EP2491103A1 - Laundry compositions - Google Patents

Laundry compositions

Info

Publication number
EP2491103A1
EP2491103A1 EP10765412A EP10765412A EP2491103A1 EP 2491103 A1 EP2491103 A1 EP 2491103A1 EP 10765412 A EP10765412 A EP 10765412A EP 10765412 A EP10765412 A EP 10765412A EP 2491103 A1 EP2491103 A1 EP 2491103A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
emulsion
copolymer
silicone
polyethylene terephthalate
terephthalate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP10765412A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2491103B1 (en
Inventor
Christopher Clarkson Jones
Vanessa Kilhams
Jinfang Wang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=43302974&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2491103(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP2491103A1 publication Critical patent/EP2491103A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2491103B1 publication Critical patent/EP2491103B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3703Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3715Polyesters or polycarbonates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0017Multi-phase liquid compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3703Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/373Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing silicones
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3703Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/373Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing silicones
    • C11D3/3742Nitrogen containing silicones

Definitions

  • This invention relates to improvement to laundry compositions. More particularly, the invention is directed to an emulsion and to a laundry composition comprising the emulsion.
  • Silicone oils are known to be useful for softening fabrics, and are included in many laundry compositions. There is a problem with these materials, as they are expensive components, but the deposition onto fabrics is inefficient.
  • One way to increase the deposition of silicones is to formulate them in the form of an emulsion, using for example nonionic surfactants as an emulsifier.
  • this invention is directed to an emulsion comprising:-
  • a second aspect of the invention relates to a process to make the emulsion of the first aspect.
  • the process comprises mixing together a silicone liquid, a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and water.
  • the third aspect of the invention relates to a laundry composition comprising:- a) from 5 to 65 wt.% of a surfactant; and,
  • Another aspect of the invention relates to the use of a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate to increase the level of
  • the copolymer is ideally used in the form of an emulsion either alone, or as part of a laundry composition.
  • a formulation shall be considered physically "stable” when after 1 week at 21 degrees Celsius it exhibits no signs of phase separation.
  • the emulsion comprises:- (a) a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid; and,
  • the copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate preferably has a molecular weight of from 5000 to 50,000 Daltons, more preferably from 20,000 to 50,000 Daltons.
  • the particle present in the emulsion is preferably in the form of a liquid droplet.
  • the size of the liquid droplet is from 0.5 to 20 ⁇ .
  • the silicone liquid present in the particle of the emulsion preferably has a viscosity of from 5,000 to 100,000 cP.
  • a particle is considered as a discrete entity which is stable in its surrounding medium.
  • the medium can be air for an isolated solid particle, or water (an example of an aqueous continuous phase) for a liquid particle in an emulsion.
  • the process to make the emulsion comprises mixing together a silicone liquid, a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate (PET- POET) and water.
  • a silicone liquid a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate (PET- POET) and water.
  • PET- POET polyoxyethylene terephthalate
  • the copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate is first dissolved in water prior to addition to the silicone oil. More preferably the copolymer is dissolved in water to a concentration of 1 % by weight to provide an emulsifier solution.
  • Suitable mixing methods for the process include mixing the ingredients together using a high shear stirrer. A suitable time period is 90 seconds.
  • the emulsion typically comprises from 30 to 99.9 wt.%, preferably from 40 to 99 wt.% of the aqueous continuous phase.
  • the aqueous continuous phase may be solely water, or a water based mixture comprising water as a majority component.
  • the emulsion may further contain an emulsifying agent, for example a surfactant such as nonionic, anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and amphoteric surfactants.
  • an emulsifying agent for example a surfactant such as nonionic, anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and amphoteric surfactants.
  • the emulsifier can be mixed together with the other emulsion ingredients as
  • an emulsifying agent preferably it is a nonionic surfactant.
  • the PET-POET copolymer can act itself as an emulsifier, without the requirement for an additional emulsifier to be employed.
  • Suitable nonionic surfactants as emulsifiers include the (poly)-alkoxylated analogues of saturated or unsaturated fatty alcohols, for example, having from 8 to 22, preferably from 9 to 18, more preferably from 10 to 15 carbon atoms on average in the hydrocarbon chain thereof and preferably on average from 3 to 1 1 , more preferably from 4 to 9 alkyleneoxy groups. Most preferably, the alkyleneoxy groups are independently selected from ethyleneoxy, propyleneoxy and
  • butylenoxy especially ethyleneoxy and propylenoxy, or solely ethyleneoxy groups and alkyl polyglucosides as disclosed in EP 0 495 176.
  • the emulsion can be included in laundry products taking a number of forms.
  • the laundry product can take the form of a laundry treatment agent for fabric, in which case it can be a laundry composition comprising:- a) from 5 to 65 wt.% of a surfactant; and,
  • the emulsion is present in the laundry composition at a level of from 0.5 to 20 wt.%, more preferably from 1 to 10 wt.% based on the total composition.
  • the laundry composition may be a main wash composition, a rinse composition, or a pre- or after-wash treatment composition, all of which may be dilutable or non-dilutable.
  • Main wash compositions are preferred.
  • compositions of the invention may be in any physical form e.g. a solid such as a powder or granules, a tablet, a solid bar, a paste, gel or liquid, especially, an aqueous based liquid.
  • the compositions may be used in laundry compositions, especially in liquid, gel, powder or tablet laundry composition.
  • the pH range of the composition is from pH 7-12, preferably from pH 8.5 to 9.5. It is desirable to buffer the formulation at whatever the target pH of the composition is.
  • Another aspect of the invention relates to the use of a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate to increase the level of deposition of a silicone onto fabric.
  • the copolymer is ideally used in the form of an emulsion either alone, or as an emulsion included as part of a laundry composition.
  • the invention also may relate to the use an emulsion comprising a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid in an aqueous continuous phase to increase the level of deposition of a silicone onto fabric.
  • the emulsion is incorporated as part of a laundry product as described herein.
  • the laundry composition comprises a surfactant, preferably a detersive
  • Suitable surfactants comprise nonionic surfactants and anionic surfactants.
  • surfactants used are saturated.
  • Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include, in particular, the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide.
  • Specific nonionic detergent compounds are C6 to C22 alkyl phenol- ethylene oxide condensates, generally 5 to 25 EO, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic Cs to Cis primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 40 EO.
  • Suitable anionic detergent compounds which may be used are usually water- soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphates and sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals.
  • suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl sulphates, especially those obtained by sulphating higher Cs to Cis alcohols, produced for example from tallow or coconut oil, sodium and potassium alkyl Cg to C20 benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl C10 to C15 benzene sulphonates; and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum.
  • the preferred anionic detergent compounds are sodium Cn to C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates and sodium C12 to Cis alkyl sulphates.
  • anionic surfactants include fatty acid-based soaps containing between C8-C26 carbon atoms. Also applicable are surfactants such as those described in EP-A-328 177 (Unilever), which show resistance to salting-out, the alkyl polyglycoside surfactants described in EP-A-070 074, and alkyl
  • the total amount of surfactant present in the liquid composition is from 5 to 65 wt.%.
  • the total amount of surfactant is from 10 to 65 wt.%, preferably from 15 to 50 wt.%.
  • surfactants such as amphoteric, zwitterionic and cationic surfactants may also be present in addition to the aforementioned nonionic and anionic
  • the laundry composition may additionally comprise one or more of the following optional ingredients.
  • the laundry composition optionally comprises from 1 to 50 wt.% of a builder.
  • the builder is present at a level of from 1 to 40 wt.%.
  • Builder materials may be selected from 1 ) calcium sequestrant materials, 2) precipitating materials,
  • the size is in the range 0.1 to 10 microns (as measured by The Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer using laser diffraction ex MalvernTM).
  • calcium sequestrant builder materials examples include alkali metal
  • polyphosphates such as sodium tripolyphosphate and organic sequestrants, such as ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid.
  • Examples of precipitating builder materials include sodium orthophosphate and sodium carbonate.
  • Examples of calcium ion-exchange builder materials include the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicates, of which zeolites are the best known representatives, e.g. zeolite A, zeolite B (also known as zeolite P), zeolite C, zeolite X, zeolite Y and also the zeolite P-type as described in EP-A- 0,384,070.
  • the composition may also contain 0-50 wt.% of a builder or complexing agent such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid or the other builders mentioned below.
  • a builder or complexing agent such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid or the other builders mentioned below.
  • Many builders are also bleach-stabilising agents by virtue of their ability to complex metal ions.
  • Zeolite and carbonate carbonate (including bicarbonate and sesquicarbonate) are preferred builders.
  • the composition may contain as builder a crystalline aluminosilicate, preferably an alkali metal aluminosilicate, more preferably a sodium aluminosilicate. This is typically present at a level of less than 15 wt.%.
  • Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula:
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium.
  • the preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1 .5-3.5 S1O2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature.
  • the ratio of surfactants to aluminosilicate (where present) is preferably greater than 5:2, more preferably greater than 3:1 .
  • phosphate builders may be used.
  • 'phosphate' embraces diphosphate
  • silicates such as soluble silicates, metasilicates, layered silicates (e.g. SKS-6 from
  • the laundry detergent formulation is a non-phosphate built laundry detergent formulation, i.e., contains less than 1 wt.% of phosphate.
  • the laundry composition preferably comprises a blue or violet shading agent in the range from 0.0001 to 0.01 wt.%.
  • the shading agents reduce the perception of damage to many coloured garments and increase whiteness of white garments.
  • the shading agents are preferably selected from blue and violet dyes of the solvent, disperse, basic, direct and acid type listed in the Colour Index (Society of Dyers and Colourists and American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists 2002).
  • a direct violet or direct blue dyes is present.
  • the dyes are bis-azo, tris-azo dyes or triphendioxazine dye.
  • the carcinogenic benzidene based dyes are not preferred.
  • the laundry composition preferably comprises a fluorescent agent (optical brightener).
  • fluorescent agents are well known and many such fluorescent agents are available commercially. Usually, these fluorescent agents are supplied and used in the form of their alkali metal salts, for example, the sodium salts.
  • the total amount of the fluorescent agent or agents used in the composition is generally from 0.005 to 2 wt.%, more preferably 0.01 to 0.1 wt.%.
  • Preferred classes of fluorescer are: Di-styryl biphenyl compounds, e.g. Tinopal (Trade Mark) CBS-X, Di-amine stilbene di-sulphonic acid compounds, e.g. Tinopal DMS pure Xtra and Blankophor (Trade Mark) HRH, and Pyrazoline compounds, e.g.
  • Blankophor SN Preferred fluorescers are: sodium 2-(4-styryl-3-sulfophenyl)-2H- napthol[1 ,2-d]trazole, disodium 4,4'-bis ⁇ [(4-anilino-6-(N methyl-N-2 hydroxyethyl) amino 1 ,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino ⁇ stilbene-2-2' disulfonate, disodium 4,4'-bis ⁇ [(4- anilino-6-morpholino-1 ,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino ⁇ stilbene-2-2' disulfonate, and disodium 4,4'-bis(2-sulfoslyryl)biphenyl.
  • PERFUME sodium 2-(4-styryl-3-sulfophenyl)-2H- napthol[1 ,2-d]trazole
  • the laundry composition comprises a perfume.
  • the perfume is preferably in the range from 0.001 to 3 wt.%, most preferably 0.1 to 1 wt.%.
  • CTFA Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association
  • perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co. It is commonplace for a plurality of perfume components to be present in a formulation. In the compositions of the present invention it is envisaged that there will be four or more, preferably five or more, more preferably six or more or even seven or more different perfume components. In perfume mixtures preferably 15 to 25 wt.% are top notes. Top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]).
  • top-notes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol. Perfume and top note may be used to cue the fabric care benefit of the invention.
  • laundry treatment composition does not contain a peroxygen bleach, e.g., sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, and peracid.
  • a peroxygen bleach e.g., sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, and peracid.
  • the laundry composition may comprise one or more polymers.
  • examples are carboxymethylcellulose, poly(ethylene glycol), polyvinyl alcohol),
  • polycarboxylates such as polyacrylates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers, lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers, and cationic polysaccharide-based polymers.
  • a liquid detergent composition may optionally include a hydrotrope, which can prevent liquid crystal formation.
  • a hydrotrope which can prevent liquid crystal formation.
  • the addition of the hydrotrope thus aids the clarity/transparency of the composition.
  • Suitable hydrotropes include but are not limited to propylene glycol, ethanol, urea, salts of benzene sulphonate, toluene sulphonate, xylene sulphonate or cumene sulphonate.
  • Suitable salts include but are not limited to sodium, potassium, ammonium, monoethanolamine,
  • the hydrotrope is selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, xylene sulfonate, ethanol, and urea to provide optimum performance.
  • the amount of the hydrotrope is generally in the range of from 0 to 30%, preferably from 0.5 to 30%, more preferably from 0.5 to 30%, most preferably from 1 to 15%.
  • Example 1 Improved fabric softening as a result of emulsification of aminosilicone oil using PET-POET polymer
  • PET-POET polyethylene terephthalate-co-polyoxyethylene terephthalate copolymer
  • the PET-POET sample was prepared utilising a stainless steel reaction kettle which offers mechanical stirring, fine thermo-controlling and high vacuum level. The reaction kettle was supplied by Weihai Auto-control Reaction Kettle Ltd.
  • Aminosilicone oil (0.1 g of Hansa ASR 7020 ex. CHT) was added to a 14ml capacity squat form glass vial along with 9.9g of emulsifier solution (a 1 % solution of PET-POET in deionized water) and mixed using a high shear stirrer (VWR VDI12 microhomogenizer with S12N-12S tool on setting '5') for 90 seconds.
  • a comparative (control) sample was prepared using a procedure identical to the above, except that the 1 % emulsifier solution was prepared using a blend of non- ionic surfactants (85:15 ratio of Neodol 25-7 (primary alcohol ethoxylate ex. Shell Chemicals) to Synperonic A20 (POE primary alcohol ex. Croda) by weight respectively).
  • Model Wash Evaluation a) Preparation of wash liquor: The wash liquor was prepared by diluting Persil® Small and Mighty (concentrated liquid detergent) with local medium/soft water (typically 6-18°FH (French water hardness)) to achieve a 2.5g/l concentration. 50ml of wash liquor was added to each 500ml Linitest pot. b) Simulated Wash (Linitest laboratory scale washing machine Ex. Heraeus)
  • a sample of knitted polyester measuring 21 cm by 21 cm was placed into each Linitest pot containing the wash liquor and aminosilicone emulsions, and the pots were sealed.
  • the Linitest pots were attached to the Linitest cradle and rotated for 45 minutes at 40°C to simulate the main wash.
  • each Linitest pot was emptied of wash liquor.
  • An 85ml aliquot of water was added to each pot and the pots were re- sealed and returned to the Linitest to rotate for a further 10 minutes to simulate rinsing.
  • Rinsing was performed at the same temperature as the mainwash. This was repeated one further time, so that each fabric had experienced two simulated rinses.
  • Samples that underwent model wash evaluation were trimmed to 20cm by 20cm in size, then allowed to condition for 24 hours in a room with controlled
  • An indication of increased levels of deposition of silicone based materials to fabric substrates can be obtained by evaluating the change in fabric mechanical properties caused by lubrication of fibres and yarns due to the presence of silicone.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
  • Processes Of Treating Macromolecular Substances (AREA)
  • Silicon Polymers (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to an emulsion comprising a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid and an aqueous continuous phase, a process to make the emulsion, to a laundry composition comprising the emulsion, and to the use of the copolymer to increase silicone deposition onto fabric.

Description

LAUNDRY COMPOSITIONS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to improvement to laundry compositions. More particularly, the invention is directed to an emulsion and to a laundry composition comprising the emulsion.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Silicone oils are known to be useful for softening fabrics, and are included in many laundry compositions. There is a problem with these materials, as they are expensive components, but the deposition onto fabrics is inefficient. One way to increase the deposition of silicones is to formulate them in the form of an emulsion, using for example nonionic surfactants as an emulsifier.
However, the problem remains that the deposition is still inefficient. There is thus a need to increase the efficiency of deposition of silicones onto fabric.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In a first aspect, this invention is directed to an emulsion comprising:-
(a) a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and
polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid; and,
(b) an aqueous continuous phase. A second aspect of the invention relates to a process to make the emulsion of the first aspect. The process comprises mixing together a silicone liquid, a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and water. The third aspect of the invention relates to a laundry composition comprising:- a) from 5 to 65 wt.% of a surfactant; and,
b) from 0.5 to 30 wt.% of an emulsion according to the first aspect. Another aspect of the invention relates to the use of a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate to increase the level of
deposition of a silicone onto fabric. The copolymer is ideally used in the form of an emulsion either alone, or as part of a laundry composition. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As used herein, the term "comprising" means "including", "made up of, "composed of, "consisting and/or consisting essentially of. All percentages quoted are wt.% unless otherwise stated.
Except in the operating and comparative examples, or where otherwise explicitly indicated, all numbers in this description indicating amounts or ratios of material or conditions of reaction, physical properties of materials and/or use are to be understood as modified by the word "about".
As used herein, a formulation shall be considered physically "stable" when after 1 week at 21 degrees Celsius it exhibits no signs of phase separation. The emulsion comprises:- (a) a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid; and,
(b) an aqueous continuous phase. The copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate preferably has a molecular weight of from 5000 to 50,000 Daltons, more preferably from 20,000 to 50,000 Daltons.
The particle present in the emulsion is preferably in the form of a liquid droplet. Preferably the size of the liquid droplet is from 0.5 to 20μηη.
The silicone liquid present in the particle of the emulsion preferably has a viscosity of from 5,000 to 100,000 cP. A particle is considered as a discrete entity which is stable in its surrounding medium. For example, the medium can be air for an isolated solid particle, or water (an example of an aqueous continuous phase) for a liquid particle in an emulsion. Process To Make The Emulsion
The process to make the emulsion comprises mixing together a silicone liquid, a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate (PET- POET) and water.
Preferably the copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate is first dissolved in water prior to addition to the silicone oil. More preferably the copolymer is dissolved in water to a concentration of 1 % by weight to provide an emulsifier solution. Suitable mixing methods for the process include mixing the ingredients together using a high shear stirrer. A suitable time period is 90 seconds.
The emulsion typically comprises from 30 to 99.9 wt.%, preferably from 40 to 99 wt.% of the aqueous continuous phase. The aqueous continuous phase may be solely water, or a water based mixture comprising water as a majority component.
The emulsion may further contain an emulsifying agent, for example a surfactant such as nonionic, anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and amphoteric surfactants. The emulsifier can be mixed together with the other emulsion ingredients as
hereinbefore described.
If an emulsifying agent is used, preferably it is a nonionic surfactant. Alternatively the PET-POET copolymer can act itself as an emulsifier, without the requirement for an additional emulsifier to be employed.
Suitable nonionic surfactants as emulsifiers include the (poly)-alkoxylated analogues of saturated or unsaturated fatty alcohols, for example, having from 8 to 22, preferably from 9 to 18, more preferably from 10 to 15 carbon atoms on average in the hydrocarbon chain thereof and preferably on average from 3 to 1 1 , more preferably from 4 to 9 alkyleneoxy groups. Most preferably, the alkyleneoxy groups are independently selected from ethyleneoxy, propyleneoxy and
butylenoxy, especially ethyleneoxy and propylenoxy, or solely ethyleneoxy groups and alkyl polyglucosides as disclosed in EP 0 495 176.
Form of the Invention
The emulsion can be included in laundry products taking a number of forms. The laundry product can take the form of a laundry treatment agent for fabric, in which case it can be a laundry composition comprising:- a) from 5 to 65 wt.% of a surfactant; and,
b) from 0.5 to 30 wt.% of an emulsion according to the first aspect of the
invention. Preferably the emulsion is present in the laundry composition at a level of from 0.5 to 20 wt.%, more preferably from 1 to 10 wt.% based on the total composition.
The laundry composition may be a main wash composition, a rinse composition, or a pre- or after-wash treatment composition, all of which may be dilutable or non-dilutable. Main wash compositions are preferred.
The compositions of the invention may be in any physical form e.g. a solid such as a powder or granules, a tablet, a solid bar, a paste, gel or liquid, especially, an aqueous based liquid. In particular the compositions may be used in laundry compositions, especially in liquid, gel, powder or tablet laundry composition.
If the laundry composition is a main wash composition, then the pH range of the composition is from pH 7-12, preferably from pH 8.5 to 9.5. It is desirable to buffer the formulation at whatever the target pH of the composition is.
Another aspect of the invention relates to the use of a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate to increase the level of deposition of a silicone onto fabric.
The copolymer is ideally used in the form of an emulsion either alone, or as an emulsion included as part of a laundry composition.
Thus the invention also may relate to the use an emulsion comprising a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid in an aqueous continuous phase to increase the level of deposition of a silicone onto fabric. Preferably the emulsion is incorporated as part of a laundry product as described herein.
COMPONENTS
Surfactants
The laundry composition comprises a surfactant, preferably a detersive
surfactant. Suitable surfactants comprise nonionic surfactants and anionic surfactants.
They may be chosen from the surfactants described in "Surface Active Agents" Vol. 1 , by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of "McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents" published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in
"Tenside-Taschenbuch", H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981 .
Preferably the surfactants used are saturated.
Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include, in particular, the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Specific nonionic detergent compounds are C6 to C22 alkyl phenol- ethylene oxide condensates, generally 5 to 25 EO, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic Cs to Cis primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 40 EO.
Suitable anionic detergent compounds which may be used are usually water- soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphates and sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl sulphates, especially those obtained by sulphating higher Cs to Cis alcohols, produced for example from tallow or coconut oil, sodium and potassium alkyl Cg to C20 benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl C10 to C15 benzene sulphonates; and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum. The preferred anionic detergent compounds are sodium Cn to C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates and sodium C12 to Cis alkyl sulphates. Further anionic surfactants include fatty acid-based soaps containing between C8-C26 carbon atoms. Also applicable are surfactants such as those described in EP-A-328 177 (Unilever), which show resistance to salting-out, the alkyl polyglycoside surfactants described in EP-A-070 074, and alkyl
monoglycosides.
The total amount of surfactant present in the liquid composition is from 5 to 65 wt.%. Preferably the total amount of surfactant is from 10 to 65 wt.%, preferably from 15 to 50 wt.%.
Other surfactants such as amphoteric, zwitterionic and cationic surfactants may also be present in addition to the aforementioned nonionic and anionic
surfactants. Optional Ingredients
The laundry composition may additionally comprise one or more of the following optional ingredients. BUILDERS OR COMPLEXING AGENTS
The laundry composition optionally comprises from 1 to 50 wt.% of a builder.
Preferably the builder is present at a level of from 1 to 40 wt.%.
Builder materials may be selected from 1 ) calcium sequestrant materials, 2) precipitating materials,
3) calcium ion-exchange materials and 4) mixtures thereof. It is preferred that when an insoluble inorganic builder, e.g., zeolite is used, the size is in the range 0.1 to 10 microns (as measured by The Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer using laser diffraction ex Malvern™).
Examples of calcium sequestrant builder materials include alkali metal
polyphosphates, such as sodium tripolyphosphate and organic sequestrants, such as ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid.
Examples of precipitating builder materials include sodium orthophosphate and sodium carbonate. Examples of calcium ion-exchange builder materials include the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicates, of which zeolites are the best known representatives, e.g. zeolite A, zeolite B (also known as zeolite P), zeolite C, zeolite X, zeolite Y and also the zeolite P-type as described in EP-A- 0,384,070.
The composition may also contain 0-50 wt.% of a builder or complexing agent such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid or the other builders mentioned below. Many builders are also bleach-stabilising agents by virtue of their ability to complex metal ions. Zeolite and carbonate (carbonate (including bicarbonate and sesquicarbonate) are preferred builders.
The composition may contain as builder a crystalline aluminosilicate, preferably an alkali metal aluminosilicate, more preferably a sodium aluminosilicate. This is typically present at a level of less than 15 wt.%. Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula:
0.8-1 .5 M20. AI2O3. 0.8-6 SiO2 where M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium. These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1 .5-3.5 S1O2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature. The ratio of surfactants to aluminosilicate (where present) is preferably greater than 5:2, more preferably greater than 3:1 .
Alternatively, or additionally to the aluminosilicate builders, phosphate builders may be used. In this art the term 'phosphate' embraces diphosphate,
triphosphate, and phosphonate species. Other forms of builder include silicates, such as soluble silicates, metasilicates, layered silicates (e.g. SKS-6 from
Hoechst). Preferably the laundry detergent formulation is a non-phosphate built laundry detergent formulation, i.e., contains less than 1 wt.% of phosphate. SHADING AGENT
The laundry composition preferably comprises a blue or violet shading agent in the range from 0.0001 to 0.01 wt.%. The shading agents reduce the perception of damage to many coloured garments and increase whiteness of white garments.
The shading agents are preferably selected from blue and violet dyes of the solvent, disperse, basic, direct and acid type listed in the Colour Index (Society of Dyers and Colourists and American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists 2002). Preferably a direct violet or direct blue dyes is present. Preferably the dyes are bis-azo, tris-azo dyes or triphendioxazine dye. The carcinogenic benzidene based dyes are not preferred.
FLUORESCENT AGENT
The laundry composition preferably comprises a fluorescent agent (optical brightener). Fluorescent agents are well known and many such fluorescent agents are available commercially. Usually, these fluorescent agents are supplied and used in the form of their alkali metal salts, for example, the sodium salts. The total amount of the fluorescent agent or agents used in the composition is generally from 0.005 to 2 wt.%, more preferably 0.01 to 0.1 wt.%. Preferred classes of fluorescer are: Di-styryl biphenyl compounds, e.g. Tinopal (Trade Mark) CBS-X, Di-amine stilbene di-sulphonic acid compounds, e.g. Tinopal DMS pure Xtra and Blankophor (Trade Mark) HRH, and Pyrazoline compounds, e.g.
Blankophor SN. Preferred fluorescers are: sodium 2-(4-styryl-3-sulfophenyl)-2H- napthol[1 ,2-d]trazole, disodium 4,4'-bis{[(4-anilino-6-(N methyl-N-2 hydroxyethyl) amino 1 ,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino}stilbene-2-2' disulfonate, disodium 4,4'-bis{[(4- anilino-6-morpholino-1 ,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino} stilbene-2-2' disulfonate, and disodium 4,4'-bis(2-sulfoslyryl)biphenyl. PERFUME
Preferably the laundry composition comprises a perfume. The perfume is preferably in the range from 0.001 to 3 wt.%, most preferably 0.1 to 1 wt.%. Many suitable examples of perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co. It is commonplace for a plurality of perfume components to be present in a formulation. In the compositions of the present invention it is envisaged that there will be four or more, preferably five or more, more preferably six or more or even seven or more different perfume components. In perfume mixtures preferably 15 to 25 wt.% are top notes. Top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]).
Preferred top-notes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol. Perfume and top note may be used to cue the fabric care benefit of the invention.
It is preferred that the laundry treatment composition does not contain a peroxygen bleach, e.g., sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, and peracid. POLYMERS
The laundry composition may comprise one or more polymers. Examples are carboxymethylcellulose, poly(ethylene glycol), polyvinyl alcohol),
polycarboxylates such as polyacrylates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers, lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers, and cationic polysaccharide-based polymers.
HYDROTROBE
A liquid detergent composition may optionally include a hydrotrope, which can prevent liquid crystal formation. The addition of the hydrotrope thus aids the clarity/transparency of the composition. Suitable hydrotropes include but are not limited to propylene glycol, ethanol, urea, salts of benzene sulphonate, toluene sulphonate, xylene sulphonate or cumene sulphonate. Suitable salts include but are not limited to sodium, potassium, ammonium, monoethanolamine,
triethanolamine. Preferably, the hydrotrope is selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, xylene sulfonate, ethanol, and urea to provide optimum performance. The amount of the hydrotrope is generally in the range of from 0 to 30%, preferably from 0.5 to 30%, more preferably from 0.5 to 30%, most preferably from 1 to 15%.
Examples Example 1 Improved fabric softening as a result of emulsification of aminosilicone oil using PET-POET polymer
Synthesis of polyethylene terephthalate-co-polyoxyethylene terephthalate copolymer (PET-POET)
PET-18000 was a polyethylene terephthalate (Mn = 18,000) from Shanghai Lianji Synthetic Fiber Company; poly (ethylene glycol) 20,000 (Mn = 20,000) was purchased from Fluka; antimony oxide (Sb2Os), calcium acetate and 2, 6-ditert- butyl-4-methylphenol (DBMP) were supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. All the reagents were used as received without further purification. The PET-POET sample was prepared utilising a stainless steel reaction kettle which offers mechanical stirring, fine thermo-controlling and high vacuum level. The reaction kettle was supplied by Weihai Auto-control Reaction Kettle Ltd. 80g of PEG of 20,000 molecular weight and 5g of PET-18000 were used for the transesterification polymerisation. Sb2O3 (20mg) and calcium acetate (20mg) were utilised as the catalyst and 2,6-ditert-butyl-4-methylphenol (80mg) as antioxidant. Before heating the reaction mixture, vacuum was applied to the kettle, followed with re-filling with nitrogen. This process was repeated three times; and then under vacuum level below zero mmHg and mechanical stirring at 50 rpm, the temperature was gradually elevated to the reaction temperature of around 260 degrees centigrade and maintained for 5 hours. Transesterification reaction took place with the release of ethylene glycol. The product was taken out of the kettle with a spatula while it was hot, at about 150°C. The viscous polymer cooled down to a hard solid of Mn= 30,000.
Emulsification of aminosilicone with PET-POET
Aminosilicone oil (0.1 g of Hansa ASR 7020 ex. CHT) was added to a 14ml capacity squat form glass vial along with 9.9g of emulsifier solution (a 1 % solution of PET-POET in deionized water) and mixed using a high shear stirrer (VWR VDI12 microhomogenizer with S12N-12S tool on setting '5') for 90 seconds.
Comparative Example A
A comparative (control) sample was prepared using a procedure identical to the above, except that the 1 % emulsifier solution was prepared using a blend of non- ionic surfactants (85:15 ratio of Neodol 25-7 (primary alcohol ethoxylate ex. Shell Chemicals) to Synperonic A20 (POE primary alcohol ex. Croda) by weight respectively). Model Wash Evaluation a) Preparation of wash liquor: The wash liquor was prepared by diluting Persil® Small and Mighty (concentrated liquid detergent) with local medium/soft water (typically 6-18°FH (French water hardness)) to achieve a 2.5g/l concentration. 50ml of wash liquor was added to each 500ml Linitest pot. b) Simulated Wash (Linitest laboratory scale washing machine Ex. Heraeus)
0.313g of 1 % aminosilicone emulsion using PET-POET or non-ionic surfactant blend (comparative example A) as emulsifier, were added to the Linitest pots containing wash liquor and agitated slightly to ensure mixing.
A sample of knitted polyester measuring 21 cm by 21 cm was placed into each Linitest pot containing the wash liquor and aminosilicone emulsions, and the pots were sealed. The Linitest pots were attached to the Linitest cradle and rotated for 45 minutes at 40°C to simulate the main wash.
At the end of the main wash simulation, each Linitest pot was emptied of wash liquor. An 85ml aliquot of water was added to each pot and the pots were re- sealed and returned to the Linitest to rotate for a further 10 minutes to simulate rinsing. Rinsing was performed at the same temperature as the mainwash. This was repeated one further time, so that each fabric had experienced two simulated rinses.
After rinsing, the fabrics were squeezed to remove excess liquid and were line dried at ambient temperature. Washes were done in quadruplicate for each sample and results averaged. Mechanical Testing Of Fabric Test Samples a) Fabric sample preparation
Samples that underwent model wash evaluation were trimmed to 20cm by 20cm in size, then allowed to condition for 24 hours in a room with controlled
temperature and humidity (20°C; 65% RH) prior to mechanical testing. b) Evaluation of fabric mechanical properties related to tactile performance
An indication of increased levels of deposition of silicone based materials to fabric substrates can be obtained by evaluating the change in fabric mechanical properties caused by lubrication of fibres and yarns due to the presence of silicone.
Several methods exist to relate fabric mechanical properties to fabric handle. An internationally recognised method is the Kawabata Evaluation System (KES). In particular one fabric parameter that has been found to relate to tactile properties such as softness and flexibility is the fabric shear hysteresis. In this example, an automated apparatus based on the KES was used to determine fabric shear hysteresis. The fabrics were oriented with the courses perpendicular to the clamping jaws.
A lower value of shear hysteresis (2HG3 parameter) corresponds to increased lubrication/softening due to improved silicone deposition. Table 1 : Fabric shear hysteresis results
A reduction in fabric shear hysteresis - which corresponds to increased softening due to increased deposition of the silicone was observed due to emulsification of aminosilicone oil with PET-POET polymer. This result is an improvement in comparison to the known emulsification method using nonionic surfactant.

Claims

An emulsion comprising:-
(a) a particle comprising a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and a silicone liquid; and,
(b) an aqueous continuous phase.
An emulsion according to claim 1 wherein the copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate has a molecular weight of from 5000 to 50,000 Daltons, preferably from 20,000 to 50,000 Daltons.
An emulsion according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the particle is a liquid droplet.
An emulsion according to claim 3, wherein the size of the liquid droplet is from 0.5 to 20 μηη .
An emulsion according to any preceding claim, comprising from 30 to 99.9 wt.%, preferably from 40 to 99 wt.% of the aqueous continuous phase.
An emulsion according to any preceding claim, wherein the silicone liquid has a viscosity of from 5,000 to 100,000 cP.
A process to make the emulsion of any one of claims 1 to 6, comprising mixing together a silicone liquid, a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate and water.
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein the copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate is first dissolved in water prior to addition to the silicone oil.
9. A laundry composition comprising:- a) from 5 to 65 wt.% of a surfactant; and,
b) from 0.5 to 30 wt.% of an emulsion according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
10. Use of a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate and polyoxyethylene terephthalate to increase the level of deposition of a silicone onto fabric.
EP10765412.1A 2009-10-20 2010-10-04 Laundry compositions Active EP2491103B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2009001160 2009-10-20
PCT/EP2010/064724 WO2011047951A1 (en) 2009-10-20 2010-10-04 Laundry compositions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2491103A1 true EP2491103A1 (en) 2012-08-29
EP2491103B1 EP2491103B1 (en) 2015-01-21

Family

ID=43302974

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10765412.1A Active EP2491103B1 (en) 2009-10-20 2010-10-04 Laundry compositions

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2491103B1 (en)
AR (1) AR078663A1 (en)
BR (1) BR112012008428A2 (en)
CL (1) CL2012000982A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2535143T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2011047951A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201202261B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR112020017967A2 (en) 2018-03-02 2020-12-22 Unilever N.V. METHOD FOR SOFTENING COTTON KNITTING AND USE OF THE METHOD

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0070074B2 (en) 1981-07-13 1997-06-25 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Foaming surfactant compositions
GB8803036D0 (en) 1988-02-10 1988-03-09 Unilever Plc Liquid detergents
CA2001927C (en) 1988-11-03 1999-12-21 Graham Thomas Brown Aluminosilicates and detergent compositions
MY106342A (en) * 1989-05-02 1995-05-30 Colgate Palmolive Co Antistatic compositions, antistatic detergent compositions and articles
DE4101070A1 (en) 1991-01-16 1992-07-23 Huels Chemische Werke Ag WASHING POWDER
ATE245689T1 (en) * 1992-05-12 2003-08-15 Procter & Gamble CONCENTRATED TISSUE PLASTICIZER COMPOSITIONS WITH BIODEGRADABLE TISSUE PLASTICIZERS
CA2542892A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Fabric care compositions comprising aminosilicone

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2011047951A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA201202261B (en) 2013-06-26
CL2012000982A1 (en) 2012-10-19
AR078663A1 (en) 2011-11-23
ES2535143T3 (en) 2015-05-06
BR112012008428A2 (en) 2016-03-29
EP2491103B1 (en) 2015-01-21
WO2011047951A1 (en) 2011-04-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3074496B1 (en) Laundry compositions
EP3074497B1 (en) Laundry compositions
WO2014079621A1 (en) Laundry compositions
WO2013087287A1 (en) Laundry compositions
EP2252680A1 (en) Laundry treatment composition comprising polymeric lubricants
EP2366008B1 (en) Laundry compositions
EP2366009B1 (en) Laundry compositions
EP2103677A1 (en) Laundry treatment compositions
EP2491103B1 (en) Laundry compositions
WO2013087285A1 (en) Laundry compositions and uses
CN107075422B (en) Laundry composition ingredients
CA3199900A1 (en) Colour care detergent compositions
US20230002702A1 (en) Colour care detergent compositions
WO2011047950A1 (en) Improvements to laundry compositions
WO2021118774A1 (en) Fabric care composition
CN102575203B (en) Laundry compositions
EP2922938A1 (en) Laundry compositions
EP2252681B2 (en) Laundry treatment compositions
WO2014079622A1 (en) Ingredient for use in a laundry composition
CA3199892A1 (en) Colour care detergent composition
CN102574996A (en) Improvements to laundry compositions
EP2521764A1 (en) Detergent formulation containing spray dried granule

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120319

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20140917

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010021980

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150305

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 709213

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2535143

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20150506

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 709213

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150421

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150421

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150422

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150521

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602010021980

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Effective date: 20151021

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLAS Information related to reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151031

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151004

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20161011

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20161024

Year of fee payment: 7

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20101004

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171005

APAJ Date of receipt of notice of appeal modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCNOA2O

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 602010021980

Country of ref document: DE

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Effective date: 20151021

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20190722

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602010021980

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: UNILEVER GLOBAL IP LIMITED, WIRRAL, GB

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: UNILEVER N.V., ROTTERDAM, NL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20211022

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20211001

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20211020

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20220127 AND 20220202

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20211022

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602010021980

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20221004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221004