EP1721250A1 - Procede pour gerer et pour controler le fonctionnement de plusieurs systemes materiels et/ou logiciels repartis qui sont integres dans au moins un reseau de communication et systeme permettant de mettre en oeuvre ledit procede - Google Patents
Procede pour gerer et pour controler le fonctionnement de plusieurs systemes materiels et/ou logiciels repartis qui sont integres dans au moins un reseau de communication et systeme permettant de mettre en oeuvre ledit procedeInfo
- Publication number
- EP1721250A1 EP1721250A1 EP05716858A EP05716858A EP1721250A1 EP 1721250 A1 EP1721250 A1 EP 1721250A1 EP 05716858 A EP05716858 A EP 05716858A EP 05716858 A EP05716858 A EP 05716858A EP 1721250 A1 EP1721250 A1 EP 1721250A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- systems
- data
- hardware
- program means
- individual
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/04—Network management architectures or arrangements
- H04L41/044—Network management architectures or arrangements comprising hierarchical management structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3466—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
- G06F11/3495—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring for systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/04—Network management architectures or arrangements
- H04L41/046—Network management architectures or arrangements comprising network management agents or mobile agents therefor
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for managing and monitoring the operation of a plurality of distributed hardware and / or software systems integrated in at least one communication network.
- the invention is therefore based on the object of an improved method for managing and monitoring the loading drive multiple distributed hardware and / or software systems.
- a central program means stored in a data processing device processes system-related data which is available from the data processing device or is received by it via a communication network, derives autonomously operational decisions therefrom and depending on this, decision-specific control data for influencing the operation of one or more hardware and / or software systems is generated and data processing devices assigned to the respective hardware and / or software systems are transmitted via the communication network.
- the central program means is thus able to perform essential management, administration and monitoring tasks automatically and autonomously. It unites capabilities and functions that administrators and system management and monitoring tools have only been able to provide in part and in the area of "adaptive computing" so far.
- An important basis of the method according to the invention is the decision component of the central autonomous program means. Based on the decisions made in this way, control data are generated and forwarded to the individual systems, which, for example, stop a hardware and / or software system or displace a specific application. The tax data are transmitted via the communication network to the individual systems affected by the respective decisions.
- the central program means takes on numerous tasks which are carried out manually by administrators in conventional hardware and software landscapes.
- the central program means is based on data processing.
- processing data stored rule data which in particular include rules on priorities and / or sequences and / or logical and / or temporal dependencies, and / or performance data, in particular the current workload and / or the time-limited and / or dynamic and / or periodic relate to the required capacity, and / or access grouping data and / or classification data and / or availability data.
- the control data form a control system that provides a basic framework for the management, administration and monitoring process.
- Priority rules can, for example, determine the preference for dialog mode over batch processing for an application instance. Sequences can determine which services must be stopped first when stopping.
- Performance data relate, for example, to the current workload or the capacity requirement that an application that runs, for example, at certain time intervals, has regularly. They provide a measure of the performance of the system landscape. For effective management, it also makes sense to divide the system landscape with its components and the tasks to be performed into different groups or classes.
- the associated grouping and classification data can relate to structural (for example in the case of identical hardware) and content (for example in the case of components which work together to solve a task) aspects.
- the method also accesses data on the availability of individual systems. For example, it determines whether and where the resources required for a scheduled application, such as B. CPUs or main memory are available.
- system-related data include operating plans, which regulate in particular run times and availability of individual hardware and / or software systems, and / or information about the operating state of individual systems, which relate in particular to current and / or future and / or periodic utilization , and / or requests entered by an operator at a central and / or individual system level.
- these system-related data are less general in nature, but more related to the current operation of the systems.
- the central program means receives, for example, data that an application is currently running that is currently heavy accessed database.
- the central program means can use the system-related data to access the control data, which include, for example, that in such a case the malfunction of the database instance must first be remedied.
- operator requests that a user can enter using an input device at a central and / or individual system level are to be taken into account in order to ensure ease of use and to enable variable operation.
- the central data processing device expediently receives the information about the operating state of individual systems actively and / or passively.
- the recording and collection of information can thus be adjusted depending on the conditions of the system landscape. For example, it can be advantageous if the central data processing device is supplied with routine data from normal operation as standard, while it is supplying special data, for example actively requests in the event of malfunctions or reconfiguration problems.
- the information would be hardware in the form of clients and / or servers and / or networks and / or storage systems and / or software in the form of applications and / or distributed applications with interdependent services and / or distributed application systems with virtualized ones relate to interdependent and / or independent services and / or databases and / or front ends.
- server / client networks as well as storage units or storage systems play an outstanding role in connected system landscapes.
- Databases are usually accessed from several systems, so the relevant information should be available centrally. The same applies to the distributed application systems, especially in the area of "adaptive computing", since configuration changes must be monitored centrally here.
- control data generated by the central program means starting and / or stopping and / or supplementing services and / or displacing services and / or applications and / or maintaining a distributed hardware and / or software system Taxes.
- the central program means that, for example, an application is started or a hardware system is stopped.
- Individual services such as dialog operation, batch processing, booking, printing, messaging or web service, can be supplemented or, if they are no longer needed or only after a certain period of time, they can be replaced.
- applications that are not required at the moment can be displaced.
- maintenance can be controlled centrally, for example when installing and updating applications.
- An embodiment of the invention provides that the operational decisions include the provisions of administrative tasks and / or task chains. For example, one task could be to monitor a particular system. Task chains include tasks to be processed in a certain order, for example the coordinated stopping of several systems.
- the central program means autonomously perform administrative tasks and / or chains of tasks, taking into account logical and / or temporal dependencies and / or dynamic influences and / or dynamic influences and / or availability data and / or priorities and / or grouping data and / or classification data and / or existing data in the data processing device. or application data, in particular for displacing and / or replacing application instances, separated into subtasks. If, for example, a reconfiguration of a system landscape is required, a chain of many tasks has to be processed. An application whose functionality is based on a database can only be put into operation again after the database due to its logical dependency. There are temporal dependencies if, for example, previous results have to be used.
- the separation into subtasks enables task chains to be processed locally and taken into account in terms of time. Furthermore, it is advantageous if the central program means continuously and / or at certain time intervals checks the chronological sequence of the administrative tasks and / or task chains transferred in the form of control data to the individual hardware and / or software systems. In this way, malfunctions and problems that may occur during routine operation are discovered. If necessary, the execution of a task chain can be interrupted. However, based on the available control and performance data, variable reactions to the faults and problems that go beyond an interruption are also possible.
- a further development of the invention provides that the distributed hardware and / or software systems are at least partially assigned their own autonomous program means stored in data processing devices in the form of autonomous agents which are subordinate to the central program means.
- the autonomous program resources or agents at the system level perform administrative and monitoring tasks here, but they are subordinate to the central program resources, so that collisions in decisions that affect several systems in the system landscape can be avoided.
- the autonomous agent of an individual hardware and / or software system accesses rule data specified in the data processing devices at the system level, which in particular include rules for the individual system and / or the interaction with the central autonomous program means.
- the autonomous agent makes rule-based decisions for its respective system, insofar as these do not fall within the scope of the central autonomous program resources. If the autonomous agent works together with the central autonomous program means, this cooperation is in turn subject to rules, so that, for example, not both for the same purpose of the system make operational decisions that may differ.
- the central program means and the autonomous agents of the individual hardware and / or software systems expediently exchange control and / or control data via the communication networks.
- the central program means receives information about control processes that have taken place at the system level, for example the displacement of a service, and the central management or the administration can coordinate them accordingly.
- the autonomous agent at the system level needs information about the interventions in the system carried out by the central program means in order to avoid collisions or double processing of individual tasks.
- the central program means permanently and / or dynamically and / or dynamically allocates and / or withdraws decision-making powers to the autonomous agents of the individual systems via the communication networks.
- Such dynamic authorization makes it possible to react flexibly to changes in the system landscape. In the event of a malfunction, for example, it makes sense for the central program resources to have greater decision-making powers in order to restore basic operation. On the other hand, if the operation runs smoothly, the decision-making powers of the autonomous agents can be increased if no problems are expected.
- the autonomous agents of the individual hardware and / or software systems each transmit general and / or system-specific control data via a communication network to the data processing device of the central program means and / or publish them in generally accessible file systems and / or when separating them administratively Participate in tasks and / or chains of tasks in subtasks.
- the central program resources or other subsystems are made available via a generally accessible file system (blackboard).
- the task separation at the individual system level relieves the central program resources, and in the case of specific systems the division into subtasks at the individual system level makes more sense.
- a further development of the invention provides that the central program means is operated in different operating modes, in particular fully autonomously or partially autonomously and / or with different reaction speeds. These different operating modes can be selected depending on the current working conditions.
- a simple standard operation can be carried out fully autonomously; in the case of malfunctions, a semi-autonomous operation will usually make sense.
- the speed at which a given situation is reacted to must be based on the entirety of the processes taking place in the system landscape. In individual cases, a slow reaction can be useful to complete a certain process before the reaction. In the event of major problems, it is often necessary to react quickly to prevent a chain of secondary problems.
- Entries by an authorized administrator on an input device are changed and / or interrupted. This ensures that in the event of rare problems or malfunctions or special operating requirements, for which there may be no rules, the operation remains manually controllable.
- the operation of the central program means in the semi-autonomous mode is changed and / or interrupted by the autonomous agents of the individual systems.
- Such a restriction of the autonomous operation of the central program means makes sense if the autonomous agents on the individual system level act comparatively independently on their system without major data exchange with the central program means, so that in the event of a malfunction the central program means may lack information which the autonomous agent has, however, and which necessitate a change in the central operation. The autonomous agent can then initiate this change.
- the central program means comprises a notification component which outputs information about sub-steps of the work of the central program means and / or its processing status via an output device.
- a notification component which outputs information about sub-steps of the work of the central program means and / or its processing status via an output device.
- the distributed hardware and / or software systems comprise at least one application system.
- the at least one application system can consist of a plurality of instances, each of which directs at least one service, in particular dialog operation and / or batch operation and / or booking and / or printing and / or messaging and / or network services.
- Messaging services enable communication and the exchange of messages, while network services are responsible for internal networks on the one hand, and for connecting to mainly external networks such as the Internet, for example as web services.
- the different instances of an application form a logical system with corresponding dependencies.
- At least one application system it is possible for at least one application system to be operated in a virtual environment without a fixed hardware assignment.
- the use of the method according to the invention using the central autonomous program means is particularly advantageous, since conventional management and administration methods are in this case only inadequate and deliver complicated solutions.
- the distributed hardware and / or software systems include client / server systems and / or operating systems.
- Client / server systems are of central importance in modern computer environments. This applies in particular to "adaptive computing".
- the corresponding operating systems form the connection to the application systems.
- the invention relates to a system for the management and monitoring of the operation of a plurality of distributed hardware and / or software systems integrated in at least one communication network, comprising a data processing device and a central autonomous program means stored therein and / or autonomous agents for individual hardware and devices stored in data processing devices / or software systems and / or input and / or output devices on a central and / or individual system level, designed to carry out the method according to one of the preceding claims.
- the figure shows a schematic diagram for carrying out the method according to the invention.
- the central program means is stored in a data processing device, not shown here. There is a connection to an input / output device.
- an operator or administrator can make entries, for example to change or interrupt the operation of a central program means working in the semi-autonomous mode, or track the messages of the central program means about the sub-steps of the work and its processing status.
- the central program resources are subordinate to two system families x and y, which consist, for example, of collaborative applications. Each of the two system families consists of two subsystems, systems A and D or B and C.
- the central program means and the individual systems each have a reciprocal relationship with the blackboards, generally accessible file systems.
- the individual systems in particular via their autonomous agents, publish general and / or system-specific control data in the blackboards, which should not only be accessible to the central program resources, but also to further individual systems. This is interesting when the data can influence other systems, for example when applications are mutually dependent.
- the individual systems in turn deliver control and control data to the central program means via communication networks. They also contribute to the separation of administrative tasks or task chains into sub-tasks.
- Systems A - D are responsible for various services a - 1. These services can include, for example, dialog or batch processing, booking, printing, messaging and web services.
- the systems are operated in a distributed manner, so that the services belonging to each system are implemented on different autonomous individual systems. In the case shown, these individual systems are autonomous hardware systems 1 - 5, which are composed of heterogeneous hardware components. Each system has its own hardware and here Operating system equipment, not shown.
- the services a and d of the system A run on the autonomous individual system 1, the service d is simultaneously operated on the individual system 3, while another service e of the system A is localized on the individual system 4. This assignment of
- Services of systems A - D for the individual systems 1 - 5 vary dynamically depending on the current requirements of the entire system landscape. There is no fixed assignment between the application and hardware resources. So there is e.g. a switchover of the service j initially running on the autonomous individual system 3, which belongs to the application system D, to operation in the autonomous individual system 5.
- the autonomous agents of the individual systems and the central program means collect and process information about the operation taking into account the changing assignments and derive autonomous decisions from them. Since the individual systems A - D in turn have the autonomous competences (not shown here), the total amount of information to be exchanged in the system landscape is reduced, and a multitude of reaction possibilities arise, which can each be attributed to simple reactions.
- the central program means can be operated fully or partially autonomously. In the semi-autonomous mode, the operation of the central program means can be changed or interrupted by the input of an administrator on the input / output device or the autonomous agents of the individual systems. Since there is no fixed assignment between hardware and software, it is possible to optimally use and utilize hardware resources. The same services can run on different autonomous individual systems, as shown here.
- the service e can be operated, for example, on the individual systems 2, 4 and 5. If one of these systems is particularly loaded, the application system, which is responsible for this service, for example, can alternatively run the service on a different hardware system.
- the central program means are "adaptive Computing "with virtual environments, effective management and monitoring and administration are possible.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multi Processors (AREA)
Abstract
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004011201A DE102004011201B4 (de) | 2004-03-04 | 2004-03-04 | Verfahren zum Management und zur Überwachung des Betriebs mehrerer in wenigstens ein Kommunikationsnetz eingebundener verteilter Hard- und/oder Softwaresysteme sowie System zur Durchführung des Verfahrens |
PCT/EP2005/050889 WO2005085999A1 (fr) | 2004-03-04 | 2005-03-01 | Procede pour gerer et pour controler le fonctionnement de plusieurs systemes materiels et/ou logiciels repartis qui sont integres dans au moins un reseau de communication et systeme permettant de mettre en oeuvre ledit procede |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1721250A1 true EP1721250A1 (fr) | 2006-11-15 |
Family
ID=34895028
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05716858A Withdrawn EP1721250A1 (fr) | 2004-03-04 | 2005-03-01 | Procede pour gerer et pour controler le fonctionnement de plusieurs systemes materiels et/ou logiciels repartis qui sont integres dans au moins un reseau de communication et systeme permettant de mettre en oeuvre ledit procede |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070174437A1 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP1721250A1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102004011201B4 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2005085999A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7779099B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2010-08-17 | Us Beverage Net Inc. | Distributed intelligent systems and methods therefor |
US7606732B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2009-10-20 | Us Beverage Net Inc. | Distributed meter networks and systems for monitoring same |
JP5028979B2 (ja) * | 2006-12-01 | 2012-09-19 | 富士通株式会社 | 機器管理システム、機器管理方法及びエージェント |
CN101715575A (zh) | 2006-12-06 | 2010-05-26 | 弗森多系统公司(dba弗森-艾奥) | 采用数据管道管理数据的装置、系统和方法 |
US8898277B2 (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2014-11-25 | Oracle International Corporation | Performance monitoring infrastructure for distributed transaction service |
US8087015B2 (en) * | 2007-10-26 | 2011-12-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Assignment of application models to deployment targets |
RU2587424C1 (ru) | 2015-02-20 | 2016-06-20 | Закрытое акционерное общество "Лаборатория Касперского" | Способ контроля приложений |
Family Cites Families (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07244644A (ja) * | 1994-03-04 | 1995-09-19 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | エージェント管理システム |
US5655081A (en) * | 1995-03-08 | 1997-08-05 | Bmc Software, Inc. | System for monitoring and managing computer resources and applications across a distributed computing environment using an intelligent autonomous agent architecture |
FR2750517B1 (fr) * | 1996-06-27 | 1998-08-14 | Bull Sa | Procede de surveillance d'une pluralite de types d'objets d'une pluralite de noeuds a partir d'un noeud d'administration dans un systeme informatique |
US5781703A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 1998-07-14 | Candle Distributed Solutions, Inc. | Intelligent remote agent for computer performance monitoring |
AU735024B2 (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 2001-06-28 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Scheduler for a software system |
JPH1196011A (ja) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-04-09 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | 自律分散システムにおける自律協調制御装置 |
US6404743B1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2002-06-11 | General Instrument Corporation | Enhanced simple network management protocol (SNMP) for network and systems management |
US6477563B1 (en) * | 1998-04-13 | 2002-11-05 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Agent system and information processing method for same |
US6405250B1 (en) * | 1999-01-25 | 2002-06-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Network management system based on passive monitoring and proactive management for formulation behavior state transition models |
US6539427B1 (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2003-03-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamically adaptive network element in a feedback-based data network |
US6671724B1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2003-12-30 | Centrisoft Corporation | Software, systems and methods for managing a distributed network |
US7260635B2 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2007-08-21 | Centrisoft Corporation | Software, systems and methods for managing a distributed network |
US7337209B1 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2008-02-26 | Sheer Networks, Inc. | Large-scale network management using distributed autonomous agents |
US6751661B1 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2004-06-15 | Applied Systems Intelligence, Inc. | Method and system for providing intelligent network management |
US7752419B1 (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2010-07-06 | Qst Holdings, Llc | Method and system for managing hardware resources to implement system functions using an adaptive computing architecture |
FR2823932B1 (fr) * | 2001-04-23 | 2003-06-27 | Intaan Technology | Systeme et procede pour la distribution dynamique de donnees et/ou de services |
US20030033400A1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2003-02-13 | Neal Pawar | System and method for managing networks using local intelligent agents |
US7127441B2 (en) * | 2002-01-03 | 2006-10-24 | Scott Abram Musman | System and method for using agent-based distributed case-based reasoning to manage a computer network |
JP2003263419A (ja) * | 2002-03-11 | 2003-09-19 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | 完全自律型マルチエージェントシステムにおけるシステム制御方法及びその実施装置並びにその処理プログラムと記録媒体 |
US7308493B2 (en) * | 2002-06-05 | 2007-12-11 | Trend Micro Incorporated | Task-based automatic network management system with distributed control and management information base |
AU2003276685A1 (en) * | 2002-06-13 | 2003-12-31 | Netscout Systems, Inc. | Real-time network performance monitoring system |
EP1518353A2 (fr) * | 2002-06-26 | 2005-03-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Commande adaptative d'un element reseau |
US7058953B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2006-06-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Managing a distributed computing system |
US7146232B2 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2006-12-05 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Agent program environment |
US20050108453A1 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2005-05-19 | Maturana Francisco P. | Integrated multi-agent system employing agents of different types |
US7620535B2 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2009-11-17 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the simulation of computer networks |
US7925984B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2011-04-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote configuration of intelligent software agents |
US7234073B1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2007-06-19 | Emc Corporation | System and methods for failover management of manageable entity agents |
US8104043B2 (en) * | 2003-11-24 | 2012-01-24 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for dynamic cooperative distributed execution of computer tasks without a centralized controller |
US20050132032A1 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2005-06-16 | Bertrand Daniel W. | Autonomous agent-based system management |
US8115593B2 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2012-02-14 | Memsic Transducer Systems Co., Ltd. | Adaptive network and method |
-
2004
- 2004-03-04 DE DE102004011201A patent/DE102004011201B4/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-03-01 WO PCT/EP2005/050889 patent/WO2005085999A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2005-03-01 EP EP05716858A patent/EP1721250A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-03-01 US US10/591,790 patent/US20070174437A1/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005085999A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102004011201A1 (de) | 2005-09-29 |
DE102004011201B4 (de) | 2006-10-12 |
US20070174437A1 (en) | 2007-07-26 |
WO2005085999A1 (fr) | 2005-09-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102020113347A1 (de) | Ausführung von containerisierten prozessen innerhalb der beschränkungen der verfügbaren host-knoten | |
EP2527936B1 (fr) | Procédé d'accès à un système d'automatisation et système fonctionnant selon ce procédé | |
WO2005085999A1 (fr) | Procede pour gerer et pour controler le fonctionnement de plusieurs systemes materiels et/ou logiciels repartis qui sont integres dans au moins un reseau de communication et systeme permettant de mettre en oeuvre ledit procede | |
DE60221019T2 (de) | Verwaltung von serverbetriebsmitteln für hostanwendungen | |
EP2506098B1 (fr) | Agencement et procédé pour le fonctionnement d'un agencement d'automatisation industriel doté d'une multitude de composants d'automatisation programmables et d'une multitude de programmes d'automatisation | |
DE102006051189A1 (de) | Verfahren und System zum Ausführen und Konfigurieren von Applikationen abhängig von einer Einsatzumgebung | |
EP1634176B1 (fr) | Dispositif cluster | |
WO2018015454A1 (fr) | Automate programmable industriel doté d'un système de gestion | |
EP3929740A1 (fr) | Procédé d'orchestration d'une utilisation à base de récipient sur un terminal | |
WO2013007349A1 (fr) | Procédé et système de répartition dynamique de fonctions de programme dans des systèmes de commande répartis | |
DE112022000406T5 (de) | Überwachen eines allgemeinzustands eines grossen cloud-computing-systems | |
DE102021129637A1 (de) | Verteiltes stream-computing mit mehreren umgebungen | |
EP3104675B1 (fr) | Terminal de commande d'une machine agricole équipé d'un logiciel hyperviseur | |
EP2224301A1 (fr) | Arrangement d'automatisation doté d'un composant d'automatisation industriel et procédé d'administration d'un composant d'automatisation industriel | |
EP3890276A1 (fr) | Intégration d'une machine dans un réseau de registres distribué existant | |
DE102019211908A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Verteilen einer Anwendung | |
DE102005053275B4 (de) | Hochverfügbares Computerverbundsystem | |
DE3874007T2 (de) | Bueroautomatisierungssystem. | |
EP1380908A2 (fr) | Système pour la configuration automatique de logiciel de commande | |
WO2019081314A1 (fr) | Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de production pour la fabrication de produits de différents types | |
EP2597570B1 (fr) | Agencement de grappe | |
WO2019063327A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif d'établissement d'un canal de communication entre un premier et un deuxième dispositif | |
DE102011085755B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Automatisierungsgeräts zum Zugriff auf eine Dokumentationsablage | |
DE102008023846A1 (de) | Rechnerverbund und Verfahren zur Konfiguration eines Rechnerverbundes | |
DE102022204718A1 (de) | Verfahren für eine adaptive Ressourcenzuweisung für Anwendungen in einem verteilten System heterogener Rechenknoten |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060822 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061229 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
APBN | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E |
|
APBR | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E |
|
APAF | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE |
|
18R | Application refused |
Effective date: 20080203 |
|
APAK | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of an appeal modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCNOA3E |
|
APBT | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20090917 |