EP1738325A1 - Method for evaluating the quality of a printed matter, produced by a printing machine - Google Patents
Method for evaluating the quality of a printed matter, produced by a printing machineInfo
- Publication number
- EP1738325A1 EP1738325A1 EP05742834A EP05742834A EP1738325A1 EP 1738325 A1 EP1738325 A1 EP 1738325A1 EP 05742834 A EP05742834 A EP 05742834A EP 05742834 A EP05742834 A EP 05742834A EP 1738325 A1 EP1738325 A1 EP 1738325A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- copies
- printed matter
- error
- printed
- quality
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 100
- 238000007639 printing Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 70
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 49
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000007645 offset printing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007650 screen-printing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002826 coolant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012805 post-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005496 tempering Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
- B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
- B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C3/00—Registering or indicating the condition or the working of machines or other apparatus, other than vehicles
- G07C3/14—Quality control systems
- G07C3/146—Quality control systems during manufacturing process
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for assessing the quality of a printed matter produced by a printing press according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Print images generated by a printing press have long been checked visually or with optical aids for their respective printing quality by the operating personnel of the printing press during ongoing production.
- a classification takes place, i. H. a classification of the assessed printed products into groups of printed products with predefined characteristics, d. H. certain error features that were the subject of the previous test.
- the total amount of printed matter tested is divided into a subset or class of good quality and a subset or class of poor, i.e. H. not usable or salable quality classified, the print image of the printed products to be assessed either as good or as bad, d. H. is judged to be defective.
- the assessment of the quality of the printed matter produced by a printing press by operating personnel is subject to considerable fluctuations, since the assessment of judgment, i. H. depends in particular on the knowledge and experience of the assessing person and can therefore vary from person to person.
- Camera systems are now increasingly being used in the printing industry for different applications, for example in inspection systems, web observation systems or register measuring systems, these systems being arranged in or on a printing press or a machine processing a printing material. These systems practice z. B. "iniine”, ie during the ongoing production of the printed matter to be produced, which means a considerable challenge for the respective camera system and an image processing system evaluating its image data due to the large amount of data supplied by a camera system and the fast process flow in the manufacture of the printed matter.
- electronic image sensors are often used for image recording, in particular color cameras with at least one z. B. from a CCD chip image sensor, the light-sensitive pixels corresponding to the color recorded in the observation area an output signal z. B. in three separate signal channels, d. H. the color channels, mostly for the colors red, green and blue.
- the post-published DE 103 35 147 A1 discloses a method for determining the state of banknotes, in which data of at least two different properties of the banknotes are evaluated, in which the data of the at least two different properties of each banknote are linked together and the state the banknote is derived from the linked data of the different properties. It can also be provided that an average for each of the different properties is determined for a set of banknotes in order to determine the state of the set of banknotes for the respective different property or that an average for the linked properties is determined for a set of banknotes to determine the overall condition of the amount of banknotes.
- post-published DE 103 14 071 B3 relates to a method for the qualitative assessment of a material with at least one identification feature, wherein a color image is recorded at least from the identification feature with an electronic image sensor, the image sensor directly or indirectly providing at least one first electrical signal that correlates with the color image an evaluation device connected to the image sensor evaluates the first electrical signal, a second electrical signal being obtained from at least one reference image and being stored in a data memory, the second electrical signal each having a setpoint for the first one for at least two different properties of the reference image Electrical signal, wherein the first signal is compared with at least two of the setpoints contained in the second electrical signal, wherein in the comparison at least the color image of the recognition feature on ei ne color deviation from the reference image and the distinguishing feature on a belonging to a certain class of identifying features or on a certain geometric contour or on a relative arrangement to at least one other identifying feature of the Material is checked.
- the material can be designed as a banknote or as a token. In any case, it is a matter of testing a material, ie a one-off test, in which the at least one identifying characteristic of the material in question is checked in different, but independently running test processes with regard to certain criteria.
- a method for signal evaluation of an electronic image sensor for pattern recognition of image contents of a test specimen in which a decision is made about the belonging of the test specimen to a certain class of test specimens.
- the method provides for the content of an image recorded by the test specimen to be evaluated on the basis of a membership function formed using methods of fuzzy logic, it also being possible to link a plurality of membership functions to form a superordinate membership function.
- DE 102 34 085 A1 discloses a method for analyzing color deviations of images recorded with an image sensor, the image signal received by the image sensor being analyzed pixel by pixel.
- DE 101 32 589 A1 discloses a method for the qualitative assessment of printed material with at least one identification feature, in which an image sensor records an image of the material to be assessed and for this image the geometric contour and / or the relative arrangement in an evaluation device of several identifying features is evaluated with one another.
- the invention has for its object to provide a method for assessing the quality of a printed matter produced by a printing press, errors occurring in the production of several copies of this printed matter being assessed in a balanced manner.
- the object is achieved by the features of claim 1.
- the advantages that can be achieved with the invention are, in particular, that the assessment of the quality of a printed matter produced by a printing press is very balanced on a broad basis, because each detected error is not assessed singularly, but in the context of other detected errors, because of a holistic assessment All errors that occur within a selected number of copies are made by assessing the errors in their relationship to one another, as a result of which a yield of copies of the printed matter classified as salable or at least processable is increased.
- the process thus increases productivity and economy in the production process of the printed matter. A required quality level is ensured and unnecessary waste is avoided.
- Errors identified in a printed matter are preferably weighted depending on their topology, e.g. B. merged in a higher-level, multi-dimensional membership function and in a synopsis of all detected Errors are assessed on the basis of a classification threshold that can preferably be parameterized as required.
- the method can also be used to evaluate the assessment obtained from the image data with regard to a slowly developing deviation in the quality of printed matter. A slowly developing deviation in the quality of the printed matter can be recognized before it grows into a waste-producing error.
- the method is particularly useful for assessing the quality of a high-quality, expensive production item, e.g. B. a printed matter produced in security printing, z. B. a banknote or a token, well suited.
- a high-quality, expensive production item e.g. B. a printed matter produced in security printing, z. B. a banknote or a token, well suited.
- Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an inspection system.
- 5 shows a representation of a parameterized second aggregated membership function.
- An inspection system used as an example points to the assessment of the quality of a printed matter produced by a printing press according to its schematic Representation in Fig. 1 a z. B. as one or more coupled color line cameras 01 or a colored area camera 01 trained image recording unit 01, which records an illuminated by a lighting device 02 print image 03, the print image 03 with a printing press on a z. B. made of paper existing printing material (not shown).
- Image data of the individual color channels determined by the image recording unit 01 from the recording of the printed image 03 are evaluated in an image processing system 04.
- the result is output e.g. B. on a monitor connected to the image processing system 04 06.
- the image recording unit 01 is arranged in the printing press in such a way that with each of its recordings the respective print image of several copies of the printed matter produced in this printing press is recorded.
- the printing press is preferably designed as a rotary printing press, in particular as a printing press printing in an offset printing process, in a steel engraving process, in a screen printing process or in a hot stamping process. If the printing press is designed as a sheet-fed printing press, it must be ensured that the sheet is also at a machine speed of e.g. B. 18,000 sheets per hour can be inspected. If the printing material to be printed is a material web, the inspection system should be able to check the quality of copies of the printed matter, which are processed at a machine speed of e.g. B. 15 m / s through the printing press to be subjected to a single piece control.
- errors that occur z. B. divided into certain types of errors, e.g. B. a) Color errors if the wrong color at a certain point on the substrate has been printed, b) intensity error, if the correct color was printed at a certain point on the substrate, but not in the intended, correct color intensity, c) contour error, if the printed image or a recognition feature of the printed image in its outline is at least partially defective, ie in particular is incomplete, or d) arrangement errors, if z. B. a window thread or other identifying feature of the printed image is missing or appears in the wrong place.
- the error types can again be broken down according to certain peculiarities, namely whether the error of a particular error type in a sequence of several copies of the printed matter produced with the printing press, e.g. B. occurs as a single error or as a multiple error.
- Color errors and intensity errors with regard to their respective error size, i. H. with regard to the areal extent of the error, can be classified and evaluated.
- the quality of the printed matter can thus be assessed at least with regard to certain types of errors and / or an amount of errors and / or an error size.
- the method preferably provides, e.g. B. to fuzzify the four inspection channels i, the amount of errors M or the size of errors N and the number K of errors m contained in the same column s.
- a defuzzification to assess the quality of a printed matter can consist in a simple evaluation of a numerical value L resulting from the method by checking whether the numerical value L resulting from the method is greater than a set threshold value Lmax, i.e. L> Lmax. With the setting of the threshold value Lmax, a degree is established from which the printed matter is either good or bad, i.e. H. faulty, is to be classified, d. H. the threshold level Lmax is used to determine the quality level required for the printed matter.
- the amount of errors M is also z. B. linearly assigned in a second membership function ⁇ f, the amount of errors M is preferably limited to a maximum number Mmax of errors m by the detected errors m z. B. with the maximum number Mmax of the error m as a weighting factor.
- the method for assessing the quality of a printed matter preferably provides that the first membership function ⁇ c and the second membership function ⁇ f are preferably conjunctively aggregated, ie the two membership functions ⁇ c; to link ⁇ f multiplicatively.
- the first aggregated membership function ⁇ g1 has a value range between 0 and 1.
- the third membership function ⁇ s can also be used with the first membership function ⁇ c and / or the second Membership function ⁇ f preferably aggregated conjunctively. For example, a conjunctive aggregation of all three membership functions results in ⁇ c; uf; ⁇ s a second aggregated membership function ⁇ g2, which can be represented as follows:
- the second aggregated membership function ⁇ g2 has a value range between 0 and 1 indicated on a vertical axis of the diagram. The linear assignments selected here as examples are clearly recognizable.
- the second aggregated membership function ⁇ g2 is a multidimensional, here four-dimensional function, the vertical axis of the diagram being used twice to represent the number Ns of successively printed copies of the printed matter per column s and to represent the range of values of this second aggregated one Membership function ⁇ g2.
- the classification threshold Lmax is preferably set for ⁇ g2 in the range between 0.2 and 0.4 depending on the respective application, ie the quality of the printed matter to be produced. It can be seen from the example shown in FIG.
- the second aggregated membership function ⁇ g2 is e.g. B. parameterizable, e.g. B. in that a weighting g can be controlled in relation to the inspection channels i.
- the amount of errors M can be replaced by the error size N or the error size N is used as a further criterion.
- the procedure described here for assessing the quality of a printed matter means in use that not every single z. B. errors detected on a printed sheet leads to the fact that this printed sheet is rejected as waste. Rather, each individual detected error is assessed in its context, with mathematical means, in particular using methods of fuzzy logic, being used to weigh the severity of each error, in particular in a mutual dependence on other detected errors and / or in relation to other detected errors, and / or or is judged. There is therefore a holistic assessment of all errors that occur within the amount of z. B. printed copies of the printed matter have been detected on a specific sheet, the errors detected within the selected quantity being assessed in their respective relation to one another. The assessment of the errors in their respective relation to one another is favored in that all errors to be assessed are recorded virtually simultaneously by the same image recording unit 01 and all the information required for assessing the quality of the printed matter can be found in the image data corresponding to the image.
- the risk of errors is comparatively high for banknotes produced using the steel engraving process, but the material costs and the overall production costs of this printed matter are also relatively high.
- a preselection can be made with regard to the printed sheets in the actual printing process. Sheets with a number of errors not exceeding the classification threshold Lmax are e.g. B. a machine further processing the sheet, then each printed on the respective sheet of the Printed matter can be subjected to an individual check again.
- Such a machine downstream of the printing press can ⁇ . B. be a cutting device, in particular a cutting device for separating the copies of the printed matter printed on each sheet, which have previously formed a certain, limited number of copies to assess their quality.
- Such a limited number of copies can have a few tens or even a few hundred or more copies of the printed matter.
- the sequence of the produced copies of the printed matter is followed by a plurality of such quantities to be selected for the quality inspection, preferably of equal numbers in the production flow, one after the other.
- a defined number of coherently produced copies can be combined into a set of copies, with several sets of copies being formed in succession.
- all copies produced are assigned to one of these quantities. It is also preferable to take a picture of each of these quantities of their respective copies in order to subject the produced copies of the printed matter to a complete assessment of their quality.
- the quality of the printed matter is preferably achieved by linking it to data from at least one machine sensor.
- a machine sensor can, for. B. a vibration sensor on a machine frame of the printing press.
- the machine sensor can also be designed as a sensor which controls the dampening solution supply.
- it can also be appropriate to use a sensor to determine the temperature of a z. B. the form cylinder of the printing press tempering temperature control, in particular a z. B.
- the form cylinder cooling coolant and additionally include the measurement data of this sensor in the quality inspection of the printed matter produced by the printing press.
- it can also be useful to additionally monitor the current consumption of the wiping device that removes excess ink from the steel engraving printing plate using a machine sensor, and information that can be derived from the measurement signal of this machine sensor about too high or too little wiping in the quality inspection of the to include printed matter produced on the press.
- the control device can derive the information that the printing press is e.g. B. is in a printing-technically critical operating state, so it is likely that short-term errors will show up on the copies of the printed matter.
- At least one unit of the printing press that influences the printing process is preferably automatically tracked by the control device in order to return the printing press to its correct operating state from its printing-technically critical operating state.
- a measurement signal from the machine sensors is used for the control process or control process for early detection of negative influences relevant to the printing process, whereas the assessment obtained from the printed image of the printed matter confirms in particular compliance with the quality requirements and, if necessary, documents it in the form of a quality certificate.
- those units of the printing press which are in a critical operating state can be readjusted, preferably each of these units influencing the printing process having a machine sensor monitoring this unit, the control device doing this at least one aggregate negatively influencing the printing process based on the detected errors and / or z.
- the respectively associated measurement signals of the respective machine sensors are determined and at least one setting of the at least one determined unit is changed until the assessment of the quality of these printed matter obtained from the printed image of the printed matter again reaches a level that can be classified as good.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
- Facsimiles In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004019978A DE102004019978B3 (en) | 2004-04-23 | 2004-04-23 | Assessing quality of printed object produced by printer involves producing several examples of same printed object, selected limited number of examples, producing image data record, assessing using image data in relation to error type(s) |
PCT/EP2005/051525 WO2005104034A1 (en) | 2004-04-23 | 2005-04-06 | Method for evaluating the quality of a printed matter, produced by a printing machine |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1738325A1 true EP1738325A1 (en) | 2007-01-03 |
Family
ID=34716761
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05742834A Withdrawn EP1738325A1 (en) | 2004-04-23 | 2005-04-06 | Method for evaluating the quality of a printed matter, produced by a printing machine |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7672486B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1738325A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4717064B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100583147C (en) |
DE (1) | DE102004019978B3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005104034A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8613254B2 (en) | 2005-11-25 | 2013-12-24 | Kba-Notasys Sa | Method for detection of occurrence of printing errors on printed substrates during processing thereof on a printing press |
DE102009023963A1 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2010-12-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for determining a quality measure for a product processed by a processing machine |
CN103076334B (en) * | 2013-01-25 | 2014-12-17 | 上海理工大学 | Method for quantitatively evaluating perceived quality of digital printed lines and texts |
CN104275928B (en) * | 2013-07-11 | 2018-04-06 | 北京印书网络科技有限公司 | Sheet-fed printing is opened paper and cut a sheet of paper method |
DE102014004556A1 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2015-10-01 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Method for checking the reliability of error detection of an image inspection method |
DE102016204506A1 (en) * | 2015-04-20 | 2016-10-20 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Production pressure inspection with local optimization |
CN110969373B (en) * | 2019-12-23 | 2022-04-08 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | To-be-inspected material pushing method and system, storage medium and device |
CN111242896A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-06-05 | 电子科技大学 | Color printing label defect detection and quality rating method |
CN110875996B (en) * | 2020-01-17 | 2020-04-28 | 中体彩印务技术有限公司 | Printing overprinting monitoring system and monitoring method thereof |
DE102020123472A1 (en) | 2020-09-09 | 2022-03-10 | Koenig & Bauer Ag | Process for checking the quality of printed products |
CN112767306B (en) * | 2020-12-24 | 2024-09-06 | 凌云光技术股份有限公司 | Printing quality detection and receiving method and system |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19940879A1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2001-03-08 | Innomess Elektronik Gmbh | Device and procedure for comparison of a digitized print image with a reference image for automatic quality control so that if error values exceed a threshold value an alarm is generated to inform print machine operators |
GB2366651A (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2002-03-13 | Ncr Int Inc | Evaluation system |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT956011B (en) * | 1972-05-31 | 1973-10-10 | S F A Soc Di Fisica Applicata | AUTOMATIC BANCO NOTICE SORTING MACHINE USED WITH FALSE INDI VIDUATION DEVICES AND WITH COLLECTION BOXES FOR SELEZIO BANKNOTES CREATED ACCORDING TO IF FALSE TO BE SENT FOR DESTRUCTION OR RETURN IN CIRCULATION |
US4197584A (en) * | 1978-10-23 | 1980-04-08 | The Perkin-Elmer Corporation | Optical inspection system for printing flaw detection |
DE3713279C2 (en) * | 1987-04-18 | 1994-01-20 | Laser Sorter Gmbh | Process for the detection of dimensional errors and / or the distortion of paper webs or format papers |
JPH03162959A (en) * | 1990-10-03 | 1991-07-12 | Kita Denshi:Kk | Method of detecting printing error |
EP0553402B1 (en) | 1992-01-31 | 1997-06-18 | Mars, Incorporated | Device for the classification of a pattern, in particular of a currency note or a coin |
JP3322958B2 (en) * | 1993-09-22 | 2002-09-09 | 株式会社東芝 | Print inspection equipment |
GB9326440D0 (en) | 1993-12-24 | 1994-02-23 | Ncr Int Inc | Neutral network for banknote recongnition and authentication |
JP3414844B2 (en) * | 1994-06-08 | 2003-06-09 | 株式会社ヒューテック | Defect pattern type determination method and device |
JPH11506555A (en) * | 1995-05-11 | 1999-06-08 | ギーゼッケ ウント デフリエント ゲーエムベーハー | Apparatus and method for processing sheet material such as banknotes |
US5923413A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1999-07-13 | Interbold | Universal bank note denominator and validator |
IT1306266B1 (en) | 1998-07-24 | 2001-06-04 | Gd Spa | CONTROL METHOD OF A PRINTED OBJECT |
CN1237476C (en) * | 1999-02-19 | 2006-01-18 | 株式会社理光 | Pattern detecting method, image processing control method, image processing device and recording medium |
JP2001105698A (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2001-04-17 | Printing Bureau Ministry Of Finance Japan | Method and apparatus for managing quality of printed matter |
US7050592B1 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2006-05-23 | Etymotic Research, Inc. | Hearing test apparatus and method having automatic starting functionality |
DE10132589B4 (en) | 2001-07-05 | 2005-11-03 | Koenig & Bauer Ag | Method for qualitative assessment of material |
JP2003098106A (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2003-04-03 | Dainippon Printing Co Ltd | Method and apparatus for displaying printing defect |
DE10234086B4 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2004-08-26 | Koenig & Bauer Ag | Method for signal evaluation of an electronic image sensor in the pattern recognition of image contents of a test specimen |
DE10234085B4 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2012-10-18 | Koenig & Bauer Aktiengesellschaft | Method for analyzing color deviations of images with an image sensor |
JP3669698B2 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2005-07-13 | 日東電工株式会社 | Inspection method and inspection apparatus for printed matter |
DE10314071B3 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Koenig & Bauer Ag | Procedure for the qualitative assessment of a material with at least one identifier |
DE10335147A1 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2005-03-03 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Method and apparatus for determining the status of banknotes |
-
2004
- 2004-04-23 DE DE102004019978A patent/DE102004019978B3/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-04-06 EP EP05742834A patent/EP1738325A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-04-06 JP JP2007508893A patent/JP4717064B2/en active Active
- 2005-04-06 US US11/587,149 patent/US7672486B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-04-06 CN CN200580001507A patent/CN100583147C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-04-06 WO PCT/EP2005/051525 patent/WO2005104034A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19940879A1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2001-03-08 | Innomess Elektronik Gmbh | Device and procedure for comparison of a digitized print image with a reference image for automatic quality control so that if error values exceed a threshold value an alarm is generated to inform print machine operators |
GB2366651A (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2002-03-13 | Ncr Int Inc | Evaluation system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2005104034A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1906636A (en) | 2007-01-31 |
JP4717064B2 (en) | 2011-07-06 |
US20070223789A1 (en) | 2007-09-27 |
WO2005104034A1 (en) | 2005-11-03 |
US7672486B2 (en) | 2010-03-02 |
CN100583147C (en) | 2010-01-20 |
DE102004019978B3 (en) | 2005-08-04 |
JP2007532928A (en) | 2007-11-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2005104034A1 (en) | Method for evaluating the quality of a printed matter, produced by a printing machine | |
DE102004014547B4 (en) | Method for the early detection of a deviation in printed images produced by a printing machine of an ongoing production | |
EP0741026A2 (en) | Image inspection and ink supply method in printed products of a printing machine | |
DE112015003903B4 (en) | Device for checking printed matter, procedures for checking printed matter and program | |
DE102013203344A1 (en) | Information display system for supporting analysis of inspection results of printed circuit board for electronic device, in manufacturing plant, has display control unit displaying two-dimensional mapping image on monitor | |
DE102019208149A1 (en) | Nozzle Health with a neural network | |
EP3878653A1 (en) | Inspection with error classification | |
EP3487707A1 (en) | Inspection system having a plurality of detection regions | |
DE102011014073A1 (en) | Method for controlling a printing process | |
DE69810528T2 (en) | Method and device for checking valuable or security objects, in particular bank notes | |
EP2529932A1 (en) | Method for controlling a print run in a rotary printing press | |
DE19940879A1 (en) | Device and procedure for comparison of a digitized print image with a reference image for automatic quality control so that if error values exceed a threshold value an alarm is generated to inform print machine operators | |
EP3871892B1 (en) | Detektion method to minimize maculature | |
WO2004056570A1 (en) | Method and device for the real time control of print images | |
EP1727679A2 (en) | Method for identifying a single panel comprising a printed image of defective quality on printed material comprising several panels | |
EP3680106B1 (en) | Mn-detection in a printed image | |
DE102018217476A1 (en) | Variable pressure nozzle test pattern | |
DE19613083A1 (en) | Procedure for the qualitative assessment of processed material | |
DE69026488T2 (en) | Process for quality assessment of printed matter | |
DE102019134721A1 (en) | Method for identifying faulty print nozzles in a printing device | |
EP3882032B1 (en) | Sheet inspection with global brightness adjustment | |
DE102015203358B4 (en) | Method for evaluating a plurality of printed products each having at least one print image with respect to their respective further processing capability | |
DE19638967A1 (en) | Measurement field group for detecting quality data in multicolour batch printing | |
EP3659813A1 (en) | Variable print control bars | |
DE102018216442A1 (en) | Register measurement without register marks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060331 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100726 |
|
APBK | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE |
|
APBN | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E |
|
APBR | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E |
|
APAF | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG |
|
APBX | Invitation to file observations in appeal sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBA2E |
|
APBZ | Receipt of observations in appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBA4E |
|
APBT | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200713 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20201124 |