EP1695902A2 - Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure - Google Patents
Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1695902A2 EP1695902A2 EP06252858A EP06252858A EP1695902A2 EP 1695902 A2 EP1695902 A2 EP 1695902A2 EP 06252858 A EP06252858 A EP 06252858A EP 06252858 A EP06252858 A EP 06252858A EP 1695902 A2 EP1695902 A2 EP 1695902A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- craft
- fender
- resilient material
- engagement
- water going
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B27/00—Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for cargo or passengers
- B63B27/30—Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for transfer at sea between ships or between ships and off-shore structures
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B39/00—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B59/00—Hull protection specially adapted for vessels; Cleaning devices specially adapted for vessels
- B63B59/02—Fenders integral with waterborne vessels or specially adapted therefor, e.g. fenders forming part of the hull or incorporated in the hull; Rubbing-strakes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B27/00—Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for cargo or passengers
- B63B27/19—Other loading or unloading equipment involving an intermittent action, not provided in groups B63B27/04 - B63B27/18
Definitions
- This invention relates to the stability of boats in open water, and particularly to their stability in active waters when delivering or receiving personnel or goods at a stationary structure.
- the invention has especial application in relation to offshore structures.
- Offshore structures around the world's coasts are becoming commonplace, and particularly with the creation of offshore wind farms, many of these structures are relatively small. Such structures do though, require maintenance and attendance for other reasons, and for these purposes only relatively short visits are often required. Similarly, only short visits are required if all that is involved is the transfer of goods or personnel to or from the stationary structure.
- a floating craft In active waters a floating craft is subject to a lot of vertical movement, and this can make difficult the transfer of personnel or goods from the craft to a stationary structure.
- the present invention seeks to facilitate such transfer by providing a means by which the craft can be temporarily stabilised against the structure.
- a floating craft has at one end a fender with an exposed surface comprising a resilient material.
- the craft is urged against the structure to engage the resilient material with the structure such that the frictional engagement in combination with the urging force, is sufficient to prevent the engaged fender from slipping downwards relative to the structure. So long as this engagement is sustained, the movement of personnel and goods between the craft and the structure is greatly eased.
- the active water will of course continue to rise and fall. This will allow the craft to pivot in a vertical plane around the point of engagement, but it is of course important that the water level cannot approach or rise above that point. Accordingly, it is preferred that the frictional engagement between the resilient material and the stationary structure permits slippage of the fender upwards relative to the structure, while resisting downward slippage. By this means, the craft preserves a horizontal or upwardly inclined attitude towards the point of engagement.
- the resilient material on the fender typically comprises natural or synthetic rubber, and can of course be a combination of different materials.
- the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core.
- the resilient material can be secured to the fender by any suitable means, bearing in mind that whatever securement is used has to be water resistant and particularly, resistant to sea water if the system is to be used offshore.
- the fender will normally present a flat surface for engagement with the structure, with an area sufficient to make firm engagement with the structure which will typically be a column or pylon projecting from the water. Such a structure will allow the resilient material to engage round a significant area so that good frictional contact can be made.
- the fender may present a concave surface to increase the contact area.
- the shape of the surface being offered can of course be matched to a particular structure if regular trips to such structure or structures are to be made. This can be of particular benefit for example, when a craft has to travel to substantially identical turbines in an offshore wind farm. In some circumstances, there could be some merit in the exposed surface on the fender being convex, for engagement for example against and between two stanchions.
- the fender itself may be part of the structure of the craft, or part of an assembly for fitting to a craft.
- Such an assembly might even be transferable between crafts, or a range of assemblies be provided for fitting to the same craft, each assembly being particularly adapted to a form of structure against which the craft is to be stabilised.
- Figure 1 shows a craft 2 held relative to an offshore structure by engagement of its bow against a pylon 4 of the offshore structure.
- the craft is shown at an inclined attitude relative to the level of the sea 6, with the bow above the stern.
- the bow of the boat is fitted with a fender 8 upon which is mounted a resilient material 10.
- the craft is continuously urged against the structure by a motor (not shown), and sustains frictional contact between the resilient material 10 and the pylon 4 to hold the bow of the boat steady relative to the pylon, enabling an individual to readily transfer to a ladder indicated at 12, or other feature attached to the pylon, from the boat.
- the frictional engagement between the bow of the boat and the pylon 4 is maintained by the craft being continuously urged against the pylon. This requires the engine to be kept running, and the stern of the boat where the boat is driven, to remain in the water. It is important then, that the attitude of the boat remains either horizontal or as shown, inclined upwardly towards the pylon 4 to sustain the frictional engagement between the bow and the pylon.
- the frictional engagement with the pylon must resist downward slippage, although upwards slippage can be tolerated.
- Figure 2 shows how the frictional engagement between the bow of the boat 2 and the pylon 4 can be maintained.
- the resilient material 10 is sufficiently soft to be compressed by engagement with the pylon 4 so that the area of contact between the material 10 and the pylon extends around 25 to 40% of the circumference of the pylon.
- the pylon 500mm in diameter and a vertical depth of the resilient material of 500mm this will establish a contact area of around 2500cm 2 .
- this engagement can hold the bow of a boat in stable contact with an offshore structure in most normal sea conditions, provided the boat engine can generate sufficient continuous power relative to the boat weight.
- Figures 3 and 4 show alternative fender arrangements in contact with a pylon or pylons of an offshore structure.
- Figure 3 shows a fender presenting a concave surface to the pylon; in Figure 4 the resilient material is on a convex surface, and makes simultaneous contact with two pylons. This can provide a little additional stability by providing some resistance to lateral movement of the craft (rotation in a horizontal plane), and also a clear indication of such lateral movement as a consequence of engagement with one of the pylons being reduced or lost.
- Figure 5 shows a cross-section through the resilient material and the fender upon which it is mounted.
- the material comprises a sleeve 14 typically of rubber, around a core 16 of resilient synthetic foam.
- the elastomer sleeve 14 has a wall thickness of 20mm with nylon reinforcement.
- the core 16 comprises polyurethane foam of density 45kg/mm 3 .
- the overall cross-section is oval in shape, 700mm in height and 300mm thick.
- a flat side is secured to an aluminium support beam 18.
- the sleeve is secured to the support beam 18 by means of adhesive, but additional straps or ties may also be used as a precaution.
- Figure 6 is a front view of a catamaran in which the fender extends between hull bows spaced by around 4m.
- Figure 6 also shows evidence of engagement of the resilient material with an offshore structure, and evidence of upward movement of the resilient material relative to for example, a pylon of such a structure.
- Figure 7 shows the bow of a monohull craft, upon which an assembly embodying the invention is fitted. As can be seen, the assembly has staves 22 attached to the side of the hull, with the centre of the fender mounted on the prow 24. It will be appreciated that such an assembly can be detachable for repair and for use on other crafts. The same does of course apply to a fender or equivalent assembly mounted on a multihull craft.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
- Foundations (AREA)
- Electrical Discharge Machining, Electrochemical Machining, And Combined Machining (AREA)
- Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)
- Wind Motors (AREA)
- Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
- Revetment (AREA)
- Vibration Dampers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to the stability of boats in open water, and particularly to their stability in active waters when delivering or receiving personnel or goods at a stationary structure. The invention has especial application in relation to offshore structures.
- Offshore structures around the world's coasts are becoming commonplace, and particularly with the creation of offshore wind farms, many of these structures are relatively small. Such structures do though, require maintenance and attendance for other reasons, and for these purposes only relatively short visits are often required. Similarly, only short visits are required if all that is involved is the transfer of goods or personnel to or from the stationary structure.
- In active waters a floating craft is subject to a lot of vertical movement, and this can make difficult the transfer of personnel or goods from the craft to a stationary structure. The present invention seeks to facilitate such transfer by providing a means by which the craft can be temporarily stabilised against the structure. According to the invention such a floating craft has at one end a fender with an exposed surface comprising a resilient material. The craft is urged against the structure to engage the resilient material with the structure such that the frictional engagement in combination with the urging force, is sufficient to prevent the engaged fender from slipping downwards relative to the structure. So long as this engagement is sustained, the movement of personnel and goods between the craft and the structure is greatly eased.
- With a craft and stationary structure engaged in the manner described above, the active water will of course continue to rise and fall. This will allow the craft to pivot in a vertical plane around the point of engagement, but it is of course important that the water level cannot approach or rise above that point. Accordingly, it is preferred that the frictional engagement between the resilient material and the stationary structure permits slippage of the fender upwards relative to the structure, while resisting downward slippage. By this means, the craft preserves a horizontal or upwardly inclined attitude towards the point of engagement.
- The resilient material on the fender typically comprises natural or synthetic rubber, and can of course be a combination of different materials. In a preferred embodiment the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core. The resilient material can be secured to the fender by any suitable means, bearing in mind that whatever securement is used has to be water resistant and particularly, resistant to sea water if the system is to be used offshore.
- The fender will normally present a flat surface for engagement with the structure, with an area sufficient to make firm engagement with the structure which will typically be a column or pylon projecting from the water. Such a structure will allow the resilient material to engage round a significant area so that good frictional contact can be made. In some embodiments, particularly where the structure with which engagement is to be made is known to comprise a column or pylon, the fender may present a concave surface to increase the contact area. The shape of the surface being offered can of course be matched to a particular structure if regular trips to such structure or structures are to be made. This can be of particular benefit for example, when a craft has to travel to substantially identical turbines in an offshore wind farm. In some circumstances, there could be some merit in the exposed surface on the fender being convex, for engagement for example against and between two stanchions.
- The fender itself may be part of the structure of the craft, or part of an assembly for fitting to a craft. Such an assembly might even be transferable between crafts, or a range of assemblies be provided for fitting to the same craft, each assembly being particularly adapted to a form of structure against which the craft is to be stabilised.
- The invention will now be described by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings wherein:
- Figure 1 shows a side view of a craft in stable engagement with an offshore structure;
- Figure 2 shows an enlarged plan view of the point of contact showing the engagement between the craft and the structure in Figure 1;
- Figure 3 shows a view similar to that of Figure 2 of an alternatively shaped fender;
- Figure 4 shows another view similar to that of Figure 2 with another alternative fender configuration;
- Figure 5 is a cross-section through a fender and the resilient material mounted thereon;
- Figure 6 is a front perspective view of a catamaran embodying the invention; and
- Figure 7 is a plan view showing an assembly according to the invention fitted to the bow of a monohull craft.
- Figure 1 shows a
craft 2 held relative to an offshore structure by engagement of its bow against apylon 4 of the offshore structure. The craft is shown at an inclined attitude relative to the level of thesea 6, with the bow above the stern. The bow of the boat is fitted with afender 8 upon which is mounted aresilient material 10. The craft is continuously urged against the structure by a motor (not shown), and sustains frictional contact between theresilient material 10 and thepylon 4 to hold the bow of the boat steady relative to the pylon, enabling an individual to readily transfer to a ladder indicated at 12, or other feature attached to the pylon, from the boat. - The frictional engagement between the bow of the boat and the
pylon 4 is maintained by the craft being continuously urged against the pylon. This requires the engine to be kept running, and the stern of the boat where the boat is driven, to remain in the water. It is important then, that the attitude of the boat remains either horizontal or as shown, inclined upwardly towards thepylon 4 to sustain the frictional engagement between the bow and the pylon. The frictional engagement with the pylon must resist downward slippage, although upwards slippage can be tolerated. Once the inclined attitude of the boat is established, rising water under the bow and the buoyancy of the bow will lift it relative to the pylon in any event, but with the drive from the engine the engagement will be sustained at a higher, and not a lower level. The weight distribution in the boat may be arranged to ensure that the inclination cannot reach an angle at which the boat itself is at risk. - Figure 2 shows how the frictional engagement between the bow of the
boat 2 and thepylon 4 can be maintained. As can be seen, theresilient material 10 is sufficiently soft to be compressed by engagement with thepylon 4 so that the area of contact between thematerial 10 and the pylon extends around 25 to 40% of the circumference of the pylon. With the pylon 500mm in diameter and a vertical depth of the resilient material of 500mm, this will establish a contact area of around 2500cm2. We have found that with natural rubber forming the exposed surface of the resilient material, this engagement can hold the bow of a boat in stable contact with an offshore structure in most normal sea conditions, provided the boat engine can generate sufficient continuous power relative to the boat weight. Typically 4 to 5 tonnes of thrust is required to maintain a boat having a dead weight of around 28 tonnes in sable contact with a pylon. This can be provided by a motor driving either a propeller or a water jet, with the latter being preferred as a water jet driven boat can operate in shallower waters; a minimum of 0.8 m as against 1.8m depth being needed for safe operation of a propeller driven craft. - Figures 3 and 4 show alternative fender arrangements in contact with a pylon or pylons of an offshore structure. Figure 3 shows a fender presenting a concave surface to the pylon; in Figure 4 the resilient material is on a convex surface, and makes simultaneous contact with two pylons. This can provide a little additional stability by providing some resistance to lateral movement of the craft (rotation in a horizontal plane), and also a clear indication of such lateral movement as a consequence of engagement with one of the pylons being reduced or lost.
- Figure 5 shows a cross-section through the resilient material and the fender upon which it is mounted. As can be seen, the material comprises a
sleeve 14 typically of rubber, around acore 16 of resilient synthetic foam. Theelastomer sleeve 14 has a wall thickness of 20mm with nylon reinforcement. Thecore 16 comprises polyurethane foam of density 45kg/mm3. The overall cross-section is oval in shape, 700mm in height and 300mm thick. A flat side is secured to analuminium support beam 18. The sleeve is secured to thesupport beam 18 by means of adhesive, but additional straps or ties may also be used as a precaution.Such ties 20 are visible in Figure 6 which is a front view of a catamaran in which the fender extends between hull bows spaced by around 4m. Figure 6 also shows evidence of engagement of the resilient material with an offshore structure, and evidence of upward movement of the resilient material relative to for example, a pylon of such a structure. - Figure 7 shows the bow of a monohull craft, upon which an assembly embodying the invention is fitted. As can be seen, the assembly has
staves 22 attached to the side of the hull, with the centre of the fender mounted on theprow 24. It will be appreciated that such an assembly can be detachable for repair and for use on other crafts. The same does of course apply to a fender or equivalent assembly mounted on a multihull craft.
Claims (21)
- A method of stabilising a floating craft against a stationary structure in which the craft has at one end a fender with an exposed surface comprising a resilient material, in which method the craft is urged against the structure to engage the resilient material therewith, the frictional engagement in combination with the urging force being sufficient to prevent the engaged fender from shipping downwards relative to the structure.
- A method according to Claim 1 wherein the frictional engagement permits slippage of the fender upwards relative to the structure.
- A method according to Claim 2 wherein the exposed surface of the fender is adapted to facilitate said upward slippage.
- A method according to any preceding Claim wherein the resilient material comprises rubber.
- A method according to Claim 4 wherein the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core.
- A method according to any preceding Claim wherein the fender is part of the craft.
- A method according to any of Claims 1 to 5 wherein the fender is part of an assembly fitted to the craft.
- A method according to any preceding Claim wherein the craft has a bow and a stern, with a motor for propelling the craft from the stern, and wherein the fender is at the bow.
- A method according to Claim 8 wherein the craft is a monohull boat.
- A method according to Claim 8 wherein the craft is a multihull boat.
- A water going craft fitted with a fender having an exposed surface comprising a resilient material at an end thereof for engagement with a stationary structure, the exposed surface being adapted upon said engagement with sufficient pressure, to prevent downward slippage of the fender relative to the structure.
- A water going craft according to Claim 11 equipped with a motor with a drive mechanism at the other end of the craft for generating said pressure.
- A water going craft according to Claim 12 wherein the drive mechanism comprises an impeller.
- A water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 13 wherein the resilient material comprises rubber.
- A water going craft according to Claim 14 wherein the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam.
- A water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 15 wherein the fender is part of an assembly fitted to the craft.
- A monohull water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 16.
- A multihull water going craft according to any of Claims 11 to 16.
- An assembly for fitting to a water going craft comprising a fender having an exposed surface comprising a resilient material at an end thereof for engagement with a stationary structure, the exposed surface being adapted upon said engagement with sufficient pressure, to prevent downward slippage of the beam relative to the structure.
- An assembly according to Claim 19 wherein the resilient material comprises rubber.
- An assembly according to Claim 20 wherein the resilient material comprises a rubber sleeve around a resilient foam core.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL06252858T PL1695902T3 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2006-06-02 | Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0512097A GB2427253A (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2005-06-14 | Technique for stabilising a boat against a structure using a fender |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1695902A2 true EP1695902A2 (en) | 2006-08-30 |
EP1695902A3 EP1695902A3 (en) | 2006-10-11 |
EP1695902B1 EP1695902B1 (en) | 2008-11-12 |
Family
ID=34855513
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06252858A Revoked EP1695902B1 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2006-06-02 | Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070000424A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1695902B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE414011T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602006003577D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1695902T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2316021T3 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2427253A (en) |
PL (1) | PL1695902T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT1695902E (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL2003728C2 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-03 | P & R Systems | METHOD FOR STABILIZING A FLOATING VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY OBJECT. |
NL2004166C2 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2011-07-29 | P & R Systems | Maintenance of an offshore wind farm making use of an assembly of a floating harbour ship and a plurality of shuttle vessels. |
GB2485556A (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2012-05-23 | Robin Barnaby Mottram Stowell | Toothed fender for offshore transfers at sea, eg to/from a wind turbine |
EP2520485A1 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2012-11-07 | Presign Holding B.V. | System and method for mooring a floating vessel against a stationary object |
EP2660140A1 (en) * | 2012-05-03 | 2013-11-06 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | A docking device for facilitating a transfer between a vessel and an offshore structure |
NL2008800C2 (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2013-11-12 | D B M Fabriek En Handelsonderneming B V | Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing. |
GB2510418A (en) * | 2013-02-04 | 2014-08-06 | Windcat Workboats Ltd | Vessel fender structure with anchor points and draw mechanisms |
DE102015108882B3 (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2016-07-21 | Harald Hübner | Method for landing a vessel on a structure |
EP3109150A1 (en) * | 2015-06-24 | 2016-12-28 | BV Scheepswerf Damen Gorinchem | A fender and a vessel comprising a fender |
CN111071394A (en) * | 2020-01-06 | 2020-04-28 | 江苏现代造船技术有限公司 | Offshore wind power operation and maintenance ship boarding device and method |
EP3647178A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2020-05-06 | Ørsted Wind Power A/S | A ship with a bow fender |
US11230357B2 (en) | 2017-02-09 | 2022-01-25 | Fender Innovations Holding B.V. | Marine fender |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2473490A (en) * | 2009-09-15 | 2011-03-16 | William Jonathan Aldiss | Progressive bow transfer apparatus and method |
GB2480408B (en) * | 2010-06-07 | 2013-01-02 | Bmt Nigel Gee Ltd | Transfer apparatus for vessels |
GB2476858C (en) | 2010-11-19 | 2021-07-21 | Stephen Mattey Ronald | Jaw apparatus for stabilising a floating craft against a stationary structure |
EP3590817A1 (en) | 2018-07-04 | 2020-01-08 | Ørsted Wind Power A/S | A method for the use in offshore crew transfer |
AU2021100933A4 (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2021-04-29 | C W F Hamilton & Co Limited | Marine vessel fender and control system |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1981182A (en) * | 1931-12-23 | 1934-11-20 | Durable Mat Company | Marine fender |
US2117121A (en) * | 1935-11-20 | 1938-05-10 | Wingfoot Corp | Ship fender |
CH365966A (en) * | 1958-02-14 | 1962-11-30 | Lonza Ag | fender |
US3063399A (en) * | 1960-05-05 | 1962-11-13 | Fred B Schuyler | Bow bumper for tugs and similar boats |
US3109405A (en) * | 1961-11-27 | 1963-11-05 | Nusinoff Willy | Boat bumper |
US3261320A (en) * | 1965-04-30 | 1966-07-19 | Goodyear Tire & Rubber | Marine fender |
NL7414096A (en) * | 1973-11-06 | 1975-05-09 | Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind | MORE DETAILS. |
JPS54100089A (en) * | 1978-01-23 | 1979-08-07 | Bridgestone Corp | Gunwale contact buffer of harbor work ship |
US4351257A (en) * | 1981-01-26 | 1982-09-28 | Seaward International, Inc. | Marine fender |
JPH0730541B2 (en) * | 1986-03-14 | 1995-04-05 | 株式会社ブリヂストン | Fender |
US4738215A (en) * | 1986-09-17 | 1988-04-19 | Tracker Marine Corporation | Bumper construction for pontoon boats |
US5313907A (en) * | 1992-03-13 | 1994-05-24 | Hodges Christopher A | External rail system for boat |
JP2002362480A (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-18 | Sekisui Plastics Co Ltd | Bow protector |
US6928944B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-08-16 | Richwood Industries, Inc. | Protective bumper for towboats |
-
2005
- 2005-06-14 GB GB0512097A patent/GB2427253A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2006
- 2006-06-02 ES ES06252858T patent/ES2316021T3/en active Active
- 2006-06-02 DK DK06252858T patent/DK1695902T3/en active
- 2006-06-02 PL PL06252858T patent/PL1695902T3/en unknown
- 2006-06-02 DE DE602006003577T patent/DE602006003577D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-06-02 AT AT06252858T patent/ATE414011T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-06-02 EP EP06252858A patent/EP1695902B1/en not_active Revoked
- 2006-06-02 PT PT06252858T patent/PT1695902E/en unknown
- 2006-06-13 US US11/451,759 patent/US20070000424A1/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL2003728C2 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-03 | P & R Systems | METHOD FOR STABILIZING A FLOATING VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY OBJECT. |
EP2316721A1 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-04 | Presign Holding B.V. | Method for stabilizing a floating vessel against a stationary object |
NL2004166C2 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2011-07-29 | P & R Systems | Maintenance of an offshore wind farm making use of an assembly of a floating harbour ship and a plurality of shuttle vessels. |
WO2011093704A1 (en) | 2010-01-28 | 2011-08-04 | P&R Systems | Maintenance of an offshore wind farm making use of an assembly of a floating harbour ship and a plurality of shuttle vessels |
GB2485556A (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2012-05-23 | Robin Barnaby Mottram Stowell | Toothed fender for offshore transfers at sea, eg to/from a wind turbine |
EP2520485A1 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2012-11-07 | Presign Holding B.V. | System and method for mooring a floating vessel against a stationary object |
EP2660140A1 (en) * | 2012-05-03 | 2013-11-06 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | A docking device for facilitating a transfer between a vessel and an offshore structure |
US20130291777A1 (en) * | 2012-05-03 | 2013-11-07 | Niels Joergen Borch-Jensen | Docking device for facilitating a transfer between a vessel and an offshore structure |
NL2008800C2 (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2013-11-12 | D B M Fabriek En Handelsonderneming B V | Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing. |
WO2013169113A1 (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2013-11-14 | D.B.M. Fabriek En Handelsonderneming B.V. | Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing |
US11136095B2 (en) | 2012-05-11 | 2021-10-05 | Fender Innovations Holding B.V. | Fender, maritime structure, method for manufacturing |
GB2510418A (en) * | 2013-02-04 | 2014-08-06 | Windcat Workboats Ltd | Vessel fender structure with anchor points and draw mechanisms |
CN105026254A (en) * | 2013-02-04 | 2015-11-04 | 风猫作业船有限公司 | Mooring structure mounted on a vessel |
US9796453B2 (en) | 2013-02-04 | 2017-10-24 | Windcat Workboats Limited | Mooring structure mounted on a vessel |
GB2510418B (en) * | 2013-02-04 | 2018-02-28 | Windcat Workboats Ltd | Vessel fender structure with anchor points and draw mechanisms |
DE102015108882B3 (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2016-07-21 | Harald Hübner | Method for landing a vessel on a structure |
WO2016192719A1 (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2016-12-08 | Hübner Harald | Method for landing a watercraft on a building structure |
WO2016207284A1 (en) * | 2015-06-24 | 2016-12-29 | Bv Scheepswerf Damen Gorinchem | A fender and a vessel comprising a fender |
EP3109150A1 (en) * | 2015-06-24 | 2016-12-28 | BV Scheepswerf Damen Gorinchem | A fender and a vessel comprising a fender |
US11230357B2 (en) | 2017-02-09 | 2022-01-25 | Fender Innovations Holding B.V. | Marine fender |
EP3647178A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2020-05-06 | Ørsted Wind Power A/S | A ship with a bow fender |
WO2020089034A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2020-05-07 | Ørsted Wind Power A/S | A ship with a bow fender |
US11851145B2 (en) | 2018-10-29 | 2023-12-26 | Ørsted Wind Power A/S | Ship with a bow fender |
CN111071394A (en) * | 2020-01-06 | 2020-04-28 | 江苏现代造船技术有限公司 | Offshore wind power operation and maintenance ship boarding device and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PT1695902E (en) | 2009-02-09 |
US20070000424A1 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
EP1695902B1 (en) | 2008-11-12 |
ATE414011T1 (en) | 2008-11-15 |
EP1695902A3 (en) | 2006-10-11 |
GB0512097D0 (en) | 2005-07-20 |
GB2427253A (en) | 2006-12-20 |
ES2316021T3 (en) | 2009-04-01 |
DE602006003577D1 (en) | 2008-12-24 |
DK1695902T3 (en) | 2009-02-23 |
PL1695902T3 (en) | 2009-05-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1695902B1 (en) | Method of stabilizing a boat against a stationary structure | |
EP3326899B1 (en) | Wind turbine mooring system | |
US9663915B2 (en) | Floatable support structure for an offshore wind turbine or other device | |
US7284497B2 (en) | Swing mooring pontoon | |
US20200164947A1 (en) | Vessel having an improved hull shape | |
US7182034B2 (en) | Offshore floating dock | |
EP0734339B1 (en) | Boat | |
WO2011033288A2 (en) | Progressive bow transfer apparatus and method | |
US8539896B2 (en) | Lift mechanism for added stability for a swim platform of a boat | |
KR20230151547A (en) | Semi-submersible service vessel and method for floating equipment | |
CN108360460A (en) | Sightseeing ship steps on quadrupler | |
RU2200684C2 (en) | Device for placing floating structure riding at anchor in required direction head into current and/or waves | |
US11655008B2 (en) | Self-righting trimaran | |
WO2015122781A1 (en) | Improved kayak design | |
AU2013205360B2 (en) | Swing mooring pontoon | |
JPH0321397B2 (en) | ||
FR2856651A1 (en) | Aquatic vehicle for water sports, has autonomous drift connected to vessel by line, where vessel has nose having inclination with respect to drift plane and adjustable along axis | |
AU2009213066A1 (en) | Swing Mooring Pontoon | |
JP2015140026A (en) | Downfall risk prevention device for sailing ship | |
FR2652333A1 (en) | Ship or sailing boat of circular shape |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B63B 59/02 20060101ALI20060907BHEP Ipc: B63B 39/00 20060101AFI20060717BHEP |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20061127 |
|
TPAC | Observations filed by third parties |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070822 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B63B 59/02 20060101ALI20080227BHEP Ipc: B63B 39/00 20060101AFI20080227BHEP Ipc: B63B 27/30 20060101ALN20080227BHEP |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602006003577 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20081224 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20090128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2316021 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20081112 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090312 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090212 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20090615 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: EE Payment date: 20090507 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20090603 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20090616 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20090514 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20090527 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20090605 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S Effective date: 20090812 Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC Effective date: 20090810 |
|
PLAZ | Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC Effective date: 20090810 Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S Effective date: 20090812 Opponent name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S Effective date: 20090812 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20090619 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S Effective date: 20090812 Opponent name: DONG ENERGY A/S Effective date: 20090812 Opponent name: E.ON CLIMATE & RENEWABLES UK LIMITED Effective date: 20090812 Opponent name: SOUTH BOATS SPECIAL PROJECTS LTD. Effective date: 20090812 Opponent name: RWE NPOWER RENEWABLES LIMITED Effective date: 20090810 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20090709 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20090921 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20090529 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: DONG ENERGY A/S Opponent name: E.ON CLIMATE & RENEWABLES UK LIMITED Opponent name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S Opponent name: RWE NPOWER RENEWABLES LIMITED Opponent name: BONUS ENERGY A/S Opponent name: SOUTH BOATS SPECIAL PROJECTS LTD. Opponent name: RWE NPOWER PLC |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20101202 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: WINDCAT WORKBOATS LTD Effective date: 20100630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20110101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100602 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: EE Ref legal event code: MM4A Ref document number: E002893 Country of ref document: EE Effective date: 20100630 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20100602 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101202 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20110228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110101 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090602 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100602 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110101 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090513 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100602 |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 |
|
PLBJ | Opposition found inadmissible |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009275 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081112 |
|
26U | Opposition found inadmissible |
Opponent name: RWE NPOWER RENEWABLES LIMITED Effective date: 20110829 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20111118 |
|
RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20110915 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100603 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100602 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: LAPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100603 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090611 Year of fee payment: 4 |