EP2203123A2 - Implant - Google Patents

Implant

Info

Publication number
EP2203123A2
EP2203123A2 EP08845217A EP08845217A EP2203123A2 EP 2203123 A2 EP2203123 A2 EP 2203123A2 EP 08845217 A EP08845217 A EP 08845217A EP 08845217 A EP08845217 A EP 08845217A EP 2203123 A2 EP2203123 A2 EP 2203123A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
implant
parts
joint
implant parts
projections
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP08845217A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Uwe Siedler
Klaus Peter Zentes
Quentin Malone
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Taurus GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Taurus GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Taurus GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Taurus GmbH and Co KG
Publication of EP2203123A2 publication Critical patent/EP2203123A2/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
    • A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
    • A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
    • A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
    • A61B17/7065—Devices with changeable shape, e.g. collapsible or having retractable arms to aid implantation; Tools therefor

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an implant according to the preamble of claim 1. Furthermore, the invention relates to a tool for implanting such an implant.
  • Such implants are used to stabilize the spine by the respective adjacent vertebrae are kept by the implant at a minimum distance from each other and prevents curvature of the spine in the region of the applied implants or only to a very limited extent.
  • WO 98/29047 describes an implant which has a first unit with a body and a first wing, which has two projections which can be arranged on one side of the spinal column, a second wing being provided which can be arranged on the opposite side of the spinal column and having a central recess to be pushed onto the body, so that the spine is stabilized on both sides.
  • the handling of these implant parts which requires a bilateral handling on the spine, but is cumbersome for the surgeon.
  • the insertion of the body into the recess of the second wing requires very high precision in the application of the implant.
  • US 2005/0203512 A1 describes a one-piece implant in which the main body, which can be arranged between the spinous processes, has four deformable projections which consist of a memory metal so that they subsequently return to their original position after being introduced into the spinous process space, to be laterally adjacent to the vertebrae.
  • the use of such memory metals is very expensive, furthermore, such metals can absorb only limited forces, so that a sufficient stabilization of the spine is not given under all conditions.
  • US 2004/0220568 A1 describes various designs of implants, including an implant with a dimensionally stable configuration, which has a central body made of a rigid material with four extensions. Due to the rigid design of this implant, however, its implantation between the spinous processes is cumbersome and the implant can not be practically adapted to the individual anatomy of the respective patient. Other variants describe implants with deformable projections or implants with respect to the spine upwardly and downwardly extending strut-shaped projections whose holding forces limited, however, or their handling is cumbersome.
  • the invention has for its object to provide an implant, which no longer has the disadvantages of the previously known implants, which is easy to handle, especially in the spinous process space adjacent
  • Vertebra is insertable, which can reliably absorb high forces and which is easy to produce and consists of a few individual parts. This object is achieved by an implant according to claim 1.
  • the implant comprises two at least substantially rigid implant parts, each having two projections which can be arranged on opposite sides of the spinal column, wherein the two implant parts are connected to one another by a joint arranged in the middle region thereof.
  • Each of the two rigid implant parts thus provides a front and a back projection that can be arranged on opposite sides of the spine.
  • the two front projections to be inserted into the spinous process interspace can then be respectively applied to each other or at least arranged close to each other, so that they can be inserted into the spinous process interspace transversely or substantially perpendicular to the spine are.
  • the two articulated implant parts can be pivoted relative to each other so that the implant preferably undergoes simultaneous positional change of the four protrusions can be converted into its stabilizing position, in each of which the two front and the two rear projections each spaced from each other and laterally adjacent the upper and lower vertebrae on both sides of the spine. Due to the two rigid implant parts, high forces of the vertebrae can be absorbed. Furthermore, the implant can be introduced in a simple manner into a spinous process interspace, in particular into the intermediate space of adjacent spinous processes of two vertebral bodies of a spinal column, and into its stabilization position. Furthermore, the implant can consist of only a few individual parts. Implants according to the invention can be used in particular for stabilizing and relieving the lumbar spine. The two implant parts can each be integrally formed be.
  • the "front projections" of the implant parts are always those which are arranged in the insertion direction of the implant in the vertebral body space at the front, and “rear projections” of the implant parts always those which are arranged in the insertion direction of the implant in the vertebral body space behind ,
  • the two implant parts can be connected to one another in an articulated manner such that the two front projections of the two implant parts can be placed against each other at least essentially and introduced into the spinous process interspace in this position, whereby the position of the two rear projections relative to each other causes a change in position, whereby the movement is coupled front projections are spread apart to be at least approximately laterally applied to the two adjacent vertebrae.
  • the two posterior projections can be applied to the two adjacent vertebral bodies, so that the implant is arranged in its stabilization position.
  • the implant parts are preferably connected to one another in an articulated manner.
  • the two implant parts may each be formed at least substantially V-shaped, each having a central vertex area, wherein the two vertex areas of the implant parts are arranged facing each other. From the apex areas or vertices, the two legs of the V-shaped implant parts respectively go off.
  • the joint connecting the two implant parts can be arranged in the region of the vertex or in the region of the two vertices of the implant parts. In general, the joint can be arranged in the middle region of the two implant parts.
  • the substantially V-shaped configuration may also include a substantially U-shaped modification, wherein the implant parts may have an arcuate transition region on the opposite and / or sides facing the vertebral body.
  • the two legs of the at least substantially V- or U-shaped implant parts can converge in the apex region or vertex of the parts, if appropriate, these can also be spaced apart from each other by a central region.
  • the joint areas on one or both implant parts can be integrated in them in such a way that the joint areas are at least partially projected from the peripheral contour of the respective part laterally in the direction of the other part at least partially within the peripheral contour of the part.
  • the joint regions can thus be designed as laterally interlocking regions of the two implant parts.
  • the sides of the two implant parts which face the spinous processes and / or the side of the two implant parts facing away from them can each be substantially V-shaped, so that the two projections of the respective implant part can be arranged on both sides of the spine and include an angle to the spine longitudinal direction.
  • the V-shaped configuration may include a substantially U-shaped or other type of modification.
  • the two side surfaces of the V-shaped implant part, which on the outside face the adjacent spinous process or the respective other implant part, may include different angles. This can apply in each case to one or both of the implant parts.
  • the two side surfaces can be arranged practically parallel to one another or can only enclose a small angle of, for example, ⁇ 20-30 ° or ⁇ 5-10 °.
  • the two side surfaces of the implant part can enclose an angle with each other, so that the implant part can be widened plateau-like at this point about 45-90 °, in particular about 45-75 °, in particular about 60 ° .
  • the side of the respective implant part facing the respective adjacent implant part may have an angle of 100-150 °, preferably 110-150 °, for example approx. 125 °.
  • the plateau-like widening arranged at the one end of the implant part may extend over an angular range of ⁇ 120 °, for example approximately 30-90 °, preferably 45-80 °, in particular about 60-70 ° or even ⁇ 30 ° extend.
  • the implant as a whole can be easily inserted into the spinous process interspace and transferred into a stabilization position, in which, on the one hand, the rear legs of the two implant parts lie against one another in the insertion direction, preferably forming a flat abutment surface, and, on the other hand, the outer sides of the implant parts facing the spinous processes the spinous process Close enough to achieve the desired stabilization of the spine.
  • the sides of the implant parts that are in each case crosswise opposite one another may enclose an angle of approximately 140-220 °, preferably approximately 155-205 ° or approximately 180 °.
  • the outer sides of the two implant parts, which are connected to each other via the hinge region, can thus be at least approximately elongated.
  • the side facing away from the spinous process of the rear projection can thus be formed substantially in extension of the spinous process facing side of the rear projection, the same applies to the spinous process facing side of the rear projection and the spinous process opposite side of the front projection.
  • one of the two side surfaces of the respective implant part arranged on both sides of the joint can preferably be applied to the respective other implant part in a contact region, preferably with a contact surface extending over at least substantially the entire height and / or length of the implant Can extend projections.
  • the two front projections are thus first brought into a pivoting position (insertion position) in which they are adjacent to each other except for a small gap or abut each other laterally so that they can be introduced into the spinous process interspace.
  • the two rearward projections are spread open in this case so that the implant is widened in a V-shape and, for example, is approximately T-shaped.
  • the rear projections are swiveled toward each other while reducing the Aufsp Sonwinkels, optionally to a small distance or until the stop at the two rear projections on each other.
  • the front projections spread this way to the same extent and can be placed laterally adjacent to the spinous processes of the upper and lower vertebra until the implant is in its stabilization position. A given spinous process of a vertebra is thus stabilized laterally by front and rear protrusions of the same implant part.
  • the implant may be formed like a scissors, wherein the joint is arranged in the central region of the two implant parts and these interconnects one another crossing each other.
  • the implant is thus designed in such a way that, if the front projections are a small distance from each other or abut each other, this also applies to the two rear projections.
  • the implant present in its insertion position can then be inserted into the spinous process space transversely or perpendicular to the spinal column.
  • the two rear projections can be mutually spaced and spread apart by pivoting the two implant parts, so that simultaneously with this, the front projections are spaced apart and the implant thus spreads the spine on both sides.
  • the respective rear projections may have plateau-like widenings, so that in the stabilizing position of the implant, the front and rear projections arranged on both sides of the spinous processes each enclose an angle of ⁇ about 90 °, for example about 45-60 ° or smaller ,
  • the two front protrusions may also be attacked, in order to move the two rear protrusions into their stabilization position in a movement-coupled manner with them.
  • the two projections in the insertion direction at an angle of 60-150 °, preferably 70-150 ° or about 80-130 ° spread, particularly preferably with an angle of 100-130 ° or about 110-120 °, - when the implant is in its stabilization position.
  • the pivot angle of the two implant parts to each other may be in the range of 60-150 °, preferably in the range of 90-130 ° or about 110-120 °, without being limited thereto. This can be in each case the maximum possible pivoting angle or the pivoting angle for the transfer of the implant parts from their insertion position into their stabilization position.
  • the two substantially rigid implant parts can have a rigidity, so that they are at least substantially dimensionally stable during implantation and in particular also during stabilization of the spine under the movement of the respective patient.
  • the implant parts can be made, for example, from a suitable metal or alloy, such as titanium, or else from a dimensionally stable plastic material or a suitable composite material.
  • the invention relates to a tool for implanting an implant according to the invention.
  • the tool has two drivers whose distance from each other is variable, which may be formed as driving pins, which may end at least approximately at the same height.
  • the drivers can engage in a Ankoppelungswolf at the two rear projections of the implant in the insertion position of the same, and the drivers can be converted into an implantation position in which the implant is in its stabilization position. Depending on the design of the implant, the drivers can be located at a greater or smaller distance in the coupling position. than in the implantation position.
  • the drivers are arranged here in a forced operation in order to move them from their Ankoppelungswolf in their implantation position can. Furthermore, an actuating means for forcibly merging the driver along the forced operation is provided.
  • the tool can have an actuator plate which is at least substantially rigid and has actuator elements acting on the drivers, for example on their holding regions in the positive guides.
  • the ⁇ ktuatorieri can be designed such that they cause a change in the distance of the driver in a change in position of the actuator plate in the main plane, in particular during a displacement in the direction of the implant 'or away from the implant, to transfer these from their Ankoppelungswolf in their implantation position .
  • the ⁇ ktuator emulate can in this case be designed as guides for the drivers or their holding areas, which include an angle to the positive guides of the driver.
  • the implant according to the invention can thereby be converted in a simple manner from its insertion position into its stabilization position.
  • the actuating means may comprise a handle for one-handed operation of the tool, wherein the actuating means are designed such that upon actuation of the tool, the handle relative to the positive guidance of the driver and / or against the spine of the patient, to which the implant is attached, is arranged Lüunver Slich ,
  • the tool can be designed such that the actuating means in the operating position of the tool on the implantatant is aligned transversely to the spinal column of the patient to be treated and / or transversely to the main plane of the patient and transversely to the spine of the patient to be treated and / or transversely to the main plane the patient is changed position to open the implant by means of the tool or close.
  • FIG. 1 shows a representation of an implant according to the invention with two implant parts in disassembled state in plan view (FIG. 1a), in side view (FIG. 1b) and in a perspective view (FIG. 1c), FIG.
  • FIG. 2 shows an implant according to FIG. 1 in the assembled state in the insertion position in plan view (FIG. 2a), in side view (FIG. 2b) and in a perspective view (FIG. 2c), FIG.
  • FIG. 3 shows a mounted implant according to FIG. 1 in a partially closed state in plan view (FIG. 3 a), in a side view (FIG. 3 b) and in a perspective view (FIG. 3 c),
  • FIG. 4 shows a mounted implant according to FIG. 1 in stabilization position in plan view (FIG. 4a), in side view (FIG. 4b) and in perspective view (FIG. 4c), as well as in a detailed view (FIG. 4d), FIG.
  • FIG. 5 shows an implant according to FIG. 1 in disassembled state with detail view (FIGS. 5a, 5b), in assembled state with detail view (FIGS. 5c, 5d) and in partially closed pivoting position with detailed view (FIGS. 5e, 5f), FIG.
  • Figure 6 is a representation of the implant according to Figure 1 in stabilizing position with-to-mount closure in 'several views
  • FIG. 7 shows an implant according to FIG. 6 with mounted closure in plan view (FIG. 7a), in side view (FIG. 7b) and in a perspective view (FIG. 7c),
  • FIG. 8 shows an implant according to FIGS. 1 to 7 in the state implanted on the spinal column
  • FIG. 9 shows a system of implant parts for forming various implants in disassembled state
  • Figure 10 different implants, built from the system according to
  • FIG. 9 in completely assembled state
  • FIG. 11 shows a plan view of an implant according to FIG. 1
  • FIG. 12 shows an alternative embodiment of an implant in a schematic illustration in the insertion position (FIG. 12a) and in the stabilization position (FIG. 12b),
  • FIG. 14 shows a representation of an implantation tool with implant in insertion position (FIG. 14a), in side view (FIG. 14b) and in frontal view (FIG. 14c),
  • FIG. 15 shows an implantation tool with implant according to FIG. 14 in stabilization position (FIG. 15 a), in side view (FIG. 15 b) and in frontal view (FIG. 15 c), FIG.
  • Figure 16 is an illustration of the tool of Figure 14 in an exploded view.
  • FIGS 1 to 8 show an implant 1, which as shown in Figure 8 between adjacent spinous processes F1, F2 (more precisely in the space between adjacent spinous processes, also called process spinosus, two vertebral bodies of a spine) can be arranged to space adjacent vertebrae from each other or to stabilize in their position.
  • the implant 1 in this case has two at least substantially rigid implant parts 2, 3, which are connected by a joint 6 arranged in the middle region 4, 5 thereof.
  • the implant parts thus represent separate parts, but in the context of the invention they can generally also be permanently or permanently connected to one another, for example by a suitable design of the joint as with a hinge pin.
  • the implant in this case has four projections 7, 8, 9, 10, each implant part comprising a front projection and a rear projection, so that in each case two projections 7, 8 and 9, 10 on opposite sides of the spine WS can be arranged.
  • On each side of the spinal column one of the projections laterally to an upper vertebra W1 (in the extension direction of the spine) and another projection, which is arranged on the adjacent implant part, can each be arranged laterally to a lower vertebra W2 in the spinal column direction.
  • the implant 1 In the arrangement of the two articulated implant parts 2, 3 shown in FIG. 2, the implant 1 is in its insertion position, so that the latter, with the projections 7, 8 in the direction of insertion transversely or perpendicular to the spinal column, laterally into the spinous process space between the spinous processes F1, F2 can be introduced.
  • the two front protrusions 7, 8 of the two implant parts lie flat against one another, at least substantially or as shown.
  • the two implant parts are connected to one another by the two joint regions 11, 12 (FIG. 1) at the central regions of the implant part in an articulated manner, more precisely pivotably.
  • the implant parts 2, 3 After inserting the front projections 7, 8, preferably until at least approximately abutting the middle regions of the implant parts or the forwardly projecting end regions 13, 14 of the posterior projections on the vertebrae, the implant parts 2, 3 are represented as in FIG pivoted against each other in the direction of their stabilization position, so that the implant simultaneously spreads forward in the direction of insertion and closes the rear.
  • the front and rear projections 7, 8 and 9, 10, respectively, of the respective rigid implant parts are thus transferred into their stabilization position in a motion-coupled manner (see FIG. 4), in which the front and rear projections of the two implant parts 2, 3 are each spaced apart from one another and on both sides Spine WS laterally adjacent or laterally adjacent to the respective upper and lower vertebrae Wl, W2 are arranged.
  • the implant is thus substantially cross-shaped in the stabilization position; in the given embodiment, the implant is in the insertion position according to FIG Made essentially T-shaped, so that the middle leg is inserted into the vertebral process space.
  • the sides 15, 16 of the implant parts respectively facing the spinous processes each enclose an angle of approximately 60 ° in order to provide acquisition regions for the spinous processes.
  • the reason of the elliptical free spaces is here arc-shaped.
  • the cranial base 17 may have a mounting chute 19, which widens toward the upper side of the implant facing away from the spinal column, for receiving the vertebral or spinous process.
  • the base 18 of the opposite free space may be formed perpendicular to the pivot plane E.
  • the bottom 17, 18 of the free-spaces on both sides, which accommodate the spinous processes, can therefore be designed differently.
  • the side 20, 21 of the respective implant part facing the respectively adjacent implant part may have an angle of approximately 125 °, the angle vertices 22, 23 (dashed) facing one another or being arranged adjacent to one another.
  • the preferably plateau-like widening 24, 25, which is arranged at one end of the implant part and which may be substantially angular or circular-segment-shaped, may extend over an angular range of approximately 60-70 °.
  • the upper and lower sides of the widenings can essentially be flat, without this being mandatory.
  • the two front projections can spread apart at an angle of approximately 110-120 °.
  • the two rear projections In order to be able to pivot the rear projections 9, 10 toward one another and to spread the two front projections, the two rear projections have points of engagement 26 (FIG. 4) in the form of recesses or passage openings into which drivers of an implantation tool, for example according to the exemplary embodiment of FIGS 13 to 15 can intervene.
  • the substantially V-shaped implant parts can thus against each other at the apex point disposed joint be pivoted.
  • the joint 6 of the implant has a first and a second joint element 27, 28 (see FIG. 5, underside view) which can be connected to one another in an articulated manner and which respectively consist of the peripheral contours of the mutually opposite central regions 4, 5 of the first and second implant part can be formed.
  • the joint elements 27, 28 are therefore only partially projecting from the peripheral contour of the respective implant part in the direction of the other part, and are partially received within the peripheral contour of the respective part.
  • a partial region of the joint element can merge into the body of the implant part
  • a partial region of the other joint element can be designed as a corresponding receptacle partially formed in the body. At least one of the joint elements can laterally engage in the other implant parts.
  • At least one of the joint elements 27 may in this case have a laterally protruding protuberance 29, which here is designed as a collar and which engages in an indentation 30 of the adjacent implant part formed in the joint area (see FIG. 1).
  • the middle region of the implant can thereby be made comparatively narrow.
  • the two joint regions can form the joint in the manner of a rolling bearing against each other, so that the joint is easy to produce and can be sterilized and deposits in the joint region are avoided.
  • the circumferential contours 29a, 29b, 29c roll on corresponding bearing surfaces of the adjacent implant part on all three levels of the comb-like joint connection in order to form the joint.
  • the two joint elements 27, 28 may each be formed in one piece with the two associated implant parts, as a result of which high forces can be absorbed by the joint, but they may also be made as separate parts, which are connected to the implant parts.
  • At least one of the two implant parts may have at least one or more protuberances 51, 52 engaging laterally into the other implant part, which may be arranged adjacent to or spaced from the joint elements or may also pass into them.
  • Both implant parts may also be provided with at least one or more protuberances which engage in the respective other implant part.
  • the protuberances 5I 7 52 can be arranged at least in regions on both sides of a separation or center line 33 of the implant parts.
  • the respective joint elements 27,28 can be created.
  • interlocking regions of the implant parts can be formed by the protuberances and the indentations 54, 55 that interlock with each other, which are in certain directions within and / or transversely or perpendicular to the pivot plane of the implant Take up forces acting on the connection region of the two implant parts, in particular in the stabilization position, and thereby stabilize the implant.
  • forces acting perpendicularly or transversely or parallel to the spinal column longitudinal direction can also be absorbed by the protuberances located in the engaged position.
  • the protuberances 51, 52 can thus be laterally supported by their lateral outer surfaces 58, 59 on contact surfaces 56, 57 (see FIG. 1) of the other implant part.
  • shear forces which act parallel to the parting line 33 or parallel to the insertion direction of the implant into the intervertebral space can be absorbed by abutment surfaces (see surfaces 32a, 35a) which are inclined relative to the parting line 33.
  • the at least one or more protuberances of the implant part can be received free of play and / or exact fit by the other implant part, so that the laterally intermeshing areas of the implant parts preferably do not participate, starting from the stabilization position alone when pivoting in the direction of the insertion position. lock other, as in the protuberances 51,52 and the
  • Indentations 54,55 with the contact surfaces 56,57 is the case. In addition, tilting of the two implant parts against each other can be prevented by these protuberances.
  • the two implant parts connected in an articulated manner can have cooperating securing means, so that the two implant parts are secured against tilting in different or at least almost all pivoting positions, optionally up to a mounting position, and / or with respect to the pivoting plane that the implant can be handled as a functional unit despite its simple assembly.
  • the displacement assurance can be done in the pivoting plane or transversely or perpendicular to this.
  • the assembly position, in which the two implant parts are joined may be the insertion position or another pivoting position, preferably excluding the stabilization position. For assembly, the two implant parts (see FIG.
  • the assembly can also take place in other ways, for example by bringing the implant parts in a direction transversely or perpendicular to the pivoting plane E, by abutment of the oppositely rotated from the pivot plane parts, and twisting of both parts in the pivoting plane or other suitable manner.
  • a displacement assurance can be given in particular transversely to the insertion direction of the implant in the spinous process interspace or in the spinal column longitudinal direction, if the implant parts are at least slightly pivoted from its mounting position or insertion position in the direction of the stabilization position.
  • the displacement safeguard can (given if not in the assembly position) in all directions in the pivoting plane of the 'two implant parts be given, in particular in the stabilization position, so that the implant parts are connected in all directions in the pivoting plane of the same force-receiving.
  • securing means described above can be provided by the same with appropriate design of the two joint areas of the implant parts, if necessary, additional securing means or securing means may be provided elsewhere, for example in the form of interlocking protuberances 31,32 of the two implant parts, in certain directions can cooperate force receiving and can be arranged adjacent to the joint.
  • the above-mentioned securing means can be designed in such a way that the two implant parts engage in a lock-like manner in a connecting region which, in particular, can represent the joint which connects the two implant parts to each other but can also be independent of this.
  • These lock-like securing means can be designed such that they prevent a separation of the two implant parts in the pivoting plane E (possibly up to their mounting position) and transversely to this.
  • the lock-like interlocking connection means can be formed, for example according to Figure 5 by such that one of the hinge portions 11 has a laterally slotted receiving lug 31 and the other hinge portion has a pivotable in the eye pivot pin 32, which preferably has a non-round cross-section, which is provided with segmental corner surfaces be, which can rest flat on the joint receiving or receiving lug. Due to the non-circular design is at least one cross-sectional constriction 32a or flattening given, so that the pivot pin inserted laterally into the receiving lug and after slight rotation in the Recording is secured against removal. The two implant parts' are thereby connectable to each other by simply pushing together in the pivoting plane.
  • a further securing means may be provided which at least partially closes the lateral opening of the joint receptacle in order to prevent a separation of the implant parts in their insertion position.
  • the joint can also be designed such that the two implant parts can be joined together in a direction transverse or perpendicular to the pivoting plane, for example by a joint pin or a circular arc-shaped projection is inserted axially into a corresponding receptacle of the other implant part, so that the two implant parts are mutually pivotable.
  • a joint pin or a circular arc-shaped projection is inserted axially into a corresponding receptacle of the other implant part, so that the two implant parts are mutually pivotable.
  • the insertion, lock-like interlocking projections may be provided which engage behind each other in another pivoting position, in particular in the stabilization point and are thereby secured together.
  • Such a closure may be formed, for example, in the manner of a bayonet closure.
  • the implant may further comprise securing means which secures the two mounted implant parts at least in their insertion position and / or in their stabilization position and optionally also in several or all pivotal positions between them against separation or displacement transversely or perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant parts (see Figure 5).
  • securing means which secures the two mounted implant parts at least in their insertion position and / or in their stabilization position and optionally also in several or all pivotal positions between them against separation or displacement transversely or perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant parts (see Figure 5).
  • the joint area with the two implant parts by cross-securing bolts o.
  • these securing means can also be formed in that the two implant parts at least partially mesh, in particular in the region of the joint elements, comb-like to transverse or perpendicular to the joint plane to be coupled together so that they can not be displaced.
  • a comb-like projection 36 can be provided on one of the two implant parts, in particular on the joint element thereof, in the middle region between the upper and underside of the pivot plane parallel to the pivot plane, which, in particular with respect to the pivot axis above and below Protrusions of the adjacent implant part, here by the above-described protuberances 51,52, over or under attacked (Fig. 1).
  • the comb-like interlocking projections are preferably designed such that they at least approximately over the entire pivoting angle of the implant parts against each other, ie between the insertion and stabilization position of the same, transversely or perpendicular to the pivot plane lock together.
  • the stability of the implant increases the tilting of the two implant parts out of the pivoting plane due to this securing means.
  • the two implant parts can also have comb-like interlocking projections on their abutment surfaces in the stabilization position, which can be radially spaced from the pivot axis to the two implant parts, for example in the form of the protuberances 51, 52 and 36 (see FIGS. , If necessary, these regions can also represent a radial extension of the comb-like intermeshing joint regions.
  • the two implant parts may have mutually cooperating stops 37, 38, which limit the pivoting angle of the same in its insertion position and / or in its stabilization position, and which may be able to be placed flat against one another.
  • the side surfaces of the front and rear projections, which face each other in the insertion and stabilization position of the implant may be designed as such stops, preferably at least substantially over their entire length and / or height.
  • the implant may have blocking means which lock the two implant parts in their stabilization position in the manner of a pre-assembly against pivoting in the direction of their insertion position relative to one another.
  • the blocking means can be embodied in particular positive locking means or latching means, which can have a latching tongue 37 and on the adjacent implant part an undercut 38, but optionally also as a force-locking means.
  • the locking means may be integrally formed on the two I ⁇ iplantat patience.
  • the implant may alternatively or additionally comprise a closure 40 (see FIG. 6.1), which fixes the two implant parts in their stabilization position relative to each other, preferably by appropriately designed positive-locking means 41, 42 in the form of pins 42 arranged on a closure body 41 can engage from the top of the implant forth in corresponding receptacles 43 of the implant parts.
  • the receptacles 43 for the closure can be identical to the coupling points for the drivers of the implantation tool.
  • the closure body 41 can bridge the dividing line 33 of the implant parts in their stabilization position.
  • the closure may be formed as a separate component.
  • the closure may be in a direction transversely or perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant parts to bring them to prevent them pivoting thereof to the latter.
  • the closure may have retaining means for securing the closure to the implant parts, for example in the form of force and / or form-locking means such as the locking means 45, which engage behind undercuts 46 of the implant parts.
  • the implant parts may have recesses 47, 48 for receiving the closure, so that the closure with its upper side 49 terminates preferably at least approximately flush with the upper side 50 of the implant parts.
  • the closure or the closure body may contain the securing means for prefixing the implant in the stabilization position 37, 38 or cover (see Fig. 7).
  • the invention relates to a system comprising a plurality of implant parts (see FIGS. 9-11), wherein at least one implant part 60 has a first hinge region 60a and a set of at least two or more implant parts 61, 62, 63 each having a second hinge region 61a are provided, wherein the first and the second hinge portion are hingedly connected to form the joint 6 to provide an implant, and wherein the different implant parts of the set have different configurations.
  • Each of the implant parts of the set is articulated to the at least one (or more) first implant part to form an implant.
  • the embodiments of the implant parts of the set may differ, for example, with regard to their shape and / or dimension, without being limited thereto.
  • the shape of the front and / or rear protrusions of the implant may be different in the various configurations, for example the shape of the two front protrusions with each other or the shape of the two rear protrusions with each other.
  • the various embodiments can also have a different width of the central region of the same arranged between the front and rear projections, which is arranged directly between the spinous processes.
  • the implants may have a different distance between the opposing indentations for receiving the spinous processes (see distance A in FIG.
  • the distance A of the indentations on the upper side of the implant may be smaller than the distance B on the underside of the implant (see FIG. 11). It can also be the shape and / or size of the arranged between the front and rear projections
  • Indentation to accommodate the spinous processes differ.
  • the embodiment variants described can also occur in any combination with one another.
  • the implant. te for patients of different sizes or anatomy customizable and it can be covered with a relatively small number of different implants a broad fürsspektrura with regard to different shaped or dimensioned spine.
  • the above applies to the individual implant parts.
  • the joint areas 61a of the set of implant parts 61, 62, 63 can be identical in construction, without this always being necessary, as long as the joint area can be connected to form an implant.
  • one or more of the following features may be made identical: the protrusions 61b of the implant parts facing the first implant part 60, the protrusions projecting toward the opposite implant part, the locking means for fixing ( Vormonttechnik) of the implants in the stabilizing position, the closure receptacle for the closure, securing means of the implant parts to each other, in particular those for displacement assurance in the axial direction and / or in the pivoting plane, arranged on these implant parts areas of the intermeshing comb structures, etc.
  • these are functional elements, the interact with functional elements of the adjacent implant part. It is understood that an identical design of all of the above features is not always mandatory.
  • FIG. 12 shows, in a highly schematic representation, a further embodiment of an implant 70 according to the invention, in which the two implant parts 71, 72 have a joint 73 in the middle region thereof through which they are connected to each other in a scissor-like manner.
  • the corresponding joint elements of the two implant parts can be detachable or permanent be with each other, for example, according to the joint elements of Figures 1-8.
  • both the two front projections 74, 75 and the two rear projections 76, 77 are thus adjacent to one another or rest against one another.
  • the projections 74-77 in the insertion position may also overlap almost completely.
  • the two front projections By spreading apart the two rear projections and pivoting the two at least substantially rigid implant parts against each other, the two front projections also pivot in a motion-coupled manner with spacing from one another while spreading the implant.
  • the sides of the projections 74-77 opposite the spinous processes can have a shape adapted to them.
  • One or both of the rear projections 76,77 may be provided with a plateau-like widening, which may each be on the opposite projection of the other implant, as shown in Figure 12b, optionally one or both of the plateau-like projections on the be arranged adjacent to the side facing the adjacent projection.
  • the preferably plateau-like widenings 78 can be equipped with further functional means, for example with engagement means 79 for the drivers of an implantation tool according to FIGS.
  • a closure means can also be provided here in order to fix the implant parts in the stabilization position, which may be formed according to the figures 1 to 8.
  • the implant parts may have corresponding receptacles for this purpose. If the implant is designed such that the two plateau-like widenings overlap one another in the insertion position of the implant, then optionally one of the projections can have a laterally open slot-shaped recess to permit an engagement of the drivers of the implantation tool to transfer the implant to its stabilization position. Unless otherwise stated, the comments on the embodiment of Figures 1-8 can here apply accordingly.
  • FIG. 13 shows a schematic representation of a modification of an implant 80 of the exemplary embodiment according to FIGS. 1-8, with full reference being made to the statements relating to this exemplary embodiment, unless otherwise indicated.
  • the implant is in its insertion position.
  • the two implant parts 81, 82 are substantially V-shaped and have hinge elements 83, 84, such as e.g. Articulated pin, which are connected by an intermediate piece 85 with each other.
  • the intermediate piece can be arranged with its overlapping regions 86 with the two implant parts, for example in a recess arranged on the underside of the implant and preferably substantially flush with the implant underside or pocket-shaped, laterally open recesses of the implant parts or articulated with these in another suitable manner be connected.
  • the implant parts 81, 82 are thus not directly hinged together, which may be general as in the context of the invention. The handling otherwise corresponds to that of the exemplary embodiment of FIGS. 1-8.
  • FIGS. 14 to 16 show an embodiment of a tool according to the invention for implanting an implant according to the invention.
  • the tool 100 has two drivers 101, which are displaceable relative to one another in order to be able to couple in an insertion position (see FIG. 14) to the implant 200 in its insertion position. In this position, the drivers are laterally spaced from each other.
  • the drivers 101 are in this case by suitable actuating means 105 in an implantation position (see Figure 15) can be transferred, in which the implant 200 is in its stabilization position. In this position, the drivers 101 are spaced a smaller distance than in the insertion position (see Figure 15) or are at least approximately laterally to each other. It is understood that correspondingly The same applies if an implant according to FIG. 12 is present.
  • the tool instructs. a support structure 110, which is formed here by a flat base plate, forced guides 112 for the driver on, preferably at least parallel forced guides, in which the drivers each engage with two holding elements 102.
  • the drivers 102 can be moved parallel to each other, preferably while maintaining the distance of the same to the main center plane of the implant, wherein the displacement thereof can take place in a plane.
  • an actuator device 120 which is variable in position relative to the positive guides 112 is provided which, with a change in position, acts indirectly or directly on the carriers by means of the actuator elements 125.
  • the actuator 120 may be formed dimensionally stable.
  • the device according to the embodiment is designed as an actuator plate, which has a high dimensional stability and is easy to produce, however, it is also possible to use another suitable design which preferably has no parts that are variable relative to one another and / or can be made in one piece.
  • the drivers are thus displaceable in the main plane of the actuator device while changing the distance thereof, wherein the drivers can remain arranged parallel to each other.
  • a suitable guide can be provided, for which purpose the drivers can each have two holding elements 102 spaced apart in their longitudinal direction.
  • actuator elements 125 two arranged in a plane guides 126 are provided which enclose an angle to each other, wherein the two guides are arranged parallel to each other.
  • the two angle vertices 127 of the guides lie on a line arranged parallel to the drivers.
  • the actuator device 120 is displaceable parallel to the connecting line of the angle vertex by means of the actuating means 105, so that with displacement of the actuator plate in arrow line direction of Figure 14, this is transferred to its position according to Figure 15, whereby the carriers are moved toward each other ⁇ .
  • the implant can be brought into its stabilization position, as shown in FIG.
  • the angled vertices 127 point downwards or towards the implant. If the drivers are to be spaced in the same direction (instead of decreasing the distance) by displacing the actuator device in the same direction, for example in the case of an implant according to FIG 180 twisted with upwardly facing angle vertices 127 are arranged.
  • the actuator elements formed as guides 126 intersect the positive guides 112 of the support structure 110 in two points, namely at the level of the holding elements 102 of the drivers, so that both carriers can be displaced relative to the implant motion-coupled, when the Aktuatorein- direction relative to the forced guides 112 is shifted with changing the distance of the actuator to the implant.
  • the holding elements of the driver then change their position relative to the two positive guides 112 and the actuator elements and can be displaceable in both.
  • the guide members 126 of the actuator device by cross-holding elements 102 are captively secured to the support structure 110, including the holding elements engage undercuts 113 of the forced guides.
  • the guides of the actuator plate have at least one cross-sectional widening 128, which allow insertion of the holding regions of the drivers, the cross-sectional widening being arranged here in the middle region of the guides.
  • the guides 126 extend in this case at an angle to the direction of movement of the actuator plate.
  • the regions of the guides 126 assigned to the respective driver ie, the guide regions which each depart from the angle apexes
  • the drivers 101 can be brought in a direction perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant to this, in order to couple to this by means of the bolt-like forestry sets -101a.
  • the driver 101 can be positioned on the implant, for example in order to position the implant 100 on the spinal column or insert it into the spinous process interspace, the carriers have holding elements 107.
  • the holding elements can under traction / pressure exerting transversely or perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant at this dock.
  • these locking means may have, for example in the form of spring tongues 108 with locking projections 109 which are unlocked under Switzerlandkraftausübung.
  • the actuating means 105 for the actuator device may have a preferably simultaneously tensile and compressive force transmitting means 140, such as a linkage, which is designed such that this by axial Lüveryere- tion transversely or at least substantially perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant parts while changing the distance to the pivoting plane acts on the drivers to transfer them from their Ankoppelungswolf in their implantation position.
  • the displaceable linkage can be guided on the holding construction 110 in a linkage guide 113.
  • the actuating means can be displaceable by means of a pivoting lever 141 in order to bring about a displacement of the actuator device or actuator plate.
  • the pivot lever 141 may be pivotally mounted on a handle 142 by means of the hinge 143 and coupled to another spaced hinge 144 on the linkage.
  • the actuating means may thus have a handle for one-handed operation of the tool, wherein these are designed such that upon actuation of the tool, the handle relative to the positive guidance of the driver and / or the spinal column of the patient is arranged immovable.
  • an actuator element for example an actuator plate, which is coupled to the carriers can be provided, which can be displaced in position relative to the positive guides of the carriers, which permit a change in the distance of the carriers.
  • the forced guidance of the drivers can. be formed against the handle lageunver baselich. The application of the implant is thereby substantially facilitated.
  • the actuating means 105 for tensile and / or compressive force transmission may be formed elongated, for which purpose an elongated transmission member such as a linkage, Switzerlandseilan extract or the like may be provided.
  • the tool can be designed such that the actuating means, in particular in training as an elongated actuating means in the operating position of the tool transversely, in particular perpendicular to the spinal column longitudinal direction of the patient to be treated and / or transversely, in particular perpendicular, arranged or aligned to the main plane of the patient and the actuating means is variable in position in this direction in order to open or close the implant by means of the tool.
  • the main plane of the patient is the plane spanned by both shoulders and pelvis.
  • the patient's main plane can correspond to the implant main level.
  • the actuating means or transmission member can thus be changed position when operating the tool transversely or perpendicular to the spine and / or transversely or perpendicular to the patient's main plane.
  • a change in position parallel to the spinal column longitudinal direction can be omitted.
  • a movement of the carrier to each other by traction means such as traction cable, wherein a spacing of the driver to convert them to their original position, can be done by suitable spring elements.
  • a return transfer by the tensile and shear forces transmitting beta is preferred. cleaning agent.
  • Actuator plate or suitable actuator means not only by longitudinal displacement perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant can cause a change in position of the driver, but also for example by a rotatably mounted actuator plate with arcuate guides as actuator elements that contract or space the drivers.
  • a non-linear forced guidance for example an arcuate positive guidance
  • the positive guidance can not, as shown in the exemplary embodiments, be arranged in a plane which is preferably perpendicular to the pivoting plane of the implant. If appropriate, the positive guidance can also be arc-shaped in the pivoting plane of the implant.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Neurology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Prostheses (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un implant pouvant être disposé entre des tiges adjacentes de deux vertèbres d'une colonne vertébrale afin d'espacer des vertèbres adjacentes, l'implant présentant quatre saillies et pouvant être disposé dans une position de stabilisation dans laquelle respectivement deux saillies peuvent être disposées sur des côtés opposés de la colonne vertébrale. Sur chaque côté, une saillie respective peut être disposée le long de la colonne vertébrale, latéralement par rapport à une vertèbre supérieure et une vertèbre inférieure. Selon l'invention, l'implant présente deux parties d'implant essentiellement fixes présentant respectivement deux saillies pouvant être disposées sur des côtés opposés de la colonne vertébrale. Les deux parties d'implant peuvent être articulées l'une à l'autre au moyen d'une articulation respectivement disposée dans la partie centrale de celles-ci, de telle manière que par rapport au sens d'insertion de l'implant dans l'interstice de saillie vertébrale, chaque partie d'implant présente une saillie avant et une saillie arrière entre lesquelles l'articulation est disposée.
EP08845217A 2007-11-02 2008-11-03 Implant Withdrawn EP2203123A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007052799A DE102007052799A1 (de) 2007-11-02 2007-11-02 Implantat
PCT/DE2008/001755 WO2009056113A2 (fr) 2007-11-02 2008-11-03 Implant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2203123A2 true EP2203123A2 (fr) 2010-07-07

Family

ID=40481776

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08845217A Withdrawn EP2203123A2 (fr) 2007-11-02 2008-11-03 Implant

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US8439950B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2203123A2 (fr)
AU (1) AU2008318047B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2704120C (fr)
DE (1) DE102007052799A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2009056113A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9055981B2 (en) 2004-10-25 2015-06-16 Lanx, Inc. Spinal implants and methods
US8241330B2 (en) 2007-01-11 2012-08-14 Lanx, Inc. Spinous process implants and associated methods
US9265532B2 (en) 2007-01-11 2016-02-23 Lanx, Inc. Interspinous implants and methods
WO2008098054A2 (fr) 2007-02-06 2008-08-14 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Dispositifs d'implant intervertébral et procédés pour leur insertion
DE102008032685B4 (de) * 2008-07-04 2016-06-23 Aesculap Ag Implantat zur gegenseitigen Abstützung der Dornfortsätze von Wirbelkörpern
EP2346422A1 (fr) * 2008-08-08 2011-07-27 Alphatec Spine, Inc. Dispositif de processus épineux et procédé d utilisation
JP2012522588A (ja) 2009-03-31 2012-09-27 ランクス インコーポレイテッド 棘突起インプラントおよび関連の方法
US20110029085A1 (en) * 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Flexible spinal implant
PL217862B1 (pl) * 2009-10-09 2014-08-29 Lfc Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Odciążeniowo-dynamiczny przyrząd międzykręgowy
DE102010000230A1 (de) 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Aesculap AG, 78532 Chirurgisches Instrumentarium
DE102010000231A1 (de) * 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Aesculap AG, 78532 Implantat zur gegenseitigen Abstützung der Dornfortsätze benachbarter Wirbelkörper sowie chirurgisches System
US11812923B2 (en) 2011-10-07 2023-11-14 Alan Villavicencio Spinal fixation device
US10188434B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2019-01-29 The University Of Toledo Hybrid multifunctional posterior interspinous fusion device
JP6148330B2 (ja) 2012-05-11 2017-06-14 アエスキュラップ アーゲー 棘突起を安定させるためのインプラント
US9011450B2 (en) 2012-08-08 2015-04-21 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Surgical instrument
DE102015104784B4 (de) * 2015-03-27 2018-09-13 Gert Stephanus Becker Vorrichtung zur Abstützung einer Wirbelsäule beziehungsweise zur Spreizung zweier benachbarter Rippen
TWI784572B (zh) * 2021-06-16 2022-11-21 兆峰生技股份有限公司 脊突間撐開支撐裝置及方法
CN115474973A (zh) * 2021-06-16 2022-12-16 兆峰生技股份有限公司 脊突间撑开支撑装置及方法

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008098054A2 (fr) * 2007-02-06 2008-08-14 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Dispositifs d'implant intervertébral et procédés pour leur insertion
EP2016917A1 (fr) * 2007-07-20 2009-01-21 BioMed Ltd. Implant pour le soutien des apophyse épineuses

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3024298A (en) * 1958-07-10 1962-03-06 Raytheon Co Evaporative-gravity cooling systems
US5860977A (en) 1997-01-02 1999-01-19 Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc Spine distraction implant and method
US6068630A (en) 1997-01-02 2000-05-30 St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. Spine distraction implant
US7189234B2 (en) 1998-10-20 2007-03-13 St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. Interspinous process implant sizer and distractor with a split head and size indicator and method
US6770096B2 (en) * 1999-07-01 2004-08-03 Spinevision S.A. Interbody spinal stabilization cage and spinal stabilization method
US6682252B2 (en) * 2002-03-01 2004-01-27 Steelcase Development Corporation Torsional energy joint for seating unit
US7763073B2 (en) 2004-03-09 2010-07-27 Depuy Spine, Inc. Posterior process dynamic spacer
US7556800B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2009-07-07 Viscofan, S.A Universal fishing bait based on filaments or strips of fibrous collagen
GB2416296B (en) 2004-07-22 2007-06-27 Dyson Ltd Handle assembly for a cleaning appliance
CA2576342C (fr) * 2004-08-13 2012-12-04 Synthes Gmbh Implant intervertebral
DE102005005694A1 (de) * 2005-02-08 2006-08-17 Henning Kloss Dornfortsatzspreizer
JP4392667B2 (ja) * 2005-10-05 2010-01-06 東海ゴム工業株式会社 流体封入式防振装置
US7585313B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2009-09-08 Depuy Spine, Inc. Rotatable interspinous spacer
US8361116B2 (en) * 2006-03-24 2013-01-29 U.S. Spine, Inc. Non-pedicle based interspinous spacer
US7985246B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2011-07-26 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Methods and instruments for delivering interspinous process spacers
TW200738209A (en) * 2006-04-07 2007-10-16 Chung-Chun Yeh Apparatus for holding open the vertebral spinous process
US20080114455A1 (en) * 2006-11-15 2008-05-15 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Rotating Interspinous Process Devices and Methods of Use
US20080167657A1 (en) * 2006-12-31 2008-07-10 Stout Medical Group, L.P. Expandable support device and method of use
US8603141B2 (en) * 2007-09-19 2013-12-10 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof
US8246655B2 (en) * 2009-01-09 2012-08-21 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008098054A2 (fr) * 2007-02-06 2008-08-14 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Dispositifs d'implant intervertébral et procédés pour leur insertion
EP2016917A1 (fr) * 2007-07-20 2009-01-21 BioMed Ltd. Implant pour le soutien des apophyse épineuses

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102007052799A1 (de) 2009-05-07
AU2008318047A1 (en) 2009-05-07
AU2008318047B2 (en) 2011-12-15
WO2009056113A3 (fr) 2009-07-09
CA2704120C (fr) 2012-12-04
US20090149886A1 (en) 2009-06-11
US8439950B2 (en) 2013-05-14
WO2009056113A2 (fr) 2009-05-07
CA2704120A1 (fr) 2009-05-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2009056113A2 (fr) Implant
EP2621383B1 (fr) Implant bilatéral de lame vertébrale
EP1795155B1 (fr) Implant intervertebral
EP1985264B1 (fr) Orthèse
EP1482875B1 (fr) Prothese intervertebrale
EP1624830B1 (fr) Implant de colonne vertebrale
DE69918998T2 (de) Wirbelsäule-osteosynthesevorrichtung zur vorderen fixierung mittels einer platte
WO2006032308A1 (fr) Prothese pour le remplacement partiel d'un corps vertebral
EP1344506A1 (fr) Prothèse intervertébrale pour la colonne cervicale
WO2006015500A1 (fr) Implant intervertebral
WO2001019295A1 (fr) Instrument d'insertion pour implant intervertebral
WO2017101989A1 (fr) Implant intervertébral réglable en continu
EP2226039B1 (fr) Implant pour colonne dorsale et lombaire
EP2735286A1 (fr) Cage expansible pour la fusion intercorporelle de vertèbres lombaires
EP2931183B1 (fr) Cage intervertébrale expansible graduellement
WO2010000488A1 (fr) Implant pour le soutien mutuel des apophyses épineuses de vertèbres
DE202005019487U1 (de) Facettengelenkprothese
EP1779814A1 (fr) Implant ayant une articulation constituée d'une seule pièce
DE202007019568U1 (de) Dornfortsatz-Implantate
DE102007018860A1 (de) Instrumentensystem für die Verwendung mit einem interspinalen Implantat
WO2012072733A1 (fr) Implant pour fusion osseuse destiné aux articulations zygapophysaires
DE60018988T2 (de) Wirbelkäfig zur immobilisierung der wirbelsäule
EP1827321B1 (fr) Ensemble de pieces pour implant intervertebral, et implant intervertebral
WO2010034287A2 (fr) Implant
EP4162903B1 (fr) Implant intervertébral expansible

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100330

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150213

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160204

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20160615