EP1740332B1 - Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof - Google Patents

Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1740332B1
EP1740332B1 EP05733730A EP05733730A EP1740332B1 EP 1740332 B1 EP1740332 B1 EP 1740332B1 EP 05733730 A EP05733730 A EP 05733730A EP 05733730 A EP05733730 A EP 05733730A EP 1740332 B1 EP1740332 B1 EP 1740332B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
powder
iron
sintered
densified
parts
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP05733730A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1740332A1 (en
Inventor
Paul Skoglund
Mikhail Kejzelman
Anders Bergmark
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hoganas AB
Original Assignee
Hoganas AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hoganas AB filed Critical Hoganas AB
Priority to PL05733730T priority Critical patent/PL1740332T3/en
Publication of EP1740332A1 publication Critical patent/EP1740332A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1740332B1 publication Critical patent/EP1740332B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/12Both compacting and sintering
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/02Compacting only
    • B22F2003/023Lubricant mixed with the metal powder
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/12Both compacting and sintering
    • B22F3/16Both compacting and sintering in successive or repeated steps
    • B22F3/164Partial deformation or calibration
    • B22F2003/166Surface calibration, blasting, burnishing, sizing, coining
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2998/00Supplementary information concerning processes or compositions relating to powder metallurgy
    • B22F2998/10Processes characterised by the sequence of their steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2999/00Aspects linked to processes or compositions used in powder metallurgy

Definitions

  • the invention relates to powder metal parts. Specifically the invention concerns sintered metal parts which have a densified surface and which are suitable for demanding applications. The invention also includes a method of preparing these metal parts.
  • the US 5 711 187 (1990 ) is particularly concerned with the degree of surface hardness, which is necessary in order to produce gear wheels which are sufficiently wear resistant for use in heavy duty applications.
  • the surface hardness or densification should be in the range of 90 to 100 percent of full theoretical density to a depth of at least 380 microns and up to 1,000 microns.
  • No specific details are disclosed concerning the production process but it is stated that admixed powders are preferred as they have the advantage of being more compressible, enabling higher densities to be reached at the compaction stage.
  • the admixed powders should include in addition to iron and 0.2% by weight of graphite, 0.5% by weight of molybdenum, chromium and manganese, respectively.
  • bearing surfaces from powder metal blanks are produced by blending carbon and ferro alloys and lubricant with compressible elemental iron powder, pressing the blending mixture to form the powder metal blank, high temperature Sintering the blank in a reducing atmosphere, compressing the powder metal blanks so as to produce a densified layer having a bearing surface, and then heat treating the densified layer.
  • the sintered powder metal article should have a composition, by weight percent, of 0.5 to 2.0% chromium, 0 and 1.0% molybdenum; 0.1 and 0.6% carbon, with a balance of iron and trace impurities. Broad ranges as regards compaction pressures are mentioned. Thus it is stated that the compaction may be performed at pressures between 25 and 50 ton per square inch (about 390-770 MPa).
  • the US 5 552 109 (1995 ) patent concerns a process of forming a sintered article having high density.
  • the patent is particularly concerned with the production of connecting rods.
  • the powder should be a pre-alloyed iron based powder, that the compacting should be performed in a single step, that the compaction pressures may vary between 25 and 50 ton per square inch (390-770 MPa) to green densities between 6.8 and 7.1 g/cm 3 and that the sintering should be performed at high temperature, particularly between 1270 and 1350°C.
  • sintered products having a density greater than 7.4 g/cm 3 are obtained and it is thus obvious that the high sintered density is a result of the high temperature sintering.
  • powder metal parts is more demanding applications, such as power transmission applications, for example, gear wheels, can be obtained by subjecting an iron or iron-based powder to unaxially compaction at a pressure above 700 MPa to a density above 7.35 g/cm 3 , sintering the obtained green product and subjecting the sintered product to a densification prccess.
  • a characteristic feature of the core of the metal part according to the invention is the pore structure, which is distinguished by comparatively large pores.
  • a sintered metal part which has a densified surface, a sintered density of at least 7.35 g/cm 3 and a core structure distinguished by the pore structure obtained by single pressing to at least 7.35 g/cm 3 and single sintering of a mixture of a coarse iron or iron-based powder and optional additives; characterized in that the core of the metal part has a pore structure wherein at least 50% of the pore area in a cross section consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 ⁇ m 2 , and that the iron or iron-based powder has a particle size such that at most 10% of the particles are less than 45 ⁇ m, and that the surface densified part is densified to a depth of at least 0.1 mm.
  • a method for producing powder metal parts having a densified surface comprising the steps of: uniaxially compacting an iron or iron-based powder having coarse particles to a density above 7.35 g/cm 3 in a single compaction step at a compaction pressure of at least 700 MPa, wherein the iron or iron-based powder has a particle size such that at most 10% of the particles are less than 45 ⁇ m; subjecting the parts to sintering in a single step at a temperature of at least 1100°C to a density of at least 7.35 g/m 3 , whereby the core of the sintered parts has a pore structure wherein at least 50% of the pore area in a cross section consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 ⁇ m 2 ; and subjecting the parts to a surface densifying process wherein the surface densified parts are densified to a depth of at least 0.1 mm.
  • Suitable metal powders which can be used as starting materials for the compaction process are powders prepared from metals such as iron. Alloying elements such as carbon, chromium, manganese, molybdenum, copper, nickel, phosphorous, sulphur etc can be added as particles, prealloyed or diffusion alloyed in order to modify the properties of the final sintering product.
  • the iron-based powders can be selected from the group consisting of substantially pure iron powders, pre-alloyed iron-based particles, diffusion alloyed iron-based iron particles and mixture of iron particles or iron-based particles and alloying elements. As regards the particle shape it is preferred that the particles have an irregular form as is obtained by water atomisation. Also sponge iron powders having irregularly shaped particles may be of interest.
  • pre alloyed water atomised powders including low amounts such as up to 5% of one or more of the alloying elements Mo and Cr.
  • powders having a chemical composition corresponding to the chemical composition of Astaloy Mo (1.5% Mo and Astaloy 85 Mo (0.85% Mo) as well as Astaloy CrM (3 Cr,0.5 Mo)and Astaloy CrL (1.5 Cr,0.2 Mo) from Höganäs AB, Sweden.
  • a critical feature of the invention is that the powder used have coarse particles i.e. the powder is essentially without fine particles.
  • the term "essentially without fine particles” is intended to mean that less than about 10%, preferably less than 5% of the powder particles have a size below 45 ⁇ m as measured by the method described in SS-EN 24 497.
  • the average particle diameter is typically between 75 and 300 ⁇ m.
  • the amount of particles above 212 ⁇ m is typically above 20%.
  • the maximum particle size may be about 2 mm.
  • the size of the iron-based particles normally used within the PM industry is distributed according to a gaussian distribution curve with a average particle diameter in the region of 30 to 100 ⁇ m and about 10-30% of the particles are less than 45 ⁇ m.
  • the powders used according to the present invention have a particle size distribution deviating from that normally used. These powders may be obtained by removing the finer fractions of the powder or by manufacturing a powder having the desired particle size distribution.
  • a suitable particle size distribution for a powder having a chemical composition corresponding to the chemical composition of Astaloy 85 Mo could be that at most 5% of the particles should be less than 45 ⁇ m and the average particle diameter is typically between 106 and 300 ⁇ m.
  • the corresponding values for a powder having a chemical composition corresponding to Astaloy CrL are suitably that less than 5% should be less than 45 ⁇ m and the average particle diameter is typically between 106 and 212 ⁇ m.
  • graphite in amounts between 0.1-1, preferably 0.2-1.0, more preferably 0.2-0.7% and most preferably 0.2-0.5% by weight of the total mixture to be compacted could be added before the compaction.
  • graphite addition is not necessary.
  • the iron-base powder may also be combined with a lubricant before it is transferred to the die (internal lubrication).
  • a lubricant is added in order to minimize friction between the metal power particles and between the particles and the die during a compaction, or pressing, step.
  • suitable lubricants are e.g. stearates, waxes, fatty acids and derivatives thereof, oligomers, polymers and other organic substances with lubricating effect.
  • the lubricants may be added in the form of particles but may also be bonded and/or coated to the particles.
  • a lubricating coating of a silane compound of the type disclosed in WO 2004/037467 is included in the powder mixture.
  • the silane compound may be an alkylakoxy or polyetheralkoxy silane, wherein the alkyl group of the alkylalkoxy silane and the polyether chain of the polyetheralkoxy silane include between 8 and 30 carbon atoms, and the alkoxi group includes 1-3 carbon atoms.
  • Examples of such compounds are octyl-tri-metoxy silane, hexadecyl-tri-metoxy silane and polyethyleneether-trimetoxy silane with 10 ethylene ether groups.
  • the amount of lubricant added to the iron-based powder may vary between 0.05 and 0.6%, preferably between 0.1-0.5% by weight of the mixture.
  • binding agents As optional additives hard phases, binding agents, machinability enhancing agents and flow enhancing agents may be added.
  • the compaction may be performed with standard equipment, which means that the new method may be performed without expensive investments.
  • the compaction is performed uniaxially in a single step at ambient or elevated temperature.
  • the compaction pressures are above about 700, more preferably above 800 and most preferably above 900 or even 1000 MPa.
  • the compaction should preferably be performed to densities above 7.45 g/cm 3 .
  • any conventional sintering furnace may be used and the sintering times may vary between about 15 and 60 minutes.
  • the atmosphere of the sintering furnace may be an endogas atmosphere, a mixture between hydrogen and nitrogen or in vacuum.
  • the sintering temperatures may vary between 1100 and 1350C. With sintering temperatures above about 1250°C the best results are obtained.
  • the method according to the present invention has the advantage that one pressing step and one sintering step are eliminated and still sintered densities above 7.64 g/cm 3 can be obtained.
  • a distinguishing feature of the core of the high density green and sintered metal part is the presence of large pores.
  • at least about 50% of the pore area consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 ⁇ m 2
  • at least about 50% of the pore area consists of pores having a pore area of about 65 ⁇ m 2 .
  • the surface densification may be performed by radial or axial rolling, shoot peening, sizing etc.
  • a preferred method is radial rolling as this method provides short cycle times in combination with great densification depth.
  • the powder metal parts will obtain better mechanical properties with increasing densifying depth.
  • the densification depth is preferably at least 0.1 mm, preferably at least 0.2 mm and most preferably at least 0.3 mm.
  • the particle sized distribution of powder A is similar to the particle size distribution for powder normally used in powder metallurgy; about 0% greater than 250 ⁇ m, about 15-25% between 150 and 250 ⁇ m and about 15 to 30% less than 45 ⁇ m.
  • Astaloy CrL an atomised Mo-, Cr- prealloyed iron based powder with a Cr content of 1.35-1.65%, a Mo content of 0.17-0.27%, a carbon content of at most 0.010% and an oxygen content of at most 0.25%.
  • the particle sized distribution of powder C is similar to the particle size distribution for powder normally used in powder Metallurgy; about 0% greater than 250 ⁇ m, about 15-25% between 150 and 212 ⁇ m and about 10 to 25% less than 45 ⁇ m.
  • Powder D The same chemical composition as powder C but with a coarser particle size distribution according to the table below; Particle size ⁇ m % by weight >500 0 425-500 0.2 300-425 7.4 212-300 21.9 150-212 25.1 106-150 23.4 75-106 11.2 45-75 7.1 ⁇ 45 3.7
  • Mix 1A was based on powder A with an addition of 0.2% by weight of graphite and 0.8% by weight of H wax.
  • Mix 1B was based on powder B with an addition of 0,2% by weight of graphite and 0.2% by weight of hexadecyl trimetoxy silane.
  • Test bars based on Mix 1A was compacted to a green density of 7.1 g/cm 3 and pre sintered at 780°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% hydrogen. After sintering the samples were subjected to a second compaction at a pressure of 1100 MPa and finally sintered at 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen. The sintered density was measured to 7.61 g/cm 3 .
  • the sample prepared from mix 1B was compacted in a single compaction process at 1100 MPa was subsequently sintered at 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen.
  • the sintered density was 7.67 g/cm 3 .
  • Table 1 MIX POWDER Pressure Sintering Pressure Sintering SD MPa/GD °C MPa °C g/cm 3 1A Astaloy 85 0.80-0.95 Mo standard 0.2 graphite 7.1 780 1100 1280 7.61 1B Astaloy 85 0.80-0.95 Mo coarse 0.2 graphite 1100 1280 7.67
  • Half of the number of the obtained sintered bodies was subjected to a surface densifaction process by shot peening at 6 bars air pressure with steel spheres with a diameter of 0.4 mm.
  • Both the surface densified samples and the samples not subjected to a surface densification process were case hardened at 920°C for 75 minutes at a carbon potential of 0.8% followed by a tempering operation at 200°C for 120 minutes.
  • Bending fatigue limit (BFL) was determined for all of the samples.
  • Figure 1 shows the bending fatigue limit for both the surface densified samples and the samples which were not subjected to surface densification.
  • Figure 2 is a light optical micrograph showing a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 1A and figure 3 is a similar micrograph from a surface densified sample prepared from mix 1B.
  • Image analysis according to ASTM E 1245 of cross section of surface densified samples produced from sample 1A shows that about 50% of the total cross section pore area consists of pores having a surface area of 65 ⁇ m 2 or more, whereas the same measuring of surface densified samples produced from mix 1B shows that about 50% of the total cross section area consists of pores having a surface area of 200 ⁇ m 2 or more.
  • Mix 2C was based on powder C with an addition of 0.7% of nickel powder, 0.2% by weight of graphite and 0.8% by weight of H wax,
  • Mix 2D was based on powder D with an addition of 0.7% of nickel powder 0.2% of graphite and 0.2% of hexadecyl trimetoxy silane.
  • Test bars based on mix 2C was compacted to a green density of 7.1 g/cm 3 and pre sintered at 780°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% hydrogen. After sintering the samples were subjected to a second compaction at a pressure of 1100 MPa and finally sintered at 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen. The sintered density was measured to 7.63 g/cm 3 .
  • Test bars prepared from mix 2D was compacted in a single compaction process at 1100 MPa followed by sintering 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen.
  • the sintered density was measured to 7.64 g/cm 3 .
  • Both the surface densified samples and the samples not subjected to a surface densifaction process were case hardened at 920°C for 75 minutes at a carbon potential of 0.8% followed by a tempering operation at 200°C for 120 minutes.
  • Figure 5 shows the bending fatigue limit for both the surface densified samples and the samples which were not subjected to surface densification.
  • Figure 6 is a light optical micrograph showing a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 2C and figure 7 is a similar micrograph from a surface densified sample prepared from mixture 2D.
  • Image analysis according to ASTM E 1245 of cross section of surface densified samples produced from sample 2C shows that about 50% of the total cross section pore area consists of pores having a surface area of 50 ⁇ m 2 or more, whereas the same measuring of surface densfied samples produced from mix 2D shows that about 50% of the total cross section area consists of pores having a surface area of 110 ⁇ m 2 or more.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
  • Adornments (AREA)

Abstract

The invention concerns a sintered metal part which has a densified surface and sintered density of at least 7.35 g/cm3 and a core structure distinguished by a pore structure obtained by single pressing to at least 7.35 g/cm3 and single sintering of a mixture of a coarse iron or iron-based powder and optional additives.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to powder metal parts. Specifically the invention concerns sintered metal parts which have a densified surface and which are suitable for demanding applications. The invention also includes a method of preparing these metal parts.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • There are several advantages by using powder metallurgical methods for producing structural parts compared with conventional matching processes of full dense steel. Thus the energy consumption is much lower and the material utilisation is much higher. Another important factor in favour of the powder metallurgical route is that components with net shape or near net shape can be produced directly after the sintering process without costly shaping such as turning, milling, boring or grinding. However, normally a full dense steel material has superior mechanical properties compared with PM components. Therefore, the strive has been to increase the density of PM components in order to reach values as close as possible to the density value of a full dense steel.
  • One area of future growth in the utilization of powder metal parts having high density is in the automotive industry. Of special interest within this field is the use of powder metal parts in more demanding applications, such as power transmission applications, for example, gear wheels. Problems with gear wheels formed by the powder metal process are that powder metal gear wheels have reduced bending fatigue strength in the tooth root region of the gear wheel, and low contact fatigue strength on the tooth flank compared with gears machined from bar stock or forgings. These problems may be reduced or even eliminated by plastic deformation of the surface of the tooth root and flank region through a process commonly known as surface densification. Products which can be used for these demanding applications are described in e.g. the US patents 5 711 187 , 5 540 883 , 5 552 109 , 5 729 822 and 6 171 546 .
  • The US 5 711 187 (1990 ) is particularly concerned with the degree of surface hardness, which is necessary in order to produce gear wheels which are sufficiently wear resistant for use in heavy duty applications. According to this patent the surface hardness or densification should be in the range of 90 to 100 percent of full theoretical density to a depth of at least 380 microns and up to 1,000 microns. No specific details are disclosed concerning the production process but it is stated that admixed powders are preferred as they have the advantage of being more compressible, enabling higher densities to be reached at the compaction stage. Furthermore it is stated that the admixed powders should include in addition to iron and 0.2% by weight of graphite, 0.5% by weight of molybdenum, chromium and manganese, respectively.
  • A method similar to that described in the US patent 5 711 187 is disclosed in the US 5 540 883 (1994 ).
  • According to the US patent 5 540 883 bearing surfaces from powder metal blanks are produced by blending carbon and ferro alloys and lubricant with compressible elemental iron powder, pressing the blending mixture to form the powder metal blank, high temperature Sintering the blank in a reducing atmosphere, compressing the powder metal blanks so as to produce a densified layer having a bearing surface, and then heat treating the densified layer. The sintered powder metal article should have a composition, by weight percent, of 0.5 to 2.0% chromium, 0 and 1.0% molybdenum; 0.1 and 0.6% carbon, with a balance of iron and trace impurities. Broad ranges as regards compaction pressures are mentioned. Thus it is stated that the compaction may be performed at pressures between 25 and 50 ton per square inch (about 390-770 MPa).
  • The US 5 552 109 (1995 ) patent concerns a process of forming a sintered article having high density. The patent is particularly concerned with the production of connecting rods. As in the US patent 5 711 187 no specific details concerning the production process are disclosed in the US patent 5 552 109 but it is stated that the powder should be a pre-alloyed iron based powder, that the compacting should be performed in a single step, that the compaction pressures may vary between 25 and 50 ton per square inch (390-770 MPa) to green densities between 6.8 and 7.1 g/cm3 and that the sintering should be performed at high temperature, particularly between 1270 and 1350°C. It is stated that sintered products having a density greater than 7.4 g/cm3 are obtained and it is thus obvious that the high sintered density is a result of the high temperature sintering.
  • In the US 5 729 822 (1996 ) a powder metal gear wheel having a core density of at least 7.3 g/cm3 and a hardened carburized surface is disclosed. The powders recommended are the same as in the US patents 5 711 187 and 5 540 883 i.e. mixtures obtained by blending carbon, ferro alloys and lubricant with compressible a powder of elemental iron. In order to obtain high sintered core density the patent mentions warm pressing; double pressing, double sintering; high density forming as disclosed in the US patent 5 754 937 ; the use of die wall lubrication, instead of admixed lubricants during powder compaction and rotary forming after sintering. Compacting pressures of around 40 tons per square inch (620 MPa) are typically employed.
  • The surface densification of sintered PM steels is discussed in e.g. the Technical Paper Series 820234, (International Congress & Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, February 22-26, 1982). In this paper a study of surface roll= ing of sintered gears is reported. Fe-Cu-C and Ni-Mo alloyed materials were used for the study. The paper reveals the results from basic research on the surface rolling of sintered parts at a density of 6.6 and 7.1 g/cm3 and the application of it to sintered gears. The basic studies includes surface rolling with different diameters of the rolls, best results in terms of strength were achieved with smaller roll diameter, lesser reduction per pass and large total reduction. As an example for a Fe-Cu-C material a densification of 90% of theoretical density was achieved with a roll of 30 mm diameter to a depth of 1,1 mm. The same level of densification was achieved to a depth of about 0.65 mm for a 7.5 mm diameter roll. The small diameter roll however was able to increase the densification to about full density at the surface whereas the large diameter roll increased the density to about 96% at the surface. The surface rolling technique was applied to sintered oil-pumps gears and sintered crankshaft gears. In an article in Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, Volume 16, p. 33-48 1984 (from the International PM Conference June 17-22, 1984, Toronto Canada,) the authors have investigated the influence of shot-peening, carbonitriding and combinations thereof on the endurance limit of sintered Fe+1.5% Cu and Fe+2% Cu+2.5% Ni alloys. The density reported of these alloys were 7.1 and 7.4 g/cm3. Both a theoretical evaluation of the surface rolling process and a bending fatigue testing of surface rolled parts is published in an article in Horizon of Powder Metallurgy part I, p.403-406. Proceedings of the 1986 (International Powder Metallurgy Conference and Exhibition, Dusseldorf, 7-11 July 1986).
  • According to the prior art many different routes have been suggested in order to reach high sintered density of a powder metallurgical component. However, the suggested processes all include steps adding additional costs. Thus warm compaction and die wall lubrication promote high green density. Double pressing and double sintering result in high sintered density and shrinkage as a result of high temperature sintering also results in high sintered density.
  • Furthermore, for high load applications such as gear wheels, special precautions has to be taken in account regarding the pore size and pore morphology in order to achieve sufficient fatigue properties. A simple and cost effective method for the preparation of gear wheels and similar products with a high sintered density and mechanical strength, regardless the pore size and morphology, would thus be attractive and the main object of the present invention.
  • Dizdar et al. "Process, Quality and Properties of High-Density P/M Gears", PM2TEC2003, Las Vegas, discloses a P/M component compacted to 7.6 g/cm2 produced by a high velocity compaction single pressing and single sintering operation. It is also disclosed that P/M gears may be surface densified.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In brief it has now been found that powder metal parts is more demanding applications, such as power transmission applications, for example, gear wheels, can be obtained by subjecting an iron or iron-based powder to unaxially compaction at a pressure above 700 MPa to a density above 7.35 g/cm3, sintering the obtained green product and subjecting the sintered product to a densification prccess. A characteristic feature of the core of the metal part according to the invention is the pore structure, which is distinguished by comparatively large pores.
  • According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a sintered metal part which has a densified surface, a sintered density of at least 7.35 g/cm3 and a core structure distinguished by the pore structure obtained by single pressing to at least 7.35 g/cm3 and single sintering of a mixture of a coarse iron or iron-based powder and optional additives; characterized in that the core of the metal part has a pore structure wherein at least 50% of the pore area in a cross section consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 µm2, and that the iron or iron-based powder has a particle size such that at most 10% of the particles are less than 45 µm, and that the surface densified part is densified to a depth of at least 0.1 mm.
  • According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for producing powder metal parts having a densified surface, comprising the steps of: uniaxially compacting an iron or iron-based powder having coarse particles to a density above 7.35 g/cm3 in a single compaction step at a compaction pressure of at least 700 MPa, wherein the iron or iron-based powder has a particle size such that at most 10% of the particles are less than 45 µm; subjecting the parts to sintering in a single step at a temperature of at least 1100°C to a density of at least 7.35 g/m3, whereby the core of the sintered parts has a pore structure wherein at least 50% of the pore area in a cross section consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 µm2; and subjecting the parts to a surface densifying process wherein the surface densified parts are densified to a depth of at least 0.1 mm.
  • The density levels above concerns products based on pure or low=alloyed iron powder.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Powder types
  • Suitable metal powders which can be used as starting materials for the compaction process are powders prepared from metals such as iron. Alloying elements such as carbon, chromium, manganese, molybdenum, copper, nickel, phosphorous, sulphur etc can be added as particles, prealloyed or diffusion alloyed in order to modify the properties of the final sintering product. The iron-based powders can be selected from the group consisting of substantially pure iron powders, pre-alloyed iron-based particles, diffusion alloyed iron-based iron particles and mixture of iron particles or iron-based particles and alloying elements. As regards the particle shape it is preferred that the particles have an irregular form as is obtained by water atomisation. Also sponge iron powders having irregularly shaped particles may be of interest.
  • As regards PM parts for high demanding applications, especially promising results have been obtained with pre alloyed water atomised powders including low amounts such as up to 5% of one or more of the alloying elements Mo and Cr. Examples of such powders are powders having a chemical composition corresponding to the chemical composition of Astaloy Mo (1.5% Mo and Astaloy 85 Mo (0.85% Mo) as well as Astaloy CrM (3 Cr,0.5 Mo)and Astaloy CrL (1.5 Cr,0.2 Mo) from Höganäs AB, Sweden.
  • A critical feature of the invention is that the powder used have coarse particles i.e. the powder is essentially without fine particles. The term "essentially without fine particles" is intended to mean that less than about 10%, preferably less than 5% of the powder particles have a size below 45 µm as measured by the method described in SS-EN 24 497. The average particle diameter is typically between 75 and 300 µm. The amount of particles above 212 µm is typically above 20%. The maximum particle size may be about 2 mm.
  • The size of the iron-based particles normally used within the PM industry is distributed according to a gaussian distribution curve with a average particle diameter in the region of 30 to 100 µm and about 10-30% of the particles are less than 45 µm. Thus the powders used according to the present invention have a particle size distribution deviating from that normally used. These powders may be obtained by removing the finer fractions of the powder or by manufacturing a powder having the desired particle size distribution.
  • Thus for the powders mentioned above a suitable particle size distribution for a powder having a chemical composition corresponding to the chemical composition of Astaloy 85 Mo could be that at most 5% of the particles should be less than 45 µm and the average particle diameter is typically between 106 and 300 µm. The corresponding values for a powder having a chemical composition corresponding to Astaloy CrL are suitably that less than 5% should be less than 45 µm and the average particle diameter is typically between 106 and 212 µm.
  • In order to obtain sintered metal parts having satisfactory mechanical sintered properties according to the present invention it may be necessary to add graphite to the powder mixture to be compacted. Thus, graphite in amounts between 0.1-1, preferably 0.2-1.0, more preferably 0.2-0.7% and most preferably 0.2-0.5% by weight of the total mixture to be compacted could be added before the compaction. However, for certain applications graphite addition is not necessary.
  • The iron-base powder may also be combined with a lubricant before it is transferred to the die (internal lubrication). The lubricant is added in order to minimize friction between the metal power particles and between the particles and the die during a compaction, or pressing, step. Examples of suitable lubricants are e.g. stearates, waxes, fatty acids and derivatives thereof, oligomers, polymers and other organic substances with lubricating effect. The lubricants may be added in the form of particles but may also be bonded and/or coated to the particles.
  • Preferably a lubricating coating of a silane compound of the type disclosed in WO 2004/037467 is included in the powder mixture. Specifically the silane compound may be an alkylakoxy or polyetheralkoxy silane, wherein the alkyl group of the alkylalkoxy silane and the polyether chain of the polyetheralkoxy silane include between 8 and 30 carbon atoms, and the alkoxi group includes 1-3 carbon atoms. Examples of such compounds are octyl-tri-metoxy silane, hexadecyl-tri-metoxy silane and polyethyleneether-trimetoxy silane with 10 ethylene ether groups.
  • According to the present invention the amount of lubricant added to the iron-based powder may vary between 0.05 and 0.6%, preferably between 0.1-0.5% by weight of the mixture.
  • As optional additives hard phases, binding agents, machinability enhancing agents and flow enhancing agents may be added.
  • Compaction
  • Conventional compaction at high pressures, i.e. pressures above 600 MPa with conventionally used powders including finer particles, in admixture with low amounts of lubricants (less than 0.6% by weight) is generally considered unsuitable due to the high forces required in order to eject the compacts from the die, the accompanying high wear of the die and the fact that the surfaces of the components tend to be less shiny or deteriorated. By using the powders according to the present invention it has unexpectedly been found that the ejection force is reduced at high pressures and that components having acceptable or even perfect surfaces may be obtained also when die wall lubrication is not used.
  • The compaction may be performed with standard equipment, which means that the new method may be performed without expensive investments. The compaction is performed uniaxially in a single step at ambient or elevated temperature. Preferably the compaction pressures are above about 700, more preferably above 800 and most preferably above 900 or even 1000 MPa. In order to reach the advantages with the present invention the compaction should preferably be performed to densities above 7.45 g/cm3.
  • Sintering
  • Any conventional sintering furnace may be used and the sintering times may vary between about 15 and 60 minutes. The atmosphere of the sintering furnace may be an endogas atmosphere, a mixture between hydrogen and nitrogen or in vacuum. The sintering temperatures may vary between 1100 and 1350C. With sintering temperatures above about 1250°C the best results are obtained. In comparison with methods involving double pressing and double sintering the method according to the present invention has the advantage that one pressing step and one sintering step are eliminated and still sintered densities above 7.64 g/cm3 can be obtained.
  • Structure
  • A distinguishing feature of the core of the high density green and sintered metal part is the presence of large pores. Thus, as an example, in a cross section of the core of a sintered metal part according to the invention, at least about 50% of the pore area consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 µm2, whereas, in a cross section of a core prepared from a corresponding normal powder (i.e. a powder including normal amounts of fine particles which has to be double pressed and double sintered in order to reach the same density), at least about 50% of the pore area consists of pores having a pore area of about 65 µm2.
  • Surface densification
  • The surface densification may be performed by radial or axial rolling, shoot peening, sizing etc. A preferred method is radial rolling as this method provides short cycle times in combination with great densification depth. The powder metal parts will obtain better mechanical properties with increasing densifying depth. The densification depth is preferably at least 0.1 mm, preferably at least 0.2 mm and most preferably at least 0.3 mm.
  • In this context is should be recalled that normally the presence of large pores in sintered parts is regarded as a drawback and different measures are taken in order to make the pores smaller and rounder. According to the present invention, however, it has surprisingly been found that the negative effect of the comparatively high amount of larger pores can be totally eliminated by a surface densification process. Thus, when comparing the effect of surface densification on the bending fatigue strength of sintered samples containing larger pores in the core with the effect on samples containing smaller pores, it has been found that the surface densification process increases the bending fatigue strength to a much higher extent when the samples are produced from metal powder with the particle size distribution discussed above. After the surface densification process, the bending fatigue strength of samples produced of these powders will surprisingly reach the same level as that of surface densified samples which are produced from powders having a normal particle size distribution(given the same chemical composition and the same sintered density level). Accordingly, as high sintered density can be reached in a single pressing, single sintering process, costly processes, such as double pressing= double sintering, warm compaction, can be avoided by utilising the method according to the present invention for production of for example gear wheels.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • Fig 1 shows the bending fatigue strength before and after the surface densification process of samples produced from the mixes 1A and 1B according to example 1.
    • Fig 2 is a light optical micrograph of a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 1A.
    • Fig 3 is a light optical micrograph of a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 1B.
    • Fig 4 shows the bending fatigue strength before and after surface densification process of samples produced from the mixes 2C and 2D according to example 2.
    • Fig 5 is a light optical micrograph of a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 2C.
    • Fig 6 is a light optical micrograph of a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 2D.
    • The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
  • The following iron-based powders were used;
    Powder A;
    Astaloy 85 Mo, an atomised pre=alloyed iron base powder with a Mo content of 0.80-0.95%, a carbon content of at most 0.02% and an oxygen content of at most 0.20%.
    The particle sized distribution of powder A is similar to the particle size distribution for powder normally used in powder metallurgy; about 0% greater than 250 µm, about 15-25% between 150 and 250 µm and about 15 to 30% less than 45 µm.
    Powder B;
    The same chemical composition as powder A but with a coarser particle size distribution according to the table below;
    Particle size µm % by weight
    >500 0
    425=500 1.9
    300-425 20.6
    212-300 27.2
    150-212 20.2
    106-150 13.8
    75-106 6.2
    45-75 .9
    <45 4.2

    Powder C;
    Astaloy CrL, an atomised Mo-, Cr- prealloyed iron based powder with a Cr content of 1.35-1.65%, a Mo content of 0.17-0.27%, a carbon content of at most 0.010% and an oxygen content of at most 0.25%.
    The particle sized distribution of powder C is similar to the particle size distribution for powder normally used in powder Metallurgy; about 0% greater than 250 µm, about 15-25% between 150 and 212 µm and about 10 to 25% less than 45 µm.
    Powder D;
    The same chemical composition as powder C but with a coarser particle size distribution according to the table below;
    Particle size µm % by weight
    >500 0
    425-500 0.2
    300-425 7.4
    212-300 21.9
    150-212 25.1
    106-150 23.4
    75-106 11.2
    45-75 7.1
    <45 3.7
  • Example 1
  • Two mixes, Mix 1A and Mix 1B were prepared by thoroughly mixing before compaction.
  • Mix 1A was based on powder A with an addition of 0.2% by weight of graphite and 0.8% by weight of H wax.
  • Mix 1B was based on powder B with an addition of 0,2% by weight of graphite and 0.2% by weight of hexadecyl trimetoxy silane.
  • FS-strength test bars according to ISO 3928 were compacted.
  • Test bars based on Mix 1A was compacted to a green density of 7.1 g/cm3 and pre sintered at 780°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% hydrogen. After sintering the samples were subjected to a second compaction at a pressure of 1100 MPa and finally sintered at 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen. The sintered density was measured to 7.61 g/cm3.
  • The sample prepared from mix 1B was compacted in a single compaction process at 1100 MPa was subsequently sintered at 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen. The sintered density was 7.67 g/cm3.
  • The results are summarized in table 1 below. Table 1
    MIX POWDER Pressure Sintering Pressure Sintering SD
    MPa/GD °C MPa °C g/cm 3
    1A Astaloy
    85
    0.80-0.95
    Mo
    standard
    0.2
    graphite
    7.1 780 1100 1280 7.61
    1B Astaloy
    85
    0.80-0.95
    Mo
    coarse
    0.2
    graphite
    1100 1280 7.67
  • Half of the number of the obtained sintered bodies was subjected to a surface densifaction process by shot peening at 6 bars air pressure with steel spheres with a diameter of 0.4 mm.
  • Both the surface densified samples and the samples not subjected to a surface densification process were case hardened at 920°C for 75 minutes at a carbon potential of 0.8% followed by a tempering operation at 200°C for 120 minutes.
  • Bending fatigue limit (BFL) was determined for all of the samples.
  • Figure 1 shows the bending fatigue limit for both the surface densified samples and the samples which were not subjected to surface densification.
  • From figure 1 it can be concluded that surface densification of the samples produced with the coarser powder contributes to a much higher increase in BFL compared with the increase in BFL which was obtained by surface densification of the samples produced with a powder having a conventional particle size distribution.
  • Figure 2 is a light optical micrograph showing a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 1A and figure 3 is a similar micrograph from a surface densified sample prepared from mix 1B.
  • Image analysis according to ASTM E 1245 of cross section of surface densified samples produced from sample 1A shows that about 50% of the total cross section pore area consists of pores having a surface area of 65 µm2 or more, whereas the same measuring of surface densified samples produced from mix 1B shows that about 50% of the total cross section area consists of pores having a surface area of 200 µm2 or more.
  • Example 2
  • Two mixes, Mix 2C and Mix 2D were prepared by thoroughly mixing before compaction.
  • Mix 2C was based on powder C with an addition of 0.7% of nickel powder, 0.2% by weight of graphite and 0.8% by weight of H wax,
  • Mix 2D was based on powder D with an addition of 0.7% of nickel powder 0.2% of graphite and 0.2% of hexadecyl trimetoxy silane.
  • FS-strength test bars according to ISO 3928 were prepared.
  • Test bars based on mix 2C, was compacted to a green density of 7.1 g/cm3 and pre sintered at 780°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% hydrogen. After sintering the samples were subjected to a second compaction at a pressure of 1100 MPa and finally sintered at 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen. The sintered density was measured to 7.63 g/cm3.
  • Test bars prepared from mix 2D was compacted in a single compaction process at 1100 MPa followed by sintering 1280°C for 30 minutes in an atmosphere of 90% nitrogen and 10% of hydrogen. The sintered density was measured to 7.64 g/cm3.
  • The results are summarized in table 3 below. Table 3
    MIX POWDER Pressure Sintering Pressure Sintering SD
    MPa/GD °C MPa °C g/cm 3
    2C CRL
    Standard
    1.35-1.65
    Cr
    0.17-0.27
    Mo+0.7%
    Ni
    7.1 780 1100 1280 7.63
    2D CRL
    Coarse
    1.35-1.65
    Cr
    0.17-0.27
    Mo+0.7%
    Ni
    1200 1280 7.64
  • Half of the number of the obtained sintered bodies were subjected to a surface densification process by shot peening at 6 bars air pressure with steel spheres with a diameter of 0.4 mm.
  • Both the surface densified samples and the samples not subjected to a surface densifaction process were case hardened at 920°C for 75 minutes at a carbon potential of 0.8% followed by a tempering operation at 200°C for 120 minutes.
  • Bending fatigue limit (BFL) were determined for all of the samples.
  • Figure 5 shows the bending fatigue limit for both the surface densified samples and the samples which were not subjected to surface densification.
  • From figure 5 it can be concluded that surface densification of the samples produced with the coarser powder con= tributes to a much higher increase in BFL compared with the increase in BFL which was obtained by surface densification of the samples produced with a powder having a conventional particle size distribution.
  • Figure 6 is a light optical micrograph showing a cross section of a surface densified sample prepared from mix 2C and figure 7 is a similar micrograph from a surface densified sample prepared from mixture 2D.
  • Image analysis according to ASTM E 1245 of cross section of surface densified samples produced from sample 2C shows that about 50% of the total cross section pore area consists of pores having a surface area of 50 µm2 or more, whereas the same measuring of surface densfied samples produced from mix 2D shows that about 50% of the total cross section area consists of pores having a surface area of 110 µm2 or more.

Claims (17)

  1. A sintered metal part which has a densified surface, a sintered density of at least 7.35 g/cm3 and a core structure distinguished by the pore structure obtained by single pressing to at least 7.35 g/cm3 and single sintering of a mixture of a coarse iron or iron-based powder and optional additives; characterized in that the core of the metal part has a pore structure wherein at least 50% of the pore area in a cross section consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 µm2, that the iron or iron-based powder has a particle size such that at most 10% of the particles are less than 45 µm, and that the surface densified part is densified to a depth of at least 0.1 mm.
  2. Metal part according to claim 1 wherein the green and the sintered densities are at least 7.45, preferably at least 7.5 g/cm3.
  3. Method for producing powder metal parts having a densified surface, comprising the steps of
    - uniaxially compacting an iron or iron-based powder having coarse particles to a density above 7.35 g/cm3 in a single compaction step at a compaction pressure of at least 700 MPa, wherein the iron or iron-based powder has a particle size such that at most 10% of the particles are less than 45 µm;
    - subjecting the parts to sintering in a single step at a temperature of at least 1100°C to a density of at least 7.35 g/m3, whereby the core of the sintered parts has a pore structure wherein at least 50% of the pore area in a cross section consists of pores having a pore area of at least 100 µm2; and
    - subjecting the parts to a surface densifying process wherein the surface densified parts are densified to a depth of at least 0.1 mm.
  4. Method according to claim 3, wherein the powder includes alloying additives in an amount up to 5% by weight.
  5. Method according to claim 4, wherein the alloying additives are selected from the group consisting of at least one element selected from the group consisting of graphite, chromium, molybdenum, manganese, nickel and copper.
  6. Method according to any one of the claims 3-5, wherein the powder includes a lubricant.
  7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the lubricant is an organosilane selected from the group consisting of alkylakoxy or polyetheralkoxy silane, wherein the alkyl group of the alkylalkoxy silane and the polyether chain of the polyetheralkoxy silane include between 8 and 30 carbon atoms, and the alkoxi group includes 1-3 carbon atoms.
  8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the organosilane is selected from the group consisting of octyl-tri-metoxy silane, hexadecyl-tri-metoxy silane and polyethylene ether-trimetoxy silane with 10 ethylene ether groups.
  9. Method according to any one of the claims 3-8, wherein the iron-based powder is a pre-alloyed, water atomised powder.
  10. Method according to any one of the claims 3-9, wherein the iron-based powder has a particles size such that at most 5% of the particles are less than 45 µm.
  11. Method according to any one of the claims 3-10, wherein the compaction is performed at a pressure of at least 800 MPa, more preferably at least 900 MPa and most preferably at least 1000 MPa.
  12. Method according to any one of the claims 3-11, wherein the sintering is performed at a temperature of at least 1200°C, preferably at least 1250°C.
  13. Method according to any one of the claims 3-12, wherein the compacted parts are sintered for a time of 15 to 60 minutes.
  14. Method according to any one of the claims 3-13, wherein the compacted parts are sintered in an endogas atmosphere, a mixture between hydrogen and nitrogen or in vacuum.
  15. Method according to any one of the claims 3-14, wherein surface densifying is performed by rolling.
  16. Method according to any one of the claims 3-15, wherein the surface densified parts are densified to a depth of at least 0.2 mm, preferably at least 0.3 mm.
  17. Method according to any one of the claims 3-16, wherein the produced powder metal parts are gears, bearings, rolls, sprockets, shafts.
EP05733730A 2004-04-21 2005-04-20 Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof Not-in-force EP1740332B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL05733730T PL1740332T3 (en) 2004-04-21 2005-04-20 Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0401041A SE0401041D0 (en) 2004-04-21 2004-04-21 Sintered metal parts and method of manufacturing thereof
PCT/SE2005/000563 WO2005102565A1 (en) 2004-04-21 2005-04-20 Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1740332A1 EP1740332A1 (en) 2007-01-10
EP1740332B1 true EP1740332B1 (en) 2010-06-23

Family

ID=32322642

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05733730A Not-in-force EP1740332B1 (en) 2004-04-21 2005-04-20 Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof

Country Status (17)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1740332B1 (en)
JP (2) JP4887287B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100841162B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1946500B (en)
AT (1) ATE471779T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2005235503B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0510000A (en)
CA (1) CA2563621C (en)
DE (1) DE602005021964D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2347803T3 (en)
MX (1) MXPA06012183A (en)
PL (1) PL1740332T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2343042C2 (en)
SE (1) SE0401041D0 (en)
TW (1) TWI285140B (en)
WO (1) WO2005102565A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200608030B (en)

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7393498B2 (en) * 2004-04-21 2008-07-01 Hoganas Ab Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof
US7384445B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2008-06-10 Höganäs Ab Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof
JP5110398B2 (en) * 2009-06-05 2012-12-26 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Iron-based sintered alloy, method for producing iron-based sintered alloy, and connecting rod
RU2445188C2 (en) * 2009-12-28 2012-03-20 Открытое акционерное общество "Русполимет" Method of producing articles from steel granules by powder metallurgy procedure with uniform distribution of nitrogen on article volume
US20130136646A1 (en) * 2010-06-04 2013-05-30 Hoganas Ab (Publ) Nitrided sintered steels
US8469003B2 (en) * 2010-09-10 2013-06-25 Burgess • Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. Fuel injector clamp
KR101912378B1 (en) * 2010-12-30 2018-10-26 회가내스 아베 (피유비엘) Iron based powders for powder injection molding
EP2753443B1 (en) * 2011-09-07 2017-11-15 Basf Se Binders and processes for producing metallic or ceramic moldings in powder injection molding
CN103008662B (en) * 2011-09-23 2015-06-03 复盛应用科技股份有限公司 Integrally forming method for compound metals
JP5929320B2 (en) * 2012-03-01 2016-06-01 Jfeスチール株式会社 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and method for producing alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy
US20150033894A1 (en) * 2012-03-12 2015-02-05 Ntn Corporation Mechanical structure component, sintered gear, and methods of manufacturing mechanical structure component and sintered gear
JP5936954B2 (en) * 2012-08-23 2016-06-22 Ntn株式会社 Manufacturing method of machine parts
CN102896315B (en) * 2012-09-15 2015-04-01 安徽省怀远县尚冠模具科技有限公司 Method for manufacturing top board of die
AU2017236260B2 (en) 2016-03-23 2022-11-03 Höganäs Ab (Publ) Iron based powder
JP6509771B2 (en) * 2016-04-07 2019-05-08 住友電気工業株式会社 Method of manufacturing sintered body
KR20180041343A (en) * 2016-10-14 2018-04-24 주식회사 엘지화학 Preparation method for metal alloy foam
CN108500277A (en) * 2018-03-28 2018-09-07 上海汽车粉末冶金有限公司 A kind of preparation method of powder metallurgy surface densified parts
CN109967746A (en) * 2019-04-06 2019-07-05 苏州中鼎冶金有限公司 A kind of manufacturing method and powder metallurgical gear of powder metallurgical gear
DE112019007667T5 (en) * 2019-08-30 2022-06-15 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Sintered material and method of making sintered material
CN110788332A (en) * 2019-11-29 2020-02-14 济南市博瀚精工机械有限公司 Powder metallurgy eccentric wheel for atomizer compression pump and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH03130349A (en) * 1989-06-24 1991-06-04 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd Ferrous sintered parts material excellent in fatigue strength and its production
ATE195276T1 (en) 1992-12-21 2000-08-15 Stackpole Ltd METHOD FOR PRODUCING BEARINGS
US5613180A (en) 1994-09-30 1997-03-18 Keystone Investment Corporation High density ferrous power metal alloy
US5729822A (en) * 1996-05-24 1998-03-17 Stackpole Limited Gears
SE9602376D0 (en) * 1996-06-14 1996-06-14 Hoeganaes Ab Compact body
KR20010052876A (en) * 1999-04-16 2001-06-25 도오다 고오이찌로 Metallic powder molding material and its re-compression molded body and sintered body obtained from the re-compression molded body and production methods thereof
SE0002448D0 (en) * 2000-06-28 2000-06-28 Hoeganaes Ab method of producing powder metal components
US7416696B2 (en) * 2003-10-03 2008-08-26 Keystone Investment Corporation Powder metal materials and parts and methods of making the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1946500B (en) 2010-05-26
EP1740332A1 (en) 2007-01-10
DE602005021964D1 (en) 2010-08-05
PL1740332T3 (en) 2010-11-30
ATE471779T1 (en) 2010-07-15
CA2563621A1 (en) 2005-11-03
MXPA06012183A (en) 2007-01-17
ZA200608030B (en) 2008-07-30
AU2005235503B2 (en) 2008-07-17
CA2563621C (en) 2009-09-29
CN1946500A (en) 2007-04-11
TWI285140B (en) 2007-08-11
JP2007533857A (en) 2007-11-22
BRPI0510000A (en) 2007-09-18
KR100841162B1 (en) 2008-06-24
SE0401041D0 (en) 2004-04-21
RU2343042C2 (en) 2009-01-10
ES2347803T3 (en) 2010-11-04
RU2006140982A (en) 2008-05-27
JP2010202980A (en) 2010-09-16
TW200539971A (en) 2005-12-16
KR20060134220A (en) 2006-12-27
WO2005102565A1 (en) 2005-11-03
AU2005235503A1 (en) 2005-11-03
JP4887287B2 (en) 2012-02-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1740332B1 (en) Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof
EP1755810B1 (en) Iron-based gear wheels produced by a process comprising uniaxially compacting, sintering and surface densifying
US7384445B2 (en) Sintered metal parts and method for the manufacturing thereof
EP0958077B1 (en) Process for producing a powder metallurgical body with compacted surface
EP1554070B1 (en) Iron-based powder composition including a silane lubricant
RU2333075C2 (en) Method of parts manufacturing on basis of iron by means of pressing at higher pressures
US7662209B2 (en) Iron-based powder
KR20060109914A (en) Method for the manufacturing of sintered metal parts having a densified surface
US7585459B2 (en) Method of preparing iron-based components
CA2258161C (en) Powder metallurgical body with compacted surface

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20061020

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090713

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005021964

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100805

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2347803

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100924

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101023

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101025

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110324

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005021964

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100923

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100623

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20150311

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20150310

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20150413

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20150325

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20150420

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20150312

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20150408

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 471779

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160420

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20161230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160502

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160420

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160421

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160421

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181205

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190410

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005021964

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201103