containers |
JPS57127830A (en) | 1981-12-18 | 1982-08-09 | Toyo Alum Kk | Apparatus for checking flexible container |
US4437353A (en) * | 1982-05-07 | 1984-03-20 | Hamerlinck R Dean | Pressurized container testing apparatus |
US4555935A (en) * | 1983-10-27 | 1985-12-03 | The Stroh Brewery Company | Apparatus for pressure testing of can bodies and lids |
US4733555A (en) * | 1987-04-13 | 1988-03-29 | Franks Stephen H | Pressure entry and test system |
US4909069A (en) * | 1987-11-27 | 1990-03-20 | Utah Medical Products, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting leaks in rubber gloves and the like |
US4864848A (en) * | 1988-02-29 | 1989-09-12 | Minnesota Automation, Inc. | Leak detection system |
US5214387A (en) * | 1989-03-06 | 1993-05-25 | Fenner Richard D | Electrolytic resistivity leak detector |
US5333492A (en) * | 1990-03-20 | 1994-08-02 | Product Suppliers Ag | Process and apparatus for leak-testing a package |
US5123278A (en) * | 1991-02-19 | 1992-06-23 | Ball Corporation | Pressure tester and method |
GB9206387D0 (en) * | 1992-03-24 | 1992-05-06 | Enderby George R | Container leak testing |
US5327784A (en) * | 1992-07-09 | 1994-07-12 | Ovonic Battery Company, Inc. | Apparatus for measuring the pressure inside a rechargeable electrochemical cell |
DE4223793A1 (en) * | 1992-07-20 | 1994-01-27 | Focke & Co | Method and device for checking the tightness of plastic bags |
JP3054040B2 (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 2000-06-19 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Weld leak detection device |
US5535618A (en) | 1995-01-31 | 1996-07-16 | The Quaker Oats Company | Seal integrity evaluation method |
JP2681764B2 (en) * | 1995-07-12 | 1997-11-26 | ジョーベン電機株式会社 | Inspection method of sealed package |
US6288554B1 (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 2001-09-11 | Joven Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Method for inspecting hermetically sealed package |
JP2000088788A (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2000-03-31 | Jiyooben Denki Kk | Inspection method for airtight package |
AUPQ667800A0 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2000-05-04 | Chubpak Australia Pty Ltd | Detection method |
US6526810B2 (en) | 2000-06-23 | 2003-03-04 | The Quaker Oats Company | Mobile apparatus and method for testing a container seal |
US6415651B1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2002-07-09 | The Quaker Oats Company | Mobile pneumatic apparatus and method for testing a container seal |
JP2002372509A (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-12-26 | Rikkaaman Nippon Kk | Method and device for inspecting leakage of sealed vessel |
TWI284202B (en) * | 2004-11-29 | 2007-07-21 | Yuanpei Inst Of Science And Te | Method for detecting defects in a package containing metal foil by cyclic voltammetry |
EP1999446A4 (en) * | 2006-03-22 | 2011-12-14 | Atmi Packaging Inc | Apparatus and methods for leak detection in bioprocessing bags |
US8104328B2 (en) * | 2006-03-22 | 2012-01-31 | Atmi Packaging, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for leak detection in bioprocessing bags |
-
2010
- 2010-12-08 CN CN201080059923.4A patent/CN102686993B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-08 JP JP2012547096A patent/JP5663034B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-08 AU AU2010337243A patent/AU2010337243B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-12-08 WO PCT/US2010/059355 patent/WO2011081801A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-12-08 EP EP10795841.5A patent/EP2519813B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2010-12-08 RU RU2012132483/28A patent/RU2544263C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-12-08 US US13/519,671 patent/US8973425B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-08 MY MYPI2012700374A patent/MY163643A/en unknown
- 2010-12-08 CA CA2785740A patent/CA2785740C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-08 MX MX2012007529A patent/MX2012007529A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2010-12-08 SG SG2012045126A patent/SG181804A1/en unknown
- 2010-12-08 BR BR112012016123A patent/BR112012016123A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2012
- 2012-06-29 CL CL2012001801A patent/CL2012001801A1/en unknown
- 2012-07-17 CR CR20120383A patent/CR20120383A/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2011081801A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CL2012001801A1 (en) | 2013-03-22 |
EP2519813B1 (en) | 2017-09-13 |
AU2010337243A1 (en) | 2012-07-19 |
US20130118233A1 (en) | 2013-05-16 |
JP2013515967A (en) | 2013-05-09 |
RU2012132483A (en) | 2014-03-27 |
AU2010337243B2 (en) | 2014-06-19 |
BR112012016123A2 (en) | 2016-05-31 |
CA2785740A1 (en) | 2011-07-07 |
CN102686993A (en) | 2012-09-19 |
MY163643A (en) | 2017-10-13 |
MX2012007529A (en) | 2012-07-20 |
CN102686993B (en) | 2015-06-10 |
RU2544263C2 (en) | 2015-03-20 |
SG181804A1 (en) | 2012-07-30 |
CA2785740C (en) | 2015-05-26 |
WO2011081801A1 (en) | 2011-07-07 |
US8973425B2 (en) | 2015-03-10 |
JP5663034B2 (en) | 2015-02-04 |
CR20120383A (en) | 2012-08-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2785740C (en) | Seal integrity evaluation device and method of use thereof | |
US5535618A (en) | Seal integrity evaluation method | |
CN103796945B (en) | For the method for the integraty and leak tightness that measure filling production lines upper container | |
US20120180902A1 (en) | Method and device for filling containers with a filling material composed of at least one first and one second liquid component at a predetermined ratio | |
CN103063565B (en) | Electrolytic cell for detecting corrosion resistance of packaging material | |
US6415651B1 (en) | Mobile pneumatic apparatus and method for testing a container seal | |
JPS60127438A (en) | Method and apparatus for leakage inspection of sealed container | |
CN210571199U (en) | Device for rapidly detecting sealing performance of suction nozzle | |
WO2021062381A1 (en) | Systems and methods for testing container integrity | |
US6526810B2 (en) | Mobile apparatus and method for testing a container seal | |
CN217586180U (en) | Bottle cap sealing performance testing tool | |
MXPA97005759A (en) | Seal integrity evaluation method | |
TH118743A (en) | Equipment for checking the strength of the seal And methods for using the said device | |
CN217466145U (en) | A equipment for packing article gas tightness detects | |
CN100371705C (en) | Tin plate coating film testing method and its testing apparatus | |
JPH10197389A (en) | Device for inspecting aluminum electrolytic capacitor for airtightness | |
CN103210315B (en) | Measurement device and measurement method | |
WO2023099718A1 (en) | Apparatus to enamel rate selected regions of metal objects | |
JP2002243702A (en) | Equipment for inspecting pin hole | |
TH118743B (en) | Equipment for checking the strength of the seal And methods for using the said device | |
JPH10132687A (en) | Method for judging empty can leakage and detector used therefor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20120718 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: DE Ref document number: 1174383 Country of ref document: HK |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20130705 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170504 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 928629 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602010045247 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170913 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 928629 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171214 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180113 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010045247 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602010045247 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180614 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20171213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171208 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171208 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20171231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171208 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180703 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171231 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171231 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20101208 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |