EP2213606B1 - Elevator device - Google Patents

Elevator device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2213606B1
EP2213606B1 EP08710980.7A EP08710980A EP2213606B1 EP 2213606 B1 EP2213606 B1 EP 2213606B1 EP 08710980 A EP08710980 A EP 08710980A EP 2213606 B1 EP2213606 B1 EP 2213606B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sheave
car
slippage
main ropes
main rope
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08710980.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2213606A4 (en
EP2213606A1 (en
Inventor
Atsushi Mitsui
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Publication of EP2213606A1 publication Critical patent/EP2213606A1/en
Publication of EP2213606A4 publication Critical patent/EP2213606A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2213606B1 publication Critical patent/EP2213606B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/0006Monitoring devices or performance analysers
    • B66B5/0037Performance analysers
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/34Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
    • B66B1/3492Position or motion detectors or driving means for the detector

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a traction elevator apparatus in which a car and a counterweight are suspended by a main rope.
  • an undercut groove that has a width that is less than that of a sheave groove that is disposed on an outer circumferential surface of a sheave is disposed on a bottom portion of the sheave groove, thereby ensuring required frictional force against a main rope.
  • a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to movement of the main rope is disposed in addition to a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to rotation of the sheave, and slippage of the main rope relative to the sheave is determined by comparing the signals from the two rotation detectors (see Patent Literature 1, for example).
  • Patent Literature 1 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. SHO 62-205973 (Gazette )
  • the present invention aims to solve the above problems and an object of the present invention is to provide an elevator apparatus that can test for slippage of a main rope relative to a sheave using a simple configuration.
  • JP 2007/153547 discloses features falling under the preamble of claim 1.
  • an elevator apparatus having the features of claim 1.
  • Figure 1 is a structural diagram that shows an elevator apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
  • a pair of car guide rails 2 and a pair of counterweight guide rails 3 are installed inside a hoistway 1.
  • a car 4 is raised and lowered inside the hoistway 1 along the car guide rails 2.
  • a counterweight 5 is raised and lowered inside the hoistway 1 along the counterweight guide rails 3.
  • a machine room 6 is disposed in an upper portion of the hoistway 1.
  • a machine base 7 is installed inside the machine room 6.
  • a hoisting machine 8 and a deflecting sheave 9 are supported by the machine base 7.
  • the hoisting machine 8 has a hoisting machine main body 10 and a sheave 11. Included in the hoisting machine main body 10 are: a motor that rotates the sheave 11; and a brake that brakes rotation of the sheave 11.
  • a plurality of main ropes 12 (only one is shown in the figures) are wound around the sheave 11 and the deflecting sheave 9. First end portions of the main ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of the car 4. Second end portions of the main ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of the counterweight 5. The car 4 and the counterweight 5 are suspended inside the hoistway 1 by the main ropes 12, and are raised and lowered by the hoisting machine 8.
  • a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11 (a speed detector) 13 is disposed on the hoisting machine 8.
  • An encoder that generates pulse signals that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11, for example, can be used as the rotation detector 13.
  • the signal from the rotation detector 13 is input into an elevator control apparatus 14 that controls running of the car 4, i.e., driving of the hoisting machine 8.
  • the elevator control apparatus 14 computes the speed and distance traveled by the car 4 based on the signal from the rotation detector 13.
  • a slippage testing portion 15 that tests for the presence or absence of slippage of the main ropes 12 relative to the sheave 11 is disposed on the elevator control apparatus 14.
  • the elevator control apparatus 14 has a computer that has a storage portion, an arithmetic processing portion, and a signal input/output portion. Functions of the slippage testing portion 15 can be implemented by the computer, for example.
  • Figure 2 is a partial cross section of the sheave 11 from Figure 1 .
  • a plurality of sheave grooves 11a into which the main ropes 12 are inserted are disposed on an outer circumferential surface of the sheave 11.
  • Undercut grooves 11b that have smaller widths than the sheave grooves 11a are disposed on bottom portions of the sheave grooves 11a.
  • the sheave grooves 11a are abraded over time by contact with the main ropes 12.
  • Figure 3 is a cross section that shows a state in which abrasion of the sheave groove 11a from Figure 2 has progressed.
  • Figures 4 and 5 are explanatory diagrams that schematically show changes in tension of the main ropes 12 that pass through the sheave 11, Figure 4 representing when the car 4 from Figure 1 is ascending, and Figure 5 representing when the car 4 from Figure 1 is descending.
  • Traction elevator apparatuses are designed so as to satisfy: T 1 / T 2 > e ⁇ k ⁇ , when T 1 > T 2, and T 2 / T 1 > e ⁇ k ⁇ , when T 1 ⁇ T 2, where T1 is tension on a side near the car 4, T2 is tension on a side near the counterweight 5, ⁇ is a contact angle of the main ropes 12 on the sheave 11, ⁇ is a coefficient of friction between the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11, and k is a shape coefficient of the sheave grooves 11a.
  • tension changes exponentially from T2 to T1, or from T1 to T2, within the limit angle ⁇ 1 required to operate without generating slippage between the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11.
  • Tension does not change in a zone of difference between the actual contact angle ⁇ and ⁇ 1, in which traction acts to change tension, i.e., ⁇ - ⁇ 1.
  • this region where tension does not change is known to be always present on the side that is being raised irrespective of the magnitude of the tension.
  • the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11 drift by an identical amount in each direction whichever side is considered, and the amount of drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 when one round trip is made is the tension differential extension 5 of the main ropes 12.
  • drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12, i.e., creep can be calculated by measuring cumulative rotational speed of the sheave 11 when the car 4 is driven up and down by a given distance and calculating differences in the measured values.
  • Traction capacity rarely suddenly decreases significantly, usually decreasing gradually over a long period of use due to the sheave grooves 11a being abraded, or the main ropes 12 being abraded and deteriorating, etc. For this reason, it is not necessary for verification of traction capacity, i.e., verification of the presence or absence of slippage, to be performed constantly, and it need only be performed regularly, for example, making use of a time period during which the elevator apparatus is not used (at night, for example).
  • a slippage detection signal is transmitted to a remote elevator monitoring switchboard to let it be known that inspection of the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 is required. If slippage is even greater, and is determined to be at a level at which normal operation is impossible, operation of the elevator apparatus is stopped.
  • the slippage testing portion 15 when performing a slippage test, it is preferable for the slippage testing portion 15 to run the car 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is significantly shorter than accelerating and decelerating time. It is even more preferable to minimize, i.e., completely eliminate, the constant speed traveling time, enabling slippage detecting precision to be improved even further.
  • an elevator apparatus of this kind because a car 4 is operated through a round trip for a predetermined distance, and slippage between a sheave 11 and main ropes 12 is tested by a slippage testing portion 15 based on a difference in a signal from a rotation detector 13 during ascent and a signal from the rotation detector 13 during descent, apparatus or software is required for pulse integration, but slippage can be tested using a simple configuration without having to dispose another rotation detector that would require separate space.
  • slippage testing portion 15 performs the slippage test after the car 4 is confirmed to be in an unloaded state, slippage can be detected precisely under stable conditions.
  • slippage testing portion 15 runs the car 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is shorter than accelerating and decelerating time when performing the slippage test, slippage detecting precision can be improved.
  • the slippage testing portion 15 is disposed on the elevator control apparatus 14, but the slippage testing portion 15 may also be disposed on another apparatus such as safety monitoring apparatus, etc., or may also be an independent apparatus, for example.
  • the main ropes 12 may be ropes that have circular cross sections, or may also be belts.
  • an elevator apparatus using a one-to-one (1:1) roping method is shown, but is not limited thereto, and for example, the present invention can also be applied to an elevator apparatus using a two-to-one (2:1) roping method.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
  • Lift-Guide Devices, And Elevator Ropes And Cables (AREA)
  • Cage And Drive Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a traction elevator apparatus in which a car and a counterweight are suspended by a main rope.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • In conventional traction elevator apparatuses, an undercut groove that has a width that is less than that of a sheave groove that is disposed on an outer circumferential surface of a sheave is disposed on a bottom portion of the sheave groove, thereby ensuring required frictional force against a main rope. When a car is moving, minute slippage between the main rope and the sheave, i.e., creep, arises due to differences in tension between the main rope on a car side and on a counterweight side, abrading the sheave groove. As abrasion of this kind progresses, more slippage arises between the main rope and the sheave, and abrasion of the sheave groove progresses further.
  • In answer to this, in conventional elevator apparatuses, a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to movement of the main rope is disposed in addition to a rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to rotation of the sheave, and slippage of the main rope relative to the sheave is determined by comparing the signals from the two rotation detectors (see Patent Literature 1, for example).
  • [Patent Literature 1] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. SHO 62-205973 (Gazette )
  • DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
  • In conventional slippage detecting methods such as that described above, since it is necessary to add a rotation detector that detects the movement of the main rope, application to existing elevator apparatuses may not be possible due to installation space problems.
  • The present invention aims to solve the above problems and an object of the present invention is to provide an elevator apparatus that can test for slippage of a main rope relative to a sheave using a simple configuration.
  • JP 2007/153547 discloses features falling under the preamble of claim 1.
  • MEANS FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM
  • In order to achieve the above object, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an elevator apparatus having the features of claim 1.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • Figure 1 is a structural diagram that shows an elevator apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;
    • Figure 2 is a partial cross section of a sheave from Figure 1;
    • Figure 3 is a cross section that shows a state in which abrasion of a sheave groove from Figure 2 has progressed;
    • Figure 4 is an explanatory diagram that schematically shows changes in tension of main ropes that pass through the sheave when a car from Figure 1 is ascending; and
    • Figure 5 is an explanatory diagram that schematically shows changes in tension of the main ropes that pass through the sheave when the car from Figure 1 is descending.
    BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
  • A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be explained with reference to the drawings.
  • Embodiment 1
  • Figure 1 is a structural diagram that shows an elevator apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. In the figure, a pair of car guide rails 2 and a pair of counterweight guide rails 3 are installed inside a hoistway 1. A car 4 is raised and lowered inside the hoistway 1 along the car guide rails 2. A counterweight 5 is raised and lowered inside the hoistway 1 along the counterweight guide rails 3.
  • A machine room 6 is disposed in an upper portion of the hoistway 1. A machine base 7 is installed inside the machine room 6. A hoisting machine 8 and a deflecting sheave 9 are supported by the machine base 7. The hoisting machine 8 has a hoisting machine main body 10 and a sheave 11. Included in the hoisting machine main body 10 are: a motor that rotates the sheave 11; and a brake that brakes rotation of the sheave 11.
  • A plurality of main ropes 12 (only one is shown in the figures) are wound around the sheave 11 and the deflecting sheave 9. First end portions of the main ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of the car 4. Second end portions of the main ropes 12 are connected to an upper portion of the counterweight 5. The car 4 and the counterweight 5 are suspended inside the hoistway 1 by the main ropes 12, and are raised and lowered by the hoisting machine 8.
  • A rotation detector that generates a signal that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11 (a speed detector) 13 is disposed on the hoisting machine 8. An encoder that generates pulse signals that corresponds to the rotation of the sheave 11, for example, can be used as the rotation detector 13.
  • The signal from the rotation detector 13 is input into an elevator control apparatus 14 that controls running of the car 4, i.e., driving of the hoisting machine 8. The elevator control apparatus 14 computes the speed and distance traveled by the car 4 based on the signal from the rotation detector 13. A slippage testing portion 15 that tests for the presence or absence of slippage of the main ropes 12 relative to the sheave 11 is disposed on the elevator control apparatus 14. The elevator control apparatus 14 has a computer that has a storage portion, an arithmetic processing portion, and a signal input/output portion. Functions of the slippage testing portion 15 can be implemented by the computer, for example.
  • Figure 2 is a partial cross section of the sheave 11 from Figure 1. A plurality of sheave grooves 11a into which the main ropes 12 are inserted are disposed on an outer circumferential surface of the sheave 11. Undercut grooves 11b that have smaller widths than the sheave grooves 11a are disposed on bottom portions of the sheave grooves 11a. The sheave grooves 11a are abraded over time by contact with the main ropes 12. Figure 3 is a cross section that shows a state in which abrasion of the sheave groove 11a from Figure 2 has progressed.
  • Next, a slippage testing method used by the slippage testing portion 15 will be explained. Figures 4 and 5 are explanatory diagrams that schematically show changes in tension of the main ropes 12 that pass through the sheave 11, Figure 4 representing when the car 4 from Figure 1 is ascending, and Figure 5 representing when the car 4 from Figure 1 is descending.
  • Traction elevator apparatuses are designed so as to satisfy: T 1 / T 2 > e μ k θ , when T 1 > T 2,
    Figure imgb0001
    and T 2 / T 1 > e μ k θ , when T 1 < T 2,
    Figure imgb0002
    where T1 is tension on a side near the car 4, T2 is tension on a side near the counterweight 5, θ is a contact angle of the main ropes 12 on the sheave 11, µ is a coefficient of friction between the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11, and k is a shape coefficient of the sheave grooves 11a.
  • In the sheave 11 on which traction acts, tension changes exponentially from T2 to T1, or from T1 to T2, within the limit angle θ1 required to operate without generating slippage between the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11. Tension does not change in a zone of difference between the actual contact angle θ and θ1, in which traction acts to change tension, i.e., θ - θ1. In addition, this region where tension does not change is known to be always present on the side that is being raised irrespective of the magnitude of the tension.
  • When the car 4 is raised, since the tension of the main ropes 12 changes from T1 to T2 within angle θ1, if the distance traveled by the sheave 11 is integrated on an exit side of the main ropes 12 (the side near the counterweight 5), it can be seen that the main ropes 12 drift toward the counterweight 5 (extend) due to tension differential extension δ of the main ropes 12, proportionately reducing the distance traveled by the sheave 11.
  • Conversely, when the car 4 is lowered by an identical distance, i.e., when the counterweight 5 is raised, if the distance traveled by the sheave 11 is integrated at identical positions, it can be seen that drift of the main ropes 12 relative to the sheave 11 does not arise since the tension of the main ropes 12 barely changes on the raised side (the side near the counterweight 5). Here, the tension differential extension δ of the main ropes 12 is given by δ = (T2-T1) × L/(E×A), where L is the length the main ropes 12 move along the sheave 11, E is the elastic modulus of the main ropes 12, and A is the cross-sectional area of the main ropes 12.
  • If the distance traveled by the sheave 11 is integrated on an entry side of the main ropes 12 (a side near the car 4) when the car 4 is raised, positional drift does not occur between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 since tension of the main ropes 12 does not change on the entry side. In contrast to that, when the car 4 is lowered by an identical distance, since the tension of the main ropes 12 changes from T2 to T1 within angle θ1, the main ropes 12 drift toward the counterweight 5 due to tension differential contraction δ of the main ropes 12.
  • In other words, the main ropes 12 and the sheave 11 drift by an identical amount in each direction whichever side is considered, and the amount of drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 when one round trip is made is the tension differential extension 5 of the main ropes 12. From the above, drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12, i.e., creep, can be calculated by measuring cumulative rotational speed of the sheave 11 when the car 4 is driven up and down by a given distance and calculating differences in the measured values.
  • Only drift due to creep occurs as described above while abrasion of the sheave grooves 11a has not progressed, and sufficient traction capacity is being maintained, but as the abrasion of the sheave grooves 11a progresses and the traction capacity decreases, slippage between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 occurs, increasing drift between the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12.
  • When slippage occurs in this manner, if the exit side of the main ropes 12 is considered when the car 4 is raised with no load on board the car 4, for example, the distance traveled by the sheave 11 relative to the distance traveled by the main ropes 12 is even smaller. For this reason, when the car 4 is lowered, the car 4 cannot be moved to a predetermined position unless the distance traveled by the sheave 11 is increased by an amount proportionate to the slippage. In other words, a rotation pulse integrated value of the sheave 11 during descent is even greater than a rotation pulse integrated value of the sheave 11 during ascent.
  • Traction capacity rarely suddenly decreases significantly, usually decreasing gradually over a long period of use due to the sheave grooves 11a being abraded, or the main ropes 12 being abraded and deteriorating, etc. For this reason, it is not necessary for verification of traction capacity, i.e., verification of the presence or absence of slippage, to be performed constantly, and it need only be performed regularly, for example, making use of a time period during which the elevator apparatus is not used (at night, for example).
  • When verifying the traction capacity, first verify that passengers and freight are not on board the car 4 (an unloaded state), make the car 4 perform a round trip for a preset distance, and find integrated values for the encoder pulse values during ascent and descent. Then, compare the difference between the integrated value during ascent and the integrated value during descent with a preset slippage tolerance value, and execute processing in response to the compared result.
  • For example, if slippage that exceeds the slippage tolerance value is detected, a slippage detection signal is transmitted to a remote elevator monitoring switchboard to let it be known that inspection of the sheave 11 and the main ropes 12 is required. If slippage is even greater, and is determined to be at a level at which normal operation is impossible, operation of the elevator apparatus is stopped.
  • If the distance traveled by the car 4 when the slippage test is performed is large, the percentage that is occupied by creep due to the difference in tension will be large even if slippage occurs. For this reason, it is preferable to make the distance traveled by the car 4 when the slippage test is performed a minimum distance for accelerating to a predetermined speed, then decelerating and stopping. In other words, when performing a slippage test, it is preferable for the slippage testing portion 15 to run the car 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is significantly shorter than accelerating and decelerating time. It is even more preferable to minimize, i.e., completely eliminate, the constant speed traveling time, enabling slippage detecting precision to be improved even further.
  • In an elevator apparatus of this kind, because a car 4 is operated through a round trip for a predetermined distance, and slippage between a sheave 11 and main ropes 12 is tested by a slippage testing portion 15 based on a difference in a signal from a rotation detector 13 during ascent and a signal from the rotation detector 13 during descent, apparatus or software is required for pulse integration, but slippage can be tested using a simple configuration without having to dispose another rotation detector that would require separate space.
  • Because the slippage testing portion 15 performs the slippage test after the car 4 is confirmed to be in an unloaded state, slippage can be detected precisely under stable conditions.
  • In addition, because the slippage testing portion 15 runs the car 4 through a speed pattern in which constant speed traveling time is shorter than accelerating and decelerating time when performing the slippage test, slippage detecting precision can be improved.
  • Moreover, in the above example, the slippage testing portion 15 is disposed on the elevator control apparatus 14, but the slippage testing portion 15 may also be disposed on another apparatus such as safety monitoring apparatus, etc., or may also be an independent apparatus, for example.
  • The main ropes 12 may be ropes that have circular cross sections, or may also be belts.
  • Moreover, in the above example, an elevator apparatus using a one-to-one (1:1) roping method is shown, but is not limited thereto, and for example, the present invention can also be applied to an elevator apparatus using a two-to-one (2:1) roping method.

Claims (2)

  1. An elevator apparatus comprising:
    a hoisting machine (8) that has a sheave (11);
    a main rope (12) that is wound around the sheave (11);
    a car (4) that is suspended by the main rope (12) on a first side of the sheave (11);
    a counterweight (5) that is suspended by the main rope (12) on a second side of the sheave (11);
    a rotation detector (13) that generates a signal that corresponds to rotation of the sheave (11); and
    a slippage testing portion (15) that operates the car (4) through a round trip for a predetermined distance, and that tests for slippage between the sheave (11) and the main rope (12) based on a difference between a signal from the rotation detector (13) during ascent and a signal from the rotation detector (13) during descent,
    characterized in that
    the slippage testing portion (15) runs the car (4) through a speed pattern in which the car (4) is accelerated to a predetermined speed, then decelerated and stopped so as to completely eliminate a constant speed traveling time.
  2. An elevator apparatus according to Claim 1, wherein the slippage testing portion (15) performs a slippage test after confirming that the car (4) is in an unloaded state.
EP08710980.7A 2008-02-08 2008-02-08 Elevator device Active EP2213606B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2008/052101 WO2009098772A1 (en) 2008-02-08 2008-02-08 Elevator device

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2213606A1 EP2213606A1 (en) 2010-08-04
EP2213606A4 EP2213606A4 (en) 2014-05-14
EP2213606B1 true EP2213606B1 (en) 2018-04-25

Family

ID=40951860

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08710980.7A Active EP2213606B1 (en) 2008-02-08 2008-02-08 Elevator device

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2213606B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5334868B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101345885B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101896415A (en)
WO (1) WO2009098772A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE112016006890B4 (en) 2016-05-23 2022-01-13 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation elevator facility

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011042480A (en) * 2009-08-24 2011-03-03 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Elevator device
JP5947094B2 (en) * 2012-04-25 2016-07-06 株式会社日立製作所 elevator
DE112015006188B4 (en) 2015-02-18 2021-12-30 Mitsubishi Electric Corp. Elevator diagnostic device
CN107522056B (en) * 2017-09-27 2020-05-05 杭州西奥电梯有限公司 Method and system for monitoring traction capacity of elevator system

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0684233B2 (en) 1986-03-05 1994-10-26 株式会社日立製作所 Elevator device and operation control method thereof
DE8904375U1 (en) * 1989-04-07 1989-07-27 TÜV Bayern e.V., 8000 München Device for recording physical parameters of an elevator
JPH038681A (en) * 1989-06-02 1991-01-16 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Main rope slippage detecting device of elevator
JP4836564B2 (en) * 2005-12-06 2011-12-14 株式会社日立ビルシステム Slip amount detection method and slip amount detection device for main rope for elevator

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE112016006890B4 (en) 2016-05-23 2022-01-13 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation elevator facility

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2009098772A1 (en) 2009-08-13
CN101896415A (en) 2010-11-24
EP2213606A4 (en) 2014-05-14
EP2213606A1 (en) 2010-08-04
KR20100051109A (en) 2010-05-14
KR101345885B1 (en) 2013-12-30
JP5334868B2 (en) 2013-11-06
JPWO2009098772A1 (en) 2011-05-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2526041B1 (en) Method for monitoring the movement of an elevator car, and an elevator system
EP1864936B1 (en) Elevator apparatus
EP2186768B1 (en) Elevator device
EP3366626B1 (en) Elevator safety system and method of monitoring an elevator system
US20100154527A1 (en) Elevator Brake Condition Testing
EP1927567B1 (en) Elevator device
EP2213606B1 (en) Elevator device
CN111099469B (en) Elevator system
EP2958843B1 (en) Method and arrangement for monitoring the safety of a counterweighted elevator
CN107922150B (en) Elevator control system and method of operating an elevator system
CN105923477B (en) Elevator
EP2743225B1 (en) Elevator system
US12103817B2 (en) Measurement arrangement and method of monitoring rotation speed of a component of an elevator, escalator, moving walkway or moving ramp
JP5947094B2 (en) elevator
CN107207198B (en) Diagnosis device for elevator
EP3750837A1 (en) Elevator monitoring the traction of the hoisting machine and adjusting the emergency terminal speed limit threshold based on the traction.
JP5264290B2 (en) Elevator apparatus and braking function inspection method thereof
JP7078145B1 (en) Elevator control device
CN109956381B (en) Safety elevator system
CN114104911A (en) Elevator system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100311

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20140415

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B66B 7/12 20060101AFI20140409BHEP

Ipc: B66B 1/34 20060101ALI20140409BHEP

Ipc: B66B 5/00 20060101ALI20140409BHEP

Ipc: B66B 5/02 20060101ALI20140409BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20171120

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 992646

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008054977

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180725

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180725

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180726

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 992646

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008054977

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190208

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190208

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190208

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190208

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190208

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602008054977

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180825

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080208

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20221229

Year of fee payment: 16

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230512