EP2252713B1 - Method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from the aqueous solutions of cobalt and/or nickel - Google Patents

Method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from the aqueous solutions of cobalt and/or nickel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2252713B1
EP2252713B1 EP09712547.0A EP09712547A EP2252713B1 EP 2252713 B1 EP2252713 B1 EP 2252713B1 EP 09712547 A EP09712547 A EP 09712547A EP 2252713 B1 EP2252713 B1 EP 2252713B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
extraction
solution
stage
cobalt
nickel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09712547.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2252713A1 (en
Inventor
Esa Lindell
Rauno Luoma
Arja Oja
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NORILSK NICKEL HARJAVALTA Oy
Original Assignee
NORILSK NICKEL HARJAVALTA Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NORILSK NICKEL HARJAVALTA Oy filed Critical NORILSK NICKEL HARJAVALTA Oy
Publication of EP2252713A1 publication Critical patent/EP2252713A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2252713B1 publication Critical patent/EP2252713B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B19/00Obtaining zinc or zinc oxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/20Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching
    • C22B3/26Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by liquid-liquid extraction using organic compounds
    • C22B3/37Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by liquid-liquid extraction using organic compounds containing boron, silicon, selenium or tellurium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B23/00Obtaining nickel or cobalt
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F11/00Compounds of calcium, strontium, or barium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01GCOMPOUNDS CONTAINING METALS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C01D OR C01F
    • C01G49/00Compounds of iron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B15/00Obtaining copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B47/00Obtaining manganese
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese by liquid-liquid extraction from aqueous solutions containing cobalt and nickel.
  • the contents of impurities vary depending on the pre-treatment method of the raw material used.
  • the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions that are used as neutralizers end up in a raffinate.
  • the equilibrium contents of the fractions of the extraction reaction are mainly determined by the pH of the aqueous solution.
  • the hydrogen ions released in the aqueous solution must be neutralized.
  • the neutralizers used either comprise ammonia or alkali hydroxides. The cations of the neutralizers may cause problems with precipitate or contaminations at the further stages of the process. To prevent this, an extraction process similar to the patent AU667539B has been presented, among others.
  • the noble metals cobalt and nickel are separated from each other by means of transmitter ions so that, in a pre-extraction, a pre-neutralized extraction solution is brought into contact with an aqueous solution containing transmitter ions.
  • these transmitter ions replace the ammonium or alkali metal ions, which move to the aqueous solution that is conveyed out of the process.
  • the extraction solution now containing the transmitter ions, is contacted with the aqueous solution containing noble metals.
  • the noble metals in turn, replace the transmitter ions, which end up in the aqueous solution.
  • the aqueous solution containing the transmitter ions returns to the pre-extraction, whereby the transmitter ion is not essentially consumed in the process. If required, transmitter ions can be added to replace any losses.
  • the transmitter ion ends up in the extraction raffinate.
  • WO 01/48252 A1 and GB 2 324 792 A describe processes in which cobalt impurity is separated by extraction from nickel solutions.
  • the advantages of the improved method include a more straight forward process without transmitter ions and circulation thereof, whereby the transmitter ions neither end up in the raffinate nor contaminate the products, and an opportunity to improve the total effectiveness of the extraction process by exploiting chloride-containing wash waters.
  • the invention relates to a method for separating the impurities zinc, iron, calcium, copper and/or manganese from aqueous solutions containing cobalt and nickel.
  • the aqueous solution containing metallic salts is brought into a mixing contact with the extraction solution, which is pre-charged with cobalt and nickel ions, whereby the cobalt and nickel in the extraction solution are replaced with impurity metals and the aqueous solution, now called raffinate, is cleaned from impurities after this stage.
  • Part of the raffinate can be used to pre-charge the extraction solution with cobalt and nickel ions by bringing it into contact with the pre-neutralized extraction solution.
  • the cobalt and nickel ions replace the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions that are used in the pre-neutralization.
  • the process coupling preferably prevents the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions that are used in the neutralization of the extraction from ending up in the extraction raffinate.
  • the aqueous solution that contains the said alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ion, but no cobalt and nickel is conveyed out of the process as reject.
  • Pre-charging means extracting the product metal in the extraction solution.
  • the pre-charging is carried out by a cation exchange extraction reagent at a higher pH before the actual extraction stage of the impurity metals at a lower pH.
  • an ion-exchange takes place between the said product metal in the extraction solution and the impurity metal in the aqueous solution, the impurity metal transferring to the extraction solution and the product metal transferring to the aqueous solution.
  • the ion exchange is based on a selectivity of the impurity metal of the extraction reagent higher than that of the product metal at the same pH of the aqueous solution.
  • cation exchange extraction reagents are typically used.
  • Such commercially significant extraction reagents include acidic phosphorus-containing extraction reagents, carboxylic acid-based extraction reagents and hydroxy oxime-based extraction reagents.
  • the extraction solution is washed at a separate washing stage to remove the cobalt or nickel ions remaining in the extraction solution.
  • This coupling enables the use of impurity metal chlorides to enhance washing.
  • the cobalt or nickel ions remaining in the extraction solution are replaced with the impurity ions and they move to the chloride-containing aqueous solution.
  • the washing water is conveyed to the above-mentioned pre-charging stage, whereby the chloride ions that come along escape to the reject and the cobalt or nickel is recovered into the extraction solution.
  • the impurities are back-extracted into the aqueous solution preferably by hydrochloric acid.
  • the advantages of this method compared with previous processes comprise: the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and ammonium ions used in the neutralization do not end up in the extraction raffinate, a more straight forward process without transmitter ions and their circulation, whereby the transmitter ions neither end up in the raffinate nor contaminate the products, and the opportunity to improve the total effectiveness of the extraction process by utilizing chloride-containing washing waters.
  • the feed solution is an aqueous solution that contains cobalt and nickel as bivalent ions, the counter-ion preferably being a sulphate ion.
  • the cobalt content of the feed solution can be, e.g., 0-5 g/L and its nickel content, e.g., 50-130 g/L.
  • the solution can contain as impurities, e.g., 0-1 g/L of iron, e.g., 0-10 g/L of zinc, e.g., 0-0.6 g/L of calcium, e.g., 0-10 g/L of copper and, e.g., 0-10 g/L of manganese. These concentrations and impurities are suggestive and do not limit the applicability of the invention.
  • the extraction reagent which is used in the water insoluble extraction solution, is preferably a cation exchange extraction reagent, such as di-2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid with the trade name of, e.g., DEHPA (the manufacturer being Rhodia).
  • the extraction reagent is diluted in kerosene or another suitable organic inert solvent that is poorly-soluble in water.
  • the process coupling of the method is, for example, the selective liquid-liquid extraction method according to Fig. 1 .
  • a feed solution (1) containing impurities is conveyed to the extraction stage (A), wherein the impurity metals are extracted into the pre-charged extraction solution (2).
  • the pre-charged extraction solution contains cobalt and nickel.
  • the impurity metal ions of the aqueous solution form a metal complex with the extraction reagent, while the cobalt and nickel ions are released from the extraction reagent into the aqueous solution.
  • This aqueous solution is now called a raffinate (3).
  • a prerequisite of a successful extraction reaction is a pH favorable for the extraction of impurity metals.
  • a preferable pH is 2-3.5, whereby the best possible separation is obtained between the impurities and cobalt and nickel.
  • the cobalt and nickel ions form a metal complex with the extraction reagent.
  • the alkaline salt of the extraction reagent in the pre-neutralized extraction solution delivers the alkali metal, alkali earth metal or ammonium ion to the aqueous solution, depending on the pre-neutralizer.
  • the extraction of the pre-charging stage takes place at a pH appropriate to the cobalt and nickel extraction, which, according to laboratory tests, is above 4.
  • the extraction solution (8), charged with impurities, is conveyed to the washing stage (C), where the cobalt or nickel, which remained in the extraction solution at the extraction stage, is washed out.
  • the washing water (9) used in the washing is an impurity-containing metallic chloride solution (16), to which water (10) has been added.
  • the free hydrochloric acid contained in the metallic chloride solution enables a decrease in the pH to a level favorable for the washing of cobalt or nickel, but the impurity metals are not back-extracted from the extraction solution. In that case, the cobalt or nickel in the extraction solution are replaced with impurity metals, improving the selectivity of the method.
  • the cobalt or nickel transfer to the aqueous solution which, as the raffinate (11) of the washing stage, is conveyed to the pre-charging stage.
  • the raffinate (11) of the washing stage can also be conveyed to the extraction stage, but if the migration of chlorides to the main solution stream (4) of the raffinate of the extraction stage and from there to the further processes is to be avoided, the coupling should be carried out according to the above.
  • the washed extraction solution (12) is conveyed to the back-extraction stage (D).
  • the impurity metals contained in the extraction solution are back-extracted into the aqueous phase with the aqueous solution (13) of hydrochloric acid.
  • the metal-free extraction solution (14) is conveyed from the back-extraction stage (D) to pre-neutralization (E).
  • the back-extraction solution (15) containing metallic chlorides is conveyed to the further process and part of the solution (16) is used at the washing stage.
  • alkali metal, alkali earth metal or ammonium hydroxides (17) can be used as the neutralizer.
  • the extraction stage was examined with a pre-charged extraction solution in a thermostated 1-litre glass reactor at two different ratios of organic/water (O/A 0.2 and 0.3) and at three different pHs (2; 2.5 and 3).
  • the temperature in the tests was 55 °C
  • the mixing time was 20 min
  • the rotation speed of the mixer was 600 rpm and the diameter of the mixing member 50 mm.
  • the aqueous solution Zn 0.5 g/L; Fe 0.1 g/L; Ca 0.2 g/L; Mn 0.2 g/L; Cu 0.1 mg/L; Co 2.3 g/L and Ni 117 g/L.
  • the pre-charging stage was examined by charge tests at two stages.
  • the extraction solution was pre-neutralized with the aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (lye) (200 g/L) in a thermostated 1-litre glass reactor (the temperature was 50 °C).
  • the dosage of lye was determined as a dose equivalent with respect to the metals extracted in the pre-charging.
  • the pre-neutralized extraction solution was mixed with the metal-containing aqueous solution which, in a calculatory sense, represented the raffinate coming to the pre-charging stage (Test 1), until the equilibrium had settled.
  • the aqueous solution was removed from the reactor and the extraction solution, pre-charged with metals, was mixed with a corresponding aqueous solution (Test 2).
  • Test 2 a corresponding aqueous solution
  • Test 3 an unused pre-neutralized extraction solution and the aqueous solution from Test 1 were mixed, whereby the aqueous solution from this test represented the reject.
  • the metals are pre-charged by almost 100%.
  • Table 1 Extraction of metals at the pre-charging stage. Test 1 and Test 2 correspond to the pre-charging stage 1 and Test 3 to the pre-charging stage 2, the aqueous solution of which comprises the reject.
  • the mixing time was 10 min and the phase ratio O/A about 12.5.
  • the washing stage of the nickel and cobalt that remained in the extraction solution was examined by first washing the extraction solution with water only, and by then adjusting the pH of the water extraction solution system to about 2.5 with the aqueous solution of sulfuric acid (about 50 g/L).
  • the washing stage was carried out at one stage. According to Fig. 3 , washing the extraction solution with water only is not effective enough, as nickel and cobalt did not escape from the extraction solution. The reason for this was the excessively high equilibrium pH. Reducing the pH considerably enhanced the washing power.
  • Fig. 3 shows the washing degrees of the extraction solution, when using water in the washing (Washing 1) and when adjusting the pH to 2.5 (Washing 2).
  • the back-extraction stage was examined with two different concentrations of the aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (200 g/L and 250 g/L) and with three different phase ratios (O/A 10, 15, 20). The tests were carried out using a separating funnel; the shaking time was 5 min. The washed extraction solution, charged with impurity metals, was back-extracted twice by changing the aqueous solution in between. According to the results in Table 2, the metals are back-extracted from the extraction solution by almost 100%, except for iron. Table 2 The degree of back-extraction for different O/A ratios and aqueous solutions of hydrochloric acid.
  • Conditions 25 volume-% DEHPA; diluent Orfom SX-11; room temperature; initial contents of the extraction solution: Zn 3 g/L; Fe 139 mg/L; Ca 6 g/L; Mn 66 mg/L; Cu 164 mg/L; Co 53 mg/L and Ni 14 mg/L.
  • the extraction coupling according to Fig. 1 was examined by laboratory-scale continuous mixer-clarifier equipment.
  • the volume of the mixer section of the equipment was 200 mL and that of the clarifier section was 1000 mL.
  • the mixer-clarifier was provided with the internal circulation of the desired phase, whereby the internal O/A ratio was about 1.
  • Each clarifier was provided with a heating resistor and the temperature was adjusted to about 50°C.
  • the rotation speed of the mixing member was adjusted so as to disperse the phases.
  • the flow rate of the feeding solution (1) to the extraction stage (A) was about 3 L/h and that of the extraction solution circulating in the coupling was about 3 L/h.
  • the flow rate of the feeding solution (5) of the pre-charging stage (B) was 0.1 L/h.
  • the flow rate of the washing water (9) to the washing stage (C) was about 0.5 L/h and that of the aqueous solution (13) of hydrochloric acid to the back-extraction stage (D) was about 0.3 L/h.
  • Tables 3-7 show the average solution analyses of a continuous test of five days.
  • the results of the washing stage (C) are shown in Tables 5 and 6. According to Table 5, cobalt and nickel are washed from the extraction solution and replaced with impurity metals, when the washing water contains impurity metal chlorides. According to Table 6, a sufficiently good washing degree is not achieved by using water only. In the test run, it was observed that sulphuric acid cannot be used at the washing stage, as the calcium that was washed from the extraction solution super-saturates the washing solution and, then, calcium sulphate crystallization that impedes the process activity is generated at the washing stage.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Removal Of Specific Substances (AREA)
  • Extraction Or Liquid Replacement (AREA)

Description

  • The invention relates to a method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese by liquid-liquid extraction from aqueous solutions containing cobalt and nickel.
  • Zinc, iron, calcium, manganese and copper enter hydrometallurgical processes within raw materials. Regarding the quality of the end product and the process, it is important to remove these impurities. The contents of impurities vary depending on the pre-treatment method of the raw material used.
  • For the separation of impurities from the aqueous solutions containing cobalt and nickel, there are generally several processing alternatives, one of which is described herein. In the solutions based on the liquid-liquid extraction used, the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions that are used as neutralizers end up in a raffinate.
  • In the liquid-liquid extraction processes that are based on the cation exchange extraction mechanism, metals transfer from the aqueous solutions to a water insoluble organic extraction solution according to the following chemical equation (1) (the upper line describes the organic solution): Me 2 + + 2 HA MeA 2 + 2 H +
    Figure imgb0001
  • According to the reaction equation (1), the equilibrium contents of the fractions of the extraction reaction are mainly determined by the pH of the aqueous solution. To bring the desired equilibrium to the side of the reaction products, the hydrogen ions released in the aqueous solution must be neutralized. Generally, the neutralizers used either comprise ammonia or alkali hydroxides. The cations of the neutralizers may cause problems with precipitate or contaminations at the further stages of the process. To prevent this, an extraction process similar to the patent AU667539B has been presented, among others. According to the patent, the noble metals cobalt and nickel are separated from each other by means of transmitter ions so that, in a pre-extraction, a pre-neutralized extraction solution is brought into contact with an aqueous solution containing transmitter ions. In the extraction solution, these transmitter ions replace the ammonium or alkali metal ions, which move to the aqueous solution that is conveyed out of the process. The extraction solution, now containing the transmitter ions, is contacted with the aqueous solution containing noble metals. In the extraction solution, the noble metals, in turn, replace the transmitter ions, which end up in the aqueous solution. The aqueous solution containing the transmitter ions returns to the pre-extraction, whereby the transmitter ion is not essentially consumed in the process. If required, transmitter ions can be added to replace any losses. In the extraction process similar to this patent, the transmitter ion ends up in the extraction raffinate.
  • WO 01/48252 A1 and GB 2 324 792 A describe processes in which cobalt impurity is separated by extraction from nickel solutions.
  • A method according to Claim 1 has now been invented. The other claims present some preferred embodiments of the invention.
  • The advantages of the improved method, compared with the process described above, include a more straight forward process without transmitter ions and circulation thereof, whereby the transmitter ions neither end up in the raffinate nor contaminate the products, and an opportunity to improve the total effectiveness of the extraction process by exploiting chloride-containing wash waters.
  • The invention relates to a method for separating the impurities zinc, iron, calcium, copper and/or manganese from aqueous solutions containing cobalt and nickel. The aqueous solution containing metallic salts is brought into a mixing contact with the extraction solution, which is pre-charged with cobalt and nickel ions, whereby the cobalt and nickel in the extraction solution are replaced with impurity metals and the aqueous solution, now called raffinate, is cleaned from impurities after this stage. Part of the raffinate can be used to pre-charge the extraction solution with cobalt and nickel ions by bringing it into contact with the pre-neutralized extraction solution. The cobalt and nickel ions replace the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions that are used in the pre-neutralization. The process coupling preferably prevents the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions that are used in the neutralization of the extraction from ending up in the extraction raffinate. After this pre-charging stage, the aqueous solution that contains the said alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ion, but no cobalt and nickel, is conveyed out of the process as reject.
  • Pre-charging means extracting the product metal in the extraction solution. Generally, the pre-charging is carried out by a cation exchange extraction reagent at a higher pH before the actual extraction stage of the impurity metals at a lower pH. At the actual extraction stage, an ion-exchange takes place between the said product metal in the extraction solution and the impurity metal in the aqueous solution, the impurity metal transferring to the extraction solution and the product metal transferring to the aqueous solution. The ion exchange is based on a selectivity of the impurity metal of the extraction reagent higher than that of the product metal at the same pH of the aqueous solution.
  • In sulphate-based processes, cation exchange extraction reagents are typically used. Such commercially significant extraction reagents include acidic phosphorus-containing extraction reagents, carboxylic acid-based extraction reagents and hydroxy oxime-based extraction reagents.
  • After the extraction stage, the extraction solution is washed at a separate washing stage to remove the cobalt or nickel ions remaining in the extraction solution. This coupling enables the use of impurity metal chlorides to enhance washing. The cobalt or nickel ions remaining in the extraction solution are replaced with the impurity ions and they move to the chloride-containing aqueous solution. The washing water is conveyed to the above-mentioned pre-charging stage, whereby the chloride ions that come along escape to the reject and the cobalt or nickel is recovered into the extraction solution.
  • After the washing stage, the impurities are back-extracted into the aqueous solution preferably by hydrochloric acid.
  • The advantages of this method compared with previous processes comprise: the alkali metal, alkali earth metal and ammonium ions used in the neutralization do not end up in the extraction raffinate, a more straight forward process without transmitter ions and their circulation, whereby the transmitter ions neither end up in the raffinate nor contaminate the products, and the opportunity to improve the total effectiveness of the extraction process by utilizing chloride-containing washing waters.
  • The feed solution is an aqueous solution that contains cobalt and nickel as bivalent ions, the counter-ion preferably being a sulphate ion. The cobalt content of the feed solution can be, e.g., 0-5 g/L and its nickel content, e.g., 50-130 g/L. Furthermore, the solution can contain as impurities, e.g., 0-1 g/L of iron, e.g., 0-10 g/L of zinc, e.g., 0-0.6 g/L of calcium, e.g., 0-10 g/L of copper and, e.g., 0-10 g/L of manganese. These concentrations and impurities are suggestive and do not limit the applicability of the invention.
  • The extraction reagent, which is used in the water insoluble extraction solution, is preferably a cation exchange extraction reagent, such as di-2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid with the trade name of, e.g., DEHPA (the manufacturer being Rhodia). The extraction reagent is diluted in kerosene or another suitable organic inert solvent that is poorly-soluble in water.
  • The process coupling of the method is, for example, the selective liquid-liquid extraction method according to Fig. 1. A feed solution (1) containing impurities is conveyed to the extraction stage (A), wherein the impurity metals are extracted into the pre-charged extraction solution (2). The pre-charged extraction solution contains cobalt and nickel. In the ion exchange reaction of the extraction stage, the impurity metal ions of the aqueous solution form a metal complex with the extraction reagent, while the cobalt and nickel ions are released from the extraction reagent into the aqueous solution. This aqueous solution is now called a raffinate (3).
  • A prerequisite of a successful extraction reaction is a pH favorable for the extraction of impurity metals. According to laboratory tests, a preferable pH is 2-3.5, whereby the best possible separation is obtained between the impurities and cobalt and nickel. After the extraction, the impurity-free raffinate is conveyed to a further process (4). Part of the raffinate is conveyed to be used as the feed solution (5) of the pre-charging stage (B). At the pre-charging stage, the cobalt and nickel are extracted from the aqueous solution into the pre-neutralized extraction solution (6).
  • In the extraction reaction of the pre-charging stage, the cobalt and nickel ions form a metal complex with the extraction reagent. When the metal complex forms, the alkaline salt of the extraction reagent in the pre-neutralized extraction solution delivers the alkali metal, alkali earth metal or ammonium ion to the aqueous solution, depending on the pre-neutralizer. The extraction of the pre-charging stage takes place at a pH appropriate to the cobalt and nickel extraction, which, according to laboratory tests, is above 4. The aqueous solution of the pre-charging stage, free of cobalt and nickel, which is called a reject (7), is removed from the process.
  • At the extraction stage, the extraction solution (8), charged with impurities, is conveyed to the washing stage (C), where the cobalt or nickel, which remained in the extraction solution at the extraction stage, is washed out. The washing water (9) used in the washing is an impurity-containing metallic chloride solution (16), to which water (10) has been added. The free hydrochloric acid contained in the metallic chloride solution enables a decrease in the pH to a level favorable for the washing of cobalt or nickel, but the impurity metals are not back-extracted from the extraction solution. In that case, the cobalt or nickel in the extraction solution are replaced with impurity metals, improving the selectivity of the method. The cobalt or nickel transfer to the aqueous solution, which, as the raffinate (11) of the washing stage, is conveyed to the pre-charging stage. The raffinate (11) of the washing stage can also be conveyed to the extraction stage, but if the migration of chlorides to the main solution stream (4) of the raffinate of the extraction stage and from there to the further processes is to be avoided, the coupling should be carried out according to the above. The washed extraction solution (12) is conveyed to the back-extraction stage (D).
  • At the back-extraction stage (D), the impurity metals contained in the extraction solution are back-extracted into the aqueous phase with the aqueous solution (13) of hydrochloric acid. The metal-free extraction solution (14) is conveyed from the back-extraction stage (D) to pre-neutralization (E). The back-extraction solution (15) containing metallic chlorides is conveyed to the further process and part of the solution (16) is used at the washing stage. In the pre-neutralization, alkali metal, alkali earth metal or ammonium hydroxides (17) can be used as the neutralizer.
  • Example of the extraction stage (A)
  • In a laboratory, the extraction stage was examined with a pre-charged extraction solution in a thermostated 1-litre glass reactor at two different ratios of organic/water (O/A 0.2 and 0.3) and at three different pHs (2; 2.5 and 3). The temperature in the tests was 55 °C, the mixing time was 20 min, the rotation speed of the mixer was 600 rpm and the diameter of the mixing member 50 mm. The aqueous solution Zn 0.5 g/L; Fe 0.1 g/L; Ca 0.2 g/L; Mn 0.2 g/L; Cu 0.1 mg/L; Co 2.3 g/L and Ni 117 g/L.
  • Example of the pre-charging stage (B)
  • The pre-charging stage was examined by charge tests at two stages. The extraction solution was pre-neutralized with the aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (lye) (200 g/L) in a thermostated 1-litre glass reactor (the temperature was 50 °C). The dosage of lye was determined as a dose equivalent with respect to the metals extracted in the pre-charging. The pre-neutralized extraction solution was mixed with the metal-containing aqueous solution which, in a calculatory sense, represented the raffinate coming to the pre-charging stage (Test 1), until the equilibrium had settled. After the separation of the phases, the aqueous solution was removed from the reactor and the extraction solution, pre-charged with metals, was mixed with a corresponding aqueous solution (Test 2). In Test 3, an unused pre-neutralized extraction solution and the aqueous solution from Test 1 were mixed, whereby the aqueous solution from this test represented the reject. According to Table 1, the metals are pre-charged by almost 100%. Table 1 Extraction of metals at the pre-charging stage. Test 1 and Test 2 correspond to the pre-charging stage 1 and Test 3 to the pre-charging stage 2, the aqueous solution of which comprises the reject. The mixing time was 10 min and the phase ratio O/A about 12.5.
    Zn % Fe % Ca % Mn % Cu % Co % Ni %
    Test 1 100 100 98 100 100 97 95
    Test 2 100 100 88 98 100 83 56
    Test 3 86 98 93 100 98
    Degree of pre-charging, % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
  • Example of the washing stage (C)
  • After the extraction stage, the washing stage of the nickel and cobalt that remained in the extraction solution was examined by first washing the extraction solution with water only, and by then adjusting the pH of the water extraction solution system to about 2.5 with the aqueous solution of sulfuric acid (about 50 g/L). The washing stage was carried out at one stage. According to Fig. 3, washing the extraction solution with water only is not effective enough, as nickel and cobalt did not escape from the extraction solution. The reason for this was the excessively high equilibrium pH. Reducing the pH considerably enhanced the washing power.
  • Fig. 3 shows the washing degrees of the extraction solution, when using water in the washing (Washing 1) and when adjusting the pH to 2.5 (Washing 2). Conditions: 25 volume-% DEHPA; diluent Orfom SX-11; temperature 55°C; O/A ratio about 8; initial contents of extraction solution Zn 5.6 g/L; Fe 1.1 g/L; Ca 1.8 g/L; Mn 0.8 g/L; Cu 2 mg/L; Co 0.4 g/L and Ni 1.6 g/L.
  • Example of the back-extraction stage (m.
  • The back-extraction stage was examined with two different concentrations of the aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (200 g/L and 250 g/L) and with three different phase ratios (O/ A 10, 15, 20). The tests were carried out using a separating funnel; the shaking time was 5 min. The washed extraction solution, charged with impurity metals, was back-extracted twice by changing the aqueous solution in between. According to the results in Table 2, the metals are back-extracted from the extraction solution by almost 100%, except for iron. Table 2 The degree of back-extraction for different O/A ratios and aqueous solutions of hydrochloric acid. Conditions: 25 volume-% DEHPA; diluent Orfom SX-11; room temperature; initial contents of the extraction solution: Zn 3 g/L; Fe 139 mg/L; Ca 6 g/L; Mn 66 mg/L; Cu 164 mg/L; Co 53 mg/L and Ni 14 mg/L.
    O/A; HCl at the beginning Zn% Fe % Ca % Mn % Cu % Co % Ni % HCl at equilibrium g/L
    O/A=10; 200 g/L 100 35 100 100 100 99 100 125
    O/A=15; 200 g/L 100 41 100 100 100 99 100 99
    O/A=20; 200g/L 100 15 100 100 100 99 100 69
    O/A=10; 250 g/L 100 22 100 100 100 99 100 175
    O/A=15; 250 g/L 100 3 100 100 100 99 100 149
    O/A=20; 250 g/L 100 6 100 100 100 99 100 118
  • Continuous laboratory test
  • The extraction coupling according to Fig. 1 was examined by laboratory-scale continuous mixer-clarifier equipment. The volume of the mixer section of the equipment was 200 mL and that of the clarifier section was 1000 mL. The mixer-clarifier was provided with the internal circulation of the desired phase, whereby the internal O/A ratio was about 1. Each clarifier was provided with a heating resistor and the temperature was adjusted to about 50°C. The rotation speed of the mixing member was adjusted so as to disperse the phases.
  • The flow rate of the feeding solution (1) to the extraction stage (A) was about 3 L/h and that of the extraction solution circulating in the coupling was about 3 L/h. The flow rate of the feeding solution (5) of the pre-charging stage (B) was 0.1 L/h. The flow rate of the washing water (9) to the washing stage (C) was about 0.5 L/h and that of the aqueous solution (13) of hydrochloric acid to the back-extraction stage (D) was about 0.3 L/h.
  • Tables 3-7 show the average solution analyses of a continuous test of five days.
  • The results of the extraction stage (A) are shown in Table 3. According to the results, the cobalt and nickel that were pre-charged into the extraction solution are transferred to the aqueous solution at the extraction stage, and the impurity metals zinc, iron, calcium, manganese and copper are almost completely extracted.
  • The results of the pre-charging stage (B) are shown in Table 4. According to the results, the almost metal-free reject exits the pre-charging stage, and the extraction solution is pre-charged with cobalt and nickel.
  • The results of the washing stage (C) are shown in Tables 5 and 6. According to Table 5, cobalt and nickel are washed from the extraction solution and replaced with impurity metals, when the washing water contains impurity metal chlorides. According to Table 6, a sufficiently good washing degree is not achieved by using water only. In the test run, it was observed that sulphuric acid cannot be used at the washing stage, as the calcium that was washed from the extraction solution super-saturates the washing solution and, then, calcium sulphate crystallization that impedes the process activity is generated at the washing stage.
  • The results of the back-extraction stage (D) are shown in Table 7. According to the results, the metals are fully back-extracted with the aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid, except for iron. Table 3 The average solution analyses of the extraction stage (A) of the continuous test.
    Solutions Zn mg/L Fe mg/L Ca mg/L Mn mg/L Cu mg/L Co mg/L Ni mg/L
    Feed solution 862 225 454 2235 1125 2172 123676
    Pre-charged extraction solution 4 122 8 38 49 208 7712
    Raffinate 18 0.1 0.3 3 16 2187 128670
    Charged extraction solution 1817 530 1134 3814 2057 219 1092
    Degree of extraction, % 98 100 100 100 99 -1 -4
    Table 4 The average solution analyses of the pre-charging stage (B) of the continuous test.
    solutions Zn mg/L Fe mg/L Ca mg/L Mn mg/L Cu mg/L Co mg/L Ni mg/L
    Feed solution of the pre-charging state 18 < 0.1 < 0.1 3 16 2187 128670
    Raffinate of the washing stage 15 < 0.1 19 238 280 723 5154
    Pre-neutralized extraction solution 3 149 1 5 3 1 < 0.1
    Reject 14 1 < 0.1 1 1 8 69
    Pre-charged extraction solution 4 122 8 38 49 208 7712
    Degree of pre-charging, % 100 100 100 100 100 100
    Table 5 The average solution analyses and the washing degree of the washing stage (C) of the continuous test, when the washing water used comprised a metal chloride solution containing impurity metals.
    Solutions Zn mg/L Fe mg/L Ca mg/L Mn mg/L Cu mg/L Co mg/L Ni mg/L
    Washing water 303 44 151 721 328 26 < 0.1
    Charged extraction solution 1817 530 1134 3814 2057 219 1092
    Raffinate of the washing stage 15 < 0.1 19 238 280 723 5154
    Washed extraction solution 2058 611 1257 4072 2243 87 39
    Washing power, % -13 -15 -11 -7 -9 60 96
    Table 6 The average solution analyses and the washing degree of the washing stage (C) of the continuous test, when the washing water used comprised pure water.
    Solutions Zn mg/L Fe mg/L Ca mg/L Mn mg/L Cu mg/L Co mg/L Ni mg/L
    Water (ion-exchanged)
    Charged extraction solution 2442 1189 1179 4672 5469 979 2542
    Raffinate of the washing stage < 0.1 0.2 2 6 4 26 548
    Washed extraction solution 2255 1106 1161 4287 5058 946 2243
    Washing power, % 8 7 2 8 8 3 12
    Table 7 The average solution analyses and the degree of back-extraction of the back-extraction stage (D) of the continuous test.
    Solutions Zn mg/L Fe mg/L Ca mg/L Mn mg/L Cu mg/L Co mg/L Ni mg/L
    Aqueous solution of the hydrochloric acid < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
    Washed extraction solution 2058 611 1257 4072 2243 87 39
    Back-extraction solution 12993 971 6385 7938 11131 290 32
    Metal-free extraction solution 7 384 5 23 20 1 < 0.1
    Degree of back-extraction, % 100 37 100 99 99 99 100

Claims (11)

  1. A method for separating the impurity metals zinc, iron, copper, calcium and/or manganese from the aqueous solution of the product metals cobalt and nickel by extraction, whereby a raffinate containing the product metals is obtained, characterized in that before the extraction, the extraction solution is pre-charged with cobalt and nickel and in that after the extraction, the extraction solution is washed with an aqueous solution containing chlorides, water or a mixture thereof, whereby the product metals in the extraction solution are replaced by the impurity metals.
  2. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that the extraction solution is washed with a back-extraction solution containing metal chlorides.
  3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the washing water from the washing stage of the extraction solution is conveyed to a pre-charging stage.
  4. A method according to any of Claims 1 - 3, characterized in that the extraction solution is neutralized using alkali metal, alkali earth metal and/or ammonium ions, and these ions are prevented from ending up in the extraction raffinate by a process coupling.
  5. A method according to any of Claims 1 - 4, characterized in that the extraction raffinate is used in the pre-charging of the extraction solution.
  6. A method according to any of Claims 1 - 4, characterized in that the raffinate of the extraction is used in the pre-charging of the extraction solution.
  7. A method according to any of Claims 1 - 6, characterized in that the extraction reagent is dialkyl phosphoric acid.
  8. A method according to Claim 7, characterized in that the extraction reagent is di-(2-ethyl hexyl)phosphoric acid.
  9. A method according to any of Claims 1 - 6, characterized in that the extraction reagent is the monoalkyl ester of alkyl phosphonic acid.
  10. A method according to any of Claims 1 - 6, characterized in that the extraction reagent is dialkyl phosphinic acid.
  11. A method according to any of Claims 4 - 10, characterized in that the extraction solution is neutralized at the pre-charging stage.
EP09712547.0A 2008-02-19 2009-02-18 Method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from the aqueous solutions of cobalt and/or nickel Active EP2252713B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20080138A FI120943B (en) 2008-02-19 2008-02-19 Method for the separation of zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from aqueous cobalt and / or nickel solutions
PCT/FI2009/050134 WO2009103850A1 (en) 2008-02-19 2009-02-18 Method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from the aqueous solutions of cobalt and/or nickel

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2252713A1 EP2252713A1 (en) 2010-11-24
EP2252713B1 true EP2252713B1 (en) 2013-07-31

Family

ID=39148917

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09712547.0A Active EP2252713B1 (en) 2008-02-19 2009-02-18 Method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from the aqueous solutions of cobalt and/or nickel

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US8357226B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2252713B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5450454B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2009216642B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2715470C (en)
EA (1) EA020087B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2433098T3 (en)
FI (1) FI120943B (en)
WO (1) WO2009103850A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201006388B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101394646B1 (en) 2012-08-27 2014-05-13 한국지질자원연구원 Methods of suppressing extraction of cobalt and recovering manganese with high selectivity by screening effect of an extractant mixture
RU2666206C2 (en) * 2016-04-05 2018-09-06 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Петрозаводский государственный университет" Method of extraction of zinc (ii), copper (ii), cobalt (ii), nickel (ii) from water solutions
CN115058597B (en) * 2022-06-30 2024-06-04 盛隆资源再生(无锡)有限公司 Recovery treatment method of electroplating sludge containing calcium, iron, cobalt and nickel

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA902931A (en) * 1970-03-11 1972-06-20 H. Lucas Bernard Copper extraction from ammoniacal solutions
US4067802A (en) * 1976-05-10 1978-01-10 Ashland Oil, Inc. Ion exchange process for the purification of base metal electrolyte solutions
US4353883A (en) * 1980-08-28 1982-10-12 American Cyanamid Company Selective extraction of cobalt(II) from aqueous solutions with phosphinic acid extractants
US4900522A (en) * 1986-07-22 1990-02-13 Amax Inc. Separation of nickel and cobalt from sulfate solutions by solvent extraction
US4956154A (en) * 1988-03-09 1990-09-11 Unc Reclamation Selective removal of chromium, nickel, cobalt, copper and lead cations from aqueous effluent solutions
FI93973C (en) 1992-06-18 1995-06-26 Outokumpu Harjavalta Metals Oy Method for preventing the formation of jarosite and ammonium- and alkali-based double salts in liquid-liquid extraction of acidic leaching processes
US6149885A (en) 1997-04-30 2000-11-21 Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. Method for purifying a nickel sulfate solution by solvent extraction
JP3546911B2 (en) * 1997-04-30 2004-07-28 住友金属鉱山株式会社 Purification method of high purity nickel sulfate
ZA987217B (en) * 1997-08-15 2000-02-14 Cominco Eng Services Chloride assisted hydrometallurgical extraction of metal from sulphide or laterite ores.
AUPQ489399A0 (en) * 1999-12-24 2000-02-03 Wmc Resources Limited Solvent extraction of impurity metals from a valuable metal sulphate solution
EP1330555A4 (en) * 2000-09-15 2005-08-31 Commw Scient Ind Res Org Solvent extraction process for recovering nickel and cobalt from leach solutions
CA2478516C (en) * 2003-09-30 2007-12-11 Jaguar Nickel Inc. A process for the recovery of value metals from base metal sulfide ores
US7935322B2 (en) * 2004-01-28 2011-05-03 Commonwealth Scientific & Indistrial Research Organisation Solvent extraction process for separating cobalt and/or nickel from impurities in leach solutions
BRPI0512430A (en) * 2004-06-28 2008-03-04 Skye Resources Inc process for leaching laterite ores containing limonite and saprolite
EP1805335B1 (en) * 2004-09-13 2014-11-05 Canopean PTY. Ltd Process for preparing nickel loaded organic extractant solution

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2715470A1 (en) 2009-08-27
JP2011514444A (en) 2011-05-06
WO2009103850A1 (en) 2009-08-27
FI20080138A0 (en) 2008-02-19
AU2009216642A1 (en) 2009-08-27
ZA201006388B (en) 2011-05-25
US20110072937A1 (en) 2011-03-31
FI20080138A (en) 2009-08-20
EA201070947A1 (en) 2011-08-30
JP5450454B2 (en) 2014-03-26
AU2009216642B2 (en) 2013-01-17
WO2009103850A4 (en) 2009-11-05
FI120943B (en) 2010-05-14
CA2715470C (en) 2016-08-02
EA020087B1 (en) 2014-08-29
US8357226B2 (en) 2013-01-22
EP2252713A1 (en) 2010-11-24
ES2433098T3 (en) 2013-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3093354B1 (en) Scandium recovery method
EP3222735B1 (en) Method of separating cobalt and magnesium from a nickel-bearing extraction feed solution
EP3670686A1 (en) Battery recycling process
RU2302997C2 (en) Method of production of the high-purity ammonium dimolybdate (its versions)
US10544482B2 (en) Recovery of copper from arsenic-containing process feed
Kumbasar Selective extraction of cobalt from strong acidic solutions containing cobalt and nickel through emulsion liquid membrane using TIOA as carrier
AU2007216890A1 (en) Process for treating electrolytically precipitated copper
EA030289B1 (en) Method for recovering metals
EP2252713B1 (en) Method for separating zinc, iron, calcium, copper and manganese from the aqueous solutions of cobalt and/or nickel
JPS5817815B2 (en) How to recover copper from copper-containing materials
WO2014177903A1 (en) Method for bioleaching and solvent extraction with selective recovery of copper and zinc from polymetal concentrates of sulfides
Cole The introduction of solvent-extraction steps during upgrading of a cobalt refinery
DE60004406T2 (en) METHOD FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION OF HIGH-PURITY ZINC OR ZINC COMPOUNDS FROM PRIMARY OR SECONDARY ZINCROUGH MATERIAL
FI120406B (en) Process for hydrometallurgical treatment of a sulfidic material containing zinc and copper
AU2007280103B2 (en) Process for improving phase separations in solvent extraction circuits of metal winning
KR102576690B1 (en) Method for separating high-purity valuable metals from used batteries using solvent extraction
CN117642519A (en) Production of high purity nickel and cobalt compounds
JP7293976B2 (en) Scandium recovery method
Gotfryd et al. The selective recovery of cadmium (II) from sulfate solutions by a counter-current extraction–stripping process using a mixture of diisopropylsalicylic acid and Cyanex® 471X
JP6340980B2 (en) Purification method of cobalt chloride solution
CN113845157B (en) Preparation method of magnesium-doped cobalt solution and nickel-cobalt-manganese ternary precursor
EP2794940B1 (en) Method and arrangement for enhancing use of reactor volume in connection with hydrometallurgical leaching
RU2226226C1 (en) Nickel/cobalt concentrate processing method
EA045218B1 (en) BATTERY RECYCLING METHOD
JP2007100153A (en) Method for removing thallium from zinc sulfate solution

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100916

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20120531

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NORILSK NICKEL HARJAVALTA OY

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 624715

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009017605

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130926

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20130731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2433098

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20131209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 624715

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130911

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131202

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131130

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009017605

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009017605

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140218

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140218

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140228

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009017605

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140902

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140902

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140218

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140218

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20090218

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230316

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20240221

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240215

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20240216

Year of fee payment: 16