EP1695902A2 - Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure - Google Patents

Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1695902A2
EP1695902A2 EP06252858A EP06252858A EP1695902A2 EP 1695902 A2 EP1695902 A2 EP 1695902A2 EP 06252858 A EP06252858 A EP 06252858A EP 06252858 A EP06252858 A EP 06252858A EP 1695902 A2 EP1695902 A2 EP 1695902A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
craft
fender
resilient material
engagement
water going
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP06252858A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1695902A3 (en
EP1695902B1 (en
Inventor
Neil M. Clarkson
Robert M. Van Rijk
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Windcat Workboats Ltd
Original Assignee
Windcat Workboats Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=34855513&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1695902(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Windcat Workboats Ltd filed Critical Windcat Workboats Ltd
Priority to PL06252858T priority Critical patent/PL1695902T3/en
Publication of EP1695902A2 publication Critical patent/EP1695902A2/en
Publication of EP1695902A3 publication Critical patent/EP1695902A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1695902B1 publication Critical patent/EP1695902B1/en
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B27/00Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for cargo or passengers
    • B63B27/30Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for transfer at sea between ships or between ships and off-shore structures
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B39/00Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B59/00Hull protection specially adapted for vessels; Cleaning devices specially adapted for vessels
    • B63B59/02Fenders integral with waterborne vessels or specially adapted therefor, e.g. fenders forming part of the hull or incorporated in the hull; Rubbing-strakes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B27/00Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for cargo or passengers
    • B63B27/19Other loading or unloading equipment involving an intermittent action, not provided in groups B63B27/04 - B63B27/18

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the stability of boats in open water, and particularly to their stability in active waters when delivering or receiving personnel or goods at a stationary structure.
  • the invention has especial application in relation to offshore structures.
  • Offshore structures around the world's coasts are becoming commonplace, and particularly with the creation of offshore wind farms, many of these structures are relatively small. Such structures do though, require maintenance and attendance for other reasons, and for these purposes only relatively short visits are often required. Similarly, only short visits are required if all that is involved is the transfer of goods or personnel to or from the stationary structure.
  • a floating craft In active waters a floating craft is subject to a lot of vertical movement, and this can make difficult the transfer of personnel or goods from the craft to a stationary structure.
  • the present invention seeks to facilitate such transfer by providing a means by which the craft can be temporarily stabilised against the structure.
  • a floating craft has at one end a fender with an exposed surface comprising a resilient material.
  • the craft is urged against the structure to engage the resilient material with the structure such that the frictional engagement in combination with the urging force, is sufficient to prevent the engaged fender from slipping downwards relative to the structure. So long as this engagement is sustained, the movement of personnel and goods between the craft and the structure is greatly eased.
  • the active water will of course continue to rise and fall. This will allow the craft to pivot in a vertical plane around the point of engagement, but it is of course important that the water level cannot approach or rise above that point. Accordingly, it is preferred that the frictional engagement between the resilient material and the stationary structure permits slippage of the fender upwards relative to the structure, while resisting downward slippage. By this means, the craft preserves a horizontal or upwardly inclined attitude towards the point of engagement.
  • the resilient material on the fender typically comprises natural or synthetic rubber, and can of course be a combination of different materials.
  • the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core.
  • the resilient material can be secured to the fender by any suitable means, bearing in mind that whatever securement is used has to be water resistant and particularly, resistant to sea water if the system is to be used offshore.
  • the fender will normally present a flat surface for engagement with the structure, with an area sufficient to make firm engagement with the structure which will typically be a column or pylon projecting from the water. Such a structure will allow the resilient material to engage round a significant area so that good frictional contact can be made.
  • the fender may present a concave surface to increase the contact area.
  • the shape of the surface being offered can of course be matched to a particular structure if regular trips to such structure or structures are to be made. This can be of particular benefit for example, when a craft has to travel to substantially identical turbines in an offshore wind farm. In some circumstances, there could be some merit in the exposed surface on the fender being convex, for engagement for example against and between two stanchions.
  • the fender itself may be part of the structure of the craft, or part of an assembly for fitting to a craft.
  • Such an assembly might even be transferable between crafts, or a range of assemblies be provided for fitting to the same craft, each assembly being particularly adapted to a form of structure against which the craft is to be stabilised.
  • Figure 1 shows a craft 2 held relative to an offshore structure by engagement of its bow against a pylon 4 of the offshore structure.
  • the craft is shown at an inclined attitude relative to the level of the sea 6, with the bow above the stern.
  • the bow of the boat is fitted with a fender 8 upon which is mounted a resilient material 10.
  • the craft is continuously urged against the structure by a motor (not shown), and sustains frictional contact between the resilient material 10 and the pylon 4 to hold the bow of the boat steady relative to the pylon, enabling an individual to readily transfer to a ladder indicated at 12, or other feature attached to the pylon, from the boat.
  • the frictional engagement between the bow of the boat and the pylon 4 is maintained by the craft being continuously urged against the pylon. This requires the engine to be kept running, and the stern of the boat where the boat is driven, to remain in the water. It is important then, that the attitude of the boat remains either horizontal or as shown, inclined upwardly towards the pylon 4 to sustain the frictional engagement between the bow and the pylon.
  • the frictional engagement with the pylon must resist downward slippage, although upwards slippage can be tolerated.
  • Figure 2 shows how the frictional engagement between the bow of the boat 2 and the pylon 4 can be maintained.
  • the resilient material 10 is sufficiently soft to be compressed by engagement with the pylon 4 so that the area of contact between the material 10 and the pylon extends around 25 to 40% of the circumference of the pylon.
  • the pylon 500mm in diameter and a vertical depth of the resilient material of 500mm this will establish a contact area of around 2500cm 2 .
  • this engagement can hold the bow of a boat in stable contact with an offshore structure in most normal sea conditions, provided the boat engine can generate sufficient continuous power relative to the boat weight.
  • Figures 3 and 4 show alternative fender arrangements in contact with a pylon or pylons of an offshore structure.
  • Figure 3 shows a fender presenting a concave surface to the pylon; in Figure 4 the resilient material is on a convex surface, and makes simultaneous contact with two pylons. This can provide a little additional stability by providing some resistance to lateral movement of the craft (rotation in a horizontal plane), and also a clear indication of such lateral movement as a consequence of engagement with one of the pylons being reduced or lost.
  • Figure 5 shows a cross-section through the resilient material and the fender upon which it is mounted.
  • the material comprises a sleeve 14 typically of rubber, around a core 16 of resilient synthetic foam.
  • the elastomer sleeve 14 has a wall thickness of 20mm with nylon reinforcement.
  • the core 16 comprises polyurethane foam of density 45kg/mm 3 .
  • the overall cross-section is oval in shape, 700mm in height and 300mm thick.
  • a flat side is secured to an aluminium support beam 18.
  • the sleeve is secured to the support beam 18 by means of adhesive, but additional straps or ties may also be used as a precaution.
  • Figure 6 is a front view of a catamaran in which the fender extends between hull bows spaced by around 4m.
  • Figure 6 also shows evidence of engagement of the resilient material with an offshore structure, and evidence of upward movement of the resilient material relative to for example, a pylon of such a structure.
  • Figure 7 shows the bow of a monohull craft, upon which an assembly embodying the invention is fitted. As can be seen, the assembly has staves 22 attached to the side of the hull, with the centre of the fender mounted on the prow 24. It will be appreciated that such an assembly can be detachable for repair and for use on other crafts. The same does of course apply to a fender or equivalent assembly mounted on a multihull craft.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Foundations (AREA)
  • Electrical Discharge Machining, Electrochemical Machining, And Combined Machining (AREA)
  • Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)
  • Revetment (AREA)
  • Vibration Dampers (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)

Abstract

A technique for stabilising a boat (2) in open water against a stationary structure (4) is disclosed. The boat (2) has a fender (8) at one end comprising a resilient material (10), and the boat (2) is urged against the structure (4) to engage the resilient material (10) with the structure (4). The frictional engagement in combination with the urging force is sufficient to prevent the engaged fender (8) from slipping down the structure (4). In this way so long as the engagement is sustained, the boat (2) is stabilised against the structure (4).

Description

  • This invention relates to the stability of boats in open water, and particularly to their stability in active waters when delivering or receiving personnel or goods at a stationary structure. The invention has especial application in relation to offshore structures.
  • Offshore structures around the world's coasts are becoming commonplace, and particularly with the creation of offshore wind farms, many of these structures are relatively small. Such structures do though, require maintenance and attendance for other reasons, and for these purposes only relatively short visits are often required. Similarly, only short visits are required if all that is involved is the transfer of goods or personnel to or from the stationary structure.
  • In active waters a floating craft is subject to a lot of vertical movement, and this can make difficult the transfer of personnel or goods from the craft to a stationary structure. The present invention seeks to facilitate such transfer by providing a means by which the craft can be temporarily stabilised against the structure. According to the invention such a floating craft has at one end a fender with an exposed surface comprising a resilient material. The craft is urged against the structure to engage the resilient material with the structure such that the frictional engagement in combination with the urging force, is sufficient to prevent the engaged fender from slipping downwards relative to the structure. So long as this engagement is sustained, the movement of personnel and goods between the craft and the structure is greatly eased.
  • With a craft and stationary structure engaged in the manner described above, the active water will of course continue to rise and fall. This will allow the craft to pivot in a vertical plane around the point of engagement, but it is of course important that the water level cannot approach or rise above that point. Accordingly, it is preferred that the frictional engagement between the resilient material and the stationary structure permits slippage of the fender upwards relative to the structure, while resisting downward slippage. By this means, the craft preserves a horizontal or upwardly inclined attitude towards the point of engagement.
  • The resilient material on the fender typically comprises natural or synthetic rubber, and can of course be a combination of different materials. In a preferred embodiment the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core. The resilient material can be secured to the fender by any suitable means, bearing in mind that whatever securement is used has to be water resistant and particularly, resistant to sea water if the system is to be used offshore.
  • The fender will normally present a flat surface for engagement with the structure, with an area sufficient to make firm engagement with the structure which will typically be a column or pylon projecting from the water. Such a structure will allow the resilient material to engage round a significant area so that good frictional contact can be made. In some embodiments, particularly where the structure with which engagement is to be made is known to comprise a column or pylon, the fender may present a concave surface to increase the contact area. The shape of the surface being offered can of course be matched to a particular structure if regular trips to such structure or structures are to be made. This can be of particular benefit for example, when a craft has to travel to substantially identical turbines in an offshore wind farm. In some circumstances, there could be some merit in the exposed surface on the fender being convex, for engagement for example against and between two stanchions.
  • The fender itself may be part of the structure of the craft, or part of an assembly for fitting to a craft. Such an assembly might even be transferable between crafts, or a range of assemblies be provided for fitting to the same craft, each assembly being particularly adapted to a form of structure against which the craft is to be stabilised.
  • The invention will now be described by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings wherein:
    • Figure 1 shows a side view of a craft in stable engagement with an offshore structure;
    • Figure 2 shows an enlarged plan view of the point of contact showing the engagement between the craft and the structure in Figure 1;
    • Figure 3 shows a view similar to that of Figure 2 of an alternatively shaped fender;
    • Figure 4 shows another view similar to that of Figure 2 with another alternative fender configuration;
    • Figure 5 is a cross-section through a fender and the resilient material mounted thereon;
    • Figure 6 is a front perspective view of a catamaran embodying the invention; and
    • Figure 7 is a plan view showing an assembly according to the invention fitted to the bow of a monohull craft.
  • Figure 1 shows a craft 2 held relative to an offshore structure by engagement of its bow against a pylon 4 of the offshore structure. The craft is shown at an inclined attitude relative to the level of the sea 6, with the bow above the stern. The bow of the boat is fitted with a fender 8 upon which is mounted a resilient material 10. The craft is continuously urged against the structure by a motor (not shown), and sustains frictional contact between the resilient material 10 and the pylon 4 to hold the bow of the boat steady relative to the pylon, enabling an individual to readily transfer to a ladder indicated at 12, or other feature attached to the pylon, from the boat.
  • The frictional engagement between the bow of the boat and the pylon 4 is maintained by the craft being continuously urged against the pylon. This requires the engine to be kept running, and the stern of the boat where the boat is driven, to remain in the water. It is important then, that the attitude of the boat remains either horizontal or as shown, inclined upwardly towards the pylon 4 to sustain the frictional engagement between the bow and the pylon. The frictional engagement with the pylon must resist downward slippage, although upwards slippage can be tolerated. Once the inclined attitude of the boat is established, rising water under the bow and the buoyancy of the bow will lift it relative to the pylon in any event, but with the drive from the engine the engagement will be sustained at a higher, and not a lower level. The weight distribution in the boat may be arranged to ensure that the inclination cannot reach an angle at which the boat itself is at risk.
  • Figure 2 shows how the frictional engagement between the bow of the boat 2 and the pylon 4 can be maintained. As can be seen, the resilient material 10 is sufficiently soft to be compressed by engagement with the pylon 4 so that the area of contact between the material 10 and the pylon extends around 25 to 40% of the circumference of the pylon. With the pylon 500mm in diameter and a vertical depth of the resilient material of 500mm, this will establish a contact area of around 2500cm2. We have found that with natural rubber forming the exposed surface of the resilient material, this engagement can hold the bow of a boat in stable contact with an offshore structure in most normal sea conditions, provided the boat engine can generate sufficient continuous power relative to the boat weight. Typically 4 to 5 tonnes of thrust is required to maintain a boat having a dead weight of around 28 tonnes in sable contact with a pylon. This can be provided by a motor driving either a propeller or a water jet, with the latter being preferred as a water jet driven boat can operate in shallower waters; a minimum of 0.8 m as against 1.8m depth being needed for safe operation of a propeller driven craft.
  • Figures 3 and 4 show alternative fender arrangements in contact with a pylon or pylons of an offshore structure. Figure 3 shows a fender presenting a concave surface to the pylon; in Figure 4 the resilient material is on a convex surface, and makes simultaneous contact with two pylons. This can provide a little additional stability by providing some resistance to lateral movement of the craft (rotation in a horizontal plane), and also a clear indication of such lateral movement as a consequence of engagement with one of the pylons being reduced or lost.
  • Figure 5 shows a cross-section through the resilient material and the fender upon which it is mounted. As can be seen, the material comprises a sleeve 14 typically of rubber, around a core 16 of resilient synthetic foam. The elastomer sleeve 14 has a wall thickness of 20mm with nylon reinforcement. The core 16 comprises polyurethane foam of density 45kg/mm3. The overall cross-section is oval in shape, 700mm in height and 300mm thick. A flat side is secured to an aluminium support beam 18. The sleeve is secured to the support beam 18 by means of adhesive, but additional straps or ties may also be used as a precaution. Such ties 20 are visible in Figure 6 which is a front view of a catamaran in which the fender extends between hull bows spaced by around 4m. Figure 6 also shows evidence of engagement of the resilient material with an offshore structure, and evidence of upward movement of the resilient material relative to for example, a pylon of such a structure.
  • Figure 7 shows the bow of a monohull craft, upon which an assembly embodying the invention is fitted. As can be seen, the assembly has staves 22 attached to the side of the hull, with the centre of the fender mounted on the prow 24. It will be appreciated that such an assembly can be detachable for repair and for use on other crafts. The same does of course apply to a fender or equivalent assembly mounted on a multihull craft.

Claims (21)

  1. A method of stabilising a floating craft against a stationary structure in which the craft has at one end a fender with an exposed surface comprising a resilient material, in which method the craft is urged against the structure to engage the resilient material therewith, the frictional engagement in combination with the urging force being sufficient to prevent the engaged fender from shipping downwards relative to the structure.
  2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the frictional engagement permits slippage of the fender upwards relative to the structure.
  3. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the exposed surface of the fender is adapted to facilitate said upward slippage.
  4. A method according to any preceding Claim wherein the resilient material comprises rubber.
  5. A method according to Claim 4 wherein the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core.
  6. A method according to any preceding Claim wherein the fender is part of the craft.
  7. A method according to any of Claims 1 to 5 wherein the fender is part of an assembly fitted to the craft.
  8. A method according to any preceding Claim wherein the craft has a bow and a stern, with a motor for propelling the craft from the stern, and wherein the fender is at the bow.
  9. A method according to Claim 8 wherein the craft is a monohull boat.
  10. A method according to Claim 8 wherein the craft is a multihull boat.
  11. A water going craft fitted with a fender having an exposed surface comprising a resilient material at an end thereof for engagement with a stationary structure, the exposed surface being adapted upon said engagement with sufficient pressure, to prevent downward slippage of the fender relative to the structure.
  12. A water going craft according to Claim 11 equipped with a motor with a drive mechanism at the other end of the craft for generating said pressure.
  13. A water going craft according to Claim 12 wherein the drive mechanism comprises an impeller.
  14. A water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 13 wherein the resilient material comprises rubber.
  15. A water going craft according to Claim 14 wherein the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam.
  16. A water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 15 wherein the fender is part of an assembly fitted to the craft.
  17. A monohull water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 16.
  18. A multihull water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 16.
  19. An assembly for fitting to a water going craft comprising a fender having an exposed surface comprising a resilient material at an end thereof for engagement with a stationary structure, the exposed surface being adapted upon said engagement with sufficient pressure, to prevent downward slippage of the beam relative to the structure.
  20. An assembly according to Claim 19 wherein the resilient material comprises rubber.
  21. An assembly according to Claim 20 wherein the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core.
EP06252858A 2005-06-14 2006-06-02 Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure Revoked EP1695902B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL06252858T PL1695902T3 (en) 2005-06-14 2006-06-02 Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0512097A GB2427253A (en) 2005-06-14 2005-06-14 Technique for stabilising a boat against a structure using a fender

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1695902A2 true EP1695902A2 (en) 2006-08-30
EP1695902A3 EP1695902A3 (en) 2006-10-11
EP1695902B1 EP1695902B1 (en) 2008-11-12

Family

ID=34855513

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06252858A Revoked EP1695902B1 (en) 2005-06-14 2006-06-02 Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20070000424A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1695902B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE414011T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602006003577D1 (en)
DK (1) DK1695902T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2316021T3 (en)
GB (1) GB2427253A (en)
PL (1) PL1695902T3 (en)
PT (1) PT1695902E (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL2003728C2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-03 P & R Systems METHOD FOR STABILIZING A FLOATING VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY OBJECT.
NL2004166C2 (en) * 2010-01-28 2011-07-29 P & R Systems Maintenance of an offshore wind farm making use of an assembly of a floating harbour ship and a plurality of shuttle vessels.
GB2485556A (en) * 2010-11-18 2012-05-23 Robin Barnaby Mottram Stowell Toothed fender for offshore transfers at sea, eg to/from a wind turbine
EP2520485A1 (en) 2011-05-03 2012-11-07 Presign Holding B.V. System and method for mooring a floating vessel against a stationary object
EP2660140A1 (en) * 2012-05-03 2013-11-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A docking device for facilitating a transfer between a vessel and an offshore structure
NL2008800C2 (en) * 2012-05-11 2013-11-12 D B M Fabriek En Handelsonderneming B V Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing.
GB2510418A (en) * 2013-02-04 2014-08-06 Windcat Workboats Ltd Vessel fender structure with anchor points and draw mechanisms
DE102015108882B3 (en) * 2015-06-04 2016-07-21 Harald Hübner Method for landing a vessel on a structure
EP3109150A1 (en) * 2015-06-24 2016-12-28 BV Scheepswerf Damen Gorinchem A fender and a vessel comprising a fender
CN111071394A (en) * 2020-01-06 2020-04-28 江苏现代造船技术有限公司 Offshore wind power operation and maintenance ship boarding device and method
EP3647178A1 (en) * 2018-10-29 2020-05-06 Ørsted Wind Power A/S A ship with a bow fender
US11230357B2 (en) 2017-02-09 2022-01-25 Fender Innovations Holding B.V. Marine fender

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2473490A (en) * 2009-09-15 2011-03-16 William Jonathan Aldiss Progressive bow transfer apparatus and method
GB2480408B (en) * 2010-06-07 2013-01-02 Bmt Nigel Gee Ltd Transfer apparatus for vessels
GB2476858C (en) 2010-11-19 2021-07-21 Stephen Mattey Ronald Jaw apparatus for stabilising a floating craft against a stationary structure
EP3590817A1 (en) 2018-07-04 2020-01-08 Ørsted Wind Power A/S A method for the use in offshore crew transfer
AU2021100933A4 (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-04-29 C W F Hamilton & Co Limited Marine vessel fender and control system

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1981182A (en) * 1931-12-23 1934-11-20 Durable Mat Company Marine fender
US2117121A (en) * 1935-11-20 1938-05-10 Wingfoot Corp Ship fender
CH365966A (en) * 1958-02-14 1962-11-30 Lonza Ag fender
US3063399A (en) * 1960-05-05 1962-11-13 Fred B Schuyler Bow bumper for tugs and similar boats
US3109405A (en) * 1961-11-27 1963-11-05 Nusinoff Willy Boat bumper
US3261320A (en) * 1965-04-30 1966-07-19 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Marine fender
NL7414096A (en) * 1973-11-06 1975-05-09 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind MORE DETAILS.
JPS54100089A (en) * 1978-01-23 1979-08-07 Bridgestone Corp Gunwale contact buffer of harbor work ship
US4351257A (en) * 1981-01-26 1982-09-28 Seaward International, Inc. Marine fender
JPH0730541B2 (en) * 1986-03-14 1995-04-05 株式会社ブリヂストン Fender
US4738215A (en) * 1986-09-17 1988-04-19 Tracker Marine Corporation Bumper construction for pontoon boats
US5313907A (en) * 1992-03-13 1994-05-24 Hodges Christopher A External rail system for boat
JP2002362480A (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-18 Sekisui Plastics Co Ltd Bow protector
US6928944B2 (en) * 2003-08-28 2005-08-16 Richwood Industries, Inc. Protective bumper for towboats

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL2003728C2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-03 P & R Systems METHOD FOR STABILIZING A FLOATING VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY OBJECT.
EP2316721A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2011-05-04 Presign Holding B.V. Method for stabilizing a floating vessel against a stationary object
NL2004166C2 (en) * 2010-01-28 2011-07-29 P & R Systems Maintenance of an offshore wind farm making use of an assembly of a floating harbour ship and a plurality of shuttle vessels.
WO2011093704A1 (en) 2010-01-28 2011-08-04 P&R Systems Maintenance of an offshore wind farm making use of an assembly of a floating harbour ship and a plurality of shuttle vessels
GB2485556A (en) * 2010-11-18 2012-05-23 Robin Barnaby Mottram Stowell Toothed fender for offshore transfers at sea, eg to/from a wind turbine
EP2520485A1 (en) 2011-05-03 2012-11-07 Presign Holding B.V. System and method for mooring a floating vessel against a stationary object
EP2660140A1 (en) * 2012-05-03 2013-11-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A docking device for facilitating a transfer between a vessel and an offshore structure
US20130291777A1 (en) * 2012-05-03 2013-11-07 Niels Joergen Borch-Jensen Docking device for facilitating a transfer between a vessel and an offshore structure
NL2008800C2 (en) * 2012-05-11 2013-11-12 D B M Fabriek En Handelsonderneming B V Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing.
WO2013169113A1 (en) * 2012-05-11 2013-11-14 D.B.M. Fabriek En Handelsonderneming B.V. Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing
US11136095B2 (en) 2012-05-11 2021-10-05 Fender Innovations Holding B.V. Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing
GB2510418A (en) * 2013-02-04 2014-08-06 Windcat Workboats Ltd Vessel fender structure with anchor points and draw mechanisms
CN105026254A (en) * 2013-02-04 2015-11-04 风猫作业船有限公司 Mooring structure mounted on a vessel
US9796453B2 (en) 2013-02-04 2017-10-24 Windcat Workboats Limited Mooring structure mounted on a vessel
GB2510418B (en) * 2013-02-04 2018-02-28 Windcat Workboats Ltd Vessel fender structure with anchor points and draw mechanisms
DE102015108882B3 (en) * 2015-06-04 2016-07-21 Harald Hübner Method for landing a vessel on a structure
WO2016192719A1 (en) * 2015-06-04 2016-12-08 Hübner Harald Method for landing a watercraft on a building structure
WO2016207284A1 (en) * 2015-06-24 2016-12-29 Bv Scheepswerf Damen Gorinchem A fender and a vessel comprising a fender
EP3109150A1 (en) * 2015-06-24 2016-12-28 BV Scheepswerf Damen Gorinchem A fender and a vessel comprising a fender
US11230357B2 (en) 2017-02-09 2022-01-25 Fender Innovations Holding B.V. Marine fender
EP3647178A1 (en) * 2018-10-29 2020-05-06 Ørsted Wind Power A/S A ship with a bow fender
WO2020089034A1 (en) * 2018-10-29 2020-05-07 Ørsted Wind Power A/S A ship with a bow fender
US11851145B2 (en) 2018-10-29 2023-12-26 Ørsted Wind Power A/S Ship with a bow fender
CN111071394A (en) * 2020-01-06 2020-04-28 江苏现代造船技术有限公司 Offshore wind power operation and maintenance ship boarding device and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0512097D0 (en) 2005-07-20
ATE414011T1 (en) 2008-11-15
US20070000424A1 (en) 2007-01-04
GB2427253A (en) 2006-12-20
PL1695902T3 (en) 2009-05-29
DE602006003577D1 (en) 2008-12-24
EP1695902A3 (en) 2006-10-11
PT1695902E (en) 2009-02-09
EP1695902B1 (en) 2008-11-12
ES2316021T3 (en) 2009-04-01
DK1695902T3 (en) 2009-02-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1695902B1 (en) Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure
EP3326899B1 (en) Wind turbine mooring system
US8479677B2 (en) Lift mechanism for lifting a swim platform above and over a rear deck of a boat
US9663915B2 (en) Floatable support structure for an offshore wind turbine or other device
US7284497B2 (en) Swing mooring pontoon
US20200164947A1 (en) Vessel having an improved hull shape
US7182034B2 (en) Offshore floating dock
EP0734339B1 (en) Boat
WO2011033288A2 (en) Progressive bow transfer apparatus and method
US8539896B2 (en) Lift mechanism for added stability for a swim platform of a boat
CN108360460A (en) Sightseeing ship steps on quadrupler
RU2200684C2 (en) Device for placing floating structure riding at anchor in required direction head into current and/or waves
KR20230151547A (en) Semi-submersible service vessel and method for floating equipment
US11655008B2 (en) Self-righting trimaran
WO2015122781A1 (en) Improved kayak design
AU2013205360B2 (en) Swing mooring pontoon
KR100873963B1 (en) An Apparatus for Protecting Screw of Ships
JPH0321397B2 (en)
FR2856651A1 (en) Aquatic vehicle for water sports, has autonomous drift connected to vessel by line, where vessel has nose having inclination with respect to drift plane and adjustable along axis
AU2003201522A1 (en) Swing mooring pontoon
AU2009213066A1 (en) Swing Mooring Pontoon
JP2015140026A (en) Downfall risk prevention device for sailing ship
FR2652333A1 (en) Ship or sailing boat of circular shape

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B63B 59/02 20060101ALI20060907BHEP

Ipc: B63B 39/00 20060101AFI20060717BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20061127

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070822

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B63B 59/02 20060101ALI20080227BHEP

Ipc: B63B 39/00 20060101AFI20080227BHEP

Ipc: B63B 27/30 20060101ALN20080227BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602006003577

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20081224

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20090128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2316021

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20081112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090312

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090212

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20090615

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: EE

Payment date: 20090507

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20090603

Year of fee payment: 4

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20090616

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20090514

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20090527

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20090605

Year of fee payment: 4

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S

Effective date: 20090812

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC

Effective date: 20090810

PLAZ Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC

Effective date: 20090810

Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S

Effective date: 20090812

Opponent name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S

Effective date: 20090812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20090619

Year of fee payment: 4

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S

Effective date: 20090812

Opponent name: DONG ENERGY A/S

Effective date: 20090812

Opponent name: E.ON CLIMATE & RENEWABLES UK LIMITED

Effective date: 20090812

Opponent name: SOUTH BOATS SPECIAL PROJECTS LTD.

Effective date: 20090812

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER RENEWABLES LIMITED

Effective date: 20090810

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20090709

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20090921

Year of fee payment: 4

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20090529

Year of fee payment: 4

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: DONG ENERGY A/S

Opponent name: E.ON CLIMATE & RENEWABLES UK LIMITED

Opponent name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER RENEWABLES LIMITED

Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S

Opponent name: SOUTH BOATS SPECIAL PROJECTS LTD.

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20101202

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: WINDCAT WORKBOATS LTD

Effective date: 20100630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20110101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: EE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Ref document number: E002893

Country of ref document: EE

Effective date: 20100630

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20110228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110101

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090602

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100602

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110101

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090513

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100602

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

PLBJ Opposition found inadmissible

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009275

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081112

26U Opposition found inadmissible

Opponent name: RWE NPOWER RENEWABLES LIMITED

Effective date: 20110829

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20111118

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20110915

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100603

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: LAPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20090611

Year of fee payment: 4