EP1854224A1 - Procede et appareil permettant d'utiliser des mesures relatives au gain de trajet relatif de liaison montante pour faciliter la gestion des ressources de liaison montante - Google Patents

Procede et appareil permettant d'utiliser des mesures relatives au gain de trajet relatif de liaison montante pour faciliter la gestion des ressources de liaison montante

Info

Publication number
EP1854224A1
EP1854224A1 EP06704640A EP06704640A EP1854224A1 EP 1854224 A1 EP1854224 A1 EP 1854224A1 EP 06704640 A EP06704640 A EP 06704640A EP 06704640 A EP06704640 A EP 06704640A EP 1854224 A1 EP1854224 A1 EP 1854224A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
path gain
base station
mobile radio
related quantity
uplink
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP06704640A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1854224A4 (fr
EP1854224B1 (fr
Inventor
Erik Geijer-Lundin
Fredrik Gunnarsson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Publication of EP1854224A1 publication Critical patent/EP1854224A1/fr
Publication of EP1854224A4 publication Critical patent/EP1854224A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1854224B1 publication Critical patent/EP1854224B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/16—Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H04W28/18—Negotiating wireless communication parameters
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
    • H04W52/04—TPC
    • H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
    • H04W52/14—Separate analysis of uplink or downlink
    • H04W52/146—Uplink power control
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
    • H04W52/04—TPC
    • H04W52/30—TPC using constraints in the total amount of available transmission power
    • H04W52/34—TPC management, i.e. sharing limited amount of power among users or channels or data types, e.g. cell loading
    • H04W52/343—TPC management, i.e. sharing limited amount of power among users or channels or data types, e.g. cell loading taking into account loading or congestion level
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/16—Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H04W28/18—Negotiating wireless communication parameters
    • H04W28/22—Negotiating communication rate
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00—Local resource management
    • H04W72/50—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria

Definitions

  • the technical field relates to radio communications systems, and more particularly, to resource management and/or load control.
  • admission and congestion control as well as resource control and allocation, for each cell are used to maintain acceptable quality of service for existing mobile user connections in those cells. And because radio resources are limited, they must be managed efficiently to maximize system capacity. For ease of description, load control, admission control, congestion control, and resource control and reallocation are generally referred to as resource management.
  • Admitting too many new connections may result in increased interference between the mobile user connections thereby degrading the quality of service. Transmitting at too high of a power level or bit rale in either the downlink or the uplink direction creates unnecessary interference which adversely impacts service quality and throughput.
  • For downlink resource management it is possible to estimate a worst case situation at every position in the service area by assuming that each base station is operating at maximum power. Such a situation may occur in cells that use high speed downlink shared channel transmission.
  • the interference In the uplink direction from mobile to base station, the interference includes both background noise as well as total received power from the transmitting mobi les.
  • Centralized resource control is desirable because it is implemented much "closer" to where the resources are actually used.
  • Centralized control schemes also require substantial signaling overhead and impose delays associated with sending information to the central control entity, e.g., a base station controller, a radio network controller, or even a core network node. Significant delay and signaling are associated with the central control entity sending commands and information to the base stations and mobile stations.
  • the central control entity e.g., a base station controller, a radio network controller, or even a core network node.
  • Significant delay and signaling are associated with the central control entity sending commands and information to the base stations and mobile stations.
  • resource management w ill likely become more decentralized or distributed in order to achieve higher speeds and avoid the considerable signaling (and associated costs) required for centralized control.
  • Centralized resource management receives information from various cells which allows informing base stations about mobile connections, conditions, etc.. in adjacent cells.
  • a distributed resource manager in a base station does not have information about other mobile connections it is not supervising/serving.
  • uplink transmissions from such unserved mobiles can have a dramatic impact the interference in the cell load.
  • a high power or high data rate uplink transmission from a mobile station that is being managed by a first base slation in a first cell may create significant interference in a nearby second cell managed by a second base station. That interference increases the load in the second cell and effectively consumes resources in the second cell that the second base station would rather use to service mobi les within the second cell.
  • the second base station has no way of knowing or estimating the impact that other mobile uplink transmissions will have on its resources or how it will impact current communications being supported in the second cell.
  • the first base station does not know, nor can it reasonably estimate, the contribution its served mobiles' transmissions make to the interference at the second base station.
  • a distributed resource control system is one in which the base station alone or in combination with a mobile station makes at least some resource management decisions without having to involve the a central controller like a BSC, RNC, core network node. etc. This is also the situation in ad-hoc networking, where access points manage the resources in a distributed fashion. But the relative path gain related measurements can also be valuable for centralized uplink resource control with limited control signaling, where only the most informative measurements should be signaled to the resource control node.
  • path gain encompasses attenuation
  • path gain related quantity will be represented by path gain itself for clarity. Any other path gain related quantity could also be used.
  • path gain values or values from which path gain can be calculated relating to pilot signals received from nearby base stations, e.g. for handover purposes. Assuming a logarithmic scale, path gain is typically determined based on a difference between a detected base station pilot signal strength detected at the mobile radio and a pilot signal strength at which the base station transmitted the pilot signal.
  • the inventive technology may advantageously be used in a cellular radio communication system using distributed resource control that includes a serving cell and a non-serving cell.
  • a mobile radio is currently served by a serving base station in the serving cell.
  • a serving cell corresponds to the cell having the highest path gain to the mobile radio and is very often the cell in which the mobile radio is currently located.
  • a relative path gain is determined for an uplink signal transmission from the mobile radio. The relative path gain is based on a comparison of a first path gain for an uplink signal transmission from the mobile radio to ihe non-serving base station with a second path gain for the uplink signal transmission from the mobile to the serving base station.
  • Relative path gain can be expressed as a ratio of the second path gain to the first palh gain i f the path gains are in linear units or as a difference between the second path gain and the first path gain if the path gains are in logarithmic units.
  • the relative palh gain is an average relative path gain.
  • a transmission power or a data rate used by the mobile radio for the uplink signal transmission may be adjusted.
  • Such adjusting may be based on a previously-determined value provided by the serving base station.
  • One example might be a maximum relative path gain, a maximum signal-to-interference ratio, a maximum data rale, a maximum transmission power, etc.
  • the mobile radio determines the relative path gain for uplink signal transmissions from the mobile radio.
  • the mobile radio also manages uplink resources by adjusting a transmission power used by the mobile radio or by adjusting a data rate used by the mobile radio for the uplink signal transmission. More specifically, the mobile radio compares the relative path gain to a predetermined value provided by the serving base station, and if the relative path gain exceeds the predetermined value, the mobile radio adjusts the resources used for the uplink signal transmission.
  • the serving base station determines the relative path gain for uplink signal transmissions from the mobile radio, and based on that relative path gain, manages uplink resources. For example, the serving base station compares the relative path gain to a predetermined value. If the relative path gain exceeds the predetermined value, the serving base station instructs the mobile radio to decrease the resources used for the uplink signal transmission.
  • the mobile radio may send a relative path gain measurement to the serving base station when the relative path gain measurement exceeds a predetermined value either absolutely or using a hysteresis. Periodic reporting may also be used.
  • Another application manages uplink resources using a mobile classification based on relative path gain.
  • a path gain measurement exceeds a predetermined value for one of the mobile radios, that one mobile radio is classified as harmful. Otherwise, the one mobile radio is classified as harmless. Fewer resources are allocated to a harmful mobile radio than to a harmless radio.
  • the technology may be applied to situations that involve more than two cells.
  • the cellular radio communication system includes multiple non- serving cells.
  • the relative path gain is then determined based on a comparison of a maximum path gain for an uplink signal transmission from the mobile radio to any of the non-serving base stations with the path gain for the uplink signal transmission from the mobile to the serving base station.
  • a relative path gain measurement also may include (a) the relation (relation means ratio in linear scale and difference in logarithmic scale) between the received pilot signal power from a non-serving cell and the received pilot signal power from the serving cell or (b) the relation between the received pilot signal power from a non-serving cell relative the interference power and the received pilot signal power from the serving cell relative the interference power. Consequently, in a 3GPP non-limiting example application, relative measurements may be reported for one of the three quantities that may be specified by path gain: common pilot received signal code power, common pilot received signal power, and relative interference power.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a cellular communications system showing different interfering effects of two mobile radios at different locations in a serving cell transmitting at the same power or data rate:
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating example procedures for managing uplink resources using relative path gain
  • Figure 3 illustrates a cellular communications system showing a reduced transmission power or data rate for the more interfering mobile radio:
  • Figure 4 illustrates a function block diagram of a mobile station that may be used in a first, non-limiting, example embodiment for managing uplink resources using relative path gain:
  • Figure 5 is a function block diagram of an example relative path gain calculator that may be used in the mobile station
  • Figure 6 is a flow chart diagram illustrating example steps for mobile-based uplink resource management
  • Figure 7 a function block diagram of a base station that may be used in a second, non-limiting, example embodiment for managing uplink resources using relative path gain
  • Figure 8 is a flow chart diagram illustrating example steps for base station- based uplink resource management. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a cellular communications system showing different interfering effects of two mobile radios at different locations in a servins cell transmittins at the same power or data rate.
  • Serving cell A with serving base station BSl serves two mobile radios MS l and MS2. Both mobile radios arc located about the same distance from base station BS l , and both are transmitting in the uplink at the same data rate.
  • the uplink path gains go from mobile radios MS I and MS2 to base station BSl are the same.
  • the mobile radio MS l has a path gain g ⁇ to notvserving base station BS2 and a path gain gu to non-serving base station BS3.
  • the mobile radio MS2 has a path gain gn to non-serving base station BS3.
  • the mobile radios MS 1 and MS2 are much further away from base station BS3, as compared to base station BS l , their path gains g ⁇ and g:;, are much lower than gi ⁇ . In other words, their interfering affects in non-serving cell C are minimal.
  • the uplink load of a cell is related to the received total wideband power / over thermal noise N at the base station antenna, which is also known as the noise rise.
  • Uplink relative load /. is defined through the pole equation:
  • lj ⁇ Pi8ij + N j (2) i
  • pi is the uplink transmit power of mobile radio i
  • gjj is the path gain for that uplink transmission from mobile i to base station;.
  • the sum is over i in equation (2) meaning over all mobiles transmitting in the network including those mobiles served by non-serving base stations.
  • Mobile i is connected to base station k ⁇ , and the uplink transmission from the mobile i is perceived with the carrier-to-total interference ⁇ , at the serving base station A,.
  • ⁇ t is given by:
  • Equation (6) means that the load contribution from mobile radio / to the load in cell j depends on the path gain to the base station / and the serving base stations k, as well as the allocated service quality closely related to ⁇ ,.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating example procedures for managing uplink resources using relative path gain that overcomes this problem and similar interference problems in non-ser ⁇ ing cells. These procedures are particularly useful in a distributed uplink resource management context because they do not rely on a centralized manager knowing the interference impact of mobile radio uplink transmissions in non-serving cells. But they are also quite useful in a centralized uplink resource management.
  • a relative path gain is determined for uplink signal transmissions from the mobile radio (step S l ).
  • Relative path gain is based on a comparison of a first path gain for an uplink signal transmission from the mobile radio to a non-serving base station with a second path gain for the uplink signal transmission from the mobile to the serving base station.
  • Relative path gain can be expressed as a ratio of the second path gain to the first path gain, if the path gains are in linear units, or a difference between the second path gain and the first path gain i f the path gains are in logarithmic units.
  • the technology may be applied to situations that involve more than two cells so that there are multiple non-serving cells for the mobile radio.
  • the relative path gain is then determined based on a comparison of a maximum path gain for an uplink signal transmission from the mobile radio to any of the non-serving base stations with the path gain for the uplink signal transmission from the mobile to the serving base station.
  • the relative path gain is averaged (step S2) to avoid widely varying gain values that may result from fast fading, for example.
  • Uplink resources arc managed using relati ve path gain, which is particularly advantageous in a distributed uplink resource management configuration (step S3).
  • resource management encompasses load control, admission control, and resource control.
  • One example way to manage uplink resources based on relative path gain measurements is to relate or limit the resource al location of a mobile to the reported measurements.
  • the relative gain for the mobile radio MS 1 is much lower than the relative path gain of mobile radio MS2, which means that much less resources are allocated to MS2 than to MS I . So its uplink data rate is not reduced.
  • the relative gain for the mobile radio MS2 exceeds the limit, so its uplink data rate is reduced, thereby reducing the interfering impact on non-serving cell B.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a function block diagram of a mobile station that may be used in a first, non-limiting, example embodiment for managing uplink resources using relative path gain in a distributed or decentralized uplink resource management context.
  • Mobile radio 10 includes radio transmission circuitry 12 and radio recei ving ci rcuitry 20 coupled to a control ler 14.
  • the control ler 14 is also coupled to a user interface 22 (coupled to a speaker, microphone, keypad, touchpad. or display, etc.) for communication with a user.
  • Each base station transmits a pilot signal or other downlink signal that includes the transmission power at which it was transmitted by its base station.
  • the radio receiving circuitry 20 receives base station pilot signals that are within range and provides them to a relative path gain calculator 1 8.
  • Uplink relative path gains are determined using downlink path gain values and making the assumption that the uplink path gain is approximately the same as the downlink path gain.
  • the relative path gain calculator 18 determines an uplink path gain for each base station may be determined by subtracting the received signal strength of its own pilot signal from that pilot signal's actual transmission power in logarithmic power units. Alternatively, the path gain uplink path gain to each base station by dividing the recei ved pilot signal strength by its actual transmission power in linear power units. An example implementation for relative path gain calculator 18 is described below in conjunction with Figure 5.
  • the control ler 14 further includes a resource manager 16 that manages uplink resources based on path gain. For example, the mobile radio compares the relative path gain to a predetermined value provided by the serving base station. If the relative path gain exceeds the predetermined value, the mobile radio decreases the resources (e.g., power, data rate, etc.) used for the uplink signal transmission.
  • a resource manager 16 that manages uplink resources based on path gain. For example, the mobile radio compares the relative path gain to a predetermined value provided by the serving base station. If the relative path gain exceeds the predetermined value, the mobile radio decreases the resources (e.g., power, data rate, etc.) used for the uplink signal transmission.
  • condition moti vated by the relati ve load approximation is as fol lows:
  • the respective relative load contributions to BS2 from the two mobiles are given by:
  • Figure 5 is a function block diagram of an example relative path gain calculator
  • a path gain calculator 25 receives pilot signals from cells A, B. C N. Assuming linear units, the path gain calculator 25 subtracts the received signal strength of each pilot signal from the pilot signal s actual transmission power.
  • a maximum value selector 26 selects from the non-serving cell path gains B. C. ..., N. the maximum path gain.
  • a comparator 27 compares the maximum non-serving path gain with the path gain A for the serv ing cell.
  • the compaiison can be a difference for linear units or a ratio of the maximum non-serving cell path gain to the serving cell path gain for logarithmic units, the relative path gain is preferably averaged in averager 28 to avoid rapid, short lived values that are caused by fast fading and other short term radio channel effects.
  • the average path gain is then forwarded to the resource manager 16.
  • Figure 6 is a flow chart diagram illustrating example steps for mobile-based uplink resource management.
  • a relative path gain is determined for uplink signal transmissions from the mobile radio based on downlink path gain values (step S lO).
  • the relative path gain is averaged to avoid widely and rapidly varying gain values (step S 12 ).
  • a predetermined relative path gain value (e.g., a maximum or a limit) is received from the serving base station (or from some other source) (step S 12). If the determined relative path gain exceeds the predetermined relative path gain or a predetermined relative path gain plus a hysteresis, the controller 14 instructs a decrease in the uplink transmission power or the uplink data transmission rate (step S 13) to reduce the interference effects of the mobile's uplink transmission in one or more non-serving cells.
  • a predetermined relative path gain value e.g., a maximum or a limit
  • the controller 14 may instruct an increase in the uplink transmission power or the uplink data transmission rate (step S 13 ) if requested by the mobile radio since there will not be a significant inference impact of lhe mobile's uplink transmission on one or more non-serving cells.
  • the controller 14 may instruct an increase in the uplink transmission power or the uplink data transmission rate (step S 13 ) if requested by the mobile radio since there will not be a significant inference impact of lhe mobile's uplink transmission on one or more non-serving cells.
  • other factors may be considered in determining whether to increase or decrease the power/data rale.
  • FIG. 7 a function block diagram of a base station 30 that may be used in a second, non-limiting, example distributed embodiment for managing uplink resources using relative path gain.
  • the base station 3 ⁇ includes radio transmission circuitry 32 and radio receiving circuitry 38 coupled to a controller 34.
  • the controller 34 is also coupled to a network interface 40 for communication with the rest of the radio network.
  • the controller includes a resource manager 36 that receives relative path gain data or relative path gain measurement data from which relative path gain can be calculated.
  • the resource manager 36 manages uplink resources using relative path gain.
  • the controller compares the relative path gain to a predetermined value, and if the relative path gain exceeds the predetermined value, the controller issues an instruction to the mobile radio to decrease its use of resources (e.g., power, data rate, etc.) for the uplink signal transmission.
  • resources e.g., power, data rate, etc.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart diagram illustrating example steps for base station- based uplink resource management.
  • the base station receives relative path gain (or average path gain) data from the mobile radio (or relative path gain data from which relative path gain can be calculated) (step S20).
  • Various path gain measurement reporting methods may be used.
  • the mobile radio may send a path gain measurement to the serving base station when the path gain measurement exceeds a predetermined value, either absolutely or using a hysteresis.
  • Two measurement reporting triggers could be used: when the relative path gain exceeds a threshold + a hysteresis and when the relative path gain dips below a threshold + a hysteresis.
  • the base station could instruct the mobile to increase its use of resources, e.g.. transmission power, data rate, etc. Periodic reporting may also be used. If the determined relative path gain exceeds a predetermined maximum, the mobile station may be instructed to reduce transmission power or data rate (step S21 ).
  • CPICH Common Pilot Channel
  • RSCP received signal code power
  • CPICH E c /I o the ratio between a received signal power level from a signal with a known signature and the interference power.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Un système cellulaire comprend une première cellule associée à une première station de base, une deuxième cellule associée à une deuxième station de base et une radio mobile actuellement desservie par la première station de base. La commande des ressources réparties peut être utilisée pour que la première station de base, seule ou conjointement à la station mobile, prenne les décisions de gestion des ressources sans devoir recourir à un contrôleur central. Dans un réseautage ad-hoc, les points d'accès peuvent gérer les ressources de manière distribuée. Le gain de trajet relatif est déterminé pour un signal montant émanant de la station mobile. Le gain de trajet relatif est fondé sur une comparaison entre une valeur de premier gain de trajet pour un signal montant mobile destiné à la deuxième station de base et une valeur de deuxième gain de trajet pour le signal montant mobile destiné à la deuxième station de base. Les ressources de liaison montante de la première cellule sont gérées sur la base de la valeur de gain relatif du trajet.
EP06704640.9A 2005-02-28 2006-02-15 Procede et appareil permettant d'utiliser des mesures relatives au gain de trajet relatif de liaison montante pour faciliter la gestion des ressources de liaison montante Not-in-force EP1854224B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/066,558 US7577456B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2005-02-28 Using uplink relative path gain related measurements to support uplink resource management
PCT/SE2006/050010 WO2006091172A1 (fr) 2005-02-28 2006-02-15 Procede et appareil permettant d'utiliser des mesures relatives au gain de trajet relatif de liaison montante pour faciliter la gestion des ressources de liaison montante

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1854224A1 true EP1854224A1 (fr) 2007-11-14
EP1854224A4 EP1854224A4 (fr) 2012-02-01
EP1854224B1 EP1854224B1 (fr) 2017-06-07

Family

ID=36927710

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06704640.9A Not-in-force EP1854224B1 (fr) 2005-02-28 2006-02-15 Procede et appareil permettant d'utiliser des mesures relatives au gain de trajet relatif de liaison montante pour faciliter la gestion des ressources de liaison montante

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US7577456B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1854224B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5329813B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN101128994A (fr)
CA (1) CA2597718A1 (fr)
MX (1) MX2007010166A (fr)
WO (1) WO2006091172A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100762647B1 (ko) * 2005-03-31 2007-10-01 삼성전자주식회사 기지국 장치 및 이를 이용한 무선 자원 관리 방법
US8095139B2 (en) * 2006-09-14 2012-01-10 Interdigital Technology Corporation Wireless communication method and apparatus for assigning cell and resource blocks
WO2008041895A1 (fr) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Procédé et dispositif d'estimation de plancher de bruit
JP5318772B2 (ja) * 2006-11-17 2013-10-16 テレフオンアクチーボラゲット エル エム エリクソン（パブル） 特別隣接セルリストの送信
US8036151B2 (en) * 2006-12-17 2011-10-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Power-based rate signaling for cellular uplink
US7965652B2 (en) * 2007-02-08 2011-06-21 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Radio communication system, least significant station, and intermediate station
CN101657976B (zh) 2007-04-20 2013-06-26 Lm爱立信电话有限公司 提高小区间干扰协调
US20090005102A1 (en) * 2007-06-30 2009-01-01 Suman Das Method and Apparatus for Dynamically Adjusting Base Station Transmit Power
KR101498968B1 (ko) 2007-07-05 2015-03-12 삼성전자주식회사 통신시스템에서 피어 투 피어 통신을 위한 자원 결정 방법및 장치
EP2096807B1 (fr) 2008-02-29 2012-04-18 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Planification des transmissions à considération d'interférence dans un réseau de communication sans fil
US8126403B2 (en) * 2008-04-23 2012-02-28 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Estimating and limiting inter-cell interference
US8737317B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2014-05-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Autonomous carrier selection for femtocells
US8711786B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2014-04-29 Qualcomm Incorporated Autonomous downlink code selection for femto cells
US8725083B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2014-05-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Self calibration of downlink transmit power
US8718696B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2014-05-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Transmit power selection for user equipment communicating with femto cells
BRPI0923013B1 (pt) * 2008-12-19 2020-12-15 Telefonaktibolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Método em uma estação base servidora para interação de sinal, método em uma estação base não servidora configurada para controlar uma ou mais células não servidoras, método em terminal sem fio para interação de sinal com uma estação base não servidora e estações base
US8737932B2 (en) 2009-01-07 2014-05-27 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Load aware power controlling
US8385832B2 (en) * 2009-03-13 2013-02-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Inter-cell interference control in an uplink multi-carrier radio communications system
WO2010124726A1 (fr) * 2009-04-28 2010-11-04 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Techniques d'adaptation de quantification en communication de signal coopérative
TWI396454B (zh) * 2009-06-23 2013-05-11 Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd User Grouping Method Applied in Cell Interference Coordination Technology in Mobile Communication System
US8107440B2 (en) * 2009-08-24 2012-01-31 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Transport network congestion control for enhanced uplink communications
US8422420B1 (en) 2009-12-17 2013-04-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Transmit power adaptation for wireless communication systems
MX2012008896A (es) * 2010-02-02 2012-08-31 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Metodos y arreglos en una red de comunicacion celular.
US9185619B2 (en) * 2010-06-29 2015-11-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for mitigating interference in femtocell deployments
GB201011165D0 (en) * 2010-07-02 2010-08-18 Vodafone Plc Radio resource management in telecommunication networks
US8571482B2 (en) * 2010-09-11 2013-10-29 Nokia Corporation Dynamic autonomous resource allocation and channel access in cellular System Uplink
US20120099449A1 (en) * 2010-09-27 2012-04-26 Qual Comm Incorporated Spatial resuse in a wireless network
EP2439986B1 (fr) * 2010-10-06 2018-08-15 Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe B.V. Procédé pour déterminer dans quel cas une première station de base en mode d'économie d'énergie doit commuter vers un autre mode de fonctionnement
WO2013051974A1 (fr) * 2011-10-07 2013-04-11 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Annulation de brouillage
US8938243B2 (en) * 2011-11-29 2015-01-20 Intel Mobile Communications GmbH Radio receiver apparatus of a cellular radio network
EP2786631B1 (fr) * 2011-11-30 2018-08-01 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Planification de liaison montante lors de l'utilisation de la suppression du brouillage
US10298349B2 (en) * 2014-12-22 2019-05-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Receive supervision method and radio unit
US10757655B1 (en) * 2019-04-18 2020-08-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Uplink interference avoidance under closed loop power control conditions
US11039398B2 (en) 2019-05-31 2021-06-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Uplink interference avoidance under open loop power control conditions

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6272322B1 (en) * 2000-02-04 2001-08-07 Atheros Communications, Inc. Real-time transceiver gain and path loss calibration for wireless systems

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5697053A (en) * 1994-07-28 1997-12-09 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of power control and cell site selection
US5574974A (en) * 1995-03-20 1996-11-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Adaptive channel allocation in a mobile communications system
US6157616A (en) * 1996-05-31 2000-12-05 Lucent Technologies Adaptive methods for packet transmission over wireless networks
US6597705B1 (en) 1998-09-10 2003-07-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for distributed optimal reverse link scheduling of resources, such as a rate and power in a wireless communication system
US6334047B1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2001-12-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Adaptive power control in a mobile radio communications system
US6760596B1 (en) * 1999-12-03 2004-07-06 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and system for bit-rate adaptation to improve coverage
US6813510B1 (en) * 2000-01-11 2004-11-02 Lucent Technologies Inc. System for automatically adjusting receive path gain
JP4453168B2 (ja) * 2000-06-23 2010-04-21 日本電気株式会社 移動通信制御方法、セルラシステム、移動局、基地局及び基地局制御装置
US6741862B2 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-05-25 Airvana, Inc. Enhanced reverse-link rate control in wireless communication
US6704579B2 (en) * 2001-02-15 2004-03-09 Ensemble Communications System and method of automatically calibrating the gain for a distributed wireless communication system
KR100915275B1 (ko) * 2001-11-05 2009-09-03 가부시키가이샤 히타치세이사쿠쇼 무선 통신 시스템 및 그 통신 제어 방법 및 무선 통신기
JP4423836B2 (ja) * 2002-04-03 2010-03-03 日本電気株式会社 セルラシステム、通信制御方法及び移動局
US7453861B2 (en) * 2002-08-02 2008-11-18 At&T Corp System and method for estimating interference in a packet-based wireless network
JP4150239B2 (ja) * 2002-10-03 2008-09-17 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ 移動通信システム、基地局、移動局、及びセル制御方法
US7457625B2 (en) * 2002-10-22 2008-11-25 Texas Instruments Incorporated Wirelessly-linked, distributed resource control to support wireless communication in non-exclusive spectrum
US7602722B2 (en) 2002-12-04 2009-10-13 Nortel Networks Limited Mobile assisted fast scheduling for the reverse link
US7146175B2 (en) 2003-04-21 2006-12-05 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Uplink load determination and signaling for admission and congestion control
US6990428B1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2006-01-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Radiolocation using path loss data
JP4272675B2 (ja) * 2003-08-19 2009-06-03 エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド 移動通信システムにおけるＮｏｄｅＢスケジューリング方法
US8666387B2 (en) * 2004-12-30 2014-03-04 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for determining transmit signal parameters using real-time channel measurements

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6272322B1 (en) * 2000-02-04 2001-08-07 Atheros Communications, Inc. Real-time transceiver gain and path loss calibration for wireless systems

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2006091172A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7577456B2 (en) 2009-08-18
JP2008532417A (ja) 2008-08-14
US20060194546A1 (en) 2006-08-31
CN101128994A (zh) 2008-02-20
EP1854224A4 (fr) 2012-02-01
JP5329813B2 (ja) 2013-10-30
CA2597718A1 (fr) 2006-08-31
EP1854224B1 (fr) 2017-06-07
WO2006091172A1 (fr) 2006-08-31
MX2007010166A (es) 2007-10-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1854224B1 (fr) Procede et appareil permettant d'utiliser des mesures relatives au gain de trajet relatif de liaison montante pour faciliter la gestion des ressources de liaison montante
EP2269415B1 (fr) Estimation et limitation de l'interférence inter-cellules
US8385832B2 (en) Inter-cell interference control in an uplink multi-carrier radio communications system
RU2395168C2 (ru) Управление помехой в системе беспроводной связи
EP1851873B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif utilises dans un systeme de telecommunication
US7126922B2 (en) Dynamic radio link adaptation for interference in cellular systems
JP5001344B2 (ja) 無線通信レート形成
JP5107937B2 (ja) 複数のレート干渉表示を用いる出力制御
US8725189B2 (en) Power control using bit rate and outstanding user traffic
JP5630906B2 (ja) 無線通信システムにおける送信電力制御装置及び方法
JP2007520908A (ja) 無線通信システム
KR101241909B1 (ko) 개선된 부분 전력 제어 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070719

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20120103

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04B 7/005 20060101AFI20120111BHEP

Ipc: H04W 4/00 20090101ALI20120111BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 52/34 20090101ALI20170228BHEP

Ipc: H04W 28/22 20090101ALI20170228BHEP

Ipc: H04B 7/005 20060101AFI20170228BHEP

Ipc: H04W 52/14 20090101ALI20170228BHEP

Ipc: H04W 72/08 20090101ALI20170228BHEP

Ipc: H04W 28/18 20090101ALI20170228BHEP

Ipc: H04W 4/00 20090101ALI20170228BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170313

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 899922

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602006052729

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170607

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170908

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 899922

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170607

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170907

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171007

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602006052729

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180227

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180227

Year of fee payment: 13

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20180227

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180215

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602006052729

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190903

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20060215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170607