EP1906701B1 - Procédé de réglage semi-automatique d'un dispositif auditif et dispositif auditif correspondant - Google Patents

Procédé de réglage semi-automatique d'un dispositif auditif et dispositif auditif correspondant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1906701B1
EP1906701B1 EP07117401A EP07117401A EP1906701B1 EP 1906701 B1 EP1906701 B1 EP 1906701B1 EP 07117401 A EP07117401 A EP 07117401A EP 07117401 A EP07117401 A EP 07117401A EP 1906701 B1 EP1906701 B1 EP 1906701B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hearing
parameter
parameter range
signal processing
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP07117401A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1906701A3 (fr
EP1906701A2 (fr
Inventor
Ulrich Dr. Kornagel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sivantos GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens Audioligische Technik GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Audioligische Technik GmbH filed Critical Siemens Audioligische Technik GmbH
Publication of EP1906701A2 publication Critical patent/EP1906701A2/fr
Publication of EP1906701A3 publication Critical patent/EP1906701A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1906701B1 publication Critical patent/EP1906701B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/41Detection or adaptation of hearing aid parameters or programs to listening situation, e.g. pub, forest
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/61Aspects relating to mechanical or electronic switches or control elements, e.g. functioning

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for adjusting a hearing device by automatically analyzing a hearing situation in which the hearing device is located, and an automatic setting of a parameter of the signal processing device of the hearing device as a function of the hearing situation in a first parameter range. Moreover, the present invention relates to a corresponding hearing device with such analysis and adjustment options.
  • hearing device is understood in particular to mean a hearing device.
  • the definition also includes any other portable and non-portable communication systems in which hearing plays an essential role, such as headsets and headphones.
  • Hearing aids are portable hearing aids that are used to care for the hearing impaired.
  • different types of hearing aids such as behind-the-ear hearing aids (BTE), in-the-ear hearing aids (IDO) and Concha hearing aids are provided.
  • BTE behind-the-ear hearing aids
  • IDO in-the-ear hearing aids
  • Concha hearing aids are provided.
  • the hearing aids listed by way of example are worn on the outer ear or in the ear canal.
  • bone conduction hearing aids, implantable or vibrotactile hearing aids are also available on the market. The stimulation of the damaged hearing takes place either mechanically or electrically.
  • Hearing aids have in principle as essential components an input transducer, an amplifier and an output transducer.
  • the input transducer is usually a sound receiver, z. As a microphone, and / or an electromagnetic receiver, for. B. an induction coil.
  • the output transducer is usually used as an electroacoustic transducer, z. B. miniature speakers, or as an electromechanical transducer, z. B. bone conduction, realized.
  • the amplifier is usually integrated in a signal processing unit.
  • FIG. 1 shown using the example of a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
  • a hearing aid housing 1 for carrying behind the ear one or more microphones 2 for receiving the sound from the environment are installed.
  • a signal processing unit 3 which is also integrated in the hearing aid housing 1, processes the microphone signals and amplifies them.
  • the output signal of the signal processing unit 3 is transmitted to a loudspeaker or earpiece 4, which outputs an acoustic signal.
  • the sound is optionally transmitted via a sound tube, which is fixed with an earmold in the ear canal, to the eardrum of the device carrier.
  • the power supply of the hearing device and in particular of the signal processing unit 3 is carried out by a likewise integrated into the hearing aid housing 1 battery. 5
  • a noise reduction algorithm for example, a noise reduction algorithm, a directional microphone or a feedback compensator (in the subcritical case) should not be activated when the hearing aid wearer is sitting in a concert.
  • a noise reduction algorithm would attack the payload and produce artifacts.
  • a directional microphone would give the spatial sound impression undesirable change.
  • a feedback compensator would produce unwanted artifacts.
  • the hearing aid system comprises an adaptation device which essentially has a first memory for a plurality of parameter sets available for each of a plurality of listening situations and an input device for selecting a currently present audible situation and one of the several parameter sets available for selection for this auditory situation.
  • the hearing aid system has a second memory for assignment data relating to the sets of parameters selected for each listening situation.
  • it is essentially proposed to assign a user-specific optimal parameter set to each optimally occurring hearing situation and to select the determined assignment data for determining an optimal parameter set for each hearing situation after the optimization phase.
  • a hearing aid with a control device known.
  • the acoustic listening environment in which the hearing aid is located is analyzed and, depending on the hearing situation detected thereby, at least one control element is assigned a setting function dependent on the respective hearing situation.
  • the adjustment of the hearing aid is thereby limited to the reasonable for the particular hearing situation settings.
  • EP 1 432 282 A2 a method for adapting a hearing device to a current acoustic environment situation and a corresponding hearing aid system is known.
  • the hearing device is used to set a parameter set belonging to the ambient situation and stored in the hearing device. Parameters of the set parameter set can be adjusted by means of an input part which can be actuated by the hearing aid wearer in accordance with the listener request of the hearing aid wearer.
  • the object of the present invention is to take better account of the subjective feeling when adjusting the hearing device.
  • a method for setting a hearing device by automatically analyzing a hearing situation in which the hearing device is located and automatically setting a parameter of the signal processing device of the hearing device as a function of the hearing situation in a first parameter range and manually setting the parameter of the signal processing device to a value in a second parameter range outside the first parameter range, wherein the automatic setting in the first parameter range is terminated thereby, wherein an acceptance or a perception threshold for an artifact is specified in the signal processing, for the automatic adjustment of the first parameter range is set such that the Artefact is below the Acceptance or Perceptibility Threshold, and when manually adjusting in the second parameter area, the artifact is above Acceptance or Perceptual mbars threshold lies.
  • the invention provides a hearing device with a signal processing device, an analysis device for automatically analyzing a hearing situation in which the hearing device is located, and an adjusting device for automatically setting a parameter of the signal processing device as a function of the analyzed auditory situation in a first parameter range in which Artifact of the signal processing of the signal processing device is below a predetermined acceptance or perception threshold, wherein the setting means for manually setting the parameter of the signal processing means is designed to a value in a second parameter range outside the first parameter range, and the artifact in the second parameter range above the acceptance or Perceptibility threshold is.
  • the invention provides a hearing device with a signal processing device, an analysis device for automatically analyzing a hearing situation in which the hearing device is located, and an adjusting device for automatically setting a parameter of the signal processing device as a function of the analyzed auditory situation in a first parameter range, wherein the setting device for manually setting the parameter of the signal processing device to a value in a second parameter range outside the first parameter range.
  • control of the hearing device or communication system thus takes place semi-automatically.
  • the effectiveness of the performance characteristics of the hearing device can thus be adjusted individually at any time, whereby the subjective impressions are better taken into account.
  • the full range of effects of the algorithms can be exploited, which otherwise is not possible due to the necessary compromise setting of the parameters.
  • artifacts may be accepted by manual adjustment, but the particular algorithm is operated with increased strength compared to the automatic adjustment range.
  • the value in the second parameter range is also changeable. This can be done, for example, manually and possibly continuously. Alternatively, an automatic adjustment can also take place in the second parameter range. Thus, automatic functions can also be used in a "forbidden" area.
  • the value in the second parameter range can be permanently stored in the hearing device. It is particularly advantageous if this value is stored as a variable software value, for example in the basic setting or adaptation, in the hearing device. In this way, for example, a hearing aid can be customized.
  • the value in the second parameter range can also be changed automatically depending on a current hearing situation.
  • an automatic value adjustment can also take place as a function of a classifier decision.
  • the parameter itself which is to be set, may also be selected automatically depending on a current hearing situation. In this way, the possibilities for semi-automatic adjustment can be significantly increased.
  • the signal of a signal input SE is fed to a signal processor SV.
  • the output signal of the signal processing device SV is provided at a signal output SA.
  • an analysis / logic unit AL which also picks up the signal from the signal input SE.
  • the analysis / logic unit AL provides two output signals: Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Both alternatives represent parameters for the control of the signal processing device SV.
  • the hearing aid wearer or the user of the communication system selects the parameter suitable for him or the respective alternative.
  • the parameter according to alternative 1 is automatically selected as a function of the respective listening situation. This means that the communication system operates without a user request with a middle or a classifier-controlled setting. If the user is not satisfied with this setting, he can increase the effectiveness of the underlying algorithm by pressing the manual switch S.
  • Switching to the alternate mode can also be accomplished by actuating a button, thereby switching the system to a select mode.
  • actuating a button thereby switching the system to a select mode.
  • the desired setting is acknowledged by pressing the button again.
  • the mode of operation of the method according to the invention or of the hearing device according to the invention will now be described with reference to FIG. 3 explained in more detail.
  • a noise reduction algorithm be set semi-automatically.
  • the level of the noise decreases.
  • this also increases the level of artifacts that result when the parameter value is increased.
  • the threshold of perceivability is also shown below which the sounds or artifacts are not audible.
  • the automatic signal processing is set to select the parameter value from a classical setting range PB1. In this area, the artifacts of the noise canceling algorithm are imperceptible (or acceptable if it is the acceptance threshold).
  • the noise remaining after the noise algorithm can be further reduced by further increasing the parameter value of the noise algorithm.
  • the artifacts are then perceptible and can be expressed, for example, in a bubbling noise, which results from modulating to a useful signal.
  • the user now decides whether the artifacts are acceptable to him and therefore manually selects the parameter range PB2 or a value thereof. He then accepts the artifacts and benefits from a lower noise level.
  • the inventive principle can also be used, for example, for speech intelligibility.
  • the directional characteristic of a hearing aid can be increased with one parameter. However, this is accompanied by the fact that more and more are lost in the output signal. In an automatic setting range, the directional characteristic is therefore only automatically adjustable to a certain extent. The user can now accept in favor of a better directivity that depths are increasingly lost. In this case, he would manually select the additional adjustment range PB2.
  • the semiautomatic control according to the invention thus takes place according to the principle that the system offers at least two setting alternatives to one or more performance features of the communication system or the hearing device, from which the user actively selects the best for him.
  • the device offers two setting alternatives: a "defensive” setting and an "aggressive” setting. The user presses a switch / button and thus acknowledges the preferred alternative for the respective hearing situation.
  • the alternative parameter settings can either be permanently stored in the system or determined at any time by an analysis unit in combination with a logic adapted to the situation.
  • the selection of the features that are suitable for this concept and the selection of the parameters of these features can be fixed or user-programmable.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
  • Control Of Amplification And Gain Control (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Procédé de réglage d'une prothèse ( 1 ) auditive par,
    - analyse automatique d'une situation auditive dans laquelle se trouve la prothèse ( 1 ) auditive,
    - réglage automatique d'un paramètre du dispositif ( 3, SV ) de traitement du signal de la prothèse ( 1 ) auditive en fonction de la situation auditive dans une première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre,
    - réglage manuel du paramètre du dispositif ( 3, SV ) de traitement du signal à une valeur dans une deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre à l'extérieur de la première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre, le réglage automatique dans la première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre mettant fin ainsi au réglage automatique dans la première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - on prescrit un seuil d'acceptation ou un seuil de perception d'un artéfact dans le traitement du signal,
    - pour le réglage automatique de la première plage de paramètre, on prescrit que l'artéfact est en dessous du seuil d'acceptation ou du seuil de perception, et
    - dans le réglage manuel de la plage de paramètre l'artéfact est au dessus du seuil d'acceptation ou du seuil de perception.
  2. Procédé suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel on modifie la valeur dans la deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre.
  3. Procédé suivant la revendication 2, dans lequel on modifie manuellement la valeur dans la deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre.
  4. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel on mémorise de manière fixe dans la prothèse ( 1 ) auditive la valeur dans la deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre.
  5. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel on modifie automatiquement la valeur dans la deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre en fonction d'une situation auditive présente.
  6. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le paramètre soi-même, qui doit être réglé, est choisi automatiquement en fonction d'une situation auditive présente.
  7. Prothèse ( 1 ) auditive comprenant
    - un dispositif ( 3, SV ) de traitement du signal,
    - un dispositif ( AL ) d'analyse automatique d'une situation auditive dans laquelle se trouve la prothèse ( 1 ) auditive et
    - un dispositif de réglage automatique d'un paramètre du dispositif ( 3, SV ) de traitement du signal en fonction de la situation auditive analysée dans une première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre, dans laquelle
    - le dispositif de réglage est conçu pour le réglage manuel du paramètre du dispositif ( 3, SV ) de traitement du signal à une valeur dans une deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre à l'extérieur de la première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre, caractérisée en ce que dans la première plage ( PB1 ) de paramètre un artéfact du traitement du signal du dispositif de traitement du signal est en dessous d'un seuil prescrit d'acceptation ou d'un seuil prescrit de perception et dans la deuxième plage de paramètre l'artéfact est dessus du seuil d'acceptation du seuil de perception.
  8. Prothèse auditive suivant la revendication 7, dans laquelle la valeur dans la deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre peut être modifiée.
  9. Prothèse auditive suivant la revendication 7 ou 8, dans laquelle la valeur dans la deuxième plage ( PB2 ) de paramètre peut être modifiée automatiquement en fonction d'une situation auditive présente.
  10. Prothèse auditive suivant l'une des revendications 7 à 9, dans laquelle le paramètre soi-même, qui est réglable, peut, en fonction d'une situation auditive présente, être réglé automatiquement par le dispositif de réglage.
EP07117401A 2006-09-29 2007-09-27 Procédé de réglage semi-automatique d'un dispositif auditif et dispositif auditif correspondant Active EP1906701B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102006046316A DE102006046316B4 (de) 2006-09-29 2006-09-29 Verfahren zum halbautomatischen Einstellen einer Hörvorrichtung und entsprechende Hörvorrichtung

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1906701A2 EP1906701A2 (fr) 2008-04-02
EP1906701A3 EP1906701A3 (fr) 2012-05-30
EP1906701B1 true EP1906701B1 (fr) 2013-01-30

Family

ID=38828595

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07117401A Active EP1906701B1 (fr) 2006-09-29 2007-09-27 Procédé de réglage semi-automatique d'un dispositif auditif et dispositif auditif correspondant

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US8224002B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1906701B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102006046316B4 (fr)
DK (1) DK1906701T3 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007035173A1 (de) * 2007-07-27 2009-02-05 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Verfahren zum Einstellen eines Hörsystems mit einem perzeptiven Modell für binaurales Hören und entsprechendes Hörsystem
DE102007038191B3 (de) * 2007-08-13 2008-12-04 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Individuell einstellbares Hörgerät und Verfahren zu seinem Betrieb
DE102007056466A1 (de) * 2007-11-22 2009-05-28 Myworldofhearing E. K. Verfahren zur individuellen Anpassung eines Hörgeräts
JP2016514856A (ja) * 2013-03-21 2016-05-23 インテレクチュアル ディスカバリー カンパニー リミテッド オーディオ信号大きさの制御方法及び装置
EP3120578B2 (fr) * 2014-03-19 2022-08-17 Bose Corporation Recommendations pour des prothèses auditives provenant de la foule
EP2991379B1 (fr) * 2014-08-28 2017-05-17 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Procede et dispositif de perception amelioree de sa propre voix
US10284969B2 (en) 2017-02-09 2019-05-07 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Hearing device incorporating dynamic microphone attenuation during streaming
US10681459B1 (en) * 2019-01-28 2020-06-09 Sonova Ag Hearing devices with activity scheduling for an artifact-free user experience
US11671769B2 (en) 2020-07-02 2023-06-06 Oticon A/S Personalization of algorithm parameters of a hearing device

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE59609754D1 (de) * 1996-06-21 2002-11-07 Siemens Audiologische Technik Programmierbares Hörgerätesystem und Verfahren zum Ermitteln optimaler Parametersätze bei einem Hörhilfegerät
US6748089B1 (en) * 2000-10-17 2004-06-08 Sonic Innovations, Inc. Switch responsive to an audio cue
US7889879B2 (en) * 2002-05-21 2011-02-15 Cochlear Limited Programmable auditory prosthesis with trainable automatic adaptation to acoustic conditions
EP1432282B1 (fr) * 2003-03-27 2013-04-24 Phonak Ag Procédé d'adaptation d'une prothèse auditive à une situation environnante momentanée et système de prothèse auditive
DE102004025691B3 (de) * 2004-05-26 2005-08-18 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Hörhilfegerät oder Hörgerätesystem mit einer Bedieneinrichtung

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8224002B2 (en) 2012-07-17
DE102006046316A1 (de) 2008-04-03
DE102006046316B4 (de) 2010-09-02
DK1906701T3 (da) 2013-05-06
US20080112583A1 (en) 2008-05-15
EP1906701A3 (fr) 2012-05-30
EP1906701A2 (fr) 2008-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1906701B1 (fr) Procédé de réglage semi-automatique d'un dispositif auditif et dispositif auditif correspondant
EP3222057B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détection rapide de la voix naturelle
DE102004047759B3 (de) Verwendung eines Hörhilfegerätesystems mit wenigstens zwei Hörhilfegeräten
DE10327889B3 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Hörhilfegerätes sowie Hörhilfegerät mit einem Mikrofonsystem, bei dem unterschiedliche Richtcharakteristiken einstellbar sind und Programmiergerät dafür
DE102018216667B3 (de) Verfahren zur Verarbeitung von Mikrofonsignalen in einem Hörsystem sowie Hörsystem
DE102007017761B4 (de) Verfahren zur Anpassung eines binauralen Hörgerätesystems
EP2070384B1 (fr) Appareil de correction auditive commandé par un modèle perceptif et procédé correspondant
EP2991379B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de perception amelioree de sa propre voix
EP2172062B1 (fr) Procédé d'adaptation d'un appareil de correction auditive à l'aide d'un modèle perceptif
EP2302952B1 (fr) Auto-ajustement d'un appareil d'aide auditive
EP2254354A1 (fr) Procédé d'acclimatation d'un dispositif auditif programmable et dispositif auditif correspondant
EP1432282B1 (fr) Procédé d'adaptation d'une prothèse auditive à une situation environnante momentanée et système de prothèse auditive
EP2200345A1 (fr) Procédé de sélection d'une direction préférentiel d'un microphone directionnel et dispositif auditif correspondant
DE102006015497B4 (de) Audiosystem und Verfahren sowie Computerprogramm und Datenträger der das Computerprogramm enthält zur Anpassung der Übertragungsfunktion eines Audiosystems mittels Sprachsteuerung
DE102009004185B3 (de) Verfahren zur Signalverarbeitung einer Hörvorrichtung und entsprechende Hörvorrichtung
EP2658289B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une caractéristique de guidage et système auditif
EP2023667A2 (fr) Procédé de réglage d'un système auditif doté d'un modèle perceptif pour oreilles binaurales et système auditif correspondant
EP4149121A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un appareil auditif
DE102006046699B3 (de) Hörvorrichtung mit unsymmetrischer Klangwaage und entsprechendes Einstellverfahren
DE102020201615B3 (de) Hörsystem mit mindestens einem im oder am Ohr des Nutzers getragenen Hörinstrument sowie Verfahren zum Betrieb eines solchen Hörsystems
EP2604046A1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un appareil auditif et appareil auditif correspondant
EP2009955B1 (fr) Dispositif auditif avec réduction du bruit passif dépendant du niveau d'entrée
DE102009014053B4 (de) Verfahren zum Einstellen einer Richtcharakteristik und Hörvorrichtungen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04R 25/00 20060101AFI20120426BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120709

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 595897

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130215

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502007011274

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130321

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130511

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130530

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130530

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130501

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20131031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502007011274

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131031

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS AUDIOLOGISCHE TECHNIK G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20130930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130927

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 595897

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130927

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502007011274

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130927

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20070927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502007011274

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FDST PATENTANWAELTE FREIER DOERR STAMMLER TSCH, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502007011274

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIVANTOS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AUDIOLOGISCHE TECHNIK GMBH, 91058 ERLANGEN, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230921

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230918

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20230921

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230919

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20231001

Year of fee payment: 17