EP1957358B1 - Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo - Google Patents
Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1957358B1 EP1957358B1 EP06818551A EP06818551A EP1957358B1 EP 1957358 B1 EP1957358 B1 EP 1957358B1 EP 06818551 A EP06818551 A EP 06818551A EP 06818551 A EP06818551 A EP 06818551A EP 1957358 B1 EP1957358 B1 EP 1957358B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- torpedo
- bearing
- bearing angle
- angle
- signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 241000251729 Elasmobranchii Species 0.000 description 8
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004397 blinking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G9/00—Other offensive or defensive arrangements on vessels against submarines, torpedoes, or mines
- B63G9/02—Means for protecting vessels against torpedo attack
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for generating a danger warning in front of a stern of a vessel attacking, in particular keel water-guided torpedo according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Torpedoes are typically capable of attacking a watercraft from all directions.
- vessel e.g. a surface ship
- jet-water-borne torpedoes attack the ship from the aft sector.
- an all-round view of the ship carried by the sonar device is required.
- Known, on-board Aktivsonare that are usually installed in the bow of the ship or at the bow as so-called Hull Mounted Sonars (HMS) are due to the situation and due to the screw noise of the ship only imperfect all-round visibility with a more or less large gap. This aft sector of the ship is blind to incoming torpedoes.
- HMS Hull Mounted Sonars
- the invention has for its object to provide an efficient method for generating a hazard warning in the case of aft-attacking torpedo, which triggers little signal processing at least then a warning alarm when the torpedo overflows the underwater antenna.
- the method according to the invention has the advantage that by monitoring the rate of change of the cotangent of the successively determined bearing angle to the starting torpedo, the overflow of the torpedo via the underwater antenna can be determined by simple means.
- the detection of the overflow provides data on both the speed of the torpedo, as well as its distance to the stern of the vessel, on the one hand, the rate of change of Kotangens the bearing angle, ie the time differential of Kotangens the bearing angle, is substantially constant and corresponds to the torpedo speed and on the other hand the predetermined by the tow distance of the underwater antenna from the rear of the vehicle and thus the torpedo position at the moment of the antenna overflow is known.
- the target data required for combat can be programmed very accurately and the time of settling of the effector for effective control of the torpedo can be maintained relatively accurately.
- the angle of a receiving direction with maximum receiving level is determined as the bearing angle.
- This maximum reception level is compared-preferably after smoothing-continuously with a threshold value, and generates a gate signal when the threshold value is exceeded.
- the gate signal is linked to the trigger signal of the cotangent detection in such a way that a linkage signal arises when the gate signal and the triggering signal generated by the cotangent detection occur together.
- the logic signal activates the warning alarm. This additional monitoring of the reception level increases the reliability of the torpedo detection, thus reducing the false alarm rate, since the torpedo generates the largest reception level when the underwater antenna overflows.
- the torpedo is additionally checked at which bearing angle the logic signal occurs and an additional alarm is output when the logic signal occurs at a bearing angle in the range of 90 °.
- the underwater antenna has a plurality of juxtaposed in the tow direction of hydrophones or hydrophone groups and from the electrical output signals of the hydrophones or hydrophone groups by means of directional formation of a series of directional characteristics, each of which a direction angle is uniquely associated, clamped on both sides of the underwater antenna ,
- the reception signals obtained via the directional characteristics are normalized, whereby a normalization window used for this purpose for the reception signals from the most aft-directional directional characteristics in comparison with a standardization window for the reception signals used for this purpose is selected to be larger from the remaining directional characteristics.
- the maximum reception level is determined and the directional angle of the directional characteristic with the maximum reception level is output as the bearing angle.
- the median or mean value is formed over a preceding time segment of each received signal as defined by the normalization window, and the current value of the received signal is divided by this median or mean value.
- the normalization window or the time segment is dimensioned differently, as described above, for directional characteristics having different directional angles. In this way, when approaching a torpedo a slow increase in level of the received signal in the aft directional characteristics, the so-called. Endfire Beams, and the overflow of the antenna, the rapid increase in level due to the rapid passage of the torpedo through the other directional characteristics taken into account.
- the receive levels of the most afferent directional characteristics are monitored and, upon the occurrence of a steep level rise exceeding a threshold, a pre-alarm is issued. As the level increases further, confirmation of the pre-alarm is issued.
- a surface ship 10 equipped as an exemplary embodiment of a general vessel for protection against torpedoes with deflection vectors has a sonar device which, in addition to the location of targets, also serves to detect and locate torpedoes which attack the ship.
- the sonar device comprises an active sonar 11, which is designed in a known manner as a cylinder base or as a so-called.
- Hull Mounted Sonar (HMS) Hull Mounted Sonar
- towed sonar which called a towed in the water from the surface vessel 10 underwater antenna, hereinafter referred towed antenna 13.
- the active sonar 11 Due to the arrangement in the bow of the ship or by the integration in the fore ship's side, the active sonar 11 only covers a sector of about 150 ° from ship to starboard and from ship to port and is in a stern sector ⁇ ⁇ 60 ° blind. Torpedoes starting from this aft sector are not detected by the active sonar 11.
- the towed antenna 13 is on a very long trailing cable or Tow rope 14, for example 800m, fixed and has an acoustic effective part of about 6m. At the towed antenna 13 may still be attached a tow brake 15. The attachment of the acoustic part of the towed antenna 13 to tow 14 and drag brake 15 is usually done via not shown here, attenuators, so-called. VIMs.
- the acoustic part of the towed antenna 13 is supported by a multiplicity of hydrophones 16 (15) arranged next to one another in the towing direction. Fig.
- hydrophone groups are formed, which are connected via running in the tow 14 signal lines 17 with an installed on board the surface vessel 10 signal processing unit. All hydrophones 16 or hydraulic groups are operated simultaneously, and by means of a direction generator 18, also called Beamförmer, is on both sides of the towed antenna 13 a fan of adjacent directional characteristics 19, also called beams, clamped. For this purpose, the electrical output signals of the hydrophones 16 or hydrophone groups are delayed in time and added in a known manner konphas.
- Each directional characteristic 19 is a direction angle ⁇ ( Fig. 1 ).
- the longitudinal axis of the towed antenna 13 thereby represents the reference line for the directional angles ⁇ , so that the directional characteristics 19 with the largest directional angles ⁇ are the furthest aft directional characteristics 19.
- the received signals received via the individual directional characteristics 19 are evaluated in order to detect a torpedo, which starts in the wake of the surface ship 10 astern, a so-called keilwasserhomenden torpedo, and to generate a danger warning.
- the receive signals from each directional characteristic 19 are normalized in block 20, wherein a Normal Deutschens capable used for the received signals from the most aft-directional characteristics 19, ie from the so-called. Endfire sector, compared to the normalization window for the received signals from the other directional characteristics 19 is selected to be large.
- a Normal Deutschens capable used for the received signals from the most aft-directional characteristics 19, ie from the so-called. Endfire sector compared to the normalization window for the received signals from the other directional characteristics 19 is selected to be large.
- the various mechanisms which lead to level changes in the received signals of the directional characteristics 19 during the torpedo startup are taken into account.
- the so-called Endfire Beams there is a slow increase in level due to the approaching torpedo.
- the core of the procedure for generating the hazard warning is the continuous bearing of the torpedo with the output of the bearing angle and bearing time.
- the maximum reception level is determined, and the direction angle ⁇ of the directional characteristics 19 having the maximum reception level is output as a bearing angle ⁇ (block 21).
- the respective maximum reception level P max is output.
- the determination of bearing angle ⁇ and receiving level P max is limited to the directional characteristics 19 whose direction angle ⁇ in the angular range between 40 ° to 140 °.
- the level maxima P max are smoothed (filter 27) and fed to a threshold (block 28). If the filtered level maximum signal exceeds the threshold value specified in block 28, then a gate signal is generated and sent to the logical AND gate 26 laid.
- the logic AND gate 26 the trigger signal coming from the block 25 and the gate signal coming from the block 28 are linked together, so that at the output of the logical AND gate 26, a logic signal occurs, which activates a warning alarm.
- the warning alarm is in Fig. 2 symbolically represented by a warning signal lamp 29.
- block 30 it is checked whether the logic signal which activates the warning alarm occurs at a bearing angle ⁇ which is in the range between 80 ° and 120 °. If this is the case, then the logic signal is switched through in block 30 and outputs an additional alarm.
- the additional alarm is indicated, for example, by blinking the signal lamp row of three warning signal lamps 31.
- the link signal through which the block 30 is connected can be used to automatically disconnect a torpedo-combating effector.
- the additional alarm signals that the torpedo has overrun the towed antenna 13 to its center, so that the distance of the torpedo is based on the length of the tow 14 and the towed antenna 13 can be determined very accurately.
- a pre-alarm is output.
- the threshold value specified in block 33 is exceeded, the pre-alarm is output, which in Fig. 2 symbolized by the warning signal lamp 37.
- a pre-alarm confirmation is output, which results in Fig. 2 symbolized by the warning signal lamp 38.
- the warning signal lamps 29, 31, 37 and 38 preferably generate a differently colored display in a display on which the torpedo track is visualized. For example, a newly emerging torpedo is visualized by lighting the warning signal lamp 37 in blue, a confirmation of the newly emerging torpedo by lighting the warning signal lamp 38 in green, an overflow of the torpedo by lighting the warning signal lamp 29 in red and a maximum alarm by flashing lights of the three warning signal lamps 31 ,
- the normalized received signals can be displayed on a screen, a so-called BTR display.
- the alarm messages described are then also displayed in the screen. This allows an operator to in addition to verify the alarm messages and thus reduce the false alarm rate.
- the parallel active operation of the active sonar 11 interferes with the passive operation of the towing sonar. Therefore, it is advantageous to hide interference by transmission during passive reception. This can be done in such a way that the transmission process is detected by a majority threshold crossing of the level of the received signals (before their normalization in block 20) and the old level value is maintained as long as the threshold crossing persists.
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Erzeugung einer Gefahrenwarnung vor einem ein Wasserfahrzeug achterlich angreifenden, insbesondere kielwassergeführten Torpedo nach dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1.The invention relates to a method for generating a danger warning in front of a stern of a vessel attacking, in particular keel water-guided torpedo according to the preamble of claim 1.
Torpedos sind typbedingt in der Lage, ein Wasserfahrzeug aus allen Richtungen anzugreifen. So laufen moderne, sehr leise Torpedos das Wasserfahrzeug, z.B. ein Oberflächenschiff, in der Regel aus einem vorlichen Sektor an, wohingegen kielwasserhomende Torpedos das Schiff aus dem achterlichen Sektor angreifen. Zur frühzeitigen Ortung eines anlaufenden Torpedos ist daher eine Rundumsicht der vom Schiff mitgeführten Sonareinrichtung erforderlich. Bekannte, bordgestützte Aktivsonare, die üblicherweise im Bug des Schiffes installiert oder am Bug als sog. Hull Mounted Sonare (HMS) integriert werden, weisen lagebedingt sowie bedingt durch das Schraubengeräusch des Schiffes eine nur unvollkommene Rundumsicht mit einer mehr oder weniger großen achterlichen Lücke auf. Dieser achterliche Sektor des Schiffes ist blind gegen anlaufende Torpedos.Torpedoes are typically capable of attacking a watercraft from all directions. Thus, modern, very quiet torpedoes run the vessel, e.g. a surface ship, usually from a previous sector, whereas jet-water-borne torpedoes attack the ship from the aft sector. For early detection of an incoming torpedo therefore an all-round view of the ship carried by the sonar device is required. Known, on-board Aktivsonare that are usually installed in the bow of the ship or at the bow as so-called Hull Mounted Sonars (HMS) are due to the situation and due to the screw noise of the ship only imperfect all-round visibility with a more or less large gap. This aft sector of the ship is blind to incoming torpedoes.
Zur Abdeckung dieses Verwundbarkeitssektors des Schiffes wird bei einem bekannten Verfahren zur Abwehr eines aus achterlicher Richtung angreifenden Torpedos (
Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, ein effizientes Verfahren zur Erzeugung einer Gefahrenwarnung im Falle eines achterlich angreifenden Torpedos anzugeben, das mit geringem Aufwand an Signalverarbeitung zumindest dann einen Warnalarm auslöst, wenn der Torpedo die Unterwasserantenne überläuft.The invention has for its object to provide an efficient method for generating a hazard warning in the case of aft-attacking torpedo, which triggers little signal processing at least then a warning alarm when the torpedo overflows the underwater antenna.
Die Aufgabe ist erfindungsgemäß durch die Merkmale im Anspruch 1 gelöst.The object is achieved by the features in claim 1.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren hat den Vorteil, dass durch die Überwachung der Änderungsgeschwindigkeit des Kotangens der sukzessiv ermittelten Peilwinkel zum anlaufenden Torpedo der Überlauf des Torpedos über die Unterwasserantenne mit einfachen Mitteln festgestellt werden kann. Die Detektion des Überlaufs liefert Daten sowohl über die Geschwindigkeit des Torpedos, als auch über dessen Entfernung zum Heck des Wasserfahrzeugs, da einerseits die Änderungsgeschwindigkeit des Kotangens der Peilwinkel, also das zeitliche Differential des Kotangens der Peilwinkel, im wesentlichen konstant ist und der Torpedogeschwindigkeit entspricht und andererseits der durch das Schleppseil vorgegebene Abstand der Unterwasserantenne vom Fahrzeugsheck und damit die Torpedoposition im Augenblick des Antennenüberlaufs bekannt ist. Dadurch können in einem zur Bekämpfung des Torpedos vom Wasserfahrzeug abgesetzten Effektor die für die Bekämpfung erforderlichen Zieldaten sehr genau vorprogrammiert werden und kann der Zeitpunkt des Absetzens des Effektors für eine wirkungsvolle Bekämpfung des Torpedos relativ genau eingehalten werden.The method according to the invention has the advantage that by monitoring the rate of change of the cotangent of the successively determined bearing angle to the starting torpedo, the overflow of the torpedo via the underwater antenna can be determined by simple means. The detection of the overflow provides data on both the speed of the torpedo, as well as its distance to the stern of the vessel, on the one hand, the rate of change of Kotangens the bearing angle, ie the time differential of Kotangens the bearing angle, is substantially constant and corresponds to the torpedo speed and on the other hand the predetermined by the tow distance of the underwater antenna from the rear of the vehicle and thus the torpedo position at the moment of the antenna overflow is known. As a result, in an effector remote from the vessel for controlling the torpedo, the target data required for combat can be programmed very accurately and the time of settling of the effector for effective control of the torpedo can be maintained relatively accurately.
Zweckmäßige Ausführungsformen des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens mit vorteilhaften Weiterbildungen und Ausgestaltungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus den weiteren Ansprüchen.Advantageous embodiments of the method according to the invention with advantageous developments and embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the other claims.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung wird als Peilwinkel der Winkel einer Empfangsrichtung mit maximalem Empfangspegel, vorzugsweise bezogen auf die Längsachse der Unterwasserantenne, bestimmt. Dieser maximale Empfangspegel wird - vorzugsweise nach Glättung - fortlaufend mit einem Schwellwert verglichen, und mit Überschreiten des Schwellwerts ein Torsignal generiert. Das Torsignal wird mit dem Auslösesignal der Kotangens-Detektion so verknüpft, dass ein Verknüpfungssignal entsteht, wenn das Torsignal und das von der Kotangens-Detektion erzeugte Auslösesignal gemeinsam auftreten. Mit dem Verknüpfungssignal wird der Warnalarm aktiviert. Durch diese zusätzliche Überwachung des Empfangspegels wird die Zuverlässigkeit der Torpedodetektion erhöht, also die Falschalarmrate reduziert, da der Torpedo bei Überlauf der Unterwasserantenne den größten Empfangspegel erzeugt.According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the angle of a receiving direction with maximum receiving level, preferably with respect to the longitudinal axis of the underwater antenna, is determined as the bearing angle. This maximum reception level is compared-preferably after smoothing-continuously with a threshold value, and generates a gate signal when the threshold value is exceeded. The gate signal is linked to the trigger signal of the cotangent detection in such a way that a linkage signal arises when the gate signal and the triggering signal generated by the cotangent detection occur together. The logic signal activates the warning alarm. This additional monitoring of the reception level increases the reliability of the torpedo detection, thus reducing the false alarm rate, since the torpedo generates the largest reception level when the underwater antenna overflows.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung wird zusätzlich geprüft, bei welchem Peilwinkel das Verknüpfungssignal auftritt und ein Zusatzalarm dann ausgegeben, wenn das Verknüpfungssignal bei einem Peilwinkel im Bereich von 90° auftritt. Durch diese Maßnahme wird die Genauigkeit der Entfernungsbestimmung des Torpedos während des Überlaufs erhöht, da bei einer Peilung des Torpedos unter 90° der Torpedo exakt die Mitte der Unterwasserantenne erreicht hat und mit dem bekannten Abstand der Unterwasserantenne vom Fahrzeugheck ein exaktes Entfernungsmaß berechnet werden kann.According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention, it is additionally checked at which bearing angle the logic signal occurs and an additional alarm is output when the logic signal occurs at a bearing angle in the range of 90 °. By this measure, the accuracy of the determination of the distance of the torpedo is increased during the overflow, since at a bearing of the torpedo at 90 °, the torpedo has reached exactly the center of the underwater antenna and with the known distance of the underwater antenna from the rear of the vehicle an exact distance measure can be calculated.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung weist die Unterwasserantenne eine Vielzahl von in Schlepprichtung nebeneinander angeordneten Hydrofonen oder Hydrofongruppen auf und aus den elektrischen Ausgangssignalen der Hydrofone oder Hydrofongruppen wird mittels Richtungsbildung ein Fächer von aneinandergereihten Richtcharakteristiken, denen jeweils ein Richtungswinkel eindeutig zugeordnet ist, beidseitig der Unterwasserantenne aufgespannt. Die über die Richtcharakteristiken erhaltenen Empfangssignale werden normalisiert, wobei ein hierzu verwendetes Normalisierungsfenster für die Empfangssignale aus den am weitesten achterlichen Richtcharakteristiken im Vergleich zu einem hierzu verwendeten Normierungsfenster für die Empfangssignale aus den übrigen Richtcharakteristiken größer gewählt wird. In den normalisierten Empfangssignalen wird der maximale Empfangspegel ermittelt und der Richtungswinkel der Richtcharakteristik mit dem maximalen Empfangspegel als Peilwinkel ausgegeben.According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the underwater antenna has a plurality of juxtaposed in the tow direction of hydrophones or hydrophone groups and from the electrical output signals of the hydrophones or hydrophone groups by means of directional formation of a series of directional characteristics, each of which a direction angle is uniquely associated, clamped on both sides of the underwater antenna , The reception signals obtained via the directional characteristics are normalized, whereby a normalization window used for this purpose for the reception signals from the most aft-directional directional characteristics in comparison with a standardization window for the reception signals used for this purpose is selected to be larger from the remaining directional characteristics. In the normalized received signals, the maximum reception level is determined and the directional angle of the directional characteristic with the maximum reception level is output as the bearing angle.
Durch die Normalisierung werden in Peilung und Pegel konstante Geräuschquellen weitgehend unterdrückt und schnelle Pegel- und Peilungsänderungen hervorgehoben. Hierzu wird über einen durch das Normalisierungsfenster definierten, vorangegangenen Zeitabschnitt eines jeden Empfangssignal der Median oder Mittelwert gebildet und der aktuelle Wert des Empfangssignals durch diesen Median oder Mittelwert geteilt. Das Normalisierungsfenster bzw. der Zeitabschnitt wird - wie vorstehend beschrieben - für verschiedene Richtungswinkel aufweisende Richtcharakteristiken unterschiedlich bemessen. Auf diese Weise wird beim sich Annähern eines Torpedos einem langsamen Pegelanstieg des Empfangssignals in den achterlichen Richtcharakteristiken, den sog. Endfire Beams, und beim Überlauf der Antenne dem schnellen Pegelanstieg infolge des schnellen Durchlaufens des Torpedos durch die übrigen Richtcharakteristiken Rechnung getragen.Due to the normalization constant noise sources are largely suppressed and fast in bearing and level Level and bearing changes highlighted. For this purpose, the median or mean value is formed over a preceding time segment of each received signal as defined by the normalization window, and the current value of the received signal is divided by this median or mean value. The normalization window or the time segment is dimensioned differently, as described above, for directional characteristics having different directional angles. In this way, when approaching a torpedo a slow increase in level of the received signal in the aft directional characteristics, the so-called. Endfire Beams, and the overflow of the antenna, the rapid increase in level due to the rapid passage of the torpedo through the other directional characteristics taken into account.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung werden die Empfangspegel der am weitesten achterlichen Richtcharakteristiken (Endfire Beams) überwacht und bei Auftreten eines steilen Pegelanstiegs, der einen Schwellwert übersteigt, ein Voralarm ausgegeben. Bei weiterem kontinuierlich sich vergrößernden Pegelanstieg wird eine Bestätigung des Voralarms ausgegeben.In accordance with an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the receive levels of the most afferent directional characteristics (Endfire Beams) are monitored and, upon the occurrence of a steep level rise exceeding a threshold, a pre-alarm is issued. As the level increases further, confirmation of the pre-alarm is issued.
Die Erfindung ist anhand eines in der Zeichnung dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiels im folgenden näher beschrieben. Es zeigen:
- Fig. 1
- eine schematisierte Draufsicht eines Oberflächenschiffes mit einem bugseitigen Aktivsonar und einem achterlichen Schleppsonar,
- Fig. 2
- ein Blockschaltbild einer Schaltungsanordnung zur Erzeugung einer Gefahrenwarnung vor einem achterlich angreifenden Torpedo,
- Fig. 3
- ein Diagramm der Funktion des Peilwinkels zu einem achterlich angreifenden Torpedo (Kurve a) und der Kotangens des Peilwinkels (Kurve b) jeweils in Abhängigkeit von der Zeit.
- Fig. 1
- a schematic plan view of a surface ship with a bow-side active sonar and a stern towed sonar,
- Fig. 2
- a block diagram of a circuit arrangement for generating a danger warning in front of aft-attacking torpedo,
- Fig. 3
- a diagram of the function of the bearing angle to aft-attacking torpedo (curve a) and the Kotangens the bearing angle (curve b) respectively as a function of time.
Ein zum Schutz gegen Torpedos mit Abwehreffektoren ausgerüstetes Oberflächenschiff 10 als Ausführungsbeispiel für ein allgemeines Wasserfahrzeug weist eine Sonareinrichtung auf, die neben der Ortung von Zielen auch zur Detektion und Ortung von das Schiff angreifenden Torpedos dient. Die Sonareinrichtung umfasst ein Aktivsonar 11, das in bekannter Weise als Zylinderbasis oder als sog. Hull Mounted Sonar (HMS) ausgeführt ist, und ein Schleppsonar, das eine im Wasser vom Oberflächenschiff 10 nachgeschleppte Unterwasserantenne, im folgenden Schleppantenne 13 genannt, aufweist. Bedingt durch die Anordnung im Bug des Schiffes oder durch die Integration in der vorderlichen Bordwand des Schiffes überstreicht das Aktivsonar 11 nur einen Sektor von jeweils ca. 150° von Schiffsvoraus nach Steuerbord und von Schiffsvoraus-nach Backbord und ist in einem achterlichen Sektor α ≈ 60° blind. Aus diesem achterlichen Sektor anlaufende Torpedos werden vom Aktivsonar 11 nicht detektiert.A
Zur Schließung dieser Verwundbarkeitslücke des Oberflächenschiffes 10 im achterlichen Bereich dient das Schleppsonar, das ausschließlich passiv arbeitet. Die Schleppantenne 13 ist an einem sehr langen Schleppkabel oder Schleppseil 14, z.B. 800m, befestigt und besitzt einen akustischen wirksamen Teil von ca. 6m. An der Schleppantenne 13 kann noch einen Schleppbremse 15 befestigt sein. Die Befestigung des akustischen Teils der Schleppantenne 13 an Schleppseil 14 und Schleppbremse 15 erfolgt üblicherweise über hier nicht dargestellte Dämpfungsglieder, sog. VIMs. Der akustische Teil der Schleppantenne 13 wird von einer Vielzahl von in Schlepprichtung nebeneinander angeordneten Hydrofone 16 (
Um in Peilung und Pegel konstante Geräuschquellen in den Empfangssignalen weitgehend zu unterdrücken und damit die sich schnell ändernden Torpedogeräusche hervorzuheben, werden im Block 20 die Empfangssignale aus jeder Richtcharakteristik 19 normalisiert, wobei ein verwendetes Normalisierungsfenster für die Empfangssignale aus den am weitesten achterlichen Richtcharakteristiken 19, also aus dem sog. Endfire-Sektor, im Vergleich zu dem Normalisierungsfenster für die Empfangssignale aus den übrigen Richtcharakteristiken 19 groß gewählt wird. Dadurch wird den unterschiedlichen Mechanismen, die beim Torpedoanlauf zu Pegeländerungen in den Empfangssignalen der Richtcharakteristiken 19 führen, Rechnung getragen. In den am weitesten achterlichen Richtcharakteristiken 19, den sog. Endfire Beams, ergibt sich ein langsamer Pegelanstieg durch den sich nähernden Torpedo. Außerhalb der Endfire Beams ergibt sich eine schnelle Pegeländerung durch das schnelle Durchlaufen des Torpedos durch die Richtcharakteristiken 19 beim Überlauf der Schleppantenne 13. Deshalb wird für die langsamen Pegeländerungen ein großer Zeitraum, also ein großes Normalisierungsfenster, und für die schnellen Pegeländerungen ein kurzer Zeitraum, also ein kleines Normalisierungsfenster, verwendet. Die Normalisierung wird in der Weise durchgeführt, dass ein aktueller Signalwert des Empfangssignals durch den Median der Signalwerte dividiert wird, die in einem durch das Normalisierungsfenster bestimmten, dem aktuellen Signalwert unmittelbar vorausgegangenen Zeitabschnitt enthalten sind. Anstelle des Median kann auch der Mittelwert über das Normalisierungsfenster verwendet werden.In order to largely suppress constant noise sources in the received signals in bearing and level and thus emphasize the rapidly changing torpedo noises, the receive signals from each
Kernpunkt des Verfahrens zur Erzeugung der Gefahrenwarnung ist die fortlaufende Peilung des Torpedos unter Ausgabe von Peilwinkel und Peilzeit. Zur Bestimmung des Peilwinkels ϑ wird in den normalisierten Empfangssignalen der Richtcharakteristiken 19 der maximale Empfangspegel ermittelt und der Richtungswinkel Θ der Richtcharakteristiken 19 mit dem maximalen Empfangspegel als Peilwinkel ϑ ausgegeben (Block 21). Ebenfalls wird der jeweilige maximalen Empfangspegel Pmax ausgegeben. Die Bestimmung von Peilwinkel ϑ und Empfangspegel Pmax ist dabei auf die Richtcharakteristiken 19 beschränkt, deren Richtungswinkel Θ im Winkelbereich zwischen 40° bis 140° liegen.The core of the procedure for generating the hazard warning is the continuous bearing of the torpedo with the output of the bearing angle and bearing time. For determining the bearing angle θ In the normalized reception signals of the
Die Zuordnung der erfassten Peilwinkel ϑ zu den Peilzeiten t ist in
Die Pegelmaxima Pmax werden geglättet (Filter 27) und einer Schwelle (Block 28) zugeführt. Übersteigt das gefilterte Pegelmaximumsignal den im Block 28 vorgegebenen Schwellwert, so wird ein Torsignal generiert und an das Logisch-UND-Glied 26 gelegt. Im Logisch-UND-Glied 26 werden das vom Block 25 kommende Auslösesignal und das vom Block 28 kommende Torsignal miteinander verknüpft, so dass am Ausgang des Logisch-UND-Glieds 26 ein Verknüpfungssignal auftritt, das einen Warnalarm aktiviert. Der Warnalarm ist in
Um den achterlich anlaufenden, kielwasserhomenden Torpedo möglichst frühzeitig zu detektieren, damit genügend Vorbereitungszeit für den Einsatz der Effektoren zum Zeitpunkt des Überlaufs des Torpedos über die Schleppantenne 13 verbleibt, wird neben der vorstehend beschriebenen sog. Überlauf-Detektion noch eine sog. Endfire-Detektion durchgeführt. Bei dieser Endfire-Detektion werden die Empfangspegel in den am weitesten achterlichen Richtcharakteristiken 19, also in denjenigen Richtcharakteristiken 19 mit den maximalen Richtungswinkeln Θ (
In einer ergänzenden Ausgestaltung des Verfahrens können die normalisierten Empfangssignale auf einem Bildschirm, einem sog. BTR-Display, dargestellt werden. Die beschriebenen Alarmmeldungen werden dann auch in den Bildschirm eingeblendet. Dadurch ist es einem Bediener möglich, zusätzlich die Alarmmeldungen zu verifizieren und damit die Falschalarmrate zu senken.In a supplementary embodiment of the method, the normalized received signals can be displayed on a screen, a so-called BTR display. The alarm messages described are then also displayed in the screen. This allows an operator to in addition to verify the alarm messages and thus reduce the false alarm rate.
Im Allgemeinen stört der parallel verlaufende Aktivbetrieb des Aktivsonars 11 den Passivbetrieb des Schleppsonars. Daher ist es von Vorteil, Störungen durch den Sendevorgang beim Passivempfang auszublenden. Dies kann in der Weise erfolgen, dass der Sendevorgang durch eine mehrheitliche Schwellenüberschreitung des Pegels der Empfangssignale (vor deren Normalisierung im Block 20) detektiert wird und, der alte Pegelwert beibehalten wird, solange die Schwellenüberschreitung andauert.In general, the parallel active operation of the
Claims (10)
- Method for production of a danger warning against a torpedo which is attacking a watercraft (10) from astern, in particular a wake-homing torpedo in which the bearing of the approaching torpedo is found continuously, with the bearing angle and the bearing time being output, by means of a sonar having an underwater antenna which is towed by the watercraft (10), characterized in that the cotangent of the bearing angle is calculated and is associated with the bearing times, in that the rate of change of the cotangent is compared with a preset value, at least in a central bearing angle range, and in that an initiation signal for a warning alarm is emitted if the preset value is exceeded.
- Method according to Claim 1, characterized in that the central bearing angle range is defined by a lower bearing angle limit of 10°, preferably 40°, and an upper bearing angle limit of 170°, preferably 140°, with the longitudinal axis of the underwater antenna forming the reference line for the bearing angle.
- Method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the rate of change of the cotangent is smoothed before comparison with the preset value.
- Method according to one of Claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the angle, preferably related to the longitudinal axis of the underwater antenna, of a receiving direction with the maximum reception level is emitted as the bearing angle, in that the preferably smoothed maximum reception level is compared continuously with a threshold value and in that a gate signal is generated if the threshold value is exceeded, and is linked to the initiation signal such that a link signal is produced when the gate signal and the initiation signal occur together, and in that the warning alarm is activated by the linking signal.
- Method according to Claim 4, characterized in that a check is carried out as to the bearing angle at which the linking signal occurs, and in that an additional alarm is emitted when the linking signal occurs for a bearing angle in the region around 90°.
- Method according to Claim 5, characterized in that the bearing angle range for initiation of an additional alarm is defined by the limit bearing angles 80° and 120°.
- Method according to one of Claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the underwater antenna has a multiplicity of hydrophones (16) or hydrophone groups which are arranged one behind the other in the towing direction, in that a fan of mutually adjacent directional characteristics (19) with each of which one direction angle is uniquely associated, is spread out on both sides of the underwater antenna (13) by means of direction formation from the electrical output signals of the hydrophones (16) or hydrophone groups, in that the received signals obtained from the directional characteristics (19) are normalized, wherein a normalization window for the received signals is selected roughly from the directional characteristics (19) which point furthest astern in comparison to the normalization window for the received signals from the other directional characteristics (19), and in that the maximum reception level in the normalized received signals is determined, and the direction angle of the directional characteristic (19) with the maximum reception level is emitted as the bearing angle.
- Method according to Claim 7, characterized in that the reception levels in the directional characteristics (19) which are furthest astern are monitored continuously, and in that an initial alarm is emitted on the occurrence of a steep level rise which exceeds a threshold value.
- Method according to Claim 8, characterized in that an initial alarm confirmation is emitted if the level continues to become greater.
- Method according to Claim 8 or 9, characterized in that the reception level monitoring is carried out using the level maximum of the received signals from the directional characteristics (19) which are furthest astern.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL06818551T PL1957358T3 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2006-11-15 | Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102005058559A DE102005058559B3 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2005-12-08 | Danger warning producing method for use during attacking of wake-controlled torpedo, involves comparing slew rate of cotangent with default value and releasing operating signal for warning alarm if cotangent exceeds default value |
PCT/EP2006/010950 WO2007065535A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2006-11-15 | Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1957358A1 EP1957358A1 (en) | 2008-08-20 |
EP1957358B1 true EP1957358B1 (en) | 2009-03-11 |
Family
ID=37440261
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06818551A Active EP1957358B1 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2006-11-15 | Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1957358B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE425079T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE102005058559B3 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1957358T3 (en) |
PL (1) | PL1957358T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007065535A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
RU2513880C2 (en) * | 2012-06-07 | 2014-04-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Таганрогский научно-исследовательский институт связи" (ОАО "ТНИИС") | Method to protect submarine against broad-band torpedo-mine |
DE102016109105A1 (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2017-11-23 | Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Watercraft for locating an underwater object |
RU2756387C1 (en) * | 2019-04-26 | 2021-09-29 | Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военный учебно-научный центр Военно-Морского Флота "Военно-морская академия им. Адмирала Флота Советского Союза Н.Г. Кузнецова" | Integrated control subsystem for anti-torpedo protection of surface ship |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4216534A (en) * | 1960-06-28 | 1980-08-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Decoying acoustic homing torpedoes |
US4215630A (en) * | 1978-03-06 | 1980-08-05 | General Dynamics Corporation Pomona Division | Anti-ship torpedo defense missile |
US5373773A (en) * | 1981-08-06 | 1994-12-20 | The United States Of American As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Anti-torpedo stern defense system |
DE19935436B4 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2005-11-10 | Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Torpedo defense method |
-
2005
- 2005-12-08 DE DE102005058559A patent/DE102005058559B3/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-11-15 DK DK06818551T patent/DK1957358T3/en active
- 2006-11-15 PL PL06818551T patent/PL1957358T3/en unknown
- 2006-11-15 WO PCT/EP2006/010950 patent/WO2007065535A1/en active Application Filing
- 2006-11-15 EP EP06818551A patent/EP1957358B1/en active Active
- 2006-11-15 AT AT06818551T patent/ATE425079T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-11-15 DE DE502006003138T patent/DE502006003138D1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PL1957358T3 (en) | 2009-08-31 |
WO2007065535A1 (en) | 2007-06-14 |
ATE425079T1 (en) | 2009-03-15 |
DE502006003138D1 (en) | 2009-04-23 |
DE102005058559B3 (en) | 2006-12-14 |
DK1957358T3 (en) | 2009-05-18 |
EP1957358A1 (en) | 2008-08-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102014218145B4 (en) | Warning system with object differentiation | |
DE2710335C2 (en) | Collision warning system for use with a radar system | |
EP1957358B1 (en) | Method for production of a danger warning against an attacking torpedo | |
EP1562053A2 (en) | Apparatus and method for monitoring the environment of a vehicle | |
DE102014111098A1 (en) | Sensor device with ultrasonic sensor and radar sensor for detecting an object in an environment of a motor vehicle and motor vehicle | |
EP0213541B1 (en) | Ship detection method | |
DE3908578A1 (en) | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING A SOUND SOURCE, IN PARTICULAR A SUBMERSIBLE SUBMARINE, AND SUBMARINE | |
DE102007019444B3 (en) | Passive determination of target data by selective reception of acoustic waves used in e.g. carrier vehicle, involves using electroacoustic transducer arrangement for sonar reception on carrier vehicle to determine position of target | |
DE19935436B4 (en) | Torpedo defense method | |
EP0213418B1 (en) | Method of and apparatus for the direction finding of targets | |
WO2015169277A1 (en) | Method for carrying out spatial and/or time resolution of a first underwater sound source from a second underwater sound source and associated device and watercraft | |
DE3248744C2 (en) | ||
DE102011018278B4 (en) | Method and device for determining target parameters | |
DE3148734C2 (en) | Device for steering a torpedo | |
DE19857760C1 (en) | Passive acoustic position finding of a target radiating sound into water uses a torpedo fitted with an electro-acoustic receiving device to pick up a position on a path with a continuously changing course or torpedo maneuver | |
EP3268705B1 (en) | Method for separating a group of ships, and watercraft and device | |
DE3248727C1 (en) | Target search control device for torpedoes | |
WO1995027908A1 (en) | Warning system to be installed on a ship | |
DE3415107B3 (en) | Torpedo defensive apparatus | |
DE102011121007B4 (en) | Device and method for displaying determined target parameters in a reconnaissance area lying targets with a display | |
DE3828151C2 (en) | ||
DE2337508C3 (en) | Arrangement for the spectral differentiation between radar target object echoes and radar apparent or interfering object echoes when switching from target search to target tracking | |
DE102007038559A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for passively determining target data | |
DE102017119036A1 (en) | Avoidance of false alarms during blind spot monitoring | |
DE102009032177A1 (en) | Radar system for driver assistance system for detecting surroundings of passenger car, has wave guide, where system detects temporary and/or situation-dependent reduced response or failure of elevation radiation direction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080424 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: BENEN, STEPHAN Inventor name: SCHMIDT-SCHIERHORN, HELMUT |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502006003138 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20090423 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090611 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090622 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090824 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090711 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090611 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20091214 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: ATLAS ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20091130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091130 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090612 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091115 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20101027 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090912 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20111118 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502006003138 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230530 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231123 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 18 |