EP1985355B1 - Verbundwerkstoff - Google Patents

Verbundwerkstoff Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1985355B1
EP1985355B1 EP07251682A EP07251682A EP1985355B1 EP 1985355 B1 EP1985355 B1 EP 1985355B1 EP 07251682 A EP07251682 A EP 07251682A EP 07251682 A EP07251682 A EP 07251682A EP 1985355 B1 EP1985355 B1 EP 1985355B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gas
component
coating
permeable composite
pfpe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP07251682A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1985355A1 (de
Inventor
Klaus Dr. c/o W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH Meindl
c/o.W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH Wolfgang Bürger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
WL Gore and Associates GmbH
Original Assignee
WL Gore and Associates GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to AT07251682T priority Critical patent/ATE511914T1/de
Application filed by WL Gore and Associates GmbH filed Critical WL Gore and Associates GmbH
Priority to PL07251682T priority patent/PL1985355T3/pl
Priority to EP07251682A priority patent/EP1985355B1/de
Priority to US12/107,595 priority patent/US8075669B2/en
Priority to EP20080735361 priority patent/EP2155370A1/de
Priority to PCT/EP2008/003234 priority patent/WO2008128760A1/en
Priority to CN2008800215260A priority patent/CN101730578B/zh
Publication of EP1985355A1 publication Critical patent/EP1985355A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1985355B1 publication Critical patent/EP1985355B1/de
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D51/00—Closures not otherwise provided for
    • B65D51/16—Closures not otherwise provided for with means for venting air or gas
    • B65D51/1605—Closures not otherwise provided for with means for venting air or gas whereby the interior of the container is maintained in permanent gaseous communication with the exterior
    • B65D51/1616—Closures not otherwise provided for with means for venting air or gas whereby the interior of the container is maintained in permanent gaseous communication with the exterior by means of a filter

Definitions

  • This invention relates to composite materials such as venting materials and vents containing said venting materials. More particularly, the present invention relates to air- or more generally gas-permeable venting composites that are oleophobic and liquid repellent.
  • vents There are many types of vents on the market that allow containers to vent by allowing a small amount of air flow through the vent.
  • Packaging vents are commonly used in providing venting solutions for consumer and industrial liquid cleaners. These liquid cleaners normally contain organic additives and surfactants which lower the surface tension of the liquid thereby promoting wetting and adherence to surfaces.
  • a further difficulty is that many types of newly developed liquid cleaners additionally have a higher viscosity than previously used. Higher viscosity liquids are preferred as this allows the liquid cleaner to function much better by increasing the adherence and contact time of the liquid to the surface to be cleaned. As a result of both the higher viscosity and the low surface tension, the viscous liquids also have the ability to stick much better to the vents themselves. The vents can therefore easily become clogged by liquid left on the surface of the vent. A further problem arises if the viscous liquid dries on the surface of the vent leaving an impermeable film made up of solid components dissolved in the liquid. The vent may therefore be rendered permanently inoperable with highly viscous liquids.
  • Viscous oils are a further type of liquid causing problems in automotive related venting applications.
  • Motor oils for example, have the ability to stick onto vents for electronic housings thereby preventing air flow and pressure exchange through the vent.
  • US 5,462,586 relates to an oil- and water-repellent gas-permeable filter which contains a porous filter material that has its internal and external surfaces coated with a compound comprising a first fluoropolymer having a fluorine-containing aliphatic cyclic structure in the main chain and a second fluoropolymer containing polyfluoroalkyl groups.
  • the coating in US 5,462,586 is intended to have substantially no effect on the porosity of the porous filter material.
  • US 5,462,586 is incorporated herein by reference.
  • sufficient residual gas flow e.g. air flow
  • the present invention provides a venting apparatus according to claim 1 and a method of venting gas according to claim 22.
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • the R 5 group may be an alkyl- or aryl-group.
  • the PFPE may comprise two end-groups at opposite ends of the PFPE structure.
  • the PFPE may comprise two perfluorinated end-groups at opposite ends of the PFPE structure, such as, -OCF 3 , -OC 2 F 5 , and -OC 3 F 7 ,
  • non-perfluorinated end groups such as those containing H. Cl, Br or I radicals.
  • non-perfluorinated end groups of PFPEs e.g. neutral PFPEs
  • end-groups according to the formula of -(O) n - (CR 1 R 2 ) m - CR 3 R 4 R 5 may be selected from any combination of the following:
  • the gas-permeable composite repells oils, water and/or water-based liquids.
  • the gas-permeable composite may be used where a surface of the composite may come into contact with high viscosity, low surface tension liquids.
  • the gas-permeable composite may therefore be used as a vent for receptacles (e.g. bottles) containing high viscosity liquids thereby preventing the receptacle becoming under- or over-pressurised.
  • the vent may be located in a lid or cap of the receptacle.
  • the gas-permeable composite has the ability to repel high viscosity liquids such as industrial cleaners, detergent solutions and oils.
  • the gas-permeable composite may be used to repel any form of hydrocarbon based liquids such as oils, lubrication oils, fuel oils, hydraulic fluids, gasoline, diesel and the like.
  • the composite may therefore have uses in automotive applications where lubricating oil is used in vehicle engines and in gearbox transmissions or axles.
  • the oleophobic and liquid repellent properties of the composite may also be used as a gas filter (e.g. an air filter) to prevent or least minimise air particle contamination.
  • the gas-permeable composite may be used to protect electronic components in mobile telephones, computers (such as disk drives) or automotive applications (such as sensors, motors, head lamps) or may be used in venting applications for medical equipment.
  • the gas-permeable composite may be substantially liquid-water resistant and may have a water entry pressure (WEP) higher than about 0.05 bar, 0.1 bar, 0.5 bar, 1.0 bar or 2.0 bar.
  • WEP water entry pressure
  • the gas-permeable composite may have an oil rating of greater than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 according to AATCC Test Method 118-1989.
  • the gas-permeable composite is therefore oleophobic.
  • the gas-permeable composite may have an air-permeability prior to any form of contact with a viscous liquid of less than about 1000 Gurley seconds, 200 Gurley seconds, 100 Gurley seconds, 50 Gurley seconds, or 30 Gurley seconds.
  • the gas-permeable composite may have a gas flow (e.g. air flow) recovery greater than about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or 90% as compared with the initial gas flow after exposure to a liquid for a set period of time such as about 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 30 seconds or 60 seconds.
  • the gas flow recovery may be measured after a pre-determined waiting time such as about 1 minute, 5 minutes or 10 minutes,
  • the gas-permeable composite may have a gas flow (e.g.
  • air flow recovery greater than about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or 90% as compared with the initial gas flow after exposure to a certain challenging test liquid such as described in an "air flow recovery test", which is described hereinafter in more detail.
  • exposure is meant any form of contact between the liquid (e.g. the test liquid) and a surface of the gas-permeable composite which includes inverting a liquid in a container onto a surface of the gas-permeable composite or dipping the gas-permeable composite into a liquid for a set period of time.
  • liquid repellency is meant the removal of liquid from a contact surface. So a vent with the ability to efficiently remove liquid from at least one of its surfaces is in the following designated as a vent with good liquid repellency properties.
  • the thickness of the gas-permeable composite may be in the region of a few micrometers to several hundreds of micrometers.
  • the composite may have a thickness of about 0.1 ⁇ m - 5000 ⁇ m, about 0.5 ⁇ m - 1000 ⁇ m, about 1 ⁇ m - 800 ⁇ m, about 5 ⁇ m - 800 ⁇ m, about 5 ⁇ m - 500 ⁇ m, about 10 ⁇ m - 800 ⁇ m, about 10 ⁇ m - 500 ⁇ m, about 50 ⁇ m - 500 ⁇ m, about 100 ⁇ m - 500 ⁇ m, about 10 ⁇ m - 100 ⁇ m, or about 10 ⁇ m - 50 ⁇ m.
  • the composite may also be attached to another or a plurality of other layers such as any appropriate backing layer to increase the mechanical integrity of the gas-permeable composite.
  • the gas-permeable composite may therefore be formed into, for example, a laminate.
  • the coating is comprised of a combination of the first and second components forming a synergistical partnership.
  • the first component may provide a certain degree of oleophobicity to prevent lower surface tension liquids from entering/wetting pores of the porous polymeric structure.
  • the second component may support the liquid repellency properties of coated surfaces. The liquid repellency properties may be improved by increasing the total coating laydown thereby closing/clogging surface pores and/or smoothing an outer surface of the polymeric structure (typically the second component is a liquid, and a liquid inherently forms extremely "smooth" surfaces).
  • the ratio and amount of the first and second components may be chosen and adapted to provide an optimum combination of liquid entry pressure and liquid repellency.
  • the liquid entry pressure is important to keep liquids out of the pores, i.e. to prevent wetting of the pores with low surface tension liquids.
  • the liquid repellency is necessary for removal of liquid puddles/droplets or liquid films from the substrate surface. Both properties are important for air flow recovery of the vent after contact with challenging liquids.
  • first and second components can be chosen to give excellent liquid repellency properties, this can have a detrimental effect on the liquid entry pressure. There is therefore a balance and trade-off in selecting the first and second components to obtain acceptable values for both liquid repellency and liquid entry pressures.
  • the weight ratio between the first and second components in the formed coating may be selected from any of the following ranges: about 1 weight part of the first component to about 0.01 - 100 weight parts of the second component; from about 1 weight part of the first component to about 0.1 - 30 weight parts of the second component; from about 1 weight part of the first component to about 0.5 - 20 weight parts of the second component, from about 1 weight part of the first component to about 2 - 20 weight parts of the second component; from about 1 weight part of the first component to about 1 - 10 weight parts of the second component; from about 1 weight part of the first component to about 3 - 7 weight parts of the second component; or from about 1 weight part of the first component to about 3 - 5 weight parts of the second component.
  • the molar ratio between the first and second components in the coating may be selected from any of the following ranges: from about 1 mol part of the first component to about 0.05 - 15000 mol parts of the second component; from about 1 mol part of the first component to about 0.5 - 10000 mol parts of the second component; or from about 1 mol part of the first component to about 1 - 5000 mol parts of the second component.
  • the coating covers/encloses at least some of the structural features of the outer and inner surface of the porous polymeric structure by a thin layer thus modifying the chemical nature of the surface and by that modifying the surface energy of the porous polymeric structure to prevent ingression of liquids (e.g. organic liquids) or oils.
  • liquids e.g. organic liquids
  • the coating may also form at least one or more or a plurality of closed and/or occluded surface portions by, for example, a thin closed and/or gas-impermeable coating layer on parts of the outer surface of the porous polymeric structure.
  • the coating layer may cover the nodes and fibrils on the outer surface of the porous structure and may block and/or occlude some of the pores on the outer surface of the porous polymeric structure.
  • outer surface is meant the outermost surface extending around a perimeter of the porous polymeric structure which can be physically touched and which first comes into contact with a liquid to be repelled. lt is this outer surface that is important for liquid repe11el1cy.
  • the term "outer surface" is not intended to Include the inner structure within the main body of the porous polymeric structure.
  • bridging elements are at least one reason for the improved liquid repellency behaviour and that the second component in, for example, a liquid form has a smoothing effect on the surface of the porous polymeric structure.
  • the smallest occluded surface portion may be in a size substantially equivalent to that of a pore/opening of the porous substrate.
  • the closed and/or occluded surface portions occurring on the outer surface of the porous polymeric structure may have a size from several ⁇ m 2 (square-micrometers) to several hundreds of ⁇ m 2 , and in total may comprise greater than about 1%, 2%, 5%, 7%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 50% of the outer surface.
  • the coating may also soak through the whole porous polymeric structure so that the other (uncoated) side is also rendered oleophobic.
  • the coating may penetrate (e.g. soak and/or impregnate) into the main body of the porous polymeric structure, however, it is intended that a portion of the coating remains on the outer surface of the porous polymeric structure, thus allowing the formation of closed and/or occluded surface portions.
  • the coating may both efficiently promote liquid repellency and may prevent or substantially prevent ingression of low surface tension liquids into pores of the porous polymeric structure and therefore maintain the ability to have a gas flow through the composite after contact with a viscous liquid.
  • the coating may therefore be used to provide a vent with significantly improved liquid repellency performance and significantly improved air flow recovery.
  • the coating layer both covering the structural features and covering/occluding the surface pores may have a typical thickness in the range of about 0.001 ⁇ m to 5 ⁇ m, about 0.01 ⁇ m to 1 ⁇ m, or about 0.1 ⁇ m to 0.5 ⁇ m
  • the coating does not fully block and/or occlude the porous structure, thus the composite remains gas-permeable.
  • the coating may be found to block and/or occlude about 0.1 - 80 %, about 0.1 - 50 %, about 0.1 - 30 %, about 0.5 - 10 %, or about 1 - 5 % of the surface pores. In particular embodiments, at least about 0.1 %, 1 %, 5 %, 10 %, 20%, 30 %, 50 % or 70 % of the surface pores may be blocked and/or occluded.
  • the total coating weight relative to the porous polymeric structure weight range may range from about 0.1 - 1000 wt. %, about 0.1 - 500 wt.
  • % about 0.1 - 300 wt%, about 1 - 500 wt.%, about 1 - 200 wt%, about 1 - 100 wt.%, about 1 - 50 wt.%, about 5 - 100 wt%, about 1 - 30 wt.%, about 5 - 30 wt% or about 2 - 15 wt.%.
  • the ratio of total coating weight relative to the weight of the porous polymeric structure may be at least about 3%, 5%, 10% or 20%.
  • the coating may be deposited in a range of about 0.01 - 1000 g/m 2 , about 0.05 - 300 g/m 2 , about 0.1 - 800 g/m 2 , 0.5 - 500 g/m 2 , 0.5 - 300 g/m 2 , about 1 - 300 g/m 2 , about 5 - 200 g/m 2 , about 10 - 100 g/m 2 , about 0.1 - 100 g/m 2 , about I - 50 g/m 2 or about 20 - 50 g/m 2 .
  • the coating may be deposited in a range of at least about 0.05 g/m 2 , 0.1 g/m 2 , 1 g/m 2 , 10 g/m 2 , 20 g/m 2 , 30 g/m 2 , 40 g/m 2 , 80 g/m 2 , 100 g/m 2 , 500 g/m 2 or 1000 g/m 2 .
  • the first component may have a molecular weight ranging from about 500 a.m.u. to about 10,000,000 a.m.u. or about 5000 a.m.u. to about 1,000,000 a.m.u..
  • the molecular weight of the first component may range from about 10,000 a.m.u. to about 1,000,000 a.m.u..
  • the fluorine content of the first component may be at least about 1 wt. %, 5 wt.%, 10 wt.%. 20 wt.% or 40 wt.% of the molecular structure of the first component.
  • the first component comprises any fluorinated material which is both oleophobic and hydrophobic, i. e. both oil- and water-repellent. Applied as a coating on a porous substrate, the first component prevents ingression of oils and low surface tension liquids into the pores of the substrate.
  • the first component may comprise a fluorinated or perfluorinated form of an ester such as an acrylate or methacrylate.
  • an ester such as an acrylate or methacrylate.
  • Homo- or copolymers of fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate compounds are well-known in the art. Examples for those polymers are described in " Modern Fluoropolymers", edited by John Scheirs, Wiley Series in Polymer Science, John Wiley &. Sons (Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto), 1997, Chapter 26 : Fluorinated Acrylic Ester Polymers, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Copolymers of fluorinated acrylates or methacrylates may comprise a range of other vinyl-monomers and are selected to adjust the required performance.
  • the first component may also be in the form of a co- or ter-polymer of tetrafluoroethytene (TFE) with, optionally, other fluorinated or non-fluorinated monomers.
  • TFE tetrafluoroethytene
  • the first component may comprise at least one amorphous fluoropolymer, amorphous perfluoropolymer, or a combination thereof, which can be dissolved in fluorinated solvents or mixtures thereof.
  • amorphous perfluoropolymers are known as Teflon® AF (DuPont), Hyflon® AD (Solvay Solexis) and Cytop® (Asahi Glass).
  • Teflon AF® is a family of amorphous fluoropolymers made by DuPont and are made by the copolymerisation of 2,2-bis-trifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3,-dioxole (PDD) with other fluorine-containing monomers.
  • PDD 2,2-bis-trifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3,-dioxole
  • Teflon® AF grades are copolymers of PDD and tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and are known as Teflon® AF1600 and Teflon® AF2400 (DuPont).
  • Hyflon® AD (from Solvay Solexis) is a family of amorphous perfluoropolymers made by copolymerization of 2,2,4-Trifluoro-5-trifluoromethoxy-1,3-dioxole (TTD) and tetrafluoroethylene (TFE).
  • TTD 2,2,4-Trifluoro-5-trifluoromethoxy-1,3-dioxole
  • TFE tetrafluoroethylene
  • US 5,883,177 describes amorphous perfluoropolymers based on TTD which are dissolved in fluoro-containing solvents to obtain solutions for coatings.
  • US 5,663,255 describes novel amorphous TFE-HFP copolymers.
  • US 5,919,878 describes amorphous fluoropolymers containing PEVE.
  • US 6,248,823 B1 , EP 0 633 257 , US 5,883,177 , US 5,663,255 and US 5,919,878 are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the first component may also comprise hydro- and oleophobic polymers containing PFPE blocks or units respectively obtained by chemical reactions of functionalized PFPEs compounds.
  • EP 1 270 631 A1 describes the preparation of PFPEs terminated with isocyanate groups which are reacted with hydrogenated diols to yield urethane polymers with PFPE units.
  • EP 1 270 631 A1 is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the first component is not particularly limited as long as it comprises a fluorinated material which is both oleophobic and hydrophobic, i. e. both oil- and water-repellent.
  • the first component may be deposited in a range of about 0.01 - 1.000 g/m 2 , about 0.05 - 500 g/m 2 , about 0.1 - 400 g/m 2 , about 0.5 - 300 g/m 2 , about 1 - 200 g/m 2 , about 5 - 100 g/m 2 , about 10 - 500 g/m 2 , about 5- 100 g/m 2 , or about 20 - 40 g/m 2 .
  • the first coating may be deposited in a range of at least about 0.01 g/m 2 , 0.1 g/m 2 , 1 g/m 2 , 10 g/m 2 , 20 g/m 2 , 40 g/m 2 , 100 g/m 2 , 500 g/m 2 or 1000 g/m 2 .
  • the second component may comprise any form or combination of a neutral PFPE.
  • PFPEs differ by the type of end groups in the molecular chain.
  • PFPEs which have neutral, non-reactive end groups.
  • neutral PFPEs are called neutral PFPEs and those are included in the present invention. They are also sometimes referred to as unpolar or non-polar PFPEs.
  • Common terminal end groups of neutral PFPEs are -OCF 3 , -OC 2 F 5 , and -OC 3 F 7 .
  • neutral PFPEs may comprise also other types of non-perfluorinated end groups such as those containing H-, Cl-, Br- or I-radicals.
  • PFPEs containing radicals such as H-, Cl-, Br-, I- or even other radicals within their backbone may still be regarded as neutral PFPEs according to the present invention, as long as they are hydrophobic.
  • An example for a repeating unit with H-, Cl, Br, and/or I- within the backbone may be CR 1 R 2 CF 2 CF 2 O wherein R 1 and R 2 independently have the meaning of H, Cl, Br, I, or C 1 -C 4 perfluoroalkyl.
  • Neutral PFPEs differ from functionalised PFPEs which may have been modified by end groups of a polar and reactive nature. These are commercially available, for example, under the trade name Fluorolink® (Solvay Solexis).
  • Neutral PFPEs are thermally stable, substantially insoluble in water and most common solvents, and cannot be leached out after a coating application.
  • PFPEs suitable for the present invention are, for example, known under the trade names Fomblin®, Galden® (both from Solvay Solexis), Krytox® (DuPont) and Demnum® (Daikin). These compounds are available in a substantially pure form, and are also sometimes supplied as a microemulsion in water, such as Fomblin FE 20C or Fomblin FE 20 EG.
  • neutral PFPEs have basic repeating units selected from any one of or combination of the following: CF 2 O; CF 2 CF 2 O; CF(CF 3 )O; CF 2 CF 2 CF 2 O; CF 2 CF(CF 3 )O; and CF(CF 3 ) CF 2 O.
  • Some newer types of neutral PFPEs may also contain other repeating units (e. g. C(CF 3 ) 2 O) or such with more than three carbon atoms: e. g. C 4 F 8 O; or C 6 F 12 O.
  • PFPE perfluoroalkyl ether moieties.
  • PFPE is synonymous to perfluoropolyalkylether.
  • Other synonymous terms frequently used include” "PFPE”, “PFPE oil”, “PFPE fluid” and "PFPAE.
  • the second component may comprise any suitable neutral PFPE available as a liquid, oil or grease which may be non-water or substantially non-water soluble.
  • the second component comprising a neutral PFPE may be a viscous liquid with viscosities ranging from about 10 mPa.s to about 1,000,000 mPa.s, about 10 mPa.s to about 10,000 mPa.s or preferably about 100 mPa.s to about 3000 mPa.s.
  • the second component may have a viscosity greater than about 50 mPa.s, 100 mPa.s, 150 mPa.s, 200 mPa.s, 250 mPa.s or 300 mPa.s.
  • the second component may be a viscous liquid with a viscosity greater than about 100 mPa.s.
  • the second component may have a surface tension lower than about 40 mN/m, 30 mN/m, 25 mN/m. 20 mN/m. 15 mN/m or 10 mN/m. Typically, the second component may have a surface tension lower than about 28 mN/m.
  • the second component may have a boiling point or decomposition point respectively of greater than about 150°C, 200°C, 250°C or 300°C. Typically, the second component may have a boiling point or decomposition point of greater than about 200°C.
  • the second component may have a vapour pressure at about 20°C lower than about 10 -1 mm Hg, 10 -2 mm Hg, 10 -3 mm Hg, 10 -4 mm Hg, 10 -5 mm Hg, 10 -6 mm Hg, or preferably lower than 10 -2 mm Hg.
  • the second component may have a molecular weight ranging from about 500 a.m.u. to about 500,000 a.m.u or about 1000 a.m.u. to about 100,000 a.m.u..
  • the molecular weight of the second component may range from about 2,000 a.m.u to about 20,000 a.m.u.
  • the second component may have an average molecular weight of at least about 1,000 a.m.u., 10,000 a.m.u., 50,000 a.m.u. or 100,000 a.m.u.. Preferably, the second component may have an average molecular weight of at least 1,000 a.m.u..
  • the second component may be deposited in the range of about 0.01 - 1000 g/m 2 , about 0.05 - 500 g/m 2 , about 0.1 - 400 g/m 2 , about 0.5 - 300 g/m 2 , about 1 - 200 g/m 2 , about 5 - 100 g/m 2 , about 1.0 - 500 about 5 - 100 g/m 2 , or about 20 - 40 g/m 2 .
  • the second component may be deposited in the range of at least about 0.01 g/m 2 , 0.1. g/m 2 , 1 g/m 2 , 10 g/m 2 , 20 g/m 2 , 40 g/m 2 , 100 g/m 2 , 500 g/m 2 or 1000 g/m 2 .
  • the fluorine content of the second component may be at least about 1 wt.%, 10 wt.%, 20 wt.% or 40 wt.% of the molecular structure of the second component
  • the second component may be substantially chemically inert, have high thermal stability, have a boiling point or decomposition point respectively greater than about 150°C or 200°C, have a low vapour pressure, have low surface tension, have oleophobic properties and have low solubility in common solvents.
  • the porous polymer structure may have passageways or continuous pores through the material.
  • the passageways may open on both sides of the porous polymer structure allowing the structure to function as a vent.
  • the porous polymeric structure may be selected from any suitable porous structure and may be in the form of a layer with a thickness ranging from about 0.1 ⁇ m to about 5000 ⁇ m, about 1 ⁇ m to about 500 ⁇ m, or about 10 ⁇ m to about 400 ⁇ m.
  • the porous polymeric structure may have a thickness of about 100 ⁇ m, about 200 ⁇ m or about 300 ⁇ m.
  • the thickness of the tape may range from about 10 ⁇ m to about 500 ⁇ m.
  • the porous polymeric structure may comprise one fluoropolymer or a combination of fluoropolymers.
  • the porous polymeric structure may comprise polytetrafuoroethylene (PTFE).
  • the porous polymeric structure may comprise one of or a combination of suitable fluoropolymers such as PTFE or polyvinylidene fluoride.
  • the porous polymeric structure may also comprise non-fluorinated polymers, such as any one of or a combination of polyolefins (e.g. polyethylene, polypropylene), polyamides, polyester, polysulfone, poly(ethersulfone), polycarbonate, polyurethane and combinations thereof.
  • the porous polymeric structure may be in the form of a membrane.
  • the porous polymeric structure may be expanded in at least one direction and may therefore be uni-axial or multi-axial expanded.
  • the porous structure may be expanded in two directions, such as in two substantially perpendicular directions, providing a bi-axial structure.
  • the porous polymeric structure may therefore be either mono- or bi-axially expanded such as mono- or bi-axially expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
  • the porous polymeric structure may be at least partially composed of fibrils and/or nodes.
  • the porous polymeric structure may be exemplified by a porous ePTFE film.
  • the layer thickness, densities and pore-size of the ePTFE layer used can vary, depending on the application.
  • an ePTFE vent may have a thickness in the range of about 5 ⁇ m to about 500 ⁇ m, a density in the range of about 0.4 to about 1.5 g/cm 3 and an average pore size in the range of about 0.05 to about 10 ⁇ m.
  • Preferred embodiments may have a thickness of about 30 ⁇ m to about 350 ⁇ m, a density in the range of about 0.5 to about 1.5 g/cm 3 , and an average pore size of about 0.1 ⁇ m to about 5 ⁇ m.
  • a particular preferred substrate is a porous PTFE made by stretching PTFE tape or film as described in US 3,953,566 , which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the structure comprises an interconnected network of nodes and fibrils interconnecting the nodes, the nodes and fibrils comprising the internal structure that defines the pores.
  • the porous polymeric layer may be an ePTFE membrane such as described in US 3,953,566 , which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the gas-permeable composite may comprise an ePTFE layer coated with a solution of, for example, about 0.5 wt.% - 2 wt.% Teflon® AF (e.g. Teflon® AF 1600) and about 1 wt.% - 20 wt.% PFPE in an appropriate solvent such as an organic fluorinated solvent.
  • the gas-permeable composite may comprise an already oleophobic treated membrane, which has an additional PFPE coating deposited thereon in a second coating step with, for example, a coating solution concentration of the PFPE in the range of about 1 wt.% - 10 wt.%.
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • the block copolymer may be in the form of an A-B or an A-B-A block copolymer wherein either of the A or B units may be PFPE based such as non-polar PFPE or neutral PFPE.
  • the PFPE may comprise repeating units such as any one of or combination of the following: CF 2 O; CF 2 CF 2 O; CF(CF 3 )O; CF 2 CF 2 CF 2 O; CF 2 CF(CF 3 )O; CF(CF 3 )CF 2 O; -(C(CF 3 ) 2 O)-; -CF 2 CF 2 CF 2 O-; -(C 4 F 8 O)- or-(C 6 F 12 O)-.
  • the PFPE forming the backbone of the copolymer is covalently linked to a non-PFPE block such as any suitable hydrocarbon based block.
  • the hydrocarbon based block may be selected from any polyolefin (such as polyethylene, polypropylene), polyester, polyurethane, polyamide or any other suitable polymeric forming components.
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • neutral PFPEs have basic repeating units selected from any one of or combination of the following: CF 2 O; CF 2 CF 2 O; CF(CF 3 )O; CF 2 CF 2 CF 2 O; CF 2 CF(CF 3 )O; and CF(CF 3 ) CF 2 O.
  • Some newer types of neutral PFPEs may also contain other repeating units (e. g. C(CF 3 ) 2 O) or such with more than three carbon atoms: e. g. C 4 F 8 O; or C 6 F 12 O,
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • a method of forming a gas-permeable composite comprising;
  • the method comprises forming a coating which may be obtained by dissolving together both the first and second components in an appropriate solvent to form a coating solution and then depositing this coating solution onto at least part of the outer surface of the porous polymeric structure using any suitable technique.
  • the first and second components may form a coating solution in any appropriate concentration such as about 0.1 - 50 wt.%, about 0.5 - 30 wt.%, or about 1 - 10 wt.%.
  • an organic solvent such as a fluorinated or perfluorinated organic solvent may be used to dissolve the first and second components.
  • the solvent may be a low molecular weight C 1 - C 20 or C 2 - C 10 fluorinated or perfluorinated solvent. Suitable solvents are available under the tradename 3M TM Fluorinert TM Liquids, 3M TM Performance Fluids or 3M TM Novec TM Fluids.
  • the solvent is intended to evaporate off leaving behind the first and second components to form the coating.
  • the boiling point of the solvent may be below about 150°C, 100°C or 70°C.
  • first or second component may initially be deposited in a first step at least onto the outer surface of the porous polymeric structure and thereafter in a second step the remaining of either the first or second component deposited.
  • the porous polymeric structure may have an initial oleophobic and hydrophobic coating formed from the first component.
  • the second component dissolved in solvent may then be added on top of the oleophobic and hydrophobic coating.
  • the components may then either at least partially dissolve into each other, or may stay separated.
  • any suitable form of deposition technique may be used such as a roller coating process, dipping, spray coating, brush coating, print coating, spin coating, depositing with a dropper such as a pipette, and the like.
  • the first component comprising oleophobic and hydrophobic fluorinated material may further be deposited by a plasma deposition coating step or another coating step out of the gas phase.
  • the first component may at least partially dissolve in the second component. It should also be noted that there may also be more than a two-component system, other than the solvent.
  • the first component may at least partially dissolve in the second component, especially when a high weight ratio of the first to the second component such as about 1 : 10 (i.e. in excess of the second component) is used. This can, for example, be the case for the aforementioned amorphous perfluoropolymers (as first component) and neutral PFPEs as second component.
  • the first and second components may simply mix with each other to form an admixture whereupon there is no chemical reaction or substantially no chemical reaction between the two components.
  • the first component may also be regarded as swollen by the second component rather than dissolved.
  • the first component prior to forming the coating may be in a solid and/or amorphous form and may comprise any suitable fluorinated or per-fluorinated oleophobic and hydrophobic oligomer and/or polymer, or combination thereof.
  • the first component may exist as a solid at, for example, about 20 °C and about 1 bar.
  • the second component prior to forming the coating is typically in a liquid form and may comprise any neutral PFPE.
  • a venting apparatus having an opening for venting gas from an enclosure or receptacle, said venting apparatus comprising:
  • a venting apparatus having an opening for venting gas from an enclosure or receptacle, said venting apparatus comprising:
  • the venting apparatus may be used as a vent for receptacles (e.g. bottles) containing liquids.
  • the vent may be located in a lid or cap of the receptacle.
  • venting apparatus may be used in automotive applications where lubricating oil is used in vehicle engines and in gearbox transmissions or axles.
  • the venting apparatus may be used to protect electronic components in mobile telephones, computers (such as disk drives) or automotive applications (such as sensors, motors, head lamps), or may be used in venting applications for medical equipment.
  • a ninth aspect there is provided a method of venting gas from an enclosure or receptacle, said method comprising:
  • a method of venting gas from an enclosure or receptacle comprising:
  • the method includes venting or filtering gas from any of the following: receptacles (e.g. bottles) containing high viscosity liquids; in automotive applications where lubricating oil is used in vehicle engines and in gearbox transmissions or axles; protecting electronic components in mobile telephones, computers (such as disk drives) or automotive applications (such as sensors, motors, head lamps); and in medical equipment applications.
  • receptacles e.g. bottles
  • lubricating oil is used in vehicle engines and in gearbox transmissions or axles
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • the gas-permeable composite may have a gas flow recovery greater than about 5% after exposure to a viscous liquid having a viscosity in the range 10 mPa.s - 50 m.Pa.s and a surface tension higher than about 27 mN/m at about 25°C.
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • a fourteenth aspect there is provided a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • a gas-permeable composite obtainable by:
  • a gas-permeable composite obtainable by:
  • a gas-permeable composite in a vent or gas filter comprising:
  • a gas-permeable composite in a vent or gas filter comprising:
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • a gas-permeable composite comprising:
  • FIG. 1 is one possible representation of apparatus according to the present invention, generally designated 100.
  • the apparatus 100 comprises a lid 102 containing a gas-permeable vent 104 (e.g. an air-permeable vent).
  • the gas-permeable vent 104 is centrally located in the lid 102 and permits gas flow 110 through the vent 104. Although not shown, it is not necessary for the gas-permeable vent 104 to be centrally located on the lid 102.
  • the lid 102 is secured to a container 106 via a screwthread.
  • the container 106 contains a viscous, low surface tension liquid 108.
  • the container 106 may be used as a receptacle for any type of liquid.
  • any viscous liquid 109 contacting the gas-permeable vent 104 is repelled.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic top view of a uni-axially expanded PTFE structure generally designated 200 which may form an outer surface of a porous composite.
  • the PTFE structure 200 is made up of nodes 210 and fibrils 212, with pores 214 located between the fibrils 212.
  • the coating layer 216 is a combination of a first component comprising oleophobic and hydrophobic fluorinated material and a second component.
  • the second comprises PFPE, said PFPE comprising end-groups selected from the following: -(O) n - (CR 1 R 2 ) m - CR 3 R 4 R 5 wherein:
  • the coating layer 216 covers/fills at least partially some of the pores 214 made up by the space between the fibrils 212.
  • the coating layer 216 may cover/fill at least part of the pores 214 on the outermost surface of the PTFE structure 200 but may also partially penetrate/impregnate into the main body of the PTFE structure 200.
  • the coating layer 216 therefore covers/coats the nodes 210 and fibrils 212 on the outer surface of the PTFE structure 200 and may block and/or occlude some of the surface pores 214 of the PTFE structure 200.
  • gals-permeable composite is meant a porous material that permits bulk flow of air or other gases through it. This is in contrast to non-porous materials in which gas permeation is controlled by diffusion mechanisms.
  • oleophobic (coating) component/material a material which repells oils. Typically these materials are fluorinated and exhibit surface energies lower than about 26 mN/m, preferred lower than about 24 mN/m, most preferred lower than about 20 mN/m.
  • oleophobic substrate/composite/membrane is meant a porous article with an AATCC Test Method 118-1989 oil rating of at least 1. This means that the gas-permeable substrate/composite/membrane has a degree of repellency towards oils and/or low surface tension liquids.
  • hydrophobic (coating) component is meant a material which repells water. Typically these materials are substantially insoluble in water and exhibit contact angles with water greater than about 60°, preferred greater than about 90°.
  • solid is meant a state of matter which can support loads, has a definite shape and volume, and whose constituent elements have a substantially fixed position in space relative to each other which accounts for a degree of rigidity.
  • liquid is meant a state of matter that has the ability to flow under the action of extremely small shear stresses and to conform to the shape of a confining vessel.
  • liquid also includes all forms of oils and greases.
  • liquid tight seal is meant a seal which can withstand a water entry pressure of at least about 0.03 bar without leakage.
  • outer surface is meant the outermost surface extending around an outer external perimeter of the porous polymeric structure which can be physically touched and which first comes into contact with a liquid to be repelled. It is this outer surface that is important for liquid repellency.
  • the “outer surface” is not intended to include the inner structure within the main body of the porous polymeric structure.
  • coating is meant a material covering surfaces on the “outer surface” of the porous polymeric structure and the inner structure within the main body of the porous polymeric structure.
  • the coating may form at least one or more or a plurality of closed and/or occluded surface portions by, for example, regions of a closed and/or gas-impermeable coating layer.
  • fluorinated material is meant a material with a fluorine content of at least 1 wt.%.
  • neutral PFPE is meant a perfluoropolyether with neutral or non-reactive end groups. These are also sometimes referred to as unpolar or non-polar PFPEs. Neutral PFPEs differ from the functionalized PFPEs which contain reactive end groups. Common terminal end groups of neutral PFPEs are -OCF 3 , -OC 2 F 5 , and-OC 3 F 7 . However, there may be also other types of non-perfluorinated end groups such as those containing H- ,Cl- Br- or I-radicals.
  • PFPEs containing radicals such as H-, Cl-, I- or Br- or even other radicals within their backbone may still be regarded as neutral PFPEs according to the present invention, as long as they are hydrophobic.
  • porous material that allow passage of gases, especially air. These include materials that comprise pores and voids that form passageways extending through the thickness of a material. Such materials may have very small, microscopic voids throughout an internal structure which form an interconnected continuous air path (passageway) from one surface to another. The passageways open on sides of the material and may be interconnected internally by, for example, fibrils and nodes.
  • polymer structure is meant any form of dimer, trimer, other forms of higher adducts, co-polymers, block co-polymers, ter-polymers, branched polymers, cross-linked polymers, low molecular weight polymers or high molecular weight polymers.
  • a “polymer structure” may be formed by a polymerisation reaction such as a radical polymerisation, a condensation or addition type reaction and may have repeat structural units and/or monomers connected by covalent bonds.
  • oligomer is meant a relatively small number of monomer units such as less than about 100 monomer units or less than about 30 monomer units.
  • component is meant a chemical molecule, compound and/or composition which is used as one of the ingredients to form the coating.
  • liquid repellency is used as a generic term for the ability of a surface to repel or remove liquids from a surface when forces such as gravity or surface tension work. The term is used irrespective of the exact mechanism how the liquid is repelled or leaves the surface. It implies the contraction of liquids on a surface to droplets, but also formation of a liquid film on the surface which contracts and/or slides down, or any other suitable mechanism.
  • test method which quantifies the liquid repellency property of a porous substrate. The test method used is described below.
  • the oil rating was determined using the AATCC Test Method 118-1989. The higher the rating, the better the oil repellency/resistance. A value of greater than 1, more preferably 4, or higher is preferred. The oil rating was determined on the side where the coating solution was applied or on the side that was directed towards the coating solution bath, respectively.
  • Water entry pressure provides a test method for water intrusion through membranes.
  • a test sample is clamped between a pair of testing plates.
  • the lower plate has the ability to pressurise a section of the sample with water.
  • a piece of pH paper is placed on top of the sample between the plate on the non-pressurized side as an indicator of evidence for water entry.
  • the sample is then pressurized with a rate of 1 bar/100 seconds until the pH paper gets wet which is the first sign of water entry.
  • the water pressure at breakthrough is recorded as the WEP.
  • test liquid composed of 68 wt.% water, 30 wt.% of 2-Propanol (Isopropanol, 99%) and 2 wt.% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) was used as test liquid.
  • SDS sodium dodecylsulfate
  • the Gurley air flow test measures the time in seconds for 100 cc of air to flow through a one square inch sample at 4.88 inches of water pressure. A sample is measured in a Gurley Densometer Model 4110 (ASTM 0726-58). The sample is placed between the clamp plates. The cylinder is then dropped gently. The automatic timer (or stopwatch) is used to record the time (seconds) required for a specific volume recited above to be displaced by the cylinder. This time is the Gurley number.
  • Pore size is determined using a standard PMI Porometer, Model CFP-1500 AEXL.
  • a silicone fluid is used for wetting of the pores (Silicones for personal care, 200 10 cst, from Dow Corning).
  • the determined mean flow pore size is given as the pore size of the substrates used in the description of the examples.
  • the viscosity of the reference liquids is determined by a Haake rheometer, model RheoStress 1.
  • a plate /cone arrangement (cone designation C35/2 Ti) was used for all the measurements. All given viscosity data refer to a temperature of 25°C and a shear rate of 50 sec. -1 .
  • the total coating laydown was determined by hot solvent extraction. For these measurements, 25 mm diameter discs of all samples were weighted before and after hot solvent extraction. From the weight difference of those samples the coating laydown was determined.
  • the samples were extracted for several days first with hot perfluorinated solvent FC-77 (from 3M company), afterwards with hot fluorinated solvent HFE-7500 (from 3M company) until no more weight loss of the samples was detected.
  • Figures 3A - 3C represent the air flow recovery test.
  • Figure 3A is a schematic representation of the air-flow recovery test apparatus, generally designated 300.
  • the air-flow recovery test apparatus 300 comprises a cylindrical container 302 with a diameter of 80 mm which may be used to retain a volume of 100 ml of test liquid 304.
  • test liquid a water based liquid composed of 3 wt.% Polyvinylpyrrolidone (from Aldrich Company, Art. No. 437190, mean molecular weight of 1300000 as determined by LS (Light Scattering)), 3 wt.% of the silicone surfactant Tegoprene® 5847 (wetting agent from Goldschmidt AG), and 94 wt.% deionised water was used.
  • test liquid A surface tension of 23 mN/m and a viscosity of 13.7 mPa.s (measured at a shear rate of 50 sec -1 ) were determined for the test liquid at a temperature of 25°C.
  • the test liquid must always be freshly prepared on the day of the measurement. This test liquid was used for the characterisation of all samples and in the following, all air flow data after performing air-flow recovery test always refer to this test liquid unless otherwise stated.
  • a second test liquid, a viscous oil was used for three samples only (Examples 1 , 4 and 5) to demonstrate the ability of surfaces to repel oils.
  • the designation of this oil was "Castrol Transmax Z" (automatic transmission fluid from Deutsche CastrolmaschinesgeseHschaft mbH. Hamburg).
  • FIG. 3A there is an adapter 306 through which air may enter into the container 302 for measurement of the initial air flow and residual air flow after liquid contact. Both air flows are measured at a pressure of 1.2 mbar (i.e. at an overpressure of 12 mbar compared with the surrounding pressure) yielding the air flow in the units norm/standard-liters/hour/cm 2 . All air now data regarding air flow recovery test hereinafter referred to are therefore in the units of standard liters/hour/cm 2 measured at a pressure of 12 mbar.
  • FIG 4 is an expanded view of the top end 308 of the container 302 which shows a microporous test sample 310 extending across a neck 302a of the container 302.
  • the material the container 302 and the neck 302a were constructed of was polycarbonate (Makrolon®).
  • the radius of the neck 302a rounding was 1 mm.
  • the microporous test sample 310 is secured in place using a seating ring 312 and a counter-pressure plate 314.
  • a substantially circular 20mm diameter section of the microporous test sample is exposed to the test liquid 304.
  • an adaptor plate may be used to seal and locate the test sample or vent construction, respectively, within the perimeter of the neck 302a.
  • a simple calculation can then be used to scale the obtained results for these smaller types of microporous test samples. Smaller samples may therefore be measured with this apparatus.
  • the container 302 as shown in Figure 3B is inverted so that the test liquid 304 contacts the microporous test sample 310 for 5 seconds.
  • the height of the liquid column over the test sample is 2 cm.
  • the container 302 is then returned to its original position whereupon the residual air flow was measured after a waiting time of exactly 5 minutes.
  • the air flow recovery test is performed at room temperature.
  • the percent air flow recovery of a porous test sample was determined by the following formula: (residual air flow / initial air flow)*100. Both air flows were determined as described in the air flow recovery test.
  • Figure 5 is a representation of apparatus 400 used to perform a liquid repellency test.
  • One side of a glass slide 402 (3.4 cm x 8 cm) is provided with a double-sided adhesive tape 404 onto which a sample of the microporous substrate 406 to be tested is fixed.
  • the glass slide 402 with the fixed porous substrate 406 is vertically immersed into a bath 408 containing test liquid 410 for about 1 - 2 seconds and then pulled out.
  • the test liquid was coloured with a few drops (5 drops per 100 g of liquid) of the following blue dyestuff solution: Duasyn Cyan FRL 10 liq. (Clariant. Kunststoff (Deutschland) GmbH, Frankfurt am Main).
  • the test was practically done by vertically fixing the glass slide 402 with a sample holder (not shown), and lifting the bath 408 with the test liquid 410 from below until about 80% of the length of the fixed porous substrate 406 is immersed.
  • the bath 408 was quickly pulled away from the bottom so that a thin film of the test liquid 410 was left on outer surface 406a of the porous substrate 406.
  • the sliding down and contraction behaviour of the liquid film of 410 on the outer surface 406a during time may be recorded with a video camera 412 for subsequent evaluation.
  • Figures 6A and 6B show a typical evaluation of four test SarTlples 1, 2, 3, 4 in parallel.
  • Sample 1 was coated with a solution of 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 in a fluorinated solvent
  • Sample 2 was coated with a solution of 1 wt.% Teflon® A.F1600 and 1 wt.% PFPE in a fluorinated solvent
  • Sample 3 was coated with a solution of 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 5 wt.% PFPE
  • Sample 4 was coated with a solution of 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 10 wt.% PFPE in a fluorinated solvent.
  • the PFPE used was Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 (Solvay Solexis; average molecular weight: 3300 a.m.u.).
  • Figure 6B shows a second snapshot after a waiting time of 15 seconds, respectively.
  • the test liquid used was a mixture of water, polyvinylpyrrolidone and a silicone surfactant (Tegoprene® 5847) as described before. This test liquid had a surface tension of 23 mN/m and a viscosity of 13.7 mPa.s (at a shear rate of 50 sec -1 ), both measured at a temperature of 25°C.
  • Figure 6B shows that Sample 1 is ineffective at repelling the test liquid as the percentage of area covered remains almost unchanged after 15 seconds.
  • Samples 3 - 4 which were coated with increasing amounts of PFPE exhibit much improved liquid repellency properties.
  • Sample 4 has the best liquid repellency properties as virtually all of test liquid has been repelled from the contact surface after 15 seconds.
  • any suitable oleophobic and hydrophobic fluorinated material may be used to form the first component and any suitable second component comprising a PFPE with end-groups as follows may be used: -(O) n - (CR 1 R 2 ) m - CR 3 R 4 R 5 wherein:
  • the second component may comprise a block copolymer comprising a PFPE backbone.
  • cPTFE expanded polytetrafluoroethylene
  • An uncoated porous monoaxial expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane having a thickness of 308 ⁇ m, an area weight of 275 g/m 2 , a porosity of 59.3 %, a mean pore size of 0.32 ⁇ m, an air flow of 24 Gurley seconds, a water entry pressure of 0.93 bar, and an oil rating of 2 was used.
  • the polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was manufactured as defined in US 3,953,566 , which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • This oleophobically treated ePTFE membrane had a thickness of 1.91 ⁇ m, an area weight of 205 g/m 2 , a porosity of 51 %, a mean pore size of 0.72 ⁇ m, an air flow of 25 Gurley seconds, a water entry pressure of 1.19 bar, and an oil rating of 8.
  • a commercially available biaxial expanded ePTFE membrane (available from W. L. Gore & Associates GmbH, Germany, Article No. GMP 20233). This ePTFE membrane had a thickness of 25 ⁇ m, an area weight of 16 g/m 2 , a porosity of 71%, a mean pore size of 0.19 ⁇ m, an air flow of 13.4 Gurley seconds, a water entry pressure of 4.38 bar, and an oil rating of 1.
  • An uncoated porous monoaxial expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane having a thickness of 106 ⁇ m, a width of 12.0 cm, an area weight of 83 g/m 2 , a porosity of 64 %, a mean pore size of 0,32 ⁇ m, an air flow of 22 Gurley seconds, a water entry pressure of 1.40 bar, and an oil rating of 1 was used.
  • the polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was manufactured as defined in US 3,953,566 , which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Substrates 1, 2, 3 and 4 are shown in Table 1 below.
  • Table 1 Substrate No, Thickness ( ⁇ m) Area Weight (g/m 2 ) Density (g/cm 3 ) Porosity (%) Pore Size PMI MFP AVG ( ⁇ m) Air flow in Gurley sec. WEP (bar) Oil rating Substrate 1 308 275 0.892 59.3 0.32 24.2 0.93 2 Substrate 2 191 205 1.074 51.0 0.72 25.4 1.19 8 Substrate 3 25 16 0.636 71.0 0.19 13.4 4.38 1 Substrate 4 106 83 0.789 64.0 0.32 22 1.40 1
  • the Substrates 1., 2, 3 and 4 were treated to form composites. Two different coating processes were used for the treatment.
  • FIG 8 is a representation of apparatus generally designated 500 used in coating process A.
  • a microporous substrate 502 is passed over a first roller 504 and then using an immersion roller 506 is passed through a bath 508 containing coating solution 510.
  • the speed of the substrate 502 through the bath 508 is adjusted (typically around 1 m/min) so that the opaque microporous substrate 502 is substantially transparent when pulled out of the bath 508 (as an indication for filling of the pores with the coating solution).
  • the coated substrate is fixed on a tenter frame (not shown) and passed through an oven (not shown) for a dwell time of about 2 minutes to completely remove the solvent.
  • the oven temperature may be varied depending on the solvent to be evaporated and may, for example, range from about 25°C - 150°C. Regarding the described Examples 1 - 15. the oven temperature was in the range of about 80 - 100°C.
  • One side of a glass slide (2.5 cm x 7.5 cm) is provided with a double-sided adhesive tape onto which a sample of the substrate is fixed.
  • the supported substrate is then held at about a 60° angle over a catch pan and saturated with the coating solution using a pipette.
  • the coating solution almost immediately wetted out the pores of the substrate (i.e. the pores were filled with the coating solution as evidenced by the normally opaque PTFE membrane becoming transparent), and excess solution dripped off into the pan.
  • the coated substrate is dried for 10 minutes at room temperature in a fume hood and an additional 5 minutes at 100°C in a ventilated oven.
  • Substrate 1 was only coated with a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the Teflon® AF1600 renders the substrate oleaphobic.
  • the coating laydown of Teflon® AF1600 was about 3.7 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and 2,2-bis-trifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3,-dioxol (PDD), Teflon® AF1600 amorphous fluoropolymer (64 mole% PDD) supplied by DuPont company, in 99 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% solution of Teflon® AF1600. The mixture was stirred for around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • TFE tetrafluoroethylene
  • PDD 2,2-bis-trifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3,-dioxol
  • PF-5070 from 3M company
  • the resultant coated substrate 1 had an oil rating of 6 and therefore is oleophobic. Furthermore, the coated substrate 1 showed all air flow of about 17 Gurley seconds, a WEP of about 0.93 bar and a LEP of about 0.27 bar. The initial air flow of coated substrate 1 was 3.32 1/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the residual air flow after the air flow recovery test was 0.0 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar). There was therefore no air flow recovery after exposure to the test liquid as described in air-flow recovery test.
  • Figures 9 and 10 show two surface SEM images at different magnification of Example 1.
  • the substrate 1 was coated with a 10 wt.% PFPE coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the coating laydown of the PFPE was of about 38.2 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 10 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) in 90 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 10 wt.% coating solution of PFPE. The solution was shaken until the PFPE was completely dissolved.
  • PFPE Factorin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company
  • This coated substrate showed only a very low oil-rating of 2, a Gurley number of about 12.1. seconds, a WEP of about 0.71 bar and a very low LEP of only about 0.07 bar.
  • the initial air flow of the coated substrate 1 was 4.20 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 1.2 mbar).
  • the residual air flow after air flow recovery test was about 3.04 l/h/cm 2 measured at a pressure of 12mbar). Therefore, this example showed an air flow recovery after exposure to the low surface tension test liquid of air flow recovery test, but only a poor oil rating and very low liquid entry pressure. Therefore this sample will get wetted after longer exposure to low surface tension liquids, or if some hydrostatic pressure is applied.
  • the substrate 1 was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 1 wt.% PFPE using the continuous coating process A.
  • the total coating laydown was about 7.5 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of Teflon® AF1600 and 1 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6) in 98 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 / 1 wt.% PFPE coating solution.
  • the mixture was stirred around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated Example 3 showed an oil-rating of 7, an air now of 15.3 Gurley seconds, a WEP of about 0.86 bar and a LEP of about 0.26 bar.
  • the residual air flow after air flow recovery test was 0.0 l/h/cm 2 (at a pressure of 12mbar). Therefore this sample showed no air flow recovery after exposure to the test liquid as described in air now recovery test.
  • the substrate was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 5 wt.% PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6) using the continuous coating process A.
  • the total coating laydown was about 23.5 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of Teflon® AF1600 and 5 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6) in 94 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 / 5 wt.% PFPE coating solution. The mixture was stirred around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate 1 had an on-rating of 6, a Gurley number of about 12.5 seconds, a WEP of about 0.79 bar and a LEP of about 0.19 bar.
  • the initial air flow of coated substrate 1 was about 3.87 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the substrate 1 was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 10 wt.% PFPE using the continuous coating process A.
  • the total coating laydown was about 42.1 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1g of Teflon® AF1600 and 10g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6) in 89g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 / 10 wt.% PFPE coating solution. The mixture was stirred around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate had an oil-rating of 5, a Gurley number of about 11 seconds, a WEP of about 0.73 bar and a LEP of about 0.12 bar.
  • the initial air flow of coated substrate 1 was 4.76 1/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • This sample showed a residual air flow of about 3.58 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12mbar) after air flow recovery test. This corresponded to an air flow recovery of 75.2 %.
  • this sample showed both a higher liquid entry pressure and also an air flow recovery after exposure to air flow recovery test.
  • Figure 11 and 12 show two surface SEM images of Example 5 coated with the addition of 10 wt.% PFPE to 1 wt.% Teflon® AF 1600 solution.
  • the surface of Example 5 shows both a significantly improved liquid repellency performance and also a marked difference in visual appearance compared with Example 1.
  • Example 5 exhibits bridging elements between nodal island-like regions of the surface. These bridging elements consist of pores (made up by the space between two fibrils) which are (at least partially) filled or covered with the coating components. Clusters of fined/covered pores are also visible.
  • Figure 13 is a further magnified view of Example 5.
  • Figure 14 is a graph showing the % of area covered by test liquid vs. time using the liquid repellency test for Examples 1, 3, 4 and 5.
  • test liquid the already described mixture of water, Polyvinylpyrrolidone and Tegoprene® 5847 was used.
  • the graph clearly shows that Examples 4 and 5 which have the coating of both Teflon® AF1600 and PFPE have much improved repellency towards the test mixture than Example 1 which only has a coating of Teflon® AF1600.
  • Figure 15 shows the % air flow recovery versus the % PFPE oil in the coating solution referring to the Examples 1, 3, 4, 5. Additionally the liquid entry pressure (LEP) of the samples is plotted. Figure 15 additionally shows the corresponding sample as described in Example 2 which was only coated with the PFPE oil.
  • the test liquid for measuring the liquid entry pressure was the already described mixture of water, 2-Propanol and sodium dodecylsulfate (surface tension: 26.5 mN/m; viscosity: 2.8 mPa.s). Figure 15 clearly demonstrates that with the two component coating both a significantly improved air flow recovery and a high liquid entry pressure can be achieved.
  • Figure 16 shows the % air flow recovery versus the % PFPE in the coating solution for Examples 1, 4 and 5.
  • a viscous oil was used (Castrol Transmax Z, automatic transmission fluid from Deutsche Castrolmaschinesgesellschaft mbH, Hamburg). Again a significant improvement in air flow recovery by addition of the PFPE to the coating formulation was recorded.
  • Table 3 Results from the air flow recovery test with transmission oil Castrol Transmax Z for Examples 1, 4, 5 (substrate 1).
  • the oleophobic substrate 2 was tested without any addition of PFPE.
  • the substrate 2 had an oil-rating of 8, a Gurley number of about 25.5 seconds, a WEP of about 1.11 bar and a LEP of about 0.33 bar.
  • the initial air flow of oleophobic substrate 2 was 2.20 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the oleophobic substrate 2 was coated with a 1 wt.% PFPE coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the total coating laydown was about 6.4 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) in 99 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% coating solution of PFPE. The solution was shaken until the PFPE was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate had an oil-rating of 8, a Gurley number of about 26 seconds, a WEP of about 1.02 bar and a LEP of about 0.32 bar.
  • the initial air flow of coated oleophobic substrate 2 was 2.15 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the oleophobic substrate 2 was coated with a 5 wt.% PFPE coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the total coating laydown was of about 14.5 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 5 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) in 95 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 5 wt.% coating solution of PFPE. The solution was shaken until the PFPE was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate had an oil-rating of 6, a Gurley number of about 25.4 seconds, a WEP of about 1.09 bar and a LEP of about 0.28 bar.
  • the initial air flow of coated oleophobic substrate 2 was 2.13 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the residual air flow was 1.02 l/h/cm 2 (measured at 12 mbar). Therefore, this example showed both a high liquid entry pressure and an air flow recovery of around 48% after exposure to the low surface tension test liquid of air flow recovery test.
  • the oleophobic substrate 2 was coated with a 10 wt. % PFPE coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the total coating laydown was of about 25.8 g/m 2 .
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 10 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) in 90 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 10 wt.% coating solution. The solution was shaken until the PFPE was completely dissolved. The resultant coated substrate had an oil-rating of 5, a Gurley number of about 24.4 seconds, a WEP of about 1.01 bar and a LEP of about 0.21 bar. The initial air flow of coated oleophobic substrate 2 was 2.36 1/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the residual air flow was 1.20 l/h/cm 2 (measured at 1.2 mbar). Therefore, this example showed both a moderate high liquid entry pressure and a high air flow recovery of 51% after exposure to the low surface tension test liquid of air flow recovery test.
  • Example 6 refers to Substrate 2 which was already oleophobic treated.
  • Examples 7 - 9 refer to Substrate 2 which was additionally coated with a PPPE oil).
  • Table 4 Air flow recovery test.
  • Example Coating Solution Composition Total Coating Laydown (g/m 2 ) Oil Rating Air permeability (Gurtey) (sec.) water entry pressure (WEP)(bar) Liquid entry pressure (LEP)(bar) initial air flow (I/h/cm 2 ) @ 12mbar residual air flow after 5min (I/h/cm 2 @ 12Mbar % air flow recovery 6 no PFPE 4.3 8 25.5 1.11 0.33 2.2 0 0 7 1% PFPE 6.4 8 26 1.02 0.32 2.15 0 0 8 5% PFPE 14.5 6 25.4 1.09 0.28 2.13 1.02 47.7 9 10% PFPE 25.8 5 24.4 1.10 0.21 2.36 1.2 51
  • Figure 17 is a graph showing the % of area covered by the test liquid vs. time using liquid repellency test for Examples 6, 7, 8 and 9.
  • test liquid again the already described mixture of water, Polyvinylpyrrolidone and Tegoprene® 5847 was used (surface tension of 23 mN/m and a viscosity of 13.7 mPa.s at 25°C).
  • the graph in Figure 17 clearly shows that Examples 8 and 9 which have the coating of PFPE as well as the oleophobic coating on the ePTFE substrate 2 have much improved repellency towards the test mixture than Example 6 which has no additional PFPE coating.
  • Figure 18 is a graph showing both the % air flow recovery-and also the liquid entry pressure (LEP) vs. wt.% of PFPE in the coating solution for Examples 6, 7, 8 and 9.
  • the test liquid for measuring the % air flow recovery was again the already described mixture of water, Polyvinylpyrrolidone and Tegoprene® 5847.
  • the test liquid for measuring the liquid entry pressure was the already described mixture of water, 2-Propanol and sodium dodecylsulfate (surface tension: 26.5 mN/m; viscosity: 2.8 mPa.s).
  • the graph in Figure 18 clearly shows that Examples 8 and 9 have a much improved repellency towards the test mixture than Example 6, but still exhibit a high LEP greater than 0.2 bar.
  • Examples 10 and 11 described below were prepared to prove a good liquid repellency performance using different types of PFPE oils.
  • Krytox® GPL107 from DuPont Company
  • Fomblin® Y LVAC25/6 from (Solvay Solexis Company) were tested and compared with each other. In both cases about the same good liquid repellency performance was achieved.
  • the substrate 1 was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 10 wt.% PFPE-oil (Krytox® GPL107 from DuPont) using the discontinuous coating process B.
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of Teflon® AF 1600 and 10g of PFPE (Krytox® GPL107 from DuPont) in 89g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 / 10 wt.% PFPE coating solution. The mixture was stirred around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the substrate 1 was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 10 wt.% PFPE-oil (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) using the discontinuous coating process B.
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of Teflon® AF1600 and 10 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) in 89 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 / 10 wt.% PFPE coating solution.
  • the mixture was stirred for around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF 1600 was completely dissolved.
  • Figure 19 is a graph showing the % of area covered by the test liquid vs. time using liquid repellency test for Examples 10 and 11.
  • test liquid again the already described mixture of water, Polyvinylpyrrolidone and Tegoprene® 5847 was used (surface tension of 23 mN/m and a viscosity of 13.7 mPa.s at 25°C).
  • the graph shows that both types of PFPE oils are about same effective in improving the liquid repellency performance of the prepared substrates.
  • Examples 12 and 13 are examples with the biaxial expanded ePTFE membrane (Substrate 3). Also in this case an improvement in air flow recovery was achieved by combining a liquid PFPE oil with Teflon® AF.
  • Substrate 3 was only coated with a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g Teflon® AF1600 in 99 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% solution of Teflon® AF1600. The mixture was stirred for around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate 3 had an oil rating of 5. Furthermore, the coated substrate 12 showed an air flow of about 15.6 Gurley seconds, a WEP of about 3.7 bar and a LEP of about 0.69 bar. The initial air flow of coated substrate 3 was 4.85 1/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the residual air flow was 0.0 1/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar). There was therefore no air flow recovery after exposure to the test liquid as described in air flow recovery test.
  • the substrate 3 was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 10 wt.% PFPE oil (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) using the continuous coating process A.
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of Teflon® AF1600 and 10 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6 from Solvay Solexis company) in 89 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.%, Teflon® AF1600 / 10 wt.% PFPE coating solution.
  • the mixture was stirred around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF 1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate 3 had an oil rating of 4. Furthermore, the coated substrate 3 showed an air flow of about 40.6 Gurley seconds, a WEP of about 2.60 bar and a LEP of about 0.35 bar. The initial air flow of coated substrate 1 was 3.05 1/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the residual air flow was 0.25 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar). This means an air flow recovery of 8 % after exposure to the test liquid as described in air flow recovery test.
  • Table 5 Summary of the measurements on the Examples 12 and 13 (substrate 3 was used for preparation of all samples).
  • Table 5 Air-flow recovery test Example Coating Solution Composition Oil Rating Air permeability (Gurley) (sec.) Water entry pressure (WEP) (bar) Liquid entry pressure (LEP) (bar) Initial air flow (1/h/cm 2 ) @ 12mbar Residual air flow after 5 min (1/h/cm 2 ) @ 12mbar % air flow recovery 12 1 % AF1600 5 15.6 3.7 0.69 4.85 0 0 13 1% AF1600/ 10% PFPE 4 40.6 2.6 0.35 3.05 0.25 8.0
  • Figure 20 compares an SEM image of Example 12 with Example 13. As already pointed out for Example 5 in the earlier examples. Example 13 also shows that a significant amount of pores are filled or covered by the coating components.
  • Example 15 in the following is a further example showing both a high air flow recovery after liquid challenge and also a high liquid entry pressure (LEP).
  • Example 14 is added as for comparison purposes.
  • Substrate 4 was coated with a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 coating solution using the continuous coating process A.
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g Tefllon® AF1600 in 99 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% solution of Teflon® AF1600. The mixture was stirred for around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate 4 showed an oil rating of 6. Furthermore, the coated substrate 4 exhibited an air flow of about 13.5 Gurley seconds, a WEP of about 1.36 bar and a LEP of about 0.35 bar. The initial air flow of coated substrate 4 was 3.64 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • the residual air flow was 0.57 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar). This means an air flow recovery of 15.7 % after exposure to the test liquid as described in air flow recovery test.
  • Figures 21 and 22 show SEM surface images of Example 14 which is only Teflon® AF coated.
  • Substrate 4 was coated with a coating solution comprising 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 and 4 wt.% PFPE using the continuous coating process A.
  • the coating solution was obtained by placing 1 g of Teflon® AF1600 and 4 g of PFPE (Fomblin® Y LVAC 25/6) in 95 g of the perfluorinated solvent PF-5070 (from 3M company) to result in a 1 wt.% Teflon® AF1600 / 4 wt.% PFPE coating solution. The mixture was stirred around 6 hours at room temperature until the Teflon® AF1600 was completely dissolved.
  • the resultant coated substrate 4 had an oil-rating of 6, a Gurley number of about 13.1 seconds, a WEP of about 1.21 bar and a LEP of about 0.25 bar.
  • the initial air flow of coated substrate 1 was 4.95 l/h/cm 2 (measured at a pressure of 12 mbar).
  • Figures 23 and 24 show SEM images of Example 15 with the combination of Teflon® AF and PFPE oil.
  • Example 15 exhibits bridging elements between the nodal areas consisting of the coating components at least partially filling or covering pores.
  • Table 6 Summary of the measurements on the Examples 14 and 15 (substrate 4 was used for preparation of all samples).
  • Table 6 Air flow recovery test Example Coating Solution composition Oil rating Air permeability (Gurley) (sec.) Water entry pressure (WEP) (bar) Liquid entry pressure (LEP) (bar) Initial air flow (1/h/cm 2 ) @ 12mbar Residual air flow after 5min (1/h1cm 2 ) @ 12mbar % air flow recovery 14 1% AF1600 6 13.5 1.36 0.35 3.64 0.57 15.7 15 1% AF1600/ 4% PFPE 6 13.1 1.21 0.25 4.95 3.89 78.5

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
  • Glass Compositions (AREA)

Claims (23)

  1. Entlüftungsvorrichtung, die eine Öffnung zum Entlüften von Gas aus einem umschlossenen Raum oder Behälter aufweist, wobei die Entlüftungsvorrichtung Folgendes umfasst:
    ein poröses, gasdurchlässiges Verbundstoff-Entlüftungselement, das sich innerhalb, außerhalb oder auf der Entlüftungsvorrichtung befindet und
    eine flüssigkeitsdichte Abdichtung der Öffnung bildet, wobei das poröse, gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff-Entlüftungselement einen gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff umfasst, der Folgendes umfasst:
    (a) eine poröse polymere Struktur, die eine Struktur aufweist, die mehrere Poren definiert, die sich durch diese hindurch erstrecken, und mit mindestens einer Außenfläche;
    (b) eine Beschichtung, die mindestens einen Teil der Außenfläche bedeckt;
    (c) wobei die Beschichtung mindestens eine erste und eine zweite Komponente umfasst;
    (d) wobei die erste Komponente oleophobes und hydrophobes fluoriertes Material umfasst; und
    (e) wobei die zweite Komponente einen Perfluorpolyether (PFPE) umfasst, wobei der PFPE Endgruppen umfasst, die aus irgendeiner Kombination der Folgenden ausgewählt sind:
    - OCF3; -OC2F5; -OC3F7; -OC4F9; -OC5F11; -OC6F13; _ OC7F15; -OC8F17; -OC9F19; -OC10F21;
    - OCF2H; -OC2F4H; -OC3F6H; -OC4F8H; -OC5F10H; - OC6F12H; -OC7F14H; -OC8F16H; -OC9F18H; -OC10F20H;
    - OCF2Cl; -OC2F4Cl; -OC3F6Cl; -OC4F8Cl; -OC5F10Cl;
    - OC6F12Cl; -OC7F14Cl; -OC8F16Cl; -OC9F18Cl; - OC10F20Cl;
    - OCF2Br; -OC2F4Br; -OC3F6Br; -OC4F8Br; -OC5F10Br;
    - OC6F12Br; -OC7F14Br; -OC8F16Br; -OC9F18Br; - OC10F20Br;
    - OCF2I; -OC2F4I; -OC3F6I; -OC4F8I; -OC5F10I; - OC6F12I; -OC7F14I; -OC8F16I; -OC9F18I; -OC10F20I;
    - OCF1H2; -OC2F3H2; -OC3F5H2; -OC4F7H2; -OC5F9H2; - OC6F11H2; -OC7F13H2; -OC8F15H2; -OC9F17H2; - OC10F19H2;
    - OCFCl2; -OC2F3Cl2; -OC3F5Cl2; -OC4F7Cl2; - OC5F9Cl2; -OC6F11Cl2; -OC7F13Cl2; -OC8F15Cl2; - OC9F17Cl2; -OC10F19Cl2;
    - OCF1Br2; -OC2F3Br2; -OC3F5Br2; -OC4F7Br2; - OC5F9Br2; -OC6F11Br2; -OC7F13Br2; -OC8F15Br2; - OC9F17Br2; -OC10F19Br2;
    - OCF1I2; -OC2F3I2; -OC3F5I2; -OC4F7I2; -OC5F9I2; - OC6F11I2; -OC7F13I2; -OC8F15I2; -OC9F17I2; - OC10F19I2;
    - CF3; -C2F5; -C3F7; -C4F9; -C5F11; -C6F13; -C7F15;
    - C8F17; -C9F19; -C10F21;
    - CF2H; -C2F4H; -C3F6H; -C4F8H; -C5F10H; -C6F12H; - C7F14H; -C8F16H; -C9F18H; -C10F20H;
    - CF2Cl; -C2F4Cl; -C3F6Cl; -C4F8Cl; -C5F10Cl; - C6F12Cl; -C7F14Cl; -C8F16Cl; -C9F18Cl; -C10F20Cl;
    - CF2Br; -C2F4Br; -C3F6Br; -C4F8Br; -C5F10Br; - C6F12Br; -C7F14Br; -C8F16Br; -C9F18Br; -C10F20Br;
    - CF2I; -C2F4I; -C3F6I; -C4F8I; -C5F10I; -C6F12I; - C7F14I; -C8F16I; -C9F18I; -C10F20I;
    - CF1H2; -C2F3H2; -C3F5H2; -C4F7H2; -C5F9H2; - C6F11H2; -C7F13H2; -C8F15H2; -C9F17H2; -C10F19H2;
    - CFCl2; -C2F3Cl2; -C3F5Cl2; -C4F7Cl2; -C5F9Cl2; - C6F11Cl2; -C7F13Cl2; -C8F15Cl2; -C9F17Cl2: - C10F19Cl2;
    - CF1Br2; -C2F3Br2; -C3F5Br2; -C4F7Br2; -C5F9Br2; - C6F11Br2; -C7F13Br2; -C8F15Br2; -C9F17Br2; - C10F19Br2; und
    - CF1I2; -C2F3I2; -C3F5I2; -C4F7I2; -C5F9I2; - C6F11I2; -C7F13I2; -C8F15l2; -C9F17I2; -C10F19I2,
    und/oder wobei die zweite Komponente ein Blockcopolymer umfasst und das Blockcopolymer eine PFPE-Rückgratkette umfasst.
  2. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff das Gewichtsverhältnis zwischen der ersten und der zweiten Komponente in der gebildeten Beschichtung innerhalb des Bereichs von 1 Gewichtsteil der ersten Komponente zu 0,01 - 100 Gewichtsteilen der zweiten Komponente liegt.
  3. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach Anspruch 2, wobei in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff das Gewichtsverhältnis zwischen der ersten und der zweiten Komponente in der gebildeten Beschichtung innerhalb des Bereichs von 1 Gewichtsteil der ersten Komponente zu 0,5 - 100 Gewichtsteilen der zweiten Komponente liegt.
  4. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach Anspruch 3, wobei in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff das Gewichtsverhältnis zwischen der ersten und der zweiten Komponente in der gebildeten Beschichtung innerhalb des Bereichs von 1 Gewichtsteil der ersten Komponente zu 2 - 100 Gewichtsteilen der zweiten Komponente liegt.
  5. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei der gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff beim Luftströmungswiedererlangungstest eine Luftströmungswiedererlangung von mehr als 50 % aufweist, wobei der Verbundstoff für eine Zeitspanne von 5 Sekunden mit einem viskosen Öl bei 25 °C kontaktiert wird, das sowohl eine Viskosität von etwa 60 mPa.s bei einer Scherrate von 50 sec-1 und auch eine Oberflächenspannung von etwa 29,5 mN/m aufweist, und die verbleibende Luftströmung nach einer Wartezeit von 5 Minuten gemessen wird.
  6. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei der gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff eine Öleinstufung von mehr als 2 aufweist.
  7. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach Anspruch 6, wobei der gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff eine Öleinstufung von mehr als 3 aufweist.
  8. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei der gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff eine Luftdurchlässigkeit vor irgendeiner Form von Kontakt mit einer viskosen Flüssigkeit von weniger als 1000 Gurley-Sekunden aufweist.
  9. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei der gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff einen Wassereinlassdruck von mehr als 0,05 bar aufweist.
  10. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff das Verhältnis des Gesamtbeschichtungsgewichts zu dem Gewicht der porösen polymeren Struktur mindestens 3 % beträgt.
  11. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff die Beschichtung 0,01 - 70 % der Poren auf der Außenfläche der porösen polymeren Struktur blockiert/bedeckt/verschließt.
  12. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff die erste Komponente ein oleophobes und hydrophobes fluoriertes oder perfluoriertes Oligomer und/oder Polymer umfasst.
  13. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach Anspruch 12, wobei die erste Komponente in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff eine Verbindung, ausgewählt aus den Gruppen von fluorierten oder perfluorierten Estern in oligomerer oder polymerer Form und Tetrafluorethylen-co- oder -terpolymeren, umfasst
  14. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die zweite Komponente in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff eines oder Kombinationen der Folgenden umfasst:
    CF3-[(OCF(CF3) CF2)m-(OCF2)n-]OCF3 wobei m + n = 8 bis 45 ist und m/n = 20 bis 1000 ist;
    CF3-[(OCF2CF2)m-(OCF2)n-]OCF3 wobei m + n = 40 bis 180 ist und m/n = 0,5 bis 2 ist;
    CF3CF2CF2O-(CF(CF3)CF2O)n-CF2CF3 wobei n = 10 bis 60 ist; und
    CF3CF2CF2O-(CF2CF2CF2O)n-CF2CF3.
  15. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die zweite Komponente in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff Wiederholungseinheiten, einschließlich einer der folgenden umfasst:
    CF2O; CF2CF2O; CF(CF3)O; CF2CF2CF2O; CF2CF(CF3)O; CF(CF3)CF2O; C(CF3)2O; CF2CF2CF2CF2O; C4F8O oder C6F12O.
  16. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die poröse polymere Struktur in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff mikroporös ist und anorganisches, organisches oder polymeres Material umfasst.
  17. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die poröse polymere Struktur in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff ein gewobener oder nichtgewobener Stoff ist.
  18. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die poröse polymere Struktur in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff Schaum-PTFE umfasst.
  19. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei der Verbundstoff auf eine Trägerschicht auflaminiert oder damit kombiniert ist.
  20. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach Anspruch 19, wobei die Trägerschicht eine gewobene Struktur oder nichtgewobene Struktur umfasst.
  21. Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der Ansprüche 19 oder 20, wobei der gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff auf beide Seiten der Trägerschicht auflaminiert ist.
  22. Verfahren zum Entlüften von Gas aus einem umschlossenen Raum oder Behälter, wobei das Verfahren Folgendes umfasst:
    das Bereitstellen eines porösen, gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff-Entlüftungselements, das sich innerhalb, außerhalb oder auf einer Entlüftungsvorrichtung befindet und eine flüssigkeitsdichte Abdichtung einer Öffnung an der Entlüftungsvorrichtung bildet, wobei das poröse,
    gasdurchlässige Verbundstoff-Entlüftungselement einen gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff umfasst, des Folgendes umfasst:
    (a) eine poröse polymere Struktur, die eine Struktur aufweist, die mehrere Poren definiert, die sich durch diese hindurch erstrecken, und mit mindestens einer Außenfläche;
    (b) eine Beschichtung, die mindestens einen Teil der Außenfläche bedeckt;
    (c) wobei die Beschichtung mindestens eine erste und eine zweite Komponente umfasst;
    (d) wobei die erste Komponente oleophobes und hydrophobes fluoriertes Material umfasst; und
    (e) wobei die zweite Komponente einen Perfluorpolyether (PFPE) umfasst, wobei der PFPE Endgruppen umfasst, die aus den folgenden ausgewählt sind, wobei die Endgruppen in dem gasdurchlässigen Verbundstoff aus irgendeiner Kombination der Folgenden ausgewählt sind:
    -OCF3; -OC2F5; -OC3F7; -OC4F9; -OC5F11; -OC6F13; - OC7F15; -OC8F17; -OC9F19; -OC10F21;
    -OCF2H; -OC2F4H; -OC3F6H; -OC4F8H; -OC5F10H; - OC6F12H; -OC7F14H; -OC8F16H; -OC9F18H; -OC10F20H;
    -OCF2Cl; -OC2F4Cl; -OC3F6Cl; -OC4F8Cl; -OC5F10Cl;
    -OC6F12Cl; -OC7F14Cl; -OC6F16Cl; -OC9F18Cl; - OC10F20Cl;
    -OCF2Br; -OC2F4Br; -OC3F6Br; -OC4F8Br; -OC5F10Br;
    -OC6F12Br; -OC7F19Br; -OC8F16Br; -OC9F18Br; - OC10F20Br;
    -OCF2I; -OC2F4I; -OC3F6I; -OC4F8I; -OC5F10I; - OC6F12I; -OC7F14I; -OC8F16I; -OC9F18I; -OC10F20I;
    -OCF1H2; -OC2F3H2; -OC3F5H2; -OC4F7H2; -OC5F9H2; - OC6F11H2-OC7F13H2; -OC8F15H2; -OC9F17H2; - OC10F19H2;
    -OCFCl2; -OC2F3Cl2; -OC3F5Cl2; -OC4F7Cl2; - OC5F9Cl2; -OC6F11Cl2; -OC7F13Cl2; -OC8F15Cl2; - OC9F17Cl2; -OC10F19Cl2;
    -OCF1Br2; -OC2F3Br2; -OC3F5Br2; -OC4F7Br2; - OC5F9Br2; -OC6F11Br2; -OC7F13Br2; -OC8F15Br2; - OC9F17Br2; -OC10F19Br2;
    -OCF1I2; -OC2F3I2; OC3F5I2; -OC4F7I2; -OC5F9I2; - OC6F11I2; -OC7F13I2; -OC8F15I2; -OC9F17I2; - OC10F19I2;
    -CF3; -C2F5; -C3F7; -C4F9; -C5F11; -C6F13; -C7F15;
    -C8F17; -C9F19; -C10F21;
    -CF2H; -C2F4H; -C3F6H; -C4F8H; -C5F10H; -C6F12H; - C7F14H; -C8F16H; -C9F18H; -C10F20H;
    -CF2Cl; -C2F4Cl; -C3F6Cl; -C4F8Cl; -C5F10Cl; - C6F12Cl; -C7F14Cl; -C8F16Cl; -C9F18Cl; -C1F20Cl;
    -CF2Br; -C2F4Br; -C3F6Br; -C4F8Br; -C5F10Br; - C6F12Br; -C7F14Br; -C8F16Br; -C9F18Br; -C10F20Br;
    -CF2I; -C2F4I; -C3F6I; -C4F8I; -C5F10I; -C6F12I; - C7F14I; -C8F16I; -C9F18I; -C10F20I;
    -CF1H2; -C2F3H2; -C3F5H2; -C4F7H2; -C5F9H2; - C6F11H2; -C7F13H2; -C8F15H2; -C9F17H2; -C10F19H2;
    -CFCl2; -C2F3Cl2; -C3F5Cl2; -C4F7Cl2; -C5F9Cl2; - C6F11Cl2: -C7F13Cl2; -C8F15Cl2; -C9F17Cl2; - C10F19Cl2;
    -CF1Br2; -C2F3Br2; -C3F5Br2; -C4F7Br2; -C5F9Br2: - C6F11Br2; -C7F13Br2; -C8F15Br2; -C9F17Br2; - C1F19Br2; und
    -CF1I2; -C2F3I2; -C3F5I2; -C4F7I2; -C5F9I2; - C6F11I2; -C7F13I2; -C8F15I2; -C9F17I2; -C10F19I2;
    und/oder wobei die zweite Komponente ein Blockcopolymer umfasst, wobei das Blockcopolymer eine PFPE-Rückgratkette umfasst.
  23. Verfahren zum Entlüften von Gas aus einem umschlossenen Raum oder Behälter nach Anspruch 22, wobei die Entlüftungsvorrichtung eine Entlüftungsvorrichtung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 21 ist.
EP07251682A 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Verbundwerkstoff Not-in-force EP1985355B1 (de)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL07251682T PL1985355T3 (pl) 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Materiał kompozytowy
EP07251682A EP1985355B1 (de) 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Verbundwerkstoff
AT07251682T ATE511914T1 (de) 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Verbundwerkstoff
EP20080735361 EP2155370A1 (de) 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 Verbundwerkstoff
US12/107,595 US8075669B2 (en) 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 Composite material
PCT/EP2008/003234 WO2008128760A1 (en) 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 Composite material
CN2008800215260A CN101730578B (zh) 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 复合材料

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07251682A EP1985355B1 (de) 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Verbundwerkstoff

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1985355A1 EP1985355A1 (de) 2008-10-29
EP1985355B1 true EP1985355B1 (de) 2011-06-08

Family

ID=38477136

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07251682A Not-in-force EP1985355B1 (de) 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Verbundwerkstoff

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1985355B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE511914T1 (de)
PL (1) PL1985355T3 (de)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100024898A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 General Electric Company Fuel tank vent including a membrane separator
CN104043323B (zh) * 2014-06-24 2016-06-29 浙江工商大学 一种电晕络合催化烟气脱硝反应装置
CN109312647B (zh) 2016-06-01 2021-07-09 沃尔沃卡车集团 用于内燃发动机的曲轴箱通风系统
WO2018185026A1 (en) * 2017-04-03 2018-10-11 Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy S.P.A. Working fluid compositions

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2854223B2 (ja) * 1993-09-08 1999-02-03 ジャパンゴアテックス株式会社 撥油防水性通気フィルター
US20040026245A1 (en) * 2002-08-09 2004-02-12 Vivek Agarwal High temperature oleophobic materials
CN104959041A (zh) * 2005-05-25 2015-10-07 戈尔企业控股股份有限公司 微孔基材上的多功能涂层

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL1985355T3 (pl) 2011-10-31
EP1985355A1 (de) 2008-10-29
ATE511914T1 (de) 2011-06-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8075669B2 (en) Composite material
RU2687436C2 (ru) Компоненты системы нанесения распылением с гидрофобной поверхностью и способы
US6884375B2 (en) Hydrophobic membrane materials for filter venting applications
CA2684740C (en) Porous composite article
EP0641594B1 (de) Öl- und wasserabweisender, gasdurchlässiger Filter
KR100341259B1 (ko) 표면 개질된 다공성 막 및 그의 제조방법
JP5866228B2 (ja) 撥油性が付与された通気フィルタ
KR100315315B1 (ko) 퍼플루오로카본 공중합체로 표면개질된 다공성 막의 제조방법
KR100341260B1 (ko) 표면개질된 막을 포함하는 물품 및 그의 제조방법
CA2290593C (en) Non-porous gas permeable membrane
US6579342B2 (en) Oleophobic membrane materials by oligomer polymerization for filter venting applications
WO2012086606A1 (ja) 撥油防水性通気フィルタおよびその製造方法
EP1985355B1 (de) Verbundwerkstoff
KR20080015022A (ko) 미세다공성 기재 상의 다작용성 코팅
GB2496224A (en) Breathable, hydrophobic and oleophobic membrane, coated with polymer and then particles
US7665615B2 (en) Composite article having hydrophilic properties and method of manufacture
GB2459749A (en) Oleophobic laminate, especially vent
KR20140146165A (ko) 발유성이 부여된 점착층을 구비한 통기 필터
KR20110020303A (ko) 이온성 플루오르중합체 및 표면 대전 나노입자의 착물을 포함하는 기판 코팅물
EP1057521A1 (de) Membranen aus (per)fluorinierten amorphen Polymeren
JP7180830B2 (ja) 多孔性フッ素系樹脂複合膜およびその製造方法
US20070077407A1 (en) Composite article having oleophobic properties and method of manufacture
WO2024206875A1 (en) Fluorine-free hydrophobic permeable material coating

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081120

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: MEINDL, KLAUS, DR.C/O W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GMBH

Inventor name: WOLFGANG BUERGER, C/O.W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GMBH

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090116

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602007015057

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110721

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20110608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110919

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110909

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111008

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007015057

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120430

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120423

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110908

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120423

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070423

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20170324

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170322

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20170324

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20170322

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20170405

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180424

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180423

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180423

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20200323

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200319

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602007015057

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210423

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210423

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180423