EP2051826B1 - Iron-based powder - Google Patents

Iron-based powder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2051826B1
EP2051826B1 EP07748599A EP07748599A EP2051826B1 EP 2051826 B1 EP2051826 B1 EP 2051826B1 EP 07748599 A EP07748599 A EP 07748599A EP 07748599 A EP07748599 A EP 07748599A EP 2051826 B1 EP2051826 B1 EP 2051826B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
entry
row
powder
max
sintering
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP07748599A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2051826A1 (en
Inventor
Ove H. MÅRS
Ingrid Hauer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hoganas AB
Original Assignee
Hoganas AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hoganas AB filed Critical Hoganas AB
Publication of EP2051826A1 publication Critical patent/EP2051826A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2051826B1 publication Critical patent/EP2051826B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/10Sintering only
    • B22F3/1003Use of special medium during sintering, e.g. sintering aid
    • B22F3/1007Atmosphere
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/02Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes
    • B22F9/06Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material
    • B22F9/08Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying
    • B22F9/082Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0257Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements
    • C22C33/0278Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5%
    • C22C33/0285Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5% with Cr, Co, or Ni having a minimum content higher than 5%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/20Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/42Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/02Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes
    • B22F9/06Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material
    • B22F9/08Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying
    • B22F9/082Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid
    • B22F2009/0824Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid with a specific atomising fluid
    • B22F2009/0828Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid with a specific atomising fluid with water
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2998/00Supplementary information concerning processes or compositions relating to powder metallurgy
    • B22F2998/10Processes characterised by the sequence of their steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2999/00Aspects linked to processes or compositions used in powder metallurgy

Definitions

  • the invention concerns atomised iron based powders having good high temperature oxidation resistance, more particular powders which are pre-alloyed with chromium and aluminium.
  • FeCrAl-alloys Conventional iron based alloys containing typically Fe and 10-30% Cr and 1-10% A1, so-called FeCrAl-alloys, have been found highly useful in various high temperature applications, due to their good oxidation resistance and can be used at temperatures as high as 1200-1400 DEG C. Thus, such materials have been used in the production of electrical resistance elements and as carrier materials in motor vehicle catalysts. As a result of its aluminium content, the alloy is able to form at high temperatures and in the majority of atmospheres an impervious and adhesive surface oxide consisting substantially of A1203. This oxide protects the metal against further oxidation and also against many other forms of corrosion, such as carburization, sulphuration etc.
  • US5970306 describes a method for manufacturing high temperature resistant shaped parts from a FeCrAl-powder by hot isostatically pressing (HIP).
  • HIP hot isostatically pressing
  • DE4235141 descibes a method of producing a part made from hot pressed powder based on a FeCrAl-alloy in which the powder is initially exposed to an oxygen-contg. atmos. to produce an chromium oxide protective layer around the particles.
  • US6761751 describes a method of producing an FeCrAl material by gas atomization, wherein in addition to containing iron (Fe), chromium (Cr) and aluminium (Al) the material also contains minor fractions of one or more of the materials molybdenum (Mo), hafnium (Hf), zirconium (Zr), yttrium (Y), nitrogen (N), carbon (C) and oxygen (O).
  • JP8120435 relates to a thermal spray material/powder comprising by weight 1 -15% of Cu, 4-10 % Al, 7-20 % of Cr and 0.02-2 % of at least one rare earth element and the balance Fe with inevitable impurities, for spraying the inner face of glass moulds for providing heat resistance.
  • This object is to provide a method of producing a sintered component comprising providing an atomised iron based powder pre-alloyed with 10,5-30 wt% Cr, 3-15 wt% Al and 5-20 wt% Cu.
  • pre-alloying the powder with Cu it is possible to sinter a component in conventional sintering processes and maintaining satisfactory material properties of the sintered component which component also have excellent high temperature oxidation resistance.
  • an iron based powder pre-alloyed with 10,5-30 wt% Cr, 3-15 wt% All, 5-20 wt% Cu and 8-20 wt% Ni is proposed.
  • the powders of the invention are preferably produced by providing a melt of iron and the alloying elements, water atomizing the melt whereby the powder forms from atomized droplets upon solidification.
  • a sintered component can be produced from the powders of the invention by a) providing a sintering material comprising the powder of the invention; b) forming a green body from the sintering material; and c) sintering the green body in a reducing or neutral atmosphere, at an atmospheric pressure or below, and at a temperature above 1100°C.
  • the sintering material could e.g. be loose sintered, cold compacted or warm compacted.
  • the sintering material is a mixture between a binder and/or a lubricant with the powder of the invention.
  • Cold compaction is performed at temperatures below 100°C, preferably at a compaction pressure within the range of 100 -1000 MPa.
  • Warm compaction is performed at temperatures within the range of 100-200 °C, preferably at a compaction pressure within the range of 300 -1000 MPa.
  • the sintering material could be a mixture between a binder and/or a lubricant with the powder of the invention, but also the powder it self i.e. without mixing the powder with a binder and/or a lubricant.
  • the sintering material could be poured into a form where after the form containing the sintering material is inserted into the sintering furnace. For instance filters having excellent high temperature oxidation resistance can be produced by loose sintering the powder of the invention.
  • a sintered component which exhibits excellent high temperature oxidation resistance may be produced from the powder of the invention which sintered component has a sintered density above 6,5 g/cm 3 , a tensile strength above 500 MPa and a yield strength above 400 MPa.
  • the invention concerns pre-alloyed iron based powders comprising more than 10,5 wt% chromium, as well as certain amounts of aluminium and copper.
  • FeCrAl-alloys have been shown to exhibit excellent oxidation resistance at high temperatures, but are unfortunately difficult to sinter under atmospheric pressure or below (vacuum). That is the reason why compounds based on FeCrAl powders are produced by the HIP- process (as described in e.g. US5970306 ).
  • pre-alloying with copper was reduced with an improved sintered structure as the outcome - compared to a reference material without copper.
  • the copper content is shown to facilitate the formation of sintering necks as can be seen from the accompanying metallographic pictures. We believe that this effect occurs due to a break-up of the aluminium oxide layer by iiquidised copper. Admixing copper and a FeCrAl-powder were also tested but sintering did not significantly improve in that case.
  • the powders of the invention are made by making a melt of iron and the desired alloying elements.
  • the melt is thereafter atomised whereby the powder is formed from the atomized droplets upon solidification.
  • the atomization is performed according to conventional technology, e.g. gas or water atomization.
  • the melt blend is water atomized, since a water atomised powder is easier to compact than a gas atomized powder.
  • the powder forms due to the water atomization the powder is oxidized and thin chromium and aluminium oxide layers forms on the surface of the powder particles.
  • the aluminium content should be above 3%, preferably the aluminium content should be above 5%, in order to obtain the desired oxidation resistance.
  • the upper limit for the aluminium content is set to 15 wt%, and in fact it is preferred to have the aluminium content below 12 wt%.
  • the boundaries for the copper content were derived from the tests described below. Accordingly it the copper content should be above 5 wt% to facilitate the formation of sintering necks and providing a sintered component having good high temperature oxidation resistance. Further the Cu-content should be below 20 wt%, powders having higher Cu-content may very well be useful for certain applications, but they are not within the scope of the present invention.
  • Figure 1 shows the Fe-Cu phase diagram, but it is believed that that Cu will influence a system in a similar way.
  • a certain amount of liquid phase must be formed, i.e. the area of ( ⁇ Fe +L) is of interest. Since the diagram is for the pure Fe-Cu system the information retrieved from it can only be used as a guideline.
  • the amount of liquid phase formed during the sintering is required to break up the aluminium oxides but excess amounts of liquid phase collapses the structure during sintering.
  • the amount of liquid phase formed is related to the chemical composition and the sintering temperature. The element having the strongest influence of the formation of liquid is copper. That is why different sintering temperatures depending of copper content of the samples were applied before the oxidation test.
  • the powder can also be pre-alloyed with austenite-foming elements in particular nickel, but also the nickel equivalent manganese.
  • austenite-foming elements in particular nickel, but also the nickel equivalent manganese.
  • nickel is also known to have a beneficial effect on the oxidation resistance which of course is desirable in the applications intended for the powders of the invention.
  • nickel is to be included in the powder it is preferred that the nickel content is in the interval of 8-20 wt%.
  • Manganese can also be an additional austenite forming alloying element, preferably the manganese content is below 3 wt%.
  • Cobalt is normally not used since it is comparably expensive.
  • the carbon content is low, since carbon has a tendency to cause intergranular corrosion why preferably the carbon content should be less than 0,1 wt% carbon.
  • the carbon content was about 0,02 wt% or lower.
  • the nitrogen content is below 0,2 wt%.
  • test samples and the reference sample were produced by filling a form (10mm diameter and 2mm thickness) with the powder of interest, followed by smoothing out the surface without compacting the powder. This procedure provides samples with high specific area (ca 45% porosity).
  • test samples were sintered in a 100 % hydrogene atmosphere for 30 minutes at a temperature depending of the Cu content according to the following table: 5 % Cu 1150 °C 10 % Cu 1320 °C 15%Cu 1350 °C 20 % Cu 1320 °C
  • the reference sample was sintered in a 100% hydrogen atmosphere for 30 minutes at 1320 °C.
  • the oxidation tests were carried out in a laboratory furnace, a Lenton 12/50/300, at a temperature of 800 °C in air.
  • Six samples could be tested at the same time by placing them on a sample holder and at each test run two of the samples were reference samples.
  • Powder 2 and 3 were further tested at different oxidation temperatures.
  • the following table shows the increase in weight relative to the reference 310B.
  • Table 2 shows that difference in oxidation resistance between samples containing Cu and Al and reference samples is further pronounced at temperatures above 800 degree Celcius. Furthermore, the composition having a Al content of 5,5 % and a Cu content of 15 % seems to have better oxidation resistance compared to the composition having 10 Al and 10 % Cu.
  • the table 3 shows that the density and the mechanical properties of Al- containing Cr or Cr-Ni stainless steel powders increases considerably if the powder are pre-alloyed with Cu. This indicates much improved sintering activity.
  • FIG. 2A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al +10Cu+ bal.
  • FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a corresponding reference test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al+ bal.
  • FIG 3A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al + 18Ni + 8Cu+ bal.
  • Fe and FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a corresponding reference test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al+ 18Ni + bal.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Metal Powder And Suspensions Thereof (AREA)
  • Electroplating And Plating Baths Therefor (AREA)
  • Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)

Abstract

An atomised pre-alloyed iron-based powder which comprises by weight-% <tables id="TABLE-US-00001" num="00001"> <table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"> <tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="3"> <colspec colname="offset" colwidth="63pt" align="left"/> <colspec colname="1" colwidth="84pt" align="left"/> <colspec colname="2" colwidth="70pt" align="left"/> <THEAD> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <entry namest="offset" nameend="2" align="center" rowsep="1"/> </ROW> </THEAD> <TBODY VALIGN="TOP"> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY>10.5-30</ENTRY> <ENTRY>Cr</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY> 3-15</ENTRY> <ENTRY>Al</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY> 5-20</ENTRY> <ENTRY>Cu</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY>max 0.1</ENTRY> <ENTRY>C</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY>max 0.2</ENTRY> <ENTRY>N</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY>max 3.0</ENTRY> <ENTRY>Mn</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY>max 2.5</ENTRY> <ENTRY>Si</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <ENTRY>max 3.0</ENTRY> <ENTRY>Mo</ENTRY> </ROW> <ROW> <ENTRY/> <entry namest="offset" nameend="2" align="center" rowsep="1"/> </ROW> </TBODY> </TGROUP> </TABLE> </TABLES> balance essentially only iron and unavoidable impurities.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The invention concerns atomised iron based powders having good high temperature oxidation resistance, more particular powders which are pre-alloyed with chromium and aluminium.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Conventional iron based alloys containing typically Fe and 10-30% Cr and 1-10% A1, so-called FeCrAl-alloys, have been found highly useful in various high temperature applications, due to their good oxidation resistance and can be used at temperatures as high as 1200-1400 DEG C. Thus, such materials have been used in the production of electrical resistance elements and as carrier materials in motor vehicle catalysts. As a result of its aluminium content, the alloy is able to form at high temperatures and in the majority of atmospheres an impervious and adhesive surface oxide consisting substantially of A1203. This oxide protects the metal against further oxidation and also against many other forms of corrosion, such as carburization, sulphuration etc.
  • A problem in powder metallurgy however is that that FeCrAl-powders are difficult to sinter, due to the fact that the aluminium oxide is harder to reduce than the chromium oxide. The formation of sintering necks through diffusion is impaired by the aluminium oxide layer and it would be advantageous if this problem could be overcome.
  • US5970306 describes a method for manufacturing high temperature resistant shaped parts from a FeCrAl-powder by hot isostatically pressing (HIP).
  • DE4235141 descibes a method of producing a part made from hot pressed powder based on a FeCrAl-alloy in which the powder is initially exposed to an oxygen-contg. atmos. to produce an chromium oxide protective layer around the particles.
  • US6761751 describes a method of producing an FeCrAl material by gas atomization, wherein in addition to containing iron (Fe), chromium (Cr) and aluminium (Al) the material also contains minor fractions of one or more of the materials molybdenum (Mo), hafnium (Hf), zirconium (Zr), yttrium (Y), nitrogen (N), carbon (C) and oxygen (O).
  • US6569221 describes a powder metallurgical FeCrAl alloy comprising, in weight %, less than 0.02% carbon; greater than 0.0 and <=0.5% silicon; greater than 0.0 and <=0.2% manganese; 10.0-40.0% chromium; <=0.6% nickel; <=0.01% copper; 2.0-10.0% aluminum; one or more of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb and Ta in an amount of 0.1-1.0; remainder iron and unavoidable impurities.
  • JP8120435 relates to a thermal spray material/powder comprising by weight 1 -15% of Cu, 4-10 % Al, 7-20 % of Cr and 0.02-2 % of at least one rare earth element and the balance Fe with inevitable impurities, for spraying the inner face of glass moulds for providing heat resistance.
  • Data Sheet from Kanthal APM, Wire, Ferritic Resistance Alloy, 1994-09-30, Issue 3 relates to an advanced powder metallurgical dispersion strengthened ferritic FeCrAl alloy for producing wires.
  • "Pre-mixed Partially Alloyed Iron Powder for Warm Compaction: KIP Clean Mix HW Series" by Yukiko Ozaki, Shigeru Unam, Satoshi Uenosono (Kawasaki Steel Technical Report No 47, December 2002, pages 48-54) discloses iron powder premixes designed for warm compaction, comprising Fe, Ni, Cu and Mo.
  • OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the invention to provide a method for producing a sintered compound having a good sintered structure when sintered in conventional sintering processes, e.g. loose sintering, cold compaction or warm compaction, and which sintered components have good high temperature oxidation properties. More specific it is an object of the invention to provide a stainless iron powder comprising more than 10,5 wt% chromium and 3-15 wt% aluminium, but which powder is easier to sinter than what is known in the prior art.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • This object is to provide a method of producing a sintered component comprising providing an atomised iron based powder pre-alloyed with 10,5-30 wt% Cr, 3-15 wt% Al and 5-20 wt% Cu. By pre-alloying the powder with Cu it is possible to sinter a component in conventional sintering processes and maintaining satisfactory material properties of the sintered component which component also have excellent high temperature oxidation resistance.
  • Further in a second embodiment an iron based powder pre-alloyed with 10,5-30 wt% Cr, 3-15 wt% All, 5-20 wt% Cu and 8-20 wt% Ni is proposed.
  • The powders of the invention are preferably produced by providing a melt of iron and the alloying elements, water atomizing the melt whereby the powder forms from atomized droplets upon solidification.
  • A sintered component can be produced from the powders of the invention by a) providing a sintering material comprising the powder of the invention; b) forming a green body from the sintering material; and c) sintering the green body in a reducing or neutral atmosphere, at an atmospheric pressure or below, and at a temperature above 1100°C.
  • The sintering material could e.g. be loose sintered, cold compacted or warm compacted.
  • Concerning cold compaction or warm compaction the sintering material is a mixture between a binder and/or a lubricant with the powder of the invention.
  • Cold compaction is performed at temperatures below 100°C, preferably at a compaction pressure within the range of 100 -1000 MPa.
  • Warm compaction is performed at temperatures within the range of 100-200 °C, preferably at a compaction pressure within the range of 300 -1000 MPa.
  • Loose sintering is performed without compacting the green body. Here the sintering material could be a mixture between a binder and/or a lubricant with the powder of the invention, but also the powder it self i.e. without mixing the powder with a binder and/or a lubricant. E.g. when not using a binder the sintering material could be poured into a form where after the form containing the sintering material is inserted into the sintering furnace. For instance filters having excellent high temperature oxidation resistance can be produced by loose sintering the powder of the invention.
  • Further, it has been shown that a sintered component which exhibits excellent high temperature oxidation resistance may be produced from the powder of the invention which sintered component has a sintered density above 6,5 g/cm3, a tensile strength above 500 MPa and a yield strength above 400 MPa.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
    • FIG.1 shows a Fe-Cu phase diagram, and
    • FIG 2A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al, Cu and Fe, and
    • FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al and Fe, and
    • FIG 3A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al, Cu, Ni and Fe, and
    • FIG 3B shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al, Ni and Fe.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention concerns pre-alloyed iron based powders comprising more than 10,5 wt% chromium, as well as certain amounts of aluminium and copper. As described above FeCrAl-alloys have been shown to exhibit excellent oxidation resistance at high temperatures, but are unfortunately difficult to sinter under atmospheric pressure or below (vacuum). That is the reason why compounds based on FeCrAl powders are produced by the HIP- process (as described in e.g. US5970306 ). By also pre-alloying with copper the problems with the sintering was reduced with an improved sintered structure as the outcome - compared to a reference material without copper. The copper content is shown to facilitate the formation of sintering necks as can be seen from the accompanying metallographic pictures. We believe that this effect occurs due to a break-up of the aluminium oxide layer by iiquidised copper. Admixing copper and a FeCrAl-powder were also tested but sintering did not significantly improve in that case.
  • The powders of the invention are made by making a melt of iron and the desired alloying elements. The melt is thereafter atomised whereby the powder is formed from the atomized droplets upon solidification. The atomization is performed according to conventional technology, e.g. gas or water atomization. In fact it is highly preferred that the melt blend is water atomized, since a water atomised powder is easier to compact than a gas atomized powder. When the powder forms due to the water atomization the powder is oxidized and thin chromium and aluminium oxide layers forms on the surface of the powder particles.
  • The effective range of the aluminium content was tested, as described below, an it was concluded that the aluminium content should be above 3%, preferably the aluminium content should be above 5%, in order to obtain the desired oxidation resistance. However, if the aluminium content becomes too high the melting point is depressed and the material looses strength at elevated temperatures. Further it can be assumed that above a certain amount of aluminium the oxidation resistance is not drastically increased and further increase of the aluminium content would only slightly improve the oxidation resistance. Therefore according to the invention the upper limit for the aluminium content is set to 15 wt%, and in fact it is preferred to have the aluminium content below 12 wt%.
  • The boundaries for the copper content were derived from the tests described below. Accordingly it the copper content should be above 5 wt% to facilitate the formation of sintering necks and providing a sintered component having good high temperature oxidation resistance. Further the Cu-content should be below 20 wt%, powders having higher Cu-content may very well be useful for certain applications, but they are not within the scope of the present invention.
  • Figure 1 shows the Fe-Cu phase diagram, but it is believed that that Cu will influence a system in a similar way. To reduce/break-up the aluminium oxide layer it is believed that a certain amount of liquid phase must be formed, i.e. the area of (γFe +L) is of interest. Since the diagram is for the pure Fe-Cu system the information retrieved from it can only be used as a guideline. Of particular interest is the amount of liquid phase formed during the sintering. Formation of liquid phase is required to break up the aluminium oxides but excess amounts of liquid phase collapses the structure during sintering. The amount of liquid phase formed is related to the chemical composition and the sintering temperature. The element having the strongest influence of the formation of liquid is copper. That is why different sintering temperatures depending of copper content of the samples were applied before the oxidation test.
  • Of course other alloying elements could also be of interest. In particular if an austenitic structure is desired the powder can also be pre-alloyed with austenite-foming elements in particular nickel, but also the nickel equivalent manganese. Besides being an austenite forming element nickel is also known to have a beneficial effect on the oxidation resistance which of course is desirable in the applications intended for the powders of the invention. If nickel is to be included in the powder it is preferred that the nickel content is in the interval of 8-20 wt%. Manganese can also be an additional austenite forming alloying element, preferably the manganese content is below 3 wt%.
  • Cobalt is normally not used since it is comparably expensive.
  • It is further preferred to keep the carbon content low, since carbon has a tendency to cause intergranular corrosion why preferably the carbon content should be less than 0,1 wt% carbon. In the tested specimens the carbon content was about 0,02 wt% or lower. It is also preferred to keep the nitrogen content as low as possible, preferably the nitrogen content is below 0,2 wt%.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • Seven different water atomised powders having the compositions of Table 1 were made by making a melt of iron and the desired alloying elements. The melt was thereafter water atomised whereby the powder formed from the atomized droplets upon solidification. The atomization was performed according to conventional water atomization technology. The resulting powders were extracted through a grid providing a maximum diameter of 75 µm.
  • For each powder sintered test samples were prepared. The sintered test samples and a reference sample having a 310B composition (25 wt% Cr + 20 wt% Ni + 2,5 wt% Si + bal. Fe) were subjected to a high temperature oxidation test described below. The material 310B was chosen as reference since it is known to possess good high temperature oxidation resistance.
  • The test samples and the reference sample were produced by filling a form (10mm diameter and 2mm thickness) with the powder of interest, followed by smoothing out the surface without compacting the powder. This procedure provides samples with high specific area (ca 45% porosity).
  • The test samples were sintered in a 100 % hydrogene atmosphere for 30 minutes at a temperature depending of the Cu content according to the following table:
    5 % Cu 1150 °C
    10 % Cu 1320 °C
    15%Cu 1350 °C
    20 % Cu 1320 °C
  • The reference sample was sintered in a 100% hydrogen atmosphere for 30 minutes at 1320 °C.
  • The prepared test and reference samples where thereafter ready for the high temperature oxidation test.
  • The oxidation tests were carried out in a laboratory furnace, a Lenton 12/50/300, at a temperature of 800 °C in air. A scale, Mettler Toledo AE260, was linked to a computer in order to save the data automatically. Six samples could be tested at the same time by placing them on a sample holder and at each test run two of the samples were reference samples.
  • The samples were weighted before they were introduced in the furnace. Short term cycles were performed, each cycle consisting of 2 min heating and 30 sec cooling, which is sufficient for the samples to cool down below 150 °C. This cycle was repeated 15 times, resulting in 30 minutes in the furnace. After every 30 minutes in the heating zone, the samples were weighted and the gain-in-weight for each of them was saved. The tests were stopped after 20 hours in the heating zone. TABLE 1
    Powder chemical comp. [wt%], bal. Fe Weight gain [g] Weight gain ref. [g] Increase in weight relative to reference [%]
    No Al Cu Cr
    1 10 15 22 0,3 1,25 24
    2 5,5 15 22 0,3 1,15 26
    3 10 10 22 0,6 1,75 34
    4 5,5 10 22 0,7 1,75 40
    5 5,5 20 22 0,5 1,25 40
    6 5,5 5 22 1,3 1,15 113
    7 1 10 22 1,9 1,3 146
  • The results show that the oxidation resistance of powder 6 and 7 were worse than the reference powder 8. Looking at the samples having an Al content of 5,5 wt%, i.e. powder 2, 4, 5 and 6, it can be see that increasing the Cu content from 5 wt% (sample 6) to 10wt%, (powder 4) drastically improved the oxidation resistance and at a Cu content of 15wt%, (powder 2) the highest oxidation resistance was achieved. Increasing the Cu content further to 20wt% (powder 5); the oxidation resistance results was as of the powder having 10wt% Cu (powder 4).
  • As can be seen a Cu-content of 15% provided the best results with regards to high temperature oxidation resistance.
  • However, during sintering the powder 5 shrank considerably indicating that at Cu-content above around 20 wt% too much liquid phase was formed.
  • Comparing powder 4 to powder 3 and powder 2 to powder 1 it can be seen that increasing the Al content from 5, 5 wt% increases the oxidation resistance slightly.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • Powder 2 and 3 were further tested at different oxidation temperatures. The following table shows the increase in weight relative to the reference 310B. TABLE 2
    Powder 3 Powder 2
    Test temperature Increase in weight relative reference Increase in weight relative reference REMARKS
    [°C] (%) (%)
    800 46 24
    850 43 22
    900 21 21
    950 14 14
    1000 20 13 Terminated after 16 hours
  • Table 2 shows that difference in oxidation resistance between samples containing Cu and Al and reference samples is further pronounced at temperatures above 800 degree Celcius. Furthermore, the composition having a Al content of 5,5 % and a Cu content of 15 % seems to have better oxidation resistance compared to the composition having 10 Al and 10 % Cu.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • In order to evaluate the effect of added Cu-content with regard to sintered density, tensile strength and yield strength, four different powders having were compared. The powders were as in example 1 and 2 water atomized powders. The powders were mixed with 1% of Acrawax®. The mixes were compacted at a compacting pressure of 600 MPa into tensile test bars. The test bars were sintered for 30 minutes at 1320 degrees Celsius in an atmosphere of 100 % hydrogen. Sintered density, tensile strength and yield strength were measured. The results are shown in table 3. TABLE 3
    Chemical composition wt%, balance Fe Sintered density Tensile Strength Yield strength
    [g/cm3] [MPa] [MPa]
    22Cr + 5,5Al + 10Cu 6,87 582 522
    22Cr + 5,5Al (ref.) 5,74 295 259
    22Cr + 18Ni + 5,5Al + 8Cu 6,70 507 412
    22Cr + 18Ni + 5,5Al (ref.) 4,96 87 69
  • The table 3 shows that the density and the mechanical properties of Al- containing Cr or Cr-Ni stainless steel powders increases considerably if the powder are pre-alloyed with Cu. This indicates much improved sintering activity.
  • Metallic examination was further performed on the tensile test bars. The metallographic pictures, see FIG. 2A, 2B and FIG 3A, 3B, clearly show that incorporation of Cu to Al- containing Cr- or Cr- Ni based stainless steel powders considerably enhance the sintering of the material. FIG 2A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al +10Cu+ bal. Fe and FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a corresponding reference test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al+ bal. Fe. FIG 3A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al + 18Ni + 8Cu+ bal. Fe and FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a corresponding reference test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al+ 18Ni + bal. Fe.

Claims (6)

  1. A method of producing a sintered component, comprising:
    a) providing a sintering material comprising a water atomised pre-alloyed iron- based powder comprising by weight-% :
    10.5-30 Cr
    3-15 Al
    5-20 Cu
    max 0.1 C
    max 0.2 N
    max 3.0 Mn
    max 2.5 Si
    max 3.0 Mo
    optionally 8-20 Ni
    balance essentially only iron and unavoidable impurities; and
    b) forming a green body from the sintering material; and
    c) sintering the green body in a reducing or neutral atmosphere, at an atmospheric pressure or below, and at a temperature above 1100°C.
  2. Method according to claim 1 wherein in a) the provided sintering material is a mixture between a lubricant and/or a binder with the water atomised pre-alloyed iron-based powder.
  3. Method according to claim 2 wherein in b) the green body is formed by cold compaction of the mixture, where preferably the compaction pressure is within the range of 100 -1000 MPa and preferably the temperature is below 100°C.
  4. Method according to claim 2 wherein in b) the green body is formed by warm compaction of the mixture, where preferably the compaction pressure is within the range of 300 -1000 MPa and preferably the temperature is within the range of 100-200° C.
  5. Method according to claim 1 wherein in a) the provided sintering material is only the water atomised pre-alloyed iron-based powder.
  6. Method according to claim 2 or claim 5 wherein the green body is shaped without compacting the green body.
EP07748599A 2006-07-21 2007-06-20 Iron-based powder Active EP2051826B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0601601 2006-07-21
PCT/SE2007/050439 WO2008010767A1 (en) 2006-07-21 2007-06-20 Iron-based powder

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2051826A1 EP2051826A1 (en) 2009-04-29
EP2051826B1 true EP2051826B1 (en) 2011-09-21

Family

ID=38957027

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07748599A Active EP2051826B1 (en) 2006-07-21 2007-06-20 Iron-based powder

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20080019858A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2051826B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2009544841A (en)
CN (1) CN101516549A (en)
AT (1) ATE525156T1 (en)
DK (1) DK2051826T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2375159T3 (en)
TW (1) TW200808982A (en)
WO (1) WO2008010767A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5384079B2 (en) * 2008-10-29 2014-01-08 Ntn株式会社 Sintered bearing
WO2011112260A2 (en) 2010-03-11 2011-09-15 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Micromirror arrays having self aligned features
CN102554216A (en) * 2012-02-07 2012-07-11 建德市易通金属粉材有限公司 Water atomization ferrum-copper alloy powder and manufacturing method
JP6384752B2 (en) * 2014-07-15 2018-09-05 日立金属株式会社 Magnetic core and coil component using the same
DK3253512T3 (en) 2015-02-03 2023-06-06 Hoeganaes Ab Publ POWDER METAL COMPOSITION FOR LIGHT MACHINING
CN106222566B (en) * 2016-08-23 2018-10-09 秦皇岛市雅豪新材料科技有限公司 A kind of superhard material products rare earth special adjusts water atomization Fe-Cu pre-alloyed powders and preparation method thereof
DE102018219686A1 (en) * 2018-11-16 2020-05-20 Mahle International Gmbh Method of making a valve seat ring infiltrated with copper
US20200216935A1 (en) * 2019-01-04 2020-07-09 Tenneco Inc. Hard powder particles with improved compressibility and green strength
KR102352433B1 (en) * 2020-04-16 2022-01-19 김재곤 The Cu Alloy Plate and this Method

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4758272A (en) * 1987-05-27 1988-07-19 Corning Glass Works Porous metal bodies
US4992233A (en) * 1988-07-15 1991-02-12 Corning Incorporated Sintering metal powders into structures without sintering aids
JP3091246B2 (en) * 1990-04-03 2000-09-25 日本碍子株式会社 Heat-resistant metallic monolith and method for producing the same
US5292485A (en) * 1990-04-03 1994-03-08 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Heat-resistant metal monolith
JPH04116103A (en) * 1990-09-05 1992-04-16 Daido Steel Co Ltd Soft magnetic alloy power
US5427601A (en) * 1990-11-29 1995-06-27 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Sintered metal bodies and manufacturing method therefor
JPH08120435A (en) * 1994-10-19 1996-05-14 Nippon Steel Corp Thermal spray material for mold for glass and the same mold
SE504208C2 (en) * 1995-04-26 1996-12-09 Kanthal Ab Method of manufacturing high temperature resistant moldings
SE0000002L (en) * 2000-01-01 2000-12-11 Sandvik Ab Process for manufacturing a FeCrAl material and such a mortar
DE60203893T2 (en) * 2001-01-24 2006-01-19 Federal-Mogul Sintered Products Ltd., Coventry METHOD FOR PRODUCING COPPER INTEGRATED RAW IRON MATERIAL
JP2005220438A (en) * 2004-01-06 2005-08-18 Hitachi Metals Ltd Fe-Cr-Al BASED MAGNETIC POWDER, Fe-Cr-Al BASED MAGNETIC POWDER COMPACT, AND ITS PRODUCTION METHOD

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2375159T3 (en) 2012-02-27
JP2009544841A (en) 2009-12-17
EP2051826A1 (en) 2009-04-29
CN101516549A (en) 2009-08-26
DK2051826T3 (en) 2012-01-09
US20080019858A1 (en) 2008-01-24
ATE525156T1 (en) 2011-10-15
WO2008010767A1 (en) 2008-01-24
TW200808982A (en) 2008-02-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2051826B1 (en) Iron-based powder
EP1536027B1 (en) Raw or granulated powder for sintering, and sintered compacts therefrom
KR100584113B1 (en) Method of making a fecral material and such material
KR100249006B1 (en) Water spray iron powder for powder plating and its manufacturing method
EP1077454B1 (en) Composite magnetic material
EP2863400B1 (en) Sintered soft magnetic powder molded body
KR100768700B1 (en) Fabrication method of alloy parts by metal injection molding and the alloy parts
WO1999028068A1 (en) Method of manufacturing aluminide sheet by thermomechanical processing of aluminide powders
KR101499707B1 (en) Metallurgical powder composition and method of production
CN105063394B (en) A kind of preparation method of titanium or titanium alloy material
CA3122303C (en) Metallurgical compositions for press-and-sinter and additive manufacturing
CN111560564B (en) Resource-saving high-nitrogen duplex stainless steel and near-net forming method thereof
CN108085576A (en) A kind of preparation method of steel knot TiCN base cemented carbides
EP1522601B1 (en) Sintered component made of stainless steel with high corrosion resistance and production method therefor
EP0812925A1 (en) Low alloy steel powders for sinterhardening
US5703304A (en) Iron-based powder containing chromium, molybdenum and manganese
JPH0715121B2 (en) Fe-Co alloy fine powder for injection molding and Fe-Co sintered magnetic material
JPH0257606A (en) Stainless steel fine powder and sintering material
KR100978901B1 (en) MANUFACTURING METHOD OF Fe-BASED SINTERED BODY WITH HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH AND HIGH HARDNESS
EP2045346B1 (en) Method for producing a sintered composite sliding part
JP2000064001A (en) Powder mixture for high strength sintered parts
RU2327547C1 (en) Method of producing iron base powder (variants)
EP1323840B1 (en) Iron base mixed powder for high strength sintered parts
CN108034881A (en) A kind of steel knot TiCN base cemented carbides and application
JPH0459362B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090221

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20091209

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA RS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602007017380

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20111124

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20110921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20110921

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2375159

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20120227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111222

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 525156

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120121

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120123

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120622

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007017380

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120622

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: HOGANAS A.B.

Effective date: 20120630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120620

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120620

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602007017380

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130101

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120620

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120620

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120702

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120702

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110921

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20131022

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120620

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120620

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120621

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070620