EP1996792B1 - Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1996792B1
EP1996792B1 EP07735094A EP07735094A EP1996792B1 EP 1996792 B1 EP1996792 B1 EP 1996792B1 EP 07735094 A EP07735094 A EP 07735094A EP 07735094 A EP07735094 A EP 07735094A EP 1996792 B1 EP1996792 B1 EP 1996792B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
borehole
assembly
sensor
wellbore
acoustic energy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP07735094A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1996792A2 (en
Inventor
Theodore Lafferty Jr.
William Underhill
Les Nutt
Alejandro Martinez
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Gemalto Terminals Ltd
Prad Research and Development Ltd
Schlumberger Technology BV
Schlumberger Holdings Ltd
Original Assignee
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Gemalto Terminals Ltd
Prad Research and Development Ltd
Schlumberger Technology BV
Schlumberger Holdings Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA, Gemalto Terminals Ltd, Prad Research and Development Ltd, Schlumberger Technology BV, Schlumberger Holdings Ltd filed Critical Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Priority to PL07735094T priority Critical patent/PL1996792T3/en
Publication of EP1996792A2 publication Critical patent/EP1996792A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1996792B1 publication Critical patent/EP1996792B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/01Devices for supporting measuring instruments on drill bits, pipes, rods or wirelines; Protecting measuring instruments in boreholes against heat, shock, pressure or the like
    • E21B47/017Protecting measuring instruments

Definitions

  • the subject matter of the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase conductivity of a subterranean formation for recovery or production of hydrocarbons and to permit injection of fluids into subterranean formation or into injection wells.
  • a fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the formation through a wellbore.
  • Particulate material known as proppant may be added to the fracturing fluid and deposited in the fracture as it is formed to hold open the fracture after hydraulic fracturing pressure is relaxed.
  • the hydraulic fracturing fluid As the hydraulic fracturing fluid is delivered from the surface to the subterranean formation through the wellbore, it is important that the pressured fluid for fracturing be directed into the formation or formations of interest.
  • the subterranean formation or formations are hydraulically fractured through either perforations in a cased well bore or in an isolated section of the open well bore.
  • One important consideration for fracturing for hydrocarbon production or waste disposal is directing the fracture into a desired formation.
  • the orientation of the hydraulic fracture is controlled by formation characteristics and the stress regime in the formation. It is important to monitor the fracture as it is being formed to insure that it does not extend beyond the intended zone and has the desired extent and orientation.
  • microseisms It is known that hydraulic fracturing operations in a wellbore generate significant seismic activity as a result of the fracture growth into a subterranean formation. Fluid injected under pressure into a subterranean formation causes a pressure build up until the in-situ stress in a subterranean formation is exceeded, resulting in fractures in the formation that extend some distance from the wellbore. This formation fracturing creates a series of small "micro-earthquakes" known as microseisms.
  • closest prior art document US 5,503,225 discloses a system for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations, wherein sensors are mounted on a coiled tubing string above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through the coiled tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to perforations in the formation.
  • US 6,446,727 discloses a process for hydraulically fracturing multiple zones of a wellbore.
  • US 5,524,709 discloses a method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore, wherein an isolation device is mounted above a subterranean formation of interest where fracturing occurs (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to perforations).
  • sensors mounted in soluble cement located above and below the formation of interest acoustically monitor the fracturing operation.
  • sensors mounted in monitoring wells also acoustically monitor the fracturing operation. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation.
  • microseismic mapping One method known for monitoring the location and size of a hydraulic fracture is called microseismic mapping.
  • a second offset well is used for monitoring hydraulic fracturing activities in the primary treatment or injection well.
  • a plurality of acoustic sensors e.g., geophones
  • These sensors in the offset well are used to record signals that result from microseisms caused by the stress induced in the subterranean surface formations by the hydraulic fracture fluid pressure build-up in the treatment or injection well.
  • microseismic monitoring are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,170 by Withers, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,726 by Sorrels and Warpinski .
  • location of fractures within an injection well are monitored in separate instrumented monitoring wells using acoustic signals resulting from microseismic events caused by the fracturing activity in the injection well.
  • Separate dedicated monitoring wells however add significant expense to these methods. Limited efforts have been made to use devices deployed in injection or treatment wells for microseismic monitoring in treatment or injection wells.
  • a method for mitigating risk of adversely affecting hydrocarbon productivity e.g.
  • acoustic sensors are deployed in an injection well for microseismic monitoring. The sensors are isolated in the annulus of the waste injection well, with the sensors generally being attached to the tubing string.
  • US 4,775,009 discloses a process for installing seismic sensors inside a well, wherein sensors 1 are embedded in a casing which is position above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to orifices). Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation.
  • US 2004/206495 discloses fracturing mapping by the use of tiltmeters which are mounted directly onto the wall of a wellbore casing. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing string, and then directing the fluid by packers and to openings in the casing and thus into the formation.
  • a technique that is usable with a well includes deploying an assembly into a wellbore.
  • the assembly includes at least one sensor.
  • a fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the wellbore to hydraulically fracture a subterranean formation of interest.
  • the technique includes measuring acoustical energy that is generated by the hydraulic fracturing using the sensor(s).
  • an apparatus for use in a well includes an assembly that has a tool body with at least one acoustic energy sensor that is disposed thereon.
  • the assembly also includes an isolation device to isolate the acoustic energy sensor from a hydraulic fracture operation.
  • Fig. 1 is a well according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a sensor sonde according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to monitor acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to perform hydraulic fracturing in different zones of a well and monitor the fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • a well 8 includes acoustic energy sensors 160 that are located downhole for purposes of monitoring the acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing.
  • Sensors 160 may be isolated from a formation of interest 60 in which hydraulic fracturing occurs. Due to the isolation, flow noise attributable to the fracturing operation does not affect the measurements by the sensors 160, and furthermore, the sensors 160 are protected from the impact of the fracture treatment.
  • the sensors 160 are part of sensor sondes 120 (sensor sondes 120 1 , 120 2 and 120 3 , being depicted as examples in Fig. 1 ) of a borehole monitoring assembly 10 of a downhole borehole assembly 100.
  • the borehole assembly 100 optionally includes an isolation device, such as a isolation device 50 (a compression-set packer, a mechanically-set packer, a hydraulically-set packer, a weight-set packer, swellable bladder, plug, etc., as just a few examples), for purposes of isolating the sensor sondes 120 (and thus, the sensors 160) from the fracturing operation.
  • a isolation device 50 a compression-set packer, a mechanically-set packer, a hydraulically-set packer, a weight-set packer, swellable bladder, plug, etc., as just a few examples
  • the borehole assembly 100 may be run into the well 8 using one of many conveyance mechanisms, such as a tubular string 30 that is depicted in Fig. 1 .
  • the string 30 may be coiled tubing.
  • a surface acquisition system 80 may be in communication with the borehole monitoring assembly 100 via a communication line 40, such as a wireline, slickline, fiber optics or a fiber optics tether.
  • Fiber optic tether refers to fiber optics deployed within a protective cover or small diameter protective tubing.
  • the communication line 40 may be contained or deployed in the string 30 to provide communication from the surface control system to the borehole monitoring assembly 100 or communication from the borehole monitoring assembly 100 to the surface control system or both. Communication and/or power may be provided by the communication lines 40, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
  • the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be any assembly or tool, which is suited to monitor acoustic signals in a wellbore.
  • each sonde 120 of the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be a similar sensor to the sonde that is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,170,601.
  • Fig. 2 depicts an exemplary embodiment of the sonde 120 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
  • the sonde 120 includes a tool body 124, which has a cavity 130 in an opening in the wall of the tool body 124.
  • the cavity 130 receives an acoustic energy sensor package 140, which is positioned in the cavity 130 and is mounted on resilient mounts 150 (springs, for example) to press the acoustic sensor package 140 against the borehole wall (or casing string 22, if the well is cased), yet isolate the sensors 160 of the package 140 from fluid-conveyed pressure disturbances.
  • the sonde 120 may include three of the sensors 160, each of which senses acoustic energy along a different axis (x, y or z axis).
  • the sonde 120 may also include an arm 136 that is activated to press the sonde 120 against the borehole wall (or casing string 22, if the well 10 is cased) for purposes of placing the sensors 160 in proximity to the wellbore or casing string 22.
  • the well 8 may be cased (via the casing string 22) or uncased, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. If installed, the casing string 22 may extend from the surface along the entire length of a wellbore.20, or only along a portion of the wellbore 20.
  • the wellbore 20 in which the borehole assembly 100 is deployed may be a deviated or lateral wellbore. In some embodiments in a deviated or lateral wellbore, a tractor may be used to deploy the borehole assembly 100.
  • the well 10 may be a subterranean or a subsea well, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, many variations are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims.
  • the well 8 has been perforated in a previous trip by a perforating gun to form corresponding perforations in the casing string 22 and corresponding perforation tunnels 61, which extend into the formation of interest 60.
  • the borehole assembly 100 is deployed in the well 8 for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of the fracturing.
  • Such hydraulic fracturing may be desired or performed for a variety of purposes, such as but not limited to increasing or improving hydrocarbon recovery from the formation of interest 60 or injecting fluid, such as water, produced water, enhanced oil recovery fluids, or gas into formation of interest 60.
  • the term fracturing fluid as used herein includes any fluid injected for the purposes of fracturing the formation and includes but is not limited to treatment fluids, enhanced recovery fluids, and disposal fluids.
  • Fig. 1 only one subterranean formation of interest 60 for the purposes of illustration. It is contemplated that there may be multiple subterranean formations of interest 60 in any wellbore 20; and these multiple formations may be hydraulically fractured separately, together, or in various combinations as the operator so desires.
  • Isolation device 50 is also deployed into the wellbore on a string 30, as part of the borehole assembly 100. More specifically, the isolation device 50 may be positioned along the string 30 above the borehole monitoring assembly 10.
  • the sensors 160 form an array of sensors and may be selected from any appropriate sensing devices such as geophones, hydrophones, or accelerometers, and various combinations that generate signals in response to received acoustic energy. Any one type of acoustic energy sensor or a combination of types may be used.
  • the acoustic energy sensor or sensors should have good sensitivity to acoustic energy in the microseismic frequency band greater than 30 Hz. This band may extend as high as 4 kiloHertz (kHz), as an example.
  • More than one acoustic energy sensor may be used in combination with other acoustic sensors to form an acoustic energy sensor package.
  • Embodiments may comprise a plurality of tri-axial (3 orthogonal) geophones to provide sensing capabilities in three directions.
  • Such acoustic sensor packages may be spaced at desired intervals (e.g. 15.24 meters (50 ft)) along the wellbore 20.
  • Acoustic sensor packages may be coupled to the wellbore wall or casing 22 via an anchoring system for borehole seismic tools.
  • the signals that are generated by each of the sensors 160 in response to acoustical energy are digitized and transmitted through the communication line 40 to the surface acquisition system 80, at the surface of the well 8.
  • the sensors 160 may provide a digital or optical signal directly to the communication line 40 or a converter may be used to convert the acoustic signals received by the sensors to digital or optical signals for transmission.
  • the surface acquisition system 80 may employ methods, such as digital filters, to remove noise from the hydraulic fracturing pumping operations from the generated signals.
  • the signals generated by each sensor are recorded in one or more memory devices that may be part of the borehole monitoring assembly 10, the memory devices generally being recoverable with the bottomhole monitoring assembly 10.
  • the signals may also be transmitted via the communication line 40, while in other embodiments the signals are not also transmitted via a communication line, as the sensor data that is stored in the memory devices may be retrieved after the borehole assembly 100 is retrieved from the well.
  • the borehole monitoring assembly 10 and the acoustic energy sensors 160 thereof are positioned in the wellbore at a location that is not adjacent to the formation of interest 60.
  • the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned below the formation of interest 60.
  • borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned in the wellbore in a location that it not adjacent to the perforated zone in the casing.
  • the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be placed below the perforated zone and thus, as depicted in Fig. 1 , the sondes 120 may be suspend from a cable from a tubular body that is mounted to the isolation device 50 and forms the lower end of the string 30.
  • the isolation device 50 is deployed in the wellbore 20 to separate the borehole monitoring assembly 10 from the subterranean formation of interest 60. In this manner, the borehole monitoring assembly 10 is isolated from hydraulic fracturing or injection activity undertaken in subterranean formation of interest 60.
  • a noise suppression device or devices such as a shock absorber may be provided, being placed between isolation device 50 and borehole monitoring assembly 10.
  • noise suppression methods such as slacking the connecting cable between components, may be used to reduce the possibility of noise transmission.
  • Noise suppression devices or methods similarly may be used between the sensors 160 in an array.
  • noise suppression may be performed by digitally processing the signals generated by the measurements made by the acoustic energy sensors.
  • Borehole assembly 100 may also include apparatuses or features for use in the hydraulic fracturing process.
  • one such apparatus may be a jetting nozzle 86 that is placed above the isolation device 50 to permit fluids to be pumped down the string 30 and out the jetting nozzle 86 to clean out debris such as sand that may accumulate above the packer 30.
  • the jetting nozzle 86 may also be used for purposes of perforating the casing string 22 and forming the perforation tunnels 61 in lieu of a perforating gun.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may include a feature such as a clean-out port, which may be selectively opened or closed and located above isolation device 50 to permit, if desired, fluid pumped down the annulus to reverse flow the fluid up coiled tubing. Methods such as ball drops or mechanical actuation may be used to selectively open or close a clean-out port.
  • borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional isolation devices located above borehole monitoring assembly 10. Additional isolation devices may be single or multi-set.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional devices to provide wellbore information.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may further include a pressure or temperature sensor or both.
  • a gyroscope may be provided for use in orientating the sensors 160 or for determining the orientation of the borehole monitoring assembly 10 to permit subsequent data adjustment.
  • the sensors may be orientated by methods such as a three component hodogram analysis that uses the recording of a calibration shot in a nearby well or at the surface.
  • the tool orientation may by calculated by the known methods such as using plane geometry and the assumption of a straight ray from source to receiver, projecting the ray onto a perpendicular plane and rotating the projection through the horizontal polarization angle to give the direction of the x-component sensor and the relative bearing angle or the method of calculating the relative bearing angle from the 3C polarization of the direct P-wave arrival as described in Becquey, M. and Dubesset, M., 1990, Three-component sonde orientation in a deviated swell (short note): Geophysics, Society of Exploration. Geophyics, 55, 1386-1388.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may include other devices, which are directed to other functions.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may include a casing collar locator (CCL) 87 that is used for purposes of precisely locating the borehole assembly 100 downhole or other tool.
  • the CCL 87 may be a magnetically-sensitive device that generates a signal (observed at the surface of the well 8) for purposes of detecting casing joints of the casing 22 for purposes of precisely locating the assembly 100. This may be helpful for purposes of precisely locating the jetting nozzles 86 when the jetting nozzles 86 perforate the casing 22 and the formation of interest 60.
  • the assembly 100 may include a tension sub 85, which is located below the isolation device 50 and is used to monitor the tension of the cable, which extends to the sondes 120.
  • a tension sub 85 which is located below the isolation device 50 and is used to monitor the tension of the cable, which extends to the sondes 120.
  • the borehole assembly may include a supplemental sensor, for example a pressure or temperature sensor, capable of providing a downhole measurement.
  • the measurement obtained using the supplemental sensor may be used in conjunction with or separately from the measurements obtained using sensors 160 to monitor hydraulic fracturing.
  • the supplemental sensor may be an additional acoustic sensor, such as a hydrophone, useful for measuring noise in the form of borehole acoustic waves.
  • the supplemental sensor may be an accelerometer.
  • a plurality of supplemental sensors, specifically acoustic sensors, may be provided. Output from this supplemental sensor may be used to digitally suppress or remove noise by processing the measurements from the acoustic sensor(s). This use is different from the use of measurements from acoustic sensors in an array to eliminate noise by cumulative processing of the measurements such as known for vertical seismic profiles.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may also include, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, a remotely-actuated latch, or connector 89, for purposes of selectively connecting the borehole assembly 100 to and releasing the assembly 100 from the string 30 (thereby leaving the assembly 100 downhole) when multiple zones are treated, as further described below.
  • a remotely-actuated latch or connector 89
  • the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring may proceed as follows in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
  • the wellbore 20 is first completed with the casing 22, and then, the casing 22 is perforated at one or more subterranean formations of interest 60.
  • the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may then be conveyed into the wellbore 20 on the string 30.
  • the isolation device 50 is simultaneously conveyed in wellbore 20 on the string 30 at a desired position above assembly 10.
  • the isolation device 50 is set in place to provide a seal in the annulus between the string 30 and the casing 22, thereby isolating borehole monitoring assembly 10 in wellbore 20 below isolation device 50. If additional isolation devices are provided, they may be actuated or set in place to provide further isolation between the borehole monitoring assembly 10 and the isolation device 50.
  • Hydraulic fracturing fluid or injection fluid is then pumped at pressure down the annulus formed between conveyance 30 and casing 22 or wellbore wall and into the subterranean formation of interest 60.
  • the hydraulic fracturing fluid may be any fluid useful for fracturing a subterranean formation, including but not limited to wellbore treatment fluids, hydrocarbons, water, produced water, disposal water, foamed fluids or gases, such as natural gas or CO 2 .
  • isolation device 50 and if provided, additional isolation device or devices, separate borehole monitoring assembly 10 from hydraulic fracturing fluids and operations performed in the wellbore above isolation device 50.
  • Isolation device 50 may be any packer, inflatable or mechanical device capable of being set and released that provides sufficient sealing pressure within the wellbore to isolate the borehole monitoring assembly from the pressured hydraulic fracturing or injection fluid.
  • the isolation device 50 includes feed-throughs to permit communication line 40 to pass through the isolation device 50 and to borehole monitoring assembly 10.
  • Some embodiments may include stiff bridles or deployment bars for use in deploying borehole sensor assembly 10 in deviated, horizontal or pressurized wells.
  • a technique 200 may be used to monitor the hydraulic fracturing of a particular formation of interest.
  • the borehole assembly 100 is run into the well into position, pursuant to block 204, the borehole assembly comprising an acoustic sensor.
  • a hydraulic fracturing operation is then performed by pumping fracturing fluid into the wellbore at pressure, pursuant to block 206.
  • the one or more acoustic sensors are used to monitor acoustic energy pursuant to block 208.
  • the acoustic energy monitored may be from fracturing operations, or may result from fracturing operations in which the hydraulic fracturing fluid comprises an acoustic signal generating element, such as a noisy proppant described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,492 .
  • Sensor 160 is used to monitor the operation or the signals generated by the acoustic signal generating element.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may be used in conjunction with the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of several zones in the well.
  • a technique 250 includes running (block 254) a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth. The perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore (block 258). The borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well, pursuant to block 262. Next, the isolation device 50 is set (block 266) and a fracturing operation is subsequently performed and the sensors 160 are used to monitor the operation, pursuant to block 270. In some embodiments, a fracturing model may be established and updated using a measurement from sensor 160.
  • zones may be fractured and monitored in the well as set forth in Fig. 4 .
  • the technique 250 is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
  • a technique includes running a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth.
  • the perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore.
  • the borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well.
  • borehole assembly 100 may comprise the perforating device.
  • a fracturing operation is subsequently performed and the sensors 160 are used to monitor the operation.
  • zones may be fractured and monitored in the well.
  • the technique is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
  • the borehole monitoring assembly 100 and techniques that are described herein may offer one or more advantages and/or improvements over conventional hydraulic monitoring techniques and devices.
  • placement of the borehole monitoring assembly in the injection well rather than a separate monitoring well reduces the time and expense required for drilling a separate well.
  • Placing the acoustical sensors below the packer isolates the sensors from the fracturing fluid and reduces the risk of damage to the sensors from the fracturing fluid as it is pumped down the wellbore.
  • placing communication line 40 within the string 30 isolates it from the fracturing fluid pumped down the annulus and significantly reduces the possibility of erosion or damage to the communication line.
  • the placement of sensors 160 below the isolation device 50 has the effect of providing isolation from flow-induced noise.
  • noise generated by pumping fracturing fluid in a wellbore has inhibited the ability to make successful microseismic measurements in the injection well.
  • Several elements are used individually or in combination in the present invention to isolate and attenuate wellbore noise. Placing the acoustic energy sensor or sensors below the isolation device 50 provides a barrier to direct flow noise. Isolation device 50 is designed to efficiently allow setting/unsetting, cleaning of sand deposited on top, and enablement of noise isolation techniques (e.g., slacking). Configuring sensors 160 in an acoustic energy sensor package and mechanically isolating the sensor package 140 (see Fig.
  • Isolation device 50 may comprise a compressional setting that is operational on a downward movement that accommodates slacking of communication line 40.
  • Shock absorbers designed to attenuate noise propagating in the bottomhole-assembly may be inserted between isolation device 50 and the acoustic sensors.
  • Digital filtering may be used to identify upward and downward propagating noise with distinctly different characteristics from the microseisms.
  • Such digital filtering techniques such as adaptive beamforming or velocity filtering may be used to attenuate noise.
  • a sub-array of hydrophones placed within an array of geophones or accelerometers may be useful for identifying and removing propagating fluid (tube) waves.
  • pumping noise is at low frequencies ( ⁇ 20Hz) much below the typical microseismic band and may be substantially removed by conventional high-pass filters.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may further include other measurement devices such as pressure, temperature, gyroscopes, or any other device useful for measuring indications of fracture characteristics.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may also include fracturing tools positioned above the isolation device 50 for use in the hydraulic fracturing process, such as jetting nozzle, clean-up port, etc.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may include a single or multi-set isolation devise above the measurement devises to protect it from the impact of the fracture treatment.
  • the borehole assembly 100 may be used in a lateral wellbore. Therefore, many variations are contemplated and are within the scope of the appended claims.

Landscapes

  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Abstract

A technique that is usable with a well includes deploying an assembly into a wellbore. The assembly includes at least one sensor. A fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the wellbore to hydraulically fracture a subterranean formation of interest. The technique includes isolating the sensor from the fracturing and measuring acoustical energy that is generated by the hydraulic fracturing using the sensor(s).

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • The subject matter of the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase conductivity of a subterranean formation for recovery or production of hydrocarbons and to permit injection of fluids into subterranean formation or into injection wells. In a typical hydraulic fracturing operation, a fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the formation through a wellbore. Particulate material known as proppant may be added to the fracturing fluid and deposited in the fracture as it is formed to hold open the fracture after hydraulic fracturing pressure is relaxed.
  • As the hydraulic fracturing fluid is delivered from the surface to the subterranean formation through the wellbore, it is important that the pressured fluid for fracturing be directed into the formation or formations of interest. Typically, the subterranean formation or formations are hydraulically fractured through either perforations in a cased well bore or in an isolated section of the open well bore. One important consideration for fracturing for hydrocarbon production or waste disposal is directing the fracture into a desired formation. The orientation of the hydraulic fracture is controlled by formation characteristics and the stress regime in the formation. It is important to monitor the fracture as it is being formed to insure that it does not extend beyond the intended zone and has the desired extent and orientation.
  • It is known that hydraulic fracturing operations in a wellbore generate significant seismic activity as a result of the fracture growth into a subterranean formation. Fluid injected under pressure into a subterranean formation causes a pressure build up until the in-situ stress in a subterranean formation is exceeded, resulting in fractures in the formation that extend some distance from the wellbore. This formation fracturing creates a series of small "micro-earthquakes" known as microseisms. These discrete, localized microseisms occur during the growth of fractures, and the amplitude of the seismic or acoustical energy (compressional ("P") waves and shear ("S") waves) are generated with significant enough amplitude to be detected by remote sensors. Accordingly, by sensing and recording the P and S waves and their respective arrival times at each of the sensors, the acoustical signals can be processed in accordance with known seismic or earthquake monitoring methodology to determine the position of the microseisms. Hence, the geometry of the fracture and its location may be inferred. One method for determining the orientation of fractures resulting from hydraulic fracturing operations is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,985,816 .
  • For example, closest prior art document US 5,503,225 discloses a system for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations, wherein sensors are mounted on a coiled tubing string above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through the coiled tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to perforations in the formation.
  • US 6,446,727 discloses a process for hydraulically fracturing multiple zones of a wellbore.
  • US 5,524,709 discloses a method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore, wherein an isolation device is mounted above a subterranean formation of interest where fracturing occurs (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to perforations). During the fracturing, sensors mounted in soluble cement located above and below the formation of interest acoustically monitor the fracturing operation. In addition, sensors mounted in monitoring wells also acoustically monitor the fracturing operation. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation.
  • One method known for monitoring the location and size of a hydraulic fracture is called microseismic mapping. In this method, a second offset well is used for monitoring hydraulic fracturing activities in the primary treatment or injection well. In microseismic mapping, a plurality of acoustic sensors (e.g., geophones) are positioned in a well offset from the well to be fractured. These sensors in the offset well are used to record signals that result from microseisms caused by the stress induced in the subterranean surface formations by the hydraulic fracture fluid pressure build-up in the treatment or injection well.
  • Examples of microseismic monitoring are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,170 by Withers, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,726 by Sorrels and Warpinski . In the methods therein, location of fractures within an injection well are monitored in separate instrumented monitoring wells using acoustic signals resulting from microseismic events caused by the fracturing activity in the injection well. Separate dedicated monitoring wells however add significant expense to these methods. Limited efforts have been made to use devices deployed in injection or treatment wells for microseismic monitoring in treatment or injection wells. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,935,424 , a method for mitigating risk of adversely affecting hydrocarbon productivity (e.g. screen out) during fracturing by monitoring the fracturing process is described. The method uses tiltmeters coupled to the casing or borehole wall in the well undergoing hydraulic fracturing to mechanically measure deformation, the deformation measurement being used to infer fracture dimensions. In this method however less than desirable coupling of the tiltmeters to the casing or borehole wall significantly impacts the accuracy of the inferred dimensions. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,225 acoustic sensors are deployed in an injection well for microseismic monitoring. The sensors are isolated in the annulus of the waste injection well, with the sensors generally being attached to the tubing string. In such a configuration however the acoustic noise in the downhole tubing caused by the fluid injection will be sensed by such a system and likely will significantly mask any sensed microseismic events. While these methods eliminate the need and expensive of the dedicated monitoring wells, the limitations of each preclude their use to accurately distinguish microseismic events. US 4,775,009 discloses a process for installing seismic sensors inside a well, wherein sensors 1 are embedded in a casing which is position above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to orifices). Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation.
  • US 2004/206495 discloses fracturing mapping by the use of tiltmeters which are mounted directly onto the wall of a wellbore casing. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing string, and then directing the fluid by packers and to openings in the casing and thus into the formation.
  • Thus, there is a continuing need for better ways to reliably and accurately monitor hydraulic fracturing and injection operations.
  • SUMMARY
  • In an embodiment of the invention, a technique that is usable with a well includes deploying an assembly into a wellbore. The assembly includes at least one sensor. A fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the wellbore to hydraulically fracture a subterranean formation of interest. The technique includes measuring acoustical energy that is generated by the hydraulic fracturing using the sensor(s).
  • In another embodiment of the invention, an apparatus for use in a well includes an assembly that has a tool body with at least one acoustic energy sensor that is disposed thereon. The assembly also includes an isolation device to isolate the acoustic energy sensor from a hydraulic fracture operation.
  • Advantages and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following drawing, description and claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Fig. 1 is a well according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a sensor sonde according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to monitor acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to perform hydraulic fracturing in different zones of a well and monitor the fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring to Fig. 1, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a well 8 includes acoustic energy sensors 160 that are located downhole for purposes of monitoring the acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing. Sensors 160 may be isolated from a formation of interest 60 in which hydraulic fracturing occurs. Due to the isolation, flow noise attributable to the fracturing operation does not affect the measurements by the sensors 160, and furthermore, the sensors 160 are protected from the impact of the fracture treatment.
  • In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the sensors 160 are part of sensor sondes 120 ( sensor sondes 1201, 1202 and 1203, being depicted as examples in Fig. 1) of a borehole monitoring assembly 10 of a downhole borehole assembly 100. In addition to the borehole monitoring assembly 10, the borehole assembly 100 optionally includes an isolation device, such as a isolation device 50 (a compression-set packer, a mechanically-set packer, a hydraulically-set packer, a weight-set packer, swellable bladder, plug, etc., as just a few examples), for purposes of isolating the sensor sondes 120 (and thus, the sensors 160) from the fracturing operation.
  • The borehole assembly 100 may be run into the well 8 using one of many conveyance mechanisms, such as a tubular string 30 that is depicted in Fig. 1. As a more specific example, the string 30 may be coiled tubing.
  • In general, a surface acquisition system 80 may be in communication with the borehole monitoring assembly 100 via a communication line 40, such as a wireline, slickline, fiber optics or a fiber optics tether. Fiber optic tether refers to fiber optics deployed within a protective cover or small diameter protective tubing. One example of a data receiving and processing system that may serve as the surface acquisition system 80 is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,552,665 . The communication line 40 may be contained or deployed in the string 30 to provide communication from the surface control system to the borehole monitoring assembly 100 or communication from the borehole monitoring assembly 100 to the surface control system or both. Communication and/or power may be provided by the communication lines 40, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
  • The borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be any assembly or tool, which is suited to monitor acoustic signals in a wellbore. In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, each sonde 120 of the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be a similar sensor to the sonde that is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,170,601.
  • Fig. 2 depicts an exemplary embodiment of the sonde 120 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. In general, the sonde 120 includes a tool body 124, which has a cavity 130 in an opening in the wall of the tool body 124. The cavity 130 receives an acoustic energy sensor package 140, which is positioned in the cavity 130 and is mounted on resilient mounts 150 (springs, for example) to press the acoustic sensor package 140 against the borehole wall (or casing string 22, if the well is cased), yet isolate the sensors 160 of the package 140 from fluid-conveyed pressure disturbances. The sonde 120 may include three of the sensors 160, each of which senses acoustic energy along a different axis (x, y or z axis). Referring to Fig. 2 in conjunction with Fig. 1, the sonde 120 may also include an arm 136 that is activated to press the sonde 120 against the borehole wall (or casing string 22, if the well 10 is cased) for purposes of placing the sensors 160 in proximity to the wellbore or casing string 22.
  • Referring back to Fig. 1, as noted above, the well 8 may be cased (via the casing string 22) or uncased, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. If installed, the casing string 22 may extend from the surface along the entire length of a wellbore.20, or only along a portion of the wellbore 20. Furthermore, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the wellbore 20 in which the borehole assembly 100 is deployed may be a deviated or lateral wellbore. In some embodiments in a deviated or lateral wellbore, a tractor may be used to deploy the borehole assembly 100. Furthermore, the well 10 may be a subterranean or a subsea well, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, many variations are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims.
  • In the state of the well that is depicted in Fig. 1, the well 8 has been perforated in a previous trip by a perforating gun to form corresponding perforations in the casing string 22 and corresponding perforation tunnels 61, which extend into the formation of interest 60.
  • The borehole assembly 100 is deployed in the well 8 for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of the fracturing. Such hydraulic fracturing may be desired or performed for a variety of purposes, such as but not limited to increasing or improving hydrocarbon recovery from the formation of interest 60 or injecting fluid, such as water, produced water, enhanced oil recovery fluids, or gas into formation of interest 60. The term fracturing fluid as used herein includes any fluid injected for the purposes of fracturing the formation and includes but is not limited to treatment fluids, enhanced recovery fluids, and disposal fluids. There is shown in Fig. 1 only one subterranean formation of interest 60 for the purposes of illustration. It is contemplated that there may be multiple subterranean formations of interest 60 in any wellbore 20; and these multiple formations may be hydraulically fractured separately, together, or in various combinations as the operator so desires.
  • Isolation device 50 is also deployed into the wellbore on a string 30, as part of the borehole assembly 100. More specifically, the isolation device 50 may be positioned along the string 30 above the borehole monitoring assembly 10.
  • The sensors 160 form an array of sensors and may be selected from any appropriate sensing devices such as geophones, hydrophones, or accelerometers, and various combinations that generate signals in response to received acoustic energy. Any one type of acoustic energy sensor or a combination of types may be used. The acoustic energy sensor or sensors should have good sensitivity to acoustic energy in the microseismic frequency band greater than 30 Hz. This band may extend as high as 4 kiloHertz (kHz), as an example.
  • More than one acoustic energy sensor may be used in combination with other acoustic sensors to form an acoustic energy sensor package. Embodiments may comprise a plurality of tri-axial (3 orthogonal) geophones to provide sensing capabilities in three directions. Such acoustic sensor packages may be spaced at desired intervals (e.g. 15.24 meters (50 ft)) along the wellbore 20. Acoustic sensor packages may be coupled to the wellbore wall or casing 22 via an anchoring system for borehole seismic tools.
  • The signals that are generated by each of the sensors 160 in response to acoustical energy are digitized and transmitted through the communication line 40 to the surface acquisition system 80, at the surface of the well 8. The sensors 160 may provide a digital or optical signal directly to the communication line 40 or a converter may be used to convert the acoustic signals received by the sensors to digital or optical signals for transmission. In some embodiments, the surface acquisition system 80 may employ methods, such as digital filters, to remove noise from the hydraulic fracturing pumping operations from the generated signals. In some embodiments, the signals generated by each sensor are recorded in one or more memory devices that may be part of the borehole monitoring assembly 10, the memory devices generally being recoverable with the bottomhole monitoring assembly 10. In such embodiments using memory devices, the signals may also be transmitted via the communication line 40, while in other embodiments the signals are not also transmitted via a communication line, as the sensor data that is stored in the memory devices may be retrieved after the borehole assembly 100 is retrieved from the well.
  • As depicted in Fig. 1, the borehole monitoring assembly 10 and the acoustic energy sensors 160 thereof are positioned in the wellbore at a location that is not adjacent to the formation of interest 60. The borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned below the formation of interest 60. In the event that the wellbore is cased, borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned in the wellbore in a location that it not adjacent to the perforated zone in the casing. The borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be placed below the perforated zone and thus, as depicted in Fig. 1, the sondes 120 may be suspend from a cable from a tubular body that is mounted to the isolation device 50 and forms the lower end of the string 30. The isolation device 50 is deployed in the wellbore 20 to separate the borehole monitoring assembly 10 from the subterranean formation of interest 60. In this manner, the borehole monitoring assembly 10 is isolated from hydraulic fracturing or injection activity undertaken in subterranean formation of interest 60.
  • In some embodiments of the invention, a noise suppression device or devices such as a shock absorber may be provided, being placed between isolation device 50 and borehole monitoring assembly 10. In some embodiments, noise suppression methods, such as slacking the connecting cable between components, may be used to reduce the possibility of noise transmission. Noise suppression devices or methods similarly may be used between the sensors 160 in an array. In some embodiments of the invention, noise suppression may be performed by digitally processing the signals generated by the measurements made by the acoustic energy sensors.
  • Borehole assembly 100 may also include apparatuses or features for use in the hydraulic fracturing process. In the event that conveyance 30 is coiled tubing, one such apparatus may be a jetting nozzle 86 that is placed above the isolation device 50 to permit fluids to be pumped down the string 30 and out the jetting nozzle 86 to clean out debris such as sand that may accumulate above the packer 30. The jetting nozzle 86 may also be used for purposes of perforating the casing string 22 and forming the perforation tunnels 61 in lieu of a perforating gun. In this regard, an abrasive fluid may be communicated downhole through the central passageway of the string 30, and the abrasive fluid is radially directed by the jetting nozzles 86 toward the casing string 22 so that the resultant jets perforate the casing string 22 and form tunnels into the surrounding formation.
  • The borehole assembly 100 may include a feature such as a clean-out port, which may be selectively opened or closed and located above isolation device 50 to permit, if desired, fluid pumped down the annulus to reverse flow the fluid up coiled tubing. Methods such as ball drops or mechanical actuation may be used to selectively open or close a clean-out port.
  • In some embodiments, borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional isolation devices located above borehole monitoring assembly 10. Additional isolation devices may be single or multi-set.
  • The borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional devices to provide wellbore information. For example, the borehole assembly 100 may further include a pressure or temperature sensor or both. In some embodiments of the invention, a gyroscope may be provided for use in orientating the sensors 160 or for determining the orientation of the borehole monitoring assembly 10 to permit subsequent data adjustment. Alternatively the sensors may be orientated by methods such as a three component hodogram analysis that uses the recording of a calibration shot in a nearby well or at the surface. By recording and analyzing one or more such shots the tool orientation may by calculated by the known methods such as using plane geometry and the assumption of a straight ray from source to receiver, projecting the ray onto a perpendicular plane and rotating the projection through the horizontal polarization angle to give the direction of the x-component sensor and the relative bearing angle or the method of calculating the relative bearing angle from the 3C polarization of the direct P-wave arrival as described in Becquey, M. and Dubesset, M., 1990, Three-component sonde orientation in a deviated swell (short note): Geophysics, Society of Exploration. Geophyics, 55, 1386-1388.
  • In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the borehole assembly 100 may include other devices, which are directed to other functions. For example, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the borehole assembly 100 may include a casing collar locator (CCL) 87 that is used for purposes of precisely locating the borehole assembly 100 downhole or other tool. In this regard, the CCL 87 may be a magnetically-sensitive device that generates a signal (observed at the surface of the well 8) for purposes of detecting casing joints of the casing 22 for purposes of precisely locating the assembly 100. This may be helpful for purposes of precisely locating the jetting nozzles 86 when the jetting nozzles 86 perforate the casing 22 and the formation of interest 60. As another example of another potential device of the borehole assembly 100, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the assembly 100 may include a tension sub 85, which is located below the isolation device 50 and is used to monitor the tension of the cable, which extends to the sondes 120. In this regard, should the cable or sondes 120 become lodged in the well 8, the corresponding tension indicative of this event is sensed by the tension sub 85 and communicated to the surface of the well. Therefore, corrective measures may then be undertaken for purposes of safely dislodging the sondes 120.
  • As another example, the borehole assembly may include a supplemental sensor, for example a pressure or temperature sensor, capable of providing a downhole measurement. In this regard, the measurement obtained using the supplemental sensor may be used in conjunction with or separately from the measurements obtained using sensors 160 to monitor hydraulic fracturing. In some embodiments, the supplemental sensor may be an additional acoustic sensor, such as a hydrophone, useful for measuring noise in the form of borehole acoustic waves. The supplemental sensor may be an accelerometer. In some embodiments, a plurality of supplemental sensors, specifically acoustic sensors, may be provided. Output from this supplemental sensor may be used to digitally suppress or remove noise by processing the measurements from the acoustic sensor(s). This use is different from the use of measurements from acoustic sensors in an array to eliminate noise by cumulative processing of the measurements such as known for vertical seismic profiles.
  • The borehole assembly 100 may also include, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, a remotely-actuated latch, or connector 89, for purposes of selectively connecting the borehole assembly 100 to and releasing the assembly 100 from the string 30 (thereby leaving the assembly 100 downhole) when multiple zones are treated, as further described below. Thus; many variations are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims.
  • The hydraulic fracturing and monitoring may proceed as follows in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. The wellbore 20 is first completed with the casing 22, and then, the casing 22 is perforated at one or more subterranean formations of interest 60. In accordance with embodiments of the invention, the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may then be conveyed into the wellbore 20 on the string 30. The isolation device 50 is simultaneously conveyed in wellbore 20 on the string 30 at a desired position above assembly 10. The isolation device 50 is set in place to provide a seal in the annulus between the string 30 and the casing 22, thereby isolating borehole monitoring assembly 10 in wellbore 20 below isolation device 50. If additional isolation devices are provided, they may be actuated or set in place to provide further isolation between the borehole monitoring assembly 10 and the isolation device 50.
  • Hydraulic fracturing fluid or injection fluid is then pumped at pressure down the annulus formed between conveyance 30 and casing 22 or wellbore wall and into the subterranean formation of interest 60. The hydraulic fracturing fluid may be any fluid useful for fracturing a subterranean formation, including but not limited to wellbore treatment fluids, hydrocarbons, water, produced water, disposal water, foamed fluids or gases, such as natural gas or CO2.
  • The isolation device 50 and if provided, additional isolation device or devices, separate borehole monitoring assembly 10 from hydraulic fracturing fluids and operations performed in the wellbore above isolation device 50. Isolation device 50 may be any packer, inflatable or mechanical device capable of being set and released that provides sufficient sealing pressure within the wellbore to isolate the borehole monitoring assembly from the pressured hydraulic fracturing or injection fluid. In embodiments of the invention where the borehole monitoring assembly 10 is deployed in the wellbore below the isolation device 50, the isolation device 50 includes feed-throughs to permit communication line 40 to pass through the isolation device 50 and to borehole monitoring assembly 10. Some embodiments may include stiff bridles or deployment bars for use in deploying borehole sensor assembly 10 in deviated, horizontal or pressurized wells.
  • In accordance with embodiments of the invention described herein, referring to Fig. 3, a technique 200 may be used to monitor the hydraulic fracturing of a particular formation of interest. Pursuant to the technique 200, the borehole assembly 100 is run into the well into position, pursuant to block 204, the borehole assembly comprising an acoustic sensor. A hydraulic fracturing operation is then performed by pumping fracturing fluid into the wellbore at pressure, pursuant to block 206. The one or more acoustic sensors are used to monitor acoustic energy pursuant to block 208. The acoustic energy monitored may be from fracturing operations, or may result from fracturing operations in which the hydraulic fracturing fluid comprises an acoustic signal generating element, such as a noisy proppant described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,492 . Sensor 160 is used to monitor the operation or the signals generated by the acoustic signal generating element.
  • Although the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of a single formation of interest, or zone, is described herein for purposes of clarifying certain aspects of the invention, it is noted that other embodiments are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims. More specifically, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the borehole assembly 100 may be used in conjunction with the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of several zones in the well.
  • In this manner, referring to Fig. 4, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a technique 250 includes running (block 254) a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth. The perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore (block 258). The borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well, pursuant to block 262. Next, the isolation device 50 is set (block 266) and a fracturing operation is subsequently performed and the sensors 160 are used to monitor the operation, pursuant to block 270. In some embodiments, a fracturing model may be established and updated using a measurement from sensor 160.
  • After the completion of the hydraulic fracturing operation, a determination is made (diamond 274) whether another zone is to be fractured. If not, then the borehole assembly 100 is pulled out of the well, pursuant to block 278. If another zone is to be fractured, then the next zone is perforated, pursuant to block 254; and pursuant to blocks 258, 262, 266 and 270, another zone is hydraulically fractured and monitored.
  • Thus, pursuant to the technique 250, zones may be fractured and monitored in the well as set forth in Fig. 4. It is noted that the technique 250 is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
  • In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a technique includes running a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth. The perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore. The borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well. In some embodiments, borehole assembly 100 may comprise the perforating device. A fracturing operation is subsequently performed and the sensors 160 are used to monitor the operation.
  • After the completion of the hydraulic fracturing operation, a determination is made whether another zone is to be fractured. If not, then the borehole assembly 100 is pulled out of the well. If another zone is to be fractured, then the perforated next zone is perforated; and another zone is hydraulically fractured and monitored.
  • Thus, pursuant to the technique, zones may be fractured and monitored in the well. It is noted that the technique is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
  • The borehole monitoring assembly 100 and techniques that are described herein may offer one or more advantages and/or improvements over conventional hydraulic monitoring techniques and devices. In particular, placement of the borehole monitoring assembly in the injection well rather than a separate monitoring well reduces the time and expense required for drilling a separate well. Placing the acoustical sensors below the packer isolates the sensors from the fracturing fluid and reduces the risk of damage to the sensors from the fracturing fluid as it is pumped down the wellbore. Similarly, placing communication line 40 within the string 30 isolates it from the fracturing fluid pumped down the annulus and significantly reduces the possibility of erosion or damage to the communication line. Furthermore, the placement of sensors 160 below the isolation device 50 has the effect of providing isolation from flow-induced noise.
  • Prior to the present invention, noise generated by pumping fracturing fluid in a wellbore has inhibited the ability to make successful microseismic measurements in the injection well. Several elements are used individually or in combination in the present invention to isolate and attenuate wellbore noise. Placing the acoustic energy sensor or sensors below the isolation device 50 provides a barrier to direct flow noise. Isolation device 50 is designed to efficiently allow setting/unsetting, cleaning of sand deposited on top, and enablement of noise isolation techniques (e.g., slacking). Configuring sensors 160 in an acoustic energy sensor package and mechanically isolating the sensor package 140 (see Fig. 2) from the tool body 124 may be used to attenuate noise (known as tubewaves) propagating in the wellbore fluid. Slacking communication line 40 may be used to attenuate noise propagating along the communication line 40 or borehole monitoring assembly 10. Isolation device 50 may comprise a compressional setting that is operational on a downward movement that accommodates slacking of communication line 40.
  • Shock absorbers designed to attenuate noise propagating in the bottomhole-assembly may be inserted between isolation device 50 and the acoustic sensors. Digital filtering may be used to identify upward and downward propagating noise with distinctly different characteristics from the microseisms. Such digital filtering techniques such as adaptive beamforming or velocity filtering may be used to attenuate noise. A sub-array of hydrophones placed within an array of geophones or accelerometers may be useful for identifying and removing propagating fluid (tube) waves. Additionally, pumping noise is at low frequencies (<20Hz) much below the typical microseismic band and may be substantially removed by conventional high-pass filters.
  • The borehole assembly 100 may further include other measurement devices such as pressure, temperature, gyroscopes, or any other device useful for measuring indications of fracture characteristics. The borehole assembly 100 may also include fracturing tools positioned above the isolation device 50 for use in the hydraulic fracturing process, such as jetting nozzle, clean-up port, etc. Furthermore, the borehole assembly 100 may include a single or multi-set isolation devise above the measurement devises to protect it from the impact of the fracture treatment.
  • Although directional and terms of orientation, such as "vertical," "up," "down," etc. have been used for reasons of convenience in the foregoing description, it is understood that such directions and orientations are not necessary to practice the invention. For example, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the borehole assembly 100 may be used in a lateral wellbore. Therefore, many variations are contemplated and are within the scope of the appended claims.
  • While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the scope of this present invention.

Claims (22)

  1. Apparatus for monitoring a hydraulic fracturing operation in a wellbore (20) performed by injecting a fracturing fluid from the wellbore into a formation (60) surrounding the wellbore, the apparatus comprising:
    a tool body (120); and
    at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) disposed on the tool body (120) and configured to monitor the fracturing operation by measuring acoustical energy generated during the fracturing operation;
    the apparatus characterized by an isolation device (50) configured to be positioned below the formation to be fractured and above the at least one acoustic energy sensor to isolate the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) from the pressure and flow of the fracturing fluid and characterized in that the at least one acoustic sensor is configured to be pressed against the wall of the wellbore while monitoring the fracturing operation.
  2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) comprises at least one of a geophone, hydrophone and accelerometer.
  3. The apparatus of claim 1 or claim 2, further comprising a string (30) to convey the isolation device (50) and said at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) downhole as a unit.
  4. The apparatus of any one of the claims 1 to 3, further comprising a remotely-activated connector to selectively connect the isolation device (50) to a tubular string (30).
  5. The apparatus of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the isolation device (50) comprises a packer (50).
  6. The apparatus of any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising a memory connected to and deployed a downhole with the tool body (120) to store data provided by said at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) such that the data is retrieved from the memory after the apparatus (10) is retrieved from the well.
  7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the isolation device (50), the tool body (120) and the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) form part of an assembly (100) which is connected to a coiled tubing (30) having a communication line (40) disposed therein.
  8. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means (80) to process data from the at least one acoustical energy sensor (160).
  9. A method of monitoring a hydraulic fracturing operation, the method comprising:
    deploying a borehole assembly (100) into a wellbore (20), the borehole assembly comprising a borehole monitoring assembly (10) having at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) for monitoring the fracturing operation by using the at least one sensor (160) to measure acoustical energy generated during the fracturing operation; and
    injecting a fracturing fluid under pressure from the borehole into a formation (60) surrounding the borehole to hydraulically fracture the formation;
    characterized by setting an isolation device (50) at a position below the formation (60) and above the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) to isolate the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) from the pressure and flow of the fracturing fluid, and effecting the monitoring by pressing the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) against the wall of the borehole.
  10. The method of claim 9, wherein the borehole assembly further comprises a supplemental sensor.
  11. The method of claim 9 or 10, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises an acoustical energy generating element.
  12. The method of any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises a noisy proppant.
  13. The method of any one of claims 9 to 12, further comprising the step of moving the borehole assembly 100 in the wellbore 20, and repeating the setting, injecting and monitoring steps
  14. The method of claim 10, wherein the supplemental sensor is an acoustic energy sensor (160).
  15. The method of claim 14, further comprising the step of using the output from the supplemental sensor in processing the measurement of acoustic energy.
  16. The method of any one of claims 9 to 15, further comprising orientating the borehole assembly (100) in the borehole (20).
  17. The method of any one of claims 9 to 16, wherein the isolating comprises setting a packer (50).
  18. The method of claim 17, further comprising:
    releasing the packer (50);
    repositioning the borehole assembly (100) in the wellbore (20); and
    repeating the isolating and injecting steps.
  19. The method of any one of claims 9 to 18, wherein the deploying comprises deploying the assembly (100) on a string (30), the method further comprising disposing a communication line (40) inside the string (30) to establish communication between said at least one sensor 160 and a surface acquisition system (80).
  20. The method of any one of claims 9 to 19, comprising providing a plurality of the sensors (160), the method further comprising spacing the sensors (160) along the wellbore (20).
  21. The method of any one of claims 9 to 20, further comprising retrieving the assembly (100) from the wellbore (20).
  22. The method of any one of claims 9 to 21, further comprising storing data indicative of the acoustical energy measured by said at least one sensor (160) in a memory of the assembly (100), and retrieving the data from the memory after the assembly (100) is retrieved from the borehole (20).
EP07735094A 2006-03-14 2007-03-13 Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring Active EP1996792B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL07735094T PL1996792T3 (en) 2006-03-14 2007-03-13 Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US78216106P 2006-03-14 2006-03-14
US11/617,372 US20070215345A1 (en) 2006-03-14 2006-12-28 Method And Apparatus For Hydraulic Fracturing And Monitoring
PCT/IB2007/050843 WO2007105167A2 (en) 2006-03-14 2007-03-13 Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1996792A2 EP1996792A2 (en) 2008-12-03
EP1996792B1 true EP1996792B1 (en) 2011-12-28

Family

ID=38349429

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07735094A Active EP1996792B1 (en) 2006-03-14 2007-03-13 Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US20070215345A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1996792B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101460703B (en)
AT (1) ATE539232T1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0708792A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2645351A1 (en)
EA (1) EA013610B1 (en)
MX (1) MX2008011685A (en)
PL (1) PL1996792T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2007105167A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016044026A1 (en) * 2014-09-18 2016-03-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and system for hydraulic fracture diagnosis with the use of a coiled tubing dual isolation service tool

Families Citing this family (94)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9500058B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2016-11-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Coiled tubing tractor assembly
US7617873B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-11-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and methods using fiber optics in coiled tubing
KR100924149B1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2009-10-28 한국지질자원연구원 Method for measuring in-situ stress of rock using thermal crack
CA2646605A1 (en) * 2006-11-01 2008-05-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracturing monitoring within a treatment well
US9477002B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2016-10-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Microhydraulic fracturing with downhole acoustic measurement
US8607864B2 (en) * 2008-02-28 2013-12-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Live bottom hole pressure for perforation/fracturing operations
GB2459457B (en) * 2008-04-22 2012-05-09 Swelltec Ltd Downhole apparatus and method
EA022413B1 (en) 2008-05-20 2015-12-30 Оксан Материалз, Инк. Method of use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries
CN101434836B (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-12-15 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 Continuous compounding method for fracturing fluid
US8490693B2 (en) * 2009-02-17 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles
BRPI1012029B1 (en) * 2009-05-27 2020-12-08 Optasense Holdings Limited method and system for monitoring and controlling a borehole process below
US8682102B2 (en) 2009-06-18 2014-03-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Cyclic noise removal in borehole imaging
US8655104B2 (en) * 2009-06-18 2014-02-18 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Cyclic noise removal in borehole imaging
US8437962B2 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-05-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Generating probabilistic information on subterranean fractures
US8386226B2 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-02-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Probabilistic simulation of subterranean fracture propagation
US8898044B2 (en) 2009-11-25 2014-11-25 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Simulating subterranean fracture propagation
US8392165B2 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-03-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Probabilistic earth model for subterranean fracture simulation
US9176245B2 (en) * 2009-11-25 2015-11-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Refining information on subterranean fractures
US8886502B2 (en) * 2009-11-25 2014-11-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Simulating injection treatments from multiple wells
CN101818633B (en) * 2010-01-18 2012-11-14 大庆福斯特科技开发有限公司 Downhole closing well technology of replacing tubing after deep horizontal gas well open hole staged fracturing
US9069099B2 (en) * 2010-02-02 2015-06-30 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for monitoring acoustic activity in a subsurface formation
US8960313B2 (en) * 2010-03-15 2015-02-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Packer deployed formation sensor
US8511400B2 (en) * 2010-04-05 2013-08-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and method for acoustic measurements while using a coring tool
EP2655795B1 (en) * 2010-12-22 2019-02-20 Maurice B. Dusseault Multi-stage fracture injection process for enhanced resource production from shales
US10001003B2 (en) * 2010-12-22 2018-06-19 Maurice B. Dusseault Multl-stage fracture injection process for enhanced resource production from shales
MX2013007200A (en) * 2010-12-22 2013-10-17 Nexen Inc High pressure hydrocarbon fracturing on demand method and related process.
CA2838840C (en) 2011-06-13 2020-05-12 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Hydraulic fracture monitoring using active seismic sources with receivers in the treatment well
US9945970B1 (en) * 2011-08-29 2018-04-17 Seismic Innovations Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy
US11774616B2 (en) 2011-08-29 2023-10-03 Seismic Innovations Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display
US8800652B2 (en) 2011-10-09 2014-08-12 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Method for real-time monitoring and transmitting hydraulic fracture seismic events to surface using the pilot hole of the treatment well as the monitoring well
US9140102B2 (en) 2011-10-09 2015-09-22 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System for real-time monitoring and transmitting hydraulic fracture seismic events to surface using the pilot hole of the treatment well as the monitoring well
CN102518426A (en) * 2011-12-31 2012-06-27 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司长庆井下技术作业公司 Hydrofracture bottom-hole pressure monitoring process
US9316098B2 (en) 2012-01-26 2016-04-19 Expansion Energy Llc Non-hydraulic fracturing and cold foam proppant delivery systems, methods, and processes
US20150003199A1 (en) * 2012-01-26 2015-01-01 Bernard Widrow Methods and apparatus for determining stimulated volume of oil and gas reservoirs
US8342246B2 (en) * 2012-01-26 2013-01-01 Expansion Energy, Llc Fracturing systems and methods utilyzing metacritical phase natural gas
US20130194892A1 (en) * 2012-01-29 2013-08-01 Daniel Golparian Autonomous System for Hydrofracture Monitoring
US9201157B2 (en) * 2012-04-26 2015-12-01 Farrokh Mohamadi Monitoring of wells to detect the composition of matter in boreholes and propped fractures
US10753197B2 (en) 2012-05-07 2020-08-25 Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. Method and system for monitoring well operations
US9739139B2 (en) 2012-05-18 2017-08-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Intervention operations with high rate telemetry
CN102828741A (en) * 2012-05-21 2012-12-19 中国石油天然气集团公司 Filtering method and device for positioning of rotating magnetic field of horizontal well
CN104131799A (en) * 2013-05-03 2014-11-05 梁红 Artesian well sealing and blocking device
CN104215934B (en) * 2013-06-05 2016-09-07 中国石油天然气集团公司 A kind of method utilizing uphole geophone to carry out fracturing micro-seismic monitoring
US20150075784A1 (en) * 2013-09-19 2015-03-19 Shell Oil Company Phased stimulation methods
US20160250812A1 (en) * 2013-10-14 2016-09-01 United Technologies Corporation Automated laminate composite solid ply generation
US9217808B2 (en) * 2013-11-07 2015-12-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wellbore signal monitor with tangential seismic sensors for tube-wave noise reduction
WO2015094159A1 (en) * 2013-12-16 2015-06-25 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Systems and methods for increasing fracture complexity using acoustic energy
WO2015089658A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-25 Hifi Engineering Inc. Sound baffle device and system for detecting acoustic signals
GB2535031B (en) * 2013-12-31 2020-06-17 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Rotating sensor mechanism for seismic while drilling sensors
US9683435B2 (en) 2014-03-04 2017-06-20 General Electric Company Sensor deployment system for a wellbore and methods of assembling the same
WO2015153537A1 (en) * 2014-03-31 2015-10-08 Schlumberger Canada Limited Systems, methods and apparatus for downhole monitoring
US20170074999A1 (en) * 2014-06-04 2017-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture treatment analysis based on seismic reflection data
US10001613B2 (en) * 2014-07-22 2018-06-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and cables for use in fracturing zones in a well
US10738577B2 (en) 2014-07-22 2020-08-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and cables for use in fracturing zones in a well
US10392916B2 (en) 2014-08-22 2019-08-27 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc System and method for using pressure pulses for fracture stimulation performance enhancement and evaluation
TWI629456B (en) * 2014-12-01 2018-07-11 財團法人國家實驗研究院 Environment monitoring system and vibration sensing device
US10060242B2 (en) 2014-12-05 2018-08-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Traceable metal-organic frameworks for use in subterranean formations
US10062202B2 (en) 2014-12-22 2018-08-28 General Electric Company System and methods of generating a computer model of a composite component
US10253598B2 (en) 2015-05-07 2019-04-09 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Diagnostic lateral wellbores and methods of use
WO2017039605A1 (en) * 2015-08-31 2017-03-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and systems employing a flow prediction model that is a function of perforation cluster geometry, fluid characteristics, and acoustic activity
WO2017059539A1 (en) 2015-10-09 2017-04-13 Darkvision Technologies Inc. Devices and methods for imaging wells using phased array ultrasound
WO2017079396A1 (en) 2015-11-05 2017-05-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods and apparatus for spatially-oriented chemically-induced pulsed fracturing in reservoirs
US10151186B2 (en) 2015-11-05 2018-12-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Triggering an exothermic reaction for reservoirs using microwaves
CN105525916B (en) * 2016-01-07 2018-05-25 陕西师范大学 A kind of active noise fracturing effect detection method
WO2017123217A1 (en) * 2016-01-13 2017-07-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. High-pressure jetting and data communication during subterranean perforation operations
BR112018070577A2 (en) 2016-04-07 2019-02-12 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited detection of downhole sand ingress locations
EP3670830B1 (en) 2016-04-07 2021-08-11 BP Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features
GB2566656B (en) * 2016-06-24 2022-03-02 Baker Hughes A Ge Co Llc Wellbore isolation system with communication lines
CN105927266B (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-05-08 山东唐口煤业有限公司 A kind of high-pressure hydraulic fracturing water injection system for coal seams and the automatically-monitored method of water filling
US10598011B2 (en) 2016-08-15 2020-03-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Segmented wireless production logging
CA3180983A1 (en) * 2016-08-18 2018-03-22 Seismos, Inc. Method for evaluating and monitoring formation fracture treatment using fluid pressure waves
WO2018136050A1 (en) * 2017-01-18 2018-07-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Determining fluid allocation in a well with a distributed temperature sensing system using data from a distributed acoustic sensing system
US10612356B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2020-04-07 Proptester, Inc. Fracture fluid and proppant transport testing systems and methods of using same
US11365626B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2022-06-21 Proptester, Inc. Fluid flow testing apparatus and methods
US11215044B2 (en) 2017-03-03 2022-01-04 Cold Bore Technology Inc. Adaptive noise reduction for event monitoring during hydraulic fracturing operations
EP3583296B1 (en) 2017-03-31 2021-07-21 BP Exploration Operating Company Limited Well and overburden monitoring using distributed acoustic sensors
US11199085B2 (en) 2017-08-23 2021-12-14 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole sand ingress locations
US11333636B2 (en) 2017-10-11 2022-05-17 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting events using acoustic frequency domain features
CN109931042B (en) * 2017-12-18 2022-03-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Directional hydraulic sand-blasting perforation fracturing device and method
CN109025939B (en) * 2018-07-27 2019-11-12 中国石油大学(北京) The fine and close oily imbibition experimental provision of ultrasonic wave
CA3053791A1 (en) 2018-09-04 2020-03-04 High-Definition Seismic Corporation Borehole seismic sensor array and associated methods
CA3120164A1 (en) 2018-11-29 2020-06-04 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Event detection using das features with machine learning
GB201820331D0 (en) 2018-12-13 2019-01-30 Bp Exploration Operating Co Ltd Distributed acoustic sensing autocalibration
US11111781B2 (en) * 2019-02-20 2021-09-07 Tubel Llc Instrumenting unconventional wells for real time in situ frac height determination, reservoir fluid movement, production monitoring and well integrity in fractured stages
CN109973051B (en) * 2019-04-11 2019-12-06 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所 high-pressure water conversion control device and stress measurement system
CN109899050A (en) * 2019-04-15 2019-06-18 武汉理工大学 Form the bed gas reservoir fracturing process of complex fracture network
WO2021073741A1 (en) 2019-10-17 2021-04-22 Lytt Limited Fluid inflow characterization using hybrid das/dts measurements
CA3154435C (en) 2019-10-17 2023-03-28 Lytt Limited Inflow detection using dts features
WO2021093974A1 (en) 2019-11-15 2021-05-20 Lytt Limited Systems and methods for draw down improvements across wellbores
CN111350496A (en) * 2020-03-19 2020-06-30 西安石油大学 System and method for fracture characterization in underground hydraulic fracturing process
EP4165284A1 (en) 2020-06-11 2023-04-19 Lytt Limited Systems and methods for subterranean fluid flow characterization
EP4168647A1 (en) 2020-06-18 2023-04-26 Lytt Limited Event model training using in situ data
CN112112619A (en) * 2020-09-16 2020-12-22 贵州大学 Shale gas underground rock stratum hydraulic fracturing method and equipment thereof
RU2758263C1 (en) * 2020-12-05 2021-10-27 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Сигма» Method for seismic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing processes in development of hydrocarbon deposits and heat impact processes in development of high-viscosity hydrocarbons
US11474270B2 (en) 2021-01-04 2022-10-18 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Three-component seismic data acquisition while fracking

Family Cites Families (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4328705A (en) * 1980-08-11 1982-05-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of determining characteristics of a fluid producing underground formation
US4442895A (en) * 1982-09-07 1984-04-17 S-Cubed Method of hydrofracture in underground formations
FR2600172B1 (en) * 1986-01-17 1988-08-26 Inst Francais Du Petrole DEVICE FOR INSTALLING SEISMIC SENSORS IN A PETROLEUM PRODUCTION WELL
US4731531A (en) * 1986-01-29 1988-03-15 Halliburton Company Method of logging a well using a non-radioactive material irradiated into an isotope exhibiting a detectable characteristic
US4832121A (en) * 1987-10-01 1989-05-23 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Methods for monitoring temperature-vs-depth characteristics in a borehole during and after hydraulic fracture treatments
US4926940A (en) * 1988-09-06 1990-05-22 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for monitoring the hydraulic fracturing of a subsurface formation
US5076392A (en) * 1988-09-28 1991-12-31 Koenig Arthur S Method and apparatus for forcing a member through material such as soil and obtaining samples therefrom
GB9026703D0 (en) * 1990-12-07 1991-01-23 Schlumberger Ltd Downhole measurement using very short fractures
FR2673672B1 (en) * 1991-03-08 1993-06-04 Inst Francais Du Petrole METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PLACING PROBES AGAINST THE WALL OF A WELL.
US5353637A (en) * 1992-06-09 1994-10-11 Plumb Richard A Methods and apparatus for borehole measurement of formation stress
US5322126A (en) * 1993-04-16 1994-06-21 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5413179A (en) * 1993-04-16 1995-05-09 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5771170A (en) * 1994-02-14 1998-06-23 Atlantic Richfield Company System and program for locating seismic events during earth fracture propagation
US6006832A (en) * 1995-02-09 1999-12-28 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and system for monitoring and controlling production and injection wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors
US5829520A (en) * 1995-02-14 1998-11-03 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for testing, completion and/or maintaining wellbores using a sensor device
US5503225A (en) * 1995-04-21 1996-04-02 Atlantic Richfield Company System and method for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations
US5524709A (en) * 1995-05-04 1996-06-11 Atlantic Richfield Company Method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore
US5607015A (en) * 1995-07-20 1997-03-04 Atlantic Richfield Company Method and apparatus for installing acoustic sensors in a wellbore
US5996726A (en) * 1998-01-29 1999-12-07 Gas Research Institute System and method for determining the distribution and orientation of natural fractures
GB2344174B (en) * 1998-07-10 2002-09-11 Schlumberger Ltd Borehole seismic tool
US6446727B1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2002-09-10 Sclumberger Technology Corporation Process for hydraulically fracturing oil and gas wells
US6552665B1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2003-04-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Telemetry system for borehole logging tools
US20030218939A1 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-11-27 Baker Hughes Incorporated Deployment of downhole seismic sensors for microfracture detection
US6935424B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-08-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Mitigating risk by using fracture mapping to alter formation fracturing process
US7134492B2 (en) * 2003-04-18 2006-11-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Mapping fracture dimensions
US6985816B2 (en) * 2003-09-15 2006-01-10 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for determining the orientation of natural fractures
US7543635B2 (en) * 2004-11-12 2009-06-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture characterization using reservoir monitoring devices

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016044026A1 (en) * 2014-09-18 2016-03-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and system for hydraulic fracture diagnosis with the use of a coiled tubing dual isolation service tool

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EA200870355A1 (en) 2009-02-27
ATE539232T1 (en) 2012-01-15
CA2645351A1 (en) 2007-09-20
CN101460703A (en) 2009-06-17
MX2008011685A (en) 2008-10-17
WO2007105167A3 (en) 2007-11-15
US20070215345A1 (en) 2007-09-20
EP1996792A2 (en) 2008-12-03
WO2007105167A2 (en) 2007-09-20
CN101460703B (en) 2013-12-04
PL1996792T3 (en) 2012-05-31
EA013610B1 (en) 2010-06-30
BRPI0708792A2 (en) 2011-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1996792B1 (en) Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring
US5503225A (en) System and method for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations
CA2860566C (en) Optical fiber well deployment for seismic surveying
US5524709A (en) Method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore
AU2019220720B2 (en) Vibration while drilling data processing methods
CA3003709C (en) Bridge plug sensor for bottom-hole measurements
US20130333879A1 (en) Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus
US9069099B2 (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring acoustic activity in a subsurface formation
US6554065B2 (en) Memory gravel pack imaging apparatus and method
WO2017105434A1 (en) Mitigation of cable damage during perforation
US6675914B2 (en) Pressure reading tool
US10267140B2 (en) Extendable/collapsible apparatus for fracture imaging and use of same
WO2017083443A1 (en) Moving system and method
US20120199368A1 (en) Method and Device for Deploying a Cable and an Apparatus in the Ground
US9045970B1 (en) Methods, device and components for securing or coupling geophysical sensors to a borehole
US11634973B2 (en) Dynamic strain detection for cable orientation during perforation operations
WO2021126873A1 (en) Method of monitoring a downhole stimulation operation, downhole device and system for monitoring the downhole operation
EP2092373A1 (en) Method and apparatus for long term seismic monitoring

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081014

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: MARTINEZ, ALEJANDRO

Inventor name: UNDERHILL, WILLIAM

Inventor name: LAFFERTY, THEODORE JR.

Inventor name: NUTT, LES

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090427

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 539232

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602007019676

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120329

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120428

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 539232

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20121001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007019676

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120313

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Payment date: 20150119

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20150209

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150310

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20150224

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20150309

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20150115

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602007019676

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20161130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160331

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160313

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240108

Year of fee payment: 18