EP2319624B1 - Method for fine crushing of lump material - Google Patents
Method for fine crushing of lump material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2319624B1 EP2319624B1 EP09808448.6A EP09808448A EP2319624B1 EP 2319624 B1 EP2319624 B1 EP 2319624B1 EP 09808448 A EP09808448 A EP 09808448A EP 2319624 B1 EP2319624 B1 EP 2319624B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- disks
- disk
- crushing
- stamp
- lump
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C7/00—Crushing or disintegrating by disc mills
- B02C7/10—Crushing or disintegrating by disc mills with eccentric discs
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C19/00—Other disintegrating devices or methods
- B02C19/0012—Devices for disintegrating materials by collision of these materials against a breaking surface or breaking body and/or by friction between the material particles (also for grain)
- B02C19/0018—Devices for disintegrating materials by collision of these materials against a breaking surface or breaking body and/or by friction between the material particles (also for grain) using a rotor accelerating the materials centrifugally against a circumferential breaking surface
Definitions
- the invention relates to a process for crushing hard materials and may be used in the mining, construction, chemical, metallurgical, and other industries for finely crushing lump materials consisting of fine fractions of sizes 30 to 10 mm of any strength.
- the crushing process comprises conveying the initial material to the crushing area, destroying a lump (lumps), and conveying the finished product beyond the crusher.
- the existing methods use essentially two principal types of lump material destruction - crushing and "free impact,” and discharging the resultant material by gravity or centrifugal forces.
- Crushing methods by stressed "free impact” include comminution by centrifugal impact apparatuses, hammer mills, and rotary crushers.
- Rotary crushers and hammer mills are designed to crush materials of relatively low strength.
- a method for crushing materials in centrifugal impact apparatuses (see: for example, U.S. Patent No. 4,921,173 ) ( FIG. 1c ), lumps of feedstock are charged into the working space vertically by free fall, whereupon a fast-rotating accelerating device causes them to move radially at a high speed. A lump is comminuted by free impact against armor plating. The finished product is discharged by the free fall of the lumps as well.
- This prior art method is disadvantageous because of its low efficiency when used to comminute materials of a small particle size (under 15 to 20 mm), particularly materials of medium and high strength, because of the small weight of a lump and, therefore, its low kinetic energy.
- a lump is destroyed by stresses originating in the lump upon impact.
- the finished product is removed by centrifugal forces as well through an adjustable gap between the rotating disks.
- the prior art method helps achieve significant speeds at which the material to be comminuted is charged into the destruction area, and also a high discharge speed of the finished product by centrifugal forces.
- the prior art method is disadvantageous because of inefficient destruction depending on probability. Stresses developing through impact are not high enough and restrict the application of the method to relatively weak materials.
- a further method for fine crushing of lump material in a disk type mill is known from GB 856 249 A .
- Initial material is conveyed by gravity and centrifugal forces into a crushing area between two disks rotating in the same direction and having their axis of symmetry extending at an angle to one another.
- Said disks have a working surface each in the shape of an inner cone.
- the material lumps are destroyed in an area where the disks come nearest to one another.
- the crushed product is discharged by centrifugal forces.
- the prior art closest to the present invention in technical idea is a crushing apparatus ( U.S. Patent No. 1,072,193 ) comprising a system of two rotating shafts, one of which is hollow and the other solid.
- the solid shaft is placed inside the hollow shaft such that the axes of revolution of the shafts do not coincide.
- the shafts are joined by a ball connection that allows the shafts to rotate in the same direction.
- the ends of the shafts are provided with disks that are the working elements of the crusher.
- the prior art invention and the claimed apparatus have common features such as rotation of the disks in the same direction and positioning of the disk axes of revolution at an angle to one another.
- the object of the invention is also achieved in an apparatus for fine crushing of lump materials comprising a support and a rotating component mounted thereon and comprising a first disk having a central charging opening and a lower disk having an axis of revolution inclined to the axis of revolution of the first disk, both disks having each a working surface in the shape of an inner cone, wherein, according to the invention, both disks are rigidly interconnected to allow synchronous rotation thereof.
- the first disk is preferably secured on a stack of two plates, with compression springs placed between them to enable them to move upward by spring compression when unbreakable bodies happen to be charged into the apparatus.
- the apparatus may also comprise a cover in the form of a housing having a tapering charging chute and armor plates mounted at the housing perimeter opposite the discharge slit between the disks to comminute the product additionally by impact.
- the disks may have projections and depressions of serrated shape such that the projections of the upper disk engage the depressions of the lower disk.
- the ratio of the disk radius to the stamp length be within the range of 1:1.5 to 1:4, and that the inclination angle of the axes of revolution of the disks be within the range of 0.5° to 3°.
- the connection between, and cyclic rotation of, the disks help construct a system of equally effective elements of the crushing process and obtain eventually a high-speed closed sequence of interrelated conveyance and material lump destruction processes matched in time. All essential functions in the process are localized in areas ( FIG. 2 ).
- the initial product is conveyed by TP1cf essentially in area A
- area B serves for engaged movement TPes and crushing CR1 of a lump
- area C is used for discharging the product by centrifugal forces TP2cf. All these processes occur in parallel, and the efficiency of individual elements of the crushing process and the process in general depends on the number of revolutions of the disk system and may be limited by technical reasons only.
- Synchronized rotation of the disks allows serrated working surfaces to be used, with the projections of the upper disk engaging the depressions of the lower disk, and offering an opportunity for improving considerably the efficiency of lump material crushing owing to bending stresses building up in the lump.
- the apparatus is provided at the housing perimeter with armor plates to comminute the finished product lumps weakened during the crushing operation CR1 by impact stresses CR2.
- An important advantage of the crushing process pattern used in the claimed method is that a lump can be engaged at a large angle and, therefore, crushed to a greater degree. It is known from experience that lump engagement can be achieved at opening angles ⁇ of the working elements of up to 45°.
- the claimed method for fine crushing of lump material is performed as follows ( FIG. 3 ).
- Material falling on a lower disk 4 is moved by centrifugal forces over the surface thereof toward a point of the disk periphery where the lump size and the gap between disks 4 and 7 is identical.
- the lump is forced into the area where the disks come nearest to one another (crushing area) and where it is compressed intensively and destroyed.
- the lump is destroyed, its size becomes smaller than the width of the gap, and the lump continues moving radially toward the periphery of disks 4 and 7 to a point where its size and the spacing between the disks are identical again. With the disks moving still closer toward one another, the lump is compressed again and destroyed. This procedure is repeated several times.
- the type of interaction between a lump in an engaged state and the disks rotating in synchronism helps construct a harmonic curve of stress developing in time and minimize shear stresses, guarantees lump destruction, and reduces the wear of the working elements significantly.
- the dynamic interaction pattern helps achieve very fine crushing effects.
- the claimed method for fine crushing of lump materials can be carried out most effectively in the claimed apparatus ( FIG. 4 ).
- the apparatus comprises a bed 22 on which a vertical support that also serves as a sliding friction bearing for the rotary system of the apparatus as a whole is mounted.
- a bearing bush 16 made of an antifriction material is press-fitted into support 1.
- a flywheel pulley 2 rotating on support 1 has a stamp 3 inserted therein and having its spherical support surface resting on the inner spherical surface of the flywheel pulley.
- a stationary armor plate having a working surface in the shape of an inner cone and a central material charging opening is mounted on support plate 5 and secured by bolts.
- a washer 20 fitted at the lower end of stamp 3 is secured in place by bolts and serves to prevent vertical movement of the stamp and the rotary system as a whole.
- the apparatus is actuated by an electric motor through a V-belt drive ( FIG. 4 ) or gear drive.
- Flywheel pulley 2, the V-belt drive, and the electric motor pulley are isolated from the remaining space of the apparatus by a sealed casing 15.
- the apparatus is covered with a housing 13 provided with a conical chute secured thereon to charge material to be crushed.
- Armor plates 14 (armor plating) are secured along the full perimeter of housing 13 opposite the slit of the crushing elements for material lumps discharged from the crushing elements at a high velocity to be comminuted further by impacting the armor plates.
- the bed plates of the apparatus have apertures ( FIG. 4 ) combined in the lower part of the plate into a single chute to discharge the finished product from the apparatus for further processing.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Crushing And Pulverization Processes (AREA)
- Crushing And Grinding (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a process for crushing hard materials and may be used in the mining, construction, chemical, metallurgical, and other industries for finely crushing lump materials consisting of fine fractions of sizes 30 to 10 mm of any strength.
- Several prior art methods are now used for crushing lump materials. The crushing process comprises conveying the initial material to the crushing area, destroying a lump (lumps), and conveying the finished product beyond the crusher. The existing methods, though, use essentially two principal types of lump material destruction - crushing and "free impact," and discharging the resultant material by gravity or centrifugal forces.
- In particular, a lump is destroyed in jaw and cone crushers ("Ore Dressing Manual," Vol. 1, Moscow, 1972, pp. 122-148) by quasi-crushing between working surfaces (jaws and cones) as stresses are applied horizontally. In this case, the initial material is fed in and the finished product discharged vertically by gravity. This process is shown diagrammatically in
FIG. 1 a. The use of existing fine crushing methods is limited by the low fine fraction output essentially because of the rate of material flow in the crushing area depending on gravity. Eventually, this dependence determines the maximum oscillation frequency of the movable elements (jaws and cones) and, accordingly, the maximum crushing output. Also, these methods are inefficient for fine crushing because of design considerations. For these reasons, industrial processes for grinding material fractions of sizes 30 to 10 mm of medium and high strength are usually performed in ball or tumbling rod mills. Material is crushed in these mills with a high degree of probability and requires significant power inputs one or two orders larger than power inputs needed to crush material to a similar class of particle size in crushers. This fact has a significant effect on the overall costs of the end product. - A similar approach is used in a method for comminuting materials in roller crushers (roller presses) under high pressure (
U.S. Patent No. 4,357,287 ) in which high intensity stress is created in the material passing between two rollers (FIG. 1b ). - The principal distinction of this method from the preceding one is that the stress is of the volumetric type and that the force is directed at the flow of lump material, which implies a significant increase in crushing efficiency. The method is disadvantageous because it is used for comminuting high-strength materials to a limited extent only.
- Crushing methods by stressed "free impact" include comminution by centrifugal impact apparatuses, hammer mills, and rotary crushers.
- Rotary crushers and hammer mills are designed to crush materials of relatively low strength.
- A method for crushing materials in centrifugal impact apparatuses (see: for example,
U.S. Patent No. 4,921,173 ) (FIG. 1c ), lumps of feedstock are charged into the working space vertically by free fall, whereupon a fast-rotating accelerating device causes them to move radially at a high speed. A lump is comminuted by free impact against armor plating. The finished product is discharged by the free fall of the lumps as well. This prior art method is disadvantageous because of its low efficiency when used to comminute materials of a small particle size (under 15 to 20 mm), particularly materials of medium and high strength, because of the small weight of a lump and, therefore, its low kinetic energy. - Still other prior art methods use disk mills to crush lump materials. The prior art invention closest to the present method in technical idea is the method realized by the device of
U.S. Patent No. 1,072,193 that uses "free impact" stress. Material is destroyed in the reducing apparatus by two conical disks rotating at a high speed in the same direction, their axed cross with an angle between them. The initial material goes through an opening in one of the disks to the space between the disks whereupon it is flung by centrifugal force to the periphery. - A lump is destroyed by stresses originating in the lump upon impact. The finished product is removed by centrifugal forces as well through an adjustable gap between the rotating disks. The prior art method helps achieve significant speeds at which the material to be comminuted is charged into the destruction area, and also a high discharge speed of the finished product by centrifugal forces. The prior art method is disadvantageous because of inefficient destruction depending on probability. Stresses developing through impact are not high enough and restrict the application of the method to relatively weak materials.
- A further method for fine crushing of lump material in a disk type mill is known from
GB 856 249 A - The prior art closest to the present invention in technical idea is a crushing apparatus (
U.S. Patent No. 1,072,193 ) comprising a system of two rotating shafts, one of which is hollow and the other solid. The solid shaft is placed inside the hollow shaft such that the axes of revolution of the shafts do not coincide. The shafts are joined by a ball connection that allows the shafts to rotate in the same direction. The ends of the shafts are provided with disks that are the working elements of the crusher. The prior art invention and the claimed apparatus have common features such as rotation of the disks in the same direction and positioning of the disk axes of revolution at an angle to one another. - The prior art apparatus has the following disadvantages:
- 1. Significant size of the apparatus, its length six to seven times the diameter of the working element. This is probably attributed to the technological level of the period and, accordingly, the need to increase the ratio of the force levers. Its flat driving belt cannot transmit moments needed to destroy rocks having a strength over 10 to 12 units on the Protodyakonov scale.
- 2. Technological complexity of the apparatus that does not meet present-day requirement for reliability and ease of repair, and high operating costs when large volumes of materials are processed.
- 3. Absence of a system to prevent breakdown of the apparatus because of unbreakable bodies occurring in the material charged into the apparatus.
- 4. Absence of a tightly sealed discharge housing to prevent dust from spreading beyond the apparatus.
- 5. The apparatus does not use the high energy of the material discharged at a high speed to destroy it by impact.
- 6. The apparatus does not synchronize rotation of the crushing elements, for which reason the crushing efficiency is reduced sharply, and the use of crushing elements of complex shape, such as serrated shape, is obviated.
- It is a technical object of the invention to correct the deficiencies listed above, increase the output of finely comminuted lumps of materials of different strength, reduce electric power inputs required for fine crushing, and to develop a technically simple design of an apparatus for fine crushing of lump materials.
- The above object is achieved in a method for fine crushing of lump material in a disk-type mill, said method comprising charging the initial material by gravity and centrifugal forces to the crushing area between two disks rotating in the same direction and having axes of revolution extending at an angle to one another and each disk having a working surface in the form of an inner cone, crushing lumps of material in the area where the disks are nearest to one another, and discharging the crushed product by centrifugal forces, wherein the disks rotate in synchronism to provide an additional force to push the lumps of material engaged by the disks into the area where the disks are nearest to one another.
- It is reasonable further to comminute the crushed product by directing the lumps of material discharged from the apparatus by centrifugal forces against armor plating.
- The object of the invention is also achieved in an apparatus for fine crushing of lump materials comprising a support and a rotating component mounted thereon and comprising a first disk having a central charging opening and a lower disk having an axis of revolution inclined to the axis of revolution of the first disk, both disks having each a working surface in the shape of an inner cone, wherein, according to the invention, both disks are rigidly interconnected to allow synchronous rotation thereof.
- Furthermore, the second disk may be secured on a stamp having a spherical support surface, the first disk and the stamp with the second disk are mounted on a heavy flywheel pulley such that the stamp bears with the spherical support surface thereof against the inner spherical support surface provided with a driving bolt engaging the groove in the spherical surface of the stamp along the axis thereof to provide a rigid force connection between the two disks and cause synchronous rotation thereof.
- In addition, the first disk is preferably secured on a stack of two plates, with compression springs placed between them to enable them to move upward by spring compression when unbreakable bodies happen to be charged into the apparatus.
- The apparatus may also comprise a cover in the form of a housing having a tapering charging chute and armor plates mounted at the housing perimeter opposite the discharge slit between the disks to comminute the product additionally by impact.
- Also, the disks may have projections and depressions of serrated shape such that the projections of the upper disk engage the depressions of the lower disk.
- It is preferred that the ratio of the disk radius to the stamp length be within the range of 1:1.5 to 1:4, and that the inclination angle of the axes of revolution of the disks be within the range of 0.5° to 3°.
- In the claimed method for fine crushing of lump material in a disk mill (
FIG. 1e ), comprising directing the initial material into the area between the disks by gravity TP1g, conveying the initial material into the crushing area by horizontal centrifugal forces TP1cf, and discharging the crushed product by gravity TP2cf, lumps are further conveyed in an engaged state TPes, and the lumps are destroyed by forces directed normally to the surface of the working elements and arising in the approach phase of the two disks rotating in synchronism and connected into an integrated system of disks having their axes of revolution extending at an angle to one another. - Movement of the lumps held securely between the working elements of the crusher as a result of synchronous rotation of, and rigid connection between, the rotating disks causes the lumps of material to be forced into the crushing area and, in this way, applies intensive dynamic force to a lump most effectively to destroy the lump.
- The connection between, and cyclic rotation of, the disks help construct a system of equally effective elements of the crushing process and obtain eventually a high-speed closed sequence of interrelated conveyance and material lump destruction processes matched in time. All essential functions in the process are localized in areas (
FIG. 2 ). In particular, the initial product is conveyed by TP1cf essentially in area A, area B serves for engaged movement TPes and crushing CR1 of a lump, and area C is used for discharging the product by centrifugal forces TP2cf. All these processes occur in parallel, and the efficiency of individual elements of the crushing process and the process in general depends on the number of revolutions of the disk system and may be limited by technical reasons only. - Synchronized rotation of the disks allows serrated working surfaces to be used, with the projections of the upper disk engaging the depressions of the lower disk, and offering an opportunity for improving considerably the efficiency of lump material crushing owing to bending stresses building up in the lump.
- Furthermore, to make the fullest possible use of the kinetic energy carried by crushed material lumps ejected from the apparatus at a high speed, the apparatus is provided at the housing perimeter with armor plates to comminute the finished product lumps weakened during the crushing operation CR1 by impact stresses CR2.
- An important advantage of the crushing process pattern used in the claimed method is that a lump can be engaged at a large angle and, therefore, crushed to a greater degree. It is known from experience that lump engagement can be achieved at opening angles α of the working elements of up to 45°.
-
-
FIG. 1 (a to d) shows diagrammatically the existing crushing methods, andFIG. 1e is a diagrammatic view of the claimed crushing method. -
FIG. 2 is a view of the disk areas where the material is conveyed (area A), engaged for movement (area B), and discharged (area C). -
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of the apparatus for performing the claimed crushing method. -
FIG. 4 is a detailed diagrammatic view of the claimed apparatus in axial section. - The claimed method for fine crushing of lump material is performed as follows (
FIG. 3 ). - Material falling on a
lower disk 4 is moved by centrifugal forces over the surface thereof toward a point of the disk periphery where the lump size and the gap betweendisks 4 and 7 is identical. As it moves now together with the rotating disks in synchronism, the lump is forced into the area where the disks come nearest to one another (crushing area) and where it is compressed intensively and destroyed. As the lump is destroyed, its size becomes smaller than the width of the gap, and the lump continues moving radially toward the periphery ofdisks 4 and 7 to a point where its size and the spacing between the disks are identical again. With the disks moving still closer toward one another, the lump is compressed again and destroyed. This procedure is repeated several times. When the crushed material becomes smaller than the spacing between the edges of the disks, it is pushed by centrifugal forces out of the crushing area, whereupon it is ejected at a high velocity out of the crushing apparatus against armor plates 14 provided opposite the discharge slit and is destroyed further. In this way, the weakened material lumps are comminuted additionally by intensive impact forces. - Significantly, the type of interaction between a lump in an engaged state and the disks rotating in synchronism helps construct a harmonic curve of stress developing in time and minimize shear stresses, guarantees lump destruction, and reduces the wear of the working elements significantly. Furthermore, the dynamic interaction pattern helps achieve very fine crushing effects.
- The claimed method for fine crushing of lump materials can be carried out most effectively in the claimed apparatus (
FIG. 4 ). - The apparatus comprises a
bed 22 on which a vertical support that also serves as a sliding friction bearing for the rotary system of the apparatus as a whole is mounted. A bearingbush 16 made of an antifriction material is press-fitted into support 1. A flywheel pulley 2 rotating on support 1 has a stamp 3 inserted therein and having its spherical support surface resting on the inner spherical surface of the flywheel pulley. The cylindrical part of stamp 3 is fitted into bearingbush 16 that has an axis of revolution inclined relative to the axis of the apparatus (axis of an upper disk 7) at an angle β°, the axis of stamp 3 and the axis of the apparatus intersecting at a point 0 that also is the center of the spherical support surfaces of stamp 3 and flywheel pulley 2. A movablelower disk 4 having a working surface in the form of an inner cone is mounted on the upper surface of stamp 3 and fixed in position. The conical projection in the center ofdisk 4 serves to improve distribution of the material charged into the apparatus. A drivingbolt 19 engaging a groove in stamp 3 on the spherical surface thereof to slide therein is press-fitted into the spherical surface of flywheel pulley 2. A package ofsupport plate 5, springs 11, and apressure plate 6 is mounted on flywheel pulley 2 through spacing bushes 12 by high-strength pins 8. The package is assembled with the help ofbolts 10 and tightened by nuts 9 on the pins. - A stationary armor plate having a working surface in the shape of an inner cone and a central material charging opening is mounted on
support plate 5 and secured by bolts. Awasher 20 fitted at the lower end of stamp 3 is secured in place by bolts and serves to prevent vertical movement of the stamp and the rotary system as a whole. - The apparatus is actuated by an electric motor through a V-belt drive (
FIG. 4 ) or gear drive. Flywheel pulley 2, the V-belt drive, and the electric motor pulley are isolated from the remaining space of the apparatus by a sealedcasing 15. The apparatus is covered with ahousing 13 provided with a conical chute secured thereon to charge material to be crushed. Armor plates 14 (armor plating) are secured along the full perimeter ofhousing 13 opposite the slit of the crushing elements for material lumps discharged from the crushing elements at a high velocity to be comminuted further by impacting the armor plates. The bed plates of the apparatus have apertures (FIG. 4 ) combined in the lower part of the plate into a single chute to discharge the finished product from the apparatus for further processing. - The apparatus operates as follows:
- When the electric motor is turned on, its rotation is transmitted by the V-belt train to flywheel pulley 2 that rotates on stationary vertical support 1. The flywheel pulley causes all components associated therewith to rotate. Driving
bolt 19 transmits rotation to stamp 3 to cause rotation oflower disk 5 in synchronism with flywheel pulley 2.Support plate 5 on which upper disk 7 is mounted also rotates in synchronism with flywheel pulley 2. Synchronous rotation oflower disk 4 and upper disk 7 produces an effect that forces material lumps into the crushing area B, and the rigid kinematic connection between these disks transmits the full destructive stress from the working elements to the material lumps. Since the cylindrical part of stamp 3 is received ineccentric bearing bush 16, and its spherical part bears against the spherical inner surface of flywheel pulley 2, the axis of revolution of stamp 3 is offset at a specified angle β relative to the axis of revolution of flywheel pulley 2. For this reason, the spacing between the surfaces oflower disk 4 and upper disk 7 varies at the periphery ofdisks 4 and 7 from a minimum value "b" to a maximum value "B" (FIG. 3 ). Destructive stresses are generated as an engaged lump moves into the area B, where the disks are nearest to one another (FIG. 2 ). The stresses generated in this area are determined from the ratio K of the radius R ofdisks 4 and 7 to the length L of stamp 3 (K = R/L) and the angle β. It has been found in practice that the optimal value of K lies within the range of 1:1.5 to 1:4. A ratio less that 1:1.5 cannot produce destructive stresses, and the ratio over 1:4 reduces sharply the particle size of the material crushed. Angle β is within the range of 0.5° to 3°, depending on the overall size of the apparatus and the required particle size of the finished product. - A working sample of the apparatus having working elements 200 mm in diameter was built to support the efficiency of the claimed crushing method.
- Granite from the Pavlovo deposit having a hardness of 13 units on the scale of Prof. Protodyakonov and ferruginous quartzites of the Mikhailovsky Mining and Ore Dressing Plant having a hardness of up to 20 units on the scale of Prof. Protodyakonov were used as test materials. Samples were analyzed at the central laboratory of the Mikhailovsky Mining and Ore Dressing Plant OJSC. The tests have shown the apparatus to be efficient, with an output that virtually does not depend on the material strength. The actual electric power input, output, and comminuted particle size are almost identical to theoretical calculations.
- Approximation of the results obtained suggests the conclusion that the claimed apparatus manufactured on an industrial scale with a working element diameter of 600 mm and n = 720 r.p.m. can replace a first stage crushing mill of type MSHR-3.2×3.1. The apparatus weighs 8 tons at most, or less than 10% of the weight of the mill just referred to, and its installed motor capacity does not exceed 90 kW (compared to the 630 kW motor driving the above-mentioned mill).
Claims (7)
- An apparatus for fine crushing of lump materials comprising a fixed support (1) and a rotary component mounted thereon and having an upper disk (7) provided with a central charging opening and a lower disk (4) having an axis of revolution that is inclined to the axis of revolution of the upper disk (7), both disks (4, 7) having each a working surface in the shape of an inner cone,
wherein the lower disk (4) is secured on a stamp (3) having a spherical support surface,
the upper disk (7) and the lower disk (4) with the stamp (3) being mounted on a heavy flywheel pulley (2) such that the stamp (3) has its spherical support surface resting against the inner spherical support surface of the flywheel pulley (2) having a driving bolt (19) engaging a groove provided on the spherical surface of the stamp (3) to have the two disks (4, 7) force-connected rigidly and rotating in synchronism. - The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the upper disk (7) is secured on a package of two plates (5), with compression springs (11) placed there between, for moving vertically upon compression of the springs (11) when unbreakable bodies are charged into the apparatus.
- The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 or 2, further comprising a cover in the form of a housing (13) having a conical charging chute and armor plates (14) provided along the housing perimeter opposite the discharging slit between the disks (4, 7) to further comminute the product by impact.
- The apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the disks (4, 7) are provided with projections and depressions of serrated shape, the projections of the upper disk (7) engaging the depressions of the lower disk (4).
- The apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein the ratio of the radius of the disks (4, 7) to the length of the stamp (3) lies within the range of 1:1.5 to 1:4, and the angle between the axes of revolution of the disks (4, 7) is within the range of 0.5° to 3°.
- A method for fine crushing of lump material in a disk-type mill using the apparatus as claimed in any of the proceeding claims,
comprising conveying the initial material by gravity and centrifugal forces into the crushing area between two disks (4, 7) rotating in the same direction and having their axes of symmetry extending at an angle to one another,
said disks (4, 7) having a working surface each in the shape of an inner cone;
destroying the material lumps in an area where the disks (4, 7) come nearest to one another, and discharging the crushed product by centrifugal forces,
wherein the disks (4, 7) are interconnected rigidly to rotate in synchronism to provide an additional force to convey the material lumps engaged by the disks (4,7) into the area where the disks (4, 7) come nearest to one another. - The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the crushed material is further comminuted by directing the material lumps ejected from the apparatus by centrifugal forces at armor plating.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
RU2008132373/03A RU2008132373A (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2008-08-04 | METHOD FOR THIN CRUSHING OF LUMB MATERIAL AND DEVICE FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION |
PCT/RU2009/000046 WO2010021564A1 (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2009-02-04 | Method for fine crushing of lump material |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2319624A1 EP2319624A1 (en) | 2011-05-11 |
EP2319624A4 EP2319624A4 (en) | 2015-04-15 |
EP2319624B1 true EP2319624B1 (en) | 2017-10-11 |
Family
ID=41707328
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09808448.6A Not-in-force EP2319624B1 (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2009-02-04 | Method for fine crushing of lump material |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2319624B1 (en) |
EA (1) | EA017555B1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2008132373A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010021564A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ZA201003406B (en) * | 2010-05-14 | 2011-08-31 | Leon Mitchell Venter | Gyratory cone crusher |
RU2499632C1 (en) * | 2012-05-10 | 2013-11-27 | Научно-производственное республиканское унитарное предприятие "НПО "Центр" | Percussion-type rotary crusher |
WO2014065689A1 (en) * | 2012-10-25 | 2014-05-01 | Andrienko Vladimir Georgievich | Vibratory impact mill |
CN109999973B (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2024-03-26 | 佛山科学技术学院 | Fiber explosion centrifuge |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1072193A (en) * | 1910-01-26 | 1913-09-02 | Edgar B Symons | Crushing-machine. |
DE1091414B (en) * | 1957-04-19 | 1960-10-20 | Miroslav Holec | Plate crusher |
DE2708053C3 (en) | 1977-02-24 | 1986-05-07 | Schönert, Klaus, Prof. Dr.-Ing., 7500 Karlsruhe | Process for fine and ultra-fine comminution of materials with brittle behavior |
SU1066637A1 (en) * | 1982-10-27 | 1984-01-15 | Государственный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Кварцевого Стекла | Installation for mincing granulated and crushed materials |
NZ213510A (en) | 1985-09-17 | 1989-02-24 | Barmac Ass Ltd | Mineral breaking by cyclonic action and separation of fines |
SU1729587A1 (en) * | 1990-01-23 | 1992-04-30 | Львовский политехнический институт им.Ленинского комсомола | Milling method and relevant device |
US5836523A (en) * | 1997-03-10 | 1998-11-17 | Johnson; Norman W. | Apparatus and method for reducing material |
RU2249483C1 (en) * | 2003-10-22 | 2005-04-10 | Научно-исследовательское учреждение Институт химии твердого тела и механохимии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук (НИУ ИХТТМ СО РАН) | Rotational eddy grinder |
-
2008
- 2008-08-04 RU RU2008132373/03A patent/RU2008132373A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2009
- 2009-02-04 EA EA201100314A patent/EA017555B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-02-04 WO PCT/RU2009/000046 patent/WO2010021564A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-02-04 EP EP09808448.6A patent/EP2319624B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
RU2008132373A (en) | 2010-02-10 |
EA201100314A1 (en) | 2011-08-30 |
EP2319624A1 (en) | 2011-05-11 |
WO2010021564A1 (en) | 2010-02-25 |
EA017555B1 (en) | 2013-01-30 |
EP2319624A4 (en) | 2015-04-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8777142B2 (en) | Device for mechanical separation of material conglomerates from materials of different density and/or consistency | |
US3834631A (en) | Spin breaking process | |
US9687853B2 (en) | Conjugate anvil hammer mill | |
US10556237B2 (en) | Device and method for ore-crushing with recycling | |
EP2319624B1 (en) | Method for fine crushing of lump material | |
US20080185466A1 (en) | Solids reduction processor | |
AU2019327451A1 (en) | Mono roller grinding mill | |
CN103657825B (en) | Dispersing device for roller press | |
CN212441555U (en) | Simple and easy reducing mechanism of solid material | |
AU2010300248A1 (en) | Method and device for comminuting ore | |
AU2014247020B2 (en) | Device and method for ore-crushing with a spring device | |
US20170312752A1 (en) | Apparatus for comminuting ore, comprising a hydraulic spring device, and associated method | |
US3933316A (en) | Mill for comminuting ore material | |
KR100625400B1 (en) | Grinding Machine Using Hammer Jet | |
US2958473A (en) | Rock crusher | |
US3533565A (en) | Hammermill with side-by-side rotating hammer systems | |
JP2001000877A (en) | Glass pulverizer | |
EP2582460B1 (en) | Rock crushing apparatus | |
RU2145521C1 (en) | Solid material grinding apparatus | |
Nikitin et al. | Drive power calculation of a crushing machine working in shear | |
RU2539518C1 (en) | Material crushing unit | |
AU2016218929A1 (en) | Comminution apparatus | |
SU1072893A1 (en) | Apparatus for crushing materials | |
WO2009154582A1 (en) | Vertical turbo crusher | |
WO2022016286A1 (en) | System and method for comminuting materials |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20110304 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA RS |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20150313 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B02C 19/00 20060101ALI20150309BHEP Ipc: B02C 7/10 20060101AFI20150309BHEP |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20160818 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170424 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 935557 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602009048851 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20171011 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 935557 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180111 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180112 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180111 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180211 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602009048851 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602009048851 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180712 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180204 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180204 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20181031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180901 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20090204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171011 |