EP1720705B1 - Method for controlling color on printing machines - Google Patents
Method for controlling color on printing machines Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1720705B1 EP1720705B1 EP05715317A EP05715317A EP1720705B1 EP 1720705 B1 EP1720705 B1 EP 1720705B1 EP 05715317 A EP05715317 A EP 05715317A EP 05715317 A EP05715317 A EP 05715317A EP 1720705 B1 EP1720705 B1 EP 1720705B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- ink
- color
- location
- determined
- measured
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
- B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
- B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
- B41F33/0045—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control for automatically regulating the ink supply
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for color control on printing presses.
- the four scale colors black, cyan, magenta and yellow as well as possibly also special colors in the form of halftone dots are usually transferred onto the substrate for the autotypical se-tenant printing.
- the colors involved in the autotypical se-tenant, namely the scale colors and the spot colors, are also referred to as process colors.
- the halftone dots of the different colors may differ in size, and the halftone dots of the different colors may be applied to the substrate when printing with mutual overlap.
- the generation of a desired color impression depends on various factors and is therefore extremely complex.
- a variety of methods for color control on printing machines are already known from the prior art.
- the methods known from the prior art for color control usually have several of the following disadvantages:
- a first disadvantage of methods known from the prior art for color control is that the same for color control as measured values, the so-called area coverage need the colors involved in printing.
- the determination of the area coverage is very complex and usually only inaccurately possible, because usually the actually located on the printed product area coverage differs from that on the printing plate and therefore can hardly be determined exactly, and because it is most important for image-sensitive pixels to surfaces which are not homogeneous in color within a paint spot to be measured. Procedures for color control, which need as the basis for calculating the area coverage, are therefore usually inaccurate.
- a further disadvantage of color control methods known from the prior art is that some of the methods known from the prior art require spectral color values as measured values. The determination of spectral color values requires special sensors, whereby the execution of such methods is complicated and expensive. Furthermore, in color control methods, which rely on the determination of spectral color values, large amounts of data must be processed. Again, this is complicated and expensive.
- a further disadvantage of color control methods known from the prior art is that they are generally based only on the four scale colors black, magenta, cyan and yellow and are not able to regulate autotypical se-tenants with spot colors. Furthermore, most color control methods known in the art have significant black control problems. These are but a few of the disadvantages of color control methods known in the art.
- the present invention has the object to provide a novel method for color control on printing presses.
- the color control process according to the invention has a large number of advantages over the processes known from the prior art. Thus, it is not necessary for the method according to the invention to determine the so-called area coverage, because it is inherently taken into account in the method according to the invention. Furthermore, the method according to the invention is based on the measurement of so-called standard color values, which, compared to the measurement of so-called spectral color values, enables a significant reduction in the amount of data to be handled. Furthermore, with the method according to the invention, in addition to the scale colors, it is also possible to reliably regulate special colors and thus all the process colors involved in the autotypic compression. Also the color Black, like all other process colors, can be reliably regulated.
- At least one color spot is measured online during printing.
- this color spot is a so-called image-important point of the print job.
- the determined actual color location is a set of measured values that consists of three color values that are in one suitable system, preferably in the so-called Lab system.
- the determined actual color location of the measured color spot is then compared for color control with the corresponding desired color location. If it is determined in this comparison that the actual color locus corresponds to the desired color locus or lies within certain tolerance limits around this desired color locus, the process parameters can be further printed without any change. If, on the other hand, it is determined that the determined actual color locus deviates from the corresponding desired color locus, color control is carried out.
- Fig. 1 visualizes the two steps or stages 10, 11 of the method according to the invention.
- the ink feed of a single process color involved in the autotypic se-tenant is preferably changed during printing.
- corresponding measured values representing the effect of the adjustment of this one color on the color values of the color locus are stored.
- step 15 After changing the ink supply for a single process color in the sense of blocks 12, 13 and 14 and determining and storing the effect of this change on the color values of the color location of the color patch to be measured, it is checked in step 15 whether by adjusting the ink supply of the one Color of the desired target color location can be achieved can. If this is the case, it is possible to branch directly to block 16. However, if it is determined that the desired target color location can not be achieved, then it is further checked whether other process colors are involved in the execution of the print job.
- the first step or the first step 10 of the color control method according to the invention represents a learning step, so to speak, in which it is determined how the adjustment of a single process color has an effect.
- the system branches to block 16 and thus the second stage 11 of the method according to the invention.
- a color location changes upon adjustment of each individual color in the corresponding color system in particular in the Lab system.
- This can Fig. 2 are taken in the designated by the reference numeral 20 a measured color location before the adjustment of a color and the reference numeral 21 of the color location after adjustment of this color. So the color locus is 20 in the Lab system of Fig. 2 by coordinates (0.3, 0.3) and the color locus 21 is indicated by coordinates (0.42, 0.38).
- a color vector 22 which is characteristic of the effect of the change of a color on the color values of the color patch to be measured, and which is stored as a corresponding measured value set or color locus for that color.
- a color vector is determined in the first stage 10 of the method.
- the second stage 11 of the method can then be calculated by simple vector addition of the determined in the first stage 10 color vectors, as the simultaneous change of several colors affects the color location.
- the determination of the effect of changing the ink supply of each individual color on the color location in the sense of the first stage 10 of the method according to the invention can be carried out in two different ways.
- a first alternative of the method according to the invention upon adjustment of the ink feed of a single color, it is possible to wait until the ink is in equilibrium after the adjustment. After reaching this state of equilibrium is then by the adjustment of the color caused change in the color locus determined as the corresponding color vector.
- the extrapolation has the advantage that corresponding measured values can be determined much faster than in the case in which one waits until an equilibrium state is reached.
- the result which is established on the basis of the control carried out in block 16 is checked. In this case, it is checked whether the color values of the color locus which adjusts after the regulation correspond to the result precalculated in block 16. If a significant deviation is detected, the vector addition carried out in block 16 can be adjusted, for example, by correcting the direction and size of the individual vectors on the basis of the present result.
- the learning phase 10 of the method according to the invention is preferably executed only once during the printing of a print job. If control deviations occur when the same print job is executed, the control can be based on the variables learned once in step 10.
- the desired color values required for control can either be known from the prepress stage and can be automatically provided to the inventive method as an input variable, or can be determined by means of a manual or control system-supported setup phase on the printing press.
- the method according to the invention is subdivided in principle into two stages, namely a learning level and the actual control level.
- the learning step the ink feed is adjusted individually for each process color involved in the printing, and the resulting effect on the color location is determined vectorially.
- these determined vector variables are superimposed by vector addition in order to predict the effect of a simultaneous adjustment of several or all of the colors involved in the printing.
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen.The invention relates to a method for color control on printing presses.
Zur ordnungsgemäßen Ausführung eines Druckauftrags ist es unter anderem erforderlich, die in einer sogenannten Druckvorstufe festgelegte, farbliche Gestaltung eines zu druckenden Erzeugnisses während des eigentlichen Druckens korrekt auf einen Bedruckstoff zu übertragen. Hierzu werden für den autotypischen Zusammendruck in der Regel die vier Skalenfarben Schwarz, Cyan, Magenta und Gelb sowie gegebenenfalls auch Sonderfarben in Form von Rasterpunkten auf den Bedruckstoff übertragen. Die am autotypischen Zusammendruck beteiligten Farben, nämlich die Skalenfarben und die Sonderfarben, werden auch als Prozessfarben bezeichnet. Beim Drucken können zum Beispiel die Rasterpunkte der unterschiedlichen Farben sich in ihrer Größe unterscheiden, und die Rasterpunkte der unterschiedlichen Farben können beim Drucken mit gegenseitiger Überlappung auf den Bedruckstoff aufgetragen werden. Bereits hieraus folgt, dass die Erzeugung eines gewünschten Farbeindrucks von verschiedenen Faktoren abhängig und daher äußerst komplex ist.For the proper execution of a print job, among other things, it is necessary to correctly transfer the defined in a so-called prepress color design of a product to be printed during the actual printing on a substrate. For this purpose, the four scale colors black, cyan, magenta and yellow as well as possibly also special colors in the form of halftone dots are usually transferred onto the substrate for the autotypical se-tenant printing. The colors involved in the autotypical se-tenant, namely the scale colors and the spot colors, are also referred to as process colors. For example, when printing, the halftone dots of the different colors may differ in size, and the halftone dots of the different colors may be applied to the substrate when printing with mutual overlap. Already it follows that the generation of a desired color impression depends on various factors and is therefore extremely complex.
Aus dem Stand der Technik sind bereits eine Vielzahl von Verfahren zur Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen bekannt. Die aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren zur Farbregelung verfügen dabei in der Regel über mehrere der folgenden Nachteile: Ein erster Nachteil von aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren zur Farbregelung liegt darin, dass dieselben zur Farbregelung als Messwerte die sogenannte Flächendeckung der am Druck beteiligten Farben benötigen. Die Ermittlung der Flächendeckung ist sehr aufwändig und meist nur ungenau möglich, weil sich in der Regel die tatsächlich auf dem Druckerzeugnis befindliche Flächendeckung von der auf der Druckplatte unterscheidet und daher kaum exakt bestimmt werden kann, und weil es sich bei bildwichtigen Bildpunkten meistens um Flächen handelt, die innerhalb eines zu vermessenden Farbflecks farblich nicht homogen sind. Verfahren zur Farbregelung, welche als Berechnungsgrundlage die Flächendekkung benötigen, sind daher meist ungenau. Ein weiterer Nachteil von aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren zur Farbregelung liegt darin, dass einige der aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren als Messwerte spektrale Farbwerte benötigen. Die Ermittlung spektraler Farbwerte erfordert spezielle Messaufnehmer, wodurch die Ausführung solcher Verfahren aufwändig und teuer ist. Weiterhin müssen bei Farbregelungsverfahren, die auf die Ermittlung spektraler Farbwerte angewiesen sind, große Datenmengen verarbeitet werden. Auch dies ist aufwendig und teuer. Ein weiterer Nachteil von aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren zur Farbregelung liegt darin, dass dieselben sich in der Regel nur an den vier Skalenfarben Schwarz, Magenta, Cyan und Gelb orientieren und nicht in der Lage sind, autotypische Zusammendrucke mit Sonderfarben zu regeln. Weiterhin haben die meisten aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren zur Farbregelung erhebliche Probleme mit der Regelung der Farbe Schwarz. Dies sind nur einige der Nachteile von aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren zur Farbregelung.A variety of methods for color control on printing machines are already known from the prior art. The methods known from the prior art for color control usually have several of the following disadvantages: A first disadvantage of methods known from the prior art for color control is that the same for color control as measured values, the so-called area coverage need the colors involved in printing. The determination of the area coverage is very complex and usually only inaccurately possible, because usually the actually located on the printed product area coverage differs from that on the printing plate and therefore can hardly be determined exactly, and because it is most important for image-sensitive pixels to surfaces which are not homogeneous in color within a paint spot to be measured. Procedures for color control, which need as the basis for calculating the area coverage, are therefore usually inaccurate. A further disadvantage of color control methods known from the prior art is that some of the methods known from the prior art require spectral color values as measured values. The determination of spectral color values requires special sensors, whereby the execution of such methods is complicated and expensive. Furthermore, in color control methods, which rely on the determination of spectral color values, large amounts of data must be processed. Again, this is complicated and expensive. A further disadvantage of color control methods known from the prior art is that they are generally based only on the four scale colors black, magenta, cyan and yellow and are not able to regulate autotypical se-tenants with spot colors. Furthermore, most color control methods known in the art have significant black control problems. These are but a few of the disadvantages of color control methods known in the art.
Aus dem Dokument
Hiervon ausgehend liegt der vorliegenden Erfindung die Aufgabe zugrunde ein neuartiges Verfahren zur Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen zu schaffen.On this basis, the present invention has the object to provide a novel method for color control on printing presses.
Diese Aufgabe wird durch ein Verfahren zur Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen gemäß Patentanspruch 1 gelöst.This object is achieved by a method for color control on printing machines according to claim 1.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren zur Farbreglung verfügt gegenüber den aus dem Stand der Technik bekannten Verfahren über eine Vielzahl von Vorteilen. So ist es für das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren nicht erforderlich, die sogenannte Flächendekkung zu ermitteln, weil dieselbe beim erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren immanent berücksichtig wird. Weiterhin beruht das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren auf der Messung sogenannter Normfarbwerte, was gegenüber der Messung sogenannter spektraler Farbwerte eine deutliche Reduzierung der handzuhabenden Datenmenge ermöglicht. Weiterhin können mit dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren neben den Skalenfarben auch Sonderfarben und damit alle am autotypischen Zusammendruck beteiligten Prozessfarben zuverlässig geregelt werden. Auch die Farbe Schwarz kann, wie alle anderen Prozessfarben, zuverlässig geregelt werden.The color control process according to the invention has a large number of advantages over the processes known from the prior art. Thus, it is not necessary for the method according to the invention to determine the so-called area coverage, because it is inherently taken into account in the method according to the invention. Furthermore, the method according to the invention is based on the measurement of so-called standard color values, which, compared to the measurement of so-called spectral color values, enables a significant reduction in the amount of data to be handled. Furthermore, with the method according to the invention, in addition to the scale colors, it is also possible to reliably regulate special colors and thus all the process colors involved in the autotypic compression. Also the color Black, like all other process colors, can be reliably regulated.
Bevorzugte Weiterbildungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus den Unteransprüchen und der nachfolgenden Beschreibung.Preferred embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the dependent claims and the description below.
Ausführungsbeispiele der Erfindung werden, ohne hierauf beschränkt zu sein, an Hand der Zeichnung näher erläutert. Dabei zeigt:
- Fig. 1:
- ein Signalflussdiagramm zur Verdeutlichung des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens zur Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen;
- Fig. 2:
- eine Darstellung eines Farborts im sogenannten Lab-System zur Verdeutlichung des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens zur Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen.
- Fig. 1:
- a signal flow diagram to illustrate the method according to the invention for color control on printing machines;
- Fig. 2:
- a representation of a color locus in the so-called Lab system to illustrate the method according to the invention for color control on printing presses.
Nachfolgend wird das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren unter Bezugnahme auf
Bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren zur Farbregelung wird während des Druckens mindestens ein Farbfleck online vermessen. Nachfolgend soll davon ausgegangen werden, dass lediglich ein derartiger Farbfleck vermessen wird, wobei es sich bei diesem Farbfleck um einen sogenannten bildwichtigen Punkt des Druckauftrags handelt.In the color control method according to the invention, at least one color spot is measured online during printing. In the following it should be assumed that only such a color spot is measured, whereby this color spot is a so-called image-important point of the print job.
Bei der Vermessung des Farbflecks wird ein Ist-Farbort ermittelt. Bei dem ermittelten Ist-Farbort handelt es ich um einen Messwertsatz, der aus drei Farbwerten besteht, die in einem geeigneten System, vorzugsweise im sogenannten Lab-System, dargestellt werden.When measuring the color spot, an actual color location is determined. The determined actual color location is a set of measured values that consists of three color values that are in one suitable system, preferably in the so-called Lab system.
Der ermittelte Ist-Farbort des vermessenen Farbflecks wird dann zur Farbregelung mit entsprechenden Soll-Farbort verglichen. Wird bei diesem Vergleich festgestellt, dass der Ist-Farbort dem Soll-Farbort entspricht bzw. innerhalb gewisser Toleranzgrenzen um diesen Soll-Farbort liegt, so kann ohne Veränderung der Prozessparameter weiter gedruckt werden. Wird hingegen festgestellt, dass der ermittelte Ist-Farbort von dem entsprechenden Soll-Farbort abweicht, so wird eine Farbregelung durchgeführt.The determined actual color location of the measured color spot is then compared for color control with the corresponding desired color location. If it is determined in this comparison that the actual color locus corresponds to the desired color locus or lies within certain tolerance limits around this desired color locus, the process parameters can be further printed without any change. If, on the other hand, it is determined that the determined actual color locus deviates from the corresponding desired color locus, color control is carried out.
Die erfindungsgemäße Farbregelung erfolgt in zwei Stufen bzw. Schritten.
In der ersten Stufe 10 des erfindungsgemäßen Farbregelungsverfahrens wird gemäß Block 12 zuerst lediglich die Farbzufuhr einer einzigen am autotypischen Zusammendruck beteiligten Prozessfarbe vorzugsweise während des Druckens verändert. Gemäß Block 13 wird sodann ermittelt, wie sich die Änderung in der Farbzufuhr dieser einen Farbe auf die Farbwerte des zu vermessenden Farbflecks auswirkt. Gemäß Schritt 14 werden entsprechende Messwerte, welche die Auswirkung der Verstellung dieser einen Farbe auf die Farbwerte des Farborts repräsentieren, gespeichert.In the
Nachdem im Sinne der Blöcke 12, 13 und 14 die Farbzufuhr für eine einzige Prozessfarbe verändert und die Auswirkung dieser Veränderung auf die Farbwerte des Farborts des zu vermessenden Farbflecks ermittelt und gespeichert worden ist, wird in Schritt 15 überprüft, ob durch Verstellung der Farbzufuhr dieser einen Farbe der gewünschte Soll-Farbort erzielt werden kann. Ist dies der Fall so kann unmittelbar auf Block 16 verzweigt werden. Wird jedoch festegestellt, dass der gewünschte Soll-Farbort nicht erzielt werden kann, so wird weiterhin überprüft, ob weitere Prozessfarben an der Ausführung des Druckauftrags beteiligt sind. Wird dabei festgestellt, dass noch weitere Farben vorhanden sind, für welche die Blöcke 12, 13 und 14 noch nicht durchgeführt wurden, so wird auf Block 12 zurückverzweigt und für jede einzelne Prozessfarbe wird getrennt und unabhängig von den anderen Prozessfarbe festgestellt, wie sich eine Verstellung in der Farbzufuhr dieser einen Farbe auf die Farbwerte des Farborts auswirkt.After changing the ink supply for a single process color in the sense of
Der erste Schritt bzw. die erste Stufe 10 des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens zur Farbregelung stellt sozusagen eine Lernstufe dar, in welcher ermittelt wird, wie sich die Verstellung einer einzelnen Prozessfarbe auswirkt. Sobald in Block 15 festgestellt wird, dass die Blöcke 12, 13 und 14 für alle am Druck beteiligten Prozessfarben abgearbeitet worden sind, wird auf Block 16 und damit die zweite Stufe 11 des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens verzweigt.The first step or the
In Block 16 der zweiten Stufe 11 des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens werden alle in der ersten Stufe 10 ermittelten und gespeicherten Messwerte bezüglich aller am Druck beteiligten Prozessfarben miteinander verrechnet, sodass zur weiteren Farbregelung einige oder alle am Druck beteiligten Farben gleichzeitig verstellt werden können. Nach Beendigung der ersten Stufe 10 und damit der Lernstufe ist nämlich bekannt, welche Auswirkungen die Verstellung einer jeden Prozessfarbe auf den Farbort hat. Aus diesen Werten kann durch mathematische Umrechnung dann geschlossen werden, welche Auswirkung die gleichzeitige Verstellung mehrerer am autotypischen Zusammendruck beteiligter Prozessfarben auf den Farbort hat.In
Es sei an dieser Stelle darauf hingewiesen, dass in der ersten Stufe 10 des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens festgestellt wird, wie sich ein Farbort bei Verstellung einer jeden einzelnen Farbe im entsprechenden Farbsystem, insbesondere im Lab-System verändert. Dies kann
In der zweiten Stufe 11 des Verfahrens kann dann durch einfache Vektoraddition der in der ersten Stufe 10 ermittelten Farbvektoren errechnet werden, wie sich die gleichzeitige Veränderung mehrerer Farben auf den Farbort auswirkt.In the
Es sei darauf hingewiesen, dass die Ermittlung der Auswirkung der Veränderung der Farbzufuhr einer jeden einzelnen Farbe auf den Farbort im Sinne der ersten Stufe 10 des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens auf zwei unterschiedliche Art und Weisen ausgeführt werden kann. So kann nach einer ersten Alternative des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens bei Verstellung der Farbzufuhr einer einzelnen Farbe gewartet werden, bis sich die Farbe nach der Verstellung im Gleichgewicht befindet. Nach Erreichen dieses Gleichgewichtszustands wird dann die durch die Verstellung der Farbe bewirkte Änderung des Farborts als entsprechender Farbvektor ermittelt. Alternativ ist es auch möglich, nach einer bestimmten Zeitdauer einen oder in bestimmten Zeitintervallen mehrere Messwertsätze zu ermitteln und dann durch Extrapolation auf den sich einstellenden Gleichgewichtszustand zu schließen. Die Extrapolation verfügt über den Vorteil, dass sich entsprechende Messwerte wesentlich schneller ermitteln lassen als in dem Fall, in dem bis auf das Erreichen eines Gleichgewichtszustands gewartet wird.It should be noted that the determination of the effect of changing the ink supply of each individual color on the color location in the sense of the
Im Anschluss an den Block 16 wird im Block 17 vorzugsweise das sich auf Basis der in Block 16 durchgeführten Regelung einstellende Ergebnis überprüft. Dabei wird überprüft, ob die Farbwerte des sich nach der Regelung einstellenden Farborts dem in Block 16 vorberechneten Ergebnis entsprechen. Wird dabei eine erhebliche Abweichung festgestellt, so kann die in Block 16 durchgeführte Vektoraddition zum Beispiel dadurch angepasst werden, dass Richtung und Größe der einzelnen Vektoren auf Grundlage des vorliegenden Ergebnisses korrigiert werden.Subsequent to block 16, in
Die Lernphase 10 des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens wird beim Drucken eines Druckauftrags vorzugsweise lediglich einmal durchlaufen. Treten bei Ausführung desselben Druckauftrags Regelabweichungen auf, so kann die Regelung auf Basis der einmal in der Stufe 10 erlernten Größen erfolgen. Die zur Regelung benötigten Soll-Farbwerte können entweder aus der Druckvorstufe bekannt sein und automatisch dem erfindungsgemaßen Verfahren als Eingangsgröße bereitgestellt werden, oder im Wege einer manuellen oder regelsystemgestützten Einrichtphase an der Druckmaschine ermittelt werden.The
Es sei an dieser Stelle darauf hingewiesen, dass selbstverständlich auch nach Verstellung der Farbzufuhr einer einzigen Prozessfarbe das gewünschte Ergebnis, also der Soll-Farbort, erzielt werden kann. In diesem Fall wird in der ersten Stufe 10 zuerst einmal nur der Farbvektor für diese eine Farbe ermittelt und dann auf die zweite Stufe 11 umgeschaltet. Wenn sich aber im Lauf des Druckauftrags herausstellen sollte, dass sich der gewünschte Soll-Farbort durch Verstellen dieser einen Farbe nicht erzielen lässt, so kann auf die erste Stufe 10 rückverzweigt werden und der Lernschritt für eine oder mehrere weitere Prozessfarben durchgeführt werden.It should be noted at this point that, of course, even after adjustment of the ink supply of a single Process color the desired result, so the target color location can be achieved. In this case, in the
Mit Hilfe des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens ist eine besonders einfache Farbregelung an Druckmaschinen möglich. Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren unterteilt sich prinzipiell zwei Stufen, nämlich eine Lernstufe sowie die eigentliche Regelungsstufe. In der Lernstufe wird für jede am Druck beteiligte Prozessfarbe die Farbzufuhr einzeln verstellt und die sich dabei einstellende Auswirkung auf den Farbort vektoriell bestimmt. Nachdem dies für jede am Druck beteiligte Prozessfarbe separat durchgeführt wurde, werden in einer zweiten Stufe des erfindungemäßen Verfahrens diese ermittelten, vektoriellen Größen durch Vektoraddition überlagert, um so die Wirkung einer gleichzeitigen Verstellung mehrerer oder aller am Druck beteiligten Farben vorauszuberechnen.With the aid of the method according to the invention, a particularly simple color control on printing presses is possible. The method according to the invention is subdivided in principle into two stages, namely a learning level and the actual control level. In the learning step, the ink feed is adjusted individually for each process color involved in the printing, and the resulting effect on the color location is determined vectorially. After this has been carried out separately for each process color involved in the printing, in a second stage of the method according to the invention these determined vector variables are superimposed by vector addition in order to predict the effect of a simultaneous adjustment of several or all of the colors involved in the printing.
Für das erfindungsgemäße Regelungsverfahren muss keine Flächendeckung ermittelt werden, weil diese immanente berücksichtigt wird. Mit dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren lassen sich am autotypischen Zusammendruck beteiligte Skalenfarben und Sonderfarben gleichermaßen zuverlässig regeln. Da das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren auf der Ermittlung von Normfarbwerten beruht, kann es mit geringem Rechenaufwand durchgeführt werden.For the control method according to the invention no area coverage must be determined because this immanent is taken into account. With the method according to the invention, it is equally possible to regulate scale colors and spot colors involved in the autotypic compression in an equally reliable manner. Since the method according to the invention is based on the determination of standard color values, it can be carried out with little computational effort.
- 1010
- Stufestep
- 1111
- Stufestep
- 1212
- Blockblock
- 1313
- Blockblock
- 1414
- Blockblock
- 1515
- Blockblock
- 1616
- Blockblock
- 1717
- Blockblock
- 2020
- Farbortcolor location
- 2121
- Farbortcolor location
- 2222
- Farbvektorcolor vector
Claims (7)
- A method for the ink control on printing machines with the following steps:a) for the ink control only the ink feed of a single process ink is changed in a first step or in a first step of the method, wherein it is determined here how the change in the ink feed of this one process ink affects ink values of an ink stain to be measured, wherein a corresponding measured value set is stored as ink vector (22) between an ink location (20) before the change of the ink feed and an ink location (21) after the change of the ink feed for the ink of the ink stain, and wherein this is performed separately in succession for each individual process ink involved in the autotypical combined print,b) for the ink control all measured values of all process inks involved determined and stored in connection with Step a) are offset against one another in a second step or in a second step of the method in such a way that for further ink control some or all process inks involved in the print are adjusted at the same time.
- The method according to Claim 1, characterised in that during the printing at least one ink stain is measured, wherein during this measurement at least one actual ink location is determined and that the or each determined actual ink location is compared with a corresponding set ink location, wherein upon a deviation between the actual ink location and the corresponding set ink location the ink control is carried out.
- The method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that determining the measured values of the or each ink location in Step a) is delayed until a state of equilibrium after the change in the ink feed of the respective ink to be printed is reached.
- The method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that for determining the measured values of the or each ink location in Step a) after a certain period of time or at certain time intervals at least one value is measured and the ensuing state of equilibrium is deduced through extrapolation.
- The method according to one or several of the Claims 1 to 4, characterised in that in Step a) for each process ink to be printed measurements are performed separately and one after the other in time to determine the effect of the isolated change of the ink feed of each process ink on the ink location of the ink stain to be measured, especially an ink vector.
- The method according to Claim 5, characterised in that in the process it is determined how on changing the ink feed of each process ink the corresponding ink location shifts, and that from the ink location present before the ink adjustment and after the ink adjustment, size and direction of an ink vector are determined.
- The method according to one or several of the Claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the offsetting of the measured values determined and stored according to Step b) is effected through vector operations, wherein for this purpose the ink vectors determined in Step a) for each individual process ink are preferentially superimposed through vector addition.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004009271A DE102004009271A1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2004-02-26 | Method for color control on printing machines |
PCT/EP2005/001438 WO2005082620A1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2005-02-12 | Method for controlling color on printing machines |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1720705A1 EP1720705A1 (en) | 2006-11-15 |
EP1720705B1 true EP1720705B1 (en) | 2010-05-26 |
Family
ID=34853689
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05715317A Not-in-force EP1720705B1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2005-02-12 | Method for controlling color on printing machines |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070188778A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1720705B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007523775A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100436130C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE468975T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE102004009271A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005082620A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB201510652D0 (en) * | 2015-06-17 | 2015-07-29 | Beers Uk De Ltd | Colour measurement of gemstones |
CN112146759B (en) * | 2020-09-17 | 2023-05-05 | 杭州临安银杏装饰材料有限公司 | On-line monitoring method for color change of intaglio decorative paper |
Family Cites Families (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3626423A1 (en) * | 1986-08-05 | 1988-02-11 | Deutsche Forsch Druck Reprod | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INFLUENCING THE COLOR APPEARANCE OF A COLOR AREA IN A PRINTING PROCESS |
DE58901780D1 (en) * | 1988-01-14 | 1992-08-13 | Gretag Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE COLOR CONTROL OF A PRINTING MACHINE. |
DE3830121A1 (en) * | 1988-09-05 | 1990-03-15 | Felix Brunner | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SETTING A PRESET PRINT STANDARDS DEFINED BY A FULL OF VALUES / GRID POINT CHANGE IN AN AUTOTYPICAL PRESSURE PROCESS |
US5070413A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1991-12-03 | Eastman Kodak Company | Color digital halftoning with vector error diffusion |
DE4305693C2 (en) * | 1992-04-06 | 1996-12-19 | Hell Ag Linotype | Color calibration procedure |
US5493321A (en) * | 1993-02-25 | 1996-02-20 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Method and apparatus of characterization for photoelectric color proofing systems |
US5537516A (en) * | 1994-03-15 | 1996-07-16 | Electronics For Imaging, Inc. | Method for calibrating a color printer using a scanner for color measurements |
US6002498A (en) * | 1994-06-15 | 1999-12-14 | Konica Corporation | Image processing method and image forming method |
DE19516354A1 (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 1996-11-07 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for image inspection and color guidance on print products of a printing press |
DE19632969C2 (en) * | 1996-08-16 | 1999-04-29 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Method for determining standard values for the production of multicolored printed copies on a printing press |
US6024018A (en) * | 1997-04-03 | 2000-02-15 | Intex Israel Technologies Corp., Ltd | On press color control system |
US5907495A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-05-25 | General Motors Corporation | Method of formulating paint through color space modeling |
JP4023573B2 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2007-12-19 | 株式会社リコー | Image forming apparatus |
US6671067B1 (en) * | 2000-01-05 | 2003-12-30 | Monaco Systems, Inc. | Scanner and printer profiling system |
PL200158B1 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2008-12-31 | Avt Advanced Vision Technology | Spectral color control method |
US6985254B2 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2006-01-10 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Calibration of a multi color imaging system using a predicted color shift |
DE60131385T2 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2008-06-19 | Hewlett-Packard Development Co., L.P. (n.d.Ges.d. Staates Delaware), Houston | Using single colors with a printer |
JP4065485B2 (en) * | 2001-11-09 | 2008-03-26 | キヤノン株式会社 | Method for correcting output value of color detection means of color image forming apparatus, and color image forming apparatus provided with the method |
US7277196B2 (en) * | 2003-01-15 | 2007-10-02 | Xerox Corporation | Iterative printer control and color balancing system and method using a high quantization resolution halftone array to achieve improved image quality with reduced processing overhead |
JP4200365B2 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2008-12-24 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Correspondence definition data creation grid point determination method, correspondence definition data creation grid point determination apparatus, correspondence definition data creation grid point determination program, print control apparatus, print control method, print control program, and image data processing apparatus |
CN1227568C (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2005-11-16 | 上海龙樱彩色制版有限公司 | Colour management method in digital proofing |
US7724392B2 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2010-05-25 | Electronics For Imaging, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for calibrating digital imaging devices |
-
2004
- 2004-02-26 DE DE102004009271A patent/DE102004009271A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-02-12 US US10/589,296 patent/US20070188778A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-02-12 AT AT05715317T patent/ATE468975T1/en active
- 2005-02-12 CN CNB2005800060177A patent/CN100436130C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-02-12 JP JP2007500095A patent/JP2007523775A/en active Pending
- 2005-02-12 WO PCT/EP2005/001438 patent/WO2005082620A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-02-12 EP EP05715317A patent/EP1720705B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-02-12 DE DE502005009635T patent/DE502005009635D1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN100436130C (en) | 2008-11-26 |
CN1922014A (en) | 2007-02-28 |
US20070188778A1 (en) | 2007-08-16 |
JP2007523775A (en) | 2007-08-23 |
ATE468975T1 (en) | 2010-06-15 |
DE102004009271A1 (en) | 2005-09-15 |
DE502005009635D1 (en) | 2010-07-08 |
EP1720705A1 (en) | 2006-11-15 |
WO2005082620A1 (en) | 2005-09-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0408507B1 (en) | Method for the determination of the distances between the color coordinates of two halftone regions printed with a printing machine and method for monitoring or adjusting the color printing of a printing machine | |
EP0321402B1 (en) | Method of controlling or regulating the ink supply in a printing press | |
EP0255586B1 (en) | Method and device for influencing the inking of an inked surface in a printing process | |
EP0324718B1 (en) | Method and device for ink monitoring in a printing machine | |
EP0143744B1 (en) | Method and device for rating the printing quality and/or controlling the ink supply in an offset printing machine, and offset printing machine with such a device | |
DE102015220716A1 (en) | Method for compensating failed nozzles in inkjet printing systems | |
EP1820650B1 (en) | Control of a printing press via a torsion model | |
DE10359322B4 (en) | Method and device for correcting non-adapted print data using a colorimetrically measured reference sheet | |
EP0585740B1 (en) | Method for printing process control on a printing press using halftone photoengraving in particular a sheet offset printing machine | |
DE10017554A1 (en) | Precise control of the ink supply to a printing machine to improve print quality by using a test procedure where a pure ink color is printed and compared with its nominal color density to determine the inherent level of impurity | |
DE19515499A1 (en) | Print colour determination for offset printer | |
DE4403861C2 (en) | Method for producing a multicolored print with a printing press in at least two different runs | |
DE102005060108A1 (en) | Device for simulating the effects of printing process-relevant positioning commands on a print image to be printed | |
EP1720705B1 (en) | Method for controlling color on printing machines | |
DE102017200808A1 (en) | Method for the automated generation of reference color values for color control | |
DE19830487B4 (en) | Method for determining area coverage in a printed image | |
DE3708652A1 (en) | Device for achieving a given ink density when printing with an offset printing machine | |
EP0522301B1 (en) | Method for monitoring and controlling the printing process, especially in offset printing machines | |
DE102016217075A1 (en) | Method for creating a preset characteristic | |
EP3715126B1 (en) | Colour compensation in offset printing | |
EP0421003A1 (en) | Method of controlling the ink supply in a printing machine | |
EP0916491A1 (en) | Method for the determination of colorimetric gradients | |
DE102004011239B4 (en) | Method for automatic color presetting on at least one inking unit of a printing press | |
EP0282446B1 (en) | Method for continuously controlling inking in an intaglio or flexographic process, and corresponding printing machine | |
DE102019207130A1 (en) | Color correction in CMYK model process for inkjet |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060926 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: MANROLAND AG |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502005009635 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20100708 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20100526 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20100526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100926 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100827 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100927 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110301 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20110222 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20110218 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502005009635 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110228 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: MANROLAND A.G. Effective date: 20110228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110228 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20110212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20111102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502005009635 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: MANROLAND SHEETFED GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: MANROLAND AG, 63075 OFFENBACH, DE Effective date: 20120509 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120229 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502005009635 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120901 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20120213 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100826 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 468975 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20130228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100906 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130228 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100526 |