EP1789634A1 - Improved anchorage head assembly - Google Patents
Improved anchorage head assemblyInfo
- Publication number
- EP1789634A1 EP1789634A1 EP05773177A EP05773177A EP1789634A1 EP 1789634 A1 EP1789634 A1 EP 1789634A1 EP 05773177 A EP05773177 A EP 05773177A EP 05773177 A EP05773177 A EP 05773177A EP 1789634 A1 EP1789634 A1 EP 1789634A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- head assembly
- coupling
- anchorage head
- resilient
- ground anchorage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D5/00—Bulkheads, piles, or other structural elements specially adapted to foundation engineering
- E02D5/74—Means for anchoring structural elements or bulkheads
- E02D5/80—Ground anchors
- E02D5/805—Ground anchors with deformable anchoring members
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D5/00—Bulkheads, piles, or other structural elements specially adapted to foundation engineering
- E02D5/74—Means for anchoring structural elements or bulkheads
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D5/00—Bulkheads, piles, or other structural elements specially adapted to foundation engineering
- E02D5/74—Means for anchoring structural elements or bulkheads
- E02D5/76—Anchorings for bulkheads or sections thereof in as much as specially adapted therefor
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an improved anchorage head assembly and in particular to such a head assembly used for monitoring the condition of ground anchorages.
- ground anchorages are commonly used in the support of engineering structures such as tunnels, retaining walls, mines, dry docks, dams, and prestressed structures.
- Ground anchorages of this sort can be subdivided into a number of different types.
- rock bolt assemblies where there is usually a single tendon, in the form of a solid bar.
- Figure 1 shows such a rock bolt assembly.
- the rock bolt assembly includes a single tendon 1, in the form of a solid bar, having a free anchor length 2 namely, one that is free from the surrounding rock 3, and a fixed anchor length 4 which is set into the surrounding rock.
- the bolt may be bonded using resin or cement grout or can be mechanically locked into place using an expanding sleeve.
- a domed bearing plate 6 includes a hemispherical washer 5 and nut that is threadingly engaged with a threaded section 7 of the tendon 1.
- the washer 6 rests in a recess in the bearing plate 6 so that the washer and the plate effectively provide a ball joint so that the plate can align with the rock surface without distorting the bolt. This arrangement serves to mitigate mis-alignment of the plate 5 relative to the tendon.
- strand anchorages of the sort shown in Figure 2 where the tendon 1' is a twisted multi-strand cable, often comprising a core surrounded by for example 6 outer wires.
- These types of anchorage assemblies may be single tendons, but in large structures they often comprise a number of tendons enclosed in a common sheath and sharing a common bearing plate 5 ' .
- this system operates by applying an axial impulse load of low magnitude and predetermined characteristics to the head of the anchorage assembly, using a specially developed loading device 17, which is attached to the protruding length of the anchorage.
- An accelerometer 9 is attached to the surface of the impact device in order to measure the resulting vibration response of the anchorage head.
- the response signatures obtained are then transferred to a laptop computer for further processing.
- a datum response signature is normally recorded for the intact anchorage immediately after installation.
- the response signatures are subsequently obtained both after any blasting and/or at a later date. Any differences between the responses indicates a potential change in the characteristics of the anchorage system.
- GRANIT has been shown to work effectively ⁇ to assess load in rock bolt anchorages during a number of projects. Preliminary results on single strand anchorages have also shown that, if the anchorage head characteristics are suitable, GRANIT can be used effectively with single strand tendons.
- the basis for load prediction is reliant on the non ⁇ linear stiffness of the anchorage system which is not designed into the anchorage per se but is a product of the contact between the rock/soil surface and the elastic deformation of the bearing plate and lock-off wedges/barrels or nut/washer assembly.
- Class I - anchorages which have relatively flexible heads which results in one or more of the natural frequencies changing appreciably with load and therefore making the anchorage diagnosable.
- Class II - anchorages whose head assemblies are so stiff that there is no appreciable change in the natural frequencies after a small load has been applied and therefore are not amenable to load diagnosis using the GRANIT system. This is often the case with single and multi-strand anchorages with large, stiff heads.
- a ground anchorage head assembly for an anchorage tendon comprising a bearing plate; and a resilient coupling, for coupling the bearing plate to said tendon, said resilient coupling having a non-linear stiffness characteristic.
- the resilient coupling comprises a non-linear
- said resilient coupling comprises a non ⁇ linear washer.
- the combination of the non-linear washer and bearing plate affords a stable and readily standardisable platform for monitoring measurement.
- said resilient coupling comprises a spring member, and more preferably a helical spring.
- the spring member acts to decouple the means for securing a tendon from the bearing plate.
- said spring member comprises a substantially tubular member having a helical slot.
- the variance in slot gap i.e. the distance -between facing surfaces of the slot in the spiral helical construction of the spring, may thus be used for direct measurement of the load applied by the tendon to the barrel.
- the incline of the helical slot may, for example, be substantially 75 degrees to the longitudinal axis of the spring member and the helical slot may, in certain embodiments extend for between 560 and 650 degrees of revolution.
- the stiffness of the resilient coupling increases as it deflects ' to a greater extent. In other words, the flexibility of the resilient coupling reduces, the further the resilient coupling deflects.
- said coupling element comprises a barrel and one or more wedge members.
- the barrel may be configured to seat reliably with the resilient element so as to ensure a stable, readily reproducible assembly can be formed.
- said bearing plate comprises a linear washer having a thickness substantially equal to its radial width. The relatively great thickness of the bearing plate lifts the resilient element away from the surface from which the tendon protrudes, thereby keeping the active part of the assembly clear of detritus and discontinuities at the surface'.
- the ground anchorage head assembly comprises a plurality of coupling elements for a plurality of tendons, and a unitary resilient element. ' Alternatively, the ground anchorage head assembly comprises a plurality of resilient elements, for a plurality of tendons .
- a distribution plate is provided between said plurality of coupling elements and said resilient element, for distributing load between said plurality of coupling elements and the resilient element.
- a resilient coupling for use in a ground anchorage head assembly for an anchorage tendon, the resilient coupling comprising:- a spring member for mounting between a tendon and a bearing plate for decoupling the two; wherein relative movement between elements of the spring member can be used for measuring load applied thereto.
- FIGS 1 and 2 show known anchorage head assembly arrangements
- FIG. 3 shows a schematic drawing of the known GRANIT (Trademark) diagnostic system
- Figure 4 shows a first embodiment of a ground anchorage head assembly of the present invention in cross section
- Figure 5 shows in cross-section a second embodiment of the ground anchorage head assembly of the present invention
- Figure 6 shows, in cross-section a third embodiment of a ground anchorage assembly head of the present invention
- Figure 7 shows a further embodiment of a resilient coupling for use in a ground anchorage head assembly of the present invention
- Figure 8 shows a perspective view of the coupling of Figure 7
- Figure 9 shows a cross-sectional view of a ground anchorage head assembly incorporating the resilient coupling of Figures 7 and 8
- Figure 4 shows a ground anchorage head assembly 10 comprising a bearing plate 11, a barrel 13, wedge members 14, and a resilient coupling having a resilient element 12 in the form of a non-linear washer.
- the non-linear washer has a non-liner stiffness characteristic, such that its stiffness increases as it deflects. Put another way, the flexibility -of the non-linear washer decreases, the further it deflects.
- This is to be contrasted with a conventional "linear" spring which has a constant stiffness, Graph A below showing a comparison between a conventional "linear” spring and a spring having a non ⁇ linear characteristic.
- a strand or tendon 15 is shown emerging from a rock surface 16 and is coupled to the head assembly 10 via the connection of the wedge members 14 in barrel 13.
- non-linear washer 12 allows the force/deflection characteristics of the anchorage head assembly 10 to be pre-determined by the geometry and material properties of the washer while still permitting the use of a large "stiff" anchorage head assembly to react the load back into the surrounding rock/soil/structure.
- the non-linear washer 12 can be used for rock bolt type anchorages provided that the relative stiffness of the non-linear washer to the bolt is arranged to ensure that the majority of the deflection occurs in the bolt.
- the bearing plate comprises a linear washer 11 having a thickness substantially equal to its radial width.
- the relatively large or great thickness of the bearing plate 11 lifts the resilient element away from the surface 16 of the rock from which the tendon protrudes, thereby keeping the active part of the assembly clear of detritus and discontinuities at the surface.
- a multi-tendon anchorage head assembly 20 of a second embodiment is shown.
- the load carrying mechanism is more complex.
- the load from each strand in a multi-tendon anchorage reacts through the barrels used to lock off each of the individual tendons and onto a common bearing plate. This means that the bearing plate experiences the total load i.e. the sum of the loads in the individual tendons making any form of condition diagnosis impracticable.
- the applicants of the present invention have realised that their concept proposed above for the single tendon anchorage can be applied to a multi-tendon anchorage by placing a large resilient element in the form of nonlinear washer/plate 22 between a distribution plate 28 and bearing plate 21 of the anchorage head assembly.
- The- tendons 15 are coupled to the barrels- 23 using wedge members 24. This provides a reading of the total load in the anchorage, when the GRANIT system is used to excite the whole head assembly.
- each tendon 15 is provided with its own resilient element in the form of a non-linear washer 32 placed under barrel 33 containing wedge members 34.
- the design of the resilient element washer can be optimised to provide a progressive shift in the anchorage's natural frequency with load.
- the stiffness characteristic of the washer can be designed for particular tendon geometries and load levels to provide the optimal frequency characteristics for diagnosis using the GRANIT system. Care needs to be taken to ensure that the flexibility of the non-linear washer does not comprise any corrosion protection measures required by British Standards to BS8081. This is not seen as a major problem, however, because typical deflections on suitable bearing plates have typically been substantially less than lmm at a load of 5OkN. The extension of a typical 15.2mm diameter 4m long strand tendon under the same tensile loading would be about ⁇ mm.
- Figure A shows the results of the first set of tests with the original head configuration which results in Class II characteristics. As can be seen from the four load levels, after a shift in the frequencies from OkN to 15kN there is no further shift and so diagnosis of the load on the basis of frequency would be impossible beyond this load value.
- Figure B shows the results from the modified anchorage head with the nonlinear washer. In this case there is a clear progressive shift in frequency over the four load levels which allows diagnosis by the GRANIT system.
- Figure 9 shows a ground anchorage head assembly 40 comprising a bearing plate 41, and a resilient element 42 in the form of spring member, a barrel 43 and wedge members ' 44.
- the spring member is of a helical type, comprising a tubular member 45 having a helical slot 46. In the embodiment shown, it is provided integrally with a barrel member 47 having a conical, inwardly tapering section 48. It should be noted that the helical slot is shown slightly exaggerated in Figure 8 for illustrative purposes.
- the spring has a non-linear stiffness characteristic.
- its stiffness can be arranged to increase as it deflects to a greater extent; in other words, its flexibility reduces, the further it deflects.
- This characteristic may be induced by progressive winding or providing increased closure between certain coils.
- the spring member 42 is hence provided between the wedge barrel and the bearing plate and provides a reaction to the imposed load on the barrel.
- the variance in slot gap i.e. the distance between facing surfaces of the slot in the spiral helical construction of the spring, may be used for direct measurement of the load applied by the tendon to the barrel, since this distance will vary according to the load on the tendon or strand. This allows the loads on individual strands of a multi strand anchor to be separately analysed, which is not possible with conventional integral head plate and wedge assemblies. Depending upon the nature of the spring, it can, if required, provide a non-linear reaction to the imposed load.
- the spring member 42 may, as shown, be formed as part of the barrel, but alternatively could be a • separate unit installed in connection with the barrel.
- the introduction of the spring member 42 allows the force/deflection characteristics of the anchorage head assembly 40 to be pre-determined by the geometry and material properties of the spring while still permitting the use of a large "stiff" type anchorage head assembly, to react the load back into the surrounding rock/soil/structure.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Piles And Underground Anchors (AREA)
- Joining Of Building Structures In Genera (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
- Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
- Ropes Or Cables (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB0418545.0A GB0418545D0 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2004-08-19 | Improved anchorage head assembly |
PCT/GB2005/003254 WO2006018656A1 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2005-08-19 | Improved anchorage head assembly |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1789634A1 true EP1789634A1 (en) | 2007-05-30 |
EP1789634B1 EP1789634B1 (en) | 2009-03-11 |
Family
ID=33042337
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05773177A Not-in-force EP1789634B1 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2005-08-19 | Improved anchorage head assembly |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1789634B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE425312T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005013250D1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB0418545D0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006018656A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202008001248U1 (en) * | 2008-01-28 | 2008-03-27 | Dywidag-Systems International Gmbh | Earth anchor or rock anchor with an anchor draw link made of one or more individual elements with corrosion-protected anchor head formation |
CN102392443A (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2012-03-28 | 山东科技大学 | Construction technique for high-slope pressure-dispersed pre-stressed anchor cable |
CN102839693B (en) * | 2012-09-02 | 2015-12-30 | 山东科技大学 | Increase resistive shape anchor pole/anchorage cable anchoring quality monitoring device and application process |
CN103032087A (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2013-04-10 | 上海旭尧玻璃钢制品有限公司 | Self-drilling type hollow grouting anchor rod and production method thereof |
CN103243714B (en) * | 2013-05-28 | 2015-06-10 | 唐山德泰机械制造有限公司 | High-strength pre-stressed anchor rod |
ITBZ20130055A1 (en) * | 2013-11-04 | 2015-05-05 | Betonform S R L | LOAD DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT FOR AN GROUND ANCHORING SYSTEM |
CN105200990B (en) * | 2015-09-29 | 2017-09-15 | 蚌埠富源电子科技有限责任公司 | A kind of tube-expanding type anchor cable |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4725168A (en) * | 1986-10-24 | 1988-02-16 | Fagundes Charles P | Retaining wall anchoring system and method |
JPH02252815A (en) * | 1989-03-27 | 1990-10-11 | Kajima Corp | Fixing of ground anchor head part |
US6935812B2 (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2005-08-30 | Anchor Wall Systems, Inc. | Retaining wall anchoring system |
GB2340144B (en) * | 1998-08-06 | 2000-06-28 | Keller Ltd | Ground anchorage |
GB2356884B (en) * | 1999-12-03 | 2001-11-07 | Keller Ltd | Slope stabilising means |
DE20015507U1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2001-02-01 | Keller Grundbau Gmbh, 63067 Offenbach | Anchor for supporting anchoring of the shoring walls of a construction pit |
-
2004
- 2004-08-19 GB GBGB0418545.0A patent/GB0418545D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2005
- 2005-08-19 WO PCT/GB2005/003254 patent/WO2006018656A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-08-19 AT AT05773177T patent/ATE425312T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-08-19 DE DE602005013250T patent/DE602005013250D1/en active Active
- 2005-08-19 EP EP05773177A patent/EP1789634B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2006018656A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB0418545D0 (en) | 2004-09-22 |
ATE425312T1 (en) | 2009-03-15 |
EP1789634B1 (en) | 2009-03-11 |
WO2006018656A1 (en) | 2006-02-23 |
DE602005013250D1 (en) | 2009-04-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1789634B1 (en) | Improved anchorage head assembly | |
JP5542961B2 (en) | Method and system for adjusting multiple strands to equal tension | |
KR102323526B1 (en) | Prestressing force monitoring system of prestressins strand using smart anchoring plate based on distributed optical fiber sensor, and method for the same | |
CN204252026U (en) | A kind of fiber grating post-tensioned prestressing intelligence ruggedized construction | |
JP4316283B2 (en) | Tensile anchorage structure and tendon stress measurement method | |
KR101869506B1 (en) | Safety Maintenance Method for Frictional Combined Ground Anchor | |
JP6669503B2 (en) | Anchor structure and wedge body of PC steel stranded wire | |
JP2001074706A (en) | Method for diagnosing ground anchor | |
Abdullah et al. | Full-scale experimental investigation of wire breakage detection in deviated multi-strand tendon systems | |
Shen et al. | Bending fatigue performance of high-strength seven-wire monostrand | |
Jang et al. | A sensitivity analysis of the key parameters for the prediction of the prestress force on bonded tendons | |
Dowd et al. | Bending fatigue of cable stays | |
Noppakunwijai et al. | Pullout capacity of non-prestressed bent strands for prestressed concrete girders | |
KR20080057675A (en) | Spacer for tensile test of steel strand for prestressed concrete | |
ZAHRAEI | Cyclic strength and ductility of rusted steel members | |
CN221765103U (en) | Static load anchoring performance test equipment | |
Jerrett et al. | 22 BOND TESTS OF CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (CFRP) RODS | |
Miah et al. | An experimental study on shear force distribution among studs in grouped and ungrouped arrangements | |
Nakaue et al. | SmART Strand” prestressing steel strand with optical fiber for tension monitoring | |
Tanaka et al. | Recent development of epoxy coated and filled prestressing strand and behavior upon a wire break | |
JPH0941372A (en) | U-turn type ground anchor structure and pc steel stranded wire used for anchor structure thereof | |
JPH11248558A (en) | Measuring method for strain distribution | |
Bawden et al. | A laboratory study on the capacity of fully grouted cable bolts subjected to combined axial and lateral loads | |
Okubo et al. | Monitoring method for the distribution of prestressing force by optical fiber | |
Forbes et al. | Coaxial load development along grouted plain strand cable bolts determined by distributed fibre optic strain sensing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070319 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: RITSON, ANDY Inventor name: IVANOVIC, ANA Inventor name: JACKSON, BRIAN C/O ANDY RITSON Inventor name: STARKEY, ANDREW JOE Inventor name: NEILSON, RICHARD DAVID |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: STARKEY, ANDREW JOE Inventor name: IVANOVIC, ANA Inventor name: NEILSON, RICHARD DAVID Inventor name: RITSON, ANDY Inventor name: JACKSON, BRIANC/O ANDY RITSON |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602005013250 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20090423 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090824 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090622 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: DR. LUSUARDI AG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090711 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090611 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20091214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090831 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090612 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20100222 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090912 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100820 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20140606 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20140828 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20141031 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602005013250 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20150819 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20160429 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160301 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150831 |