EP2126876B1 - Procédé de surveillance d'un système de gestion de guidage et de contrôle de la circulation de surface pour aéroports - Google Patents
Procédé de surveillance d'un système de gestion de guidage et de contrôle de la circulation de surface pour aéroports Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2126876B1 EP2126876B1 EP08734645.8A EP08734645A EP2126876B1 EP 2126876 B1 EP2126876 B1 EP 2126876B1 EP 08734645 A EP08734645 A EP 08734645A EP 2126876 B1 EP2126876 B1 EP 2126876B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- management system
- specific data
- traffic management
- evaluation
- ground traffic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 25
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/06—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC] for control when on the ground
- G08G5/065—Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. for taxiing or rolling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0017—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information
- G08G5/0026—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information located on the ground
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for monitoring a taxiing management system for airports, wherein the taxiing management system is arranged for detecting objects located at the airport and for continuously determining object-specific data.
- the invention further relates to a computer program with program code means for carrying out such a method and to a device for carrying out the method with a computer unit which is connected to the taxi traffic management system and has such a computer program.
- A-SMGCS Rolling Stock Management Systems
- controllers to better monitor, coordinate and guide ground-based aircraft using automated functions.
- the aim of the A-SMGCS is to provide the pilots with a better overview of a complex traffic situation, as well as to support them at night and in the case of poor visibility.
- Such rolling traffic management systems are usually connected to a series of monitoring sensors, such as ground or Anradradar and Multilaterationssystem, so as to obtain a comprehensive overview of the current situation on the tarmac and display the pilot.
- apron Objects such as aircraft, but also other vehicles, detected and identified by means of the monitoring sensors.
- the detected objects are continuously tracked on the tarmac to monitor and control the movements of the objects. These objects are then displayed on a display for the pilot.
- the central process of the Roll Traffic Management System merges the information from the individual monitoring sensors into object tracks. This is done based on the current position, but also the speed. The past of the respective object tracks is also included in the decision to which track an observation belongs.
- the object of the invention is therefore to provide an improved method for monitoring such Roll horrs-management systems.
- the object is achieved with the method of the type mentioned by evaluating the time sequence of the object-specific data of the same type and monitoring the Roll Bers-management system depending on the rating, including detecting failures of individual sensors for detecting objects located at the airport.
- the object-specific data captured and determined by the taxi traffic management system are thus evaluated accordingly, for example with respect to their quality, so that a statement can be made as to how accurate the information displayed by the taxi traffic management system is ,
- the data are evaluated with regard to their dynamics, ie the temporal sequence of the data.
- a monitoring of the taxi traffic management system depending on this evaluation the object-specific data.
- the evaluation of the object-specific data is advantageously carried out without knowledge of the airport topology, so that an adaptation to the specific airport conditions is not required.
- the assessment of the object-specific data is carried out by means of statistical methods and / or statistical parameters such as averaging. However, other statistical information can also be determined from the object-specific data.
- the evaluation of the data can also be done by means of a continuity check. In this case, the currently determined object-specific data are compared with previous determined data, so as to be able to detect, for example, large jumps in the data that are not physically possible. For example, it is conceivable that erroneous speed information will be detected if the speed changes compared to the previous speed with an acceleration of more than 3 m / sec 2.
- the evaluation of the object-specific data takes place by means of a consistency check. In such a consistency check, it is checked whether the data determined in relation to the context are even possible. Thus, e.g. be checked whether the current speed or acceleration within predetermined or physical limits, so that information outside these limits indicate erroneous data.
- object-specific data are e.g. the speed, the position of the object, the acceleration and / or the position change are conceivable as covered distance.
- the method can also be based on other object-specific data.
- a speed profile is determined as a function of the object-specific data of at least one object.
- a speed profile can be, for example, the speed course over a certain period of time.
- the taxi times of the objects can then be determined from these speed profiles.
- a taxi time This refers to the time from the runway to the gate.
- the determination of the taxi times in dependence on the determined velocity profiles of the objects can be done eg by comparison by comparing the determined velocity profiles with stored velocity profiles.
- the taxi times can also be determined by the waiting times and the number of starts and stops. In particular, a threshold comparison is particularly advantageous.
- the approach and / or departure phases of the objects can be derived from the velocity profiles, since these velocity profiles are characterized by a uniformly high velocity course and takeoffs and landings by a high positive or negative acceleration.
- FIG. 1 shows a flowchart for implementing the above method.
- the required data records are read in or received (eg ASTERIX CAT011).
- the received or read-in data records are then stored in a database.
- Each record contains at least the track number assigned to a vehicle by the Roll Transport Management System.
- the records are then stored in terms of their track number, so that for each track, for example, the information about position, speed and acceleration of the corresponding vehicle as a function of time and possibly a callsign o.ä features exists.
- step two a first consistency check of the records in the database is then performed. In this case, it is checked whether the values of the individual data records lie within certain limit values, the limit values being related to the time sequence of the data of the same type. For each track it is examined whether a position change of more than 100 meters, a speed of more than 25 m / sec or an acceleration of more than 3 m / sec2 is stored in the database. This examination is done separately for each record of the track, but also in conjunction with the previous record. If records were located that are outside the specified thresholds, these records are marked accordingly (PFD).
- step three If all tracks have undergone such a consistency check, the parameter calculation takes place in step three.
- the parameter PD results from the number of correct reports in relation to the number of expected reports.
- a report is a data record that contains the object-specific information and is generated at regular intervals (for example, every second).
- the time interval between the individual reports is precisely defined by the Roll Transport Management System, so that a certain number of reports are expected in a fixed period of time.
- the parameter PD indicates how many reports were recognized correctly and how many reports provided correct data.
- PFD Probability of False Detection the number of incorrect reports, ie reports that can not be assigned to any aircraft / vehicle in relation to all correct reports. This may be due to reflections, "wrong" targets (moving grass, puddles of water, hail / rain / snow showers, etc.) or software errors.
- PID Probability of Identification
- PFID Probability of False Identification
- a track is a set of reports that all have the same track number and that all belong to an object (vehicle / airplane).
- PCT Probability of Continuous Track.
- This parameter specifies the number and length of gaps in a report, that is, how many missing position information a particular track has. Gaps are always missing reports between correct reports. For very large gaps, e.g. be closed on a defect of a sensor.
- step four the determined parameters are then output accordingly.
- the output can be done online, i. during operation of the Rolling Stock Management System.
- the Probabilty of Detection and / or the Probability of Identification are displayed to signal to the technical staff and / or the pilot how exactly and how correctly the system is currently operating.
- the calculation of the parameters takes place offline, i. not during the ongoing operation of the Rolling Stock Management System, in order to be able to provide a posteriori statement on the correctness or quality of the Rolling Stock Management System.
- the program runs in offline mode until the end of the file or online until it is aborted by the user.
- the cancellation condition is checked in step five.
- FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of a speed profile of a flying object that rolls from the gate to the runway and there begins to start. From this speed profile can be clearly determine the taxi times and the starting phase. As can be seen in area 1, the Profiil is characterized by a series of starts and stops of the object. However, the speed in the range 1 does not exceed a certain threshold. From this it can be deduced that area 1 is a taxi process, ie the distance from the gate to the runway.
- the area 2 is characterized by a steadily increasing speed, which is above the threshold value of the taxi times and thus can be clearly identified as the starting phase of the flying object.
- a standing object is identified if its speed is less than 1.7 m / sec. Up to a speed of 3 m / sec the movement of the object is identified as a restart and in the range up to 25 m / sec the movement is recognized as a taxi process.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Claims (11)
- Procédé de surveillance d'un système de gestion du trafic au sol dans des aéroports, le système de gestion de trafic au sol étant conçu pour saisir des objets présents dans l'aéroport et pour déterminer en continu des données spécifiques à ces objets,
caractérisé par
l'évaluation de la succession temporelle des données spécifiques à des objets de même type par un procédé statistique et/ou des paramètres statistiques et
la surveillance du système de gestion du trafic au sol en fonction de l'évaluation, avec notamment détection des défaillances de capteurs utilisés pour saisir des objets présents dans l'aéroport. - Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par l'évaluation des données spécifiques aux objets qui ont été déterminées, sans connaissance de la topologie de l'aéroport.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par l'évaluation à l'aide d'une vérification de continuité des données spécifiques aux objets qui ont été déterminées.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par l'évaluation à l'aide d'une vérification de cohérence des données spécifiques aux objets qui ont été déterminées.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par l'évaluation de la vitesse, de la position, de l'accélération et/ou du chemin parcouru en tant que données spécifiques aux objets.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par la détermination d'au moins un profil de vitesse d'au moins un objet en fonction des données spécifiques aux objets.
- Procédé selon la revendication 6, caractérisé par la détermination des durées de déplacement au sol de l'objet à l'aide d'au moins l'un des profils de vitesse.
- Procédé selon les revendications 6 ou 7, caractérisé par la détermination des phases d'atterrissage et/ou de décollage de l'objet à l'aide d'au moins l'un des profils de vitesse.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 6 à 8, caractérisé par le lissage des profils de vitesse.
- Programme informatique doté de moyens de code de programme permettant de mettre en oeuvre le procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes lorsque le programme informatique est exécuté sur une installation de traitement de données.
- Dispositif de surveillance d'un système de gestion du trafic au sol d'aéroports, en vue de la mise en oeuvre du procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, le dispositif présentant une unité de calcul qui est raccordée au système de gestion du trafic au sol et qui présente un programme informatique selon la revendication 10.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE200710014599 DE102007014599A1 (de) | 2007-03-23 | 2007-03-23 | Verfahren zur Überwachung eines Rollverkehrs-Management-Systems für Flughäfen |
PCT/EP2008/002156 WO2008116580A1 (fr) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-03-18 | Procédé de surveillance d'un système de gestion de guidage et de contrôle de la circulation de surface pour aéroports |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2126876A1 EP2126876A1 (fr) | 2009-12-02 |
EP2126876B1 true EP2126876B1 (fr) | 2014-12-10 |
Family
ID=39493903
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08734645.8A Not-in-force EP2126876B1 (fr) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-03-18 | Procédé de surveillance d'un système de gestion de guidage et de contrôle de la circulation de surface pour aéroports |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2126876B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102007014599A1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2008116580A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8203486B1 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2012-06-19 | Omnipol A.S. | Transmitter independent techniques to extend the performance of passive coherent location |
US7782256B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-08-24 | Era Systems Corporation | Enhanced passive coherent location techniques to track and identify UAVs, UCAVs, MAVs, and other objects |
US7667647B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-02-23 | Era Systems Corporation | Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas |
US7777675B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-08-17 | Era Systems Corporation | Deployable passive broadband aircraft tracking |
US8446321B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2013-05-21 | Omnipol A.S. | Deployable intelligence and tracking system for homeland security and search and rescue |
US7570214B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2009-08-04 | Era Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surviellance |
US7889133B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2011-02-15 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management |
US7908077B2 (en) | 2003-06-10 | 2011-03-15 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Land use compatibility planning software |
US7739167B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-06-15 | Era Systems Corporation | Automated management of airport revenues |
US7965227B2 (en) | 2006-05-08 | 2011-06-21 | Era Systems, Inc. | Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5200902A (en) * | 1990-10-09 | 1993-04-06 | Pilley Harold R | Airport control/management system |
DE4140406C2 (de) * | 1991-12-07 | 1998-09-03 | Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag | Verfahren zur Orientierung, Navigation, Führung und Überwachung von Flugzeugen |
US5519618A (en) * | 1993-08-02 | 1996-05-21 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Airport surface safety logic |
US5374932A (en) * | 1993-08-02 | 1994-12-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Airport surface surveillance system |
DE10032433A1 (de) * | 2000-07-04 | 2002-01-17 | H A N D Gmbh | Verfahren zur Bodenraumüberwachung |
DE10338234A1 (de) | 2003-08-14 | 2004-09-23 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren zur Ortung eines bewegten Objekts |
-
2007
- 2007-03-23 DE DE200710014599 patent/DE102007014599A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2008
- 2008-03-18 EP EP08734645.8A patent/EP2126876B1/fr not_active Not-in-force
- 2008-03-18 WO PCT/EP2008/002156 patent/WO2008116580A1/fr active Application Filing
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2126876A1 (fr) | 2009-12-02 |
WO2008116580A1 (fr) | 2008-10-02 |
DE102007014599A1 (de) | 2008-09-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2126876B1 (fr) | Procédé de surveillance d'un système de gestion de guidage et de contrôle de la circulation de surface pour aéroports | |
DE19619015B4 (de) | Verfahren und Anordnung zur Verkehrsüberwachung | |
DE60303924T2 (de) | Verfahren und system zur anzeige von zeitlichem abstand mehrerer anflüge | |
EP3078992B1 (fr) | Système et procédé d'identification et/ou de prévision de chutes de grêles | |
DE102017205093A1 (de) | Verfahren und System zur Vorhersage von Sensorsignalen eines Fahrzeugs | |
DE102008013366A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bereitstellung von Information für Fahrerassistenzsysteme | |
DE212015000274U1 (de) | Vorrichtung und nichtflüchtiges Computerprogrammprodukt zur Überwachung einer Flugzeugposition | |
DE102016216154A1 (de) | Verfahren und Auswerteeinheit zur Ermittlung der Position von Verkehrszeichen | |
DE102016224212A1 (de) | Automatisierte Freiraumerkennung mittels Differenzanalyse für Fahrzeuge | |
DE102017212513A1 (de) | Verfahren und System zum Detektieren eines freien Bereiches innerhalb eines Parkplatzes | |
EP3938266A1 (fr) | Procédé et produit-programme d'ordinateur de reconnaissance de symboles de signalisation pour la commande de circulation de véhicules guidés ainsi que système de reconnaissance de symboles de signalisation et véhicule guidé, en particulier véhicule ferroviaire | |
DE102011078746A1 (de) | Abstands- und Typenbestimmung von Flugzeugen während des Andockens an das Gate | |
Hon et al. | Wake vortex measurements at the Hong Kong International Airport | |
DE102018251778A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Assistieren eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
EP2322003B1 (fr) | Procédés, dispositifs et produit logiciel d'ordinateur pour la classification de mesures assistée par ordinateur et pour la localisation basée sur des caractéristiques d'un objet mobile dans une zone prédéterminée | |
EP1170715A2 (fr) | Procédé de surveillance au sol | |
DE102017005671A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Fehldetektionen eines Sensorsystems eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
DE102019212261A1 (de) | Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Schienenfahrzeug | |
DE102016110691A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bestimmen einer jeweiligen Position einer Mehrzahl von auf einer Flughafenfläche befindlichen Luftfahrzeugen | |
DE102022000257A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Umgebungserfassung für ein Fahrzeug | |
DE102015206593A1 (de) | Fahrzeug, Anordnung und Verfahren zur Analyse eines Verhaltens einer Lichtsignalanlage | |
EP2887332B1 (fr) | Procédé et système de détermination d'une situation de trafic sur une voie de circulation | |
DE102005008360A1 (de) | Verfahren und System zur Ermittlung von Positionsdaten eines Objekts | |
DE102020006644A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Evaluierung von systematischen und statistischen Fehlern von Multi-Radar basierten Erkennungssystemen | |
DE102018219256A1 (de) | Ermitteln einer Degradation einer bestimmten Gleiskomponente |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20090918 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20110407 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 502008012479 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G08G0005060000 Ipc: G08G0005000000 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G08G 5/00 20060101AFI20140811BHEP Ipc: G08G 5/06 20060101ALI20140811BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20140912 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 700991 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20150115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502008012479 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20150122 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20141210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150310 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150311 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150410 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502008012479 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GRAMM, LINS & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAEL, DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150410 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502008012479 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150318 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20150911 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20150318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20151130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150318 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 700991 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20150318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20080318 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141210 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20180308 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502008012479 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191001 |