EP1662638B1 - Carbon brush - Google Patents

Carbon brush Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1662638B1
EP1662638B1 EP03818580A EP03818580A EP1662638B1 EP 1662638 B1 EP1662638 B1 EP 1662638B1 EP 03818580 A EP03818580 A EP 03818580A EP 03818580 A EP03818580 A EP 03818580A EP 1662638 B1 EP1662638 B1 EP 1662638B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
particle size
graphite particles
graphite
carbon brush
particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP03818580A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1662638A1 (en
EP1662638A4 (en
Inventor
Hidenori c/o Totankako Co. Ltd. SHIRAKAWA
Yoshikazu c/o Totankako Co. Ltd. KAGAWA
Takashi c/o Totankako Co. Ltd. MAEDA
Takahiro c/o TOTANKAKO CO. LTD. SAKODA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyo Tanso Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Toyo Tanso Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyo Tanso Co Ltd filed Critical Toyo Tanso Co Ltd
Priority to SI200331559T priority Critical patent/SI1662638T1/en
Publication of EP1662638A1 publication Critical patent/EP1662638A1/en
Publication of EP1662638A4 publication Critical patent/EP1662638A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1662638B1 publication Critical patent/EP1662638B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01RELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE CONNECTIONS; STRUCTURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF A PLURALITY OF MUTUALLY-INSULATED ELECTRICAL CONNECTING ELEMENTS; COUPLING DEVICES; CURRENT COLLECTORS
    • H01R39/00Rotary current collectors, distributors or interrupters
    • H01R39/02Details for dynamo electric machines
    • H01R39/18Contacts for co-operation with commutator or slip-ring, e.g. contact brush
    • H01R39/20Contacts for co-operation with commutator or slip-ring, e.g. contact brush characterised by the material thereof
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01RELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE CONNECTIONS; STRUCTURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF A PLURALITY OF MUTUALLY-INSULATED ELECTRICAL CONNECTING ELEMENTS; COUPLING DEVICES; CURRENT COLLECTORS
    • H01R39/00Rotary current collectors, distributors or interrupters
    • H01R39/02Details for dynamo electric machines
    • H01R39/18Contacts for co-operation with commutator or slip-ring, e.g. contact brush
    • H01R39/26Solid sliding contacts, e.g. carbon brush

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns a carbon brush which uses a graphite particle filler and which is for use in electric machines and, particularly, it relates to a carbon brush which prevents desorption of particles of the filler during use.
  • carbon brushes have been known.
  • they include those disclosed in JP-A No. 2000-197315 .
  • Those in this document use artificial graphite particles or natural graphite particles, etc. as the filler.
  • the artificial graphite particles, natural graphite particles, etc. used as the filler have been controlled loosely during use, for example, distinguishing between fine powder and coarse powder, the filler structures of the formed carbon brushes have not been uniform, but those not having uniform particle size have been predominant.
  • the present inventors have made an earnest study, as a result, have found that use of the graphite particles for forming a filler of a controlled grain size distribution is extremely important for extending the life of the carbon brush, and have accomplished the invention. That is, when graphite particles are measured forming the filler by a laser diffraction method, the carbon brush according to the invention has a grain size distribution in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a grain size of 5 ⁇ m or less is 10% or less that of all the graphite particles.
  • the distribution of particle diameters is controlled so that the accumulated value of graphite particles with a grain size of 5 ⁇ m or less is 10% or less and, preferably, 5% that of all the graphite particles or less, and further, the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 ⁇ m or more is 10% or less, that from 10 to 40 ⁇ m is 60% or more, and that from 12 to 20 ⁇ m is 40% or more of the whole.
  • the principle of the laser diffraction method will here be described.
  • a laser light monochromatic light, parallel beam
  • a spatial distribution pattern of light intensity of diffracted and scattered lights is formed.
  • the distribution pattern of light intensity is detected by a sensor.
  • the distribution pattern of light intensity changes depending on the size of particles.
  • the distribution pattern of light intensity formed from the group of particles is an overlap of diffracted and scattered lights from respective particles.
  • the overlapped distribution pattern of light intensity can be detected and the size of the particles and the ratio of them contained in the group of sample particles can be calculated from this data of the distribution pattern of light intensity.
  • distribution of the grain size can be obtained.
  • a graph as shown in Fig. 1 can be obtained.
  • the abscissa indicates the particle size ( ⁇ m) (logarithmic expression) and the ordinate indicates relative amount of particles (%).
  • the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size from 10 to 40 ⁇ m in the particle size distribution resulting from measurement of graphite particles by a laser diffraction method in Fig. 1 means the ratio of the area of the hatched portion (portion corresponding to the particle size of from 10 to 40 ⁇ m) to the area surrounded by the particle size distribution line and the abscissa.
  • graphite particles of artificial graphite or natural graphite can be used. Further, they may be a mixture thereof.
  • the resin for bonding the particles of the graphite particles epoxy resin, phenol resin and various thermosetting resin obtained by modifying them, etc. can be used.
  • the amount of resin used is preferably from 10 to 40%.
  • thermosetting resin for use as the binder of the graphite particles was molded into a predetermined shape and heat treated at a temperature of 150 to 250°C at which the resin is cured to prepare a carbon brush.
  • a solid lubricant such as molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide or boron nitride can also be added in addition to the filler.
  • the invention can be applied not only to the thermosetting carbon brush described above but also to various kinds of carbon brushes referred to as a carbon graphite type or metallic graphite type, formed by kneading with a phenol resin or pitch and firing, whereby similar effects can be obtained.
  • SALD-2000A As a grain size distribution measuring apparatus of laser diffraction type, SALD-2000A manufactured by Shimazu Seisakusho Co. was used. This was used also in the subsequent examples and comparative examples.
  • the particle size distribution calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method was adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 5 ⁇ m or less was 30% and the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 100 ⁇ m or more was 10%, and 25% by weight of a general-purpose epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 ⁇ m or less were about 50%, it was molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • the particle size distribution calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method was adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 5 ⁇ m or less was 40%, the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 100 ⁇ m or more was 15%, and the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size from 10 to 40 ⁇ m was 55%, and 25% by weight of a general-purpose epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 ⁇ m or less were about 50%, they were molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • FIG. 3 collectively shows the characteristics of each of the carbon brushes.
  • the working life of the carbon brush of Example 2 in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 ⁇ m or less was 5% and the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 ⁇ m or more was 10% in the particle size distribution calculated from measurement of the graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method is extended by about twice that of the not controlled carbon brush in Comparative Example 2.
  • the invention can provide a carbon brush with greatly extended working life compared with existent products.

Landscapes

  • Motor Or Generator Current Collectors (AREA)
  • Carbon And Carbon Compounds (AREA)
  • Battery Electrode And Active Subsutance (AREA)

Abstract

The particle size distribution calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method is controlled so that the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 µm or less is 10% or less and preferably, 5% or less, the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 µm or more is 10% or less, and the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of from 10 to 40 µm is 60% or more, and the graphite particles with a particle size of from 12 to 20 µm is 40% or more of the whole.

Description

    Technical Field
  • The present invention concerns a carbon brush which uses a graphite particle filler and which is for use in electric machines and, particularly, it relates to a carbon brush which prevents desorption of particles of the filler during use.
  • Background Art
  • Heretofore, carbon brushes have been known. For example, they include those disclosed in JP-A No. 2000-197315 . Those in this document use artificial graphite particles or natural graphite particles, etc. as the filler. Then, since the artificial graphite particles, natural graphite particles, etc. used as the filler have been controlled loosely during use, for example, distinguishing between fine powder and coarse powder, the filler structures of the formed carbon brushes have not been uniform, but those not having uniform particle size have been predominant.
  • By the way, inputs to motors have been increased and also the usage conditions for carbon brushes have become severer in recent years. In the situation described above, the invention described in the document above sometimes has desorption of particles, etc. during use, which shortens the working life.
  • In view of the above, it is an object of the present invention to make the filler structure uniform for the graphite particle filler and provide a carbon brush using the graphite particle filler and which has long working life.
  • Disclosure of the Invention
  • In order to solve the foregoing subject, the present inventors have made an earnest study, as a result, have found that use of the graphite particles for forming a filler of a controlled grain size distribution is extremely important for extending the life of the carbon brush, and have accomplished the invention. That is, when graphite particles are measured forming the filler by a laser diffraction method, the carbon brush according to the invention has a grain size distribution in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a grain size of 5 µm or less is 10% or less that of all the graphite particles.
  • Brief Explanation of the Drawings
    • Fig. 1 is a graph showing an example of a grain size distribution, Fig. 2 is a graph showing another example of the grain size distribution, and Fig. 3 is a table showing characteristics of examples of the invention and comparative examples.
    Best Mode for Practicing the Invention
  • When measuring graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method, the distribution of particle diameters is controlled so that the accumulated value of graphite particles with a grain size of 5 µm or less is 10% or less and, preferably, 5% that of all the graphite particles or less, and further, the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 µm or more is 10% or less, that from 10 to 40 µm is 60% or more, and that from 12 to 20 µm is 40% or more of the whole. This makes the structure of the graphite particles for forming the filler uniform. Accordingly, in the carbon brush using the graphite particle filler, even when desorption of particles occurs during use, the amount of desorbed particles is small, which has the effect of extending the life of the brush.
  • The principle of the laser diffraction method will here be described. When a laser light (monochromatic light, parallel beam) is irradiated to particles as an object of measurement, a spatial distribution pattern of light intensity of diffracted and scattered lights is formed. The distribution pattern of light intensity is detected by a sensor. The distribution pattern of light intensity changes depending on the size of particles.
  • Since particles are actually measured as a group, and a plurality of particles of different sizes are present together, the distribution pattern of light intensity formed from the group of particles is an overlap of diffracted and scattered lights from respective particles.
  • Upon measurement by grain size distribution a measuring apparatus of laser diffraction type using the laser diffraction method, the overlapped distribution pattern of light intensity can be detected and the size of the particles and the ratio of them contained in the group of sample particles can be calculated from this data of the distribution pattern of light intensity. Thus, through calculation, distribution of the grain size can be obtained.
  • For example, a graph as shown in Fig. 1 can be obtained. In the graph of Fig. 1, the abscissa indicates the particle size (µm) (logarithmic expression) and the ordinate indicates relative amount of particles (%). In this case, "the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size from 10 to 40 µm in the particle size distribution resulting from measurement of graphite particles by a laser diffraction method" in Fig. 1 means the ratio of the area of the hatched portion (portion corresponding to the particle size of from 10 to 40 µm) to the area surrounded by the particle size distribution line and the abscissa.
  • For the graphite particles used in the invention, graphite particles of artificial graphite or natural graphite can be used. Further, they may be a mixture thereof.
  • As the resin for bonding the particles of the graphite particles, epoxy resin, phenol resin and various thermosetting resin obtained by modifying them, etc. can be used. For use as a binder component, the amount of resin used is preferably from 10 to 40%.
  • Then, after mixing the thermosetting resin for use as the binder of the graphite particles, the mixture was molded into a predetermined shape and heat treated at a temperature of 150 to 250°C at which the resin is cured to prepare a carbon brush.
  • In the carbon brush according to the invention, a solid lubricant such as molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide or boron nitride can also be added in addition to the filler. Further, the invention can be applied not only to the thermosetting carbon brush described above but also to various kinds of carbon brushes referred to as a carbon graphite type or metallic graphite type, formed by kneading with a phenol resin or pitch and firing, whereby similar effects can be obtained.
  • The invention is to be described specifically by way of examples.
  • (Example 1)
  • As a grain size distribution measuring apparatus of laser diffraction type, SALD-2000A manufactured by Shimazu Seisakusho Co. was used. This was used also in the subsequent examples and comparative examples.
  • To 75% by weight of an artificial graphite powder having a mode diameter of 57 µm with a standard deviation value of 0.25 controlled so as to form a graphite particle filler (average particle size of 62 µm) in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 µm or less (ratio of the area of the hatched portion on the left to the area surrounded by the particle size distribution line and the abscissa (a portion for 5 µm or less on the abscissa in Fig. 2)) was 10% as calculated from measurement of the graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method, 25% by weight of an epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 µm or less were about 50%, they were molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • (Example 2)
  • To 75% by weight of an artificial graphite powder adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 µm or less was 5%, and the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 µm or more (ratio of the area of the hatched portion on the right to the area surrounded by the particle size distribution line and the abscissa (values of 100 µm or more on the abscissa)) was 10% as calculated from measurement of the graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method, 25% by weight of an epoxy resin as a binder was blended. This mixture was pulverized so that particles of 63 µm or less were about 50%, and then molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • (Example 3)
  • To 75% by weight of an artificial graphite powder adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 µm or less was 3%, the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 µm or more was 4%, and the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of from 10 to 40 µm was 65% in the graphite particle in a particle size distribution as calculated from measurement of the graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method, 25% by weight of an epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 µm or less were about 50%, it was molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • (Comparative Example 1)
  • The particle size distribution calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method, was adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 5 µm or less was 20%, and 25% by weight of an epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 µm or less were about 50%, it was molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • (Comparative Example 2)
  • The particle size distribution calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method was adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 5 µm or less was 30% and the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 100 µm or more was 10%, and 25% by weight of a general-purpose epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 µm or less were about 50%, it was molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • (Comparative Example 3)
  • The particle size distribution calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method was adjusted so as to form a graphite particle filler in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 5 µm or less was 40%, the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 100 µm or more was 15%, and the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size from 10 to 40 µm was 55%, and 25% by weight of a general-purpose epoxy resin as a binder was blended and kneaded. After pulverizing the kneaded product so that particles of 63 µm or less were about 50%, they were molded at 100 MPa to obtain a carbon brush.
  • Each of the carbon brushes described above was assembled into a motor for use in a vacuum cleaner and working life was investigated. Fig. 3 collectively shows the characteristics of each of the carbon brushes.
  • As can be seen from Fig. 3, as compared with the not controlled carbon brush of Comparative Example 1, it can be seen that the working life of the carbon brush of Example 1 with an adjusted particle size distribution as calculated from measuring graphite particles for forming the filler by a laser diffraction method such that the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 5 µm or less in the graphite particles was 10%, was 1.5 times that of Comparative Example 1.
  • Further, it can be seen that the working life of the carbon brush of Example 2, in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 µm or less was 5% and the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 µm or more was 10% in the particle size distribution calculated from measurement of the graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method is extended by about twice that of the not controlled carbon brush in Comparative Example 2.
  • Further, it can be seen that the working life of the carbon brush of Example 3 in which the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 5 µm or less was 3%, the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of 100 µm or more was 4%, and the accumulated value of graphite particles with a particle size of from 10 to 40 µm was 65% in a particle size distribution calculated from measurement of the graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method, is extended by about 3 times as compared with the not controlled carbon brush in Comparative Example 3.
  • Accordingly, it could be confirmed that the invention can provide a carbon brush with greatly extended working life compared with existent products.
  • The invention can be changed in view of the design within a range not departing the scope of the patent and it is not restricted to the embodiments and examples described above.
  • Industrial Applicability
  • It is possible to provide extended life for a carbon brush which uses the graphite particle filler, by making filler structure of the graphite particle filler uniform .

Claims (5)

  1. A carbon brush with graphite particle filler in which, in the particle size distribution, the accumulated value of graphite particles having a particle size of 5 µm or less is 10% or less as calculated from measurement of graphite particles forming a filler by a laser diffraction method.
  2. A carbon brush according to claim 1, wherein the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of 100 µm or more is 10% or less.
  3. A carbon brush according to claim 2, wherein the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of from 10 to 40 µm is 60% or more.
  4. A carbon brush according to claim 3, wherein the accumulated value of graphite particles with the particle size of from 12 to 20 µm is 40% or more.
  5. A carbon brush according to any one of claims 1 to 4, which is selected from a resin bonded type carbon brush, a carbon graphite type carbon brush and a metallic graphite type carbon brush.
EP03818580A 2003-09-05 2003-09-05 Carbon brush Expired - Lifetime EP1662638B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SI200331559T SI1662638T1 (en) 2003-09-05 2003-09-05 Carbon brush

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2003/011366 WO2005025034A1 (en) 2003-09-05 2003-09-05 Carbon brush

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1662638A1 EP1662638A1 (en) 2006-05-31
EP1662638A4 EP1662638A4 (en) 2006-12-27
EP1662638B1 true EP1662638B1 (en) 2009-01-07

Family

ID=34260141

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03818580A Expired - Lifetime EP1662638B1 (en) 2003-09-05 2003-09-05 Carbon brush

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1662638B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1839529A (en)
AT (1) ATE420477T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60325785D1 (en)
SI (1) SI1662638T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2005025034A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101001819A (en) 2004-08-02 2007-07-18 阿斯莫有限公司 Carbon brush and rotating electrical machine
WO2007073793A1 (en) * 2005-12-24 2007-07-05 Pyongyang Technical Trading Centre Flexible natural graphite material and flexible manufacturing method (process) and use thereof
DE102014116114A1 (en) * 2014-11-05 2016-05-12 Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik Gmbh Multi-layer carbon brush and production of such

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH03270660A (en) * 1990-03-16 1991-12-02 Mabuchi Motor Co Ltd Carbon brush for miniature motor and manufacture thereof
JP2641695B2 (en) * 1993-12-28 1997-08-20 マンドー マシネリー コーポレーション Manufacturing method of metallic graphite brush
EP0713258B1 (en) * 1994-04-08 2000-06-21 Sony Corporation Nonaqueous-electrolyte secondary cell
JP2001327127A (en) * 2000-05-17 2001-11-22 Toshiba Ceramics Co Ltd Copper-carbon brush and its manufacturing method
JP2002080922A (en) * 2000-09-07 2002-03-22 Mitsubishi Materials Corp ARMATEUR-BRUSHING MATERIAL MADE OF Cu-GRAPHITE BASED SINTERED MATERIAL HAVING EXCELLENT WEAR RESISTANCE
JP3797662B2 (en) * 2002-01-30 2006-07-19 トライス株式会社 Copper graphite brush

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60325785D1 (en) 2009-02-26
EP1662638A1 (en) 2006-05-31
WO2005025034A1 (en) 2005-03-17
SI1662638T1 (en) 2009-06-30
CN1839529A (en) 2006-09-27
EP1662638A4 (en) 2006-12-27
ATE420477T1 (en) 2009-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Meden et al. Atomic and electronic structure of Mo6S9− xIx nanowires
CN105061989B (en) A kind of polyether-ether-ketone/nano hydroxyapatite composite material for SLS technologies and preparation method thereof
CN1329956A (en) Tungsten-copper composite powder
EP1662638B1 (en) Carbon brush
KR20160145638A (en) Resin-bonded carbonaceous brush and method for manufacturing same
EP1784371B1 (en) Carbon brush and rotating electrical machine
JP2014188871A (en) Composite material powder and method of producing molding
JP2016103473A (en) Multilayer carbon brush and manufacturing method of the same
DE112014003171T5 (en) Steel ultrasonic sonotrode for tire cutting and method of manufacture
JP2007028841A (en) Brush for dc electric motor and its manufacturing method
EP2863523B1 (en) Metal-carbonaceous brush and method for producing same
CN104692805A (en) Sintered ceramic, slide part therefrom, and process for producing sintered ceramic
JP2004099782A (en) Carbon brush
KR100899264B1 (en) Carbon brush
DE102017204355A1 (en) Rolling bearing cage for a dental technology bearing and method for producing such a rolling bearing cage
EP3882215A1 (en) Particulate material and thermally conductive substance
KR101377896B1 (en) Composite magnetic powders and dust core using said composite magnetic powders
DE102018212447A1 (en) Powdery material suitable for the production of a three-dimensional object in a generative layer construction process, its use and production process therefor
JP2005086850A (en) Carbon brush
JP2001327127A (en) Copper-carbon brush and its manufacturing method
JP6642078B2 (en) Sample preparation method for powder X-ray diffraction analysis
EP3046728A1 (en) Abrasive medium comprising a phosphate-based filler
KR101746836B1 (en) Ball mill standardization method
JP7250337B2 (en) METAL-GRAPHITIC EARTH BRUSH MAINLY COMPOUNDED BY SILVER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
JP2017017796A (en) Carbon brush and manufacturing method therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060221

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT DE IT SI

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: SHIRAKAWA, HIDENORI,C/O TOTANKAKO CO., LTD.

Inventor name: MAEDA, TAKASHI,C/O TOTANKAKO CO., LTD.

Inventor name: KAGAWA, YOSHIKAZU,C/O TOTANKAKO CO., LTD.

Inventor name: SAKODA, TAKAHIRO,C/O TOTANKAKO CO., LTD.

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT DE IT SI

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20061127

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H01R 39/20 20060101AFI20061121BHEP

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: TOYO TANSO CO., LTD.

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT DE IT SI

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60325785

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20090226

Kind code of ref document: P

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20091008

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150902

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20150819

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20150825

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60325785

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 420477

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160905

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SI

Ref legal event code: KO00

Effective date: 20170609

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160906

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160905

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20220811

Year of fee payment: 20

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230509