EP1607011A1 - Babies' safety helmet - Google Patents
Babies' safety helmet Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1607011A1 EP1607011A1 EP04425367A EP04425367A EP1607011A1 EP 1607011 A1 EP1607011 A1 EP 1607011A1 EP 04425367 A EP04425367 A EP 04425367A EP 04425367 A EP04425367 A EP 04425367A EP 1607011 A1 EP1607011 A1 EP 1607011A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- upper portion
- helmet
- operating condition
- baby
- basic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A42—HEADWEAR
- A42B—HATS; HEAD COVERINGS
- A42B3/00—Helmets; Helmet covers ; Other protective head coverings
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a babies safety helmet including the features stated in the preamble of claim 1.
- the present invention falls within the field of goods dedicated to the babyhood ed in particular to the babies safety during their deambulation.
- the braincase is not completely closed and shows fontanelles and sutures which join the bony parts of the skull by allowing its expansion through the action of the brain pressure in the course of development.
- babies of an age ranging between six and eighteen months begin to walk, first by crawling then by toddling.
- these latter are frequently subject to even violent falls, due to the loss of the balance and to an incomplete familiarity with the mechanisms of the motion.
- These undesirable events may cause physical injuries of various type, especially when the impact with a solid foreign body concerns the babies head which, because of the high mass relative to the rest of the body, tends to violently strike the floor or the solid surrounding bodies, causing dangerous head injuries.
- infantile head injuries which represent the main cause of mortality in infants of age below two years, are mostly due to accidental falls from domestic resting places, such as dressing tables, beds and/or couches, or during play, run and the environmental exploration. Head injuries result even more dangerous when the injuries concern non-protected zones of the bone structure, such as for instance the fontanelles or the suture zones, or when the bumps of the braincase occur against pointed bodies, such as the corners of furniture and/or doors.
- Some of these products such as for instance protective sheaths, apply directly on the angular bodies in order to avoid that possible impacts against the same can hurt the body of the babies.
- Other products such as for instance safety helmets, are applied directly on the babies head so as to offer a permanent protection capable of deadening and/or absorbing possible impacts due to accidental falls.
- the structure of such helmets usually consists of three different portions.
- a basic portion for circumferentially winding the cranium of the baby.
- a first upper portion perpendicularly integral to the basic portion according to an upside-down "T" configuration and arranged for engaging the sagittal arch of the baby cranium, from the forehead to the nape.
- a second upper portion perpendicularly integral to the first one, according to a cross-shaped configuration and arranged for engaging a transverse arch of the baby cranium extending from ear to ear.
- the ends of the basic portion of the helmet are inserted within respective buttonholes obtained in correspondence with the ends of the second upper portion, so that the structure of the helmet assumes a curved configuration.
- the ends of the basic portion of the helmet are then joined by way of proper hooking elements, at the free end of the first upper portion to hold the curved configuration.
- the second upper portion of the helmet further presents, in correspondence with its own ends, additional buttonholes for the engagement of a submandibular lacing element which, by means of proper buckles and/or similar sliding elements of regulation and blocking, is apt to firmly holding the helmet on the baby's head.
- the Applicant has found that although the known safety helmets protect the more delicate parts of the babies braincase during their possible accidental falls, they are not lacking in some drawbacks, mainly with reference to the limited adaptation properties of the helmets to the various shapes and dimensions of the babies cranium, the not completely adequate protection of some parts, as well as the potential dangerousness of the same in strangulation situations of the babies due to an insufficient structural compliance of the sub-throat elements in such situations.
- the known helmets can be regulated along three main dimensions, that is to say: the circumference of the braincase of the baby which is determined by the overlapping of the ends of the basic portion; the forehead/nape sagittal arch which is determined by the overlapping of the free end of the first upper portion with the ends of the basic portion; and the submandibular arch which is determined by the adjustment of the blocking sliding elements.
- the known helmets do not foresee, however, the required adjustment of the ear/ear crown.
- the second upper portion is firmly engaged with the first upper portion in order to form with the same a single cross-shaped structure, which rather limits the adaptability of the safety helmets to any type of cranium.
- this lack may be partly prevented by an excessive adjustment of the lacing element which anyway involves an unwanted displacement of the basic portion from its ideal position, by consequently penalizing the baby's safety in correspondence with the circumferential zone of the cranium previously covered, as well as a considerable and troublesome pressure of the baby's head.
- the safety helmets such as the one above described may easily entangle in the bulges of the solid bodies usually present in the domestic environment, causing dangerous situations wherein the babies may run into strangulations and/or suffocations due to the submandibular lacing element. More particularly, as the lacing elements are rather resistant and firmly connected to the structure of the helmet, they do not easily come unlaced nor break down, by remaining joined to the structure thereof in any situation and by contrasting its removal.
- the object of the present invention is to solve the problems found in the known art by proposing an effective babies safety helmet which is readily suited to any type of cranium and presents at least a yielding portion in the case of a holding thereof.
- the helmet 1 has a structure 2 made of a soft material, substantially flexible and pliable at least between a non operating condition, wherein it presents a substantially plane development 3 (figures 1, 7 and 8), and an operating condition, wherein it presents a curved development 3 (figures 2-6) suitable for engaging the ovoidal shape of a cranium 1b of a baby 1a.
- the structure 2 of the helmet 1 includes at least a basic portion 4 for engaging the cranial circumference 1c of the cranium 1b of the baby 1a so as to cover, at least partly, bony zones of the latter, such as the frontal bone, sphenoid bone, temporal bone, parietal bone and the occipital bone, and completely, zones without bones, such as the sphenoid and mastoid fontanelles and the squamous sutures.
- the basic portion 4 presents a substantially straight development which, for ergonomics reasons, is slightly curved in correspondence with a central zone 4a of the basic portion 4 and opposite ends 4b substantially rounded.
- the basic portion 4 presents a cross edge defining a protection portion 4c which can be overlapped to the basic portion itself for constituting a double-layer zone 4d assigned for covering the frontal bone of the baby 1a.
- the protection portion 4c is a single piece with the basic portion 3 and is separate from the latter by a crease line 4e substantially extending in parallel to the longitudinal development of the basic portion 4.
- the structure 2 further presents a first upper portion 5 transversally associated with the basic portion 4 opposite with respect to the protection portion 4c of the latter and destined to engage the forehead/nape sagittal arch 1d of the cranium 1b of the baby 1a for protecting at least the front and the back fontanelles, as well as the sagittal suture of the latter.
- the first upper portion 5 extends from the basic portion 4 according to a substantially straight development and ends, opposite with respect to the basic portion 4, with a substantially rounded free end 5a such as the opposite ends 4b of the basic portion 4.
- the structure 2 is also provided with a second upper portion 6 for engaging the ear/ear arch 1e of the cranium 1b of the baby 1a in order to coat both the sphenoid and front fontanelles and the coronal suture.
- the second upper portion 6 is operably engaged at the first upper portion 5 in such way to result movable with respect to the same according to transverse directions.
- the second upper portion 6 is firmly engaged at the basic portion 4 opposite with respect to the protection portion 4c, between one of the opposite ends 4b of the basic portion itself and the first upper portion 5.
- the second upper portion 6 develops from the basic portion 4 according to a substantially equal extent to the longitudinal development of the first upper portion 5, so as to end, opposite with respect to the basic portion 4, with a substantially rounded free end 6.
- the first upper portion 5 and the second upper portion 6 are preferably integral, in a one-piece, with the basic portion 4, but they could also be different elements joinable to the basic portion 4 by fixing means 10.
- each portion 4, 5 and 6 of the structure 2 of the helmet 1 may change depending on the cranial conformation of the babies 1a to which the helmet 1 are directed and on the structural and aesthetical features required to their commercialization.
- the first and the second upper portions 5 and 6 are relatively movable due to the working interposition of proper guide means 7.
- the guide means 7 are associated with the first upper portion 5 for guiding the second upper portion 6 along a cross direction with respect to the longitudinal development of the first upper portion 5.
- the guide means 7 are defined by at least a buttonhole 8 longitudinally obtained through the first upper portion 5 according to an extent not less than the maximal cross dimension of the second upper portion 6, whereby when the structure 2 is in the operating condition, the second upper portion 6 pass transversally through the buttonhole 8 with respect to the longitudinal development of the first upper portion 5.
- the guide means 7 preferably consist of at least two substantially parallel buttonholes 8, extending along the longitudinal development of the first upper portion 5.
- the buttonholes 8 define a slide loop 8a on which the second upper portion 6 glides during the helmet 1 preparation (figures 2 and 3) from the non operating condition (figures 1, 7 and 8) to the operating condition (figures 4 and 5).
- the structure 2 of the helmet 1 is made of a single piece, as shown in the enclosed figures.
- the structure 2 may also consist of discrete portions 4, 5, 6 and arranged for being properly joined during the helmet preparation from the non operating condition to the operating condition. In this case, it may result advantageous to release the second upper portion 6 from the rest of the structure 2, so that the helmet 1 has a reduced bulkiness in a non operating condition.
- the safety helmet 1 further includes a submandibular lacing element 9 able to ensure the engagement of the helmet 1 to the cranium 1b of the baby 1a.
- the lacing element 9 which is also made of flexible material, presents a fixed end 9a firmly engaged at the basic portion 4 close to the protection portion 4c and a free end 9b, opposite to the fixed end 9a, which can be movably engaged at the basic portion 4 for keeping the helmet 1 engaged at the cranium 1b of the baby 1a.
- the helmet 1 is further provided with fixing means 10 for keeping the structure 2 in the operating condition (figures 4 and 5), that is to say in an operating position.
- the fixing means 10 include a plurality of hooking means 10a, 10b, 10c, 10d, such as for example VelcroTM or other different seam elements suitable for the purpose and arranged for joining two superimposed surfaces, which are properly distributed on the structure 2.
- the fixing means 10 include a first hooking means 10a operably interposed between the ends 4b of the basic portion 4 for keeping these latter engaged according to an overlapped configuration when the structure 2 is in the operating condition.
- the first hooking means 10a includes at least a hooking element arranged in correspondence with at least one of the ends 4b of the basic portion 4, apt to interact with the material constituting the structure 2 for firmly holding the latter.
- the fixing means 10 also foresee a second hooking means 10b operably interposed between the free end 5a of the first upper portion 5 and the basic portion 4 for keeping these latter engaged when the structure 2 is in the operating condition.
- the second hooking means 10b includes a hooking element arranged in correspondence with the first upper portion 5, arranged for interacting with the material constituting the structure 2 for firmly holding the latter in the desired position.
- the fixing means 10 further comprise a third hooking means 10c operably interposed between the free end 6a of the second upper portion 6 and one of the ends 4b of the basic portion 4, for holding these latter overlapped in the operating condition.
- the third hooking means 10c includes a respective hooking element placed in correspondence with the end 4b of the basic portion 4 opposite to the end 4b supporting the hooking element of the first hooking means 10a.
- the hooking element of the third hooking means 10c is apt to interact with the material forming the structure 2 of the helmet 1, in order to firmly hold the latter in the operating condition.
- the fixing means 10 are provided with a fourth hooking means 10d operably interposed between the free end 9b of the lacing element 9 and the basic portion 4 of the structure 2.
- the fourth hooking means 10d foresees a single hooking element placed in correspondence with the free end 9b of the lacing element 9, capable of holding the basic portion 4 by interacting with the material forming the structure 2.
- the fixing means 10 also include a fifth hooking means (not shown) operably interposed between the protection portion 4c and the basic portion 4, in order to keep the protection portion 4c adhesive to the basic portion 4 once the helmet 1 is worn on the cranium 1b of the baby 1a.
- the first upper portion 5 of the helmet 1 substantially develops perpendicularly from a middle point 4f of the basic portion 4, while the second upper portion 6 develops according to an inclined direction towards the first upper portion 5.
- the second upper portion 6 is progressively close to the first upper portion 5 away from the basic portion 4.
- the second upper portion 6 of the helmet 1 substantially develops perpendicularly from the basic portion 4, while the first upper portion 5 develops according to an inclined direction towards the second upper portion 6. More particularly, the first upper portion 5 is progressively close to the second upper portion 6 away from the basic portion 4.
- the structure 2 of the helmet 1 is an intermediate shape between the first and the second embodiment, wherein the basic portion 4 is similar to that of the second embodiment, while the arrangement of the first upper portion 5 and of the second upper portion 6 are similar to those of the first embodiment.
- the buttonholes 8 and the loop 8a present a longitudinal development above the required dimension for the engagement of the second upper portion 6, so that the latter is free of sliding, also partly, along the longitudinal extension of the first upper portion 5.
- the second upper portion 6 can pass through the buttonholes 8 transversely with respect to the first upper portion 5, by gliding on the loop 8a and running longitudinally on the latter along a transverse direction to the second upper portion itself.
- the second upper portion 6 is movably joinable to the basic portion 4 in a plurality of discrete operating positions (for changing the length of the ear/ear arch), in correspondence with both its ends, by way of the fixing means above illustrated.
- such second upper position 6 may be an element per se or it may also be symmetrically fixed to the first upper portion 5.
- the present invention solves the problems found in the known art and attains the proposed aims.
- the helmet 1 allows an excellent protection of the braincase of babies 1a from possible impacts against angular bodies, as well as from potential dangerous situations such as strangulations and/or suffocations due to unexpected holding of the helmet 1 during accidental falls of the toddling babies 1a.
- the adaptability of the helmet 1 according to the present invention to any type of cranium 1b allows the same to conform to the head of the baby, by protecting the more delicate parts without however omitting other parts which anyway need a proper covering.
- the possibility of carry out a regulation of the ear/ear coronal arch, by intervening directly on the third hooking means 10c allows from one side to conform the structure 2 of the helmet 1 in the operating condition, and from the other side to avoid forced deformations thereof in order to adapt itself to the cranium 1b of the baby 1a.
- a hooking means 10d such as for example VelcroTM between the free end 9b of the lacing element 9 and the basic portion 4, or anyhow the structure 2 of the helmet 1, allows the release of the lacing element 9 when the helmet 1 is hold by an angular body.
- the hooking means 10d defines on the lacing elements 9 a structural zone with a limited strength, which jerkily sink, by the action of the stresses during the holding of the helmet 1 in the event of an accidental fall of the baby 1a.
- the compliance of the lacing element 9 allows to avoid dangerous situations of accidental suffocation and/or strangulation, by imparting to the helmet 1 high protective properties.
- the presence of the protection portion 4c defining a double-layer zone 4d of the structure allows to increase the protective power of the helmet 1 in correspondence with the forehead of the cranium 1b of the baby 1, by defending this zone from possible impacts with solid bodies.
Landscapes
- Helmets And Other Head Coverings (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
- Component Parts Of Construction Machinery (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a babies safety helmet including the features stated in the preamble of
claim 1. The present invention falls within the field of goods dedicated to the babyhood ed in particular to the babies safety during their deambulation. As it is known, during the first months of the babies life, the braincase is not completely closed and shows fontanelles and sutures which join the bony parts of the skull by allowing its expansion through the action of the brain pressure in the course of development. At this initial condition of partial ossification of the braincase, babies of an age ranging between six and eighteen months begin to walk, first by crawling then by toddling. During the babies movements, these latter are frequently subject to even violent falls, due to the loss of the balance and to an incomplete familiarity with the mechanisms of the motion. These undesirable events may cause physical injuries of various type, especially when the impact with a solid foreign body concerns the babies head which, because of the high mass relative to the rest of the body, tends to violently strike the floor or the solid surrounding bodies, causing dangerous head injuries. - It is also known that infantile head injuries, which represent the main cause of mortality in infants of age below two years, are mostly due to accidental falls from domestic resting places, such as dressing tables, beds and/or couches, or during play, run and the environmental exploration. Head injuries result even more dangerous when the injuries concern non-protected zones of the bone structure, such as for instance the fontanelles or the suture zones, or when the bumps of the braincase occur against pointed bodies, such as the corners of furniture and/or doors.
- A series of products for protecting the babies during their deambulation are now available on the market.
- Some of these products, such as for instance protective sheaths, apply directly on the angular bodies in order to avoid that possible impacts against the same can hurt the body of the babies. Other products, such as for instance safety helmets, are applied directly on the babies head so as to offer a permanent protection capable of deadening and/or absorbing possible impacts due to accidental falls.
- Referring to the safety helmets now on the market, these latter present a structure made of a soft material for covering the more delicate parts of the braincase, such as the fontanelles, the sutures, the forehead and the nape. The structure of such helmets usually consists of three different portions. A basic portion, for circumferentially winding the cranium of the baby. A first upper portion, perpendicularly integral to the basic portion according to an upside-down "T" configuration and arranged for engaging the sagittal arch of the baby cranium, from the forehead to the nape. A second upper portion, perpendicularly integral to the first one, according to a cross-shaped configuration and arranged for engaging a transverse arch of the baby cranium extending from ear to ear.
- In the operating condition, the ends of the basic portion of the helmet are inserted within respective buttonholes obtained in correspondence with the ends of the second upper portion, so that the structure of the helmet assumes a curved configuration. The ends of the basic portion of the helmet are then joined by way of proper hooking elements, at the free end of the first upper portion to hold the curved configuration.
- The second upper portion of the helmet further presents, in correspondence with its own ends, additional buttonholes for the engagement of a submandibular lacing element which, by means of proper buckles and/or similar sliding elements of regulation and blocking, is apt to firmly holding the helmet on the baby's head.
- The Applicant has found that although the known safety helmets protect the more delicate parts of the babies braincase during their possible accidental falls, they are not lacking in some drawbacks, mainly with reference to the limited adaptation properties of the helmets to the various shapes and dimensions of the babies cranium, the not completely adequate protection of some parts, as well as the potential dangerousness of the same in strangulation situations of the babies due to an insufficient structural compliance of the sub-throat elements in such situations.
- In particular, it appeared that the known helmets can be regulated along three main dimensions, that is to say: the circumference of the braincase of the baby which is determined by the overlapping of the ends of the basic portion; the forehead/nape sagittal arch which is determined by the overlapping of the free end of the first upper portion with the ends of the basic portion; and the submandibular arch which is determined by the adjustment of the blocking sliding elements. The known helmets do not foresee, however, the required adjustment of the ear/ear crown. In fact, the second upper portion is firmly engaged with the first upper portion in order to form with the same a single cross-shaped structure, which rather limits the adaptability of the safety helmets to any type of cranium. In some cases, this lack may be partly prevented by an excessive adjustment of the lacing element which anyway involves an unwanted displacement of the basic portion from its ideal position, by consequently penalizing the baby's safety in correspondence with the circumferential zone of the cranium previously covered, as well as a considerable and troublesome pressure of the baby's head.
- It should also be considered that the safety helmets such as the one above described may easily entangle in the bulges of the solid bodies usually present in the domestic environment, causing dangerous situations wherein the babies may run into strangulations and/or suffocations due to the submandibular lacing element. More particularly, as the lacing elements are rather resistant and firmly connected to the structure of the helmet, they do not easily come unlaced nor break down, by remaining joined to the structure thereof in any situation and by contrasting its removal.
- The object of the present invention is to solve the problems found in the known art by proposing an effective babies safety helmet which is readily suited to any type of cranium and presents at least a yielding portion in the case of a holding thereof.
- These and other objects, which better result during the following description, are substantially attained by a safety helmet including the features defined in one or more of the following claims. Further features and advantages will more result from the detailed description of a preferred, but not limiting, embodiment of a babies safety helmet according to the present invention. Such description will be show hereinafter with reference to the enclosed figures, which are given by way of example only but not limitation, wherein:
- figure 1 is a plane development of a babies safety helmet, according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
- figure 2 is a perspective view of the safety helmet of figure 1 in a preparation condition;
- figure 3 is a perspective view of the safety helmet of the preceding figures in a further preparation condition;
- figure 4 is a perspective view of the safety helmet of the preceding figures in an operating condition;
- figure 5 is a perspective view of the safety helmet of the preceding figures in an operating condition on a baby's cranium;
- figure 6 is an enlarged perspective view of a detail of the safety helmet of the preceding figure;
- figure 7 is a plane development of a safety helmet, according to a second embodiment;
- figure 8 is a plane development of a safety helmet, according to a third embodiment.
-
- With reference to the enclosed figures, by 1 a
babies safety helmet 1a according to the present invention is generally shown. - The
helmet 1 has astructure 2 made of a soft material, substantially flexible and pliable at least between a non operating condition, wherein it presents a substantially plane development 3 (figures 1, 7 and 8), and an operating condition, wherein it presents a curved development 3 (figures 2-6) suitable for engaging the ovoidal shape of acranium 1b of ababy 1a. - As it can be seen in the enclosed figures, the
structure 2 of thehelmet 1 includes at least abasic portion 4 for engaging the cranial circumference 1c of thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a so as to cover, at least partly, bony zones of the latter, such as the frontal bone, sphenoid bone, temporal bone, parietal bone and the occipital bone, and completely, zones without bones, such as the sphenoid and mastoid fontanelles and the squamous sutures. Particularly, thebasic portion 4 presents a substantially straight development which, for ergonomics reasons, is slightly curved in correspondence with acentral zone 4a of thebasic portion 4 andopposite ends 4b substantially rounded. Advantageously, thebasic portion 4 presents a cross edge defining aprotection portion 4c which can be overlapped to the basic portion itself for constituting a double-layer zone 4d assigned for covering the frontal bone of thebaby 1a. Preferably, theprotection portion 4c is a single piece with thebasic portion 3 and is separate from the latter by acrease line 4e substantially extending in parallel to the longitudinal development of thebasic portion 4. - The
structure 2 further presents a firstupper portion 5 transversally associated with thebasic portion 4 opposite with respect to theprotection portion 4c of the latter and destined to engage the forehead/napesagittal arch 1d of thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a for protecting at least the front and the back fontanelles, as well as the sagittal suture of the latter. In particular, the firstupper portion 5 extends from thebasic portion 4 according to a substantially straight development and ends, opposite with respect to thebasic portion 4, with a substantially roundedfree end 5a such as theopposite ends 4b of thebasic portion 4. - The
structure 2 is also provided with a secondupper portion 6 for engaging the ear/ear arch 1e of thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a in order to coat both the sphenoid and front fontanelles and the coronal suture. Advantageously, the secondupper portion 6 is operably engaged at the firstupper portion 5 in such way to result movable with respect to the same according to transverse directions. As shown in the enclosed figures, the secondupper portion 6 is firmly engaged at thebasic portion 4 opposite with respect to theprotection portion 4c, between one of theopposite ends 4b of the basic portion itself and the firstupper portion 5. The secondupper portion 6 develops from thebasic portion 4 according to a substantially equal extent to the longitudinal development of the firstupper portion 5, so as to end, opposite with respect to thebasic portion 4, with a substantially roundedfree end 6. The firstupper portion 5 and the secondupper portion 6 are preferably integral, in a one-piece, with thebasic portion 4, but they could also be different elements joinable to thebasic portion 4 by fixing means 10. - It should be noted, however, that the longitudinal dimensions of each
portion structure 2 of thehelmet 1, as well as the proportions therebetween, may change depending on the cranial conformation of thebabies 1a to which thehelmet 1 are directed and on the structural and aesthetical features required to their commercialization. - Advantageously, the first and the second
upper portions upper portion 5 for guiding the secondupper portion 6 along a cross direction with respect to the longitudinal development of the firstupper portion 5. - In particular, the guide means 7 are defined by at least a
buttonhole 8 longitudinally obtained through the firstupper portion 5 according to an extent not less than the maximal cross dimension of the secondupper portion 6, whereby when thestructure 2 is in the operating condition, the secondupper portion 6 pass transversally through thebuttonhole 8 with respect to the longitudinal development of the firstupper portion 5. - In the embodiments shown in the enclosed figures, the guide means 7 preferably consist of at least two substantially
parallel buttonholes 8, extending along the longitudinal development of the firstupper portion 5. Thebuttonholes 8 define aslide loop 8a on which the secondupper portion 6 glides during thehelmet 1 preparation (figures 2 and 3) from the non operating condition (figures 1, 7 and 8) to the operating condition (figures 4 and 5). - For the purpose of the use and constructive practicality, it is preferable that the
structure 2 of thehelmet 1 is made of a single piece, as shown in the enclosed figures. However, it is not excluded that thestructure 2 may also consist ofdiscrete portions upper portion 6 from the rest of thestructure 2, so that thehelmet 1 has a reduced bulkiness in a non operating condition. - Always referring to the enclosed figures, the
safety helmet 1 further includes asubmandibular lacing element 9 able to ensure the engagement of thehelmet 1 to thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a. The lacingelement 9, which is also made of flexible material, presents a fixedend 9a firmly engaged at thebasic portion 4 close to theprotection portion 4c and afree end 9b, opposite to the fixedend 9a, which can be movably engaged at thebasic portion 4 for keeping thehelmet 1 engaged at thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a. - The
helmet 1 is further provided with fixing means 10 for keeping thestructure 2 in the operating condition (figures 4 and 5), that is to say in an operating position. The fixing means 10 include a plurality of hooking means 10a, 10b, 10c, 10d, such as for example Velcro™ or other different seam elements suitable for the purpose and arranged for joining two superimposed surfaces, which are properly distributed on thestructure 2. In particular, the fixing means 10 include afirst hooking means 10a operably interposed between theends 4b of thebasic portion 4 for keeping these latter engaged according to an overlapped configuration when thestructure 2 is in the operating condition. Preferably, the first hookingmeans 10a includes at least a hooking element arranged in correspondence with at least one of theends 4b of thebasic portion 4, apt to interact with the material constituting thestructure 2 for firmly holding the latter. The fixing means 10 also foresee a second hooking means 10b operably interposed between thefree end 5a of the firstupper portion 5 and thebasic portion 4 for keeping these latter engaged when thestructure 2 is in the operating condition. Similarly to the first hookingmeans 10a, the second hookingmeans 10b includes a hooking element arranged in correspondence with the firstupper portion 5, arranged for interacting with the material constituting thestructure 2 for firmly holding the latter in the desired position. The fixing means 10 further comprise a third hookingmeans 10c operably interposed between thefree end 6a of the secondupper portion 6 and one of theends 4b of thebasic portion 4, for holding these latter overlapped in the operating condition. In particular, the third hookingmeans 10c includes a respective hooking element placed in correspondence with theend 4b of thebasic portion 4 opposite to theend 4b supporting the hooking element of the first hookingmeans 10a. Preferably, the hooking element of the third hookingmeans 10c is apt to interact with the material forming thestructure 2 of thehelmet 1, in order to firmly hold the latter in the operating condition. - Advantageously, the fixing means 10 are provided with a fourth hooking
means 10d operably interposed between thefree end 9b of thelacing element 9 and thebasic portion 4 of thestructure 2. Likewise with the other hookingmeans means 10d foresees a single hooking element placed in correspondence with thefree end 9b of thelacing element 9, capable of holding thebasic portion 4 by interacting with the material forming thestructure 2. - It is further possible that the fixing means 10 also include a fifth hooking means (not shown) operably interposed between the
protection portion 4c and thebasic portion 4, in order to keep theprotection portion 4c adhesive to thebasic portion 4 once thehelmet 1 is worn on thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a. - According to a first embodiment of the present invention shown in figures 1-6, the first
upper portion 5 of thehelmet 1 substantially develops perpendicularly from amiddle point 4f of thebasic portion 4, while the secondupper portion 6 develops according to an inclined direction towards the firstupper portion 5. In other words, the secondupper portion 6 is progressively close to the firstupper portion 5 away from thebasic portion 4. - According to a second embodiment of the present invention shown in figure 7, in opposition to the first embodiment, the second
upper portion 6 of thehelmet 1 substantially develops perpendicularly from thebasic portion 4, while the firstupper portion 5 develops according to an inclined direction towards the secondupper portion 6. More particularly, the firstupper portion 5 is progressively close to the secondupper portion 6 away from thebasic portion 4. - According to a third embodiment of the present invention shown in figure 8, the
structure 2 of thehelmet 1 is an intermediate shape between the first and the second embodiment, wherein thebasic portion 4 is similar to that of the second embodiment, while the arrangement of the firstupper portion 5 and of the secondupper portion 6 are similar to those of the first embodiment. In this case, in order to ensure the desired functionality, thebuttonholes 8 and theloop 8a present a longitudinal development above the required dimension for the engagement of the secondupper portion 6, so that the latter is free of sliding, also partly, along the longitudinal extension of the firstupper portion 5. In other words, according to this arrangement, the secondupper portion 6 can pass through thebuttonholes 8 transversely with respect to the firstupper portion 5, by gliding on theloop 8a and running longitudinally on the latter along a transverse direction to the second upper portion itself. In a varying embodiment, not illustrated in the figures, the secondupper portion 6 is movably joinable to thebasic portion 4 in a plurality of discrete operating positions (for changing the length of the ear/ear arch), in correspondence with both its ends, by way of the fixing means above illustrated. In this case, such secondupper position 6 may be an element per se or it may also be symmetrically fixed to the firstupper portion 5. - The present invention solves the problems found in the known art and attains the proposed aims.
- First of all, the
helmet 1 according to the present invention allows an excellent protection of the braincase ofbabies 1a from possible impacts against angular bodies, as well as from potential dangerous situations such as strangulations and/or suffocations due to unexpected holding of thehelmet 1 during accidental falls of the toddlingbabies 1a. - In particular, the adaptability of the
helmet 1 according to the present invention to any type ofcranium 1b allows the same to conform to the head of the baby, by protecting the more delicate parts without however omitting other parts which anyway need a proper covering. In fact, the possibility of carry out a regulation of the ear/ear coronal arch, by intervening directly on the third hookingmeans 10c, allows from one side to conform thestructure 2 of thehelmet 1 in the operating condition, and from the other side to avoid forced deformations thereof in order to adapt itself to thecranium 1b of thebaby 1a. - It should also be noted that the predisposition of a hooking
means 10d, such as for example Velcro™ between thefree end 9b of thelacing element 9 and thebasic portion 4, or anyhow thestructure 2 of thehelmet 1, allows the release of thelacing element 9 when thehelmet 1 is hold by an angular body. In other words, the hookingmeans 10d defines on thelacing elements 9 a structural zone with a limited strength, which jerkily sink, by the action of the stresses during the holding of thehelmet 1 in the event of an accidental fall of thebaby 1a. The compliance of thelacing element 9 allows to avoid dangerous situations of accidental suffocation and/or strangulation, by imparting to thehelmet 1 high protective properties. Additionally, the presence of theprotection portion 4c defining a double-layer zone 4d of the structure allows to increase the protective power of thehelmet 1 in correspondence with the forehead of thecranium 1b of thebaby 1, by defending this zone from possible impacts with solid bodies.
Claims (14)
- Babies safety helmet having a substantially flexible structure (2) between a non operating condition, wherein it presents a substantially plane development (3), and an operating condition, wherein it presents a curved development (3) suitable for the ovoidal shape of a cranium (1b) of a baby (1a), said structure (2) including:at least a basic portion (4) associable to a cranial circumference (1c) of a baby (1a);a first upper portion (5) transversely associated with said basic portion (4) and associable in correspondence with a forehead/nape arch (1d) of the cranium (1b) of the baby (1a) ;a second upper portion (6) associable in correspondence with an ear/ear arch (1e) of the cranium (1b) of the baby (1a) and developing transversely, in said operating condition, with respect to said first upper portion (5);fixing means (7) for holding said structure (2) of said helmet (1) in the operating condition,
- Helmet according to claim 1, characterized in that said second upper portion (6) is movably associable to said basic portion (4) in correspondence with at least one free end (6a) thereof or both its ends.
- Helmet according to claims 1 or 2, characterized in that said first and second upper portions (5, 6) are fixed to each other.
- Helmet according to claims 1 or 2, characterized in that said first and second upper portions (5, 6) are movable one with regard to each other.
- Helmet according to claim 4, characterized in that it further comprises guide means (7) operably interposed between said first and second upper portions (5, 6) for ensuring their relative movement according to transverse directions.
- Helmet according to claim 5, characterized in that said guide means (7) are associated with said first upper portion (5) for guiding said second upper portion (6) along a transverse direction with respect to the development of said first upper portion (5), or they are associated to said second upper portion (6) for guiding said first upper portion (5) along a transverse direction with respect to the development of the second upper portion (6).
- Helmet according to claim 6, characterized in that said guide means (7) include at least a slide loop (8a) defined by at least a buttonhole (8) longitudinally obtained in said first upper portion (5), said second upper portion (6) running through said buttonhole (8) transversely to said first upper portion (5) in said operating condition, or conversely said guide means (7) are defined by at least a buttonhole (8) longitudinally obtained in said second upper portion (6), said first upper portion (5) running through said buttonhole (8) transversely to said second upper portion (6) in said operating condition.
- Helmet according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said first and/or said second upper portion (5, 6) are firmly engaged at said basic portion (4) transversely thereto.
- Helmet according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the structure (2) of said helmet (1) is carried out in a single piece.
- Helmet according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said basic portion (4) includes a superimposable and associable protection portion (4c) to said basic portion (4) for constituting a double-layer zone (4d) destined for covering the frontal bone of the baby (1a).
- Helmet according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that it further includes a submandibular lacing element (9) for the engagement of said helmet (1) to the cranium (1b) of the baby (1a), said lacing element (9) having a fixed end (9a) integral with said basic portion (4) and a free end (9b) opposite to the fixed end (9a) and which can be movably engaged to the structure (2), for tensile yielding over a predetermined maximum safe load.
- Helmet according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said fixing means (10) include:a first hooking means (10a) operably interposed between one of said ends (4b) of said basic portion (4) for keeping these latter engaged according to an overlapped configuration when said structure 2 is in the operating condition;a second hooking means (10b) operably interposed between said free end (5a) of said first upper portion (5) and one of said ends (4b) of said basic portion (4) for keeping these latter engaged according to an overlapped configuration when said structure (2) is in the operating condition; anda third hooking means (10c) operably interposed between the free end (6a) of said second upper portion (6) and said basic portion (4) for holding these latter engaged according to an overlapped configuration when said structure is in the operating condition.
- Helmet according to claim 12, characterized in that said fixing means (10) further include a fourth hooking means (10d) operably interposed between said free end (9b) of said lacing element (9) and said structure (2) of said helmet (1), for holding said structure (2) and said lacing element (9) joined according to an overlapped configuration.
- Helmet according to claim 13, characterized in that said fixing means (10) include a fifth hooking means operably interposed between said basic portion (4) and said protection portion (4c) for keeping these latter engaged and overlapped.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ES04425367T ES2277228T3 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2004-05-20 | PROTECTIVE HELMET FOR BABIES. |
AT04425367T ATE346517T1 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2004-05-20 | HEAD PROTECTION FOR BABY |
DE602004003482T DE602004003482D1 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2004-05-20 | Head protection for babies |
EP04425367A EP1607011B1 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2004-05-20 | Babies' safety helmet |
CNB2005100727604A CN100479684C (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2005-05-19 | Baby crash helmet |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP04425367A EP1607011B1 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2004-05-20 | Babies' safety helmet |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1607011A1 true EP1607011A1 (en) | 2005-12-21 |
EP1607011B1 EP1607011B1 (en) | 2006-11-29 |
Family
ID=34932508
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04425367A Expired - Lifetime EP1607011B1 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2004-05-20 | Babies' safety helmet |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1607011B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100479684C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE346517T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602004003482D1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2277228T3 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20230053226A (en) * | 2021-10-14 | 2023-04-21 | 주식회사 오라운드 | Head guard |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007039287B4 (en) * | 2007-08-20 | 2009-10-08 | Rösler, Peter | Industrial impact protection cap |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB350142A (en) * | 1931-01-17 | 1931-06-11 | John Peate | Improvements in protective head-coverings for babies |
EP0286726A1 (en) * | 1987-04-16 | 1988-10-19 | Maria Kuchenbecker | Protective head cover for babies and small children |
CH689008A5 (en) * | 1997-08-12 | 1998-07-31 | Renato Pellegrini | Head protector for small children |
GB2336759A (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 1999-11-03 | Paul Ronald Stacey | Protective cap |
AU714894B2 (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 2000-01-13 | Isla Kaylene George | Head protector |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN87204507U (en) * | 1987-08-15 | 1988-04-13 | 钟菊成 | Head protector of child while walking |
CN2169290Y (en) * | 1993-09-12 | 1994-06-22 | 陈威 | Adjustable protective cap for baby |
CN2239167Y (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 1996-11-06 | 周国燕 | Safety helmet |
US6493881B1 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2002-12-17 | Brooke Picotte | Head protector for infants and small children |
-
2004
- 2004-05-20 DE DE602004003482T patent/DE602004003482D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-05-20 AT AT04425367T patent/ATE346517T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-05-20 EP EP04425367A patent/EP1607011B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-05-20 ES ES04425367T patent/ES2277228T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-05-19 CN CNB2005100727604A patent/CN100479684C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB350142A (en) * | 1931-01-17 | 1931-06-11 | John Peate | Improvements in protective head-coverings for babies |
EP0286726A1 (en) * | 1987-04-16 | 1988-10-19 | Maria Kuchenbecker | Protective head cover for babies and small children |
AU714894B2 (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 2000-01-13 | Isla Kaylene George | Head protector |
CH689008A5 (en) * | 1997-08-12 | 1998-07-31 | Renato Pellegrini | Head protector for small children |
GB2336759A (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 1999-11-03 | Paul Ronald Stacey | Protective cap |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20230053226A (en) * | 2021-10-14 | 2023-04-21 | 주식회사 오라운드 | Head guard |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1607011B1 (en) | 2006-11-29 |
ES2277228T3 (en) | 2007-07-01 |
CN1698488A (en) | 2005-11-23 |
CN100479684C (en) | 2009-04-22 |
DE602004003482D1 (en) | 2007-01-11 |
ATE346517T1 (en) | 2006-12-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP4009757B2 (en) | Head protection for impact protection | |
US5799337A (en) | Face guard attached chinstrap for an athletic helmet | |
US8918918B2 (en) | Apparatus for preventing neck injury, spinal cord injury and concussion | |
US5930841A (en) | Soccer headguard | |
US11388944B2 (en) | Chin strap | |
US8782819B1 (en) | Spider web protective inserts for a football helmet or the like | |
CA2457618A1 (en) | Freely jointed arrangement for protecting the back against bumps | |
US20170245579A1 (en) | Helmet with chin cup | |
KR20140110918A (en) | Helmet provided with an adjustable device for the helmet comfort liner | |
US20140331393A1 (en) | Wrestling headgear | |
US11234473B2 (en) | Whiplash reduction systems and devices and methods to use the same | |
EP1607011B1 (en) | Babies' safety helmet | |
US20150374059A1 (en) | Hooded garment with impact protection | |
JPH11206896A (en) | Face mask with wearing bands and its manufacturing | |
CA2822642C (en) | Apparatus for preventing neck injury, spinal cord injury and concussion | |
JP3229436U (en) | hat | |
WO2007049048A1 (en) | Protective headgear | |
JP2003180905A (en) | Leg guard | |
JP4672051B2 (en) | Leg guard for ball game | |
JP4309416B2 (en) | Leg guard for baseball or softball catchers | |
JP3100069U (en) | Sports clothing | |
JP7485702B2 (en) | Protective helmet | |
JP3114670U (en) | Helmet interior | |
JP2012072527A (en) | Head protector | |
JP4610513B2 (en) | Seat belt pad |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20050323 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602004003482 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20070111 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070301 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070430 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2277228 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20070830 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070301 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070521 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070520 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070530 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061129 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180329 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20180601 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20190529 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20190528 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190520 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190520 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20200928 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190521 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200520 |