EP1871917A1 - Boron steel grade for induction hardening and shaft - Google Patents

Boron steel grade for induction hardening and shaft

Info

Publication number
EP1871917A1
EP1871917A1 EP06717138A EP06717138A EP1871917A1 EP 1871917 A1 EP1871917 A1 EP 1871917A1 EP 06717138 A EP06717138 A EP 06717138A EP 06717138 A EP06717138 A EP 06717138A EP 1871917 A1 EP1871917 A1 EP 1871917A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
induction hardening
molybdenum
nickel
boron steel
boron
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP06717138A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Erik Sandqvist
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Scania CV AB
Original Assignee
Scania CV AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scania CV AB filed Critical Scania CV AB
Publication of EP1871917A1 publication Critical patent/EP1871917A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/54Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with boron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a boron steel grade according to the introductory part of the attached claim 1.
  • the invention also relates to a shaft made of boron steel according to the introductory part of the attached claim 6.
  • Low-alloy boron steel is used inter alia for shafts which by induction hardening of a surface zone are provided with increased fatigue and static strength but also a wear-resistant surface layer.
  • Induction hardening of this kind causes in the surface zone compressive stresses which counteract the occurrence of fatigue cracks in this surface zone and thereby have a positive effect on fatigue strength.
  • the relationship between the magnitude of the compressive stresses and the fatigue strength is unambiguous. The greater the compressive stresses, the higher the fatigue strength.
  • the compressive stresses in the surface zone are balanced by tensile stresses in central portions (the core).
  • Tensile stresses in the core do not normally affect strength, since the level of stresses arising from imposed loads is low in specifically the core.
  • stationary induction hardening also called single-shot hardening, i.e. a hardening operation where the total volume to be hardened is first heated to the hardening temperature and is thereafter cooled immediately or after a certain delay
  • the compressive stresses in the surface zone become particularly high and the fatigue strength becomes better than is achieved by progressive induction hardening where heating and subsequent cooling are effected during continuous mutual movement between inductor/cooling shower and the workpiece which is to be hardened.
  • the stresses, not least the tensile stresses in the core in the case of stationary induction hardening may become so great during the actual hardening process that cracks (central cracks) occur in the core.
  • a typical and representative ratio is about 20,000 load cycles at 20 kNm torsional fatigue for progressive induction hardening as against about 80,000 load cycles at 20 kNm torsional fatigue for stationary induction hardening.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide low-alloy boron steel which can be induction-hardened statically without central cracks occurring.
  • Fig. 1 depicts a compilation in tabular form concerning Hie incidence of cracks as a function of composition, where primarily the molybdenum and nickel contents clearly vary
  • Fig. 2 depicts in diagram form the incidence of cracks as a function of molybdenum and nickel contents
  • FIG. 3 depicts in an axial section a driveshaft for which experiments with steel grades according to the present invention were carried out.
  • the steel grades according to the invention are low-allow boron steel, and steel grades according to the invention with the range of composition according to the invention appear in Table 1 together with a corresponding known steel grade.
  • Carbon which has a substantial influence on induction hardening characteristics, is present in contents of between 0.30 and 0.50%, resulting in desired strength after hardening. A carbon content amounting to 0.38-0.45% is preferred.
  • Silicon is present in an amount of 0.15-0.40%, preferably more than 0.15% up to 0.40%, and is primarily added as a carrier for other alloying elements, but also has some strengthening effect.
  • Manganese is present in an amount of 1.10 up to 1.50%, preferably more than 1.10% up to 1.50%, and has strengthening effects partly by increasing the hardenability, which, where there is great hardness depth, may affect the hardness depth in induction hardening. Manganese is also added in order to bind sulphur which would otherwise have adverse effects on impact strength.
  • the phosphorus content, ⁇ 0.035%, has to be kept low to prevent brittleness and hardness cracks due to grain boundary weakening.
  • MnS manganese sulphide
  • Chrome is present in an amount ⁇ 0.5%, preferably more than 0.2% and less than 0.5%. Chrome increases hardenability and reduces the risk of decarburisation.
  • Molybdenum in an amount of 0.030% and up to 0.15% has according to the invention proved to be able, together with certain contents of nickel as below, to prevent the occurrence of central cracks, inter alia in static induction hardening.
  • the molybdenum content is normally not even specified for boron steel of this kind. It is also likely that such an addition of molybdenum in combination with nickel also reduces the risk of hardness cracks in other grades.
  • Molybdenum in a quantity of 0.05 up to 0.15% is preferred.
  • Nickel in an amount of 0.15% up to 0.40% has proved, together with molybdenum as above, according to the invention, to be able to prevent the occurrence of central cracks, inter alia in static induction hardening.
  • the nickel content is likewise not usually specified.
  • Nickel is regarded as an impurity. It is also likely that such an addition of molybdenum in combination with nickel also reduces the risk of hardness cracks in other grades.
  • Nickel in an amount of more than 0.20 up to 0.40% is preferred.
  • Titanium in certain contents is needed for keeping a certain content of boron in solid solution in the steel with a view to improving the hardening characteristics. Titanium should therefore be present in an amount of 0.020-0.050%. Aluminium is a deoxidant and is therefore present in low contents. Aluminium impairs the fatigue strength by forming aluminium oxide, and aluminium contents should be kept ⁇ 0.050%.
  • the desirable content in solid solution is at least 0.0005%, while the total content should be limited to less than 0.004%.
  • molybdenum and nickel constitute impurities which are not even specified in a standard composition.
  • the composition ranges for molybdenum and nickel which result in the crack-eliminating effect according to the invention nevertheless comprise contents which clearly exceed prevailing impurity levels.
  • Fig. 1 shows the incidence of cracks on a large number of driveshafts from a large number of charges with mutual varying chemical composition
  • "No.” denotes the number of shafts in which cracks were detected
  • “Tot.” the total number of shafts examined for each steel charge
  • “Incid. %” the ratio between "No.” and “Tot”, i.e. the proportion of shafts with detected cracks.
  • Fig. 2 shows the incidence of cracks, "Crack Incidence %", as a function of molybdenum content and nickel content, although for manufacturing reasons the effect of molybdenum content or nickel content would be isolated.
  • the minimum contents indicated have been adjusted by a small margin to the respective content combinations of 0.035% molybdenum/0.167% nickel and 0.038 molybdenum/0.188% nickel, which resulted in no cracks.
  • the preferred minimum contents have been provided with a margin upwards relative to the minimum contents extracted.
  • An upper content limit has also been set for both molybdenum and nickel. This is partly for cost reasons and for preventing disadvantages, e.g. impaired machinability, which occur at increasing molybdenum and nickel contents.
  • Scania boron steel TB 1639 as a low-alloy material is specified in Table 1 below.
  • Low-alloy compositions are usually stated without contents of molybdenum and nickel, which substances are to be regarded as common impurities.
  • a general composition according to the invention, a preferred composition and a detailed composition which in experiments resulted in lack of cracks are also specified.
  • Table 1 Composition of boron steel according to the state of the art and the invention.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
  • Shafts, Cranks, Connecting Bars, And Related Bearings (AREA)

Abstract

Low-alloy boron steel grade, e.g. for shafts, which by induction hardening of a surface zone are given an improved fatigue and static strength. The greatest improvement in fatigue strength is obtained by stationary (single shot) induction hardening, due to higher compressive stresses in the surface compared to those obtained by progressive (scanning method) induction hardening. High corresponding tensile stresses in the shaft centre have, however, proved to be able to cause central cracks for these steel grades. The invention means that by using slightly increased contents of molybdenum and nickel as compared with those which as a rule appear as impurities in boron steel of standard composition without specification of the molybdenum and nickel content, the occurrence of central cracks is eliminated.

Description

BORON STEEL GRADE FOR INDUCTION HARDENING5 AND SHAFT
1. Background
1.1 Technical field
The present invention relates to a boron steel grade according to the introductory part of the attached claim 1.
The invention also relates to a shaft made of boron steel according to the introductory part of the attached claim 6.
1.2 Brief presentation of the state of the art
Low-alloy boron steel is used inter alia for shafts which by induction hardening of a surface zone are provided with increased fatigue and static strength but also a wear- resistant surface layer.
Induction hardening of this kind causes in the surface zone compressive stresses which counteract the occurrence of fatigue cracks in this surface zone and thereby have a positive effect on fatigue strength. The relationship between the magnitude of the compressive stresses and the fatigue strength is unambiguous. The greater the compressive stresses, the higher the fatigue strength.
The compressive stresses in the surface zone are balanced by tensile stresses in central portions (the core). Tensile stresses in the core do not normally affect strength, since the level of stresses arising from imposed loads is low in specifically the core.
In stationary induction hardening, also called single-shot hardening, i.e. a hardening operation where the total volume to be hardened is first heated to the hardening temperature and is thereafter cooled immediately or after a certain delay, the compressive stresses in the surface zone become particularly high and the fatigue strength becomes better than is achieved by progressive induction hardening where heating and subsequent cooling are effected during continuous mutual movement between inductor/cooling shower and the workpiece which is to be hardened. However, the stresses, not least the tensile stresses in the core, in the case of stationary induction hardening may become so great during the actual hardening process that cracks (central cracks) occur in the core. If central cracks can be avoided, however, stationary induction hardening of a shaft results in very good fatigue strength. A typical and representative ratio is about 20,000 load cycles at 20 kNm torsional fatigue for progressive induction hardening as against about 80,000 load cycles at 20 kNm torsional fatigue for stationary induction hardening.
Low-allow boron steel has proved to be very sensitive to the phenomena described above, which under certain conditions give rise to central cracks, which are of course unacceptable in the hardened product. Cracks of this kind are normally difficult to detect when they do not reach the surface of the product concerned. It has nevertheless proved possible to detect them by examination with ultrasound.
The object of the present invention is to provide low-alloy boron steel which can be induction-hardened statically without central cracks occurring.
2. Summary of the invention
The object as above is achieved with boron steel and shafts according to the attached claims 1 and 6.
Further advantages are achieved by what is specified in the dependent claims.
3. Brief description of the drawings
The invention is described below in more detail with reference to examples of embodiments and the attached drawings, in which - Fig. 1 depicts a compilation in tabular form concerning Hie incidence of cracks as a function of composition, where primarily the molybdenum and nickel contents clearly vary,
- Fig. 2 depicts in diagram form the incidence of cracks as a function of molybdenum and nickel contents,
- Fig. 3 depicts in an axial section a driveshaft for which experiments with steel grades according to the present invention were carried out.
4. Detailed description of preferred embodiments
In the description, all percentage figures given for elements in the steel grades indicated are by weight.
The steel grades according to the invention are low-allow boron steel, and steel grades according to the invention with the range of composition according to the invention appear in Table 1 together with a corresponding known steel grade.
Carbon, which has a substantial influence on induction hardening characteristics, is present in contents of between 0.30 and 0.50%, resulting in desired strength after hardening. A carbon content amounting to 0.38-0.45% is preferred.
Silicon is present in an amount of 0.15-0.40%, preferably more than 0.15% up to 0.40%, and is primarily added as a carrier for other alloying elements, but also has some strengthening effect.
Manganese is present in an amount of 1.10 up to 1.50%, preferably more than 1.10% up to 1.50%, and has strengthening effects partly by increasing the hardenability, which, where there is great hardness depth, may affect the hardness depth in induction hardening. Manganese is also added in order to bind sulphur which would otherwise have adverse effects on impact strength. The phosphorus content, < 0.035%, has to be kept low to prevent brittleness and hardness cracks due to grain boundary weakening.
Sulphur improves machinability by formation of manganese sulphide (MnS) but at the same time reduces strength because MnS constitutes in the stronger steel matrix weak regions which may act as crack notches. The sulphur content needs here to be kept within the range 0.020-0.050%.
Chrome is present in an amount < 0.5%, preferably more than 0.2% and less than 0.5%. Chrome increases hardenability and reduces the risk of decarburisation.
Molybdenum in an amount of 0.030% and up to 0.15% has according to the invention proved to be able, together with certain contents of nickel as below, to prevent the occurrence of central cracks, inter alia in static induction hardening. The molybdenum content is normally not even specified for boron steel of this kind. It is also likely that such an addition of molybdenum in combination with nickel also reduces the risk of hardness cracks in other grades. Molybdenum in a quantity of 0.05 up to 0.15% is preferred.
Nickel in an amount of 0.15% up to 0.40% has proved, together with molybdenum as above, according to the invention, to be able to prevent the occurrence of central cracks, inter alia in static induction hardening. The nickel content is likewise not usually specified. Nickel is regarded as an impurity. It is also likely that such an addition of molybdenum in combination with nickel also reduces the risk of hardness cracks in other grades. Nickel in an amount of more than 0.20 up to 0.40% is preferred.
Titanium in certain contents is needed for keeping a certain content of boron in solid solution in the steel with a view to improving the hardening characteristics. Titanium should therefore be present in an amount of 0.020-0.050%. Aluminium is a deoxidant and is therefore present in low contents. Aluminium impairs the fatigue strength by forming aluminium oxide, and aluminium contents should be kept < 0.050%.
Boron in low contents improves hardening characteristics, e.g. hardenability, which where there is great hardness depth may affect the hardening depth in induction hardening. The desirable content in solid solution is at least 0.0005%, while the total content should be limited to less than 0.004%.
5. Applying the invention
In normal circumstances, molybdenum and nickel constitute impurities which are not even specified in a standard composition. The composition ranges for molybdenum and nickel which result in the crack-eliminating effect according to the invention nevertheless comprise contents which clearly exceed prevailing impurity levels.
However, said ranges correspond to relatively small amounts of the alloy substances molybdenum and nickel and probably have an extremely marginal effect on the steel cost of the low-allow boron steels here concerned.
On the oilier hand, a substantial increase in strength is achieved by being able to apply static induction hardening without central cracks occurring, which in itself is likely in certain cases to mean that material can be economised in workpieces concerned without affecting performance as regards such aspects as fatigue strength.
6. Examples and experiments
Driveshafts (Fig. 3) made of boron steel TB 1639 with various molybdenum and nickel contents were hardened by stationary induction hardening as follows:
1. Induction heating in about 40 seconds to a surface temperature of about 10000C.
2. Cooling by water-based polymer mixture (polyalkylene glycol). 3. Tempering (reheating, about 90 seconds) by inductive stationary heating to a surface temperature of about 3000C.
The occurrence of cracks was detected by ultrasound from shaft end surface.
The table in Fig. 1 shows the incidence of cracks on a large number of driveshafts from a large number of charges with mutual varying chemical composition, hi the table, "No." denotes the number of shafts in which cracks were detected, "Tot." the total number of shafts examined for each steel charge and "Incid. %" the ratio between "No." and "Tot", i.e. the proportion of shafts with detected cracks. Fig. 2 shows the incidence of cracks, "Crack Incidence %", as a function of molybdenum content and nickel content, although for manufacturing reasons the effect of molybdenum content or nickel content would be isolated.
From the compositions of the shafts (testpieces) in which no cracks were detected ("Incid. 0%" in Fig. 1), minimum contents of about 0.030% molybdenum and about 0.15% nickel, for prevention of cracks, can be extracted.
The minimum contents indicated have been adjusted by a small margin to the respective content combinations of 0.035% molybdenum/0.167% nickel and 0.038 molybdenum/0.188% nickel, which resulted in no cracks. The preferred minimum contents have been provided with a margin upwards relative to the minimum contents extracted.
An upper content limit has also been set for both molybdenum and nickel. This is partly for cost reasons and for preventing disadvantages, e.g. impaired machinability, which occur at increasing molybdenum and nickel contents.
Within the scope of the experimental investigation described above, it was also possible to verify by both measurements and calculations that stationary induction hardening results in both higher compressive stresses in the surface and higher tensile stresses in the centre than progressive induction hardening of shafts. 7. Chemical compositions
Scania boron steel TB 1639 as a low-alloy material is specified in Table 1 below. Low-alloy compositions are usually stated without contents of molybdenum and nickel, which substances are to be regarded as common impurities. A general composition according to the invention, a preferred composition and a detailed composition which in experiments resulted in lack of cracks are also specified.
Table 1 Composition of boron steel according to the state of the art and the invention.
Chemical composition
Basic TB 1639 Invention Preferred Example substance basis generally embodiment from Fig. 1
C 0.38-0.45 0.30-0.50 0.30-0.50 0.417
Si 0.15-0.40 0.15-0.40 > 0.15-0.40 0.282
Mn 1.10-1.50 1.10-1.50 > 1.10-1.50 1.323
P < 0.035 < 0.035 < 0.035 0.011
S 0.020-0.050 0.020-0.050 0.020-0.050 0.028
Cr < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.20-0.50 0.297
Mo 0.030-0.15 0.05-0.15 0.038
Ni 0.15-0.40 > 0.20-0.40 0.188
Ti 0.020-0.050 0.020-0.050 0.020-0.050 0.039
Al < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.032
B (total) < 0.0040 < 0.0040 < 0.0040 < 0.0040
B (soluble) > 0.005 > 0.005 > 0.005 > 0.005

Claims

1. A boron steel, preferably for stationary induction hardening, comprising, in wt%,
0.30-0.50% carbon 0.15-0.40% silicon 1.10-1.50% manganese
< 0.035% phosphorus 0.020-0.050% sulphur < 0.50% chrome
0.030-0.15% molybdenum 0.15-0.40% nickel 0.020-0.050% titanium
< 0.050% aluminium < 0.0040% total boron
> 0.0005% soluble boron
and the remainder iron and impurities.
2. A boron steel according to claim 1 , comprising in wt%,
0.30-0.50% carbon more than 0.15 up to 0.40% silicon more than 1.10 up to 1.50% manganese < 0.035% phosphorus 0.020-0.050% sulphur
< 0.50% chrome 0.05-0.15% molybdenum 0.20-0.40% nickel 0.020-0.050% titanium
< 0.050% aluminium
< 0.0040% total boron
> 0.0005% soluble boron
3. A boron steel according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the proportion of carbon is 0.38-0.45%.
4. A boron steel according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterised in that the proportion of nickel is more than 0.20 up to 0.40%.
5. A boron steel according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, characterised in that the proportion of chrome is more than 0.20 up to 0.50%.
6. A shaft, characterised in that it is made of a boron steel according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5.
7. A shaft according to claim 6, characterised by a hardened layer caused by stationary induction hardening.
EP06717138A 2005-04-12 2006-04-06 Boron steel grade for induction hardening and shaft Withdrawn EP1871917A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0500812A SE0500812L (en) 2005-04-12 2005-04-12 Brush steel for induction hardening and shaft
PCT/SE2006/050059 WO2006110100A1 (en) 2005-04-12 2006-04-06 Boron steel grade for induction hardening and shaft

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1871917A1 true EP1871917A1 (en) 2008-01-02

Family

ID=35653953

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06717138A Withdrawn EP1871917A1 (en) 2005-04-12 2006-04-06 Boron steel grade for induction hardening and shaft

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1871917A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2008537982A (en)
CN (1) CN101155941B (en)
BR (1) BRPI0608675A2 (en)
SE (1) SE0500812L (en)
WO (1) WO2006110100A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101624675B (en) * 2009-07-30 2011-02-16 莱芜钢铁股份有限公司 45BM steel for caterpillar track pin roll and manufacturing method thereof

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2725747B2 (en) * 1990-11-16 1998-03-11 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Steel for induction hardening
JP2916069B2 (en) * 1993-09-17 1999-07-05 新日本製鐵株式会社 High-strength induction hardened shaft parts
JP3432944B2 (en) * 1995-03-16 2003-08-04 新日本製鐵株式会社 Steel material for induction hardened shaft parts with excellent torsional fatigue strength
JP3432950B2 (en) * 1995-04-17 2003-08-04 新日本製鐵株式会社 Steel material for induction hardened shaft parts that has both cold workability and torsional fatigue strength characteristics
JPH10195589A (en) * 1996-12-26 1998-07-28 Nippon Steel Corp High torsional fatigue strength induction hardened steel
JPH11181542A (en) * 1997-12-16 1999-07-06 Nippon Steel Corp Steel for induction hardening excellent in cold workability and induction hardening and its manufacturing method
ES2292836T3 (en) * 2002-10-18 2008-03-16 Jfe Steel Corporation STEEL MATERIAL FOR MECHANICAL STRUCTURE, EXTREMELY APPROPRIATE FOR LAMINATION, TEMPERATURE FISSURE RESISTANCE AND TORSION PROPERTY AND MOTOR SHAFT.
JP3774697B2 (en) * 2002-12-04 2006-05-17 新日本製鐵株式会社 Steel material for high strength induction hardening and method for manufacturing the same
JP2005048211A (en) * 2003-07-30 2005-02-24 Jfe Steel Kk Manufacturing method of steel material with excellent fatigue characteristics

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2006110100A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006110100A1 (en) 2006-10-19
SE527221C2 (en) 2006-01-24
JP2008537982A (en) 2008-10-02
SE0500812L (en) 2006-01-24
CN101155941A (en) 2008-04-02
BRPI0608675A2 (en) 2010-01-19
CN101155941B (en) 2010-09-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3719149B1 (en) High-hardness steel product and method of manufacturing the same
EP0643148B1 (en) Steel material for induction-hardened shaft part and shaft part made therefrom
EP0949340B1 (en) Steel having excellent outer surface scc resistance for pipeline
JP2002256382A (en) Wear-resistant steel plate and method of manufacturing the same
KR20090102791A (en) Wear-resistant steel sheet having excellent wear resistance at high temperatures and excellent bending workability and method for manufacturing the same
US20120000567A1 (en) Electric resistance welded steel pipe excellent in deformability and fatigue properties after quenching
US6383311B1 (en) High strength drive shaft and process for producing the same
JP2916069B2 (en) High-strength induction hardened shaft parts
JP3432950B2 (en) Steel material for induction hardened shaft parts that has both cold workability and torsional fatigue strength characteristics
US6270596B1 (en) Process for producing high strength shaft
JPH05163563A (en) High-speed steel for end mill
WO2006110100A1 (en) Boron steel grade for induction hardening and shaft
JP3432944B2 (en) Steel material for induction hardened shaft parts with excellent torsional fatigue strength
JP4728884B2 (en) Induction contour hardened steel and induction contour hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue characteristics
JPH08311615A (en) Long life induction hardened bearing steel
JP2011038185A (en) Steel material for high frequency induction contour hardening having excellent low cycle fatigue property and induction contour hardened component
JP2952318B2 (en) High strength steel for induction hardening
JPH07179988A (en) Hot tool steel excellent in high temperature strength
JPH09287054A (en) Cold forging-steel for induction hardening
JPH0796696B2 (en) Alloy tool steel
JPH0978127A (en) Method for manufacturing shaft-shaped parts for high-strength and high-toughness machine structures
JPH0557350B2 (en)
JP2004300551A (en) High-strength medium carbon steel
JPH08269626A (en) Forged steel back-up roll for rolling mill
JPH0726348A (en) High-strength rail with excellent rolling fatigue damage resistance and manufacturing method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20071112

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: SANDQVIST, ERIK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20110314