EP1973335B1 - Procédé d'impression - Google Patents

Procédé d'impression Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1973335B1
EP1973335B1 EP08251031A EP08251031A EP1973335B1 EP 1973335 B1 EP1973335 B1 EP 1973335B1 EP 08251031 A EP08251031 A EP 08251031A EP 08251031 A EP08251031 A EP 08251031A EP 1973335 B1 EP1973335 B1 EP 1973335B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
inks
colours
process according
brand
spot
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP08251031A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1973335A2 (fr
EP1973335A3 (fr
Inventor
Graham Hawkins
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
LFH Brand Identity Consultants Ltd
Original Assignee
LFH Brand Identity Consultants Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=38024641&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1973335(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by LFH Brand Identity Consultants Ltd filed Critical LFH Brand Identity Consultants Ltd
Priority to EP11003687A priority Critical patent/EP2381670A1/fr
Publication of EP1973335A2 publication Critical patent/EP1973335A2/fr
Publication of EP1973335A3 publication Critical patent/EP1973335A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1973335B1 publication Critical patent/EP1973335B1/fr
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00—Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/46—Colour picture communication systems
    • H04N1/54—Conversion of colour picture signals to a plurality of signals some of which represent particular mixed colours, e.g. for textile printing

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a printing process for use in printing branded packaging.
  • Standard printing (eg, all magazine-printing) uses four standard printing inks called 'process colours'. These process colours are cyan, magenta, yellow and black, and they are mixed to produce the standard 'process' range of colours.
  • 'Spot colours' are non-process colours, that is, colours which cannot be formed from the four standard printing inks. They are normally specified in colour systems such as the Pantone system, which consists of 1,114 predetermined selectable colours. However, sometimes a spot colour may be specifically developed on a bespoke basis.
  • Spot colours are often chosen for use as 'brand colours' in branded packaging, that is, the colours which define a brand and help it to be differentiated from other brands, as they are less common than the process range of colours.
  • the ink for each spot colour must be ordered separately. This means that many different printing inks are often required when printing branded packaging, thereby increasing costs.
  • a first algorithm is applied to the image which is to be printed to quantise the image to about 2000 colours.
  • a second algorithm is then applied to various combinations of paper and inks selected from the quantised image and an iterative process is used to place the various combinations in order in terms of printing performance.
  • the gamut of printable colours obtainable for a particular combination of inks and paper is then calculated for the best performers
  • US2003/007164 discloses a process which aims to improve the appearance of printing on unbleached corrugated cardboard packaging. This is done by using two transparent inks, and (optionally) a masking ink. The colours of the inks are selected by converting a red/green/blue image into a cyan/magenta/yellow image, selecting the two dominant colours in the resulting image and choosing the spot colours which are closest to those two colours for the transparent inks.
  • the invention provides a process for use in printing a range of branded packaging, the process comprising the steps of:
  • the colours of the inks which form the palette of inks at the end of the process are called the 'palette' colours.
  • the identified inks may be listed in order of the decreasing importance of the colours of those inks to the brand.
  • the inks which are allocated primary importance may be the inks having colours which define the brand. These colours are called the 'brand colours'. They are usually spot colours.
  • the inks which are allocated secondary importance may be the inks having colours which are used in the text of the brand. These colours are called the 'brand text colours'. They are also usually spot colours.
  • the inks which are allocated tertiary importance may be the inks having colours which are used in the general text and colour ways. These inks are usually spot colour inks, but this is not always the case.
  • the inks having colours which are used in the graphical elements of the brand may be allocated either primary or secondary importance. These colours are called the 'graphical colours'. They are often inks from the range of process colour inks, but this is not always the case.
  • spot colours will us usually be brand colours. These are the colours for which it is particularly important to achieve a close match. Four spot colour inks are usually selected.
  • the most important process colours will be those colours which must be mixed to obtain the graphical colours identified in the brand. Three or four process colour inks are usually selected.
  • steps b and d priority may be given to the inks having the colours which are most important to the brand. By including the inks having the most important colours in the palette of inks, it becomes possible to achieve the closest match for those colours.
  • the spot inks selected in steps b and d may be altered to take into account the process inks which have been selected.
  • the list of required colours specified in step c will usually correspond substantially to the colours of the list of identified inks. However, the required colours may be altered during step c. The required colours may be altered according to their order of importance in the list of identified colours. Thus, if necessary, one or more of the less important colours may be approximated or omitted if it seems that the inclusion of those colours will make it difficult to minimise the number of palette inks. The required colours may also be altered according to the difficulty in obtaining the colours. Thus, if necessary, one or more colours may be approximated or omitted if it is difficult to obtain, either because of the number of suppliers involved or the substrates and printing processes required. Usually, it will only become apparent that the list of required colours requires alteration once one or more groups of possible palette inks have been already tested.
  • a first print run of inks identified in the audit was then carried out, and the colours of the printed inks were checked against the colours on approved current packaging using spectrography to ensure that the colours of the inks listed in the artwork match the approved colours.
  • the colours of the inks were then listed in order of priority, starting with the brand colours, followed by the brand text colours and then the colours used in the general text and colour ways.
  • the graphical colours may be listed with the brand colours or with the brand text colours, depending on their importance to the brand.
  • the brand and brand text colours are usually spot colours, whereas the graphical colours are usually (but not always) in the process range of colours.
  • the colours used in the general text and colour ways are usually spot colours, but again this is not always the case.
  • the complexity of producing each colour is also listed
  • 'Gretag Macbeth Color Picker' software is a known software package.
  • Gretag Macbeth Inc. has now been acquired by X-Rite Inc.
  • the Gretag Macbeth range has been re-branded, and the 'Gretag Macbeth Color Picker' software is now being sold by X-Rite under the name 'ColorPicker'. It can be obtained from the website www.X-rite.com.
  • the 'ColorPicker' software provides an accurate display of measured and composed colours, showing how well colours can be reproduced by the output device.You can fine-tune colours in the source colour space (grey, RGB, CMYK and multi-colour) or device independent LCH space, as well as compare colour variations using ⁇ E, ⁇ E 94 and ⁇ E CMC calculations.”
  • a provisional palette of up to 8 ink colours was entered into the software as La°b° values.
  • the La°b° value for any colour can be obtained using a spectrophotometer.
  • the palette will usually consist of 4 spot colour inks and 3 or 4 process colour inks.
  • the spot colour inks were selected from the brand and text colours which have been identified in the audit, with the brand colours being given priority.
  • the process colour inks were selected based on the graphical colours which have been identified in the audit. These two are interdependent, and the spot colour inks selected may vary depending on the process colour inks which have been selected.
  • the software then calculates all the colours which can be obtained by mixing the palette colours. This is called the 'gamut'.
  • the software compares each of the colours listed in the audit with the gamut to see how close a match can be obtained. For each colour, the software lists the various possible combinations of palette colours, together with a ⁇ E value, which indicates how close each combination is to the target colour.
  • the user can then select a different set of palette ink colours to be tested by the software. This process can be repeated until a set of palette inks is obtained which will produce the required colours to within a specified maximum ⁇ E value.
  • colours of low importance and/or high difficulty can be approximated or eliminated in order to assist in the choice of the palette inks.
  • the palette was then profiled electronically on a press accurate proofing device to create the palette's gamut.
  • the gamut was checked to ensure that it encapsulates all the required colours in a printable form, and, if necessary, fine tuned.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Printing Methods (AREA)
  • Coloring (AREA)
  • Inks, Pencil-Leads, Or Crayons (AREA)
  • Ink Jet Recording Methods And Recording Media Thereof (AREA)
  • Ink Jet (AREA)
  • Press Drives And Press Lines (AREA)
  • Liquid Developers In Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Polymerisation Methods In General (AREA)
  • Non-Metallic Protective Coatings For Printed Circuits (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Printed Wiring (AREA)
  • Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Procédé à utiliser dans l'impression d'un champ d'emballage de marque, le procédé comprenant les étapes consistant à :
    a. identifier chacune des encres présentement utilisées dans l'impression du champ d'emballage de marque en obtenant ces informations depuis le travail artistique pour chaque article dans le champ d'emballage de marque ;
    b. sélectionner une palette d'encres constituée d'un groupe d'encres ponctuelles possibles et d'un groupe d'encres de traitement possibles, et mettre à l'essai des combinaisons possibles de ces encres pour voir dans quelle mesure il est possible de faire concorder les couleurs des encres identifiées dans une tolérance spécifiée ;
    c. spécifier les couleurs qui doivent être reproduites lors de l'impression du champ d'emballage de marque soit en décidant qu'elles doivent être les mêmes que les couleurs des encres identifiées, soit en omettant l'une des encres ou en approximant une ou plusieurs des couleurs des encres identifiées ;
    d. sélectionner une palette d'encres constituée d'un groupe d'encres ponctuelles possibles et d'un groupe d'encres de traitement possibles, et mettre à l'essai des combinaisons possibles de ces encres pour voir dans quelle mesure il est possible de faire concorder les couleurs requises dans la tolérance spécifiée, en prenant en compte les résultats de l'essai précédent lors de la sélection des encres à mettre à l'essai ; et
    e. répéter les étapes c et d jusqu'à ce qu'une palette d'encres ait été obtenue qui est constituée du nombre minimal d'encres qui peuvent être mélangées pour obtenir les couleurs requises dans la tolérance spécifiée.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre l'étape consistant à énumérer les encres identifiées dans l'ordre d'importance décroissante des couleurs de ces encres pour la marque.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel les encres qui se voient attribuer une importance primaire sont les encres ayant des couleurs qui définissent la marque.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel les encres qui se voient attribuer une importance secondaire sont les encres ayant des couleurs qui sont utilisées dans le texte de la marque.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 4, dans lequel les encres qui se voient attribuer une importance tertiaire sont les encres ayant des couleurs qui sont utilisées dans le texte général et dans les voies de couleur.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, dans lequel les encres ayant des couleurs qui sont utilisées dans les éléments graphiques de la marque se voient attribuer une importance soit primaire, soit secondaire.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel les encres ponctuelles sont choisies parmi les encres ponctuelles qui ont été identifiées dans le champ d'emballage de marque.
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 7, dans lequel une priorité est donnée aux encres ponctuelles ayant des couleurs qui sont les plus importantes pour la marque lors de la sélection des encres à mettre à l'essai.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel les encres de traitement sont choisies parmi les encres de traitement ayant des couleurs qui doivent être mélangées pour obtenir les couleurs graphiques identifiées dans le champ d'emballage de marque.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, dans lequel une priorité est donnée aux couleurs graphiques qui sont les plus importantes pour la marque lors de la sélection des couleurs des encres à mettre à l'essai.
  11. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel les encres ponctuelles choisies sont modifiées pour prendre en compte les encres de traitement qui ont été sélectionnées.
  12. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel les couleurs requises sont modifiées selon leur ordre d'importance, ou selon la difficulté d'obtention des encres ayant ces couleurs.
EP08251031A 2007-03-22 2008-03-20 Procédé d'impression Revoked EP1973335B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11003687A EP2381670A1 (fr) 2007-03-22 2008-03-20 Procédé d'impression

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB0705513.0A GB0705513D0 (en) 2007-03-22 2007-03-22 A Printing process

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11003687.8 Division-Into 2011-05-05

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1973335A2 EP1973335A2 (fr) 2008-09-24
EP1973335A3 EP1973335A3 (fr) 2009-07-29
EP1973335B1 true EP1973335B1 (fr) 2011-07-20

Family

ID=38024641

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08251031A Revoked EP1973335B1 (fr) 2007-03-22 2008-03-20 Procédé d'impression
EP11003687A Withdrawn EP2381670A1 (fr) 2007-03-22 2008-03-20 Procédé d'impression

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11003687A Withdrawn EP2381670A1 (fr) 2007-03-22 2008-03-20 Procédé d'impression

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (2) EP1973335B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE517505T1 (fr)
DK (1) DK1973335T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2373143T3 (fr)
GB (1) GB0705513D0 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009095630A1 (fr) * 2008-09-22 2009-08-06 Lfh Brand Indentity Consultants Limited Procédé d'impression
GB2527495A (en) * 2014-05-20 2015-12-30 Chesapeake Ltd Ink set optimisation

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7054031B2 (en) * 2001-06-22 2006-05-30 Weyerhaeuser Company Color reproduction process
US7136074B2 (en) * 2004-08-02 2006-11-14 Master Colors Method and system of improved color selection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE517505T1 (de) 2011-08-15
ES2373143T3 (es) 2012-01-31
EP1973335A2 (fr) 2008-09-24
EP1973335A3 (fr) 2009-07-29
EP2381670A1 (fr) 2011-10-26
GB0705513D0 (en) 2007-05-02
DK1973335T3 (da) 2011-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9649868B2 (en) Expanded color gamut
US9767396B2 (en) Ink set optimization
US7791776B2 (en) Spot color adjuster
US20070002342A1 (en) Systems and methods for evaluating named colors against specified print engines
WO2018080427A1 (fr) Étalonnage de couleur
US10986251B2 (en) Colour standard from a digital input file
JP2004229295A (ja) 色彩測定された参照枚葉紙を用いて、マッチングしていない印刷データを修正する方法
US8873102B2 (en) Dynamic color separation at a digital press
US20110149311A1 (en) Color inconstancy guide for spot color print applications
US10195870B2 (en) Ink jet print method with integrated spot color and process color
US8506086B2 (en) Device and method for the representation of body colours
EP1973335B1 (fr) Procédé d'impression
GB2435572A (en) Selecting a set of inks for colour process printing
JP2012044475A (ja) 画像処理方法及び画像出力装置
US8456701B2 (en) Reference color difference quantity guide for spot color applications
JP3783869B2 (ja) ソフトプルーフを行う方法、及びプロファイル作成方法
US20050166781A1 (en) Uses of metamerism in printing
US20080094644A1 (en) Method And Device For Converting Source Image Data Into Target Image Data
Suchy et al. Spot color reproduction with digital printing
US7855807B2 (en) Digital image processor spot color workflow test file
JP4016760B2 (ja) 組合せ色情報算出装置及び組合せ色情報算出方法
CN104869282A (zh) 色谱方面的特性化数据的换算
US10397418B1 (en) Profile creation device, profile creation method, and recording medium
US11363169B2 (en) Color adjustment system and method
US20110247515A1 (en) Printing process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04N 1/54 20060101AFI20090617BHEP

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: LFH BRAND IDENTITY CONSULTANTS LIMITED

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090827

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20100121

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: LFH BRAND IDENTITY CONSULTANTS LIMITED

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008008352

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20110720

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 517505

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110720

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111121

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111120

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2373143

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20120131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: HEPP WENGER RYFFEL AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111021

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: PEPSICO INC.

Effective date: 20120420

Opponent name: ESKO SOFTWARE BVBA

Effective date: 20120420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602008008352

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120420

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

PLAY Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110720

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120320

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080320

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20140919

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20140919

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20140918

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20140922

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20140922

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20140919

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20140918

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20140916

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20140926

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20140924

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20140917

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 602008008352

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 602008008352

Country of ref document: DE

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20140918

Year of fee payment: 7

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PLX

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20150214

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20150214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20110720

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20110720

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R107

Ref document number: 602008008352

Country of ref document: DE

RDAC Information related to revocation of patent modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299REVO

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

R27W Patent revoked (corrected)

Effective date: 20150114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: MMEP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC