EP1921038A1 - Control system for elevator - Google Patents
Control system for elevator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1921038A1 EP1921038A1 EP05776101A EP05776101A EP1921038A1 EP 1921038 A1 EP1921038 A1 EP 1921038A1 EP 05776101 A EP05776101 A EP 05776101A EP 05776101 A EP05776101 A EP 05776101A EP 1921038 A1 EP1921038 A1 EP 1921038A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- elevator
- safety device
- control device
- electronic safety
- abnormality
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
- B66B5/0031—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system for safety reasons
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an elevator control system, including an electronic safety device for determining presence or absence of an abnormality in an elevator and a control device for controlling an operation of the elevator based on information from the electronic safety device.
- a base transceiver is electrically connected to the control device, and a transceiver is electrically connected to each equipment.
- a token is outputted from the base transceiver.
- the token outputted from the base transceiver is passed onto the transceiver of each equipment in succession and then returns to the base transceiver.
- the token is blocked by the broken device, so the token does not return to the base transceiver.
- the operation of the elevator is stopped by the control device (see Patent Document 1).
- Patent Document 1 JP 2003-40543 A
- the device can be provided as an electronic safety device for electrically determining presence or absence of an abnormality in the elevator and transmitting information to the control device.
- the present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, and it is therefore an object of the present invention to obtain an elevator control system, capable of more reliably preventing a normal operation of the elevator from being continued while an electronic safety device is kept electrically disconnected from a control device.
- An elevator control system includes: an electronic safety device for determining presence or absence of an abnormality in an elevator and outputting a confirmation response signal when the electronic safety device receives a predetermined confirmation request signal; and a control device, which outputs the confirmation request signal to the electronic safety device during an operation of the elevator and detects presence or absence of reception of the confirmation response signal from the electronic safety device to determine presence or absence of an abnormality in an electrical connection with the electronic safety device, for controlling the operation of the elevator based on the determination on the presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator and the determination on the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection.
- Fig. 1 is a structural view showing an elevator according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- a hoistway 1 in a hoistway 1, there are provided a car 2 and a counterweight 3.
- a hoisting machine (drive device) 4 for raising and lowering the car 2 and the counterweight 3 and a deflector sheave 5 arranged in the vicinity of the hoisting machine 4.
- the hoisting machine 4 has a hoisting machine main body 6 including a motor and a drive sheave 7 rotated by the hoisting machine main body 6.
- a plurality of main ropes 8 are looped around the drive sheave 7.
- the car 2 and the counterweight 3 are suspended in the hoistway 1 by the main ropes 8.
- the car 2 and the counterweight 3 are raised and lowered in the hoistway 1 by rotation of the drive sheave 7.
- a governor sheave 9 In the upper portion of the hoistway 1, there is provided a governor sheave 9 and in a lower portion of the hoistway 1, there is provided a tension pulley 10. A governor rope 11 moved together with the car 2 is looped around the governor sheave 9 and the tension pulley 10. Therefore, the governor sheave 9 and the tension pulley 10 are rotated when the car 2 moves.
- the governor sheave 9 is provided with an encoder (detection sensor) 12 for generating a signal corresponding to the rotation of the governor sheave 9.
- an encoder detection sensor
- an electronic safety device 14 for generating a signal corresponding to the rotation of the governor sheave 9.
- Fig. 2 is a structural view of the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 of Fig. 1 .
- each of the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 is individually mounted on a support base in the hoistway 1.
- the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 are mounted in the hoistway 1, respectively, thereby being electrically connected to each other through a communication line 19.
- the electronic safety device 14 includes a safety device CPU (safety device processing portion) 16 for determining presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator. Further, the control device 15 includes a safety circuit 17 for stopping the operation of the elevator when the abnormality in the elevator occurs and a control device CPU (control device processing portion) 18 for controlling the operation of the eleavtor.
- a safety device CPU safety device processing portion
- control device processing portion control device processing portion
- the safety device CPU 16 performs the determination of presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator (determination of presence or absence of an abnormality of the electronic safety device 14 itself, presence or absence of an abnormality of a speed of the car 2, and the like) based on information from various detection sensors such as the encoder 12. Further, when the safety device CPU 16 performs the determination that the abnormality in the elevator does not occur and the state of the elevator is normal (state normality determination), the safety device CPU 16 turns on an internal circuit to output a normal signal 20 to the safety circuit 17. Further, when the safety device CPU 16 performs the determination that the abnormality in the elevator occurs (state abnormality determination), the safety device CPU 16 turns off the internal circuit to stop the output of the normal signal 20.
- the safety circuit 17 When the normal signal 20 from the safety device CPU 16 is inputted to the safety circuit 17, the safety circuit 17 is not actuated.
- the operation of the elevator is controlled by the control device CPU 18 to be a normal operation. Further, the safety circuit 17 is actuated by stoppage of the input of the normal signal 20 from the safety device CPU 16. As a result, the operation of the elevator is forcedly stopped.
- the control device CPU 18 In order to determine presence or absence of an abnormality of the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15, the control device CPU 18 outputs predetermined confirmation request signals (electrical signals) to the safety device CPU 16 through the communication line 19 during the operation of the elevator.
- the confirmation request signals are outputted at predetermined time intervals.
- the safety device CPU 16 When the safety device CPU 16 receives the confirmation request signal from the control device CPU 18, the safety device CPU 16 outputs a confirmation response signal (electrical signal) to the control device CPU 18 through the communication line 19. Each confirmation response signal is outputted from the safety device CPU 16 every time the safety device CPU 16 receives the confirmation request signal.
- connection normality determination when the control device CPU 18 receives the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16 within a predetermined time after the output of the confirmation request signal, the control device CPU 18 performs a determination that there is no abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 (connection normality determination). Further, when the control device CPU 18 does not receive the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16 even after the predetermined time from the output of the confirmation request signal, the control device CPU 18 performs a determination that there occurs an abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 (connection abnormality determination). That is, based on presence or absence of the reception of the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16, the control device CPU 18 determines whether or not the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 is abnormal.
- the control device CPU 18 When the control device CPU 18 performs the connection normality determination, the control device CPU 18 allows the normal operation of the elevator to be continued. Further, while the control device CPU 18 is performing the connection abnormality determination, the control device CPU 18 stops the operation of the elevator even if the normal signal 20 is inputted to the safety circuit 17.
- the elevator control system includes the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15.
- Fig. 3 is a flow chart showing the connection confirmation operation of the control device CPU 18 of Fig. 2 .
- the control device CPU 18 determines presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15
- the control device CPU 18 outputs the confirmation request signal to the safety device CPU 16 (S1).
- the control device CPU 18 detects whether or not the control device CPU 18 has received the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16 (S2).
- control device CPU 18 determines whether or not the predetermined time has passed (S4).
- the control device CPU 18 repeats the determination on whether or not the control device CPU 18 has received the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16 until the predetermined time passes. After that, in a case where there is no reception of the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16 even after the predetermined time has passed, the control device CPU 18 performs the connection abnormality determination (S5), and the connection confirmation operation of the control device CPU 18 ends.
- the safety device CPU 16 When, for example, the speed of the car 2 becomes abnormal and the safety device CPU 16 performs the state abnormality determination, the input of the normal signal 20 to the safety circuit 17 is stopped. As a result, the safety circuit 17 is actuated and the operation of the elevator is forcedly stopped.
- the control device CPU 18 performs the connection abnormality determination, and even when the input of the normal signal 20 to the safety circuit 17 is continued, the operation of the elevator is stopped.
- the control device 15 outputs the confirmation request signal to the electronic safety device 14 during the operation of the elevator and determines whether or not the electrical connection with the electronic safety device 14 is abnormal based on presence or absence of the reception of the confirmation response signal from the electronic safety device 14. Therefore, it is possible to determine whether or not the electronic safety device 14 is electrically disconnected from the control device 15 with more reliability. Accordingly, even in a case where the reception of the normal signal 20 by the electronic circuit 17 is forcedly continued by the short-circuiting treatment with respect to the control device 15, it is possible to prevent the normal operation of the elevator from being continued when the electronic safety device 14 is actually disconnected electrically from the control device 14. As a result, it is possible to prevent the normal operation of the elevator during repair of the electronic safety device 14, thereby making it possible to increase the soundness of the operation of the elevator.
- control device 15 stops the operation of the elevator when the control device 15 determines that the electrical connection with the electronic safety device 14 is abnormal. Therefore, it is possible to further increase the soundness of the operation of the elevator.
- the control device CPU 18 detects presence or absence of the reception of the confirmation response signal from the electronic safety device 14, thereby determining presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15.
- a microswitch detection device
- the control device CPU 18 may determine the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 based on information from the microswitch. That is, the microswitch for detecting the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 may be provided to the support base.
- the microswitch is turned on by coming into contact with the electronic safety device 14 when the electronic safety device 14 is mounted on the support base, and the microswitch is turned off when the electronic safety device 14 is removed from the support base. Further, in the control device CPU 18, when the microswitch is on, it is determined that there is no abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15, and when the microswitch is off, it is determined that there occurs the abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15.
- control device CPU 18 can determine the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between the electronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 based on information from the microswitch, so it is possible to prevent a situation in which the normal operation of the elevator is performed when the electronic safety device 14 is being removed from the support base. Therefore; it is possible to increase the soundness of the operation of the elevator.
- the control device CPU 18 stops the operation of the elevator when performing the connection abnormality determination, but may cause the operation of the elevator during the connection abnormality determination to be a low-speed operation. In this case, regardless of presence or absence of the reception of the normal signal 20 by the electronic circuit 17, the control device CPU 18 causes the operation of the elevator to be the low-speed operation when performing the connection abnormality determination. Further, in the low-speed operation by the control device CPU 18, the speed of the car 2 is made lower than that in the normal operation, that is, a level of speed not interfering the operation of the elevator even when the electronic safety device 14 does not function.
- the control device CPU 18 when performing the connection abnormality determination, causes the speed of the car 2 to be lower than that in the normal operation, thereby making it possible to prevent the normal operation of the elevator from being continued while the electronic safety device 14 is kept electrically disconnected from the control device 15. Further, it is possible to enhance an operational efficiency of the elevator.
Landscapes
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to an elevator control system, including an electronic safety device for determining presence or absence of an abnormality in an elevator and a control device for controlling an operation of the elevator based on information from the electronic safety device.
- Conventionally, in order to monitor a state of an elevator, there has been proposed a safety chain for an elevator device, for performing wireless communication between each equipment of the elevator and the control device. A base transceiver is electrically connected to the control device, and a transceiver is electrically connected to each equipment. A token is outputted from the base transceiver. The token outputted from the base transceiver is passed onto the transceiver of each equipment in succession and then returns to the base transceiver. In a case of a breakdown of any of the equipment, the token is blocked by the broken device, so the token does not return to the base transceiver. In this case, the operation of the elevator is stopped by the control device (see Patent Document 1).
- Patent Document 1:
JP 2003-40543 A - As described above, for the conventional elevator, as a system for enhancing performance thereof, there has been proposed a system for monitoring a state of the elevator by wireless communication. Accordingly, in a case where a safety device for monitoring the state of the elevator is individually installed, in order to enhance the performance, the device can be provided as an electronic safety device for electrically determining presence or absence of an abnormality in the elevator and transmitting information to the control device.
- In this case, for example, when the electronic safety device suffers a breakdown, for repair, it is required to remove the electronic safety device from the control device. Usually, in a state where the electronic safety device is removed from the control device, the operation of the elevator is not performed. However, in the conventional elevator, even when the electronic safety device is kept removed from the control device, by performing a short-circuiting treatment, it is possible to easily perform a normal operation of the elevator. Thus, in this case, the electronic safety device does not function at the time of normal operation, so soundness of the operation of the elevator decreases.
- The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, and it is therefore an object of the present invention to obtain an elevator control system, capable of more reliably preventing a normal operation of the elevator from being continued while an electronic safety device is kept electrically disconnected from a control device.
- An elevator control system according to the present invention includes: an electronic safety device for determining presence or absence of an abnormality in an elevator and outputting a confirmation response signal when the electronic safety device receives a predetermined confirmation request signal; and a control device, which outputs the confirmation request signal to the electronic safety device during an operation of the elevator and detects presence or absence of reception of the confirmation response signal from the electronic safety device to determine presence or absence of an abnormality in an electrical connection with the electronic safety device, for controlling the operation of the elevator based on the determination on the presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator and the determination on the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection.
-
-
Fig. 1 is a structural view showing an elevator according toEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. -
Fig. 2 is a structural view of the electronic safety device and the control device ofFig. 1 . -
Fig. 3 is a flow chart showing the connection confirmation operation of the control device CPU ofFig. 2 . - Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
-
Fig. 1 is a structural view showing an elevator according toEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. In the figure, in ahoistway 1, there are provided acar 2 and acounterweight 3. In an upper portion of thehoistway 1, there are provided a hoisting machine (drive device) 4 for raising and lowering thecar 2 and thecounterweight 3 and adeflector sheave 5 arranged in the vicinity of the hoistingmachine 4. The hoistingmachine 4 has a hoisting machinemain body 6 including a motor and adrive sheave 7 rotated by the hoisting machinemain body 6. - A plurality of
main ropes 8 are looped around thedrive sheave 7. Thecar 2 and thecounterweight 3 are suspended in thehoistway 1 by themain ropes 8. Thecar 2 and thecounterweight 3 are raised and lowered in thehoistway 1 by rotation of thedrive sheave 7. - In the upper portion of the
hoistway 1, there is provided agovernor sheave 9 and in a lower portion of thehoistway 1, there is provided atension pulley 10. Agovernor rope 11 moved together with thecar 2 is looped around the governor sheave 9 and thetension pulley 10. Therefore, the governor sheave 9 and thetension pulley 10 are rotated when thecar 2 moves. - The
governor sheave 9 is provided with an encoder (detection sensor) 12 for generating a signal corresponding to the rotation of thegovernor sheave 9. In thehoistway 1, there are separately provided anelectronic safety device 14 and acontrol device 15. -
Fig. 2 is a structural view of theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 ofFig. 1 . In the figure, each of theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 is individually mounted on a support base in thehoistway 1. Theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 are mounted in thehoistway 1, respectively, thereby being electrically connected to each other through acommunication line 19. - The
electronic safety device 14 includes a safety device CPU (safety device processing portion) 16 for determining presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator. Further, thecontrol device 15 includes asafety circuit 17 for stopping the operation of the elevator when the abnormality in the elevator occurs and a control device CPU (control device processing portion) 18 for controlling the operation of the eleavtor. - The
safety device CPU 16 performs the determination of presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator (determination of presence or absence of an abnormality of theelectronic safety device 14 itself, presence or absence of an abnormality of a speed of thecar 2, and the like) based on information from various detection sensors such as theencoder 12. Further, when thesafety device CPU 16 performs the determination that the abnormality in the elevator does not occur and the state of the elevator is normal (state normality determination), thesafety device CPU 16 turns on an internal circuit to output anormal signal 20 to thesafety circuit 17. Further, when thesafety device CPU 16 performs the determination that the abnormality in the elevator occurs (state abnormality determination), thesafety device CPU 16 turns off the internal circuit to stop the output of thenormal signal 20. - When the
normal signal 20 from thesafety device CPU 16 is inputted to thesafety circuit 17, thesafety circuit 17 is not actuated. When thesafety circuit 17 is not actuated, the operation of the elevator is controlled by thecontrol device CPU 18 to be a normal operation. Further, thesafety circuit 17 is actuated by stoppage of the input of thenormal signal 20 from thesafety device CPU 16. As a result, the operation of the elevator is forcedly stopped. - In order to determine presence or absence of an abnormality of the electrical connection between the
electronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15, thecontrol device CPU 18 outputs predetermined confirmation request signals (electrical signals) to thesafety device CPU 16 through thecommunication line 19 during the operation of the elevator. The confirmation request signals are outputted at predetermined time intervals. - When the
safety device CPU 16 receives the confirmation request signal from thecontrol device CPU 18, thesafety device CPU 16 outputs a confirmation response signal (electrical signal) to thecontrol device CPU 18 through thecommunication line 19. Each confirmation response signal is outputted from thesafety device CPU 16 every time thesafety device CPU 16 receives the confirmation request signal. - When the
control device CPU 18 receives the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16 within a predetermined time after the output of the confirmation request signal, thecontrol device CPU 18 performs a determination that there is no abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 (connection normality determination). Further, when thecontrol device CPU 18 does not receive the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16 even after the predetermined time from the output of the confirmation request signal, thecontrol device CPU 18 performs a determination that there occurs an abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and the control device 15 (connection abnormality determination). That is, based on presence or absence of the reception of the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16, thecontrol device CPU 18 determines whether or not the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 is abnormal. - When the
control device CPU 18 performs the connection normality determination, thecontrol device CPU 18 allows the normal operation of the elevator to be continued. Further, while thecontrol device CPU 18 is performing the connection abnormality determination, thecontrol device CPU 18 stops the operation of the elevator even if thenormal signal 20 is inputted to thesafety circuit 17. Note that, the elevator control system includes theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15. - Next, a connection confirmation operation of the
control device CPU 18 for determining presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 will be explained.Fig. 3 is a flow chart showing the connection confirmation operation of thecontrol device CPU 18 ofFig. 2 . As shown in the figure, when thecontrol device CPU 18 determines presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15, thecontrol device CPU 18 outputs the confirmation request signal to the safety device CPU 16 (S1). After that, thecontrol device CPU 18 detects whether or not thecontrol device CPU 18 has received the confirmation response signal from the safety device CPU 16 (S2). - In a case where the
control device CPU 18 has received the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16, thecontrol device CPU 18 performs the connection normality determination (S3), and the connection confirmation operation of thecontrol device CPU 18 ends. Further, in a case where thecontrol device CPU 18 has not received the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16, thecontrol device CPU 18 determines whether or not the predetermined time has passed (S4). - In a case where the predetermined time has not passed, the
control device CPU 18 repeats the determination on whether or not thecontrol device CPU 18 has received the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16 until the predetermined time passes. After that, in a case where there is no reception of the confirmation response signal from thesafety device CPU 16 even after the predetermined time has passed, thecontrol device CPU 18 performs the connection abnormality determination (S5), and the connection confirmation operation of thecontrol device CPU 18 ends. - Next, an operation of the elevator control system will be explained. When the operation of the elevator is performed normally, the state normality determination is performed by the
safety device CPU 16, and the connection normality determination is performed by thecontrol device CPU 18. At this time, thenormal signal 20 from thesafety device CPU 16 is inputted to thesafety circuit 17, and the operation of the elevator is not stopped. - When, for example, the speed of the
car 2 becomes abnormal and thesafety device CPU 16 performs the state abnormality determination, the input of thenormal signal 20 to thesafety circuit 17 is stopped. As a result, thesafety circuit 17 is actuated and the operation of the elevator is forcedly stopped. - Further, when, for example, the
electronic safety device 14 is removed from the support base and theelectronic safety device 14 is electrically disconnected from thecontrol device 15, the confirmation response signal outputted from thesafety device CPU 16 does not reach thecontrol device CPU 18, so reception of the confirmation response signal by thecontrol device CPU 18 is stopped. As a result, thecontrol device CPU 18 performs the connection abnormality determination, and even when the input of thenormal signal 20 to thesafety circuit 17 is continued, the operation of the elevator is stopped. - In the elevator control system as described above, the
control device 15 outputs the confirmation request signal to theelectronic safety device 14 during the operation of the elevator and determines whether or not the electrical connection with theelectronic safety device 14 is abnormal based on presence or absence of the reception of the confirmation response signal from theelectronic safety device 14. Therefore, it is possible to determine whether or not theelectronic safety device 14 is electrically disconnected from thecontrol device 15 with more reliability. Accordingly, even in a case where the reception of thenormal signal 20 by theelectronic circuit 17 is forcedly continued by the short-circuiting treatment with respect to thecontrol device 15, it is possible to prevent the normal operation of the elevator from being continued when theelectronic safety device 14 is actually disconnected electrically from thecontrol device 14. As a result, it is possible to prevent the normal operation of the elevator during repair of theelectronic safety device 14, thereby making it possible to increase the soundness of the operation of the elevator. - Further, the
control device 15 stops the operation of the elevator when thecontrol device 15 determines that the electrical connection with theelectronic safety device 14 is abnormal. Therefore, it is possible to further increase the soundness of the operation of the elevator. - Further, in the above-mentioned example, the
control device CPU 18 detects presence or absence of the reception of the confirmation response signal from theelectronic safety device 14, thereby determining presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15. However, a microswitch (detection device) for detecting attachment/detachment of theelectronic safety device 14 may be provided to the support base, to thereby allow thecontrol device CPU 18 to determine the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 based on information from the microswitch. That is, the microswitch for detecting the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 may be provided to the support base. - In this case, the microswitch is turned on by coming into contact with the
electronic safety device 14 when theelectronic safety device 14 is mounted on the support base, and the microswitch is turned off when theelectronic safety device 14 is removed from the support base. Further, in thecontrol device CPU 18, when the microswitch is on, it is determined that there is no abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15, and when the microswitch is off, it is determined that there occurs the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15. - Even in the elevator control system as described above, the
control device CPU 18 can determine the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection between theelectronic safety device 14 and thecontrol device 15 based on information from the microswitch, so it is possible to prevent a situation in which the normal operation of the elevator is performed when theelectronic safety device 14 is being removed from the support base. Therefore; it is possible to increase the soundness of the operation of the elevator. - Further, in the above-mentioned example, the
control device CPU 18 stops the operation of the elevator when performing the connection abnormality determination, but may cause the operation of the elevator during the connection abnormality determination to be a low-speed operation. In this case, regardless of presence or absence of the reception of thenormal signal 20 by theelectronic circuit 17, thecontrol device CPU 18 causes the operation of the elevator to be the low-speed operation when performing the connection abnormality determination. Further, in the low-speed operation by thecontrol device CPU 18, the speed of thecar 2 is made lower than that in the normal operation, that is, a level of speed not interfering the operation of the elevator even when theelectronic safety device 14 does not function. - As described above, when performing the connection abnormality determination, the
control device CPU 18 causes the speed of thecar 2 to be lower than that in the normal operation, thereby making it possible to prevent the normal operation of the elevator from being continued while theelectronic safety device 14 is kept electrically disconnected from thecontrol device 15. Further, it is possible to enhance an operational efficiency of the elevator.
Claims (4)
- An elevator control system, characterized by comprising:an electronic safety device for determining presence or absence of an abnormality in an elevator and outputting a confirmation response signal when the electronic safety device receives a predetermined confirmation request signal; anda control device, which outputs the confirmation request signal to the electronic safety device during an operation of the elevator and detects presence or absence of reception of the confirmation response signal from the electronic safety device to determine presence or absence of an abnormality in an electrical connection with the electronic safety device, for controlling the operation of the elevator based on the determination on the presence or absence of the abnormality in the elevator and the determination on the presence or absence of the abnormality in the electrical connection.
- An elevator control system, characterized by comprising:an electronic safety device for determining presence or absence of an abnormality in an elevator;a control device electrically connected to the electronic safety device; anda detection device for detecting presence or absence of an abnormality of an electrical connection between the electronic safety device and the control device,characterized in that the control device controls an operation of the elevator based on information from each of the electronic safety device and the detection device.
- An elevator control system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the control device stops the operation of the elevator when the control device determines that the electrical connection with the electronic safety device is abnormal.
- An elevator control system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the control device causes the operation of the elevator to be a low-speed operation when the control device determines that the electrical connection with the electronic safety device is abnormal.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/015872 WO2007026416A1 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2005-08-31 | Control system for elevator |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1921038A1 true EP1921038A1 (en) | 2008-05-14 |
EP1921038A4 EP1921038A4 (en) | 2013-03-06 |
EP1921038B1 EP1921038B1 (en) | 2014-02-12 |
Family
ID=37808520
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05776101.7A Not-in-force EP1921038B1 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2005-08-31 | Control system for elevator |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1921038B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5068534B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101068741B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007026416A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
PL2167413T3 (en) * | 2007-07-17 | 2013-05-31 | Inventio Ag | Method for monitoring a lift system |
JP5523455B2 (en) * | 2009-06-23 | 2014-06-18 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator equipment |
JP2013046939A (en) * | 2011-08-29 | 2013-03-07 | Disco Corp | Grinding device |
EP3034445A1 (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2016-06-22 | Kone Corporation | A configuration apparatus and main safety circuit for an elevator system and an elevator system |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6173814B1 (en) * | 1999-03-04 | 2001-01-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Electronic safety system for elevators having a dual redundant safety bus |
EP1864935A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2007-12-12 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Elevator apparatus |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5742470A (en) * | 1980-08-28 | 1982-03-10 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Safety device for elevator |
JPH04261243A (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 1992-09-17 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Signal transmitter for elevator |
JPH07240803A (en) * | 1994-03-01 | 1995-09-12 | Toshiba Erebeeta Technos Kk | Remote supervisory system for elevator |
JP3529291B2 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2004-05-24 | 東芝エレベータ株式会社 | Elevator transmission control device |
JP4553535B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2010-09-29 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator equipment |
JP2005104596A (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2005-04-21 | Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd | Control device for elevator |
-
2005
- 2005-08-31 JP JP2006529353A patent/JP5068534B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-08-31 CN CN2005800412123A patent/CN101068741B/en active Active
- 2005-08-31 EP EP05776101.7A patent/EP1921038B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-08-31 WO PCT/JP2005/015872 patent/WO2007026416A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6173814B1 (en) * | 1999-03-04 | 2001-01-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Electronic safety system for elevators having a dual redundant safety bus |
EP1864935A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2007-12-12 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Elevator apparatus |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2007026416A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN101068741B (en) | 2012-01-11 |
JPWO2007026416A1 (en) | 2009-03-05 |
CN101068741A (en) | 2007-11-07 |
JP5068534B2 (en) | 2012-11-07 |
WO2007026416A1 (en) | 2007-03-08 |
EP1921038A4 (en) | 2013-03-06 |
EP1921038B1 (en) | 2014-02-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP4907097B2 (en) | Elevator equipment | |
EP2380841A1 (en) | Elevator device | |
CN102951517B (en) | Controller for elevator | |
EP3333110A1 (en) | Elevator safety system, elevator system and method of operating an elevator system | |
EP2774886A1 (en) | Traction sheave elevator | |
EP1870368A1 (en) | Elevator device | |
US8887873B2 (en) | Elevator device | |
EP1921038A1 (en) | Control system for elevator | |
CN104555641B (en) | The security system of elevator | |
EP1958911B1 (en) | Elevator device | |
JP2005247433A (en) | Elevator and its emergency stop testing method | |
KR102523904B1 (en) | Double safety operation system and method by the rope break detection of elevator | |
JP2007062948A (en) | Elevator system | |
EP1733991B1 (en) | Elevator apparatus and method of controlling the apparatus | |
JP6541698B2 (en) | Operation test method of elevator safety gear and short circuit for operation test | |
EP2130792A1 (en) | Elevator control system | |
JP2010254386A (en) | Safety device for elevator | |
KR20070085570A (en) | Control system for elevator | |
JP4901446B2 (en) | Elevator control system | |
JP2011037545A (en) | Elevator control device | |
CN109132756B (en) | Elevator device and control method thereof | |
CN114555506B (en) | Elevator system | |
CN112955396A (en) | Elevator device | |
CN210655006U (en) | Conveying equipment and operation protection device thereof | |
KR100844671B1 (en) | Control device for elevator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070531 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE ES FR NL PT |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE ES FR NL PT |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20130206 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B66B 5/02 20060101AFI20130131BHEP Ipc: B66B 5/00 20060101ALI20130131BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20130911 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE ES FR NL PT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602005042682 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140327 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140612 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602005042682 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20141113 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602005042682 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20141113 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20150430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R084 Ref document number: 602005042682 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20190712 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20190820 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602005042682 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20200901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210302 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200901 |