EP2213606B1 - Elevator device - Google Patents
Elevator device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2213606B1 EP2213606B1 EP08710980.7A EP08710980A EP2213606B1 EP 2213606 B1 EP2213606 B1 EP 2213606B1 EP 08710980 A EP08710980 A EP 08710980A EP 2213606 B1 EP2213606 B1 EP 2213606B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sheave
- car
- slippage
- main ropes
- main rope
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0037—Performance analysers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
- B66B1/3492—Position or motion detectors or driving means for the detector
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a traction elevator apparatus in which a car and a counterweight are suspended by a main rope.
- an undercut groove that has a width that is less than that of a sheave groove that is disposed on an outer circumferential surface of a sheave is disposed on a bottom portion of the sheave groove, thereby ensuring required frictional force against a main rope.
- a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to movement of the main rope is disposed in addition to a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to rotation of the sheave, and slippage of the main rope relative to the sheave is determined by comparing the signals from the two rotation detectors (see Patent Literature 1, for example).
- Patent Literature 1 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. SHO 62-205973 (Gazette )
- the present invention aims to solve the above problems and an object of the present invention is to provide an elevator apparatus that can test for slippage of a main rope relative to a sheave using a simple configuration.
- JP 2007/153547 discloses features falling under the preamble of claim 1.
- an elevator apparatus having the features of claim 1.
- Figure 1 is a structural diagram that shows an elevator apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- a pair of car guide rails 2 and a pair of counterweight guide rails 3 are installed inside a hoistway 1.
- a car 4 is raised and lowered inside the hoistway 1 along the car guide rails 2.
- a counterweight 5 is raised and lowered inside the hoistway 1 along the counterweight guide rails 3.
- a machine room 6 is disposed in an upper portion of the hoistway 1.
- a machine base 7 is installed inside the machine room 6.
- a hoisting machine 8 and a deflecting sheave 9 are supported by the machine base 7.
- the hoisting machine 8 has a hoisting machine main body 10 and a sheave 11. Included in the hoisting machine main body 10 are: a motor that rotates the sheave 11; and a brake that brakes rotation of the sheave 11.
- a plurality of main ropes 12 (only one is shown in the figures) are wound around the sheave 11 and the deflecting sheave 9. First end portions of the main ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of the car 4. Second end portions of the main ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of the counterweight 5. The car 4 and the counterweight 5 are suspended inside the hoistway 1 by the main ropes 12, and are raised and lowered by the hoisting machine 8.
- a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11 (a speed detector) 13 is disposed on the hoisting machine 8.
- An encoder that generates pulse signals that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11, for example, can be used as the rotation detector 13.
- the signal from the rotation detector 13 is input into an elevator control apparatus 14 that controls running of the car 4, i.e., driving of the hoisting machine 8.
- the elevator control apparatus 14 computes the speed and distance traveled by the car 4 based on the signal from the rotation detector 13.
- a slippage testing portion 15 that tests for the presence or absence of slippage of the main ropes 12 relative to the sheave 11 is disposed on the elevator control apparatus 14.
- the elevator control apparatus 14 has a computer that has a storage portion, an arithmetic processing portion, and a signal input/output portion. Functions of the slippage testing portion 15 can be implemented by the computer, for example.
- Figure 2 is a partial cross section of the sheave 11 from Figure 1 .
- a plurality of sheave grooves 11a into which the main ropes 12 are inserted are disposed on an outer circumferential surface of the sheave 11.
- Undercut grooves 11b that have smaller widths than the sheave grooves 11a are disposed on bottom portions of the sheave grooves 11a.
- the sheave grooves 11a are abraded over time by contact with the main ropes 12.
- Figure 3 is a cross section that shows a state in which abrasion of the sheave groove 11a from Figure 2 has progressed.
- Figures 4 and 5 are explanatory diagrams that schematically show changes in tension of the main ropes 12 that pass through the sheave 11, Figure 4 representing when the car 4 from Figure 1 is ascending, and Figure 5 representing when the car 4 from Figure 1 is descending.
- Traction elevator apparatuses are designed so as to satisfy: T 1 / T 2 > e ⁇ k ⁇ , when T 1 > T 2, and T 2 / T 1 > e ⁇ k ⁇ , when T 1 ⁇ T 2, where T1 is tension on a side near the car 4, T2 is tension on a side near the counterweight 5, ⁇ is a contact angle of the main ropes 12 on the sheave 11, ⁇ is a coefficient of friction between the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11, and k is a shape coefficient of the sheave grooves 11a.
- tension changes exponentially from T2 to T1, or from T1 to T2, within the limit angle ⁇ 1 required to operate without generating slippage between the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11.
- Tension does not change in a zone of difference between the actual contact angle ⁇ and ⁇ 1, in which traction acts to change tension, i.e., ⁇ - ⁇ 1.
- this region where tension does not change is known to be always present on the side that is being raised irrespective of the magnitude of the tension.
- the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11 drift by an identical amount in each direction whichever side is considered, and the amount of drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 when one round trip is made is the tension differential extension 5 of the main ropes 12.
- drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12, i.e., creep can be calculated by measuring cumulative rotational speed of the sheave 11 when the car 4 is driven up and down by a given distance and calculating differences in the measured values.
- Traction capacity rarely suddenly decreases significantly, usually decreasing gradually over a long period of use due to the sheave grooves 11a being abraded, or the main ropes 12 being abraded and deteriorating, etc. For this reason, it is not necessary for verification of traction capacity, i.e., verification of the presence or absence of slippage, to be performed constantly, and it need only be performed regularly, for example, making use of a time period during which the elevator apparatus is not used (at night, for example).
- a slippage detection signal is transmitted to a remote elevator monitoring switchboard to let it be known that inspection of the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 is required. If slippage is even greater, and is determined to be at a level at which normal operation is impossible, operation of the elevator apparatus is stopped.
- the slippage testing portion 15 when performing a slippage test, it is preferable for the slippage testing portion 15 to run the car 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is significantly shorter than accelerating and decelerating time. It is even more preferable to minimize, i.e., completely eliminate, the constant speed traveling time, enabling slippage detecting precision to be improved even further.
- an elevator apparatus of this kind because a car 4 is operated through a round trip for a predetermined distance, and slippage between a sheave 11 and main ropes 12 is tested by a slippage testing portion 15 based on a difference in a signal from a rotation detector 13 during ascent and a signal from the rotation detector 13 during descent, apparatus or software is required for pulse integration, but slippage can be tested using a simple configuration without having to dispose another rotation detector that would require separate space.
- slippage testing portion 15 performs the slippage test after the car 4 is confirmed to be in an unloaded state, slippage can be detected precisely under stable conditions.
- slippage testing portion 15 runs the car 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is shorter than accelerating and decelerating time when performing the slippage test, slippage detecting precision can be improved.
- the slippage testing portion 15 is disposed on the elevator control apparatus 14, but the slippage testing portion 15 may also be disposed on another apparatus such as safety monitoring apparatus, etc., or may also be an independent apparatus, for example.
- the main ropes 12 may be ropes that have circular cross sections, or may also be belts.
- an elevator apparatus using a one-to-one (1:1) roping method is shown, but is not limited thereto, and for example, the present invention can also be applied to an elevator apparatus using a two-to-one (2:1) roping method.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Lift-Guide Devices, And Elevator Ropes And Cables (AREA)
- Cage And Drive Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a traction elevator apparatus in which a car and a counterweight are suspended by a main rope.
- In conventional traction elevator apparatuses, an undercut groove that has a width that is less than that of a sheave groove that is disposed on an outer circumferential surface of a sheave is disposed on a bottom portion of the sheave groove, thereby ensuring required frictional force against a main rope. When a car is moving, minute slippage between the main rope and the sheave, i.e., creep, arises due to differences in tension between the main rope on a car side and on a counterweight side, abrading the sheave groove. As abrasion of this kind progresses, more slippage arises between the main rope and the sheave, and abrasion of the sheave groove progresses further.
- In answer to this, in conventional elevator apparatuses, a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to movement of the main rope is disposed in addition to a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to rotation of the sheave, and slippage of the main rope relative to the sheave is determined by comparing the signals from the two rotation detectors (see
Patent Literature 1, for example). - [Patent Literature 1] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
SHO 62-205973 (Gazette - In conventional slippage detecting methods such as that described above, since it is necessary to add a rotation detector that detects the movement of the main rope, application to existing elevator apparatuses may not be possible due to installation space problems.
- The present invention aims to solve the above problems and an object of the present invention is to provide an elevator apparatus that can test for slippage of a main rope relative to a sheave using a simple configuration.
-
JP 2007/153547 claim 1. - In order to achieve the above object, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an elevator apparatus having the features of
claim 1. -
-
Figure 1 is a structural diagram that shows an elevator apparatus according toEmbodiment 1 of the present invention; -
Figure 2 is a partial cross section of a sheave fromFigure 1 ; -
Figure 3 is a cross section that shows a state in which abrasion of a sheave groove fromFigure 2 has progressed; -
Figure 4 is an explanatory diagram that schematically shows changes in tension of main ropes that pass through the sheave when a car fromFigure 1 is ascending; and -
Figure 5 is an explanatory diagram that schematically shows changes in tension of the main ropes that pass through the sheave when the car fromFigure 1 is descending. - A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be explained with reference to the drawings.
-
Figure 1 is a structural diagram that shows an elevator apparatus according toEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. In the figure, a pair ofcar guide rails 2 and a pair ofcounterweight guide rails 3 are installed inside ahoistway 1. Acar 4 is raised and lowered inside thehoistway 1 along thecar guide rails 2. Acounterweight 5 is raised and lowered inside thehoistway 1 along thecounterweight guide rails 3. - A
machine room 6 is disposed in an upper portion of thehoistway 1. Amachine base 7 is installed inside themachine room 6. A hoistingmachine 8 and a deflectingsheave 9 are supported by themachine base 7. The hoistingmachine 8 has a hoisting machine main body 10 and asheave 11. Included in the hoisting machine main body 10 are: a motor that rotates thesheave 11; and a brake that brakes rotation of thesheave 11. - A plurality of main ropes 12 (only one is shown in the figures) are wound around the
sheave 11 and thedeflecting sheave 9. First end portions of themain ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of thecar 4. Second end portions of themain ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of thecounterweight 5. Thecar 4 and thecounterweight 5 are suspended inside thehoistway 1 by themain ropes 12, and are raised and lowered by the hoistingmachine 8. - A rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11 (a speed detector) 13 is disposed on the hoisting
machine 8. An encoder that generates pulse signals that corresponds to the rotation of thesheave 11, for example, can be used as therotation detector 13. - The signal from the
rotation detector 13 is input into anelevator control apparatus 14 that controls running of thecar 4, i.e., driving of the hoistingmachine 8. Theelevator control apparatus 14 computes the speed and distance traveled by thecar 4 based on the signal from therotation detector 13. Aslippage testing portion 15 that tests for the presence or absence of slippage of themain ropes 12 relative to thesheave 11 is disposed on theelevator control apparatus 14. Theelevator control apparatus 14 has a computer that has a storage portion, an arithmetic processing portion, and a signal input/output portion. Functions of theslippage testing portion 15 can be implemented by the computer, for example. -
Figure 2 is a partial cross section of thesheave 11 fromFigure 1 . A plurality ofsheave grooves 11a into which themain ropes 12 are inserted are disposed on an outer circumferential surface of thesheave 11.Undercut grooves 11b that have smaller widths than thesheave grooves 11a are disposed on bottom portions of thesheave grooves 11a. Thesheave grooves 11a are abraded over time by contact with themain ropes 12.Figure 3 is a cross section that shows a state in which abrasion of thesheave groove 11a fromFigure 2 has progressed. - Next, a slippage testing method used by the
slippage testing portion 15 will be explained.Figures 4 and 5 are explanatory diagrams that schematically show changes in tension of themain ropes 12 that pass through thesheave 11,Figure 4 representing when thecar 4 fromFigure 1 is ascending, andFigure 5 representing when thecar 4 fromFigure 1 is descending. - Traction elevator apparatuses are designed so as to satisfy:
car 4, T2 is tension on a side near thecounterweight 5, θ is a contact angle of themain ropes 12 on thesheave 11, µ is a coefficient of friction between themain ropes 12 and thesheave 11, and k is a shape coefficient of thesheave grooves 11a. - In the
sheave 11 on which traction acts, tension changes exponentially from T2 to T1, or from T1 to T2, within the limit angle θ1 required to operate without generating slippage between themain ropes 12 and thesheave 11. Tension does not change in a zone of difference between the actual contact angle θ and θ1, in which traction acts to change tension, i.e., θ - θ1. In addition, this region where tension does not change is known to be always present on the side that is being raised irrespective of the magnitude of the tension. - When the
car 4 is raised, since the tension of themain ropes 12 changes from T1 to T2 within angle θ1, if the distance traveled by thesheave 11 is integrated on an exit side of the main ropes 12 (the side near the counterweight 5), it can be seen that themain ropes 12 drift toward the counterweight 5 (extend) due to tension differential extension δ of themain ropes 12, proportionately reducing the distance traveled by thesheave 11. - Conversely, when the
car 4 is lowered by an identical distance, i.e., when thecounterweight 5 is raised, if the distance traveled by thesheave 11 is integrated at identical positions, it can be seen that drift of themain ropes 12 relative to thesheave 11 does not arise since the tension of themain ropes 12 barely changes on the raised side (the side near the counterweight 5). Here, the tension differential extension δ of themain ropes 12 is given by δ = (T2-T1) × L/(E×A), where L is the length themain ropes 12 move along thesheave 11, E is the elastic modulus of themain ropes 12, and A is the cross-sectional area of themain ropes 12. - If the distance traveled by the
sheave 11 is integrated on an entry side of the main ropes 12 (a side near the car 4) when thecar 4 is raised, positional drift does not occur between thesheave 11 and themain ropes 12 since tension of themain ropes 12 does not change on the entry side. In contrast to that, when thecar 4 is lowered by an identical distance, since the tension of themain ropes 12 changes from T2 to T1 within angle θ1, themain ropes 12 drift toward thecounterweight 5 due to tension differential contraction δ of themain ropes 12. - In other words, the
main ropes 12 and thesheave 11 drift by an identical amount in each direction whichever side is considered, and the amount of drift between thesheave 11 and themain ropes 12 when one round trip is made is the tensiondifferential extension 5 of themain ropes 12. From the above, drift between thesheave 11 and themain ropes 12, i.e., creep, can be calculated by measuring cumulative rotational speed of thesheave 11 when thecar 4 is driven up and down by a given distance and calculating differences in the measured values. - Only drift due to creep occurs as described above while abrasion of the
sheave grooves 11a has not progressed, and sufficient traction capacity is being maintained, but as the abrasion of thesheave grooves 11a progresses and the traction capacity decreases, slippage between thesheave 11 and themain ropes 12 occurs, increasing drift between thesheave 11 and themain ropes 12. - When slippage occurs in this manner, if the exit side of the
main ropes 12 is considered when thecar 4 is raised with no load on board thecar 4, for example, the distance traveled by thesheave 11 relative to the distance traveled by themain ropes 12 is even smaller. For this reason, when thecar 4 is lowered, thecar 4 cannot be moved to a predetermined position unless the distance traveled by thesheave 11 is increased by an amount proportionate to the slippage. In other words, a rotation pulse integrated value of thesheave 11 during descent is even greater than a rotation pulse integrated value of thesheave 11 during ascent. - Traction capacity rarely suddenly decreases significantly, usually decreasing gradually over a long period of use due to the
sheave grooves 11a being abraded, or themain ropes 12 being abraded and deteriorating, etc. For this reason, it is not necessary for verification of traction capacity, i.e., verification of the presence or absence of slippage, to be performed constantly, and it need only be performed regularly, for example, making use of a time period during which the elevator apparatus is not used (at night, for example). - When verifying the traction capacity, first verify that passengers and freight are not on board the car 4 (an unloaded state), make the
car 4 perform a round trip for a preset distance, and find integrated values for the encoder pulse values during ascent and descent. Then, compare the difference between the integrated value during ascent and the integrated value during descent with a preset slippage tolerance value, and execute processing in response to the compared result. - For example, if slippage that exceeds the slippage tolerance value is detected, a slippage detection signal is transmitted to a remote elevator monitoring switchboard to let it be known that inspection of the
sheave 11 and themain ropes 12 is required. If slippage is even greater, and is determined to be at a level at which normal operation is impossible, operation of the elevator apparatus is stopped. - If the distance traveled by the
car 4 when the slippage test is performed is large, the percentage that is occupied by creep due to the difference in tension will be large even if slippage occurs. For this reason, it is preferable to make the distance traveled by thecar 4 when the slippage test is performed a minimum distance for accelerating to a predetermined speed, then decelerating and stopping. In other words, when performing a slippage test, it is preferable for theslippage testing portion 15 to run thecar 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is significantly shorter than accelerating and decelerating time. It is even more preferable to minimize, i.e., completely eliminate, the constant speed traveling time, enabling slippage detecting precision to be improved even further. - In an elevator apparatus of this kind, because a
car 4 is operated through a round trip for a predetermined distance, and slippage between asheave 11 andmain ropes 12 is tested by aslippage testing portion 15 based on a difference in a signal from arotation detector 13 during ascent and a signal from therotation detector 13 during descent, apparatus or software is required for pulse integration, but slippage can be tested using a simple configuration without having to dispose another rotation detector that would require separate space. - Because the
slippage testing portion 15 performs the slippage test after thecar 4 is confirmed to be in an unloaded state, slippage can be detected precisely under stable conditions. - In addition, because the
slippage testing portion 15 runs thecar 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is shorter than accelerating and decelerating time when performing the slippage test, slippage detecting precision can be improved. - Moreover, in the above example, the
slippage testing portion 15 is disposed on theelevator control apparatus 14, but theslippage testing portion 15 may also be disposed on another apparatus such as safety monitoring apparatus, etc., or may also be an independent apparatus, for example. - The
main ropes 12 may be ropes that have circular cross sections, or may also be belts. - Moreover, in the above example, an elevator apparatus using a one-to-one (1:1) roping method is shown, but is not limited thereto, and for example, the present invention can also be applied to an elevator apparatus using a two-to-one (2:1) roping method.
Claims (2)
- An elevator apparatus comprising:a hoisting machine (8) that has a sheave (11);a main rope (12) that is wound around the sheave (11);a car (4) that is suspended by the main rope (12) on a first side of the sheave (11);a counterweight (5) that is suspended by the main rope (12) on a second side of the sheave (11);a rotation detector (13) that generates a signal that corresponds to rotation of the sheave (11); anda slippage testing portion (15) that operates the car (4) through a round trip for a predetermined distance, and that tests for slippage between the sheave (11) and the main rope (12) based on a difference between a signal from the rotation detector (13) during ascent and a signal from the rotation detector (13) during descent,characterized in thatthe slippage testing portion (15) runs the car (4) through a speed pattern in which the car (4) is accelerated to a predetermined speed, then decelerated and stopped so as to completely eliminate a constant speed traveling time.
- An elevator apparatus according to Claim 1, wherein the slippage testing portion (15) performs a slippage test after confirming that the car (4) is in an unloaded state.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2008/052101 WO2009098772A1 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2008-02-08 | Elevator device |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2213606A1 EP2213606A1 (en) | 2010-08-04 |
EP2213606A4 EP2213606A4 (en) | 2014-05-14 |
EP2213606B1 true EP2213606B1 (en) | 2018-04-25 |
Family
ID=40951860
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08710980.7A Active EP2213606B1 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2008-02-08 | Elevator device |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2213606B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5334868B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101345885B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101896415A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009098772A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE112016006890B4 (en) | 2016-05-23 | 2022-01-13 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | elevator facility |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2011042480A (en) * | 2009-08-24 | 2011-03-03 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Elevator device |
JP5947094B2 (en) * | 2012-04-25 | 2016-07-06 | 株式会社日立製作所 | elevator |
DE112015006188B4 (en) | 2015-02-18 | 2021-12-30 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp. | Elevator diagnostic device |
CN107522056B (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2020-05-05 | 杭州西奥电梯有限公司 | Method and system for monitoring traction capacity of elevator system |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0684233B2 (en) | 1986-03-05 | 1994-10-26 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Elevator device and operation control method thereof |
DE8904375U1 (en) * | 1989-04-07 | 1989-07-27 | TÜV Bayern e.V., 8000 München | Device for recording physical parameters of an elevator |
JPH038681A (en) * | 1989-06-02 | 1991-01-16 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Main rope slippage detecting device of elevator |
JP4836564B2 (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2011-12-14 | 株式会社日立ビルシステム | Slip amount detection method and slip amount detection device for main rope for elevator |
-
2008
- 2008-02-08 JP JP2009552360A patent/JP5334868B2/en active Active
- 2008-02-08 EP EP08710980.7A patent/EP2213606B1/en active Active
- 2008-02-08 WO PCT/JP2008/052101 patent/WO2009098772A1/en active Application Filing
- 2008-02-08 CN CN2008801127214A patent/CN101896415A/en active Pending
- 2008-02-08 KR KR1020107006436A patent/KR101345885B1/en active IP Right Grant
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE112016006890B4 (en) | 2016-05-23 | 2022-01-13 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | elevator facility |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2009098772A1 (en) | 2009-08-13 |
CN101896415A (en) | 2010-11-24 |
EP2213606A4 (en) | 2014-05-14 |
EP2213606A1 (en) | 2010-08-04 |
KR20100051109A (en) | 2010-05-14 |
KR101345885B1 (en) | 2013-12-30 |
JP5334868B2 (en) | 2013-11-06 |
JPWO2009098772A1 (en) | 2011-05-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2526041B1 (en) | Method for monitoring the movement of an elevator car, and an elevator system | |
EP1864936B1 (en) | Elevator apparatus | |
EP2186768B1 (en) | Elevator device | |
EP3366626B1 (en) | Elevator safety system and method of monitoring an elevator system | |
US20100154527A1 (en) | Elevator Brake Condition Testing | |
EP1927567B1 (en) | Elevator device | |
EP2213606B1 (en) | Elevator device | |
CN111099469B (en) | Elevator system | |
EP2958843B1 (en) | Method and arrangement for monitoring the safety of a counterweighted elevator | |
CN107922150B (en) | Elevator control system and method of operating an elevator system | |
CN105923477B (en) | Elevator | |
EP2743225B1 (en) | Elevator system | |
US12103817B2 (en) | Measurement arrangement and method of monitoring rotation speed of a component of an elevator, escalator, moving walkway or moving ramp | |
JP5947094B2 (en) | elevator | |
CN107207198B (en) | Diagnosis device for elevator | |
EP3750837A1 (en) | Elevator monitoring the traction of the hoisting machine and adjusting the emergency terminal speed limit threshold based on the traction. | |
JP5264290B2 (en) | Elevator apparatus and braking function inspection method thereof | |
JP7078145B1 (en) | Elevator control device | |
CN109956381B (en) | Safety elevator system | |
CN114104911A (en) | Elevator system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100311 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20140415 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B66B 7/12 20060101AFI20140409BHEP Ipc: B66B 1/34 20060101ALI20140409BHEP Ipc: B66B 5/00 20060101ALI20140409BHEP Ipc: B66B 5/02 20060101ALI20140409BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20171120 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 992646 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180515 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008054977 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180425 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180725 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180725 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180726 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 992646 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180827 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008054977 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190208 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190208 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190228 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190208 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190208 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190228 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190208 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R084 Ref document number: 602008054977 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180425 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180825 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20080208 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20221229 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230512 |