EP1620211A1 - Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verarbeiten von bedrucktem papier - Google Patents

Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verarbeiten von bedrucktem papier

Info

Publication number
EP1620211A1
EP1620211A1 EP04729111A EP04729111A EP1620211A1 EP 1620211 A1 EP1620211 A1 EP 1620211A1 EP 04729111 A EP04729111 A EP 04729111A EP 04729111 A EP04729111 A EP 04729111A EP 1620211 A1 EP1620211 A1 EP 1620211A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
printed
code
bundle
container
papers
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP04729111A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1620211B1 (de
Inventor
Pierre Jost
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
France Routage
Original Assignee
France Routage
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=33104348&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1620211(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by France Routage filed Critical France Routage
Publication of EP1620211A1 publication Critical patent/EP1620211A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1620211B1 publication Critical patent/EP1620211B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07CPOSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
    • B07C3/00Sorting according to destination
    • B07C3/18Devices or arrangements for indicating destination, e.g. by code marks
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07CPOSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
    • B07C3/00Sorting according to destination
    • B07C3/008Means for collecting objects, e.g. containers for sorted mail items

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to installations and methods for processing printed papers. More particularly, the invention relates to an installation for processing printed papers in order to dispatch the printed papers to addressees, the installation including means for accessing a database corresponding to a list of addressees for printed papers packaged in packaging units in an order corresponding to the list of addressees, and for instance in an order allowing an optimized distribution.
  • This type of installation can be implemented in a routing or mail-handling business or a printed paper distribution business (such as a postal distribution business, for example) , specifically for the purpose of sorting and gathering printed papers as a function of their destinations.
  • a routing or mail-handling business or a printed paper distribution business such as a postal distribution business, for example
  • a packaging unit e.g. a container
  • a filling volume that is well determined whereas the volume of the printed papers may vary and be difficult to predict. This applies particularly when inserts specific to each (or to some) addressees are associated with printed papers.
  • Such a packaging unit then becomes full with a varying and unpredictable number of printed papers. Correlation between the list of addressees and the content of the packaging unit is thus lost. The ability to trace printed papers is also lost.
  • the present invention seeks in particular to mitigate that drawback.
  • the invention provides a printed paper processing installation which, in addition to the features mentioned above, is characterized by the fact that it includes control means adapted for transmitting information to computer means for the purpose of characterizing all of the printed papers of the packaging unit, the information corresponding to at least one printed paper of at least one packaging unit.
  • Information can be transmitted to the computer means individually for each printed paper, or for only some of them.
  • the computer means can store information associated with each printed paper in a new database or it can include it in an existing database.
  • each item of information is compared with at least one item extracted from the database corresponding to the list of addressees in order to match the database corresponding to the list of addressees to the real content of the packaging unit.
  • the information corresponding to each printed paper may correspond to one or more of the following items: a packaging unit number; a number for the printed paper in the packaging unit; information specific to the addressee of the printed paper; the weight of the printed paper (possibly including the weight of an insert, of wrapping, etc.); etc.
  • the computer means can compare this information with at least one item extracted from the database, e.g. corresponding to the list of addressees, in order to characterize and/or identify all of the printed papers in the packaging unit.
  • the packaging unit may be a bundle of printed papers.
  • the installation of the invention may include packaging means adapted to put the printed papers into bundles.
  • the control means can then be constituted, for example, by identity (ID) code reader means, e.g. for reading a bar code, a two-dimensional code, a numerical code, or the like, or indeed means for reading an ID code or information contained in a chip.
  • ID code may correspond to a plurality of code subunits. For example, there may be a bar code that is specific to each printed paper and a bar code that is specific to the bundle in which the printed paper is to be inserted.
  • the bar code specific to the printed paper corresponds to information about the addressee, for example, whereas the bar code specific to the bundle encodes a bundle number and a predefined content corresponding thereto determined by the number of copies, and thus also the number of bundles that are to be dispatched to a distribution site such as a printed paper handling depot, a regional or departmental postal sorting center, or a local inward sorting office.
  • These reader means are connected to a computer to which they transmit the information as read.
  • the computer is programmed to compare said information with data taken from a database, e.g. a database corresponding to the list of addressees.
  • the database contains information about addressees, about the makeup of bundles, etc., for example.
  • sampling means to sample one printed paper per bundle, e.g. by reading the ID code of the printed paper situated on the top of the bundle, and to identify in the list of addressees the particular bundle concerned and to deduce therefrom and identify which other printed papers are in the bundle.
  • the control means may also be means for reading a beginning or end of bundle signal from a label or from printing that is already present on the bundle, such as a bundle number code. These control means then send a signal to the computer means for identifying the state of progress of the system for filling packaging units relative to the list of addressees.
  • the packaging unit could also be a container.
  • the printed papers may initially be put into bundles prior to being put into the container.
  • the installation may thus also include a containerizing station in which the bundles are put into a container.
  • the computer means can also identify the bundles in a container on the basis of a signal for identifying printed papers from the information corresponding to the list of addressees, or more directly from the ID code of at least one printed paper in at least one bundle of the container, and from the number of bundles put into the container.
  • This number of bundles can be given to the computer means or it can be deduced thereby, on the basis of a control signal triggered by an operator actuating control means while verifying the level to which the container has been filled.
  • the sampling means recognizing the ID code of a printed paper in each bundle. If the preparation of the bundle is itself controlled on the basis of information extracted from the distribution list, then the content of each bundle is known. Only the content of the container then needs to be deduced by making a comparison between the list of addressees and counting and/or identifying the bundles put into the container.
  • An ID code can be printed for each bundle on the basis of fields in the list of addressees.
  • fields for characterizing the printed paper there can be fields for characterizing the printed paper (its title, its issue number, its print number, etc.), fields relating to the destination of the printed paper (the postal distribution network, the sorting center to which the printed paper is to be dispatched or to which the bundle containing it is to be dispatched, a bundle ID code, the inward sorting office to which the printed paper is to be dispatched, or the bundle containing it, the address of the addressee of the printed paper, etc.), and other fields (the weight of the printed paper and/or of the insert included therewith, etc.).
  • the computer means are adapted to read at least one of these fields from the database corresponding to the list of addressees.
  • the installation may also include printer means.
  • the printer means can serve to print, as a function of instructions received from the computer means, the ID code on a label which is then stuck onto a printed paper, or it may print directly onto each printed paper or onto its wrapping film, e.g. using an ink jet printer.
  • the installation may also include means for printing container labels.
  • Each container label is for applying to a container. It includes, for example, a routing code that encodes information concerning the content and the destination of the container. This information may include the number of the network to which the container is to be dispatched, the departments corresponding to the destination addresses of the printed papers stored in the container, etc. This information may also include data such as the quantity of printed papers stored in the container, the corresponding weight, and/or other fields such as those mentioned above.
  • the invention provides a method of processing printed papers for the purpose of dispatching the printed papers to addressees, the method comprising operations of using computer means and reading at least one printed paper ID field from a database corresponding to a list of addressees, the method being characterized by the fact that it further comprises an operation consisting in transmitting information to the computer means corresponding to at least one printed paper of at least one packaging unit in order to characterize all of the printed papers of the packaging unit.
  • recourse may optionally also be had to one or more of the following dispositions :
  • the computer means proceed by comparing information corresponding to at least one printed paper stored in the packaging unit with at least one printed paper ID field read in the database in order to identify all of the printed papers stored in a packaging unit containing a plurality of printed papers;
  • the packaging unit is a bundle of printed papers; • the method includes an operation consisting in reading an ID code on at least one printed paper of each bundle, and in extracting therefrom said information corresponding to at least one printed paper stored in the packaging unit;
  • the packaging unit is a container containing at least one bundle of printed papers; • the method includes an operation of printing container labels each comprising a routing code encoding information about the content and the destination of the container;
  • the method includes an operation of printing a list code corresponding to the containers loaded into a vehicle
  • the method includes an operation of reading ' a list code, a routing code, and/or an ID code in order to associate it with the location of the packaging unit concerned, so as to obtain corresponding location data in order to enable containers and/or printed papers to be traceable;
  • the method includes an operation of publishing the location data on a computer server in order to enable users to follow the dispatching of printed papers towards their addressees;
  • the computer means are able to amend a list of printed papers in a packaging unit as a function of the data they receive; . a service quality is monitored using data recorded by the computer means;
  • packaging units are weighted on the fly; . the weight of each weighted packaging unit is transmitted to the computer means; and . the computer means calculate the weights of containers or bundles.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the various operations of dispatching printed papers in a first example of an installation and a method of the invention
  • Figure 2 is a diagram showing the various operations of dispatching printed papers in a second example of an installation and a method of the invention.
  • the installation 1 comprises computer means 2, ID code printer means 3, ID code reader means 4, means 5 for printing container code labels, and a containerizing station 6.
  • This type of installation 1 may be situated in a mail-handling business.
  • the mail-handling business receives printed papers 7 from a publisher, together with a computer file corresponding to a list of addressees for the printed papers 7. Together with the computer file, the business may also receive labels printed with an ID code.
  • the computer means 2 in this case a computer, are programmed to read the computer file corresponding to the list of addressees.
  • the ID code printer means 3 e.g. constituted by an ink jet printer, print an ID code that is specific to each printed paper, as a function of the data extracted from the computer file by the computer means 2 and transmitted by the computer means to the ID code printer means 3. In general, this printing is performed on a packaging film wrapped around the printed paper 7.
  • a label carrying an ID code may be stuck onto each printed paper.
  • the ID code corresponds to a plurality of fields selected from: the title of the printed paper; its issue number; its publication number; the number of the postal network via which it is to be dispatched; the sorting office through which it is to pass; a bundle number; an inward sorting office for delivery; the address of the addressee; etc.
  • the ID code may also encode information such as the weight of the printed paper, a reference number for an insert that is to be associated with the printed paper, the weight of the insert, etc.
  • the printed papers 7 are then put into bundles 8.
  • Each bundle corresponds, for example, to a "postman's walk”.
  • Bundling is performed by a stacker. This machine responds to the ID code or to some other printed sign to identify end-of-bundle papers so as to bundle together the printed papers that belong to the same bundle.
  • the end-of-bundle information corresponds to data from the computer file giving the list of addressees.
  • the reader means 4 read the printed paper ID code situated on the top of the bundle and forwards the corresponding information to the computer means 2. This information serves in particular to determine whether the corresponding bundle has been completed and whether it is being dispatched to a container 9.
  • an operator places the bundles coming from the stacker in a container 9.
  • the operator actuates control means causing a container label 11 to be printed.
  • the container label 11 includes a routing code encoding information about the destination of the container 9, together with information describing the content of the container 9. This information is deduced from the data forwarded by the reader means 4 and the data in the computer file corresponding to the list of addressees.
  • the containers 9 as identified in this way with their container labels 11 are loaded into transport vehicles 12 to be taken to transit and sorting centers 13.
  • the installation 1 may optionally include means for printing lists.
  • Each list enables the content of a transport vehicle
  • staff in the sorting centers 13 can determine the content and the destination of each container 9.
  • the bundles 8 are extracted from the containers 9 for insertion into
  • postmen's walks Each postman subsequently undoes the bundles 8 in order to deliver the printed papers 7 to the letter boxes 15 of the addressee.
  • the printed papers 7 are put into bundles 8 and into containers 9 using the installation 1 of the invention, but the containers 9 are dispatched directly to the inward sorting offices 14 without passing via the transit and sorting centers 13.
  • only the operation performed, e.g. by postal services, in order to reconstitute the content of a bundle 8, consists in identifying the printed papers 7 of a packaging unit, such as a bundle 8, by comparing information obtained by reading an ID code on a printed paper 7 in the bundle 8 with printed paper ID fields read from the database.
  • this type of operation may also be used to reconstitute the content of a container 9.
  • the second example of an installation in accordance with the invention is substantially analogous to that described above.
  • the installation 1 differs from that described above essentially by the fact that the computer means 2 communicate with a handler server 20 (see Figure 2) .
  • the handler server 20 is not necessarily located in a mail- handling business. It may be a secure and independent central handler server which stores information coming from a plurality of mail-handling businesses.
  • information such as the weights of the various elements for sending (printed papers, inserts, reminders, packaging films, etc.), printed paper destination fields (postal distribution network, sorting center, inward sorting office, address of addressee, etc.) etc. are stored by the computer means 2 in a file.
  • the computer means 2 On the basis of this file, the computer means 2 generate a subscriber ID code (bar code, encoded chip, etc.) together with a bundle ID code (bar code, encoded chip, etc. ) .
  • the subscriber ID code essentially encodes information associated with the distribution network and the address of the subscriber.
  • the bundle ID code corresponds to a bundle number and to its content.
  • the content is determined by the computer means 2 as a function of the site(s) through which the bundle is to pass (printed paper handling depot, regional sorting center, departmental sorting center, inward sorting office, etc. ) .
  • a temporary list describing a packaging unit such as a container 9 is printed, said list containing the numbers of the bundles that are to be loaded into the container 9 in question.
  • the printer means 3 Simultaneously with printing the address, the printer means 3 also print the various ID, bundle, and subscriber codes, a number for the container 9, and a number for the printed paper 7 in the bundle 8 in question .
  • the computer means 2 determine the most suitable volume for the container 9 (small or large crate) .
  • the bundles 8 are made up as a function of their weight. For example, according to the current postal regulations, a bundle must contain at least six printed papers or four printed papers if the bundle weight is at least 800 grams .
  • the reader means 4 read on each printed paper 7 its bundle ID code.
  • the bundle ID code as read is compared with the file stored in the computer means 2.
  • An operator or a robot at the outlet from the installation 1 places the bundles 8 in the containers 9 as a function of the bundle numbers and as a function of the container numbers printed on each of the bundles 8.
  • Certain printed papers 7 are processed individually. These may be single pieces (which cannot be included in a bundle of more than four copies), recycled papers (e.g. after reprinting a code that was wrongly printed initially) , or printed papers that have suffered some other incident in production.
  • the subscriber code for each of these printed papers 7 that are handled individually is read by the reader means 4.
  • the corresponding information is transmitted to the computer means 2.
  • the computer means look for the corresponding file to verify the way in which they ought to have been processed. Thus, if the corresponding paper 7 ought to belong to a bundle 8, the computer means 2 modify the file in order to remove this copy from the list of papers provided in the initial bundle. If the item is a single piece, the computer means 2 tell an operator in which container 9 it should be placed.
  • the final list 11 is an accurate representation of the content of the container 9.
  • a final sheet is issued giving a list of the bundles contained in the container together with a sorting level (e.g. direct or to be sorted), their weight, and the number of printed papers contained in each bundle.
  • a sorting level e.g. direct or to be sorted
  • their weight e.g., their weight
  • the number of printed papers contained in each bundle e.g., their weight
  • the number of printed papers contained in each bundle e.g. printed on the list 11
  • the corresponding information is transmitted to the computer means 2 which prints a delivery note and a depot list.
  • These documents include the number plate number of the vehicle 11 and the time it left the mail-handling business.
  • the information stored by the computer means 2 is transmitted in full or in part to the handler server 20.
  • the codes characteristic of each container 9 are read again.
  • the corresponding information, together with the time of being taken in charge by the delivery site is transmitted to the handler server 20.
  • This information is processed by the handler server 20, in particular to verify that the delivery complies with what ought to have been delivered. Otherwise, the corresponding file stored in the handler server 20 is corrected accordingly.
  • the containers 9 and/or the bundles 8 are distributed in a distribution network. Optionally, the distribution is associated with tracing using the bundle and/or subscriber ID codes.
  • the publisher (s) of printed papers can consult the handler server 20 in order to discover in real time how distribution is progressing.
  • a new list can be printed.
  • the data corresponding to this list can be processed by the billing server 30, for example with the consent of a checking administration 25.
  • the corresponding information is also optionally transmitted to the handler server 20.
  • the data in the files as established and optionally corrected in the handler server 20 can be analyzed in such a manner as to determine the quantities and the weights transmitted to the sorting centers, to the depot centers, as a function of bundle type (direct, for sorting, multiple), as a function of issue number, etc.
  • the files created and possibly modified by the computer means 2 and/or by the handler server 20 make it possible to know the following:
  • the method of the invention thus enables the quality of the service provided by the distribution network to be monitored. This enables complaints to be sent to the distribution network in the event of late distribution.
  • the weight of each printed paper and/or of each bundle need not be calculated but could be weighed on the fly, prior to stacking and/or prior to loading containers with bundles.
  • the information corresponding to these weights can be transmitted to the computer means 2 in order to calculate the weights of the containers 9 and/or of the bundles 8 and/or of the papers 7 dispatched through a distribution network.
  • One or more lists taking account of the individual weighing operations performed on the papers or the bundles can be printed.

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Facsimiles In General (AREA)
  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
  • Making Paper Articles (AREA)
  • Ink Jet (AREA)
  • Projection-Type Copiers In General (AREA)
EP04729111A 2003-04-23 2004-04-23 Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verarbeiten von bedrucktem papier Expired - Lifetime EP1620211B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0305001A FR2854266B1 (fr) 2003-04-23 2003-04-23 Installation et procede de traitement d'imprimes
PCT/EP2004/005182 WO2004094077A1 (en) 2003-04-23 2004-04-23 An installation and a method for processing printed papers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1620211A1 true EP1620211A1 (de) 2006-02-01
EP1620211B1 EP1620211B1 (de) 2007-08-29

Family

ID=33104348

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04729111A Expired - Lifetime EP1620211B1 (de) 2003-04-23 2004-04-23 Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verarbeiten von bedrucktem papier

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1620211B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE371506T1 (de)
DE (1) DE602004008609T2 (de)
ES (1) ES2293249T3 (de)
FR (1) FR2854266B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2004094077A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8369984B2 (en) 2009-04-10 2013-02-05 Pierre Jost Facility and method for processing printed materials

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015219736A1 (de) * 2015-10-12 2017-04-13 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Sortierung buchartiger Wert- oder Sicherheitsdokumente

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5329102A (en) * 1990-10-09 1994-07-12 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and apparatus for preparing validated mail tray labels

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004094077A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8369984B2 (en) 2009-04-10 2013-02-05 Pierre Jost Facility and method for processing printed materials

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE602004008609D1 (de) 2007-10-11
ATE371506T1 (de) 2007-09-15
ES2293249T3 (es) 2008-03-16
FR2854266A1 (fr) 2004-10-29
FR2854266B1 (fr) 2005-07-01
WO2004094077A1 (en) 2004-11-04
EP1620211B1 (de) 2007-08-29
DE602004008609T2 (de) 2008-06-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1439496B1 (de) System zum Verfolgen von Poststücken
US8598482B2 (en) Intelligent barcode systems
US5060165A (en) Optimizing mail processing by matching publisher and printer entities
US20080154751A1 (en) Sortation and extraction system for item management systems and associated methods
EP1696391B1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bemessung von Postgebühren
US20070250326A1 (en) System and method for shipping a mail piece having post office box recognition
US5673193A (en) System and method for processing bulk mail
US20020029153A1 (en) Method and apparatus for tracking a special service delivery of a mail item created by an office worker
EP1560166A2 (de) Verfahren zum Speichern von Daten eines Poststücks
US8798785B2 (en) System and process for real time monitoring of mail and print jobs and providing real time verification of mail piece completion
CN112508480A (zh) 一种文档批量打印智能分箱方法
EP2119510A2 (de) Verfahren und System zur Anzeige des Entleerungsstatus einer Dokumentenverarbeitungsvorrichtung
US20050171919A1 (en) Method for generating mailpieces and storing mailpiece identification and tracking information
EP1620211B1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zum verarbeiten von bedrucktem papier
AU2012372472B2 (en) Method of tracking postal items for measuring time of transit through a multi-network postal sorting system
AU2003229664A1 (en) Method of handling bulk mailing
CA2053455A1 (en) Mail sorting apparatus and method
CA2541902A1 (en) Method for capturing and processing information in a communication system
KR20210114128A (ko) 물류 서비스 자동처리 시스템 및 그 방법
KR20210116962A (ko) 통합물류 서비스에 있어서 자동처리 시스템 및 그 방법
WO2008067336A2 (en) Sortation and extraction system for item management systems and associated methods
JP2004094497A (ja) 振り分け装置、配送業者選定装置、郵便物配送システム

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20051018

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: JOST, PIERRE

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602004008609

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20071011

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2293249

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071130

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071129

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20080530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080423

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20090424

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071129

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20090414

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20090423

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20090626

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20090427

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20090508

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20090415

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070829

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: FRANCE ROUTAGE

Effective date: 20100430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20101101

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100521

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100430

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100430

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100423

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20110711

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100424

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110423

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110423

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100423

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CJ

Effective date: 20121003

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20121003

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: FRANCE ROUTAGE PARTICIPATIONSS, FR

Effective date: 20140610

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190419

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200430