EP1689918B1 - Method and device for order management in a production process for a fibrous product - Google Patents
Method and device for order management in a production process for a fibrous product Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1689918B1 EP1689918B1 EP04803289A EP04803289A EP1689918B1 EP 1689918 B1 EP1689918 B1 EP 1689918B1 EP 04803289 A EP04803289 A EP 04803289A EP 04803289 A EP04803289 A EP 04803289A EP 1689918 B1 EP1689918 B1 EP 1689918B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- production
- control unit
- actual
- product
- target
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
- D01D13/00—Complete machines for producing artificial threads
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
- D01D13/00—Complete machines for producing artificial threads
- D01D13/02—Elements of machines in combination
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
- D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
- D01D5/08—Melt spinning methods
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for order control of a production process for a fiber product and to an apparatus for carrying out the method according to the preamble of claim 11.
- the production of fiber products is largely determined by the quality specifications that the fiber product should have. Regardless of whether the fiber product is a single fiber or a sheet, certain use-specific properties are required. For example, from the EP 0 580 071 A2 describe the production of a synthetic fiber in which the quality of the fiber produced is continuously monitored during the process. In the case of deviations, a process change in the production process can be carried out selectively. The manufacturing process is usually monitored and controlled from a plant control unit out.
- the fiber products to be produced are determined by individual production orders. Each manufacturing lot of a fiber product is thus directly based on a production order.
- the difficulty arises that, due to the complex processing steps for producing the fiber product, a large number of influencing variables leads to disruptions in the production process being unavoidable due to fluctuating quality of the fiber product or process interruptions.
- the fiber product is divided into quality grades A, B and C.
- a production order with a target specification of a certain product quantity of quality A can only be produced as efficiently as possible if the quality levels B and C are insignificant or even non-existent during the production process.
- this can not be realized, since a bobbin with the crimped yarn is already rated B quality if, for example, a thread knot is formed inside the thread bobbin, which results from the transition from a supply bobbin to a reserve bobbin. Therefore, a planning for the execution of several successive production orders is hardly possible or only with a great deal of effort.
- Another object of the invention is to constantly monitor the manufacturing process with respect to the underlying production mission.
- the object is achieved by a method having the features of claim 1 and by a device having the features of claim 11.
- the invention is characterized in that an intelligent connection between the business processes and the manufacturing processes is created. This is already possible when creating new production orders within of the business process incorporate the current situation in the manufacturing process.
- an actual nominal evaluation is carried out between the predetermined target specification for production of a fiber product and the respective actual state of the production process, which was triggered on the basis of the production order. In this case, a deviation from the target specification is displayed, so that both the current production order located in the manufacturing process and also the following production orders can be adjusted.
- the actual state of the production process is determined by a per unit of time finished fiber product subset and from the fiber product subset a job-related actual value is calculated to the fiber product and generates a difference value from the actual target evaluation, wherein by the target specification, a product quantity and / or a production time for the given production order is determined.
- control and planning of the production order can be carried out at an early stage with the help of just a few parameters.
- the time unit which is relevant for the fiber product subset, could be given in coordination with the production time in hours, days, weeks or months.
- the cumulative fiber product partial quantity can be determined after each unit of time and the actual value calculation can be used.
- the device has a higher-level planning control unit, by means of which the actual target evaluation between the predetermined target specification determined by a production order and an actual state of the production process can be carried out.
- the planning control unit is coupled to the plant control unit via a data connection, so that the data required for determining the actual state are accessible to the planning control unit.
- the planning control unit enables automated planning for the production of a fiber product.
- a fiber product both individual synthetic fibers or natural fibers and intermediates of these fibers or flat end products of these fibers, such as tissue, Knit or braids apply.
- the device for carrying out the method in the system control unit has a means by which a fiber product partial quantity finished per unit time can be determined.
- This means can advantageously be formed by a calculation module, by means of which an evaluation of the state variables which are continuously recorded and transmitted to the plant control unit can be carried out.
- a weight control of the finished wound coils could be detected in a melt spinning process as state variables and summed up in the calculation module per given time unit to form a fiber product subset.
- the planning control unit may have means which determine the required fiber product partial quantities directly from the state variables and carry out an actual value calculation.
- the difference value resulting from the actual target evaluation can advantageously be specified as a production time difference or as a product quantity difference.
- the actual value is calculated from the time unit, the fiber product partial quantity and the product quantity.
- the actual value thus represents an anticipated production end time, which leads to a production time difference in the actual-target comparison with the predetermined production time. This determined production time difference must therefore be taken into account in the planning for the completion of the production order and at the beginning of subsequent production orders.
- the difference value could be output as a product quantity difference.
- the actual value is calculated from the fiber product partial quantity, the time unit and the production time.
- the actual value thus represents an expected Amount of product that can be created during production time.
- the actual-target comparison thus results in a product quantity difference, which must be based on the production order.
- the order-related target specifications can advantageously be given up manually by an operating unit.
- ERP enterprise resource planning
- the target specifications can be directly automated and passed on when creating a production order at the business process level.
- giving up the order-related target specification by the ERP control unit is particularly advantageous.
- a preferred embodiment of the device is designed such that the planning control unit has an interface for connecting a manual operating unit and / or an interface for connecting an ERP control unit. This makes it possible to carry out a comparison between the calculated actual values and the target specification at any time within the planning control unit.
- the difference value can be displayed both by a visualization on the operating unit or, advantageously, by a continuation to the ERP control unit.
- the effects on subsequent production orders can thus advantageously be implemented automatically in the ERP control unit at the same time so that the business processes are updated in each case.
- the difference value can already be calculated by a simple comparison module.
- the difference value can then be forwarded to the ERP control unit or to an operating unit via the interfaces of the planning control unit.
- the difference value could then trigger a change in the target specification of the current production order or a change in the target specification of the follow-on production orders.
- follow-up production orders can also be placed directly in the planning control unit, which, after adjustment between the target specification and the difference value, creates a processing plan coordinated with the follow-up orders.
- a processing plan could, for example, be given to the ERP control unit in order to be able to carry out a detailed planning.
- This is also advantageous given the opportunity to counteract an impermissible deviation in the field of business processes to the effect that the target specification of the currently processing production order or follow-up production orders to change.
- the renewed actual target evaluation leads to a new processing plan, which can be coordinated within the business process level with superordinate specifications.
- the development of the device in which the planning control unit has a means for determining a machining plan, is therefore particularly advantageous in order to specify proposals for the further processing of the production jobs.
- this makes it possible to provide the precursors that are processed into the fiber product in the manufacturing process; Taxes.
- the incorporation of the processing plans created by the planning control unit into the business processes allows a high degree of flexibility with regard to the execution and execution of a large number of production orders with one production process.
- the manufacturing process can also be divided into several independently running sub-processes.
- a thread break within a high-speed spinning process causes the production in a spinning station is interrupted. Since the wound coils do not have the required coil weights or coil diameters at the time of yarn breakage, they could, for example, only be taken into account as C quality when determining the fiber product content. However, in order to determine a relevant for the production order fiber product subset, more example, the fiber quality determining state size are required.
- the method variant, in which one or more state variables are detected with respect to the fiber product and / or the machine executing the processing steps are thus particularly suitable for being able to carry out automated planning in complex production processes. For this purpose, the relevant fiber product partial quantity is determined with the aid of the state variables.
- the process variant is preferably used, in which several production orders from multiple target orders a constant comparison with the calculated actual values and thereby depending on the adjustment, the provision of precursors of the following production orders is triggered.
- special planning algorithms can be predetermined by which, for example, priorities are predetermined.
- Fig. 1 is an embodiment of a manufacturing process for melt-spun threads the process of the invention for job control and the device according to the invention for carrying out the method described in more detail.
- a plurality of filaments of a thermoplastic material are spun and wound into coils.
- the thermoplastic material is previously condyled in a granulate preparation 1.
- the granulate preparation 1 essentially has a dryer 2 with a heater 3 and a metering 4.
- a machine control 5.1 is provided for controlling the granulate preparation 1.
- the dried granules are fed in metered form to a melt preparation 6.
- Melt preparation 6 consists essentially of an extruder 7 to which the granules are fed via a filler neck 8. Within the extruder 7, an extruder screw is driven, so that the granules are melted and discharged via a melt line 9 at the outlet of the extruder 7.
- the Melt preparation 6 is monitored and controlled by the machine control 5.2.
- a spinning device 10 For melt-spinning, treating and winding the threads, a spinning device 10, a treatment device 15 and a winding device 17 are provided.
- the spinning apparatus 10 has in detail a plurality of spinning pumps 11 which supply a plurality of spinning heads 12 with the melt.
- Each of the spinning heads 12 has a plurality of spinnerets, wherein in Fig. 1 only one spinneret is shown per spinning station. Subsequently, the freshly extruded fibers are cooled by a cooling device 13 below the spinning head.
- the treatment device 15 is formed in this embodiment by two galette units 16.1 and 16.2, through which the threads are stretched.
- the winding device 17 has at least one winding spindle 18 per spinning station, at the periphery of which a plurality of coils 19 are formed simultaneously. Thus, each thread 20 is wound into a respective coil 19.
- the spinning device 10, the treatment device 15 and the winding device 17 are monitored and controlled per spinning station by a position controller 14.
- the majority of the position control 14 are coupled via a bus system with a higher-level machine control 5.3.
- the machine controls 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 are connected to a plant control unit 22.
- the plant control unit 22 controls and monitors the entire production process from the precursor to the final fiber product.
- the sensor used within the granulate preparation 1, the melt processing 6, the spinning device 10, the treatment device 15 and the winding device 17 sensor means for monitoring the manufacturing process are not shown and explained in detail. From the DE 199 11 704 A1 For example, a manufacturing process of a synthetic thread is described, from which a monitoring of the product and machine parameters is known. In that regard, reference is made to the cited reference.
- the plant control unit 22 is connected via a data connection 24 to a higher-level planning control unit 23.
- the planning control unit 23 has an interface 25, by means of which an ERP control unit 26 is connected to the planning control unit 23.
- the ERP control unit 26 serves to represent the business processes in order, for example, to create and dispose of production orders. In this case, usual PPS software systems can be used.
- a manufacturing process is produced as a fiber product, a synthetic wound on coils thread.
- the manufacturing process is based on a production order, by which at least the amount of thread or coils to be produced is determined.
- Such production orders are created as a business process in the ERP control unit 26 and thus trigger the manufacturing process.
- the state variables of the production process which are issued to the system control unit 22 are used to determine an actual state of the respective production order with regard to the fiber products to be produced and to abandon the planning control unit 23.
- an actual value relating to the production order is extrapolated from the actual state of the production process.
- the projected actual value represents a comparison value to the target specification predefined by the ERP control unit 26.
- An actual target evaluation carried out between the actual value and the target specification thus leads to a difference value from which a fulfillment takes place directly or non-fulfillment of the production order to the specified target specifications.
- the of the planning control unit 23 through According to algorithms deposited deviation is supplied to the ERP control unit 26. This makes it possible to reconcile the business processes and in particular the production orders.
- the actual state of the production process is usually determined by a finished per unit of time fiber product subset, since the target specification of the production order is usually specified in the form of information about the amount of product or alternatively a production time or by specifying the amount of product and the production time.
- the target specification of the production order is usually specified in the form of information about the amount of product or alternatively a production time or by specifying the amount of product and the production time.
- Fig. 2 an exemplary embodiment for forming a difference value is shown, as it would be executable, for example, in the planning control unit 23 by appropriate means and stored algorithms.
- the example in Fig. 2 is a time axis with the reference t applied.
- there is a target specification which requires a production time t E. Within the production time t E is defined by the target specification, the product to be produced amount of the fiber product.
- the target specification refers here to a production order and is the planning control unit abandoned.
- the current actual state of the manufacturing process determined in view of the produced fiber products.
- the data contained in the system control unit 22 are for this purpose the planning control unit abandoned.
- the unit of time here is the period from the beginning of the manufacturing process to the time t i .
- an extrapolation of the actual value based on the production order is now carried out with the aid of the actual state.
- the production subset which was created up to the time t I , the total amount of product is compared.
- the quotient of the product quantity and the product subset multiplied by the time unit now yields an actual value for the production time.
- the actual value of the production time is in Fig.
- the production time t E can not be met, but by a difference value, in this case a production time difference is exceeded.
- the production time difference is supplied by the planning control unit of the ERP control unit, so that a business process optimization or a change of the target specification of the production order or a postponement of subsequent production orders can take place.
- Fig. 3 is shown another embodiment for monitoring and control of the production order.
- a product quantity axis M is shown.
- the target specifications which take place in the form of a maximum product quantity and a production time, are entered, the product quantity being identified by the reference symbol M E.
- the finished fiber product subset M I is determined.
- the actual state of the production process is then extrapolated in the planning control unit to an actual value based on the production order to be executed.
- the time unit associated with the fiber product subset is compared with the maximum production time. The quotient of the production time and the unit of time multiplied by the fiber product partial quantity results in an actual value for the entire product quantity.
- the actual value of the product quantity is indicated by the reference M E Ist.
- M E Ist The actual value of the product quantity.
- the difference in the product quantity indicates that the current actual state of the manufacturing process results in a smaller product volume while maintaining the maximum production time.
- the product quantity difference is fed from the planning control unit to the ERP control unit.
- Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 illustrated embodiments for monitoring a production order can already be used for simple manufacturing processes, in which only the produced fiber product subset is detected continuously. Such systems can also be executed directly without connection to an ERP control unit.
- the scheduling control unit preferably has an interface to integrate an operation unit.
- Fig. 1 the operating unit 27 is also shown. The connection of the operating unit 27 via a data connection is here indicated by dashed lines.
- a first embodiment is shown schematically.
- the plant control unit 22 is connected via a bus connection 31 to the machine controls of the manufacturing process and via a data link 24 to the planning control unit 23.
- the process, product and machine parameters transmitted via the bus connection 31 are shared within the plant control unit 22.
- a control module 32 by which a monitoring and control of the manufacturing process is executable.
- the other part of the parameters is immediately forwarded directly to the higher-level planning control unit 23.
- the parameters are given to a computing module 33, in which the current actual state of the production process is determined. From the current actual state of the production process, an extrapolation for forming the actual value is carried out in the calculation module 33. Subsequently, the actual value is supplied to a comparison module 34 in order to be able to carry out an actual nominal evaluation. For this purpose, the comparison module 34 is given the order-related target specification. From the actual target evaluation, a difference value is formed, which is supplied to an output unit 36.
- the output unit 36 can be combined with an ERP control unit or an operating unit.
- Fig. 5 a further embodiment of a signal flow for monitoring and controlling a production order is shown.
- the embodiment according to Fig. 5 is essentially identical to the embodiment according to Fig. 4 , so that only the differences are shown below.
- the system control unit 22 has a control module 32 and a computing module 35. With the calculation module 35, an actual state of the production process is determined from the product, machine and process parameters and the planning control unit 23 abandoned.
- the planning control unit 23 includes a calculation module 33 and a comparison module 34 to form a difference value from an actual target evaluation.
- a planning module 37 is provided within the planning control unit 23.
- the planning module 37 is supplied with the difference value.
- the target specifications of one or more production orders stored in the planning module 37 are compared with respect to the current difference value by means of a specific planning algorithm and converted into a processing plan and forwarded.
- the proposal for the processing plan can be directly implemented or even customized by changing the target specifications of the production orders to existing processes.
- the specification of the precursors can be controlled particularly advantageously.
- the processing plan could provide the preliminary products needed in individual production orders. This makes it possible to achieve a high utilization of the machine capacity.
- Fig. 6 is a further embodiment of a manufacturing process with inventive order control shown schematically.
- the entire manufacturing process is formed by a total of three sub-processes.
- a thermoplastic granules is produced.
- the GranulatherstellRIS is designated by the reference numeral 28.
- a multiplicity of synthetic fibers are spun from the previously produced granules.
- the so-called tire cord manufacturing process 30 the fibers are processed by cabling into a tire cord. Such tire cord fibers are used for production needed from tires.
- Each of the sub-processes 28, 29 and 30 are each monitored and controlled by a plant control unit 22.1, 22.2 and 22.3.
- the plant control units 22.1, 22.2 and 22.3 are connected in parallel to the planning control unit 23 via the data links 24.1, 24.2 and 24.3.
- the planning control unit 23 is coupled to an ERP control unit 26.
- the fiber product to be produced relates to a tire cord.
- three sub-processes have to be taken into account, with the intermediate products of the first and the second sub-process being essential for the final product quantity of the fiber product. If it turns out, for example, that problems arise in the first sub-process which lead to a defective quality of the required granulate, the entire process chain shifts, because for example only one granulate required with the quality level A is required for the spinning process.
- the planning control unit 23 is given a target specification for each sub-process as well as for the final fiber product.
- an actual nominal evaluation can be carried out in the planning control unit 23 for each subprocess so that the production order is first subdivided into individual subcontracts to be processed in succession. From the actual target evaluation for each sub-process, an effect on the entire production order can then be determined, which is continued as a difference value. This makes it possible to execute overlapping production orders.
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Auftragssteuerung eines Herstellungsprozesses für ein Faserprodukt sowie eine Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens gemäß dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 11.The invention relates to a method for order control of a production process for a fiber product and to an apparatus for carrying out the method according to the preamble of
Die Herstellung von Faserprodukten ist maßgeblich bestimmt durch die Qualitätsvorgaben, die das Faserprodukt aufweisen soll. Unabhängig ob es sich bei dem Faserprodukt um eine einzelne Faser oder ein Flächengebinde handelt, werden bestimmte verwendungsspezifische Eigenschaften gefordert. So ist beispielsweise aus der
In der Praxis sind die herzustellenden Faserprodukte durch einzelne Produktionsaufträge bestimmt. Jedem Herstellungslos eines Faserproduktes liegt somit unmittelbar ein Produktionsauftrag zugrunde. Bei der Abarbeitung mehrerer Produktionsaufträge stellt sich insbesondere in dem Herstellungsprozess von Faserprodukten die Schwierigkeit, dass aufgrund der komplexen Bearbeitungsschritte zur Herstellung des Faserproduktes eine Vielzahl von Einflussgrößen dazu führt, dass Störungen im Herstellungsprozess aufgrund schwankender Qualität des Faserproduktes oder Prozessunterbrechungen unvermeidlich sind. So werden beispielsweise bei einem Herstellungsprozess von texturierten Garnen, bei welchem ein vorgelegter synthetischer Faden verstreckt und gekräuselt wird, das Faserprodukt in Qualitätsstufen A, B und C aufgeteilt. So könnte beispielsweise ein Produktionsauftrag mit einer Soll-Vorgabe einer bestimmten Produktmenge der Qualität A nur dann möglichst effizient hergestellt werden, wenn während des Herstellungsprozesses die Qualitätsstufen B und C unwesentlich oder gar nicht anfallen. Dies lässt sich jedoch nicht realisieren, da bereits eine Fadenspule mit dem gekräuselten Garn als B-Qualität bewertet wird, wenn beispielsweise innerhalb der Fadenspule ein Fadenknoten enthalten ist, der durch den Übergang von einer Vorlagespule zu einer Reservespule entsteht. Daher ist eine Planung zur Abarbeitung mehrerer aufeinander folgender Produktionsaufträge kaum bzw. nur mit sehr viel Aufwand möglich.In practice, the fiber products to be produced are determined by individual production orders. Each manufacturing lot of a fiber product is thus directly based on a production order. During the execution of several production orders, in particular in the manufacturing process of fiber products, the difficulty arises that, due to the complex processing steps for producing the fiber product, a large number of influencing variables leads to disruptions in the production process being unavoidable due to fluctuating quality of the fiber product or process interruptions. For example, in a textured yarn production process in which a given synthetic thread is stretched and curled, the fiber product is divided into quality grades A, B and C. For example, a production order with a target specification of a certain product quantity of quality A can only be produced as efficiently as possible if the quality levels B and C are insignificant or even non-existent during the production process. However, this can not be realized, since a bobbin with the crimped yarn is already rated B quality if, for example, a thread knot is formed inside the thread bobbin, which results from the transition from a supply bobbin to a reserve bobbin. Therefore, a planning for the execution of several successive production orders is hardly possible or only with a great deal of effort.
Aus der
Demgemäß ist es Aufgabe der Erfindung ein Verfahren zur Auftragssteuerung eines Herstellungsprozesses für ein Faserprodukt sowie eine Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens zu schaffen, mit welchem eine Planung zur Ausführung von Produktionsaufträgen möglich ist.Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a method for order control of a manufacturing process for a fiber product and an apparatus for performing the method, with which a planning for the execution of production orders is possible.
Ein weiteres Ziel der Erfindung liegt darin, den Herstellungsprozess im Hinblick auf den zugrunde liegenden Produktionsauftrag ständig zu überwachen.Another object of the invention is to constantly monitor the manufacturing process with respect to the underlying production mission.
Die Aufgabe wird erfindungsgemäß durch ein Verfahren mit den Merkmalen des Anspruchs 1 sowie durch eine Vorrichtung mit den Merkmalen des Anspruchs 11 gelöst.The object is achieved by a method having the features of
Vorteilhafte Weiterbildungen der Erfindung sind durch die Merkmale und Merkmalskombinationen der einzelnen abhängigen Ansprüche definiert.Advantageous developments of the invention are defined by the features and feature combinations of the individual dependent claims.
Die Erfindung zeichnet sich dadurch aus, dass eine intelligente Verbindung zwischen den Geschäftsprozessen und den Herstellungsprozessen geschaffen wird. So lässt sich bereits beim Neuanlegen von Produktionsaufträgen innerhalb des Geschäftsprozesses die momentane Situation in dem Herstellungsprozess mit einbinden. Hierzu wird erfindungsgemäß eine Ist-Soll-Auswertung zwischen der durch einen Produktionsauftrag vorbestimmten Soll-Vorgabe zur Herstellung eines Faserproduktes und dem jeweiligen Ist-Zustand des Herstellungsprozesses, welcher aufgrund des Produktionsauftrages ausgelöst wurde, durchgeführt. Dabei wird eine Abweichung von der Soll-Vorgabe angezeigt, so dass sowohl der momentane im Herstellungsprozess befindliche Produktionsauftrag bzw. auch folgende Produktionsaufträge angepasst werden können. Dabei wird der Ist-Zustand des Herstellungsprozesses durch eine pro Zeiteinheit fertig gestellte Faserproduktteilmenge bestimmt und aus der Faserproduktteilmenge wird ein auftragsbezogener Ist-Wert zu dem Faserprodukt errechnet und ein Differenzwert aus der Ist-Soll-Auswertung erzeugt, wobei durch die Soll-Vorgabe eine Produktmenge und / oder eine Produktionszeit für den vorgegebenen Produktionsauftrag bestimmt ist. Damit kann bereits mit Hilfe weniger Parameter eine Steuerung und Planung des Produktionsauftrages zu einem frühen Zeitpunkt ausgeführt. Die Zeiteinheit, die für die Faserproduktteilmenge maßgeblich ist, könnte in Abstimmung zu der Produktionszeit in Stunden, Tagen, Wochen oder Monaten vorgegeben werden. Dabei lässt sich bei fortlaufendem Herstellungsprozess nach jeder Zeiteinheit jeweils die kumulativ hergestellte Faserproduktteilmenge ermitteln und der Ist-Wert-Berechnung zugrunde legen. Zur Durchführung des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens weist die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung eine übergeordnete Planungssteuereinheit auf, durch welche die Ist-Soll-Auswertung zwischen der durch einen Produktionsauftrag vorbestimmten Soll-Vorgabe und einem Ist-Zustand des Herstellungsprozesses ausführbar ist. Hierbei ist die Planungssteuereinheit über eine Datenverbindung mit der Anlagensteuereinheit gekoppelt, so dass die zur Bestimmung des Ist-Zustandes erforderlichen Daten der Planungssteuereinheit zugänglich sind. Die Planungssteuereinheit ermöglicht eine automatisierte Planung zur Herstellung eines Faserproduktes. Als Faserprodukt können sowohl einzelne synthetische Fasern oder Naturfasern als auch Zwischenprodukte dieser Fasern oder flächige Endprodukte aus diesen Fasern wie beispielsweise Gewebe, Gestrick oder Geflechte gelten. Außerdem weist die Vorrichtung zur Ausführung des Verfahrens in der Anlagensteuereinheit ein Mittel auf, durch welche eine pro Zeiteinheit fertiggestellte Faserproduktteilmenge bestimmbar ist. Dieses Mittel lässt sich vorteilhaft durch ein Rechenmodul ausbilden, durch welches eine Auswertung der laufend erfassten und der Anlagensteuereinheit übermittelten Zustandsgrößen ausgeführt werden kann. Im einfachsten Falle könnte beispielsweise eine Gewichtskontrolle der fertig gewickelten Spulen in einem Schmelzspinnprozess als Zustandsgrößen erfasst und in dem Rechenmodul pro vorgegebener Zeiteinheit zu einer Faserproduktteilmenge aufsummiert werden.The invention is characterized in that an intelligent connection between the business processes and the manufacturing processes is created. This is already possible when creating new production orders within of the business process incorporate the current situation in the manufacturing process. For this purpose, according to the invention, an actual nominal evaluation is carried out between the predetermined target specification for production of a fiber product and the respective actual state of the production process, which was triggered on the basis of the production order. In this case, a deviation from the target specification is displayed, so that both the current production order located in the manufacturing process and also the following production orders can be adjusted. In this case, the actual state of the production process is determined by a per unit of time finished fiber product subset and from the fiber product subset a job-related actual value is calculated to the fiber product and generates a difference value from the actual target evaluation, wherein by the target specification, a product quantity and / or a production time for the given production order is determined. This means that control and planning of the production order can be carried out at an early stage with the help of just a few parameters. The time unit, which is relevant for the fiber product subset, could be given in coordination with the production time in hours, days, weeks or months. In this case, in the case of a continuous production process, the cumulative fiber product partial quantity can be determined after each unit of time and the actual value calculation can be used. In order to carry out the method according to the invention, the device according to the invention has a higher-level planning control unit, by means of which the actual target evaluation between the predetermined target specification determined by a production order and an actual state of the production process can be carried out. In this case, the planning control unit is coupled to the plant control unit via a data connection, so that the data required for determining the actual state are accessible to the planning control unit. The planning control unit enables automated planning for the production of a fiber product. As a fiber product, both individual synthetic fibers or natural fibers and intermediates of these fibers or flat end products of these fibers, such as tissue, Knit or braids apply. In addition, the device for carrying out the method in the system control unit has a means by which a fiber product partial quantity finished per unit time can be determined. This means can advantageously be formed by a calculation module, by means of which an evaluation of the state variables which are continuously recorded and transmitted to the plant control unit can be carried out. In the simplest case, for example, a weight control of the finished wound coils could be detected in a melt spinning process as state variables and summed up in the calculation module per given time unit to form a fiber product subset.
Es ist jedoch auch möglich, dass die Planungssteuereinheit über Mittel verfügt, die unmittelbar aus den Zustandsgrößen die erforderlichen Faserproduktteilmengen ermitteln und eine Ist-Wert-Berechnung vornehmen.However, it is also possible for the planning control unit to have means which determine the required fiber product partial quantities directly from the state variables and carry out an actual value calculation.
Der aus der Ist-Soll-Auswertung sich ergebende Differenzwert kann je nach Soll-Vorgabe vorteilhaft als eine Produktionszeitdifferenz oder aber als eine Produktmengendifferenz angegeben werden. Für den Fall, dass die durch die Soll-Vorgabe vorgegebene Produktmenge zur Erfüllung des Produktionsauftrages unbedingt einzuhalten ist, wird der Ist-Wert aus der Zeiteinheit, der Faserproduktteilmenge und der Produktmenge errechnet. Der Istwert stellt somit eine voraussichtliche Produktionsendzeit dar, die bei dem Ist-Soll-Vergleich mit der vorgegebnen Produktionszeit zu einer Produktionszeitdifferenz führt. Diese ermittelte Produktionszeitdifferenz ist somit in der Planung zur Fertigstellung des Produktionsauftrages sowie zu Beginn nachfolgender Produktionsaufträge zu berücksichtigen.Depending on the target specification, the difference value resulting from the actual target evaluation can advantageously be specified as a production time difference or as a product quantity difference. In the event that the product quantity specified by the target specification is absolutely to be adhered to to fulfill the production order, the actual value is calculated from the time unit, the fiber product partial quantity and the product quantity. The actual value thus represents an anticipated production end time, which leads to a production time difference in the actual-target comparison with the predetermined production time. This determined production time difference must therefore be taken into account in the planning for the completion of the production order and at the beginning of subsequent production orders.
Für den Fall, dass die durch Soll-Vorgabe vorgegebene Produktionszeit aufgrund besonders dringlicher Folgeaufträge unbedingt einzuhalten ist, könnte der Differenzwert als eine Produktmengendifferenz ausgegeben werden. Hierzu wird der Ist-Wert aus der Faserproduktteilmenge, der Zeiteinheit und der Produktionszeit errechnet. Der Ist-Wert stellt somit eine voraussichtliche Produktmenge, die während der Produktionszeit erstellt werden kann. Bei dem Ist-Soll-Vergleich ergibt sich somit eine Produktmengendifferenz, die dem Produktionsauftrag zugrunde gelegt werden muß.In the event that the production time specified by target specification is absolutely to be adhered to because of particularly urgent follow-up orders, the difference value could be output as a product quantity difference. For this purpose, the actual value is calculated from the fiber product partial quantity, the time unit and the production time. The actual value thus represents an expected Amount of product that can be created during production time. In the actual-target comparison thus results in a product quantity difference, which must be based on the production order.
Bei einfachen Herstellungsprozessen und -anlagen lassen sich die auftragsbezogenen Soll-Vorgaben vorteilhaft manuell durch eine Bedienungseinheit aufgeben. In der Praxis werden jedoch üblicherweise ERP-Steuereinheiten (Enterprise Resource Planning) verwendet, um die Geschäftsprozesse zu führen. Somit ist es besonders vorteilhaft, wenn die Soll-Vorgaben beim Anlegen eines Produktionsauftrages auf der Geschäftsprozessebene unmittelbar automatisierte und weitergeben werden können. Somit ist das Aufgeben der auftragsbezogenen Soll-Vorgabe durch die ERP-Steuereinheit besonders vorteilhaft.In simple manufacturing processes and systems, the order-related target specifications can advantageously be given up manually by an operating unit. However, in practice, enterprise resource planning (ERP) control units are commonly used to manage business processes. Thus, it is particularly advantageous if the target specifications can be directly automated and passed on when creating a production order at the business process level. Thus, giving up the order-related target specification by the ERP control unit is particularly advantageous.
Zur Durchführung der Verfahrensvariante ist eine bevorzugte Weiterbildung der Vorrichtung derart ausgebildet, dass die Planungssteuereinheit eine Schnittstelle zur Anbindung einer manuellen Bedienungseinheit und / oder eine Schnittstelle zur Anbindung einer ERP-Steuereinheit aufweist. Damit lässt sich innerhalb der Planungssteuereinheit zu jedem Zeitpunkt ein Abgleich zwischen den errechneten Ist-Werten und der Soll-Vorgabe durchführen.To carry out the method variant, a preferred embodiment of the device is designed such that the planning control unit has an interface for connecting a manual operating unit and / or an interface for connecting an ERP control unit. This makes it possible to carry out a comparison between the calculated actual values and the target specification at any time within the planning control unit.
Um die Abweichung von der Soll-Vorgabe ständig in eine Planung umsetzen zu können, läßt sich der Differenzwert sowohl durch eine Visualisierung an der Bedienungseinheit oder aber vorteilhaft durch eine Weiterführung an die ERP-Steuereinheit anzeigen. Im letzteren Falle lassen sich damit vorteilhaft gleichzeitig die Auswirkungen auf nachfolgende Produktionsaufträge automatisiert in der ERP-Steuereinheit umsetzen, so dass die Geschäftsprozesse jeweils aktualisiert sind.In order to be able to constantly implement the deviation from the target specification in a planning, the difference value can be displayed both by a visualization on the operating unit or, advantageously, by a continuation to the ERP control unit. In the latter case, the effects on subsequent production orders can thus advantageously be implemented automatically in the ERP control unit at the same time so that the business processes are updated in each case.
Hierzu weist eine vorteilhafte Weiterbildung der Vorrichtung innerhalb der Planungssteuereinheit ein Mittel zum Erzeugen eines Differenzwertes auf. Unter der Vorraussetzung, dass der errechnete Ist-Wert und die Soll-Vorgabe auf gleicher Basis vorliegen, lässt sich der Differenzwert bereits durch einen einfachen Vergleichsmodul errechnen. Über die Schnittstellen der Planungssteuereinheit kann sodann der Differenzwert an die ERP-Steuereinheit oder an eine Bedienungseinheit weitergeleitet werden. Durch den Differenzwert könnte sodann eine Änderung der Soll-Vorgabe des gerade arbeitenden Produktionsauftrags oder eine Änderung der Soll-Vorgabe der Folgeproduktionsaufträge auslösen.For this purpose, an advantageous development of the device within the planning control unit on a means for generating a difference value. Provided that the calculated actual value and the target specification are set to On the same basis, the difference value can already be calculated by a simple comparison module. The difference value can then be forwarded to the ERP control unit or to an operating unit via the interfaces of the planning control unit. The difference value could then trigger a change in the target specification of the current production order or a change in the target specification of the follow-on production orders.
Grundsätzlich können derartige Folgeproduktionsaufträge auch unmittelbar in der Planungssteuereinheit aufgegeben sein, die nach Abgleich zwischen der Soll-Vorgabe und dem Differenzwert eine auf die Folgeaufträge abgestimmten Bearbeitungsplan erstellt. Ein derartiger Bearbeitungsplan ließe sich beispielsweise der ERP-Steuereinheit aufgeben, um eine Feinplanung ausführen zu können. Damit ist auch vorteilhaft die Möglichkeit gegeben, eine unzulässige Abweichung im Bereich der Geschäftsprozesse dahingehend entgegenzuwirken, dass die Soll-Vorgabe des gerade bearbeitenden Produktionsauftrages oder der Folgeproduktionsaufträge zu ändern. Somit führt die erneute Ist-Soll-Auswertung zu einem neuen Bearbeitungsplan, welcher innerhalb der Geschäftsprozessebene mit übergeordneten Vorgaben abgestimmt werden kann.In principle, such follow-up production orders can also be placed directly in the planning control unit, which, after adjustment between the target specification and the difference value, creates a processing plan coordinated with the follow-up orders. Such a processing plan could, for example, be given to the ERP control unit in order to be able to carry out a detailed planning. This is also advantageous given the opportunity to counteract an impermissible deviation in the field of business processes to the effect that the target specification of the currently processing production order or follow-up production orders to change. Thus, the renewed actual target evaluation leads to a new processing plan, which can be coordinated within the business process level with superordinate specifications.
Die Weiterbildung der Vorrichtung, bei welcher die Planungssteuereinheit ein Mittel zur Ermittlung eines Bearbeitungsplanes aufweist, ist daher besonders vorteilhaft, um Vorschläge für die weitere Verarbeitung der Produktionsaufträge vorzugeben. Insbesondere lassen sich damit die Bereitstellung der Vorprodukte, die in dem Herstellungsprozess zu dem Faserprodukt verarbeitete werden; steuern. Die Einbindung der durch die Planungssteuereinheit erstellten Bearbeitungspläne in die Geschäftsprozesse ermöglicht eine hohe Flexibilität hinsichtlich der Ausführung und Abwicklung einer Vielzahl von Produktionsaufträgen mit einem Herstellungsprozess. Hierbei kann der Herstellungsprozess auch an mehrere unabhängig voneinander ablaufende Teilprozesse gegliedert sein.The development of the device, in which the planning control unit has a means for determining a machining plan, is therefore particularly advantageous in order to specify proposals for the further processing of the production jobs. In particular, this makes it possible to provide the precursors that are processed into the fiber product in the manufacturing process; Taxes. The incorporation of the processing plans created by the planning control unit into the business processes allows a high degree of flexibility with regard to the execution and execution of a large number of production orders with one production process. Here, the manufacturing process can also be divided into several independently running sub-processes.
Aufgrund der komplexen Herstellungsprozesse wirken eine Vielzahl von Maschinen und Produktparametern auf das zu erstellende Faserprodukt ein. So führt beispielsweise ein Fadenbruch innerhalb eines Schnellspinnprozesses dazu, dass die Produktion in einer Spinnstelle unterbrochen ist. Da zum Zeitpunkt des Fadenbruches die gewickelten Spulen nicht die erforderliche Spulengewichte bzw. Spulendurchmesser aufweisen, könnten diese bei Bestimmung der Faserproduktteihnengen beispielsweise nur als C-Qualität berücksichtigt werden. Um dennoch eine für den Produktionsauftrag maßgebliche Faserproduktteilmenge zu bestimmen, sind weitere beispielsweise die Faserqualität bestimmende Zustandsgröße erforderlich. Die Verfahrensvariante, bei welcher ein oder mehrere Zustandsgrößen im Bezug auf das Faserprodukt und / oder der die Bearbeitungsschritte ausführende Maschine erfasst werden, sind somit besonders geeignet, um bei komplexen Herstellungsprozessen eine automatisierte Planung ausführen zu können. Hierzu werden mit Hilfe der Zustandsgrößen die maßgebliche Faserproduktteilmenge bestimmt.Due to the complex manufacturing processes, a large number of machines and product parameters influence the fiber product to be created. For example, a thread break within a high-speed spinning process causes the production in a spinning station is interrupted. Since the wound coils do not have the required coil weights or coil diameters at the time of yarn breakage, they could, for example, only be taken into account as C quality when determining the fiber product content. However, in order to determine a relevant for the production order fiber product subset, more example, the fiber quality determining state size are required. The method variant, in which one or more state variables are detected with respect to the fiber product and / or the machine executing the processing steps, are thus particularly suitable for being able to carry out automated planning in complex production processes. For this purpose, the relevant fiber product partial quantity is determined with the aid of the state variables.
Zur Erreichung einer möglichst vollständigen Auslastung der Produktionsanlage ist die Verfahrensvariante bevorzugt verwendet, bei welcher aus mehreren Soll-Vorgaben mehrere Produktionsaufträge ein ständiger Abgleich mit dem errechneten Ist-Werten erfolgt und dabei in Abhängigkeit von dem Abgleich die Bereitstellung von Vorprodukte der folgenden Produktionsaufträge ausgelöst wird. Hierbei können besondere Planungsalgorithmen vorgegeben sein, durch welche beispielsweise Prioritäten vorgegeben sind.In order to achieve as complete as possible utilization of the production plant, the process variant is preferably used, in which several production orders from multiple target orders a constant comparison with the calculated actual values and thereby depending on the adjustment, the provision of precursors of the following production orders is triggered. In this case, special planning algorithms can be predetermined by which, for example, priorities are predetermined.
Die Erfindung wird anhand einiger Ausführungsbeispiele unter Hinweis auf die beigefügten Figuren nachfolgend näher erläutert.The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to some embodiments with reference to the accompanying figures.
Es stellen dar:
- Fig. 1
- Schematisch ein erstes Ausführungsbeispiel eines Herstellungsprozesses für ein Faserprodukt mit erfindungsgemäßer Auftragssteuerung;
- Fig. 2
- schematisch ein Beispiel zur Bestimmung eines Differenzwertes für einen Produktionsauftrag;
- Fig. 3
- schematisch ein weiteres Beispiel zur Bestimmung eines Differenzwertes für einen Produktionsauftrag;
- Fig. 4
- schematisch ein Signalfluß eines Ausführungsbeispiels zur Überwachung eines Produktionsauftrages;
- Fig. 5
- schematisch ein Signalfluß eines weiteren Ausführungsbeispiels zur Überwachung eines Produktionsauftrages und
- Fig. 6
- schematisch ein mehrstufiger Herstellungsprozeß für ein Faserprodukt mit erfindungsgemäßer Auftragssteuerung.
- Fig. 1
- Schematically a first embodiment of a manufacturing process for a fiber product with order control according to the invention;
- Fig. 2
- schematically an example for determining a difference value for a production order;
- Fig. 3
- schematically another example for determining a difference value for a production order;
- Fig. 4
- schematically a signal flow of an embodiment for monitoring a production order;
- Fig. 5
- schematically a signal flow of another embodiment for monitoring a production order and
- Fig. 6
- schematically a multi-stage manufacturing process for a fiber product with order control according to the invention.
In
In dem Herstellungsprozess wird eine Vielzahl von Fäden aus einem thermoplastischen Material gesponnen und zu Spulen aufgewickelt. Hierzu wird das thermoplastische Material zuvor in einer Granulataufbereitung 1 kondentioniert. Die Granulataufbereitung 1 weist im wesentlichen einen Trockner 2 mit einer Heizung 3 sowie eine Dosierung 4 auf. Zur Steuerung der Granulataufbereitung 1 ist eine Maschinensteuerung 5.1 vorgesehen. Das getrocknete Granulat wird dosiert einer Schmelzeaufbereitung 6 zugeführt. Die Schmelzeaufbereitung 6 besteht im wesentlichen aus einem Extruder 7, dem über einen Einfüllstutzen 8 das Granulat zugeführt wird. Innerhalb des Extruders 7 ist eine Extruderschnecke angetrieben, so dass das Granulat aufgeschmolzen wird und über eine Schmelzeleitung 9 am Ausgang des Extruders 7 abgeführt. Die Schmelzeaufbereitung 6 wird über die Maschinensteuerung 5.2 überwacht und gesteuert.In the manufacturing process, a plurality of filaments of a thermoplastic material are spun and wound into coils. For this purpose, the thermoplastic material is previously condyled in a
Zum Schmelzspinnen, Behandeln und Aufwickeln der Fäden ist eine Spinnvorrichtung 10, eine Behandlungseinrichtung 15 und eine Aufwickeleinrichtung 17 vorgesehen. Die Spinnvorrichtung 10 weist im einzelnen eine Mehrzahl von Spinnpumpen 11 auf, die eine Mehrzahl von Spinnköpfen 12 mit der Schmelze versorgen. Jeder der Spinnköpfe 12 weist mehrere Spinndüsen auf, wobei in
Die Behandlungsvorrichtung 15 wird in diesem Ausführungsbeispiel durch zwei Galetteneinheiten 16.1 und 16.2 gebildet, durch welche die Fäden verstreckt werden.The
Die Aufwickeleinrichtung 17 weist pro Spinnstelle zumindest eine Spulspindel 18 auf, an deren Umfang mehrere Spulen 19 gleichzeitig gebildet werden. So wird jeder Faden 20 zu jeweils einer Spule 19 aufgewickelt.The winding
Die Spinnvorrichtung 10, die Behandlungsvorrichtung 15 und die Aufwickeleinrichtung 17 werden pro Spinnstelle durch eine Stellensteuerung 14 überwacht und gesteuert. Die Mehrzahl der Stellensteuerung 14 sind dabei über ein Bus-System mit einer übergeordneten Maschinensteuerung 5.3 gekoppelt.The
Die Maschinensteuerungen 5.1, 5.2 und 5.3 sind mit einer Anlagensteuereinheit 22 verbunden. Über die Anlagensteuereinheit 22 wird der gesamte Herstellungsprozess vom Vorprodukt bis zum Faserendprodukt gesteuert und überwacht. Die innerhalb der Granulataufbereitung 1, der Schmelzeaufbereitung 6, der Spinnvorrichtung 10, der Behandlungseinrichtung 15 und der Aufwickeleinrichtung 17 eingesetzte Sensormittel zur Überwachung des Herstellungsprozesses sind hier nicht näher dargestellt und erläutert. Aus der
Die Anlagensteuereinheit 22 ist über eine Datenverbindung 24 mit einer übergeordneten Planungssteuereinheit 23 verbunden. Die Planungssteuereinheit 23 weist eine Schnittstelle 25 auf, durch welche eine ERP-Steuereinheit 26 mit der Planungssteuereinheit 23 verbunden ist. Die ERP-Steuereinheit 26 dient zur Abbildung der Geschäftsprozesse um beispielsweise Produktionsaufträge anzulegen und zu dispositionieren. Hierbei können übliche PPS-Softwaresysteme zur Anwendung kommen.The
Bei dem in
Der Ist-Zustand des Herstellungsprozesses wird üblicherweise durch eine pro Zeiteinheit fertig gestellte Faserproduktteilmenge bestimmt, da die Soll-Vorgabe des Produktionsauftrages üblicherweise in Form von Angaben über die Produktmenge oder alternativ eine Produktionszeit oder durch Angaben der Produktmenge und der Produktionszeit vorgegeben ist. In
In
Bei dem in
Unabhängig von der Anbindung an eine EPR-Steuereinheit oder eine Bedienungseinheit ist das Zusammenwirken von der Planungssteuereinheit mit der Anlagensteuereinheit wesentlich für die Überwachung und Steuerung der Produktionsaufträge. In
In
Bei dem Ausführungsbeispiel nach
In
Bei dem in
- 11
- Granulataufbereitunggranulate preparation
- 22
- Trocknerdryer
- 33
- Heizungheater
- 44
- Dosierungdosage
- 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.35, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3
- Maschinensteuerungmachine control
- 66
- Schmelzeaufbereitungmelt preparation
- 77
- Extruderextruder
- 88th
- Einfüllstutzenfiller pipe
- 99
- Schmelzeleitungmelt line
- 1010
- Spinnvorrichtungspinning device
- 1111
- Spinnpumpespinning pump
- 1212
- Spinnkopfspinning head
- 1313
- Kühleinrichtungcooling device
- 1414
- StellensteuerungSite controller
- 1515
- Behandlungsvorrichtungtreatment device
- 16.1, 16.216.1, 16.2
- Galetteneinheitgalette
- 1717
- Aufwickeleinrichtungtakeup
- 1818
- Spulspindelwinding spindle
- 1919
- SpuleKitchen sink
- 2020
- Fadenthread
- 22, 22.1, 22.2, 22.322, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3
- AnlagensteuereinheitConditioning control unit
- 2323
- PlanzungsteuereinheitPlan Zung control unit
- 24, 24.1, 24.2, 24.324, 24.1, 24.2, 24.3
- DatenverbindungData Connection
- 2525
- Schnittstelleinterface
- 2626
- ERP-SteuereinheitERP control unit
- 2727
- Bedienungseinheitoperating unit
- 2828
- GranulatherstellungsprozessPellet production process
- 2929
- Spinnprozessspinning process
- 3030
- ReifencordherstelprozessReifencordherstelprozess
- 3131
- BUS-VerbindungBUS connection
- 3232
- Steuermodulcontrol module
- 3333
- Rechenmodulcalculation module
- 3434
- Vergleichsmodulcomparison module
- 3535
- Rechenmodulcalculation module
- 3636
- Ausgabeeinheitoutput unit
- 3737
- Planungsmodulplanning module
Claims (16)
- Method for order control in a production process for a fibre product, in which at least one primary product is provided and processed further to form the fibre product, in which the individual processing steps of the further processing are performed by machines, in which the course of the production process is determined by a target standard of a production order, and in which the actual status of the production process is recorded, an actual/target evaluation being performed between the target standard predefined by the production order and the actual status of the production process, and a deviation from the target standard being displayed, characterized in that the actual status of the production process is determined by a partial quantity of fibre product finished per unit of time, and an order-related actual value relating to the fibre product is calculated from the partial quantity of fibre product and a differential value is produced from the actual/target evaluation, a product quantity and/or a production time for the predefined production order being determined by the target standard.
- Method according to Claim 1,
characterized in that
the actual value is calculated from unit of time, the partial quantity of fibre product and the product quantity, the actual/target comparison resulting in a production time difference as a differential value. - Method according to Claim 1
characterized in that
the actual value is calculated from the partial quantity of fibre product, the unit of time and the production time, the actual/target comparison resulting in a product quantity difference as a differential value. - Method according to any one of Claims 1 to 3,
characterized in that
the order-related target standard is entered manually via an operating unit or via an ERP control unit. - Method according to Claim 4,
characterized in that
the differential value is displayed by a display on the operating unit or by a tracking system on the ERP control unit. - Method according to Claim 5,
characterized in that
a counter-check is compiled between the target standard and the differential value in relation to a plurality of subsequent production orders, and a processing plan is derived from the counter-check. - Method according to Claim 6,
characterized in that
in the case of non-fulfilment of the target standard, the target standard is modified, and a new processing plan is compiled from the renewed actual/target evaluation. - Method according to any one of the preceding Claims,
characterized in that
one or more status variables are recorded in relation to the fibre product and/or the machines executing the processing steps, the partial quantity of fibre product is determined by means of the status variables. - Method according to any one of Claims 1 to 8,
characterized in that
a plurality of target standards of a plurality of production orders are defined, the target standards and the actual value are counter-checked according to a planning algorithm, and the provision of primary products for the subsequent orders is initiated in dependence on the counter-checking. - Method according to any one of Claims 1 to 9,
characterized in that
the target standard is complemented by specifications relating to product properties and product qualities. - Apparatus for executing the method according to any one of Claims 1 to 10, having a production plant for a fibre product produced from at least one primary product, consisting of a plurality of machines (1, 6, 10, 15, 17), and having a plant control unit (22) which is connected to the machines (1, 6, 10, 15, 17) via a control and monitoring network (31), wherein a master planning control unit (23) is provided for performing an actual/target evaluation between a target standard predefined by a production order and an actual status of the production process, the planning control unit (23) being coupled to the plant control unit (22) via a data connection (24),
characterized in that
the plant control unit (22) has a means (33) by which a partial quantity of fibre product finished per unit of time can be determined. - Apparatus according to Claim 11,
characterized in that
the planning control unit (23) has an interface (25) for the connection of a manual operating unit (27) and/or an interface for the connection of an ERP control unit (26), through which the target standard of the production order can be placed. - Apparatus according to any one of Claims 11 or 12,
characterized in that
the planning control means (23) has a means (34) for generating a differential value which results from the actual/target evaluation between the target standard predefined by the production order and the actual status of the production process. - Apparatus according to any one of Claims 11 to 13,
characterized in that
the planning control unit has further means (37) for determining a processing plan with specifications for the provision of the primary product and a time sequence for the further processing. - Apparatus according to any one of Claims 11 to 14,
characterized in that
the planning control unit (23) is connected to an output unit (36) for the visual display of data and processing plans. - Apparatus according to Claim 15,
characterized in that
the output unit (36) is combined with the operating unit (27) or with the ERP control unit (26).
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10357003 | 2003-12-05 | ||
PCT/EP2004/013420 WO2005054551A1 (en) | 2003-12-05 | 2004-11-26 | Method and device for order management in a production process for a fibrous product |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1689918A1 EP1689918A1 (en) | 2006-08-16 |
EP1689918B1 true EP1689918B1 (en) | 2012-01-04 |
Family
ID=34638419
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04803289A Not-in-force EP1689918B1 (en) | 2003-12-05 | 2004-11-26 | Method and device for order management in a production process for a fibrous product |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7496421B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1689918B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1890410B (en) |
AT (1) | ATE540142T1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2378546T3 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI346849B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005054551A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101646810B (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2012-07-04 | 欧瑞康纺织有限及两合公司 | Method and device for melt spinning, treating and winding a synthetic thread |
CH702009A1 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2011-04-15 | Uster Technologies Ag | Method for optimizing a textile production process. |
WO2015135794A1 (en) * | 2014-03-08 | 2015-09-17 | Oerlikon Textile Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method and device for melt-spinning, drawing, crimping and winding multiple threads |
US10530902B2 (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2020-01-07 | Gregory Bullock | Method of operating a protocol translator |
CN108677415B (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-06-01 | 襄阳信正纺织有限公司 | Yarn sizing method |
CN108677408B (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-03-16 | 襄阳信正纺织有限公司 | Yarn dyeing and finishing process |
CN108677416B (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-06-08 | 襄阳信正纺织有限公司 | Yarn processing method |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3622448A (en) * | 1968-02-16 | 1971-11-23 | Industrial Nucleonics Corp | System and method of process control, particularly papermaking processes in response to fraction defective measurements |
US3648035A (en) * | 1969-06-02 | 1972-03-07 | Industrial Nucleonics Corp | System and method for optimizing processor or equipment profit |
US3936665A (en) * | 1972-06-12 | 1976-02-03 | Industrial Nucleonics Corporation | Sheet material characteristic measuring, monitoring and controlling method and apparatus using data profile generated and evaluated by computer means |
US3847579A (en) * | 1973-03-22 | 1974-11-12 | Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp | Method of and apparatus for processing linear elements |
SU964030A1 (en) * | 1979-12-17 | 1982-10-07 | Барнаульский Филиал Опытно-Конструкторского Бюро Автоматики | Method of monitoring the process of chemical filament prodluction |
US4453404A (en) * | 1982-11-22 | 1984-06-12 | The Mead Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining statistical characteristics of sheet material |
US4819176A (en) * | 1987-02-06 | 1989-04-04 | Treasure Isle, Inc. | Process control and data collection system |
DE3824034C1 (en) * | 1988-07-15 | 1989-09-14 | Gustav 7290 Freudenstadt De Memminger | |
DE69326978T2 (en) | 1992-07-18 | 2001-04-26 | Barmag Barmer Maschf | Process for the production and / or treatment and winding up of an endless material made of thermoplastic plastic with the output of a quality signal and recording device |
DE4492654B4 (en) | 1993-04-29 | 2004-10-21 | Saurer Gmbh & Co. Kg | Fault diagnosis in synthetic yarn mfr. - involves continuous measurement and evaluation of several parameters |
US5893055A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-04-06 | Abb Industrial Systems, Inc. | Two-dimensional web property variation modeling and control |
US6092003A (en) * | 1998-01-26 | 2000-07-18 | Honeywell-Measurex Corporation | Paper stock shear and formation control |
DE19911704A1 (en) | 1998-04-01 | 1999-10-07 | Barmag Barmer Maschf | Quality control for production of wound bobbins of melt spun filaments |
US6447639B1 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2002-09-10 | Sita Ruby Warren | Process for controlling a digester using real time measurement of moisture content and species of wood |
FI115081B (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2005-02-28 | Metso Automation Oy | Method and apparatus for controlling the operation of a pulp department of a paper machine |
DE10250442A1 (en) | 2001-11-14 | 2003-05-22 | Barmag Barmer Maschf | Synthetic fibre production and/or working unit, has several machine components, machine controls, central control unit and sensor screen |
US7035877B2 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2006-04-25 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Quality management and intelligent manufacturing with labels and smart tags in event-based product manufacturing |
US6901300B2 (en) * | 2002-02-07 | 2005-05-31 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.. | Adaptation of advanced process control blocks in response to variable process delay |
JP3616067B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2005-02-02 | 三菱レイヨン株式会社 | Fiber toe splice detection sensor and control method using the same |
CN100511039C (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2009-07-08 | 法赫尔丁·T·阿塔尔瓦拉 | Integrated optimization and control using modular model predictive controller |
US7204914B2 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2007-04-17 | Metso Automation Usa Inc. | System and method for controlling a processor including a digester utilizing time-based assessments |
CA2447098A1 (en) * | 2003-10-28 | 2005-04-28 | Centre De Recherche Industrielle Du Quebec | Method for estimating an optimal dosage of bleaching agent to be mixed with wood chips |
US7381303B2 (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2008-06-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for controlling a thermo-mechanical wood pulp refiner |
-
2004
- 2004-11-19 TW TW093135662A patent/TWI346849B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-11-26 US US11/446,639 patent/US7496421B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-11-26 WO PCT/EP2004/013420 patent/WO2005054551A1/en active Application Filing
- 2004-11-26 EP EP04803289A patent/EP1689918B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2004-11-26 AT AT04803289T patent/ATE540142T1/en active
- 2004-11-26 ES ES04803289T patent/ES2378546T3/en active Active
- 2004-11-26 CN CN2004800361593A patent/CN1890410B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2378546T3 (en) | 2012-04-13 |
TW200525322A (en) | 2005-08-01 |
ATE540142T1 (en) | 2012-01-15 |
US7496421B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 |
CN1890410B (en) | 2010-04-21 |
TWI346849B (en) | 2011-08-11 |
WO2005054551A1 (en) | 2005-06-16 |
US20070027565A1 (en) | 2007-02-01 |
CN1890410A (en) | 2007-01-03 |
EP1689918A1 (en) | 2006-08-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0410429B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for running a spinning plant | |
EP1771371B1 (en) | Method and device for controlling the quality during the production of an extruded polymer product | |
EP3802927B1 (en) | Ring-spinning line and process thereof | |
EP3260584B1 (en) | Method for optimizing the production of a rotor spinning machine | |
DE3530905C2 (en) | ||
EP0090911A2 (en) | Method and apparatus to optimize a work occurrence at each working station of a textile machine | |
EP0644282B1 (en) | Procedure for quality control during fabrication of a plurality of yarns | |
EP3760772A1 (en) | Optimization of the operation of a spinning machine | |
EP1238273B1 (en) | Method for controlling a texturing machine, and texturing machine | |
DE102004052669A1 (en) | Process and assembly to monitor the productivity and operating efficiency of a number of textile spinning stations | |
EP3672895B1 (en) | Method and device for texturing a synthetic thread | |
EP1689918B1 (en) | Method and device for order management in a production process for a fibrous product | |
DE102017110572A1 (en) | Method for monitoring and operating a plurality of melt spinning stations and a melt spinning plant with multiple melt spinning stations | |
WO2018224398A1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring a yarn tension of a running yarn | |
EP3807453B1 (en) | Method for controlling a melt spinning process and melt spinning apparatus | |
EP1266270B1 (en) | System and method for determining the optimal operating speed of a production machine | |
EP3802389B1 (en) | Automatic ring spinning system and method for automatically operating same | |
WO2013143873A1 (en) | Yarn monitoring method | |
WO2008017644A2 (en) | Method for simulating a visual image of a thread and/or a fiber product made from the thread, as well as a method and device for producing a bcf thread | |
EP1709222A1 (en) | Method for the production of a fancy yarn | |
EP4115009B1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring machinery for the production or treatment of synthetic fibres | |
WO2020035415A1 (en) | Method for monitoring a melt spinning process and melt spinning device | |
DE4440206A1 (en) | Method for assessing the sliver quality in a textile machine | |
DE19735337B4 (en) | Method of winding up melt-spun filaments | |
DE102020004467A1 (en) | Process and device for monitoring a machine plant for the production or treatment of synthetic fibers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060526 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: SEULEN, DIRK Inventor name: GROSS, JOERG Inventor name: MUEHLENMEISTER, REINHARD |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO. KG |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070820 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO. KG |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 540142 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502004013204 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120223 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2378546 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20120413 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120504 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120405 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120504 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121005 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502004013204 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121005 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20121121 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20121124 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20121126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 540142 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121126 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041126 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20150529 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131127 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20161205 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20171120 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20171123 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502004013204 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180602 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |