EP2300003B1

EP2300003B1 - Compounds for use in treating injury associated with exposure to an alkylating species

Info

Publication number: EP2300003B1
Application number: EP09805313.5A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Brian J. Day; Carl W. White
Original assignee: National Jewish Health
Current assignee: National Jewish Health
Priority date: 2008-05-23
Filing date: 2009-05-26
Publication date: 2014-03-05
Anticipated expiration: 2029-05-26
Also published as: KR20110017398A; US20230000830A1; CA2725012A1; MX2010012593A; AU2009280042B2; KR20160036108A; CA2725012C; RU2010152638A; DK2300003T3; EP2300003A2; WO2010016965A9; EP2732817B1; EP2300003A4; IL209435A0; IL209435A; KR101646066B1; RU2506083C2; EP2732817A1; ES2600469T3; JP2012507471A

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Bis (2-chloroethyl sulfide) or sulfur mustard (SM) was first synthesized in the late 1880s and since has been used as a warfare agent on a number of occasions. SM was first used in World War I and has been used in warfare as recently as the Iran-Iraq conflict of the late 1980s. Although SM is less of a threat in warfare than it once was, it still poses a threat to military and civilian personnel because of current concerns for its deployment in a terrorist attack.
Sulfur mustards are classic vesicating agents that mainly affect the skin, eyes, and respiratory system. Medical surveillance of individuals exposed to mustard gas in the early 1980's has documented a number of respiratory conditions including bronchiolitis obliterans, asthma, and lung fibrosis that can persist throughout the victims' lifetime.
There is currently no known antidote for SM poisoning. Upon exposure, the best recourse is decontamination and supportive treatment. Decontamination of the skin is relatively straight forward and beneficial, whereas internal exposure such a inhalation of sulfur mustards is much more difficult to treat.
McClintock et al. report in J. Applied Toxicology, 26(2), 2006, 126-131 that 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES) induced injury of rat lungs can be diminished by the presence of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and/or catalase, delivered via liposomes.
WO-A-02078670 discloses the treatment of patients who have suffered damage to the cerebrospinal tissue or who have risk of damage thereto comprising injecting a perfusion fluid in the cerebrospinal pathway containing a neuroprotectant, which may be a free radical inhibitor, including metalloporphyrins, including AEOL10150. The damage can be ischemia, haemorrhage, trauma or exposure to toxic chemicals, such as chemical warfare agents, including the nerve agents VX and Sarin.
WO-A-02060383 describes that metalloporphyrins, including 10158, are useful for prevention of toxicity resulting from free radicals produced by chemotherapeutic agents, such as bleomycin, cisplatin, adriamycin (doxorubicin) and camptothicen.
It can be seen from the foregoing discussion that there is a need for developing agents that are capable of attenuating, preventing, and/or rescuing organ injury from the deleterious effects resulting from exposure to alkylating agents (e.g., inhalation damage), such as sulfur mustards. The invention addresses these and other needs in the art.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed herein are, inter alia, methods for rescuing or preventing organ injury following exposure to alkylating agents by using a substituted porphyrin as the active agent or alkylating agent protectant. The methodology of the invention may implemented as follows.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a compound for use in treating an injury associated with exposure to an alkylating-agent, or for use in protecting a subject from the toxic effects associated with exposure to said alkylating agent, the compound having the formula
The above compound is also known as "AEOL 10150".
The injury may be associated with skin or lungs. The alkylating agent may be a sulfur mustard or 2- chloroethyl ethyl sulfide. Specifically, the alkylating agent is a sulfur mustard. Exposure to the alkylating agent may produce mitochondrial dysfunction, which in turn may result in an increase in reactive oxygen species production or oxidative stress. In particular, exposure to the alkylating agent, relative to non-exposure to the alkylating agent causes an increase in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, an increase in IgM levels, a decrease of glutathione levels, and an increase in myleperoxidase levels.
The compound may be administered by inhalation administration or topical administration. The compound may be administered to the subject within about 0.5 hours to about 48 hours after exposure to the alkylating agent. More specifically, the compound may be administered to the subject within about 1 hour to about 10 hours after exposure to the alkylating agent.
Additional features, advantages, and embodiments of the invention may be set forth or apparent from consideration of the following detailed description, and claims. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing summary of the invention and the following detailed description are exemplary and intended to provide further explanation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the detailed description serve to explain the principles of the invention. No attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than may be necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention and various ways in which it may be practiced.

FIGURE 1 shows the structures of bis(2-chloroethyl sulfide), known as SM, and its analog chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES).
FIGURE 2 is a graph showing that CEES exposure caused a concentration-dependent injury of human airway epithelial cells. Human lung 16HBE cells were grown to approximately 90% confluence and treated with concentrations of CEES ranging from 600 to 1000 µM for 24 h. Cell viability decreased in a dose-dependent manner as measured by quantifying calcein AM fluorescence. Data represented as mean ± S.E.M., n = 4 where control group fluorescence was defined as 100% viability.
FIGURE 3A-3C are graphs showing that CEES exposure produced increased levels of mitochondrial ROS dysfunction. SAE cells (Panel A) and 16HBE cells (Panel B) were treated with 900 µM CEES for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, after which cells were incubated with the mitochondrial ROS probe MitoSOX (Panel A and Panel B) for 1 h. (Panel C) 16 HBE cells were incubated with the mitochondrial membrane potential indicator Rhodamine 123 for 30 min. MitoSOX fluorescence correlated with increased ROS, where Rhodamine 123 fluorescence was inversely correlated with mitochondrial membrane potential.
FIGURE 4 shows chemical structures the catalytic antioxidant metalloporphyrins tested in specific examples 1-6, below.
FIGURE 5 is a graph showing the protective effects of metalloporphyrins on CEES-induced cell injury. 16HBE cells were grown to 90% confluence and exposed to 900 µM CEES for a total of 24 h. Cells were treated 1 h after the initial CEES exposure with AEOL 10150, AEOL 10113, AEOL 10303, or MnTBAP at a final concentration of 50 µM in the presence (black bars) or absence (white bars) of 900 µM CEES. Data represented as mean ± S.E.M., n =4. *** , p<0.001 compared with CEES-only treatment group.
FIGURE 6A-D are graphs showing the rescue effect of AEOL 10150 on CEES-induced cell death. SAE cells (Panel A and Panel B) and 16HBE cells (Panel C and Panel D) were exposed to 900 µM CEES with AEOL 10150 at 10, 25, and 50 µM concentrations added 1 h after CEES exposure. Cell viability was measured using both calcein AM (Panel A and Panel C) and MTT (Panel B and Panel D) staining with control values being defined as 100% viability. Data represented as mean ± S.E.M., n = 4. **, p <0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared with CEES-only treated group.
FIGURE 7A-C are graphs showing that AEOL 10150 rescues CEES-induced increases in mitochondrial ROS and dysfunction. SAE cells (Panel A) and 16HBE cells (Panel B) were exposed to 900 µM CEES for 12 h. AEOL 10150 (50 µM) was added 1 h after CEES exposure. Panel C, 16HBE cells were exposed similar as before except for 4 h. Mitochondrial membrane potential was determined using Rhodamine 123, where fluorescence is inversely correlated with mitochondrial membrane potential. Mean fluorescence was normalized to control levels with controls being 100%. Data represents mean ± S.E.M., n =3 to 6; *, p <0.05; ***, p <0.001 compared with control values. Two-way ANOVA of AEOL 10150, p =0.0563; CEES, p = 0.0033; interaction, p=0.042 (A); AEOL 10150, p =0.1073; CEES, p =0.0004; interaction, p =0.0001 (B); and AEOL 10150, p =0.2876; CEES, p =0.0007; interaction, p = 0.0051 (C).
FIGURE 8A-B are graphs showing the effects of CEES on markers of cellular oxidative stress and prevention by AEOL 10150 in 16 HBE cells. Panel A: cells exposed to 900 µM CEES for 12 h had decreased total cellular GSH levels, and AEOL 10150 (50 µM) rescued this decrease when treated 1 h after CEES exposure. Total GSH levels were normalized to the amount of protein and expressed as nanomoles of GSH per milligram of protein. Panel B: CEES also increased the levels of the DNA oxidation marker 80HdG, and AEOL 10150 (50 µM) post-CEES treatment decreased the levels of DNA oxidation. Data expressed as a ratio of 80HdG per 10⁵ 2dG. Data presented as mean ± S.E.M., n =4 to 8; *, p <0.05; ***, p < 0.001 compared with control levels. Panel A: two-way ANOVA of AEOL 10150, p =0.1444; CEES, p =0.0001; interaction, p= 0.0481; Panel B: two-way ANOVA of AEOL 10150, p =0.1394; CEES, p =0.0001; interaction, p = 0.0004.
FIGURE 9A-D are graphs showing the effects of CEES on markers of injury, edema and inflammation and prevention by AEOL 10150 in rat lung. Panel A: the cytotoxicity marker lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured spectrophotometrically. Panel B: protein levels which are a marker for edema were measured and was measured spectrophotometrically. Panel C: IgM, which is a marker of lung leak was measured by ELISA. Panel D: BAL cells, which are a marker of inflammation and hemorrhage were measure differential cytometry.
FIGURE 10 is a graph showing LDH levels in the BAL were increased as a result of CEES inhalation; these levels were decreased to control values when AEOL 10150 was given following CEES. Levels of LDH in the BAL leak were significantly increased as a result of CEES, indicative of epithelial damage and thus leak from those damaged cells. Post exposure treatment with AEOL 10150 significantly decreased LDH leak from cells. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M., protein n=5 to 9. **, p< 0.01;***, p< 0.001.
FIGURE 11A-B are graphs showing the protective effect of AEOL 10150 on CEES-induced increases in BAL protein levels and BAL IgM. At 1 and 9 hours following CEES exposure, rats were treated with AEOL 10150 (5 mg/kg, SC). At 18 hours post exposure, rats were lavaged and levels of BAL protein and IgM were measured. Panel A: CEES exposure resulted in significant increases in BAL protein, while AEOL 10150 treatment with CEES exposure resulted in a significant decrease in protein in the BAL. Panel B: shows a significant increase in BAL IgM as a result of CEES exposure and a subsequent significant decrease in BAL IgM with AEOL 10150 treatment following CEES exposure. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M., protein n=6 to 16. ***, p< 0.001. IgM n=6. ***, p< 0.001.
FIGURE 12A-C are graphs showing that CEES inhalation resulted in increases in BAL RBCs and PMN; treatment with AEOL 10150 reduced BAL RBCs and PMN in BAL. Panel A: In EtOH+PBS or EtOH+AEOL 10150 treated rats, there were very low levels of RBCs. In the CEES+PBS group, rats had significantly increased RBCs in the BAL, indicative of hemorragic injury. Panel B: Neutrophils (polymorphonuclear cells, PMN) were also significantly increased in CEES+PBS treated rats as compared to both EtOH treatment groups. Treatment with AEOL 10150 following CEES resulted in significant decreases in PMN as compared to CEES+PBS. Macrophages were not significantly changed in any of the treatment groups. Data are mean ± S.E.M., n=6 to 13. *,p=0.05; **, p< 0.01;***, p< 0.001.
FIGURE 13 is a graph showing that lung tissue myeloperoxidase levels were significantly increased in the CEES+PBS group; treatment with AEOL 10150 significantly decreased lung myeloperoxidase levels as compared to CEES+PBS. Lung tissue was perfused and snap frozen at the time of euthanization. Lung tissue was homogenized in HTAB buffer. Oxidation of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was followed for 3 minutes; this data was used to calculate a rate of change. An extinction coefficient for TMB of 3.9 x 10⁴ M^-1 cm^-1 at 652 nm was used to calculate Units of peroxidase activity and activity was normalized to protein levels using the BCA protein assay. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M., n=6. *, p=0.05; **, p< 0.01.
FIGURE 14 is a graph showing that the DNA oxidation marker 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) was significantly increased as a result of CEES inhalation; treatment with AEOL 10150 significantly decreased CEES-induced DNA oxidation. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M., n=12. *, p=0.05; **, p< 0.01.
FIGURE 15 is a graph showing that levels of the lipid peroxidation marker 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) were elevated as a result of CEES exposure, treatment with AEOL 10150 significantly decreased levels of 4-HNE. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M., n=11 for EtOH+PBS and CEES+PBS, n= 5 for EtOH+10150 and CEES+10150. *, p=0.05; **.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It is be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include the plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, a reference to "a cell" is a reference to one or more cells.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. The embodiments of the invention and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the embodiments and examples that are described and/or illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. It should be noted that the features illustrated in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques may be omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the embodiments of the invention. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the invention may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments of the invention.
Accordingly, provided immediately below is a "Definition" section, where certain terms related to the invention are defined specifically for clarity, but all of the definitions are consistent with how a skilled artisan would understand these terms.

SM is sulfur mustard
CEES is 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide
SOD is superoxide dismutase
ROS is reactive oxygen species
RNS is reactive nitrogen species
GSH is glutathione
80HdG is 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine
MTT is 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
ANOVA is analysis of variance
HBE is human bronchiolar epithelial cells
SAEC is human small airway epithelial cells
4-HNE is 4-hydroxynonenal

"Alkylating agent," as used herein, generally refers to compounds containing alkyl groups that readily attach to other molecules thereby forming a covalent bond. This process may also be referred to as alkylation. Generally, alkylating agents can disrupt DNA function through different mechanisms, such as: (i) by alkylating DNA bases, thereby preventing DNA synthesis and RNA transcription, (ii) by mediating the formation of cross-bridges, bonds between atoms in the DNA strand, or (iii) by facilitating the mispairing of the nucleotides in the DNA strand thereby leading to mutations. Also, alkylating agents may initiate oxidative stress within the cells of the exposed organ system causing an overall decrease in intracellular glutathione (GSH) and increased DNA oxidation. Exposure to alkylating agents may cause blistering of the skin, damage to the eyes, and damage to the respiratory tract. Exposure to alkylating agents may also cause systemic toxic effects, such as nausea and vomiting, reduction in both leukocytes and erythrocytes, hemorrhagic tendencies, edema, depletion of glutathione, increased myleperoxidase (MPO), increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and increased IgM.
"Oxidation," as used herein, is a chemical reaction that transfers electrons from a substance to an oxidizing agent. Oxidation reactions may produce free radicals, which result in oxidative stress and may ultimately result in cell death.
"Reactive oxygen species," as used herein, generally refers to free radicals, reactive anions containing oxygen atoms, or molecules containing oxygen atoms that can either produce free radicals or are chemically activated by them. Reactive oxygen species may include, without limitation, superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrite, lipid peroxides, hydroxyl radicals, thiyl radicals, superoxide anion, organic hydroperoxide, RO• alkoxy and ROO• peroxy radicals, and hypochlorous acid. The main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vivo is aerobic respiration, although reactive oxygen species are also produced by peroxisomal b-oxidation of fatty acids, microsomal cytochrome P450 metabolism of xenobiotic compounds, stimulation of phagocytosis by pathogens or lipopolysacchrides, arginine metabolism, tissue specific enzymes. Accumulating oxidative damage may also affect the efficiency of mitochondria and further increase the rate of ROS production.
"Reactive nitrogen species," as used herein, generally refers to a family of biomolecules derived from nitric oxide (NO•) and may be produced in animals through the reaction of nitric oxide (NO•) with superoxide (O₂ ^-) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO^-). In general, reactive nitrogen species act together with reactive oxygen species to damage cells, resulting in nitrosative stress.
"Oxidative stress," as used herein, generally refers to cell damage caused by ROS. The primary damage to cells results from the ROS-induced alteration of macromolecules such as polyunsaturated fatty acids in membrane lipids, essential proteins and DNA. As described in U.S. Patent No. 7,189,707 , oxidative stress and ROS have been implicated in a number of disease states such as Alzheimer's disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, and aging.
"Antioxidant," as used herein, generally refers to molecules or compounds with the capability to attenuate or prevent the oxidation of other molecules. Antioxidants may remove free radicals generated from oxidation reaction and inhibit other oxidation reactions by becoming oxidized themselves. Antioxidants may include reducing agents such as thiols or polyphenols. Additionally, antioxidants may include, without limitation, glutathione, vitamin C, vitamin E, catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, various other peroxidases, the substituted porphyrin compounds of the invention and any other molecule or compound that is capable of scavenging reactive oxygen species known in the art.
"Rescue," as used herein, is generally defined as counteracting, recovering, or conferring protection from the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species and other free radicals in a subject, organ, tissue, cell, or biomolecule.
"Organ," as used herein, generally refers to a tissue that performs a specific function or group of functions within an organism. An exemplary list of organs includes lungs, heart, blood vessels, blood, salivary glands, esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, intestines, rectum, anus, endocrine glands such as hypothalamus, pituitary or pituitary gland, pineal body or pineal gland, thyroid, parathyroids, adrenals, skin, hair, nails, lymph, lymph nodes, tonsils, adenoids, thymus, spleen, muscles, brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, nerves, sex organs such as ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterus, vagina, mammary glands, testes, vas deferens, seminal vesicles, prostate, and penis, pharynx, larynx, trachea, bronchi, diaphragm, bones, cartilage, ligaments, tendons, kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra.
"Organ system," as used herein, generally refers to a group of related organs. Organ systems include, without limitation, circulatory system, digestive system, endocrine system, integumentary system, lymphatic system, muscular system, nervous system, reproductive system, respiratory system, skeletal system, and urinary system.
"Biomarker," as used herein, generally refers to an organic biomolecule which is differentially present in a sample taken from a subject of one phenotypic status (e.g., exposure to an alkylating agent) as compared with another phenotypic status (e.g., no exposure to an alkylating agent). A biomarker is differentially present between different phenotypic statuses if the mean or median expression level of the biomarker in the different groups is calculated to be statistically significant. Common tests for statistical significance include, among others, t-test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney and odds ratio. Biomarkers, alone or in combination, provide measures of relative risk that a subject belongs to one phenotypic status or another. As such, they are useful as markers for disease (diagnostics), therapeutic effectiveness of a drug (theranostics), and for drug toxicity.
"Subject," as used herein, includes individuals who require intervention or manipulation due to a exposure or potential exposure to an alkylating agent that can facilitate organ injury. Furthermore, the term "subject" includes non-human animals and humans.
"Active agent," as used herein, generally refers to any compound capable of inducing a change in the phenotype or genotype of a cell, tissue, organ, or organism when contacted with the cell, tissue, organ, or organism. For example, the compound may have the ability to scavenge ROS, prevent or attenuate oxidative stress, and protect organs and organ systems from injury due to exposure to an alkylating agent. The compound may include any substituted porphyrin compounds of the invention, such as a superoxide mimetic, a catalase mimetic or a mimetic having both features.
A "pharmaceutically acceptable carrier," as used herein, generally refers to pharmaceutical excipients, for example, pharmaceutically, physiologically, acceptable organic or inorganic carrier substances suitable for enteral or parenteral application that do not deleteriously react with the active agent.
Where substituent groups are specified by their conventional chemical formulae, written from left to right, they equally encompass the chemically identical substituents that would result from writing the structure from right to left, e.g., -CH₂O- is equivalent to -OCH₂-.
"Effective dose" or "pharmaceutically effective dose," as used herein, generally refers to the amount of the substituted porphyrin(s) described herein that produces a desired therapeutic effect, such as counteracting the deleterious effects of alkylating agent exposure. The precise amount of the effective dose of a such a compound will yield the most effective results in terms of efficacy of treatment in a given subject will depend upon the activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and bioavailability of a particular substituted porphyrin of the invention, physiological condition of the subject, the nature of the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier in a formulation, and a route of administration, among other potential factors. Those skilled in the clinical and pharmacological arts will be able to determine these factors through routine experimentation consisting of monitoring the subject and adjusting the dosage. Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (Gennaro ed. 20.sup.th edition, Williams & Wilkins PA, USA) (2000).

Methods

In one aspect, methods are disclosed for treating, rescuing and/or protecting organ and organ systems in a subject from the deleterious effects resulting from exposure to alkylating agents using substituted porphyrins. A method for treating an injury associated with exposure to an alkylating agent in a subject may include administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of AEOL10150. A method for protecting a subject from the toxic effects associated with exposure to an alkylating agent may include administering prophylactically to a subject in need thereof an effective amount AEOL10150. A method is disclosed for rescuing or protecting organ injury by administering AEOL10150 as the active agent of an alkylating agent protectant.
Compound AEOL 10150 is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 7,189,707 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0149498 .

Alkylating Agents

Alkylating agents contain alkyl groups that combine readily, typically through covalent bonding, with other molecules. Alkylating agents can disrupt DNA function by three mechanisms: (i) alkylating DNA bases, thereby preventing DNA synthesis and RNA transcription, (ii) mediating the formation of cross-bridges, bonds between atoms in the DNA strand, or (iii) facilitating the mis-pairing of the nucleotides in the DNA strand resulting in mutations in the DNA strand. Also, alkylating agents may initiate oxidative stress within the cells of the exposed organ system causing an overall decrease in intracellular glutathione (GSH) and increased DNA oxidation.
Sulfur mustard (2, 2'-dichloro diethyl sulfide) is a known potent vessicating agent and inhalation results in apoptosis and necrosis of the airway epithelium, inflammation, edema, and pseudomembrane formation. 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES, half mustard) is a monofunctional analog of SM that can be utilized to elucidate the mechanisms of injury and as an initial screening of therapeutics. Both SM and CEES ( Figure 1 ) are alkylating agents capable of binding macromolecules including proteins, DNA and lipids.
Oxidative stress plays a significant role in SM/CEES mediated damage. For example, exposure to CEES causes an imbalance in production of ROS/RNS and antioxidant defenses in favor of the former. There are many factors that contribute to the increase in ROS following SM/CEES exposure. For example, exposure to SM/CEES facilitates the proliferation of inflammatory cells such as polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN), which in turn produces oxidants, including superoxide and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). Furthermore, exposure to CEES also results mitochrondrial dysfunction which further drives increased ROS production, and ultimately, oxidative stress.
As discussed above, following exposure to SM/CEES, there is irreparable damage to the respiratory tract such as apoptosis and necrosis of the airway epithelium. However, in certain embodiments of the invention, administration of the substituted porphyrins of the invention subsequent to alkylating agent exposure, have been shown to significantly improve the outcome. For example, administration of AEOL 10150 following CEES exposure have been shown to rescue lung cells and airway cells from alkylating agent-induced toxicity, prevent alkylating agent-mediated ROS and dysfunction, and alkylating agent-induced oxidative stress. AEOL 10150 has been shown to reduce alkylating agent-induced cytotoxicity, reduce alkylating agent-induced increases of protein and IgM in the lung, reduce levels of RBCs and inflammatory cells in the lung, decrease tissue accumulation of PMN, and prevent alkylating agent-induced oxidative stress.
The compound may be administered prophylactically to serve as a protectant against exposure to an alkylating agent. The compound may be administered in the dosage amounts specified above about 1 hour to about 48 hours prior to alkylating agent exposure. In specific embodiments, the compound of the invention may be administered about 1 to about 24 hours, more specifically, about 1 to about 12 hours, more specifically about 1 to about 6 hours, and even more specifically, about 1 to about 6 hours prior to alkylating agent exposure.
For any compound described herein, the therapeutically effective amount can be initially determined from cell culture assays. Target concentrations will be those concentrations of active compound(s) that are capable of counteracting the effects of the alkylating agent, by monitoring the presence, absence, or alteration in levels of the biomarkers indicative of alkylating agent exposure, such as glutathione, LDH, IgM, and 80-HdG, for example. Methods for measuring the levels of such compounds is known by those of skill in the art and is matter of routine experimentation.
Therapeutically effective amounts for use in humans may be determined from animal models. For example, a dose for humans can be formulated to achieve a concentration that has been found to be effective in animals. The dosage in humans can be adjusted by monitoring the levels of the biomarkers indicative of exposure to an alkylating agent and adjusting the dosage upwards or downwards.

EXAMPLES

For the purpose of the following specific examples, the compounds of Formulas IV-IX, will be designated as indicated in Table 1, below.

Table 1

Compound of Formula AEOL No. Designation

IV AEOL 10153

V AEOL 10158

VI AEOL 10123

VII AEOL 10150

VIII AEOL 10151

IX AEOL 10303

X AEOL 10113

Compounds AEOL 10153, AEOL 10158, AEOL 10123, AEOL 10151, AEOL 10303 and AEOL 10113 are included in the examples for the purpose of reference and fall outside the scope of the claimed invention.

Specific Example 1: CEES-Induced Airway Epithelial Cell Injury

Human lung 16HBE cells were grown to approximately 90% confluence and treated with increasing concentrations of CEES, ranging from about 600 to about 000 µM. Cell viability was determined by measuring the fluorescence of calcein AM and was found to decrease in a dose-dependent manner from 80% with the 600 µM CEES to below 10% with 1000 µM CEES (Figure 2). 900 µM CEES was used as the optimal dose to carry out the cytoprotection studies because it provided enough cell injury (about 50%) for potential therapeutics to demonstrate efficacy and the most consistent cell injury response in the two cell systems. Because of observed increased resistance of SAE cells to CEES toxicity as seen with 16HBE cells, these exposures were prolonged to 48 h in the SAE cells to provide similar injury responses for comparison of antioxidant protective effects between cell systems.

Specific Example 2: Delayed Increase in Mitochondrial ROS and Dysfunction with CEES Exposure

As discussed above, mitochondria are a major source of cellular ROS production. Both SAE and 16HBE cells were exposed to 900 µM CEES for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, after which the cells were incubated with MitoSOX (MitoSOX is a mitochrondrially targeted ROS probe) and fluorescence was measured using flow cytometry. CEES exposure increased ROS levels that peaked at 12 h, and this time-dependent increase was seen in both SAE ( Figure 3A ) and 16HBE ( Figure 3B ) cells. As a consequence, further exposure studies measuring markers of cellular stress were examined after 12 h of exposure.
Next CEES was examined to determine whether CEES exposure was associated with any mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondria need to maintain a membrane potential to actively make ATP. To examine this, measured Rho 123 fluorescence was measured, which is inversely correlated with mitochondrial membrane potential. Human lung 16HBE cells were exposed to CEES for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, after which the cells were incubated with Rho 123, and fluorescence was measured using flow cytometry. The results showed that CEES produced a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential by 4 h, which persisted for 24 h as evidenced by the increase in Rho 123 fluorescence ( Figure 3C ). Notably, there was a significant decrease in Rho 123 fluorescence at 48 h, which can be attributed to the cell death that would be expected to occur based on previous cell viability tests.

Specific Example 3: Metalloporphyrins Rescue Human Lung Cells from CEES-Induced Toxicity

Several structurally different metalloporphyrins (AEOL 10150, AEOL 10113, AEOL 10303, and MnTBAP) were screened in 16HBE cells for efficacy against CEES toxicity 1 h after the initial exposure ( Figure 4 ). Cells were treated with CEES for 1 h at 37°C, after which the compounds of Formula 10150 (Formula VI, above), 10113 (Formula IX, above), 10103 (Formula VIII, above) and MnTBAP were added at a final concentration of 50 µM. After 24 h, cell viability was measured using calcein AM fluorescence. Three catalytic antioxidant compounds significantly increased cell viability in CEES-exposed cells to 60, 56, and 41% in the 10150, 10113, 10103 groups compared with only 20% in CEES-only exposed cells ( Figure 5 ). Of the four compounds tested, only MnTBAP did not show any protection.

Specific Example 4: AEOL 10150 Rescues Human Primary Airway Cells from CEES-Induced Toxicity

Primary human lung SAE cells and 16HBE cells were exposed to 900 µM CEES for 48 h. Treatment with AEOL 10150 (10, 25, and 50 µM) occurred 1 h after the initial CEES exposure. AEOL 10150 (50 µM) alone did not change the viability of the cells, as measured by both the calcein AM ( Figure 6 , A and C) and the MTT ( Figure 6 , B and D) assays. CEES alone resulted in a 50% decrease in cell viability, and this was significantly attenuated at the highest concentration of AEOL 10150, to 80% of the control in SAE cells ( Figure 6 , A and B) and nearly 90% in 16HBE cells ( Figure 6 , C and D). Although neither 10 nor 25 µM AEOL 10150 showed a significant increase in viability in the SAE cells, 25 µM AEOL 10150 did show a significant increase in viability in the 16HBE cells. Similar results were obtained in both the calcein AM and the MTT assays used to assess cell viability.

Specific Example 5: AEOL 10150 Prevents CEES-Mediated Mitochondrial ROS and Dysfunction

AEOL 10150 were assessed to determine whether its cytoprotective effects are associated with CEES-mediated changes in mitochondrial ROS and dysfunction. Cells were grown to approximately 90% confluence and exposed to 900 µM CEES with and without AEOL 10150 (50 µM). Cells were incubated with MitoSOX 12 h after CEES exposure, and fluorescence was measured using flow cytometry. AEOL 10150 added 1 h after CEES treatments significantly decreased mitochondrial ROS compared with CEES exposed cells in both SAE ( Figure 7A ) and 16HBE ( Figure 7B ) cells. AEOL 10150 alone did not cause a change in mitochondrial ROS.
Additionally, AEOL 10150 was assessed to determine if it can protect the mitochondria from CEES-induced dysfunction. Lung 16HBE cells were exposed to 900 µM CEES for 4 h with 50µM AEOL 10150 added 1 h after the initial CEES exposure. The CEES-only treated groups showed an increase in Rhodamine 123 fluorescence, indicating a significant loss of mitochondrial membrane potential that was attenuated in the AEOL 10150-treated cells ( Figure 7C ).

Specific Example 6: AEOL 10150 Prevents CEES-Induced Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress can result from an imbalance between oxidant production and antioxidant defense. As discussed above, GSH is a major cellular antioxidant. So, the effect of CEES on total cellular GSH levels was determined as well as whether AEOL 10150 altered CEES-mediated changes in GSH levels. Human lung 16HBE cells were exposed for 12 h to CEES, and AEOL 10150 (50 µM) was added 1 h post-CEES treatment. AEOL 10150 alone did not alter intracellular GSH levels, whereas CEES caused a significant decrease in intracellular GSH levels ( Figure 8A AEOL 10150 treatment prevented the CEES-induced decrease in GSH, further implicating an imbalance in redox status of the cells caused by CEES that was reversible by AEOL 10150.
One consequence of oxidative stress is an increase in the oxidation of cellular macromolecules. A classic marker for DNA oxidation is the formation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8O-HdG), which was determined 12 h after CEES exposure. CEES caused a significant increase in 80HdG levels in lung 16HBE cells as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography ( Figure 8B ). Moreover, AEOL 10150 added 1 h post-CEES exposure decreased CEES-mediated DNA oxidation. These data further support the role of oxidative stress in CEES-mediated injury that is ameliorated by the catalytic antioxidant metalloporphyrin, AEOL 10150.

Specific Example 7: AEOL 10150 Protects CEES-Induced Lung Injury in Rat

Rats were exposed to 5% CEES for 15 minutes and killed 18 hours later. Groups of rats received AEOL 10150 (5 mg/kg sc, bid) 1 hour after CEES exposure. Rat lungs were lavaged and markers of cytotoxicity, inflammation and edema were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). As shown in Figure 9 , CEES caused a significant increase in the ROS. Moreover, AEOL 10150 added 1 h post-CEES exposure decreased CEES-mediated DNA oxidation. These data further support the role of oxidative stress in CEES-mediated injury that is ameliorated by the catalytic antioxidant metalloporphyrin, AEOL 10150.

Specific Example 8: AEOL 10150 Reduces CEES-induced Cytotoxicity as Measured by LDH Release

CEES-induced cytotoxicity may be assessed by measuring LDH release in the lung. LDH release in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) is a marker of cellular injury in the epithelium. Figure 10 shows levels of LDH release were not different between EtOH + PBS and EtOH + AEOL 10150 treated animals. Following CEES exposure with PBS treatment, LDH release doubled as compared to the control groups (p < 0.01). When rats were administered AEOL 10150 following CEES-exposure, LDH levels were significantly attenuated as compared to the CEES + PBS group (p < 0.001).

Specific Example 9: AEOL 10150 Reduces CEES-induced BAL Increases in Protein and IgM

Administering AEOL 10150 reduces alkylating agent-induced increases in protein and IgM in the lung. BAL in normal rats consists of macrophages and low levels of large proteins such as albumin. Measuring protein levels in the BAL is one way to measure the accumulation of extravascular protein in the airways. As shown in Figure 11A , compared to EtOH + PBS or EtOH + AEOL 10150, protein levels in BAL were significantly increased as a result of 5% CEES + PBS (p < 0.001). Protein levels in the BAL were significantly decreased from CEES + PBS when animals were administered AEOL 10150 (p < 0.001). Although increased protein levels in BAL may not be a clear indicator of vascular permeability because it may also indicate lysis of damaged epithelium resulting from CEES exposure, the presence of very high molecular weight molecules such as IgM (900 kD) are clearly indicative of increased vascular permeability. Accordingly, Figure 11B demonstrates that IgM levels in the BAL were significantly increased a result in CEES + PBS rats as compared to EtOH + PBS or EtOH + AEOL 10150 (p < 0.001). IgM levels were significantly decreased with CEES + AEOL 10150 treatment as compared to CEES + PBS. Combined, these data demonstrate that administration of the AEOL 10150 following CEES exposure decreased protein levels in BAL as well as IgM levels.

Specific Example 10: AEOL 10150 Treatment Reduces Levels of RBCs and Inflammatory Cells in BAL

Administering AEOL 10150 following alkylating agent exposure reduces levels of red blood cells (RBCs) and inflammatory cells in the lung. RBCs should not be present in the lung in any considerable levels unless there is hemorrhagic injury. Exposure to 5% CEES + PBS results in significantly increased hemorrhage as shown by increased RBC levels in the BAL (p < 0.001). This CEES-induced damage is ameliorated with AEOL 10150 treatment 18 hours after CEES exposure (p < 0.05). Levels of PMN or neutrophils in the BAL were significantly increased in the CEES + PBS rats as compared to EtOH + PBS or EtOH+10150 (p < 0.001). CEES-induced neutrophil increases were significantly decreased with AEOL 10150 treatment (p < 0.05). While there was a decrease in macrophage levels with CEES exposure, this change did not reach significance as compared to the EtOH exposed animals.

Specific Example 11: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) in Lung Homogenate

MPO is a glycoprotein expressed in all cells of the myeloid lineage but is most abundant in the azurophilic granules ofPMNs. Released MPO by activated PMNs measured in whole lung homogenate demonstrates tissue accumulation and is a useful complement to measurement of PMN in the BAL. MPO levels were significantly increased as a result of CEES+PBS indicating an increase in PMN tissue accumulation (p < 0.01, Figure 12 ). AEOL 10150 treatment after CEES treatment significantly decreased tissue accumulation of PMN (p < 0.05).

Specific Example 12: AEOL 10150 Prevents CEES-induced Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress occurs when oxidant production exceeds antioxidant defense. One marker of oxidative damage is DNA oxidation, which can be measured by the formation of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8OHdG). 8OHdG significantly increased in CEES+PBS rats as compared to levels in EtOH+PBS (p <0.01) or EtOH+ 10150 (p < 0.05) treatment 18 hours after exposure as measured by HPLC ( Figure 13 ). When rats were exposed to CEES and then received AEOL 10150, 8O-HdG levels were significantly decreased as compared to CEES+PBS (p < 0.05). These data further support the role of oxidative stress in CEES-mediated injury that is ameliorated by the catalytic antioxidant metalloporphyrin, AEOL 10150.
Another marker of oxidative damage is the formation of lipid peroxidation products including 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE). 4-HNE is a major product of total unsaturated aldehydes formed during lipid peroxidation. Measurement of 4-HNE levels in the lung 18 hours after CEES exposure resulted in a significant increase compared with EtOH+PBS treated rats ( Figure 14 ). AEOL 10150 significantly inhibited CEES- induced lipid peroxidation.

Claims

A compound for use in treating an injury associated with exposure to an alkylating agent, or for use in protecting a subject from the toxic effects associated with exposure to said alkylating agent, the compound having the formula
The compound for use according to claim 1 wherein the alkylating agent is selected from the group consisting of a sulfur mustard and 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide.
The compound for use according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the compound is for use in administration by inhalation.
The compound for use according to any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the compound is for use in treating lung injury induced by the alkylating agent.
The compound for use according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the compound is for use in topical administration.
The compound of use according to any of claims 1, 2 and 5, wherein the compound is for use in treating skin injury induced by the alkylating agent.
The compound for use according to any preceding claim, wherein the injury is associated with exposure to a sulfur mustard.
The compound for use according to any preceding claim, wherein the compound is for use in administration within about 0.5 hours to about 48 hours after exposure to said alkylating agent.
The compound for use according to any preceding claim, wherein the compound is for use in administration within about 1 hour to about 10 hours after exposure to said alkylating agent.
The compound for use according to any preceding claim, wherein the compound is for use in reducing cytotoxicity induced by the alkylating agent.