EP1599738A1 - Detection of earth faults in three phase systems - Google Patents

Detection of earth faults in three phase systems

Info

Publication number
EP1599738A1
EP1599738A1 EP04717346A EP04717346A EP1599738A1 EP 1599738 A1 EP1599738 A1 EP 1599738A1 EP 04717346 A EP04717346 A EP 04717346A EP 04717346 A EP04717346 A EP 04717346A EP 1599738 A1 EP1599738 A1 EP 1599738A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
requirement
phase
current
earth fault
fulfilled
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP04717346A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1599738B1 (en
Inventor
Jan Berggren
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Protrol AB
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP1599738A1 publication Critical patent/EP1599738A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1599738B1 publication Critical patent/EP1599738B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/16—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to fault current to earth, frame or mass
    • H02H3/162—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to fault current to earth, frame or mass for ac systems
    • H02H3/165—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to fault current to earth, frame or mass for ac systems for three-phase systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/50—Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections
    • G01R31/52—Testing for short-circuits, leakage current or ground faults

Definitions

  • This invention is aimed for detection of earth faults in three phase high voltage electrical distribution networks, based on the detection of transient and steady state phase currents in the system.
  • Earth faults in feeders may occur because of damages in the isolation due to ageing, or mechanical injury, as for example during digging work in the case of underground cables.
  • the available automation technology is intended for primary medium voltage substations and has, due to cost, not been utilized to any extent in secondary substations. Additionally the problem with arcing ground faults (restrikeing earth faults, intermittent earth faults) in underground cables has increased and traditional detection methods many times fail in the treatment of those.
  • This need is in compliance with the present innovation as it presents a method to detect single phase earth faults in three phase electrical distribution networks, which includes comparison during a predefined period of time of the change in current in one of the phases with the corresponding change in the second and third phase during the same period, where a first condition to be fulfilled is that the current change in the first phase during the predefined period of time to its amplitude or direction in a predefined way differs from the current change in the second and third phase in the system.
  • the mentioned condition is combined with a second one, which includes measurement of the zero sequence current, or rather the change thereof, and where the second condition is fulfilled when the level of the zero sequence current exceeds a predefined value during a predefined period of time.
  • a second condition is fulfilled when the level of the zero sequence current exceeds a predefined value during a predefined period of time.
  • the first and second conditions are combined with a third condition, which includes measurement of the steady-state zero sequence current, where the third condition is fulfilled when the zero sequence current steady-state (normally 50 or 60 Hz) amplitude exceeds a predefined level, and an earth fault is detected if the first, second and the third requirements are fulfilled.
  • a third condition which includes measurement of the steady-state zero sequence current, where the third condition is fulfilled when the zero sequence current steady-state (normally 50 or 60 Hz) amplitude exceeds a predefined level, and an earth fault is detected if the first, second and the third requirements are fulfilled.
  • the invention also includes arrangements for implementation of the method according to the mentioned realizations.
  • Fig. la and lb show a schematically reactance grounded three phase system where an earth fault has occurred in one of the phases on feeder LI.
  • Fig. la shows a single line diagram of a distribution network with a single phase earth fault at point F where the measuring points (location for detectors) Dl, D2 and D3 are indicated.
  • Fig. lb a simplified electrical model for the same network shows current changes according to Thevenins theorem.
  • the model has been used for generation of the curves in Fig. 2 and 3.
  • each feeder is assumed to be 1 km corresponding to 2 Ampere (2 Ampere equals 750 m - 1.2 km PEX 3-conductor cable at 10 kV with varying conductor area). Note that all loads from Fig. la have been neglected and that the feeders L3-LN have been lumped together to one equivalent feeder in this model.
  • 2a, 2b and 2c show the steady-state currents changes in the 3 phases where the earth fault is located "in front of the measuring point on the "own” feeder (D2), in another feeder (Dl) and behind in the "own” feeder (D3), respectively.
  • the "recordings” show the current changes with a sufficiently time period after the fault occurred enabling higher frequencies to diminish.
  • Fig. 3a, 3b and 3c show the initial transient currents (310-314) in the system from the same measuring points as Fig. 2a, 2b and 2c, but in another scale.
  • the curves are filtered by a low pass filter and somewhat damped by R f for the sake of "readability". The fault occurs at the time 0.04 seconds.
  • Fig. 4 shows a device (realization) according to the innovation, whereby the notation "CPU” represents means for both “number crunching” facilities and memory (RAM and ROM) for data storage and settings.
  • the filters are aiming at reducing higher frequencies in the currents than the sampling rate allows.
  • Fig. la and lb show schematically a three phase electrical distribution system, where the phases in the following will be denoted A, B and C.
  • a transformer in the system is denoted T
  • capacitances, resistances, reactances and impedances in the system are denoted C, R, L and Z, respectively.
  • the system is typical for a reactance grounded (Peterson coil) medium voltage network for power distribution to buildings, industries or villa quarters. Through-out the feeder the voltage is transformed down in secondary substations from the medium voltage level to a "household" level before the power is "consumed”.
  • An earth fault implies that current is fed from one point (the fault location) in the network to the environment which could be the surrounding territory or objects in connection with the same.
  • the fault may have occurred due to mechanical damage, as for example during digging work, a phase conductor in contact with a tree, or ageing (treeing) which results in the lost of voltage strength in the isolation around one or three phases in underground cables.
  • the phase, where the earth fault has occurred, is denoted phase A, and the earth fault is shown schematically in Fig. la with an "arrow" at the location F.
  • FPT Fault Pass Through
  • the purpose of the invention is the development of devices that are able to detect earth faults in high impedance grounded networks only by measuring the current without the addition of the traditionally required zero sequence voltage measurement.
  • the benefits are the omission of the voltage transformer (which is normally not available in secondary substations), the true Fault Pass Through characteristic of the method and also its high sensitivity and discrimination of arcing ground faults.
  • Fig. 2a the steady-state current changes (according to Thevenins theorem) are shown - in a measuring point between the source (the transformer T) and the fault - in the phases A, B and C caused by the earth fault in phase A at location F.
  • the current changes noticed in phases B and C are mainly generated by the feeder capacitance to ground for the own phase conductor "forward" from the measuring point caused by the change in voltage to ground (zero sequence voltage) whereas the current change in phase A, in principle, depends on the whole network impedance to ground.
  • Fig. 2b shows the steady-state current changes in a measuring point located in a
  • Fig. 2c shows the steady-state current changes in a measuring point located in the faulty feeder "forward" to the fault (in other words: not located between the source T and the fault F) in the phases A, B and C due to the earth fault in phase A at point F.
  • the current changes in principle, are similar in amplitude and phase angle as all are caused by the own conductor capacitance to ground from the part of the feeder "forward" to the measuring point and the change in voltage to ground.
  • the Figures 3 a, 3b and 3 c show mainly the same fault situation as the Figures 2a, 2b and 2c, but in the transient stage shortly after the fault has occurred (310-314) and with other scales on the axes.
  • Fig. 3a, 3b and 3c have a higher resolution on the time-axis (the horizontal axis).
  • the vertical axis in the graph in Fig. 3 a which shows the current change in phase A (310)
  • the device includes means for connection of each of the three phases (alternatively two phases and 3I 0 from where the third phase current can be calculated.
  • the device includes means for connection of each of the three phases (alternatively two phases and 3I 0 from where the third phase current can be calculated.
  • this kind of set up, and also any other similar set up, must be construed to be encompassed by the expression "three phases" uses in the claims.)
  • means for low pass filtering of the signals from the three phases at each one of these connection means one analogue-digital converter, and a calculating unit in the form of a CPU.
  • the task for the device according to the invention is to detect if there is an earth fault or not located in the "forward" direction considering the measuring point and the source (FPT) by utilising the asymmetry as described above, and as concluded from Fig. 2a and 3a.
  • the part of the asymmetry shown in Fig. 2a and 3a can be detected by the device in Fig. 4 by computation and comparison during a predefined period of time of the current change in a first of the system's phases, for example phase A, with the current change in the second, phase B, and third, phase C, during the same period of time.
  • the conditional criteria for the detection of the existence of an earth fault is a comparison whether the current change in the first phase during a predefined time period to its amplitude in a predefined way differs from the amplitude of the current changes in the second and third phase.
  • An example of a calculation aiming at finding out whether the criteria is fulfilled or not is to see if the quotient of the highest amplitude for the highest current change in the first phase and the sum of the amplitudes for the highest current changes in the second and third phase during the same time period to its value exceeds a preset level.
  • the quotient (1) is then compared with a suitable threshold value to find out whether there is an earth fault ("forward" to the measuring point) or not.
  • the threshold value (the sensitivity) should be selected with respect to current changes in "legitimate loads” at the same time as the earth fault occurs, for example connection and disconnection of heat loads etc.
  • the sensitivity must be selected such that the detection will be selective, that is the quotient (1) should not reach the threshold value when no earth fault exists or the measuring point is outside the trace between the source (T) and the fault point (F).
  • a reasonable threshold value is in the range of 2 (1-3).
  • an arbitrary threshold value for the quotient (1) as the selected sensitivity for Rf and load change may vary.
  • the device in Fig. 4 can, if it should detect the asymmetry shown in Fig 3 a, for example use the following algorithm:
  • the CPU detects on what side of the "zero line” the current change for the three phases is situated. (Or in other words: if the three phases range within a certain value from the "zero line” or not.) A current change above the "zero line” is given a positive value, for example “1” (310), and a current change below is given a negative value, for example "- 1" (311,312). If there is no earth fault located in the "forward" direction, considering the measuring point and the source, the absolute value of the sum of the three phases is therefore 3, and when the measuring point is located between the source and the fault the absolute value of the sum gets the value 1, which makes it easy to detect the asymmetry due to an earth fault according to what can be seen in Fig. 3 a.
  • the first requirement can be added with a second requirement, a trig requirement, in other words a requirement which, if fulfilled, initiates the calculation to find out if a start requirement exists.
  • a trig requirement in other words a requirement which, if fulfilled, initiates the calculation to find out if a start requirement exists.
  • One example of how to realize such a trig requirement is, according to the invention, to calculate, in the CPU or in other ways, if there is a spontaneous change in the zero sequence current If a spontaneous change in the zero sequence current (in a healthy system the zero sequence current is almost zero) exceeds a preset value the start criterion calculation takes place, and a FPT earth fault is recognized if both the trig and start requirements are fulfilled.
  • the change in phase currents or in the zero sequence current can, for example, be calculated by the change between 2 measurements (samples) which differ 20 ms (one 50 Hz cycle) or 16.67 ms (one 60 Hz cycle).
  • a suitable trig level should correspond to the sensitivity one will achieve with the third requirement described below.
  • a third requirement a so called "signal" requirement, to assure that the fault persists for a certain time. The calculation of this third requirement is initiated only if the two other requirements are fulfilled, and alarm (or trip) is executed only if all three requirements are fulfilled.
  • An appropriate signal requirement is the zero sequence current, and this condition is considered to be fulfilled if the steady state RMS-value exceeds a threshold value.
  • the signal threshold level should be set to about 1 Ampere.
  • the third requirement can be achieved in many different ways. If the device should be located in the feeding primary substation it should, alternatively, be possible to measure the zero sequence voltage or a digital signal from a neutral voltage protective device.
  • the trig, start and signal requirements can be used to be complementary to each other, or the start requirement can be used alone, all depending on different factors, for example the reliability in the detection, available processing power etc.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
  • Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)
  • Locating Faults (AREA)

Abstract

The invention refers to a method for detection of earth faults in electrical distribution networks with three phases, which during a predefined period of time includes comparison of the current change in a first (A) of the system's phases with the current changes in the second (B) and third (C) phase during the same period of time. A first requirement for an earth fault to be considered detected is, that the current change (310) in the first phase (A) during the mentioned time period to its amplitude or direction in a predefined way differs from the current changes (311, 312) in the second and third phase in the system.

Description

DETECTION OF EARTH FAULTS LN THREE PHASE SYSTEMS.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention is aimed for detection of earth faults in three phase high voltage electrical distribution networks, based on the detection of transient and steady state phase currents in the system.
TECHNOLOGY POSITION
Earth faults in feeders (overhead lines and underground cables) may occur because of damages in the isolation due to ageing, or mechanical injury, as for example during digging work in the case of underground cables.
When electrical energy consumers are subjected to an outage due to faults in the distribution network the supply should be restored as soon as possible. This is the case not just for earth faults, but is also valid for short circuits between phases. It is quite common that the network topology gives the possibility for different feeding "routes", especially in rural areas, and in such cases it is important to find out which section is faulty to be able to disconnect the same and connect another section (NOP = Normally Open Point) for the alternative feeding route. A common method to restore a faulty network is to manually reconfigure the network and by trial and error find out which section has to be disconnected. This is costly, inefficient and prolongs the total outage time.
The available automation technology is intended for primary medium voltage substations and has, due to cost, not been utilized to any extent in secondary substations. Additionally the problem with arcing ground faults (restrikeing earth faults, intermittent earth faults) in underground cables has increased and traditional detection methods many times fail in the treatment of those.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
There is a need for a method and a device which will be able to detect and locate earth faults in three phase high voltage systems in a more simple and cost efficient way than has been known up to now.
This need is in compliance with the present innovation as it presents a method to detect single phase earth faults in three phase electrical distribution networks, which includes comparison during a predefined period of time of the change in current in one of the phases with the corresponding change in the second and third phase during the same period, where a first condition to be fulfilled is that the current change in the first phase during the predefined period of time to its amplitude or direction in a predefined way differs from the current change in the second and third phase in the system.
In a special realization the mentioned condition is combined with a second one, which includes measurement of the zero sequence current, or rather the change thereof, and where the second condition is fulfilled when the level of the zero sequence current exceeds a predefined value during a predefined period of time. In this realization an earth fault is detected if both the first and the second requirements are fulfilled.
In another special realization the first and second conditions are combined with a third condition, which includes measurement of the steady-state zero sequence current, where the third condition is fulfilled when the zero sequence current steady-state (normally 50 or 60 Hz) amplitude exceeds a predefined level, and an earth fault is detected if the first, second and the third requirements are fulfilled.
The invention also includes arrangements for implementation of the method according to the mentioned realizations.
DESCRIPTIONS OF FIGURES
The invention will be described more in detail in the following, with references to the attached drawings, where:
Fig. la and lb show a schematically reactance grounded three phase system where an earth fault has occurred in one of the phases on feeder LI.
Fig. la shows a single line diagram of a distribution network with a single phase earth fault at point F where the measuring points (location for detectors) Dl, D2 and D3 are indicated.
In Fig. lb a simplified electrical model for the same network shows current changes according to Thevenins theorem. The model has been used for generation of the curves in Fig. 2 and 3. For sake of simplicity, each feeder is assumed to be 1 km corresponding to 2 Ampere (2 Ampere equals 750 m - 1.2 km PEX 3-conductor cable at 10 kV with varying conductor area). Note that all loads from Fig. la have been neglected and that the feeders L3-LN have been lumped together to one equivalent feeder in this model. Fig. 2a, 2b and 2c show the steady-state currents changes in the 3 phases where the earth fault is located "in front of the measuring point on the "own" feeder (D2), in another feeder (Dl) and behind in the "own" feeder (D3), respectively. The "recordings" show the current changes with a sufficiently time period after the fault occurred enabling higher frequencies to diminish.
Fig. 3a, 3b and 3c show the initial transient currents (310-314) in the system from the same measuring points as Fig. 2a, 2b and 2c, but in another scale. The curves are filtered by a low pass filter and somewhat damped by Rf for the sake of "readability". The fault occurs at the time 0.04 seconds.
Fig. 4 shows a device (realization) according to the innovation, whereby the notation "CPU" represents means for both "number crunching" facilities and memory (RAM and ROM) for data storage and settings. The filters are aiming at reducing higher frequencies in the currents than the sampling rate allows.
FORMS OF REALIZATION
Fig. la and lb show schematically a three phase electrical distribution system, where the phases in the following will be denoted A, B and C. A transformer in the system is denoted T, and capacitances, resistances, reactances and impedances in the system are denoted C, R, L and Z, respectively.
The system is typical for a reactance grounded (Peterson coil) medium voltage network for power distribution to buildings, industries or villa quarters. Through-out the feeder the voltage is transformed down in secondary substations from the medium voltage level to a "household" level before the power is "consumed".
Let us assume an earth fault has occurred in one of the phases. An earth fault implies that current is fed from one point (the fault location) in the network to the environment which could be the surrounding territory or objects in connection with the same. The fault may have occurred due to mechanical damage, as for example during digging work, a phase conductor in contact with a tree, or ageing (treeing) which results in the lost of voltage strength in the isolation around one or three phases in underground cables. The phase, where the earth fault has occurred, is denoted phase A, and the earth fault is shown schematically in Fig. la with an "arrow" at the location F.
The problem to be solved by this invention is to find out where in the network the earth fault has occurred by calculating whether the measuring position point is "electrically" located between the feeding substation and the fault location or not (FPT = Fault Pass Through). By placing measuring devices in secondary substations, where connection and disconnection is possible, one can, from a macro perspective, settle which feeder segment is the faulty one (see Fig. la). The purpose of the invention is the development of devices that are able to detect earth faults in high impedance grounded networks only by measuring the current without the addition of the traditionally required zero sequence voltage measurement. The benefits are the omission of the voltage transformer (which is normally not available in secondary substations), the true Fault Pass Through characteristic of the method and also its high sensitivity and discrimination of arcing ground faults.
In Fig. 2a the steady-state current changes (according to Thevenins theorem) are shown - in a measuring point between the source (the transformer T) and the fault - in the phases A, B and C caused by the earth fault in phase A at location F. The current changes noticed in phases B and C are mainly generated by the feeder capacitance to ground for the own phase conductor "forward" from the measuring point caused by the change in voltage to ground (zero sequence voltage) whereas the current change in phase A, in principle, depends on the whole network impedance to ground.
Fig. 2b shows the steady-state current changes in a measuring point located in a
"healthy" part of the network (not located between the source T and the fault point F) in the phases A, B and C due to the earth fault in phase A at F. It can be seen from the graph that the current changes, in principle, are similar in amplitude and phase angle as all are caused by the own conductor capacitance to ground and the change in voltage to ground.
Fig. 2c shows the steady-state current changes in a measuring point located in the faulty feeder "forward" to the fault (in other words: not located between the source T and the fault F) in the phases A, B and C due to the earth fault in phase A at point F. It can be seen from the graph that the current changes, in principle, are similar in amplitude and phase angle as all are caused by the own conductor capacitance to ground from the part of the feeder "forward" to the measuring point and the change in voltage to ground. The Figures 3 a, 3b and 3 c show mainly the same fault situation as the Figures 2a, 2b and 2c, but in the transient stage shortly after the fault has occurred (310-314) and with other scales on the axes. To clarify the initial transient phenomena the Fig. 3a, 3b and 3c have a higher resolution on the time-axis (the horizontal axis). In addition, the vertical axis in the graph in Fig. 3 a, which shows the current change in phase A (310), has another scale than the graphs in Fig. 3 a showing the current changes in the phases B (311) and C (312).
From Fig. 2a-2c and 3a-3c it is evident that asymmetries arise in the current changes between the three phases, which asymmetries are used by this invention to detect single phase earth faults. Except for the asymmetry shown in Fig. 2a, where it is concluded that the current change in a faulty phase conductor has a higher amplitude than the current changes in the two other phase conductors, it is also evident from Fig. 3 a that the current change in a feeder phase with an earth fault has another direction (310) than the current change in the two non-affected phases (311-312).
This can be interpreted as the "current" in the faulty phase flows in another direction with respect to the measuring point than the "currents" in the two other phases, or graphically as the "current" in the faulty phase with respect to a "zero line" (no current) flows in another direction than the "current" in the two other phases. (From Fig. 3 a it is apparent that the current change in phase A flows "upwards", whereas the two other flow "downwards". Naturally the opposite can occur, which also would indicate an earth fault in the actual feeder.)
In Fig. 4 a possible device for implementation of the method according to the invention is shown: the device includes means for connection of each of the three phases (alternatively two phases and 3I0 from where the third phase current can be calculated. For the sake of clarity it is emphasized that this kind of set up, and also any other similar set up, must be construed to be encompassed by the expression "three phases" uses in the claims.), means for low pass filtering of the signals from the three phases at each one of these connection means, one analogue-digital converter, and a calculating unit in the form of a CPU.
The task for the device according to the invention is to detect if there is an earth fault or not located in the "forward" direction considering the measuring point and the source (FPT) by utilising the asymmetry as described above, and as concluded from Fig. 2a and 3a.
The part of the asymmetry shown in Fig. 2a and 3a can be detected by the device in Fig. 4 by computation and comparison during a predefined period of time of the current change in a first of the system's phases, for example phase A, with the current change in the second, phase B, and third, phase C, during the same period of time.
The conditional criteria for the detection of the existence of an earth fault is a comparison whether the current change in the first phase during a predefined time period to its amplitude in a predefined way differs from the amplitude of the current changes in the second and third phase. An example of a calculation aiming at finding out whether the criteria is fulfilled or not is to see if the quotient of the highest amplitude for the highest current change in the first phase and the sum of the amplitudes for the highest current changes in the second and third phase during the same time period to its value exceeds a preset level.
The calculation can be expressed mathematically according to the following formula: |ΔIA|Λ/(|ΔIB|Λ + |ΔIC|Λ) (1)
The quotient (1) is then compared with a suitable threshold value to find out whether there is an earth fault ("forward" to the measuring point) or not. The threshold value (the sensitivity) should be selected with respect to current changes in "legitimate loads" at the same time as the earth fault occurs, for example connection and disconnection of heat loads etc. The threshold level should in addition be set to manage reasonably high earth fault resistances Rf. Suitable selections for these values, Rf, and at the same time - within the predefined time period for comparison - appearing load changes could be, say R = 3-5 kΩ, and a 3 -phase load change of 6-10 kW. On the other hand, the sensitivity must be selected such that the detection will be selective, that is the quotient (1) should not reach the threshold value when no earth fault exists or the measuring point is outside the trace between the source (T) and the fault point (F). Experiments have shown that a reasonable threshold value is in the range of 2 (1-3). Naturally it is possible within the scope of the invention to choose an arbitrary threshold value for the quotient (1), as the selected sensitivity for Rf and load change may vary.
The discussion above is, for the sake of simplicity, based on the steady-state asymmetry shown in Fig. 2a, but the method also combines within the scope of the invention detection of the transient asymmetry shown in Fig. 3a (310-312) by a suitable choice of filters and time period for the measurement.
The device in Fig. 4 can, if it should detect the asymmetry shown in Fig 3 a, for example use the following algorithm:
The CPU detects on what side of the "zero line" the current change for the three phases is situated. (Or in other words: if the three phases range within a certain value from the "zero line" or not.) A current change above the "zero line" is given a positive value, for example "1" (310), and a current change below is given a negative value, for example "- 1" (311,312). If there is no earth fault located in the "forward" direction, considering the measuring point and the source, the absolute value of the sum of the three phases is therefore 3, and when the measuring point is located between the source and the fault the absolute value of the sum gets the value 1, which makes it easy to detect the asymmetry due to an earth fault according to what can be seen in Fig. 3 a.
The alternative methods for detection that have been described above can, as mentioned, be used separately or in combination with each other. Irrespective of how they are used they can be said to be a first requirement for detecting a FPT earth fault, a so called starting requirement.
To avoid making the calculations according to the first requirement mainly continuously by the CPU, the first requirement can be added with a second requirement, a trig requirement, in other words a requirement which, if fulfilled, initiates the calculation to find out if a start requirement exists. One example of how to realize such a trig requirement is, according to the invention, to calculate, in the CPU or in other ways, if there is a spontaneous change in the zero sequence current If a spontaneous change in the zero sequence current (in a healthy system the zero sequence current is almost zero) exceeds a preset value the start criterion calculation takes place, and a FPT earth fault is recognized if both the trig and start requirements are fulfilled.
The change in phase currents or in the zero sequence current can, for example, be calculated by the change between 2 measurements (samples) which differ 20 ms (one 50 Hz cycle) or 16.67 ms (one 60 Hz cycle). A suitable trig level should correspond to the sensitivity one will achieve with the third requirement described below. Depending on the prerequisites for the detection it is possible, in order to secure the reliability of the detection, to add to the trig and start requirements a third requirement, a so called "signal" requirement, to assure that the fault persists for a certain time. The calculation of this third requirement is initiated only if the two other requirements are fulfilled, and alarm (or trip) is executed only if all three requirements are fulfilled.
An appropriate signal requirement is the zero sequence current, and this condition is considered to be fulfilled if the steady state RMS-value exceeds a threshold value. In a 10 kV system, where the sensitivity should be set to be able to detect earth faults with Rf ~ 5 kΩ, the signal threshold level should be set to about 1 Ampere.
The third requirement can be achieved in many different ways. If the device should be located in the feeding primary substation it should, alternatively, be possible to measure the zero sequence voltage or a digital signal from a neutral voltage protective device.
Once again it should be pointed out, that the trig, start and signal requirements can be used to be complementary to each other, or the start requirement can be used alone, all depending on different factors, for example the reliability in the detection, available processing power etc.

Claims

PATENT CLAIMS
1. A method to detect earth faults in an electrical distribution network with three phases, characterised by a comparison during a predefined time period of the current change in a first (A) of the phases with the current changes in the second (B) and third (C) phase during the same period of time, wherein a first requirement for an earth fault being detected is that the current change (310) in the first phase (A) during the same period of time to its amplitude or direction in a predefined way differs from the current changes (311, 312) in the second (B) and third (C) phase in the system.
2. The method according to claim 1, ch ara cteri se din that the first requirement for earth fault is fulfilled if the quotient between the amplitude of the current change in the first phase and the sum of the current change amplitudes for the second and third phase in the system exceeds a preset threshold value.
3. The method according to claim 1, ch aracteri s e d in that the first requirement is fulfilled if the current change in the first phase to its direction differs from the direction of the current changes in the two other phases.
4. The method according to any of the above claims, ch aracteri z ed in that a second requirement for earth fault detection, which second requirement includes the measurement of the change in zero sequence current, and where the second requirement is considered to be fulfilled if the mentioned changes within a predefined period of time exceed a preset value, whereby an earth fault is detected if the first and the second requirements both are fulfilled.
5. The method according to any of the previous claims, characteriz e d in that a third requirement for earth fault detection, which third requirement includes the measurement of the zero sequence current, whereby the third requirement is considered to be fulfilled if the zero sequence steady state current exceeds a preset value, and earth fault is detected if the first, second and third requirements are fulfilled.
6. A device for earth fault detection in electrical distribution networks with three phases, characterize d by the device (400) including means (410) arranged to compare the current change in a first of the system's phases during a predefined period of time with current changes in the second and third phase during the same period of time, also including means (410) arranged to evaluate a first requirement which is used for an earth fault being considered detected, which first requirement includes that the current change to its amplitude or direction in a predefined manner differs from the current change in the second and third phase in the system.
7. The device (400) according to claim 6, characteriz ed in that the means (410) arranged to evaluate of the first requirement are arranged to indicate that the mentioned requirement is fulfilled if the quotient between the amplitude for the current change in the first phase and the sum of the current change amplitudes in the second and third phase exceeds a predefined threshold value.
8. The device (400) according to claim 7, characteriz ed in that the means (410) arranged to evaluate the first requirement are arranged for evaluation of the mentioned requirement if the current change in the first phase to its direction differs from the direction of the current changes in the two other phases.
9. The device (400) according to any of claims 6-8, characteri sed by means (410) arranged to evaluate of a second requirement for detection of earth fault, including measurement of changes in the zero sequence current, which second requirement of mentioned means (410) is considered to be fulfilled if the mentioned changes during a predefined time exceed a preset value, whereby the device (400) is arranged to indicates that an earth fault is detected if the first and the second requirements both are fulfilled.
10. The device (400) according to any of the claims 6-9, ch aracteri s ed by means (410) arranged to evaluate a third requirement for detection of earth fault, including means arranged to measure the steady state zero sequence current, whereby the third requirement for the mentioned detecting means is considered to be fulfilled if this exceeds a preset level, and the device (400) is arranged to indicate that an earth fault is considered to be detected if the first, the second and the third requirements are fulfilled.
EP04717346A 2003-03-05 2004-03-04 Detection of earth faults in three phase systems Expired - Lifetime EP1599738B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0300570 2003-03-05
SE0300570A SE526446C2 (en) 2003-03-05 2003-03-05 Detection of earth faults in three-phase system
PCT/SE2004/000302 WO2004079378A1 (en) 2003-03-05 2004-03-04 Detection of earth faults in three phase systems

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1599738A1 true EP1599738A1 (en) 2005-11-30
EP1599738B1 EP1599738B1 (en) 2012-05-09

Family

ID=20290558

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04717346A Expired - Lifetime EP1599738B1 (en) 2003-03-05 2004-03-04 Detection of earth faults in three phase systems

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1599738B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE557287T1 (en)
DK (1) DK1599738T3 (en)
SE (1) SE526446C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2004079378A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102006006350A1 (en) * 2006-02-07 2007-08-16 Siemens Ag Method and device for earth fault detection in a supply cable
FR2902887B1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-08-01 Schneider Electric Ind Sas DIRECTIONAL DETECTION METHOD FOR EARTH FAULT AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME
ES2754711T3 (en) * 2008-09-25 2020-04-20 Schneider Electric Ind Sas Directional detection of a ground fault
FR2936378B1 (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-10-15 Schneider Electric Ind Sas DIRECTIONAL DETECTION OF A LOW-SAMPLING EARTHFALL FAULT
CN101858948B (en) * 2009-04-10 2015-01-28 阿海珐输配电英国有限公司 Method and system for carrying out transient and intermittent earth fault detection and direction determination in three-phase medium-voltage distribution system
GB0907085D0 (en) * 2009-04-24 2009-06-03 Schneider Electric Ltd System and method for locating earth faults
CZ304106B6 (en) * 2012-10-25 2013-10-23 Ege, Spol.S R.O. Method of controlling compensation device for compensation of ground fault currents in n-phase distribution system
CN103207346A (en) * 2013-03-13 2013-07-17 福建省电力有限公司 Power transmission line fault phase selection method
GB2518188B (en) * 2013-09-12 2020-11-18 Ea Tech Limited Fault level monitor
CN103872666B (en) * 2014-03-26 2016-02-24 国家电网公司 A kind of load based on voltage plane and single phase ground fault recognition methods
CN112964967B (en) * 2021-03-19 2023-02-07 云南电网有限责任公司昆明供电局 Line selection method for single-phase earth fault line of power distribution network switching power supply

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE446678B (en) * 1981-11-02 1986-09-29 Asea Ab METHOD TO DETECT EARTH ERRORS IN NET FOR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE METHOD
SE501934C2 (en) * 1993-09-30 1995-06-26 Asea Brown Boveri Method and apparatus for identifying simple soil faults
JPH07245869A (en) * 1994-03-02 1995-09-19 Hitachi Ltd Insulation deterioration detection device for electric equipment
JPH09215177A (en) * 1996-01-29 1997-08-15 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Method for determining phase and calculating impedance when system power failure occurs
US5839093A (en) * 1996-12-31 1998-11-17 Abb Transmit Oy System for locating faults and estimating fault resistance in distribution networks with tapped loads
RU2174690C2 (en) * 1999-09-28 2001-10-10 Омский государственный технический университет Method for locating defective junction and point of single-phase ground fault in insulated-neutral mains

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004079378A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE557287T1 (en) 2012-05-15
SE0300570D0 (en) 2003-03-05
DK1599738T3 (en) 2012-07-16
WO2004079378A1 (en) 2004-09-16
EP1599738B1 (en) 2012-05-09
SE0300570L (en) 2004-09-06
SE526446C2 (en) 2005-09-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2686691B1 (en) A method for detecting earth faults
EP1724597B1 (en) System and method for determining location of phase-to-earth fault
US7969696B2 (en) Ground fault detection and localization in an ungrounded or floating DC electrical system
RU2491563C2 (en) Technique and device for detection of phase-to-ground fault
CN103840437B (en) The quick diagnosis of power distribution network ferromagnetic resonance and singlephase earth fault and processing method
CN1916651B (en) Method and system for determining location of phase-to-earth fault
RU2583452C2 (en) Directed detection of resistive ground fault and rupture of conductor of medium voltage
SE0104168L (en) Systems and methods for locating faults on a transmission line with multiple loads connected to outlets
Garcia-Santander et al. Down-conductor fault detection and location via a voltage based method for radial distribution networks
Abdel-Fattah et al. Transient algorithm based on earth capacitance estimation for earth-fault detection in medium-voltage networks
Masoud et al. Protection scheme for transmission lines based on alienation coefficients for current signals
Loos et al. Fault direction method in compensated network using the zero sequence active energy signal
CN112534280A (en) System and method for locating faults on a multi-phase electrical network using positive and negative sequence voltage variations
US20150124358A1 (en) Feeder power source providing open feeder detection for a network protector by shifted neutral
EP1599738B1 (en) Detection of earth faults in three phase systems
KR100918515B1 (en) Method for measuring earth resistance of a single ground in active state
RU2446533C1 (en) Method to detect area of single-phase ground fault in network with isolated neutral
Altonen et al. Performance of modern fault passage indicator concept in compensated MV-networks
Olejnik Adaptive zero-sequence overcurrent criterion for earth fault detection for fault current passage indicators in resistor grounded medium voltage networks
Ferdous Zone protection system of transmission line by distance relay using Matlab/Simulink
Bjerkan et al. Locating earth-faults in compensated distribution networks by means of fault indicators
Radhakrishnan et al. Location of high impedance faults using smart meters in distribution systems with DGs, power electronic loads and Electric Arc furnaces
EP3185025B1 (en) Electrical fault location method
Balcerek et al. Centralized substation level protection for determination of faulty feeder in distribution network
EP1065510A1 (en) Location of restriking and transient earth faults

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050802

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

RAX Requested extension states of the european patent have changed

Extension state: MK

Payment date: 20050802

Extension state: LV

Payment date: 20050802

Extension state: LT

Payment date: 20050802

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20091202

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: LT LV MK

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: PROTROL AB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: JAN BERGGREN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 557287

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120515

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602004037751

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120712

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20120509

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

Effective date: 20120509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 557287

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120910

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120810

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120820

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602004037751

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120809

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130304

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130304

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130304

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20040304

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130304

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190121

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20190318

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602004037751

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210302

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602004037751

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221001

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20230307

Year of fee payment: 20