EP1667806A1 - Verfahren zur vorhersage und steuerung der vergiessbarkeit von flüssigstahl - Google Patents

Verfahren zur vorhersage und steuerung der vergiessbarkeit von flüssigstahl

Info

Publication number
EP1667806A1
EP1667806A1 EP04763467A EP04763467A EP1667806A1 EP 1667806 A1 EP1667806 A1 EP 1667806A1 EP 04763467 A EP04763467 A EP 04763467A EP 04763467 A EP04763467 A EP 04763467A EP 1667806 A1 EP1667806 A1 EP 1667806A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
castability
melt
predicting
controlling
liquid steel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP04763467A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Thomas Matschullat
Hans-Jürgen OEYNHAUSEN
Klaus Pronold
Hans-Herbert Welker
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP1667806A1 publication Critical patent/EP1667806A1/de
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/06Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths into moulds with travelling walls, e.g. with rolls, plates, belts, caterpillars
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D2/00Arrangement of indicating or measuring devices, e.g. for temperature or viscosity of the fused mass

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for predicting and controlling the castability of liquid steel by analyzing the chemical composition of a melt to be cast, performing an alloy calculation and determining alloying elements and / or additives to achieve certain material properties of the steel and defining • driving diagrams for the further treatment of the Melt.
  • Such processes are used in steel production.
  • the molten steel is delivered by a steel mill.
  • the secondary metallurgy is carried out in a ladle furnace upstream of a thin strip caster.
  • certain secondary metallurgical devices are provided in or on the ladle furnace in order to treat the liquid steel metallurgically.
  • precise analyzes of the melt can be carried out, and the melt can also be precisely thermally conditioned.
  • the liquid steel is treated in the ladle furnace by adding alloying agents, slag formers, reducing agents, desulfurizing agents, etc., whereby these additives are added automatically or manually.
  • the slag can be added by adding oxygen or by flushing with an inert gas such as e.g. Be treated with argon.
  • the liquid steel can be stirred electromagnetically in the pan, and electrical energy can also be supplied to it via carbon electrodes. The arc running from the electrodes to the melt causes the alloying elements to melt and enables the thermal conditioning of the melt.
  • Steel strip with a strip thickness of up to 10 mm is usually produced in thin strip casting plants. Conditioning the
  • Liquid steel is said to be non-castable if the cast strip breaks, for example when casting in the thin strip casting plant, the cast material has surface defects or structural defects of a general nature and causes system malfunctions as a result of the non-castable liquid steel, e.g. sticking on the casting rolls, etc. So far, attempts have been made , this Problems related to the castability are essentially to be solved in the thin strip caster itself. However, these attempts were only partially successful, since many melts proved to be non-pourable.
  • the invention is therefore based on the problem of improving the method for predicting and controlling the castability of liquid steel in such a way that the error rate is significantly reduced.
  • the invention is based on the surprising finding that interactions exist between the alloy and / or additive elements, which not only see the mechanical properties but also the castability of the
  • the current proportions of the two alloying elements shown are entered in the coordinate system, this instantaneous value being symbolized by a point.
  • the graphic shows immediately whether the melt is within the tolerance range or not.
  • those interactions that have an influence on the castability of the melt must also be taken into account.
  • the method according to the invention provides that the information “pourable” or “non-pourable” is assigned to each poured melt.
  • the method according to the invention provides that, based on the data collection of cast melts and the alloy elements and / or additives related to one another, at least one permissible range of values for the proportions of the alloy elements and / or additives is defined within which a castable Melt is expected.
  • This permissible value range is a subset of the value range mentioned above, in which only those interactions are taken into account that have an influence on the material properties.
  • the range of values which specifies the permissible proportions of the individual alloying elements and aggregates, must already be cast, taking into account the data collection
  • the permissible range of values for the proportions is defined as the intersection of a plurality of inequalities. Due to an inequality, the entire x-y area of the coordinate system can be divided into two parts, namely a valid and an invalid area. Graphically, a surface on one side of a straight line corresponds to an inequality.
  • the coordinate axes can be used to determine permissible value ranges, since the alloy elements can only take positive numbers, only the first quadrant has to be considered.
  • the permissible range of values it will generally be necessary to determine the permissible range of values as an intersection of several intersecting straight lines. If the axes of the coordinate system are not taken into account, at least three straight lines are required in order to clearly define a range of values. In practice, it has been found that more than three inequalities, in particular four, are often required for a meaningful determination of the value range.
  • the method according to the invention can be carried out particularly quickly and in part automatically if the changing Effects of the alloy and / or addition elements can be implemented as mathematical models in a computer system.
  • the calculation and graphical representation of the value ranges requires comparatively little computing time, so that immediately after a melt analysis has been carried out it can be determined whether the proportions of the individual alloying elements and additives are within the permissible value range or whether further treatment steps are required.
  • the method according to the invention for predicting and controlling the castability of liquid steel is carried out iteratively automatically by the computer system.
  • fuzzy logic methods are used for the mathematical models in the method according to the invention.
  • neural networks are used for the mathematical models.
  • the alloy calculation can be carried out by preselecting those alloy and / or additive elements which have an influence on the castability of the melt. Studies have shown that only some of the alloying elements influence the castability. If a melt has ten elements, one would have to examine the first element with the remaining nine elements. The second element with eight elements etc., so that a large number of element pairs would have to be taken into account. It is therefore expedient to consider only those alloy elements or pairs of alloy and / or additive elements that actually affect the castability of the melt. In this way, the number of element pairs to be taken into account can be considerably reduced. This also reduces the number of inequalities to be taken into account or boundary conditions, which makes it easier to solve the systems of equations.
  • the method according to the invention can be designed such that interactions of the following pairs of alloy elements and / or additives are taken into account in the alloy calculation: N / ⁇ 2 , Zn / ⁇ 2 , S / Zn, C / Zn, Mn / S, Mn / N , Si / C, Al / C, in particular Si / 0 2 , S / ⁇ 2 , Al / 0 2 , S / C, N / C. From the eight selected alloy elements mentioned, 28 pairs can theoretically be combined. However, it has been shown that only 13 of these pairs have an influence on the castability. Of these, five pairs of alloying elements or additives have a serious influence on the castability. If only these five pairs are taken into account with regard to a rational process, excellent results can already be achieved in terms of predicting and controlling the castability.
  • the permissible value range for a or each alloy element or one or each additive and the actual value measured in the melt result in a castable melt.
  • the actual value can be indicated in the graphic as a point or cross or the like, so that it can be seen at a glance whether it is within the permissible value range or not.
  • This graphic representation is displayed for each of the pairs of values taken into account, so that an operator can knows whether all boundary conditions that have an influence on the castability are fulfilled. Otherwise, it recognizes which alloy elements require further treatment, for example by adding the alloy element further.
  • the permissible value range for an alloy element or an additive, which results from the desired material properties is displayed.
  • an updated actual value of an alloy element or an additive is displayed after a treatment step carried out on the melt. In this way it can be checked immediately whether the treatment step has led to the desired success.
  • the method according to the invention can be used particularly advantageously in a thin strip casting installation which works according to the two-roll casting method.
  • the invention relates to a control device for a secondary metallurgical plant, in particular a ladle furnace, with a means for analyzing the chemical composition of a melt to be cast, a means for performing an alloy calculation for determining alloying elements and / or additives to achieve certain material properties of the steel and a means for establishing driving diagrams for the further treatment of the melt.
  • the control device is designed to carry out the described method.
  • Fig. 1 shows schematically the sequence of the method according to the invention
  • Fig. 4 is a diagram showing the proportions of the elements silicon and oxygen and the pourable area.
  • FIG. 1 schematically shows the sequence of the method for predicting and controlling the pourability of liquid steel.
  • the starting point of the process is a melt analysis to determine the chemical composition of the melt to be cast.
  • the melt is located in a ladle furnace, which is upstream of a thin strip caster.
  • the metallurgical treatment of the liquid steel takes place in the ladle furnace in order to set the required material parameters. Electrical or thermal energy can be supplied to the melt via graphite electrodes in order to trigger certain chemical reactions.
  • the melt can be stirred electromagnetically in the ladle furnace.
  • the addition of alloying elements and additives such as slag Formers, reducing agents, desulfurizing agents, etc. is done automatically or manually. It is also possible to purge the liquid steel with an inert gas such as argon or to add oxygen.
  • an alloy calculation 1 is carried out in order to set metallic and non-metallic alloy elements in a defined range.
  • the alloy calculation is used to calculate the type and quantity of additives and alloying elements so that the batch of liquid steel currently in the ladle furnace can be modified and treated in such a way that it meets the requirements.
  • the individual alloy elements must be present in the correct quantity ratio, that is, in the correct concentration, with tolerance bands with a lower and upper limit for each element.
  • this method takes into account interactions between the alloying elements and additives that have an influence on the castability.
  • the mathematical models used in alloy calculation 1 take these interactions into account, so that the melt is very likely to be cast after treatment.
  • melt fulfills the requirements regarding the material properties of the finished steel, but e.g. Surface defects on or the steel stuck to the casting rolls, so that the melt had to be discarded as not pourable.
  • the process is continued by determining driving diagrams 2 for the electric furnace rack and the ladle furnace. If the result Alloy calculation 1 reads "not castable", for example further alloy elements or additives have to be added or treatment steps such as the addition of an inert gas or oxygen are required.
  • the driving diagrams for driving the ladle furnace are determined and specifications are made about the addition of metallic and non-metallic additives and the further treatment. The consideration of the interactions that have an influence on the castability leads to additional conditions for the driving diagrams or to a switching of a driving diagram.
  • the driving diagrams are determined for the ladle furnace and the secondary metallurgy.
  • This procedure is advantageous with regard to the selection of the melts. If a melt proves not to be pourable or if the measures to produce the castability are too complex, it can be decided to reject the melt. In this case, the melt would have to be treated again in the steel mill. This procedure avoids errors in production costs and conserves resources.
  • the melt can be brought into a castable state by means of metallic or non-metallic additives and if this procedure is not too complex, then the cast diagrams for the ladle furnace and the secondary metallurgy can be used to achieve the castability of the melt. In this case, too, there is the advantage of avoiding production errors and conserving resources.
  • the melt can be treated in the ladle furnace with the travel diagram planned for it and released for the thin strip casting plant. If one recognizes that the melt can be adjusted even more favorably metallurgically, taking into account the interactions affecting the material properties, this can be implemented while maintaining the castability. This has the advantage that the melt can be optimally adjusted metallurgically, taking into account the castability. In this case too, errors in production costs are avoided and resources are spared.
  • control parameters for the further treatment of the melt are obtained by determining the driving diagrams.
  • the value ranges for the proportions of the elements x and y are plotted on the x and y axes, respectively.
  • the value range of each element is limited by two axially parallel straight lines, which indicate the minimum or maximum concentration of the respective substance in the melt. If the analysis value of the melt lies within the intersection of these straight lines, the requirements for the material properties are met.
  • Fig. 2 the pourable area is represented by the straight sections 3, 4, 5.
  • a melt that meets the requirements for material properties on the one hand and the requirements for castability on the other must lie in the intersection of both surfaces.
  • This valid area 6 is shown hatched in FIG. 2.
  • a value 7 is known from a melt analysis which fulfills the conditions for conventional casting operation, since it lies within the range of values of the elements x and y, provided the material properties are affected. However, it is not within the valid range 6, so it can be expected that this melt is not pourable.
  • This examination which is exemplarily explained on the basis of the elements x and y, is to be carried out for all relevant value pairs, all of which must lie within the valid value range. At least the following pairs of values should be checked: Si / 0, S / ⁇ 2 , Al / 0 2 , S / C, N / C. If the examination of these conditions leads to the result that all elements lie within the valid ranges, the melt is very likely to be pourable. If any value is not within the valid range, a further treatment step is necessary, for example by adding an alloying element. However, it should be noted that when adding an alloy element, the proportions or concentrations of the other alloy elements and additives to be taken into account are also influenced. These relationships are generally not linear and complex.
  • the mathematical models that take account of these interactions, which have an influence on the castability, therefore include methods such as neural networks or fuzzy logic.
  • an iterative calculation or an optimization calculation is therefore carried out in order to achieve the target with the minimum amount of alloy achievement elements or as inexpensively as possible.
  • FIG. 3 shows a diagram of the proportions of the elements sulfur and carbon.
  • the concentration of carbon in the melt is plotted on the x-axis, and the concentration of sulfur on the y-axis.
  • the triangular surface 9 shown in FIG. 3 shows the region of the castability of the sulfur / carbon element pair.
  • the first analysis value 10 lies outside the triangular area 9, that is to say the melt cannot be cast in this state.
  • the melt is therefore treated, for example by adding an additive, in order to increase the proportion of carbon and to reduce the proportion of sulfur.
  • an analysis is carried out again and the analysis value 11 results.
  • a second treatment step is necessary until the analysis value 12 results.
  • the analysis value 12 lies within the triangular area 9, ie within the pourable area. At the same time, however, it must also be ensured that the other elements or pairs of elements to be taken into account are within their valid ranges.
  • Fig. 4 shows the proportions of the elements silicon and oxygen and the pourable area.
  • the pourable region 13 in FIG. 4 is indicated by a plurality of sections of the furnace which do not form a closed surface.
  • the castable area can also be specified by parabola sections or sections of trigonometric functions.
  • the aim should be to define the valid ranges using straight line sections in order to keep the calculation effort within limits.
  • the first analysis value 14 lies outside the pourable area 13. After the treatment of the melt, the analysis value 15 was determined, in which the oxygen content was increased, but was too high, so that the value 15 was again outside the pourable area 13 , The analysis value 16, which complies with the conditions for the elements silicon and oxygen, was only measured after a further treatment step.
  • the method provides that the operator is shown the diagrams for the five most important pairs of elements simultaneously on a display.
  • the analysis values for individual alloying elements or aggregates can be shown as numerical values in a table. In this way, the operator can see at a glance which values are already in order and which require further treatment.
  • the measured values of this melt are stored in a database, so that the mathematical models can access an ever-growing database, which increases the probability of prediction.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Continuous Casting (AREA)
  • Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
EP04763467A 2003-08-26 2004-07-23 Verfahren zur vorhersage und steuerung der vergiessbarkeit von flüssigstahl Ceased EP1667806A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10339595A DE10339595A1 (de) 2003-08-26 2003-08-26 Verfahren zur Vorhersage und Steuerung der Vergießbarkeit von Flüssigstahl
PCT/EP2004/008300 WO2005021186A1 (de) 2003-08-26 2004-07-23 Verfahren zur vorhersage und steuerung der vergiessbarkeit von flüssigstahl

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1667806A1 true EP1667806A1 (de) 2006-06-14

Family

ID=34258251

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04763467A Ceased EP1667806A1 (de) 2003-08-26 2004-07-23 Verfahren zur vorhersage und steuerung der vergiessbarkeit von flüssigstahl

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US7543628B2 (zh)
EP (1) EP1667806A1 (zh)
CN (1) CN1842384B (zh)
DE (1) DE10339595A1 (zh)
WO (1) WO2005021186A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103341604B (zh) * 2013-06-26 2015-07-15 湖南镭目科技有限公司 一种连铸结晶器自动加渣控制的方法、系统及装置
AU2015394657B2 (en) * 2015-05-11 2019-07-11 Arcelormittal Method of determining a chemical composition of a slag portion
CN105868483A (zh) * 2016-04-11 2016-08-17 贵州大学 一种铸钢流动性预测方法
JP6617842B1 (ja) * 2019-01-17 2019-12-11 Jfeスチール株式会社 金属材料の設計支援方法及び設計支援装置

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6296948B1 (en) * 1981-02-17 2001-10-02 Ati Properties, Inc. Amorphous metal alloy strip and method of making such strip
FI73528C (fi) * 1983-06-30 1987-10-09 Valtion Teknillinen Foerfarande foer kontrollering av en tvaofasig processmaelta av gjutmaessing.
US4919711A (en) * 1987-06-29 1990-04-24 Aqualon Company Binder for metal-containing ores
US4946644A (en) * 1989-03-03 1990-08-07 Baltimore Specialty Steels Corporation Austenitic stainless steel with improved castability
CN1056715A (zh) * 1990-08-24 1991-12-04 吴君旺 废铁屑炼铁真接浇注铸件工艺
CH684172A5 (de) * 1990-10-26 1994-07-29 Branko Hribovsek Dr Alexander Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Vergiessbarkeit und des Reinheitsgrades von Stahlschmelzen für Strangguss.
KR100188551B1 (ko) * 1993-11-22 1999-06-01 아사무라 다까시 강판 제조공정에 있어서의 표면결함이 적은 극저탄소강연속주조슬래브 및 극저탄소박강판 및 그것들의제조방법
US5582657A (en) * 1993-11-25 1996-12-10 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat-resistant, ferritic cast steel having high castability and exhaust equipment member made thereof
US5855697A (en) * 1997-05-21 1999-01-05 Imra America, Inc. Magnesium alloy having superior elevated-temperature properties and die castability
FR2790485B1 (fr) 1999-03-05 2002-02-08 Usinor Procede de coulee continue entre cylindres de bandes d'acier inoxydable ferritique a haute ductilite, et bandes minces ainsi obtenues
JP4379753B2 (ja) * 1999-04-05 2009-12-09 日立金属株式会社 排気系部品、およびそれを用いた内燃機関、並びに排気系部品の製造方法
DE10042386A1 (de) * 2000-08-29 2002-03-28 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Bestimmung der thermischen Materialeigenschaften von Metall-Formteilen
DE10100790C2 (de) * 2001-01-10 2003-07-03 Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh Nickel-Basislegierung für die gießtechnische Herstellung einkristallin erstarrter Bauteile
KR100400905B1 (ko) * 2001-05-25 2003-10-08 주식회사 우진 내산성이 우수한 고규소주철 및 그 제조방법

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2005021186A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1842384B (zh) 2010-12-22
CN1842384A (zh) 2006-10-04
WO2005021186A1 (de) 2005-03-10
US20070000578A1 (en) 2007-01-04
US7543628B2 (en) 2009-06-09
DE10339595A1 (de) 2005-04-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3096896B1 (de) Verfahren zur optimierten herstellung von metallischen stahl- und eisenlegierungen in warmwalz- und grobblechwerken mittels eines gefügesimulators, -monitors und/oder -modells
AT525791B1 (de) Überwachungsverfahren für eine Stranggießkokille mit Aufbau einer Datenbank
DE4338607B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Führung eines Prozesses in einem geregelten System
DE102009051955A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung der Erstarrung eines Gießstrangs in einer Stranggießanlage beim Anfahren des Gießprozesses
EP1324845B1 (de) Verfahren zum betreiben einer anlage der grundstoffindustrie
DE102011082158A1 (de) Gießverfahren, insbesondere Stranggießverfahren
DE19637917C2 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Entwurf oder zur Steuerung des Prozeßablaufs einer Anlage der Grundstoffindustrie
WO2005021186A1 (de) Verfahren zur vorhersage und steuerung der vergiessbarkeit von flüssigstahl
EP1658533B1 (de) Verfahren und einrichtung zur steuerung einer anlage zur herstellung von stahl
DE3311246A1 (de) Verfahren zur steuerung der anzeige einer numerischen steuereinrichtung
EP1448330B1 (de) Verfahren zum stranggiessen
EP3065015B1 (de) Diagnoseeinrichtung und -verfahren zur überwachung des betriebs von regelkreisen
DE3005738C2 (de) Numerische Steuereinrichtung für eine Werkzeugmaschine
DE19832762C2 (de) Gießwalzanlage, insbesondere Dünnbrammengießwalzanlage
CH694117A5 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Drahtentladungsbearbeitung.
DE3242828C2 (de) Verfahren und Anordnung zum Elektroschlacken-Umschmelzen
WO2020224839A1 (de) Verfahren zum betreiben einer industriellen anlage
WO2020244850A1 (de) VORRICHTUNG UND VERFAHREN ZUR STEUERUNG KOMPLEXER PRODUKTIONSABFOLGEN IN GROßTECHNISCHEN ANLAGEN INSBESONDERE DER STAHLINDUSTRIE
EP3488948A1 (de) Verfahren zur analyse von fehlerursachen beim stranggiessen
DE2611278A1 (de) Verfahren zur herstellung kugelig gegossenen eisens
WO2023006834A1 (de) Verfahren zur feststellung einer defektwahrscheinlichkeit eines gegossenen produktabschnittes
EP4455312A1 (de) Betriebsverfahren für eine hüttentechnische anlage der eisen- oder stahlerzeugung
DE3026234C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Auftragschweißen von variabel legierbaren Schichten
EP4320489A1 (de) Optimierungsverfahren für den betrieb von anlagen der grundstoffindustrie
DE4324528C2 (de) Recheneinrichtung zur Bestimmung von Entschwefelungszusätzen für eine Stahlschmelze und Stahlschmelze mit Entschwefelungszusätzen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060227

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR IT SE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR IT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20060914

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR IT SE

APBN Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E

APBR Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E

APAF Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE

APBT Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20100708