EP2118248A1 - Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases - Google Patents

Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases

Info

Publication number
EP2118248A1
EP2118248A1 EP08728362A EP08728362A EP2118248A1 EP 2118248 A1 EP2118248 A1 EP 2118248A1 EP 08728362 A EP08728362 A EP 08728362A EP 08728362 A EP08728362 A EP 08728362A EP 2118248 A1 EP2118248 A1 EP 2118248A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
enzyme
enzymes
ppm
grams
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP08728362A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2118248B1 (en
Inventor
Christopher L.G. Dayton
Erin Marie Rosswurm
Flavio Da Silva Galhardo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bunge Oils Inc
Original Assignee
Bunge Oils Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/668,921 external-priority patent/US8956853B2/en
Priority claimed from US11/853,339 external-priority patent/US8460905B2/en
Application filed by Bunge Oils Inc filed Critical Bunge Oils Inc
Priority to PL08728362T priority Critical patent/PL2118248T3/en
Publication of EP2118248A1 publication Critical patent/EP2118248A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2118248B1 publication Critical patent/EP2118248B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/003Refining fats or fatty oils by enzymes or microorganisms, living or dead

Definitions

  • This application relates to an enzymatic method for removing various phospholipids and lecithins (known collectively as "'gums " ') from vegetable oils to produce a degummed oil or fat product that can be used for food production and/or non-food applications. More particularly, this application relates to a method for the enzymatic treatment and removal of various phospholipids and lecithins, which method can be practiced on either crude oils or water-degummed oils. In one embodiment, the enzyme reaction or treatment period can be less than about an hour.
  • phospholipids contain a phosphate group on one of the two ends of the glycerol backbone, whereas a triacy .glycerol contains at least one fatty acid.
  • the phosphate group of the phospholipid is "hydrophilic” or ''water-loving,” meaning that the functional group X is attracted to water.
  • the phospholipid's fatty acid chains Rl and R2 are "lipophilic " ' or "lipid-loving.” meaning that they are attracted to lipids. Since the phospholipid molecule possesses both a hydrophilic functional group and lipophilic fatty acid chains, it is an excellent natural emulsifier.
  • the functional group X in FIG. 1 may be any of several of a variety ofknown types, a few of which are illustrated in FIG. 2.
  • Phospholipids containing the functional groups -choline and -ethanolamine have the greatest affinity for water, while the acids, acid salts (calcium, magnesium, and iron), and - inositol have much lower affinities for water.
  • Phosphatidic acid and the salts of phosphatide acid are commonly known as ''Non Hydratable Phospholipids" or NHPs.
  • Phospholipids are commonly measured in oil as "phosphorous content" in parts per million. Table 1 contains the typical amounts of phospholipids present in the major oilseed crops, and the distribution of the various functional groups as a percentage of the phospholipids present in the oil.
  • Phospholipids can be partially or totally removed from vegetable oils through several different known means.
  • the most commonly used processes in the industry are water degumming, acid degumming, caustic refining and enzymatic degumming.
  • This technique is usually applied to crude oils containing a high amount of hydratable phospholipids. Due to its mild characteristics, the phospholipids obtained can be used as lecithin (a natural emulsif ⁇ er).
  • the oil obtained from this technique is generally referred to in the industry as being "degummed,” despite being only partially degummed. Since water degummed oil still contains high amounts of phospholipids, especially non- hydratable phospholipids, the use of other process techniques, such as caustic refining or PL ⁇ 1 enzyme degumming, can be required to produce a finished, high quality oil having high stability and low color.
  • water degumming process water (1 to 5% w/w) is added to crude oil at 60 - 75°C with vigorous mixing. The oil is then gently mixed from 15 to 60 minutes to aid the hydration of the phospholipids present in the oil.
  • the hydration of the phospholipids or "'gums" causes the gums to swell and agglomerate as a flocculent.
  • the flocculent is an emulsion or mixture of hydrated gums and oil.
  • the emulsion has a specific gravity higher than that of the oil and may be separated by settling, filtration, or the industrial practice of centrifugation.
  • the centrifuge yields two streams, water degummed oil and wet gums.
  • the water degumming process removes predominately only the hydratable phospholipids. The remaining phospholipids (50 to 250 ppm), measured as the salts of phosphatidic acid and/or PL can be removed in subsequent processing operations.
  • the separated wet gums are an emulsified oil mixture containing at least one molecule of triacylglycerol (or oil) for every two molecules of phospholipid (or gum).
  • CHl-1627663vl emulsified oil cannot be physically separated or recovered from the emulsion and is considered a process loss.
  • the gums may be dried and sold as a food grade lecithin, but they are usually used as a by product in other applications such as animal feed or in an industrial process, with reduced economic value.
  • Crude oil is treated with 250 to 2000 ppm of phosphoric acid or citric acid at 60 - 90 0 C with vigorous mixing.
  • the acid is allowed to react with the sails of the NHPs for a period of 10 to 90 minutes.
  • the acid improves the hydrophilic nature of the NHPs, thus aiding in their removal.
  • Water (1 to 5% w/w) is then added to the acid-treated crude oil at 60 - 75 0 C with vigorous mixing.
  • the oil is then gently mixed from 15 to 60 minutes to aid the hydration of the phospholipids.
  • the hydration of the phospholipids or "gums” causes the gums to swell and agglomerate as a flocculent
  • the flocculent is an emulsion or mixture of hydrated gums and oil.
  • the emulsion has a specific gravity higher than that of the oil and may be separated by settling, filtration, or the industrial practice of centrifugation.
  • the centrifuge yields acid degummed oil and a wet gum.
  • the acid degumming process removes most of the phospholipids, but enough still remain (25 - 100 ppm) in the degummed oil to require additional processing.
  • the acid degummed oil is usually submitted to bleaching and deodorization, a process known in the industry as "physical refining".
  • the gums treated with acid are no longer usable for a food grade lecithin.
  • the separated and dry gums in the acid degumrning process contain at least one molecule of triacyl glycerol (or oil) for every two molecules of phospholipid (or gum). This emulsified oil cannot be physically separated or recovered and is considered a process loss, with negative economic impact on the overall economic balance of the refined oil process cost.
  • Crude or water degummed oil is treated with 200 to 1000 ppm of phosphoric acid or citric acid at 60 - 90 ° with vigorous mixing.
  • the acid is allowed to react with the salts of the NHPs from 10 to 90 minutes.
  • the acid improves the hydrophilic nature of the NHPs, thus aiding in their removal.
  • a diluted sodium hydroxide solution (10 - 18% w/w) is added to lhe acid-treated oil at 65 - 75 0 C.
  • the amount of sodium hydroxide (caustic) is based on the amount of free fatty acids present in the oil as well as an excess of between 0.05 to 0.20% on a dry basis.
  • the caustic solution neutralizes the free fatty acids (producing sodium soaps), neutralizes the excess acid, and with the sodium soaps created, assists in hydrating and emulsifying all the remaining phospholipids.
  • the sodium hydroxide solution / oil is mixed for approximately 10 minutes then separated by settling, filtration, or industrially by centrifugation.
  • the centrifuge yields a caustic treated oil and soapstock.
  • the caustic treated oil is then "washed' " with 10 to 20 % softened water at 90 - 95 0 C and centrifuged again.
  • the oil from the centrifuge is known as 'Once Refined” and the water is commonly known as ' " Wash Water " '.
  • the "once refined' " oil is usually submitted for bleaching and deodorizat ⁇ on to produce salad oil.
  • An alternative to water washing is to treat the caustic treated oil with an absorbent silica
  • the separated and dry gums in the caustic refining process contain one molecule of triacylglycerol (or oil) for every two molecules of phospholipid (or gum).
  • This emulsified oil cannot be physically separated or recovered and is considered a process loss.
  • the sodium hydroxide will react with the neutral oil to form soaps, thereby further reducing the overall oil yield with negative economic impact in the overall economic balance on the refined oil process cost.
  • Enzymatic degumming is used when the goal is the total removal of phospholipids.
  • enzymatic degumming treatments of the prior art have been practiced on oils that have been degummed previously by one of the other methods, typically water degumming.
  • the enzyme degummed oil is sequentially submitted to bleaching and deodorizalion, a process known in the industry as ' " physical refining.”
  • Enzymatic degumming provides a better oil yield than water, acid, or caustic degumming, with improved economic results.
  • the enzymatic reaction changes the nature of the phospholipid, cleaving some of the phospholipid parts. This reduces the phospholipids' emulsification properties, so that less oil is lost when the gums are separated from the oil, thus saving oil.
  • Enzymes exhibiting activity with phospholipids are commonly called "'phospholipases".
  • the types of phospholipase are based on the position on the phospholipid molecule at which the enzyme reacts, and are known as PLAl, PLA2, PLC, and PLD. The positions on the phospholipid molecule at which the different types of phospholipases react are illustrated in FlG. 3.
  • each type of phospholipase has its own rate of reaction and its own optimal reaction conditions in terms of pH, water % and temperature.
  • PLA when used alone generally requires a reaction time of at least about 4 hours, while PLC when used alone generally requires a reaction time of about one hour.
  • enzymatic treatment should occur at a pH less than or equal to 8, in order to minimize undesirable oil saponification, but PLA has an optimum reaction pH of 4.5, while PLC has an optimum reaction pH of 7.0,
  • Each enzyme also has different thermal tolerances. PLA enzymes will denature at about 50 0 C while PLC enzymes will denature at about 65°C.
  • One commercial PLAl enzyme product with phospholipase activity is Novozymes' phospholipase Al Lecitase® Ultra. This product is known to yield polar lyso- phospholipids and polar fatty acids when mixed with degummed oil with a 1-1.5% water citric acid-NaOH buffer at 4.5 ⁇ pH ⁇ 7.0 and 40°C ⁇ T ⁇ 55°C, as described on Novozymes' Application Sheet Oils & Fats# 2002-185255-01 and 2002-05894-03.
  • the PLAl selectively hydrolyzes the fatty acid opposite the phosphate functional group on the glycerol backbone, as illustrated in FlG. 4.
  • the resulting reaction yields a lyso -phospholipid and a fatty acid.
  • the lyso- phospholipid molecule has lost one hydrophilic functional group, and the remaining alcohol group at the reaction site is hydrophilic. Now with two hydrophilic sites, the lyso-phospholipid molecule is water soluble, and has lost its emulsification properties.
  • CHI- 1627663 v 1 process thus reduces refining losses by no longer removing any neutral oil with the gums, and the only loss is the original phospholipid molecule.
  • enzymatic degumming offers significant advantages to oil processors, it also poses certain disadvantages.
  • One disadvantage is that the reaction of the enzyme with the phospholipids can be slow and time consuming.
  • the reaction of phospholipase A enzymes with phospholipids can take many hours, depending on reaction variables such as pi L temperature, relative concentrations, and mixing conditions. Such prolonged reaction times can have a significant negative impact on the overall economic value of enzymatic degumming processes.
  • enzymatic degumming is typically carried out on oil compositions that have been first been subjected to water degumming. Thus, the oil must be degummed twice to obtain a product that has a phosphorous level low enough for its intended purposes.
  • PLCs will react with only certain phosphatidic groups.
  • PLPLC Pi-specific PLC
  • CHI-I627663vf It is thus one aspect of the invention to provide a method for enzymatic degumming of oils wherein the enzymatic reaction rate is faster than in prior art enzymatic degumming processes.
  • Aalrust states that because the oil which is recovered contains less than 5 ppm of phosphorous, it is adaptable to be physically refined to edible oil. Later, details of the technology described by Aalrust were disclosed in several publications (Dahlke, K. and Eichelsbacher, M., Enzymax® and Alcon® -
  • U.S. 5,532,163 to Yagi et al. discloses an enzymatic method using at least 30 weight parts water, and preferably 50-200 weight parts water, per 100 weight parts oil or fat, for the reaction of phospholipases Al, A2 or B with oil containing 100 to 10,000 ppm phosphorous. The oil is then washed with a 30% to 200% weight parts water or acidic aqueous solution per 100 weight parts oil or fat. The total water load required to utilize the process ranges from 60% to 400% w/w of oil processed. The production of such a large effluent in an industrial plant renders this method uneconomical.
  • U.S. 6,001.640 to Loeffler et al. discloses a process wherein one or more vegetable oils containing phosphorous-containing components are subjected to a mixture of phospholipases obtained from Aspergillus, the mixture comprising an enzyme having Al activity, A2 activity, or both, and an enzyme having lysophospholipase activity.
  • the patent states that since phospholipase would attack lecithin, it is not practical to use that method with oils with a high lecithin content, such as crude soybean oil.
  • Loeffler et al. disclose that the enzymatic reaction should be run at a pH of less than 4, and with the emulsion drop size being below 20 ⁇ m. The form of measurement and
  • U.S. 6,127,137 to Hasida et al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholipases capable of removing both of the fatty acyl groups present on a phospholipid molecule when mixed with degummed oil (50 to 250 ppm phosphorous) with a 0.5 - 5% water, pH from 1.5 - 3, temperature from 30 - 45°C, and a time of 1 to 12 hours.
  • U.S. 6,143.545 to Clausen et al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholipases (Al, A2, or B) for use in the enzymatic removal of phospholipids, and a method for producing the enzymes.
  • the enzymatic degumming process utilizes the method described in US 5,264,367 without any additional process steps.
  • U.S. 6,548,633 to Edwards et al. discloses sequences of cDNA " s encoding secreted proteins.
  • the patent states that the protein of that invention can be used in the enzyme degumming of vegetable oils as disclosed in U.S. 6,001,640. cited above.
  • the patent further states in the same paragraph that the protein of that invention can be combined in a ''cocktail' " with other enzymes to improve feed utilization in animals.
  • U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/556,816 of Dayton et al. discloses an improved enzymatic degumming process wherein the pH of the buffered enzymatic reaction is
  • CHi-1627663V 1 lowered to below 4.5 after the enzymatic reaction is completed, thereby eliminating the fouling of the equipment, particularly the heat exchangers and the separating centrifuge, that would result from precipitation of calcium and magnesium salts at the optimum pH required for the enzyme activity.
  • U.S. 2004/0005399 Al of Chakrabarti et al. discloses an enzymatic method utilizing a single addition of enzyme and buffering system and a short retention / reaction time, followed by bleaching with 2-4% bleaching earth and 0-1% activated carbon, and then dewaxing to achieve an oil with a phosphorus content of 5 ppm. Both the bleaching process and dewaxing process will remove residual phosphorus from the oil. Additionally, Chakrabarti et al. states that the oil lost to the gums is in the range of 30-40% of the gums separated, suggesting that the enzymatic reaction did not go to completion, resulting in high oil losses due to emulsification of oil in the removed phospholipids.
  • U.S. 2005/0059130 Al of Bojsen at al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholipases for use in the enzymatic removal of phospholipids, and a method for producing the enzymes.
  • the publication refers to the treatment of vegetable oil to reduce the content of phospholipids as disclosed in U.S. 5,264,367.
  • the application further states that such phospholipases can be used for enzymatic degumming of vegetable oils, and that the PLCs of the invention can be used in addition to or in place of PLAIs and PLA2s in commercial oil degumming, such as in the ENZYMAX® process, where phospholipids are hydrolyzed by PLAl and PLA2.
  • the application states that PLC ma ⁇ be used alone or with PLA to remove non-hydratable phospholipids from oil that previous! ⁇ has
  • CHI- 1627663% 1 been water degummed. but does not provide reaction conditions for use of the two enzymes together. As the optimum reaction conditions of PLA enzyme and PLC enzyme are different. this statement in the application with no working examples does not teach one skilled in the art how to use PLA and PLC enzymes simultaneously.
  • the application further states that phospholipases C. Dl and D2 may be employed in the enzymatic de gumming of previously degummed and non-degummed (crude) oils and as an aid to caustic refining.
  • the invention relates to a method for degumming an oil composition, the method comprising
  • step (c) separating the phospholipids reaction products from the oil composition, the remaining oil composition after the separation being a degummed oil composition, whereby during step (b) the reaction of said one or more phospholipase A enzymes proceeds at a faster rate than it would in the absence of said one or more phospholipase C enzymes.
  • the reaction of step (b) continues for a duration of less than about one hour.
  • the amount of water necessary for the process of the present invention can be less than about 5%, and advantageously can be reduced to less than about 3%, and preferably to about 1.5-2.0%.
  • CHI-1627663vl The pH of the system can be adjusted either before or after the addition of one or all of the enzymes to the oil composition.
  • the yield of oil is maximized based on the phospholipid composition contained in the crude.
  • this invention relates to a method in which both a Phospholipase C (PLC) enzyme and a Phospholipase A (PLA) enzyme are used together in an enzyme reaction to remove phospholipids present in oil. More specifically, this invention relates to adding in combination a Phospholipase C (PLC) and / or Phosphatidyl-Inositol specific Phospholipase C (PI-PLC) with Phospholipase Al (PLAl) and / or Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) to maximize oil yield and reduce the amount of waste products produced.
  • PLC Phospholipase C
  • PPA Phospholipase A
  • the kinetics of the enzyme reactions proceed much more rapidly than expected when the two enzymes are used together than when either one is used separately. Further, it has been found that the reactions proceed more rapidly than expected even if the reaction conditions are not optimized for at least one of the enzymes. Further, it has been found that the reaction can proceed in less than about one hour, and can proceed as quickly as about thirty minutes.
  • the oil treated can be either a crude oil or a water-degummed oil.
  • the enzymes can be added to the oil either separately or together, but the two enzymes will be in simultaneous contact with the oil.
  • enzymatic reaction parameters such as water concentration, temperature, pH, agitation time, and enzyme concentration can be controlled to optimize the reaction for a particular enzyme combination in a particular oil system.
  • FIG. 1 is illustrates the chemical structures of generic phospholipids and generic triacylglycerols.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates functional groups and structures for common phospholipids.
  • CHI-1627663V 1 [0053J FlG. 3 illustrates the positions on the phospholipid molecule at which the different types of phospholipases react.
  • FlG. 4 illustrates the reaction of a phospholipid with a PLA 1 enzyme and the resulting products.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the reaction of a phospholipid with a PLC enzyme and the resulting products.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph summarizing the results of Examples 13-30, in which the average residual phosphorous in the degummed sample is plotted for each level of each experimental factor being evaluated.
  • FlG. 7 is a graph summarizing the results of Examples 31-38, in which the average residual phosphorous in the degummed sample is plotted for each level of each experimental factor being evaluated.
  • the present invention relates to an improvement in a process for enzymatically degumming an oil composition.
  • the inventors have found that, surprisingly, using a combination of enzymes can improve the reaction kinetics of phospholipid cleavage, In particular an enzymatic degumming process conducted with a combination of a phospholipase C enzyme with a phospholipase A enzyme provides a degummed oil product with a lower phosphorus content in a shorter reaction time than would be achieved with phospholipase A alone. Further, it has been found that surprisingly the reaction can proceed in less than about one hour, and can proceed as quickly as about thirty minutes.
  • PLA when used alone generall ⁇ requires a reaction time of at least about 4 hours, while PLC when used alone generally requires a reaction time of about one hour.
  • PLA has an optimum reaction pH of 4.5, while PLC has an optimum reaction pH of 7.0.
  • Each enzyme also has different thermal tolerances. The PLA enzyme will denature at about 50 0 C
  • CHI-1627663vl while the PLC enzyme will denature al about 65 0 C.
  • thermal stability of enzymes can be improved via site specific mutations.
  • Such cloned enzymes can be thermally stable at temperatures as high as 80°C, and the use of such cloned enzymes is contemplated in the present invention,
  • reaction time is evidenced by the PLA, When used in combination with PLC. the reaction time is dramatically reduced, and in some embodiments can be less than about 1 hour, even under acidic reaction conditions which are not optimum for PLC. The inventors further have found that under proper conditions it is possible to reduce the reaction time to as low as about 30 minutes.
  • the water concentration can be adjusted to meet the needs of a particular processing environment.
  • the water concentration can be decreased to about 1-2%, and particularly to about 1.5%, where it is desired to reduce the amount of wastewater produced by the process.
  • the water concentration can be increased to about 4-5%, and particularly to about 4.5%, where it is desired to increase the efficienc; of the degumming process.
  • Oil to be degummed can be either crude oil, or previously degummed by one of the prior art methods. It is a distinct advantage to the oil processor to be able to accomplish the oil degumming in a single step.
  • Oils that can be treated in accordance with the present invention may include but are not limited to the following: canola oil, castor oil, coconut oil, coriander oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil. hazelnut oil, hempseed oil, linseed oil, mango kernel oil, meadowfcam oil, neat's foot oil. olive oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, palm olein, peanut oil. rapeseed oil, rice bran oil, safllower oil, sasanqua oil. soybean oil, sunflower seed oil, tall oil, tsubaki oil. and vegetable oil.
  • the phospholipase A enzyme used in the method of the present im ention can be either a phospholipase Al enzyme or a phospholipase A2 enzyme.
  • CI IH 627663 vl enzyme used in the present invention can be either a phospholipase C or an inositol specific phospholipase C.
  • Many varieties of enzymes in the phospholipase ⁇ and phospholipase C families are available commercially; and it is contemplated that such enzymes and their equivalents will be suitable for use in the present invention.
  • the different phospholipases used together in an enzymatic degumming process of the present invention can be mixed together before being added to the oil to be treated. Alternatively, they can be added to the oil separately, either sequentially or simultaneously. Whether added sequentially or simultaneously, the enzymatic reaction will proceed at some point vvith both enzymes present in the rection mixture.
  • the degumming process of the present invention is carried out at a pH below about 8, preferable between about 3-7, and most preferably between about 4-5.
  • the pH of the enzyme degumming process can be achieved by the addition of known buffers. Citric acid and sodium hydroxide are well known to be suited to this purpose. Other buffering agents can be used as needed to adjust the pH under specific reaction conditions.
  • the temperature of the enzymatic degumming process of the present invention can be in the range of about 40-80 0 C, preferably in the range of about 40-60 0 C, and more preferably in the range of about 45-55°C. Tt has been found that, surprisingly, under the methods of the present invention PL ⁇ degumming can proceed at a temperature above its own optimum of 45°C. and closer to the optimum operating temperature of PLC, without excessive denaturing.
  • the method of the present invention provides a single step degumming process in which the phospholipids content of an oil, even a crude oil, can be reduced to less than 50 ppm P, preferably less than 20 ppm P 5 more preferably less than 10 ppm P, and most preferably less than 5 ppm P.
  • the degummed oil can be subjected to further processing steps known in the art such as bleaching or deodorizing, as may be necessary or desirable depending on the end use for which the degummed oil product is intended.
  • the overhead mixer was a Heidolph mixer model Elector KG with a flat blade paddle; operated at 90 rpm for normal agitation and 350 rpm for vigorous agitation.
  • the centrifuge was a De Laval Gyro - Tester installed with ''The Bowl Unit" for continuous separation. The centrifuge bowl was closed with the plug screws installed. Shear mixing was accomplished with an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer SD-45 with a G450 rotor stator at 10,000 rpm.
  • the PLAl enzyme was Lecitase® Ultra (lot number LYN050070) sold by Novozymes A/S of Denmark, and having a concentration of 11.2 Units/mg.
  • the PLA2 enzyme was Rohalase® MPL (Lot number Ch: 4738) sold by AB Knzymes located in Germany, and having a concentration of 2000 Units/mg.
  • the PLC enzyme was Purifine 1 M sold by Diversa Corporation of San Diego, California. For examples 1-12, the PLC was Lot BD16449, having a concentration of 205 Units/mg. For Examples 13-38, the PLC was Lot 90BU002A1 , having a concentration of 27.5 Units/mg.
  • the amount of phospholipids remaining in the treated oil was measured as ppm P in accordance with the method of American Oil Chemists' Society Official Method Ca 20-99, "'Analysis of Phosphorus in Oil by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy.”
  • Control Water Degumming - 1965.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 746 ppm phosphorous was heated to 70 - 75 0 C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. To the warm oil, 39.4 grams of de-ionized water was added with vigorous agitation for
  • Control Single enzyme degumming with Phospholipase Al (PLAl)-- 1997.9 g of crude soybean oil containing 746 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0 C under agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % Ww solution of citric acid was added and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for one hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was at 40 - 45 0 C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5.
  • Control Single enzyme degumming with Phospholipase C (PLC)- 201 1.1 grams of crude soybean oil containing 746 ppm phosphorous was heated to 55 - 60 0 C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 60.3 grams of de-ionized water was added and the mixture was shear mixed for 1 minute. 0.1051 grams of Diversa ' s PurifmeTM (PLC lipase BD 16449 containing 205 U/mg) was added and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil
  • CHI-1627663vi mixture underwent normal agitation for 1 hour at 50 - 63 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged, and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC degummed oil was 70,9 ppm.
  • Control PLC followed by PLA Degumming -
  • the oil sample is reacted with each enzyme separately under the reaction conditions optimum for that enzyme, in accordance with the prior art, 2110.5 grams of crude soybean oil containing 560.1 ppm phosphorous was heated to 60 0 C under normal agitation.
  • 63 grams of dc-ionizcd water and 0.1123 grams of Diversa's PurifineTM (PLC lipase BDl 6449 containing 205 U/mg) were added and the mixture sheared for 1 minute.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 1 hour at 55 - 56 0 C.
  • the oil was then centrifuged, and the oil and wet gums were collected.
  • PLC and P LA 1 together, neutral pi I with a 4 hour reaction time at 45°C ⁇ 2003.7 grams of crude soybean oil containing 560.1 ppm phosphorus was heated to 45 0 C under normal agitation. 60 grams of de-ionized water, 0,1040 grams of Diversa ' s Purf ⁇ neTM (PLC enzyme) and 0.1085 grams of Novozymes * Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme) were added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 4 hours at a temperature of approximately 45 0 C. The oil was then centrifuged, and the separated oi! and wet gums were collected. The process using the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture with four hours of reaction time at a neutral pH produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 10.5 ppm,
  • This residual phosphorous value is about the same as that achieved in Example 7 indicating that an increase of the reaction time from one hour to four hours did not make a significant difference in the efficacy of the degumming process.
  • This residual phosphorous value is about the same as that achieved in Examples 7 and 8. indicating that an increase of the reaction temperature from about 45°C to about 55°C
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 40 — 45 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC and PL ⁇ 2 combined enzyme mixture at neutral pH produced a de gummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 3.3 ppm.
  • Example 7 This example is similar to Example 7 above, but for the substitution of PLA2 for PLAl .
  • the low residual phosphorous level in the finished product demonstrates that PLA2 can function about equally well as PLAl in the method of the present invention.
  • CHI-1627663V I mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 40 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential degummed oil was 6.5 ppm.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes at a temperature of 40 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential degummed oil was 27.4 ppm.
  • CHI-1627663vl for 45 seconds.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes at a temperature of 50 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential deguramed oil was 79.3 ppm.
  • CHl- 1627663V underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer.
  • the oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0 C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds.
  • the citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0.
  • CHM 627663V 1 (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0 C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl sequential treated degummed oil had a residual phosphorous of 2.1 ppm.
  • CHJ-1627663V 1 number LYN05007 was added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water was and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 50 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then cenlriiuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 7.2 ppm.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 50 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLA 1 sequential treated degummed oil at a neutral pH had a residual phosphorous of 72.6 ppm.
  • CHI-1627663V 1 LYN05007 was added followed b ⁇ 30 grams of de-ionizcd water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0 C.
  • the enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected.
  • the residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 13.7 ppm.
  • FiG. 6 is a plot of the average final phosphorous amount at each level of each factor.
  • Ci ⁇ -1627663vl combination of enzymes added sequentiall ⁇ or together produced acceptable residual phosphorous levels in oils that would allow them to be physically refined.
  • an acidic pll is employed, only one of the experimental runs failed to produce an oil with a residual phosphorous of less than 10 ppm.
  • Example 30 had a residual phosphorous level greater than 10 (13.7 ppm), and was produced with the lowest levels of both enzymes, the lowest temperature, the lowesl percentage of water, the shortest mixing and agitation times, and the most acidic pH.
  • CHI-1627663v S maintained at 60 0 C, 0.7509 grams of Diversa's PurifmeTM (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1105 grams Novozymes : Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 60 0 C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 6.7 ppm.
  • the oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0 C, The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected, lhe residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 2.2 ppm.
  • CHI- i 627663V I grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0 C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5.
  • CHI-1627663vl maintained at 40 0 C, 0.7422 grams of Diversa's PurifmeTM (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A! ) and 0.1 195 grams Novo/ymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by ⁇ O grains of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0 C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 6.7 ppm.
  • FIG. 7 is a chart summarizing Examples 31-38. plotting the average final phosphorous amount at each level of each factor holding pH, PLA dosage, and combined addition constant,
  • CHI-] 627663 vl ppm phosphorous in the final product could be achieved under the proper conditions with reaction times as low as about thirty minutes. Further, without wishing to be bound by theory. it appears that either the PLC enzyme or one of its hydrolysis reaction products is catalyzing the reaction of the PLA enzyme, allowing for the reaction time to be significantly less than the reaction time for either of the single enzymes. These results are unexpected based on the known optimum reaction parameters for PLA and PLC enzymes.
  • the concentrations of the PLA and PLC enzymes to be used in a particular run the choice will depend on whether the goal is to run at the lowest possible cost or the greatest possible performance. If the goal is to run at the lowest possible cost, then the concentration of PLA can be less than about 2,0 ppm, preferably less than about 1.0 ppm, and most preferably less than about 0.5 ppm. Such a low concentration of the PLA enzyme can still provide effective degumming in many situations.
  • the concentration of PLA is preferably at least about 0.5 ppm, more preferably at least about 1.0 ppm, and most preferably 2.0 ppm.
  • the pH can be about 7.0, while pH of about 5.0 is preferable and pH of about 4.5 is presently preferred.
  • the concentration of water in the system can be generally about 3.0%, but can be as low as about 1.5% if reduced wastewater is desired, or as high as about 4.5% if greater degumming efficiency is desired.
  • the reaction temperature can be as high as about 60 0 C, but is more preferably less than about 50 0 C, and surprisingly most preferable at about 40 0 C.
  • CHi-l ⁇ 27663vl time during initial mixing is can be about 45 seconds, is more preferably about 60 seconds, and is most preferably about 120 seconds
  • the duration of the enzyme reaction can be greatly reduced, in some embodiments to be advantageously less than about 60 minutes, and preferably about 30 minutes.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Fats And Perfumes (AREA)

Abstract

A method for degumming an oil composition comprises the steps of (a) providing an oil composition containing a quantity of phospholipids, (b) contacting said oil composition simultaneously with one or more phospholipase A enzymes and one or more phospholipase C enzymes, under conditions sufficient for the enzymes to react with the phospholipids to create phospholipid reaction products, and (c) separating the phospholipids reaction products from the oil composition, the remaining oil composition after the separation being a degummed oil composition, whereby during step (b) the reaction of said one or more phospholipase A enzymes proceeds at a faster rate than it would in the absence of said one or more phospholipase C enzymes. In a preferred embodiment the reaction of step (b) continues for a duration of less than about one hour.

Description

ENZYMATIC DEGUMMING UTILIZING A MIXTURE OF PLA AND PLC PHOSPHOLIPASES
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This application relates to an enzymatic method for removing various phospholipids and lecithins (known collectively as "'gums"') from vegetable oils to produce a degummed oil or fat product that can be used for food production and/or non-food applications. More particularly, this application relates to a method for the enzymatic treatment and removal of various phospholipids and lecithins, which method can be practiced on either crude oils or water-degummed oils. In one embodiment, the enzyme reaction or treatment period can be less than about an hour.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002J Crude vegetable oils obtained from either pressing or solvent extraction methods are a complex mixture of triacylglycerols, phospholipids, sterols, tocopherols, free fatty acids, trace metals, and other minor compounds. It is desirable to remove the phospholipids, free fatty acids and trace metals in order to produce a quality salad oil w ith a bland taste, light color, and a long shelf life.
[0003] The removal of phospholipids generates almost all of the losses associated with the refining of vegetable oils. As illustrated in FlG. 1, phospholipids contain a phosphate group on one of the two ends of the glycerol backbone, whereas a triacy .glycerol contains at least one fatty acid.
[0004] The phosphate group of the phospholipid is "hydrophilic" or ''water-loving," meaning that the functional group X is attracted to water. The phospholipid's fatty acid chains Rl and R2 are "lipophilic"' or "lipid-loving." meaning that they are attracted to lipids. Since the phospholipid molecule possesses both a hydrophilic functional group and lipophilic fatty acid chains, it is an excellent natural emulsifier.
CHM627663vl [0005] The phospholipid's phosphate-containing functional group denoted in FlG. 1 as ''X"" determines the degree of its hydrophilic nature. The functional group X in FIG. 1 may be any of several of a variety ofknown types, a few of which are illustrated in FIG. 2.
[0006] Phospholipids containing the functional groups -choline and -ethanolamine have the greatest affinity for water, while the acids, acid salts (calcium, magnesium, and iron), and - inositol have much lower affinities for water. Phosphatidic acid and the salts of phosphatide acid are commonly known as ''Non Hydratable Phospholipids" or NHPs. Phospholipids are commonly measured in oil as "phosphorous content" in parts per million. Table 1 contains the typical amounts of phospholipids present in the major oilseed crops, and the distribution of the various functional groups as a percentage of the phospholipids present in the oil.
PHOSPHOLIPID COMPOSITION
Cl II-1627663 V 1 [0007] Table 1 : Typical levels and phospholipid distributions for common oilseeds.
[0008] Phospholipids can be partially or totally removed from vegetable oils through several different known means. The most commonly used processes in the industry are water degumming, acid degumming, caustic refining and enzymatic degumming.
Water Degumming
[0009] This technique is usually applied to crude oils containing a high amount of hydratable phospholipids. Due to its mild characteristics, the phospholipids obtained can be used as lecithin (a natural emulsifϊer). The oil obtained from this technique is generally referred to in the industry as being "degummed," despite being only partially degummed. Since water degummed oil still contains high amounts of phospholipids, especially non- hydratable phospholipids, the use of other process techniques, such as caustic refining or PLΛ1 enzyme degumming, can be required to produce a finished, high quality oil having high stability and low color.
[0010] In the water degumming process, water (1 to 5% w/w) is added to crude oil at 60 - 75°C with vigorous mixing. The oil is then gently mixed from 15 to 60 minutes to aid the hydration of the phospholipids present in the oil. The hydration of the phospholipids or "'gums" causes the gums to swell and agglomerate as a flocculent. The flocculent is an emulsion or mixture of hydrated gums and oil. The emulsion has a specific gravity higher than that of the oil and may be separated by settling, filtration, or the industrial practice of centrifugation. The centrifuge yields two streams, water degummed oil and wet gums. The water degumming process removes predominately only the hydratable phospholipids. The remaining phospholipids (50 to 250 ppm), measured as the salts of phosphatidic acid and/or PL can be removed in subsequent processing operations.
[001 Ij The separated wet gums are an emulsified oil mixture containing at least one molecule of triacylglycerol (or oil) for every two molecules of phospholipid (or gum). This
CHl-1627663vl emulsified oil cannot be physically separated or recovered from the emulsion and is considered a process loss. The gums may be dried and sold as a food grade lecithin, but they are usually used as a by product in other applications such as animal feed or in an industrial process, with reduced economic value.
[0012] The oil loss through emulsifi cation is significant, with a negative impact in the overall economic balance on the refined oil process cost.
Acid Degumming
[0013] This technique is usually applied to crude oils when the goal is the total removal of phospholipids. The oil obtained is usually called "super-degummed" or "'totally de gummed'" in the industry.
[0014] Crude oil is treated with 250 to 2000 ppm of phosphoric acid or citric acid at 60 - 90 0C with vigorous mixing. The acid is allowed to react with the sails of the NHPs for a period of 10 to 90 minutes. The acid improves the hydrophilic nature of the NHPs, thus aiding in their removal. Water (1 to 5% w/w) is then added to the acid-treated crude oil at 60 - 75 0C with vigorous mixing. The oil is then gently mixed from 15 to 60 minutes to aid the hydration of the phospholipids. The hydration of the phospholipids or "gums" causes the gums to swell and agglomerate as a flocculent The flocculent is an emulsion or mixture of hydrated gums and oil. The emulsion has a specific gravity higher than that of the oil and may be separated by settling, filtration, or the industrial practice of centrifugation. The centrifuge yields acid degummed oil and a wet gum. The acid degumming process removes most of the phospholipids, but enough still remain (25 - 100 ppm) in the degummed oil to require additional processing. For food applications, the acid degummed oil is usually submitted to bleaching and deodorization, a process known in the industry as "physical refining". The gums treated with acid are no longer usable for a food grade lecithin.
4
CHI-I627663U [0015] As in lhe water degumming process, the separated and dry gums in the acid degumrning process contain at least one molecule of triacyl glycerol (or oil) for every two molecules of phospholipid (or gum). This emulsified oil cannot be physically separated or recovered and is considered a process loss, with negative economic impact on the overall economic balance of the refined oil process cost.
Caustic Refining
(0016] This technique is usually applied to crude or water deguramed oils when the goal is to remove all of the phospholipids and free fatty acids.
[0017] Crude or water degummed oil is treated with 200 to 1000 ppm of phosphoric acid or citric acid at 60 - 90 ° with vigorous mixing. The acid is allowed to react with the salts of the NHPs from 10 to 90 minutes. The acid improves the hydrophilic nature of the NHPs, thus aiding in their removal. A diluted sodium hydroxide solution (10 - 18% w/w) is added to lhe acid-treated oil at 65 - 75 0C. The amount of sodium hydroxide (caustic) is based on the amount of free fatty acids present in the oil as well as an excess of between 0.05 to 0.20% on a dry basis. The caustic solution neutralizes the free fatty acids (producing sodium soaps), neutralizes the excess acid, and with the sodium soaps created, assists in hydrating and emulsifying all the remaining phospholipids.
[0018] The sodium hydroxide solution / oil is mixed for approximately 10 minutes then separated by settling, filtration, or industrially by centrifugation. The centrifuge yields a caustic treated oil and soapstock. The caustic treated oil is then "washed'" with 10 to 20 % softened water at 90 - 95 0C and centrifuged again. The oil from the centrifuge is known as 'Once Refined" and the water is commonly known as '"Wash Water"'. For food applications, the "once refined'" oil is usually submitted for bleaching and deodorizatϊon to produce salad oil. An alternative to water washing is to treat the caustic treated oil with an absorbent silica
CHl-1627663vl gel, and filter out the residual soaps and phospholipids not removed in the initial centrifugation.
[0019] As with the water and acid degumming processes, the separated and dry gums in the caustic refining process contain one molecule of triacylglycerol (or oil) for every two molecules of phospholipid (or gum). This emulsified oil cannot be physically separated or recovered and is considered a process loss. Additionally, the sodium hydroxide will react with the neutral oil to form soaps, thereby further reducing the overall oil yield with negative economic impact in the overall economic balance on the refined oil process cost.
Enzymatic Treatment
[0020] Yet another refining technique used in the vegetable oil industry is "enzymatic refining'" or "enzymatic degumming". Enzymatic degumming is used when the goal is the total removal of phospholipids. Generally, enzymatic degumming treatments of the prior art have been practiced on oils that have been degummed previously by one of the other methods, typically water degumming. For food applications, the enzyme degummed oil is sequentially submitted to bleaching and deodorizalion, a process known in the industry as '"physical refining." Enzymatic degumming provides a better oil yield than water, acid, or caustic degumming, with improved economic results.
[0021] The enzymatic reaction changes the nature of the phospholipid, cleaving some of the phospholipid parts. This reduces the phospholipids' emulsification properties, so that less oil is lost when the gums are separated from the oil, thus saving oil. Enzymes exhibiting activity with phospholipids are commonly called "'phospholipases". The types of phospholipase are based on the position on the phospholipid molecule at which the enzyme reacts, and are known as PLAl, PLA2, PLC, and PLD. The positions on the phospholipid molecule at which the different types of phospholipases react are illustrated in FlG. 3.
ClIl- 1627663 vl [0022J It may be seen in FIG. 3 that different types of phospholipases will yield different compounds upon reacting with the phospholipids. Further, each type of phospholipase has its own rate of reaction and its own optimal reaction conditions in terms of pH, water % and temperature. PLA when used alone generally requires a reaction time of at least about 4 hours, while PLC when used alone generally requires a reaction time of about one hour. It is known that enzymatic treatment should occur at a pH less than or equal to 8, in order to minimize undesirable oil saponification, but PLA has an optimum reaction pH of 4.5, while PLC has an optimum reaction pH of 7.0, Each enzyme also has different thermal tolerances. PLA enzymes will denature at about 500C while PLC enzymes will denature at about 65°C.
[0023] Sequences of amino acids with phospholipase activity are extensively reported in the literature and disclosed in patents, and some of those are reported to have activity on phospholipids present in vegetable oils. All this is known in the art.
[0024] One commercial PLAl enzyme product with phospholipase activity is Novozymes' phospholipase Al Lecitase® Ultra. This product is known to yield polar lyso- phospholipids and polar fatty acids when mixed with degummed oil with a 1-1.5% water citric acid-NaOH buffer at 4.5<pH<7.0 and 40°C<T<55°C, as described on Novozymes' Application Sheet Oils & Fats# 2002-185255-01 and 2002-05894-03. The PLAl selectively hydrolyzes the fatty acid opposite the phosphate functional group on the glycerol backbone, as illustrated in FlG. 4.
[0025] The resulting reaction yields a lyso -phospholipid and a fatty acid. The lyso- phospholipid molecule has lost one hydrophilic functional group, and the remaining alcohol group at the reaction site is hydrophilic. Now with two hydrophilic sites, the lyso-phospholipid molecule is water soluble, and has lost its emulsification properties. The PLAl degumming
CHI- 1627663 v 1 process thus reduces refining losses by no longer removing any neutral oil with the gums, and the only loss is the original phospholipid molecule.
[0026] While enzymatic degumming offers significant advantages to oil processors, it also poses certain disadvantages. One disadvantage is that the reaction of the enzyme with the phospholipids can be slow and time consuming. In particular, the reaction of phospholipase A enzymes with phospholipids can take many hours, depending on reaction variables such as pi L temperature, relative concentrations, and mixing conditions. Such prolonged reaction times can have a significant negative impact on the overall economic value of enzymatic degumming processes. Because of the slowness of the PLA reaction, enzymatic degumming is typically carried out on oil compositions that have been first been subjected to water degumming. Thus, the oil must be degummed twice to obtain a product that has a phosphorous level low enough for its intended purposes.
[0027] It is known in the art that PLC enzymes react with a phospholipid by selective!} hydrolyzing the phosphate functional group, as shown in FIG. 5. The resulting reaction yields a diacylglycerol ("4DAG") and a phosphatidic group. The diacylglycerol molecule no longer has the phosphate functional group and does not need to be removed. The PLC degumming process reduces the refining loss by retaining the original phospholipid molecule, while removing only the phosphate functional group. However, PLC does not react with all of the phospholipids present in the oil. Generally, PLC does not react with either phosphatidic acid (PA) or phosphatidic inositol (PI), illustrated in FIG, 2. Yet both PA and PI are non-hydratable phosphatides that remain in oil after water degumming. Thus the PLC-treated oil must be further treated with caustic to remove the residual gums.
[0028] It is known that certain PLCs will react with only certain phosphatidic groups. For example, a Pi-specific PLC, identified as PLPLC, is known.
CHI-I627663vf [0029] It is thus one aspect of the invention to provide a method for enzymatic degumming of oils wherein the enzymatic reaction rate is faster than in prior art enzymatic degumming processes.
[0030] It is another aspect of the invention to provide a method for enhancing the reaction rate of a phospholipase A enzyme used in an enzymatic degumming process.
[0031] It is yet another aspect of the present invention to provide a method for degumming an oil composition in which both hydratable and non-hydratable phospholipids can be treated in a single process.
[0032] It is yet another aspect of the present invention to provide such enzymatic degumming and treatment methods wherein the enzymatic reaction has a duration of less than about one hour.
[0033] The following references relate to the art of enzymatic degumming of oils.
[0034] U.S. 5,264,367 to Aakust et al. describes the use of phospholipases Al, A2, or B to treat oil that has first been refined to 50 to 250 ppm phosphorous. The technology described in this patent is known commercially as Enzymax®. Aalrust states that since these enzymes attack lecithin, '"it would make no sense to use the method of the invention on oils haλ'ing a high content of lecithin, such as raw soybean oil." The reaction is carried out at a temperature of 20 - 80 0C, with citric acid or a salt thereof at a pH range of 3-7. It is stated that the enzyme should be thoroughly distributed in the oil, with the enzyme-water solution present as droplets smaller than 10 μm in diameter. The form of measurement and calculations of the weight average were not disclosed. An emulsifier is used to dissolve the phospholipases obtained from pancreatin or pancreas products, which contain fat. Aalrust states that because the oil which is recovered contains less than 5 ppm of phosphorous, it is adaptable to be physically refined to edible oil. Later, details of the technology described by Aalrust were disclosed in several publications (Dahlke, K. and Eichelsbacher, M., Enzymax® and Alcon® -
CHI-1627663vl Lurgi's route to Physical Refining in Proceeding of the World Conference on Oilseed and Edible Oils Processing, Istanbul, Turkey, 1996, ed. Kaseoglu, Rhee and Wilson; Dalke, K. et al., First Experiences with Enzymatic Oil Refining, Inform, vol. 6, No. 12, Dec 1995). The data disclosed in these publications for industrial trials reinforce the use of the referred technology on oils with P content ranging from 40 to 180 ppm, and not higher. It is also disclosed that "The process does not require any special equipment. All pumps, agitators, mixers, and-heat exchangers, as well as the centrifuge, are of standard design and can be procured from various suppliers." Dahlke, K. and Eichelsbacher, M., Enzymax® and Alcon® - Lurgi's route to Physical Refining in Proceeding of the World Conference on Oilseed and Edible Oils Processing, Istanbul, Turkey, 1996, cd. Kaseoglu. Rhee and Wilson, page 56.
[0035] U.S. 5,532,163 to Yagi et al. discloses an enzymatic method using at least 30 weight parts water, and preferably 50-200 weight parts water, per 100 weight parts oil or fat, for the reaction of phospholipases Al, A2 or B with oil containing 100 to 10,000 ppm phosphorous. The oil is then washed with a 30% to 200% weight parts water or acidic aqueous solution per 100 weight parts oil or fat. The total water load required to utilize the process ranges from 60% to 400% w/w of oil processed. The production of such a large effluent in an industrial plant renders this method uneconomical.
[0036] U.S. 6,001.640 to Loeffler et al. discloses a process wherein one or more vegetable oils containing phosphorous-containing components are subjected to a mixture of phospholipases obtained from Aspergillus, the mixture comprising an enzyme having Al activity, A2 activity, or both, and an enzyme having lysophospholipase activity. The patent states that since phospholipase would attack lecithin, it is not practical to use that method with oils with a high lecithin content, such as crude soybean oil.
[0037] Loeffler et al. disclose that the enzymatic reaction should be run at a pH of less than 4, and with the emulsion drop size being below 20μm. The form of measurement and
10
CHl-1627663vl calculations of the emulsion drop size weight average were not disclosed. The patent states that the resulting product will have residual P of 15 ppm or less. It is known in the art that submitting the oil to pi I as low as A, or lower, will cause gums present in the oil to become hydrated and to separate from the reaction medium. The hydrated gums will act as emulsifiers. such that when they are separated they will carry oil with them, thus causing oil loss. No data on oil loss in the gums is presented.
[0038J U.S. 6,103,505 to Clausen et al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholi pases (Al3 A2, or B) for use in the enzymatic removal of phospholipids, and a method for producing the enzymes. The enzymatic degumming process utilizes the method described in US 5,264,367 without any additional process steps.
[0039) U.S. 6,127,137 to Hasida et al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholipases capable of removing both of the fatty acyl groups present on a phospholipid molecule when mixed with degummed oil (50 to 250 ppm phosphorous) with a 0.5 - 5% water, pH from 1.5 - 3, temperature from 30 - 45°C, and a time of 1 to 12 hours.
[0040] U.S. 6,143.545 to Clausen et al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholipases (Al, A2, or B) for use in the enzymatic removal of phospholipids, and a method for producing the enzymes. The enzymatic degumming process utilizes the method described in US 5,264,367 without any additional process steps.
[0041] U.S. 6,548,633 to Edwards et al. discloses sequences of cDNA"s encoding secreted proteins. At column 44, the patent states that the protein of that invention can be used in the enzyme degumming of vegetable oils as disclosed in U.S. 6,001,640. cited above. The patent further states in the same paragraph that the protein of that invention can be combined in a ''cocktail'" with other enzymes to improve feed utilization in animals.
[0042] U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/556,816 of Dayton et al. discloses an improved enzymatic degumming process wherein the pH of the buffered enzymatic reaction is
11
CHi-1627663V 1 lowered to below 4.5 after the enzymatic reaction is completed, thereby eliminating the fouling of the equipment, particularly the heat exchangers and the separating centrifuge, that would result from precipitation of calcium and magnesium salts at the optimum pH required for the enzyme activity.
[0043] U.S. 2004/0005399 Al of Chakrabarti et al. discloses an enzymatic method utilizing a single addition of enzyme and buffering system and a short retention / reaction time, followed by bleaching with 2-4% bleaching earth and 0-1% activated carbon, and then dewaxing to achieve an oil with a phosphorus content of 5 ppm. Both the bleaching process and dewaxing process will remove residual phosphorus from the oil. Additionally, Chakrabarti et al. states that the oil lost to the gums is in the range of 30-40% of the gums separated, suggesting that the enzymatic reaction did not go to completion, resulting in high oil losses due to emulsification of oil in the removed phospholipids.
[0044] U.S. 2005/0059130 Al of Bojsen at al. discloses the discovery and activity of certain phospholipases for use in the enzymatic removal of phospholipids, and a method for producing the enzymes. The publication refers to the treatment of vegetable oil to reduce the content of phospholipids as disclosed in U.S. 5,264,367.
[0045] U.S. 2005/0108789A1 of Gramatikova et al., now U.S. Patent no. 7,226,771 purports to disclose phospholipases (e.g., phospholipase A, B, C, D patatin enzymes) that efficiently cleave glycerophosphate ester linkages in oils, such as vegetable oils, to generate a water extractable phosphorylated base and a diglyceride. At paragraph 108, the application further states that such phospholipases can be used for enzymatic degumming of vegetable oils, and that the PLCs of the invention can be used in addition to or in place of PLAIs and PLA2s in commercial oil degumming, such as in the ENZYMAX® process, where phospholipids are hydrolyzed by PLAl and PLA2. At paragraph 474, the application states that PLC maλ be used alone or with PLA to remove non-hydratable phospholipids from oil that previous!} has
12
CHI- 1627663% 1 been water degummed. but does not provide reaction conditions for use of the two enzymes together. As the optimum reaction conditions of PLA enzyme and PLC enzyme are different. this statement in the application with no working examples does not teach one skilled in the art how to use PLA and PLC enzymes simultaneously. The application further states that phospholipases C. Dl and D2 may be employed in the enzymatic de gumming of previously degummed and non-degummed (crude) oils and as an aid to caustic refining.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0046] The invention relates to a method for degumming an oil composition, the method comprising
(a) providing an oil composition containing a quantity of phospholipids,
(b) contacting said oil composition simultaneously with one or more phospholipase A enzymes and one or more phospholipase C enzymes, under conditions sufficient for the enzymes to react with the phospholipids to create phospholipid reaction products, and
(c) separating the phospholipids reaction products from the oil composition, the remaining oil composition after the separation being a degummed oil composition, whereby during step (b) the reaction of said one or more phospholipase A enzymes proceeds at a faster rate than it would in the absence of said one or more phospholipase C enzymes. In a preferred embodiment, the reaction of step (b) continues for a duration of less than about one hour.
[00471 The amount of water necessary for the process of the present invention can be less than about 5%, and advantageously can be reduced to less than about 3%, and preferably to about 1.5-2.0%.
13
CHI-1627663vl [0048] The pH of the system can be adjusted either before or after the addition of one or all of the enzymes to the oil composition. The yield of oil is maximized based on the phospholipid composition contained in the crude.
10049] Specifically, this invention relates to a method in which both a Phospholipase C (PLC) enzyme and a Phospholipase A (PLA) enzyme are used together in an enzyme reaction to remove phospholipids present in oil. More specifically, this invention relates to adding in combination a Phospholipase C (PLC) and / or Phosphatidyl-Inositol specific Phospholipase C (PI-PLC) with Phospholipase Al (PLAl) and / or Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) to maximize oil yield and reduce the amount of waste products produced. Surprisingly, it has been found that the kinetics of the enzyme reactions proceed much more rapidly than expected when the two enzymes are used together than when either one is used separately. Further, it has been found that the reactions proceed more rapidly than expected even if the reaction conditions are not optimized for at least one of the enzymes. Further, it has been found that the reaction can proceed in less than about one hour, and can proceed as quickly as about thirty minutes.
[0050] Advantageously, the oil treated can be either a crude oil or a water-degummed oil. The enzymes can be added to the oil either separately or together, but the two enzymes will be in simultaneous contact with the oil. In accordance with the invention, enzymatic reaction parameters such as water concentration, temperature, pH, agitation time, and enzyme concentration can be controlled to optimize the reaction for a particular enzyme combination in a particular oil system.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0051] FIG. 1 is illustrates the chemical structures of generic phospholipids and generic triacylglycerols.
[0052] FIG. 2 illustrates functional groups and structures for common phospholipids.
14
CHI-1627663V 1 [0053J FlG. 3 illustrates the positions on the phospholipid molecule at which the different types of phospholipases react.
[0054] FlG. 4 illustrates the reaction of a phospholipid with a PLA 1 enzyme and the resulting products.
[0055] FIG. 5 illustrates the reaction of a phospholipid with a PLC enzyme and the resulting products.
[0056] FIG. 6 is a graph summarizing the results of Examples 13-30, in which the average residual phosphorous in the degummed sample is plotted for each level of each experimental factor being evaluated.
[0057] FlG. 7 is a graph summarizing the results of Examples 31-38, in which the average residual phosphorous in the degummed sample is plotted for each level of each experimental factor being evaluated.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0058] The present invention relates to an improvement in a process for enzymatically degumming an oil composition. The inventors have found that, surprisingly, using a combination of enzymes can improve the reaction kinetics of phospholipid cleavage, In particular an enzymatic degumming process conducted with a combination of a phospholipase C enzyme with a phospholipase A enzyme provides a degummed oil product with a lower phosphorus content in a shorter reaction time than would be achieved with phospholipase A alone. Further, it has been found that surprisingly the reaction can proceed in less than about one hour, and can proceed as quickly as about thirty minutes. This is particularly unexpected because PLA when used alone generall} requires a reaction time of at least about 4 hours, while PLC when used alone generally requires a reaction time of about one hour. Moreover PLA has an optimum reaction pH of 4.5, while PLC has an optimum reaction pH of 7.0. Each enzyme also has different thermal tolerances. The PLA enzyme will denature at about 500C
15
CHI-1627663vl while the PLC enzyme will denature al about 650C. In addition, it is known in the art that the thermal stability of enzymes can be improved via site specific mutations. Such cloned enzymes can be thermally stable at temperatures as high as 80°C, and the use of such cloned enzymes is contemplated in the present invention,
[0059] The reduction of the reaction time is evidenced by the PLA, When used in combination with PLC. the reaction time is dramatically reduced, and in some embodiments can be less than about 1 hour, even under acidic reaction conditions which are not optimum for PLC. The inventors further have found that under proper conditions it is possible to reduce the reaction time to as low as about 30 minutes.
[0060] It has been found that the water concentration can be adjusted to meet the needs of a particular processing environment. Thus, the water concentration can be decreased to about 1-2%, and particularly to about 1.5%, where it is desired to reduce the amount of wastewater produced by the process. Alternatively, the water concentration can be increased to about 4-5%, and particularly to about 4.5%, where it is desired to increase the efficienc; of the degumming process.
[0061] It is an advantage of the present invention that the oil to be degummed can be either crude oil, or previously degummed by one of the prior art methods. It is a distinct advantage to the oil processor to be able to accomplish the oil degumming in a single step. Oils that can be treated in accordance with the present invention may include but are not limited to the following: canola oil, castor oil, coconut oil, coriander oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil. hazelnut oil, hempseed oil, linseed oil, mango kernel oil, meadowfcam oil, neat's foot oil. olive oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, palm olein, peanut oil. rapeseed oil, rice bran oil, safllower oil, sasanqua oil. soybean oil, sunflower seed oil, tall oil, tsubaki oil. and vegetable oil.
[0062J The phospholipase A enzyme used in the method of the present im ention can be either a phospholipase Al enzyme or a phospholipase A2 enzyme. The phospholipase C
16
CI IH 627663 vl enzyme used in the present invention can be either a phospholipase C or an inositol specific phospholipase C. Many varieties of enzymes in the phospholipase Λ and phospholipase C families are available commercially; and it is contemplated that such enzymes and their equivalents will be suitable for use in the present invention.
[0063] In the method of the invention, the different phospholipases used together in an enzymatic degumming process of the present invention can be mixed together before being added to the oil to be treated. Alternatively, they can be added to the oil separately, either sequentially or simultaneously. Whether added sequentially or simultaneously, the enzymatic reaction will proceed at some point vvith both enzymes present in the rection mixture.
[0064] The degumming process of the present invention is carried out at a pH below about 8, preferable between about 3-7, and most preferably between about 4-5. The pH of the enzyme degumming process can be achieved by the addition of known buffers. Citric acid and sodium hydroxide are well known to be suited to this purpose. Other buffering agents can be used as needed to adjust the pH under specific reaction conditions.
[0065] The temperature of the enzymatic degumming process of the present invention can be in the range of about 40-800C, preferably in the range of about 40-600C, and more preferably in the range of about 45-55°C. Tt has been found that, surprisingly, under the methods of the present invention PLΛ degumming can proceed at a temperature above its own optimum of 45°C. and closer to the optimum operating temperature of PLC, without excessive denaturing.
[0066] The method of the present invention provides a single step degumming process in which the phospholipids content of an oil, even a crude oil, can be reduced to less than 50 ppm P, preferably less than 20 ppm P5 more preferably less than 10 ppm P, and most preferably less than 5 ppm P.
17
CHi-1627663V 1 [0067] After the enzymatic degumming has been completed and the degummed oil has been separated from the gums, the degummed oil can be subjected to further processing steps known in the art such as bleaching or deodorizing, as may be necessary or desirable depending on the end use for which the degummed oil product is intended.
[0068] Various preferred embodiments of the invention are set forth in the examples below, along with control examples using conditions of the prior art. In each of the examples below, the overhead mixer was a Heidolph mixer model Elector KG with a flat blade paddle; operated at 90 rpm for normal agitation and 350 rpm for vigorous agitation. The centrifuge was a De Laval Gyro - Tester installed with ''The Bowl Unit" for continuous separation. The centrifuge bowl was closed with the plug screws installed. Shear mixing was accomplished with an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer SD-45 with a G450 rotor stator at 10,000 rpm. The PLAl enzyme was Lecitase® Ultra (lot number LYN050070) sold by Novozymes A/S of Denmark, and having a concentration of 11.2 Units/mg. The PLA2 enzyme was Rohalase® MPL (Lot number Ch: 4738) sold by AB Knzymes located in Germany, and having a concentration of 2000 Units/mg. The PLC enzyme was Purifine1 M sold by Diversa Corporation of San Diego, California. For examples 1-12, the PLC was Lot BD16449, having a concentration of 205 Units/mg. For Examples 13-38, the PLC was Lot 90BU002A1 , having a concentration of 27.5 Units/mg. The amount of phospholipids remaining in the treated oil was measured as ppm P in accordance with the method of American Oil Chemists' Society Official Method Ca 20-99, "'Analysis of Phosphorus in Oil by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy."
Example 1
[0069] Control: Water Degumming - 1965.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 746 ppm phosphorous was heated to 70 - 75 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. To the warm oil, 39.4 grams of de-ionized water was added with vigorous agitation for
18
CHH 627663V X 1 minute. The mixer was slowed to normal speed (90 rpm) to allow the gums to flocculate for 30 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged, and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the waier-degummed oil was 80.7 ppm.
Example 2
[0070] Control: Single enzyme degumming with Phospholipase Al (PLAl)-- 1997.9 g of crude soybean oil containing 746 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % Ww solution of citric acid was added and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for one hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was at 40 - 45 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 40 - 45 0C, first 60.0 grams of de-ionized water was added and the mixture was shear mixed 1 minute, then 0.1044 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra PLAl was added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed with an o\ erhead mixer for 4 hours at a temperature range of 41 - 48 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLAl- degummed oil was 31.7 ppm.
Example 3
[0071] Control: Single enzyme degumming with Phospholipase C (PLC)- 201 1.1 grams of crude soybean oil containing 746 ppm phosphorous was heated to 55 - 60 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 60.3 grams of de-ionized water was added and the mixture was shear mixed for 1 minute. 0.1051 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase BD 16449 containing 205 U/mg) was added and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil
19
CHI-1627663vi mixture underwent normal agitation for 1 hour at 50 - 63 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged, and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC degummed oil was 70,9 ppm.
Example 4
[0072] Control: PLC followed by PLA Degumming - In this control example, the oil sample is reacted with each enzyme separately under the reaction conditions optimum for that enzyme, in accordance with the prior art, 2110.5 grams of crude soybean oil containing 560.1 ppm phosphorous was heated to 60 0C under normal agitation. 63 grams of dc-ionizcd water and 0.1123 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase BDl 6449 containing 205 U/mg) were added and the mixture sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 1 hour at 55 - 56 0C. The oil was then centrifuged, and the oil and wet gums were collected. To create a buffer of pH 4.5, first 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added to the PLC-degummed oil, the mixture was sheared for 1 minute, and ther agitated for one hour at normal speed with an overhead mixer; then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the oil mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds, 59 grams of de- ionized water was added and the mixture was shear mixed 1 minute. With the buffer established, 0.1061 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra PLAl was added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil was agitated at normal speed for 4 hours at a temperature range of approximately 45 0C. The oil was then centrifuged; the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequentially degummed oil was 3.2 ppm.
Example 5
[0073] PLC and PLAl together, neutral pH with a 1 hour reaction time at 45°C ~~ 2004.9 grams of crude soybean oil containing 560.1 ppm phosphorus v, as heated to 45 0C under normal agitation. With the oil at a neutral pH, 60 grams of de-ionized water, 0.1037
20
CHI-1627663v] grams of Di versa" s Purrlne1" (PLC enzyme) and 0.1076 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme) were added to the oil and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil and enzyme mixture was agitated at normal speed for 1 hour at a temperature of approximately 45 0C. The oil was then centrifuged, and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The oil treated with the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a neutral pH and 450C with one hour of reaction time produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 13.2 ppm.
[0074] This residual phosphorous value is significantly lower than that achieved with either PLA alone under its optimum conditions (Example 2), or PLC alone under its optimum conditions (Example 3).
Example 6
[0075] PLC and P LA 1 together, neutral pi I with a 4 hour reaction time at 45°C~ 2003.7 grams of crude soybean oil containing 560.1 ppm phosphorus was heated to 45 0C under normal agitation. 60 grams of de-ionized water, 0,1040 grams of Diversa's Purfϊne™ (PLC enzyme) and 0.1085 grams of Novozymes* Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme) were added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 4 hours at a temperature of approximately 45 0C. The oil was then centrifuged, and the separated oi! and wet gums were collected. The process using the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture with four hours of reaction time at a neutral pH produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 10.5 ppm,
[0076] This residual phosphorous value is only a slight improvement over that achieved in Example 5. indicating that an increase of the reaction time from one hour to four hours did not make a significant difference in the efficacy of the degumming process.
21
CHI-1627663V 1 Example 7
[0077] PLC and PLAl together, 4.5 pH with a 1 hour reaction time at 45°C- 2021.4 g of crude soybean oil containing 547.9 ppra phosphorous was healed to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for one hour. The oil was allowed to cool until the temperature reached 40 - 45 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. 61.0 grams of de-ionized water, 0.1 184 grams of Diversa's Purfϊne™ (PLC enzyme) and 0.1038 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme) were added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 1 hour at a temperature of approximately 45 0C. The oil was then cenlrifuged, and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The process using the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture with one hour of reaction time at a pLl of 4.5 and a temperature of 45°C produced a degummcd oil with a residual phosphorous of 2.4 ppm.
[0078] This residual phosphorous value is about the same, and even slightly better, than lhat achieved in Example 4 wherein each enzyme was reacted separately and at its own optimum conditions. Surprisingly, degumming efficacy is just as good when the two enzymes are run together at a reaction time not optimum for PLA, and at a pH and temperature not optimum for PLC, as for the two enzymes run separately, each at its own optimum conditions.
Example 8
[0079] PLC and PLAl together, 4.5 pH with a 4 hour reaction time at 45°C- 2069.3 g of crude soybean oil containing 547.9 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added, and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute, and then agitated at normal speed for one hour. The mixture was allowed to cool to 40 - 45 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was
22
CH I- 1627663 V 1 added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. 63 grams of de-ionized water, 0.1 112 grams of Diversa's Purfme1M (PLC enzyme) and 0,1258 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme) were added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 4 hours at a temperature of approximately 45 0C. The oil mixture was then centrifuged, and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The process using the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture with four hours of reaction time al a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 2.5 ppm.
[0080] This residual phosphorous value is about the same as that achieved in Example 7 indicating that an increase of the reaction time from one hour to four hours did not make a significant difference in the efficacy of the degumming process.
Example 9
[0081] PLC and PLAl together, 4.5 pHwilh a 1 hour reaction time at 55°C - 1985.2 g of crude soybean oil containing 547.9 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation. 2,0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute, then agitated a normal speed for one hour. The mixture was allowed to cool to 40 - 45 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. 63.0 grams of de-ionized water, 0.1085 grams of Diversa's Purfine™ (PLC enzyme) and 0.1045 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme) were added and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 1 hour at a temperature of 55°C. The oil wras then centrifuged; the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The process using the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture with one hour of reaction time at a pH of 4.5 and a reaction temperature of 55°C produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 2.3 ppm.
[0082] This residual phosphorous value is about the same as that achieved in Examples 7 and 8. indicating that an increase of the reaction temperature from about 45°C to about 55°C
23 αil-1627663vl did not make a significant difference in the efficacy of the degumming process, even though PLAl would normally be expected to denature at a temperature above 500C.
Example 10
[0083] PLC and 2 times PLAl concentration together, 4.5 pHw Uh a 1 hour reaction time at 45°C ~ 1992.2 g of crude soybean oil containing 547.9 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under agitation at normal speed. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and the mixture was sheared for 1 minute, then agitated for one hour. The mixture was allowed to cool to 40 - 45 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. To the mixture were added 60 grams of de-ionized water, 0,1319 grams of Diversa's Purfine™ (PLC enzyme) and 0,2139 grams of Novozymes" Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl enzyme), and the entire mixture was sheared for 1 minute. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 1 hour at a temperature range of 45 0C. The oil mixture was then centrifuged; the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The process using the PLC and twice the concentration of PLAl combined enzyme mixture with one hour of reaction time at a pll of 4,5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 7.0 ppm.
(0084] This residual phosphorous value is acceptable for certain applications but not quite as good as that achieved in Examples 7-9, indicating that, surprisingly, increasing the dosage of PLAl does not result in improved efficacy of the degumming process, even under reaction conditions optimum for PLAL
Example 11
[0085] PLC and P LU together, 4.5 pH with 1 hour retention time at 45°C - 1998.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 341.2 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an
24
CHI-1627663vl overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 40 - 45 0C, 0.1 112 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ ((PLC lipase BD16449 containing 205 U/mg) and 0.2094 grams Rohalase® MPL (Lot number Ch: 4738) sold by AB Enzymes were added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 40 — 45 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLΛ2 combined enzyme mixture at neutral pH produced a de gummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 3.3 ppm.
[0086] This example is similar to Example 7 above, but for the substitution of PLA2 for PLAl . The low residual phosphorous level in the finished product demonstrates that PLA2 can function about equally well as PLAl in the method of the present invention.
Example 12
{0087] PLC and PLA2 together, 4.5 pH with 4 hour retention time at 45°C - 1998.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 341.2 ppm phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C5 then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4,5. With the temperature maintained at 40 - 45°C. 0.1038 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ ((PLC lipase BDl 6449 containing 205 U/mg) and 0.2047 grams Rohalase® MPL (Lot number Ch: 4738) sold by AB Enzymes were added followed by 60
25
CHI-1627663V 1 grams of de- ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 4 hours at a temperature of 40 ~ 45 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifυged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLA2 combined enzyme mixture at neutral pll produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 5.8 ppm.
[00881 This example illustrates that increasing the reaction time from one to four hours did not result in better degumming, and in fact resulted in a higher level of residual phosphorous.
[0089] The results of the foregoing Examples 1-12 are summarized in Table 2 below.
Table 2
26
CHi- 1627663 V 1 Examples 13-30
[0090] A Design of Experiments (DOE) was set up to determine the ei'fects of certain process control variables for the enzymatic degumming process, as set forth in Table 3 below .
Table 3
[0091] Sequential - each enzyme was added separately, although both enzymes were in contact with the oil mixture during at least part of the reaction time
[0092] Simultaneous - both enzymes were added at the same time
[0093] pH - The pH at which the enzymes are exposed to the oil
[0094] Temperature - Temperature at which the enzymes are exposed to the oil
[0095] Agitation time - The time that the mixture is agitated at high speed after addition of each enzyme
[0096] Reaction l ime - Total time ihat at least one enz\me is in contact with oil [0097] These operational variables were evaluated in eighteen separate trials, presented herein as Examples 13-30. The values of each variable tested in each example 13-30 are set forth in Table 4 below.
27
CHI-1627663vl Table 4
Example 13
[0098] 1999.1 grams of crude soybean oil containing 769.5 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oii underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 1.5008 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added followed by 30 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 0.2132 grams of Novozymes" Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil
28
CHI-1627663V I mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential degummed oil was 6.5 ppm.
Example 14
[0099] 2010.5 grams of crude soybean oil containing 785.1 ppm of phosphorous was cooled to 60 0C under normal agitation utilizing and overhead mixer. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 1.5316 grams of Diversa's Purifϊne™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.2073 grams Novoz}mes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) were added followed by 30 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at neutral pH produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 109.6 ppm.
Example 15
1994.5 grams of crude soybean oil containing 785.1 ppm of phosphorous was cooled to 40 0C under normal agitation utilizing and overhead mixer. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 0.754 grams of Diversa's Purifϊne™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C. 0.2242 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential degummed oil was 27.4 ppm.
29
CHI-1627663vl Example 16
[00100] 2002.0 grams of crude soybean oil containing 785.1 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 50 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pll of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 0.7498 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added followed by 30 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 50 °C, 0.4064 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 50 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential degummed oil was 7.6 ppm.
Example 17
[00101] 2010.7 grams of crude soybean oil containing 785.1 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 50 0C under normal agitation utilizing and overhead mixer. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 1.4981 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized w ater and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 0.4143 grams of Novozymcs" Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed
30
CHI-1627663vl for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes at a temperature of 50 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential deguramed oil was 79.3 ppm.
Example Ϊ8
[00102] 2005.3 grams of crude soybean oil containing 742.9 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 0.7491 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 0.1220 grams of No\ozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC then PLAl sequential degummed oil was 2.2 ppm.
Example 19
[00103] 2000.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 742.9 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil
31
CHl- 1627663V] underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 2.2270 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1 ) and 0.3937 grams Novozymes' Ledtase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) were added followed by 30 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at pH 5.0 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 7.8 ppm.
Example 20
100104] 2006.3 grams of crude soybean oil containing 719.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 60 0C under normal agitation utilizing and overhead mixer. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 0.7561 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.4098 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) were added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at neutral pH produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 64.1 ppm.
Example 21
[00105J 1998.5 grams of crude soybean oil containing 719.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0
32
CHI-1627663v l grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C3 then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pli of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 1.4798 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added and 0.4018 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at pH 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 5.5 ppm.
Example 22
[00106] 2001.3 grams of crude soybean oil containing 719.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid v»as added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 2.2580 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 0.4126 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase© Ultra
33
CHM 627663V 1 (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl sequential treated degummed oil had a residual phosphorous of 2.1 ppm.
Example 23
[00107] 2002.0 grams of crude soybean oil containing 747.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C5 2.2194 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1 ) followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water were added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 0.2198 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 15 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl sequential treated degummed oil had a residual phosphorous of 4.6 ppm.
34
ClIl- 1627663vϊ Example 24
[00108| 2000.8 grams of crude soybean oil containing 747.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated Io 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2 0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 50 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 2.2500 grams of Diversa's Purifϊne™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added and 0.2216 grams Novozymes" Lecitase© Ultra (PLΛ1 lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 50 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then ceπtrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzjme mixture produced a degυmmed oil with a residual phosphorous of 1.8 ppm.
Example 25
[00109] 1998.9 grams of crude soybean oil containing 747.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer, 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 50 0C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 0.7445 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) was added and 0.2042 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot
35
CHJ-1627663V 1 number LYN05007) was added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water was and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 50 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then cenlriiuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 7.2 ppm.
Example 26
[00110] 1997 3 grams of crude soybean oil containing 810.8 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 1.5189 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 60 °C, 0.1 119 grams of Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture wras shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl sequential treated degummed oil had a residual phosphorous of 2.2 ppm.
36
CHI-1627663v l Example 27
[001111 2010.0 grams of crude soybean oil containing 810.8 ppra of phosphorous was cooled to 50 0C under normal agitation utilizing and overhead mixer. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 2.2608 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) followed by 30 grams of de-ionized water was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes. With the temperature maintained at 50 °C, 0.1 172 grams of Novozymcs' Lecitase® Ultra (PLΛ1 lipase lot number LYN05007) was added and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 60 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 50 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLA 1 sequential treated degummed oil at a neutral pH had a residual phosphorous of 72.6 ppm.
Example 28
[00112) 2005.1 grams of crude soybean oil containing 810.8 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 40 0C under normal agitation utilizing and overhead mixer. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 2.2622 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1031 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 60 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 60 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a neutral pH produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 61.5 ppm.
37
CHI-1627663vl Example 29
[00113] 2006.3 grams of crude soybean oil containing 795.3 ppra of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 50 °C, then 2.4 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was sheai mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 5.0. With the temperature maintained at 50 0C, 1.5373 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1168 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 50 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLA! combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 5.0 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 1.9 ppm.
Example 30
[001141 2006.1 grams of crude soybean oil containing 795.3 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 0.7736 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1072 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number
38
CHI-1627663V 1 LYN05007) was added followed b} 30 grams of de-ionizcd water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 13.7 ppm.
[00115] The results of Examples 13-30 in terms of phosphorous level is set forth in Table 5 below.
Table 5
[00116] A summary of the above experimental runs is illustrated in the graph shown in FiG. 6, which is a plot of the average final phosphorous amount at each level of each factor.
[001171 At a neutral pi r, optimum for the PLC enzyme, the combination of the two enzymes failed to produce an oil with acceptable phosphorous values allowing for the oil to be physically refined. However, at an acidic pH, optimum for the PLA enzyme, the
39
Ci π-1627663vl combination of enzymes added sequentiall} or together produced acceptable residual phosphorous levels in oils that would allow them to be physically refined. When an acidic pll is employed, only one of the experimental runs failed to produce an oil with a residual phosphorous of less than 10 ppm. Example 30 had a residual phosphorous level greater than 10 (13.7 ppm), and was produced with the lowest levels of both enzymes, the lowest temperature, the lowesl percentage of water, the shortest mixing and agitation times, and the most acidic pH.
{00118] A synergetic effect was discovered between the enzyme combination allowing the reaction to go to completion in less than 30 minutes, compared with 1 hour for the PLC enzymes or 4 hours for the PLA enzymes. Additional testing was completed to verify the effect of very short reaction time; the results are set forth in Table 6 below. In these additional tests, the pH was maintained at 4.5, in view of the finding above thai a lower pH produced significantly more favorable results than a neutral pH. The amount of PLAl also was held constant at 0.5 ppm, as it was determined above that increasing the amount of PLΛ1 above this level did not result in more effective degumming. Further, in each of these examples the enzymes were added simultaneously rather than sequentially, in view of the determination above that s.multaneoυs addition of enzymes produced better degumming results than sequential addition. Further, in an industrial process it is advantageous to limit the total process time, total equipment, and dedicated assets.
Table 6
40
CHl-1627663vi 37 Simultaneous 10 0.5 30 40 jό | zo__ 45
38 Simultaneous 10 0.5 120 60 T5 | Z0 120
Example 31
[00119] 2003.6 grams of crude soybean oil containing 784.8 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of cilric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 1.4603 grams of Diversa's Purifme1 M (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1021 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 40 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then ccntrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PI Al combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 10.7 ppm.
Example 32
[00120] 2004.8 grams of crude soybean oil containing 784.8 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature
41
CHI-1627663v S maintained at 60 0C, 0.7509 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1105 grams Novozymes: Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 6.7 ppm.
Example 33
[00121] 2000.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 697.7 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed Io cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With lhe temperature maintained at 40 0C, 0.7530 grams of Diversa's Purifϊne1 ^ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1022 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C, The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected, lhe residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 2.2 ppm.
Example 34
[00122] 1999.4 grams of crude soybean oil containing 714.2 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0
42
CHI- i 627663V I grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 1.508 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1139 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 40 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 16.5 ppm.
Example 35
[00123] 1999 grams of crude soybean oil containing 714,2 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 40 0C, 1.5010 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1060 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums wfere collected.
43
CHI-1627663vI The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 1.9 ppm.
Example 36
[00124J 1999 grams of crude soybean oil containing 695.1 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C, 1.5296 grams of Diversa's Purifine™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002Λ1) and 0.1241 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by 90 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged: and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 5.2 ppm.
Example 37
[00125 J 2005.2 grams of crude soxbean oil containing 695.1 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 40 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pH of 4.5. With the temperature
44
CHI-1627663vl maintained at 40 0C, 0.7422 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A! ) and 0.1 195 grams Novo/ymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN05007) was added followed by ^O grains of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 45 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 30 minutes at a temperature of 40 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 6.7 ppm.
Example 38
[00126] 1998 grams of crude soybean oil containing 695.1 ppm of phosphorous was heated to 75 - 80 0C under normal agitation utilizing an overhead mixer. 2.0 grams of 50 % w/w solution of citric acid was added and sheared for 1 minute. The oil underwent normal agitation for 1 hour with an overhead mixer. The oil was allowed to cool with agitation at normal speed until the oil temperature was 60 0C, then 1.8 milliliters of 4 molar sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the mixture was shear mixed for 10 seconds. The citric acid and caustic formed a weak buffer with a pi I of 4.5. With the temperature maintained at 60 0C5 0.7429 grams of Diversa's Purifme™ (PLC lipase lot number 90BU002A1) and 0.1041 grams Novozymes' Lecitase® Ultra (PLAl lipase lot number LYN 05007) was added followed by 40 grams of de-ionized water and the entire mixture was shear mixed for 120 seconds. The oil mixture was agitated at normal speed for 120 minutes at a temperature of 60 0C. The enzyme treated oil was then centrifuged; and the separated oil and wet gums were collected. The residual phosphorous in the PLC and PLAl combined enzyme mixture at a pH of 4.5 produced a degummed oil with a residual phosphorous of 4.4 ppm.
45
CIO- 1627663 V 1 Table 7
[00127| FIG. 7 is a chart summarizing Examples 31-38. plotting the average final phosphorous amount at each level of each factor holding pH, PLA dosage, and combined addition constant,
[00128] The five factors evaluated in these Examples 31-38 are listed below in order of the magnitude of their effect on the degumming process. The effects are the differences in average phosphorus lev el (in absolute value) between the high and low factor settings.
[00129J Increased water dosage lowers the residual phosphorous
[00130] Decreased PLC dosage lowers the residual phosphorous
[00131] Decreased reaction temperature lowers the residual phosphorus
[00132] Increased agitation lowers the residual phosphorous
[00133] Increased reaction time lowers the residual phosphorous
[00134] There has been disclosed a novel process for degumming of oils using a phospholipase A enzyme and a phospholipase C enzyme simultaneously. Tt has been found that, surprisingly, such a combination works better than either en/>me alone, even when by necessity one or the other of the enzymes is reacted under reaction conditions that are less than optimum for that enzyme. It also was a surprise to find that degumming at levels of less than about 10 ppm phosphorous, as low as about 5 ppm phosphorous, and even as low as about 3
46
CHI-] 627663 vl ppm phosphorous in the final product could be achieved under the proper conditions with reaction times as low as about thirty minutes. Further, without wishing to be bound by theory. it appears that either the PLC enzyme or one of its hydrolysis reaction products is catalyzing the reaction of the PLA enzyme, allowing for the reaction time to be significantly less than the reaction time for either of the single enzymes. These results are unexpected based on the known optimum reaction parameters for PLA and PLC enzymes.
[00135] Those skilled in the art will recognize from the foregoing disclosure that various operating parameters can be varied in the practice of the preseni invention, depending on the goals of a particular situation, while still remaining within the scope of the invention. For example, in determining the concentrations of the PLA and PLC enzymes to be used in a particular run, the choice will depend on whether the goal is to run at the lowest possible cost or the greatest possible performance. If the goal is to run at the lowest possible cost, then the concentration of PLA can be less than about 2,0 ppm, preferably less than about 1.0 ppm, and most preferably less than about 0.5 ppm. Such a low concentration of the PLA enzyme can still provide effective degumming in many situations. Conversely, if maximized performance is desired, the concentration of PLA is preferably at least about 0.5 ppm, more preferably at least about 1.0 ppm, and most preferably 2.0 ppm. Those skilled in the oil processing arts will understand how to vary the concentrations of the enzymes in the reaction mixture to obtain the desired balance of cost efficiency and product performance.
[00136] Variations in other processing conditions also are possible. The pH can be about 7.0, while pH of about 5.0 is preferable and pH of about 4.5 is presently preferred. The concentration of water in the system can be generally about 3.0%, but can be as low as about 1.5% if reduced wastewater is desired, or as high as about 4.5% if greater degumming efficiency is desired. The reaction temperature can be as high as about 600C, but is more preferably less than about 500C, and surprisingly most preferable at about 400C. The agitation
47
CHi-lό27663vl time during initial mixing is can be about 45 seconds, is more preferably about 60 seconds, and is most preferably about 120 seconds Finally, the duration of the enzyme reaction can be greatly reduced, in some embodiments to be advantageously less than about 60 minutes, and preferably about 30 minutes.
[00137] While preferred embodiments of the invention have been set forth herein, other embodiments encompassing the inventive method will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and all such embodiments and their equivalents are intended to be covered by this application and encompassed by the claims hereof.
48
CH I- 1627663 V S

Claims

We claim:
1. In a method for dcgumraing an oil composition, the method comprising
(a) providing an oil composition containing a quantity of phospholipids,
(b) contacting said oil composition simultaneously with one or more phospholipase A enzymes and one or more phospholipase C enzymes, under conditions sufficient for the enzymes to react with the phospholipids to create phospholipid reaction products, and
(c) separating the phospholipid reaction products from the oil composition, the remaining oil composition after the separation being a degummed oil composition, whereby during step (b) the reaction of said one or more phospholipase Λ enzymes proceeds at a faster rate than it would in the absence of said one or more phospholipase C enzymes.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the duration of the reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids is less than one hour.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the duration of the reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids is about thirty minutes.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said one or more phospholipase A enzymes are selected from the group consisting of a phospholipase Al enzyme and a phospholipase A2 enzyme.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said one or more phospholipase C enzymes are selected from the group consisting of a phospholipase C enzyme and a phosphatidyl-inositol specific phospholipase C enzyme.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids occurs at a pH of about 3-7.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids occurs at a pH of aboul 4-5.
49
CHI-1627663 vl
8. I he method of claim 1 wherein said reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids occurs at a temperature of about 40-800C.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein said reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids occurs at a temperature of about 40-60°C.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein said reaction of the enzymes with the phospholipids occurs at a temperature of about 45-55°C.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein said oil composition comprises a crude oil.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein said oil composition comprises a previously degummed oil.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein said PLC enzyme is present in a quantity of about 30 ppm of active enzyme or less.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said PLC enzyme is present in a quantity of about 20 ppm of active enzyme or less.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said PLC enzyme is present in a quantity of about 10 ppm of active enzyme or less.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein said PLA enzyme is present in a quantity of about 2 ppm of active enzyme or less.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein said PLA enzyme is present in a quantity of about 1 ppm of active enzyme or less.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein said PLA enzyme is present in a quantity of about 0.5 ppm of active enzyme or less.
19. The method of claim 1 wherein during step (b) the mixture of the oil composition and the enzymes is initially shear mixed.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein said shear mixing continues for a duration of at least about 45 seconds.
50
Cm-1627663vl
21. The method of claim 1 wherein during step (b) a quantity of water is added.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein said quantity of water is at least about 1.5% by weight of the total mixture.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein said quantity of water is ai least about 3.0% by weight of the total mixture.
24. The method of claim 23 wherein said quantity of water is at least about 4.5% by weight of the total mixture.
25. The method of claim 1 wherein the degummed oil composition of step (c) has a phospholipid content measured as parts per million of phosphorous of about 50 ppm or less.
26. The method of claim 25 wherein said phospholipid content is about 20 ppm or less.
27. The method of claim 26 wherein said phospholipid content is about 10 ppm or less.
28. The method of claim 27 wherein said phospholipid content is about 5 ppm or less.
29. An oil degumming process comprising the step of reacting a phospholipase A enzyme with phospholipids in an oil composition, the method characterized in that the oil composition is contacted simultaneously with at least one phospholipase A enzyme and at least one phospholipase C enzyme to react with the phospholipids in the oil composition, under reaction conditions such that the phosphoHpase A enzyme reaction proceeds at a faster rate than it would in the absence of the phospholipase C enzyme.
51
CHM627663vϊ
EP08728362.8A 2007-01-30 2008-01-28 Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases Active EP2118248B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL08728362T PL2118248T3 (en) 2007-01-30 2008-01-28 Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/668,921 US8956853B2 (en) 2007-01-30 2007-01-30 Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of PLA and PLC phospholipases
US11/853,339 US8460905B2 (en) 2007-09-11 2007-09-11 Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of PLA and PLC phospholipases with reduced reaction time
PCT/US2008/052162 WO2008094847A1 (en) 2007-01-30 2008-01-28 Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2118248A1 true EP2118248A1 (en) 2009-11-18
EP2118248B1 EP2118248B1 (en) 2014-08-27

Family

ID=39428274

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08728362.8A Active EP2118248B1 (en) 2007-01-30 2008-01-28 Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2118248B1 (en)
CN (1) CN105038978B (en)
BR (1) BRPI0808024B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2676412C (en)
DK (1) DK2118248T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2523300T3 (en)
MX (1) MX2009007919A (en)
PL (1) PL2118248T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2477746C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2008094847A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6936289B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2005-08-30 Danisco A/S Method of improving the properties of a flour dough, a flour dough improving composition and improved food products
DK1387616T3 (en) 2001-05-18 2007-09-24 Danisco Process for preparing a dough with an enzyme
DE602004030000D1 (en) 2003-01-17 2010-12-23 Danisco PROCESS FOR IN-SITU-PRODUCTION OF AN EMULSIFIER IN A FOODSTUFF
JP5604032B2 (en) 2004-07-16 2014-10-08 デュポン ニュートリション バイオサイエンシーズ エーピーエス Method for enzymatic degumming of edible oil
WO2009081094A2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-07-02 Danisco A/S Process
GB0904787D0 (en) 2009-03-20 2009-05-06 Desmet Ballestra Engineering Sa Improved enzymatic oil recuperation process
DE102009051013A1 (en) 2009-10-28 2011-06-09 Ab Enzymes Gmbh Cloning, expression and use of acid phospholipases
WO2012062817A1 (en) * 2010-11-12 2012-05-18 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having phospholipase c activity and polynucleotides encoding same
ES2495991T3 (en) * 2011-11-09 2014-09-18 Alfa Laval Corporate Ab Enzymatic degumming
BR112014020280A8 (en) * 2012-02-17 2017-07-11 Clariant Produkte Deutschland Gmbh METHOD FOR ENZYME DESUMING AND TRIGLYCERIDE DESUMING METHOD
EP2861701B1 (en) * 2012-06-14 2018-12-19 Bunge Global Innovation, LLC. Process for production of low saturate oils
UA115886C2 (en) 2012-10-31 2018-01-10 Альфа Лавал Корпорейт Аб Enzymatic degumming
RU2015126866A (en) * 2012-12-11 2017-01-19 Новозимс А/С POLYEPEPTIDES POSSESSING THE ACTIVITY OF PHOSPHOLIPASE C, AND POLINUCLEOTIDES CODING THEM
EP2792735A1 (en) 2013-04-16 2014-10-22 Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH Method for improving the aqueous enzymatic degumming of vegetable oils
EP2799531A1 (en) 2013-05-03 2014-11-05 Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH Use of phosphatases for the enzymatic degumming of triglycerides
EP2910129A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2015-08-26 Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH Composition for enzymatic sludge removal from oil
CN106103704A (en) 2014-03-19 2016-11-09 诺维信公司 There are the polypeptide of phospholipase C activity and the polynucleotides of these polypeptide of coding
AR102318A1 (en) * 2014-05-15 2017-02-22 Novozymes As COMPOSITIONS THAT INCLUDE POLIPEPTIDES THAT HAVE ACTIVITY PHOSPHOLIPASE C AND ITS USES
AR104205A1 (en) 2015-04-09 2017-07-05 Dsm Ip Assets Bv PHOSPHOLIPASE C
WO2018186734A1 (en) * 2017-04-06 2018-10-11 Purac Biochem B.V. Enzymatic degumming of unrefined triglyceride oil
CN108085131A (en) * 2017-12-25 2018-05-29 无锡德合食品科技有限公司 Cryogenic technique integrates the method for preparing high-quality rapeseed oil
CN115678674A (en) * 2022-10-31 2023-02-03 武汉轻工大学 Degumming rice bran crude oil and degumming method for refining rice bran oil by using adsorbent and composite phospholipase

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06306386A (en) * 1993-04-25 1994-11-01 Showa Sangyo Co Ltd Refining of fat or oil
DE4339556C1 (en) * 1993-11-19 1995-02-02 Metallgesellschaft Ag Process for degumming vegetable oil by means of enzymes
AR017484A1 (en) * 1998-04-08 2001-09-05 Novozymes As AN ENZYMATIC DEGOMING PROCESS OF EDIBLE OIL
US7226771B2 (en) * 2002-04-19 2007-06-05 Diversa Corporation Phospholipases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2008094847A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2118248B1 (en) 2014-08-27
CA2676412A1 (en) 2008-08-07
CA2676412C (en) 2015-10-06
WO2008094847A1 (en) 2008-08-07
PL2118248T3 (en) 2015-03-31
BRPI0808024A2 (en) 2014-06-17
ES2523300T3 (en) 2014-11-24
MX2009007919A (en) 2009-08-27
BRPI0808024B1 (en) 2017-05-16
RU2009132518A (en) 2011-03-10
CN105038978A (en) 2015-11-11
DK2118248T3 (en) 2014-11-03
RU2477746C2 (en) 2013-03-20
CN105038978B (en) 2017-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2676412C (en) Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of pla and plc phospholipases
US8956853B2 (en) Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of PLA and PLC phospholipases
JP2937746B2 (en) Oil and fat refining method
CA2711359C (en) Generation of triacylglycerols from gums
US8460905B2 (en) Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of PLA and PLC phospholipases with reduced reaction time
US11505763B2 (en) Enzymatic degumming of unrefined triglyceride oil
Li et al. Enhancing the performance of a phospholipase A1 for oil degumming by bio-imprinting and immobilization
US8435766B2 (en) Enzymatic oil recuperation process
Sein et al. Enzymes in vegetable oil degumming processes
JP4938450B2 (en) Method for producing monoacylglyceride and diacylglyceride-containing emulsifier by enzyme
RU2637134C2 (en) Improved method for water-enzymic degumming of vegetable oils
Zhang et al. Enzymes in oil and lipid based industries
EP1363502A2 (en) Methods for treating organic acid-treated phosphatides
US11091721B2 (en) Enzymatic degumming of unrefined triglyceride oil
ÇAVDAR Enzyme Applications in Oil Refining

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090828

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20130801

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20140602

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 684552

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008034092

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20141009

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20141031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2523300

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20141124

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 684552

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141229

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141127

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141128

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141127

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141227

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008034092

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20150528

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150131

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E024047

Country of ref document: HU

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140827

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20161213

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20161213

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20161220

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20170106

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: FP

Effective date: 20141105

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180128

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20210113

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20210111

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20220131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220131

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20221208

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20221213

Year of fee payment: 16

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230527

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240201

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240129

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240129

Year of fee payment: 17