EP2177439B1 - Unité de fabrication et procédé de fonctionnement de l'unité de fabrication - Google Patents

Unité de fabrication et procédé de fonctionnement de l'unité de fabrication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2177439B1
EP2177439B1 EP09011406A EP09011406A EP2177439B1 EP 2177439 B1 EP2177439 B1 EP 2177439B1 EP 09011406 A EP09011406 A EP 09011406A EP 09011406 A EP09011406 A EP 09011406A EP 2177439 B1 EP2177439 B1 EP 2177439B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
drive
dependent
master
values
shaft
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09011406A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2177439A1 (fr
Inventor
Eckhard Grundmann
Wolfgang Linke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Focke and Co GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Focke and Co GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Focke and Co GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Focke and Co GmbH and Co KG
Priority to PL09011406T priority Critical patent/PL2177439T3/pl
Publication of EP2177439A1 publication Critical patent/EP2177439A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2177439B1 publication Critical patent/EP2177439B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65B—MACHINES, APPARATUS OR DEVICES FOR, OR METHODS OF, PACKAGING ARTICLES OR MATERIALS; UNPACKING
    • B65B19/00—Packaging rod-shaped or tubular articles susceptible to damage by abrasion or pressure, e.g. cigarettes, cigars, macaroni, spaghetti, drinking straws or welding electrodes
    • B65B19/28—Control devices for cigarette or cigar packaging machines
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A24—TOBACCO; CIGARS; CIGARETTES; SIMULATED SMOKING DEVICES; SMOKERS' REQUISITES
    • A24C—MACHINES FOR MAKING CIGARS OR CIGARETTES
    • A24C5/00—Making cigarettes; Making tipping materials for, or attaching filters or mouthpieces to, cigars or cigarettes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65B—MACHINES, APPARATUS OR DEVICES FOR, OR METHODS OF, PACKAGING ARTICLES OR MATERIALS; UNPACKING
    • B65B57/00—Automatic control, checking, warning, or safety devices
    • B65B57/005—Safety-devices
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65B—MACHINES, APPARATUS OR DEVICES FOR, OR METHODS OF, PACKAGING ARTICLES OR MATERIALS; UNPACKING
    • B65B65/00—Details peculiar to packaging machines and not otherwise provided for; Arrangements of such details

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for operating a production unit of a production plant in set-up operation, in particular a manufacturing and / or packaging system, preferably for cigarettes or other smokable articles, wherein the production unit has at least one electrically driven, in normal operation dependent on a central machine speed drive, for which in the set-up of the production unit by actuation of an operator manually operable actuator, preferably a handwheel, master values are generated directly or indirectly derived from which by means of a controller movements of the dependent drive, in particular movements of a drive shaft of the dependent drive, in particular error-related Movements of the dependent drive with regard to reaching or exceeding a limit value are monitored.
  • the invention further relates to a production unit that operates according to this method.
  • such a production plant usually comprises a number of different production units, which are combined with one another in the production and / or packaging process, such as a cigarette manufacturing machine, a packaging machine, a film wrapping machine and optionally a package packer and a carton packer.
  • the speeds of the individual units within the individual production units are usually coordinated with regard to to a central machine speed of the respective production unit.
  • the production unit has a main drive, by means of which the central machine speed is defined and which supplies master or master values, from which the movements of drives dependent on these values are then derived, if necessary with the aid of corresponding laws of motion.
  • the master values usually correspond to the respective rotational speeds of a master shaft of the main drive or they are dependent on these rotational speeds.
  • the master shafts of systems or production units by means of a service case with the shaft directly or indirectly coupled actuator, usually a handwheel move on.
  • the dependent drives are also moved further.
  • the problem is the risk of injury to operators or other persons who are in the vicinity of the plant.
  • the speeds at which the dependent drives move can be significantly higher than those of the respective master shaft.
  • the comparatively slow further movement of the master shaft can trigger a significantly faster, operator-endangering sealing movement of a sealing unit moved by a dependent drive.
  • the object of the invention is achieved by a method having the features of claim 1.
  • the object is also achieved by a production unit having the features of claim 9.
  • the method mentioned in the invention is characterized in that in the Einricht stipulate the manufacturing unit, ie outside the normal or automatic mode, the limit in terms of which the movements of - mechanically uncoupled - dependent drive are monitored, linearly dependent, in particular proportionally, by the actuation of the actuator generated master values of the manufacturing unit is increased or decreased.
  • the dynamic increased or decreased limit value is typically a limit rotational speed, with respect to which the movement of one or the shaft of the dependent drive is monitored. However, it can also be a limit rotational position or a boundary rotational position range within which the rotational position of the shaft of the dependent drive must move.
  • limit value should therefore encompass such a rotational position limit range within the scope of the application.
  • the master values generated by actuation of the actuating member generally correspond to the actual values of the rotational speed of a master shaft of a main drive of the production unit or are dependent on these actual values.
  • the production unit has no master shaft.
  • the movements of the dependent drives in automatic mode are derived exclusively from a virtual, as it were, central machine speed.
  • the master values, from which the movements of the dependent drives are derived in the set-up mode can also be the actual values of rotational speeds and / or rotational positions of the actuating element or they can be derived therefrom. Then, for example, first an encoder associated with the actuator would detect the rotation of the actuator generated by an operator. In a controller, these values would then be converted electronically into corresponding control signals or setpoints for the movements of the respective dependent drive.
  • a safety control and / or regulating unit of the production unit expediently monitors that the movements of the dependent drive do not reach or do not exceed the dynamically increased or decreased limit value in the manner mentioned.
  • the respective dependent drive is preferably switched inactive, that is, in an operating state in which a secure standstill of the same is given.
  • Such an inactive state can mean in the simplest version that the dependent drive is switched off, namely switched off and / or de-energized.
  • the dependent drive will be designed as a servo drive, that is with servo and servo motor.
  • the servo controller and / or the servo motor can be current and / or de-energized. It is important that the servo drive remains in a so-called safe standstill in the inactive state.
  • safe standstill As the person skilled in the art knows, there are various possibilities for the possibilities of the technical implementation of a safe standstill, such as a secure hold. Some of the possibilities are contained in the relevant standards for a safe stop of drives.
  • the dependent drive can also be braked.
  • the limit value, with respect to which the movement of the dependent drive is monitored is increased or decreased at least over a certain actual rotational speed range of the master shaft and / or the actuator proportional to their respective actual rotational speed and / or the actual rotational speed of the actuator ,
  • the limit when the operator engages the actuator at the beginning of the set-up operation, that is to say with the master shaft, the limit is set to zero when the actuator is stopped.
  • the dependent drives even if they are already active, can not start up or would, if appropriate, be switched inactive.
  • the limit value of the dependent drive is increased in proportion to the rotational speed, so that it can start as desired.
  • the limit is further increased proportionally. The other way around, the limit value is again lowered if the rotational speed of the master shaft and / or of the actuating member is reduced again in the further course.
  • this proportional increase / decrease of the limit value only up to a certain, predetermined actual rotational speed he follows. After reaching this predetermined actual rotational speed, the limit value can then be set, for example, to a specific, constant value.
  • respective respective limit values can also be stored in a table which is stored in the safety control and / or regulating device or in a data memory assigned thereto.
  • the limits are stored in each case to the possible actual rotational speeds of the master shaft and / or the actuator in this table.
  • the limit values are selected and the monitoring of the movement of the dependent drive is taken as the basis.
  • the dependent drives are monitored for rotational synchronism with the master values, in particular possibly the rotational position values of the master shaft. Deviations of the dependent drives from the given synchronous rotation can thus be detected. After detection of such deviations then the appropriate measures are initiated, such as the inactive switching of the respective dependent drive and / or the braking of the same.
  • the shaft of the dependent drive is expediently assigned a rotational angle or rotational position sensor.
  • the From this measured Istflagen be compared with derived from the rotational positions of the master values or the master shaft target rotational positions.
  • any difficult detectable creep movements of the dependent drive during a targeted standstill thereof such as non-actuation of the actuator, the distance traveled by the shaft of the stationary drive during a period rotation angle - Drehwinkelweg - in terms of reaching or exceeding a predetermined, stored in the control or in the control database associated Grenzfitwinkelwegs.
  • at least one signal is generated, in particular an optical or acoustic warning signal.
  • the embodiment of the invention shown in the drawings relates to production units 10, 11 of a production plant, namely a manufacturing and / or packaging plant for cigarettes.
  • a production plant usually comprises a number of manufacturing units, such as a cigarette maker, a subsequent packaging machine, a packer, a subsequent film wrapping machine (cello), a packaging machine for making multiple cigarette packs (packers) and a cartoner packing the packages into a shipping box.
  • manufacturing units such as a cigarette maker, a subsequent packaging machine, a packer, a subsequent film wrapping machine (cello), a packaging machine for making multiple cigarette packs (packers) and a cartoner packing the packages into a shipping box.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show by way of example two production units 10 and 11 of such a production and / or packaging installation for cigarettes.
  • Each of the manufacturing units 10, 11 has a main drive 12, which drives a main shaft, namely a master shaft 13.
  • the master shaft 13 drives unillustrated units of the production unit 10, 11 which are in mechanical operative connection with it.
  • the main drive 12 is designed as a servo drive with servomotor 14 and servo controller 15 (servo control and / or servo control).
  • Each of the production units 10, 11 furthermore has a plurality of drives 16, also designed as servo drives, which are dependent on the respective main drive 12 - slave drives - each having a servomotor 17 and a servo controller 18.
  • the production units 10, 11 each have protective devices 19, namely hoods or doors that cover individual areas of the production units 10, 11 to the outside.
  • the hoods 19 prevent a user from accidentally moving with them. Parts of the manufacturing units 10, 11 may come into contact.
  • the hoods 19 can be opened by hand by means of handles 20, cf. Hood 19 in Fig. 1 as well as left hood 19 in Fig. 2 ,
  • the dependent drives 16 drive different units, such as a revolver 21, a toothed belt 22 or a linear slide 23rd
  • the production units 10, 11 further each have an actuating member 24.
  • the actuating member 24 of the manufacturing unit 10 is designed as a mechanical handwheel, the actuator 24 of the manufacturing unit 11 as an electronic hand rim.
  • the master shaft 13 of the main drive 12 by hand, namely by an operator 25, are moved.
  • the handwheel 24 is coupled after opening the corresponding hood 19 with the master shaft 13, namely operatively connected. This will be explained in more detail later for the mechanical handwheel 24 of the production unit 10.
  • a safety switching device 26 ensures that the production unit 10, 11 passes into the setting mode when the hood 19 is opened.
  • the master shaft 13 is no longer driven by the central machine controller.
  • the dependent drives 16 are also brought to a standstill. In this standstill, however, the dependent drives 16 remain active according to the invention. In the manner to be explained in more detail later, however, the dependent drives 16 are (also) monitored for erroneous startup in this operating state.
  • the safety switching device 26 in the present embodiment comprises a safety switch 27, which is arranged on the housing 28 of the manufacturing unit 10.
  • the safety switch 27 has a recess formed in a special way, into which a counterpart corresponding to the recess, namely a key 29, can preferably engage in a form-fitting manner.
  • the key 29 is arranged on the hood 19.
  • the position of the safety switch 27 on the housing 28 on the one hand and the position of the key 29 on the other hand is chosen so that the arranged on the housing 19 key 29 engages in the recess of the safety switch 27 when the hood 19 is closed. This leads to a corresponding switching contact.
  • the production units 10, 11 are operated in the set-up mode, namely controlled and / or regulated. This will be described below in particular with reference to Fig. 3 - 6 explained.
  • hood 19 of the production unit 10, 11 which covers the faulty unit 21, 22, 23 is opened.
  • the safety switching device 26 switches and transmits a corresponding signal to a safety control and / or regulating device 30 of the respective manufacturing unit 10, 11.
  • the master shaft 13 is switched inactive, namely transferred to a state in which a particular unintentional start the master shaft 13 is substantially excluded. Since the movements of the dependent drives 16 are derived from the master shaft 13, these are also first transferred to a standstill accordingly.
  • the handwheel 24 is coupled by an operator 25 to the master shaft 13 of the main drive 12.
  • the handwheel 24 in the in Fig. 3 drawn by an arrow direction until a rotatably connected to the handwheel 31 drive gear 32, namely a pinion; in operative connection with a non-rotatably mounted on the master shaft 13 gear 33 is.
  • Rotational movements of the handwheel 24 in this coupled state lead directly to rotational movements of the master shaft 13.
  • the coupling process of the handwheel 24 with the master shaft 13 furthermore leads to a switch 34 which is in corresponding operative connection with the handwheel 24 or the axis 31 of the handwheel 24 is switched. This switching operation is detected by the safety control and / or regulating device 30.
  • the switching process is a necessary condition for the further control and / or regulation processes.
  • the signals of the rotary encoder 35 are the servo controllers 18, namely corresponding signal inputs of the servo controller 18, supplied. They serve the servo controllers 18 as master values, depending on which the servo controllers 18 control or regulate the dependent drives 16.
  • the dependent drives 16 are synchronized with the main drive 12 at the beginning of the rotation of the handwheel 24.
  • the master shaft 13 is temporarily stopped by a mechanical brake 36 associated therewith and acting on it.
  • the auxiliary drives 16 "synchronized" to the main drive 12, that is, the drive shafts 37 of the auxiliary drives 16 are moved to appropriate rotation angle, the Synchronization of the waves 13, 37 are necessary.
  • the dependent drives 16 are monitored for excessive rotational speeds, in particular due to faulty starting.
  • the dependent drives 16 have rotary encoders 38, which can detect the actual rotational speed or actual rotational speed of the shafts 37.
  • the actual rotational speeds of the shafts 37 are each reported back to the safety control and / or regulating device 30 (hereinafter referred to collectively as safety control device).
  • the higher-level machine control is additionally transmitted a warning or information signal.
  • the limit values that are stored in the safety controller 30 for each dependent drive 16 are dependent on the actual rotational speed of the master shaft 13. In principle, the relationship applies that the faster the operator 25 rotates on the handwheel 24, the more is greater than the limit, the respective dependent drive 16 must comply.
  • a proportional relationship with a proportionality constant, which is referred to below as "gear factor" at least for a certain range of the actual rotational speed of the master shaft 13.
  • limit values in a table of a data storage device assigned to the safety control device 30, which limits, for example, for certain intervals of rotational speeds of the master shaft 13. Contains limits assigned to intervals. The limits are then selected based on the actual rotational speed of the master shaft 13.
  • this drive 16 is switched inactive. Alternatively or additionally, it may be provided to actively decelerate the dependent drive 16.
  • the handwheel 24 is checked by means of the rotary encoder 38 whether the shafts 37 of the drives 16 are at a standstill. If the answer is yes, the entire monitoring procedure or the test procedure will be executed again. However, if the slave drive 16 does not stop, it will be disabled.
  • control technology checks whether the actual rotational speed of the shaft 37 of the dependent drive 16 is greater than the permissible limit value for the dependent drive 16.
  • the limit value is the mathematical product of the rotational speed of the Handwheel 24 and the master shaft 13 on the one hand and the above-mentioned proportionality constant (gear factor) on the other. If the actual rotational speed is greater than the limit value as a result, the dependent drive 16 is switched off. Otherwise, the entire monitoring cycle is run through again.
  • the following values are entered from left to right:
  • the speed n M is entered, which indicates the actual rotational speed of the master shaft 13 in revolutions per minute.
  • the limit speed n Smax for the dependent drive 16 is indicated.
  • the actually measured actual speed n S of the dependent drive 16 is shown, as detected by the rotary encoder 38.
  • the fourth column 39 of the tables the operating state of the machine control or the safety control device 30 is shown.
  • the operating state reflects the conditions correctly, since the actual speed n S is smaller than the limit value n Smax .
  • the table of the Fig. 4 is the table of the Fig. 5 Underlying situation changed by inventively the limit value Smax now no longer constant, but depends on the master shaft speed n M.
  • n Smax does not increase further beyond a value of n M > 30, but is set constant to the value 30.
  • Rotations on the handwheel 24, which lead to master shaft speeds n M > 30 and thus n S > 30, are therefore recognized as errors - as in the analogous situation of the prior art (compare line 4 of FIGS Fig. 5 ).
  • the rotary encoder 35 detects the master shaft 13 in each case the actual rotary position value of the master shaft 13. Depending on this value, target rotational position values for the dependent drives 16 are calculated in the safety controller 30 or in the servo controllers 18.
  • tolerances are still formed by the predetermined target rotational position values, since a 100% agreement between nominal rotational position value and actual rotational position value is generally not achievable.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Safety Devices In Control Systems (AREA)
  • Diaphragms For Electromechanical Transducers (AREA)
  • Molding Of Porous Articles (AREA)
  • Fluid-Pressure Circuits (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Procédé de fonctionnement d'une unité de fabrication (10, 11) d'une installation de production en mode réglage, notamment d'une installation de fabrication et/ou d'emballage, de préférence pour des cigarettes ou d'autres articles à fumer, procédé selon lequel l'unité de fabrication (10, 11) présente au moins un mécanisme d'entraînement (16) à commande électrique dépendant, en mode normal, d'une vitesse de machine centrale, pour lequel, en mode réglage de l'unité de fabrication (10, 11), peuvent être générées directement ou indirectement, en actionnant un organe d'actionnement (24) qui peut être actionné manuellement par un opérateur (25), de préférence un volant (24), des valeurs maîtres à partir desquelles sont déduits, au moyen d'une commande (18), des mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant, notamment des mouvements d'un arbre d'entraînement (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant, procédé selon lequel les mouvements liés à des défauts du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant sont notamment surveillés pour vérifier si une valeur limite est atteinte ou dépassée, caractérisé en ce que la valeur limite du point de vue de laquelle sont surveillés les mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est augmentée ou diminuée avec une dépendance linéaire, notamment proportionnelle aux valeurs maîtres générées par l'actionnement de l'organe d'actionnement (24).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les valeurs maîtres dépendent des valeurs réelles des vitesses de rotation et/ou des positions de rotation d'un arbre maître (13) de l'unité de fabrication (10, 11) et/ou des valeurs réelles des vitesses de rotation et/ou des positions de rotation de l'organe d'actionnement (24), elles correspondent de préférence à ces valeurs réelles respectives.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que la valeur limite du point de vue de laquelle sont surveillés les mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est augmentée et/ou diminuée linéairement au moins sur une plage de valeurs de rotation réelles définie de l'arbre maître (13) en fonction de la vitesse de rotation réelle correspondante de l'arbre maître (13) et/ou de l'organe d'actionnement (24), de préférence proportionnellement à la vitesse de rotation réelle, et/ou en ce que des valeurs limites respectives sont stockées dans une table d'une base de données pour les vitesses de rotation réelles de l'arbre maître (13) et/ou de l'organe d'actionnement (24), lesquelles sont sélectionnées en fonction de la vitesse de rotation réelle de l'arbre maître (13) ou de l'organe d'actionnement (24) et servent de base à la surveillance des mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant.
  4. Procédé selon une ou plusieurs des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est rendu inactif et/ou freiné lorsque la valeur limite est atteinte ou dépassée.
  5. Procédé selon une ou plusieurs des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant sont dérivés au moyen de lois de mouvement appropriées des valeurs maîtres qui peuvent être générées indirectement ou directement par l'actionnement de l'organe d'actionnement (24).
  6. Procédé selon une ou plusieurs des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la valeur de position de rotation réelle d'un arbre (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est détectée et comparée avec une valeur de position de rotation de consigne ou une plage de valeurs de position de rotation de consigne dérivée à partir des valeurs maîtres, et en ce qu'en présence d'un écart entre la valeur de position de rotation réelle et la valeur de position de rotation de consigne ou dans le cas où la, valeur de position de rotation réelle se trouve endehors de la plage de valeurs de position de rotation de consigne, le mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est rendu inactif et/ou freiné.
  7. Procédé selon une ou plusieurs des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que pour détecter d'éventuels mouvements de fluage du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant pendant un état inactif de celui-ci, notamment provoqué par le non-actionnement de l'organe d'actionnement (24), l'angle de rotation ou la course angulaire de rotation parcouru par l'arbre (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) inactif pendant une portion de temps est surveillé pour vérifier si un angle de rotation limite ou une course angulaire de rotation limite est atteint ou dépassé, et en ce qu'au moins un signal est généré si l'angle de rotation limite ou la course angulaire de rotation limite est atteint ou dépassé, notamment un signal visuel ou sonore.
  8. Procédé selon une ou plusieurs des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les valeurs maîtres générées par l'organe d'actionnement (24), notamment les vitesses de rotation de l'organe d'actionnement (24) réalisé sous la forme d'un volant (24), sont surveillées pour vérifier si une valeur limite est atteinte ou dépassée, et en ce que si la valeur limite est atteinte ou dépassée, l'organe d'actionnement (24) est freiné et/ou le mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est rendu inactif ou freiné.
  9. Unité de fabrication d'une installation de production, notamment d'une installation de fabrication et/ou d'emballage pour des cigarettes ou d'autres articles à fumer, comprenant au moins un mécanisme d'entraînement (16) à commande électrique dépendant, en mode normal, d'une vitesse de machine centrale, comprenant un organe d'actionnement (24) qui peut être actionné manuellement, de préférence un volant (24), avec lequel, en mode réglage de l'unité de fabrication, peuvent être générées des valeurs maîtres directement ou indirectement en actionnant celui-ci, comprenant une commande (18) associée au mécanisme d'entraînement (16) avec laquelle des valeurs de consigne pour les mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant peuvent être déduites à partir des valeurs maîtres, notamment des valeurs de consigne pour les mouvements d'un arbre d'entraînement (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant, et comprenant un dispositif de commande de sécurité et/ou de régulation (30) avec lequel les mouvements notamment liés à des défauts du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant peuvent être surveillés pour vérifier si une valeur limite est atteinte ou dépassée, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de commande de sécurité et/ou de régulation (30) est configuré de telle sorte que la valeur limite du point de vue de laquelle peuvent être surveillés les mouvements du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant peut être augmentée ou diminuée avec une dépendance linéaire, notamment proportionnelle aux valeurs maîtres générées par l'organe d'actionnement (24) .
  10. Unité de fabrication selon la revendication 9, caractérisée en ce que l'unité de fabrication (10, 11) présente un mécanisme d'entraînement principal (12) comprenant un arbre maître (13) avec lequel, en mode réglage, l'organe d'actionnement (24) peut être accouplé électroniquement ou mécaniquement de sorte que l'arbre maître (13) peut être mis en rotation par un actionnement de l'organe d'actionnement (24), et en ce que les vitesses de rotation réelles de l'arbre maître (13) et/ou les vitesses de rotation réelles de l'organe d'actionnement (24) réalisé sous la forme d'un volant (24) peuvent être détectées sous la forme de valeurs maîtres d'un codeur rotatif (35) associé à l'arbre maître (13) ou au volant (24) et acheminées à la commande (18) associée au mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant, avec laquelle les valeurs de consigne pour le mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant peuvent être générées à partir des valeurs maîtres.
  11. Unité de fabrication selon la revendication 9 ou 10, caractérisée en ce qu'à l'organe d'actionnement (24) et/ou au mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant et/ou éventuellement à l'arbre maître (13) du mécanisme d'entraînement principal (12) est associé un dispositif de freinage (36) avec lequel un mouvement de l'organe d'actionnement (24) et/ou de l'arbre (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant et/ou de l'arbre maître (13) du mécanisme d'entraînement principal (12) peut être freiné.
  12. Unité de fabrication selon une ou plusieurs des revendications précédentes 9 à 11, caractérisée en ce qu'à l'arbre (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant est associé un codeur d'angle de rotation avec lequel peuvent être détectées les angles de rotation parcourus pendant une portion de temps par l'arbre (37) du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) en vue de détecter d'éventuels mouvements de fluage du mécanisme d'entraînement (16) dépendant, notamment pendant son état inactif.
EP09011406A 2008-10-17 2009-09-05 Unité de fabrication et procédé de fonctionnement de l'unité de fabrication Active EP2177439B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL09011406T PL2177439T3 (pl) 2008-10-17 2009-09-05 Jednostka produkcyjna oraz sposób eksploatacji jednostki produkcyjnej

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102008051779A DE102008051779A1 (de) 2008-10-17 2008-10-17 Fertigungseinheit sowie Verfahren zum Betreiben der Fertigungseinheit

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2177439A1 EP2177439A1 (fr) 2010-04-21
EP2177439B1 true EP2177439B1 (fr) 2011-11-02

Family

ID=41510484

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09011406A Active EP2177439B1 (fr) 2008-10-17 2009-09-05 Unité de fabrication et procédé de fonctionnement de l'unité de fabrication

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2177439B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE531623T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102008051779A1 (fr)
PL (1) PL2177439T3 (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL393438A1 (pl) 2010-12-27 2012-07-02 International Tobacco Machinery Poland Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Automatyczny system produkcyjny
DE102015008827A1 (de) * 2015-07-13 2017-01-19 Focke & Co. (Gmbh & Co. Kg) Verfahren zum sicheren Betreiben einer Zigarettenverpackungsmaschine
DE102016009406A1 (de) * 2016-08-04 2018-02-08 Focke & Co. (Gmbh & Co. Kg) Verpackungsmaschine sowie Verfahren zum Bereitstellen eines Steuerungsprogramms für diese
CN114431514B (zh) * 2022-02-08 2023-02-17 浙江中烟工业有限责任公司 一种基于数采信息的卷包机组节能控制系统及方法

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4000449A (en) * 1974-10-22 1976-12-28 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Electrical shaft system
US4554774A (en) * 1983-04-30 1985-11-26 Shibuya Kogyo Co., Ltd. System for synchronizing two or more process units
JP3010583B2 (ja) * 1989-12-31 2000-02-21 株式会社エスジー 複数軸の同調制御方式
DE19522447C2 (de) * 1995-06-21 1999-08-26 Najib Kaskadierbare Überwachungseinrichtung
DE19752015A1 (de) * 1997-11-24 1999-05-27 Brehmer Buchbindereimaschinen Sammelhefter für Falzbogen und Verfahren zur Antriebssteuerung eines Sammelhefters
DE10249071B3 (de) * 2002-10-21 2004-01-15 Bebeco Technologie Gmbh Linearantrieb für die Materialzufuhr an Werkzeugmaschinen
DE10319064A1 (de) * 2003-04-25 2004-11-11 Focke & Co.(Gmbh & Co. Kg) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung einer Fertigungseinheit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102008051779A1 (de) 2010-04-22
EP2177439A1 (fr) 2010-04-21
ATE531623T1 (de) 2011-11-15
PL2177439T3 (pl) 2012-03-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0742503B1 (fr) Dispositif pour la commande numérique d'une machine-outil ou d'un robot
DE102006046286A1 (de) Bewegungsüberwachung
EP2422244B1 (fr) Commande de sécurité et procédé de commande d'une installation automatisée
EP2177439B1 (fr) Unité de fabrication et procédé de fonctionnement de l'unité de fabrication
EP2356527B1 (fr) Commande de sécurité et procédé pour commander une installation automatisée comprenant une pluralité de composants matériels
CH656362A5 (de) Verfahren zur automatischen steuerung einer maschine zum verschliessen von packungen und steuereinrichtung zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens.
EP2492236A1 (fr) Dispositif de levage doté d'un dispositif de sécurité
EP4177175A1 (fr) Procédé de détection et/ou d'évitement de collisions entre les organes de machine d'une machine d'emballage
DE10163010A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur sicheren Geschwindigkeitsüberwachung
EP1253490A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance sécurisée de la vitesse
EP3137948B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de surveillance d'une partie de machine mobile avec protection contre les erreurs
EP2205106B1 (fr) Unité de fabrication et procédé pour exploiter l'unité de fabrication
EP3182236A1 (fr) Système de fonctionnement d'une installation d'emballage pour produits, en particulier articles de tabac
EP2836724A1 (fr) Système fluidique et procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un système fluidique
DE4432768C2 (de) Schaltungsanordnung zur Überwachung sicherheitsrelevanter Maschinenparameter und Betriebszustände bei Bewegungsvorgängen
WO2020229119A1 (fr) Ensemble commutateur comprenant un système d'entraînement
EP1618441A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de commande d'une unite de fabrication
DE102004058471A1 (de) Sicherheitseinrichtung für eine automatisiert arbeitende Anlage mit zumindest einem automatisiert bewegbaren Anlagenteil
DE102007017285A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überwachen von Drehstrommaschinen
DE112011103889T5 (de) Steuersystem
EP3466662B1 (fr) Dispositif de commande sécurisé et procédé de réglage de la longueur de course d'une presse excentrique
DE10313393A1 (de) Produktions- und/oder Verpackungsanlage sowie Verfahren zu deren Betrieb
DE4432759A1 (de) Variabler Sicherheitsmodul zur Überwachung und Steuerung sicherheitsrelevanter Maschinenparamter und Betriebszustände
DE4309007A1 (de) Sicherheitsüberwachungsverfahren bei Schutzeinrichtungen von Maschinen und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
EP3118127B1 (fr) Procédé d'utilisation en toute sécurité d'une machine d'emballage de cigarettes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100525

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20100621

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: GRUNDMANN, ECKHARD

Inventor name: LINKE, WOLFGANG

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502009001777

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20111102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20111102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120202

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120302

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120203

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120302

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120202

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120803

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502009001777

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120803

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: FOCKE & CO. (GMBH & CO. KG)

Effective date: 20120930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120905

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090905

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 531623

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140905

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140905

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20190813

Year of fee payment: 11

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190905

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190905

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210826

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502009001777

Country of ref document: DE

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230517

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200905

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230810

Year of fee payment: 15